The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewMike Whitney Archive
Will Fewer Blacks Vote for "Jailer Joe" Biden Than Hillary??
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Here’s a riddle for you: How is Joe Biden– who has a long record of pushing through legislation that mostly targets black men– going to get African Americans to swarm the polls to vote for him on November 3?

Answer– He’s going to choose a hard-nosed, mixed-race female prosecutor –who oversaw the mass incarceration of hundreds of black men– as his running mate. That’s how Biden is going to win the election.

Can you see the problem with this strategy?

As we all know, the Democrats have moved heaven and earth to make the upcoming election about race. The Dems are obsessed with race. For them, everything is race, race, race. They don’t want to talk about the issues that the American people really care about (In January, Gallup conducted a survey that identified the issues that Americans care most about. The top 10 were Healthcare, Terrorism, Gun Policy, Education, the Economy, Immigration, Climate Change, Abortion, Wealth Distribution, and the Budget Deficit.) because they have no intention of doing anything about them. And, they’re not going to reach out to poor, working-class whites, because then they’d have to roll back the trade deals that moved millions of jobs overseas and flooded the country with illegals. They’re not going to do that because they’re deep-pocket contributors would never allow it. So, basically, they’re stuck with race, an issue that didn’t even appear on people’s radar before the George Floyd incident, but is now headline news on an almost daily basis. Why is that?

Well, it’s because the Party leadership thinks that race is an issue on which Trump is particularly vulnerable, thus, the corrupt media has inflated the Floyd death into a transformational moment in American history (on a par with Pearl Harbor or 9-11), in order to create the fractious and emotionally-charged political environment the Democrats want to beat Trump and seize power. So, just as the 3-year Russiagate hoax was about seizing power, and the failed impeachment proceedings were about seizing power, and the manipulations of the Coronavirus policy were about seizing power (Democrat governors ordered lockdowns that destroyed the economy.), so too, the Floyd incident is being used to exacerbate racial antagonisms to further demonize “evil” Trump and pave the way for a Biden victory in November. It’s all about power.

But– as we mentioned earlier– there are some glaring holes in the Democrat strategy, the most obvious of which is Biden’s sizable role in creating the modern-day mass incarceration state. It was Biden who concocted and shepherded through Congress many of the laws that disproportionately target young black men. Here’s a bit of background from an article in the New York Times:

“(Biden) now plays down his role overhauling crime laws with segregationist senators in the ’80s and ’90s. That portrayal today is at odds with his actions and rhetoric back then…In September 1994, as President Bill Clinton signed the new Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act in an elaborately choreographed ceremony on the south lawn of the White House, Joseph R. Biden Jr. sat directly behind the president’s lectern, flashing his trademark grin.

… for Mr. Biden, the moment was the culmination of his decades-long effort to more closely marry the Democratic Party and law enforcement, and to transform the country’s criminal justice system in the process. He had won.

“The truth is,” Mr. Biden had boasted a year earlier in a speech on the Senate floor, “every major crime bill since 1976 that’s come out of this Congress, every minor crime bill, has had the name of the Democratic senator from the State of Delaware: Joe Biden.”… Now… he must answer for his role in legislation that criminal justice experts and his critics say helped lay the groundwork for the mass incarceration that has devastated America’s black communities...

Mr. Biden’s relationship with (segregationist, Strom) Thurmond… who became his co-author on a string of bills that effectively rewrote the nation’s criminal justice laws with an eye toward putting more criminals behind bars. In 1989, with the violent crime rate continuing to rise as it had since the 1970s, Mr. Biden lamented that the Republican president, George H. W. Bush, was not doing enough to put “violent thugs” in prison. In 1993, he warned of “predators on our streets.”…

“It doesn’t matter whether or not they’re the victims of society,” Mr. Biden said in 1993, adding, “I don’t want to ask, ‘What made them do this?’ They must be taken off the street.”…

Over the next decade — first with Mr. Thurmond as chairman and then Mr. Biden after Democrats won back the Senate in 1986 — the pair wrote roughly a half-dozen crime bills together, laying the groundwork for three of the most significant pieces of crime legislation of the 20th century: the Comprehensive Crime Control Act of 1984, establishing mandatory minimum sentences for drug offenses; the 1986 Anti-Drug Abuse Act, which dictated much harsher sentences for possession of crack than for powder cocaine; and the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994, a vast catchall tough-on-crime bill that also included money for prevention, including Mr. Biden’s signature initiative, the Violence Against Women Act.

In other Senate floor speeches in 1993 and 1994, Mr. Biden spoke openly of wanting…to rid Democrats of their reputation of being soft on crime…... there is also evidence that it contributed to the explosion of the prison population. Biden aides and supporters often note that the trend toward mass incarceration began much earlier, in the 1970s, and that states — not the federal government — house an overwhelming majority of the nation’s inmates.” (“‘Lock the S.O.B.s Up’: Joe Biden and the Era of Mass Incarceration“, New York Times)

Let’s summarize. Biden either authored of pushed through various anti-crime legislation including:

  1. The Comprehensive Crime Control Act of 1984, establishing mandatory minimum sentences for drug offenses.
  2. The 1986 Anti-Drug Abuse Act, which dictated much harsher sentences for possession of crack than for powder cocaine.
  3. The Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994, a vast catchall tough-on-crime bill.

The problem with these catch-all crime bills is that the number of wrongful convictions goes up exponentially which is why the bills have come under greater scrutiny in recent years by organizations like the Innocence Project. (Note– “Nationwide, 252 people have been exonerated through DNA testing since 1989, according to the Innocence Project.”) So, while guys like Biden can garner praise for “Locking the S.O.B.s Up”, his efforts have not been as warmly received in the neighborhoods that have been decimated by his actions. Bottom line: Many African Americans think Biden’s laws unfairly targeted people of color and put innocent blacks behind bars. Which means that Biden’s record is going to hurt his chances to win the black vote.

And the same rule applies to Kamala Harris whose record is nearly as bad as Biden’s. Here’s an excerpt from an article by Margaret Kimberley at the Black Agenda Report:

“Harris has spent her career locking up Black and brown people… She served as the district attorney of San Francisco and later as attorney general of California. In both roles she did everything in her power to support the mass incarceration system and all of its foundations. That is what prosecutors do after all, but most of them don’t try to run for president and ask for black people’s votes….

As attorney general Harris opposed legislation that would have required her office to investigate police shootings. When California was ordered to reduce prison overcrowding, she argued against it. She said, accurately, that a low wage work force would go free. But that is the reason to diminish the carceral state, not an argument to continue it. She always sided with law enforcement, which means she acted against the interests of black people. She still does this in her memoir, These Truths We Hold: An American Journey. She says of mass incarceration, “I wanted to tear it down,” but the facts say otherwise….

One of her more disgraceful policies was to victim shame black mothers for their children’s school truancy. They were fined and when most of them could not pay, were put in jail and separated from their children. This action is the epitome of modern-day chattel slavery and Harris cannot be given a pass.

Harris shows her true colors before she even begins her campaign. She is either a cold-hearted cynic who went along with the ever-popular cult of being “tough on crime” or she harbors true animus towards black people. In either case she presents a great danger.

The 2020 election is already presenting dangers to black voters. The understandable desire to defeat Trump is complicated by the role of the ever-duplicitous Democratic Party. The racist divide keeps black people trapped in the party that is only slightly less racist….

Kamala Harris is no friend of black people and she should be treated as such…. We have seen this movie and we know how it ends. A black candidate with all the right credentials makes the case for race pride but the people end up with nothing to show for their adoration….We must say no to Kamala Harris.” (“Kamala Harris has destroyed Black Lives“, Margaret Kimberley, Black Agenda Report)

Huh? So, Harris is not a shoe-in with black voters, after all??

Apparently, not. Apparently, African Americans are not as easily bamboozled as Democrat leaders would like to believe.

So where does that leave Joe Biden? How is Biden– who built his reputation on anti-crime legislation that mostly targeted black men– going to persuade millions of skeptical African Americans that they should rush to the polls and vote for him in November?

He won’t persuade them. Turnout for Biden is going to be worse than it was for Hillary, and for good reason. Hillary didn’t conjure up laws that stuffed people in the hoosegow to curry favor her constituents. The same can’t be said for Biden.

Biden made his bed, now he can lie in it.

 
Hide 54 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. The top 10 were Healthcare, Terrorism, Gun Policy, Education, the Economy, Immigration, Climate Change, Abortion, Wealth Distribution, and the Budget Deficit.) because they have no intention of doing anything about them.

    As most, if not all, of these have Americans split in two roughly equal camps, nothing can be done about them, by anyone, by definition

    Apparently, not. Apparently, African Americans are not as easily bamboozled as Democrat leaders would like to believe.

    Joe Biden heads the ticket because black voters put him there. Democrats have 200 years of intimate contact with blacks. They know exactly how to bamboozle them, and will continue to do so.

    • Replies: @Truth
    , @Wyatt
  2. El Dato says:

    While locking up people carrying drugs is ridiculous, and mandatory prison sentences are so likewise, the rhetoric in this article is ridiculous too.

    What’s that about anti-drug legislation “targeting blacks”? Are blacks really disproportionately clung to by drug packages lying in the streets?

    I would think that legislation “targeting black men” should be legislation that talks about skin color.

    Refusing to assign agency to blacks however, is flimflammery.

    From the NYT article, as cited but not highlighted:

    In 1989, with the violent crime rate continuing to rise as it had since the 1970s, Mr. Biden lamented that the Republican president, George H. W. Bush, was not doing enough to put “violent thugs” in prison. In 1993, he warned of “predators on our streets.”…

    Okay. Sounds good to me. What’s the problem?

    The problem with these catch-all crime bills is that the number of wrongful convictions goes up exponentially which is why the bills have come under greater scrutiny in recent years by organizations like the Innocence Project.

    “Exponentially” in what parameter and in what exponent? “Exponentially” has a precise meaning, too. If you lock up twice as many offenders are there suddenly 16 times more wrongful convictions? 32 times more? Why? It is a mystery.

    race, an issue that didn’t even appear on people’s radar before the George Floyd incident, but is now headline news on an almost daily basis. Why is that?

    Because that statement is wrong? Race appeared as high-impact problem able to sell newspapers since at least the 90s. Do the O.J. Simpson trials count? Yes they do.

    I don’t think for a moment that “tough on crime” bills will be a problem for Biden and this article smacks of engineering an issue where there is none. Blacks may deny their crime problem on camera, and claim to be “disproportionately policed” or whatever phraseology someone moving up the world-savior’s revolutionary outrage career path through the NYT editorial section has put out, but in reality they are quite happy that someone takes the trash away.

    • Replies: @anonymous
    , @Sean
  3. Bro43rd says:

    This was my thoughts exactly when Kamala was announced as his vp. It would seem that the dems are throwing this one to trumpy. The uniparty wins again. Where I admit I was played in 2016 to vote for orange-man bad, will all the wokesters realize they’re getting played too!?

  4. Race and bad policing do matter. Cops are undisciplined, unprofessional and lack a proper chain of command. They should rightly be brought to heel just like any government bureaucrats. And, police have unfairly and without cause targeted blacks and such should stop.

    But, but, everything else Mike says is right on. The Democrats want to plump up race because indeed they have no plans to do anything to resolve the many other important issues. That and endless Russia-gate lies.

    • Disagree: VinnyVette
    • Replies: @Parsnipitous
  5. theMann says:

    If the Democratic Party wants to make the election about Race, and the Face of that election is angry Black men waving guns, rioting, and looting, that will make the Election about Race, just not in the way they intended. It would be a record number of first time Republican voters.

    Then there is the Economic Catastrophe of CoronaFraud. How many millions of people, their businesses destroyed, out of work, forcibly (and illegally) detained, isolated, and tormented by overwhelmingly Democratic Governors, are planning to vote Democrat this time around? Who knows how many more first time Republican Voters come from that, not that any Republican deserves their vote, but the rage against Democrats is far larger than anybody in Media Land realizes.

    Making the Election about Race is a sure fire loser for the Democrats, since the Race that “owns” the Democratic Party is pretty much despised by everybody else, no matter what they say publicly.

    I think the Democrats want to lose so they don’t own the coming Economic catastrophe.

    • Agree: RadicalCenter
  6. Biff says:

    So where does that leave Joe Biden?

    Not giving a damn. The private contractors that operate the electronic voting machines will be electing Biden.

  7. anonymous[245] • Disclaimer says:
    @El Dato

    See also, the cliché “mass incarceration,” which means … what exactly? People being charged/convicted/sentenced in groups? Overpacked in prison cells? Who coined it and why?

    I, too, believe that far too many people in this country are imprisoned for far too long because of personal vices. But you’re correct to call out some fuzzwords and buzzwords that, like the magical incantation “systemic racism,” are used to obscure facts and manipulate discussion.

    • Agree: Parsnipitous, VinnyVette
  8. A123 says:

    The GOP is going to make a run at black voters. Here is an ad that is already running.

    The message is positive and delivered effectively. Compare it to the negative DNC message that reeks of victimization.
    ___

    As an aside

    Someone in the target demographic will have to explain how walking in high heels on broken pavement makes sense. Clearly, that choice was very intentional, so it must have appeal to the target audience.

    PEACE 😇

  9. Sean says:
    @El Dato

    Refusing to assign agency to blacks however, is flimflammery

    Agent causation is tied up with forensic notions of responsibility, and other legal fictions. Causation is “the aggregate of accidents in the agent or agents, requisite for the production of the effect” (Hobbes 1655) and so agency as would be commonly understood simply does not exist. No one is responsible for being what they are, still less for what they do.

    I would think that legislation “targeting black men” should be legislation that talks about skin color.

    A society of those with relatively strong internal genetic controls on behavior like Europeans (or East Asians) that has a community lacking those controls and enacts laws against vices that the minority community lacks the genetically mediated self control adaptations to resist, is targeting them.

    Do the O.J. Simpson trials count? Yes they do.

    Simpson had it all, and threw it away.

    From the above grin, “Big Floyd ” was happy at 43, when he appeared in Sexy Ebony Queen Porn… Houstons Own Kimberly Brinks . But after Fentanyl and COVID-19, both straight out of Wunan.

    By the time he got murdered (cause of death listed as murder at Dead Porn Stars) I think you can see drugs had taken everything from him. So Simpson and Floyd both lacked self control, but so did Officer Chauvin whose mother cuckolded his father and abandoned her family by the way. It only took one white like Chauvin to tear down the Zero Tolerance law enforcement edifice. Harris will become president able to pass new laws in effect targeting whites, and she will.

    Biden’s medical history says he had sports injuries, I suspect he got some nasty concussions when from football that frayed his brain. In his 40s he had a cerebral hemorrhage, clot on the lung, and an operation to correct another brain aneurysm. His son died of brain cancer in his early 40s. Under stress he’ll suffer minor stroke like events, and is is not going to last a year as president, so Blacks will know they are voting for Harris who owes Blacks. She will conjure up laws that stuff people in the hoosegow to curry favor with her constituents again only this time her constituents are black and problack while the ones getting a term in jail or denied positions in society so they can be given to blacks will be white. It makes no difference to Harris, none of her ancestors were US blacks or whites. They were immigrants and she will open the doors wider to immigration than currently seems possible. She probably will reverse the China policy, but not to the extent Rice would have.

    • Replies: @Rich
    , @Ilya G Poimandres
  10. @A123

    I noticed that part too …

    “[] if these other politicians walked the streets like I do …”

    Indeed 😀 😀 😀

  11. Rich says:
    @Sean

    St Floyd died from an overdose. That’s pretty much been acknowledged by everyone now. He wasn’t murdered. I’m not sure why you think defaming the political prisoner Chauvin’s mother adds to your argument.

    • Troll: Biff
    • Replies: @Parsnipitous
  12. There’s not 1 person in a 1000 that knows what the voting record is of any of the political class.

    That the parties will try to ‘inform’ the voters of a particular record is a usual tactic, but I doubt too many will actually hear the message and changer their useless vote.

    • Agree: ariadna
    • Replies: @Justvisiting
    , @animalogic
  13. @RoatanBill

    I see a lot of comments around here in the format “voters don’t know x, voters don’t know y”.

    Yeah–they don’t–in August.

    It is the job of the campaigns to get the message out to the public.

    • Replies: @RoatanBill
  14. GeeBee says:

    So, just as the 3-year Russiagate hoax was about seizing power, and the failed impeachment proceedings were about seizing power, and the manipulations of the Coronavirus policy were about seizing power (Democrat governors ordered lockdowns that destroyed the economy.), so too, the Floyd incident is being used to exacerbate racial antagonisms to further demonize “evil” Trump and pave the way for a Biden victory in November. It’s all about power.

    Can no-one else see the (to me) obvious corollary of those undoubtedly true (or at least, almost true) words above? Almost true because, of course, the tawdry political jostling the writer describes is not actually about real ‘power’ at all. True power lies entirely outside of the despicable class of chancers-on-the-make that we know as ‘professional politicians’. The ‘Money Power’ not merely influences, but is in total control of actual political power. Professional politicians are no more than the lackeys and lickspittles of the cabal of billionaire oligarchs that comprise this ‘Money Power’. This handful of largely stateless and unaccountable people are stratospherically above the polity, and what is more, they know it. They call all the shots.

    So what is left for these wretched lickspittles who presumptuously crave our votes every four years? Why, the illusion of power, no more. The chance to strut and fret their hour upon the stage, and then be heard no more (as Macbeth might have put it). The chance to appear on the front pages of oligarch-owned print media, and oligarch-owned television. The chance to make untold fortunes on the back of their puppet masters (although naturally, never nearly as much as the puppet-masters themselves).

    So what are we to make of this seriously untenable situation? Is it not blatantly obvious? Our much vaunted ‘Democracy’ is a toxic charade. The selling by ‘Murca of ‘Freedom and Democracy’ is a rent-seeker or huckster’s wet-dream. The entire edifice of Neo-Liberal Finance Capitalism (together with its chief tool that guarantees its perpetual hegemony, which is to say ‘Democracy’), are nothing more than a carefully crafted system designed to bribe, bludgeon and brainwash ‘the people’ into the absurd notion that they are ‘sovereign’.

    The four-yearly jamboree that Americans know as the Presidential election offers ‘The People’ nothing, except the chance to vote for ‘Agenda A’ in a blue rosette or ‘Agenda A’ in a red rosette (where ‘Agenda A’ is a continuation of the upward flow of money from labour to capital, and the further enrichment of the oligarchy at the expense of ‘The People’).

    Let us enumerate what this upward flow of money means, in practical terms, for the great majority of Americans. It means a life of grinding toil, where a young couple both must work long and hard merely to be able to afford the most basic housing. That starting a family is essentially impossible until the wife is well beyond the optimum age for child-bearing. That if either becomes sick, the fear of unaffordable healthcare is a stark reality. And should they eventually manage to start a family, their children will be brought up by an education system that (tragically and unwittingly) is fully on board with the oligarchy’s agenda. Tragically and unwittingly? Well you don’t suppose, surely, that the demonisation of Whites and the canonisation of blacks is some sort of social justice trope? The education establishment has bought this lie, for sure. But in reality, it is just a part of the cynical ‘divide and rule’ strategy by which the oligarchy ensures that there will never arise any sort of meaningful opposition to its loathsome hegemony. If people can be successfully blinded to the beam in their own eye, by relentless focus by the Media-Entertainment complex, the Education Establishment and the apparatus of the law (three of the five great entities that form the matrix of true power) on the mote that is represented by ‘Identity Politics’, then so much the better for the oligarchy.

    The game, sadly, is up. As indeed it was from that blackest day in the history of the White race, which was the eighth of May 1945.

    • Agree: animalogic
  15. Sean says:

    It quite clearly says “Place the subject in the recovery position to alleviate positional asphyxia”. Minneapolis police department rules at the time of Floyd’s demise “explicitly required moving an arrestee from a prone position to a recovery position when the maximal restraint technique is used and required continuous monitoring of an arrestee’s condition” according to Chief Arradondo. Chauvin has not got a leg to stand on, he had all the time he needed but did not move Floyd from prone to recovery position not even even after no pulse could be found.

    David Layman the ex cop and former supermax guard YouTuber, who deliberately broke fingers until convicts submitted, and once was struck by a colleague to get him to stop baton choking a rampaging convict said the duration of what Chauvin did to Floyd was nothing like what would be done in the line of duty, clearly unnecessary, and not only amounted to murder, but Chavin knew it continued past the point where it was lawful restraint because Chauvin was resting his hands on his thighs. Relative to the education and amount of training required–to be a nurse for example–cops are excessively remunerated. In future someone like Chauvin will be weeded out. Unfortunately the damage has been done. Not least to Trumps prospects of re-election.

    • Agree: Kratoklastes
    • Replies: @Rich
    , @Jim Bob Lassiter
  16. @Justvisiting

    You’re repeating what I said, but drawing a different conclusion.

    The parties will try and succeed in confusing the voters. That’s what they end up doing, one negating the other. End result is that voters don’t hear either message to the extent it changes voting preferences.

    If Trump wins, it will be by a significant margin. If he loses, it will be too close to call.

    Half the country hates the other half. The determining factor for votes is just how much one hates the other to bother voting in another useless election. The behind the scenes dirty tricks will determine the outcome, not the voting. Votes will be manufactured and destroyed by both parties. The winner will be the more ruthless and cunning. That actually bodes well for Biden if he’s still breathing by then.

  17. anon[313] • Disclaimer says:

    More importantly, “fragile whites” are more apt to flagellate themselves over “Willie’s Ho” Kamala than Slick Willie’s old lady.

  18. ATBOTL says:
    @A123

    Y0u have to be a total imbecile to think this “Democrats are the real racists” and pandering to blacks will win any significant number of blacks votes. It already has alienated a huge number of white voters who will not be supporting Trump or the GOP in the upcoming elections. Get the hell out of here with this DR3 bullshit. We can go to any boomer conservative website and read this garbage.

  19. @John Thurloe

    “And, police have unfairly and without cause targeted blacks and such should stop.”

    Not without cause. Young black bucks are crazier, more dangerous, therefore receive prejudicial treatment.

    I agree with the rest of your comment, cops are often undisciplined, even sadistic, but one has to see it’s a shit job. Would you like to deal with the likes of St. George on a daily basis?

    • Replies: @Jim Bob Lassiter
  20. I have to respectfully disagree with the tone of your article Mr Whitney, although you are a favorite of mine. Biden being tough on crime means he actually got something right in his lackluster career. We are all familiar with the stats on blacks regarding crime as well as real world experience. They are a crime nightmare. It’s not as though white criminals are exempt from these crime bills. Nothing racist about it.
    Blacks will vote for Biden / Harris because they are both Democrats and she’s a minority.
    That’s it. And even if they aren’t too thrilled with Biden and Harris’s record on crime, Trump is a white man who is NOT a Democrat.
    There is that miniscule percentage of right / conservative leaning blacks at the high end of the pathetic black IQ curve, but it’s so small as to be practically nothing more than a statistical anomaly.
    Blacks want to own the country and turn the white population into a defacto political minority.
    They want all the government largess the Democrats have on the ready, as if they don’t have enough now.
    One would hope the Hispanics who out number blacks by a small percentage would get it, that if blacks get their way, along with the psychopathic whites and Jews who are supporting them, they will be equally as screwed as whites.
    I won’t be holding my breath!
    As much as I’m pro Trump, he can’t run as a “law and order candidate” after he sat back tweeting and wringing his hands while cities were burning, and be taken seriously.
    I’m sure he is truelly a law and order guy, but he dropped the ball.

    • Replies: @Parsnipitous
  21. @A123

    All black lives matter. One more word, and the meaning completely changes. Chicago, we got you covered.

  22. @Sean

    Causation is “the aggregate of accidents in the agent or agents, requisite for the production of the effect” (Hobbes 1655) and so agency as would be commonly understood simply does not exist. No one is responsible for being what they are, still less for what they do.

    And for living beings, one of these ‘accidents’, conditions, is intention.

    You don’t have to choose to carry guns, you can choose to be poor. May not be fair that others don’t have to make that choice because they face different conditions, but that’s another discussion.

    • Replies: @Sean
  23. Rich says:
    @Sean

    Except the autopsy shows St Floyd had excessive amounts of fentanyl and methamphetamine in his system and he wasn’t asphyxiated. Face it, you were duped, for political purposes. Stop being a dupe.

  24. @RoatanBill

    Yes.
    “But– as we mentioned earlier– there are some glaring holes in the Democrat strategy, the most obvious of which is Biden’s sizable role in creating the modern-day mass incarceration state.”
    Mike is referring to reality — but how often is reality an issue. It can be taken as a given that the vast bulk (90 % ?) of the MSM will back Biden. So how will these bits of history emerge? Will the Republicans have the grit to go after this? Perhaps. And perhaps they’ll have a go at Biden’s corruption (Ukraine etc)
    It will be interesting to see if even one actual policy commitment makes it into the public “debate” in 2020….

    • Replies: @RoatanBill
  25. Stogumber says:

    If Mr. Whitney comes through with his message that Biden/Harris are tough against Black crime – this will incite a lot of conservative voters to vote for Biden/Harris. So let us hope that nobody listens to Mr. Whitney.
    (I owe that – or at least the gist of it – to David Cole.)

    • Agree: SteveK9
  26. Can you see the problem with this strategy?

    No. Blacks have always been a more reliable voting bloc than any others. More reliable than the Jewish vote. Dems assume they will show up, and they are probably right. What they need to win is a sizeable part of the White vote, and they only get that with Law & Order candidates, better still if one is a PoC à la Barack Hussein Obama.

    Law & Order: DNC

    Do it for the Children

  27. @Parsnipitous

    “Would you like to deal with the likes of St. George on a daily basis?”

    I doubt Mr. Thurloe delivers a cogent response to that.

    In a nutshell, cops are public employees who spend their fair share of time counting days to fully vested retirements. (much like public school teachers) But it is a tough job if it is worked. Their spouses also worry about their cop hubbys or wives (at least the ones that work the streets) coming home at the end of their shifts alive and unindicted for roughing up some random Dindu Africanus.

    This business of the media peddling the narrative that White cops roll out of bed every morning thinking “Hmmm, how can I make life hard on some Niggers today and kill me some if they try to give me any shit?” is nothing but unadulterated deconstruction of society.

    The media also would have its readers and viewers believe that every cop car in the country ought to be towing a mobile ER staffed with psychiatrists, crisis counselors and drug overdose specialists in order to improve the mortality rates of all the George Floyds of the world.

  28. @animalogic

    If the Trump organization had any brains, they would have already brought the Ukraine / Biden issue to the fore and used it to bring criminal charges against Biden’s coke head son at a minimum.

    But, no, they won’t do that because that would cause the Biden camp to publicize why Trump has been so ineffective, namely the dirt they have on him to keep him tweeting while he does absolutely noting of substance to ‘drain the swamp’. The swamp owns him.

    These are two scumbags running for president. The intel agencies have dirt on anyone and everyone that wants political power. Vote for either one, since the outcome doesn’t matter. The government always gets elected, and that’s the deep state.

    The US is a soft military dictatorship. The military and intel agencies ARE the gov’t. How else could DOD and HUD have stolen $21 Trillion and there are no congressional investigations to find out where the money went.

    https://missingmoney.solari.com/

    To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize. – Voltaire

  29. @Sean

    If you view all the released cop cams footage in their entirety you will see that Floyd insisted on (among other things) laying down.

  30. Gunga Din says:

    After reading this story (and what they did), I’m half tempted to vote for these two!

  31. Gordo says:

    who has a long record of pushing through legislation that mostly targets black men

    No, no Mister Whitney the South African Natives (Abolition of Passes and Co-ordination of Documents) Act, Act No 67 of 1952 targetted black men, Old Joe’s legislation did no such thing.

  32. We have no shortage of black people with presidential names, but we keep getting ones like “Obama” and “Kamala.”

    If we’re going to have a black president, at least give us a “Calvin Jefferson” or “Quincy Washington” instead of something that sounds like a secondary character in a Robert E. Howard story.

    • LOL: Sean
    • Replies: @anon
    , @RoatanBill
  33. c matt says:

    I am confused – is this article trying to convince me to vote for Biden? I kind of like Jailer Joe.

  34. Sean says:
    @Ilya G Poimandres

    You don’t have to choose to carry guns, you can choose to be poor. May not be fair that others don’t have to make that choice because they face different conditions, but that’s another discussion.

    If human have this “choice” between punishment or reward you speak of, then it means little more than they are disciplined by the administering pain or pleasure to them. But animals such as dogs and horses are similarly amenable to discipline. If some dog breeds and some individuals within those breeds show extremes of trainability or its opposite, what does that and the male female difference–also observable in humans–say about the influence of genes on choice?

    • Replies: @Ilya G Poimandres
  35. anon[313] • Disclaimer says:
    @Sollipsist

    Well, at least those nominated Blacks have names free of apostrophes and free of “Le” or “De” prefixes.

    • Disagree: Sean
  36. Truth says:
    @Reg Cæsar

    More like 60 years, Old Sport. Eisenhower got 40% of the black vote in 1956. Even Richard Nixon (who was popular among blacks) got 36% of the vote against Kennedy, who was super popular among blacks.

    The Democrats did not lock up the black vote until the Republicans nominated Barry Goldwater in 1964.

    • Replies: @neutral
    , @Reg Cæsar
  37. neutral says:
    @Truth

    You really want the blunt truth, blacks are collectively stupid, they are known for being the most inferior of all races for good reasons. If you follow politics in sub Saharan Africa then you would know that ideology plays a very little role in the 50 or so black run states. All politics is tribal and with the mass media now being the true democracy, they will vote whatever they are told to vote for.

    Some stupid 70 IQ aunt Jemina is beyond understanding the ideologies of any politician, they will not vote for Goldwater because mass media outlets were pumping out propaganda that “Goldwater bad, other guy good”, there is no other reason. They will vote for a senile corpse because they are told to, nothing more to it.

    • Replies: @Truth
  38. @Sollipsist

    If the current trend continues, sooner or later we’ll have Felopiah and Testikleeze to vote for.

    • LOL: Sollipsist
    • Replies: @Sollipsist
    , @Parsnipitous
  39. Wyatt says:
    @Reg Cæsar

    It’s not exactly hard to bamboozle blacks. All you have to do is show them a picture of an old colored fellow and say he invented *insert item here,* not whitey, and they’ll believe it.

    It’s about as difficult to trick them as it is to trick 8 year olds.

    • LOL: Jim Bob Lassiter
  40. @Truth

    The Democrats did not lock up the black vote until the Republicans nominated Barry Goldwater in 1964.

    Who had a lot more respect for them than did Lyndon Johnson. (Who had no respect for anybody but the “best and brightest” Ivy Leaguers he appointed.)

    Rep. Arthur Mitchell persuaded Democrats that black votes needn’t be “won”, but simply bought. He demonstrated that himself by having bumped off Oscar dePriest, a garden-variety black Republican, in 1934. At least on the South Side, they had no problem voting for Theodore Bilbo’s party.

    Eisenhower had it easy– Adlai Stevenson was so clueless about black Americans he had nothing to offer them but his expertise on African indepenence issues. One of his advisors quickly set him straight on that fantasy.

    • Replies: @Truth
  41. Charles says:

    Maybe blacks will come out in force for Biden, but as others have pointed out it doesn’t really make much difference. Blacks are perhaps 13% of the population. Of that percentage, many are too young to vote, many are in prison, and many simply don’t care. Of the blacks who are free adults who definitely will make the effort to vote, their number CANNOT “swing” any national election. Of course, I’m referring to legitimate, lawful voting, so…

  42. @RoatanBill

    I’ve actually met two women named Latrina. I can only assume they were not from military families.

  43. @Sean

    Yes, experience is dependently originated – we react negatively to pain, and positively to pleasure, same as animals, and all life.

    But I don’t think a human mind – a mind with access to reason – is comparable to a German shephard or a golden retriever.

    Perhaps one could argue that some subsections of the human race have less access to reason, or are less inclined to access reason, but I would say this is still very cultural – I sit with my 120 IQ white (Polish genes) ex-partner, and she is a TDS succumbed, 4th wave feminist. She would never even think of opening an Unz link, even written by a leftist of her inclination, never mind the right leaning articles that litter this site. It is a purely gutteral reaction for her (I have had enough reaction to not bother any more!), and reason doesn’t play a part.

    I believe access to reason is more cultural than genetic.

    Look at our western societies over the last half century – reasonable debate at the beginning, now both sides abhor each other, unwilling to even listen to the other side through that pre-TSD taint that Gilad Atzmon coined!

    This is an excess of emotion, a lack of reason, and it has happened in societies which have largely remained genetically similar.

    Take black musical culture, which forges teenagers (I sure was somewhat affected by it in my teens in the early naughties).. Bitches, money, guns.

    White teens listen more to optimistic sugar candy.

    Is it their genes, or is it their culture, maybe the fortune of their birth that affects their culture? I doubt it’s genes.

    • Replies: @Sean
  44. Sean says:
    @Ilya G Poimandres

    I believe access to reason is more cultural than genetic.

    Women are less violent than men, less likely to have a machine gun and less likely to use one, and are less like to be unemployed too. Also less likely to make internet comments.

    • Replies: @Ilya G Poimandres
  45. @VinnyVette

    “Biden being tough on crime means he actually got something right in his lackluster career.”

    The sociopathic worm got something right in his slimy disgusting path and now he has to renounce it Bolshevik-style. Tragic and comical.

    “…Trump, he can’t run as a “law and order candidate” after he sat back tweeting and wringing his hands while cities were burning”

    Any sheriff needs a posse, his deputy is Barr, a (Jewish?) deep-stater who won’t indict any antifas or BLMs, no matter how badly they chimp out. (Replace Barr with Kushner, Sessions, Bolton, HR McMaster, etc, etc, hard to remember them all, but all worthless yet dangerous and malevolent.

    I used to dump on Trump, but his political instincts are actually decent. He may have been the most lonely president of the United States, but I’m no expert.

  46. @Rich

    If the admittedly innocent Officer Chauvin gets acquitted, we’ll have Rodney King riots x100. So it won’t happen, not even sure I can root for it.

  47. Truth says:
    @neutral

    You really want the blunt truth,blacks are collectively stupid…

    Wow! Really? In 12 years I have yet to read that one here.

  48. Truth says:
    @Reg Cæsar

    Rep. Arthur Mitchell persuaded Democrats that black votes needn’t be “won”, but simply bought.

    Then I guess Camacho is a shoo-in for re-election in November.

  49. @Sean

    You have a point they are different-er, but women have been developing separately for billions if years, whiles the human races are separated by 60,000 at most.

    Their violence is psychological, over our physical imo as well. I find them more violent than men too, imo because they have not had thousands of years to work through their mindsets through a female led philosophical movement.

    Maybe it’s the women I am around, but why invent an idea like ‘mansplaining’? It shows a lack of willingness to debate, only a desire to suppress the opponent through insult.

    Still, when they use reason, they are no different to men.

    • Replies: @Sean
  50. Sean says:
    @Ilya G Poimandres

    But women are to men as dogs are to bitches, and male violence is hardly a social construct. Nor is some breeds of animals’ violence. The Russian fox taming experiment shows how fast a breed of animal can alter.

    • Replies: @Ilya G Poimandres
  51. @Sean

    And those foxes are cute – if only they weren’t $8,000 a pop! :p

    I just see life with access to reason as qualititvely different to life without access to it.

    Of course this is a continuum too – like orcas adopting injured orcas from alien pods probably shows charity beyond base self-centered animal instincts – but the violence of the individual with access to reason is not mostly based on genes in my view, but intentional choice.

    Making genes the cause of human intention is one of the three paths to inaction the Buddha talked about – that only past actions influence the present (as opposed to past and present), https://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/an/an03/an03.061.than.html

    I’m not saying genes don’t matter, but human behaviour can go beyond genes. Genes work on animals who optimise behaviour. A tree chooses to improve its lot through optimising – as best as it can – every choice it has access to.

    Humans are different, we can work against our genes, by damaging ourselves. This is not genes talking, but our reason.

    Strange that reason grants the power of rebellion away from the path of optimisation of course!

    Anyways, I just see reason as a greater forger of intention than genes for Man.

    BLM – is that genetics or misdirected, ideological, minds? Many are white, and happy to commit violence for a ‘just cause’!

    • Replies: @Sean
  52. Sean says:
    @Ilya G Poimandres

    The light coated floppy eared domesticated foxes in the famous experiment have more oxytocin, but that hormone has been found to increase aggression to those outside the group. Altruism within the group is predation on those outside it, because AOTBE the tighter group will outcompete its rival. The loser becomes a winner by taking it to the next level: genes, individual organisms, extended families, groups of related families, nations, and alliances of nations. But the competition at the lower level is still there, which is why bullies can prosper. Indeed, the more a society is optimised for competition with another group, the easier a freeriding individual will find it to flourish.

    Not a lot of people know it, but the Russian fox experiment also had a second project in which aggression was selected for, and as a result of that selection over the generations the increasingly vicious foxes began to turn black!

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Mike Whitney Comments via RSS