RSS
◄►◄❌►▲ ▼▲▼ • BNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
The piece further elaborates on the disconnect between political narratives and the harsh realities faced by many Americans. It paints a bleak picture of societal neglect, where outside the political discourse, individuals are struggling with homelessness and addiction. The author juxtaposes this grim reality with the polished, optimistic portrayal of the economy and social conditions presented by politicians and the media, highlighting a significant disparity between the political elite's rhetoric and the lived experiences of ordinary citizens.
Moreover, the article emphasizes a sense of futility in the electoral process, suggesting that regardless of who is elected, the underlying issues that plague society remain unaddressed. The author argues that both parties, while claiming to champion family values, ultimately do little to foster genuine human connections. Instead, they perpetuate systems of war and economic disparity that fracture families and communities, pointing fingers at the military-industrial complex that profits from such turmoil, thus rendering their claims hollow.
In conclusion, the author warns that as the political circus of elections unfolds, it may distract from the pressing issues that need urgent attention. The piece suggests that the upcoming election could be a turning point, where the collective frustrations of the population may lead to unforeseen consequences, challenging the scripted political narratives that have dominated American politics. The call to action seems to be a reminder for citizens to remain vigilant and critical of the political machinery, recognizing that real change requires more than just electoral participation—it necessitates a deeper examination of societal values and priorities.
## I. Introduction
A. Family values as a key topic in American elections
B. Republicans' view on gay marriage
1. Perception of gay marriage as a threat to traditional family values
2. Labeling Obama with derogatory terms regarding his support for gay marriage
## II. Political Perspectives on Family Values
A. Democratic response to Republican views
1. Assertion that personal matters are private and not governmental concerns
2. Critique of the TSA and government intrusion into personal lives
B. Democrats’ mixed messages about military involvement
1. Obama viewed as a liberal for military actions abroad
2. Use of military force framed as necessary for resource acquisition
## III. The Hypocrisy of Political Parties
A. Republicans and their stance on family values
1. Claim to cherish traditional family structures
2. Disregard for the emotional toll of war on families
B. Democrats and their inclusive rhetoric
1. Feigned support for family rights while ignoring real issues
2. Indifference to the impact of war and economic policies on families
## IV. Critique of the Political System
A. Both parties’ failure to genuinely support families
1. Indifference to human connections and emotional well-being
2. Criticism of the military-banking complex that harms families
B. The role of media in distracting the public
1. Describing the addiction to entertainment and social media
2. People’s disconnect from reality and important social issues
## V. Observations from the Outside World
A. Contrasting images of life outside the political narrative
1. Depiction of street performers and the struggles of ordinary people
2. The reality of veterans and the homeless
B. The façade of stability presented by the media
1. Claims of economic recovery and job growth
2. The dissonance between reality and media portrayals
## VI. The Illusion of Presidential Elections
A. The electoral process as a farce
1. Promises of renewal and hope that ultimately lead to the same outcomes
2. The election cycle as a distraction from real issues
B. The risk of upheaval amid political machinations
1. Potential for societal unrest due to economic disparities
2. The possibility of a chaotic election outcome
## VII. Conclusion
A. The upcoming election may challenge established narratives
B. Acknowledgment of widespread discontent and potential for change
C. The need for authentic engagement with the issues affecting families and society
---
### Summary
The article discusses the intersection of family values and American politics, particularly during election periods. It begins by illustrating how Republicans frame gay marriage as a threat to traditional family structures, labeling Obama with derogatory terms for his support of gay rights. The Democrats counter this perspective by asserting that personal matters should remain private, though they are critiqued for their own contradictions involving military actions.
Both parties are criticized for their hypocrisy—Republicans claim to value traditional families while neglecting the emotional consequences of war, and Democrats profess support for family rights while being indifferent to the impact of policies on real families. The author argues that neither party genuinely cares about the human connections that families embody.
The article transitions to observations of society outside the political discourse, highlighting the struggles of everyday people, veterans, and the homeless. This stark reality contrasts with the media's portrayal of economic recovery and stability.
Furthermore, the author views the presidential election as a farcical process that offers false hope while perpetuating the same issues. There’s a warning that growing discontent, if unchecked, could lead to societal upheaval.
In conclusion, the article emphasizes the need for genuine attention to the issues affecting families and a move away from the superficial narratives perpetuated by political systems.
If family values are in the news, you can be sure an American election is just around the corner. According to Republicans, gay marriage is a glory hole puncturing the sanctity of the nuke-clear family, so for backing such a ghastly proposal, with ring, no less, Obama is the “gayest president,” according to Rand Paul, or “The First Gay President,” per Newsweek. Anything to sell that particularly brand of rectum tissues, I suppose, although I’d rather use corn cobs.
Countering, Democrats will huff that the travails of their dead battery, soft spot, touching turmoil or whatever it is that’s inside their boxer’s shorts or panties is no one’s business, least of all the government, though of course the Democrat-appointed Janet Napolitano and her TSA hordes have set up an enduring base next to their exposed, uh, discount toys. Irradiated and propped up by Cialis, they don’t look half bad. Oh yes, they do.
According to Democrats, Obama is a good liberal because he will also send gay men and women worldwide to massacre whoever gets in the way of the oil liberals need to drive their SUVs to anti-war rallies.
According to Republicans, Mitt is a good conservative since he can’t stand Ellen DeGeneres, Johnny Weir or Barney the Dinosaur, although he will condemn a husband or wife halfway across the globe to commit unspeakable acts for years, while the remaining spouse languishes at home in anxiety and loneliness, to be comforted by some groggy chick at the bar, talk radio, a young cable guy, Jesus, reruns of American Idol or, in the best case scenario, nothing at all.
Republican politicians pretend to cherish the traditional family, while their Democratic counterparts feign that everyone should have a right to a family, but in fact neither side cares about anyone’s family, because they are indifferent if not hostile to human connections, period. Propped up by our military-banking complex, both parties support a bankrupting and bankrupted banking system and an endless war policy that destroy families worldwide, including here.
On top of that, they’ve tricked you into being plugged to their various brainwashing machines all day long, so that you’re divorced from your very self, honey. Outside, birds, sunshine and mounds of corpses your tax money murdered, though you wouldn’t know it, because you’re addicted to songs you’ve heard for the billionth time, each, as well as Snookie updates, pixelated pussies, cocks and boxscores.
Outside, a busking violinist says that his life is easier now, since there are so many out-of-business stores he can play in front of, without being shooed away. Outside, a person, male or female, it’s not clear, poses as a horse for tips, as a real horse looks on. Outside, a Vietnam vet drinks mouthwash to get high, while an Iraq vet shows his discharge paper to prove that he is a genuine, disposable piece of fodder, and not just an ordinary panhandler. A pint of Listerine with 21.6% alcohol costs $4.50, compared to a 24 oz., tallboy can of Natural Ice at $1.49, with 5.9 % alcohol, so Listerine is a much, much better value. It’s not exactly Jameson, true, but a few gulps will get you buzzed for maybe five hours, especially on an empty stomach. Plus, it will give you kissable breath. Outside, a man sells Newport cigarettes, “Two for a dollar, two for a dollar. Who’s next? How are you today? Very good to see you. Welcome back, it’s happy Monday. Time to go to work! It’s a beautiful day today, but don’t get used to it. It’s going to rain tomorrow! We all have our own cross to bear, ladies and gentlemen. My, aren’t you lovely today! Yes, you! Welcome back!” If he sells the entire pack in an hour, he will make $3.50. Outside, a man drains a leftover soda fished from a trash can in a well-manicured downtown plaza surrounded by bank skyscrapers.
But inside the screen, and thus inside your mind, all is well, stable and sexy. The recovery is on track, unemployment is steadily going down, and new college graduates are entering an improving job market, with multiple offers even. Inside the screen, what happens in Europe stays in Europe, Detroit is back, California is still the land of milk and honey and, soon enough, we will be amped up by orations of hope, change, forward, believe in America, let America be America and, yes, America can!
In this land of peeling yet persistent illusions, none is more farcical than the Presidential election, for even as it promises renewal, common purpose, focus and hope, and demands a collective soul searching, even, this elaborate and drawn out ritual will deliver nothing more than a new (or renewed) apologist for the same set of crimes against humanity, country and you. If there’s any good to this coming circus, it’s that the empire seems determined to maintain a relative peace until the electoral shenanigans are over. Though it’s itching for new rounds of shock and awesome, y’all, because that’s how it makes its money, it doesn’t want to tip this tottering economy into the mother of all ditches, not when citizens are somewhat focused on how to correct or improve our common lot.
If enough machinists, PhDs and war veterans dumpster dive and share a honey bucket, if whores dally in middle-class suburbs and gas goes to 6 bucks, for example, the country will explode from sea to shining sea, and not just because of well-placed FBI agents. With events quickly spiraling out of control, this election may not go as choreographed, family values be damned.
English
Arabic
Chinese (Simplified)
Dutch
French
German
Hebrew
Hindi
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Russian
Spanish
Swedish
Turkish
Vietnamese