The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewLarry Romanoff Archive
The Pleasures of Depopulating the Earth
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments

When writing of the evils of globalisation, many authors focus on the commercial aspects such as privatisation, with other primarily political components such as the loss of national sovereignty, the destruction of cultures and civilisations and of the family, morality and societies, being perhaps not ignored but not seen or included as integral parts of the same picture. It doesn’t appear widely recognised that one fundamental pillar of globalisation, of our imminent New World Order in fact, is an astonishingly vigorous and vicious attempt to eliminate not only the world’s surplus poor but to depopulate the entire non-white world. This essay is an introduction to the origins of depopulation.

Emma Goldman

Emma Goldman was a Jewish Communist Bolshevik, anarchist, escapee from an insane asylum, conspirator to violence and murder, trouble-maker and nymphomaniac, and not necessarily in that order. From her teen-age days, Goldman studied the Bolshevik anarchists, leading her imagination to images of a social order with freedom of action unrestricted by man-made law. Goldman quickly came to support politically motivated murder and violent revolution, and the assassinations of politically significant individuals, as a tool for social change. She became a firm proponent of violence whenever words failed to do the job, an attitude some historians describe as ‘propaganda of the deed’, i.e. if they won’t listen to us, we will kill them. According to the Jewish Womens’ Website, “Desiring a state of absolute freedom and believing it would never come about through gradual reform, Goldman and her comrades advocated complete destruction of the State.”[1]

Goldman emigrated from Russia as a teen-ager and soon began promulgating various models of society based primarily on the two pillars of political anarchy and promiscuous sex. Her widespread and excessively vocal promotion of these ideals earned Goldman the label of being one of the two most dangerous anarchists in America. However, the same Jewish womens’ website tells us her insistence on “the right to express herself” – primarily through sexual promiscuity, abortion and murder – led her to become a prominent figure in “establishing freedom of speech in America.” A definition of free speech rather at odds with mine. This same Jewish Womens’ website contained its article on Emma Goldman under the banner of “Women of Valor”.[2] No idea why, but that’s how history is spun.

Various apologists have reported that Goldman and her lover Berkman (a kind of political Bonnie and Clyde) were “horrified by violence”, as in the suppression of striking workers. Our dynamic duo responded as would any rational horrified-by-violence beings – they decided to kill the person responsible for the anti-labor violence, then-US President William McKinley.[3][4] The police were never able to link Goldman directly to McKinley’s murder, though the assassin had frequently met with her and claimed to have acted under her instructions. It wasn’t only a US President who was targeted by Goldman and her group. They attempted to kill several other public figures, their plan to bomb John D. Rockefeller’s mansion in New York City failing only because the bomb exploded prematurely, killing a dozen or so anarchists while destroying much of Goldman’s home in the process. One of Goldman’s anarchists named Carlo Valdinoci blew up the front of Attorney General A. Mitchell Palmer’s home in Washington, D.C., also blowing himself up in the process when the bomb exploded too early.[5] And some other good tries.[6][7]

Goldman eventually had her citizenship revoked and was deported back to Russia, spending the rest of her life in exile and dying in Canada, alone, poor and friendless, claiming there was “no one who cares whether one is dead or alive”. Nevertheless, one Goldman supporter claimed (though without evidence) that “Thousands of mourners flocked to see her casket, and tributes poured in from every corner of the world.” However, my research suggests that the few mourners actually in attendance were there only to be sure she was really dead, and the only tribute I’m aware of was by the New York Times. As a kind of obituary, the Jewish Womens’ Organisation claims Goldman’s “advocacy of … sexual freedom helped to shape modern American society”, while failing to note that America’s resulting new shape was not necessarily a blessing. The same Goldman-lovers stated her work contributed not only to the development of free speech in America, but showed “the true meaning of patriotism”. No idea how.

Before Goldman died, supporter Peggy Guggenheim and a few friends raised $4,000 for her to get a small cottage in Saint-Tropez on the Cote d’Azur in France, where she spent two years writing her autobiography, imaginatively titled “Living My Life”, which was published in 1931. On this book, A PBS writer made the following observation: “On its publication, The New York Times advised readers “to pay less attention to Goldman’s politics and to read the book as a human document of the most absorbing interest.” Not everyone agreed. One prominent critic attacked the memoir as a “thousand dull pages of fornication and fanaticism”.”[8]

It isn’t only the Jewish Womens’ Website and the New York Times who are busy sanitising and Photoshopping. Wikipedia doesn’t want to be left out of this whitewashing parade, informing us solemnly that Emma Goldman “was an important contributor to several fields of modern political philosophy”, leaving our imaginations to identify those fields and deduce her contribution. Referring to one occasion when a group of her political anarchist colleagues attacked Goldman for her rampant sexual promiscuity, Wikipedia’s deliciously sanitising understatement was that “she was chided by an associate for her carefree demeanor”.[9]

From her relations with her Jewish Bolshevik friends, Goldman’s actual purpose was to foment a Communist revolution in the US, following the pattern these people had laid with their revolutions in Russia, Hungary, Germany, and other countries. But, in the end, Goldman didn’t accomplish as much anarchy as she might have done, mostly because she discovered she was more interested in sex than politics. “I demand the independence of woman, to love whomever she pleases, or as many as she pleases.” And as many at the same time as she pleases; Goldman had a reputation for especially enjoying sex in groups of her anarchist colleagues. Our Jewish womens’ website tells us Goldman was a tireless advocate for the “emancipation” of women, but that’s not exactly how it was. “Viewing marriage through a lens of repressive prostitution”, her emancipation of women focused on their “freedom”, i.e., sexual and reproductive freedom, i.e., rampant and promiscuous sex, individually, serially, and simultaneously, followed by free abortions as a post-hoc birth control method. Emma didn’t hesitate to raise funds for her anarchist activities by working the streets as a prostitute, her husband’s parents considering her so morally destitute, they refused to permit her into their home.

Interestingly, Goldman did not want true emancipation for women, not for voting or political rights, nor even for employment or professional careers, or the ownership of property. To Goldman, the entire concept of freedom, independence, emancipation, womens’ rights, was just a red ribbon wrapping the core issue of sexual promiscuity. Her interest in the emancipation of women was mostly personal, stemming from her own experience of reckless sex, repeated pregnancies, and the repeated need for abortions – which were dangerous and illegal in those days. And thus is woman emancipated. Goldman believed women should enter and leave sexual relationships without restraint, promiscuous sexuality being “crucial to personal and professional fulfillment”, and thus she engaged in “numerous passionate affairs throughout her life”.

As testimony, she wrote to one lover who apparently left her “overwhelmed with sexuality”. “You have opened up the prison gates of my womanhood. All the passion that was unsatisfied in me for so many years, leaped into a wild reckless storm boundless as the sea.”[10][11] And who said communists don’t know how to have fun. The reason I have dwelt on this latter point is that while Goldman left no heritage of value to anarchists, failed miserably as a revolutionary, and surely made no contribution to modern political philosophy, her “carefree demeanor” left an indelible mark on the world since, as fate would have it, who should walk into this veritable Garden of Earthly Delights but a young woman named Margaret Sanger.

Margaret Sanger

Unlike Emma Goldman, Margaret Sanger was not a Bolshevik, nor a conspirator to violence or political murder. However, like Goldman, she was an anarchist, an escapee from an insane asylum, a trouble-maker and a nymphomaniac and, like Goldman, not necessarily in that order. The history books seem a bit thin on the original relationship between these two women, but indications are that Goldman’s “carefree demeanor” stoked Sanger’s fires of passion and “opened the gates” of her womanhood, both deeply sharing the common need for contraception in whatever form, and quite possibly sharing considerably more. Goldman’s only apparent contribution to Sanger’s career was in awakening her nymphomania though, as we shall see, that was more than nothing. Having thus established what we might call mutual bonds of fertility, Goldman provided “aggressive support” for Sanger’s sexual and contraceptive crusades, both women being arrested for dissemination of lewd material but both escaping conviction for the behavior underlying that material. Goldman even conducted nationwide speaking tours on Sanger’s behalf, raising awareness of contraception and only heaven knows what else.

Like Goldman, Sanger’s zeal for birth control was in no small part due to her sexually promiscuous lifestyle.[12][13] By the time of her meeting with Goldman she had been having numerous affairs, calling the marriage bed “the most degenerating influence in the social order”, fervently devoting her rampant sexual conduct to regenerating that order. Given her surprised husband’s objections, the two soon separated, her ‘socially regenerating’ conduct then accelerating markedly and drawing considerable public attention. At the same time, and perhaps resulting from the same stoked passions, Sanger began publishing newsletters and distributing sexual materials that were clearly illegal, resulting in her arrest on charges that would most likely have led to a prison sentence of about 45 years.

Discretion being the better part of valor, the day prior to her trial Sanger dumped her children onto her estranged husband and fled to England where fate would intervene yet one more time. Upon arrival in England, Sanger met some men who would inadvertently provide her with the tools that would (unfortunately) change history forever. The record isn’t completely clear on where her relationships began, but the sexologist Havelock Ellis[14], H. G. Wells, and George Bernard Shaw were there, as were perhaps most members of their new Fabian Debating Society.

Wells certainly had a passionate affair with her, and Sanger definitely took the initiative with Ellis, these two quite likely passing her around the debating society after that. One writer noted that Wells and Ellis were only part of “a huge stable of men” with which Sanger had affairs. Ellis’ theories on female sexuality helped Sanger to “broaden her perspective” on women fully enjoying sexual relations, though she already appeared to have few or no inhibitions in that regard. However, Ellis in particular expanded her justifications for birth control in more ways than one.

Perhaps the most significant factor of Sanger’s European exile was that the society of these men consisted of radicals, feminists and, most importantly, a veritable flock of Neo-Malthusians who educated Sanger to the dire threat of excess world population and thus greatly refining her sexual rationale. Sanger traded copious free love and information on contraception needs, receiving in return an education of incomparable value. Prior to this time, neither Goldman nor Sanger achieved much traction with their contraception promotions, at least not in a broad public sense, because their efforts were seen realistically as a cover for their own personal proclivities, and which promised benefit only to the poor – who were of little or no interest to anyone. But now Sanger’s mission had suddenly gained an intellectual substructure, a kind of respectable philosophical scaffolding on which she could promote her views. She was now primed to return to the US to promote the entire genocidal gamut of eugenics, contraception, abortion and euthanasia, not for her narrow personal interests but for the purpose of saving humanity from itself.

At the time, abortion was not at all favorably viewed, much less as a casual method of birth control, and was illegal. But here we are, back in the USA, our two little nymphomaniacs lacking the “family planning” services of the not-yet-invented WHO and USAID, yet badly needing regular abortions. What do we do, if we want to carry out an enterprise that is both illegal and highly immoral by the standards of the day, where normal execution would put us into prison and earn widespread moral condemnation? Well, we wrap our intent in a cloak of freedom and human rights, then imprint a biblical bar-code onto it and present it as an enterprise of immense humanitarian value, our actions performed in humility and self-sacrifice for the benefit of the world.

And thus was born Planned Parenthood[15], presented not as birth control for reckless nymphomaniacs, and only secondarily as the “freedom of women to choose”, without exactly specifying what it was they were choosing; the primary thrust was now overpopulation and the desperate need to limit, cull, and otherwise exterminate the world’s surplus poor. Now, Sanger would get everyone’s attention, at least those of the elite who were all Malthusians at heart. Of course, the general population would also get the message but that didn’t really matter because the elite provided the funding and the general population were the target.

And it was then, on her return to the US after her brief European exile, that Margaret Sanger hoisted her true colors and proved that she really was an escapee from an insane asylum. The first thing Sanger did was to get herself remarried, this time to a man named J. Noah H. Slee, a Jewish millionaire owner of a petroleum products company. The historical record tells us Margaret kept the name of her first husband – Sanger – and that after marrying Mr. Slee, she “maintained her sexual independence”. Use your imagination. This was curious because, as you will see, Margaret’s promotional and fund-raising activities cut a wide swath through the bedrooms and office couches of industrialists, bankers, financiers, sponsors of every description, virtually all men, and with whom, by all accounts, Margaret laid the table with more than information. And for 20 years, until he died, Mr. Slee financed her activities, apparently without complaint.

Sanger’s unique combination of atheism, Marxism, Malthusianism, uninhibited sexuality, a contempt for religion, especially Christianity, and an inherent racism that must have always been present, conspired to make her not only offensive but positively evil. Her motives no longer related to liberating women but to eugenics, having somehow reached the philosophical position that through rampant and unrestrained sexuality, followed closely by contraception, abortion, sterilisation and euthanasia, her mission was to assist the human race in the progressive elimination of itself, or at least of that portion her idolising adherent Bill Gates would later determine unfit to live.

At the same time as her sexual promiscuity increased by an order of magnitude, she abandoned morals and ethics, developed a love of vulgarity and a general bad taste, a needless and often counterproductive aggression, and an altogether unwarranted enthusiasm for exterminating people. Upon her return to the US and flying her new colors, Sanger praised Nazi Germany’s sterilisation policies, became violently anti-family and deeply racist to the extent of claiming blacks should not be permitted to contaminate the white gene pool. She also became virulently anti-Christian, claiming in a news article that she enjoyed promoting birth control because it was “calculated to undermine the authority of the Christian Church”.

At first, Sanger avoided promoting euthanasia, writing that the community should not send defective progeny to the gas chambers, but soon thereafter (in the same book) rather harshly stating that all charity should cease because it served only to prolong the lives of the unfit and that society required “the elimination of human weeds”.[16] Her views on abortion similarly changed, to the point where she and her organisation were actively sponsoring abortion rights.

At this point, it appears Sanger was insane, though Planned Parenthood try very hard to bury the insanities by claiming “We can’t know what Margaret really meant to say, because she’s dead.” Well, yes we can know what she meant. Her words have the same meaning today they did then. For one, the least nasty part of the new Margaret was that she endorsed selective breeding to produce perfect humans, as she claimed in an article titled, “Birth Control to Create a Race of Thoroughbreds”, longing for a motherhood that would refuse “to bring forth weaklings”, pushing for “more children from the fit, less from the unfit”, those unfit representing “the greatest present menace to civilization”. In one book, Sanger wrote that parents of a defective child should be permitted no more children, and that “Birth control … is nothing more or less than the … weeding out the unfit, of preventing the birth of defectives or of those who will become defectives.” In the same book, she deplored multi-child families and wrote, “The immorality of large families lies not only in their injury to the members of those families but in their injury to society … The most merciful thing that the large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.”[17] When reviewing the historical record, it is exceedingly difficult to see why Planned Parenthood, the Jewish Womens’ Society, Bill Gates, or indeed anyone else, would venerate this woman.

Sanger was promoting the use of what she called “birth control” to exterminate the genetically inferior races, which to her meant most of the non-white world. She stated that Jews!, Hispanics, and blacks were “human weeds” who, if they reproduced, “would bring a dead weight of human waste into the world”. She had a stated goal of the extermination of all blacks in the US, and dehumanised the poor as “parasites”, “defectives” and “mistakes”. Sanger wrote, “The lower down in the scale of human development we go the less sexual control we find. It is said that the aboriginal Australian, the lowest known species of the human family, just a step higher than the chimpanzee in brain development, has so little sexual control that police authority alone prevents him from obtaining sexual satisfaction on the streets.”[18] In a perfect expression of irony, we might well express those identical sentiments about Margaret herself, though history tells us even the police were sometimes insufficient to suppress Margaret’s carefree demeanor.

In another book, Sanger wrote, “[Eugenics] shows that we are paying for and even submitting to the dictates of an increasing, unceasingly spawning class of human beings who never should have been born at all.” She continued that “Every single case of inherited defect, every malformed child, every congenitally tainted human being brought into this world is of infinite importance to that poor individual; but it is of scarcely less importance to the rest of us and to all of our children who must pay in one way or another for these biological and racial mistakes.”[19] In a widely-promoted public address, Sanger promoted the elimination of entire classes of people, stating that society must “Keep the doors of immigration closed to the entrance of certain aliens whose condition is known to be detrimental to the stamina of the race, such as feebleminded, idiots, morons, insane, syphilitic, epileptic, criminal, professional prostitutes, and others in this class”.[20]

Sanger also proposed that the poor, the “morons and immoral”, and other “inferior types” be placed in concentration camps where they could be re-educated to what she called “better moral conduct”, i.e., have plenty of abortions. She went on to write, “I consider that the world and almost our civilization for the next twenty-five years, is going to depend upon a simple, cheap, safe contraceptive to be used in poverty-stricken slums, jungles, and among the most ignorant people. Even this will not be sufficient, because I believe that now, immediately, there should be national sterilization for certain dysgenic types of our population who are being encouraged to breed and would die out were the government not feeding them.” She wrote, “While I personally believe in the sterilization of the feeble-minded, the insane and syphilitic, I have not been able to discover that these measures are more than superficial deterrents when applied to the constantly growing stream of the unfit … Eugenics without Birth Control [is] a house builded upon the sands.” She was especially harsh on blacks: “The mass of Negroes … particularly in the South, still breed carelessly and disastrously, with the result that the increase among Negroes, even more than among Whites, is from that portion of the population least intelligent and fit”, stating elsewhere that her intent was to exterminate all the blacks in America but hoped that intent would not be discovered by them until it was too late.[21]

The New York Times didn’t like this version of the truth, so the Editors created their own history of Margaret Sanger. In an obituary for Sanger, “Special to the New York Times”, they wrote that Sanger merely “sought to create equality between the sexes by freeing women”.[22] Perhaps I’m slow, but if I understand correctly, the NYT Editors are telling us that (a) killing off all the blacks will make women free, and (b) that aborting all the fetuses in America will make women and men equal. The NYT also informed us that Margaret merely strove to present “her view that family planning is a basic human right”. However, the Editors neglected to contemplate the ‘basic human right’ of all us defectives to live our lives without Margaret’s help. This is an appropriate place to note that the NYT has published glowing obituaries of nearly every human monster in the past 100 years, almost without exception so far as I can tell, perhaps related to the fact that almost all those individuals were Jewish.

They noted Sanger’s “unfailing charm and persuasive wit”, specifying that “Many a policeman escorting her to the station had his ears wilted by Irish invective”, failing to mention this is representative not of charm and wit, but of a foul mouth. And her good friend and Planned Parenthood colleague, Dr. Alan Guttmacher, apparently oblivious to the above, claimed Sanger “convinced America and the world that … conception is a basic human right”. Here again, if conception is a basic human right, why is Guttmacher so determined to make me abort all my unborn children. Perhaps conception and birth are different rights. Guttmacher neglected to mention that avoiding sterilisation and euthanasia, i.e., the right to live, is perhaps even a more basic human right. And if all this weren’t enough, the elite declared Sanger “humanist of the year”, and gave her an award for making “the most conspicuous contribution to the enrichment of life”, without specifying exactly whose lives had been enriched. Or how.

Nevertheless, there was a recent news item that Planned Parenthood, at least in New York, is deleting Sanger’s name from the masthead, due to her finally-coming-to-light views on euthanasia for all us defectives.[23]

A Step Back Into the Past

Before we proceed to discover where this sexually-inspired eugenicide leads, let’s look back into the past for a moment and find its origin. The process began in England with primarily four men: Thomas Malthus, Charles Darwin, Herbert Spencer and Francis Galton.

In about 1800, UK economist Thomas Malthus published his First Essay on Population,[24]An Essay on the Principle of Population; frightening British society with the prospect that food production could never be sufficient to supply a population that would always increase at a faster rate, leaving some portion of society perpetually unfed. He theorised that nature itself managed and executed restrictions on excess population growth, equalising food with population by means of war, pestilence and famine. In his construct, it was the poor (and generally all non-whites) who had been “ordained by nature” to bear the weight of these necessary occasional but recurring genocidal ravages, their inescapable lot in life by virtue of their misfortune to be born in poverty, and further that these impecunious unfortunates had neither the ability to rise above their position nor the resources to do so even were they to have the ability. Malthus essentially separated his world into two new and hitherto undefined races of people: the superior rich and the inferior poor. Then, deriving from the inviolability and ruthlessness of nature’s laws, he claimed it was a counterproductive and even dangerous challenge to nature’s power to feed or otherwise assist the poor, since an improvement in their physical circumstances would result in increased breeding which would then be countered with an increasing harshness when nature found it necessary to rein in that excess population growth. Defiance of nature will inevitably lead to retaliation.

Malthus actually became quite sinister in his recommendations, stating that nature should not be thwarted but rather aided in its task of culling the world’s surplus poor. In his words, “We should facilitate, instead of foolishly and vainly endeavoring to impede the operations of nature in producing this mortality; and if we dread the too frequent visitation of the horrid form of famine, we should sedulously encourage the other forms of destruction, which we compel nature to use.” Malthus recommended encouraging overcrowding and uncleanliness to promote infectious diseases and cause the return of the plague. And above all, he stated we should prohibit medical remedies for their diseases, letting smallpox for instance totally ravage the poor districts and villages without raising a hand to help. This was their just dessert, based on their natural inferiority from a lack of cash.

It may not be widely known, but it was the adoption of Malthus’ theories and policies that led directly to the deliberate starvation of countless millions in Ireland and in India. Moreover, it was the scare from Malthus’ theories that prompted China to implement its former one-child policy, but I would note that the (Jewish) Westerners who pushed China so hard in this direction are precisely the same people today condemning China for having listened to them.

The rich, the elite, the landed gentry, were naturally thrilled to learn of this revelation, to receive scientific validation of their secretly-held belief in their own superiority, in fact to have their always-suspected but now proven natural excellence engraved on stone tablets in the shrine of humanity. They were equally thrilled to be provided with a powerful motive, courtesy of nature and the laws of the universe, to feel no further obligation to assist the poor. Philanthropy was dead. Charity was not only a foolish waste of money but an unwarranted act of defiance against nature itself, one which would bring a harsh retribution against the same objects of that charity. So much good news from one man. Malthus naturally gained a grateful following among the nation’s elite, and in the process created an entirely new and altogether unpleasant economic racism, one much better than the ethnic kind in that in one fell swoop it disposed of perhaps 80% of the population as candidates for culling by the dictates of Mother Nature herself.

At about the same time, Charles Darwin pronounced his new theory of evolution, or what he termed “natural selection” – simply stated, that organisms and beings change, mutate and adapt through time, and those mutations which assist organisms in adapting to their environment, will persist while others die out. Equally, the organisms containing those favorable mutations will tend to survive because they will be better adapted, not so stressed by their environment. Darwin’s scientific and essentially sound theory was then used by Herbert Spencer to concoct a “scientific” basis for Malthus’ anti-human racism, producing in the process what we now call “Social Darwinism”.

Spencer combined Malthus’ theory that the poor existed as a lesser race of human and Darwin’s theory that those who best adapt will best survive, into the proposition that over the millennia some elements of humanity had proven not only more mutable but had intelligently selected the most propitious mutations, and therefore emerged as the elite and rich upper class of society. By virtue of Darwin’s natural selection and their survival of the fittest, the monied elite were revealed to be not only economically and scientifically but now also genetically superior to the poor classes.

Following on Spencer’s heels, Francis Galton provided a further boost to this enticing view of humanity by proclaiming newly-discovered scientific evidence that Darwin’s process of natural selection had indeed resulted in an evolution of the poor, in this case the evolution being retrogressive and downward, and that Mother Nature herself had indeed rendered the poor as inferior and worthless, an evolutionary process perhaps still incomplete. Galton further distinguished himself as a scientist by realising that, just as with plants or animals, the cross-breeding and inbreeding of desirable human traits could serve to assist nature in producing an even more superior product. Galton thus created what today we call eugenics, which he loosely defined as “the science of improving stock by judicious mating”.

Spencer was similarly inclined as Malthus in terms of helping the poor because charity defied “the natural truths of biology” and served only as an “artificial preservation of those least able to take care of themselves”, as we might think of the continuous financing of a bankrupt company, this artificial assistance serving only to prolong suffering and preventing rebirth. In his view, just as nature weeds out the unfit, society must also permit them to die off so as to maintain the health of the remaining elite. In his view, humanity was in the process of evolving, with nature herself protecting those who had money and killing off those who didn’t. Galton, for his part, was distressed by the possibility of the lower classes hampering the natural evolution toward riches of the elite and, since he viewed these things in genetic terms, he viewed the poor as enemies of the state and was one of the first advocates of forcible sterilisation of all but the elite. Both men saw eugenics as an assist to nature, preventing births that were doomed to expire prematurely in any case, and secondarily to improve the human livestock with wholesome breeding practices – in other words, mating money with money.

In his book, Allan Chase wrote so appropriately: “Where Spencer offered ‘revolutionary’ rationales for low wages and subhuman working and living conditions, Galton offered the ‘hereditary’ reasons in the Natural Laws of biology for not wasting sympathy, money, education, and, above all else, health care on biologically low-class types who were destined by the Will of God and/or Nature to be nothing but drains on society and a rapidly proliferating population of hereditary paupers, thieves and parasites.”[25]

Steven Mosher wrote in a delightful, informative, and well-researched article that the British upper class “helped to ensure that their founder’s Essay on Population was a commercial success, appearing in no fewer than six editions from 1798 to 1826. Population horror stories have sold well ever since. Lifespan lengthened and general health improved throughout the nineteenth century, but Charles Darwin gave the Malthusians something new to brood over. Not only were the poor too prolific, but by having all those children – most of whom, to make matters worse, now survived childhood – they were rapidly dumbing down the population. For the prosperous and privileged, who found themselves increasingly outnumbered by the great unwashed, this was the “survival of the fittest” in reverse.”[26]

It is fair to say that the economic racism of Malthus intertwined with Darwin’s theories of evolution and natural selection left the poor in an unenviable position, but then Spencer and Galton took these building blocks and further merged the nation’s traditional ethnic racism with their version of scientific racism, leaving the world’s white elite with a comfortable certitude that not only the poor but virtually all non-white populations were inherently, scientifically, genetically and morally inferior to them. Such happy epiphanies are rare indeed, so it can’t be a surprise that Spencer’s Social Darwinism and Galton’s eugenics combined forces and swept through the elite of the Anglo-Saxon world with approximately the same unsatisfied boundless passion as Emma Goldman’s sexuality.

Still, we can be surprised at the virulence with which this deplorable philosophy infected the Western white man, and more especially the unconscionable extent to which the Americans mis-applied it and the despicable political and military applications they found for it, applications in full force today. I suppose one other surprise was the contribution of this philosophy to further plumbing the hitherto still-unimagined depths of American racism and contempt for humanity, the original ideas of Malthus, Spencer and Galton still pervading America today. For a better appreciation of the depth of American Darwinist ideology, here is South Carolina’s Lt. Gov. Andre Bauer, explaining why it is wrong for the US government to provide food assistance to the poor, and why he would fight against any such legislation:

“My grandmother was not a highly educated woman, but she told me as a small child to quit feeding stray animals. You know why? Because they breed. You’re facilitating the problem if you give an animal or a person an ample food supply. They will reproduce, especially ones that don’t think too much further than that. And so what you’ve got to do is you’ve got to curtail that type of behavior. They don’t know any better.”[27]

Another bright star in the democratic nebula, this one US Congressman Don Young from Alaska, said the solution to the homeless poor was wolves, because they were predators, and that if he could introduce wolves to America’s communities, “you wouldn’t have a homeless problem anymore”.[28] I want to write something here, but I can’t think of anything to say.

Dr. John Holdren, President Obama’s science czar, proposed forced abortions and compulsory sterilisation, as well as the creation of a “Planetary Regime” that would forcibly control severely-reduced human population levels worldwide.[29] Holdren denies this when he can, but in a textbook he co-wrote in 1977 with Paul and Anne Ehrlich, this was precisely what he said. If I recall the details correctly, he also mentioned plans to implant sterilising capsules in people when they reach puberty, and the spiking of water reserves with sterilising chemicals. Being a true Malthusian, Holdren based his theories entirely on the claims that the world’s food supply would always be insufficient, claims repeatedly proven over two centuries to be complete rubbish.

Certainly it was true that the elite in the early part of the last century, as is still true today, had no love whatever for humans or humanity, people like J. P. Morgan, Harriman, Hill, Rockefeller, Carnegie, Mellon, Baruch, Vanderbilt, Warburg, Bush, Astor, Monsanto, Duke, Scaife, Lasker, Sulzberger, DuPont, and our usual collection of European Jewish banking families, believing and acting as if 95% of humans were infesting vermin who were tolerable only to the extent they could add to one’s wealth, those frustrating this ambition generally receiving contempt and bullets in more or less equal amount. And it was these same individuals, most especially Rockefeller and Carnegie, who were smitten heart and soul with the new ‘science’ of eugenics, and in fact with euthanasia as well. It was Carnegie (or his institute) that recommended locally-operated gas chambers to exterminate the lower classes. It was truly a monstrous philosophy that became exceedingly dangerous when put into action by men of enormous wealth and influence, because almost no one had the power to contradict or obstruct them. The result was that within a few years, in the first decade of the last century, legalised and legislated forcible sterilisations were already occurring, and culminating in at least countless hundreds of thousands and not the few thousand listed in the history books. At first, those who might have been considered criminals, idiots, imbeciles, rapists, the infirm, the institutionalised, were being sterilised against their will. Then, everybody else.

The above essay describes only the beginning of an enormous worldwide program of depopulating the earth, a real and frightening genocide on a global scale that is in silent execution today, an apparently unrecognised but integral part of globalisation. It led not only to the vast program of eugenics taught in American universities, the forcible sterilisations the Carnegie Institute’s gas chambers. It led directly to Henry Kissinger’s US National Security Memorandum 200 (NSSM 200), a viciously aggressive plan to prevent, at apparently almost any cost, the populations of non-Western countries from having children.[30][31][32]

It led to USAID and Reimert Ravenholt sterilising at least 100 million unwitting women, killing tens of millions in the process. It led to hundreds of thousands of American women being rendered permanently sterile and millions of sterilities and deaths in undeveloped countries, from the Dalkon Shield. It led to Robert McNamara’s Project 100,000, where about 500,000 low-IQ individuals were conscripted into the US army and sent to Vietnam, few returning.[33] It led to the WHO using tetanus and polio vaccinations produced by Rothschild’s Sanofi-Connaught laboratories seeded with the female hormone hCg supplied by the US CDC, to surreptitiously sterilise perhaps 150 million women in developing nations without their knowledge and certainly against their will.[34] It became part of the US Biological Weapons program, much evidence suggesting SARS, MERS, and perhaps AIDS were created for this purpose, part of the World Bank’s “private department” with persistent house of horrors rumors. It led to the Zika Virus with Oxitec’s GM “Terminator” Mosquitoes [35], and so much more. If you don’t know the story of ZIKA or of the WHO hCg anti-fertility vaccinations, I urge you in the strongest terms to read these articles.

In 2001 scientists at the Epicyte bio-lab in San Diego created a GM contraceptive corn, having discovered a rare class of human antibodies that attack sperm. Their researchers isolated the genes that regulate the manufacture of these antibodies and inserted them into corn plants, creating horticultural factories that make contraceptives.[36][37][38][39] Shortly after the 2001 Epicyte press release, all discussion of the breakthrough vanished. The company was taken over by Biolex and nothing more was heard in any media about the development of spermicidal corn. Epicyte, DuPont and Syngenta (sponsors of the Svalbard Seed Vault) had a joint venture to share and use this technology. Silvia Ribeiro, of the NGO ETC Group, warned in a column in the Mexican daily La Jornada, that “The potential of spermicidal corn as a biological weapon is very high”, and reminisced about the use of forced sterilizations against indigenous peoples.

This is the reason seed companies are suddenly promoting the use of cotton seeds as a primary foodstuff for underdeveloped countries. Cotton seeds are toxic, containing a chemical called gossypol which is an effective male sterilant.[40] The seed companies claim to have removed this toxin to a safe level, but there is no safe level for gossypol. Even very minute doses taken repeatedly (as when used for a basic food) will render an entire male population sterile.[41][42] What the Rothschilds and Sanofi, Bill Gates, the WHO, the World Bank, USAID and UNICEF do for the female populations, the seed companies will do for the male portion. If they have their way, much of the world may one day be uninhabited.

























[24] An Essay on the Principle of Population;



















• Category: Ideology, Science • Tags: Eugenics, Globalization, Population 
Hide 292 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. IvyMike says:

    Can’t get past the author’s primitive thinking. Nymphomaniac?

    • Troll: JasonT, Rahan
    • Replies: @Paulbe
    , @Anonymous
    , @Ace
  2. Mr. Romanoff, I vaguely recall here at unz or elsewhere a few weeks ago reading that Bill and Melinda Gates are in big trouble with the U.N. and the World Court for their vaccinations against disease permanently sterilizing hundreds of thousands-to-millions of women from several countries in Africa, plus Pakistan and India. Now, having been kicked out of those countries, they are now embroiled in lots of lawsuits. The numbers of those sterilized could be triple those they know of because many were given to children not yet of reproductive age yet and so the disaster is of unknown proportions. They’ve managed to keep a lid on it in our media here, but who’s going to buy their vax when THAT story gets out? Their vax’s could be a cover story for whatever horror-show they wish to impose here after all.

    Also, if true, these tales of the Gates’ would qualify them as the monstrous equal of any of those noted in the stories above, no? Are not Fauci and the Gates’ (and Paul Allen when he was alive) good buddies throughout all this, too?

    • Agree: Alternate History
    • Replies: @JasonT
    , @Larry Romanoff
    , @ivan
  3. JasonT says:
    @Jim Christian

    ” but who’s going to buy their vax when THAT story gets out? ”

    Enough people in North America to make it a living hell.

  4. anonymous[316] • Disclaimer says:

    As the saying goes… the higher you climb, the harder you fall!

    The whitevil race considers itself the highest… their fall into Hell will be epic.

    • Replies: @Based Lad
    , @Anon
    , @throtler
  5. World population has doubled in less than a lifetime. Less than a lifetime. It used to take millennia. And yet you fools say there is no over-population. Well, there will be shortly, so hang onto your hats.

  6. TG says:

    This is such utter rubbish that I don’t know where to start.

    Let’s keep it simple. The rich like money. They easiest way for the rich to get money, is through cheap labor. The easiest way to get cheap labor, is to have 100 desperate people competing for each job. And the easiest way for there to be 100 desperate people competing for each job, is to encourage/force everyone to have seven kids each.

    Sure, the rich will babble on about ‘global warming’ and abortion rights yada yada but look at what they do: they are always on the side of forcing population growth ever higher.

    For a time it looked like Mexico was going to be as prosperous as the United States or Canada. Can’t have that! So the rich propagandized that it was every woman’s patriotic duty to have seven kids each “to make Mexico bigger and better.” The result – predictably – was massive poverty for the many, and massive profits for the few. Mission accomplished!

    In the 1960’s the United States was doing as well as any nation on earth ever had. How terrible! So the floodgates to the overpopulated third world were opened, and as expected, wages fell, and profits rose. And no, immigration does not just move people around.- it maximizes total world population, because every surplus person escaping from an overpopulated third-world sweatshop just make room for more people to survey and grow to adulthood back home.

    Canada had abundant resources and a low fertility rate, and was prosperous and stable and boring. Most people could handle that kind of boring, but oh the rich would prefer cheap labor, the Canadian government now has as OFFICIAL POLICY to at least quadruple the nominal 25 million Canadians to at least 100 million and beyond. And I guarantee: when Canada’s population has been forced to hundreds of millions, the average Canadian will not have so pleasant a life: but the rich will make more money.

    About the only nation so far where the people have been allowed to set their own population is Japan. Peaceful, stable, prosperous,… and how the rich scream that this cannot stand, the Japenese simply MUST breed like Bangladeshis, or failing that, they simply MUST be replaced by people who will breed like Bangladeshis. Tell me, is this the reaction of an elite that really wants to depopulate the Earth?

    Rubbish. The rich want to jam so many people in, that most of us will live like battery hens, cramped into tiny cage-like apartment, subsisting on the meanest rice and beans, while our betters live in golden palaces.

  7. Based Lad says:

    You got it wrong bud. We don’t really want anything other than to grill and explore. Many of us prefer our own race as company. We are being pitted against one another. It’s unfortunate, but I understand the feeling. Racial separation doesn’t mean hate. In fact, our cultures can thrive with a respectable distance between them. That wouldn’t help the market enough though. Shame.

  8. @Jim Christian

    Yes, it is truly monstrous. At least 150 million women in many countries were permanently sterilized without their knowledge or consent.

    It is internationally accepted that a single tetanus vaccination is good for ten years, and is more often given to males than females. But the WHO specified only females between the ages of about 15 and 45 – child-bearing ages, and specified 3-5 repeated vaccinations within about two months. After floods of miscarriages and other problems exclusively within the vaccinate population, the countries had the vaccines examined and they all contained the hCG hormone necessary for implanting an embryo in the uterine wall. The WHO denied the test results, then stated the contamination was minor, then that it was harmless, then went silent.

    The vaccines were prepared by Rothschild’s Connaught labs in Canada, part of his Sanofi, and were illegal. They had never been tested on humans and had no approval of any kind anywhere in the world, for use on humans. It was all very secret. The media buried it.

    Many nations now will not permit the WHO or UNICEF into the country.

  9. The author is unable to contest any of the protagonists of eugenics and population control on facts. We are actually still moving rapidly in the dreaded direction of dysgenic population explosion, especially in Africa but also among certain communities like Amish or Gypsies, that, unlike the author, don’t believe in humanist-christian ideals of self-actualization but will in the end inherit the earth and drive its fate toward the state dreaded by Malthus, i.e. the normal state of equilibrium between recklessly expanding genes and scarce physical resources. There is quite a nice series of articles by Anatoly Karlin on the same UNZ website

    • Agree: Based Lad, jamie b.
    • Replies: @Kali
    , @76239
  10. Anon[380] • Disclaimer says:

    Francis galton look like the lost cousin of jared taylor

  11. Anon[242] • Disclaimer says:

    Every race has a few outliers. The meek shall inherit the earth.

    • Replies: @Caspar von Everec
  12. … one fundamental pillar of globalisation, of our imminent New World Order in fact, is an astonishingly vigorous and vicious attempt to eliminate not only the world’s surplus poor but to depopulate the entire non-white world.

    For your next article, cogitate on how we got exactly the opposite of these ends out of the NWO.

    • Agree: MarkU, jamie b., Stan d Mute
    • Replies: @Stan d Mute
  13. gT says:

    Such a nice easy to read essay that I never realised its length, complements to the author for that.

    So this is where the depopulation agenda started, tptb have always been anti-development, especially with regards to the 3’rd world countries. It always seemed that only the West was allowed to progress, no-one else, but in actual fact they have been undermining the West as well. Tptb have always bragged that the collapse to come will be orderly, with not all countries collapsing at once, and with Switzerland as usual being left neutral as a place to preserve their capital in case things don’t go according to plan.

    There are 2 groupings in tptb, the true Globalist depopulation bunch epitomised by Hillary, who believe that most must die; and the pro-Israel camp which also believe that most must die, only not in Israel, as epitomised by Trump. Luckily these differences in tptb frustrate the depopulation agenda to a certain extent, allowing the rest of us more time to prepare for the climax which has been orchestrated to arrive in time with the disruption of the Grand Solar Minimum. The differences in tptb also means that they will turn on each other eventually, hence its going to be interesting to observe how many of the “elite” survive with their ill gotten gains.

    China was of course “made” to take out Russia and/or take out the inevitable centres’ of resistance in the West once the West collapses and/or sort out the East. Whether China sticks to its part in the agenda remains to be seen.

    We live in interesting times indeed.

  14. MarkU says:

    I have rarely seen such an ill-conceived article. We start the ball rolling with Emma Goldman, Margaret Sanger and the Fabian society (some of whose views would be frowned upon today admittedly) After that we have a ‘step into the past’ (which seems to imply the aforementioned people are being treated as somehow contemporary) to have yet another dig at Malthus (among others) Eventually we get to catch up to the more recent past. The author then links all those wildly disparate individuals together as if they were all conspiring in a massive plot that must be more than a century old. That plot being…

    an astonishingly vigorous and vicious attempt to eliminate not only the world’s surplus poor but to depopulate the entire non-white world.

    I don’t know which planet Mr Romanoff lives on but it is obviously NOT what is happening here on planet Earth.

    If Mr Romanoff wants to expose some reprehensible things that have been done comparatively recently in the third world, then fair enough. If that is the case then next time perhaps he could do it without cobbling together a garbage thesis that obviously does not correspond to reality. This is what happens when you pay a hack by the word.

    One more point, Malthus and his ilk were not wrong, they simply underestimated the ability of the human race to evade an issue, at the expense of making it worse in the long term. No amount of moralising diarrhoea will ever alter the fact that you cannot have infinite growth on a finite planet.

    • Agree: mark green, Alden, E_Perez
    • Replies: @Alden
  15. @obwandiyag

    Populations are peaking and going down for their own reasons in a lot of countries based on statistics in recent decades. Anyhow nothing goes straight up.

    The banking and certain Chosen elites insist to play God with the world, maybe the world population has it coming, with their own self serving and individualistic priorities only.

    Most like to think that they are from the Chosen or the elite, and it will be the Other tribes that are selected for reduction and elimination. Lol.

    Of course certain religious proclivities support such non-sense, while others say the more the merrier.

    Covid lock-downs and engineered economic crashes will certainly have a huge role to play in driving down the world population, leaving the elite and the Chosen tribes untouched and more secure in a smaller world.

    • Agree: ziggurat
  16. eD says:

    What is the maximum population of humans the Earth can sustain, without massive involuntary depopulation?

    • Replies: @Badger Down
    , @obwandiyag
  17. eD says:

    If there was an elite conspiracy to reduce human population, wouldn’t they have done a better job of it? Its increased by 80 million a year, every year since World War 2, and has gone from 2 billion in 1938 to 7.8 billion in 2018.

    • Agree: MarkU
    • Thanks: Alden
    • Replies: @J
  18. Kali says:

    Are you not confusing “the rich” for “the bankers”?
    Even as deindustrialisation, automation and the service economy reduce the need for armies of cheep labour in the West.
    And as the World Bank, IMF, B&MGates, the Rothschilds, et al, fund eugenics research and sterilisation programs for deployment against apparently increasingly “useless eaters” the world over.

    Bankers generate money out of thin air. Their concern is Big Power in their own hands, not cheep labour.


  19. Kali says:
    @Hartmut Pilch

    It’s my understanding (based on a vague memory of a lecture I attended many years ago) that every population, animal or human, will reproduce to the extent that their immediate environment allows, and that populations always reach an equilibrium balance with their environment. – Even a plague of locusts only lasts for a season or less.
    A population under existential threat will reproduce more quickly and expand its territory if it can.

    Of course, in the human world, where the “economy stupid” determines migration patterns, distribution of resources, wealth and poverty, etc, things get a bit scewed. But left to our own devices, sans bankers, the “economy stupid” and artificial power structures, I reckon we’d muddle along just fine.
    And, even if I am mistaken, no murderous intellectual-cum-financial elite has any business interfering in the future of the human race, no matter how “justified” they believe themselves to be.

    Fairer distribution of land and water and other basic resources would doybtless solve most of mankinds problems.


  20. The equilibrium between population explosion and scarce physical resources that Mother Nature holds in store for us would not be “just fine” but, in the words of the average christian or humanist moralizer, more than “inhumane”. It is rather an armageddon-like scenario and worse than that, because the intelligence of humanity has expanded the limits of this scenario to such an extent that after it mother earth may well become uninhabitable for good. Therefore not only are all those nasty oligarchs that this post is trying to demonize correct in their assessment. Things are worse: the only way that the equilibrium can be made more humane is by government intervention, and the only intervention of this kind that has ever been tried with some success is the one attempted by the Chinese Communist Party in the 1970s. If you rely on the “invisible hand” or some other christian or humanist deity, you will ultimately get the scenario where the most reckless R-strategists win out and drive the development to the stated armaggeddon-like limit.

  21. P.S. I even doubt that those nasty oligarchs that the article is trying to demonize actually exist. Most of the phrases are probably taken out of context and even many of the accusations against Bill Gates may well have originated from the fantasy of African decolonization and voodoo doctors or islamic preachers. Gates is the perfect example of the evil old white man, and the desire to lock for such evil creatures and blame all the evils of the earth on them is still very prosperous on the left and right (or, one might say, among global socialists and national socialists) everywhere. Obviously when looking at human populations from a point of view of equilibrim between genetic reproduction and physical constraints, you end up engaging in all kinds of “inhumane” theorizing, and it is very tempting for political agitators to combine this with the idea that some big richt scapegoats are planning depopulation. Thus this whole story too closely fits the playbook of egalitarian scapegoat propaganda to be true.

  22. The earth is huge and can hold many times the current population now circa 7.5 billion;
    each person if placed in one square meter, would fit into an area of only 7,500 sq. kilometers, a tiny corner of the planet.

    There are currently hundreds of billions of mammals and reptiles on the earth, that is not deemed a problem.

    Most of the earth has little to no human population. Stop trying to kill us off, so the elite can go around in their planes and do their hunting and fishing without people getting in the way.

    Sorry, earth resources seem to be infinite, nothing is running out except common sense, brotherly love, generosity, and ethical and charitable outlooks.

  23. I unironically support this.

    If you have an IQ below 85, you’re practically dead weight and completely redundant to modern society. All you’ll ever be is a dysgenic breeder, leeching off the productivity of your betters and waging crime against them.

    Even worse, if you leave the dysgenic intact, over time they’ll breed with and pollute the gene pool of the upper castes. This happened in India. Aryans conquered India in ancient times and built a great civilization of knowledge and prosperity.

    However in typical Aryan fashion, they were too kind and left the native Dravidians to their own devices. Over time, the Aryans were bred out of existence by the darker underclasses and now all of India is one big toilet.

    There are too many people on this Earth and most of them are useless, incapable of higher thinking or beauty. The resources of the planet are beign stretched to breaking point and an ever increasing population necessitates more and more austerity and bottom feeder policies from the world.

    Why does the World need 4 billion Africans? Would the world not be better with zero Africans?

    • LOL: nokangaroos
    • Replies: @Kali
    , @Miville
  24. @Anon

    The meek shall only inherit a boot to their face.

    Christianity is a death cult

    • Agree: Johnny Smoggins
    • Replies: @Astuteobservor II
  25. @Tommy Thompson

    further to that comment, that is placing the entire worlds population in an of 86 x 86 kilometers.

    A pretty small area indeed. Where is the problem? Everyone views the other as a competitor?

    Resources are not being exhausted, a big made up hoax. The Carbon issue is totally upside down, the diminishing carbon levels since the Cambrian age are well documented and lead to almost global extinction of life on this plant of carbon based organisms.

    The eugenics and depopulation agenda is throw back mentality back to hunter gathers’ society not replaced by the top of the food chaine predators, the moneyed/ banking elites that dont see any need for excess populations beyond what they need for maintaining their productive food and goods), security , that is far removed from threats of rebellion by the many .

    Most of the comments for this article seem to be emanating from anti-social types , people with little love or regard for for their fellow man, especially those of different race, ethnics or religion. What a boring and lonely world the eugenicists, seek, they almost alone in the wilderness with a few slaves or servants.

    • Replies: @Caspar von Everec
  26. @Tommy Thompson

    Further to the Tommy Thompson comment above, that is an area of 86 x 86 square kilometers. A large city size plot. the earth is not covered with humans, but by the excessive and unnecessary constructions of man. Even these have a limited life span, as all goes back to mother nature with time.

    Where is the problem with human numbers??? Are we to view each other only as competitors, are we back to the hunting-gathering outlook, when mass abundance surrounds us?

    Or as social beings are not to brothers in spirit. Human life on this planet has a short life span and is constantly under replacement like all other animal life.

    Keep in mind that pollution is not caused by the general people as much as bad governance and its inability to curb the demands of the economic elites. The Carbon challenge is a big hoax, if it was not for man induced or released CO2 emissions life on this planet, which where photosynthesis is dependent we all life, would be near extinction levels. Since Cambrian era huge the atmospheric carbon has become locked up in coal, petroleum and limestone bringing life giving Co2 to dangerously low levels. This CO2 is being returned to the atmosphere where it was in far higher amounts in the geo record. CO2 climate effect is highly exaggerated.

    We need to drop the agenda of the moneyed /banking elite that has decided they dont need to take us all along with them for the ride, but only need some of us to provide their food and manufacturing needs. So goes the Georgia Guide Stones.

    We should understand that we are a social being, we need each other more, and maybe the more the merrier. Biology has a way to temper our numbers like other mammals and that has been happening from one country to another in the past 100 years. Population growth seems to be stalling on its own. So thank you, we dont bio or nuclear wars to control population growth or eugenicists to appoint themselves our new Gods because they control our money supply and our thoughts and outlook (” the environmental movement”) via their total media control.

    Live and let live.

  27. @Tommy Thompson

    Your precious blacks in Africa rape corpses and eat children. The dysgenic have no love for anyone

    • Agree: Thim
    • Replies: @nokangaroos
  28. Must be getting old for I fail to see what sexually defective jews (but I repeat myself) have to do with Thomas Malthus. Not that it matters …

    Malthus of course was wrong, the starry-eyed snowflake.
    He theorized the population/resources curve is logistic i.e. everybody procreates until everybody is too miserable to either boink or carry to term which then constitutes equilibrium (Marx BTW said much the same).
    No such luck. In the absence of predators growth does not stop at “carrying capacity” (however defined) but goes into “overshoot” resulting in irreversible resource depletion and a much lowered carrying capacity.
    Textbook examples include the erstwhile woods of Easter Island or around the Mediterranean, the reindeer of St. Matthews Island or the sheep of Motane.
    The Sahel wasn´t turned into a desert by some unholy “climate” (fence off a strip and it will be lush in three years, sorry Gretta) but by the goodperson welldiggers and the goats and owners who should have died off.
    Much the same for the interior of Madagascar, the Amazon, …
    so at least locally we are already far in overshoot.

    How many people can the Earth feed?
    Well, it depends on what standard you envision 😛

    Sterilizing everything with an IQ below 85 makes more sense.

    • Disagree: Tommy Thompson
    • Replies: @Kali
  29. @Larry Romanoff

    The vaccines were prepared by Rothschild’s Connaught labs in Canada, part of his Sanofi, and were illegal.

    Lawsuits? Repercussions in a quiet sense? People fired/disgraced/sword-falling? Or just another day? And these countries, they have no voice at the UN or any of the hundreds of NGOs that supposedly ‘protect’ the little people? Sean Penn, where are you (yeah, right)?

    Thanks, Larry. Jesus. Compared the the snippets I’ve been picking up, your snippets depict a reproductive holocaust x>20 or 30. Daunting they’re able to keep this under wraps with zero ramifications. And do tell, IS it the NGOs financing all this, with pharma providing the doses? Just spiballing here, but it’s one thing to produce the toxic juice, another, far further-flung and expensive to distribute and all that requires, the logistics have got to be hugely expensive. Then, you have to have tens of thousands to wield the needles. What and who is THAT network?

    Or is that even possible to ascertain?

    • Replies: @Larry Romanoff
  30. The Sahel wasn´t turned into a desert by some unholy “climate” (fence off a strip and it will be lush in three years, sorry Gretta) but by the good person well diggers and the goats and owners who should have died off.

    Sorry but this is pure unscientific rubbish. The Sahel area of Africa was lush and green when the glaciers covered the northern hemisphere. When they receded the weather patterns changed. Anybody that says the inhabitants made such a desert is an idiot and should offer themselves to the eugenicists first.

    North America and Europe were covered with lush forests, where are they now?????
    Cut down by your forefathers, sure racial supremacists. The Amazon and Congo and Indonesian jungles were just fine until banker capitalism with the claimed superior races set foot there. Now look what a mess.

    • Agree: Kali
    • Replies: @nokangaroos
  31. @Caspar von Everec

    This sounds awfully like Calhoun´s rats. The more the merrier?

    How can these Pollyannas not realize that as you raise population density the Bantu must be exterminated first (followed by Whites until only Northeast Asians are left)?

  32. Paulbe says:

    Probably just pointing out that every era has its blue-haired Trigglypuffs.

  33. @Tommy Thompson

    This is a common misconception …
    the rock art of giraffes, hippos and swimmers in the Hoggar, central Sahara harkens from the Atlantikum (“postglacial climate optimum”), ~8000-6000 ybp, 2-6° warmer than today i.e. if it gets warmer (which it probably does) the Sahara will shrink.

    – I did mention examples from Europe. But apart from the macchia and Karst most parts are worked sustainably (contrary to popular belief “sustainable” does not mean “anti-racist and gender-affirming”)

    – The colonizers did not introduce irresponsibility to unwhite realms (brush up on your history), but they lowered mortality in populations adapted to recurring mass dieoffs.
    And as a rule of thumb in moderate climes it takes an acre to feed an adult, not one square meter 😀

  34. Blake says:

    Nowadays they don’t escape from insane asylums they run the world.

  35. @Jim Christian

    No repercussions. The Western media put an information embargo on it. Nothing escaped. Nobody sues the WHO, and so nothing could be done. Too late and too bad.

    And it isn’t and can’t be NGOs. Our Deep State had to concoct this. Rothschild had to agree (or offer) to make the tetanus vaccine, the US-based CDC had to agree (or offer) to supply the hCg hormone to contaminate the vaccine, the WHO had to agree (or offer) to conduct the vaccination programs, and Bill Gates had to agree (or offer) to fund it in whole or in part.

    For 150 million women to be vaccinated multiple times, that required about 750 million doses of an illegal vaccine that had never been tested on humans and was never approved for testing on humans, nor approved for sale.

    And when it was discovered, the WHO derided the tests, saying those labs were competent only to “test urine samples”. It was only after all the victimized nations conducted multiple tests that the WHO began to back off, first admitting “a few” samples “may have been” contaminated, then that the hCg was “harmless” anyway, and finally going silent.

    Yet on the WHOs own website they list all their research projects going back 20 years, about creating an anti-fertility vaccine using hCg tied to tetanus toxoid as the carrier, and how they spent $400 million doing it.

    That’s a large project as you said, and done entirely in the dark. Too evil for words. They did it many times in many countries, and are still doing it today, pretending a desire to stamp out tetanus or polio, or something.

    No human in their right mind should ever contemplate a vaccine from the WHO. Or the US CDC, for that matter.

    • Agree: Montefrío
    • Thanks: Jim Christian
    • Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert
    , @xcd
  36. @TG

    They easiest way for the rich to get money, is through cheap labor.


    The easiest way for the rich to get money is through buying politicians. The rate of return on political bribery in measured in thousands of percent; the rate of return on wage reduction is in hundredths of a percentage point.

    The easiest way to get rich to begin with, is by furnishing a product that people want at a price that generates economic profits – which usually involves innovation… although in the 20th century it has also involved government grants of monopoly-power through IP protection: otherwise Gates would not have been able to generate a fortune by producing a product where the marginal cost of production is almost zero.

    The relative price of labour is irrelevant, and has been since industrial processes went past a 1750s level of capital intensity.

    If low labour costs were an important feature of wealth-creation for capitalists, wage arbitrage (i.e., offshoring) would happen early in the process of corporate expansion, rather than being the thing that all firms do last (even after “bribe politicians”).

    Wage arbitrage is what happens when a firm has already used every other way to improve profitability – and usually it only happens as a way to mask transfer-pricing (that is, moving value-created to a lower-tax jurisdiction) and to capture political opportunities (e.g., wage or tax subsidies in the targeted jurisdiction).

    • Replies: @The Alarmist
  37. @Larry Romanoff

    Yes, it is truly monstrous. At least 150 million women in many countries were permanently sterilized without their knowledge or consent.

    There’s no evidence this claim is true. This sounds like QAnon sensational type stuff.

    The African population continues to explode.

    • Replies: @Herald
  38. @nokangaroos

    And as a rule of thumb in moderate climes it takes an acre to feed an adult, not one square meter

    A square metre (1sqm) is closer to reality than an acre (4046sqm).

    250sqm (the area of a tennis court) can easily produce a reliable surplus over the caloric requirements for a human family – without the use of fertilisers or pesticides, and using only rainwater.

    Humans are fucking outstanding at using technology to overcome constraints.

    The latest trick (I won’t call it a ‘gimmick’) is to use fitted-out shipping containers with hydroponic ‘vertical gardens’, which have a yield roughly equal to 1.5 acres of land, with solar panels providing the interior lighting. (The ‘pro’ level of this partitions the container into separate microclimates that are optimised for different plants – including different nutrient compositions in the hydroponic solution; different ambient temperature and humidity).

    We can credit the clandestine weed industry for dramatic advances in human understanding of how to achieve extremely high yields in small, enclosed environments.

    Obviously, the greatest yield per acre happens when the diet of the people running these things is plant-based.

    • Thanks: Kali, nokangaroos
    • Replies: @nokangaroos
    , @ploni almoni
  39. @eD

    One billion. This figure was reached around 1896, long before the Doña Paz MV sank. If you still eat animals, none of this will make any sense to you.

  40. @Tommy Thompson

    Try it for a year, Tommy. Live on one square metre, catch rainwater, and grow your own food.

    • Replies: @DaveE
  41. Art says:

    Ever increasing population?

    Malthus’s thought of ever-increasing human numbers is receiving another blow from reality. It is that modern women are only having two children. Woman having just two children will cause humanity to decrease. In the advanced cultures, all over the world this is fact.

    Have read that humanity will increase to 9 billion, then begin a long slide downward.

    Marriage itself is in decline. It is not unthinkable that women could choose to have only one child.


  42. Pft says:

    Somehow the Rockefeller’s get left out of a lengthy article on Population reduction/control.

    1924- The Rockefeller Foundation begins funding Margaret Sanger.
    1927- U.S. Supreme Court upholds the validity of mandatory sterilization in Buck v. Bell. During the Nuremburg trials, a German doctor will cite Buck vs. Bell as the precedent for Nazi race hygiene and sterilization programs.

    1938 -Thirty states in the U.S. have mandatory sterilization laws.

    1952-Population Council, a nongovernmental organization established by John D. Rockefeller III. For over a decade, the Council was the major sponsor of demography research, contraceptive research, and family planning programs, both at home and abroad.

    1956-article in the Rockefeller-financed Eugenics Review, “The very word eugenics is in disrepute in some quarters…. We must ask ourselves, what have we done wrong? We have all but killed the eugenic movement.” Osborn had a ready answer: people for some reason refused to accept that they were “second rate” compared to Osborn, Rockefeller, Sanger and their “superior class.” As Osborn put it, “We have failed to take into account a trait which is almost universal and is very deep in human nature. People are simply not willing to accept the idea that the genetic base on which their character was formed is inferior and should not be repeated in the next generation…. They won’t accept the idea that they are in general second rate….”


    1960-it was discovered that Simian Virus 40 (SV40) contaminated up to 30% of the poliovirus vaccines in the US. This contamination arose because the vaccines were produced in monkey kidney cell cultures harboring SV40 between 1955 and 1963. During this period, approximately 90% of children and 60% of adults in the USA were inoculated for polio and possibly exposed to SV40. Contaminated vaccines were allowed to be given until stocks were depleted in 1963

    1966- Congress passed the Foreign Assistance Act , including a provision earmarking funds from the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) for population control programs to be implemented abroad. The legislation further directed that all U.S. economic aid to foreign nations be made contingent upon their governments’ willingness to cooperate with State Department desires for the establishment of such initiatives within their own borders. In other words, for those Third World rulers willing to help sterilize their poorer subjects, there would be carrots. For the uncooperative types, there would be the stick.

    An Office of Population was set up within USAID, and Dr. Reimert Thorolf Ravenholt was appointed its first director in 1966. He would hold the post until 1979, using it to create a global empire of interlocking population control organizations operating with billion-dollar budgets to suppress the existence of people considered undesirable by the U.S. Department of State.

    1966, Secretary of the Interior Stuart Udall began to make use of newly available Medicaid money to set up sterilization programs at federally funded Indian Health Services (IHS) hospitals.

    These sterilizations were frequently performed without adequate informed consent….  Native American physician Constance Redbird Uri estimated that up to one-quarter of Indian women of childbearing age had been sterilized by 1977; in one hospital in Oklahoma, one-fourth of the women admitted (for any reason) left sterilized…. She also gathered evidence that all the pureblood women of the Kaw tribe in Oklahoma were sterilized in the 1970s….

    1968-Robert McNamara, a staunch believer in population control, resigned his post as Secretary of Defense to assume the presidency of the World Bank. From this position he was able to dictate a new policy, making World Bank loans to Third World countries contingent upon their governments’ submission to population control, with yearly sterilization quotas set by World Bank experts. Cash-short and heavily in debt, many poor nations found this pressure very difficult to withstand. This strengthened Ravenholt’s hand at the USAID immeasurably.

    1969-Responding to lobbying by General William H. Draper, Jr., the former under secretary of the Army and a leading overpopulation fear monger, Nixon approved U.S. government support for the establishment of the U.N. Fund for Population Activities (UNFPA). With this organization as a vehicle, vast additional American funds would be poured into the global population control effort, with their source disguised so as to ease acceptance by governments whose leaders needed to maintain a populist pose in opposition to “Yankee Imperialism.”

    1969-Congressional hearings of July 29, 1969, organized by Rep. George Bush (R-Tex.). Bush arranged testimony by Gen. William Draper of the Population Crisis Committee, for example. Draper, in a 1971 article,2 had likened the developing nations to an “animal reserve,” where, when the animals become too numerous, the park rangers “arbitrarily reduce one or another species as necessary to preserve the balanced environment for all other animals. . . . But who will be the park ranger for the human race? . . .
    Following these hearings, Bush gained Congressional support for Third World population control programs backed by President Nixon and his national security adviser, Henry Kissinger.

    1969-Pentagon official Donald MacArthur on June
    9 requested $10 million
    to develop, over the next 5 to 10 years, a new, contagious microorganism which would destroy the human immune system. Such research could be categorized as “defensive” as in order to defend oneself against a possible new virus, one must first develop the virus.

    1972-July 5 and Aug. 9, the Soviet Union secretly contracted to buy 16.45 million metric tons of wheat, corn, barley and soyabeans from six multinational grain companies.
    The grain sales helped spur the fastest rise in food prices since the Civil War. U.S. grain stocks were depleted. In 1974, American food assistance to developing countries was reduced because of concern over the availability of grain for flour millers and farmers at home. Sen. Henry M. Jackson (D-Wash.) nicknamed the episode “the great grain robbery.”

    1974- 1974 United Nations World Food Conference, which set up the World Food Council (suspended in 1993), derived from a Rockefeller proposal for a World Food Bank.

    . Secretary of Agriculture Earl Butz during the November 1974 UN World Food Conference backed the “Malthusian” eugenics views on controlling the world food supply in conjunction with efforts to limit the population.

    Butz calls for the establishment of a new “world food agency” along the same lines proposed by the UN’s Food and Agricutlure Organization (FAO). The Rockefeller Foundation-authored FAO proposal would establish a supranational agency allowing the Rockefeller cabals control over world food supplies.

    One month after the pivotal 1974 United Nations World Food Conference, Henry Kissinger officially issued the National Security Council document “National Security Study Memorandum 200: Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests.” (NSSM 200 for short).]

    It became U.S. official policy on Nov. 26, 1975. NSSM-200 concentrated on 13 developing countries, which it declared were responsible for 47% of the world’s expected rate of population growth.

    The basic thesis of the memorandum was that population growth in the least developed countries (LDCs) is a concern to US national security, because it would tend to risk U.S. economy growth as we will require large and increasing amounts of minerals from abroad.

    This document called for using “food as a weapon” to aid in Third World depopulation efforts. One part of the proposal discusses withholding food aid to induce population reduction and family planning on the basis of food shortages. Kissinger as a top Rockefeller envoy places a high priority on reducing population, is directing U.S. foreign policy, in the name of national security, to essentially blackmail countries into compliance with “family planning” programs to implement contraceptives, sterilizations and abortions to reduce the birthrate with the leverage of food supply and food aid.

    1974- Rockefeller’s World Health Organization’s anti-fertility research began . The research was directed against human chorionic gonadtrophin (hCG), also known as the ‘pregnancy hormone’, because hCG sustains the ovum once fertilized, and is essential for implantation. When the hCG vaccine is introduced into the woman’s body, the woman’s immune system produces antibodies (anti-hCG) that will disable or deactivate real hCG it’ and when she becomes pregnant. If the hCG, which occurs naturally in the woman’s body only when she is pregnant, is attacked by the antibodies, the pregnancy would be terminated, primarily by the disruption of implantation.

    Although the term “Anti-Fertility Vaccine”, coined by the Rockefeller Foundation, was replaced by the more bureaucratic sounding “Fertility Regulating Vaccine (FRV), the programme was obviously the same. The WHO, UN Population Fund and World Bank continued on the path outlined by the Rockefellers in the late 1960s. All these organization are interlocked, best captured under the header “Scientific Dictatorship”

    1975-The International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI®) was established in 1975 to identify and analyze alternative national and international strategies and policies for meeting food needs of the developing world on a sustainable basis, with particular emphasis on low-income countries and on the poorer groups in those countries.

    1975-the U.S. territory of Puerto Rico, was subjected to mass sterilization program as instigated by the Draper Fund/Population Crisis Committee and implemented with federal funds from the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare through the island’s major hospitals as well as a host of smaller clinics. According to the report of a medical fact-finding mission conducted in 1975, the effort was successful in sterilizing close to one-third of Puerto Rican women of child-bearing age.

    1975-after OPECs oil embargo, a quintupling petroleum prices was seen virtually overnight. For poor countries like India, it was devastating. Conditions in India became so bad that Prime Minister Gandhi declared a state of national emergency and assumed dictatorial power. Driven once again to desperation, she found herself at the mercy of the World Bank, led by arch-Malthusian Robert S. McNamara. McNamara made it clear: if India wanted more loans, Gandhi needed to use her powers to deal more definitively with India’s supposed population problem. Tough measures were implemented. During 1976, eight million Indians were sterilized. Far from being dismayed by the massive violation of human rights committed by the campaign, its foreign sponsors expressed full support. Reimert Ravenholt ordered 64 advanced laparoscope machines — altogether sufficient to sterilize 12,800 people per day — rushed to India to help the effort.

    1976 -On November 26 , 1975 NSSM 200 was formally adopted by the Ford administration. A follow-up memo issued in 1976 by the NSC called for the United States to use control of food supplies to impose population control on a global scale. It further noted the value of using dictatorial power and military force as means to coerce Third World peoples into submission to population control measures. Democracy was a great threat to population control efforts and was to be discouraged

    1976-Swine Flu scare while Bush was 11th CIA Director. United States mass vaccinated 45 million people in four weeks with the swine flu vaccine. The official toll of people who qualified by government standards as having Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) was more than 200, 11 of whom died.* There was a clustering of cases in the second and third weeks after vaccination. The epidemic never arrived, and the ill-conceived campaign was labeled a fiasco..CDC and IOM today agree that the vaccine led to “an increased risk” of GBS.

    Dr. John Anthony Morris was a bacteriologist and virologist who worked for thirty-six years at NIH and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Dr. Morris irked his superiors by arguing that the vaccine was dangerous and could induce neurological injuries. His CDC superior warned Dr. Morris, “I would advise you not to talk about this.” When vaccine recipients began reporting adverse reactions, including Guillain-Barré, Dr. Morris disobeyed that order and went public. He declared that the flu vaccine was ineffective and potentially dangerous and said that he could find no evidence that this swine flu was dangerous or that it would spread from human to human. In retaliation, FDA officials confiscated his research materials, changed the locks on his laboratory, reassigned his laboratory staff, and blocked his efforts to publish his findings. The FDA assigned Dr. Morris to a small room with no telephone. Anyone who wished to see him had to secure permission from the chief of the lab. In 1976, HHS fired Dr. Morris on the pretext that he failed to return library books on time. Subsequent events supported Dr. Morris’s skepticism about the swine flu shot.

    1978- the CDC conducted a hepatitis B vaccine experiment on homosexual men living in New York City, San Francisco and Los Angeles. HIV/AIDS was first detected among the participants in the CDC hepatitis B vaccine trial and quickly spread throughout the gay community in those cities.

    Before these CDC experiments there were no reported cases of HIV or AIDS in America. The AIDS epidemic was officially declared by CDC in 1981, at the conclusion of the experiment.

    Between 1978 and 1980, of 359 hepatitis B seronegative homosexual and bisexual men that were recruited from the San Francisco municipal sexually transmitted disease clinic for hepatitis B vaccine trials. Of the 359 participants, 320 (89%) consented to have their stored blood samples tested for human immunodeficiency virus antibodies. The prevalence of human immunodeficiency virus infection in these 320 vaccine trial participants was 0.3% in 1978 based on these samples. That comes out to 1 positive which was likely a false positive given the accuracy of the testing at the time.

    The men in the Manhattan experiment had the highest rate of HIV ever recorded for that time period: 20% were discovered to be HIV-positive from samples collected in 1980, and over 40% in 1984. In addition, a re-examination of the stored blood samples from an AIDS trial in NYC by epidemiologists at the National Cancer Institute in 1999, found that one out of five gay men (20%) tested positive for the new KS herpes-8 virus (Kaposi’s Sarcoma virus) in 1982.

    Before 1978 no stored blood anywhere in the US tested positive for either HIV or the Kaposi’s Sarcoma virus (which was not identified until 1994).

    One of hepatitis B vaccine developers was Saul Krugman of New York University. Krugman became infamous in the 1970s, when it came out that he had deliberately infected retarded children institutionalized at Willowbrook in New York City since 1955 with hepatitis virus (A& B), using the pretext that conditions there were so atrociously unsanitary, that the children would become infected anyway.

    I could go on but population reduction is clearly not a lib conspiracy as the article seems to imply. Its an elitist conspiracy that is bipartisan

    Indeed, I think today they realize that higher population numbers are not a problem in less developed countries if that increases poverty and reduced life expectancy. They are now directing their attention to the developed economies of US and Europe where we will either have a choice of drastic reduction in standard of living or a drastic reduction in population, or some combination of both

    I’ll end with a couple of quoted of more recent vintage

    1988-Prince Philip reportedly said:

    “In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus, to contribute something to solving overpopulation.”

    1992 Maurice Strong stated:

    “Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsibility to bring that about?”

    At the Rio Earth Summit Strong that same year he added:

    “Current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class – involving high meat intake, use of fossil fuels, appliances, air-conditioning, and suburban housing – are not sustainable.”

    2009-Peter Thiel, “I no longer believe that freedom and democracy are compatible. “

    • Replies: @onebornfree
  43. glib says:

    Larry is smart about breaching this subject. The 10T to Wall Street, the humiliation of conforming to meaningless practices, the cover up of the Wall Street induced economic collapse, the terrorizing of the population, the rampant atomization of society – all that is nothing compared to what is coming. We looked with mild disapproval at all this while it was happening in the tropics, but now it is our turn.

  44. Kali says:
    @Caspar von Everec

    You’re funny! Thanks for making me laugh.

    There are too many people on this Earth and most of them are useless, incapable of higher thinking or beauty.

    Unlike your good self?
    Your words are base, ugly and lacking in nuance. Your thinking is ugly.
    Do you imagine that your white skin is sufficient to mark you out as “better”, more intelligent and therefore more worthy?

    The resources of the planet are beign stretched to breaking point

    Indeed they may be, but it is not our brown skinned brothers and sisters who are stretching those resources, but the white skinned, culturally “superiour”, wealthy “oligarchs” of the political West, and their economic model of exploitation, greed and usury, which are destroying vast swathes of this planet for their own enrichment/empowerment.

    So, upon reflection, maybe there is a good argument for eugenics, to rid the world of the greedy, exploitative, megalomaniacal, parasitic classes so that the rest of us might share the planet in peace.

    Why does the World need 4 billion Africans? Would the world not be better with zero Africans?

    But without them, who would the wealthy white capitalists have to exploit? Who would mine the essential minerals that make your phone work. Who would mine the diamonds? Who would grow the cocoa? How would we “superior” white skinned races manage to indulge our vices without brown people to exploit? – I’m really not sure you’ve thought any of this through properly. Not from any angle.

    Have a nice day,
    Kali Prajita. 😀

  45. dually says:

    Spenser came first. Herbert Spenser invented what we would today call “Social Darwinism” beginning in 1857. Darwin projected Spenser’s economic theory onto the animal kingdom in On the Origin of Species of 1859.

    • Agree: Thim
  46. @Larry Romanoff

    So why are the populations of sub-Saharan Africa and the Indian subcontinent still growing if the global elite wants to reduce or even exterminate them?

    And why is that very same global elite promoting mass immigration from the Third World into the First World if they are such terrible “white racists”? And why is that very same global elite supporting the BLM anti-White agenda?

    The only reasonable answer is that those “white racists” are not really “white” (or do not identify as such) but are Jews.

    If they want to reduce or exterminate non-Whites, at least they want the same for Whites too. Strangely enough, they don’t sell their “polio-vaccines” to Israel, nor do they plead for mass non-White immigration to Israel.

    Something smells of Tikkun Olam here.

    • Agree: Alden, throtler
  47. Kali says:

    How many people can the Earth feed?
    Well, it depends on what standard you envision 😛

    Indeed it does.
    Parasitic economic exploitation of human and natural resources are standards which the world can live without. Abandonment of these “standards” would leave enough for everyone, engender equilibrium, and would ensure the survival of our species.

    Of course, if these “standards” are to be maintained for the benefit of the “superior” classes, a massive cull of the world’s people is required so that the few may continue to enjoy their “superiority” and maintain their position as lords and masters.

    Sterilizing everything with an IQ below 85 makes more sense.

    Given that the parasites exploiting the world’s resources for their own gain, at the expence of the entire planet and every living thing on it, are arguably the biggest part of the problem, would we not be wiser to wipe them out first, along with their mono-god, hierarchical ideogy?

    I’m not sure that “IQ” is the best measure to determine who is culled and who isn’t. Not all high IQ people are evil! Let’s just start with the bankers, the financiers, the billionaires. I’m sure, once we’re rid of that lot we’ll find there’s more than enough to go around. 😀


    • Replies: @nokangaroos
  48. Levtraro says:

    Actually, human world population has been increasing with decreasing acceleration since the mid 20th century, most likely reaching a plateau at the end of this century. The size of the human population follows the same mathematical patterns as populations of rats, sardines, protozoans:

    Ideas and schemes of malthusians are inconsequential. Population growth is a natural pehnomenon controlled by powerful intrinsic and extrinsic natural forces and individuals that believe that can influence that are self-aggrandizingly delusional.

  49. anon[191] • Disclaimer says:

    This article goes on about the plan to depopulate the third world when the opposite is being put into practice. Is the author so blind that he doesn’t see the process which is unfolding right now before our eyes everywhere in the world? The process where the rich nations have increased the populations of Africa, India and Latin America in the past 50 years by every means necessary and at the same time have loosened immigration rules so that those same rich nations are now being flooded with the excess populations of Africa, India and Latin America. Doesn’t the author see that the governments of the rich nations have instituted every policy that discourages the formation of stable marriages between white men and women so that they can have white offspring? Either the author is an imbecile or this is a left-wing propaganda piece meant to deflect the reader’s attention from what’s really going on.

    • Agree: Alden, throtler
  50. Alden says:

    Whatever Malthus predicted 250 years ago and Margaret Sanger sought to prevent 100 years ago, de population is a complete and utter failure. What we’re in now is massive over population in every country in the world.

    And in countries like N America and Western Europe where the poor can’t be persuaded to have more children with generous welfare payments, the governments just tear down border control and invites the unemployed and unemployable hordes in.

    Population grows and grows, wages go down and down, the price of housing and need for expensive public transit goes up and up and the rich get richer as wages go down and the price of housing goes up.

    • Replies: @FB
    , @foolisholdman
  51. Alden says:

    Great post. Thanks for refuting this ridiculous article so I don’t have to. If the elites going back 120 years really wanted de population, world population would not have increased from 2 billion to almost 8 billion in the last 80 years.
    Margaret Sanger’s population control plans have been a complete failure.

    Emma Goldman’s politics and alleged sex life have nothing to do with population statistics. I despise Goldman because she was a communist revolutionary Jew. I don’t have to read her Wikipedia entry as I learned a great deal about her a long time ago. Despicable as this communist harridan was, she has nothing to do with de population and Planned Parenthood By the way, that’s the most flattering photo of her I’ve ever seen.

    • Replies: @onebornfree
    , @another fred
  52. Herald says:

    Caution – Big Pharma Gatekeeper at work.

    • Replies: @RichardTaylor
    , @Getaclue
  53. Herald says:

    Massive and rapid depopulation is being planned and will not be a natural phenomenon. Anyone up for a Bill Gates fast tracked, hardly tested, highly experimental and free of all liability vaccine?

    • Replies: @Culpepper
  54. MEH 0910 says:

    The deadliest question is how to accommodate blacks. One mustn’t say what everyone knows, that blacks are the least educable, least productive, most criminal, most violent, most dependent, and least assimilable of the population.

  55. Culpepper says:

    Matt Ridley is interesting about Gates


  56. Great article, Larry Romanoff. Your heart’s in the right place. Amazing how many big-government/world government sociopaths believe this arbitrary culling of strangers with whom they cannot identify is the right way to go, and not just a sophisticated, elitist death cult. If money somehow disappeared overnight, would they be looking for some new criterion to define useless eaters? Wealth and power being flip-sides of the same coin, how would an impoverished former elite then prove its special worthiness to keep on living? The red thread in this eugenics movement is the desire to meddle with other people’s lives. What ever happned to the concept of individual freedom and equality under law?

  57. onebornfree says: • Website

    “2009-Peter Thiel, “I no longer believe that freedom and democracy are compatible. “”

    Well Thiel, at least was right about that much [and no, I’m not a fan of his.]

    “Democracy is a sort of laughing gas. It will not cure anything, perhaps, but it unquestionably stops the pain.”
    H.L. Mencken

    “Liberty and democracy are eternal enemies, and every one knows it who has ever given any sober reflection to the matter. ” H.L. Mencken

    “Democracy is the worship of jackals by jackasses.”H.L. Mencken

    “Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want, and deserve to get it good and hard.”H.L. Mencken

    “If x is the population of the United States and y is the degree of imbecility of the average American, then democracy is the theory that x times y is less than y.” H.L. Mencken

    “All of democracy’s axioms “resolve themselves into thundering paradoxes, many amounting to downright contradictions in terms. The mob is competent to rule the rest of us – but it must be rigorously policed itself. There is a government, not of men, but laws – but men are set upon benches to decide finally what the law is and may be.” H.L. Mencken

    Regards, onebornfree

  58. “It led to Robert McNamara’s Project 100,000, where about 500,000 low-IQ individuals were conscripted into the US army and sent to Vietnam, few returning.”

    This is not remotely believable. “Few returning.” How few? The official death count for American soldiers in Vietnam is around 58,000. In a different blog he says that the U.S. government inflated the death count by a factor of 10. So, 580,000 killed in Vietnam? More that both world wars? WWII killed 410,000 American military, WWI, 54,000. Nobody in the massive number of anti-war activists noticed that 5 or 6 thousand families a month were getting the bad news?

    This is the sort of invention makes it hard to believe anything he says.

    • Agree: Montefrío
  59. Biff says:

    This should fit right here:

  60. Larry Romanoff is obviously an extreme misogynist and anti-Semite.


    • Replies: @KatyJarTheDoor
  61. onebornfree says: • Website

    “If the elites going back 120 years really wanted de population, world population would not have increased from 2 billion to almost 8 billion in the last 80 years.”

    That”s an entirely illogical conclusion on your part. Maybe, just maybe, “the elites” are not as all-powerful as both they, [ idiots that they all are ], and yourself, imagine 🙂 .

    Maybe, just maybe, they’re all too stupid to understand that most likely, in the real world, their worldwide population control schemes, regardless of how many they sterilize or murder, have the exact opposite of the intended consequence [thereby boosting populations worldwide], essentially no different from the plain as day fact that, for example, [1] a government “war on poverty” naturally creates even _more_ poverty in the real world , and likewise [2], a government “war on some drugs” increases use of the drugs warred against.

    So that maybe, just maybe, a worldwide war on populations by “the elites” actually increases those populations at, ironically, a far higher rate than might otherwise naturally occur.

    regards, onebornfree

  62. Concept of sterilization mass population is a phobic perception by the jews. The first time it came was in 1941 by Theodor Kaufman and Wolfgang Diewerge book : Germany must perish.
    Lovely is it?

  63. The opening frame with the disgusting war criminal not yet punished, Henry Kissinger, says it all! Yes, we need to reduce population dramatically but it can start with the old Jew hanging himself from the rafters, if the corpulent beast can raise himself up… he has lived too long on the backs of gentiles.

  64. DaveE says:
    @Badger Down

    Try it for a year, Tommy. Live on one square metre, catch rainwater, and grow your own food.

    ….. Or try sharing your space w a grizzly or two, living underwater w sharks, on top of a mountain w 200 ft of snow pack, disposing of your waste, manufacturing shoes, plywood and nails, bartering with others to get nutrients and tools you don’t have…… the list in endless.

    “Tommy” gets my Most Idiotic Comment EVER Award.

    • Replies: @Kali
  65. Anonymous[193] • Disclaimer says:

    So, referring to sexual depravity is “primitive thinking” in your view? You embarrass yourself without realizing it, IvyMike, inasmuch as your smart aleck riposte inadvertently reveals your approval of, if not participation in, the same.

  66. Saggy says: • Website

    From the article…..

    She stated that Jews!, Hispanics, and blacks were “human weeds” who, if they reproduced, “would bring a dead weight of human waste into the world”.

    Another bogus quote – Snopes …

    So, who in hell is this guy? Has anyone actually seen ‘Larry Romanoff’?

  67. While at it how about depopulating the planet of war criminals, genocidal maniacs and robber barons?

  68. @Tommy Thompson

    The chosen tribes need victim hood. All modern elites love war with all its mass deaths and resource plundering. Both groups are primarily in the financial end of business. Besides the obvious of who will do all the real work, where will their wealth come from without demand? Don’t think it will end well for them given their blood lust.

  69. One problem with your theory: the nonwhite global population is exploding, and only whites have birthrates below replacement level.

  70. Saggy says: • Website

    The lead quote … Henry Kissinger ..

    Depopulation should be the highest priority of foreign policy towards the third world, because the US economy will require large and increasing amounts of minerals from abroad, especially from less developed countries.

    is also bogus …

  71. @Herald

    No, I’m not a gatekeeper for The Man. I’m saying, provide a shred of evidence. If true, it should be very easy.

    This sounds like clickbait.

  72. Rahan says:

    I enjoyed reading this article, although my hair is still standing on end, so thanks!

    Paternalistic centralized regimes, i.e. “ebil totalitarian hells”, when they decide to lower birth levels, or to dismantle certain social institutions, or to create a new type of person–they clearly state this. They start massive propaganda effort, and clearly state stuff along the lines of “Comrades, we shall lower the birth rates!” Or “We shall dismantle X institution!” Or “We shall create Y type of new person!”

    Even if they decide to replace the population somewhere, they simply say “we’re shipping you off, deal with it,” or “we’re bringing in more settlers, don’t do anything stupid”. Likewise with “rooting out religion”, when they go through that phase, as the commie ones tend to.

    It may be undemocratic in the Western sense, but it is honest and it is upfront.

    In today’s West however, when these things are being done–and they are all being done–they are done secretly, at the expense of destroying all positive elements of the Western heritage, such as free speech, open debate, truth-finding, level playing field, fair play, checks and balances–all the time pretending they’re not doing this and if you think they’re doing this, you’re crazy.

    Western Democracies are already post-Western post-Democracies and it’s getting an increasingly ugly sight to behold. Thanks again for the article!

    Important pre-election meme collection for sharing:

  73. frontier says:
    @Tommy Thompson

    Populations aren’t “peaking and going down for their own reasons”, there are specific reasons for it, one being humanitarian aid from the low-fertility white countries, another is immigration into the same – giving hope to make kids flee or be sold thus freeing space for more people in the 3-rd world. Looking at population growth, absolutely nobody sane would claim depopulation of the 3-rd world – Africa’s got the highest fertility rate by far.

    I’m in favor of banning all vaccines sent to the 3-rd world and severely restricting, as well as making fully transparent, the ones used in the West. It would be also mandatory to make aid contingent on the success of lowering birth rate by the country receiving it. Nonsensical claims of “peaking and going down for their own reasons” are what brought us to such extreme and poverty causing imbalances.

    The vaxx situation is a symptom not the disease, there’s so much wrong with pharma & FDA & CDC right here in US that focusing on countries with much lower political independence is utterly pointless and even harmful. So yes, this article is harmful because it both masks the overpopulation problem AND the root drivers of our runaway pharma industry. The vaxxers are exempt from lawsuits, here in US, for Christ’s sake, they can inject you with trash and you’ve got no recourse – talk about these issues, the 3-rd world situation won’t get fixed before we fix ours here.

    • Replies: @anon
  74. @Art

    Marriage?? Do you really think decreasing marriage is a deterrent to population growth?

    • Replies: @AlaskaJ
  75. Chris Moore says: • Website
    @Tommy Thompson

    Most like to think that they are from the Chosen or the elite, and it will be the Other tribes that are selected for reduction and elimination. Lol.

    Covid lock-downs and engineered economic crashes will certainly have a huge role to play in driving down the world population, leaving the elite and the Chosen tribes untouched and more secure in a smaller world.

    Which is it?

  76. Chris Moore says: • Website
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    The only reasonable answer is that those “white racists” are not really “white” (or do not identify as such) but are Jews.

    Or Jewish hybrids. Or Marxist-Zionists. Who have joined in scapegoating whites and Christians for the failures of the world to get its libido, its greed, and other base appetites under control. Because they themselves couldn’t, as this article makes clear.

  77. FB says: • Website

    How is public transport ‘expensive’…?

    In every city in the world that has a good public transport system [some are truly wonderful], public transport is much cheaper than any other form of transport…it’s also quicker, more convenient and much more ecologically friendly…

    Ninety percent of meatheads driving on public roads are not mentally equipped to operate a motor vehicle…and if there was proper training and licensing they would not be allowed to get behind the wheel in the first place, and pose an intolerable menace to humans and pets as they go road-raging around town…

    The US is an outlier in decent public transit compared to most countries…badly lagging in most places…a big, big fundamental problem…

    The automobile has become an albatross around humanity’s neck…the modern industrial economy mostly runs on automobiles, manufacturing them, financing them, extracting and refining the fuel required and so on…when you add all that up, the economy is largely auto-driven…

    In the US low income folks must have a car simply in order to have employment…and so they are forever chained to debt slavery out of which many can never dig out…increasingly, working class Americans in urban centers can’t afford both a car and a place to live, so they live in their car, the only realistic option…

    • Agree: Commentator Mike
    • Replies: @Alden
  78. The only thing wrong with eugenics is that they want to use force to gain their ends. The idea that we should encourage limiting the mental midgets in the society is a good one.

    Force is wrong and unnecessary to get rid of the really low end of the population that just mooches off the rest. All that’s needed is to stop the ‘free stuff’ that penalizes the producers to allow the baby factories to pump out more of themselves.

    Every individual has the right to support anyone they choose as an act of charity. When the gov’t steps in and robs Peter to pay Felopia or Testicleese that’s a different matter entirely. It is gov’t action that is the underlying problem.

    It’s well known that what you subsidize you get more of. Simply stop the subsidy and let the generations of welfare moochers figure out how to survive. Maybe they can pick the strawberries instead of importing illegals.

    Trouble is, we have a huge portion of the population that votes for a living instead of works for a living.

  79. What are we to do with Desmond Hatchet? 30+ kids and a min wage job. Once (or twice) sired 4 infants in a year.

  80. Kissinger, Gates, Fauci, and others of that ilk are the executioners for the zionists that are behind the depopulation agenda and the zionists are behind the covid-19 scam, hoax, psyop to murder millions via their vaccinations which their puppet Trump has vowed to use the military to inject the population with the tracking nano particles and other toxic substances to reduce the population, in concert with the zionist plans.

    Read the Rockefeller document 2010 and the World Economic Forum event 201, which was financed by Gates October 18, 2019, they came right out and said what they were going to do, a modern version of Mein Kamp, these brazen bastards would have put the SS to shame!

    Read The Protocols of Zion and The Controversy of Zion, there is seen the template for the zionist takeover of the world.

    • Agree: Kali
  81. Anonymous[268] • Disclaimer says:

    Very informative article. I knew about Malthus and Darwin but not much about the others.

    But were they wrong?

    I enjoy sex. I use contraception. I am concerned about overpopulation. In fact, I think most of the world’s environmental problems are due to overpopulation: pollution, deforestation, overfishing, extinction of species.

    Even modern economic problems: housing prices, what to do with the unemployed when manufacturing jobs are off-shored. What happens when there is a mismatch between the jobs available in the modern economy and the people looking for jobs?

    I don’t think any reasonably ethical people would advocate outright killing people. But limiting family size and offering birth control seem to be obvious needs. A more draconian notion is sterilization, but this could be offered through free-market incentives and not imposed by govt force.

    The other alternative is that the masses of people compete for resources and their countries go to war killing thousands, millions. I would prefer the less violent option of family planning.

    And no family needs ( deserves?) to have more than 3 children. 2 or less preferred.

  82. Jiminy says:

    What confuses me is that when you look at world population growth graphs, there seem to be no dips- only a constantly rising line. The figure is now somewhere below 8 billion inhabitants. It’s strange that with so many people having been sterilised, there appears to be no sign of a dropping off of populations, anywhere. One can only assume that the whole process has been an abject failure.
    And if McNamara sent 500000 soldiers to Vietnam but few returned, (let’s say 60000 were killed there), where are the rest of them now. Are they still locked up in jungle jails, or running strip joints in Hanoi. Who knows.

    • Replies: @ravis
  83. @Alden

    If the elites going back 120 years really wanted de population, world population would not have increased from 2 billion to almost 8 billion in the last 80 years.

    There is another possibility, i.e. that the “elites” do not have the power to control events that so many here ascribe to them.

    • Replies: @Alden
  84. haha says:
    @Tommy Thompson

    With all due respect, the earth and its resources are very much finite, not infinite. Anyone who loves nature and would like to have the planet retain its flora and fauna, forests, wide open spaces, clean air and pristine water would wish the human print to be kept small and reasonable.

    That said, I am NOT in favor of human and social engineering or eugenics. These are repulsive ideas, truly repulsive. Mankind has played God over Nature for too long, with disastrous consequences for us and the entire animal kingdom. Having prolonged human lifespan, we must learn to practice birth control as well. Not at the behest of social engineers, tyrants, plutocrats or compulsive do-gooders but out of inner understanding, love for nature, and our collective well-being. Small, happy families, committed to preserving and revering nature and the beauty of the planet is what we need as a new philosophy arising from within our inner souls.

    • Thanks: Kali
  85. anon[113] • Disclaimer says:

    I’d fully support depopulation if it is aimed at sub-Saharan Africans and American blacks.

  86. gay troll says:

    So let’s see, earlier this week Larry was pinning Nazi science on Jews and now he is pinning eugenics on feminists. It must be hard to be a Christian, with everyone out to get you. It must be especially hard to believe in a God who lets the devil do as he pleases. I thought YHWH specifically sent himself to Earth as Jesus Christ so that the wicked Jews could crucify him as absolution for that time a woman chose to know the difference between good and evil? I thought Jesus promised to return to Earth within ONE generation? I also thought Titus executed Christ’s judgment against Jerusalem? So why is it that you theophagic agnostics still think you’re at war?

    I think I’ve gotten the gist of alt media; mostly it consists of white Christian authors emphasizing to white Christian audiences that RACE, not RELIGION, accounts for human differences. White Nationalism has always been marketed to Christians, yet it has become a form of proselytization that avoids explicitly mentioning Jesus in hopes of recruiting a larger mass of crackers. All the layers of political criticism, sometimes well founded, cannot elevate the core contention that all whites, all Christians, and all nationalists should be white Christian nationalists. Meanwhile the alt media outlets are still beholden to Jewish oversight including Michael Snyder’s ZeroHedge and Ron Unz’ Vanity Blog.

    If Jews were once defined by race, they have long been defined by faith, just like Christians. Yet many Jews, even the white ones, insist on racial identity. This is the same attitude they want to cultivate among Christians. It is deadly obvious that racially motivated Christendom will fulfill the project of racially justified Judaism, which is to say the covenant between the Jews and their demon god YHWH will be upheld, and we will soon see a bunch of white male chauvinists litigating from the Third Temple while writing Donald Trump fan fiction for their next testament.

    Christianity can neither save or enlighten anyone. If you find something inspiring in the Bible, do a little research and learn where it was plagiarized from, then throw away your Judeo Christian Guide to World Domination.

  87. Iseeit says:

    I won’t attempt to express the full range of my thoughts, nor my awareness beyond saying thank you for sharing-:)

  88. Here is the one graphic that is worth a thousand words, why the elite (and the white nationalists should) want to depopulated Africa by Bill Gates vaccines. They are out breeding us at a fantastic rate. For the wealthy, such a horde portend future disaster, as huge populations will always vote socialistic and eventually they will vote or go to war to take the wealth from the elites. Marxism is extremely popular in poor countries, it is really the politics of jealousy.

    Bill Gates and his billionaire friends probably view his anti-fertility vaccines as salvation.

  89. @Saggy

    The quote is taken directly from Margaret Sanger’s book, The Pivot of Civilization.

    Snopes is wrong in their conclusions more than half of the time, from what I’ve seen, and most of these so-called ‘fact check’ websites are notorious for regurgitating the official narrative of the day. Anything the NYT deems a ‘conspiracy theory’ is almost always followed religiously by these websites, plus none have access to obscure 70 year-old books.

    Snopes is no more reliable than Wikipedia.

    • Replies: @Saggy
    , @acementhead
  90. @Kali

    I’m not talking whites ruling the world. Yes, there are below dumb whites and they need to done away with as well. Capitalism also needs to be replaced, it produces soulless materialism instead of high culture and beauty.

    As for the poor african workers…give me a break. Most Sub Saharans and mestizos in the US are a net negative on the economy. They take more in services adn handouts than they ever give back.

    You don’t need to exploit anyone for economic development, stop reading critical theory and social science. Germany industrialized before having any colonies, as did Austria-hungary. Japan, Poland, South Korea, all became successful without any colonies or muh oppression.

    Economic development is the inevitable result of a high iq population that is not handicapped by some system like communism or extreme neoliberal monopoly capitalism.

    Most labor is being automated away in any case and there will be no need for all that cocoa and coal in a world with 500 million people. Man will be able to live in equillibrium with nature and every man will have a life standard worthy of a feudal lord, with an army of machine labor to support him.

    In your world, the entire planet will be burried under sub saharans and will submerge into a permanent dark age.

    I support hte illuminati

    • Replies: @Kali
    , @Kali
  91. @Yukon Jack

    Bill Gates is the least competent evil person in history. With all his wealth and supposed plan to sterilize Africa, black women are pumping out 5-6 apelets a piece.

  92. Of course many of the “authorities” you quote, people like Holdren and Kissinger, are at best menaces and at worst insane, but that does not mean that humanity is not facing a real crisis.

  93. gay troll says:

    Larry Romanoff = For Formal Yarn

  94. Vojkan says:

    When I read the comments on this article I wonder whatever happened to “live and let live”. The Earth may be, or may be not, over-populated but no one has a God-given right to decide who may live and who must die or who may breed and who must be sterilised. In fact, maybe we should start the depopulation effort by eliminating the psychopaths who think like they do.

    • Agree: AB_Anonymous, Montefrío
  95. Kali says:

    Indeed. It makes you wonder how humankind ever managed to survive for all those millenia before agriculture and later, capitalism came to save us from the grizzlies whilst we lived “under water with sharks”!

    ‘“Tommy” gets my Most Idiotic Comment EVER Award.’


  96. @Yukon Jack

    The Africans haven’t the brains or equipment to take over anything. If they keep breeding like rabbits, they will continue to starve or have miserable lives. You can’t fix stupid and the whole continent is largely stupid on steroids. The Africans themselves have to realize that they can’t properly support their kind in the numbers they’re creating.

    The problem with the Africans is due to all the ‘free stuff’ they get from the bleeding hearts all over the civilized world. Stop sending them free food, etc because it’s just making all their and the rest of the world’s problems worse.

    The fact that they’ve overrun Europe is the fault of the European political class wanting to virtue signal. Anyone with 2 neurons to rub together knows that you can’t take a low IQ individual and suddenly make him productive in a higher IQ country. Every African peasant is a drain on the productive class and sooner or later reality will make itself felt. When the European economies really start to unwind is when all the ‘free stuff’ will necessarily be curtailed or canceled outright and that’s when the freeloaders will have to go back to where they can scratch up a living or die in Europe. The US is no different.

    • Agree: Alfred
  97. I recall consuming cotton seed oil. Wasn’t it a standard oil for frying potato chips not so many years ago? I’m sure it was included in the ubiquitous “vegetable oil.”

    • Replies: @Larry Romanoff
  98. ravis says:

    Rambo freed most of them.

  99. @Caspar von Everec

    Any organization becomes a Death cult when members gives up thinking and leave their lives in the hands of unelected “men of god”.

  100. @Saggy

    I took the time to check your ‘fact check’ reference at Snopes, and this is what you “checked”:

    “Slavs, Latin and Hebrew immigrants are human weeds … a deadweight of human waste … Blacks, soldiers and Jews are a menace to the race.”

    My article contains no such quote, I have never seen this before, and I also am certain it is false.

    You surely knew this supposed quote from Snopes was NOT contained anywhere in the article. Yet you made a post effectively accusing the author of lying, of fabricating false quotes, when you are the one who is lying – doing a supposed fact-check on one quotation, and on this basis then claiming a totally different quotation to be false.

    My compliments on your honesty and integrity.

  101. Saggy says: • Website
    @Larry Romanoff

    The quote is taken directly from Margaret Sanger’s book, The Pivot of Civilization.

    That’s chutzpah, folks. You can see the complete text of the book here …

    Only one mention of ‘weeds’ ….

    This child was found groping his way down the beet-rows pulling out weeds and feeling for the beet-plants

    and no mention of ‘Jew’ or ‘Jews’ at all.

    Has anyone actually seen ‘Larry Romanoff’?

    • Replies: @Roger
  102. All immigration to The West from the ‘Billion + Club’ (china, India, africa) should cease immediately.

    • Agree: Alfred
  103. Alfred says:

    The crash in oil prices suggests that at the margin people can no longer afford it. However, the cost of oil is way below the level necessary to replace depletion. As oil consumption drops, so will the food supply and everything else. The population in some places will drop more dramatically than in other places. The Middle East is a huge importer of grain. It will be interesting to see what happens when that supply is choked. The Grand Solar Minimum is here. Crops will fail. Already this year Russia stopped grain exports for two months. Russia was the largest exporter of grain last year.

    • Replies: @Steven80
  104. anon[327] • Disclaimer says:

    Everyone listed above should have been aborted
    then bronzed to be modern art.

  105. Maybe it’s just because I’m getting old and impatient, but I really need to be persuaded by the first 10-12 paragraphs of an article that it will be worth reading, or at least has a direct bearing on the stated topic 😀

  106. MEH 0910 says:
    @Stephen Paul Foster

    This is the sort of invention makes it hard to believe anything he says.

    You are right. Larry Romanoff can’t be believed.

    “It led to Robert McNamara’s Project 100,000, where about 500,000 low-IQ individuals were conscripted into the US army and sent to Vietnam, few returning.”

    This is not remotely believable. “Few returning.” How few? The official death count for American soldiers in Vietnam is around 58,000. In a different blog he says that the U.S. government inflated the death count by a factor of 10.

    Link to a Romanoff piece (which he footnoted in this piece):

    US casualty figures mushroomed after the introduction of this program, the victims of which were simply cannon-fodder and, for this and other reasons, I remain convinced there is a high probability American deaths in Vietnam were grossly under-reported and that a great many of these nearly 500,000 simply never returned and whose records no longer exist. It is not only possible, but probable, that American deaths in Vietnam were in fact ten times the stated 50,000.

    Link from a footnote in that Romanoff piece:

    McNamara’s Folly: Lowering the Standards to Fill the Ranks
    Jerry D. Morelock

    Books and articles about the Vietnam War tend to focus on “the best and brightest,” whether to praise them for superior performance or to criticize them for failures in judgment and not measuring up to their promise. Author and Vietnam veteran Hamilton Gregory, however, examines servicemen at the opposite end of the ability and intelligence spectrum—the men inducted under the Pentagon’s “Project 100,000,” which began in October 1966.

    Gregory reveals the disproportionate price paid by the New Standard Men for Johnson and McNamara’s disastrous policy: “A total of 5,478 low-IQ men died while in the service, most of them in combat. Their fatality rate was three times as high as that of other GIs. An estimated 20,270 were wounded, and some were permanently disabled (including an estimated 500 amputees).”

    • Replies: @Thim
  107. @Larry Romanoff

    Snopes is a CIA, Mossad, MI6 disinformation site.

  108. @Kratoklastes

    The easiest way for the rich to get money is through buying politicians.

    They’re way past that now. Now they actively groom their chattel politicos. Look at the bio of Mike Pompeo, for example.

  109. It’s certainly true, that the elites think one way, while, the masses another way, one influenced by media propaganda. It is becoming increasingly difficult to disseminate right from wrong, moral from immoral, while easier to question one’s own common sense.

  110. @The Alarmist

    For your next article, cogitate on how we got exactly the opposite of these ends out of the NWO.

    Brother, this was literally the most retarded thing that I’ve ever read on Unz. It was so unhinged that I had to go look up this Romanoff to attempt a diagnosis. He’s Canadian? Romanoff? Hmm.

    What twisted mind opposes any attempt to improve our species (or our race) by preventing the reproduction of mutant freaks? Romanoff seems to want to flood us with mutant freaks. Now who exactly would want that done to us?

    I actually enjoy this kind of thing and I’m grateful to Ron for republishing this evil bullshit – it’s far more educational than even Sailer’s constant showcasing of the NYT. The only downside is that Romanoff has buried the motivation for his fanatically dysgenic dystopia somewhere in FAR too many words for a sane person to bother wading through – pretty common for his ilk. Beware those incapable or unwilling to communicate succinctly.

    • Replies: @Herald
  111. J says:

    Great rebuttal. Pity those conspiracy lunatics will not be affected by logic. Tomorrow another will write another long crazy tirade and Unz will be happy to publish it.

  112. Miville says:
    @Caspar von Everec

    This is not true actually and that untruth still shows in contemporary figures. One of the most prosperous and equalitarian civilizations ever built in India, that of Mohenjo Daro and Harrappa, was clearly miscegenated, multicultural and multiracial judging by the variety of artefacts and skeletons and though rather Dravidian by mean racial mixture, Brownish already spoke an Aryan, Sanskrit related language, though it was not Sanskrit proper. As the purer Aryans came from the North, intellectual level was lowered for about one thousand years, though this was due more to the final decadent phase of the Mohenjo Daro civilisation rather than to the invasion proper, which was more a kind of revolution against an economical order that had grown to corrupt to pay sufficiently its most useful workers which happened to be the cattle-raisers from the North. The process was too gradual and slowly to be perceived as an invasion by those who experienced it, though they did experience very violently the revolutionary outbursts of the gradually immigrated Aryans calling for more decent revenues as wages were dwindling in the final phase. It must be also said that the fluvial valley of Indus was drying up and that former river Saraswati which used to be a verdoyant series of lakes and marshes disappeared altogether as the climate kept drying. The whiter peoples from the North (not so white actually : the Aryan beauty cannon called for a golden hued skin, with very black waving hair) did not bring any kind of economic prosperity, their ambition was to make the country more primitive and less dependent on experts. In a certain sense they made India into a toilet as their way of life clearly recommended shitting in the open so as to humiliate the new subject people. The caste system they believed in though giving some importance to colour, did not acknowledge nationalities, but only castes where trades are inherited by birth. People of the same hereditary occupation were encouraged to intermarry even though of different races.

    • Replies: @Alden
    , @RoatanBill
  113. @RoatanBill

    One African country that never asked for help and aid was Libya and all it got was bombs. There’s more than just low IQ of Africans at play why it is the way it is. They sit on a lot of valuable natural resources that others want to profit from and their countries aren’t truly independent although they pretend they are sitting in their UN seats. I agree that all aid, charity and investment to them should be stopped but simultaneously with cessation of exploitation of their resources by foreign corporations. Let them do whatever, or nothing, with their own resources, but stop exploiting them for the benefit of foreign corporations and nations.

    • Agree: Kali
  114. Kali says:
    @Caspar von Everec

    Hi Cascara,

    Firstly let me say I do appreciate your response and you perspective.

    I think it may be wise to define our terms though, if we’re to reach any kind of understanding.

    “The economy stupid” (TES) is my prefered term for the exploitative parasitic economy under which we all labour today. I think we’re in agreement that that has to go.
    I’d suggest that the operators and witting supporters of that system, regardless of IQ also have to go and the ideologies which underpins it need to be thoroughly debunked and left in the dust.
    That would go some way toward reducing the population, and getting rid of a tribe abusive psychopaths…

    … To be continued. Sorry, right now I have my personal Domestic Economy (ie, putting food on the table) to attend to. Your reply deserves my full attention.


  115. Larry Romanoff must be very afraid of women’s sexuality. An impotent fascist patriarch who wants to impose his will on impoverished women and children.

    • Replies: @Alden
    , @Joe Paluka
  116. @Commentator Mike

    I oppose all wars because they only benefit the wealthy at the expense of everyone else.

    The Africans have a political class that’s sucking their populations dry by dealing with the multinationals that want the natural resources. I can’t blame the corporations for wanting things. I blame the corruption in gov’t that impoverishes the locals. The gov’t sets the rules and the corporations have to play by those rules or get nothing.

    Trade should be fair, but with gov’ts all over the world sticking their long noses in every transaction, that’s now impossible. The people that keep voting in one low life after another ultimately are to blame. They keep hoping the next sociopath will be different, but different is always in the wrong direction, worse. The fools that insist on gov’t never learn.

    • Agree: Alfred
    • Replies: @Astuteobservor II
  117. @Commentator Mike

    That will happen when Africa runs out of resources to be exploited.

  118. Alden says:

    Public transit costs the taxpayers a fortune. By public transit I also mean bridges streets roads and freeways.

    Other than the roads and bridges it uses, the cost of a car is borne by one private owner. The cost of public transit costs the taxpayers .

    Examples. The cost to the rider of the Los Angeles light rail and subway system is reasonable. But it costs $28.0o per ride to the cities and state and federal funds that pay for it. That’s $56.00 per day for every commuter. It’s moronic to compare the $5.00 per day the actual commuters pay to the $56.00 per day the government agencies pay for a round trip.

    Golden Gate Bridge electrical refit. The old lighting and electrical systems were perfectly fine and would last another 80 years. But the environmental lobby , aka the electrical industry lobbied for a save the earth re fit. 11 billion dollars for the bridge to have a totally unnecessary refit. Good for the engineers who designed it, the companies who provided the new wiring lights and fittings and the contractors and electricians who did the work

    Subways cost more than a billion a mile. Before mass immigration and excess population many cities had no need for subways because bus and car traffic moved smoothly on the surface streets. But when due to increase in population it’s faster to walk 2 miles than drive or take the bus; well there no choice but to build a billion plus a mile subway.

    There’s an intersection in Los Angeles so crowded with buses and cars it takes 35 minutes to get through. Before the immigrant invasion and vast population increase it took about 5 minutes to get through. About 4 minutes by a slow walk, 35 minutes by bus or car.

    Buses that cost about 400K apiece that come along every 12 minutes from 6:30 am to 1 AM all day Monday through Friday and about every 18 minutes weekends. 400K apiece buses plus 100K drivers plus daily cleaning, fuel the whole administrative system, public transit is necessary but more expensive than cars to the government’s. Cost of cars borne by the owner. Cost of public transit borne by the taxpayer.

    And yes moron, buses use the GG Bridge all day long and bridges and roads traffic signs and lights are considered part of public transit because no vehicle can move with adequate roads bridges and streets. Whether it’s a car or bus.

    What about schools? It’s not cheaper to run a state school system with 700 thousand in the entire state than a school system with 400 thousand in 3 cities along with the the students in the rest of the state?

    2 billion people on earth in 1940. almost 8 billion 2018. That’s not a vast increase? Especially as the population of Africa India Asia and S America all want to move to the most crowded cities in America Canada and Western Europe. .

    The government investment in new buses subways and light rail to accommodate the enormous public increase is enormous.

    • Agree: frontier
    • Replies: @FB
    , @Biff
  119. Alden says:

    Quite a bit to deduct from a few ruins and bones dated 9 thousand years ago more or less.

  120. Sorry, but if one truly cares about the environment (as opposed to using it as a stick to beat non-Marxists) or the fast-fading concept of quality of life, population reduction is a massive benefit. There are better and worse ways of achieving the goal, but the goal itself is humane.

  121. @TG

    TG, you speak eloquently and truthfully.

  122. Alden says:
    @Larry Romanoff

    After wading through your article including your completely irrelevant fantasies about Emma Goldman’s sex life and even abortions you claim she had, I figured out your point is that the Eugenicists succeeded in greatly reducing the population of the earth for their benefit.

    But it’s just not true. Whatever Rockefeller did in 1900 and Gates is doing in Africa today, the population of the earth is growing and growing every year.

    De population has been a total failure. Why claim de population was a success when obviously it was not? How can you deny 1.5 billion people on earth 100 years ago and almost 8 billion today? Eugenics was a short lived fad that absolutely totally failed. So why rant and rave about it now 80 years after it ended? And why claim Bill Gates is de populating Africa when his well baby medical and feeding programs have vastly increased the birth rate in Africa?

    Emma Goldman and Margaret Sanger didn’t invent birth control and abortion either. Isn’t abortion mentioned in the 3,000 year old Hippocrate Oath? Didn’t ancient Egyptian Greek and Roman women use various cervix blockers? Haven’t Men been using withdrawal since the first cave couple noticed sperm plus 9 months equals baby?

    Your thesis that the elites succeeded in de population is completely contrary to the truth.

    Your throwing everything possible into the mixer is ludicrous.

    I can tell you what causes de population diphtheria scarlet fever epidemics typhoid typhus whooping cough small pox bubonic and respiratory Plague Spanish flue 122 years ago, even measles colds flu bronchitis when they hit malnourished populations living in dirty conditions.

    Your thesis is false. The points you made to support it don’t support it.

  123. ANON[408] • Disclaimer says:

    The article contains the usual simplistic slur of Libertarian thought, in its attack on Herbert Spencer.
    Spencer wrote in the late nineteenth century, which indeed was heavily influenced by Darwin, but his philosophy of individualism did not include the sentiment that the poor and unfit were expendable. This is the result of “former” Communist Richard Hofstaders 1944 book “Social Darwinism in American Thought”. Hofstatder included, as this article does, Spencer’s discussion on how a Darwinist might conclude that culling the poor was beneficial. Yet he omits, as does the article, that Spencer immediately concluded that it was more just that Social Benevolence replace Social Darwinism.
    Hofstatder former communism had led to a conversion to New Deal Progressivism. He hated classical liberalism and its cousin laissez-faire economics, and tried to use Spencer’s alleged indifference to the poor to promote massive government interventions, which only lead to unexpected consequences, then more interventions, then more unintended consequences, and a constant loss of freedoms. In other words, the left’s argument used against classical liberalism, that the Law, in its infinite wisdom, allows both the rich and poor to sleep under the city bridges.
    Spencer was a thoroughgoing classical liberal, a principled champion of individual rights in all spheres of human life. Eugenics, which was based on racism, coercion, and collectivism, was alien to everything that Spencer believed.

    • Replies: @Johan
  124. Alden says:
    @Idi Malink

    Usually it’s the fathers of one child who rant and rave in comments that other people should have 5 or 6 kids and shouldn’t use birth control. This time it’s an author.
    A prevailing theme on UNZ is a weird interest in other people’s sex lives including people long dead.

    Just as well Emma Goldman and Alexander Berkowitz didn’t have kids.

    Their Russian revolutionary Jew immigrant contemporaries did. And now their great grand children like Chesa Boudin, Susan Rosenberg and the rest rule the country. We’d have been better off if the Boudin Rosenberg Gold Dohrn lines had ended at Ellis Island. Ethel and Julius Rosenberg’s sons have been lecturing to stupid university students since they were 20 years old that their parents were not guilty and if they were they did a good thing.

    Susan Rosenberg no relation served a long sentence for murder bombing and terrorism. Got out in her old age and now runs the BLM wing of the Democrat party, Chess Boudin’s commie Jew father is serving a life sentence for murder and terrorism. His mother spent half her life in prison for the same thing. Chesa’s Grandpa Leonard Boudin was general counsel to the CPUSA. And so on back to jewish communist revolutionary Boudins landing at Ellis Island fleeing outstanding warrants for revolutionary terrorism in Europe,

    Thank God Berkowitz and Goldman didn’t have children. One good thing about their lives.

  125. @Art

    Indeed, population is in decline in advanced countries, but that is not a good thing.

    Per the CIA, as of 2017, roughly half of 224 countries have a Total Fertility Rate (TFR) of less than 2.1 children per woman, and half more. Those losing population are predominately white and advanced Asian, while those exploding in population are Third World, primarily African.

    Niger has the highest TFR at 6.49 children per woman. It appears the only non-African country in the top 30 is Afghanistan at 5.12. The only first world country with a TFR over 2.1 is Israel at 2.64, which ranks it at 71.

    As for predominately white countries, France leads at 2.07 (ranking 109). The US is 1.87 (143), and Russia is 1.61 (179). As for East Asia, China is 1.6 (182), Japan 1.41 (209), and South Korea 1.26 (219). And in many advanced countries the TFR continues to drop.

    Today’s world faces a HUGE, perhaps insurmountable problem. Those 19th Century eugenicists Romanoff discusses with distain appear to be mostly right. The dumbed down world to come will not be friendly for our children unless something drastic is done.

    • Replies: @Oliver D. Smith
  126. Thim says:
    @MEH 0910

    On a side note, when the Vietnamese saw these American dunces, they turned against us. Never had a chance once the army of retards showed up.

    I remember the Wisconsin Congressman who around 1967 or 1968 analyzed the income level of the families of all the young men who had been drafted in his district.

    Not a single family had an income over $5,000. They were all under the poverty level.

    Everyone with a brain could find a way out, and they did. But extremely poor whites, blacks, Ricans, and a large number of Indians from the reservations wanted to go. They wanted the benefits and they got them.

    Of course you cannot win a war with an army like that. Or the one we have now either.

  127. @Art

    Art, you are ignoring the different growth rates among different ethnic and geographical populations. Maybe the fertility rate is down to a steady rate in some of what you call “advanced” cultures (to distinguish them from unadvanced cultures like Africans and Muslims?). But the lowest-IQ groups are still breeding like fruit flies, and overrunning the more prosperous and rational peoples.

    I must admit the latter are not very rational about welcoming their replacements.

  128. Saggy says: • Website
    @Larry Romanoff

    Yet you made a post effectively accusing the author of lying, of fabricating false quotes,

    For the record, my previous 2 posts were 100% accurate, not to mention the earlier post on the bogus Netanyahu quote.

    This is really silly, posting not only false but obviously preposterous quotes (it reminds me of the holohoax), and then defending them with gibberish.

    It doesn’t look good for

  129. Emslander says:
    @Larry Romanoff

    Mr. Romanoff, thank you for having the courage to expose the dangerously destructive movement that has succeeded in turning human beings against themselves.

    The devil’s greatest successes:

    1. Convincing God’s chosen people that they ought to take the Messiah they were promised from their beginnings and turn Him over to the Romans for torture and murder.

    2. Persuading modern women that there is something more important for them to do in life than be the bearers of new human beings.

    3. Perpetuating the idea that he doesn’t exist.

    • Replies: @Alden
  130. Roger says:

    Well, the easiest way to resolve this would be for Larry Romanoff to cite chapter and page of the book (if the quote is actually there). If he can do that, then he wins. If not, then Saggy takes the round.

    • Replies: @anon
    , @Larry Romanoff
  131. @nokangaroos

    – The colonizers did not introduce irresponsibility to unwhite realms (brush up on your history), but they lowered mortality in populations adapted to recurring mass dieoffs.
    And as a rule of thumb in moderate climes it takes an acre to feed an adult, not one square meter

    Until quite recently, 40 years ago, say, the British, who are some of the most crowded people on the planet, had almost an acre each about 75% of it, good arable land. At the start of WW2 the British government did some research and concluded that if entirely cut off from imports of food, the British could feed themselves. Since then crop yields have increased. The population has too but only from about 45 million to 65 million.
    Two of the biggest and stupidest wastes of resources are the previous and the current Cold Wars.
    Get rid of one billionaire and you can feed a thousand people!

  132. @Levtraro

    Covid-19, polio, floods, forest fires, malaria and countless other plagues are natural phenomena. (I have no idea what “intrinsic and extrinsic natural forces” means.) Fortunately many humans have taken and are taking positive action to counter them. I guess they are self-aggrandizingly delusional in imagining they can make us safer.

    Overpopulation can be cured by disease, famine, war, and other natural processes. Or it can be cured by the application of intelligent remedies instead of just hoping the problem will take care of itself, or the feeble-minded “more is better” ideology.

    • Replies: @Levtraro
  133. @Franklin Ryckaert

    You can only pull this off once. Without the western middle class many workers in the South will be come redundant.

  134. Kali says:
    @Caspar von Everec

    As for the poor african workers…give me a break. Most Sub Saharans and mestizos in the US are a net negative on the economy. They take more in services adn handouts than they ever give back.

    I was actually referring to those in Africa, that continent of vast mineral wealth, exploited for the past <2 centuries. Had that exploitation of human and natural resources not taken place who knowns what shape the continent and it’s people might be in today!
    And had Gaddafi and Libya not been beaten to a bloody pulp by the Obama government, who knows how far a little economic protectionism and financial independance might have helped to restore some kind of balance?

    In the meantime, and to address your point, current economic migration out of Africa is of course a burden on the welfare budgets of recipient states. But would a better solution not be to stop the exploitation of Africa and allow it to develope its economy as it will, without western corporations making virtual slaves and economic refugees of its people?
    As I mentioned in an earlier comment, populations reach equibrium with their environment when not under threat/attack, which inevitably causes an expansion in fertility.
    In short, just leave them alone to undo the damage done to them by exploitative capitalist parasites.

    You don’t need to exploit anyone for economic development, stop reading critical theory and social science. Germany industrialized before having any colonies, as did Austria-hungary. Japan, Poland, South Korea, all became successful without any colonies or muh oppression.

    Economic development is one thing, economic expansion is another thing entirely. Both do rely on exploitation of one sort or another, be it of the people or of natural resources. Take a look at some of the open-cast mines in Africa (or elsewhere) and you’ll see what I mean.

    Of course a nation may develope its economy so that the needs, including creativity, of its people are met, and everyone satisfied. But this is not what we have.
    We live under the yoke of continued economic expansion by a parasite class, which has maneuvered itself to become the central, determining force for all life on Earth! – Weishaupt, the founder of the Illuminati, which you say you support, couldn’t have come up with a better scheme for the taking, administration and control of power!
    And yet you tell us “Capitalism also needs to be replaced, it produces soulless materialism instead of high culture and beauty.” – The same disconnect which I detected in your earlier comment is also present in this one. Weishaupt was a soulless capitalist who’s central concern was exploitation for his own, and his classes, gain. Either you support the Illuminati, or you wish to replace capitalism. You can’think choose both!

    In your world, the entire planet will be burried under sub saharans and will submerge into a permanent dark age.

    In my world every single man woman and child will live in peace, rid of “the economy stupid”, free to create and develope (and to defend if necessary) the necessities and pleasures of life, unburdened by capitalist exploiters, supported by local social administration, by community, and by those natural resources at their disposal.

    The populations of the world will reach a natural equilibrium once Weishaupts’ legacy has been destroyed.

    Like it or not, the global population is about to take a hit. Let’s just hope that those who survive have the good sense not to repeat the mistakes of moden industrial and post-modern post-industrial societies.

    It’s pre-fudal agrarian all the way for me, and death to the Illuminati! 😀

    Oh, btw, my apologies for not spotting that the predictive text on this phone had changed your name in my previous reply!

    With love,

    • Replies: @nokangaroos
  135. Jane says:

    Boy, Ron is off even more of his meds. Ron, Emma Goldman wasn’t the exception when it comes to your ilk, she is the rule. We know defectives like Goldman and you get off trying to terrorize and push your weight around. I am not afraid of you. But you are afraid of God and He won’t bow down to you 5h1t house rats, even were you to eradicate every Christian off the face of the earth, He will consign you to hell. The only thing that would alter that were you repenting and reparation but that requires decency and honesty, I don’t think you’re capable of that. You should pray that you are.

  136. anon[177] • Disclaimer says:

    Quote from “CHAPTER V: The Cruelty of Charity” – paragraph 8 [para exploded here + emphasis mine]

    Statistics now available also inform us that more than a million dollars are spent annually to support the public and private institutions in the state of New York for the segregation of the feeble-minded and the epileptic.

    A million and a half is spent for the up-keep of state prisons, those homes of the “defective delinquent.”

    Insanity, which, we should remember, is to a great extent hereditary, annually drains from the state treasury no less than $11,985,695.55, and from private sources and endowments another twenty millions.

    When we learn further that the total number of inmates in public and private institutions in the State of New York—in alms-houses, reformatories, schools for the blind, deaf and mute, in insane asylums, in homes for the feeble-minded and epileptic—amounts practically to less than sixty-five thousand, an insignificant number compared to the total population, our eyes should be opened to the terrific cost to the community of this dead weight of human waste.

    — Margaret Sanger, The Pivot of Civilization

  137. Jane says:

    In all candor Ron, God has been tipping the hand, so to speak of you parasites. Why else do you think he made Ben Shapiro the spitting image of the character Damien in another Hollyweird movie. While God would welcome your sincere repentance, as He loves all human beings, He doesn’t condone your behavior and I can’t help but feel He wants us to laugh at you.

  138. @Levtraro

    There is one proven , humane, in my view highly acceptable way of preventing population growth, which is educating girls. So far, it has worked most of the time and where it hasn’t it has probably reduced the tendency for the population to increase.

    • Replies: @Levtraro
    , @obwandiyag
    , @xcd
  139. @Alden

    Population grows and grows, wages go down and down, the price of housing and need for expensive public transit goes up and up and the rich get richer as wages go down and the price of housing goes up.

    None of that is true of China.

  140. anon[177] • Disclaimer says:

    From the source

    “Compared with the African negro,” [Dr. Austin Freeman] writes, “the British sub-man is in several respects markedly inferior.

    The British Sub-Man. Gotta remember that one.

    I’ve just skimmed this book and the arguement between @Larry and @Saggy, but it seems Sanger’s position is simply that modern society is creating the “unnatural” situation that rewards the “unfit” and penalizes the “fit”. It doesn’t appear to be a racist position. The very mention of the “British sub-man” proves it.

    Her position is that of the materialist fundamentalist.

  141. 1. maggie sanger sounds hawt ! ! !
    2. um, are we saying we are underpopulated, then ? ? ?
    3. um, are we saying more stoopidheads having stoopidheads will not result in mostly stoopidheads ? ? ?
    4. um, selective breeding ‘works’, and is ‘good’ for roses, green beans, dogs, cattle, and horses, but not nekkid apes ? ? ?
    5. meh, get rid of all the warning labels on everything and the problem will sort itself out…

    • Agree: gay troll
  142. FB says: • Website

    Two words…


    [But of course we all knew that already…]

    • Replies: @Alden
  143. Loup-Bouc says:

    Larry Romanoff writes better than perhaps all but two other Unz Review authors — Linh Dinh & Israel Shamir. Among the three, Mr. Romanoff is the one best able to compose a novelette-length article of which I will read more than a few paragraphs. Better — and worse — Mr. Romanoff’s “The Pleasures of Depopulating the Earth” seduced me (a nearly cynical vicious skeptic) to feel, initially, that I might accept the entire placenta of article’s thesis, even its host’s anatomy, biochemistry, physiology, and last meal’s nutrition — until I read through the piece’s 5th paragraph.

    My neural pumps were primed for acceptance, because, though I favor both sex’s absolute sexual freedom (save if it harms an object who desires no pain) — even sexual freedom of children — I oppose abortion performed after the fetus attains capacity of feeling alarm-pain. “Alarm-pain” means noxious experience that causes the recipient to experience a sensation kindred to what an infant feels as alarming pain or a sense of “suffering.”

    At about 7 weeks of gestation, a fetus can feel a sense describable as pain. But very likely such “pain” is not alarm-pain or noxious experience. Surely, however, by 12 to 14 weeks, a fetus can feel alarm-pain — can suffer.

    Many “authorities” (none a fetus, neonate, or even a 6-months-old child) insist that alarm-pain — or suffering — cannot occur before formation of cerebral cortex and thalamocortical tracts spinal-cord-connected (neurally) to organs and the periphery [circa 23-24 weeks of gestation]. Hereinafter, those authorities’ insistence (or perception) shall be called “thalamocortical-spinal-peripheral theory.” See, e.g.,,

    But other sources present well-supported contrary arguments. And the “no-pain-before-cerebral-cortex-and-thalamocortical-tracts (etc.) sources neglect to account the fact that in minimally-intelligent non-human animals — even in human infants — apparent alarm-pain can — most often does — occur sub-cerebrally per psychological mechanics that operate without cortical intervention. See, e.g.,,

    Orgonomic psychiatry has proven that even in human adults, psychic experience lodges outside the brain — in the organ, muscle, and other anatomical structures other than the brain. See, e.g.,, these:
    (1) Morton Herskowitz, D.O., Emotional Armoring: An Introduction to Psychiatric Orgone Therapy (LIT Verlag 30 August 1998, republished. 2008 and 2012)), ISBN10 3825835553, ISBN13 9783825835552, available online at
    Wilhelm Reich, Character Analysis (Farrar, Straus, and Giroux 1972, paperback 1990), Paperback ISBN-13: 978-0-374-50!J8IJ–l, Paperback ISBN-lO: 0-:374-50980-8, available online at
    (3) Wilhelm Reich, The Function of the Orgasm: Sex-economic Problems of Biological Energy (Farrar, Straus, and Giroux 1973, earlier editions by the Orgone Institute Press 1942 and 1948), Library of Congress catalog card number: 72-81011, Paperback ISBN: 0-374-50204-8, excerpt available online at AND
    (4) Myron Sharaf, Fury on Earth: A Biography of Wilhelm Reich (Da Capo Press 1994), ISBN-13: 9780306805752.

    Cardiologists have discovered that resuscitated brain-dead heart transplant and deep hypothermic circulatory arrest patients recall experiences occurring during time of brain-death, that organs have “brains,” that transplanted hearts carried deceased donor’s memories to the transplanted heart’s recipient, and that not only the heart, but other organse, even the intestines, have “brains.”. See, e.g.,,

    The thalamocortical-spinal-peripheral theory may (I believe does) derive from bias that the human adult is nature’s (or evolution’s) crowning achievement. Even other mammals’ virtues are measured against the standard of the human adult. That bias spurs thalamocortical-spinal-peripheral theorists to disregard the actuality that numerous invertebrate animals feel alarm-pain (or noxious experience) and suffer — even many invertebrates whose thalamocortical apparatus is relatively primitive or nearly nonexistent.

    Such considerations led me to opine that criminal law ought to provide that post-11th-week abortions are homicides analogous to infanticide — murder or manslaughter — even if the pregnancy resulted from rape. Surely (except where rape occurs when the victim is utterly unconscious and the penetration does not cause post-resuscitation vaginal sensitivity), long before gestation-week eleven, the rape victim must have been aware that pregnancy was possible and ought to have obtained pregnancy-testing early enough to undergo abortion before gestation-week twelve.

    Since effective birth control — even the “morning after” pill — has been readily available, and mostly inexpensive, for decades, law cannot find a rational/moral premise of excusing any above-65-IQ (smarter than moron) woman’s becoming pregnant and undergoing abortion after gestation-week eleven.

    But what of Emma Goldman’s abortions? Emma Goldman [hereinafter “Emma”] was far from moronic, and numerous sources insist her intelligence was higher than average. But, in her epoch, non-abortion birth control methods were spare throughout most of the world and, in the United States, Canada, and much of Europe, illegal. Mr. Romanoff appears to argue that Emma’s abortions were inexcusable because either she was a nymphomaniac or outrageously promiscuous.


    If she was a nymphomaniac, then her behavior derived from a psychic illness of powerful influence, perhaps powerful enough to deprive Emma of moral choice, so that her abortions ought be excused for reason kindred to the reason that explains the criminal law’s excusing the criminal acts of the legally insane or those suffering a certain degree of diminished capacity. Mr. Romanoff insists Emma was insane. He insists she escaped from an “insane asylum” and later asserts quite directly and unequivocally that she was insane.

    But the insane-asylum escape assertion lacks factual support. Where Mr. Romanoff asserts that Emma escaped from “ an insane asylum,” Mr. Romanoff does not cite a source. I reviewed all the sources he cited. None even intimated that Emma suffered mental illness or a neurotic or other non-psychotic condition that could impair her reality-testing (more than “normal” humans’ reality-testing is impaired quite often, as is (and has been much proved), e.g.,, the reality-testing of most, if not near-all, “normal” human eyewitnesses who testify in judicial trials).

    One source — Bruce E. Levine, PhD, a practicing clinical psychologist — offers this:

    …Emma Goldman (1869–1940)…lived a cinematic life that included international travel, public speaking fame, multiple imprisonments, and deportation [and]…she built an enviable ré sumé of enemies that included J. Edgar Hoover and Vladimir Lenin. At psychiatric survivor activist conferences, I routinely meet women who—though not self-identifying as anarchists—remind me of Goldman in terms of personality, grit, and intelligence; they, unlike Goldman, have been previously stigmatized with mental illness labels such as oppositional defiant disorder, conduct disorder, borderline personality disorder, antisocial personality disorder, and bipolar disorder.

    Given that Goldman, as a teenager and young woman, had the “symptoms” for all the above so-called “disorders,” anarchists and psychiatric survivors immediately recognize that in today’s world—rather than becoming the most famous anarchist woman in US history—she would likely have become a psychiatric patient (and then a survivor activist). Nowadays, many anti-authoritarian women, for their anger and rebellious behaviors—almost always far less violent than Emma’s—are labeled with various serious psychiatric disorders and heavily medicated. Similar to Goldman, their “symptoms” have often been fueled by the physical and emotional abuse of various authorities—experiences which taught them to distrust authorities.

    Quoted from Bruce E. Levine, PhD, “Sublime Madness”: Anarchists, Psychiatric Survivors, Emma Goldman & Harriet Tubman,

    Dr. Levine did not assert, or even intimate, that Emma had escaped from an insane asylum or that she had resided, ever, in a booby hatch. Dr. Levine perceives that Emma was sane but engaged in behaviors that might induce an unscrupulous, puritanical, or stupid relative to seek a Emma clone’s being committed to a mental hospital — for her manifest and “socially unacceptable” iconoclasms.

    For more than a few decades starting around 1900, physicians treated female “hysteria” by giving women orgasms, first with manual stimulation effected with a finger or fingers of the physician’s hand(s), then with vibrators. The women were sex-starved, or worse. Worse? Stuck in marriages the men of which were sexual incompetents, oft unloving, “wham, bam, thank you Ma’am” patriarchs. [What is Catholic foreplay? “Brace yer-self, Mary Margaret.”] Polite society deemed — still deems — women “sluts” if they enjoyed sex.

    In some cultures (cultures mostly abroad, but trickled even into Western Europe and North America), women are submitted to forced “circumcision” (clitorechtomy). A victim woman is consigned to according sexual pleasure to a man who considers her a thing bearing a wet hole to fuck and to squirt-out male heirs but who must not seek pleasure with a man who might LOVE her sexually — share with her a fulfilling, loving lust.

    Emma was neither insane nor a nymphomaniac, but simply a sexually-liberated woman. So, Mr. Romanoff’s complaint reduces to the assertion that Emma was obliged not to enjoy sex except in a monogamous relationship in which she would bear to term, then mother, any fetuses produced by that relationship’s sexual aspect.

    Mr. Romanoff assertion suggests a legal rule — a rule that law forbids every woman any (heterosexual) reproduction-capable sexual pleasure not occurring in a monogamous relationship. One cannot imagine a more flagrantly oppressive rule of law, surely not a more egregiously evil patriarchal or horrendously male-supremacist one — except, perhaps, in, e.g.,, certain Islamic, far right Christian, or far right Jewish cultures. A psychically healthy woman ADORES love-involved heterosexual sex — much as does a psychically healthy man.

    Truly healthy humans need not only to enjoy rather frequent sexual pleasure but also to receive, and give, love. Without loving feelings, sexual experience pales and tends toward the perverse. Emma did not insist that women were entitled to, or need pursue, mere free, frequent sex, but, rather, that both men and women need and ought not be precluded from pursuing whatever sexual LOVE they may realize, with whomever they might realize it.
    Psychic health does not require that love be huge or permanent — only that sex be loving, rather than manifest sexual greed, or a grasping for an always-unattainable consummate excitement.

    Mr. Romanoff decries forced sterilization. How is forced sterilization different from forced preclusion of a woman’s freedom of sexual gratification? Mr. Romanoff contemns Emma’s risking abortion for satisfaction of her natural sexual desire. Surely Emma would not have mothered a child: her consistent life-style proves so. Ought she have carried fetuses to term and then shunted them to orphanages or to the mercy of the state?

    * [Side-Note:
    My parents dumped my sister (of 13 years) and me (then six) in an orphanage dubbed “Catholic Society for Prevention of Cruelty to Children” — a name much like titles of statutes the pursue their name’s opposites, like a Clean Air Act that diminishes air-cleanliness to serve the greed of owners of air-polluting industries). I learned well the nuns’ bludgeon and lash.

    Once, before I was six, I overheard my father and mother attempting in coitus. My mother: “Get off my tit, you filthy prick. What do you think I am, a cow?” My father voiced a passacaglia of grunts. Like Emma, I played, often, the target of my parents’ fists, back-hands, feet, my father’s belt……. My mom and pop were fine upstanding members of society — hard working, law-abiding, paragons of proper morality.
    End Side-Note:]

    If a judge of a high court, would Mr. Romanoff have ordered her Emma sterilized — to save fetuses from being birthed into hell? Cf. Buck v. Bell, 274 US 200 (1927), which authorized a forced salpingectomy’s (bilateral fallopian tube excision) being performed upon Carrie Buck, a “feeble minded white woman” . Mr. Romanoff insists Emma was insane, even dangerous, even an assassin or assassin’s conspirator. If the law supports sterilization of female imbeciles, why not murderously dangerous lunatics whose offspring may carry the mother’s psychopathy-seed?

    But wait. Back to sane, rational focus: All animals fuck — per force of genetic drive. Humans are animals. Unlike other female animals, human females do not have heat cycles. Healthy — untrammeled by moral dreck — the human female can be horny every day. The healthy female human’s genes demand free sexual expression. Society’s only legitimate sex-related concern is that humans not harm other humans (intentionally or by acting with reckless disregard of foreseeability of harm) when they seek sexual satisfaction. [To avoid transmuting this comment into a disquisition, I shall eschew discussing the psychopathology of sadomasochism, but refer you to Wilhelm Reich, Character Analysis (supra ), Chapter XI, pp.225-269.]

    Insane? Romanoff is insane. He hallucinates insanity into others who are SANE.

    Romanoff writes:

    [The] Jewish womens’ website tells us her [Emma’s] insistence on “the right to express herself” – primarily through sexual promiscuity, abortion and murder – led her to become a prominent figure in “establishing freedom of speech in America.” A definition of free speech rather at odds with mine. This same Jewish Womens’ website contained its article on Emma Goldman under the banner of “Women of Valor”. No idea why, but that’s how history is spun.

    The key is Romanoff’s language “ sexual promiscuity, abortion and murder.” The term “promiscuity” is puritanically judgmental. It deems free love a SIN (despite sin does not exist save in warped minds of the God-fearing or others who contemn free expression of natural healthy drives and their natural functions). And, Emma never murdered, conspired to murder, or aided or abetted murder of President McKinley, or anyone else.
    Mr. Romanoff cites nothing that could support his assertion. Were Emma Goldman alive now, she could expropriate Mr. Romanoff’s entire wealth with a libel suit.

    Mr. Romanoff tries to mock Emma’s refusing to support the women’s suffrage movement of the early 20th century: How risibly ironic — he suggests — Emma’s urging and fighting for women’s liberation but failing to struggle for women’s full, equal participation in choosing the personages of government. Either Romanoff did not read, or could not endure reading, the sane, very rational reason of Emma’s not fighting for women’s suffrage:

    Emma Goldman, the nation’s leading anarchist, mocked the notion that the ballot could secure equality for women, since it hardly accomplished that for the majority of American men. Women would gain their freed, she said, only “by refusing the right to anyone over her body….”

    See bottom of this web-page — where, under the here-above linked article [“Emma Goldman American Anarchist”], the Encyclopedia Britannica editors cross-link three other articles, including “feminism: the suffrage movement,” whence the immediately preceding quote.

    When I began reading Mr. Romanoff’s article, I did not pause to consider one certain term — the term “Jewish” — of his identifying Emma thus: “a Jewish Communist Bolshevik, anarchist, escapee from an insane asylum, conspirator to violence and murder, trouble-maker and nymphomaniac, and not necessarily in that order” — because I was fascinated by his terms “escapee from an insane asylum, conspirator to violence and murder,…and nymphomaniac.” I had not known anything of Emma. So, I was willing to consider the possibility that she was an insane-asylum escapee, conspired commit violent crime, and a nymphomaniac — though the term nymphomaniac troubled me, for reasons that appear above.

    But after reading the whole of Mr. Romanoff’s treatment of Emma, I could not avoid wondering whether, at least partly, Mr. Romanoff misrepresented flagrantly Emma’s person and her history because Mr. Romanoff hates Jews — Jews, NOT Zionists, Zionism or Israel or the monumentally evil religion of Yahweh and its traditional followers.

    Tired of writing this comment, I shall forgo trashing the rest of Mr. Romanoff’s libelous assertions respecting Emma and his similar libelous assertions respecting Margaret Sanger. Instead, I shall render two, last, considerations.

    (1) Mr. Romanoff writes:

    The record isn’t completely clear on where her relationships began, but the sexologist Havelock Ellis, H. G. Wells, and George Bernard Shaw were there, as were perhaps most members of their new Fabian Debating Society.

    Then Mr. Romanoff proceeds to assert that Ellis, Wells, and Shaw joined Emma in a sex-orgy, though he renders ZERO evidence that could support such a wild assertion.

    I know little of Ellis and Wells, except what I have gathered from their published writings. But I know George Bernard Shaw — not only from having read every work he published, but also his personal correspondence and his friends’ comments that various sources have published. I cannot imagine Shaw’s participating in ANY kind of orgy — sexual or other — just as I cannot imagine Shaw’s having sex with Emma or any other woman or any male or trans-sexual human, except, perhaps, one woman with whom Shaw corresponded frequently, and neither he nor that woman would have engaged in coitus unless with great mutual respect and love.

    (2) Mr. Romanoff decries eugenics. I wonder how he would respond to Arthur Jensen’s suggestion that American Blacks could mitigate, substantially, the sundry troubles of the American Black population’s remarkably low mean IQ [mean = 85] if, per their own free choice, unsuccessful, troubled American Blacks avoided procreating and successful and relatively untroubled Blacks procreated more. [Arthur Jensen? See, e.g.,, these:
    Not-unlikely, Mr. Romanoff would have despised Emma less had Emma constrained herself to be monogamous or, at least, serially monogamous or markedly less promiscuous. Jensen’s suggestion urged constraints formed by free choice.

    In Baltimore (Maryland) of the past few decades, the large majority has been Black. Very many, if not most, Baltimore Blacks have live in hideous Black ghettos, gravely crime-ridden. The Black ghetto denizens are barely educated. The non-impoverished residents gather money much by drug-selling, prostitution, or theft-type crimes.

    Many Baltimore Black women are crack whores or sex-whoring addicts of other drugs. They bear offspring in droves. Many offspring are born addicts. Rarely do the “fathers” bear any responsibility. Either the welfare system does, or offspring depend on the mothers’ prostitution-income or just land on the street. Many offspring become addicts, if they are not born so, and of those, many whore, deal drugs, or commit sundry crude, oft-violent crimes. The Buck v. Bell decision (supra) fits Baltimore’s procreation-trouble. Still, that case’s actual application makes me cringe — as it ought any human possessing honor and empathy.

    But suppose, per Jensen’s urging, successful relatively untroubled Baltimore Blacks pursued a campaign of urging, and facilitating (even economically), Baltimore ghetto Blacks’ diminishing their procreation-rate. Suppose Baltimore Whites and local, state, and federal governments joined in that non-forceful campaign — and, also, in enabling and pressing a huge enhancement of enforcement of laws that seek to deter and minimize drug-addiction, an abysmal education-system, poverty, and other causes of Baltimore’s Black ghetto troubles that produce hordes of hapless offspring destined to addiction, poverty, and crime.

    • Replies: @Alden
  144. @Larry Romanoff

    Snopes is no more reliable than Wikipedia.

    I have to disagree with that. Snopes is totally reliable; 100% of everything that they say is the opposite of the truth. It is just a Deep-State propaganda site. On the other hand, Wikipedia has lots of useful and accurate stuff, especially in technology and science(except the “climate science” nonsense).

    • Replies: @Larry Romanoff
  145. @RoatanBill

    Christian groups from the west have installed water hand pumps all across Africa, they view it as a good thing, but is that true?

    The problem with the Africans is due to all the ‘free stuff’ they get from the bleeding hearts all over the civilized world. Stop sending them free food, etc because it’s just making all their and the rest of the world’s problems worse.

    Yes, this argument has merit, as bleeding hearts from Christianized nations send lots of food aid, water pumps, and thus from a biological Darwinian naturalist viewpoint, if you increase food, and slow disease the population will explode for animal specie including humans. Nature keeps population in check by cruel means, if a save the world type circumvents this control mechanism, the argument goes, Africans will greatly increase in number and so will their suffering. So it might make a bleeding heart feel good by sending aid and technology but in the long run they have only increased total suffering.

    I have discussed this problem of humans and suffering at great lengths in my essays, and I have concluded the only way to stop suffering is to stop existence. I say again and again the only real heaven is non-existence. That has raised some eyebrows but many of my readers agree with me. I am not the only person who thinks the natural world is particularly cruel, and I want none of it, I don’t want past lives, I don’t want my current life, and I don’t want future lives. I do not want to be part of some retarded reincarnation cycle or fantacize about going to heaven in some imagined afterlife.

    The only solution to the problem of life is to simply not exist at all, because afterall you can’t suffer if you don’t exist. Thus the Buddha conundrum of all life is suffering is solved, simply don’t exist. And I say Buddha’s solution is a pipe dream, you are not really living life if you resign to kill all desires and live like a monk, nor can you expect the breeding population, who keep the monks alive with their donations, to stop lustful breeding.

  146. Anon[289] • Disclaimer says:

    So today at lunchtime I was talking to my teens.. they both said very matter-of-factly that the series they were watching on Netflix had “Malthusian” characters or plots.. when questioned, they explained for example, that a baddie was this high-ranking woman in the US government that had access to vials of mean viruses. She would drop them around on her trips. Another such character targeted minorities 🙄. They wanted to reduce the population(s).

    Watch the propaganda. As the Bill Clinton campaign taught us.. It’s the population, stupid.

  147. @Yukon Jack

    My point of view is teach a man to fish versus give the man a fish. Helping people to help themselves is laudable. Simply giving them stuff for today with no regard for how that affect tomorrow is dangerous.

    The Africans need some tough love, like it or not. They need to drastically slow down their rate of population increase on a continent that has meager resources for simple food production. Couple that with their low average IQ and kleptocracy style governments and their future is not that bright.

    If their natural resources could be fairly developed and the proceeds shared with the people, then they could afford to purchase from elsewhere what they don’t produce locally. That, however is a fantasy in the current environment.

    The regions of the world being overrun with African and other migrants should cut that flow off, full stop. The burden for change has to occur within the boundaries that has the problem. Allowing their problems to become the rest of the worlds problems doesn’t solve the problem, just spreads it around.

    The idiocy of all forms of religion teach people to be submissive to authority, all of it total bullshit. Religion and other forms of witchcraft need to be exposed as a giant fraud to allow the people to realize how they’ve been screwed for generations by gov’t ministers and religious ministers. The Africans need an awakening not a perpetual hand out.

    Throne and alter were twins–two vultures from the same egg.
    To attack the king was treason; to dispute the priest, blasphemy.
    The sword and cross were allies.
    Together they attacked the rights of men; they defended each other.
    The king owned the bodies of men, the priests the souls.
    One lived on taxes collected by force, the other on alms collected by fear.
    Both robbers, both beggars.
    The king made laws, the priest made creeds.
    With bowed backs the people carried the burdens of one, with open-mouthed wonder received the dogmas of the other.
    The king said rags and hovels for you, robes and palaces for me.
    The priest said God made you ignorant and immoral; He made me holy and wise; you are the sheep, I am the shepherd; your fleeces belong to me.
    You must not reason, you must not contradict, you must believe.
    Robert G. Ingersoll

  148. Alden says:

    And how many children do you have Mr Emslander? Takes a man and a woman to make a baby. Can you even do what it takes to make a baby? I doubt.

    So many MEN OF UNZ all ranting that women should all have several children when the MEN OF UNZ have 0-1 apiece. You want more children in the world? Get to work and make some. Even withered old man Norman Lear managed to make 2 babies in his old age. Anthony Quinn too.

    The MEN OF UNZ “ do as I say, don’t do as I do”. Unlike women Men can make babies in their 70s and 80s. So get to work!!!!!!

    • Agree: Alfred
  149. Jiminy says:

    Wars and famine appear not to halt birth rates, nor pestilence. In the first world countries where birth rates seem to be declining, the reasons I think are education and a rise in personal income. People like their lifestyle that their income affords them, so why upset the applecart by having too many kids. Maybe it could be a case of personal greed as well.
    But often it appears that the bigger families are the ones that seem to be able to least afford the increased number of siblings. I know that when I was growing up things seemed to be harder to obtain- but today people tend to whine a lot about how difficult it is to afford to have a family. And yet there are more government handouts, plenty of cheap food both good and bad, and so many smokers and drinkers. And drugs. I’m sure living has become easier not harder. Maybe there are more whingers around.

  150. @follyofwar

    Niger has carbon emissions per capita 70 times lower than UK and at least 150 times lower than US.

    Fertility rates need to be massively cut everywhere including third world countries because of overpopulation, but the most immediate positive impact to the environment and climate is if they’re massively cut in Western countries who are the biggest overconsumers with largest per capita carbon emissions, as I said, just compare carbon emissions per capita of Niger to UK or US.

    There’s no conspiracy theory of the “elites” to depopulate the world. Generally speaking just look at the so-called “elites” to see they have large families themselves. Take a look at the world’s richest people right now and they virtually all have kids, most of them at least 3.

    If anything the “elites” want population growth because they’re capitalists. Capitalists love population growth because of economic growth, more people = more consumers.

    • Replies: @follyofwar
  151. Alden says:

    Couldn’t refute a word I wrote about the costs of public transit can you?

    We definitely need public transit. And the more people crowd into an area, the more public transit we need. And when even express lane buses take 35 minutes to get through an intersection, it’s time to build a billion dollar a mile subway under the street. Which makes public transit even more expensive

    Individuals can choose how much their car or pick up costs and how much they drive, even if they wash the car themselves or spend $ 16.00 a week at the car wash in addition to the other expenses. But everybody pays the cost of public transit and has no choice.

    S California, someone told me its possible to get from the Ventura LA county border all the way to the Mexican border via public buses and light rail. That’s a triumph of public transit but costs money money money.

    • Replies: @Etruscan Film Star
  152. Getaclue says:

    You are so infantile you can’t do some research yourself? The use of the sterilization agent in Africa is basically admitted by Gates, they couldn’t deny it but they could try and buy off the Government…. — but you can’t find that? Loser.

  153. @acementhead

    Wikipedia is accurate and dependable if you want to know the number of protons in a Cesium atom or the geographical area of New Guinea. However, as you approach any topic related to history, politics, Israel and the Jews, most current affairs of significance, geo-political events, Wiki is increasingly heavily sanitized to the point where the entries are nearly totally false. For more than a few topics, you can read Wiki and assume the opposite as true.

    This is so true that Wiki can be used as an accurate barometer of Deep State involvement or other government malfeasance. On many topics, if the Wiki entry appears cleverly crafted, one can be almost certain of an underlying plot. In effect, the difference between a news article and an opinion piece.

  154. dfordoom says: • Website

    Malthus’s thought of ever-increasing human numbers is receiving another blow from reality. It is that modern women are only having two children. Woman having just two children will cause humanity to decrease. In the advanced cultures, all over the world this is fact.

    Have read that humanity will increase to 9 billion, then begin a long slide downward.

    Marriage itself is in decline. It is not unthinkable that women could choose to have only one child.

    Agreed. In fact in much of the developed world women are already, on average, choosing to have just one child. In much of the developed world (particularly in East Asia) birth rates are already less than half replacement level.

  155. Vojkan says:

    Judging by the photos, to describe Goldman and Sanger as unattractive would be something of an understatement so I’m rather incredulous regarding the affairs Mr. Romanoff attributes them. The description of their sex lives has the opposite effect of intended. About Sanger specifically, to show how odious she was, quoting her suffices. Her views in her own words are explicit enough.

  156. Alden says:

    Emma Goldman was a major liberal commie heroine in her day. Something like Ilhan Omar AOC Hildabeast Clinton today. I’ve read several biographies of her. Her lover friend partner in revolution Berkowitz was often mentioned but nothing about abortions.

    So where did Romanoff get the information? Or did he just make it up to link her to bourgeois capitalist Margaret Sanger?

    And you’re a complete fool to think abortion was the only available method of birth control in those days.

    FYI abortion was never a crime in Christian Europe or the Americas until about 1860. When it became a feminist liberal progressive cause to make abortion a crime. A feminist cause.

    Here’s what happened you moron who blathers about things of which you know nothing.

    1850s English man Drs began taking over oby gyny from woman midwifes. Man Drs instead of midwives began delivering babies.

    These men Drs noticed thousands and thousands of women who married at 22 or so, lived in the same house with the husband and yet by age 45 had given birth to only 2 or 3 children statistically impossible if they lived normal married lives.

    What happened these men Drs asked? These Drs realized that all these married women had had regular abortions all those years. The newspapers and magazines were full of cures and potions to bring on the menses as it was called.

    And long before magazines and newspapers the midwives had passed out these potions.

    In fact, I’ve got a garden full of an abortion plant. It grows all over the United States. You’ve probably seen it. It’s a nice little ground cover on sale in everywhere nursery. It’s called Penny Royal. It was there when we bought the house and it’s all over town.

    Back to the chronology. The English Men Drs publisher their findings about how widespread abortion was. People were shocked, particularly the abolitionist Prohibitionist women’s suffrage activist middle and upper class women and the criminalization of abortion was on in the Christian world. Soon the Pope made an anti abortion statement revising the time of the human soul entering the body of the fetus from about 5 months to conception.

    Criminalization all took place between about 1840 and 1880 due to a collaboration between English Drs activist feminist women and the Christian churches.

    The more I read UNZ the more I am astonished at the absolute ignorance of human reproduction coupled with obsession about the human reproduction of other people.

    As for Emma Goldman, it’s an excellent thing she didn’t have children. Look at what the children grandchildren and great grandchildren of the other Russian communist Jew immigrants did and are doing to this country.

    Romanoff, like you, really needs to take a course on human reproduction and obstetrics gynecology before he spouts such moronic ignorance.

    A much, much more reasonable and realistic explanation why Emma Goldman didn’t have children isn’t multiple abortions. It’s she must have had gonorrhea and or chalmydia and the other STDs that cause sterility in woman. STDs were widespread in the late 19th early 20th century. STDs were major causes of sterility and miscarriages.

    You sex and reproduction obsessed men really should learn the basics of sex and reproduction. Buy a used med or nursing school text book on Amazon and read about human reproduction.

  157. Athena says:

    US-UK led NATO, Kissinger, Schumer, and CRF friends destroyed Libya, bombed universities, schools, hospitals, roads, destroyed the Great Man Made River, killed thousands and made more than 1 million refuges.

    Thousands died at sea trying to reach Europe, while thousands died in prisons near Israel.

    The US, UK, and Europe then robbed more than 100 BILLIONS in Libyan assets.

    The MEDIA still REFUSE to tell the truth on the ”humanitarian” bombings the US-Canada-UK friends did in Libya. WHY?

    So now the US-UK and European friends want to ”help” Africa? Help Africans? Compulsive liars, manipulators, war criminals. What did you do in Libya?

    Sanger at a KKK Rally:

    Kissinger’s protégée, Hillary Clinton, honors Sanger at the 2009 Planned Parenthood Honors Gala

    ”On today’s fact check, James verifies the truth about Sanger and the real racist and eugenicist roots of Planned Parenthood that are not being explored in the establishment corporate PR.”

    • Replies: @Alden
  158. Alden says:
    @another fred

    Excellent point. Did you ever hear about the baby boy who was born with Mommy’s IUD clutched in his hand?

    Romanoff should have done a bit more research about Margaret Sanger. One of the big reasons she advocated birth control was to prevent abortion.

    • Replies: @Larry Romanoff
  159. Alden says:

    You call it racism. I call it race realism. Never been around blacks much have you?

  160. anon[172] • Disclaimer says:

    such opinions tear me something serious..particularly with regard to Africa.

    Africa gave rise to the human population. the human population is african period with by now some specialized groups like white people we can subspecies. these subspecies returned to Africa and enslaved the colonized their mother and therein lie all African problems.

    heres what to do Frontier:

    cut out all the aid period

    closed and lock all your immigration period

    leave Africa yourself in all ways, taking your physical presence with you.. lets see your shadow as you leave, save those who may have integrated where they are and are no threat to the nationalist polity

    Africa can and will take care of itself..and all its imbalances will be brought back into line relative to african conditions in nature and what is and is not supportable in those conditions. such is the way of nature

    but this is no secret. the west knows this. the reason they are still in africa and speak like you is that you intend to take the dam continent, killing off africans. that’s the point of all the continual ridiculous and bloody propaganda , along with general western policies towards Africa we see all the time

  161. Hegar says:

    The poor in the past are not the same kind as the poor today.

    In the past, it was misfortune that made many poor.

    In the West today, anyone can go to college and get an education. If they simply study hard in school. If they don’t, they get a monotonous job forever doing the same thing over and over for the rest of their lives. And then they hate those who worked hard to make something of themselves, and they vote for the Social Democrats and communists to steal money from others.

    And maybe they take some time to claim that their targets are evil “Social Darwinists” or something. Totally relevant to today’s world.

    Luckily, those “Social Darwinists” or “oppressors” or whatever, those who studied in school and now have jobs that demand some ability, have created a much better world than in the past. There is less starvation today than ever before. In the West, and in most of the rest of the world, starvation no longer exists. This is a first in world history. And even the average worker lives a more comfortable life than kings lived in the Middle Ages. They can also afford all the potato chips and beer they could possibly stuff themselves with – studies show they consume more unhealthy food and drink than the middle class and upper class, even though healthy food such as eggs would actually be far cheaper.

    But, lazy low-IQ failures, go ahead and blame those who made something of themselves.

  162. FRITZ says:

    Does “Jews!” indicate Mexican Jews or something?

  163. ivan says:
    @Jim Christian

    Bill Gates is a big man in India. With respect to population control his audience understands that it is not for them, but for the menial classes. India is riven by class differences as anywhere else. Don’t look to India for solutions concerning anything.

  164. Loup-Bouc says:

    And you’re a complete fool to think abortion was the only available method of birth control in those days.

    I did not say that “abortion was the only available method of birth control in those days.” I did not say anything that could imply such per any sane logic.

    abortion was never a crime in Christian Europe or the Americas until about 1860

    Not true. But even if such were true, it would be irrelevant, since the matter it the life of a woman born in 1869. And, you disprove your own assertion with this:

    Criminalization all took place between about 1840 and 1880 due to a collaboration between English Drs activist feminist women and the Christian churches.

    Now this of your dreck:

    The more I read UNZ the more I am astonished at the absolute ignorance of human reproduction coupled with obsession about the human reproduction of other people.
    Romanoff, like you, really needs to take a course on human reproduction and obstetrics gynecology before he spouts such moronic ignorance.

    I have been a physician since 1995, a solo practitioner since 1998. Do not presume to lecture me concerning matters of medicine. Your comments show that your know nothing of medicine but that your brain has developed a remarkable, and errant, capacity of hallucination.

    As for Emma Goldman, it’s an excellent thing she didn’t have children. Look at what the children grandchildren and great grandchildren of the other Russian communist Jew immigrants did and are doing to this country.
    A much, much more reasonable and realistic explanation why Emma Goldman didn’t have children isn’t multiple abortions. It’s she must have had gonorrhea and or chalmydia and the other STDs that cause sterility in woman. STDs were widespread in the late 19th early 20th century. STDs were major causes of sterility and miscarriages.

    You sex and reproduction obsessed men really should learn the basics of sex and reproduction. Buy a used med or nursing school text book on Amazon and read about human reproduction.

    (1) Why do you assume I am a man? [My pseudonym is constructed of two male-animal names; but the reason may be my liking the named beasts, rather than my possessing the Y chromosome and male genetalia. How do you divine that I am “sex-obsessed” or “reproduction-obsessed“? Certainly my main comment (to which you reply) bears NOTHING that can support such assertions. You need a remedial reading tutor (one who can READ), and more (see my closing sentence).
    (2) Exactly what horror befell “the children grandchildren and great grandchildren of the other Russian communist Jew immigrants”? Exactly what wrong(s) have such individuals done “to this country” because of their heritage or their national origins? Was every Soviet Jewish immigrant an advocate of “communism” (an immensely ambiguous concept) or even a “communist”? What of all those who fled Soviet “communism” or Stalinist Russia’s banes? Why does any such matter bear any relevance to Emma Goldman’s life, principles, or actions? She was not a clone of THE ESSENTIAL. PROTOTYPICAL SOVIET COMMUNIST JEWISH DOLL. Rather, she fled Soviet communism.
    (3) You do not know why Emma Goldman did not bear children — or even whether, actually, she never did.
    (4) “chalmydia [Spelled wrongly],” actually chlamydia, was not a significant STD until at least 1950, more likely not until circa 1970; and its frequency distribution did not approach that of syphilis or gonorrhea until the closing years of the 20th century. Not until 2007, did the medical community did not consider that chlamydia could approach epidemic frequency distribution.
    In 2007, five nations reported to the ECDC a total of circa 250 000 cases.
    Recently, in the U.S., circa 1.5 million chlamydia infections occur. The equally recent gonorrhea number is circa 600,000.
    The chlamydia frequency began to rise steeply after 1995. In 2003, the number was 100,000. In that same year, in the United States alone, the gonorrhea number was about 135,000.
    And chlamydia does not render all or even a third the victims sterile (infertile) —likely far fewer.
    (5) Mostly, your comment is irrelevant to my comment to which your comment attempts to reply. Otherwise it is a mix of (a) idiocy, (b) speciousness, (c) illogic, (d) evidence-free assertion, (e) fallacy, (f) anti-Jew bigotry, (g) ignorant anti-“communism,” (h) stupid presumption that “communists” are, by definition, evil, and (i) malodorous hogwash.

    You need a brain-transplant, thence a complete re-education.

  165. @Alden

    Several years ago, CNN was sued by one of their news anchors for being orderd to lie in the newscasts. CNN won the case. They did not deny ordering the news anchor to lie. Their defense was based simply on the position that American news media have “no obligation to tell the truth”.

    Perhaps this is a contagious disease for which there is no immunity. It is true of the entire English-speaking world, but primarily and notably the US, to the extent that it is a fair generalisation (though there are of course exceptions) that Americans as a people have little or no regard for the truth.

    Aside from the media, one need only read the comments on this website and others similar. Opinions are stated as fact. Wishful thinking is stated as fact. Provable truths and demonstrable facts are either dismissed or contradicted, or flatly denied and termed false. A wild and unfounded accusation against a person or a country is considered, by the mere stating of it, as equating to indisputable evidence. The truth is now a lie and lies are the truth.

    “Did you ever hear about the baby boy who was born with Mommy’s IUD clutched in his hand?”

    On 28 April 2017, a mother jokingly displayed a photograph on her Facebook page showing her newborn baby clutching an IUD which was placed in his hand for irony after it was discovered behind the placenta fully intact, clearly having failed in its purpose of preventing pregnancy. But a lie is the truth.

    “One of the big reasons [Margaret Sanger] advocated birth control was to prevent abortion.”

    It would be difficult to make a statement more stupid and provably false than the one above. In the real world, a person making such a statement would be considered either insane or an incorrigible fool, but this is America, and things are different here. The entire world is aware of this, but Americans seem oblivious to it and no one is asking why.

    “Romanoff should have done a bit more research about Margaret Sanger.”

    I guess that’s one possibility.

  166. anon[172] • Disclaimer says:

    there are still lunatic people like this in the world?

    if there was a choice to be made between Africans and this guy as to who has brains… it would it would be a no brainer..Africans win hand down

    no wonder Americans and white people all over the planet..apart from the Dutch.. are obediently masked..because they are smarter than Africans thats why, even with tie rhigh school education..all of them.

    in high school they are supposed to learn biology to a level that teaches them about immunity, how it is achieved by exposure not lock lock down..and additionally masking… achieves the opposite of immunity – biological weakness and susceptibility to disease

    the official position on Covid and directions to the people are calculated to infect the people of the USA and the west not to protect them. yet I see the white people obediently following these suicidal instructions, and enthusiastically enforcing it others

    it is to get the exploiter out of Africa period! thats the African answer! get him out and get back to basics and build from there

    this man here is a salesman with a product we would be advised to avoid

    • Replies: @RoatanBill
  167. ANON[172] • Disclaimer says:

    what is interesting here is that the elites are now after EVERYBODY including white people! white people will not escape this time.



    • Replies: @Matchstick
  168. Can anyone here do maths?

    There are no where near 7 billion people in the world.

    Take any country and note its official population. Find out what percentage is urban. Calculate the figure. Now add up the official population of every city and town in that country. You will not get anything close to the figure you started out with.

    My country is supposed to have 26 million people. Yet when I added up every city and town right down to towns of 30,000 people, and even adding in an extra 15% of 26 million to account for the rural population, I ended up with only 17 million people.

    They are lying to you about the world’s population. Since the elite love herding us into big cities like cattle, it provides the illusion of overpopulation. But the truth is the vastness of the earth is extremely sparse. The satan-worshipping elite simply HATE humanity and will find any excuse or lie to justify our complete annihilation. But they will fail, just as they fail at everything their inferior god commands.

    • Replies: @Alfred
  169. @ANON

    The white races are all too easily given over to pride and arrogance. It’s an astounding weakness.

    When they don’t have their original Gods to worship, they begin to worship themselves with disasterous results.

    But I feel little sympathy for people who dispose of God. If you pay your dues and sincerity to God, he will protect you from harm, especially moral harm–the most deadliest of all harm. But few people pay God proper attention and worship. It’s no shock he has foresaken the world.

    The satan-worshiping elite are constantly nourishing their evil demon god with blood and flesh sacrifices. It’s no wonder the world is becoming more satan like each day filling to the brim with lies and death.

  170. A terraformed earth could house a trillion people.

    A ring world a quadrillion.

    There is no reason at all to reduce population.

  171. Biff says:

    Examples. The cost to the rider of the Los Angeles light rail

    That is the worst boondoggle of an example there is on the planet. It takes people who aren’t there to places nobody wants to go, and most important is, LA is completely designed around the automobile.
    Remove it and nobody would notice. Remove public transport from other cities(Tokyo, Paris, New York, Seoul), and life as they know it would come to a screeching halt – check the price tag on that?

    • Agree: Alfred
  172. @Tommy Thompson

    Your logic of 1 sqmt supporting a living human doesn’t make sense at all! Did you mean to say 1 sq-mile per human? That would have made more sense for supporting 1 person’s food supply, including the animals, as well as enuf space to park his bicycle, motorcycle, autos, truck, RV and etc.

  173. Emslander says:

    And how many children do you have Mr Emslander? Takes a man and a woman to make a baby. Can you even do what it takes to make a baby? I doubt.

    Well, sweetheart, I not only KNOW, I’ve DONE. Way more than my share and my children have done way more than theirs. Barking up the wrong tree here.

    My wife can back me up on that.

  174. Levtraro says:
    @Etruscan Film Star

    Intrinsic forces are things such as fecundity (most impregnated females produce just one offspring per delivery) and age to maturity (most females produce their first offspring 14 to 35 yr after birth), things that are determined by the biology and genetics of the species. Extrinsic forces are the climate, land productivity, other biological populations. Extrinsic forces determine the environmental carrying capacity. Under those forces, the human population has been increasing according to the logistic map and will reach the asymptote by the end of the century approx. This is very, very common in animal populations.

    There is no human over-population. Humans are approaching the environmental carrying capacity with ever decreasing acceleration, this asymptotic size could be tweaked a little but not much. There might be an over-population of people you don’t like, like those you consider feeble-minded in your naive mis-understanding of population biology, but the human population will approach its asymptotic size no matter what. Even mass mortality events such as world wars are just minor blips in the march to the asymptote.

    Scientists and technologists working to improve human health and wellbeing by specific, minor but significant actions, are not self-aggrandizingly delusional. Malthusians thinking they can control the whole process of population growth are self-aggrandizingly delusional and people worried about the self-aggrandizingly delusional malthusians are naive.

  175. Levtraro says:

    Human population growth has been prevented by educated females but this has only happened at the small spatial scale of countries and for very short periods of time. The big picture however has been unchanged since the birth of the species a few hundred thousand yr ago: very slow growth at the beginning, population bottlenecks several times under stochastic demographics and varying environmental conditions, and logistic growth after gaining a firm foothold (probably happening a few millenia after spreading out of Africa).

  176. Alfred says:

    Unlike women Men can make babies in their 70s and 80s. So get to work!!!!!!

    I fully agree. In my youth, the girls I was with preferred to have abortions. It happened twice without my involvement. One girl was German and the other French. I believe they are now both childless. Doubtless regretting their haste. I found them on the internet but I don’t communicate with them. One dark night in a Parisian sidestreet, I ran into the German. She had become lesbian. She told me that if she had not acted, we might have had a child of 11 by then. I cringed.

    Since then, I have had 3 kids with two women. Now, I am looking for a girl who wants to have kids. Outlook is positive. I am 70. The girls I am interested in are 28-38.

    Go for it guys. Watch your colleagues, friends, exes, kids and relatives go green with envy. 🙂

    • Replies: @Emslander
  177. Steven80 says:

    Quite right – most Middle eastern countries subsidise the bread price to avoid social unrest – about 26 thousand metric tons this season alone will be imported.

    However, most of the grain produced is usually used for fodder – it is much cheaper/easier to mill and store. If there are several consequtive cold years, the Middle yeast will just get worse quality bread.

    The price of bread depends on wheat futures (mainly Chicago exchange, and for the Middle east – Budapest exchange), and they are heavily manipulated at times. One of the major reasons for the Syrian war was Goldman Sachs manipulating the price of wheat – this is just before the war:

    I’ve been dealing with grain trade a lot in previous years. I don’t follow the markets nowadays, but I’m pretty sure a serios and very well organised manipulation by several large Wall street banks will be needed for a starvation scenario.

    • Thanks: Alfred
    • Replies: @Alfred
  178. @Kali

    How is it that everybody and her mama fancy the future as some kind of hippie commune with free love and ganja for all?
    If we are lucky it will look like Tokugawa Japan:
    Beheading for wearing the wrong trousers, flaying for “peaceful protest”
    (come to think about it, … 😛 ), but all in style.

    I will concede that the American Way, based on terra nullius (“Monroe”) doctrine and robber baron methods, is neither sustainable nor desirable … with a few caveats:

    – European (and East Asian) standards in mining, forestry and soil husbandry did not evolve because they are fun but to squeeze the last bit of benefit out of limited resources – from dire need.
    Africa has more water per capita than Europe and more European specialists than during colonial times, and look at the place … the only ones that are not corrupt are Muslim psychos.
    Bantu evolved to rape, loot and destroy everything they couldn´t rape or loot lest it be of use to others – this evolutionary strategy proved superior for rapid repopulation of vast tracts of land after periodic mass die-offs and is by no means “less evolved” or “primitive”, in fact it is the opposite.
    I think you see the problem; once we are gone, they will revert to dung huts, cannibalism and mass die-offs.

    – “Equilibrium” as pertains to living systems is an inexcusable romanticism … overproduction and die-off are functions of Life itself – the Right Rev. Malthus was spot on; if you intend to dampen it a little, read up on Calhoun´s rats, Hardin (“The Tragedy of the Commons”, 1965), Lorenz (“Das sogenannte Böse”) and Eybl-Eibesfeldt.

    .. the rope will break, the Wolf run free
    far into the future I see 😉

    • Replies: @Kali
    , @Loup-Bouc
  179. @anon

    Aside from name calling and going off on a tangent concerning Covid, what in my post upset you so?

    Please explain why you believe the average African with an IQ of around 80 is smarter than I am; someone with engineering degrees.

    If you could, please explain what Covid has to do with African exploitation.

    Further, please explain how not purchasing the only things the Africans have to sell will somehow raise up their society and improve their living conditions.

    Or are you just mindlessly mouthing off?

    • Replies: @anon
  180. @Alden

    The MEN OF UNZ “ do as I say, don’t do as I do”. Unlike women Men can make babies in their 70s and 80s. So get to work!!!!!!

    But choose prospective mothers carefully. A man who allows a manipulative woman, or a woman with “issues” to bear his children enters a hell on earth that will teach him more “lessons” about our legal, social, and religious systems than he bargains for.

    There is a vast network that is biased towards mothers (for very good reasons) and the man is just collateral damage when a bad marriage breaks up. There is no defense but being damn careful in your choice.

    • Replies: @Alden
  181. Emslander says:

    I think one of your girlfriends would have been much more willing to have had your children if you’d married her and agreed to support her. That’s what my wife of 51 years and mother of six has told me.

    • Replies: @Alfred
  182. @ loopy bocce baller –
    1. do i own my own body or not ?
    2. ok, let the oh-so-advanced fetus speak up, then… (crickets)
    3. interesting the individuals fetus-people pick to represent them…
    4. a simple aphorism that has the benefit of being true: No Pain, No Gain.
    apparently life is supposed to be ALL about not only the avoidance of any/all pain, but mere discomfort or annoyance at the unapproved THOUGHTS of others…
    (yahkov smirnoff voice: vat a species ! ! ! )
    @ really tan bill –
    give a man a fish, and he will eat for a day; teach a man to fish, and he has an excuse to goof off for his whole life ! ! !
    hee hee hee
    ho ho ho
    ha ha ha
    ak ak ak

  183. throtler says:

    Unz, you need to create a “fuck off” button. It will be used often especially on people like this clown.

    • Replies: @glib
  184. @TG

    the Canadian government now has as OFFICIAL POLICY to at least quadruple the nominal 25 million Canadians to at least 100 million and beyond.

    Canadas population is over 37 million, not 25 million. Also, Canada is 77% white.

  185. @Kali

    Reasonable enough … and my apologies for not getting you right the first time 😉

    Just one minor gripe –

    whether or not the Great One was the 10th Coming of Vishnu, their definition of “parasite” (“work-free income”) is more biologistic and therefore better applicable:
    BOTH the rentier and the welfare queen.

    Best regards, 😀

    • Replies: @Kali
  186. C3PO says:

    I think you are correct to a certain degree, however, as automation is able to perform an ever increasing number of jobs the need for cheap labor declines. Automation and AI have been taking over jobs from, not only, unskilled labor but skilled middleclass careers as well. Since the people who really control pretty much everything see this 4th industrial revolution coming plans must be implemented now to “right size” the population. If the progress is too slow an new Holodomor will be implemented to eradicate as many useless eaters as needed as quickly as possible.

  187. Alfred says:

    I ended up with only 17 million people

    I agree that there is a massive error in population numbers. But I have no idea which countries are far out and in which direction.

    When I was last in Lagos, 40 years ago, I was told that the population of Nigeria is between 60-150 million. They had no idea. I just checked online and they claim it is now around 200 million. Frankly, it could be anywhere between 150 million and 300 million. No one has the slightest idea.

  188. Alfred says:

    I think one of your girlfriends would have been much more willing to have had your children if you’d married her and agreed to support her

    The German was the fiancé of a wealthy Dutchman. She was in London learning English. She planned it all. They bought an apartment in Hamburg jointly. The girl had her abortion and then two weeks later her fiancé was killed in a 747 crash in Africa. He was traveling with his German business partner to South Africa. his partner was afraid of flying. He had a premonition that he would perish in a plane crash. He insisted on sitting as far back as possible in planes. He reasoned that the front would hit the ground first. They could have easily gone First Class.

    Sadly, the 747 stalled on takeoff from Nairobi. It fell on its tail. Out of the 157 on board, 59 died. They were all at the rear of the aircraft.

    I was in Iran when all this happened. The girl wrote to me to say that she had an abortion. A few weeks later, she wrote that she was heartbroken as her fiancé had died in the plane crash. It was a huge shock for me as I realised that if things had happened in a different order I would have been a father at 25 with an older girl.

    Lufthansa Flight 540

    The French girl was a weird case. We only made love once and that was it. She knew that I was married and it was her decision. I paid for her to do it privately – 4000 francs which was hefty money at the time.

    In France, women were supposed to give the name of the putative male. She told me later that she put the name of some unpleasant boyfriend she had known earlier on. Women are strange. Maybe your wife can explain that one. 🙂

    • Replies: @Emslander
  189. glib says:

    I believe you are talking about the “ignore” button. I have had most of my buttons disabled following the discovery that my covid opinions are not popular with management. But thank god the ignore button still works. It makes for an efficient reading of the comments here.

  190. Loup-Bouc says:

    In my comment of August 3, 2020 at 3:31 am GMT (comment # 165) [repying to your comment of August 3, 2020 at 1:36 am GMT (comment # 157)], this language:

    Not until 2007, did the medical community did not consider that chlamydia could approach epidemic frequency distribution.

    ought to be thus:

    Not until 2007, did the medical community consider that chlamydia could approach epidemic frequency-distribution.

    • Replies: @Alden
  191. As a real right-winger, as opposed to one of the contemptible creatures called “conservatives”, I’m no fan of Emma Goldman. However, I am a fan of accuracy and as such I have to dispute erroneous assertions made in this article. Emma Goldman was not a Bolshevik but an anarchist. After she was deported from the U.S. to the Soviet Union in 1919, she quickly became an opponent of the Bolsheviks’ heavy-handed rule and ended up leaving the country again two years later. “From her teen-age days, Goldman studied the Bolshevik anarchists” is an inane statement for several reasons. Firstly, as already stated, Bolsheviks are not the same anarchists, nor anarchists a type of Bolshevik, nor Bolsheviks a type of anarchist. While both groups can be considered to be part of the “Left” they are distinct from one another and generally inimical. Bolsheviks executed anarchists both in the Soviet Union and during the Spanish Civil War. Just as damning for the author’s credibility is the indisputable fact that there was no such thing as a Bolshevik until well after Goldman’s teenage years. She was born in 1869 and the Bolsheviks became defined as both a cogent group and a political term no earlier than 1903, on the occasion of the 2nd Congress of the Russian Democratic Social Labor Party, when Lenin’s faction adopted a Russian word meaning “majoritarian” to define themselves. I also know of no evidence Goldman was ever an inmate of an insane asylum or that she fled from such a place, and the author does not care to a provide a source for that assertion. Goldman was extremely radical for her time, but she would a good fit for today’s Democrat Party—if anything she would be a moderate. That’s plenty bad enough and there is no need to make unsubstantiated accusations against her.

    • Agree: Alden, dfordoom
    • Replies: @thotmonger
  192. Kali says:

    How is it that everybody and her mama fancy the future as some kind of hippie commune with free love and ganja for all?

    Because I fancy it, Nokangaroos, (actually I live it) doesn’t mean that I think that’s what will happen… not unless we somehow manage to kill off the psycho’s currently running the show (rather than the low IQ inocents currently in the sights of several commenters on this thread).
    And even a deamer like me recognises the likelihood of that happening any time soon is aproximately zero.

    I do fantasise, from time to time, that following whatever apocalyptic event they unleash on us, survivors around the world seal them into their underground city-bunkers and shut off the power. Then my hippie-topia would flourish. But I’ll save the details for the book, lest I bore you stupid in just one comment. (If I haven’the already!)

    I think you see the problem; once we are gone, they will revert to dung huts, cannibalism and mass die-offs.

    What will be, will be, friend. Leave them to whatever destiny they calve out for themselves.
    Just lay off the genocidal wet dream. It’s bad for your soul, and you seem like an otherwise decent guy – your inexplicable dislike of kangaroos aside.

    You bring much interesting information to the conversation which I appreciate. – I had No Idea that Africa has more water than Europe, per capita!!

    I may well look up some of the reading you suggest. Reading about Jews as a break from reading about “covid”, and vice versa is wearing on my nerves. The Tragedy of the Commons sounds like a delightful distraction given our current situation. 😀

    .. the rope will break, the Wolf run free
    far into the future I see 😉

    And we are just a footnote in history (if we’re lucky).

    Farewell Dude,

    • Replies: @nokangaroos
    , @Loup-Bouc
  193. @Mental Lockdown

    Yes, cottonseed oil was frequently used as a cooking oil, and still is in some places. More notably, it is also used as a fundamental component of insecticides and pesticides, as well as laundry detergent and, in spite of its low-cholesterol benefits, has been repeatedly linked to liver damage.

  194. Mr Romanoff,
    The bottom line is that Zionism is a cancer that metastasis very rapidly in all aspect of our lives. It is very similar to the game of Whac-a-Mole that no matter how hard you hit them on the head it pops up from another place!
    BTW, You mentioned Malthusianism killed many people in India and another place but you neglected to mention Brits sanctioning food & medicine into Iran and killing over 9 million people in 1917-1919!

    • Replies: @Larry Romanoff
  195. Emslander says:

    No one could explain, certainly not a woman who has valued her children like my wife, why someone would be so cavalier with conceived human beings as you appear to be. Your stories are disgusting. I will pray for your sorry soul.

    • Replies: @Alfred
  196. Kali says:

    I took your first comment to me in the good-natured way I thought you meant it. No apologies necessary.

    Just one minor gripe –

    whether or not the Great One was the 10th Coming of Vishnu, their definition of “parasite” (“work-free income”) is more biologistic and therefore better applicable:

    Work-free-income – income being an economic necessity in the world we inhabit, for those without access to land/water, and work for the poor being undervalued, underpaid and underavailable – versus sucking the planet and the people dry for personal gain at the expence of the rest?

    I see your gripe and raise a quibble! 😀

    Fond regards back,

    • Replies: @nokangaroos
  197. @Monty Ahwazi

    Yes, almost every famine in history was merely a food shortage until the Deep State placed a food embargo on those nations and prohibited the importation of food.

    It was similar with China’s great famine in 1959-1961. China had terrible weather conditions that created food shortages, but again the same people immediately implemented a worldwide food embargo on China, forbidding all nations to either give or to sell food to China – at any price, and the entire world sat and watched while 20 million Chinese starved to death. Iran in 1917 was the same as you say, a deliberate genocide. The Irish “Potato Famine” was the same. They all are.

    And it wasn’t “Malthusians” who engineered these atrocities. The official blame is usually placed on the British or Americans, but the planning and impetus were from the same Deep State Zionists in each case. These are some of the blank pages in our history books.

    • Agree: Alfred
    • Replies: @gay troll
    , @Monty Ahwazi
    , @xcd
  198. Poco says:

    Loup-Bouc is an amoral maggot. Capable of memorization and regurgitation but stupid as a bag of doorknobs.

  199. @Kali

    Pardon if my visions are a bit … gloomy.

    – The quote describes the beginning of Ragnarökk (Schmidt insists it not be translated as “dusk” but DARKENING of the Gods – when the Sons of the World Fire come from the South;
    I couldn´t resist 😛 )

    – I do not “hate” marsupials; it´s a ancient joke (Americans believe Austria is the one with the kangaroos and O Tannenbaum is an Irish Jew).

    – Hardin is the final word on why communitarianism can´t work; the rest are ethologists.

    Clearly it is no one else´s business what you do with your own Yuga.

    Enjoy 😀

    • Replies: @Kali
  200. anon[424] • Disclaimer says:

    Looks like an attempt by the author to baffle with verbose bullshit.
    e.g., footnote 33: It led to Robert McNamara’s Project 100,000, where about 500,000 low-IQ individuals were conscripted into the US army and sent to Vietnam, few returning.
    No way in that world that can be right.

    • Replies: @lysias
  201. Loup-Bouc says:

    Does your pseudonym reference the Hindu goddess?

    If so, does your choosing that pseudonym imply that you are a woman?

    Or, are you a man who chose your pseudonym because of the character or functions of goddess Kali?

    Or, does your pseudonym NOT reference the Hindu goddess, but some consideration I cannot apprehend?

    I put those questions because I wish to learn how to address you with a compliment: Bravo, or Brava.

    Regretfully ignorant of your sex, I must choose both:



    (The order follows not “sexism,” but a sense of rhythm and sound.)

    This morning, happenstantially, I read one of your comments and wondered whether it indicated a consistent perspective. I began reading others of your comments.

    Your existence deserves appreciation.

    How pleasant: knowing that you are among the few brave, percipient, truly-critical-thinking, non-psychopathic, relatively psychically healthy, and manifestly empathic who comment here.

    My best complimentary greeting: Cheers, Kali, fellow beast.

    • Replies: @Kali
  202. @Yukon Jack

    So what’s stopping you from enjoying non-existence (if that’s what you think, against much evidence, follows death)? Why not prove you are serious?

  203. @Kali

    Ah, but isn´t that the whole point (more exactly two)?

    Marx famously marveled why American wages were three times higher than European ones. The simple answer is the American worker, if miserable enough, could always opt for eating bio, wearing expensive fur and knocking up Injun princesses. The root of the American Pathology is that with nothing left to plunder that mindset now turns inward (as opposed to Europeans and East Asians who have gotten a bit more used to the problem – not that it was fun).
    Calhoun described the social breakdown from population pressure (“behavioral sink”) in rats, but look at any inner city.
    And all the proposed “remedies” – integration, immigration, assorted other ingratiations – only destroy social cohesion further; which is equal parts intentional and inevitable.

    In Mongol law predating Genghis Khan pissing in a stream would cost your head – not for the overabundance of pissers but for lack of streams, and framed in religious terms.
    Grim Gretta would love it but I doubt she understands: Everything goes better with lower population pressure; “rights” and “liberties” are illusions; and it isn´t just the resources either – Calhoun´s rats were well taken care of.
    What, then, to do about intraspecific aggression?
    The opposition tout the Bonobo method – which only goes to show they have no idea what they are talking about, the reason they are so measly, black and extinct (the Bonobos, not the opposition).
    “Domestication”s.s. works as long as you can keep the undomesticated out, then it becomes self-defeating.
    From an evolutionary biologist POV, things are simple:
    We have eliminated extraspecific selective pressure (neither brains nor muscles nor sociability convey reproductive success), and no evolutionary potency ever survived the switch to pure intraspecific (= sexual) selection.
    The Great Culling is inevitable, and – there is no orthogenesis – it will be interesting to see from which branch the Übermensch arises (I foresee lots of surprises).

    We are doomed 😀

    • Replies: @Kali
  204. @Alden

    Alden, aren’t you generalizing from an extreme case (southern California) to more-normal places elsewhere? Having driven in LA I can believe there might be some intersection it takes 35 minutes to cross, although that is atypical even for LA. Otherwise I have never experienced or even heard of such a thing in other areas.

    Look, southern CA’s widespread traffic jam is because of overpopulation. We can’t, and shouldn’t, stop people moving there (except Mexicans). But building yet more fantastically expensive rail systems (doesn’t LA already have quite a large one?) just encourages the trends that created the problem in the first place.

    Thinking some new technological solution will square the circle is hayzee fantayzee.

    • Agree: Herald
    • Replies: @Alden
  205. lysias says:

    Oh, it happened. There’s a book about it, “McNamara’s Folly,” by Hamilton Gregory.

    • Replies: @anon
  206. gay troll says:
    @Larry Romanoff

    Glad to see you occasionally on target with a “Deep State Zionists” remark. I look forward to your next deep dive into the secret history of the Bush family, their connections to Nazi Germany, their involvement in the assassination of JFK and the fascist totalitarianism they have pursued ever since. Look forward to your thoughts on how Christianity as especially espoused by the likes of the Bush clan plays an indispensable role in the Zionist project. Perhaps you can also reflect on the fact that Christianity is intrinsically Zionist, duplicating a claim on the “promised land” by redefining Yahweh’s “chosen people.” Perhaps you will consider that only Christians believe in Satan and only a Christian would worship Satan as a god; the rest of us correctly identify “him” as a figment of your imagination.

    There is a war going on, and one side in this war has been correctly identified as a Zionist Deep State. Some say this entity is communist, some fascist, some Jewish, some Christian, some White supremacist, some miscegenist. Any of these delusions are acceptable to the ZDS and that is why they are willing to promote them all. The fact is that America was never intended to be a white nation or a Christian nation. It was never intended to be fascist or communist. It was intended to be republican and color blind. Larry like other alt media provocateurs invites you to choose a side in a false dichotomy. But the true enemy of the deep state is the public at large. And they have not been working to reduce our numbers, they have been working to control our minds and thereby our thoughts and actions.

    • Replies: @ingotus
  207. Herald says:
    @Stan d Mute

    They are not interested in improving the species in any meaningful way and certainly not for the likes you or me. The plan is simple, reduction of the general population to around 500 million, those left will act as mind controlled janitors, servants and crop tenders.

    I can sometimes sympathise with the depopulators and all the more so, when I read a post like your very own. You have much to learn, but somewhat thankfully, I don’t expect you will get the opportunity.

  208. @Loup-Bouc

    It overtaxed my net connection, then gave me a headache, and I still have no idea.
    Chichi lawyer humor is not my strongest suit I´m afraid 😉

  209. Kali says:

    Dear Loup-Bouc, what a great compliment! Thank you for your kind words and interest. I will do my very best not to let your comment inflate my ego.

    Yes, Kali references the Hindu goddess, and yes, I am a woman. It’s not a pseudonym though, but a “calling” I was given by an Indian Sadu around 8 years ago. – All part of life’s rich tapestry and learning. – If Kali is the destroyer of egos, then it follows that taking this calling means head-on confrontation with my own ego… (In my next life I may choose an easier path! 😀 )

    Thank you, Loup-Bouc, for you very kind words!

    With much love,

  210. Kali says:

    You know, in an earlier reply to you, Nokangaroos, I almost confessed to fully understanding everything you write.

    I make that confession now! 😀

    I will make a point of reading Hardin, because having ones ideas a perceptions challenged is good excercise.

    Ragnarokk sounds like a pedant – and also Norse?

    Boa noite, Nokangaroos,

    • Thanks: nokangaroos
    • Replies: @Kali
  211. anon[172] • Disclaimer says:

    mindlessly mouthing off!
    take it easy!

    • Replies: @RoatanBill
  212. Kali says:

    You have a beautiful turn of phrase, Nokangaroos, and on several of the points you make I’m in agreement.
    Cities are unnatural places and scew ones perceptions (they make the place/planet look over-crowded!)

    I’ve long recognised that “muliculturalism” is Newspeak for mono-culturalism, and the that monoculture being pushed is neo-liberal Americanism (or “Israel-first” Zionism, if you prefer).

    That simple phrase, “birds of a feather flock together” conveys a certain truthiness, and maybe also a lesson for humankind. – In years gone by I came within a hairs breadth of becoming an SJW (it was my brain that saved me, and the feeling that I was being manipulated) so that’s quite an admition! 😀

    Political “rights” and “liberties” are certainly illusions, whilst nature bestows strengths and capabilities, if only we know how to access and utilise them. Fuck the system! Burn it down! Because, yeah, “we’re doomed” by it.

    Would we be doomed if this particular ideology hadn’t welded itself to the world of Man? I doubt even God knows the answer to that!

    It would be a great shame for our species to burn out before giving our potential for good, for beauty, compassion, love, kindness a fair crack of the whip… 😮

    I will be plagiarising “Grim Greta” in future pronouncements. I hope you don’t mind! 😀

    With love,

    • Replies: @dfordoom
    , @nokangaroos
  213. @eD

    Yeah, right. Population is going down. Doubled in less than a century. And you say it’s going down. Because of some blip in the data. Bullshit.

  214. @anon

    What’s the matter, can’t back up your BS?

  215. @foolisholdman

    You forget the other thing. A steady supply of food. Which contributes to children staying alive. People who do not need more and more sons and daughters to work the farm do not need lots of sons and daughters.

    • Agree: Hiram of Tyre
  216. @RoatanBill

    Hate to break it to you, but multinationals would be jack shit if they don’t have the American military backing them up.

    And yes, that is what the empire is all about, not the fantasies about freedoms.

    • Replies: @RoatanBill
  217. @Astuteobservor II

    You’re preaching to the choir.

    Corporations should be just a way to pool funds for a specific purpose. They have morphed into the controlling interest for gov’ts around the globe, especially the US regime. The criminals that are the US gov’t accept their payoffs to do their corporate masters bidding. The morons in the military are expendable mobile small arms platforms that are too stupid to understand how they’re being used.

    When the SHTF, any day now, the US military will either ‘use it before you lose it’ or start to downsize. My money is on TPTsB starting a war with China and Russia that the US will lose. End of empire, end of reserve currency, end of sanctions, start of payback from the whole world.

  218. Alden says:
    @Etruscan Film Star

    That’s what I wrote. Mass transit is fantastically expensive. My response was to answer FB’s ignorant post that mass transit is cheaper than private cars. It’s not.

    The intersection is Santa Monica Blvd and the 405 freeway underpass; 35 minutes much of the day. I tend to walk distances of less than 2 miles as it takes a bit less time and is much less irritating

    My Seattle relatives love Los Angeles traffic because compared to Seattle it moves so fast and the streets are in better condition.

    Then there’s crawling across the SF Oakland and Golden Gate bridges at 5-10 miles an hour. An hour to go 6 miles on a city bus.

    • Replies: @nokangaroos
  219. Alden says:
    @another fred

    Sometimes UNZ is just group therapy for unhappily married, unhappily divorced, and bitter woman less child less men with a weird obsession with other people’s reproductive activities.

  220. Alden says:

    Epidemic or not, chalmydia causes both miscarriages and after a few years sterility.

    • Replies: @Loup-Bouc
    , @Loup-Bouc
  221. @Oliver D. Smith

    If the elites really want population growth they’re going about it in a strange way. Their engineered plan-demic has so demoralized the people with social distancing and compulsory mask-wearing that they don’t want to bring children into a crumbling world. The TFR in the US continues to decline every year, most especially among whites, but it appears that you are very happy about that, since whites are the biggest polluters in your opinion.

    Of course the elites can afford to have large families as they are immune from the damage they have wrought. Like Gates, they want a hugely reduced world population, as they know current population growth is unsustainable. And they aren’t too worried about consumers as robots will be doing most of the work.

    • Replies: @dfordoom
  222. AlaskaJ says:
    @Jim Bob Lassiter

    Womyn are increasingly having children absent the child’s natural father in their life, choosing not to marry, or divorcing the child’s natural guardian (guardian-by-nature) for the child support monies. They don’t have many children. With the decline of marriage, comes the decline in population. It’s a fact. A nation ruled by womyn and children is a curse…. and men who permit it belong to nations not worth saving. Why would our Creator care one whit about a nation made up of cucked, narcissist Cains? He doesn’t, and it’s self-evident.

    • Replies: @Larry Romanoff
  223. @Kratoklastes

    The Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th edition tells us: Alp. To the Swiss dwellers in the plains the term “the Alps” signifies the high snowy mountains which they see on the horizon, but to the dwellers in the valleys which nature has carved in the sides of those high mountains, the word alp means exclusively the summer pastures situated on the slopes above the valley, though below the snow-line. In fact such pastures are essential to the inhabitants of pastoral alpine districts, for the fodder to be obtained in the valley itself would not suffice to support the number of cattle which are required to afford sustenance to the inhabitants. Such mountain pastures, made use of only during the summer months, are of almost immemorial antiquity, cases occurring in 739, 868 and 999, while they are found in all parts of the Alpine chain….
    But in Switzerland, and especially in the German speaking mountain districts, the alps are the centre round which the entire pastoral life of the inhabitants turns. It is reckoned that in that country there are now about 4778 alps in all, the capital value of which is put at rather over 3,000,000….
    These Alpgemeinden are composed of the persons who have a right to send cattle up to any particular alp in summer, this right being attached (in different places) either to certain plots of ground in the valley or certain houses in the village, or to certain persons. In any case the owners of an alp fix the greatest number of cows which it can support during the summer without being permanently damaged. The plot of ground which can support a single cow (or 2 heifers, 3 calves or sheep, 4 pigs or 8 goats) is called a Kuhstoss (of which there are 270,389 in Switzerland), and it is in these terms that the productiveness of the alp is reckoned. Sometimes a particular alp, or a portion of it, is reserved exclusively to heifers and calves, or to goats (in this case it is the loftier portion). On each alp there are several sets of huts wherein live the cow-herds and cheese-makers (the latter are called Sennen or Fruitiers ),..
    . The milk given each day by each cow is entered in a book, and then made into butter and cheese, the cow-herds and cheese-makers having the right to a certain proportion of milk, butter and cheese for their own sustenance, and receiving a small sum per head of cattle for looking after them. At the end of the season the net amount of cheese produced by milk from each cow is handed over to the owner of that particular cow, and is carried down by him to his home in the valley from the hut (a small building on four stone legs to secure the contents from mice) wherein the cheeses have been stored since they were made – this hut is called a Speicher. As the owners of Kuhstiissen may exchange them provisionally. for others on another alp, or may hire them out (they can only sell them with the plot or house to which they are attached), the persons who in any given summer actually send cows up to an alp (these form the Besetzerschaft ) need not necessarily be absolutely identical with the true owners of these rights or Besitzerschaft. Hay is never mown on the true alps save in spots which are not easily accessible to cattle (in very high spots it belongs to the mower, and is then called Wildheu ), but hay-crops are made on the Mayens or Voralpen, the lowest pastures, situated between the homesteads and the true alps; these Voralpen are individual (not communal) property, though probably in olden days cut out of the true Alpen. In the winter the cattle consume the hay mown on these Voralpen (which, to a certain extent, are grazed in late spring and early autumn, that is, before and after the summer sojourn on the alps), either living in the huts on the Voralpen while they consume it, or in the stable attached to the dwelling-houses in the village; in the barn is stored the hay mown on the homestead and on the meadows near the village, which may belong to the owner of the cattle. The whole system is well organized and is well understood by the natives, though not always by strangers who visit the Alps in summer.
    The number of alp, and therefore the number of cattle the land can support, cannot go up, it can only go down, as land is used for other purposes and construction continues.

    • Thanks: gay troll
  224. Anonymous[299] • Disclaimer says:

    I think you’re just extremely bitter that older men can still get laid, married, and have kids, while old heifer gasbags like yourself haven’t been properly laid in decades:

  225. Loup-Bouc says:

    Again, at least a second time, you misspell chlamydia — as “chalmydia.” Once, and I presume a mere typing error. Twice, and I conclude the cause is medical-language illiteracy (which suggests ignorance of the science of medicine, ignorance suggested also by much of the rest of your comments).

    Epidemic or not, chalmydia causes both miscarriages and after a few years sterility.

    You reference the wrong epoch, and the wrong issue.

    The subject was Emma Goldman, 1869-1940. In her lifetime, a European or American had a very wee chance of contracting chlamydia infection. And, even now, a chlamydia-victim suffers about a 12-15% chance of becoming infertile because of the infection. More important: You have zero evidence-based premise of arguing that Emma Goldman suffered any STD or that an STD caused her to become infertile.

    But all such stuff is irrelevant both to my comment and to Mr. Romanoff’s horrendously libelous, spurious, scurrilous, much fraudulent, viciously anti-women’s-sexual-freedom, antisemitic, historically unsound, risibly illogical article. Already, earlier, I showed that your “perspectives” reside in toxic dreck.

    You have not stated ANYTHING that could rebut ANYTHING I presented either in (a) my lead comment [my comment of August 2, 2020 at 11:42 pm GMT (comment # 144) or in (b) my first comment responding to your first reply comment [my comment of August 3, 2020 at 3:31 am GMT (comment # 165), as amended by my comment of August 3, 2020 at 3:07 pm GMT (comment # 191)].

    I shall not waste my time on enhancing my showings of the imbecilic absurdity of your comments. Simply shall I not respond again to your abysmally stupid comments.

    Taisez-vous, Monsieur Crétin ou Madame Crétine. Ne polluez plus mon appréhension.

    • Replies: @Loup-Bouc
  226. @Kali

    Who did the wealthy white capitalists exploit before they imported blacks? Were the miners of Europe blacks? People exploit each other. No need to bring race into it and play the victim.

    • Replies: @Kali
  227. Loup-Bouc says:

    The subject was Emma Goldman, 1869-1940. In her lifetime, a European or American had a very wee chance of contracting chlamydia infection. And, even now, a chlamydia-victim suffers about a 12-15% chance of becoming infertile because of the infection.

    I neglected to note that essentially the same is true of miscarriage.

  228. Loup-Bouc says:

    See both my reply of August 4, 2020 at 12:18 am GMT(comment #$ 227) and my comment of August 4, 2020 at 12:27 am GMT (comment # 229), which supplements my reply of August 4, 2020 at 12:18 am GMT(comment #$ 227).

  229. @RoatanBill

    There will never be a direct hot war between the 3 major Nuclear powers.

  230. dfordoom says: • Website

    I’ve long recognised that “muliculturalism” is Newspeak for mono-culturalism, and the that monoculture being pushed is neo-liberal Americanism

    Yep. It’s a point I’ve tried to make to people many times. It’s difficult to convince dissident rightists of this truth because they’re so blinded by hatred of other races and cultures.

    • Thanks: Kali
  231. dfordoom says: • Website

    Corporations should be just a way to pool funds for a specific purpose. They have morphed into the controlling interest for gov’ts around the globe, especially the US regime. The criminals that are the US gov’t accept their payoffs to do their corporate masters bidding. The morons in the military are expendable mobile small arms platforms that are too stupid to understand how they’re being used.

    I agree with all of that.

    When the SHTF, any day now, the US military will either ‘use it before you lose it’ or start to downsize. My money is on TPTsB starting a war with China and Russia that the US will lose.

    I certainly think that a major global war involving nuclear powers is much much more likely today than it ever was during the original Cold War. And if there is such a war it will certainly be the US that starts it.

    Apart from the ‘use it before you lose it’ factor there’s also the same kind of thinking that led to the First World War, when various Great Powers convinced themselves that were declining in relative terms vis-à-vis rival Great Powers. The French feared they were in relative decline compared to Germany, the Germans persuaded themselves they were in decline relative to Russia. So they convinced themselves that war now would be better than war later.

    So now there are many in the US who want war with China sooner rather than later. They see it as the last chance to destroy a rising rival.

    Declining great powers are very very dangerous.

    • Replies: @Astuteobservor II
  232. dfordoom says: • Website

    Sometimes UNZ is just group therapy for unhappily married, unhappily divorced, and bitter woman less child less men with a weird obsession with other people’s reproductive activities.

    True. But then UNZ is group therapy for all kinds of inadequates and social misfits. Losers who want to blame someone else for the fact that they’re losers, so they blame the blacks or the Jews or the commies or the “Deep State” or the Freemasons or the Boomers or the satanists or various people they have decided are diabolical criminal masterminds.

    The Dissident Right is in fact little more than group therapy. It attracts a handful of genuinely intelligent and thoughtful people but mostly it attracts bitter losers.

    There’s no question that it also attracts a massively disproportionate number of male bitter losers. Maybe women are less likely to become bitter losers, or maybe female bitter losers manifest themselves in different ways.

  233. Depopulation the Earth has been an obsession of the ruling class for centuries, if not longer.

    Based on Webster Tarpley’s “Against Oligarchy”, it seems to have originated in Venice with Giammaria Ortes and his myth of “Carrying Capacity” — which Malthus and others have perpetuated.


    The originator of the “carrying capacity” argument was Giammaria Ortes, a defrocked Camaldolese monk and libertine, who in 1790, in the last year of his life, published the raving tract Reflections on the Population of Nations in Relation to National Economy. Here Ortes set the unalterable upper limit for the world’s human population at 3 billion.

    Ortes (1713-1790) was a Venetian charlatan and mountebank, and his “population possible to subsist on all the earth” has long since been exceeded and today has been doubled. Ortes was one of the most important ideologues of the Venetian oligarchy in its final phase. Many current proponents of U.N. -sponsored genocide would identify themselves as followers of Parson Thomas Robert Malthus (1766-1834), the author of the infamous “Essay on the Principle of Population,” which was published in 1798. But all of Malthus’s argument is already contained in a more explicit form in the writings of Ortes. In fact, in the entire school of British Philosophical Radicalism after the time of the American Revolution-including Malthus, Jeremy Bentham (1748-1732), James Mill (1773-1836) and John Stuart Mill (1806-1873), there is virtually nothing that cannot already be found in Ortes. The British empiricists were, as usual, obliged slavishly to plagiarize their decadent Venetian originals.


    When British East India Company retainer Thomas Malthus published his Essay on Population he was plagiarizing from the Venetian Giammaria Ortes, who produced, around 1750, a fully developed version of the argument that geometric population growth outstrips the much slower arithmetic progress of food production.


    JFK, two months before his assassination, had addressed the lunacy of the ideology at the National Academy of Sciences:

    “Malthus argued a century and a half ago that man, by using up all his available resources, would forever press on the limits of subsistence, thus condemning humanity to an indefinite future of misery and pov- erty. We can now begin to hope and, I believe, know that Malthus was expressing not a law of nature, but merely the limitation then of scientific and social wisdom.”

    “The truth or falsity of [Malthus’s] prediction will depend now, with the tools we have, on our own actions. . . . The Earth can be an abundant mother to all of the people that will be born in the coming years. . . . Abundance depends now on the application of sound biological analysis to the problems of agriculture, and the long-term answer to inadequate food production, which brings misery with it, must lie in new re- search and new experimentation, and the successful use of new knowledge will require close cooperation with other nations.

  234. Alfred says:

    I will pray for your sorry soul.

    Thank you. That is very kind of you.

    Not everyone leads the sort you life you admire. Not everyone wishes to lead it either. I suspect a lot more is going on in your neighborhood than you imagine. Apparently, 10% of kids in the UK are not the kids of their putative father. It is probably no different where you are. But a big dose of hypocrisy covers it up.

    It has always been like that. Women make these decisions. They know best. Nature arranged it like that. They marry one guy (like you?) for stability and security but they want their kids to be smarter or better-looking than him. It is their prerogative.

    There is not shortage of articles to say that the 30% of DNA clinics are excessive. I agree. I suspect 10% is more like it.

    What are the chances that your dad isn’t your father?

    • Replies: @Emslander
  235. Alfred says:

    I’ve been dealing with grain trade a lot in previous years. I don’t follow the markets nowadays.

    Martin Armstrong says that his model is predicting much higher food prices.

    there are serious shortages of food on the horizon. Those who are attempting to destroy the economy so they can recreate it in their image are clueless about how the world economy functions. All they have looked at is their stupid models on CO2 when CO2 is 0.04% of the atmosphere. They have wiped out crops by destroying the food chain and either they are totally ignorant of their actions, or they have deliberately also tried to invoke starvation to reduce the population. Nobody will investigate either and I am sure they would claim to be ignorant of the impact on the food supply by pushing for lockdowns. There is ample evidence that this excuse is BS and they must know what they are doing which would bring up the question of crimes against humanity. They will then probably blame global cooling.

    Socrates was projecting this would be a wave of inflation coming from SHORTAGES of food. We are already witnessing rising food prices (July 2020)

  236. dfordoom says: • Website

    If the elites really want population growth they’re going about it in a strange way. Their engineered plan-demic has so demoralized the people with social distancing and compulsory mask-wearing that they don’t want to bring children into a crumbling world.

    Which suggests that the idea that the pandemic is an evil plot by the elites is just another crazy right-wing conspiracy theory.

  237. @dfordoom

    That is why China just needs to Build 1000 more nukes n long range ICBMs.

    Problem solved.

    This is only an issue because China only has 250 nukes on paper and not all of them can reach the USA.

    China needs to build them for all of us.

    • Replies: @dfordoom
  238. anon[129] • Disclaimer says:

    What about the claim that 500,000 morons were sent to Vietnam and most never returned?
    In an earlier article, the author claimed 500,000 German POWs were sent to America and no record of their repatriation could be found.

  239. Kali says:

    I almost confessed to ***NOT*** fully understanding everything you write.

    N.B. Never comment whilst distracted.

    • Thanks: nokangaroos
  240. Kali says:
    @ploni almoni

    Bom Dia Ploni almoni,

    I guess you must have stopped reading at “white capitalists” or you’d have seen this:

    How would we “superior” white skinned races manage to indulge our vices without brown people to exploit?

    But in answer to your question, the “wealthy white capitalists” (read feudal lords and royals) exopted landless peasants… white ones.

    You are right to pull me on my sloppy language though, so thanks for that.


    • Replies: @ploni almoni
  241. @AlaskaJ

    “A nation ruled by womyn and children is a curse”

    Not necessarily. Matriarchal societies tend to be quite successful. They may not become as industrially powerful as male-dominated societies, but they don’t start wars, either.

    China has the Mosuo ethnic group in its Yunnan-Tibet border region and it has thrived for a very long time. All children belong to the matriarchal side of the family. The husband spends the night with his wife but is part of his mother’s home (or grandmother’s). Divorce is a non-event because the children belong to the mothers and there are no shared personal assets. There is also no violence, no reports ever of sexual abuse, and there is no word in the language for “rape”.

    It can’t be all bad.

    • Replies: @ingotus
  242. @Roger

    Never wrestle with a pig, because it isn’t interested in the outcome. It derives all its pleasure from luring you into the pigsty where it can coat you with muck and excrement.

  243. Emslander says:

    They marry one guy (like you?) for stability and security but they want their kids to be smarter or better-looking than him. It is their prerogative.

    Alfred, if I weren’t faithful to my wife, I’d be the guy the women would be going to for children who are taller, stronger, smarter or better looking. I know from the proposals I used to get. My wife and I live the way we do because it’s always been the correct way. It still is. When you’re not bloviating anonymously on a crappy web site, you probably wish you had what I’ve got.

    Like I’ve said, it may be time for you to look to your immortal soul.

    • LOL: Alfred
    • Replies: @Anon
  244. @Miville

    I’ve never encountered a time traveler before, so I have to ask, how did you communicate with those folks in Mohenjo Daro?

    I assume you have first hand knowledge and aren’t just repeating the stories that those BS artist archaeologists invent for the shallow thinkers.

  245. @Kali

    Thanx 😉

    – Gibbon would have argued everything follows well-established, aye downright boring pattern … and there´s a bit more to it than classic old White men´s Jeremiad.
    We have gotten soft – though loads of empires have managed to follow the path of all flesh without jewish assistance, so maybe it´s not that simple.

    Cities are a conditio sine qua non of civilization (how´s my tautology?).
    “Pre-feudal agrarian”, sorry; though Göbekli Tepe raised some interesting new questions – maybe the Neolithic Revolution was driven by the eternal quest for a reliable beer source.
    Utterly believable, no 😀 ?
    No one ever said cities are healthy – for long periods the lords had to slack their recruiting standards (thieves, smugglers, sodomites, fugitives, fugees etc.) and offer incentives (dispens from taxes, draft, pro- and persection, serfdom, trade and tariff privileges) to get anyone to dwell in their cities at all (“bourgeois” lit. “castle dweller”).
    Once the synergies kicked in and the brain drain got going, over tens of generations the unreliable, useless and dysfunctional were removed from the gene pool with extreme prejudice*, resulting in the European/Chinese/Japanese functional citoyen: Meek, passive-aggressive, phlegm and guile; as well as functioning cities.
    Allow me to skip the Industrial Revolution; the point I wish to arrive at is:
    Inner city pathology is the inevitable result of stuffing warrior genes in chicken coops, and cannot be addressed on a city planner´s level; at least not a contemporary one 😛

    Like it or not, the cities are the foreseeable future, their explosive growth the paradox result of more and more people becoming useless.

    [“.. our potential for good, for beauty, compassion, love, kindness ..”]
    I´m afraid your X chromosomes are showing 😛 Besides, it is teleological wrongthink.
    [“.. a fair crack of the whip…”]
    Sure thing, Domina. If you do not like IQ as a yardstick (on which you are probably right), “social credit” looks like a reasonable proxy; does 490pts (of 600) sound about right?

    *Loup-Bouc seems to like Peter Prince Kropotkin (Czar´s butler and aristo-anarchist) who swiped Aristoteles´idea that states, “like tools and animals”, have a “natural size” above and below which they lose their qualities, esp. that anything bigger than the polis is of necessity unfree.
    – Aesthetically pleasing but unfeasible; there´s just not enough room. It will be hard enough to keep the unwashed masses from going at someone or else´s throat.
    – For every free Athenian some ten slaves and serfs did the entire primary sector. All of these are now superfluous.
    – Solon´s (NOT Drakon´s) Law included the death penalty for unemployment (i.e. anyone without discernible income is of necessity criminal), a provision that was renewed four times “because it was very good”. Anyone seriously for that?

    Not that I have any answers …

    Hope this finds you well and doesn´t make you unwell, 😀

    • Thanks: Ann Nonny Mouse
    • Replies: @Loup-Bouc
    , @Loup-Bouc
    , @Kali
  246. @Alden

    Medium-term, individual motor transport is energetic insanity.
    It is also comparatively recent – how did people before Rosa Parks manage not to die out?

    To the outsider it is fascinating to watch American burbs gang up AGAINST public transport … after spending top dollah to get away from the, erm, “urban” 😀

    • Replies: @onebelowall
  247. Loup-Bouc says:

    Loup-Bouc seems to like Peter Prince Kropotkin

    You hallucinate what you want to perceive.

    (a) Nowhere in this thread did I even mention Kropotkin.

    I would not say that I “like” Kropotkin (or Marx, with whom Kropotkin disagreed concerning some core matters). Such a statement may fit your banal, if not intellectually-challenged mentality. But such statements do not live in the world of my thought.

    Previously (in this thread) I replied to you only by linking an article of one of my colleagues, Leonard R. Jaffee. This was the link:
    The linked article is Leonard R. Jaffee, The Troubles with Law and Economics , 20 Hofstra Law Review 777 (1992)

    In his article that I linked in my earlier reply responding to you (same Hofstra Law Review article linked, and properly cited, above), Prof. Jaffee intimates that he (Prof. Jaffee) might urge humans abandon all current species of “civilization” and pursue a “natural”-like development of small community culture that would, substantially, consist with Kropotkin’s “anarchy of mutual aid.”

    In the same Hofstra Law Review article, Prof. Jaffee cites, and occasionally relies on, another of his articles, Leonard R. Jaffee, Empathic Adjustment—An Alternative to Rules, Policies, and Politics, 58 University of Cincinnati Law Review 1161 (1990). In THAT article, Prof. Jaffee describes a social order that consists with the considerations he developed in his above-linked Hofstra Law Review article and consists substantially also with Kropotkin’s anarchy of mutual aid.

    You presume, falsely, that I am Prof. Jaffee. I am NOT Professor Jaffee. I was a member of a law faculty of which he was also a member. I linked his article because I respect Prof. Jaffee’s work (despite sometimes a disagree with aspects of it) and because his Hofstra Law Review article clashes with your at-best-shallowly-educated perspectives regarding economics and social organization and other, like matters that Romanoff’s article and various of this thread’s comments try to treat. My citing particularly Prof’ Jaffee’s Hofstra Law Review article does not imply that I agree with any certain proposition of it.

    You presume much else falsely. At best, your “intellectual” modus operandi is very sloppy — at worst, dissembling and inclined to render false or spurious assertions, often snidely but without evidence or better-than-threadbare scholarly support.

    (b) You misrepresent Kropotkin’s position. Either your misrepresentation derives from contemnible bias, or it reflects pretension masking substantial ignorance. [I doubt you have READ Kropotkin’s works.]

    (c) Your Kropotkin-mocking “Czaŕs butler and aristo-anarchist” language states abysmally stupid falsehood — perhaps in an attempt of prepubescent sarcasm (as if ANY sarcasm has merit other than its evidencing poor taste and weakness of intelligence).

    (d) You seem to conflate Kropotkin’s position with a pinch of Aristotle’s salt — though, were Kropotin asked his opinion of Aristotle, he (Kropotkin) might have responded: “somewhat intelligent, but stuck in a dream-world of character-neurotic absolutes.”

    (d) Respecting whether Kropotikin’s social-organization suggestions imagined an infeasible reality, your conclusion assumes continuation of the systems YOU know (or think you know) — all of which systems suffer the trouble that they are SYSTEMS and, hence, sick (whether they are consciously designed or produced by dominent character-structures). Compare, e.g., Wilhelm Reich, THE MASS PSYCHOLOGY OF FASCISM (Orgone Institute Press New York 1946),
    Wilhelm Reich, INVASION OF COMPULSORY SEX-MORALITY, excerpted here:
    Wilhelm Reich, Wilhelm Reich, CHARACTER ANALYSIS (Farrar, Straus, and Giroux 1972, paperback 1990), Paperback ISBN-13: 978-0-374-50!J8IJ–l, Paperback ISBN-lO: 0-:374-50980-8, excerpted here:
    [I hope you appreciate the meaning of e.g.]

    Some time ago, I delivered a paper at an Annual Congress of the International Academy of Law & Mental Health (which paper was published by the same International Academy of Law & Mental Health). I shall not state the year or location of the Convention or the paper’s title — because the information could enable an Unz Review reader to discover my identity. I shall observe only that the paper discussed sundry primitive societies, including, but not only, Hopi, Zuni, pre-WWII Trobriand Island culture, Hottentot, Australian Aborigine, and San (aka Bushman).

    The audience consisted of Law Professors, Psychiatrists, Neurologists, and other physicians, and also Psychologists. [I am both law professor and physician and specially experienced, and published, in clinical psychology.] Sundry audience-members agreed with my assessment that the only clearly healthy society was that of the San, partly because San society had neither religion nor rules — no social SYSTEM. But most audience-members — even the agreeing ones — manifested fear of abandoning the comforts and (illusory) security of “civilization.”

    I confess that I, too, have not endeavored to beg a San band to adopt me into it (a San band). Here I remain, a near-misanthrope swimming in my total lack of politics and my angry condemnation of “civilization” and its many evils.

    • Thanks: Ann Nonny Mouse, Kali
  248. Loup-Bouc says:

    I neglected to express my expectation that you did not READ Prof. Jaffee’s Hofstra Law Review article ( ], but skimmed a bit of its mostly philosphic beginning and deigned to file it away (in your mechanical brain) as a gloopy, goody-goody Kropotkinian anarchist piece.

    Had you READ the piece, you would have encountered excellent economics analysis of legal doctrines and neoliberal “economics” dreck. Prof. Jaffee’s article’s first circa 45% deconstructed, and showed the dyseconomics of a legal rule called “efficient breach,” a neoliberal legal rule established before neoliberalism was labeled such.

    Prof. Jaffee deconstructed, thoroughly, and destroyed not only the ordinary-language-presented logico-empirical arguments and evidence-uses of both law professors and economists who have sought to justify the “efficient breach” rule. He demolished also the math and statistics arguments they have adduced.

    More than a few law professors, judges, and economists have agreed that Prof. Jaffee’s deconstruction succeeded. One economist/law-professor [of University of Pennsylvania law school] observed: Prof. Jaffee’s article was so effective that it caused Judge Richard Posner (the leading neoliberism-defending jurist and law professor) to “froth at the mouth.”

    • Replies: @thotmonger
  249. dfordoom says: • Website
    @Astuteobservor II

    That is why China just needs to Build 1000 more nukes n long range ICBMs.

    Problem solved.

    This is only an issue because China only has 250 nukes on paper and not all of them can reach the USA.

    China needs to build them for all of us.

    Yep. They also need lots more hypersonic missiles to persuade the US that conventional war is not an option either.

    There are two choices open to nations today – become grovelling US vassals, or build a strong nuclear deterrent. I guess there’s a third option – to shelter under the Chinese nuclear umbrella but that would require China to have a much larger much more formidable nuclear umbrella.

    The survival of civilisation rests on China’s shoulders. They need to move quickly since it’s now clear that the US is likely to choose the option of war sooner rather than later.

    • Replies: @VinnyVette
  250. Derer says:
    @Yukon Jack

    It is not clear, 7-8 children at what age or should it not be 7-8 born. The fertility is only one part of the equation the second part is mortality statistics. For example if from 10 children only one survives to puberty then the map is meaningless because that is not included. Indicating that perhaps in Africa or India the high fertility is a function of high mortality rate.

    We are, or even our grand children, still far from the finish line. What is limited is the Earth plant protein capacity and humans compete for it with animals. We are still converting this limited plant protein at very inefficient rate into animal protein just because we like it. As our numbers are increasing, this luxury will be first to diminish and we will become vegetarian. This eventuality is still far away.

  251. Johan says:

    “Spencer was a thoroughgoing classical liberal, a principled champion of individual rights in all spheres of human life. Eugenics, which was based on racism, coercion, and collectivism, was alien to everything that Spencer believed.”

    Agreed, the article contains a great deal of the usual slander and gossip, for purposes of making it sensational.

  252. The planet is over populated. That said, I and any sane person is not on board with Bill Gates and his cronies nefarious plans for depopulation.
    The biggest problem with over population is the disproportionately largest percentage is from 3rd world shit hole countries / continents, actually, and all they do is drag the first world countries down to their level. All efforts to pull the 3rd world up to 1st world level have been a complete waste of time, effort, and resources.
    Since the powers that be are well aware of this, they like open borders, so the proles can share the blunt of 3rd world misery, while they live isolated from the fallout of their policies, and benefit from the cheap labor and political power afforded them via 3rd world cast offs.
    While first world whites are busy fighting it out to survive at ground level with the 3rd world immigrants, the elites are moving the chess pieces around and around the board… Vying to control it all.

  253. @dfordoom

    So when the Chinese save civilization, they are going to become our “benevolent” savior’s? Lmfao. If you call that saving civilization, you can have it brother!
    Btw the Chinese create nothing of their own. They are merely good at ripping off and copying white, European, western technology.
    When they conquer the west, who are they going to copy? Enslave whites to do the inventing and innovating for them?
    Great plan man!

    • Replies: @dfordoom
  254. @Alden

    Since I am neither “woman less,” “child less,” nor obsessed with anyone’s reproductive activities I assume your comment was for someone else.

    “Marry in haste, repent in leisure” is old advice, and sound.

    Have a nice day.

  255. dfordoom says: • Website

    Btw the Chinese create nothing of their own. They are merely good at ripping off and copying white, European, western technology.

    Lots of cope in that comment.

    • Replies: @Loup-Bouc
    , @VinnyVette
  256. Loup-Bouc says:

    You use the term “cope” as I have not previously encountered its being used (for denotation I cannot divine, because of my having encountered no “cope” usage even distantly akin to whatever is the usage to which you may be putting the term).

    Please translate.

    Thank you.

    • Replies: @dfordoom
  257. dfordoom says: • Website

    You use the term “cope” as I have not previously encountered its being used (for denotation I cannot divine, because of my having encountered no “cope” usage even distantly akin to whatever is the usage to which you may be putting the term).

    Please translate.

    It means it’s an attempt to cope with an unpleasant truth (in this case the fact that the Chinese are currently doing much better than the US) by means of wishful thinking (in this case by claiming that the Chinese, despite all evidence to the contrary, are still inferior to white people).

  258. Kali says:

    Hello Nokangaroos,

    Sorry for the delay in replying – my friend/neighbours horse ate and trampled my garden (three times in two weeks) despite that I’ve been asking hubby and said neighbour friend for fences for 3 years. Need I say more? Gloria the horse needs to be free (she was held in solitary confinement when we met) which means gardens need fences. Not rocket science, I’m sure you’ll agree.

    But I digress.

    Cities are a conditio sine qua non of civilization (how´s my tautology?).

    I wish I knew, No Kangaroos! lol

    “Pre-feudal agrarian”, sorry

    Haha! Fair point. – How about post-post-modern agrarian? A whole new, differnt, better, “new normal”! Or are my Communitarian chromosomes showing again? 😀

    [“.. our potential for good, for beauty, compassion, love, kindness ..”]
    I´m afraid your X chromosomes are showing 😛 Besides, it is teleological wrongthink.

    Then allow me to expand my reasoning and give you a glimpse at my second
    X, coupled (if you will) with hubbies Y. 😀

    Anarchy = self-rule. In order to achieve self-rule it is essential to know ones self (lest we end up with what so many columnists on this website mislabelled “anarchy” – The “anarchy” of senselessness/mindlessness and might-is-right tyranny on the streets).

    To fully know oneself requires deep meditation, and a “journey” to the centre of ones being, where resides The Divine (“God” is not – or is not only – an external force) which is Pure Love, which is Compassion. Unfortunately religions, at least the mono-god religions, point to an entirely externalised “God”, separate from, and above man – who is, they tell us, born bad and must be saved. Actual telelogical wrongthink!

    So, when I say:
    “nature bestows strengths and capabilities, if only we know how to access and utilise them” that’s what I’m talking about. We really are capable of so much more than “the system”, as it has evolved, allows. The journey to self-knowing reveals Compassion to be an essential part of our Being. Once known, it can be lived.

    This describes a way of life that me and he have practiced for almost a decade (our 9th aniversary approaches). We litterally work for others for free – living in rural Portugal with its rapidly aging population means there is PLENTY of work to be done tending the land, and the solar and irrigation systems of fellow immigrants don’t install themselves.
    So, we work for free, knowing, from life experience, that The Divine really does provide for all of ones needs (for example, we live on and cultivated a piece of land given to us by the son of a lady who’s garden (smallholding) we prepare for planting every spring. This gift came exactly when, and not a second before, we needed it.). With practice, one learns to let go of fear, anxiety, worry. As the Australians say, “she’ll be right”. Trust the intelligence at the heart of everything to support what it has created.

    “Fuck the system! Burn it down!” Probably sounded funnier in my head (I doubt you got my irony) because I know that all that is needed for the system, in all of its aspects, to be defeated, destroyed, finished, is for people to turn away from it. Money is by convention a replacement for trust – the fewer of us who use it, the few who need it. There are better ways for us to manage our affairs.
    Hubby and I do not follow the “rule of law” of an entirely unfit, corrupt, evil empire, rather we follow the one imperative that has any meaning – know yourself. When one knows oneself, one knows God and is indomitable. (This approach has been tested in the courts and over many encounters with state “authorities” 🙂 )

    It would be a great shame for our species to burn out before giving our potential for good, for beauty, compassion, love, kindness a fair crack of the whip…

    I’m glad you got my joke! 😀

    Although 2020 is shaping up to be the year which defines the future, which may relegate this now, suddenly, outdated/out-of-reach solution to some remote corners of the planet (our mountainside in Portugal being one, as high-ground is easier to defend), I feel sure you will appreciate our perspective and mark us up from “teleological wrongthink” to “maybe not so crazy after all”.

    If you do not like IQ as a yardstick (on which you are probably right), “social credit” looks like a reasonable proxy; does 490pts (of 600) sound about right?

    You are far too generous!
    And you reveal far too many gaps in my reading!! 😀

    I have a friend back in England who I’ve nicknamed “Reverend Riddle”. Neither he nor you make me sick, but my poor brain does quiver in befuddlement at times! 😀

    Wishing you a wonderful day!

    Much love,

    • Thanks: gay troll
    • Troll: VinnyVette
    • Replies: @nokangaroos
  259. @dfordoom

    Lots of CRAP in your comment…
    Why don’t you give me a rundown on all the various Chinese technological wonders that have contributed to modern civilization. You know “back your shit up?”

    • Troll: Kali
    • Replies: @Larry Romanoff
  260. Anon[264] • Disclaimer says:

    “Like I’ve said, it may be time for you to look to your immortal soul.”

    Your Christlike humility just drips from each post like diarrhea from your mouth – evidence that you are truly among god’s own anointed.

    There’s nothing like American Christianity – 1 Part [Mystery Babylon] Old Testament, 1 Part [Pharisaical] New Testament, 8 Parts Mercantilism.

    • LOL: Emslander
  261. @nokangaroos

    how did people before Rosa Parks manage not to die out?

    I was having a conversation about this a while back regarding the “Fifties” (meaning the popular version shown on TV) vs the actual 1950’s. It seems that most people still got around through mass transit like buses or trains. It was closer to The Honeymooners than Happy Days.

    • Agree: nokangaroos
  262. @Kali

    Delightful 😀

    … though IIRC Diogenes also abstained from women in rather rude terms.
    What´s a nice gal like you doing on a site like this ?

    – The horse and fence are a metaphor and an omen (->Commons);
    heresaround it´s mostly the cats crapping everywhere (though good for the chilis)
    and neighbor´s chickens digging up my topinambur (one of these days … 😛 ).

    Good to see you have internalized the First Lesson: Get outta da city!
    And don´t forget to gun up.

    All the best, 😀

    • Replies: @Kali
  263. 76239 says:
    @Hartmut Pilch

    Malthus was wrong then, and wrong now. Most industrial and agriculture commodities are at all time lows in terms of US dollars or gold. Population growth much like the economy is self regulating. We don’t need systemic murder to protect us. Individuals know far better their interests than the academic, the bureaucrat, the politician or the billionaire software developer. We need liberty not eugenics.

    • Replies: @Hartmut Pilch
  264. Kali says:

    And don´t forget to gun up.

    Married a former Royal Engineer Officer, and teamed up with other retired military bods. At the very least we can blow the bridges when the time comes. :p

    Take care Nokangaroos!

    With love,

  265. Ace says:

    It’s just the term for females besotted by sex. In males it’s called satyriasis and an example of it is William Jefferson somebody or other.

    • Agree: Larry
  266. dfordoom says: • Website

    It’s just the term for females besotted by sex. In males it’s called satyriasis and an example of it is William Jefferson somebody or other.

    Basically yes. We’re not allowed to use the word nymphomaniac for the same reason we’re not allowed to call women hysterical. Feminists have convinced us that using those words is thoughtcrime.

    I’m not suggesting that it’s common for women to be nymphomaniacs, but it does happen. I’m also not suggesting that all women are hysterical, but some are.

  267. @Loup-Bouc

    I think it was HD Thoreau who once said “One measure of wealth is what you can afford to leave alone.” Or maybe that was John Muir.

    What I am wondering is did Jaffee walk his talk? And what effect really did his argument have on the obscenely reified culture of lawyers and economists?

    p.s. Characterizing Kropotkin’s intellect as something that overshadowed Aristotle is like elevating a glow worm above an eagle. But let’s not go there.

  268. @Ray Caruso

    Thank you for these distinctions. Careful scholarship does not seem to be Larry’s strong suit*. However, was Romanoff correct in saying that Emma Goldman was Jewish, and in all likelihood connected to the assassination of President McKinley? I do not recall if Unz mentioned this in his American Prava essays slamming the ADL or Mossad. (?) And was her anarchist group also connected with a number of other murders? Put another way, what is the veracity of this “propaganda of the deed” claim, and is this ~attitude~ in any way connected with Talmudic teaching?

    * Re: Malthus, I have asked a number of life scientists over the past several decades if they can think of any case where a population of some species goes into an exponential growth phase and then levels off without suffering some sort of decline. None could think of any. To date, I remain unaware of any such example.

    Whether it is the ups and downs of lynx and hare, or the boom and burb of yeast in a beer bottle, the sad fact is Malthus’ thesis has never been proven wrong. Norman Borlaug, one of the pioneers of the Green Revolution, made it very clear he considered his efforts were only buying time in forestalling eventual food shortages and great famine.

    True, Malthus was wrong about the timing of the pinch in the case of people in England. Malthus did not foresee the industrial revolution, fossil fuels, Haber-Bosch etc. His recommendations of the day thus appear cruel and misplaced. Indeed they were. But his conscience was not inhumane. He wrote his famous essay because he was deeply troubled by this phenomenon of population growth outstripping available resources.

    Malthus remained a thorn because his pill of LIMITS infuriated capitalists and commies alike. Marx detested Malthus. And economists, the modern day priesthood that do the hocus pocus for the banks and holds the world is awe, have for the most part precious little to offer in the way of a steady state economy that does not depend on an ever expanding throughput of biophysical resources. What should we expect for those who have no skin in the game? Ha.

    p.s. JS Mill pretty much settled it back in 1848 when he explained:

    “If the earth must lose that great portion of its pleasantness which it owes to things that that the unlimited increase of wealth and population would extirpate from it, for the mere purpose of enabling it to support a larger, but not a better or happier population, I sincerely hope, for the sake of posterity, that they will be content to be stationary, long before necessity compels them to it.”

    – JS Mill, Principles of Political Economy, 1848

    NOT that this defends or denies the very real possibility that Bill Gates and vaccine politics is connected to nefarious designs of mass sterilization and murder. That takes us to CS Lewis and his essay, The Abolition of Man, which exposes the Controllers as soulless fiends; vain captains of their own abyss. But I will stop here.

  269. Miville says:

    This is a non-issue : in more ancient times the problem of ressources was resolved in a very simple way : the highest social status if not the only one offered to modest classes to ascend was to become religious celibates, that was the way taken by India when the country fared well. Reproduction, though viewed positively, was viewed only as a second choice. In our times the same regulatory function is achieved by gay supremacism.

  270. I don’t know how this ‘depopulating the Earth’ meme has become so powerful. But maybe it is mostly motivated by the anti-abortion fight. If you can make yourself believe that the Earth is not overpopulated but in fact is being depopulated, you can remove one of the main reasons given for birth control and abortion. It also feeds into the perpetual need for conservatives to say, ‘See, we aren’t the racists–they are!’ Don’t you see, they’re depopulating the Third World!

    Just go take a look at the Census Bureau Population Clock and ask yourself if this is an Earth that is being depopulated? In reality, globalists for decades have been fanning the flames of overpopulation by rushing in food aid in response to every population starvation crash, coming up with new ways to re-engineer the growing of crops to support ever growing numbers of people, and encouraging migrations from the Third Word to the First that will vastly increase the populations of both.

    Depopulation theories are Flat Earth.

  271. There is nothing Jews love more than murdering innocent women and children, other than calling you an anti-Semite if you object.

  272. @Alden

    FYI abortion was never a crime in Christian Europe or the Americas until about 1860.

    Can you elaborate? I’m curious because I’ve heard this before, that basically a human life was considered to have begun at birth in the Middle Ages, but I don’t know enough about it.

    It would be ironic if the whole “life begins at conception” thing is modern invention.

  273. ingotus says:
    @gay troll

    Hello gay troll,
    I am somewhat confused by your post. Would you please expand on your idea of a false dichotomy? Are you referring to the republican/democrat divide? Or the ZDS/rest of the world divide? Or perhaps something else?
    Thank you,

  274. ingotus says:
    @Larry Romanoff

    Very interesting, thank you Larry, I had never heard of such a community.

    I wonder how this society will do with the encroachment of technology and wealth. This could be relevant as in determining the dominant societal or cultural strategy. I recall an academic article exploring why a libertarian society could not exist over the long run, as the eventual establishment of a mob would require a state.

  275. @76239

    This is pure ideology and not a proper response to what I wrote. My original post already thouroughly refutes this belief in self-regulating liberty. Sure there may be some self-regulation, but it is one that the typical humanist liberal/libertarian moralizer will decry as “inhumane”.

  276. @Stephen Paul Foster

    Stephen Paul Foster. You are indeed correct. 59,000 is the valid number for dead American service members in Vietnam.
    In WW1 some 54,000-56,000 Americans died in combat but I read that 63,000 other American service members died from disease in the WW1 period 1917-1919.

    The Korean War remains confusing to me: total killed in combat on Korea around 33,000 and over 3,000 from other causes, yet I read that over 8,000 listed as POWs or missing in action that did not return.
    MIAs are often those blown to pieces/vaporized by artillery. We know that thousands of American POWs died from disease and starvation and that the North Koreans executed thousands of captured men. The 2nd Infantry Division lost over 7,000 men dead in Korea.
    I still find the official figures of 36,000-37,000 confusing.

  277. @Stephen Paul Foster

    58.Stephen Paul Foster says: • Website

    It led to Robert McNamara’s Project 100,000, where about 500,000 low-IQ individuals were conscripted into the US army and sent to Vietnam, few returning.

    “This is not remotely believable. “Few returning.” How few? The official death count for American soldiers in Vietnam is around 58,000”

    Whether or not you find this even ‘remotely believable’, it is nonetheless true. The “official” figure for American casualties in Vietnam has always been around 58,000, but any historian will tell you there are major discrepancies in the data and a good deal of obfuscation from the military authorities. Few serious historians accept that number as accurate, but this is another story the US media won’t touch, and no publisher will accept a scholarly investigation into the matter. This is simply one more part of buried history.

    It is shocking to me that apparently many Americans will so vehemently defend statistics such as these when it is so apparently obvious that the US government and the military lie about almost everything.

    As one example, the generally-accepted death toll for Vietnam and surrounding area – at the hands of the US military – is around 5 million fatalities. But the US government, the military, and even many American historians, claim the entire death toll was less than 1 million – on the basis that “Vietnamese statistics are notoriously unreliable”. Nothing to see here. Let’s move on.

    If the US government will lie so blatantly about Vietnamese deaths, on what foundation do you build your illusion that they would not lie about American deaths? Is American lying some kind of one-way street? We lie and grossly underestimate foreign deaths, but never our own?

    In every country the US has attacked, the local tolls for deaths, injuries, disabilities, refugees, are usually an order of magnitude higher than those promulgated by the US government.

    • Replies: @Stephen Paul Foster
  278. @Larry Romanoff

    “If the US government will lie so blatantly about Vietnamese deaths, on what foundation do you build your illusion that they would not lie about American deaths? ”

    I wouldn’t doubt for a second that the US government lied about Vietnam death counts. I am just skeptical that it could pull off one of such magnitude, particularly in the face of such massive anti-war opposition, an opposition that was powerful enough to drive LBJ out of office and eventually shut down the war. Plus, the victorious North Vietnamese would be eager to tell how many American soldiers they had been able to kill. Before I believe your 580,000 figure, I’d need to see proof . Anyone can make up a number. Show me your documentation.

  279. I received some justifiable criticism of my comment relating to McNamara’s Project 100,000 and the number of fatalities incurred by that group.

    First, read the article (only 1,300 words) so we’re talking about the same thing.

    I agree my comment that “few returned” was too casual, and I apologise for that lack of precision. I have no accurate count of the number of those retarded young men who died in Vietnam, but it was more than zero. The truth will likely remain hidden forever.

    The official US military position is this: “Yes, we recruited and trained 500,000 retarded young men (average IQ around 65, all below 80), but we cannot locate the deployment records for those men. That means you cannot know how many were sent to Vietnam, and that means you cannot know how many returned. And please don’t bother us further because we’re busy.”

    Multiple military historians have complained of large and unexplained ‘discrepancies’ in recruiting numbers for Vietnam, in deployment numbers and in returnees, much of this conflicting with the official fatality record. They claim they receive no assistance from any branch of the military or the government, but only obfuscation and stonewalling. This mostly happens when there is something to hide. But, since we have no data, we cannot know what is being hidden, nor how much is being hidden.

    If you recall the atmosphere in the US during the final stages of the Vietnam war, there was so much upheaval that portions of the country were becoming almost ungovernable. That was when thousands were fleeing to Canada to escape the draft, when draft cards were being burned, when the Pentagon Papers were released, when demonstrations were filling the nation. One result was the cancellation of the compulsory draft, a direct result of the anarchy existing at the time.

    In the context of that heated political and emotional climate, the US military was not prone to admit even the existence, much less the fate, of those 500,000 retarded young men. McNamara’s Project 100,000 was so totally buried by the government and the media at the time that there is no evidence anyone was even aware of it, and it was discovered only by accident about 35 years later.

    But on circumstantial evidence alone, the US government, the military, and the mass media, lie about so many things so much of the time, there is little reason to believe that in this one isolated instance they are telling the whole truth and that only 3,000 or 4,000 of these young men died.

  280. xcd says:
    @Larry Romanoff

    This suggests that the seemingly illiterate, uncivilized, reactionary people in the backwoods of Pakistan were right in rioting against the polio vaccine the do-gooders were bestowing on them.

  281. xcd says:
    @Commentator Mike

    Thank you for the sane comment. Saddam had his head ripped off from his body — would not happen without special effort. Gaddhafi was sodomised to death.

    Also remember AIDS and ebola, the imperial bio-labs, and the rising military “cooperation”. In some ways, France is even more guilty.

    To be fair, the article did cover the issue of getting rid of pesky natives sitting on valuable resources. To the impeialists, China is a nightmare as it trades with Africa in a refreshing way.

  282. xcd says:

    It even worked in Bangladesh.

  283. xcd says:
    @Larry Romanoff

    Godfree Roberts had an article on the China famine here, about a year ago. He concluded that the giant figure of deaths was bogus: propaganda to condemn those who had dared to challenge the religion of capitalism.

    • Agree: dfordoom
    • Replies: @Larry Romanoff
  284. @xcd

    The Great China Famine was not as advertised in the West. China had some exceptional weather in the period from 1959, but all that did was create a food shortage. When we go to our kitchen and find the cupboard bare, we don’t starve to death; we go to the supermarket and buy more food. The question then is why, when Mao discovered his cupboard was bare, he didn’t simply go to the supermarket.

    The answer is that he did go to the supermarket, but it was closed. Upon hearing of China’s food shortage, The European Jews, using the US as an international bullying enforcer, initiated through the UN a worldwide food embargo on China. Vietnam and nearby nations were in approximately the same position and unable to help, but no Western nation would donate any food to China, nor sell any food to China at any price. The US and Canada particularly had huge reserve food stocks, but refused to sell.

    For three years the Western world sat and watched while 20 million Chinese starved to death.

    The Western Jewish media and ‘historians’ have twisted this tale to blame Mao for “killing” 20 million of his own people.

  285. Emma Goldman had a built in contraceptive, her face.

  286. @Idi Malink

    I think you’re on the wrong site here, Salon would be more to your liking.

Current Commenter

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone

 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Larry Romanoff Comments via RSS
The JFK Assassination and the 9/11 Attacks?
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement
Our Reigning Political Puppets, Dancing to Invisible Strings