The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewJames Thompson Archive
LCI14 Conference Proceedings Kenya Kura
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

(Here is the abstract, as promised, and I will attempt to get the fuller presentation later).

Learning Without Questioning –Why Asians do not win Nobel prizes

Kenya Kura1

1Faculty of Economics and Information, Gifu Shotoku Gakuen University, Japan

Asians (Chinese, Koreans, and Japanese) are supposed to have higher IQs (about 105 on average) than North Europeans (100), while sciences have been developed overwhelmingly by Europeans and their offshoots. Why Asians are lacking in scientific success might relate to two factors:

1. Low curiosity, which is expressed by lower Openness to experience (-.59 SD) as shown in various cross-cultural personality comparisons.

2. Collectivism, which is captured by various individualism-collectivism indices such as the Hofstede individualism index (IDV), or Hofstede and Triandis individualism index (about -2 SD). The genetic underpinnings for these traits, such as DRD4, 5HTTLPR, and OPRM1 have also become increasingly apparent.

To integrate these psychological traits, a “q” factor is constructed by factor analysis on measures of Openness and Collectivism, which are then correlated with variables measuring academic achievements and also student assessments. It is found that IQ scores coupled with “q” factor scores neatly predict racial scientific achievements and also world-wide student assessments.

(Republished from Psychological Comments by permission of author or representative)
• Category: Science 
Hide 6 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    Japanese scientists have done pretty well in terms of Nobel prizes recently, with eleven winners since 2000. It's the Chinese who are really underperforming.

  2. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    Koreans haven't won a single Nobel science prize. That's pretty terrible, too. Japanese have been getting Nobels since 1949, and with an accelerating pace recently. Japan Westernized before the rest of East Asia, so perhaps the Chinese and Koreans will start doing top-level research once they have developed a Western-style research infrastructure.

  3. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    What is the LCI14 Conference exactly? Does it have a website with abstracts and papers? Google shows nothing.

    • Replies: @James Thompson
  4. @Anonymous

    This was the first time it was run, by invitation and without prior publicity. I hope to repeat it next year.

  5. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    Isn't it merely due to the fact that they're not far enough down the pipeline yet? We'll know better about Koreans and Chinese in one generation from now. They finally have enough of an educated class is mostly just coming out of college now. Nobel Prize winners are old.

  6. Jim says:

    The Japanese have done quite well in mathematics in the twentieth century. Certainly comparable on a per capita basis to most European countries. While there have been very outstanding Chinese and Indian mathemticians in the twentieth century the numbers have been far below European on a per capita basis.

    The contributions of Ashkenazi Jews to twentieth century mathematics have been extraordinary. It might be interesting in comparing scientific achievements between Europeans and East Asians to compare East Asians with non-Ashkenazi Europeans and Ashkenazi Europeans separately.

    I think that the personality differences mentioned here, conformity for example, play an important role but lumping Ashkenazi Europeans with non-Ashkenazi Europeans distorts the picture.

Current Commenter

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone

 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All James Thompson Comments via RSS