The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 PodcastsKevin Barrett Archive
Will the West’s Suicide Bring World Peace?
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

In The Grand Chessboard, Zbigniew Brzezinski speculated about the American unipolar hegemon’s ultimate geostrategic nightmare: “a new ‘antihegemonic’ coalition, formed around the three powers with the greatest geopolitical stake in reducing America’s primacy in Eurasia.” Those three powers, of course, are Russia, China, and Iran. Such a development, Brzezinski observed, would “bring together the world’s leading Slavic power, the world’s most militant Islamic power, and the world’s most populated and powerful Asian power, thereby creating a potent coalition.”

Such an alliance would require “a renewal of the bilateral Sino-Russian connection, capitalizing on the resentment among the political elites of both states over the emergence of America as the only global superpower.” That seemed unlikely when Brzezinski was writing in 1997 because, as he put it, such a coalition could only develop if the US were stupid enough to antagonize all three nations simultaneously.

Brzezinski should have known never to underestimate the stupidity of American foreign policy elites. As I write this in late July 2022 (Dhu’l-Hijjah 1443 AH) the neocon-led west is committing strategic suicide by doing exactly what Brzezinski warned against: not just antagonizing, but massively antagonizing Russia, China, and Iran all at once. The inevitable result will be the collapse of American pretensions to global leadership, sooner rather than later.

The US under Donald Trump blew up whatever shred of credibility it had with Tehran by tearing up the JCPOA and assassinating Gen. Qassem Soleimani after luring him to Baghdad with a fake peace offer. Moving the US embassy to occupied Jerusalem/al-Quds, deeming Israeli land-theft legitimate, and sponsoring the anti-Iran anti-Palestine Shaitan Accords (misnamed the “Abraham Accords” in a horrific insult to sayyidna Ibrahim alaihi as-salaam) was just the icing on the cake. After those actions, Iran had no choice but to face the reality that the US is, as the Russians say, non-agreement-capable.

Around the same time the US attacked Wuhan with COVID-19, inadvertently (?) unleashing a global pandemic. This came on the heels of suspected American bio-attacks on China in 2017 and 2018 that decimated the Chinese meat supply in the midst of Trump’s red-hot trade war. Immediately after exploding out of Wuhan, COVID suspiciously jumped 3600 miles to Qom, disproportionately infecting Iran’s political and clerical leadership just weeks after the US had murdered Gen. Soleimani. The Rahbar, Imam Sayyid Ali Khamenei all but accused the US of perpetrating a biological attack, and Iran formally complained to the United Nations.

The US COVID bio-attack on Wuhan and Qom was presumably designed to be blamed on China in order to foster anti-Chinese hysteria and trigger the supply-chain decoupling that would be necessary during the lead-up to military escalation. Though elements of China’s leadership dropped many hints that they knew the score, Beijing apparently calculated that playing coy as the pandemic “returned to sender” was wiser than launching formal accusations and sparking domestic outrage that could force a premature hot war.

While angering China and Iran with such reckless mistreatment, the US would have been well-advised to play nice with Russia. Instead, the neocons did the exact opposite: They orchestrated the 2022 war on Russia through Ukraine. After installing a neocon-run puppet government in the 2014 Maidan coup, the US built a huge NATO-armed-and-trained “Ukrainian” army—and, in early 2022, sent it to attack the Donbass and Crimea. Russia’s pleas to respect the Minsk Accords and negotiate limits on NATO expansion were brutally rebuffed as US-Ukrainian biological warfare labs on Russia’s borders ramped up their suspicious activities. All of this was intended to trigger a pre-emptive Russian invasion of Ukraine, and it succeeded.

To win its proxy war on Russia, the US needs to isolate Moscow. To that end it slapped sanctions on Russian energy, banking, and raw materials. Washington’s obsequious European vassals meekly obeyed, depriving themselves of Russian natural gas and thereby committing economic suicide. But most of the world is defying the sanctions, and China and Iran are leading the way. As the US propaganda service Radio Free Europe recently whined, “China’s growing appetite for discounted Russian oil has made it the leading financier of the Kremlin’s war in Ukraine by giving Moscow a reliable revenue source that blunts the impact of tough Western sanctions against its economy.” (Why would China kowtow to US orders even as Biden breaks with US policy and announces his readiness to go to war with China over Taiwan, which the US has officially deemed a province of China for half a century?)

Meanwhile the Rahbar of Iran brought Russian President Putin and Turkish President Erdogan to Tehran on July 19 to plan the eviction of the US from Syria while forging a Eurasian partnership that will eventually see all three nations working with China to build an alternative non-US-authorized trade and security order. According to al-Jazeera “The two leaders (Imam Khamenei and Putin) also reportedly discussed bilateral relations and gradually removing the US dollar from bilateral trade.” By accelerating the erosion of the dollar as global reserve currency, Russia and Iran, along with China and other Eurasian partners in the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, will undercut Washington’s ability to print the unlimited currency it uses to finance its military occupation of much of the world.

Also at the Tehran conference, Russia announced its investment of \$40 billion in developing Iranian gas and oil fields, while the two leaders jointly agreed to proceed with plans for enlarging Russia-Iran-China joint military exercises (which are already happening around the world including in Latin America, Washington’s “Monroe Doctrine” backyard). The multipolar alliance’s move into Central and South America has been facilitated by a wave of left-wing election victories empowering Latin leaders who never much cared for US dominance of their half of the hemisphere.

And even as Turkey was joining Russia and Iran in Tehran in a pointed rebuke to Biden’s visits to Tel Aviv and Riyadh, Pakistan’s Imran Khan won a smashing election victory in Punjab, signaling the Pakistani people’s refusal to accept the US-IMF coup that deposed Khan in April. Other Central Asian nations are also leaning toward the new multipolar axis based on the Russia-China-Iran tripartite alliance.

These developments, together with Russia’s victory over the US in Ukraine, suggest that the “new American century” has ended 78 years early. The boundless arrogance of America’s neocons, who seized power in their 9/11/2001 coup d’état and proceeded to squander America’s soft and hard power in a series of ill-advised adventures, has created the very nightmare scenario that all serious strategic thinkers, including Brzezinski, had insisted on avoiding at all costs.

Ironically, the Americans may be inadvertently preparing the groundwork for world peace even as they blunderingly bestride the globe waging bloody, counterproductive wars. By forcing Eurasia to unite both commercially and militarily, the US may have accidentally created the conditions for a more stable world order. Eurasia, after all, is the center of the “grand chessboard” and ground zero in the competition for land and resources that tends to erupt into war. As Eurasian nations band together into an anti-American alliance, they may be forging enduring ties that will eventually facilitate the emergence of more peaceful world bound by economic, intellectual, and spiritual exchange rather than military competition and plunder.

(Republished from Substack by permission of author or representative)
Hide 18 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. That is weird! Seems America has lost The Second Cold War.

  2. God (Allah) is the Shaytan’s boss. If God didn’t want all this amount of unbelievable utterly stupid suffering he could simply pull Shaytan’s plug. But he doesn’t pull it. Therefore all pain, all suffering, all insanity is God’s.

    And you wonder why people hate middle eastern religions? The NWO, like it or not, is simply the very most justified reaction to this utterly utterly mind-**ffing insanity.

    • Replies: @ivegotrythm
  3. The US under Donald Trump blew up whatever shred of credibility it had with Tehran by tearing up the JCPOA and assassinating Gen. Qassem Soleimani after luring him to Baghdad with a fake peace offer.

    This murder, more than numerous other fuckups, soured me on Trump. Just an awful act, surely done to satisfy neocon blood lust.

    Karma is a bitch and the nose has a LOT of karma heading their way.

  4. Yes, the fall of the West will bring world peace. Because we know Eastern, Asian, African, “Latin American”, and Muslim nations have never fought idiotic wars against each other. All those little dusky persons just held hands and sang happy songs.

  5. Let´s not get overboard shall we … as the great Moltke observed

    “Eternal peace is a dream – and not a pretty one.”

    That said, the US started north of 80% of all wars – in absolute numbers well
    over 200 – since WWII, most of which made no sense whatsoever except
    (((shareholder value))); so yes, the comparative outbreak of peace will be almost unbearable.

  6. @Chris Mallory

    It’s not that other nations are never aggressive…’s that jewish influence has been the major cause of most of the wars in the last 100 years.

    Because of the bloodthirsty neocon assholes we destroyed most of the ME.

    So, yeah, the downfall of the jewish led MIC would surely be a great start to having peace on this earth.

    As long as the small hats are “repairing the world,” the world is in a lot of trouble.

    • Agree: Female in FL, lavoisier
  7. Notsofast says:

    to call brzezinski a “serious strategic thinker” is perpetuate the neocon myth. this meatheaded polack is the spiritual grandfather of all neocons idiots and wahhabist headchopping terrorists. he couldn’t think his way out of a paper bag and relied exclusively on dirty tricks, mass murder and false flags to advance his greedy, nazi agenda. i will never forgive jimmy carter for unleashing despicable sociopathic serial killer on the world and ushering in the age of the neocon. even today we have his bubbleheaded, bleachblond media whore daughter, chirping away in the mockingbird media and his even dumber, even more meatheaded son as our ambassador to poland, encouraging his meatheaded kinsman to fight to the last stupid fuckin polack standing.

    on the bright side of things, the utter incompetence of all neocons has lead to the collapse of their thousand year reich, so in the end, i guess we have the old demon to thank for his and all neocon stupidity, that will lead to the birth of a new world.

    • Agree: MarkU
    • Replies: @Tony Hall
    , @RobinG
  8. Tony Hall says:

    Given the timing of his transfer from the British secret service to its US offshoot, I developed the view that Bernard Lewis was probably Brzezinski’s main handler. It was Lewis who oversaw in 1979 the great plunge of the Zio-American empire into British-style imperial Orientalism. I also suspect Lewis was the great fiction writer of the initiating and early events of the Global War on Terror. Lewis, it seems to me, quite likely wrote much of the text misattributed to bin Laden after 9/11. And Lewis may have charted out the elaborate al-Qaeda history of ideas and action in the clever combination of truth and fiction outlined in particular detail in Lawrence Wright’s The Looming Tower.

  9. The Jews want revenge for The Holocaust. And, they will do anything to get it.

    • LOL: Legba
    • Replies: @Robert Dolan
  10. Franz says:

    The US under Donald Trump…

    Was it really?

    I ask in all seriousness.

    A current article raises a point, I think bearing hard on the topic of discussion, that what Trump stands for might be a lot more dangerous than what Trump is or may have been.

    “I think it’s because, while Trump’s core MAGA agenda is decidedly not outside the historic bipartisan mainstream, it is well outside the present regime’s core interests. Our rulers’ wealth and power rise with open borders, trade giveaways, and endless war. Trump, at least in principle, and often in practice, threatens all three. The old America—the one in which Republicans cared about the heartland and weren’t solely valets to corporate power, Democrats were pro-worker and anti-war, and Bill Clinton and The New York Times could advocate border security—is in the process of being replaced, if it hasn’t already been, by one in which there is only one acceptable opinion on not just these, but all other issues..”

    This is the key. Trump himself will never matter. It’s the reason Trump inspired voters and later the MAGA hat crowd.

    Michael Anton’s information agrees with mine: American, Brits, Canuks, etc, don’t actually have “leaders”. We have a highly paid pack of demolition experts who aim to keep money flowing outward — via war or peace — our population altered and our national life degraded. By even implying something else, Trump opened a dangerous area of thought.

    Keep in mind totalitarians want some thing unmentionable so they become unthinkable. If you can’t think of anything but the present disaster zone the West once was, you won’t.

    I don’t for a minute believe Trump himself could have done anything. Zion told the Trump administration what to do. Knowing nothing better to do, Zion got what it wanted. Not since Lyndon Johnson has any president not kowtowed to Israel. Carter was humiliated his last two years for only complaining.

    • Replies: @Legba
  11. Legba says:

    Is that the same ‘ Lyndon Johnson ‘ as the one who was complicit in the Jew attack on the USS Liberty?

    • Replies: @Franz
  12. It’s too perfect to be attributed to stupidity. If our rulers were merely stupid there would be an element of randomness to their actions. They would do sort of stupid things, stupid things, seriously stupid things and meaningless things along with occasional things that are not stupid. Like with the stopped clock.

    But everything they do is exactly wrong and extremely stupid. Unless their simple single objective is to reduce the human population of planet Earth. Causing war famine and disease then does not seem so stupid.

    I don’t think the WEF wants nuclear war. It might fuck up their plans. I also think that Russia, China and Iran are working AGAINST the WEF. Therein lies our hope. The people who own and operate the “West” want to kill most of us and enslave the rest. They must be destroyed.

  13. @Chris Mallory

    Yes, the fall of the West will bring world peace. Because we know Eastern, Asian, African, “Latin American”, and Muslim nations have never fought idiotic wars against each other. All those little dusky persons just held hands and sang happy songs.

    Let me slightly rephrase your “logic”, mutt.

    >”Will the riddance of black population bring safe neighborhood?”
    >”Yes. Because we know huwhite people have never commit savage crimes against each other. All those little huwhite persons just held hands and sang happy songs.”

    Amiright, mutt?

  14. Franz says:

    Is that the same ‘ Lyndon Johnson ‘ as the one who was complicit in the Jew attack on the USS Liberty?

    Yes. Probably should read “Not since Harry Truman” but he took the Big Bribe of 1948 so…

    Maybe all of them. At least Jimmy Carter and Richard Nixon had the stones to badmouth them. A small thing, but not nothing.

    • Agree: Kolya Krassotkin
  15. RobinG says:

    Thanks for reminding how much damage sweet ol’ Jimmy did in his brief reign. The Carter Doctrine is priceless.

  16. @Psychotic Break

    What would “pulling Shaytan’s plug” do to you?

Current Commenter

Leave a Reply -

 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Kevin Barrett Comments via RSS
How America was neoconned into World War IV
The “war hero” candidate buried information about POWs left behind in Vietnam.
What Was John McCain's True Wartime Record in Vietnam?
The Shaping Event of Our Modern World
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement
The Surprising Elements of Talmudic Judaism