The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewMichelle Malkin Archive
Is Biden-Loving Comcast Meddling in Loomer's Campaign?
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

There’s bad blood between President Donald Trump and Comcast. It’s no secret.

The commander in chief nicknamed the telecom giant “Concast” for presiding over incessantly skewed media coverage of his campaign and administration. Comcast is the parent company of NBC News and MSNBC, whose notorious fake news media execs are “trying to poison the mind of the American voter” in President Trump’s view. On Twitter, he has called on supporters to drop the cable conglomerate for its “terrible service” and “go to a good provider” instead.

For their part, top Comcast execs and employees have forked over a whopping $213,974 in contributions to the Biden for President campaign. The Democratic presidential candidate held his first mega-fundraiser last April at the Philadelphia home of Comcast executive David Cohen, who oversees the firm’s corporate lobbying (which totaled more than $13 million last year). The very next day, after Cohen’s posh kickoff (which raked in more than $500,000), Comcast-owned NBC News communications director T.J. Ducklo left his position to serve as Biden’s national press secretary.

Against that backdrop, let us now consider what happened this week to Laura Loomer, the Trump-supporting conservative investigative journalist and fierce critic of big tech bias who is the GOP front-runner in Florida’s 21st congressional district — home to Mar-A-Lago and the Trumps’ official legal residence since last fall. If Loomer prevails in her Aug. 18 primary as widely expected, she will face four-term incumbent Democratic Rep. Lois Frankel and win an extraordinary opportunity to turn Trump’s long-blue home district red.

On Monday, Loomer discovered that Xfinity/Comcast had blocked voters from receiving her campaign texts and emails. Customers instead received an ominous warning that read: “Hold On! We blocked access” to Loomer’s messages because they were alleged to pose a threat to users’ devices “or contain dangerous content.”

The company claims it was a “technical” glitch. One corporate spokesman in charge of engineering issues told me Monday afternoon that “the security alert had nothing to do with the content or sender of any communication.” Instead, he blamed “widely used third-party threat-intelligence services” for flagging Loomer’s texting provider.

When I asked which third-party intelligence services Comcast uses to determine what is and isn’t “dangerous,” the company would not specify. When I asked what new information led to the security red flag, the company could not or would not say, but suggested that a “phishing” scheme may have led to the warning. Curiously, Comcast decided in the wake of Loomer’s whistleblowing that it would override the third-party threat-intelligence services and generously “fix” and “resolve” the issue by unblocking her messages.

ORDER IT NOW

Here’s the thing: Loomer’s campaign has used the same texting provider all year without any problems until now. What changed? One spokesman shrugged the question off: “I don’t know why the timing issue is what it is,” he told me. Another D.C.-based Comcast communications official blithely dismissed any suggestion of political interference, emphasizing to me that Loomer “hasn’t won her primary yet” and that these types of incidents have happened before. When I asked for any other example of such glitches affecting political campaigns, she came up empty.

The posture of disinterest is unconvincing. It’s hard to accept the curious technical glitch that blocked Loomer from voters at a critical juncture in her high-profile upstart campaign — just one week before primary Election Day — at face value coming from a company that not only sides so overwhelmingly with Biden but has donated nearly $15,000 to Rep. Frankel (who is also a Comcast stockholder) since 2012.

The curious technical glitch robbing Loomer temporarily of her ability to communicate came just as her campaign was endorsed by GOP Rep. Matt Gaetz of Florida and former Nixon aide and veteran GOP operative Roger Stone. The technical system also just happened to glitch as Loomer made national news for her astonishing fund-raising haul — more than $1.1 million this cycle, despite being the most-banned woman in America, if not the planet.

You may recall that in 2018, the 27-year-old independent reporter was suspended permanently from Twitter (where she had built up a formidable following of more than 250,000 users) during the crucial midterm election season for blasting sharia-adherent Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn. Paypal, Instagram, TeeSpring, Facebook, Uber, Uber Eats, Lyft, Venmo, GoFundMe and Medium all followed suit as Loomer exposed systemic tech censorship. China’s got nothing on America’s big tech overlords when it comes to silencing dissent and criticism.

Why is Loomer “dangerous”? It’s because she has almost singlehandedly unmasked Silicon Valley’s social credit system and its anti-American, free speech-squelching collaborators led by the Southern Poverty Law Center, Anti-Defamation League and the Council on Islamic-American Relations. She is the canary in the de-platforming coal mine. Her enemies are President Trump’s enemies, who’ve done everything in their coordinated power to crush him.

It strains credulity not to believe the corporate dirty tricksters and social justice handmaidens are doing everything between now and Aug. 18 — including, yes, election meddling—to stop Laura Loomer from disrupting the powers that be.

Question the timing? Hell, yes.

Michelle Malkin’s email address is [email protected] To find out more about Michelle Malkin and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.

 
Hide 16 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. It’s an Information War, and Alex Jones sure got it right with his site name, “Infowars”. It’s not just a war WITH information as the weapons, but against some information and for other information. The weapon is Big-Biz monopoly with US Feral Government complicity.

    Michelle, it’s one thing that we have the silencing of dissent and criticism, at least within the near-monopoly forms of communication that Americans choose to use. China is one step ahead of us. Peak Stupidity has a (very light on details) post on China’s slide into Book of Revelation level madness from information obtained by my China sources. It’s the smart phones upon which most of the buying and selling is being done (only old codgers out in the sticks keep the red Mao 100’s under the mattresses), and now the contact tracing and color-coded health scores with the Kung Flu as the excuse.

    The control of information is just the beginning. We’d better learn from modern day China, if we don’t want the End Times coming a lot sooner than we are ready for!

  2. I had the same thing happen some months ago now when attempting to access Michelle’s site so that I could share an article she wrote, “…warning: the site you are attempting to access…”. And yep, xfinity/comcast(concast) is my provider. WAS may now be more accurate now that I’ve been armed with this knowledge although…at&t is my only other option in these parts(NW Indianapolis) and they’re as, ahem, restrictive. Bottom line? All of these “providers” wish to conceal the truth from folks who refuse to be sheep being led to slaughter, those of us who bother to spend time digging for the real truth rather than their “truth”/ lies.

  3. anonymous[245] • Disclaimer says:

    As I said under her previous column, keep an eye on Mrs. Malkin — she’s an unrepentant Neocon. She helped to monger the wars begun during the Cheney Administration, praising people like John Bolton. She’s since rebranded as an anti-Invite the World and family values type, never even typing “Bolton” during his last White House gig. But she has never renounced her support for Invading the World, and smeared China in her first couple columns here at Unz Review.

    So with that in mind, where’s the evidence for including the Council on Islamic-American Relations in this passage?

    Why is Loomer “dangerous”? It’s because she has almost singlehandedly unmasked Silicon Valley’s social credit system and its anti-American, free speech-squelching collaborators led by the Southern Poverty Law Center, Anti-Defamation League and the Council on Islamic-American Relations. She is the canary in the de-platforming coal mine. Her enemies are President Trump’s enemies, who’ve done everything in their coordinated power to crush him.

    Tell us also, Mrs. Malkin, what you think Uncle Sam should be doing about Venezuela, Russia, Iran, and China.

    • Replies: @Anon
    @anonymous

    The neocons will love the next U.S. President

    https://twitter.com/MaxBlumenthal/status/1145575260810633221?s=20

    , @HappyBlueBreakfasts
    @anonymous

    Indeed. It's no surprise that Malkin would show solidarity for a disingenuous grifter (and pretend conservative) like Laura Loomer, too.

  4. @anonymous
    As I said under her previous column, keep an eye on Mrs. Malkin -- she's an unrepentant Neocon. She helped to monger the wars begun during the Cheney Administration, praising people like John Bolton. She's since rebranded as an anti-Invite the World and family values type, never even typing "Bolton" during his last White House gig. But she has never renounced her support for Invading the World, and smeared China in her first couple columns here at Unz Review.

    So with that in mind, where's the evidence for including the Council on Islamic-American Relations in this passage?

    Why is Loomer “dangerous”? It’s because she has almost singlehandedly unmasked Silicon Valley’s social credit system and its anti-American, free speech-squelching collaborators led by the Southern Poverty Law Center, Anti-Defamation League and the Council on Islamic-American Relations. She is the canary in the de-platforming coal mine. Her enemies are President Trump’s enemies, who’ve done everything in their coordinated power to crush him.
     
    Tell us also, Mrs. Malkin, what you think Uncle Sam should be doing about Venezuela, Russia, Iran, and China.

    Replies: @Anon, @HappyBlueBreakfasts

    The neocons will love the next U.S. President

  5. Laura Loomer is a little on the Zionist side for my tastes. But it is horrifying how she is unpersoned and banned from everything, including all major social media platforms, banks and even Comcast.

    Everyone who is banned really needs to work together, regardless of whether you are a Zionist or an anti-Zionist. We cannot afford that kind of in-fighting to prevent solidarity among the banned. So I am glad that Michelle Malkin is standing up for Laura Loomer on the principle of free speech.

    • Agree: Achmed E. Newman
  6. (((Laura Loomer))), like

    shabbatz goy Drumpf,

    is a Zionist tool. Next

    she’ll be claiming someone slashed her tires. Wait,

    she already did that.

  7. Laura Loomer’s campaign is being bankrolled by Bernie Marcus. Comcast is under Tribal management with guys like Executive VP David Cohen.

    Loomer has confirmed her Zionist commitments many times over including her recent Talmudry on how she can defend anti-BDS legislation despite being a “free speech advocate.”

    It’s all one big happy family. Any supposed “in-fighting” here is strictly for show. At most, it’s just right-wing Jignats haggling with left-wing Optics-Tribe over how best to purchase the rest of America’s soul and how fast.

    On David Cohen, from his Wiki:

    “The Pennsylvania Report named him to the 2003 “The Pennsylvania Report Power 75” list of influential figures in Pennsylvania politics, noting that “No one–in or out of government–is closer to Ed Rendell than Cohen. No major policy decision, personnel, political or other decision will be made without his imprimatur or veto.”

  8. @anonymous
    As I said under her previous column, keep an eye on Mrs. Malkin -- she's an unrepentant Neocon. She helped to monger the wars begun during the Cheney Administration, praising people like John Bolton. She's since rebranded as an anti-Invite the World and family values type, never even typing "Bolton" during his last White House gig. But she has never renounced her support for Invading the World, and smeared China in her first couple columns here at Unz Review.

    So with that in mind, where's the evidence for including the Council on Islamic-American Relations in this passage?

    Why is Loomer “dangerous”? It’s because she has almost singlehandedly unmasked Silicon Valley’s social credit system and its anti-American, free speech-squelching collaborators led by the Southern Poverty Law Center, Anti-Defamation League and the Council on Islamic-American Relations. She is the canary in the de-platforming coal mine. Her enemies are President Trump’s enemies, who’ve done everything in their coordinated power to crush him.
     
    Tell us also, Mrs. Malkin, what you think Uncle Sam should be doing about Venezuela, Russia, Iran, and China.

    Replies: @Anon, @HappyBlueBreakfasts

    Indeed. It’s no surprise that Malkin would show solidarity for a disingenuous grifter (and pretend conservative) like Laura Loomer, too.

  9. Dear Michele Malkin you once said the Koch Brothers hired illegal immigrants the only Koch family owned foods Corporation in Alabama and Mississippi is a store grocery store that hires illegals do your home work they are not part of American for Prosperity or Charles or David Koch Industries
    Carole

  10. O/T but please make note of this on your twitter, Michelle

    Remember before there was Cannon Hinnant, there was Kevin Shifflett

    https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/5078335/kevin-benjamin-shifflett

    His murder also had a near media blackout with the typical, faux head scratching (“what could possibly be the motive? hmm..so hard to figure out…”).

    Needless to say, whites can and should have a virtual wall of #RememberTheirNames for all the whites (esp women and children) murdered by blacks.

  11. Can’t post the link to FB cause its content is abusive. Give me a break….

  12. Loomer vs Frankel.
    Yid vs Yid.

    I’ll write-in Ilhan Omar

  13. Notice how Michelle Malkin refers to Laura Loomer as “the most-banned woman in America, if not the planet” [italics added]. Malkin’s use of “woman,” as opposed to “person,” allows her to avoid mentioning Andrew Anglin, who unlike Loomer sure is not going to get any funds from Bernard Marcus.

  14. Well well – Facebook says that posting this article “violates their community standards” without any explanation. Of course I told them that they know DAMN WELL why they are blocking this article. I have never seen such blatant assaults on our freedoms in my lifetime. If this keeps up there is only one alternative — and I cannot say what that might be …

  15. I recommend not using Google (search with DuckDuckGo). Maintain your sanity by avoiding Facebook and Twitter. As for me, I start every day by going to https://www.lucianne.com/ after skimming my print edition of the Wall Street Journal.

  16. I read recently that Concast is partially owned by the ChiComs. Is this veracious?

    We watch Bret Baier and Lester Holt to get both sides of the story. It is stunning the major stories that receive no mention on NBC. She also watches the NBC morning program. On the rare occasion when I join her, I am stunned by the dearth on white males. Their absence is a stain on the networks devotion to diversity.

Comments are closed.

Subscribe to All Michelle Malkin Comments via RSS
PastClassics
The “war hero” candidate buried information about POWs left behind in Vietnam.
Are elite university admissions based on meritocracy and diversity as claimed?
Our Reigning Political Puppets, Dancing to Invisible Strings