The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewMichelle Malkin Archive
Fists of Furry
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Don’t believe the pervert media. Reuters, NBC News, entertainer John Oliver and Denver 9News zealot Kyle Clark all want you to believe that parents nationwide are simply imagining an infestation of “furries” (children dressing up and identifying as animals) in their public schools. The gaslighting campaign is so toxically incandescent that you can see the glow from a SpaceX rocket.

Let me assure you: You are not crazy. They are.

First, let’s review the headlines over the past week.

Here’s Reuters on Oct. 18:

“Fact Check — No evidence of schools accommodating ‘furries’ with litter boxes.”

Here’s NBC News on Oct. 14 in a piece by whopping four-reporter “misinformation” police squad:

“How an urban myth about litter boxes in schools became a GOP talking point.”

Over the weekend, comedian John Oliver dismissed the parental sound and fury over furries as “humiliating nonsense” and mocked conservative state legislators as “heartbreakingly stupid” for amplifying constituents’ concerns.

Denver 9News conservative-bashing zealot Kyle Clark two weeks ago purported to debunk the furry frenzy by simply regurgitating several Colorado school districts’ blanket denials, including Jefferson County, which told the news station: “There is absolutely no truth to this claim. There are no litter boxes in our buildings and students are not allowed to come to school in costume.”

That deceitful stock answer was authored by communications executive director Kimberly Eloe; shared with district leaders for “awareness and alignment” (translation: marching orders and echo chamber formation); and sent to multiple news outlets inquiring about the anthropomorphic animal contagion. 9News executive producer Nathan Higgins revealed his intentions to neuter the controversy when he accused parents of spreading a “conspiracy theory” in his inquiry to the Jeffco schools’ PR team seeking any “substantiated or specific instances or claims of furries in schools.”

Here is the whole truth, which the pervert media labels “misinformation” because truly informed nuclear families threaten The Great Parental Replacement agenda:

A vigilant group of parents and kids in Jefferson County have been hounding school officials about the bizarre presence of “furries” in Colorado middle schools and high schools since February 2022. This is not a “GOP talking point” or an election-season ploy. This is not a joke or satire. It’s real, it’s disruptive, and it’s sick. Lindsay Datko and a team of eight citizen activists with Jeffco Kids First file Colorado Open Records Act requests to expose the lies and secrets driving wedges between parents and their children — not just on curriculum indoctrination, but on all matters pertaining to family autonomy, health and safety.

“We leave no stone unturned,” Datko told me. And that’s why the pervert media and their fellow travelers believe she and her group must be smeared and destroyed.

ORDER IT NOW

On Oct. 13, the county school district’s records custodian coughed up a 36-page document filled with emails between parents, school officials and other parties chronicling the need for costumed critter control. I obtained and verified the hair-raising trove. Back in February, a parent had informed JeffCo’s “chief student success officer” Matt Palaoro about rabid furries at Wayne Carle Middle School who wore “cat/dog ears, tails, fur gloves, collars, and leashes” while threatening peers who objected. The parent’s son reported that the costumed students would “hiss, bark, scratch, and meow” at students who objected to the behavior.

Another child reported that the herd of furries would “walk on all 4s in the hallway” and “also eat with their face in their food.”


Back in March, parents at Drake Middle School in Jeffco met with principal Melinda Feir to alert her of the classroom disruptions caused by the human pet parade.

In April, another parent reported furry sightings at Dakota Ridge High School.

In August, Drake Middle School updated its dress code specifically to ban animal ears and tails. (The public records show that litter boxes were never mentioned; it was Datko’s group that discovered they were being used during lockdowns.)

Despite the long electronic trail of complaints and alarms, left-wing activist and Colorado Times Recorder propagandist Heidi Beedle slammed GOP gubernatorial candidate Heidi Ganahl in a hit piece titled “Ganahl Falsely Claims that Kids Are ‘Identifying as Cats … All Over Colorado; Schools Are Tolerating It.'” What Beedle and the publication fail to disclose is that Beedle is — not making this up — an apologist for furries who penned a 2,000-plus word celebration of the “oft-misunderstood community” in 2018 for the Colorado Springs Independent. She highlighted a 16-year-old “wolfdog” named “Avedis” whose parents drive him to “all-ages meetups” and quoted “Chip,” a “DenFur” convention staffer who explained that “(w)hile furry is not an exclusively LGBTQ phenomenon, it skews pretty gay due to its obvious LGBTQ appeal.”

“Furry allows you to try out different identities,” the wolfman told Beedle. “If you’re not sure if you’re gay, you can roleplay as a gay character. If you’re not sure if you’re trans, you can roleplay as a different gender. Furry allows you to experiment.”

Rolling Stone chronicled the spread of this “long-misunderstood subculture” (gee, that sounds familiar) to young TikTok viewers in 2019. Dr. Cynthia Morton, a high school counselor, blogged on “Making a Safe Place for Students Who Identify as Furries, Therians, and Otherkins” back in 2018.

Now that parents are blowing the whistle on this filthy infiltration, gaslighters pretend we’re the ones with mental illness and demand that families doxx their own children instead of holding public safety menaces in the schools accountable for their “diversity” perversity.

Never forget: You are not crazy. They are.

Michelle Malkin’s email address is MichelleMalkinInvestiga[email protected]

 
Hide 25 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. This commentary sounded crazy–and it is. I googled the topic and across the country there are articles debunking the furry story. What is not crazy is homophobic and anti-public school Republicans are using a “furry” narrative to attack public schools and the LGBTQ communities generally. This is just another way to impose the Republican anti-gay agenda.

    Obviously the most basic thing–parents control how their kids dress for school. Schools don’t make kids into “furry.” Schools are not mandating kids be furries. If kids like to wear furry costumes, that is entirely on the parents. Like most so called bad things kids do, the parents are entirely to blame.

    It is time for Republicans who love to preach personal responsibility to take a step back and begin by blaming parents for what kids do, and why kids fail.

    • Replies: @Bee-Mused
    @Harry Huntington

    If people had been more openly disapproving decades ago of the perverse lifestyles that are so flagrant these days, our country/society would not be the MESS it now is. The "gay" (GEI) lifestyle is not a healthy way of being, and no amount of protesting/complaining/defending it will change that. We need to be more assertive and frank about the health risks, physical and emotional and social, in such a lifestyle. Hopefully, the tide is turning! You and your ilk can get all huffy and insulted and stressed about it, but the fact is: "The (gay/gei) life" is no life at all, and it engenders much unhappiness and unhealthiness, not just for the particular person involved but for everyone in his life as well. End of story.

    , @Legba
    @Harry Huntington

    Sure you googled the topic, and that's great, but what does Snopes have to say?

    , @Joe Paluka
    @Harry Huntington

    Are you a furry or a teacher or both?

    , @Observator
    @Harry Huntington

    This seems to be an unforeseen consequence of the legalization of marijuana: extreme paranoia coupled with a bizarre detachment from reality, this time among "conservatives" instead of crazy stoned-out hippies. Live long enough, you get to see the darnedest things, whew.

  2. So there really are gangs of furry kids allowed to behave as animals in public schools, but the cat box idea is “cognitive infiltration” thrown in to smear parents who object.

    • Replies: @Anonymo8s
    @Red Pill Angel


    the cat box idea is “cognitive infiltration” thrown in to smear parents who object.
     
    Not any more. I have reports of a cat box used by a furry kid one town to my North, and I'm out in the boonies where you'd expect the local School Board to be less infiltrated by the Left. The school is suspending any kids that say the furry kid is doing something wrong.
    Same school that has the cat box also has a reserved parking place for police response right next to the main entrance.
  3. This is one sick country. SMOD, where are you?

  4. I get the impression there are disturbingly large numbers of people in USA these days who are quite out of touch with REALITY and are living mostly in some FANTASY REALM. This does not bode well for America. I don’t understand how this has happened or why, but I hope some sort of REALITY MODE can set in soon, before we lose the country entirely. It doesn’t look good at this point. :((

  5. @Harry Huntington
    This commentary sounded crazy--and it is. I googled the topic and across the country there are articles debunking the furry story. What is not crazy is homophobic and anti-public school Republicans are using a "furry" narrative to attack public schools and the LGBTQ communities generally. This is just another way to impose the Republican anti-gay agenda.

    Obviously the most basic thing--parents control how their kids dress for school. Schools don't make kids into "furry." Schools are not mandating kids be furries. If kids like to wear furry costumes, that is entirely on the parents. Like most so called bad things kids do, the parents are entirely to blame.

    It is time for Republicans who love to preach personal responsibility to take a step back and begin by blaming parents for what kids do, and why kids fail.

    Replies: @Bee-Mused, @Legba, @Joe Paluka, @Observator

    If people had been more openly disapproving decades ago of the perverse lifestyles that are so flagrant these days, our country/society would not be the MESS it now is. The “gay” (GEI) lifestyle is not a healthy way of being, and no amount of protesting/complaining/defending it will change that. We need to be more assertive and frank about the health risks, physical and emotional and social, in such a lifestyle. Hopefully, the tide is turning! You and your ilk can get all huffy and insulted and stressed about it, but the fact is: “The (gay/gei) life” is no life at all, and it engenders much unhappiness and unhealthiness, not just for the particular person involved but for everyone in his life as well. End of story.

    • Agree: Clark Kent
  6. That stuff is showing up in Idaho. I have spoken to teachers about it. The teachers I spoke with state that the behavior is “mostly associated if not completely associated with the LGBTQ community.” So no it is not just propaganda. The movement is growing. It is a corollary to the other perverse dogmas inserted by the marxists for the purpose of destroying civilized society.

    So, again the advice. If you have your children in public school you are committing child abuse. Severe psychological child abuse. Your children are not safe even in what would be considered Red States.

  7. The parent’s son reported that the costumed students would “hiss, bark, scratch, and meow” at students who objected to the behavior.

    Another child reported that the herd of furries would “walk on all 4s in the hallway” and “also eat with their face in their food.”

    Wait, are we talking pre-school here, because that’s fairly normal.

    OK, seriously, I thought these “Crazy Years” we’re in lived up to the term nicely, but this stuff goes above and beyond. A Peak Stupidity post on this will be forthcoming this evening, pre-empting our regularly scheduled stupidity. Check later on. The jokes have already written themselves.

    And, for Harry the Troll, there are direct disinformation sites now, such as Snopes, which get themselves onto the front pages of search results. I’ve seen it in regard to other issues that I know much about. See, now there’s another post coming…

    • Replies: @WorkingClass
    @Achmed E. Newman

    Turns out decadence contains an element of comic relief. Who knew?

  8. @Harry Huntington
    This commentary sounded crazy--and it is. I googled the topic and across the country there are articles debunking the furry story. What is not crazy is homophobic and anti-public school Republicans are using a "furry" narrative to attack public schools and the LGBTQ communities generally. This is just another way to impose the Republican anti-gay agenda.

    Obviously the most basic thing--parents control how their kids dress for school. Schools don't make kids into "furry." Schools are not mandating kids be furries. If kids like to wear furry costumes, that is entirely on the parents. Like most so called bad things kids do, the parents are entirely to blame.

    It is time for Republicans who love to preach personal responsibility to take a step back and begin by blaming parents for what kids do, and why kids fail.

    Replies: @Bee-Mused, @Legba, @Joe Paluka, @Observator

    Sure you googled the topic, and that’s great, but what does Snopes have to say?

  9. Remember many are in the cons, and they breed, or use surrogates to make more of themselves, so they continue in generations, hiding ‘in the open’ among us, including the next generation doing cons among other kids, or used by cons to push schemes among the young, as adults do the rest on us, ‘state’ cons, ‘court’ cons, ‘media’ cons, ‘skool’ cons, ‘religion’ cons, fake ‘activist group’ cons, etc. Besides in false systems they are among us, where we live, half are females. Have to sort people, focus local.

    Other thought, how kids/people would wear costumes around halloween or to skool, some dress as animals etc innocent before, now shuffled to bend to filth focus schemes, this psyop around halloween convenient for schemers to push underlying filth and beastiality schemes, also human-animal ‘chimeras’ or ‘hybrid’ terr schemes, which are much further along than people assume. Many many sick minds including in ‘colleges’.

    Note words chimera or ‘hybrid, they made words then use to dumb or double meanings. ‘hy’brid’ once meant natural changing plants, but now other things vile. The words mutant or mutation more accurate. Suggest note, paper pen not copy paste. There are many in sick schemes and many schemes. Should share knowledge and energy with others as able.

    Supposed skools were never for our benefit, including supposed coleges.
    Everyone should dress as a pirate, including females, they were real clothes anyway just pants boots shirt.

    Appreciate the article Michelle, cutting through. Each person should push back, on everything. Otherwise effort by the few is wasted. Find friends based on what matters.

  10. There is a thing of non specific sex who was appointed to some kind of Biden Admin post last February or so who posted on twitter a pic of himself w/ pals in some furry get up but his name did not stick in my memory. It was in the news at the French Embassy on Bastille Day posing with another Biden Admin official of non specific sex.

    I believe both have male sex organs but that would probably too much information if somebody wished to document it.

  11. Current museum installation exhibit at The Tate, in England. If I understand the concept correctly, it deconstructs your gender stereotypes and assumptions when you find yourself immersed. Don’t underestimate the power of curated museum exhibits. Many people, especially children, have difficulty understanding concepts in the abstract, but a concrete exhibit inculcates new thinking.

    • Replies: @Curmudgeon
    @SafeNow

    The real question is why would anyone consider that to be an "exhibit"? It looks like my kids' daycare 40+ years ago.

    , @Old Brown Fool
    @SafeNow

    Stereotypes are not dreamed up people with time to while away; stereotypes are the combined images built by the whole society. Sometimes there could be mistakes in the details, but overall stereotype is usually well substantiated.

  12. If you think that the answer to this can be found within the system that created it, then you are part of the problem. End government schooling.

    • Agree: Achmed E. Newman
    • Replies: @Harry Huntington
    @Jim Richard

    You have that backwards. The problem is private and parochial schooling. Parents are the problem not the schools. We need to end any parental involvement in education and only the state can do that. School should be left to education professionals who are trained. You would not send your child to a neighbor parent instead of the doctor? You would not hire a carpenter to fix your car? Why do we think parents know anything about education?

    , @Greta Handel
    @Jim Richard

    Or just remove your own children, if you can bear depriving them of football, The Pledge, and JROTC.

  13. Why no public viewing of comments?

  14. @Red Pill Angel
    So there really are gangs of furry kids allowed to behave as animals in public schools, but the cat box idea is "cognitive infiltration" thrown in to smear parents who object.

    Replies: @Anonymo8s

    the cat box idea is “cognitive infiltration” thrown in to smear parents who object.

    Not any more. I have reports of a cat box used by a furry kid one town to my North, and I’m out in the boonies where you’d expect the local School Board to be less infiltrated by the Left. The school is suspending any kids that say the furry kid is doing something wrong.
    Same school that has the cat box also has a reserved parking place for police response right next to the main entrance.

    • Thanks: Red Pill Angel
  15. @Harry Huntington
    This commentary sounded crazy--and it is. I googled the topic and across the country there are articles debunking the furry story. What is not crazy is homophobic and anti-public school Republicans are using a "furry" narrative to attack public schools and the LGBTQ communities generally. This is just another way to impose the Republican anti-gay agenda.

    Obviously the most basic thing--parents control how their kids dress for school. Schools don't make kids into "furry." Schools are not mandating kids be furries. If kids like to wear furry costumes, that is entirely on the parents. Like most so called bad things kids do, the parents are entirely to blame.

    It is time for Republicans who love to preach personal responsibility to take a step back and begin by blaming parents for what kids do, and why kids fail.

    Replies: @Bee-Mused, @Legba, @Joe Paluka, @Observator

    Are you a furry or a teacher or both?

  16. @Harry Huntington
    This commentary sounded crazy--and it is. I googled the topic and across the country there are articles debunking the furry story. What is not crazy is homophobic and anti-public school Republicans are using a "furry" narrative to attack public schools and the LGBTQ communities generally. This is just another way to impose the Republican anti-gay agenda.

    Obviously the most basic thing--parents control how their kids dress for school. Schools don't make kids into "furry." Schools are not mandating kids be furries. If kids like to wear furry costumes, that is entirely on the parents. Like most so called bad things kids do, the parents are entirely to blame.

    It is time for Republicans who love to preach personal responsibility to take a step back and begin by blaming parents for what kids do, and why kids fail.

    Replies: @Bee-Mused, @Legba, @Joe Paluka, @Observator

    This seems to be an unforeseen consequence of the legalization of marijuana: extreme paranoia coupled with a bizarre detachment from reality, this time among “conservatives” instead of crazy stoned-out hippies. Live long enough, you get to see the darnedest things, whew.

  17. @Jim Richard
    If you think that the answer to this can be found within the system that created it, then you are part of the problem. End government schooling.

    Replies: @Harry Huntington, @Greta Handel

    You have that backwards. The problem is private and parochial schooling. Parents are the problem not the schools. We need to end any parental involvement in education and only the state can do that. School should be left to education professionals who are trained. You would not send your child to a neighbor parent instead of the doctor? You would not hire a carpenter to fix your car? Why do we think parents know anything about education?

  18. @Jim Richard
    If you think that the answer to this can be found within the system that created it, then you are part of the problem. End government schooling.

    Replies: @Harry Huntington, @Greta Handel

    Or just remove your own children, if you can bear depriving them of football, The Pledge, and JROTC.

  19. @Achmed E. Newman

    The parent’s son reported that the costumed students would “hiss, bark, scratch, and meow” at students who objected to the behavior.

    Another child reported that the herd of furries would “walk on all 4s in the hallway” and “also eat with their face in their food.”
     
    Wait, are we talking pre-school here, because that's fairly normal.

    OK, seriously, I thought these "Crazy Years" we're in lived up to the term nicely, but this stuff goes above and beyond. A Peak Stupidity post on this will be forthcoming this evening, pre-empting our regularly scheduled stupidity. Check later on. The jokes have already written themselves.

    And, for Harry the Troll, there are direct disinformation sites now, such as Snopes, which get themselves onto the front pages of search results. I've seen it in regard to other issues that I know much about. See, now there's another post coming...

    Replies: @WorkingClass

    Turns out decadence contains an element of comic relief. Who knew?

    • Agree: Achmed E. Newman
  20. This “furry” thing has been around a long time and being in the sci-fi and comic community, I’ve known a few of them. Always thought it was very silly. As a hobby, it’s harmless, but of course some people take it to a level of mental illness. Also there’s a strong sexual fetish element to some groups, very worrisome when minors get involved. As far as the schools go, this seems like yet another example of disciplinary breakdown. Not as destructive as the transgender mania but it could easily get out of hand. It could also be a form of gaslighting with transgender groomers setting up concerned parents to be “debunked.”

  21. where are the pictures and videos?

  22. @SafeNow
    https://www.creativeboom.com/uploads/articles/5b/5b0e6c78d933e6367e9ad1db8186a8dceb930bf0_810.jpg

    Current museum installation exhibit at The Tate, in England. If I understand the concept correctly, it deconstructs your gender stereotypes and assumptions when you find yourself immersed. Don’t underestimate the power of curated museum exhibits. Many people, especially children, have difficulty understanding concepts in the abstract, but a concrete exhibit inculcates new thinking.

    Replies: @Curmudgeon, @Old Brown Fool

    The real question is why would anyone consider that to be an “exhibit”? It looks like my kids’ daycare 40+ years ago.

  23. The backlash, when it comes, and sure it will come, will be very strong; no use crying then. Permissive behaviours usually swing between extremely rigid to extremely relaxed environments, and it takes about three or four generations (we rarely hear about the permissive eras of the past because 1. people in the past were reluctant to record stupid fads, and 2. the subsequent rigid eras erase the memories). It will be self-destructive of any “sub-culture” of people to test the tolerance limits of the society.

  24. @SafeNow
    https://www.creativeboom.com/uploads/articles/5b/5b0e6c78d933e6367e9ad1db8186a8dceb930bf0_810.jpg

    Current museum installation exhibit at The Tate, in England. If I understand the concept correctly, it deconstructs your gender stereotypes and assumptions when you find yourself immersed. Don’t underestimate the power of curated museum exhibits. Many people, especially children, have difficulty understanding concepts in the abstract, but a concrete exhibit inculcates new thinking.

    Replies: @Curmudgeon, @Old Brown Fool

    Stereotypes are not dreamed up people with time to while away; stereotypes are the combined images built by the whole society. Sometimes there could be mistakes in the details, but overall stereotype is usually well substantiated.

  25. I don’t know… if they’re anything like these cat girls, then all I can say is “mee—ooow, indeed.”

Comments are closed.

Subscribe to All Michelle Malkin Comments via RSS
PastClassics
Are elite university admissions based on meritocracy and diversity as claimed?
The Shaping Event of Our Modern World
Our Reigning Political Puppets, Dancing to Invisible Strings