The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewMike Whitney Archive
Putin’s Line in the Sand: No Regime Change in Syria
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
List of Bookmarks

“Obama administration officials, who have been negotiating with Turkey for months, said Thursday that they had reached an agreement for manned and unmanned American warplanes to carry out aerial attacks on Islamic State positions from air bases at Incirlik and Diyarbakir. The agreement was described by one senior administration official as a “game changer.”

New York Times, July 23, 2015

The Syrian war can divided into two parts: The pre-Incirlik period and the post-Incirlik period. The pre-Incirlik period is roughly the four year stretch during which US-backed Islamic militias and al Qaida-linked groups fought the Syrian army with the intention of removing President Bashar al Assad from power. This first phase of the war ended in a draw.

The post-Incirlik period looks like it could produce an entirely different outcome due to the fact that the US will be able to deploy its drones and warplanes from a Turkish airbase (Incirlik) that’s just 15 minutes flying-time from Syria. That will boost the number of sorties the USAF can able to carry out while increasing the effectiveness of its jihadi forces on the ground which will conduct their operations under the protection of US air cover. This will greatly improve their chances for success.

The New York Times calls the Incirlik deal a “game-changer” which is an understatement. By allowing US F-16s to patrol the skies over Syria, Washington will impose a de facto no-fly zone over the country severely limiting Assad’s ability to battle the US-backed militias that have seized large swaths of the countryside and are now descending on Damascus. And while the war cannot be won by airpower alone, this new tactical reality tilts the playing field in favor the jihadis. In other words, the Incirlik agreement changes everything.

putin-assad_2577178b

The Obama administration now believes that regime change is within its reach. Yes, they know it will require some back-up from US Special Forces and Turkish combat troops, but it’s all doable. This is why Obama has shrugged off Russia’s plan for a transitional government or for forming a coalition to defeat ISIS. The US doesn’t have to compromise on these matters because, after all, it has a strategically-located airbase from which it can protect its proxy-army, bomb cross-border targets, and control the skies over Syria. All Obama needs to do is intensify the war effort, put a little more pressure on Assad, and wait for the regime to collapse. This is why we should expect a dramatic escalation as we begin Phase 2 of the conflict.

Russian President Vladimir Putin knows this, which is why he’s sending more weapons, supplies and advisors to Syria. He’s signaling to Washington that he knows what they’re up to and that he’ll respond if they carry things too far. In an interview with Russia’s state Channel 1, Putin said, “We have our ideas about what we will do and how we will do it in case the situation develops toward the use of force or otherwise. We have our plans.”

The administration is very nervous about Putin’s plans which is why they keep probing to see if they can figure out what he has up his sleeve. Just days ago, Secretary of State John Kerry phoned his Russian counterpart Sergei Lavrov to express his concerns about “an imminent enhanced Russian military buildup” in Syria. The call was a clumsy attempt to trick Lavrov into volunteering information that might shed light on what Moscow intends to do if Washington goes ahead with its regime change strategy. But Russia’s foreign minister didn’t take the bait. He stuck to his script and didn’t tell Kerry anything he didn’t already know.

But the fact is, Putin is not going to allow Assad to be removed by force. It’s that simple. Obama and his advisors suspect this, but they are not 100 percent certain so they keep looking for confirmation one way or the other. But Putin is not going to provide a clear answer because he doesn’t want to tip his hand or appear confrontational. But that doesn’t mean he’s not resolute. He is, and Washington knows it. In effect, Putin has drawn a line in the sand and told the US that if they cross that line, there’s going to trouble.

So it’s up to Obama really. He can either seek a peaceful solution along the lines that Moscow has recommended or push for regime change and risk a confrontation with Russia. Those are the two choices.

Unfortunately, Washington doesn’t have an “off” switch anymore, so changing policy is really not in the cards. Instead, the US war machine will continue to lumber ahead erratically until it hits an impasse and sputters to a halt. Once again, the immovable object will prevail over the unstoppable force (as it did in Ukraine), albeit at great cost to the battered people of Syria, their nation and the entire region.

Keep in mind, that the imperial plan for Syria is subtler than many people realize. As the Brookings Institute’s Michael E. O’Hanlon states in his piece titled “Deconstructing Syria: A new strategy for America’s most hopeless war”:

“The plan… would not explicitly seek to overthrow him (Assad), so much as deny him control of territory that he might still aspire to govern again. The autonomous zones would be liberated with the clear understanding that there was no going back to rule by Assad or a successor. In any case, Assad would not be a military target under this concept, but areas he currently controls… would be. And if Assad delayed too long in accepting a deal for exile, he could inevitably face direct dangers to his rule and even his person.” (“Deconstructing Syria: A new strategy for America’s most hopeless war”, Michael E. O’Hanlon, Brookings Institute)

This is the basic plan: To seize major cities and large parts of the countryside, disrupt supply-lines and destroy vital civilian infrastructure, and to progressively undermine Assad’s ability to govern the country. The ultimate goal is to break the state into a million disconnected enclaves ruled by armed mercenaries, al Qaida-linked affiliates, and local warlords. This is Washington’s diabolical plan for Syria. It is strikingly similar to the Zionist plan to “effect the division of the whole area into small states by the dissolution of all existing Arab states.” (“The Zionist Plan for the Middle East”, Israel Shahak) In fact, it is virtually identical.

It’s clear that Obama is emboldened by the Incirlik deal and believes that, with Turkey’s help, he can achieve US imperial ambitions in Syria. But it’s not going to happen. Russia, Iran and Hezbollah are prepared to defend their ally Assad and stop Washington dead-in-its-tracks. Obama will have succeeded in destroying another sovereign nation and scattering its people across the Middle East and Europe. But the US mission will fall short of its original objectives. There will be no regime change in Syria. Putin, Nasrallah and Khamenei will make sure of it.

MIKE WHITNEY lives in Washington state. He is a contributor to Hopeless: Barack Obama and the Politics of Illusion (AK Press). Hopeless is also available in a Kindle edition. He can be reached at [email protected].

(Republished from Counterpunch by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: Foreign Policy • Tags: Russia, Syria 
Hide 9 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Realist says:

    I hope Putin sticks to it.

  2. If you want Damascus you will have to fight Russia, China and Iran. In a sane world that would be the end of it. But……………….

  3. tom says:

    I’m glad some commentators are moving from the claim that the Wests terrorist proxies have been defeated in their overall war in Syria and now see it as a success, and as a part of a western bombing campaign which looks to be happening very soon.
    – Syria has lost half its army, a magnificent success for evil.
    – Syria has no more oilfields left in their control.
    – hundreds of thousands of been killed
    – millions have left or escaped to other countries, which leaves a smaller state in population terms to be attacked.
    – their economy has been devastated.

    It truly is amazing that anyone could say something so stupid to say that the West and Mideast tyrannies jihadi proxy plan has been a failure in Syria, And making that absurd claim right in the middle of the funking War. AMAZING.
    The ridiculous claim just reinforces the desperation of what they want to happen in their own minds.

    Western terrorists States led by the US Empire always knew of limitations of its Jihad against a more in entrenched military in Syria. And that is exactly why they will start committing their aerial war crimes.

    Oh, and the ultimate goal of the evil US Empire is always military dictatorship. That has been the most accessible way of US control and exploitation of another country.

    And there will be never Empire satisfaction of any resistance left in Syria. Please stop talking about the ultimate plan being a divided country. The ultimate plan is always domination and control by the evil US Empire.

  4. Tom_R says:

    RUSSIA MUST PROVIDE AIR POWER TO SYRIA—FOR ITS OWN SAKE.

    Thanks for the great article, Sir. As stated in my other comments, USA (a banana republic of Israel), has been attacking Syria’s Assad, a duly elected govt and Israel is training ISIS and treating them in its hospitals, all to clean Syria for a Greater Israel. ISIS is an American-Israeli puppet.

    If Russia does not help Syria with air power to bomb ISIS, and if Assad falls, the domino effect will spread to other countries in the Middle East and even Russia. So Russia must arm Assad and even Iran with air support to contain Israeli terror. So this is good news.

  5. Priss Factor [AKA "The Priss Factory"] says: • Website

    “It is strikingly similar to the Zionist plan to ‘effect the division of the whole area into small states by the dissolution of all existing Arab states.’ (‘The Zionist Plan for the Middle East’, Israel Shahak) In fact, it is virtually identical.”

    The reason why ‘history’ has been violently lurching forward since the end of the Cold War is due to Jewish Supremacist Power.

    This is what Francis Fukuyama overlooked. He ignored the ethnic content of the Cold War and merely saw it as a struggle of ideas and ideologies. He figured liberal democratic capitalism defeated communism in the war for modernity, and so liberal democratic capitalism(with social safety nets) was the future. He totally overlooked the ethnic character of the Cold War: many Jews were on the side of communism in the 20th century but most Jews had joined the anti-communist side by late 20th century and that they had a very Jewish agenda in opposing it. It wasn’t just a war over ideas and ideologies. Jews had ethnic reasons for their switch in ideologies.

    Indeed, one of the reason why the post-Cold-War NWO failed in so many parts of the world is because of Jewish dirty tricks. If American Jews and Russian Jews hadn’t been so greedy and instead had aided post-communist Russia with good will, maybe Russia would have made a workable transition to the Western Liberal Democratic Model. Instead, Jews used the agenda of ‘democratization’ and ‘privatization’ to turn Russia into one big looty-booty for Jewish pirates. Privatization turned into piratization.

    Jews invoked free markets and democracy, but their main agenda was to expand and further Jewish control over Russia. Jews were not content with the post-cold-war order where ‘democracy’ and ‘capitalism’ triumphed equally for all. What was most important for them was that Jewish power triumph over all without favoring any particular group.
    Jews invoked anything to further Jewish power. In Europe, Jews say ‘diversity’, in Israel Jews say ‘Jewish right to survive’, in Hungary Jews say, ‘shame on Hungarians for their atavistic nationalism’, but in Ukraine Jews say ‘hurrah for Ukrainian nationalism against Russian imperialism’, etc. Jews would even has us believe that Neo-Nazis in Ukraine are ‘liberal democrats’.

    What do all these contradictions have in common? The issue of “Is it good for the Jews?” Fukyomama totally overlooked the ethnic content of the Cold War and continues to overlook it as one of the reasons why the post-Cold-War has been plagued by so many problems. (We know who butters his bread.)
    Though drunken Mel Gibson overstated it, he wasn’t much wrong in saying all (major)wars, at least since the Cold War, have been instigated by Zio-globalists. If not for Jews, would there have been the Gulf War, Iraq Invasion, toppling of Gadfly in Libya, the horror in Syria, the mess in Ukraine? And Jews are making Obama stir up troubles with China when US and China can get along just dandy.

    In a way, Fukyomama’s thesis is form of neo-Christianism. Christianity differs from Judaism in having begun as a universal creed that declared the end of ‘history’.
    While Christians believe mundane history goes on, they believe that the ‘history’ of ideas came to a close with the arrival of Jesus as the Son of God who spread the Gospel for mankind for all time and all places. There is nothing more to know and learn in terms of what is right and wrong. Jesus’s message was the ‘end of history’ of idears.
    We have the Truth from the mouth of the Messiah Himself. All we have to do is spread it far and wide, and all will be well. There is no need for new ideas or better ideas. No idea can be better than what Jesus preached to the world. So, the arrival of Jesus was the ‘end of history of ideas and truth’. Mundane history goes on but the ‘history of ideas’ is over. Jesus revealed the Truth that is the proper truth for all men.

    Fukyomama’s view of the end of the Cold War is like that. Liberal Democratic Capitalism(with social safety nets) is the Truth. It is good for all mankind. Since the West won the Cold War, its values and ways should be adopted by all other societies, and there can be nothing that is any better.
    Now, Fukyomama isn’t entirely wrong as far as ideas go. I think most of us want to live in a free society with free enterprise and political rights and liberties. But he was wrong to think that universalist ideas have a power of their own, a kind of independence of human agency, a supremacy over particularist concerns. He thinks because the ideas/values of the West won, the West(and the rest that would follow the West) are mainly committed to upholding and practicing those ideas. In other words, people submit to ideas than use their ideas for their own self-aggrandizement.

    But let’s look at the Jews. Sure, American Jews believe in capitalism, democracy, Western values(in their own fashion), and etc. But do Jews subordinate their tribal interest in service of those ideas or do they use those ideas(often by distortion, manipulation, opportunism, etc) to serve the Jewish agenda?
    Look at Jewish control and use of media. Look at Jewish use of finance. Look at Jewish use of politicians(who seek endorsement of AIPAC). Look at how Jews have used the homo agenda to undermine the power of the majority. Look at Jewish use of ‘diversity’. All those fall under the rubric of Western Liberalism, but they are carefully and selectively calibrated in the US and EU to favor Jewish interests over white gentile interests. If Jews really uphold those ideas above all else, why do they support the tribal-nationalist-racialist state of Israel? Some Jews, like Tony Judt, did just that, but most Jews don’t because it would be putting ideas before identity, and that means the death of a race. Any race that puts ideas above identity is finished. Ideas must be used to serve an identity, not the other way around.

    Besides, there is a wide spectrum of Western values that ranges from Christianism to atheism to capitalism to socialism to nationalism to globalism to libertarianism to communitarianism to individualism to communalism to familism to feminism, etc. Indeed, notice how the Constitution can be invoked to justify anything. If Supreme Court justices can see guarantee of ‘gay marriage’ in the Constitution, then it’s an open book depending on who has power over the court. So, ‘Western values’ matter less than how they are manipulated by the powers-that-be. In the 50s and 60s, Jewish radicals invoked the US Constitution to champion total freedom of speech so that their radical views would be protected. But now, most American Jews say ‘hate speech’ laws are or should be guaranteed by American laws. So, even ‘universal Western values’ can be manipulated in infinite ways to promote and push certain tribal agendas.
    While naive white Libs and cuckservatives put ideology/principle above all else, Jews and their non-white allies only seek to use ‘western values’ to serve their narrow tribal agendas.

    Fukyomama may see the current global conflict as being between the West that stands for universal principles versus China/Russia/Iran that are about ‘atavistic’ nationalism, but in fact, the West itself is directed by a certain hidden nationalism. Jews didn’t push regime change in Ukraine for reasons of universal values. They did it in consideration of “Is it good for Jews?” Jews don’t push ‘gay marriage’ and ‘gay agenda’ all over the world for reasons of ‘universal values’ and ‘tolerance’. It is to undermine and subvert the national sovereignty of gentile nations by using homo-globo collaborators as fifth columnists working for the likes of George Soros and Sheldon Adelson.

    The so-called West is dominated and controlled by Jewish Supremacists. It is not ‘universal western values’ versus Russia/China/Iran, but Jewish-Supremacist-wolf-in-universal-western-sheep’s-clothing versus the nations that still have the power to resist total takeover by fiendish Jews. For proof, just consider the Second Republican Debate where the candidates sing hosannas to Israel and want to fight more Wars for Israel or to vilify MOOOOOSLIMS of Iran or the yellows of China to divert mass attention from Jewish power that really rules this country; oh and don’t forget those RUSSKIES are the News Nazis and poised to invade all of Europe(though there is nothing wrong with Europe being overrun by tons of migrants from all over Africa and Middle East) and burn all the ‘gays’. (Kudos to Ann Coulter for finally blowing her top over all this slavishness toward Jews.)

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XtApUGtp6oA

    Video Link

    Video Link
    (Uncle Ben’s Nice.)

    Christians believed in the ‘end of history(of ideas)’ because the Messiah had arrived in the world and spread the Gospel. Sure, Christians awaited the return of Jesus, but they believed mankind had been blessed by Jesus’s holy teachings. So, there is no need to think. Just believe and have faith in the universal creed. And just spread it all around.

    Jews, in contrast, were always in the thinking-mode since their Messiah had yet to come. Also, Jewish envisioned their Messiah as serving the Jews, not all of mankind.
    At any rate, there was no final truth that Jews could cling to. Jews had to keep thinking about possibilities of furthering their power since they had no end-of-history formula that they could believe in. Since there was no final formula, Jews had to adopt all sorts of different ideas. Since no idea was deemed final, the main emphasis became the use of ideas for Jewish interest. Jewish identity and interests outlived any idea since Jews didn’t believe any idea was the ‘end of history’ answer for all time and place. In contrast, Christians did believe that Gospel of Jesus was the ‘end of history’ in terms of ideas. Such a view created a mind-set among white gentiles that was more idealistic and committed to certain ideas.

    So, while Christians were thinking in ‘end of history’ universal terms, Jews were thinking in terms of tribal/opportunistic terms. And yet, because Jews had to survive in gentile lands, Jews had to master the art of combining their tribalism with the more ‘universal’ concerns of their Christian and Muslim neighbors. For Jews, ‘universalism’ was never an ‘end of history’ creed but a tool of manipulation to expand their own tribal power. Of course, all groups — Brits, French, Germans, Spanish, and etc — did this. They too invoked universalism to serve national/tribal interests. Even so, their core ideology was informed by Christianity(and later the Enlightenment), a genuinely universalist creed. Idealism became the defining mode of the West. Thus, once their hypocrisies were exposed, white folks genuinely sought to atone themselves by becoming more and more ‘universalist’ and ‘inclusive’.
    But the core of Jewish ‘history’ was never surrendering to universalism. It was about using universalism to become rulers of a universalized world. For Jews, universalism doesn’t mean becoming one with humanity. It means becoming the lords of humanity. Thus, at the core of Jewish practice of universalism, there is a tribalism and supremacism.
    For white gentiles to become universalist, they must sacrifice and abandon their particular identities. But for Jews to be ‘universalist’, they can play up their particular identities. To be universal, white gentiles must reject their identity and surrender to the Jews. To be ‘universal’, Jews can strengthen their identity and lord over the gentiles.
    Because the West that was supposedly committed to the universalist creed turned nationalist and ‘racist’ and killed a lot of Jews during WWII, Jews are have come to be seen as ‘universalist’ victims of particularist whites.
    In truth, Jews were the particularist victims of particularist Europeans. But because European particularism turned radical and committed horrors, there’s been a tendency to see Jews as victims who embodied ‘universalist values’. A replay of this type of thinking can be seen in current Europe where Islamism is often conflated with universal values of tolerance since nativist whites bitterly oppose the Islamization of Europe. The fallacy is the result of thinking that whatever European particularists hate must be about universalist values since the opposite of particularism is universalism. In truth, there is no single particularism, and particularisms are often at odds among themselves, i.e. Tibetan particularists don’t like Chinese, Georgian particularists don’t like Russia.
    Because so many Jews were cosmopolitan and international, the assumption was that Jews were on the side of universal Enlightenment values. In fact, Jews found a way to use universalism to serve their particularism. We see this among Neocons all the time as they invoke ‘democracy’ and ‘human rights’ in order to promote Wars for Israel all over the Middle East.

    Now, Fukyomama sort of suspected this when he became alienated from the Neocon movement in the aftermath of the Iraq War debacle. He supported the war/invasion as a means of spreading ‘western values’, but he couldn’t help realizing that it was a dirty trick pulled by Zio-Neocons to mess up an Arab nation to the advantage of Israel. In other words, the Iraq War was less about the march of ‘western values’ than the cynical invocation of ‘western values’ by Jewish supremacists for tribalist reasons.

    Idears serve Jews than Jews serve idears. If naive white Libs and cuckservatives will even choose national/racial suicide in favor of the ‘end of history’ idea, Jews will use the same idea in clever ways to further Jewish power and interests.
    Fukyomama must have realized this when he broke away from the Charles Krauthammers of the world, but then you don’t get very far in America unless you kiss Jewish butt. So, Fukyomama reverted to his servile status by rooting for the West’s messing up of Libya, Syria, and Russia. As long as American soldiers are not killed in new wars, Fukyomama didn’t much care. He seems pleased that the West has used proxies to subvert Assad in Syria(which is rather odd since Assad, more than the opposition made up of ISIS loonies, has ruled a social/political order that is closer to the model of tolerance and modernity). Fukyomama’s glibness about Syria and Russia suggests he’s either an opportunist toady or a sociopath who serves the elites who butter his bread.

    Anyway, the end of the Cold War was like Jesus’s Resurrection moment for people like Fukyomama. It was as if the triumph of the West meant that we don’t need any more new ideas. Since Western Liberal Ideas won, those Ideas were supreme and all people around the world would commit to such Ideas. Those holy ideas would trump any individual or tribal agenda. They were the final secular gospel of mankind.

    Similarly, early Christians thought that the end of history was at hand, spiritually and even literally as many thought End of Times was just around the corner. No new truths were necessary(or even possible) since The Truth was revealed by Jesus.

    In fact, of course, Christianity was cleverly manipulated and used by various powers-that-be. The kings and aristocrats.
    Likewise, the triumph of Western values didn’t mean the Western Ideas prevailing over tribalism. Rather, it meant clever tribalists such as Jews would find new creative ways to invoke ‘western values’, ‘democracy-spreading’, ‘tolerance’ and etc. to further Jewish power. Look how Jews spread the ‘gay’ agenda in the name of ‘tolerance’ but the effect of this is that, in nation after nation, the homo-agents of globo-Zionists undermine the national sovereignty and tribalism of other peoples.

    Dumb and/or naive people let ideas lead them. Smart and/or aware people lead and use ideas. You could invoke ‘western ideas’ to aid Hussein against Iran. You could invoke ‘western ideas’ to invade and destroy Iraq. You could invoke ‘western ideas’ to destroy Christian bakers who won’t bake ‘gay wedding’ cakes. But you could also invoke ‘western ideas’ to allow Sikhs in the US military to wear rags on their heads for religious reasons(in the name of ‘tolerance’ and ‘diversity’). Ideas are not without certain core principles, but they can be melted and remolded according to the heat of the power that really rules society. George Orwell knew this in ANIMAL FARM. In the end, what really matters is the pigs have the power, so they can turn their ‘socialism’ into anything they please.

    In the West, it’s not the case that all peoples are equal cuz they have the same ‘rights’. It depends who has the power. Why is it that free speech that offends Jews is illegal in the EU, but you can still get away with a lot of anti-Muhammad speech? Because Jews control the EU whereas Muslims don’t. How come ‘marriage equality’ applies to homosexuals but not to incest-sexuals and polygamists? Because Homos have more elite power and have the backing of the Jews, the overlords of the West.

    The current world order is imperialist, but it’s a new kind of imperialism. Globalism is elite-imperialism, but its full imperialist nature is hidden because elites of all colors benefit than just the elites of one color. It also disingenuously appears less imperialist since white masses suffer along with non-white masses.

    Traditional imperialism favored one people over another people. British Imperialism favored even lower-class Brits over non-whites, even well-to-do ones. Even a working class Frenchman could go to Algeria and have privileged unavailable to even upper-crust Algerians.
    Even a lowly Japanese could settle in Manchuria and have privileges not available to all Manchurians during the heyday of the Japanese empire.

    In contrast, globalist elite imperialism offers tremendous riches and privileges to the elites all around the world: London, Paris, New York, San Fran, Tokyo, Taipei, Hong Kong, Seoul, Singapore, Mexico City, Rio, Santiago, Lima, New Delhi, Cairo, Vienna, Warsaw, and etc.
    But for the masses? They can all go to hell. Globalists all over the world will work together to get theirs and they grow richer and richer. Elites around the world get together and identify more with one another than with their own countrymen whom they’ve come to despise. (And indeed, the masses all over the world have grown more despicable with the rise of youth culture, tattoo culture, homo culture, hedonism culture, amnesia culture, porn culture, trash culture, and etc. When the elites no longer discipline, inspire, guide, and lead their own people but feed them the junk of globalist garbage culture, the masses will indeed grow trashier and more despicable. And then the globalist elites will feel even more justified in identifying with the fancy elites of other nations than with the people of their own nation who’ve been Jerry-Springer-ized. But then, wasn’t it the elites who control the media and entertainment who’ve corrupted and degraded the masses into yob-dom immersed in Negro savagery, homo bitchery, and Jewish a**holery? It’s like a parent who corrupts and ruins his own children and then says he/she no longer feels like carrying the burden of parental responsibility since the children as so stupid and worthless.)

    You can see the same pattern in white as well as non-white nations. Because globalist elite imperialism offers ‘equal privilege’ to elites of all color, it doesn’t seem ‘racist’. Also, how can globalism be ‘racist’ when it dumps on the white masses and forces them to accept huge inflows of darkies into their white nations? Indeed, the British elites and German elites reserve their greatest hostility for white masses who say NO to further immigration and racial displacement.
    Globalism is a form of universal elite imperialism where elites all around the world collude to get theirs while they sacrifice their own national masses to nothingness. Of course, the angry masses are pacified with bread-and-circuses of pop culture and celebrity gossip(and bogus political issues and moral causes like ‘gay marriage’).

    To be sure, there are exceptions to globalist elite imperialism. China, Russia, Iran, and Jewdonia(Jewish World Power Dominion). In these nations, you still have something like the anti-globalist creed that there should be the unity of elites and the masses. The Chinese elites believe something must be done for the Chinese masses. Russian government promotes nationalism and the sense that Russians all share something in common rooted in history and heritage. Iranians don’t believe money is everything; they are bound by religion and heritage. And Jewish elites don’t leave Jewish masses behind. Jews take care of their own. Even rich secular Jews care about poor Jews; even American Jews care about settler-invader Jews in West Bank.

    Of course, it helps that most Jews are fairly smart and capable, so they are less dependent on Jewish elites(in the way that dumbass Negroes are so dependent on black elites and elites of other kind). Even so, Jewish elites care about Jews all around the world. For starters, all Jews carry the get-out-of-jail holocaust card. Just by invoking one’s Jewishness, the system is rigged so that Jews get special prizes. Even though Israel is more ‘racist’, ‘nationalist’, and ‘tribalist’ than any EU nation, it receives special recognition and consideration from US and EU. A Jew can go anywhere and just scream ‘antisemitism’, and he or she is showered with apologies and flowers.

    Notice how the Jewish kid is looking out for the other Jewish kid in RISKY BUSINESS. Jews look out for each other.

    Video Link

    Paradoxically, Jews are so much at odds with Russia, China, and Iran because all of them still stick to some degree to the policy of the unity of leaders and the led.
    White cuck gentiles in the US have been brainwashed to serve Jews. White elites ignore white masses and suck up to the likes of Soros and Adelson. Moronic white masses are more passionate about defending Israel than saving Europe or rescuing whites in South Africa who face a horrendous future at the hands of ghastly Negroes.
    If a single Jew dies at the hands of Palestinians, white Americans are all angry and wanna kill tons of ‘muzzies’, but if a 1000 whites are raped, robbed, and killed by blacks in South Africa, there is just stony silence as white cucks go weepy-poo with the fantasy that, one day, all Negroes could become as nice as Uncle Ben Carson the Negro Dr. Dolittle.

    Video Link

    Jews want unity of elites and masses for themselves but can’t stand it when they see the same happen in other peoples. This is why Jews are dumping on Orban of Hungary, a leader who defends the Hungarian people. Jews are pissed cuz they want such right or privilege to exist only for Jews, as in Israel that still occupies Golan Heights and won’t allow a single Syrian refugee to enter it. Jews are horrified that Orban is acting ‘too Jewish’.

    The central paradox of how the world works is that Jews hate gentiles who act like Jews. Jews are antisemitic against the Jewishy-ness of gentiles who also want to survive and thrive like Jews.

    • Replies: @Rifleman
  6. ” . . . In effect, Putin has drawn a line in the sand and told the U.S. that if they cross that line, there’s going to be trouble. . . .”

    Hell, somebody’s got to stand up to Washington, District of Corruption, and Vlad Putin’s man enough to do it. Of course, let’s hope that Mr. O-Bomb-a doesn’t warmonger to the point of war. . . .

  7. Rifleman says:
    @Priss Factor

    ASPERGERS ALERT!!!!!!!!

    Jesus H. Nobody is going to read that prissy, I mean Andrea.

    It would be better to leave the aspergy long winded mentally ill rants for your own site here.

    On unz try to be more concise. Some of your points are interesting despite your closeted homosexual and aspergy issues.

  8. Priss Factor [AKA "The Priss Factory"] says:
    @Rifleman

    A nagging stalker.

    Zzzzzzzzzzz.

  9. @Rifleman

    ahhhh…I never would have known it is Herself. Andrea Ostrov-Whatever is one of my favorite internet fantasy-girlfriends. Now I will go back and read it. She is frustrated and lonely because hardly anybody stops by her brilliant-but-somewhat-haunted-and-uneven site

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Mike Whitney Comments via RSS