The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 PodcastsKevin Barrett Archive
To Denazify Ukraine, Russia (And Americans) Must Denazify USA
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Video Link

One of the most important stories we covered on this week’s False Flag Weekly News was Scott Ritter’s postmortem on phase one of Russia’s Special Military Operation in the Ukraine. As Ritter writes, and the mainstream media admits, Russia is close to achieving its first aim, the complete liberation of the Donbass.

The next phase, “denazification and demilitarization,” will be more difficult. Ritter:

Denazification…has an important political component that, at the moment, is not being addressed by Russia’s military operation, namely the continued existence of Ukraine’s far-right and neo-Nazi political parties at a time when all other political activity has been shut down under martial law.

If anything, the “Nazification” of Ukrainian political life has expanded exponentially since Russia’s invasion, with Ukraine more under the influence of the ideology of Stepan Bandera, the Ukrainian nationalist whose followers killed hundreds of thousands of Jews, Gypsies, Poles, and Russians while fighting alongside Nazi Germany in World War Two…

True denazification, in my view, would require Russia to remove the Zelensky government from power and replace it with a new political leadership that will aggressively sustain the Russian objective of an eradication neo-Nazi ideology in Ukraine. So far there is no indication that that is a Russian objective.

Ritter’s point is well taken. But I would argue that Russia’s real problem is not so much the nazified Ukraine as the nazified USA. It was, after all, the US secret services that rescued Ukrainian and other nazis after World War II and weaponized them against Russia. And it was the US government that sponsored the 2014 Maidan coup that installed US-trained neo-nazis as the real power behind Ukraine’s sham democracy.

Many readers will no doubt object that Ukraine’s various ultra-nationalist Russophobic sects are not carbon copies of the Hitler-era German Nazi party; and that the USA, far from being Nazified, is dominated by ethnic Jews and by a fanatical anti-Nazi ideology that demonizes Hitler and worships the Holocaust. For these readers, Putin’s calls to denazify Ukraine are dubious, and my call to denazify America must sound ridiculous.

So let’s define our terms. I am obviously not asserting that more than 10% of Ukrainians, or more than 1% of Americans, are in love with Adolf Hitler. I’m using the word nazi with a small n (as distinguished from the German big-N Nazis under Hitler) to denote a certain family resemblance, not an absolute identity.

In Ukraine, that family resemblance is obvious. Many Ukrainian neo-Nazi groups, including the West’s beloved Azov Brigade, do lionize Hitler, brandish swastikas, and goose step around as if they were auditioning for minor roles in a remake of The Producers. Additionally, a considerable portion of the 55% of Ukrainians whose mother tongue is Ukrainian (and perhaps even a few among the 45% who speak Russian) have caught the ultra-nationalist Russophobic bug from the Azov nazis. These people now hate all things Russian with what one might call naziesque fanaticism.

But the US government, which basically manufactured the entire Ukrainian neo-nazi phenomenon (in the same way it manufactured “Islamic extremism,” by spending enormous amounts of money and effort using people’s genuine grievances and traditional hatreds as a lever to incite them to lunacy) does not look nazi. Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, Anthony Blinken, the Kagan family, and other shapers of US Ukraine policy don’t goose-step around waving swastikas.

In the USA, unlike in Ukraine, the nazi element is well-hidden. To locate it, we need to unpack the political philosophy of neoconservatism, which is, in fact, a predominantly Jewish brand of neo-nazism.

Anyone who says Jews can’t be nazis (as is often said of Zelensky) must not have heard of Leo Strauss, the founder of neoconservatism. Strauss, as his most able explicator Shadia Drury explains, was the top student of the leading German Nazi philosopher, Carl Schmitt, who taught that politics is the science of enmity, consisting of uniting people in hatred of an internal or external foe. Schmitt taught that politicians should whip up hatreds of real, fabricated, or imaginary enemies, while using crises as excuses to suspend civil liberties and take drastic measures that people would otherwise never accept.

As I wrote in Questioning the War on Terror:

The neoconservatives are cult followers of Leo Strauss, the University of Chicago philosophy professor who died in 1973. Strauss, a German Jew, was the top student of leading Nazi philosopher Carl Schmitt. Schmitt argued that leaders (like Hitler, and later Bush) are above the law; that all politics is based on scapegoating enemies; that “domestic enemies” (Jews in Germany, Arab/Muslims in America) are legitimate targets; that killing enemies is a very good thing and that moral considerations don’t apply, so the mass killing of “enemies” can be engaged in guilt-free. And enemies are so indispensable that if they don’t exist, a suitable one must be manufactured.

Strauss was even more extremist than Schmitt. He glorified killing and enmity even more than Schmitt had, then added the doctrine of the “noble lie.” Strauss borrowed this idea from Plato, who had argued that a lie that strengthens the nation, and expresses a deeper truth, is a good, noble thing; and from Nietzsche, who claimed that there is no truth, so truth is darkness—the destruction of illusions—rather than light. “Instead of descending into the cave with knowledge of the sunny truth, (Strauss) believes that the role of the philosopher is to manipulate the images in the cave. He teaches that philosophers must fabricate lies for the many while embracing the darkness for themselves. Unwittingly, Strauss cultivates an unprincipled elite whose lies are intended for others and not for themselves.”

Strauss was so fanatical in his insistence that the power elite must lie to the people that he turned the story of Socrates upside-down. For Strauss, Socrates is a villain, not a hero. Strauss taught that Socrates deserved to die, because he had committed the one unpardonable crime: he told the truth in public. Strauss actually applauds the murder of Socrates! According to leading neocon critic Shadia Drury, Strauss believed the strong should tyrannize the rest: “Those who are fit to rule are those who realize there is no morality and that there is only one natural right, the right of the superior to rule over the inferior.”

Neocon Straussians not only advocate the Noble Lie, they support what might be called the Noble Big Lie. The Big Lie was famously described by Hitler:

“They followed the very correct principle, that in the greatness of the lie there is always a certain potency of believability, because the broad masses of people are sooner corrupted in their inmost hearts than they are consciously or intentionally bad; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their nature, they more easily fall victims to the big lie than the small one, since they themselves sometimes tell little fibs, but would be too ashamed to tell great lies. Such falsehoods do not even occur to them, so they cannot believe others capable of the colossal impudence of these most scandalous distortions. Even when faced with the facts in such a case, they will still linger in doubt and waver and continue to suppose that there must be some truth to it.”

For the neocons, the bigger the lie, the more noble. “After all, a great lie, one that is believed, gives form to the void, imposes order on chaos, and creates the world ex nihilo.”

9/11, of course, was the ultimate neocon big lie. The neocons blew up the World Trade Center, inflicted trauma-based mind-control on the American people, and created a “state of exception” that overthrew the Constitution in favor of a permanent war against an abstract noun. They attempted to unite the West with Israel in hatred of Islam and Muslims, and to a significant extent they succeeded.

Today, the same neocons, give or take a few, are responsible for war in Ukraine, which began with the 2014 Maidan coup d’état—the Ukrainian 9/11-Reichstag Fire. The neocon operators spent billions of dollars overthrowing a democratic government and brainwashing Ukrainians to unite in hatred of both an external enemy (Russia) and an internal enemy (the 45% of Ukrainians who speak Russian).

Now the neocons are trying to unite not just Ukraine but the entire West in hatred of Russia. They are shamlessly brandishing big lies, with the legends of the Ghost of Kiev and the Foul-Mouthed Martyrs of Snake Island being the two best-known concrete examples, while the talking points “Russia is losing” and “Russia is deliberately committing large-scale war crimes” also qualifying. And they are squeezing Europe dry in service to their plan to destroy Russia, then move on to finish off China. The tsunamis of lies and hatred unleashed by the neocons will be difficult to stop before they wash away what passes for modern civilization.

Since the neocons are the real nazis, Russia’s goal of “denazifying Ukraine” is too limited. The nazis the Russians are really fighting are in Washington, DC and other big American metropolises. And getting rid of them shouldn’t be Russia’s job. The American people need to overthrow the neocons and denazify their own country—before the Russians are left with no choice but to do it with nuclear warheads.

(Republished from Substack by permission of author or representative)
• Category: Foreign Policy • Tags: Joe Biden, Neo-Nazis, Neocons, Russia, Ukraine 
Hide 13 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. Biff says:

    Well, if you read threw the Nazi platform and the Zionist platform they pretty much rhyme starting with “an ethnically cleansed homeland/fatherland for the chosen people”.

    • Replies: @Kevin Barrett
  2. @Biff

    That’s true. And they both want to get the Jews out of Europe.

  3. lloyd says: • Website

    I can’t help noticing parallels with 1939. Hitler lured into attacking Poland after genocidal attacks on German civilians by Polish militias, the gas masking of the entire London population, the press gas lighting of the lead up to the German invasion of Poland. To this day, few know the full story. The demonisation of Putin as next Hitler. It shows distinct lack of imagination by the Zionists. They are not as clever as they once were. They are more like moronic generals fighting the last war. Have the clever Jews abandoned them in disgust?

  4. Of course Jews can be Nazis and a lot of them are. Have not heard of Leo Strauss, nonetheless. His ideas are pure Satanism.

    And there are Jewish Nazis. There even was Jewish Hitler – rabbi Meir Kahane. His book makes Mein Kampf look innocent.

    The problem is not in Ukraine alone, that’s not a question. Now the same kind of mental disorder is spreading in Poland, Finland, Baltic states and even in Serbia.

    Now the Finns are deranged and so are the Poles, the NGO network is working hard and it’s efficient. Small peoples are susceptible to this poison, like children.

  5. The use of hate as an incentivizer and motivator is a defining characteristic of fascism in its many forms including Zionist and Americanism. Hatred and demonization of individuals and groups exploits long-standing prejudices in a cultural group and the needs of the powerless for power. Hitler did not invent antisemitism; he exploited it. Biden did not invent Russophobia or Sinophobia but he and his party exploit them, as others have before them. In the end though this state of the public mind leads to a meltdown. The US is finished already. It just doesn’t know it yet.

  6. The Jews used Hitler to help create the state of Israel. Without Hitler Israel would never have come into existence.

    • Agree: Ann Nonny Mouse
    • Disagree: follyofwar
    • Replies: @BuelahMan
  7. BuelahMan says:
    @Jim Richard

    I would use Biden to send them all away, if I could. Madagascar, Israel, or Timbuktu.

    The Balfour Declaration was written in 1917 (and talk of Israel was around long before then).

    All this comparing “nazis” simply bolsters the jewish victimhood mantra. It is so easy to use the Nazi card, especially when so many people are so hoodwinked by the jews’ incessant propaganda.

    • Replies: @Ann Nonny Mouse
  8. Tony says:

    Nigga you crazy. Its good too many people dont read you. Youre out of you mind.

  9. @BuelahMan

    To send them all away is stupid. Don’t impose them on others. Make BDS official and they will simply disappear.

    Neturei Karta, the Orthodox Jews, is explicit that Israel has no right to exist. Make the sanctioning of Israel official in USA and Europe and Israel will, peacefully, cease to exist within a few weeks.

    And when Israel has ceased to exist its genocidal nature will be able to be discussed more openly and suddenly, 99.99999 percent of the world’s Jews will be horrified at the evil of Judaism, will abandon it.

    Also impose a tax on interest-free loans taken out by corporations and there will be no more billionaire Jews pulling the strings.

    • Replies: @BuelahMan
  10. JackOH says:

    I’m using the word nazi with a small n (as distinguished from the German big-N Nazis under Hitler) to denote a certain family resemblance, not an absolute identity.

    True dat. I heard a very bright university prof claim that hyper-utilitarianism was a key feature of big-N Nazis.

    At first I dismissed his characterization as the usual polysyllabic mumbo-jumbo university profs are fond of. Then I thought of the early Nazis, the true believers, who fell out with Hitler when they saw he was using their sincere convictions to achieve power with reckless disregard for consequences.

    So, yeah, I think small-n nazi might be a useful way of referring to policies and political movements where “reckless disregard for consequences” are something of a built-in.

  11. bert33 says:

    Yes but can the ukranian jewish neonazis even be true to form or is there so much self-loathing now baked in that they’re mainly a bunch of gussied-up idiots dropping munitions on civilians for lack of a better target than maybe themselves? Zelensky’s all but done and hi army nazi or no is pretty much finished and good riddance. russia will eventually publish a report of their findings including the illegal germ lab stuff. If israel does turn out to be materially involved there will likely be a reckoning with the international community, and not in their favor.

  12. BuelahMan says:
    @Ann Nonny Mouse

    I have to disagree. Because they have never been sent anywhere else (at least since Adolf’s desire), they now run rampant in control. Give them just a little leeway and look what happens.

Current Commenter

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone

 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Kevin Barrett Comments via RSS
The Surprising Elements of Talmudic Judaism
Becker update V1.3.2