The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewLarry Romanoff Archive
Humanity at the Crossroads
Connecting the Dots to Our Brave New World
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Humankind is at a cusp, a point of transition between two different states of governance and existence. The world today is like a sack being slowly filled while the string around the opening is pulled increasingly tighter to prevent the contents from escaping confinement. The shadows of this future are everywhere to be seen but even the keenest of observers tend to view the portents not as the warnings they are, but instead regard all these pieces of one despairing puzzle as disconnected and unrelated events. In this essay, we will take a look at where our world is going, how it is going there, and why it is going there.

For, dark and despairing, my sight I may seal, but man cannot hide what God would reveal.
‘Tis the sunset of life gives me mystical lore,and coming events cast their shadow before.[1]Lochiel’s Warning; Thomas Campbell

One needn’t be credentialed as either prophet or oracle to make the connections and expose the plan. It is another matter entirely to convince average readers of the truth of it. German philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer wrote that all truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident. We are midway between the first and second stages, where proponents of exposure are still widely ridiculed but, if they gain a popular audience, they will be violently attacked.

Where we are going – One World Government

Lest we succumb to the temptation of dismissing this as yet another batty conspiracy theory, it would be wise to consider these quotes:

David Rockefeller in an address to the Trilateral Commission, referring to the Bilderberg Group, whose existence was hotly denied and derided for decades as just another conspiracy theory:

“We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected the promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of public scrutiny during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and fully prepared to march towards our one world-government. The supranational sovereignty of our intellectual elites and world bankers is surely preferable to the globe as a whole.”[2]David Rockefeller Quotes;

Montagu Norman, Governor of The Bank of England prior to the crash of 1929, addressing the United States Bankers’ Association, New York, Idaho Leader, 26 August 1924.

“When, through process of law, the common people lose their homes, they will become more docile and more easily governed through the strong arm of the government applied by a central power of wealth under leading financiers. These truths are well known among our principal men, who are now engaged in forming an imperialism to govern the world.”[3] ; This was apparently a portion of a document called “The Bankers Manifesto” of 1892, that was re-stated by Norman and re-published in 1924.

Banker Paul Warburg, testifying before the US Senate on February 17, 1950, stated,

“We will have a world government whether you like it or not. The only question is whether that government will be achieved by conquest or consent.”[4]

We will have a look at one example each of the ‘conquest’ and ‘consent’ scenarios in Iraq and Greece, but let me state here that there are literally thousands of similar statements going back well over 100 years (sufficient with footnotes to fill a 300-page book), by authors and personalities famous and obscure, but all containing essentially the same message – that the financial powers of Europe and America are planning a super-sovereign world government within their absolute control. One would have to be a fool to ignore the sheer volume of evidence.

A Quick Look at Greece

Greece is now a failed state, an almost perfect exemplar of our future, the definitive ideal of those planning the world to come. Driven into bankruptcy by unrepayable loans, the leaders of Greece threw away their nation’s one chance for survival as a sovereign state and instead capitulated totally, accepting draconian measures meant to perpetually impoverish their population, while privatising the entire nation in one fell swoop. The international bankers bullied Greece into placing the nation’s entire infrastructure into a so-called trust (controlled by “an independent Luxembourg-based company”), which, by order, would be “entirely outside the reach or influence” of the Greek government. The bankers and their friends will now take ownership of all of it, at prices they set.

Greece was bullied into a package of reforms with severe austerity measures and spending cuts. The government slashed spending in all quarters, eliminated 25% of civil service positions, reducing wages by 30% for those remaining. Greece was forced to increase the VAT rate, reduce (and eliminate) pensions and increase the retirement age, raise the domestic corporation tax while cutting taxes for the top 1% and foreign corporations, take drastic measures to “improve tax collection and fight tax evasion”. Naturally, the economy instantly cratered, losing about one quarter of its size with unemployment rising above 25% and youth unemployment above 50%, rendering the majority of families under considerable financial stress.

The government was also forced to establish virtually a new constitution, with Eurocrats and IMF officials not only writing the new laws but also having a veto over all new legislation, serving to embody in law a lack of social infrastructure and perpetual poverty, emasculating the sovereignty of the state. To ensure compliance with the austerity directives, Greece is obliged to surrender control over the policing of all major portions of its economy. Eurocrats and IMF officials not only wrote the new laws, but EU (i.e. banking) officials are placed inside all ministries, with authority to ensure compliance and control funds. Greeks now hate the Europeans bitterly, believing that these foreign creditors’ power to “rummage through every government department on Greek soil” is an insult to Greek sovereignty, with Greece in fact and reality now facing not only austerity but external governance.

Greece’s Finance Minister, Yanis Varoufakis, resigned his position rather than participate in the destruction of his country, accusing the bankers and the ECB of deploying “liquidity asphyxiation” to bring the country to its knees, saying

“The costs being demanded of Greece are so punitive that they are almost impossible to meet.” He said further that “The most humiliating and unbearable choice is an agreement that will surrender and loot our country and subjugate our people. The European Central Bank cut off all liquidity and creditors simply destroyed our country.”

Greece’s economy has become nearly paralysed, with the whole economy shifting to cash. The local payments system is breaking down since nobody wants to accept transfers into bank accounts that could be seized at any moment, the Greeks remembering only too well the recent prior events in Cyprus where the same bankers seized from 50% to 90% of all bank accounts of significant size, including pension funds and (to the glee of many) all accounts held by Russians. Many Cypriots saw their savings wiped out because of the privately-owned central bank. The US government did something similar to its own citizens in 1933 by seizing all gold holdings by Americans – in the depths of the Great Depression. Citizens received dollars in return for the seized gold, but that dollar was formally devalued by 40% at the same time, robbing all of 60% of their holdings.[5][6]

Greece has virtually ceased to exist as a sovereign nation, and there are many others similar, including Cyprus, Haiti, Somalia, Iraq, Libya, the Balkans, Panama, Nicaragua. This is not news. To quote William Blum:

“It was under Reagan administration influence that the International Monetary Fund and World Bank began widely imposing the policy package known as structural adjustment – featuring deregulation, privatization, emphasis on exports, cuts in social spending – that has plunged country after country in the developing world into economic destitution.”

The IMF chief at the time was honest about what was to come, saying in 1981 that, for low-income countries, “adjustment is particularly costly in human terms”.[7][8]

With Greece as in all such cases after Imperialism has taken control, the nation is surrounded by a news blanket through which little if anything escapes, with the willing compliance (or terrified submission) of all news wires and media outlets, removing the country from the worldwide public mind.

A Look at Iraq

It is well-known the US launched a devastating war on Iraq, criminally unjustified and based entirely on falsehoods, and against the advice of its own military, some in the Pentagon labeling the idea “crazy”. By 2013 the US media were reporting a US military withdrawal from Iraq, but the US never had any intention of ever leaving Iraq. The myth of withdrawal was merely a PR attempt “to delete Iraq from the public’s collective consciousness, to make it disappear so they can work quietly without public scrutiny”. It is true that several hundred small military bases have been closed, but there are an additional 40 or 50 very large bases that were built to be permanent and will never be closed.

The US embassy in Beijing contains an astonishing more than 1,200 people, but the US embassy in Baghdad contains more than 16,000 people, the largest and most expensive in the world, comprising more than 100 acres, larger than the Vatican City, and costing more than 2 billion dollars to build. It is a self-contained, heavily armed and fortified city in the center of Baghdad, centered on Saddam’s former palace and containing more than 20 buildings surrounded by 20-foot walls and entirely self-sufficient for electricity, water, and all other functions, the permanent Middle East Headquarters of the American empire. From here, in conjunction with the US “embassy” in Yerevan, Armenia that contains 6,000 people (the second-largest embassy in the world) the US can spread its brutal imperial tentacles over a wide swath of Mesopotamia and the Middle East.

Iraq’s New Legislative Control

Iraq’s government is a nearly irrelevant puppet administration. The first acts of the occupying Provisional Authority were to rewrite Iraq’s constitution and body of laws by declaring a succession of 100 so-called “Provisionary Orders” promulgated by American Paul Bremer. These Provisionary Orders were written into Iraqi law prior to the US handover of the government, and have the highest standing of all laws in Iraq, so high they “cannot be removed by any subsequent Iraqi government”. They are perpetual.[9]

Orders 57 and 77 ensure full control of Iraq by placing US-appointed auditors and inspectors-general in every government ministry, with sweeping authority over contracts, programs, employees and regulations. These Orders stipulate that the US must approve every senior government appointment and every candidate for elected office. US military officers are reported to frequently and freely enter cabinet meetings with demands or instructions on policy decisions to be made. One of Bremer’s first acts was to close almost 200 state-owned businesses and turn the industry sectors over to American companies, rendering unemployed more than 500,000 people. He took control of Iraq’s media, shuttering them on a whim, over the objections of virtually everyone.

Bremer’s Orders permit foreign multinationals to privatise the entire nation including all physical and social infrastructure and all commerce. They allocate to foreign oil companies the exclusive right to at least 65% of the country’s oil reserves, and to determine the distribution of revenue and profit allocated to Iraq from the remainder. Order 39 allows for the tax-free remittance of all foreign corporate profits. Order 81 stipulates that all Iraqi farmers must use Monsanto’s GM seed for all crops planted in the country, with the use of any heritage Iraqi seed stock now totally prohibited. Order 17 guarantees that all Americans and foreign contractors in Iraq will not be subject to Iraqi law. The orders state that “All trained elements of the Iraqi armed forces shall at all times be under the operational control of the American commander”. Order 56 creates a new privately-owned (foreign) central bank.

Examining Bremer’s Laws

I have occasionally been charged with responsibility for drafting legislation at a national level and can testify this is not something one does in ten minutes over a cup of coffee. The task requires extreme expertise in a particular area and a more than adequate facility in the drafting of legal wording. When amending legislation, it is paramount to possess a flawless familiarity with the content of existing law and, most importantly, a thorough apprehension of the full range of potential consequences of a particular selection of legal wording.

Consider the framing of legislation for a national health care system. Certainly we need one or more medical experts intimately familiar with the entire range of health services and a general appreciation of the required infrastructure, but we also need extensive experience in planning the delivery system for such care, as well as the taxation implications of financing. It would be rare to find this combination of knowledge in one person, to say nothing of the legal knowledge necessary to draft the appropriate huge legislation. If we add medical insurance into this mix, it should be apparent that we need an entire team of specialists and considerable time to forge the necessary legal framework. Moreover, except for the most simple of items, we would almost never rely on the opinion or judgment of only one person in any field, thus considerably expanding the numbers of this team.

Bremer’s laws covered virtually the entire gamut of Iraqi society, including taxation, transportation, and medical care, the founding of a privately-owned central bank, a new Iraqi currency and a full slate of laws on foreign investment, banking and securities markets, SOEs, a new electoral law governing parties and elections. There were new laws governing the nation’s petroleum industry, control of the media, laws dealing with foreign contractors, the auditing of government departments, a new penal code, detention and prison facilities, control of Iraqi borders, ports and airports, a Ministry of Science and Technology, a full revision of the labor code, vast legislation dealing with trademarks, patents, design, and an overhaul of IP, entirely new laws controlling agriculture that included GM seed, and very much more.

It should be obvious that no one man could possess the required expertise in all these areas, and nothing in Bremer’s background suggests ability of consequence in any of them. Further, many of these portions of legislation were extremely complex, each containing a great many pages of precise legal wording that would have required several months in the drafting. This means a great number of large teams meeting regularly over many months to finalise drafts, but it also infers mandatory reporting to a control group on the progress, guidance as to overall intent of each piece of legislation, with periodic approval of direction, content, and final result. Yet Bremer was promulgating these new Orders at the rate of three or four per week, the entire 100 produced in about ten months.

The drafting of these laws would have required at least hundreds of experts, perhaps more than 1,000, and a lengthy time in preparation. Bremer was appointed to Iraq on May 9, 2003, and issued his first Order (on the De-Ba’athification of Iraqi Society) on May 16. That would hardly provide adequate time to overcome jet lag, much less to obtain an appreciation of what Ba’ath society was, much less the rationale for, and consequences of, exterminating it. Bremer then issued another 30 or 40 laws within the next few months, including the entire penal code, banking and investment, the military, and more.

Order 56 creating the new privately-owned central bank is an immense document that would require months of preparation. The seed laws were almost certainly written by the lawyers from Monsanto and Cargill, et al. Others are similar. It is obvious these laws were written in advance by executives and lawyers of banks and multinational corporations all over the world and simply delivered to Bremer to promulgate. It is also obvious these laws were planned and in process long before the US invaded Iraq. To add to this equation, we have the fact that the laws were not prepared by any portion of the US government, since even the White House had no specific knowledge of any of Bremer’s activities and the US Congress had been sidelined and silenced beforehand.

Bremer’s Appointment

Let’s step back for a moment to examine Bremer’s appointment as Director of the Coalition Provisional Authority and interim President of Iraq. The sanitised narrative tells us that Bremer was selected by President Bush, but there is no evidence that Bush had ever met Bremer or indeed ever heard his name, the man having had minor past appointments but having been out of government employ for more than ten years prior.

Secretary of State Colin Powell had already placed Lt. Gen. Jay Garner as the top official in Iraq, and planned to add Zalmay Khalilzad, an Iraqi with extensive local knowledge to assist Garner. Suddenly and without explanation (while Powell was out of town), Bremer was plucked from thin air and appointed to replace Garner – to the great surprise of Powell, Rice, and all others. According to the published record, Powell called Rice on his return and asked, “What’s going on? What happened?” Rice apparently replied, “I don’t know. I had nothing to do with it.” Bremer’s appointment was not only a surprise, but against the stated will of the President, the Secretary of State and the country’s National Security Advisor. As well, both the CIA and the military strongly objected, the CIA because they hadn’t been asked or informed and the military because they viewed an uninformed civilian helicopter transplant as both dangerous and useless.

The facts suggest the impetus came through Henry Kissinger, with whom Bremer had been closely associated and was a Managing Director of Kissinger Associates for 10 or 12 years to that point, the thread seeming to lead through Cheney while bypassing the President. The facts are not clear on whether Bush was instructed to obey or was even informed on the matter prior to his announcement. Military knowledge and intimate familiarity with Iraq were deemed essential for this position, but Bremer had neither. When Bremer was given the position in Iraq, the White House plan was that he take Khalilzad with him but, in a private meeting with President Bush, Bremer insisted he be solely in charge, a demand Bush accommodated.

On the organisation chart, Bremer reported to Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, but ample evidence exists that Rumsfeld totally ignored Bremer and his activity, Bremer doing the same in reverse. Rumsfeld had a reputation as a control mandarin; it has been widely documented that he was often present in Baghdad to direct the torture facilities and ‘military pacification’ of the Iraqi citizenry, and it is thus beyond logic that he would have ignored his most important subordinate – the “President of Iraq”, who was tasked with remaking the entire country, but there is no credible record of the two even crossing paths. Bremer held what appears to have been a fully independent and unassailable position with no oversight from any part of the US government.

Rajiv Chandrasekaran, an assistant managing editor of The Washington Post and its bureau chief in Baghdad at the time, wrote a book titled ‘Imperial Life in the Emerald City: Inside Iraq’s Green Zone’.[9] He spoke at length about this in a PBS interview in 2006. [10]Imperial Life in The Emerald City: Inside Iraq’s Green Zone; Chandrasekaran claims Bremer “viewed his (Saddam’s) palace out there in Baghdad not as an embassy that had any obligation to report back developments to Washington”, claiming further that virtually no information flowed from Baghdad to Washington and that “Bremer had been given an exemption” from clearing any decisions through the White House.

In fact, Bremer’s leash was so long and Bremer so secretive that when the White House wanted information, Condolezza Rice could do no better than have her NSC staff check the Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA) website – to see if they could learn what was happening in Baghdad. Bremer further refused to hire anyone who wasn’t ‘ideologically sympathetic’ to his real purposes, or who might have a ‘back channel’ to Washington. “Their only allegiance would be to Bremer.” Chandrasekaran says that whatever Bremer wanted, he got, and that he “amassed quite a degree of power and influence”. In this entire matter, the US Congress was nowhere to be seen, totally removed from oversight or governing.

A Matter of Money

At least US\$100 billion and perhaps as much as US\$200 billion, the bulk of this in cash, all of it within Bremer’s control, simply disappeared without a trace. The US FED alone shipped US\$40 billion in cash by air to Iraq, most of it unaccounted for. Millions of tons of Iraqi oil were sold without accounting as to the purchasers and with no record of the disposition of the receipts. A large but undetermined additional amount of exported oil was unmetered, leaving no record of the volume or the payments. Bremer had a room near his office in Saddam’s palace that contained by documented reports US\$600 million to US\$800 million in cash, that was his private ‘slush fund’ and which bore no records of any kind. There was no oversight from any source. Billions of dollars were repeatedly paid for contracts where no evidence existed of work having being done. In addition, Iraq’s central bank was looted of at least US\$20 billion in gold (some reports claimed US\$60 billion), plus undocumented billions in foreign currency, which is also unaccounted for.

In one case, a ‘reconstruction project’ was quoted to the Iraqi ‘government’ as costing US\$20 billion but Bremer presented instead an invoice for US\$60 billion. When Iraq objected, Bremer’s response was, “Just be grateful we saved you from Saddam.” The \$60 billion was paid from Iraqi oil exports but no documentation exists as to who received the money and no evidence existed as to any actual work having been performed. In other cases, Bremer paid multiple invoices for hundreds of millions of dollars each as wages for thousands of workers when no one could produce evidence that such workers had ever existed.[11]

An International Advisory and Monitoring Board (IAMB) was later established to provide independent financial oversight of Bremer’s CPA spending, the board including representatives from the UN, the World Bank, the IMF and the Arab Fund for Economic and Social Development. The IAMB spent months trying to find auditors acceptable to the US, the Bahrain office of KPMG finally appointed in April 2004. It was stonewalled. They wrote in an interim report:

“KPMG has encountered resistance from CPA staff regarding the submission of information required to complete our procedures.”

“The auditors even had trouble getting passes to enter the Green Zone. There appears to have been good reason for the Americans to stall. At the end of June 2004, the CPA would be disbanded and Bremer would leave Iraq. There was no way the (White House) would want independent auditors to publish a report into the financial propriety of its Iraqi administration while the CPA was still in existence and Bremer at its head still answerable to the press. So the report was published in July.”[12]So, Mr Bremer, Where Did All the Money Go? By Ed Harriman; The Guardian; July 7, 2005

Bremer’s exit from Iraq raised many questions. His handover of government was done days in advance of the published schedule, performed entirely by surprise and literally in minutes, Bremer then quickly boarding a helicopter for the airport where he then boarded a US military transport. When all Iraqis had left the scene, he suddenly deplaned and boarded a private Gulfstream 4 that flew him out. He then resurfaced in Vermont as a ski instructor.

There is very much more. Generally, the auditors found either inadequate or no documentation to account for almost all funds, with no way of knowing how much money was actually looted or to whom it was paid. “Since then, investigators have spent years trying to trace what happened to the enormous amount of money shipped in the frantic days of the occupation of Iraq. Although there have been hundreds of pages of reports, Congressional hearings, and inquiries from Washington to Baghdad, no one in Congress, a special inspector general’s office, the Department of Defense or the Iraqi government itself can say with certainty what exactly happened to all of that money.”[12]So, Mr Bremer, Where Did All the Money Go? By Ed Harriman; The Guardian; July 7, 2005

A Review

Let’s review what we have so far. A group of powerful men decided that Iraq would be colonised, and pressed Bush to use the US military to destroy and then occupy the country, this over the objection of the US military. This same group removed Garner and installed Bremer as the head of the Coalition Occupying government, over the unanimous objections of the US President, the Secretary of State, the National Security Council, the US military and the CIA. Bremer, appearing to have unlimited power and no oversight, reported to no one in the US government, the evidence suggesting the White House and Cabinet, including Donald Rumsfeld, Bremer’s direct superior, and the US President, were forbidden to meddle or even to ask direct questions on his activity. The US military and CIA voiced strong objections – to no avail – to many of Bremer’s initial laws, especially on the Ba’ath society and dismantling the Iraqi military, stating these actions would lead to perpetual protests and bloodshed.

This same group of powerful men gathered hundreds of experts to draft new legislation to control Iraq according to their private plan. Simultaneously, Iraq was being unconscionably looted, openly and without apparent inhibition, perhaps of US \$200 billion in total which disappeared without a trace, and with no information as to who received that money.

This was all done with no identifiable benefit to the US as a nation, or to the American people. The US incurred the several trillion dollars of the cost of the Iraq war, took all the battlefield casualties, and was delegated to occupy Iraq at its own expense, then remain silent. The only apparent duty of the US Congress was to conduct an insincere investigation into the missing billions, then sweep the matter under the carpet. The media, compliant as always, remained silent on all matters demanding a voice.

Who are They?

Who were those people, this handful of powerful men, who decided to subjugate and loot Iraq, the men responsible for drafting all Iraq’s new laws, and undoubtedly the recipients of the missing billions? Who are these men who have the power to direct the US President and the military to destroy an innocent country and occupy it? Who has the power to take over Iraq’s entire infrastructure and loot all its assets, while forbidding any part of the US government to interfere, in spite of the fact that the US paid the bill for the entire effort? Similarly, who were the men with the power not only to terrify Greece into utter submission and loot the country’s entire infrastructure in one shot but to embed themselves permanently into Greece’s government with the authority to maintain and ensure that submission?

These men were, are, and will be, our new masters in our Brave New World. But there is much more. We have seen brief examples of where we are going – “by conquest or consent”. Let’s take a brief look at how the rest of us are going there.

The Train to Perdition

The over-riding feature of our new world will be the ultimate control of our economies, our nations – such as they will be, and our lives, by a group of international bankers and industrialists. One arrow in this quiver is the privatisation – taking public assets into private hands – of the entire physical and social infrastructure of our nations, as we have seen with Greece and Iraq – and which already applies to more than a few other nations. It is this that is responsible for the extreme push that has been building since the 1970s and early 1980s to privatisation, the US being the best example of acquiescence. For those nations resisting, this is the cause of the push in the WTO and other agreements to securitise all infrastructure in preparation for collapsing stock markets then purchasing for pennies all of a nation’s assets. Privatisation includes even arable land and water aquifers, everything of value and of necessity for human life.

The world needs with extreme urgency to see a world map of privatisation as it exists today, diagrams of all nations displaying all the national assets and infrastructure that have already been privatised. The shock from seeing this alone might serve to wake up the world, to realise how far this strategy has already progressed. As one example, after the destruction of Jugoslavia, it was briefly reported that George Soros and Madeline Albright had taken possession of Kosovo’s entire communications network, with an estimated value of US\$800 million. George Bush’s family took ownership of millions of acres of the largest water aquifer in South America. There are literally thousands of such events scattered around the globe that have received no publicity or attention, being considered as isolated instances instead of crucial elements of a vast plan that has been increasing in speed for the past 60 years. Extreme attention is being paid to controlling the entire world’s fresh water. Nestle’s president is on record as stating that water is not a human right but a commodity that should be priced and sold (and privately-owned).

It isn’t only public assets that are being ‘privatised’. This includes the creation of ever-larger worldwide corporate and banking behemoths swallowing their smaller rivals until, in each nation, most of the means of production and distribution are in the same hands, eliminating nation by nation the leading producers until none of significance remain. Control of a nation’s food supply is part of this enormously ambitious scheme of world government and control, hence the intense bullying push on all nations to accept GM seed. This seed has two main purposes. The obvious one is that it gives the multi-national seed companies virtual total control over the fundamental fabric of a nation’s food supply. The less obvious purpose is that GM seed was invented not by seed companies but by the US military as an offensive weapon or, more precisely, as a weapons-delivery system. It is now widely-known that many lethal pathogens can be spliced into GM seed. The masters will have a choice with recalcitrant nations: either refuse a supply of seed and let the population starve, or splice typhus, HIV, the plague, into the seeds and let nature take its course.

The plan involves the destruction of national sovereignty and of individual nationalism. Patriotism and loyalty to nations are a curse which must be eliminated. There are many avenues for this. One is the incessant drumbeat in the media, propagandising the world against economic or any other kind of nationalism. Another is immigration, as is being carried out in Europe. Economic hopefuls and other refugees have no nationalistic feelings toward their adopted country and no regrets over lost sovereignty. When a nation reaches a level of 30% of such persons, it may be impossible to arouse a critical mass of indignity that would lead to protests and uprisings.

But sovereignty does not disappear; it is merely replaced. Thus, another major building block is the transfer of sovereignty to the bankers and their multi-national corporations, which was the main thrust of the stillborn TPP where the rights of corporations would supersede those of a nation’s government and its supreme courts, being thrust solely into the hands of panels consisting of lawyers selected by this same group. The TPP attempt was astonishing in its boldness, a terrifying amount of bullying of nations to transfer absolute power to a group of entirely unknown persons for the sake of establishing in perpetuity the rights of these people to absolutely loot every nation to abject poverty. As one example, the refusal to a tobacco company to sell cigarettes would trigger an automatic obligation to pay that firm all the profits – in perpetuity – it would have made had it been entirely free of government regulation.

To bring this plan to completion also requires the eventual destabilisation and effective destruction of the family, of organised society, and of religion. When the Bolsheviks inflicted their communist coups throughout Europe, the instance of Hungary is most exemplary. When the communists took over Hungary, Bela Kun proclaimed himself dictator, one of his first decrees being to nationalise almost all private property and to announce that private commerce would be punished with the death penalty. He immediately confiscated virtually all industry and land, and began an intense attack on religion while making great efforts to undermine and destroy all public morality as well as concepts of God and religion. He instituted a program of what came to be known as cultural terrorism. As part of this, he began a radical sex education program in Hungarian schools where children were instructed in free love, sexual intercourse, the archaic nature of middle class family codes, the outdatedness of monogamy and the irrelevance of religion which deprives man of all pleasures. Women were called to rebel against the sexual mores of the time by engaging in open promiscuity.

The stated purpose in promoting licentiousness among women and children was to destroy the family, the core institution of Christianity and western culture. As perhaps the best current example, we can clearly see evidence in slow motion today of this happening in the US, in large part with the heavy promotion and even celebration of the alphabet soup of sexual preferences and of two men becoming ‘husband’ and ‘wife’ and adopting small boys.

In terms of society, this is the cause of the class war being waged in all Western nations today, the purpose being, as with the Bolshevik revolutions and the US in 2008, to either kill off or bankrupt the bourgeois, the middle classes, and send them all down to the lower class where they eventually become homeless, disposable cattle.

The 2008 debacle in the US was generally described as a financial crisis, but it was really part of the class war, meant to deprive as many Americans as possible of their homes to make them more docile and more easily governed. The huge bubble in 2008 in ‘subprime’ home loans was immediately repeated with automobiles in precisely the same way, these loans securitised then diced and sliced while being given AAA ratings by Moodys. Today, the ratio of delinquent auto loans is approaching a crisis point and will undoubtedly soon implode, depriving millions of Americans of their only hope of holding any employment since a car is virtually a necessity in much of the US. In 2008, most of the US middle class was unceremoniously dumped into the lower class, all signs seeming to indicate a repeat on the horizon.

The program has also involved for the past 60 years increasingly bold attempts at population reduction, either killing off or sterilising vast swaths of humanity. This was the reason for the foundation of Planned Parenthood, the main reason for existence of USAID, for Kissinger’s NSSM 200 – a viciously aggressive plan to prevent, at apparently almost any cost, births in non-Western countries. USAID and Reimert Ravenholt sterilised at least 100 million unwitting women, killing tens of millions in the process. This program was behind Robert McNamara’s Project 100,000. It was almost certainly behind the recent Zika virus in South America. It is the reason the WHO has been traveling the undeveloped world and sterilising countless millions of women without their knowledge through the fraudulent tetanus vaccination programs where the vaccine is laced with Hcg, in fact permanently vaccinating women against pregnancy.

This is the reason seed companies are suddenly promoting the use of cotton seeds as a primary foodstuff for underdeveloped countries. Cotton seeds are toxic, containing a chemical called gossypol which is an effective male sterilant. The seed companies claim to have removed this toxin to a safe level, but there is no safe level for gossypol. Even very minute doses taken repeatedly (as when used for a basic food) will render an entire male population sterile. What the WHO, the World Bank, and UNICEF do for the female populations, the seed companies will do for the male portion. If they have their way, much of the world may one day be uninhabited.

The Bankers’ Private Army

Such grand plans to corral humanity as domestic animals and to successfully put down opposition from them and the remnants of their governments, requires overwhelming military strength. It began with the British East India Company where Rothschild had at one time a standing army of more than one million men, a testimony to the profitability of looting rich India. The army had two main purposes: to discourage local Indians from protesting at the looting of their nation by foreigners, and the necessity of enforcing by violence the abandonment by farmers of food crops to grow opium for sale in China. The history books are mostly silent and cleverly vague on the transfer of these responsibilities to the British government, leading readers to assume the British at some point ordered the East India Company to relinquish its power to be replaced by the more humane British. But that’s now how it was. Rothschild abandoned his military when the profits were insufficient to carry it, and simply transferred his flag to the British military who became literally the Banker’s Private Army to be used not only in India but in many other instances like the Boer wars where Rothschild wanted the gold and diamonds, this private army obediently killing all those who stood in the way.

The UK was used thus for many years, through two world wars nobody wanted, until England was finally bankrupt, its fabled Empire in tatters, and begging the US for financial support. England was deliberately sacrificed for these ends as described, and today remains only a rump, a tail so grateful to have a dog. But no matter. These same men had already obtained virtual full control of the US government and simply transferred their flag – again to the world’s most powerful military. It is no secret that the US is itself being cannibalised by this same group, eventually drowning in unrepayable war debt, the citizenry mostly homeless and bankrupt, and the entire infrastructure and means of production owned by this same small group. As Benjamin Netanyahu famously stated, “Once we have squeezed everything we want from the US, it can dry up and blow away.” And it will.

But no matter. The flag is already being transferred to NATO, a supra-national military responsible only to this same group, an irresistible military force comprised of all the armed forces of dozens of nations. This is why a full surrender of a nation’s military is a prerequisite even for consideration in joining the EU. This is why the servicemen of NATO are being taught to abandon all feelings of nationalism for their country and wear only a NATO flag on their hearts. NATO was meant as the enforcement arm of the TPP, had it succeeded, but will still function as something similar.

We are now seeing rampant uprisings in Iraq, throughout South America, and will soon see them in Greece, the populations arising en masse to protest against their impoverishment and slavery. In the end, each stripped and emasculated national ‘government’ will have only two functions: tax collection to funnel money to the masters of the world, and population suppression to put down the inevitable revolts. In cases where either the government itself revolts, or where the government proves unable to quell massive disturbances, NATO will intervene to “pacify” the population with terror and brutality.

Who are These People?

The members of this group are generally extremely wealthy bankers and industrialists, the owners or controllers of most of the world’s multi-national companies, media, and so on, who seem to hold an ideal of a world comprised of their small number owning all the means of production, assisted by a larger group of educated compradors, all ruling over a world populated by homeless, uneducated and impoverished pre-humans. I have no explanation for this ambition. They would own or control the entire world’s wealth, but to what end? None of these people can spend what they have now, many private fortunes running into the trillions of dollars. I believe most of us would prefer to be kings of a rich and educated society, rather than Tarzan, king of the apes, the ruler of a herd of goats not being much of a ruler by any measure.

Signs of Hope

There are some, but not many. The strength of Russia and China, and perhaps Iran, is of some comfort, since another world war is almost certainly on the horizon for the finalisation of this plan. The protests in France and throughout South America bring some comfort, particularly those nations gathering their courage and refusing to be enslaved or to be bullied into submission by the US.

This cabal of would-be world emperors has flaws of its own, prematurity resulting from excessive confidence being one. It was the same group that attempted the fascist coup in the US in 1934, but failed. The TPP was an astonishingly bold attempt to simply bully much of the world into submission, which also failed. There have been others.

The plethora of online information and its absorption by what appears to be an increasing number of people in many nations, is cause for hope since education is vital to expose all parts of this plan, and sunlight is still the best disinfectant. And, as William Blum said, you need faith and courage.

Larry Romanoff is a retired management consultant and businessman. He has held executive positions in international consulting firms, and owned an international import-export business. He lives in Shanghai and is currently writing a series of ten books generally related to China and the West. He can be contacted at: [email protected] He is a frequent contributor to Global Research.


[1] Lochiel’s Warning; Thomas Campbell

[2] David Rockefeller Quotes;

[3] ; This was apparently a portion of a document called “The Bankers Manifesto” of 1892, that was re-stated by Norman and re-published in 1924.







[10] Imperial Life in The Emerald City: Inside Iraq’s Green Zone;


[12] So, Mr Bremer, Where Did All the Money Go? By Ed Harriman; The Guardian; July 7, 2005

[13] NY Fed’s \$40 Billion Iraqi Money Trail; Eamon Javers, 25 Oct 2011;

(Republished from Moon of Shanghai by permission of author or representative)
Hide 139 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. Wade says:

    This was an excellent article. I’m surprised there are so few comments on Larry’s articles.

  2. War is about stealing money and the Jewish Bankers always are the winners. Americans have an attention span of about 20 seconds and have no idea how much money disappeared in these wars. Enough money to fix our collapsing infrastructure and make America great again. We have been raped by the bankers and their lust for war.

    • Replies: @Richard B
  3. utu says:

    Kissinger is too old to tell the story. He would not survive the enhanced interrogation. But Paul Bremer is fit and ripe to tell the story. The full truth can be found only by extra-legal means.

    • Replies: @ariadna
  4. Here is a condensed version of this article in video.

    • Replies: @SolontoCroesus
    , @Agent76
  5. Mefobills says:

    It was the same group that attempted the fascist coup in the US in 1934, but failed. The TPP was an astonishingly bold attempt to simply bully much of the world into submission, which also failed

    The 1934 so called “fascist” coup plot seems to me to be more of a corporatist maneuver similar to TPP. It is private corporations, including banking corporations…grabbing for power.

    Mussolini nationalized the banks in 1926, making banking corporations unhappy.

    Hitler restricted corporate power by closing the public/private revolving door.

    (Richard Tedore, Hitler’s revolution)

    Perhaps nowhere was Hitler more restrictive than with regard to regulations governing the conduct of public officials. Sponsoring massive construction programs to improve the economy required civil servants to solicit bids and award contracts, issue building permits, conduct inspections, re-zone districts, recruit manpower and so on. The opportunity for them to favor certain private commercial interests in exchange for gratuities was particularly troublesome to Hitler. He enacted laws making it illegal for public servants to possess stock portfolios or to serve as consultants to private corporations. The law also affected members of the armed forces and the National Socialist party in positions of procurement. It was a violation for anyone leaving public sector to accept a job with a private concern that he had previously contracted with in an official capacity. Even as private citizens, former civil servants were forbidden by Hitler from investing their personal wealth in stock shares

    Nice article with new information revealed… thanks

    • Agree: Curmudgeon
    • Thanks: Malla, Alfred
    • Replies: @lloyd
    , @EB5318
  6. Biff says:

    One thing I noticed first off in Bremer’s constitution is no gun rights. The public is to be dis-armed.

  7. Anon[356] • Disclaimer says:

    The banksters may want world government, both gentile and jew. However the Indians, Russians, Chinese, Iranians, Indonesians, Koreans, Japanese, and all the Islamic “stans” do not. We would have to defeat all these nations militaries to make this happen now. Everybody is onto what our elite’s want now, and they are opposed.
    The banksters are probably going to succeed into making Europe and America much weaker if anything. The “refugee” bullshit our elites prattle about is just a ruse to get the world to accept oodles of Africans, who then will promote color revolutions around the world. Problem is, only America and Europe seem to be buying in. Nobody else is taking them. We will have to win a WW3 to make world government happen. I think we would get nuked and ruined if we tried.

    • Agree: anon8383892
  8. @Wade

    Larry tells just half the story. Now that US was dry sacked by the friends of Larry, they move to China and back to India and other places, and do their parasitic work in the ‘bowels’ of their new hosts.
    Thanks Larry for the revelations you made here, in this writing of yours.
    By the way, the billions sucked out of Irak went to the pockets of the banksters, and as a gift to their beloved land of Israel.

    • Replies: @romar
  9. Clown World is now complete.

    Boomer and X-er parenting the worst ever.

  10. Shamil says:

    Excellent article !

    One correction. Zalmay Khalilzad is an Afghan and not Iraqi.

  11. Ber says:

    Countries only go under mainly because of their own leaders selling out.

    • Replies: @Rev. Spooner
  12. Emily says:

    The strength of Russia and China, and perhaps Iran,

    Russia was openly plundered by these pernicious khazar thieves under Yeltzin.
    Putin is clawing back what he can.
    China and its people have been used as the new exploited slave labour to make them trillions.
    Iran has dared to stand and say NO.
    Venezuela, Syria too.
    And the EU – their kernal for world government.
    Yep – take a look at the Barcelona Declaration – it was moving to take in North Africa – with no borders – the end of white Europe almost in months, barely years – but its teetering now.
    Thanks to the English and Welsh who put a salvo across its existence.
    Of course no help from the pro EU whinging Scots.
    There is a little hope – that is – until the BLM and their allies started open destruction within our states and our police sat back on their knees.
    We live in interesting times.
    God help us and give us the strength to keep our democracy and liberty.
    But as we, too, face our Waterloo, to paraphrase Wellington.
    It will be a close run thing..
    His actual words – ‘the nearest run thing you ever saw in your life’.
    He is also quoted as saying
    ‘The only thing I am afraid of is fear’
    Lets remember that as well.

  13. As Benjamin Netanyahu famously stated, “Once we have squeezed everything we want from the US, it can dry up and blow away.”

    I hate fake quotes. Think about it for a minute: does this sound like something that would enhance Bibi’s leverage over America, or antagonize it? And does Bibi do anything that’s not in his best interest? I’m no fan, but I doubt he even thinks like this, and I know he’d sure as hell never say it. Some friend of a friend of a guy overheard it. There ya go.

    And I know that doom sells, and I know America has deep problems, but we’re a long, long way from a “citizenry mostly homeless and bankrupt.”

    This is more melodrama than analysis.

    • Agree: Saggy
  14. archie says:

    Terrifying read. Illuminating as well. Thanks for this.

    The Greek and Iraq takeovers take a new meaning with this special light shed on the powers behind the scene.
    The Paul Bremer loot is nothing short of astonishing in terms of volume, as well as scale and involved planning. No wonder they were warnings that “conspiracy theorists would not be tolerated” (presidential quote).

    This somewhat shifts my perspective, as a Frenchman, on the (timid) struggle at play in my country. Even so timid a protest was too much since it was deemed necessary to jail everybody home, after which the same calls for civil war were played in a loop in the public funded but billionaire-owned media and TV networks. We do have a French version of BLM, for those who didn’t know. doesn’t seem to take, though, but the attempt is clear.

    While the yellow jackets march (or rather used to), demanding to burn more diesel oil for cheaper, French officials silently privatize strategic commodities such as dams and pass laws in favour of pesticides and GM seeds, all the while announcing they are doing quite the opposite. Dams are keystones in energy balance, itself an irresistible speculation lever on the energy market – on an European scale, nothing less! They also are a deciding factor in niceties such as nuclear plants cooling, irrigation and water supply to the public. Such are the tools of control and blackmail that the French puppets in charge are about to hand over. Or else, they say in Brussels. What would the Enron executives have done with such tools? How many times will Europe have to endure an Enron scenario, before something happens? Can something still happen ? Everything seems pretty locked down, very much as described by M. Orwell.

    I can’t refrain from drawing a parallel between Iraq’s puppet government and France’s own Vichy puppet government, just before France was “saved” by means of Normandy towns’ carpet bombing. How long before we get there again? Aren’t the same powers behind Germany’s rearmament before WWII and Paul Bremer’ actions ?

    Just like German newspapers were printing about taking over Greek islands at a time of monetary assaults against the Euro currency, we now hear about France being part of Southern Europe (Italy and Spain being already there, obviously) and needing some Greek responsibility too.

    What a morsel France will be ! Everything is in place with corrupt politicians ready to sell themselves and their mother for the shadow of a seat at the table and a few crumbs for themselves and their mistress. It’s been more than ten years since the French Presidency took over both police and intelligence services, turning them into ferocious control and repression arms against the population. With the locked down media, we have a nice landscape for a full fledged dictatorship, one that no march will be able to prevent or oppose. Even less so with BLM mobs occupying the protest theater, with enthusiastic support from both media and politicians. Our interior minister -here in command of all police forces- recently suggested that they bend a knee. Yes he did 🙂 The same forces that were asked to perform previously unseen brutality against peaceful protesters, all the while ignoring violent looters. They did oblige in mass, with very few dissidence; must feel to them like the other shoe is dropping but they won’t get any sympathy from those they brutalized. Unless they turn, become the people’s last hope, before they are kicked out and rehired by privatized militia, ala Elyseum-the-movie. I won’t hold my breath…

    A turning point in France, indeed. I suppose the rest of the world will watch carefully, waiting for the sky to fall on their heads too. There is little doubt to me, that France will be the first large western country to fall under NWO tyranny, serve as laboratory for the rest of the world for this new, massive, shift in paradigm, exposed in this excellent article. At least, that’s where my thoughts wandered, while I was there. Thanks again, one of the most enlightening reading I have done in a while.

  15. @Wade

    My exact sentiment.We need to get the word out…

  16. Thomasina says:

    That was an excellent article! Very well done. Thank you for that.

    Reading about Iraq, is it any wonder Trump asked the Ukrainian president to look into Biden and his son’s business dealings there? I read that U.S. aid money was given to Ukraine, then funneled out through various other countries, and then into Biden’s bank account.

    We can also thank Trump for the cancellation of the TPP immediately upon becoming President. Obama had pushed hard for this, and he must have been pissed when Trump cancelled it.

    No wonder they are making life a living hell for Trump and hitting him with everything they’ve got. Trump is a nationalist, and they are one-world globalists.

    My instincts have been telling me that this is exactly what is happening.

    Spread this article far and wide!

    • Replies: @Mefobills
  17. Malla says:

    Excellent Article. Dark days ahead.

  18. Using a tetanus vaccine to deliver hcg as means of covert population control would probably have the opposite effect to that intended.

    The contraceptive effect of the hcg component wears off after a relatively short period while the immunity to tetanus is longer lasting. Repeat injections are needed to maintain the contraceptive effect but these also boost the immunity to tetanus. After several injections the recipient would become permanently immune to tetanus but the contraceptive effect would remain short lived.

    The likely net effect would be that the recipients of the vaccine would have fertile periods between injections and many would become pregnant. These pregnancies would be much more likely to produce viable offspring because the resultant newborns would also have acquired immunity to tetanus from the mother during pregnancy.

    Tetanus infection was a significant cause of mortality among newborns in Africa. The introduction of tetanus vaccination has in fact seen a huge reduction in perinatal infant deaths from that cause.

    All the other stuff in the article seems plausible to me but I do have a somewhat paranoid mindset.

  19. AnonCN says:

    “We will have a world government whether you like it or not. The only question is whether that government will be achieved by conquest or consent.”[4]

    We will have a world government!
    It will be both the government of conquest(Yin), and the government of consent(Yang).
    You have clearly point out the Yin阴side of the future, but not much focus on the Yang阳 side, that we all get ideas openly from UN, EU,NATO, ASEAN, OBOR, whatever looks they may show you now right now, one day they will joint hands together in the future as the rival for the Yin power.

    I am not optimistic, I am just pragmatic.
    Yea, justice will win, but evil will live.

  20. Alba - says:

    Is the mesianic dream of jerusalem as the centre of the world and jews as a supercaste of brahmins ruling as gods what really motivate them.
    Money is only an instrument

  21. anonymous[245] • Disclaimer says:

    In this entire matter, the US Congress was nowhere to be seen, totally removed from oversight or governing.

    This sentence could and should be in many Unz Review articles about the USA. The SCOTUS now legislates, the President bombs in his discretion. Congress rubber stamps and grandstands.

  22. Anonymous[661] • Disclaimer says:

    Thanks for this article. A very cogent analysis of where we are and how we got there. I wouldn’t mind seeing more articles from this author.

  23. The article, alas non-fiction is better then fiction.

    Unlike “layers” in architectural software, this article explains nothing. John le Carre the Second. Varoufakis can be catalogued till now in the Assange category. Giving him a structure and the necessary tools, he would bring indeed some real resistance to global finance. Of course this cannot happen, the sledge-hammer is busy rented @US, demolishing brass statues. The naive limits of shrewdness of Varoufakis is that he himself seems to insist to slide into a niche of public denouncing, ego, rather then power. Not Jewish(think base “Italian mafia”, Sopranos), he is definitely not.

    The methods of pillorying are not explained to the point of erasing the smirk of the faces of the insiders. A dose of feel-good, and told you so. As of today, all actors in the public domain are vaccined with the right measure of secondary personal wealth, and the menacing cloud of scandal. Things only got incremented over the last twenty years. Not helpful this scribble is, to grasp the state of the world!

    Financial Capitalism and Military Capitalism, are one, guess who drives the beetle? They are the constructs of the glass ceiling, real wealth does not scale well beyond a certain point. Hard assets have not accrued to the “billions” in the accounting business. The grand weakness of Finance Capitalism(as referred to both above), is that to increment “real” wealth, it needs to reach beyond the national borders, a complication arising there as to China and Russia playing their own cards under Xi and Putin. Guess that if the “rich and powerful” want to expand their grasp, and not just distancing themselves from the meaningless surplus population(this just adds to absurdity and means nothing, the difference between a single Billion and a \$50.000 salary is just as big as a hundred Billion fortune and the same) they will have to put up an entente(between “elites”) that reaches a global scale. Hard at work.

    On a singular note, and often misunderstood? Comment me if you feel I am wrong or misguided. On the question of are there in-fights between elite fractions, certainly! Where the elites really came together was on the issue of Corona-#, one could say, a real first. All possible culprits probably stressed to be exposed, and seeing the immense social credulity of fear took full advantage of the phenomenon. They will now all collaborate long-term to keep the hoax alive. The difference with something like 9-11?. It is one thing to be complicit and silent and another being a participating actor.

  24. The steam behind the world ruling class is Racist Atheist Yiddish caste. The RAY dominated the Bolshevik revolution in Russia and lit the fires of communism worldwide.
    Now the RAY dominate lower Manhattan, Beltway, Hollywood, academia. . . . We have to face that fact to make any progress.

  25. Franz says:

    This cabal of would-be world emperors has flaws of its own, prematurity resulting from excessive confidence being one.

    Not sure there’s anything “premature” about their confidence where the USA is concerned.

    Since the end of WWII and the start of the Cold War, the National Security State has run the USA. It has many channels, the main one being the Council on Foreign Relations.

    Not widely known is that, since the NSA took over in 1947, any person deemed a threat to “national security” can be detained without charge, tossed in the a federal pen and left to rot.

    They’ve been using the American population as guinea pigs since for… whatever experiments they might have in mind.

    Here’s a nugget on “Operation Sea Spray” from 1950, and there’s dozens more like it:

    “From September 20 to 27, 1950, the U.S. Navy released the pathogens off the shore of San Francisco. Based on results from monitoring equipment at 43 locations around the city, the Army determined that San Francisco had received enough of a dose for nearly all of the city’s 800,000 residents to inhale at least 5,000 of the particles.”

    John Kaminski kept calling Americans “stupid” and Paul Craig Roberts uses “dumbshits” but what’s the game plan for being something else?

    We are ruled by a secret society with many hydra-heads. The CIA, FDA, FBI, hell, all of them are just part of a whole, and they do not answer to us. Since they are also global, they can also create havoc right here in the USA and count on their own creation, the United Nations, to send foreign “peacekeepers” in to put us in our place. And they’ve said as much.

    Smart or stupid, your enemy must be clear to you. Non-globalists the world over can have only partial understanding of the nature of the threat. And we also have zero capacity to alter or even expose them for what they are.

    One true weapon against them is our refusal. But not many people are packing off to the wilderness to chuck it all, and for every one that does another docile “dumbshit” will step up to fill the opening.

    • Replies: @anonymous
    , @PetrOldSack
  26. @Wade

    Yes, this was an excellent article. It puts some red meat on the dry bone that many have been blandly calling neo-feudalism. I’ve always thought that Huxley’s Brave New World was less dystopian prophecy than a practical handbook that has been dictating official policies for many decades. We can’t thank Larry R. enough for reminding us with specific examples and concrete details on how the elite scheme has actually worked in practice. Maybe others who write superficially about the current virus lockdown hoax and the bogus racism wave will be encouraged to focus instead on the oligarchic corporate sources from which they sprang.

  27. Jesus didn’t dispute Satan’s ownership of all the kingdoms of the world when Satan offered them up.


    • Replies: @anon
  28. Ephesians 6:12-13 would seem to apply..

  29. Z-man says:

    There are few comments because he goes overboard from his basic history and observations which is good but then becomes a mess when he starts over delving on Iraq which I just glanced over. Like a lot of articles here they start out good and then fizzle into minutia and ramblings.

    ‘yuribezmenoff’ nails it in his reply.

    Larry tells just half the story. (Even though Larry was long winded. LOL ) Now that US was dry sacked by the friends of Larry, they move to China and back to India and other places, and do their parasitic work in the ‘bowels’ of their new hosts.
    Thanks Larry for the revelations you made here, in this writing of yours.
    By the way, the billions sucked out of Irak went to the pockets of the banksters, and as a gift to their beloved land of Israel.

    The race of Vampire Squid.

  30. @Nancy Pelosi's Latina Maid

    but we’re a long, long way from a “citizenry mostly homeless and bankrupt.”

    Where you sleep is where you stand.

    grand irony
    bridges are crumbling

    Build it up with silver and gold
    Silver and gold
    Silver and gold —

    You fans of Ron Paul & others who urge buying gold and silver against the coming destruction of the dollar — ever stop to think that the gold in US mint- guaranteed gold eagle is stolen? From Iraq, Libya . . .

    • Agree: Alfred
    • Replies: @Curmudgeon
    , @GeeBee
  31. 18.Julian of Norwich says:

    “Using a tetanus vaccine to deliver hcg as means of covert population control would probably have the opposite effect to that intended. The contraceptive effect of the hcg component wears off after a relatively short period while the immunity to tetanus is longer lasting. Repeat injections are needed to maintain the contraceptive effect but these also boost the immunity to tetanus. After several injections the recipient would become permanently immune to tetanus but the contraceptive effect would remain short lived.”

    It should be a criminal offense for an individual to so calmly propagate such outrageous lies. The effect of hCg does not “wear off after a relatively short period”. It does not ‘wear off’ at all. Documents posted on the WHO’s own website state that several vaccinations make the infertility total and permanent. The WHO spent more than 20 years and \$400 million to make it so.

    I have researched this subject at great length. The facts are not in dispute, except by the criminals themselves (and their adoring compradors). If you have interest in the vicious extent to which our new (imminent) masters are determined to depopulate our world, I urge you to read this article. It will shock you, and may make you ill, but it is something you need to know.

    • Thanks: Alfred
    • Troll: utu
    • Replies: @Agent76
  32. Okay. Assume that One World Government is achieved. What next?

    Human nature being what it is (real as opposed to Clintonian ambiguity “is”), there will be immediate disagreement at the top. Imagine a group of Freemasons all standing around arguing with each other, trying to come to some agreement.

    Bosses will war against each other in a neverending struggle for supremacy. One faction or other may dominate for a while. But eventually, even Joseph Stalin croaks and is replaced. Brutus will, often, help in the assasination of Caesar.

    As a result the whole thing will split apart along ethnic and religious lines. The same old divisions that have existed for millenia will determine the next wave of winners and losers. And the world of the future will look pretty much as it does today.

    Bye bye New World Order.

  33. 13.Nancy Pelosi’s Latina Maid says:

    As Benjamin Netanyahu famously stated, “Once we have squeezed everything we want from the US, it can dry up and blow away.”

    “I hate fake quotes. Think about it for a minute: does this sound like something that would enhance Bibi’s leverage over America, or antagonize it? And does Bibi do anything that’s not in his best interest?”

    In this case, your disaffection for fake quotes is irrelevant. Netanyahu was visiting Jonathon Pollard at the Federal Correctional Institution in Butner, N.C. after failing to obtain his release from prison for disclosing US state secrets to Israel. He was recorded by the prison video and audio system as having made this departing statement to Pollard as he left the room.

    • Replies: @Yogowotsi
    , @Saggy
  34. @Carlton Meyer

    @9:49: this is the first time I’ve heard Iran blamed for use of chemical weapons against Kurds.

    You cite CIA as source for that information.
    So surely it is the truth, the whole truth and nothing but …

    In the Iran-Iraq war, USA supplied logistics as well as precursor chemicals to Iraq that was used against Iran, killing or permanently debilitating several hundred thousand Iranians, many of them civilians and children. Iran protested to the UN, but their letters were unheeded. Iranian generals clamored for permission to use chemical weapons to retaliate against Iraq, but Khomeini would not consent. This is well documented.

    • Agree: Alfred
    • Replies: @Carlton Meyer
  35. 10.Shamil says:

    “One correction. Zalmay Khalilzad is an Afghan and not Iraqi.”

    You are correct, of course. I deserve to be embarrassed, thinking a ‘fact’ was too obvious to check.

  36. @Anon

    The banksters are probably going to succeed into making Europe and America much weaker if anything.

    Yeah, their plan required rolling both the CCP in China and the Kremlin in Russia. Periodically you get comments cryptically claiming their villain d’jour controls both of those. Doubtful. Kissinger himself got played by the CCP is how I’m interpreting it. Around the beltway, Kissinger is considered some sort of demi-god, but if you go into a non anti-intellectual society, minds like Kissinger’s are not so rare. CCP probably has thousands at that calibre ready to go. We poison our population to make them as stupid as possible, so of course an evil fat mediocrity like Kissinger can establish a grand farting throne, which is all he has done, and made a joke of American in the process.

    So, the prognosis is: Western civilization implodes and is reorganized, perhaps with the globalists overwhelmingly powerful over this sphere. I guess the CCP would like to make the globalists into their comprador agents over the West, and that was the cipher to their play on Kissinger. Russia will play with the CCP until PNAC is definitively defeated, and then will have to work assiduously to generate strategic balance or risk being overwhelmed in the long run. Ironically, the best bet for Russia is saving the West from the globalists, NATO, corporatism, etc.

    I don’t think the CCP _is_ globalist/corporatist, they just played along for awhile. They’ve got their whole entire own paradigm and rubric. Still quite insular. Not necessarily evil, but very different. Japan same thing at a smaller scale.

    • Replies: @Richard B
  37. @Anon

    The west imports plenty of ” Indians, Russians, Chinese, Iranians, Indonesians, Koreans, Japanese, and all the Islamic “stans”.” Mass immigration isn’t totally about weakening the host country. Also how many of those countries don’t have a central banking system in place?

  38. ariadna says:

    Bremer could not tell the story even under “enhanced interrogation,” or not much of it anywa, because he was a tool who did what he was told to do and only given information on a “need to know” basis. The proof: he is still alive. He may not even know when most of the loot went even if he arranged for it to be sent somewhere.

    • Troll: utu
  39. 31.MrFoSquare says:

    “It was James Warburg testifying before the U. S. Senate in 1950, not his father Paul Warburg. See my comment below from June 21.”

    You almost had it right. The quote was made by “James Paul” Warburg, the son of “Paul Moritz” Warburg, nephew of Felix Warburg and of Jacob Schiff, both of Kuhn, Loeb & Co., and who financed the Russian Revolution.

    • Replies: @MrFoSquare
  40. anon[183] • Disclaimer says:
    @Sick of Orcs

    He already told you that the enemy “is a liar and a killer”.

    “Hey, if you be mine you can have the Brooklyn Bridge!”

    Of course “dumbshit” “Christians” — and who but extreme dummies buy Saul’s story on his way to Demascus to demolish the Church of Jerusalem, make a mini-God out of a Prophet, and then take the Roman Pontif Maximus as Christ’s vicar? — take that as “indeed, the beautiful Earth, shining Jewel of Milky Way, belongs to the prince of darkness”.


  41. @HallParvey

    I’ve always wonder how the elite, who have lived by creating war and chaos for at least the past century, will all of a sudden be able to stop when they achieve the one world. Also when we all become serfs, where will the demand for banking come from? Creating wealth from ownership without demand is just maintenance on a naturally depreciating product.

  42. @SolontoCroesus

    You dismiss him as a “CIA source”. Recall at the time the CIA was pressured to find excuses to invade Iraq.

    Stephen C. Pelletiere’s Jan 31, 2003 New York Times OpEd on the evidence that Iran was responsible for the gassing of 5000 Kurds at Halabja, not Iraq:

    “We cannot say with any certainty that Iraqi chemical weapons killed the Kurds. This is not the only distortion in the Halabja story. I am in a position to know because, as the Central Intelligence Agency’s senior political analyst on Iraq during the Iran-Iraq war, and as a professor at the Army War College from 1988 to 2000, I was privy to much of the classified material that flowed through Washington having to do with the Persian Gulf. In addition, I headed a 1991 Army investigation into how the Iraqis would fight a war against the United States; the classified version of the report went into great detail on the Halabja affair.”

    He wasn’t working for the CIA when he wrote this, and did so only to counter President Bush’s effort to demonize Iraq to justify an invasion. In addition, he referred to the incident as a accident of war and did not write that Iran intentionally killed the Kurds.

    “The agency did find that each side used gas against the other in the battle around Halabja. The condition of the dead Kurds’ bodies, however, indicated they had been killed with a blood agent — that is, a cyanide-based gas — which Iran was known to use. The Iraqis, who are thought to have used mustard gas in the battle, are not known to have possessed blood agents at the time.”

    He noted:

    “These facts have long been in the public domain but, extraordinarily, as often as the Halabja affair is cited, they are rarely mentioned.”

    • Agree: Curmudgeon
  43. @HallParvey

    Bosses will war against each other in a neverending struggle for supremacy.


    Homo sapiens will never have peace, or justice, or equality.

    Those who believe that their protest or their vote or their actions will help bring that about are dangerously deluded–and pawns for elites that know better.

    We are ruled by sociopaths–who want to rule for only one reason–because they can.

  44. MarkU says:

    The fact that the (mainly Zionist) bankers are in control of the west isn’t exactly news to me, many of us got there decades ago. It is beyond obvious that they control the governments of the UK & the US, their financial apparatus and the majority of the media.

    I’m not convinced that population control is anywhere near being a priority though. If population control was a significant issue to them then why on earth would they flood the stable (or even declining) populations of Europe and North America with faster breeding immigrants? That policy seems to have three main objectives…

    1) Keep the population growing to prop up the banking system, which relies on continual growth.

    2) Destroy whitey wherever he can be found because whitey has many times gotten wise to the money ruse and evicted them.

    3) Turn every major city into a crime ridden hellhole so all the property can be bought up for a pittance, with their magic money conjured from thin air.

    It seems to me that domination is the primary objective, population control and ecological responsibility seem far down on the list. If population control was anything like a priority issue to those bastards they wouldn’t be setting out to destroy us would they?

    • Agree: fish
    • Replies: @PetrOldSack
  45. trickster says:

    A one world government ? LOL

    Politicians cannot run a city properly or a state properly or a country properly. The Euro Union is falling apart, the Soviet Union fell apart, it looks like the US is coming to pieces, India and China are fighting with umbrellas, crutches and stones for some woe begotten area. In our other big continent the Dindus are at each other, the whole place is a mess and the Chinese have their chopsticks in the Afro pot of millie meal !

    And the world is going to be run by one Government !! ?? It looks like Larry has replaced Anatoly (millions will die Karlin) as comedian of the year. What shall be the first prize ? A gilded donkey is my recommendation.

    You fellows need to get brain scans. You might find the machine does not register any activity.

  46. anonymous[400] • Disclaimer says:

    many others similar, including Cyprus, Haiti, Somalia, Iraq, Libya, the Balkans, Panama, Nicaragua

    . All countries that have had military action of one sort or another imposed on them. It “requires overwhelming military strength” for the US to rove the world looking for weaker countries to attack and loot like the world’s number one bandit. Only Russia, China and Iran have the capabilities and will to block the US in their respective areas hence all the constant propaganda blare of war incitement against them. The comparison of Bela Kun’s ideology and that of the current crop of terrorist rioters is quite striking even as they are spaced apart by over a hundred years. Who knows what the psychology is of the sociopathic parasites for whom the world is not enough. The US is seemingly falling apart socially so their vehicle may be sputtering at the moment. A major war, which they seem to have been driving for, would be a colossal disaster for all humanity. Don’t rule it out though, a huge gamble where they’ll recklessly throw the dice.

  47. anonymous[119] • Disclaimer says:

    Elephants fight
    Elephants make love
    The grass gets trampled

  48. LarryS says:

    “The mashiach will bring about the political and spiritual redemption of the Jewish people by bringing us back to Israel and restoring Jerusalem. He will establish a government in Israel that will be the center of all world government, both for Jews and gentiles. He will rebuild the Temple and re-establish its worship. He will restore the religious court system of Israel and establish Jewish law as the law of the land.”

  49. anonymous[119] • Disclaimer says:

    Since the end of WWII beginning of WWI and the start of the Cold War the Federal Reserve system, the National Security State has run the U\$A. It ha\$ many channel\$ . . .


    • Agree: Franz
  50. @SolontoCroesus

    That’s not London Bridge, it’s Tower Bridge. The rhyme was popular before banks existed.

    Regardless, if the shoe fits…

    • Replies: @Kapyong
    , @Bill Jones
  51. schrub says:

    The idea that Paul Bremer had such unaccountable power is not a surprise to me considering his previous connection to the just as unaccountable Henry Kissinger.

    Kissinger essentially directed the entire American response to the 1973 Arab-Israel war despite only being a presidential advisor at the time. He essentially propped up the Israelis who were then in immediate danger of losing a war which had been started by the Arabs to regain land seized by Israel in its 1967, a war which had been designed to increase Israel’s land holdings at the expense of its neighbors.

    Kissinger took over the conduct of the war without any apparent real input from either Nixon or William Rogers, Nixon’s Secretary of State. Rogers was apparently totally unaware of what Kissinger was up to. Apparently Kissinger crony General Alexander Haig was also actively involved in Kissinger’s scheme. Haig was later to became quite wealthy as a member of Kissinger’s immensely influential business firm Kissinger Associates.

    This sleight of hand was revealed by author Robert Dallek about a decade ago when Dallek was making the rounds of various TV stations (mostly PBS) to push a book in a book he had written about Kissinger and Nixon entitled “Nixon and Kissinger-Partners in Power”.

    The interviewer, who had apparently read the entire large book, asked Dallek, who had extensively interviewed Kissinger for hundred of hours prior to writing it, why and how Kissinger had been able to seemingly take over the reins of government during the 1973 War , Dallek said that Kissinger had told him (Dallek is also Jewish and therefore Kissinger might have felt quite comfortable confiding in) that he (Kissinger) had done this because he felt it necessary because “Nixon was drunk all the time” (apparently because of the stresses of the ongoing Watergate investigation). The interviewer didn’t ask Dallek about the book’s revelation that Nixon’s Secretary of State Williams Rogers had also been kept entirely in the dark about what Kissinger was up to.

    How extensive was the aid that Kissinger gave to Israel during the 1973 War. Immense. Absolutely immense.

    Kissinger essentially stripped the US military based in the US and Europe of most or or all of its most modern arms and then shipped them immediately off to Israel by air. This shipment not only included the most modern land based hand operated weapons including the newest guided missiles and the latest jet fighters. Rumor is that American pilots not only flew the planes to Israel but might also have engaged in combat once there on behalf of the Israelis in their now unmarked or newly re-badged Israeli planes.

    I later realized that the long flight of these jet fighters to Israel would have also required the use of air tankers to refuel them while in transit.

    The tide then turned because of all this aid and Israel ended up winning the 1973 War.

    The logistics required for doing all this is simply mind boggling. How all this was done has never been fully revealed for obvious reasons. At a minimum, it must have required a secret, duplicate chain of command.

    After reading Dallek’s book I realized that we essentially had two governments, the public one and a secret one. The secret one had the ability to take over the public one when the need arose. Trump is presently at war with the secret government. Watergate was apparently just an earlier version of Russigate.

    Was the reason Nixon was overthrown merely because “Nixon was a crook” or was it because Nixon had become increasingly reluctant to blindly defend the the Israel’s expansionism out of fear of further offending our Arab oil suppliers. If this latter fact had been was the case, Nixon had signed his own death warrant and “his pal” Kissinger was to be his executioner. Israel doesn’t countenance American presidents who are less than totally obedient.

    I have also come to the conclusion that “Deep Throat” could only have been Kissinger, no one else. Kissinger was, interestingly enough, the only close Nixon aide to have come out of Watergate entirely unscathed.

    For the rest of the 1970s and early 1980s the US suffered crippling inflation because of high oil prices which the Arabs had imposed because of the US’s blind obedience to the Israelis. If the American government had forced Israel to return the land it had seized the 1967 these high oil prices, along with their crippling effects on the US economy, would have most likely ended.

    The US government instead chose the welfare of Israel over that of its own citizens. Kissinger was probably very pleased.

    • Replies: @utu
    , @lloyd
    , @FB
  52. Great article with lots of detail that provides detail examples of how these vermin rich elites are plowing and plundering humanity. They are using the US military to attack humanity. They are strip mining the world.

    There is hope as long as Russia, China, and Iran stand apart and strong. The vermin elites in the West might just push to nuclear war but except for that my hope is that the East will eternally frustrate the terrible ambitions of the Western elites.

  53. Mefobills says:

    Thomassina… agree about TPP.

    Trump for me has always been mixed signals. Maybe he does that on purpose? His calibration between Zionist Jews, Zionist Christians, and Chabad Jews is hard to discern. His policy toward Iran, who is anti-zionist, seems to favor Zionists, who in turn are globalists.

    Watch this new Trump Ad before it gets de-platformed by “corporate” censors. I was stunned into silence. You can fast forward a bit if you want to go beyond Bill Still’s commentary.

    • Replies: @Ondra Hada
    , @anonimo11
    , @Saggy
  54. Whitewolf says:

    He then resurfaced as a ski instructor? Say what? He’s installed as a dictator tasked with looting an oil rich country and needs to supplement his income when the job is done? He must have some serious gambling or drug problems.

  55. Agent76 says:
    @Carlton Meyer

    Thanks for the share. Jul 31, 2016 Karl Rove Iraq War “ABSOLUTELY” Worth It, Gets Called A War Criminal!

    In this video Luke Rudkowski randomly see’s Karl Rove walking around the perimeter of the Democratic National Convention so he decides to ask him an important question. Over 10 years from the fact was the Iraq war worth it and the former George W. Bush presidential advisor said Absolutely.

  56. Agent76 says:

    Dec 22, 2014 How the Neocons Never Left

    Abby speaks with Media Roots Journalist, Robbie Martin about a conference held by the Foreign Policy Initiative, an influential think tank that promotes Neo-Conservative policies.

  57. Yes and no!
    The article is very good, and it is true that world society is developing as described.
    But it is only Communism with different coat.
    Communism was a good idea but in the end it did not work.
    These types of society do take away initiative of the individual. and that freezes the society in time.
    Society looses its dynamism and become stagnant and the society does become stale.
    Total control eliminates competition. Society cannot live without competition.
    Society without competition dies.
    No government should ever rule. Its the people who should choose which way to go.
    Government should stay behind end execute only corrections.
    Government should be as parents with children who are giving children freedom and they only act when it is absolutely necessary.

  58. Mefobills says:

    A one world government ? LOL

    It won’t work. One world government goes against people’s instincts, but that doesn’t mean there isn’t a one-world agenda.

    One world money is the driving force. One world government comes later. Money’s true nature is law, so individual governments have to be co-opted. What happened to Greece is a recent example of a sovereign country becoming subordinated.

    The money type is to be corporate bank credit… for now.

    One world government run by some sort of “international” elite has been on the agenda for centuries now. Maybe international communism wasn’t a thing in the past?

    WW1 and 2 was started by finance capital, and after winning in war, globalist structures were installed.

    Your brain does not register any activity.

    • Replies: @TheTrumanShow
  59. @Mefobills

    Wow that was surprisingly on point from Trump.

    By the way Mefobills, did you ever notice that the publisher of Gottfried Feder’s Manifesto was “Joseph C. Huber’s Verlag”? I found it a strange coincidence with Joseph Huber of as being in a similar position in monetary reform against Private Banks ( although the situations and approaches are different, obviously ).

    • Thanks: Mefobills
  60. Should have embedded more hyper links in the article and made it more credible for the uninformed.

  61. @Ber

    And there are many Jeffery Epsteins about.
    The honey pot wasn’t this lethal for the politicians before this present age. Ages of 12 to 15 were acceptable.
    Dershowshit has been pushing for it in op-eds.

  62. Now somewhere in the Black Mountain Hills of Dakota There lived a young boy named Rocky Raccoon And one day his woman ran off with another guy Hit young Rocky in the eye Rocky didn’t like that He said, “I’m gonna get that boy” So one day he walked into town Booked himself a room in the local saloon Rocky Raccoon checked into his room Only to find Gideon’s Bible Rocky had come, equipped with a gun To shoot off the legs of his rival His rival it seems, had broken his dreams By stealing the girl of his fancy Her name was Magill, and she called herself Lil But everyone knew her as Nancy Now she and her man, who called himself Dan Were in the next room at the hoe down Rocky burst in, and grinning a grin He said, “Danny boy, this is a showdown” But Daniel was hot, he drew first and shot And Rocky collapsed in the corner Now the doctor came in, stinking of gin And proceeded to lie on the table He said, “Rocky, you met your match” And Rocky said, “Doc, it’s only a scratch And I’ll be better, I’ll be better, Doc, as soon as I am able” Now Rocky Raccoon, he fell back in his room Only to find Gideon’s Bible Gideon checked out, and he left it, no doubt To help with good Rocky’s revival!

  63. @Larry Romanoff

    Not a big deal, but comment #31 that you allude to is not my comment but one of yours. From what I can tell, my comment has disappeared.

  64. Since LARRY ROMANOFF is being coy about naming the folks behind this, let me do it for him. Hey Larry, everyone knows they are the IRISH and the Lord is a shoving leopard.

    • Replies: @romar
  65. Delusional, mentally incompetent, inherently corrupt, narcisstic, psychopaths that clearly lack any ability to even govern themselves, and exercise any self control over their own criminal impulses, that cannot even face reality, believe that it would be far easier for them to control over seven billion people than to learn how to control themselves is a monument to their total insanity. 

    They have not even been capable of mastering themselves, yet they believe that they are uniquely qualified to be masters of the entire world! 

    Man plans and God laughs!

    Not sure why the psychopathic hacker changed this to Rocky Racoon lyrics! What a fucking loser! Best of its abilities!

  66. Thank you again for expanding on your recent article connecting the dots. So many layers to uncover.

    William Blum’s Killing Hope was another dot connector describing the behavior of the exceptionally powerful group of banksters and industrialists. Blum is coy as well in not naming who that group is. His research is outstanding but he won’t name names. Chris Hedges and John Pilger have done outstanding work as well but are reticent to cross the finish line.

    You’ve heard it said that all wars are banksters’ wars. That claim is only partially true. Without naming the Talmudic syndicate, one misses another critically important layer to uncover.

    I anticipate you are not done connecting the dots but I encourage to peel off one more layer of the onion.

  67. anonimo11 says:

    This is not a new ad at all. It was the main ad for the 2016 campaign, and the one that convinced me (always a man of the economic left) to vote Trump.

    • Agree: utu
    • Replies: @Mefobills
  68. aandrews says:

    “…the Greeks remembering only too well the recent prior events in Cyprus where the same bankers seized from 50% to 90% of all bank accounts of significant size….”

    Which coincided with a huge surge in popularity for Bitcoin and cryptocurrency in general. It was the best and easiest way to preserve money from plunder (and get it out of the country, specifically). Cyprus is always trotted out as a selling point for cryptocurrency. Orania, the white, ethno-Disneyland (according to Vice) oasis in South Africa, recently introduced its own cryptocurrency.

  69. Hodd says:

    Odd really, that anyone would write this sort of article, let alone publish it…

    The purpose of life is to make a choice…the choice is between materialism and spirituality.

    Anything to do with wealth, power and ‘God-like’ acts inclines towards various aspects of materialism.

    Anything that renounces and excludes wealth, power and, for want of a better term, absolute authority based upon some human definition (and I include religions like Christianity, Judaism, Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, Parsees/Janes/Sikhs and all the various sects that dot the world/One World Government, New World Order), is inclined towards spiritual endeavour…spiritual attainment…

    So it is your choice…materialism or spiritualism. It does not matter which political structure you are forced to live under.

  70. utu says:

    “I have also come to the conclusion that “Deep Throat” could only have been Kissinger, no one else. “ – We know who “Deep Throat” was sand it was not Kissinger.

    “At a minimum, it must have required a secret, duplicate chain of command.” – This is very interesting implication if it were true. But I think that Nixon gave the green light to the aid of Israel. He was motivated at that point to do so.

    • Replies: @schrub
  71. Agent76 says:
    @Larry Romanoff

    This should help folks know who is running the global medical establishment. Bill also funds WHO.

    Mar 31, 2020 Who was Bill Gates Before Microsoft?

    This is a video about philanthropic billionaire, Bill Gates. We go into his family history, his early childhood, education, extracurriculars, and time at Harvard to answer the question “Who was Bill Gates before Microsoft?”

  72. Truth3 says:

    Hey Larry…

    If you are a member of The Tribe, say so.

  73. Agent76 says:

    Jun 29, 2020 US Calls Out Chinese Companies with Military Links

    On the list are Huawei and Hikvision, companies that have long been targeted by the Trump Administration. But is the trade war now veering into complete decoupling of the US China economies? And what will it mean for the global economy?

  74. GeeBee says:

    Only Americans would (predictably) use graphics depicting Tower Bridge to illustrate a song about London Bridge (they are separated by about half a mile in distance and about five hundred years in age).

  75. @Franz

    Might give the impression but it is not out of context:

    Never mentioned till now here at salon (to our knowledge). The ultimate goal of immigration is building animosity between the US expatriates of Latin and even Asian and African countries and the native populations @their territories. So as to build inroads into further global control. ‘One dumbshit is worth another’.

    Russia, the EU(Africa and only certain parts of it) and China have the same mindset. The US is a step ahead. The other side of the coin but secondary is setting “identities” up against one another, locally(wihin the US), to keep the streets busy, and the attention away from the big league.

    Maybe out of context, but it needs mentioning that immigration into the US, is weaponized internationalism, and only then has to do with local short term goals as politically taking advantage of insulated “identities” for local-political reasons, having cheap labour to compete and depress the local surplus population of earlier waves, have cheap nannies for the rich. Immigration is Finance is Military Capitalism. Recruiting of canon fodder is done at the bottom of societies. Recruitment of beat cops is done at the bottom of society, within low opportunity communities.

    • Replies: @Franz
  76. R2b says:

    Reading this deracinated utter piece of crap, you will be Shanghaied. Cause where is double citizens?

  77. So, is it actually possible to resist assimilation by the NWO Borg?

  78. If I may, I’d like to let you know of another similar idea not much heard in the West.

    Halabja, where the major complaint of “gassing his own people” comes from is true as far as I can tell. But there is in fact nuance to it that I’ve never heard in the West. Halabja is a border town between Iraq and Iran. It is a Kurdish town. As we all know, Iraq and Iran were at war and as (I hope) we have all seen by now, the Kurds will go with whomever is “winning” in order to further their own goals. We have seen this in both Iraq and Syria for example.

    It is fairly well known in Iraq that the Kurds in Halabja at the time were allowing Iranian soldiers to infiltrate slowly across the border. Their numbers had grown quite large and the population was hiding them in their homes and civilian facilities all over town. It would soon be a border town lost to the other side without so much as a bullet fired. The Iraqi authorities became aware of this and gave numerous warnings to the population to stop. And being in the middle of a war, and also being thuggish, the warnings were sealed with an “or else!”statement. The warnings were not headed and the “or else!” came to pass.

    I am an Iraqi, for the record, who was no lover of Sadam Hussein or his band of thieves. Nor was I a lover of Khomeini and his band of thieves. In fact, I am not a lover of any government anywhere, regardless of who they pretend to represent. I’m not foolish enough to believe they represent me or anyone else. They all, and I truly mean all, view us as expendable slaves.

    • Agree: TheTrumanShow
    • Replies: @Patagonia Man
  79. @MarkU

    There is an international facet to local immigration into the US. The “one world idea” (Mebobills), see also my latter comment in this article´s thread.

  80. Mefobills says:

    Jokes on me and Bill Still too..

    Thanks for letting me (and others) know.

  81. lloyd says: • Website

    Interesting. Are those laws or at least their legacy still in existence? They might help to explain Germany’s post war “economic miracle”.

    • Replies: @Mefobills
  82. FB says: • Website

    An interesting article, by an author who has obviously put a lot of work into this…

    The information about Bremer is very curious…it seems to hint at a shadowy clique that really rules…unlike the public faces we think are in charge…some have written books about these ‘rulers in the shadows’…

    It would not be surprising that things behind the scenes are far different than we ordinary people believe…

    • Replies: @SolontoCroesus
  83. lloyd says: • Website

    Henry Kissinger became Secretary of State in September 22 1973, a month before the 1973 Arab Israeli war. Unless you think Deep Throast was a literary invention, Kissinger could not have been Deep Throat in this era as he was at that time outside America.

  84. schrub says:

    “We know who “Deep Throat” was sand it was not Kissinger.”

    Actually, about a decade or more ago the media claimed that “Deep Throat ” was retired FBI Associate Director Mark Felt who, at the time of this revelation was suffering such a severe case of age related dementia that he was completely incapable of being interviewed to verify the claim. The claim that Felt was “Deep Throat” came principally from Felt’s daughter, not Felt himself. She was also trying to get a book deal at the time for her now wacky father’s supposed “confession”. As s result she was more than a bit biased and untrustworthy.

    The media also claimed that Felt had tattled on Nixon because Felt had a grudge against him for being passed over as the new head of the FBI after J. Edgar Hoover had croaked in 1972. .

    Deep Throat=the Teflon coated Henry Kissinger. No one benefitted more.

  85. @FB

    [The Bremer story] . . . seems to hint at a shadowy clique that really rules…unlike the public faces we think are in charge…some have written books about these ‘rulers in the shadows’…

    It would not be surprising that things behind the scenes are far different than we ordinary people believe…

    Only a few weeks ago Phil Giraldi reported that Michael Ledeen’s daughter is now on the Pentagon’s Middle East planning staff,

    She was one among numerous neocon offspring who rotated through Iraq-in-the-time-of-Bremer

    Some of the corruption grew out of the misguided neoconservative agenda for Iraq, which meant that a serious reconstruction effort came second to doling out the spoils to the war’s most fervent supporters. The CPA brought in scores of bright, young true believers who were nearly universally unqualified. Many were recruited through the Heritage Foundation or American Enterprise Institute websites, where they had posted their résumés. They were paid six-figure salaries out of Iraqi funds, and most served in 90-day rotations before returning home with their war stories. One such volunteer was former White House Press Secretary Ari Fleischer’s older brother Michael who, though utterly unqualified, was named director of private-sector development for all of Iraq.

    If I remember correctly, Paul Wolfowitz drew up the master-plan for de-Baathification: In Wolfowitz’s mind, Baathists were Nazis and the uncontrolled/unconstrollable impulse was for de-Nazification, the sequel. Jews never seem to slake the appetite for revenge and, having nearly run out of actual Nahzees, will gorge on Iraqis or Afghanis or Syrians or Palestinians or Iranians — methadone for heroin.


    nb. About the London or Tower Bridge: how terribly embarrassing to have misidentified the piles of rocks. Abject apologies.
    My city has dozens of bridges, many of them known by names appended to memorialize some famous figure in the city’s history.
    The characteristic they share is the homeless who live under them, and that was the reference directed at Pelosi’s Maid, who dismissed homelessness as of no account.
    I agree, of course: I luv me my 13″ high pillow-top mattress with goose down in winter, Egyptian cotton in summer.
    Others sleep on concrete under iron girders year ’round.

  86. FB says: • Website

    A well-informed comment…

    Your point about US supplying weapons, including the latest fighter aircraft to the Israelis during the 1973 ‘October War’…

    Kissinger essentially stripped the US military based in the US and Europe of most or or all of its most modern arms and then shipped them immediately off to Israel by air.

    This shipment not only included the most modern land based hand operated weapons including the newest guided missiles and the latest jet fighters.

    Rumor is that American pilots not only flew the planes to Israel but might also have engaged in combat once there on behalf of the Israelis in their now unmarked or newly re-badged Israeli planes.

    Here is previously classified document from 1973 with Kissinger and senior Israeli government and military figures…pdf file…

    Note the exchange on page three between Kissinger and General Peled of the Israeli Air Force…he tells Kissinger that the Israelis have been badly mauled by Soviet made anti-aircraft missiles and have lost 102 aircraft…including 32 state of the art McDonnell F4 ‘Phantoms’…

    He also says ‘thank you’ for the new Phantoms he has already received, but notes that the problem now is pilots…

    Our problem is crews. There are 69 to 70 crews left who can use 80 to 100 Phantoms.

    So certainly what you have quoted here, presumably from that book, sounds very plausible indeed… I had often wondered how those F4s got to Israel that quickly…it’s not like you could just churn out 100 fighter planes at the drop of a hat…

    Of course the issue of pilots is a much much bigger story, if true…I would say that we would have heard someone talking about it by now if it had happened…

  87. Harfang67 [AKA "Harfang 67"] says:

    How can one not be shocked by such information? Simply blacked out! To the point where I’m afraid to spell such truth to my kids.

    Thanks a million! Will certainly give focus to my interventions in fighting the EVIL at my capacity. If everyone starts acting within.his means this order will fail. But the must be destroyed , completely!


  88. Art says:

    The Rothschild Jew banking cartels, are every bit as bad as this article declares.

    Banks loaning money to governments is the bane of humanity. Politicians spend the money on their donors – then the middleclass folks must pony up the taxes to repay the loans. It is called Austerity.

    All these private central banks must be nationalized, and their assets sold off – PERIOD.

    (Guaranteed – not one of those oligarch bastards ever earned their wealth.)

  89. Kapyong says:

    “That’s not London Bridge, it’s Tower Bridge. ”

    Readers in USA are fortunate to be able to visit London Bridge (well, one of them, anyway) in Lake Havasu City, Arizona :

    No, really.

    • Replies: @Bill Jones
  90. vot tak says:

    This is a useful in many respects. In some others, not so much.

    The string pullers are the very rich in the west. The oligarchs, the autocrats, the fascists, the nazis. The parasites. IE: the right. The zpc/nwo (zionist power configuration/new world order).

    Yes, they want total control of the planet and are supranational, well some are that. They view countries as they view their corporations. Tools.

    Except one country, israel, israel is sacrosanct to them. Not to all of these organised criminals, but to enough of them, power wise, to own a “controlling interest” in corporate speak. All other countries are subject to total exploitation except israel. While every other country gets denationalised and reduced to mere tool status, israel continues its expansion, the oded yinon plan is very much alive and well.

    The population manipulation they work towards is not an assault on “the family”, “religion”, blah blah blah, which is propagandized by their tools and marks to facilitate division. It is the total isolation of the individual from any support that isn’t accessable through the rightwing oligarchy. To reduce people to isolated and helpless individuals, with no real realization of genuine self and community. The zpc//nwo needs their “human resources” to be both in effect dependent children and adult slaves. Helpless to seek anything, do anything, totally dependent on massa with no way out.

  91. Mefobills says:

    Hello Lloyd,

    Maybe some of it rubbed off on post war Germans?

    Hudson always mentions post war German miracle. When he does, he also mentions that Western Powers (American’s) erased all of the Nazi debts. American’s also forbade Greece from making any claims against Germany, which implies that other countries wouldn’t be able to as well.

    Greece was then folded into the post-war construct as a bulwark against Soviet Union.

    Michael Hudson [00:26:32] That’s right. The German Economic Miracle was the Allied debt reforms of 1947/48. They essentially wiped out all debts except for what employers owed their employees – you know, the workers’ wages and minimum working balances at the banks. It was easy for the Allies to cancel the debts owed to German creditors. because the creditors were mainly Nazis. The whole idea was to wipe them out. They didn’t the want to leave the former Nazis with financial power to take over the economy again. They wanted a Clean Slate.

    Canceling the debts created the German Economic Miracle. Because the economy was able to operate without personal debt, and without much public debt or corporate debt. It was able to take off. Today, essentially you’re dealing with a criminalized banking class that I think we should treat in the same way that the Allies treated the Nazis. If you don’t cancel the debts owed to them, the economy is going to shrink and shrink, and polarize. We’re going to have essentially a neo-feudalism controlled by the creditor class, like you had in Rome in the Dark Ages. Do you really want a new Dark Age?

    • Thanks: FB
  92. romar says:

    These are “friends of Larry”? Silly comment…

  93. Good info mixed with a little disinfo. Of course Mr. Unz could never post an article without at least little red baiting thrown in the mix. Not mad though, do your thing. Commies baaad.

    These two lines I find ridiculous:

    To bring this plan to completion also requires the eventual destabilisation and effective destruction of the family, of organised society, and of religion.

    I find the part about religion absurd. At least in America “religious” folks are the most hateful, pro-war, pro-imperialism brainwashed fools you’ll ever run across. Thats been my experience here in GA anyhow. Atheists or non-church going pro-Jesus folk are usually pretty wise about war, economics, and all the stuff that goes along with that. Destruction of family I guess I can agree with, capitalism is certainly getting that done.

    The plan involves the destruction of national sovereignty and of individual nationalism. Patriotism and loyalty to nations are a curse which must be eliminated.

    Again, the patriots in Merica are generally just bloodthirsty and easily duped Fox News programmed drones. At least in my neck of the woods. I honestly don’t see how eliminating these folks would be good for the NWO/Empire. Nationalism can be good or bad I suppose, but from what I’ve seen from most nationalists its mostly bad, and for the most part benefits the empires agenda, divide and rule in particular.

    Kissinger will certainly burn in hell for what he did to the Vietnamese and Chilean people among others. All the “white nationalists” and alt-righters that love to idolize folks like Solzhenitsyn and Pinochet should know that they are endorsing the ideology of Kissinger when they do.

    Kissinger and the CIA overthrew Allende to bring Pinochet to power. Pinochet reversed all the nationalization that took place under Allende and the previous govt. and privatized it to benefit the CIA and Wall St vultures. Pretty much what this article points out that happened in Iraq under Bremer. Solzhenitsyn was very pro-Vietnam war, endorsed the mass slaughter of civilians, not what you would expect from a true Christian, but exactly what you would expect from and NWO stooge and neocon.

    As far as the comments on Kissinger, Heres an interesting take on him and Israel from a Jewish group:


    Few Jews have had the opportunity to defend the lives of the Jewish people against our enemies as did Kissinger when he was the Secretary of State of the United States in 1973.

    Yet, Kissinger, during his tenure in that position, did everything possible to bring about the destruction of Israel and the slaughter of yet another 5 million Jews. In that he did not succeed because President Nixon, a man who ranted anti-Jewish epithets, saved the people of Israel from mass murder against the wishes and machinations of Kissinger.

    On October 6, 1973, the Egyptian army, supplied by the Soviet Union, crossed the Suez Canal and initially defeated the army of Israel in the Sinai. At the same time the Syrians assaulted Israel in the Golan heights, so that Israel had to fight a two front war, which at first seemed to lead to Israel’s defeat.

    In view of the losses Israel was taking on October 6 and for the first week of the fighting, Israel was losing the war. Had this happened, the entire population of Israel would have been slaughtered Nazi style by the Arab haters. In face of these developments, Kissinger, himself a refugee from Nazi Germany, refused to supply Israel with the ammunition and weapons needed to defend themselves. It was only when the then Prime Minister of Israel, Golda Meir, appealed directly to President Nixon and also threatened to use the atomic bomb that Israel was given the needed tanks, guns and ammunition to turn certain defeat into victory. In fact, General Ariel Sharon and his troops crossed the Suez Canal and came within 50 miles of Cairo when Kissinger threatened to cut off all aid to Israel unless they retreated back to the Suez. Israeli troops had surrounded 50,000 Egyptian troops and utterly defeated both the Egyptian and Syrian armies.

    This displeased Kissinger, who then forced Israel to lift the siege of the defeated Egyptian army, demanded Israel retreat from the Sinai, and openly sided with the Arab haters, whom he called his friends. Kissinger also told American Jews that he would not allow Israel have any further American weapons unless the American Jewish community stopped helping the Soviet Jews to emigrate.

    Although Kissinger held up arms shipments to Israel, he told the Israelis that the then Secretary of Defense, Schlesinger, was responsible for the delays. He also told Moshe Dayan, Israel’s Minister of Defense, that the Soviets were about to attack Israel with nuclear weapons. This was not true, but led the Israelis to agree to Kissinger’s demands. There can be no doubt that Kissinger turned Israel’s remarkable victory into a diplomatic defeat and the subsequent loss of the Sinai.

    Kissinger’s hatred of the Jewish people was evident even before the Yom Kippur war debacle. On a visit to Israel, he refused to visit the Yad Vashem holocaust museum, which all other diplomats visited on first arriving in Israel.

    Over the years since then, Kissinger has accepted awards from numerous Jewish organizations such as the Anti-Defamation League and the United Jewish Appeal.

    Kissinger is of course not the only Jew who has betrayed his people for personal gain. In our own day, Tony Judt, a NYU historian, who died recently, joined with Noam Chomsky of MIT fame, Norman Finkelstein, and Richard Goldstone in defaming the Jewish people and promoting the destruction of Israel.

    As early as the first century C.E., a Jew named Barnabas wrote anti-Jewish tracts later repeated by every bigot on earth from then to the rantings of Martin Luther in his infamous “The Jews and Their Lies,” written in 1543, to Hitler’s propaganda minister Göbbels.

    Kissinger will be remembered in Jewish history as a brutal apostate who damaged us and sought our deaths like Haman before him. He has not succeeded except to be known as the Torquemada of his day.

    Shalom u’vracha.

    • Thanks: FB
    • Replies: @FB
  94. 66.Beautiful Evidence says:

    “William Blum is coy as well in not naming who that group is. His research is outstanding but he won’t name names. Chris Hedges and John Pilger have done outstanding work as well but are reticent to cross the finish line. Without naming the Talmudic syndicate, one misses another critically important layer to uncover. I anticipate you are not done connecting the dots but I encourage to peel off one more layer of the onion.”

    Your analysis is acccurate and we all stand guilty as charged. However, prior to throwing myself onto the mercy of the court of public judgment, there is an alibi to account for this behavior, unrelated to being coy: We cannot name names because we don’t have them.

    Nevertheless, your concern is valid and deserves an honest answer. This is too complex to be properly explained in a single comment, and yes I will address it more fully in another article, but I will do here what I can.

    First, you must appreciate that we are in speculation-land because facts on the ground are so thin as to be almost invisible. As near as I am able to determine, there is an inner cabal of around 300 to 400 individuals who all know each other very well, who have all the control, set the strategy, and make the decisions – for example, the timing of World War III which is coming and maybe very soon. This group would be entirely Jews, the European banking families and industrialists. No Gentile would be permitted into this group. The head of Mossad might have contact with some of these members, but maybe not, being only a tool. Netanyahu is irrelevant, a cheap peasant doing some dirty work for the Mafia. Kissinger knows these people. Soros doesn’t.

    There would have to be a secondary group that I guess would have to consist of between maybe 2,000 and 10,000 individuals who function as lieutenants, and perhaps in an advisory capacity though I personally doubt the central core requires advice or guidance. This group also would consist entirely of Jews, and again no Gentile would be permitted here. It is through these individuals that ‘instructions’ are channeled to what we might call ‘operatives’ in the rest of the world.

    For example, some years ago Alan Dershowitz from Harvard gave a speech to AIPAC where he told all the Jews to exert maximum pressure on China for imaginary human-rights violations in Tibet – specifically for the purpose of taking the world’s attention off the Jews’ travesties in Palestine. That was not his idea. He received that request or instruction from someone in the channel, and he obliged, as did the media. Similarly, shortly thereafater, Harrison Ford made a presentation to the US Congress on China’s supposed travesties in Tibet. I like Ford as an actor, but this was quite a dirty piece of work, if I may say so. This was not Ford’s idea. Like Dershowitz, he answered the call.

    This is the same with Pompeo today. None of his ingenious accusations and outrageous war-mongering provocations are his own; again, he is merely doing what he is told to do. I believe this is also true for the Jewish-owned Western media. They are not big enough to be part of the core group and are unlikely to even be within the secondary cabal. They are simply loyal soldiers who lie when they are told to lie and who tell the lies that are provided to them.

    The organisation is loose, undocumented, hiding in plain sight, and impossible to identify because it is secret and scattered. None of these people will ever suffer a change of heart and spill the beans and, if they did so, they would be dead within hours. And no small fry will ever attend group ‘information sessions’. They tried that once, more than 100 years ago, which is how The Protocols of the Elders of Zion were leaked, and they won’t make that mistake again.

    Beyond this, the part that is public, is the Jared Kushners, the Mike Pompeos and all their ilk, including the CIA which is 100% under their control and has always been. The CIA is just as Jewish as Mossad. Ask Mike Pompeo. It was interesting that Oswald’s wife said in a later interview that the answer to to the Kennedy assassination lay with the Federal Reserve and that it was wrong to blame it on the CIA and James Jesus Angleton alone (Angleton was a rabid Zionist). She said, “The people who control the money are above the CIA”. They receive their orders through Kissinger and the secondary cabal, and do what they are told to do.

    After this, we have perhaps the most visible group consisting of all the well-known usual suspects, the far right-wing war-mongers and trouble-makers, the Boltons and the Wolfowitzes and hundreds of others similar. A great many are Jews, but not all. Many are deluded Christian Zionist like Conrad Black, Hillary Clinton, Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld, who believe they are part of the “in group” but who will be chopped up and fed to the vultures when their usefulness ends.

    This is already much too long for a comment post, so I will stop here.

  95. Kissinger also played a key role in Operation Gladio, CIA program supporting ex-Nazis and fascist groups in Europe to undermine socialists and pro-Soviet pols. Thats a deep hole I won’t get into now. Do your own research. So all the pro-fascist, pro-Nazi folks should know that they are on the same page as Kissinger.

  96. Richard B says:

    War is about stealing money and the Jewish Bankers always are the winners.

    True. They’re certainly stealing money. But, as far as winning is concerned I think what they’ll get in the end is a Pyrrhic Victory.

    In any event, the edited quote below from the article can be used as a template for what the hostile elite have down to the American people, namely in the areas of Foreign, Domestic, and Economic Policies (Invade the World, Invite the World, In-Debt to the World).

    But also for the current implementation of Anarcho-Tyranny.

    Anyone can fill in the blanks with any number of things, such as,

    The Looting of the Treasury
    The Lockdown
    The Riots
    etc. etc.

    This was all done with no identifiable benefit to the US as a nation, or to the American people. The US incurred the cost of ———-, took all the casualties, and was delegated to be occupied at its own expense, then remain silent. The only apparent duty of the US Congress was to conduct an insincere investigation, then sweep the matter under the carpet. The media, compliant as always, remained silent on all matters demanding a voice.

    This helps explain why they don’t want us noticing things like behavioral patterns.

    Because behavioral patterns are assocaiated with impulses, habits and customs that together make it easy to, among other things, predict a groups next move.

    And it’s exactly this knowledge one would need to protect themselves from such predators and parasites.

  97. Richard B says:

    Interesting comment. I agree with pretty much all of it.

    Though there are a couple of things worth pointing out.

    So, the prognosis is: Western civilization implodes and is reorganized, perhaps with the globalists overwhelmingly powerful over this sphere.

    There’s a lot involved just in the words “implodes” and “reorganized.”

    And a case could be made that the implosion will make the reorganization near impossible, but certainly very difficult.

    Let’s not forget, whatever one thinks of Western Civilization, it’s hands down the most complex and unpredictable civliization in history.

    So, the word “implode” is no small thing.

    Like a scientific theory that produces more data than the theory can manage, and a kind of data it can’t respond to at all, the implosion might turn out to be more than any power center can handle.

    It very well may be.

    Also, assuming we do survive the implosion, any reorganization will take a coordinated effort that could take ages to organize, let alone put to work to achieve the goal.

    And, a coordinated multicultural effort. With all that implies.

    To get to the point, The Hostile Elite, or whatever one wants to call them, have certainly proven themselves to be very good at infiltration, subversion, betrayal, destruction and death.

    But they are no good at social management.

    In fact, one could argue that this is their Achilles Heel.

    This is why with each day I become more and more convinced that the two-fold moment we’re witnessing right now is

    The Collapse Of The West and The Pyrrhic Victory Of The Hostile Elite

    Reality very well may have a joker up its sleeve after all.

    One thing’s for sure. We’re going to find out sooner than later.

    • Replies: @Justvisiting
  98. @Mefobills

    Excellent, excellent comment!

    The distinction you make between the goal/final state (a one-world government), and the process of attaining that goal/state (a one-world agenda) reminds me of the scene in “Butch Cassidy and The Sundance Kid”, where Redford is balking at Newman’s plan to jump from their cliff-top perch into the river below to escape the sheriffs’s posse (escape being the goal). Finally, Redford sheepishly confesses, “I can’t swim.” Newman scoffs dismissively, “You can’t swim! Hell, the fall will probably kill you.” (the fall being the agenda). Equally so, a one-world agenda.

    • Thanks: Mefobills
  99. FB says: • Website

    Excellent comment Hooch…

    I agree of course that the ridiculous schmaltz about ‘bad’ communism has needlessly marred an otherwise very good article…

    The Soviet led communists certainly did not attack religion…they of course recognized it for the destructive superstition that helped keep the peasants in bondage during the Tsarist era…and stopped according it the undeserved privileges it had become accustomed to…a definite turn in the right direction…

    But it was the church that prosecuted a Jihad against socialism, recruiting along the way fascist allies of the west, like the Catholic Church, plus Nazis like Solzhenytsin…

    As for encouraging ‘licentiousness’ among women, that’s just pure mushroomland…certainly women were empowered properly for the first time in those very patriarchal societies, but that was all to the good…and the legacy of the educated, modern woman lives on in Eastern Europe precisely as a result of the socialist emancipation…

    This is just crude and silly propaganda that reveals a total lack of first hand experience with eastern European women…ridiculous…

    Thanks also for your very enlightening comments about Kissinger…that’s nothing less than a revelation…my only question is why he would take a pro Arab tack…?…was it to poach the Arabs out of the Soviet sphere…?…which did eventually happen with Mubarak’s turn to the US…

  100. @Disturbed_robot

    There’s sufficient evidence to indicate that Saddam was actually a CIA asset.

    There is also sufficient evidence to show he obtained the gas from the USA – that’s how they know he used it.

    When it came to Gulf War I (1990/91) and his invasion of Kuwait (a former province of Iraq) – he was indeed tricked. The US sent Assistant Under-Secretary of Trade, April Gladsby, who pretty much told him: ‘if Iraq goes into Kuwait, the US will look the other way’ (words to the effect).

    Foolishly for him, and for Iraq, he believed her.

    The US subsequently denied it of course.

  101. I posted this on another thraed this morning, but having subsequently reda this excellent article, irt seems as apropos here:

    “The Trilateral Commission is intended to be the vehicle for multinational consolidation for the commercial and banking interests by seizing control of the political government of the United States. The Trilateral Commission represents a skillful, coordinated effort to seize control and consolidate the four centers of power: political, monetary, intellectual and ecclesiastical. What the Trilateral Commission intends is to create a worldwide economic power superior to the political governments of the nationstates involved. As managers and creators of the system, they will rule the future.” – US Senator Barry GoldwaterWith No Apologies, 1964

    NOTE 1: Goldwater spent years in the US Senate, was an officer in the USAF and kept a private Alpha File that candidly recorded his private encounters with Kennedy, Carter, and other world leaders.

    NOTE 2: The co-founders of the TC were David Rockefeller and Pres. Carter’s former National Security Advisor & zionist Zbigniew Brzezinski.

  102. When speaking of Iraq, it needs to be acknowledged that US State Department’s nickname is Zio-Central.

    In fact, these days State has infiltrated the UN Secretary General’s office, even his spokesperson Stephane Dujarric is from State.​

    To underline Condoleeza Rice’s duplicity she said soon after 9/11 that ‘no one could envisage planes flying into buildings’ (words to the effect) – whereas it was pointed out at the time that the USG were warned about planes used in a terror attack – by the Egyptian, German and another national government’s intel agencies (I forget which now) as plans were afoot in these 3 countries.

    Another direct lie.

    I think after that the President or CEO(?) of Exxon named his luxury yacht ‘Condoleeza’ – in her honor!

  103. Yogowotsi says:
    @Larry Romanoff

    Nice response Larry. Usually your articles are generously sourced, which I appreciate very much. This one, not so much, perhaps because your generalizations are too large to have a single source. The case studies of Iraq and Greece are highly factual and that granularity gives them far more gravitas than they would otherwise have. Sourcing, in journalism, is badly underrated.

  104. Goyboy says:

    When you add to the equation the hoax pandemic and the nobbling of small business, I wonder if Bezos is planning a global restaurant chain and calling it Bezos is Best, perhaps not but he’s doing mighty fine with Amazon.

    Western governments are certainly running up that bill with these banksters. It’s a mystery to me why our governments are onboard with this BS.

  105. @Curmudgeon

    Didn’t some dipshit Americans buy London Ridge thinking they were getting the Towered one?
    Arizona somewhere?

  106. @romar

    Are you really that ignorant?

    Look up Spoonerism.

  107. @Kapyong

    Just saw your comment 10 minutes after I’d made a similar, lazier one, sorry.

  108. Franz says:

    immigration into the US, is weaponized internationalism, and only then has to do with local short term goals as politically taking advantage of insulated “identities” for local-political reasons, having cheap labour to compete and depress the local surplus population of earlier waves

    Very good analysis.

    Actually I’ve seen the “compete and depress” strategy and not just in the States. But it’s tragic wherever it is. People pull up roots, learn a new tongue, work dangerous jobs… then get stiffed when it’s possible to repeat it all at their expense.

    The one chance is the current disorder breaking enough of the former mainstream media down and getting people to see how much worse this all is, even in small communities. The people who fled from the cities are finding that whatever they’re running from always seems to find them, often very quickly.

    The workers of the world never united, and the thinkers of the world are busy splitting hairs over what the Powers That Be consider jokes: Was it a “Civil War” or “The War of Yankee Aggression”?

    They don’t care, they just rake in the money it made them, just like the race war will. They count on our pigheadedness, and our educated peasants are too happy to oblige.

    • Replies: @PetrOldSack
  109. Goyboy says:
    @Larry Romanoff

    Fair to say then the Devil is using his own

  110. 100.FB says: • Website

    “I agree of course that the ridiculous schmaltz about ‘bad’ communism has needlessly marred an otherwise very good article. The Soviet led communists certainly did not attack religion.”

    The Jewish Bolsheviks (your “Soviet-led Communists”) exterminated between 80% and 90% of the clergy in Russia. If that doesn’t qualify as ‘attacking religion’, I don’t know what would.

    “As for encouraging ‘licentiousness’ among women, that’s just pure mushroomland…certainly women were empowered properly for the first time in those very patriarchal societies, but that was all to the good. This is just crude and silly propaganda that reveals a total lack of first hand experience with eastern European women…ridiculous…”

    As I have said repeatedly, statements like these, which are egregiously and horridly false, and which contradict all the available evidence, should be designated felony crimes and punished by years of imprisonment. Bela Kuhn was one of the world’s most despicable Satanists, the worst kind of human rubbish, and ’empowering women’ was hardly his agenda.

    I assume you are Jewish since your comments follow a standard template. Might I suggest that there is no shortage of reputable Jews in the world for you to defend. Perhaps you might direct your attention to them, rather than a monster like Bela Kuhn.

    • Replies: @FB
  111. FlintWheel4 says: • Website
    @Nancy Pelosi's Latina Maid

    It depends on his audience. Jews? Absolutely believable. The US Congress? Maybe not so much (for now). Bibi has demonstrated time and again he has no concern, nor does he need to, for anyone’s opinion of him other than Israel’s.

  112. @trickster

    Fully agreed. I only check in here anymore for entertainment purposes, to see what ass-hat is given a platform for embarrassing themselves.

    • Replies: @Mefobills
  113. Paul Bremer III, still looking for his calling:

    Not that Mr. Romanoff’s article left any doubt Bremer’s being a puppet/shill.

  114. Adûnâi says: • Website

    If America is so brutal and warlike, why has the population of Iraq been increasing for all these decades? Iraq has a better fate than the White race. America is the biggest charity on planet Earth – no wars since 1945, only police operations to make everyone suck the LGBT dick. Prosperity and collective suicide!

    But of course, the boring Marxists may only moan about scary wars. The LGBT are not scary, eh? Desirable, of course! Eternal LGBT peace!

  115. Mefobills says:
    @Beefcake the Mighty

    Fully agreed. I only check in here anymore for entertainment purposes, to see what ass-hat is given a platform for embarrassing themselves.

    You are agreeing with someone who uses baseless insults and ad-hominems on a regular basis.

    Breitbart is missing you.

    • Replies: @Beefcake the Mighty
  116. @Mefobills

    No, I’m agreeing with someone who’s correctly come to the conclusion that this site has become a joke (and quite possibly a limited hangout/psy-op), and that some mockery is in order.

  117. FB says: • Website
    @Larry Romanoff

    I assume you are Jewish…

    Get real, SHNORK…

    You wrote a semi-decent article by this website’s ‘standards’ and now you are able to flick people off with this ‘Jewish activist’ smear…?

    Is that what you’re thinking…?

    Bela Kun from 1919 and those several months of anarchy in Hungary has NOTHING to do with Soviet communism…

    Like I observed…you have ZERO firsthand experience with communism or women in Eastern Europe, which are to this day the most educated and least oppressed by patriarchal norms…

    I spent a full year in East Germany as an exchange student…traveled widely in the former Eastern Bloc throughout the 1980s and have continued to do so, including long work assignments in Russia…

    You would do well to take honest criticism from people who happen to know more than you about this subject, rather than get into a public meltdown…doesn’t look good…

    As for ‘exterminating’ Russian clergy, that is just plain bullshit…the early Bolshevik rule under Lenin did contain a lot of Jews, many of whom were radicals that committed a lot of eye-opening acts of indecency…

    But Stalin took over after those first few years and cleaned house…the Russian everyman was given a full education for the first time in history…the same everyman who was for centuries a ‘Krestyanin’ [Christian] meaning serf…ie an indentured laborer, in fact a SLAVE…with no education, and in fact possessing nothing more than an African tribesman [other than what the mighty Church planted in his poor head about obedience to the wealthy parasites]…read Tolstoy on this, who set up his own schools for serfs on his vast estates…

    Within a couple of decades the Soviet Union had the most educated populace in the world…a vast intellectual infrastructure that soon became the world standard and eventually put the first man in space…

    The legacy of the Soviet focus on education is the one big advantage that Russia has today, continuing to lead in high technologies and graduating four times as many engineers, per capita, as the US…

  118. @Franz

    The surplus population does produce outliers, who understand the situation at large, of their own mostly, single generation impact individuals as Assange, as Varoufakis, …of course they are stiffed. Many times even before they get to adulthood. There are even fewer generational currents, within families or groups, that transmit general understanding (within the surplus population as understood).

    In conclusion, there are more then a single impediments that suffocate any surplus population ferment. Secrecy is another one, a bright mind needs to be fed, putting toxic data into any analysis leaves but rectal extraction, a guess based on forensics of what happens in the power nucleus. The biggest culprit of severed upward mobility? Probably the lack of sophistication at the top of our system, there is no need for in depth analysis. The cycle is at the phase of taking advantage of the short term and progress consists in securing egotistic ambitions. Talent is undesirable.

    The streets in general, as always in history, are even worse in recognition of talent. A group, sub-groups of Jews in all it´s flavours bridges this by loyalty to insiders, no matter what. The pressure on the outside of their own apparently is stronger then their abhorrence (in the extreme) for their own elites. The context at large is reduced to insider advantage only, no matter what.

  119. Anonymous[247] • Disclaimer says:

    The Bolsheviks wanted a state-educated population so that they could more easily propagandize them. As Lenin said, “The illiterate person stands outside politics.” He was quite a reformer!


  120. 118.FB says: • Website

    “Stalin took over after those first few years and cleaned house”.

    It wasn’t Stalin who cleaned house. It was Stalin’s Jews who cleaned house, primarily through the Checka and the gulags which were entirely Jewish creations and run entirely by Jews. It’s true this was done under Stalin’s watch, but everyone surrounding Stalin was a Jew, including his wife. And my definition of “cleaning house’ does not include exterminating the entire middle classes and most of the clergy – both of which are historical facts not in dispute. Except, apparently by you.

    .You wrote:

    “Bela Kun from 1919 and those several months of anarchy in Hungary has NOTHING to do with Soviet communism”

    Communism was entirely (100%) a Jewish invention, starting with Karl Marx. The Jewish Bolshevik revolution in Russia was only one of many which was planned and financed by the same people. Jacob Schiff financed the revolution in Russia, but he was just obeying the call. The decision came from Europe, not the US.

    Hungary did not have “several months of anarchy”. The country suffered several years of the atrocities of Bela Kuhn before Romania invaded and drove him back to Russia where he received his orders.

    They sent Rosa Luxembourg to Germany, who succeeded in taking over the Reichstag, but who (along with her friends) was driven out and shot dead several days later. They sent Ernst Bettelheim, again with the approval and funding of the Comintern to set up an Austrian Communist Party. Bettelheim and his followers planned to seize control of the government, while Bela Kuhn sent the Hungarian army to the Austrian border, ready to invade to support these compatriots. This also was stillborn because the Austrian police discovered and arrested all of them.

    This same group sent Emma Goldman to the US. She and her compatriots managed to kill the then-US President William McKinley, but her communist revolution failed because Goldman proved to be more interested in promiscuous sex than politics. They sent huge military support to Spain, resulting in the ‘Spanish revolution’ where, as usual, the Jewish Communists carried out sickening atrocities against civilians, such as setting fire to the wives and children of Nationalist officers after dousing them with petrol. They raped nuns, tortured priests, and set fire to churches with the worshippers locked inside.

    These same Jewish Communists sent a small group of Mongols to set up the First Congress of the Mongolian People’s Party in Kyakhta, and proclaimed a Provisional Revolution Government. They formed a minuscule Mongolian army, and in 1921 this tiny force marched into Mongolia with the Bolshevik army close behind, which guaranteed a Jewish communist victory to what would have otherwise been the movement of a few hundred malcontents.

    Then they sent Gregory Voitinsky to China, but Mao didn’t buy into the Jewish Bolshevik’s plans to exterminate the middle classes and sent him packing. That is why China’s brand of “communism” was so different from that in all other countries: it wasn’t Jewish.

    I won’t bother replying to more of this nonsense, but I would suggest that readers question any statements from this “FB” source because so far I have seen no statements by this person that are factually correct.

    • Thanks: Robjil
    • Troll: FB
    • Replies: @FB
  121. @Larry Romanoff

    Thank you very kindly for this thorough and thoughtful response. I am learning a lot from you.

    I went down the 9/11 rabbit hole for many years on Twitter. If one touched the hot stove of Israeli involvement in 9/11, one would get shoahed. Your inner circle reference above would most certainly include Rabbi Dov Zakheim, Michael Chertoff, and Larry Silverstein to name a few names. Henry Kissinger would also be part of that inner circle under different but equally gruesome circumstances. My point is, then, that I respectfully disagree that we cannot name names. We must in order to recognize the level of this county’s occupation.

  122. FB says: • Website
    @Larry Romanoff

    Well…at least you’ve clarified one important point…that you cannot be taken seriously as a writer on any subject…

    …exterminating the entire middle classes and most of the clergy – both of which are historical facts not in dispute.

    That is just so insane that you are simply to be written off…’exterminating’ of any kind did not happen…in Stalin’s three decades of rule about 700,000 people were executed for various crimes, including political…that is well documented from the archives now available…

    That is the figure that is not in dispute, and the real writer Israel Shamir has written about this on this website…

    I was far too generous in my praise of your obvious diarrhea…including your ‘article’ on Covid a few days ago…

    • Troll: ploni almoni
  123. EB5318 says:

    “Hitler restricted corporate power by closing the public/private revolving door.”

    Hitler privatized the banks, corporations, railroads, utilities, etc. that had been nationalized by the Weimar Republic. His rich supporters wanted water, electric and gas utilities especially, because they produced necessities which provided steady and secure incomes for the private owners. Hitler’s ascension to head of state overthrew the democratic Weimar Republic. He was put into power and paid by the industrialists to get rid of democracy and make the government serve them instead of the greater good (much like today’s fascists are doing to the U.S.). Also, it should be noted that there was a socialist faction of the Nazi party. It was led by Ernst Rohm, who was a genuine socialist and served as a means for the Nazis to win votes from socialists. After Hitler was securely ensconced in power, he ordered Rohm and his socialist followers executed, reportedly on orders from Hitler’s banker, Hjalmar Schacht. The pretext for Rohm’s execution was his alleged homosexuality, but that had been known all along. After Rohm’s death, Nazism was pure turbo-capitalism with no sign of socialism, except for the industrialists.

    • Replies: @Malla
    , @Malla
    , @Malla
  124. 122.Beautiful Evidence says:

    “Your inner circle reference above would most certainly include Rabbi Dov Zakheim, Michael Chertoff, and Larry Silverstein to name a few names. Henry Kissinger would also be part of that inner circle under different but equally gruesome circumstances. My point is, then, that I respectfully disagree that we cannot name names. We must in order to recognize the level of this county’s occupation.”

    You are correct in your disagreement about naming names. I was attempting to communicate the difficulty of allocating specific responsibility for events. As an example, the CIA’s MK-ULTRA program that devastated millions of lives in the most horrid human experimentation, seems to have been entirely a Jewish program led by Sydney Gottlieb who was a Jew. We can name him and a great many of his lieutenants (who were also all Jews) because the specific information is still available. Similarly, we can state with confidence that it was the Jew Frederick Lindemann (Lord Cherwell) who was responsible for ‘Bomber Harris’ night-time carpet-bombing of German working-class houses. We have records of Lindemann’s submission of his plan to the war cabinet urging this method and suggesting that “greater flesh-incineration-per-bomb could be achieved” that way.

    But we cannot name those men at the original meetings who decided to force onto the world both World Wars. If they maintained a roll-call, they haven’t published it. Certainly Rothschild would have been part of that group as well as the Warburgs, Sassoons, Montefioris and the list of usual suspects, but we are naming these names by deduction rather than by hard evidence. We cannot name specifically those Jewish financiers who caused the several great depressions (including those of 1893, 1929 and 2008) by instructing all US banks “You will at once retire one-third of your circulation and call in one-half of your loans.” In other words, they abruptly reduced the money supply by 33% and all bank credit by 50%, plunging the world into depression and chaos, but those commands were delivered third-hand and we have no easy way to trace those commands back to their specific origin. Again, we can be certain Rothschild was behind them, but we can quote no document to prove this.

    I believe the names you mentioned may be much too small to be included in the central cabal, similar in status to Jeffrey Epstein.

    In terms of “recognising the level of this county’s occupation”, we can do much of that. I have compiled a listing of all Jews in the US government during the recent administrations, and it is astonishing in its scope. Virtually every cabinet and senior position of consequence has been filled by a Jew for many decades and each of those representing only the apex of a pyramid which would consist entirely or largely of Jews, their control of the US government virtually total. Jewish magazines even boast about this. I can submit this listing, if Ron Unz would be interested in publishing it. Certainly it would open a few eyes.

    But once again, the individuals forming this enormously extensive public layer of Jewish control are only the ‘operatives’, those executing instructions and policy emanating from the bowels of the Synagogue of Satan in Europe. We know from whence the instructions and policy originate but, because transmission and communication are scattered through many individuals and layers, we cannot trace them to their origins except again by deduction.

    • Replies: @Beautiful Evidence
  125. Jiminy says:

    Sterilising females against their will, on the surface sounds terrible. With so many of these women poor and illiterate, how do you honestly explain the benefits to them. But ultimately did it do any harm? I can’t think of any non- western country that is in fear of extinction. Quite the opposite. Here nightly we are saturated with ads for monies to go towards saving little Mjango- only ten dollars a month. For year after year it seems never ending. They have no food, no water, no education, no future and yet still they breed and multiply like rampant rabbits.

    I’ve noticed lately though that the arabs from war- torn areas especially, when wanting asylum here always seem to have a new family in tow. At least two or three young siblings. It makes me wonder if they haven’t been told that married men with a family will be accepted before single, unattached males.

    As for sterilising people, I think there could be a monetary incentive to have a smaller family or no child at all. Just because a woman is fertile doesn’t mean she will make a great mother, for any fool can get pregnant. Unfortunately four kids to five different guys seems to be the norm these days.
    But also I don’t think that it’s just non- western countries that need more stringent birth control measures.

    • Replies: @vot tak
  126. vot tak says:

    How about sterilizing jiminys instead?

    • Replies: @Jiminy
  127. @Richard B

    they are no good at social management

    The elites have developed the tools for social management, but their large egos means that they will always overplay their hand.

    The best social management is to create a “team spirit” where everyone has an opportunity for input, and their ideas are actually implemented often enough that they believe that the large institutions are “on their side”.

    In the business world you can see this concept in action through “lean thinking” and its many variants.

    Also in the business world, lean thinking _always_ fails after a while for one very simple reason–at some point a senior executive will come along who is a sociopath and wants to rule by decree.

    The sociopath will keep the “team” talking points while implementing top-down rules.

    That is what we see in “democracies”. The elites just can’t help themselves–they have to rub the peons noses in it from time to time.

  128. Malla says:

    He was put into power and paid by the industrialists to get rid of democracy and make the government serve them instead of the greater good (much like today’s fascists are doing to the U.S.).

    Pure B.S. Contrary to the Marxist view of the National Socialists, Hitler was in no sense a tool of big business. As Henry Ashby Turner has massively documented in German Big Business and the Rise of Hitler [Oxford University Press, 1985], the great majority of business contributions before 1933 went to other political parties.

  129. Malla says:

    Hitler privatized the banks, corporations, railroads, utilities, etc. that had been nationalized by the Weimar Republic. His rich supporters wanted water, electric and gas utilities especially, because they produced necessities which provided steady and secure incomes for the private owners.

    Hitler never tired of condemning capitalism, as Brendan Simms has documented in his masterful work Hitler: Only the World Was Enough. ‘International stock exchange enslavement’, ‘profiteering’, ‘plutocracy’, ‘interest slavery’, ‘big capital’, ‘exploitative capitalism’, ‘money-grubbing capitalism’ were just a few of the epithets Hitler used to describe the system he sought to overthrow.

    The National Socialist Party’s founding manifesto, which spoke of the ‘division of profits’, the ‘breaking of rent slavery’, abolishing ‘unearned’ incomes, the ‘expansion on a large scale of old age welfare’, overturning laws that served the ‘materialistic world-order’, adopting the principle that ‘common utility precedes individual utility’, and enacting ‘a struggle without consideration against those whose activity is injurious to the general interest’. Tellingly, the latter group included ‘usurers’ alongside ‘criminals’.

    The “unalterable” 25 point 1920 program of the party proposed, among other things, “that all unearned income, and all income that does not arise from work, be abolished”; “the nationalization of all trusts”; “profit-sharing in large industries”; and “an agrarian reform in accordance with our national requirements, and the enactment of a law to expropriate the owners of any land needed for the common purpose. The abolition of ground rents, and the prohibition of all speculation in land.”

    Point 16 of the program was totally Anti Walmartian saying: “We demand … the immediate communalization of large stores which will be rented cheaply to small tradespeople.”

    Also ‘We demand the nationalization of all businesses which have been up to the present formed into companies (trusts)’. Granted, in its first five years in power, the Nazi Party actually sold off many national industries. But Hitler had to do this to raise money for the government.

    Probably the most prominent on the NSDAP’s left wing were Gregor Strasser and his brother Otto. Dr. Joseph Goebbels, later the minster for propaganda, was also an ardent socialist. Gottfried Feder, the principal author of the 20-point program, famous for his denunciations of the “tyranny of interest” became an economic planner in the government.

    Hitler had in meetings with industrialists before taking power given assurances that he was not hostile to business. The Fuhrer did not immediately assume total power. Quite the contrary, the Fuhrer headed a coalition cabinet which included leftists as well as Conservative nationalists such as Franz von Papen, the vice-chancellor.

    Adolf Hitler also said

    “Aryanism means ethical perception of work and that which we today so often hear– socialism, community spirit, common good before own good. Jewry means egoistic attitude to work and thereby mammonism and materialism, the opposite of socialism.”

    The war with Great Britain, the Fuhrer declared, was between ‘plutocratic-capitalist Britain’ and the German ‘welfare state’. Germany was fighting against the ‘capitalist war mongers of England and her satellites’ – ‘democratic warmongers and their Jewish-capitalist backers’.
    As Hitler explained, this nationalisation strategy reflected a general Nazi principle regarding private property:

    “To put it quite clearly: we have an economic programme. Point number 13 in that programme demands the nationalisation of all public companies, in other words socialisation, or what is known here as socialism… The basic principle of my Party’s economic programme should be made perfectly clear and that is the principle of authority… The good of the community takes priority over that of the individual. But the State should retain control; every owner should feel himself to be an agent of the State; it is his duty not to misuse his possessions to the detriment of the State or the interests of his fellow countrymen. That is the overriding point. The Third Reich will always retain the right to control property owners.”

    Hitler’s aim, he told his friend Otto Wagener, was to ‘convert the German Volk to socialism without simply killing off the old individualists’.

    Adolf Hitler believed that communism was yet another a Jewish-capitalist conspiracy. He spoke of the ‘intention of Jewish big capital to destroy Russia completely in order to maximize profits’. In Hitler’s view, communism, just like capitalism, was a system in which an exploitative Jewish ‘clique’ conquered a nation’s people by pitting them against each other – class against class. ‘Bolshevism is really just the general form of capitalism’, he opined.

    In a passage in Mein Kampf Adolf Hitler elaborated on this theme, suggesting that Bolshevism is a precondition of capitalist exploitation. He warned that Germany was under threat from ‘Bolshevik storm troops in the service of Jewish international finance’. He warned of ‘Marxist fighting forces, commanded by international and Jewish stock exchange capital’. He explained:

    “Jewish finance demands not only the absolute economic destruction of Germany but its complete political enslavement. The internationalisation of our German economic system, that is to say, the transference of our productive forces to the control of Jewish international finance, can be completely carried out only in a state that has been politically Bolshevised.”

    According to Adolf Hitler only National Socialism could effect ‘a complete elimination of class differences and the creation of a true socialist community.’

    One election poster in the early 1930s declared that ‘Marxism is the guardian angel of capitalism’. Another, promoting the 1940 film The Eternal Jew, portrayed a Jewish figure with coins in one hand, a whip in the other, and a hammer-and-sickle tablet tucked under his arm. As for the film itself, it castigates Jews for shunning ‘useful work’; ‘these Jews don’t want to work but barter’; ‘they welcome trade eagerly because it suits their character and natural inclination’. The narrator explains:

    “These people don’t have the idealism that ours do. With them, the egoism of the individual is not in the service of higher goals… For the Jew there’s one thing of value: money.”

    Later in the film, the narrator links so-called Jewish capitalism to communism, asserting that, ‘in the guise of selfless humanitarians’, the Jews ‘promised the masses castles in the sky, inciting them against civic order’. He continues, not-so-subtly merging capitalism with communism:

    Unrestrained personal freedom and self-indulgence for the individual. Rejection of all ideals and higher values. Submission to the basest life of material pleasures. Criticism of all that is sacred. Revolt against everything. Incitement of the young to class warfare and terrorism. It’s no accident that this doctrine of destruction of nations sprang from the Jewish mind of Karl Marx.”

    In 1944, in the depths of the war, when the military tide had long turned against the German Third Reich, he was still saying that Germany is a ‘socialist people’s state’ engaged in a struggle against the ‘Bolshevik-plutocratic world conspirators and their Jewish wire pullers’. His last will and testament, composed in a bunker in besieged Berlin in 1945, left little doubt as to the beliefs that had led him there. He railed against ‘international money and finance conspirators’ who had treated the ‘peoples of Europe’ like ‘blocks of shares’.

    Hitler even mused that Russia might soon achieve an ‘internal change’ and become an ideological ally of the National Socialists. ‘It could not be excluded that Russia’, a country which was ‘today in reality Jewish-capitalist’, would end up ‘national-anti-capitalist’. In such an event, he later predicted, Russia would abandon its internationalism and embrace ‘panslavism’.

    Russia – initially the hub of an international communist movement – eventually went the way Hitler predicted, with Stalin cultivating Russian nationalist fervour to fuel his Marxist objectives, both political and military.

    • Replies: @GeeBee
  130. Malla says:

    After Rohm’s death, Nazism was pure turbo-capitalism with no sign of socialism, except for the industrialists.

    Not true.
    The Third Reich Government’s economic policy was a combination of both, free market mixed with socialism and one of improvisation in response to the immediate situation and needs of Germany.

    The Third Reich economy cannot be described as truly a capitalist one. True enough, the forms of private ownership were preserved. The government did not nationalize the means of production, as in Soviet Russia. But the ostensible owners could not set prices on their own volition. The government made all essential decisions. The Government nominally and seemingly preserves private ownership of the means of production, and keeps the appearance of ordinary markets, prices, wages, and interest rates. These are, however, no longer entrepreneurs, but only shop managers (Betriebsführer in the terminology of the NS legislation). These shop managers are seemingly instrumental in the conduct of the enterprises entrusted to them; they buy and sell, hire and discharge workers and remunerate their services, contract debts and pay interest and amortization. But in all their activities they are bound to obey unconditionally the orders issued by the government’s supreme office of production management. This office (the Reichswirtschaftsministerium in the German Third Reich) tells the shop managers what and how to produce, at what prices and from whom to buy, at what prices and to whom to sell. It assigns every worker to his job and fixes his wages. It decrees to whom and on what terms the capitalists must entrust their funds.

    • Thanks: Mefobills
  131. Jiminy says:
    @vot tak

    That sounds painful.

    • Replies: @vot tak
  132. Saggy says: • Website
    @Larry Romanoff

    In this case, your disaffection for fake quotes is irrelevant. Netanyahu was visiting Jonathon Pollard at the Federal Correctional Institution in Butner, N.C. after failing to obtain his release from prison for disclosing US state secrets to Israel. He was recorded by the prison video and audio system as having made this departing statement to Pollard as he left the room.

    This could be a product of your imagination. I haven’t been able to find any other source. If you have one, let’s have it and I’ll eat my hat, otherwise GTFOOT.

  133. Saggy says: • Website

    Extraordinary speech, unfortunately he did not mean a word of it. After being elected he immediately brought the worst of the worst of the swamp creatures into his govt., all in the service of Israel.

  134. BEST article I’ve ever read!

  135. vot tak says:

    What? OK to do to others, but not to you? You must be a rightwinger.

  136. @Larry Romanoff

    Many, many thanks for your cogent response.

    “I believe the names you mentioned may be much too small to be included in the central cabal, similar in status to Jeffrey Epstein.” Point taken. I, too, have the tools of observation and deduction and they only take me so far. I have a firm grasp on the obvious as my dad used to say. Your writing is more precise than my informed speculation regarding what can actually be proved.

    I would be fascinated by your list of every cabinet member and senior position of consequence. Hope Ron Unz is interested as well.

    Gilad Atzmon’s recent article on Dieudonne stirred memory of this piece:
    It’s worth a look.

  137. GeeBee says:

    Very well said sir. But with the likes of this alphabet soup commenter to whom you reply, you might just as well try to talk some sense into the likes of that mendacious arch-hasbara troll Christopher Bjerknes, (author of such unutterable drivel as Adolf Hitler: Bolshevik and Zionist), who appears to have successfully lured the eternally credulous Kevin Barrett over to the dark side. You are, in short, wasting your breath on such as they. But your efforts are none the less mightily useful.

    For the fact is that such people are either, like Barrett, credulous fools, or, more commonly (and I suspect like your alphabet soup commenter here) JIDF/hasbara trolls. One thing they don’t seem to get, however, is that their schtick (is that the right Jewish word?) simply results in more and more people learning the truth, thanks to the tireless efforts of many of us – and you are a shining example – to rebut their scurrilous nonsense with factual replies.

    Therefore good friend, I can only say keep up the good work.

    • Thanks: Malla
  138. Fantastic essay is so many ways. Wonderfully informative. But what bothers me is the failure to simply name names, lots of names. This cabal of elite globalists should and must be named and identified. We need a list, at of 100 would suffice for now, but name names.

Current Commenter

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone

 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Larry Romanoff Comments via RSS
The Shaping Event of Our Modern World
Becker update V1.3.2