The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewNorman Finkelstein Archive
Interview by Jamie Stern-weiner on David Cameron's Dodgy Friends’
‘Cameron is much closer to Netanyahu’s thinking than people realise’
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

British Prime Minister David Cameron has long professed himself a ‘passionate friend of Israel’. He is also a passionate supporter of the Conservative Friends of Israel, whose meetings he has repeatedly addressed and whose long-time director, Stuart Polak, he awarded with a peerage. Cameron is reputed to be an intimate friend and ally of Israel’s right-wing prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu—or, as Cameron prefers to call him, ‘Bibi’. Even on those rare occasions where they disagree, Netanyahu refers to the British prime minister warmly as ‘[m]y friend’. When Netanyahu was re-elected in March 2015, Cameron congratulated him by telephone, and ‘looked forward to working with’ his government. When Cameron himself won re-election in May 2015, the Netanyahu government was overjoyed. One senior Israeli diplomat gushed, ‘Cameron is much closer to Netanyahu’s thinking than people realise’. How does this ‘passionate friend[ship]’ manifest in practice?

In 2006, when senior Conservative official William Hague dared to criticise Israel’s attacks on Lebanon as ‘disproportionate’, the Conservative Friends of Israel reportedly ‘complained in person to David Cameron’ and thereby ‘obtained a promise that the word would never be used again’. In 2011, Cameron’s government amended UK law on universal jurisdiction to shield from legal accountability visiting Israeli officials, such as Israeli foreign minister Tzipi Livni, who had been credibly charged with war crimes. He now assures Israeli officials: ‘[my] country is open to you and you are welcome to visit any time’. His stated rationale for shielding Israeli criminals from prosecution echoed Jeremy Corbyn’s explanation for meeting with representatives of Hamas and Hezbollah: ‘we want to get the Peace Process moving’. During Israel’s summer 2014 assault on Gaza, Cameron repeatedly affirmed ‘the UK’s staunch support for Israel’ and ‘underlined Israel’s right to defend itself’.

In today’s Prime Minister’s Questions, Cameron savaged Corbyn for having referred to Hamas and Hezbollah as his ‘friends’, and repeatedly demanded that Corbyn withdraw the remark. Norman Finkelstein—leading authority on the Israel-Palestine conflict—what are your thoughts on Cameron’s demands?

Does Cameron keep better company than Corbyn? Let’s look at the record. In 2006, armed hostilities broke out between Israel and Lebanon. In the course of those hostilities, Israel killed 1,200 Lebanese, of whom 1,000 (80 percent) were civilians. Hezbollah killed 160 Israelis, of whom 40 (25 percent) were civilians. If you look at the numbers, whether absolutely or relatively, who, prima facie, was the bigger war criminal? In the final 72 hours of the conflict, when the war was effectively over as the Security Council had already passed a ceasefire resolution, Israel dropped as many as four million cluster sub-munitions on South Lebanon. It was the densest use of cluster sub-munitions in the history of warfare. Entire civilian villages were saturated. It was a war crime on a mind-boggling scale.

If Corbyn shouldn’t have referred to Hezbollah as his ‘friend’; and if one attaches equal value to each human life; and if war crimes are war crimes regardless of the address from which they originate—in other words, if facts rather than demagoguery serve as the basis of one’s moral calculus, wasn’t the Tory embrace of Israel incalculably worse?
Consider now Gaza. Parts of Gaza are among the most densely populated areas on the planet. 80 percent of Gaza’s population consists of refugees and descendants of refugees, while more than half the population consists of children under the age of 18. Gaza has been under military occupation for a full half-century, and it’s suffocated under an illegal and immoral blockade for the past decade. Even David Cameron has described Gaza as a ‘prison’. In the past 12 years, Israel has launched not less than eight murderous operations against the overwhelmingly refugee and mostly child population herded in this prison. In 2008, after it broke a ceasefire that Hamas was ‘careful to maintain’ (Israeli Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center), Israel launched Operation Cast Lead or, what Amnesty International called, ‘22 days of death and destruction’. In the course of this assault, Israel dropped white phosphorous, a substance that reaches 800 degrees Celsius, on a humanitarian warehouse, a school and two hospitals (al-Quds hospital and al-Wafa hospital). It destroyed 6,000 homes, and it left 1,400 Gazans dead. Up to 1,200 of these were civilians, 350 of them children. After the attack, Israeli soldiers described what happened as akin to ‘a child playing around with a magnifying glass, burning up ants’, and a ‘PlayStation [computer] game’. One of the principal architects of this massacre was then-foreign minister Tzipi Livni. The day after Cast Lead was over, Livni boasted on Israeli television, ‘Israel demonstrated real hooliganism during the course of the recent operation, which I demanded’. Later, she declared that she was ‘proud’ of her decisions during the invasion, and would ‘repeat’ every one of them.

Human rights organisations such as Amnesty called on governments to utilize the provision for universal jurisdiction in international law to prosecute war criminals like Livni. The U.K. was the principal venue in which this provision of international law was tested. What did Cameron’s government do? It revised domestic U.K. law so as to shield Livni and her cronies from criminal prosecution.

In July-August 2014, Israel launched another murderous assault on Gaza. This time it destroyed, not 6,000 homes, but 19,000 homes. This time it killed, not 350 children, but 550 children. How many Israeli children were killed? One. A ratio of 550:1. How many Israeli homes were destroyed? One. A ratio of 19,000:1. While Hamas fired ‘bottle rockets’—as Foreign Affairs journal described them—at Israel, Israel dropped as many as twenty thousand tonnes of explosives on Gaza. Israeli soldiers who did combat duty subsequently described the ‘insane’ and ‘crazy’ amounts of firepower used in Gaza, and testified that the formal and informal rules of engagement were to ‘shoot to kill’ at ‘anything that moves’.
Notwithstanding these serial atrocities, Cameron feels no shame, and displays no embarrassment, in warmly embracing Israel and its criminal leaders. But, when Corbyn designates Hezbollah and Hamas as ‘friends’, so as to facilitate a process—blocked at every turn by the lunatic Netanyahu government—for resolving the conflict, he’s crucified and browbeaten into issuing an apology. If Corbyn owes the British public an apology for the company he keeps, and if, as Cameron seems to believe, one is guilty by virtue of the company one keeps, then Cameron clearly needs to put in a stint behind bars—or, better still, in Gaza.

(Republished from Byline by permission of author or representative)
• Category: Foreign Policy • Tags: David Cameron, Israel Lobby 
Hide 10 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. Cameron is a protégé of Professor Vernon Bogdanor, that well known proponent of “moderate” conservatism.
    Professor Bogdanor is a member of the neocon Henry Jackson Society.
    Yes, you are right. It is the company you keep.

  2. anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    Stern wiener is something that Cameron lacks.

  3. Rehmat says:

    David Cameron has also boasted his family Jewish roots. He is allergic to people especially Muslims who are critical of Israeli policies or support Palestinian struggle against Jewish occupation of their homeland.

    Last month, he questioned the candidacy of Algerian-born Malia Bouattia for the leadership of UK’s National Union of Students (NUS). She happens to be a African Muslim. UK’s Jewish Lobby blamed her for authoring an antisemite article saying that UK’s media is lead by Zionists and that pro-Israel groups control most of UK campuses. As expected, her accusers didn’t mention Jewish student Daniel Lindley who co-authored the article on March 28, 2011 as part of Apartheid Week.

    Anyway, Majority of UK students threw eggs on David Cameron and the Jewish groups by electing her as the first female Muslim president of NUS.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  4. Rehmat says:

    In 2014, Norman Finkelstein was interviewed by Israeli journalist Jamie Stern-Weiner in which Finkelstein claimed that if Mahmoud Abbas accepts John Kerry’s plan, it would be the end of Palestine.

  5. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    David Cameron has also boasted his family Jewish roots.

    Isn’t this tendency to want to boast about having a smidgen of Jewish blood/roots a little bizarre and/or a little pathetic? Like Christopher Hitchens after his 180 degree politcal turn to neocon philosophy or über-hawk Madeleine Albright or even Hillary Clinton bragging about her grandmother’s second husband, Max Rosenberg.

    • Replies: @Santoculto
  6. @Anonymous

    Isn’t this tendency to want to boast about having a smidgen of Jewish blood/roots a little bizarre and/or a little pathetic?

    Jewish camouflage has its greatest treasures among Mischling that pass unnoticed. the more subtle the better. ‘They’ hate to be noticed because the main Jewish cultural work is to take the idea of spontaneity of the historical events while most-to– everything was coldly planned.

    It’s just like discovering the magic trick. No magician likes to be unmasked.

    no no =)

  7. Anonymous [AKA "SmokeSignals"] says:

    Poor Finkelstein. He surely is obsessed with ‘Jewish’. Where does this proportionality in war come from anyway? Sounds ‘Jewish,’ no? If someone shoots at you don’t you have the right to shoot back and punish and kill? Or utterly defeat the aggressor until he would wish the first shot was never fired? If Finkelstein was leading our legions into war he’d be counting all the time instead of shooting and killing and beating the enemy …. or maybe he would give the enemy bigger guns just to make the fight ‘fair’? He makes no sense. But that is probably part of his Jewish pussy genetics.

  8. Nice ending: indeed all former, foreign criminal presidents/generals/colonels/kings living in London, the financial crime capital of the world, need to be put in Gaza, so they feel their crimes.

  9. Ram2009 says:

    Theresa May’s thinking is in no way different from those of Cameron.

  10. Most UK politicians (the same goes for the US, Canada, France, Germany etc.) are Shabbas Goy Friends of Israel Merchants. They are bought and paid for whores shilling for Israel. Their obsequious fawning and pandering are really stomach churning.

    Israel itself is an increasingly brazen outlaw terrorist regime. Recently a senior intelligence officer from the Israeli Embassy was caught red handed conspiring to destroy the careers of 2 senior Tory MPs, Alan Duncan and Crispin Blunt, who had been mildly critical of Israel. Both men are gay, and it seems that some kind of manufactured sex scandal was being planned. The same people were probably behind the fake anti semitic smears that were engineered recently by Jewish Labour MPs and the Red Tory Blairites to try to bring down Jeremy Corbyn.

    At home Israel is now openly genocidal in its behaviour. An Israeli woman government minister called for Palestinian mothers to be exterminated in concentration camps so that no Palestinian children could be born. Two rabbis in Israel published a book called “The Kings Torah” calling for the murder of Palestinian children. A national newspaper, The Times of Israel, quite openly advocated genocide. It called for the Palestinian people to be exterminated at concentration camps in the desert.

Current Commenter

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone

 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Norman Finkelstein Comments via RSS
The Shaping Event of Our Modern World
Talk TV sensationalists and axe-grinding ideologues have fallen for a myth of immigrant lawlessness.
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement
The Surprising Elements of Talmudic Judaism
How America was neoconned into World War IV