The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewMike Whitney Archive
Greece and the Eurozone
Monday's Deadline
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Monday is a crucial deadline in Greece’s struggle against Brussels-imposed austerity. Eurozone finance ministers are set to meet in the morning to decide whether Greece has made sufficient progress on previous agreements to justify further support. The new leftist government of Greece, Syzira, has rejected provisions in the so-called bailout, saying that the loans have only increased the country’s debt-to-GDP ratio which has ballooned from 115 percent in 2010 more than 170 percent today. Eurogroup ministers have dismissed Syriza’s objections saying that Greece must accept the conditions of the original (\$270 billion) agreement or be cut off from additional funding. The confrontation between the Eurogroup and Syriza has set the stage for clash that could trigger a run on the Greek banking system followed by a “dirty exit” of Greece from the Eurozone. The impact this would have on the people of Greece, who have already endured a five year slump worse than the Great Depression, could be catastrophic.

Greek Finance Minister Yanis Varoufakis made the case for changing the terms of the EZ’s programs in an op-ed in the New York Times on Monday. He said:

“The great difference between this government and previous Greek governments is twofold: We are determined to clash with mighty vested interests in order to reboot Greece and gain our partners’ trust. We are also determined not to be treated as a debt colony that should suffer what it must…

We shall desist, whatever the consequences, from deals that are wrong for Greece and wrong for Europe. The “extend and pretend” game that began after Greece’s public debt became unserviceable in 2010 will end. No more loans — not until we have a credible plan for growing the economy in order to repay those loans, help the middle class get back on its feet and address the hideous humanitarian crisis. No more “reform” programs that target poor pensioners and family-owned pharmacies while leaving large-scale corruption untouched.”
(Yanis Varoufakis: No Time for Games in Europe, Yanis Varoufakis, New York Times)

Game theory expert, Varoufakis, denies that he is engaged in a game of chicken to win concessions from Brussels. What he wants is a deal that makes sense, that is, funding assistance with a component for economic growth so Greece can finally emerge from its long-term slump and put its people back to work. The current bailout strategy makes no sense at all from an economic point of view. As we pointed out earlier, accepting loans while shrinking the economy through crippling austerity measures, only generates more red ink and a deeper hole. Even so, Varoufakis’s “modest proposals” are not a blanket rejection of Greece’s obligations to its creditors, they merely adjust the terms of the agreement so that success becomes possible. For example, Varoufakis has recommended that Greece reduce the size of its primary budget surplus to provide more fiscal stimulus for the ailing economy. While an economy with 25 percent unemployment obviously needs more stimulus, Varoufakis’s approach pales in comparison to Obama’s \$800 billion ARRA package of 2009 that was aimed at ending the Great Recession. In fact, it’s not really stimulus at all; it is just a reduction in the surplus. (which is “small beer” by any standard) The point is, Varoufakis is not making unreasonable demands. He merely wants an agreement that provides solutions that address the problem, and don’t just add more debt. Here’s more from Varoufakis’s op-ed:

“Our government is not asking our partners for a way out of repaying our debts. We are asking for a few months of financial stability that will allow us to embark upon the task of reforms that the broad Greek population can own and support, so we can bring back growth and end our inability to pay our dues.”

Varoufakis has described the current bailout regime as paying off the mortgage with a credit card. The strategy might buy some time, but it only puts off the inevitable day of default. Strangling the economy through counterproductive belt-tightening measures and the selling of state-owned assets has not improved Greece’s finances at all. It has been an utter failure as the rising debt-to-GDP figures illustrate. Even so, the European Central Bank (ECB) has threatened to cut off liquidity to the Greek banking system if Greece doesn’t capitulate and accept an agreement that only increases the debt, prolongs the slump and deepens the crisis. Does that make sense?

Varoufakis is giving euro-leaders a chance for redemption, a chance to rethink their vision of Europe as a land of prosperity for banks, bondholders and creditors alone. He’s laid down the gauntlet saying that he will meet these lofty Masters of the Universe halfway or, perhaps, more than halfway; but he won’t abandon the working people who have suffered so dramatically under the present regime. He won’t submit to the ECB’s blackmail or give in to Germany’s threats. He’ll stick to his convictions and do what he promised to do because– as he says in his op-ed– “it is right”.

Monday’s negotiations are about more than just Greece. They’re about the future of Europe. Varoufakis wants a Europe that is less divided between debtor and creditor, between German and Greek, between us and them. He is not asking for a reprieve or a bailout or charity. He’s asking Europe’s leaders to take the Union in an entirely different direction, a direction that better reflects the hopes and aspirations the vast majority of working people in the EU. As he says in his op-ed:

“Europe will only regain its soul when it regains the people’s trust by putting their interests center-stage.”

Bravo, Varoufakis.

MIKE WHITNEY lives in Washington state. He is a contributor to Hopeless: Barack Obama and the Politics of Illusion (AK Press). Hopeless is also available in a Kindle edition. He can be reached at [email protected].

(Republished from Counterpunch by permission of author or representative)
• Category: Foreign Policy • Tags: Eurozone, Greece 
Hide 5 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. The problem for the bankster class agreeing, is “What’s in it for them?” They couldn’t care less about anyone other than themselves, vile practitioners as they have become of Adam Smith’s Vile Maxim, “More for me, less for everyone else.”

  2. Kiza says:

    I have read so much about the Greek Financial Crisis, but nowhere did I read the following basics:
    1) The private debt of Greek companies was nationalized under the pressure of Western/German creditors by the former Greek Government; imagine if you could take a home mortgage and then someone said – you do not have to pay this off any more – it becomes a part of the national debt – the taxpayers will be paying off your mortgage. I am sure that the bank would be very happy, especially if you are insolvent and they know they could not get money from you.
    2) The Western credit rating agencies have been manipulating the credit rating of Greece to keep interest on debt so high that Greece will not be able to pay off the principal in the next 1,000 years. Every “bailout” has been pushing Greece deeper and deeper into debt. This credit rating game is like when they down-graded Russia’s credit to the level of junk bonds (again to increase the interest) whilst Russia, for example, has the second largest reported reserves of gold in the World.
    3) A large portion of the Greek government debt was for military equipment from Germany, bought at a high price and under extremely suspicious circumstances (bribery).

    The lesson is very simple – stay away from the Western financial markets, they are like a pack of wolves: one pack corrupts your government into taking loans, another pack downgrades your credit rating to make you pay much higher interest, another pack forces you to collateralize private company debt into public debt, yet another pack creates a “bail out” and so on. It is pure and simple Debt Slavery, Greece must repudiate debt created under such conditions to discourage the wolves from doing the same to other countries. That is the only way for the West to learn responsible lending practices.

  3. Jim says:

    The formation of the Eurozone was based on ideology not rational economic considerations. Ideology leads to stupity.

  4. Wally [AKA "BobbyBeGood"] says: • Website

    Greek stupidity brought about their situation, they deserve it.

    As a former Marxist state they expected a colossal Marxist super-state free ride, but now it’s time to pay the piper. Poetic justice. Some never learn.

    Blaming the EU ignores the utter failure of the Greek Marxist economy pre-EU. It’s not as if they were previously a raging economic success.

    Default and ‘Grexit’ means they will have no one left to blame, although I’m sure they will try.

    It’s time the Greeks carried their own weight.

    • Replies: @Andrew E. Mathis
  5. @Wally

    Rather than reiterate all the points I made in response to your last post on this topic, I’ll provide a quick link:

    A couple of points do bear mentioning/repeating:

    (1) In the first instance of the application of the Truman Doctrine, Greece fought a civil war (U.S.-backed nationalists vs. USSR-backed communist guerrillas) in the late 1940s. After the communist side was defeated, the Communist Party of Greece (KKE) was banned until the 1970s.

    (2) That pretty much leaves only since 1974 or thereabouts (fall of the six-year U.S.-backed dictatorship) that Greece could have been a “Marxist” state. However, a look at the list of prime ministers of Greece since free elections were instituted in 1974 shows that only for a little more than half of that 40 years could the governments of Greece even be characterized as left-wing (approx. 24 years):

    But, in fact, the party holding power for those 24 years (PASOK) isn’t really even properly a socialist party, nevermind a Marxist party. That’s why Syriza won the election — because there was no other party representing the true left.

    (2a) Not to put too fine a point on it, but your allegation that Greece was a Marxist state pre-EU is even more ridiculous. Greece joined the EU in 1981. PASOK did not hold power AT ALL between 1974 and 1981. Remember: No communist party in Greece between 1949 and 1974.

    (3) I would remind you as a final point that the existence of a welfare state in a country does not automatically make it “Marxist.” Indeed, the first welfare state in Europe was the German Empire under Bismarck, which was specifically designed to draw support away from socialists and communists by providing social services commensurate with a modern state. Bismarck was hardly a “Marxist.”

    Again, please read the first link, which I wrote two weeks ago or so in response to you.

Current Commenter

Leave a Reply -

 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Mike Whitney Comments via RSS