The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewMike Whitney Archive
Pompeo to Iraq: If You Kick Us Out, We Will Bury You
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

The Trump administration is threatening to destroy Iraq’s economy by withholding a critical source of money that is controlled by the Federal Reserve. The threat is a response to the Iraqi parliament’s unanimous decision to end Washington’s 17 year-long military occupation. The Iraqi people and their representatives in parliament are incensed by the recent assassination of Iran’s most revered general, Qassem Soleimani, who was savagely incinerated by a Hellfire missile on the direct orders of Donald Trump. Iraqi prime minister, Adel Abdul-Mahdi, and his supporting MPs believe that the US committed a gross violation of Iraq’s sovereignty by killing a visiting dignitary without first obtaining the government’s permission. This is why the parliament and the prime minister have asked the administration to respect the wishes of the Iraqi people and withdraw all US troops from the country.

In response to parliament’s request, President Trump has threatened to impose harsh economic sanctions on Iraq while the State Department has issued a defiant statement that flatly rejects Iraq’s demands and refuses to even discuss the matter. Here is an excerpt from the statement:

“America is a force for good in the Middle East. Our military presence in Iraq is to continue the fight against ISIS and as the Secretary has said, we are committed to protecting Americans, Iraqis, and our coalition partners….At this time, any delegation sent to Iraq would be dedicated to discussing how to best recommit to our strategic partnership—not to discuss troop withdrawal, but our right, appropriate force posture in the Middle East. …. There does, however, need to be a conversation between the U.S. and Iraqi governments not just regarding security, but about our financial, economic, and diplomatic partnership. We want to be a friend and partner to a sovereign, prosperous, and stable Iraq.”

It would interesting to know whether ‘shadow president’, Mike Pompeo, composed the communique himself or if he was assisted by his fellow neocon advisors at State. In any event, the terse directive leaves no doubt that Iraq remains the exclusive property of the US government who will not permit any challenge to its iron-fisted rule. By any definition, Iraq remains an American colony, that is, “a country that is under the full or partial political control of another country and occupied by (soldiers) from that country.” Pompeo’s imperious response shows that, despite the nonsensical hype in the western media, Iraq is neither independent nor sovereign.

A closer look at the State Department’s communique hints at the manner in which Pompeo intends to keep Iraq under Washington’s thumb. When he says, “There .. needs to be a conversation … about our financial, economic, and diplomatic partnership.” What he appears to mean is: ‘We have no intention of launching another costly counterinsurgency operation in Iraq. Instead, we will withhold the proceeds from Iraq’s oil revenues, which will drive the government into bankruptcy thrusting the country into another agonizing period of sectarian conflict.’

This new strategy, which is tantamount to blackmail, was fleshed-out in a number of recent articles which garnered only modest attention in the media. According to the Wall Street Journal:

“The State Department warned that the U.S. could shut down Iraq’s access to the country’s central bank account held at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, a move that could jolt Iraq’s already shaky economy, the officials said….

The warning regarding the Iraqi central bank account was conveyed to Iraq’s prime minister in a call on Wednesday,….The Federal Reserve Bank in New York, which can freeze accounts under U.S. sanctions law… said it doesn’t comment on specific account holders.

“The U.S. Fed basically has a stranglehold on the entire [Iraqi] economy,” said Shwan Taha, chairman of Iraqi investment bank Rabee Securities….” (“U.S. Warns Iraq It Risks Losing Access to Key Bank Account if Troops Told to Leave”, Wall Street Journal)

This is how the Trump administration does business. After invading Iraq on false pretenses, killing a million of its people, and reducing large swaths of the country to an uninhabitable wastelands, the US is now conducting a financial ‘scorched earth’ campaign aimed at forcing Iraq to comply with Washington’s diktats. It is hard to see how the State Department can characterize this behavior as “a force for good” but perhaps they are being facetious. In any event, the danger to Iraq’s fragile economy is quite real as can be seen in this article by the French News Agency AFP. Here’s an excerpt:

“Iraqi officials fear economic “collapse” if Washington imposes threatened sanctions, including blocking access to a U.S.-based account where Baghdad keeps oil revenues that feed 90% of the national budget….

The PMO (Prime Ministers Office) got a call threatening that if U.S. troops are kicked out, ‘we’ – the U.S. –will block your account at the Federal Reserve Bank in New York,”….The Central Bank of Iraq’s account at the Fed was established in 2003 following the U.S.-led invasion that toppled ex-dictator Saddam Hussein…Under United Nations Security Council Resolution 1483, which lifted the crippling global sanctions and oil embargo imposed on Iraq after Saddam’s invasion of Kuwait, all revenues from Iraqi oil sales would go to the account.

Iraq is OPEC’s second-biggest crude producer and more than 90% of the state budget, which reached $112 billion in 2019, derives from oil revenues… To this day, revenues are paid in dollars into the Fed account daily, with the balance now sitting at about $35 billion, Iraqi officials told AFP…..Every month or so, Iraq flies in $1-$2 billion in cash from that account for official and commercial transactions.

“We’re an oil-producing country. Those accounts are in dollars. Cutting off access means totally turning off the tap,” the first Iraqi official said… The second official said it would mean the government could not carry out daily functions or pay salaries and the Iraqi currency would plummet in value. “It would mean collapse for Iraq,” the official said.” (“Iraq warns of ‘collapse’ if Trump blocks oil money”, Daily Sabah)

This article is key to understanding US policy in Iraq, so let’s take a minute to summarize:

1– Iraq’s wealth is in the hands of the Fed

From the earliest days of the invasion (2003) the Federal Reserve has held the revenues from Iraq’s oil proceeds. That money has never been directly under the control of the Iraqi people or their elected representatives.

2–The proceeds from Iraqi oil do not benefit the Iraqi people

Iraq is presently OPEC’s second-biggest crude producer and more than 90% of the state budget, which reached $112 billion in 2019, derives from oil revenues. While this may sound like a significant amount of money, it’s worth noting, that Iraq’s petroleum contracts were drawn up under US supervision which means that Iraq is neither being adequately compensated for its oil nor are the revenues being fairly distributed among the Iraqi people.

3– The Fed is a political actor that is deeply involved in the implementation of U.S. foreign policy

The Federal Reserve is a political actor that plays a essential roll in spreading neoliberalism. The Fed works with government agents to prevent countries like Iraq from controlling their own wealth or from establishing their own sovereign independence.

4– The Iraqi government remains in Washington’s death grip

Iraq currently has $35 billion in an account at the Fed that it does not control, does not have access to, and cannot be used to improve the lives of the Iraqi people. Instead, the Iraqi government must wait for its American overlords to release the money in dribs and drabs as it sees fit. Now that parliament has angered Uncle Sam with their demand that US troops leave the country, Washington is threatening to “turn off the tap” paving the way for an economic collapse followed by widespread social unrest.

5–Iraq must sell its oil in USD

Iraqi oil is solely denominated in US Dollars which strengthens the petrodollar system that recycles revenues into US debt. This, in turn, helps to maintain the dollar’s dominance as the world’s reserve currency which is a political tool Washington uses to impose its own development model on foreign countries.

This brief recap helps to illustrate that US policy in Iraq is a shameless extortion racket that only serves the interests of Washington and its ally, Israel. What these bullet-points do not cover, however, is the way that US policy has failed to address Iraq’s battered and neglected infrastructure, its perennially-high unemployment, its largely-polluted drinking water or the grinding, demoralizing poverty faced by a large percentage of the population. (“23% of the Iraqi people live below the poverty line while more “than half of the urban population lives in slum-like conditions.” Electricity is only available for roughly 8 hours a day while summer temperatures frequently top 100 degrees Fahrenheit. 20% of households in Iraq use an unsafe drinking water source, while 65% must use public networks as a main source of drinking water.
Unemployment stands at 13% while youth unemployment is soaring at 25%.)

So while the oil giants continue to rake in burgeoning profits on record oil extraction, millions of Iraqis are living hand-to-mouth in an increasingly hardscrabble and dystopian environment.

The media typically scapegoats the government for Iraq’s problems, (“mismanagement, bureaucratic inefficiency, and corruption”) but the real source of the troubles is the US invasion. Before the invasion, Iraq was a relatively-secure, moderately-prosperous country. Now it is a broken, dysfunctional failed state that remains helplessly pinned beneath Washington’s boot-heel. That is unlikely to change under the present administration which has already expressed its intention to extend the occupation into perpetuity.

The Iraq war is the greatest catastrophe of our time. Aside from a handful of fanatical Likudniks and behemoth oil companies, no one has benefited at all. A 5,000 year-old civilization was sadistically bombed into oblivion so Washington and its ally, Israel, could redraw the map of the Middle East and establish their hegemony over a strategically-critical region of the world.

Author Nir Rosen summed it up like this in an interview on Democracy Now 10 years ago. He said,

“We’ve destroyed Iraq and we’ve destroyed the region, and Americans need to know this.”

 
Hide 15 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Sean says:

    A 5,000 year-old civilization was sadistically bombed into oblivion so Washington and its ally, Israel, could redraw the map of the Middle East and establish their hegemony over a strategically-critical region of the world.

    Half of the oil that China import coms through the Strait of Hormuz. Israel couldn’t care less about China.

    • Replies: @anon
  2. The US government is acting like the mob taking over a business and busting it up.

  3. Biff says:

    Iraqi oil is solely denominated in US Dollars which strengthens the petrodollar system that recycles revenues into US debt. This, in turn, helps to maintain the dollar’s dominance as the world’s reserve currency which is a political tool Washington uses to impose its own development model on foreign countries.

    Well I’m sure this is a detraction from the usual draftings here at Unz that claim “It wasn’t about the oil!”

  4. “Shameless extortion racket” pretty much sums it up.
    Let’s face it: Iraq is dying a death by a thousand cuts. This US vampire kiss can go on… for ever?
    Perhaps it’s time to fight back?
    The question: would the blow-back from closing Iraq’s FED account hurt Iraq more than the US?
    And there would be blow-back. Social violence. Perhaps near social collapse.
    Essentially, Iraq is a conquered state. It has only the appearance of sovereignty. It controls little of its own national interests. (note: the deal that Iraq made with China re reconstruction for oil was intimately causal with subsequent events, such as the mass street demonstrations, & the shooting deaths at these demo’s… as promised by Trump to the Iraqi PM) – It will never remove the US death grip on the short-medium term without a fight.
    Should it play it’s cards right, it might gain international sympathy & reveal to the world the truth most of us here know: that the US is a fascist Imperial state. A rogue state. A gangster state.
    Iraq can fight or suffer a death by a thousand cuts…. It’s up to Iraqi’s to choose.

  5. nickels says:

    Well, we see Bush finally vindicated-Amerikkkans HAVE brought democracy to Iraq.
    And we see it functions pretty much the same there as it does at home.

  6. @Biff

    Well I’m sure this is a detraction from the usual draftings here at Unz that claim “It wasn’t about the oil!”

    Even if oil played a role, an invasion of the country wouldn’t have been necessary. Sadam was ready to accept all demands that the US might want to make, if only oil was a question. But the fact is that the US wanted to invade the country independently of the question of oil. As we see, the invasion didn’t make things relating to oil easier to the US, on the contrary. The US could have the oil without war. Now the US has had a war and possibly no oil. Iraq signed a contract with China and not with the US. So, it still can be right that “it wasn’t about the oil”.

    • Replies: @james charles
  7. @UncommonGround

    “it wasn’t about the oil”

    You may be right. However, could S.H. be trusted not to ‘invest’ the revenue from oil in W.M.D.’s?

  8. @Biff

    Actually, the article oversimplifies the issue. Oil is part of the issue, but any trade settled in dollars, runs through the New York Fed. South Korea may sell steel to Malaysia, but almost certainly that trade is settled in US dollars, and runs through the New York Fed.
    One of Saddam’s mistake was selling Iraq’s oil in Euros then telling everybody it was more profitable. Another mistake was pumping more oil reducing demand dropping prices and putting a big f*ck into the futures markets. Saddam had to go, and Iraq’s oil had to stay in the ground.

    Iran, like Libya and Iraq has been prepared to sell oil in other currencies. Not only that, like Venezuela, they have traded oil for a commodity, which not only avoids the New York Fed, but the Bank Of International Settlements. This can’t be allowed to happen. It wasn’t allowed for Germany in the 1930s, and it won’t be allowed now.

    The reason Iran, Russia, and China are threats, is that they are setting up a parallel system not based on the USD. That was the genesis of the BRICS. Brazil and Argentina have been vassalized once again, India is waffling, and South Africa will self destruct internally. The Belt and Road initiative is one of the ways of moving away from the USD, as is the Shanghai Co-operation Organization. Nordstream has less to do with Russia supplying the actual gas, and more to do with moving Germany and the EU away from the USD and toward Eurasian economic integration.
    Donald may have his mild economic nationalism of MAGA come to fruition in some form, but it won’t be what he thought it would be.

  9. Ashtray says:
    @Biff

    It’s always about oil, always. And about war/mic, debt/fed and the petrodollar

    • Replies: @Sean
  10. Occams says:

    Has anyone yet realized that in the ‘war on terror’ – the TERRORISTS ARE ISRAEL AND THE USA?

    • Replies: @Just passing through
  11. …we are committed to protecting Americans, Iraqis, and our coalition partners…

    Murdering a million Iraqis over two wars, destroying a once very prosperous country and rendering destitute over 4 million more hardly sounds like protecting them. This is eerily reminiscent of killing 2 million Vietnamese in order to save them.

    Trump had earlier openly declared his intention of stealing Syrian oil – no frills – and then siphon it to our master, Israel. He also lamented the fact that our country failed to steal Iraqi oil during Operation Iraqi “Freedom”. Our mob style protection racket is now in full gear. We have now totally discarded any pretenses to the lies justifying our brutality and beastly nature. And now a word or two about morality from the “international community”. A declaration of Iraq as our colony is the only measure missing from our ongoing barbaric, savage and sadistic behavior. Seventeen years of this crap and we remain deafeningly silent. But wait! We have more pressing issues like the impeachment circus.

    We want to be a friend and partner to a sovereign, prosperous, and stable Iraq.

    A sovereign, prosperous and stable Iraq? Hard to remember the last time Iraq enjoyed any semblance of sovereignty, prosperity and stability after Desert Storm and Operation Iraqi “Freedom”.

    …Qassem Soleimani, who was savagely incinerated by a Hellfire missile on the direct orders of Donald Trump.

    That is giving a lot more credit to Trump than he is really due. A more accurate statement would be “…under orders from Trump, who in turn was obeying orders from Israel”.

  12. Sean says:
    @Ashtray

    Does Ukraine have oil? Russia withdrew from Ukraine, and then found that Nato was moving in. You simply cannot withdraw from a strategically important area and expect the power vacuum will not draw another great power in.

  13. @Occams

    It is actually the War of Terror

  14. Trump may do in Iraq what others failed to achieve – unite Shia and Sunni in a holy war against foreign occupation.

    Iraq just has to tell the Fed to keep the $35 billion and invite in Chinese and Russian peacekeepers to secure its sovereignty.

    In the long run they’d come out ahead.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Mike Whitney Comments via RSS