The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewMichelle Malkin Archive
The Nuking of the American Nuclear Family
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

“Gay poly throuple makes history, lists 3 dads on a birth certificate.”

That’s an actual headline from The New York Post, which last week featured an unsettling trio of men who recruited two female friends to help them conceive and deliver a baby girl named Piper.

Piper is now 3 years old and has a 1-year-old brother named Parker. According to the “gay poly throuple,” Piper told her preschool classmates how proud she was of her plentiful progenitors by bragging: “You have two parents. I have three parents.”

Actually, the “throuple” is really a quintet. If you count Piper’s egg donor and birth surrogate, we’ve now traveled from “Heather Has Two Mommies” (the infamous children’s book normalizing same-sex adoptions published in 1989) to “Piper Has Five Parents.” And in 2021, if you have any discomfort or reservations at all about the nuking of the nuclear family by throuples or quadrouples or dozenouples, then woke society tells us there’s something wrong with us, not them.

Dr. Ian Jenkins, one of Piper’s polyamorous pops, wrote in a newly released book about their “adventures in modern parenting” that the arrangement is “just not a big deal.” Nothing to see here, move along. Two, three, whatever. “Some people seem to think it’s about a ton of sex or something,” Jenkins complained, “or we’re unstable and must do crazy things. (But) it’s really remarkably ordinary and domestic in our house and definitely not ‘Tiger King’ (the creepy Netflix hit series about convicted murder-for-hire zookeeper Joe Exotic, who headed up a three-way “marriage to two men).

Weirdly, one of Piper’s other dads, Jeremy, is also a zookeeper like Joe Exotic whom the other two met through an online dating service. All very “remarkably ordinary and domestic.” Ho-hum.

Neighborhoods, cities and nations are safer, healthier and more prosperous where nuclear families are the norm. But for the sake of social justice and modern progressivism, we are all just supposed to shake our heads politely and keep our alarm about the sexual slippery slope to ourselves. As University of Virginia sociologist W. Bradford Wilcox summarized in a 2020 article reviewing the benefits of two-parent married households for The Atlantic magazine, “sadly, adults who are unrelated to children are much more likely to abuse or neglect them than their own parents are.”

Never mind all the scientific studies showing an elevated risk of child sexual abuse in households where children live with unrelated adults. Never mind the CDC data showing that introducing men unrelated to the children in a family elevates the risk of physical, sexual and emotional abuse of those children by about nine times higher than the rate experienced by children raised in normal, stable nuclear family of married biological parents and their children.

ORDER IT NOW

In a separate report for the Institute for Family Studies, Wilcox found that the very types of highly educated California liberals who publicly promote and support “alternative” family structures across pop culture and in the political arena are themselves more committed to traditional marriage and nuclear families for their own children. But don’t you dare question their extreme and dangerous perversity. Look at what happened to grassroots social conservative Lauren Witzke, the former Senate GOP candidate in Delaware. She was suspended from Twitter last week after exposing a left-wing transgender zealot named Alok Vaid-Menon, who tweeted derisively to traditional parents objecting to transgender bathroom laws that “little girls are also kinky.”

Witzke called the statement “demonic,” which Twitter determined was “hateful conduct” that violated its terms of service.

While Twitter has been purging pro-family, pro-life users from its platform for years, it encouraged discussions of “attraction towards minors,” including the posting of nude photos of children. The policy (only rescinded last fall after a massive backlash) embraced pedophiles as “minor-attracted persons.” Even more perverse is that elite Republican figures are using their Silicon Valley platforms to attack vocal Christian dissidents instead of supporting them. Witzke came under fire last week from President Donald Trump’s gay former ambassador to Germany, Ric Grenell, and gay black TPUSA contributor Rob Smith for criticizing their promotion of transgenderism and the LGBTQIXYZ agenda.

“The Republican Party has remained stagnant as conservatives are being silenced by Big Tech, out of the fear of losing the support of their big corporate donors,” Witzke told me. “The GOP is no longer the Party of God, Family and Traditional Marriage. They are now corporate slaves to progressivism, transgenderism and compromise.”

Once again, our “friends” are our own worst enemies. Accommodation is the downfall of political parties and crumbling civilizations. The children always pay the highest price.

Michelle Malkin’s email address is [email protected] To find out more about Michelle Malkin and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.

 
• Category: Culture/Society 
Hide 30 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. The studies on abuse are interesting, but I would wonder whether they correlate directly: a gay household chooses to have children together, whilst a step-parent to a remarried parent does not to choose to have that kid.. or at least if the child is not important to them – that risks neglect, and if the child is important to them – that risks physical/sexual abuse.

    I can imagine where in the latter there would be competition for the love of the parent between the child and the new arrival (it’s seen often enough in the animal kingdom too, lions killing the old runts and so on), whilst I would think it would be less likely that that would be the case, were however many whoever, decided to have kids that were biologically related to only one of the two or however many parents.

    In our romantic/materialistic age, marriage has come to mean an expression of love between people, whilst really it has always been an institution to raise children in a functional environment. A parent remarrying often for their own needs, may not prioritise the needs of the kids. But if parents make the decision to raise children from the get go, I think the relationship with the non-biological parents would be different.

    There would be the lack of balance from interacting with only one sex of course, I have a pair of lesbian friends who conceived through a male friend, and more than there being two mothers – who are both very doting and caring – it’s the lack of male role models for the daughter that I worry about.

    Of course though, we are hurtling into this without much direct data on homosexuals raising children, and driving blind is a serious risk.

    • Replies: @goldgettin
    @Ilya G Poimandres

    "We're hurtling into this without much direct data-driving blind"

    I hope your concern is for the entire matrix of perversions as well?
    Do the eugenics programs, Genetic alterations of our foods,
    genocides, world poverty,starvation, profitable medicine complex,
    cradle to grave incarceration to the law of rule, vulture capital,
    ecocide, constant wars ever irk your ire? I DOUBT it very much.

    Supposedly, we're spinning at 8000+ miles per hour,lightening is
    striking over 6 mil.x per day and NOW you all feign outrage at this
    horrible "serious risk"?/ /? What about CERN and space junk in orbit?

    Replies: @Ilya G Poimandres

  2. Its simple. we have allowed the misfit toys to take over and “rino” republicants have gone alone with it for fear of being labeled “racist” or homophobic.

    Time to take it to them, use their tactics against them, label them, protest outside of their homes, fire them from your jobs (or get them fired) and show NO fear. They cant cancel you if you dont let them. Stomp it back and take back your place

  3. @Ilya G Poimandres
    The studies on abuse are interesting, but I would wonder whether they correlate directly: a gay household chooses to have children together, whilst a step-parent to a remarried parent does not to choose to have that kid.. or at least if the child is not important to them - that risks neglect, and if the child is important to them - that risks physical/sexual abuse.

    I can imagine where in the latter there would be competition for the love of the parent between the child and the new arrival (it's seen often enough in the animal kingdom too, lions killing the old runts and so on), whilst I would think it would be less likely that that would be the case, were however many whoever, decided to have kids that were biologically related to only one of the two or however many parents.

    In our romantic/materialistic age, marriage has come to mean an expression of love between people, whilst really it has always been an institution to raise children in a functional environment. A parent remarrying often for their own needs, may not prioritise the needs of the kids. But if parents make the decision to raise children from the get go, I think the relationship with the non-biological parents would be different.

    There would be the lack of balance from interacting with only one sex of course, I have a pair of lesbian friends who conceived through a male friend, and more than there being two mothers - who are both very doting and caring - it's the lack of male role models for the daughter that I worry about.

    Of course though, we are hurtling into this without much direct data on homosexuals raising children, and driving blind is a serious risk.

    Replies: @goldgettin

    “We’re hurtling into this without much direct data-driving blind”

    I hope your concern is for the entire matrix of perversions as well?
    Do the eugenics programs, Genetic alterations of our foods,
    genocides, world poverty,starvation, profitable medicine complex,
    cradle to grave incarceration to the law of rule, vulture capital,
    ecocide, constant wars ever irk your ire? I DOUBT it very much.

    Supposedly, we’re spinning at 8000+ miles per hour,lightening is
    striking over 6 mil.x per day and NOW you all feign outrage at this
    horrible “serious risk”?/ /? What about CERN and space junk in orbit?

    • Replies: @Ilya G Poimandres
    @goldgettin

    Not sure where you are heading here, but for the most part I am concerned about the lot of what you say, but as a rabbit in the headlights of a transmorphing society, I find it best not to fear. The things that are not under your control, after all, are not worth panicking over!

    Replies: @goldgettin

  4. @goldgettin
    @Ilya G Poimandres

    "We're hurtling into this without much direct data-driving blind"

    I hope your concern is for the entire matrix of perversions as well?
    Do the eugenics programs, Genetic alterations of our foods,
    genocides, world poverty,starvation, profitable medicine complex,
    cradle to grave incarceration to the law of rule, vulture capital,
    ecocide, constant wars ever irk your ire? I DOUBT it very much.

    Supposedly, we're spinning at 8000+ miles per hour,lightening is
    striking over 6 mil.x per day and NOW you all feign outrage at this
    horrible "serious risk"?/ /? What about CERN and space junk in orbit?

    Replies: @Ilya G Poimandres

    Not sure where you are heading here, but for the most part I am concerned about the lot of what you say, but as a rabbit in the headlights of a transmorphing society, I find it best not to fear. The things that are not under your control, after all, are not worth panicking over!

    • Replies: @goldgettin
    @Ilya G Poimandres

    You are "as a rabbit in the headlights" !!!
    What I am saying, to be clear, is get the ----off the road.
    It's "not under your control","worth panicking over""best not to fear" ?

    It AMAZES me you people have not already been splattered 1000 x.
    Please attempt any escape from your little box,and think about doing
    whatever you can to get to the other side,where the real light emanates.

    Unless you're correct and it's futile because of a trans society/cult-ure

    Replies: @Ilya G Poimandres

  5. “… fighting for gay marriage generally involves lying about what we are going to do with marriage when we get there-because we lie that the institution of marriage is not going to change, and that is a lie. The institution of marriage is going to change, and it should change. And again, I don’t think it should exist.” – (((Masha Gessen)))

    And a must read book on another key aspect of the assault: Review of The Transgender-Industrial Complex by Scott Howard – https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2020/11/26/review-of-the-transgender-industrial-complex-by-scott-howard/

    Interview with Scott Howard –

  6. There are three factors that have contributed to the destruction of the nuclear family—reliable birth control, abortion and feminism.

    Each of them on their own could not have accomplished what all three of them have wrought.

    Birth control is responsible for divorcing the sex act from the desirability of procreation-the creation of new human life. No longer would procreation be the primary reason for completing the sexual act.

    This also absolved women from much of their responsibility for the consequences of their actions. Finally, women could control their reproductive capability to a much greater degree than was previously possible.

    One could safely argue that reliable birth control was responsible for the feminism movement.

    Abortion, (once seen as murder) has been another factor in the feminism movement. Until recently, there were limits on this horrific procedure, but no more. Abortion has become acceptable until the time of birth and is quite often used as another form of “birth control”…not good.

    Women “want it both ways”. They want to be able to have abortions without any input from the father of the child. As there haven’t been any “immaculate conceptions” for the last 2000 years or so, excluding men from the consequences of their actions has led to the deterioration of civil society and is responsible for the wholesale cheapening of human life, to the point of human destruction. In fact, many men are abortion supporters as this vile act absolves them of responsibility for their actions.

    Feminism is the third factor in the destruction of civil societies.

    As much as feminists would deny it, men and women ARE different and in normal society, are supposed to complement each other.

    In traditional societies, men were “breadwinners”, providing for the family, “bringing home the bacon” and providing protection for a safe and stable household.

    Women “ran the household”, taking care of the husband and children as well as maintaining the stability of the household, establishing routines for children and making sure the household runs smoothly.

    With feminism, women lost a lot more than they gained. How many women now have careers (just because they want to prove themselves) and still have domestic household responsibilities? Feminism placed a “guilt trip” on women, insisting that running a domestic household “was not enough” and one had to have a career in the work world in order to be successful. Feminism stigmatized “stay-at-home” moms and made them feel guilty for not having a career outside the home. Pushing children into “day-care centers” destroyed the home life and stability that children need in their lives.

    These three factors have done much to destabilize and damage civil society…

    • Replies: @Trial by Wombat
    @anarchyst


    Once again, our “friends” are our own worst enemies. Accommodation is the downfall of political parties and crumbling civilizations.
     
    Love you Michelle, but "Sacred Two Party System Inc." has no friends, only servile vassals. We are largely ignoring the fact that our Junta duopoly votes their own pensions and primacy. Until that is addressed, we are simply patching the potholes of corruption.

    There are three factors that have contributed to the destruction of the nuclear family—reliable birth control, abortion and feminism.
     
    You need to adjust your aim, Apollo Far Striker.

    The decay of the nuclear family is simply a side-effect of the destruction of actual cultures. Suburbia, Generations like Boomer / Millenial / Gen X are not a culture, they are grasping attempts at defining peoples' long since stripped of all intrinsic culture.

    How many Americans know that they originate from a particular town or county, in which their own ancestor founded the place, the local origin stories concern their own families, and the people unite around something affirmatively instead of being coached by mass media simply to opposed the most outlandish manifestations of other culture-less, commercially defined peoples?

    The Federalism of the so-called Founders was in fact the extirpation of allegiance to one another beyond materialism, corporatism and accumulation. The Big Lie of the Federalists was that they intended to limit the powers of the central state.

    Like their other tactics, this was a complete lie. What they were not able to force through at the pre-rigged convention, they later over-layed Judicially, with their own co-conspirators on the public payroll, inventing "Implied Powers".

    Strangling the States into mere "Corporations", as promised by Hamilton, also degenerated the people of those states into undifferentiated, interchangeable worker units and consumers.

    Undifferentiated worker units are ideal for tax collection purposes, but they dont know where they came from, who they are, why they exist, or what purpose they serve. Those who dont know who they are can be led anyplace that you want to take them to.

    , @animalogic
    @anarchyst

    Agree with most of what you say.
    But let's go back to the 70's -- 2 things happen: women increasely enter & stay in the work force.
    Then wages slowly begin to stagnate -- they do NOT keep up with (as they did for 30 odd years) productivity increases.
    Thus, the necessity of both parents working.
    So contraception, abortion & feminism.
    Now where is the causation, where the correlation?
    Did the Oligarchs exploit these emerging social factors to slowly, imperceptibly alter the class make up of society? (ie in the US, now, 10% have 70% of the wealth etc etc).
    And were working people suckers to not see their vicious stratagy in its embryo stage?

    Replies: @anarchyst

    , @Walter Craig
    @anarchyst

    Nice post.

    But you confused the Immaculate Conception with the Virginal Conception. The Immaculate Conception refers to the dogma that Mary's soul was infused into her without any sin - that she was created in a state similar to the way Adam and Eve were created with respect to sin before they fell. Many of the Fathers of the Church referred to Mary as the New Eve, by the way, and the idea is implicit in the New Testament with Jesus referring to Mary as "Woman" at the wedding at Cana and from the cross according to John's Gospel. "Woman" was not an unusual expression but it was quite unusual from a son to his mother.

    A virginal conception refers to conceiving without the sexual intercourse.

  7. please watch this documentary “THE BOY WITH THE HENNA TATTOO”

  8. Allowing homosexuals and genital mutilators to raise children is nothing short of child abuse. Unless this country changes, we’re headed for a disaster of biblical proportions. Read the Old Testament sections on Sodom and Gomorrah to see what’s coming

    • Replies: @h5mind
    @Rich

    My sister adopted a boy after fostering him for a number of years. At the same time, three of the boy's siblings were placed from birth with another woman in the same foster program. In spite of being a single mother, she provided a wonderful and loving home for those kids. She and my sister visited often to ensure the siblings could play together and remain close. The woman put her name in for adoption, but in spite of stellar CPS reports and happy, well-adjusted kids, all three were removed from her care and given to a gay couple for immediate adoption. The couple (two guys) cut all visitation rights to the former foster mother, and severely curtailed my sister's ability to have her son visit with his own siblings. The unfortunate kids placed with these two nuts now show clear signs of emotional abuse, and are not allowed out of their sight for any reason during the few brief visits my sister is allowed. Any complaint or concern would be labeled "homophobic" and runs the risk not only of legal prosecution, but possible loss of her own adopted son to the State. This is not a random aberration, but an established policy.

    , @follyofwar
    @Rich

    "Gay poly throuple makes history, lists 3 dads on a birth certificate."

    My first thought was, how did those 3 perverts do it? Did they mix their semen together before insemination? It would be the logical conclusion, wouldn't it?

    Also, Rich, when you speak of "genital mutilators" who commit "child abuse," I hope you're including those millions of American parents who get their poor little boys circumcised.

    , @animalogic
    @Rich

    "Read the Old Testament sections on Sodom and Gomorrah to see what’s coming"
    Yes, if that nasty Jewish deity is actually around we would be in deep shit.
    Here's hoping NOT.

    Replies: @Rich

  9. anon[246] • Disclaimer says:

    I have often thought gays should not be allowed to adopt. Who knows what these pervs do to their kids? Homosexuality is a perversion and a sickness. The acceptance of homosexuality was the beginning of the end for the West.

    A large proportion of gays are pedophiles, they do this not just to prey on children who are defenseless and naive, but also to grow their population for potential partners down the road. Many young gay men became gay because they were abused as children, and grew up hating themselves and got into substance abuse, or became abusers themselves. I’ve read that 90% of pedophiles are either gay or bisexual. And this sickness overwhelmingly afflicts Jews. That is why pedophilia and homosexuality is so prevalent in Jew run Hollywood.

    Read the 2006 article by Boston Magazine “Boy Crazy”, it’ll make your skin crawl. The article talks about a gay man in his 50’s or 60’s who calls himself “Socrates”, who had fostered over 30 boys from foster care and also runaways, gave them booze, drugs then had sexual relations with them. Instead of charging him with statutory rape, the foster care social services continued to send him these boys.

    It’s like the former mayor of Seattle, Ed Murray, who finally got exposed after the 4th man came forward about being abused by him as foster care children, all 4 were black. As adults all his victims became substance abusers to numb their pain and shame. The Seattle Times buried the first 3 charges to protect him, but when the 4th man came forward, they decided to print the story because they were afraid of being called racist.

    In a saner world, homosexuality would be eradicated from the face of the earth, instead, we’re “celebrating” it. It’s a sad day when the West has to look to Muslim world for our salvation, because the West is so completely destroyed beyond salvation by the depraved Jews.

    • Agree: anarchyst
    • Replies: @Hans
    @anon

    Reading about GLSEN (founded by Obama's "Safe School" Czar Kevin Jennings) and their reading list awoke my from my libtardation.

    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2009/12/breaking-obamas-safe-schools-czar-is-promoting-porn-in-the-classroom-kevin-jennings-and-the-glsen-reading-list/

    I post excerpts as often as I can under liberal noses hoping it will have the same effect.

    Jennings was in on "fistgate" and the "little black book" for the kiddies.

    MassResistance does great work - https://www.massresistance.org/

    Fistgate files - https://www.massresistance.org/docs/issues/fistgate/index.html

    Little Black Book - https://www.massresistance.org/docs/issues/black_book/black_book_inside.html

  10. We’re on our way to Huxley’s Brave New World, where there are no parents, all children are conceived in a lab, brought to term on a conveyor, in a decanter of blood-surrogate solution, then educated by the state for the role the state wants them to play.

    • Replies: @goldgettin
    @GrimFandango

    I've been saying this since I read the book 30 yrs. ago.

    We are not on our way, we are there...

    The peoples south of the equator didn't do it.Maybe it's

    the missionaries ?The globohomos ? Good luck ...

  11. The acronym “GOP”, as far as I’m concerned now stands for “Gathering of Pussies”.

    As for the increase of Sexual Perversionism: it’s not gonna get any better, nor GO Away, until enough NORMAL PEOPLE get “militant” regarding Driving It Out Of Our Culture or until The Tribulation in “Revelation” and Jesus’ Return occurs.

  12. Destroying Marriage for a mere 3% of the population is as innocent as legalizing “meh-DIS-sin-all” marijuana – just see how fast it leads to something far more dire … yeah, but D O N ‘ T !

  13. @GrimFandango
    We're on our way to Huxley's Brave New World, where there are no parents, all children are conceived in a lab, brought to term on a conveyor, in a decanter of blood-surrogate solution, then educated by the state for the role the state wants them to play.

    Replies: @goldgettin

    I’ve been saying this since I read the book 30 yrs. ago.

    We are not on our way, we are there…

    The peoples south of the equator didn’t do it.Maybe it’s

    the missionaries ?The globohomos ? Good luck …

  14. @Ilya G Poimandres
    @goldgettin

    Not sure where you are heading here, but for the most part I am concerned about the lot of what you say, but as a rabbit in the headlights of a transmorphing society, I find it best not to fear. The things that are not under your control, after all, are not worth panicking over!

    Replies: @goldgettin

    You are “as a rabbit in the headlights” !!!
    What I am saying, to be clear, is get the —-off the road.
    It’s “not under your control”,”worth panicking over””best not to fear” ?

    It AMAZES me you people have not already been splattered 1000 x.
    Please attempt any escape from your little box,and think about doing
    whatever you can to get to the other side,where the real light emanates.

    Unless you’re correct and it’s futile because of a trans society/cult-ure

    • Replies: @Ilya G Poimandres
    @goldgettin

    I very carefully avoided the T of the LGBT in my first post!

    I have yet to debate this with my gay friends, generally I don't have a right to speak on these issues because I poke too close and too deep imo, but my view is this:

    There is a difference between individual preferences, and solipsistic fantasy.

    A gay person states an 'abnormal' preference, but we agree that preferences are varied, and saying a man likes penis is, if strange, not so different to saying a person likes apples over oranges. We can debate whether this is damaging to society for sure.

    A trans person however, states 'I am not what I most certainly am, in fact, I am the opposite of that'. It is a denial of the lay of the land, reality, of self - but not in any intelligent way. It is not a Buddhist, Islamic, even Christian taming of the Self, it is a shunning of one imminent self, for some make belief feeling.

    The trans community should not be part of the LGB community, because they follow a distinct path to them. One that is only damaging.

    Libertarians have the principle of 'no force, no deceit'.. well, saying 'I am a woman, even though I have XY sex chromosomes', cannot be anything but deceit, at the least. And the force against those that push back against the deceit is obviously felt by us.

    Not that trans people want kids on the whole imo, but I don't think they should be given the right to have them. Self-deception is a bad first step to being a parent - how much easier to deceive another of you have received yourself?!

    LGB? Sure, I can criticise aspects of child raising by them, but it is much more subjective, because 'force and deceit' are not absolutely obvious within their lives. Just horses for courses as the cockneys say!

  15. @Rich
    Allowing homosexuals and genital mutilators to raise children is nothing short of child abuse. Unless this country changes, we're headed for a disaster of biblical proportions. Read the Old Testament sections on Sodom and Gomorrah to see what's coming

    Replies: @h5mind, @follyofwar, @animalogic

    My sister adopted a boy after fostering him for a number of years. At the same time, three of the boy’s siblings were placed from birth with another woman in the same foster program. In spite of being a single mother, she provided a wonderful and loving home for those kids. She and my sister visited often to ensure the siblings could play together and remain close. The woman put her name in for adoption, but in spite of stellar CPS reports and happy, well-adjusted kids, all three were removed from her care and given to a gay couple for immediate adoption. The couple (two guys) cut all visitation rights to the former foster mother, and severely curtailed my sister’s ability to have her son visit with his own siblings. The unfortunate kids placed with these two nuts now show clear signs of emotional abuse, and are not allowed out of their sight for any reason during the few brief visits my sister is allowed. Any complaint or concern would be labeled “homophobic” and runs the risk not only of legal prosecution, but possible loss of her own adopted son to the State. This is not a random aberration, but an established policy.

  16. @anon
    I have often thought gays should not be allowed to adopt. Who knows what these pervs do to their kids? Homosexuality is a perversion and a sickness. The acceptance of homosexuality was the beginning of the end for the West.

    A large proportion of gays are pedophiles, they do this not just to prey on children who are defenseless and naive, but also to grow their population for potential partners down the road. Many young gay men became gay because they were abused as children, and grew up hating themselves and got into substance abuse, or became abusers themselves. I've read that 90% of pedophiles are either gay or bisexual. And this sickness overwhelmingly afflicts Jews. That is why pedophilia and homosexuality is so prevalent in Jew run Hollywood.

    Read the 2006 article by Boston Magazine "Boy Crazy", it'll make your skin crawl. The article talks about a gay man in his 50's or 60's who calls himself "Socrates", who had fostered over 30 boys from foster care and also runaways, gave them booze, drugs then had sexual relations with them. Instead of charging him with statutory rape, the foster care social services continued to send him these boys.

    It's like the former mayor of Seattle, Ed Murray, who finally got exposed after the 4th man came forward about being abused by him as foster care children, all 4 were black. As adults all his victims became substance abusers to numb their pain and shame. The Seattle Times buried the first 3 charges to protect him, but when the 4th man came forward, they decided to print the story because they were afraid of being called racist.

    In a saner world, homosexuality would be eradicated from the face of the earth, instead, we're "celebrating" it. It's a sad day when the West has to look to Muslim world for our salvation, because the West is so completely destroyed beyond salvation by the depraved Jews.

    Replies: @Hans

    Reading about GLSEN (founded by Obama’s “Safe School” Czar Kevin Jennings) and their reading list awoke my from my libtardation.

    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2009/12/breaking-obamas-safe-schools-czar-is-promoting-porn-in-the-classroom-kevin-jennings-and-the-glsen-reading-list/

    I post excerpts as often as I can under liberal noses hoping it will have the same effect.

    Jennings was in on “fistgate” and the “little black book” for the kiddies.

    MassResistance does great work – https://www.massresistance.org/

    Fistgate files – https://www.massresistance.org/docs/issues/fistgate/index.html

    Little Black Book – https://www.massresistance.org/docs/issues/black_book/black_book_inside.html

  17. I will no longer support the Republican “so-called” conservative party, as there are as many snakes, God_haters, and demons in it as the Democratic party. I regret all the funds I sent last year in support of them

  18. Three fathers on the birth certificate? That is worse than silly, it is crazy. Regardless of the feelings of adults, the child’s birth certificate should be an accurate record of the biological father and the biological mother. Those are the people who contributed genetic material to the child. A number of people might contribute socially and emotionally to the child over the years, including teachers, clergy, etc. but they should not be cluttering up the birth certificate and confusing who contributed DNA. The identity of the DNA contributors may be needed in the future re possible diseases and conditions. Those who selfishly insist on being added to the birth certificate for their own ego stroking may be putting the child’s life in danger in the future. Plus some of them will disappear from the child’s life long before adulthood is achieved.

  19. @Rich
    Allowing homosexuals and genital mutilators to raise children is nothing short of child abuse. Unless this country changes, we're headed for a disaster of biblical proportions. Read the Old Testament sections on Sodom and Gomorrah to see what's coming

    Replies: @h5mind, @follyofwar, @animalogic

    “Gay poly throuple makes history, lists 3 dads on a birth certificate.”

    My first thought was, how did those 3 perverts do it? Did they mix their semen together before insemination? It would be the logical conclusion, wouldn’t it?

    Also, Rich, when you speak of “genital mutilators” who commit “child abuse,” I hope you’re including those millions of American parents who get their poor little boys circumcised.

    • Agree: Rich
  20. @goldgettin
    @Ilya G Poimandres

    You are "as a rabbit in the headlights" !!!
    What I am saying, to be clear, is get the ----off the road.
    It's "not under your control","worth panicking over""best not to fear" ?

    It AMAZES me you people have not already been splattered 1000 x.
    Please attempt any escape from your little box,and think about doing
    whatever you can to get to the other side,where the real light emanates.

    Unless you're correct and it's futile because of a trans society/cult-ure

    Replies: @Ilya G Poimandres

    I very carefully avoided the T of the LGBT in my first post!

    I have yet to debate this with my gay friends, generally I don’t have a right to speak on these issues because I poke too close and too deep imo, but my view is this:

    There is a difference between individual preferences, and solipsistic fantasy.

    A gay person states an ‘abnormal’ preference, but we agree that preferences are varied, and saying a man likes penis is, if strange, not so different to saying a person likes apples over oranges. We can debate whether this is damaging to society for sure.

    A trans person however, states ‘I am not what I most certainly am, in fact, I am the opposite of that’. It is a denial of the lay of the land, reality, of self – but not in any intelligent way. It is not a Buddhist, Islamic, even Christian taming of the Self, it is a shunning of one imminent self, for some make belief feeling.

    The trans community should not be part of the LGB community, because they follow a distinct path to them. One that is only damaging.

    Libertarians have the principle of ‘no force, no deceit’.. well, saying ‘I am a woman, even though I have XY sex chromosomes’, cannot be anything but deceit, at the least. And the force against those that push back against the deceit is obviously felt by us.

    Not that trans people want kids on the whole imo, but I don’t think they should be given the right to have them. Self-deception is a bad first step to being a parent – how much easier to deceive another of you have received yourself?!

    LGB? Sure, I can criticise aspects of child raising by them, but it is much more subjective, because ‘force and deceit’ are not absolutely obvious within their lives. Just horses for courses as the cockneys say!

  21. @anarchyst
    There are three factors that have contributed to the destruction of the nuclear family—reliable birth control, abortion and feminism.

    Each of them on their own could not have accomplished what all three of them have wrought.

    Birth control is responsible for divorcing the sex act from the desirability of procreation-the creation of new human life. No longer would procreation be the primary reason for completing the sexual act.

    This also absolved women from much of their responsibility for the consequences of their actions. Finally, women could control their reproductive capability to a much greater degree than was previously possible.

    One could safely argue that reliable birth control was responsible for the feminism movement.

    Abortion, (once seen as murder) has been another factor in the feminism movement. Until recently, there were limits on this horrific procedure, but no more. Abortion has become acceptable until the time of birth and is quite often used as another form of “birth control”...not good.

    Women “want it both ways”. They want to be able to have abortions without any input from the father of the child. As there haven’t been any “immaculate conceptions” for the last 2000 years or so, excluding men from the consequences of their actions has led to the deterioration of civil society and is responsible for the wholesale cheapening of human life, to the point of human destruction. In fact, many men are abortion supporters as this vile act absolves them of responsibility for their actions.

    Feminism is the third factor in the destruction of civil societies.

    As much as feminists would deny it, men and women ARE different and in normal society, are supposed to complement each other.

    In traditional societies, men were “breadwinners”, providing for the family, “bringing home the bacon” and providing protection for a safe and stable household.

    Women “ran the household”, taking care of the husband and children as well as maintaining the stability of the household, establishing routines for children and making sure the household runs smoothly.

    With feminism, women lost a lot more than they gained. How many women now have careers (just because they want to prove themselves) and still have domestic household responsibilities? Feminism placed a “guilt trip” on women, insisting that running a domestic household “was not enough” and one had to have a career in the work world in order to be successful. Feminism stigmatized “stay-at-home” moms and made them feel guilty for not having a career outside the home. Pushing children into “day-care centers” destroyed the home life and stability that children need in their lives.

    These three factors have done much to destabilize and damage civil society...

    Replies: @Trial by Wombat, @animalogic, @Walter Craig

    Once again, our “friends” are our own worst enemies. Accommodation is the downfall of political parties and crumbling civilizations.

    Love you Michelle, but “Sacred Two Party System Inc.” has no friends, only servile vassals. We are largely ignoring the fact that our Junta duopoly votes their own pensions and primacy. Until that is addressed, we are simply patching the potholes of corruption.

    There are three factors that have contributed to the destruction of the nuclear family—reliable birth control, abortion and feminism.

    You need to adjust your aim, Apollo Far Striker.

    The decay of the nuclear family is simply a side-effect of the destruction of actual cultures. Suburbia, Generations like Boomer / Millenial / Gen X are not a culture, they are grasping attempts at defining peoples’ long since stripped of all intrinsic culture.

    How many Americans know that they originate from a particular town or county, in which their own ancestor founded the place, the local origin stories concern their own families, and the people unite around something affirmatively instead of being coached by mass media simply to opposed the most outlandish manifestations of other culture-less, commercially defined peoples?

    The Federalism of the so-called Founders was in fact the extirpation of allegiance to one another beyond materialism, corporatism and accumulation. The Big Lie of the Federalists was that they intended to limit the powers of the central state.

    Like their other tactics, this was a complete lie. What they were not able to force through at the pre-rigged convention, they later over-layed Judicially, with their own co-conspirators on the public payroll, inventing “Implied Powers”.

    Strangling the States into mere “Corporations”, as promised by Hamilton, also degenerated the people of those states into undifferentiated, interchangeable worker units and consumers.

    Undifferentiated worker units are ideal for tax collection purposes, but they dont know where they came from, who they are, why they exist, or what purpose they serve. Those who dont know who they are can be led anyplace that you want to take them to.

    • Agree: animalogic
  22. @anarchyst
    There are three factors that have contributed to the destruction of the nuclear family—reliable birth control, abortion and feminism.

    Each of them on their own could not have accomplished what all three of them have wrought.

    Birth control is responsible for divorcing the sex act from the desirability of procreation-the creation of new human life. No longer would procreation be the primary reason for completing the sexual act.

    This also absolved women from much of their responsibility for the consequences of their actions. Finally, women could control their reproductive capability to a much greater degree than was previously possible.

    One could safely argue that reliable birth control was responsible for the feminism movement.

    Abortion, (once seen as murder) has been another factor in the feminism movement. Until recently, there were limits on this horrific procedure, but no more. Abortion has become acceptable until the time of birth and is quite often used as another form of “birth control”...not good.

    Women “want it both ways”. They want to be able to have abortions without any input from the father of the child. As there haven’t been any “immaculate conceptions” for the last 2000 years or so, excluding men from the consequences of their actions has led to the deterioration of civil society and is responsible for the wholesale cheapening of human life, to the point of human destruction. In fact, many men are abortion supporters as this vile act absolves them of responsibility for their actions.

    Feminism is the third factor in the destruction of civil societies.

    As much as feminists would deny it, men and women ARE different and in normal society, are supposed to complement each other.

    In traditional societies, men were “breadwinners”, providing for the family, “bringing home the bacon” and providing protection for a safe and stable household.

    Women “ran the household”, taking care of the husband and children as well as maintaining the stability of the household, establishing routines for children and making sure the household runs smoothly.

    With feminism, women lost a lot more than they gained. How many women now have careers (just because they want to prove themselves) and still have domestic household responsibilities? Feminism placed a “guilt trip” on women, insisting that running a domestic household “was not enough” and one had to have a career in the work world in order to be successful. Feminism stigmatized “stay-at-home” moms and made them feel guilty for not having a career outside the home. Pushing children into “day-care centers” destroyed the home life and stability that children need in their lives.

    These three factors have done much to destabilize and damage civil society...

    Replies: @Trial by Wombat, @animalogic, @Walter Craig

    Agree with most of what you say.
    But let’s go back to the 70’s — 2 things happen: women increasely enter & stay in the work force.
    Then wages slowly begin to stagnate — they do NOT keep up with (as they did for 30 odd years) productivity increases.
    Thus, the necessity of both parents working.
    So contraception, abortion & feminism.
    Now where is the causation, where the correlation?
    Did the Oligarchs exploit these emerging social factors to slowly, imperceptibly alter the class make up of society? (ie in the US, now, 10% have 70% of the wealth etc etc).
    And were working people suckers to not see their vicious stratagy in its embryo stage?

    • Replies: @anarchyst
    @animalogic

    You are correct. Wages did not keep up with the productivity gains that were realized by women in the workforce.
    Yes, the oligarchs exploited these social factors for their own personal gain.
    Excellent points. Thanks.

  23. @Rich
    Allowing homosexuals and genital mutilators to raise children is nothing short of child abuse. Unless this country changes, we're headed for a disaster of biblical proportions. Read the Old Testament sections on Sodom and Gomorrah to see what's coming

    Replies: @h5mind, @follyofwar, @animalogic

    “Read the Old Testament sections on Sodom and Gomorrah to see what’s coming”
    Yes, if that nasty Jewish deity is actually around we would be in deep shit.
    Here’s hoping NOT.

    • Replies: @Rich
    @animalogic

    Nasty? Nonsense. If you can't separate those who call themselves "Jews" but violate every law God has laid down, from good people, then you're just not that swift. Do you think it's healthy for humans to live degenerate lifestyles? You may not be one of those chosen to accept God, but even an atheist should be able to see that the rectum isn't a sexual organ, that men shouldn't be cutting off their genitals and prancing around like ladies, that children shouldn't be force fed this degenerate nonsense. If you can't see that, you're part of the problem. Every nation that has gone down this deviant path, has been destroyed. Every single one.

    Replies: @animalogic

  24. @animalogic
    @anarchyst

    Agree with most of what you say.
    But let's go back to the 70's -- 2 things happen: women increasely enter & stay in the work force.
    Then wages slowly begin to stagnate -- they do NOT keep up with (as they did for 30 odd years) productivity increases.
    Thus, the necessity of both parents working.
    So contraception, abortion & feminism.
    Now where is the causation, where the correlation?
    Did the Oligarchs exploit these emerging social factors to slowly, imperceptibly alter the class make up of society? (ie in the US, now, 10% have 70% of the wealth etc etc).
    And were working people suckers to not see their vicious stratagy in its embryo stage?

    Replies: @anarchyst

    You are correct. Wages did not keep up with the productivity gains that were realized by women in the workforce.
    Yes, the oligarchs exploited these social factors for their own personal gain.
    Excellent points. Thanks.

  25. @animalogic
    @Rich

    "Read the Old Testament sections on Sodom and Gomorrah to see what’s coming"
    Yes, if that nasty Jewish deity is actually around we would be in deep shit.
    Here's hoping NOT.

    Replies: @Rich

    Nasty? Nonsense. If you can’t separate those who call themselves “Jews” but violate every law God has laid down, from good people, then you’re just not that swift. Do you think it’s healthy for humans to live degenerate lifestyles? You may not be one of those chosen to accept God, but even an atheist should be able to see that the rectum isn’t a sexual organ, that men shouldn’t be cutting off their genitals and prancing around like ladies, that children shouldn’t be force fed this degenerate nonsense. If you can’t see that, you’re part of the problem. Every nation that has gone down this deviant path, has been destroyed. Every single one.

    • Replies: @animalogic
    @Rich

    Contempt for the Judge doesn't mean sympathy for the sin.
    And re your sins of the flesh? You might like to investigate the ideas of cause & effect or disease & symptom.

    Replies: @Rich

  26. @Rich
    @animalogic

    Nasty? Nonsense. If you can't separate those who call themselves "Jews" but violate every law God has laid down, from good people, then you're just not that swift. Do you think it's healthy for humans to live degenerate lifestyles? You may not be one of those chosen to accept God, but even an atheist should be able to see that the rectum isn't a sexual organ, that men shouldn't be cutting off their genitals and prancing around like ladies, that children shouldn't be force fed this degenerate nonsense. If you can't see that, you're part of the problem. Every nation that has gone down this deviant path, has been destroyed. Every single one.

    Replies: @animalogic

    Contempt for the Judge doesn’t mean sympathy for the sin.
    And re your sins of the flesh? You might like to investigate the ideas of cause & effect or disease & symptom.

    • Replies: @Rich
    @animalogic

    If you have no sympathy for the sin, why attack those with whom you agree because they find solace, and hope, in the Judge?

    Replies: @animalogic

  27. @animalogic
    @Rich

    Contempt for the Judge doesn't mean sympathy for the sin.
    And re your sins of the flesh? You might like to investigate the ideas of cause & effect or disease & symptom.

    Replies: @Rich

    If you have no sympathy for the sin, why attack those with whom you agree because they find solace, and hope, in the Judge?

    • Replies: @animalogic
    @Rich

    To be completely accurate I attacked the belief not the believer.
    I have no problem with private beliefs (I would not want to affect any hope or solace of any person -- life is hard enough) -- but beliefs become "fair game" when they want to influence mass public belief & behavior.
    References to Sodom & Gomorrah are of questionable utility -- in my opinion (& that's merely my opinion).

    Replies: @Rich

  28. @Rich
    @animalogic

    If you have no sympathy for the sin, why attack those with whom you agree because they find solace, and hope, in the Judge?

    Replies: @animalogic

    To be completely accurate I attacked the belief not the believer.
    I have no problem with private beliefs (I would not want to affect any hope or solace of any person — life is hard enough) — but beliefs become “fair game” when they want to influence mass public belief & behavior.
    References to Sodom & Gomorrah are of questionable utility — in my opinion (& that’s merely my opinion).

    • Replies: @Rich
    @animalogic

    If my agreement with you comes from the spiritual, if the Church's teachings about Christ, result in a better, more civil society, why is that a problem? Should only personal beliefs be allowed to influence discourse? Marx or Adam Smith are okay, but St Augustine or St John are out? We all arrive at our conclusions from different beginnings, if we arrive at the same place, why does it matter whether I quote Solomon or Hobbes? I can understand opposition to a theocracy, but the Christian Faith has been one of the biggest influences in European and World history for a very long time. Knee jerk opposition because of "religion" only divides more an already divided people.

  29. @animalogic
    @Rich

    To be completely accurate I attacked the belief not the believer.
    I have no problem with private beliefs (I would not want to affect any hope or solace of any person -- life is hard enough) -- but beliefs become "fair game" when they want to influence mass public belief & behavior.
    References to Sodom & Gomorrah are of questionable utility -- in my opinion (& that's merely my opinion).

    Replies: @Rich

    If my agreement with you comes from the spiritual, if the Church’s teachings about Christ, result in a better, more civil society, why is that a problem? Should only personal beliefs be allowed to influence discourse? Marx or Adam Smith are okay, but St Augustine or St John are out? We all arrive at our conclusions from different beginnings, if we arrive at the same place, why does it matter whether I quote Solomon or Hobbes? I can understand opposition to a theocracy, but the Christian Faith has been one of the biggest influences in European and World history for a very long time. Knee jerk opposition because of “religion” only divides more an already divided people.

  30. @anarchyst
    There are three factors that have contributed to the destruction of the nuclear family—reliable birth control, abortion and feminism.

    Each of them on their own could not have accomplished what all three of them have wrought.

    Birth control is responsible for divorcing the sex act from the desirability of procreation-the creation of new human life. No longer would procreation be the primary reason for completing the sexual act.

    This also absolved women from much of their responsibility for the consequences of their actions. Finally, women could control their reproductive capability to a much greater degree than was previously possible.

    One could safely argue that reliable birth control was responsible for the feminism movement.

    Abortion, (once seen as murder) has been another factor in the feminism movement. Until recently, there were limits on this horrific procedure, but no more. Abortion has become acceptable until the time of birth and is quite often used as another form of “birth control”...not good.

    Women “want it both ways”. They want to be able to have abortions without any input from the father of the child. As there haven’t been any “immaculate conceptions” for the last 2000 years or so, excluding men from the consequences of their actions has led to the deterioration of civil society and is responsible for the wholesale cheapening of human life, to the point of human destruction. In fact, many men are abortion supporters as this vile act absolves them of responsibility for their actions.

    Feminism is the third factor in the destruction of civil societies.

    As much as feminists would deny it, men and women ARE different and in normal society, are supposed to complement each other.

    In traditional societies, men were “breadwinners”, providing for the family, “bringing home the bacon” and providing protection for a safe and stable household.

    Women “ran the household”, taking care of the husband and children as well as maintaining the stability of the household, establishing routines for children and making sure the household runs smoothly.

    With feminism, women lost a lot more than they gained. How many women now have careers (just because they want to prove themselves) and still have domestic household responsibilities? Feminism placed a “guilt trip” on women, insisting that running a domestic household “was not enough” and one had to have a career in the work world in order to be successful. Feminism stigmatized “stay-at-home” moms and made them feel guilty for not having a career outside the home. Pushing children into “day-care centers” destroyed the home life and stability that children need in their lives.

    These three factors have done much to destabilize and damage civil society...

    Replies: @Trial by Wombat, @animalogic, @Walter Craig

    Nice post.

    But you confused the Immaculate Conception with the Virginal Conception. The Immaculate Conception refers to the dogma that Mary’s soul was infused into her without any sin – that she was created in a state similar to the way Adam and Eve were created with respect to sin before they fell. Many of the Fathers of the Church referred to Mary as the New Eve, by the way, and the idea is implicit in the New Testament with Jesus referring to Mary as “Woman” at the wedding at Cana and from the cross according to John’s Gospel. “Woman” was not an unusual expression but it was quite unusual from a son to his mother.

    A virginal conception refers to conceiving without the sexual intercourse.

Comments are closed.

Subscribe to All Michelle Malkin Comments via RSS
PastClassics
Becker update V1.3.2
The JFK Assassination and the 9/11 Attacks?