The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewMichelle Malkin Archive
Prosecutorial Zeal (Updated with a Correction)
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

I’m sure liberals will be buzzing about this Washington Post story, which purports to show the Bush administration has overstated the number of successful terrorism prosecutions.

Two leading Bush critics who might feel sorely tempted to gloat are war-on-terror opponents New York Times columnist Paul Krugman and Georgetown law professor David Cole. Just one teeny, tiny problem: both have falsely asserted that there have been no successful terrorism prosecutions at all since 9/11. A leading Bush critic who might feel sorely tempted to gloat is war-on-terror opponent New York Times columnist Paul Krugman. Just one teeny, tiny problem: he has falsely asserted that there have been no successful terrorism prosecutions at all since 9/11.

Krugman wrote on May 11, 2004:

After two and a half years, during which he arrested and secretly detained more than a thousand people, Mr. Ashcroft has yet to convict any actual terrorists. (Look at the actual trials of what Dahlia Lithwick of Slate calls “disaffected bozos who watch cheesy training videos,” and you’ll see what I mean.)

He repeated that allegation on June 15, 2004:

First, there’s the absence of any major successful prosecutions. The one set of convictions that seemed fairly significant–that of the “Detroit 3”– appears to be collapsing over accusations of prosecutorial misconduct.

Cole argued in The Nation last fall:

With the latest Detroit convictions overturned, Ashcroft has not convicted a single person of terrorism since 9/11.

According to the Post story, 39 people–not zero–have been convicted of crimes related to terrorism or national security.

Neither Cole nor Krugman has corrected their false allegations. Too bad they won’t be able to join in all the Bush-bashing fun. Krugman has not corrected his false allegation. Too bad he won’t be able to join in on the Bush-bashing fun.

Correction, 6/13: Why are we back in Iraq? points out that the quote I attributed to Cole was actually added by AlterNet. I apologize for my error and retract what I wrote about Cole (see edits above). (I also added links to Krugman’s columns and expanded the quoted excerpt from his May 11 column.)

(Republished from MichelleMalkin.com by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: Ideology • Tags: Paul Krugman 
PastClassics
The unspoken statistical reality of urban crime over the last quarter century.
Which superpower is more threatened by its “extractive elites”?
How a Young Syndicate Lawyer from Chicago Earned a Fortune Looting the Property of the Japanese-Americans, then Lived...
Becker update V1.3.2