The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewMike Whitney Archive
Reuters Confirms That Bolton Torpedoed the Hanoi Summit
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

An explosive report by Reuters confirms that John Bolton sabotaged the denuclearization talks between Kim Jong un and Donald Trump in Hanoi in February. According to a March 29 exclusive by journalists Lesley Wroughton and David Brunnstrom:

“Donald Trump handed North Korean leader Kim Jong Un a piece of paper” demanding that Kim surrender all of his “nuclear weapons and bomb fuel to the United States.” Trump also added a number of unrelated demands including “fully dismantling” all “chemical and biological warfare program(s)…. and ballistic missiles, launchers, and associated facilities.” Trump surprised Kim by demanding complete, unilateral disarmament in exchange for a flimsy promise to lift economic sanctions sometime in the future. Naturally, Kim rejected the offer.

Here’s more from the same article:

“The document appeared to represent Bolton’s long-held and hardline “Libya model” of denuclearization that North Korea has rejected repeatedly….North Koreans rejected Bolton’s repeated demands for it to follow a denuclearization model under which components of Libya’s nuclear program were shipped to the United States in 2004.

Seven years after a denuclearization agreement was reached between the United States and Libya’s leader, Muammar Gaddafi, the United States took part in a NATO-led military operation against his government and he was overthrown by rebels and killed” (“Exclusive: With a piece of paper, Trump called on Kim to hand over nuclear weapons”, Reuters)

Bolton presented Kim with an offer he knew Kim would reject, the same offer that led to the destruction of Libya and the savage murder of Gaddafi. Bolton wanted the talks to fail so he could push for tougher sanctions that would pave the way for regime change. That was his goal. Kim’s nuclear weapons were never the target, they were merely the pretext for intensifying the economic strangulation, the relentless belligerence and the threats of war.

But why would Trump agree to go along with this fraud? And why has Trump deployed more troops to Syria while green-lighting Israel to annex the Golan Heights?

Is there a connection between Trump’s (recent) foreign policy reversals and the termination of the Mueller investigation? Did Trump make a deal with his deep state antagonists to get Mueller off his back?

It’s hard to say, but there was no reason for Mueller to wrap up the investigation. The probe was doing exactly what it was supposed to do: Create a 4th branch of government that was empowered to hector, harass and indict anyone it chose in order to keep the administration on the defensive, derail any effort to normalize relations with Russia, and undermine the legitimacy and moral authority of the president. Why would Mueller give up all that if it wasn’t part of some undisclosed Grand Bargain?

He wouldn’t.

On a personal level, Trump trusts Kim which is why he probably wanted to cut a deal. An article in last week’s Korea’s Hankyoreh news supports this view. Check it out:

“During the North Korea-US summit in Hanoi last month, US President Donald Trump reportedly had a positive perspective on relaxing sanctions on North Korea provided that there was a “snapback” clause that would reinstate sanctions if the North failed to implement its agreement. North Korean Vice Foreign Minister Choe Son-hui made this statement during a briefing to foreign diplomats in Pyongyang on Mar. 15, but her full remarks hadn’t been made public until now.

According to the text of Choe’s remarks released on Mar. 25, she said, “When we made a practical proposal in the talks, President Trump adopted the flexible position that an agreement would be possible if a clause was added stating that the sanctions could be reinstated if North Korea resumed nuclear activities after the sanctions were lifted.” But Choe went on to say that, “because of their continuing hostility and mistrust, US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and White House National Security Advisor John Bolton created obstacles to the two leaders’ efforts to have constructive negotiations, and ultimately the summit didn’t produce meaningful results.”

. … According to Choe’s statement … the two leaders appear to have explored the possibility of trading Yongbyon’s shutdown for partial sanctions relief. … Choe’s remarks imply that the ultimate reason the summit concluded without an agreement was because of resistance from Pompeo and Bolton.” (“Trump responded positively to relaxing sanctions with “snapback clause” during Hanoi summit”, Hankyoreh News)

The Hankyoreh article corroborates much of what is stated in the Reuters piece. Both articles acknowledge that the nuclear talks were scuppered by Bolton.

The media has consistently misled its readers about what actually took place at Hanoi and who should ultimately be held responsible for its failure. According to CNN:

“Kim had demanded total sanctions relief upfront in exchange for only partial denuclearization, leaving the two sides at an impasse….(Wrong) Trump cast his decision to walk away as evidence that he will not accept a bad deal, (Wrong) but the abrupt conclusion of his much-ballyhooed second summit nonetheless amounted to the most stinging setback yet in his effort to achieve North Korea’s denuclearization through direct talks with its leader…. (Wrong, it wasn’t a setback, it was deliberate.)

More than anything, the failure to produce results during the second summit called into question the personality-driven diplomacy that has been at the core of Trump’s effort to end the North Korean nuclear threat.” (Wrong, again) (“Takeaways from the Trump-Kim Hanoi summit”, CNN)

None of this is true. The meetings didn’t fail because of Trump’s “personality-driven diplomacy”. They failed because Bolton deliberately blew them up. That’s what happened. As one would expect, virtually everything CNN tries to pass off as evenhanded, thoroughly-researched journalism is nothing more than misleading gobbledygook served up by political activists. (The dismal Hanoi coverage helps to show that the Trump-collusion fiction was not a “one off”, but a critical feature of media policy which aims to shape the news according to the political agenda of elites.)

But if the Trump administration is unwilling to honestly negotiate with the North, then how can Kim possibly move forward with his plan to establish peaceful relations with his friends in the South and his allies in the region?

The only way forward for Kim is to bypass the Trump administration altogether and strengthen relations with those who will help him achieve his strategic objectives. He must show that he is a trustworthy partner who is willing to continue along the path of denuclearization regardless of the obstacles and provocations created by the United States. He must continue to seek the input of leaders in Beijing, Moscow and Seoul and prove to them that he is unwaveringly committed to ridding the peninsula of its nuclear weapons in the interests of peace and security. Kim must welcome international weapons inspectors to monitor the decommissioning of his nuclear arsenal and his nuclear enrichment plants. He must increase the frequency of his visits to Seoul where his public approval ratings have skyrocketed and where his efforts for peace and reunification are applauded by nearly 80% of the people. He must “promote his own denuclearization timetable” and present his case to the UN Security Council for review. He must convince the public that he will not backtrack on his ironclad commitment to dialogue, cooperation, economic integration and peace.

According to Hankyoreh News, Kim’ Jong un’s chief of staff and protocol officer made a secret trip to Moscow last week “fueling speculation that Kim Jong-un may be about to pay a visit to Russia.” At the same time, a senior national security official (Kim Hyun-chong) from South Korea visited Russia as well.

Can you see what’s going on? What these secret meetings suggest is that regional leaders are now developing a “post-Hanoi” strategy that will take into account Kim’s eagerness to cooperate and Washington’s obstinate rejection of any policy that does not further enhance its own vicious grip on power. The Trump team is no longer in the loop. Regional bigwigs are taking matters into their own hands and moving forward.

As we pointed out in an earlier piece, Kim is neither a firebrand nor ideological. He is a contemporary man who who wants to make his own mark on the world, lead his country into the modern era, and join the coalition of nations that are fast becoming the biggest trading block in history.

Here’s how author John Delury summed it up in a recent op-ed in the New York Times:

“Mr. Kim wants to be a great economic reformer…(He wants to) shift the regime’s focus, from security to prosperity….He wants North Korea to … catch up with and integrate into the region, and it’s in everyone’s interest to help him do so…”(“Kim Jong-un Has a Dream. The U.S. Should Help Him Realize It”, New York Times)

 
• Category: Foreign Policy • Tags: Donald Trump, John Bolton, North Korea 
Hide 12 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Realist says:

    To all you who think Trump is on the up and up answer this….why did he hire the assholes he has????
    Trump has clear culpability in all that happens in his administration.

    • Replies: @APilgrim
  2. At the beginning of last year the rhetoric between Washington and Pyongyang was very belligerent, the countries on course for war – then a rapprochement. I’m not too sure how this came about: what was its purpose? The change coincided with increased belligerence towards Iran, and talk of war. Did the US want to avoid fighting on two fronts at the same time, put North Korea on the back-burner and deal with Tehran first? Or did it feel it would have a stronger case for confronting Iran if it could point to a peace deal with Kim Jung-un? What was the reason for John Bolton scuppering the Hanoi Summit, as Reuters allege? Did he think the North Koreans could be simply brow-beaten into handing over their nuclear arsenal? What was Kim’s reason for rapprochement with Trump? Did he want to avail of the economic prosperity on offer from the American tycoon? Did he want to loosen the hold Beijing had over his nation, in an unsatisfactory lord-vassal relationship? Or was he simply playing for time, to be ready for the war that would inevitably come?
    The facts are unclear, opaque. But these events are a piece in the jigsaw of history, the picture emerging is a world heading for nuclear war. The rapprochement has disturbing similarities with Munich 1938 and the German-USSR non-aggression pact prior to world war two. The pattern of history points to world war.
    https://www.ghostsofhistory.wordpress.com/

  3. I disagree with your conclusions on what Kim wants to do, specifically your idea that Kim will still denuclearlize but without doing deals with the US, solely to impress Russia, China and the South. That’s obvioualy wrong, if only that the US military would be left inside the South with the navy all around and those nuclear launchers they brought in.

    Kim has to either get the South to tell the US to get out or in some way have the US back down and start to do the deal that Trump agreed to in their first meeting and then see it implemented.

    My no-evidence feeling about why these neo-con fools are in Trump’s administration is that it’s a good way to keep your enemies closer, while at the same time exposing and exploding their various schemes. This would include the Golan Heights thing, the Venezuuelan thing, etc. Trump puts the guys in who want to do these foolishnesses and says: let’s see what you can do.

    They fall on their faces over and over again, but this time more publicly and the world clearly sees and so do many of the American people clearly see what these people are really about and how their policies are cowardly and bankrupt.

    Conjecture that the Deep State has done a deal with Trump by removing Mueller hold little water. For one, Mueller’s ending has more to do with Barr and that’s obvious. For another Trump had Bolton and Pompeo in long before Mueller was ready to bring things to an end.

    My theory has one other component. Trump’s completely ineffectual shooting of missles into Syria. The targets were unpopulated, the people that would have been near the targets were warned by the US in advance, the missles were shot down partly because there was no surprise–they knew they were coming.

    By doiing it that way, Trump looked good to warhawks while simultaneously flushing them out into the open (Brian Jennings crowing like a lunatic that Trump was finally Presidential).

    I may be wrong, but so far that’s what it looks like.

  4. hetro says:

    Mike, you’ve got to give us more than this–sounds like more conspiracy speculation and hogwash:

    Is there a connection between Trump’s (recent) foreign policy reversals and the termination of the Mueller investigation? Did Trump make a deal with his deep state antagonists to get Mueller off his back?

    It’s hard to say, but there was no reason for Mueller to wrap up the investigation. The probe was doing exactly what it was supposed to do: Create a 4th branch of government that was empowered to hector, harass and indict anyone it chose in order to keep the administration on the defensive, derail any effort to normalize relations with Russia, and undermine the legitimacy and moral authority of the president. Why would Mueller give up all that if it wasn’t part of some undisclosed Grand Bargain?

    He wouldn’t.

  5. I agree with Mr Whitney’s advice to Kim. However, in background there must be a concerted effort by all parties (ALL nations) to make US economic sanctions ineffectual. This is one of the major sticks the US uses to control the world. Until they are neutered, Nth Korea ( & other nations) will never be able to aspire to economic prosperity & sovereignty.
    Do not expect the US to play “fair” with Nth Korea– they didn’t back in the Clinton/Bush II days, they won’t today either.

  6. WHAT says:

    What do you mean “Bolton presented”? Was it not Trump at the meeting? Is it not Trump who makes the final decision?

  7. Giuseppe says:

    The only way forward for Kim is to bypass the Trump administration altogether and strengthen relations with those who will help him achieve his strategic objectives.

    It would have happened eventually as a natural process, but this is just one more example of how Trump is acting as a catalyst to speed up Washington’s loss of influence in the world.

  8. MAS says:

    “…….Kim must welcome international weapons inspectors to monitor the decommissioning of his nuclear arsenal and his nuclear enrichment plants…….”

    So Mr Whitney, you criticize a tried and tested USA policy and at the same time advocate for it. Which one do you want to do? North Korea must welcome “international inspectors” – obviously USA inspectors, “decommissioning of his nuclear arsenal” – exactly what the USA is working at! so as to leave North Korea defenseless and an easy target for the USA. Pardon me but I don’t follow.

  9. Regula says:

    I don’t think it is the time just yet for Kim to denuclearize: he needs the nukes to keep the US out, especially now that the US wants to resume exercises simulating invasion of North Korea.

    What appears to me would be more realistic is S the author of the article asserts, is for Kim to strengthen relations with South Korea, Russia and China, Iran and Syria and Japan, all of whom except for Japan are on the US enemy list due to their refusal to accept US hegemony. All of these states know full well that Kim is neither dangerous nor will he use nukes or chemical weapons in any other circumstance tha US invasion. Such horror would obviously draw in Russia and China who are both nuclear powers, on with the YS in the case of Russia. Which means, unless Bolton-Pompeo want to destroy the entire planet for a base barely 100 miles closer to China than the US bases in South Lotea, the chance for any nuclear showdown is remote. And everybody is fully aware of it. Since the US showed itself to be untrustworthy time and again, the surrounding nations will agree that North Korea should not give up its nuclear deterrent just yet, but maybe its intercontinental missiles that would deprive the YS of its argument of “national threat”. That would leave the neighboring countries free to agree on a peace treaty between North and South Korea not linked to the US and in the longer term a unified Lorean peninsula protected by a nuclear deterrent. It would leave South Korea able to ask the US to leave from its territory as it can defend itself in complement with Lim’s nukes.

  10. anon[199] • Disclaimer says:

    Reuters Confirms That Bolton Torpedoed the Hanoi Summit

    Liars Confirm That Bolton Torpedoed the Hanoi Summit

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Mike Whitney Comments via RSS