The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewMike Whitney Archive
Trump’s Deregulation Boondoggle; “One Shitty Deal”
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Donald Trump wants to rip up the financial rule book and let the bankers go hog-wild. But haven’t we tried that before?

Last Friday, the president announced a plan to scrap the rules that were put in place in 2010 to prevent another financial meltdown. Trump wants to return to the ‘good old days’ when the financial services industry could rip off clients with impunity, pile on the red ink, and operate trillion dollar brokerage houses on mere slivers of capital. Naturally, Wall Street applauded the president’s ‘bold idea’ by sending all three major stock indices soaring into record territory. The investor class knows a good deal when they see it.

Flanked by his crony friends for an après-announcement photo op, the billionaire president said he was going to roll back the toothless provisions in the 2010 Dodd-Frank financial reform bill so the banks and other financial institutions could resume the destabilizing and predatory activities that vaporized the financial system, wiped out an estimated \$14 trillion in capital, forced 9 million homeowners into foreclosure, and left the global economy in a smoldering pile of rubble. According to Trump, the benefits of ditching the rules far exceed the risks which, of course, will be shouldered exclusively by the blue collar working stiffs who naively supported Trump’s bid for president thinking he had their best interests at heart. Hopefully, these people will realize that President Silverspoon has allied himself with the same thieving scoundrels who precipitated the 2008 financial crash and whose sole ambition in life is to feed their voracious appetite for more money.

Trump is particularly annoyed with the so called “fiduciary rule” which requires financial advisors to put the interests of their clients above their own. What kind of crazy idea is that? How’s a guy supposed to pay off his 32-bedroom beachfront estate in the Hamptons if he can’t shake down a few credulous punters from time to time?

Trump sees the rule as another example of onerous over-regulation and namby-pamby government meddling. He thinks it reduces lending and limits investor choice, when in fact it merely protects mom and pop investors from getting fleeced by incentives-driven werewolves who adeptly pick the pockets of gullible clients in order to beef up their own commissions. That’s the name of the game right there; scamming grandma to fatten the bottom line. Here’s more from the Wall Street Journal:

“The Dodd-Frank law spawned thousands of pages of rules designed to make banks safer. Now, with President Donald Trump looking to undo much of that legislation, banks are scurrying to prepare their wish lists….

Next up on bankers’ wish lists are changes to the so-called stress tests administered each year by the Federal Reserve. The exam is meant to gauge a bank’s ability to weather big shocks that could upend the financial system. While banks say stress tests have merit, they want a process that is more quantitative, less unpredictable and more collaborative. This is crucial for them since the tests help determine how much capital banks can return via dividends or share buybacks…

Aside from specific rules changes, many banks would welcome a change in tone among regulators, who have leeway in how they interpret rules. Some say relations between banks and regulators have become too adversarial in recent years.

That is one area where the administration may be able to have the most immediate impact. In the next 18 months, President Trump is expected to get the chance to appoint a variety of financial regulators from key Federal Reserve governors to the heads of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

“There could be major changes just through the changes at the heads of the agencies,” said H. Rodgin Cohen, senior chairman of law firm Sullivan & Cromwell LLP. “And in some critical respects, [bank] supervision is the most important element. You don’t actually need legislation.” (How Big Banks Want Donald Trump to Change Regulation, Wall Street Journal)

Let’s summarize: Dodd-Frank created thousands of pages of rules designed to make banks safer. Trump wants to toss the whole damn rulebook on the burnpile ASAP. Got that?

Second, the banks want weaker stress tests so they don’t have to hold as much capital, that way they can juice stock prices by loading up on more of their own shares and creaming hefty profits off the gains. Unfortunately, “less capital” means more risk for the public because undercapitalized banks are more prone to go belly-up. Naturally, that doesn’t bother Trump who favors the riskier but more profitable option. And, why not? After all, Trump knows from experience that the cost of any meltdown will be borne by US taxpayers just like it was last time. So why worry about it?

Third, the banks want friendlier regulators (“Less adversarial”) that are more willing to bend the rules to make them look safer than they really are. Did I mention that G-Sax alums will hold posts at both the SEC (Jay Clayton) and the US Treasury (Steve Mnuchin)? That oughta do the trick, don’t you think?

So– in other words– whatever regulations President Wreckingball can’t obliterate outright, he’s going to undo by appointing ‘hands off’ regulators who simply ‘look the other way’ and ignore the predatory and fraudulent activities going on right under their noses. The Wall Street Journal even admits it openly. Check it out:

“The administration plans to change how postcrisis rules are enforced, many of which are at the discretion of regulators. This includes lighter enforcement of the so-called Volcker rule, which bars banks from making proprietary trades. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau also could see a change in personnel.

There could even be some relief on capital requirements. ….The administration has enough power on its own to move the needle considerably, especially for the biggest Wall Street firms. Financial stocks, already among the biggest winners since the election, just got fresh fuel to go higher.” (Trump Reforms Are Stuff of Banker Dreams, Wall Street Journal)

This serious stuff, folks. Trump’s deregulatory rampage is going to impact the lives and living standards of every man, woman and child in this country. He’s going to turn Wall Street into a financial Fukushima that reduces the sputtering US economy to a toxic waste-dump incapable of supporting the nearly-extinct middle class. And, for what? To add a little more helium to a grossly-inflated stock market bubble? It makes no sense.

By the way, when the WSJ talks about “lighter enforcement of the so-called Volcker rule”, what they really mean is that the banks are going to have greater flexibility in the way they use government-insured deposits in their casino operations. Wouldn’t you like that? Wouldn’t you like to plop-down a big chunk of change on Seabiscuit at Churchill Downs, knowing that if you lose, the government will pick up the tab?

Sure, you would. Everyone wants that deal, but Trump thinks the perks should go exclusively to the banks because they’re part of the big club. And as George Carlin says, “You and me are not part of the big club.”

And what’s Trump’s beef with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, after all, didn’t they just fine Wells Fargo \$100 million for opening bogus accounts without customers’ consent?

Yep, they sure did. And that’s what has Trump so rankled. The president doesn’t like the idea that his banking chums can get their wrists slapped by an upstart regulator on a crusade to clean up Wall Street corruption. He doesn’t like that at all. He’s going to decapitate the pesky CFPB, slash its budget, and make sure its troublemaking Director, Richard Cordray, is put out to pasture. You can’t have consumer advocates in positions of power who actually do their jobs. That just won’t do at all!

Gutting Dodd-Frank is just part of Trump’s masterplan to cozy up to the Wall Street heavyweights in order to consolidate his own personal power. That’s what’s really going on. Trump has already made the same ingratiating appeal to muck-a-mucks in the military, law enforcement and the intelligence community, now he wants to be buddy-buddy with the big money guys. It’s all a powerplay.

It’s just a pity his base hasn’t figured it out yet.

MIKE WHITNEY lives in Washington state. He is a contributor to Hopeless: Barack Obama and the Politics of Illusion (AK Press). Hopeless is also available in a Kindle edition. He can be reached at [email protected].

(Republished from Counterpunch by permission of author or representative)
• Category: Economics • Tags: Deregulation, Donald Trump, Wall Street 
Hide 13 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. Anon • Disclaimer says:

    Gutting Dodd-Frank is just part of Trump’s masterplan to cozy up to the Wall Street heavyweights in order to consolidate his own personal power. That’s what’s really going on. Trump has already made the same ingratiating appeal to muck-a-mucks in the military, law enforcement and the intelligence community, now he wants to be buddy-buddy with the big money guys. It’s all a powerplay.

    It’s just a pity his base hasn’t figured it out yet.

    Some have. But they are aware that the President needs to ally with part of the forces at play, if he wants to achieve anything at all. It’s not a choice between beauty and evil, utopia and injustice: it’s between major and minor ills, and we think Trump is making the right choices.

    • Replies: @tim s
  2. tim s says:

    Trump’s base is better equipped to see his betrayals than O’s or Hillary’s bases. His base has been shystered enough times before to call a spade a spade. A good number of them know the harm that Goldman-Sachs has done. It is very disappointing to see these developments, but there should be no surprise. Many of those of us who voted for him viewed him as a long-shot opportunity for change.

    If he betrays us it will not be a surprise. I mean, he is Donald Trump….

  3. Throw out Dodd-Frank, at least the parts that require all that paperwork, which is just wasteful.
    The fiduciary rule sounds good in principle, but how do you enforce that?
    Reinstate Glass-Steagal. Repealing it was what got us into trouble in the first place.

  4. tim s says:

    A most unfortunate ally, though, from the people’s perspective. This ally is the root of the globalism he is supposed to be pushing against. That is no ally at all, but a deal with the devil, and the devil wins when a deal is made.

  5. Dodd-Frank is a law passed by the congress, and it can’t be overturned by the executive branch.

    To whatever extent the regulators are capable to exercise their discretion, that’s also within the constraints of the law.

    Now, if the purpose of expected regulatory adjustments is to enrich the banks at the expense of everyone else, then it’s a travesty indeed. But it could also be an attempt to jump-start the economy, as this guy (albeit a banker himself) opines:

    “To a certain extent, a law like Dodd-Frank is established so regulators have a volume control,” he added. “What you’ll see is some change in that volume control, and also watch how markets perform and how regulators manage that performance.”

  6. Diogenes says:

    Should I be surprised that Mike’s piece has generated much commentary to date?

    Either Mike has lost some of his credibility or the trust of his readers or his conclusion is incontrovertible.

    Isn’t silence expected when staunch Trump supporters see their man [Messiah?] cozy up to Wall Street and seek to deregulate the banks which are mostly responsible for putting Trumps supporters into the economic straight jacket in which they are presently entrapped?

    Do I detect signs of worry among his fans? If not, you should be worried because Wall Street and their Governing enablers are going to cause another financial fiasco like the last one in 2008, precipitating the necessity [?] of another “bail out” and/or “bail in” which, of course, will result in more austerity for the low and middle classes.

    Yep, expect to be sodomized yet again. Well in a perverse way it will be good news if the whole corrupt rotten American capitalist system collapses like the sclerotic Soviet Union did in 1998.

  7. Renoman says:

    Well he is just an Evil Capitalist Exploiter of the Poor after all, what did we really expect? The problem is that despite his many many shortcomings he is still far and away the best choice. Too bad the dems shot themselves in the foot by dumping Bernie but that’s old news. America has dug itself a deep dark hole that it may never rise out of, mistakes will be made, bribes extended and a new crop of Ultra Rich will rise. Will anything really change? Unlikely but we might as well make the best of it, there is always some hope of a better future however slim.

  8. kek says:

    “Last Friday, the president announced a plan to scrap the rules that were put in place in 2010 to prevent another financial meltdown.”

    Dodd-Frank is a joke, the only rule to prevent a financial meltdown is the Glass-Steagall act enacted in 1932 and repealed by rapist phony Bill Clinton in 1999.

    The Left knows less about Finance than they do about male-female fornication. Stick to bathrooms, illegal immigrants and the 1% of sexual confused individuals roaming the USA that’s what you’re best at.

  9. I have been reading about this for the last 3 days. essentially the wall street mofos wants to put their profits/commisions before the best interest of their clients who hired them.

    fuck trump.

  10. It seems to be mainly a matter of nomenclature. You don’t usually have pharmaceutical company salesmen calling themselves “doctors” even though there are many medical doctors employed by pharmaceutical companies in research and development, because there is an expectation that medical doctors will do what is best for the patient rather than what is best for the doctor (an expectation that is probably not always upheld, but it is what it is.)

    In many lines of business it is customary for people to euphemistically call themselves specialists, consultants, or counselors or advisors, rather than salesmen (saleswomen). For example a Preowned Transportation Specialist might do pretty much the same job as a used car salesman.

    If you are trying to make a living getting people to put their savings in a mutual fund that pays you a high rate of commission, you are probably not going to call yourself a mutual fund commission agent. Financial advisor sounds much better, but if there is no state or federal regulation of the title “financial advisor”, then anybody is going to use it, just like any quack medicine merchant would call themselves a physician or medical practitioner if use of such titles were not regulated by law.

  11. “Flanked by his crony friends for an après-announcement photo op, the billionaire president said he was going to roll back the toothless provisions in the 2010 Dodd-Frank financial reform bill…”

    My bold. Rolling back a toothless bill has little effect. But yes. Trump is no enemy of Crony Capitalism. To be an engine of prosperity for the people Capitalism must be regulated by a competent and honest government. Something Trump could not possible achieve if he wanted to.

    What Trump can (hopefully) do is restore our national sovereignty, avoid nuclear winter and begin to re-industrialize our economy. What Trump has already done is destroy the credibility of the corporate media and defeat the odious coalition of the fringes which is bent on the destruction of the white race.

  12. Anonymous [AKA "F Harper"] says:

    Hey Mike,

    I found your problem:

    Let’s summarize: Dodd-Frank created thousands of pages of rules designed to make banks safer.

    Those rules do no such thing, nor were they designed to do so. Dodd-Frank is crony-capitalism through and through. It is just another layer of financial regulation perched atop all of the other layers. Have you ever worked for a bank? I did, for four years and with one of the largest banks in the country, designing software whose sole purpose was to keep the bank in compliance with the myriad regulations imposed upon it. I was being paid to please the government, rather than customers. The sooner you realize how worthless (and counter-productive) regulations are as a tool to help consumers, the faster you’ll realize that Trump is on the right path.

    Read here for more on the wonders of Dodd-Frank:

  13. If so worthless, why repeal it?

    guys, don’t worry, this roller coaster is safe! trust me, you don’t need the hardness. we believe you can fly. enjoy the air!

Current Commenter

Leave a Reply -

 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Mike Whitney Comments via RSS