The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewMike Whitney Archive
From Bad to Worse
Memo to Obama: Creat More Jobs or Resign
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks


Abysmal.

That’s the only way to describe the latestjob’s report. The whole thing stunk. And, on top of that, the unemployment rate has been heading higher for the last 3 months. It’s now at 9.2 percent a full two years into the recovery. That’s unprecedented. Where are the jobs, that’s what everyone wants to know.

This is beyond disappointing. The stock market has regained most of the ground it lost since it touched bottom in March 2009, but the real economy is still stuck in the mud. Just look at the data. Here’s a clip from economist Tim Duy who sums it up perfectly:

"…the labor force fell, the participation rate fell, the employment to population ratio fell, the number of employed plummeted, and the number of unemployed climbed. Private nonfarm payrolls gains a paltry 57k, and the drag from government cutbacks pulled the overall jobs gain to just 18k. Far short of the numbers needed to even hold unemployment steady." ("Grim", Tim Duy, Fed Watch)

Get the picture? It’s all bad. And guess what? Those "18,000 new jobs" falls within the Labor Depts margin for error, so there could actually be "no new jobs". Will that wake up Obama? Probably not.

How do you light a fire under Washington, that’s the question? Is Congress even aware that we’re undergoing a major jobs crisis or are they too busy bickering over tax cuts for fatcats or how much money they can divert from Social Security to Wall Street?

Look; unemployment is over 9% and rising. The states are firing tens of thousands of teachers and public employees every month because they need to balance their budgets and they’re not taking in enough revenue. The stimulus is dwindling (which means that fiscal policy is actually contractionary in real terms) And the 10-year Treasury has dipped below 3 percent (as of Monday morning.) In other words, the bond market is signalling "recession", even while the dope in the White House is doing his utmost to slice $4 trillion off the deficits.

Does that make any sense?

Maybe if you’re Herbert Hoover, it does. But it makes no sense at all if you were elected with a mandate to "change" the way Washington operates and put the country back to work. Obama is just making a bad situation worse by gadding about in his golf togs blabbering about belt tightening. It’s enough to make you sick.

Get with the program, Barry, or resign. That would be even better. Then maybe we can find someone who’s serious about running the country.

Just think of the message Obama is sending our trading partners. By refusing to spend more on stimulus, Obama is announcing to the world that his administration will do nothing to rebuild the middle class and shore up flagging global demand. They’ve got to love that in China! Instead, he wants to make increase the pain, by cutting off the bloodflow of Federal spending while households are still are still digging out from the losses they sustained after the housing bubble burst. That will just make it harder for people to patch their balance sheets and get back to normal. Doesn’t Obama know that?

Do you know what it’s going take to find jobs for all the people who want them? According to economist Gary Burtless from the Brookings Institution, "To bring the adult employment rate back to its pre-recession level, we would need to add about 11 million new jobs. At the pace of job growth we have seen since the start of the year, that task may take decades."

And here’s more from the New York Times:

"The economy needs to add about 150,000 jobs a month just to keep up with normal population growth. The protracted stretch of weak-to-moderate job creation over the last two years has left many of the people who lost jobs during the recession increasingly desperate. There are now 14.1 million unemployed, with 6.3 million of them having searched for work for six months or longer. Including those who are working part time because they cannot find full-time work and those who have stopped looking, the broader unemployment rate is now 16.2 percent, its highest level since December 2010." ("Job Growth Falters Badly, Clouding Hope for Recovery", New York Times)

So, we’re in trouble, right? Big trouble. Not only are we not creating jobs, the administration is not providing sufficient resources to the states so they can keep the people who ARE employed still working. It’s madness.

Some of this can be attributed to supply disruptions in Japan or problems in Europe, but not very much. And, yes, the Fed should get some of the blame for fiddling the money supply with QE2, it’s wacko bond buying program that sent gas and food prices through the roof. That slowed consumer spending enough to discourage business owners from hiring more workers. But QE2 is not the real problem. The real problem is that the recovery is running out of steam because the government is reducing its spending and consumers aren’t in a position where they can make up the difference. So, it gets down to this: Either we get a second round of stimulus or unemployment is going to climb even higher and growth will continue to flag. It’s one or the other.

If Obama thinks he can slash spending and have a strong recovery at the same time, he’s in for a big surprise.

Mike Whitney lives in Washington state and cvan be reached at [email protected]

 

(Republished from CounterPunch by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: Economics • Tags: Unemployment 
Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Mike Whitney Comments via RSS