The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 PodcastsKevin Barrett Archive
DHS Disinformation Squad: “Do NOT Watch False Flag Weekly News!” (With Cat McGuire)
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Video Link

Since the Department of Homeland Security has a new Disinformation Squad tasked with “countering false narratives,” meaning non-DHS-approved ones, I decided to save them some work by flagging my own video as follows:

The Department of Homeland Security Disinformation Squad warns that this video may elicit unapproved thoughts, illicit impulses, and inappropriate laughter. The final segment on the Hitler Wedding, in particular, has been rated “odious” by the ADL and should only be watched by mature individuals wearing an N95 mask carefully affixed over both eyes.

But why should I have to flag my own videos, when my hard-earned tax money is going to DHS censors who are supposed to be flagging them for me? I’m actually kind of miffed that the Disinfo Squad has not yet targeted my work. I know they’ve only been in existence for a few weeks, but still…haven’t they noticed that I’ve been challenging the official narrative of just about everything for almost 20 years? Don’t my videos deserve official DHS warning labels, not just my homemade ones? What am I doing wrong?

I am also extremely annoyed that Paypay hasn’t yet frozen my account and stolen my entire balance, like they’ve done or threatened to do to Consortium News and MintPress. Yes, I know Consortium News has a bigger audience, and MintPress does more thorough investigative work, but all things considered I think my stuff is at least as problematic as theirs. Doesn’t Paypal realize they need to ruin me financially and force me to spend my last wad of cash on an AK-47 and a revenge plan? (Just kidding, Paypal, I wouldn’t really do anything like that, at least not unless I became mentally unbalanced after undergoing an experimental injection, which won’t happen until hell freezes over.)

And then there is Twitter. What is the use of Twitter paying Censor-in-Chief Vijaya Gadde \$17 million per year if she isn’t going to boot people like me off the platform? Heck, for even half that much money I’d be happy to boot myself off Twitter! It’s kind of humiliating that an idiot like Donald Trump was considered worth ejecting from Twitter, and the Hunter Biden laptop story was deemed worth banning, whereas none of my bombshell stuff seems to have even raised one of Vijaya Gadde’s dark and sultry eyebrows. If that nasty white male heterosexual misogynist Elon Musk really does fire her, she won’t get any sympathy from me.

And however many millions a year the top YouTube censor is raking in, they’re not doing their job either. Why, oh why, can I never seem to get a third strike, leading to the permanent deletion of the thousands of hours of footage I’ve been posting for well-nigh 15 years? All they ever do is shadowban me and give me strike one and then strike two, but never strike three. All kinds of people who are vastly less outrageously subversive than I am manage to get their YouTube channels mercilessly nuked. So, once again, what am I doing wrong?

And then there is the ADL, which issued repeated attacks on me throughout 2015, 2016, and 2017. Now it seems like I haven’t heard from them in ages. Why not? I thought we were old friends!

I used to get condemned by the media as an evil person who should never, ever talk to presidential and vice-presidential candidates like Ajamu Baraka and Marianne Williamson. I used to get pilloried by illustrious people like the president of France. As recently as Valentine’s Day, 2021, I was nominated as one of the world’s eight leading “superspreaders of COVID conspiracy theories” by the Atlantic Council and the Associated Press.

And now I can’t even get one measly little DHS warning label attached to my video! I guess I’ll have to complain to DHS Disinfo Squad Commissar Nina Jankowicz:

Hey Nina, you adorable Mary Poppins lookalike and governess of ungovernable naughty children on social media, can’t you at least spare a couple of minutes to give my work a well-deserved official US government spanking?

(Republished from Substack by permission of author or representative)
• Category: Ideology • Tags: Censorship, Joe Biden 
Hide 18 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. Notsofast says:

    sorry kevin but you’re getting old, vajayjay gaddde simply has no interest in crushing you under her spiked heels (that she borrowed from zelensky). even a nymphomaniac like nina “who do i have to fuck” jankowicz has zero interest in humiliating and destroying you. it’s just a sad fact that boomers like us, simply don’t matter anymore, they intend to just ignore us until we finally fade away.

    • Replies: @JWalters
  2. JWalters says:

    Perhaps they realize that their selections will be highly prized badges of honor, and valuable PR assets. So the last thing they want to do is honor you with one of their insanely idiotic smears!

    They are seeing through your “Please throw me in the briar patch” ploy.

    • Replies: @PJ London
  3. JWalters says:

    Maybe, but don’t sell yourself short. Remember that revolutionary leader Benjamin Franklin!

  4. Censchwarzship.

    Whether Jewish Bolsheviks or Jewish Globo-Capitalists, it’s ‘free speech for us’ and ‘censorship for you, goyim’.

    Even Jewish pro-free-speech in the past was suspect because it was in defense of Jewish communist-sympthizers in support of a totalitarian regime. And Jews sure are hard on BDS.

    It’s the Jewish Supremacist Way. Principled Jews like Glenn Greenwald are shunted aside by the Power.

    • Agree: JWalters
    • Replies: @The Alarmist
  5. PJ London says:

    “highly prized badges of honor”

    Ah, those were the days when the school tannoy said “Will the boys who put Miss Jamieson’s car on the stage in the auditorium please return it to the parking lot. Then come and see me in my office.” and we all turned out to claim responsibility.

    • LOL: JWalters
    • Replies: @aldasfail770
  6. DanD says:

    The critical moment has already passed, the spike-protein’d clot-shot is widely distributed to a vast population of shedders. Always, in order to qualify to do essential infrastructure labor, a wage-slave had to pollute itself first. In less than five more years, their frozen vascular systems will invalid them out, and everybody depending on their no-longer-provided supply-chain accomplishments will starve, most to death.

    Then the paramilitary clean-out crews will start filling in the canyon-sized mass-burial pits. They’ll also be eliminating all unauthorized survivors. No one will care that all are not fully deceased yet. It can’t be stopped now, at best only hindered for a while.

    Also, the worst of it will be managed by AI algorithms. The fable continues that, when the global murder-agenda is completed, the AI can then be turned off. But not until the murder-workers themselves (that it manages) are consumed. Such pollutants of a reperfected world cannot be allowed to survive.

  7. R2b says:

    Ntsfst should sht up.
    This is a good presentation..
    Just listen.
    It’s good with info.
    Thx Kev.

    • Replies: @Kevin Barrett
  8. @R2b

    Ntsfst’s comment was as ironic as my article (I hope!). Double-edged irony, maybe, but still I’m pretty sure he/she/it knows that I’m not really a masochist begging to be mistreated by Gadde and Jankowicz.

    • Replies: @Notsofast
  9. @Priss Factor

    It’s like the Cylons in BSG2004, but not as pretty.

  10. Why, oh why, can I never seem to get a third strike, leading to the permanent deletion of the thousands of hours of footage I’ve been posting for well-nigh 15 years?

    Are you another of those poor souls who doesn’t bother to keep local copies of your videos because storage is so expensive (which it isn’t) ?

  11. Dually says:

    Clue: Direct energy weapons, like the ones used to perpetrate 911, were used to sink the Moskva.

  12. Notsofast says:
    @Kevin Barrett

    it is a sad day and age when people can no longer comprehend irony and sarcasm. as to gender pronouns, i am a self identified pan dimensional intergalactic being and like fellow traveler elon musk, i find them to be stupid and try to avoid them as much as possible. thank you for your service (news service).

  13. JWalters says:

    Thanks for the great discussion.

    Attention Cat, some thoughts on the abortion issue you might find interesting –

    There is a lot of anecdotal evidence that our spirit is not created at the moment our body is “conceived”. Rather, that our spirit not only continues to exist after the body’s death, but also exists prior to its conception, and that after the body’s death the surviving spirit eventually reincarnates in another body. Numerous anecdotal instances of verified past life memories fit this theory.

    In that context early termination of a pregnancy is not killing a spirit, which cannot be killed, but is requiring the spirit to wait for a later incarnation. It’s possible that in some situations such a delay would be in the best interests of the spirit. For example, it may save the spirit from coming into a situation with very poor prospects for a fulfilling life. Who would be best situated to make that decision on behalf of the waiting spirit? Certainly the woman who would be its mother would be among those closest to the situation and best able to assess it.

    Also, some say the spirit waits until the new body is essentially ready for use before entering it. Until then it prefers the freedom and mobility of the spirit realm. And the last organ to be ready is the brain, which is the most essential for human experience.

    If the government bans abortion on the assumption that a full human being, including the spirit, begins at the conception of the body, then that ban is based on a religious theory. The Constitution prohibits any law that promotes a particular religious theory. Therefore such a law would logically be unconstitutional.

    It’s perhaps worth mentioning that the Bible, which has long discussions of murder, never mentions abortion, even in any of those discussions.

    Some things to consider.

    • Replies: @Kevin Barrett
  14. @JWalters

    That is an interesting theory. But it’s a much more “religious” theory than the one upon which the baseline case against abortion rests:

    To agree with your argument, I need to accept your view of reincarnation, which is a much-disputed “religious” position; whereas Douhat’s outline of the baseline case against abortion doesn’t rely on any particular religious narrative.

    • Replies: @JWalters
  15. @PJ London

    Sorry Boomer but that story NEVER happened anywhere in America EVER. Stick to watching Matlock instead of trying to dazzle us with silly high school tropes that never happened.

    • Replies: @JWalters
  16. JWalters says:

    I once went to my study room and found my desk was missing. I discovered it was on the roof.

  17. JWalters says:
    @Kevin Barrett

    The point does not depend on one accepting the reincarnation theory. It’s simply that there are two alternative theories about the relation between the body and the spirit, i.e. two religious theories. Simply juxtaposing the reincarnation theory makes it clear that these are two alternative theories on what is essentially a religious question. And the proposal to ban abortion is clearly based on one of them, as its proponents freely acknowledge in their premise and slogan, “life begins at conception”.

    I tried to look at the Douthat article, but it’s behind a paywall. I did find another article that reviewed Douthat’s article, and included data such as the following.

    “When Douthat says that more women than men say that Roe should be overturned, those numbers are: 30% for women, 29% for men.”

    According to the reviewer, the numbers overall do not support the notion that opposition to abortion is a dominant cultural norm.
    Ross Douthat on Abortion: A Case of Op-Ed Malpractice

    Some early Christians believed in reincarnation. It was eventually ruled out of official church doctrine because “it was believed to contradict the doctrine of corporeal resurrection and undermine the need for Christ’s redemptive sacrifices”.
    The Argument over Reincarnation in Early Christianity

    Personally, I do not think there is a contradiction.

Current Commenter

Leave a Reply -

 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Kevin Barrett Comments via RSS
The Shaping Event of Our Modern World
The Surprising Elements of Talmudic Judaism
Shouldn't they recuse themselves when dealing with the Middle East?