At a National Press Club event in Washington DC yesterday, March 14, retired federal agent and whistleblower Karl Golovin asked Seymour Hersh pointed questions about Nordstream, 9/11, and WTC-7, and then handed Hersh a copy of Laurent Guyenot’s book The Unspoken Kennedy Truth, which blames Israel for JFK’s assassination.
Golovin’s question referenced Tucker Carlson’s recent comments about WTC-7 on the show REDACTED. In the above interview Golovin discusses driving across the Nevada desert with Tucker Carlson in 2008 and trying to convince Carlson to investigate 9/11.
Karl Golovin retired in 2007 as a Special Agent of the U.S. Customs Service (by then known as DHS/ICE). In November 2001, while working in the U.S. Customs Service’s Office of Internal Affairs, Golovin was among USCS/IA agents assigned duties at Ground Zero and Fresh Kils Landfill, including sifting the rubble of WTC-7.
Golovin served as Security Director of the Ron Paul 2008 Presidential Campaign.

Maybe Sy Hersh knows the truth about 9/11 et al, and simply doesn’t want to get JFK’d himself. It might explain the denial, or it might not.
It’s clear (from bits & snatches of all the interviews he’s done lately) that Sy knows much more than he dare say. Take away from Tuesday night: for the health of his source, he will NOT follow up on his Nord Stream article.
Meanwhile in Pakistan, great shot of Imran Khan with tear gas cannisters.
https://geopoliticaleconomy.com/2023/03/15/pakistan-coup-regime-arrest-imran-khan/
I have little doubt that Hersh knows the truth about 9/11 but I suspect that he knows the potential consequences of revealing Israel’s participation and I think, like so many others like Chomsky they have a visceral/tribal loyalty to the Jewish state.
Remember when an investigator of the murder of Seth Rich recorded a conversation with Hersh in which Hersh hinted that it was not a robbery and that he knew more about it. Hersh immediately renounced his comments and never said another word after the conversation was made public. He knows when the reporting of “news” results in termination with extreme prejudice.
Still no Dallas Cowboys at the Alamo.
When “SPECIFICALLY” do the “PROSELYTES” to Talmudic Judaism from the
land of Gog & Magog turn into the… ” Children of Israel “…in the Old Testament….
700 years after the Crucifying of Christ.
No {{{{JEWS}}}} in the Old Testament.
What ….Where…When…How…?….The Synagogue Of Satan…?
https://www.palestine-encyclopedia.com/
More must reads from Laurent Guyenot:
JFK-9/11: 50 Years of Deep State
Our God is Your God Too, But He Has Chosen Us: Essays on Jewish Power
From Yahweh to Zion: Jealous God, Chosen People, Promised Land…Clash of Civilizations
If a fed doesn’t know CIA whacked Kennedy, he’s a moron. More likely he’s still on the job, moonlighting at limited hangout.
Izzies can and do pitch in and help, but they ultimately depend on CIA impunity. For everything they do. You want to fuck the Izzies? Demolish CIA.
Chomsky may feel visceral loyalty to Israel, but I doubt Hersh does. Either way, the two cases are different. Chomsky is a public intellectual who sounds off about a broad range of issues, especially those related to US empire, but doesn’t do much original research or reporting. So 9/11 was in his bailiwick, and indeed he published the most influential (unfortunately) early book on the subject, gaslighting and misleading the entire Western left, and obstructing justice so blatantly that he ought to be arrested and charged. https://kevinbarrett.substack.com/p/why-chomsky-is-wrong-about-911
Hersh is an investigative reporter who focuses narrowly on each issue that he’s working on. He does in-depth original research and breaks stories, but doesn’t voice opinions on other issues. Since citizen investigators have already broken the 9/11 story, he won’t go there unless some deep state source gives him something monumental. (As may have happened with the JFK documents he mentions in his response to Karl Golovin.)
Long story short, there’s no evidence I’m aware of that Hersh is covering for Israel, whereas with Chomsky there is a fair bit of circumstantial evidence.
Here’s a link to that quite interesting interview of Tucker Carlson on Redacted News with Clayton Morris. It provides insights into Tucker’s character and evolution.
Tucker Carlson: The truth needs to come out
https://rumble.com/v2cotn2-tucker-carlson-the-truth-needs-to-come-out.html
I would disagree with Tucker on one point. January 6 was like 9/11. They were both false flag events orchestrated by the “Deep State” to further specific objectives. In the case of 9/11 it was to drag American blood and treasure into Israel’s wars.
War Profiteers and 9/11
https://warprofiteerstory.blogspot.com/p/war-profiteers-and-911.html
In the case of 1/6 it was to sabotage a presidential candidate who did not believe the official 9/11 story.
Donald Trump Calls Into WWOR/UPN 9 News on 9/11
It seems to me an effective way to introduce the fraud of 9/11 is to begin with the fact that the official report makes no mention of that fact that a third building collapsed that day. This is like a crime scene report that discusses two of three bodies and omits all mention of the third body.
This approach defers all discussion of engineering issues until this obvious case for fraud has been established. An example of such a case is in
War Profiteers and 9/11
https://warprofiteerstory.blogspot.com/p/war-profiteers-and-911.html
Thanks for continuing the discussion of these issues.
I think a lot of people don’t want to get JFK’d. People in the media like Amy Goodman and people in politics like Barbara Boxer. We are living under a stealth Reign of Terror. Terrorism is a standard Zionist strategy. Calling their victims “terrorists” is the PR part of that strategy.
War Profiteers and the Roots of the ‘War on Terror’
https://warprofiteerstory.blogspot.com/p/war-profiteers-and-roots-of-war-on.html
Seymour Hersh did not see through the Bin Laden hoax right. He believes the US killed him. They did not. They killed his unfortunate double. I don’t rely on Seymour Hersh.
Hersh demolished the official story of the OBL killing, but did not successfully explain what actually happened. It’s often easier to falsify official stories than to verify unofficial ones.
That’s also true of 9/11. The official conspiracy theory is obviously false. But we only know what really happened in broad outlines, without the specific details that would emerge from arrests and prosecutions.
Hersh covered up how nigger sergeants and Mexican company commander went crazy in My Lai and how a black Major Colin Powell covered that up in the army. Some White 2LT got blamed.
Hersh has his own tightly held institutional agenda to protect the reputation of the US armed services.
He’s got his job etc.
He’s ‘jewish’
And right on script
C’mon….how long before you figure it out?
“In the case of 1/6 it was to sabotage a presidential candidate who did not believe the official 9/11 story.”
The problem was not that he did not believe it (I doubt that the other candidates believed it) but rather that he was and always will be a loose cannon likely to talk out of school, not out of some noble motives, but because he loves to expatiate on any topic as an “expert”in his typical narcissistic way.
Video from my phone captured additional audio, fun perspective of handing Guyénot’s “The Unspoken Kennedy Truth” to Seymour Hersh:
“former” presidential candidate.
…as was the 2020 regime change presidential election.
former and seemingly eternal