The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewJames Thompson Archive
Sex Particle Backscatter
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks


After the furore, farrago and stramash of Prof Alessandro Strumia talking about sex differences, I went back to the BBC last night to read about other news. Of course, my eye was caught by a story entitled: The Women standing up for Science

There were 3 interviews with women university researchers, apparently selected because they had tweeted criticisms about the lecture.

Dr Jennifer Rohn, cell biologist, University College London

Prof Strumia’s comments: If you took them at face value, they could be quite demoralising – he is a big-shot professional. Most of what he presented has been debunked and there’s been a swift universal rebuttal from the science community of his comments.

Dr Jess Wade, physicist, Imperial College London:

Prof Strumia’s comments: They are really damaging to the community. Most of us realise that having diversity, having people who think differently to you, is so important to research. If you only have people who look and think the same, you will never progress.

Dr Sylvia McLain, biophysicist, University of Oxford

Prof Strumia’s comments: I think he’s weak and feeling threatened. In nature, some oak trees kill off small oak trees so they can grow bigger and stronger.

Of course, all three may have said much more, but it is odd that none of that was reported, when a couple of killer blows on the content of the lecture would have received wide publicity. I looked for other things they might have said elsewhere, and in one case found better particulars:

Dr Jess Wade, reported in the New Scientist, who had attended the conference, said of Strumia’s lecture:

Sadly, the event was overshadowed by a talk given by Alessandro Strumia at the University of Pisa, Italy, a long-standing member of the CERN collaboration. He had told organisers he would present a historical look at women’s representation in academic publishing. Instead, he insulted the professors coordinating the meeting, the audience of young women and, now, women scientists all over the world.

In a nutshell; he claimed that women weren’t as good at physics, were promoted too early and received disproportionate funding given their ability. Unlike my talk, backed by evidence, he cited a bunch of poorly thought out gender science from right-wing thinkers. These included James Damore, who was fired from Google last year for holding similar views.

The is an interesting comment, particularly the notion that declaring researchers to be “right-wing thinkers” is a way of refuting a proposition. Dr Wade is working to get more women into studying science, which is a good thing. On the issue of sex differences, one of her stated sources on sex differences is Angela Saini’s “Inferior”.

Other tweeters again suggested that Strumia’s comments were factually wrong, outdated, irrelevant, discredited and so on, but without providing references, presumably because all those criticisms were so well known that further explanation was unnecessary.

If I can find any more information on the counter-arguments, I will let you know.

• Category: Science 
Hide 5 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. Anonymous [AKA "E-D"] says: • Website

    JT, you are being intentionally obtuse, surely? There is a saying about bringing a knife to a gun fight. Prof. Strumia brought rationality to a religious fight. He isn’t being punished for his science but for his blasphemy.

    Isn’t it obvious by now that all mainstream institutions are de facto baizuo-controlled institutions? There is zero chance of turning the baizuo tide with facts and arguments. Prof. Strumia is no doubt a clever physicist but it’s astonishing that evidently he and many others still don’t understand what’s going on.

    • Agree: Per/Norway
  2. The world will be done in by Jennifers.

  3. anon[693] • Disclaimer says:

    If you only have people who look and think the same, you will never progress.

    I 100% agree that thinking differently is what drives progress in hard things like science. But what does looking different have to do with theoretical physics? What is the correlation coefficient between looks and thinks?

    • Replies: @Hypnotoad666
  4. @anon

    It’s a scientific fact that diversity is our strength. Thus, if Newton had been a black woman, F=MA would be a more diverse equation, and hense much stronger.

    The fact that you don’t get this shows that you have no understanding of woke science.

  5. ” Most of us realise that having diversity, having people who think differently to you, is so important to research. ”

    Most of you diversity advocates, that is.

    Meanwhile in China just about no one cares about ‘diversity’. The emphasis is on getting the job done.

    For that matter, how exactly do China, Japan, Korea manage to do so well in science and engineering despite homogeneity, while diverse India and Brazil are so terrible?

Current Commenter

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone

 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All James Thompson Comments via RSS