The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 PodcastsJared Taylor Archive
The Evil That Men Do
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

The terrible legacy of Richard Lewontin.

This video is available on BitChute.

In Shakespeare’s play, Marc Anthony says of Julius Caesar: “The evil that men do lives after them; the good is oft interred with their bones.” I don’t know if much good was interred when Richard Lewontin died last month, but a great deal of evil lives after him. He was one of the first people to claim that race is a meaningless social construct. And that, of course, is why we are supposed to love him.

The Washington Post wrote: “Richard Lewontin, a preeminent geneticist of his era, dies at 92.”

The New York Times said he was “widely considered one of the most brilliant geneticists of the modern era,” adding that “many of his students and colleagues regarded him with an awe that tipped toward reverence.”

The Guardian called him a “Pioneering biologist and geneticist whose research showed the emptiness of traditional biological concepts of race.

Somehow, none of the obituaries mentioned that in 1985, he co-authored a book called The Dialectical Biologist. On page 165, it says that “as working scientists in the field of evolutionary genetics and ecology, we have been attempting with some success to guide our own research by a conscious application of Marxist philosophy.”

The book is dedicated to Friedrich Engels, shown here on the right with his buddy, Karl Marx.

Lewontin was openly partisan. The author of this book writes on page 298 that Lewontin cheerfully admitted that he was deliberately “nasty” – his word – about people who disagreed with him in order to make the debate sound like a moral battle instead of a scientific question.

In a 2003 interview with PBS, he explained why people use racial categories even though they are meaningless. “They justify the inequalities that exist in a society” And, boy, did that idea catch on.

Vox tells us there are “11 ways race isn’t real.” Eleven ways? Number one: “Americans embraced the idea of race to make slavery feel okay.” Newsweek tells us, “There is No Such Thing as Race.” Scientific American explains that “The Concept of ‘Race’ Is a Lie.” Not just a mistake, mind you; an outright lie.

And here’s lofty talk from the American Association of Biological Anthropologists: “The Western concept of race must be understood as a classification system that emerged from, and in support of, European colonialism, oppression, and discrimination. It thus does not have its roots in biological reality, but in policies of discrimination.”

That means it’s only out of a desire to oppress and discriminate that you might think the guy on the right is biologically different from the others.

And since we’re all the same, who cares if whites are replaced by immigrants. We’re being replaced only by ourselves.

Lewontin did discover something, which he reported in a 1972 article called “The Apportionment of Human Diversity.” He found that of all the genetic diversity in humans, 85 percent is found within the same race, and only 15 percent varies from race to race. This was his justification for claiming that race is a myth.

The reality is that there is an enormous amount of genetic variation in human beings that seems to have no effect on how we turn out. The 15 percent, where there are racial patterns, produce the very clear differences we see between human groups. It turns out that in the case of dogs there is twice as much genetic variation between breeds as there is between human races: 30 percent of the genome rather than 15 percent. But there are tremendous differences in dog breeds, not only in appearance, but in intelligence, lifespan, temperament, you name it. Would anyone argue that these differences are a meaningless social construct?

There are racial differences because the races evolved independently without contact for 50 to 100 thousand years or more. In animals, the equivalent of race is subspecies. As Wikipedia explains, “When geographically separate populations of a species exhibit recognizable phenotypic differences, biologists may identify these as separate subspecies; a subspecies is a recognized local variant of a species.” That sounds like a perfect definition of race, because that is exactly what it is. Please note the tiger.

There are nine subspecies or races of tiger. Unlike distinguishing between human races, you’d have to be an expert to tell a Malayan Tiger from a Bengal Tiger. Here are nine different subspecies of Hartebeest. Do you think they differ more or less than human races?

Nobody invented these distinctions so that Swayne’s hartebeest, shown here, could oppress the red hartebeest. The distinction is pure biology, and the same rules apply to humans.

The races are clearly genetically different. This paper, for example, uses several analytic tools to distinguish race. Principal components analysis shows this kind of genetic clustering corresponds clearly to race. On the right, from the top down, as you travel from East to West, you can see the genetic groupings of different populations. Black Africans are off to the left because they are genetically very different from everyone else.

As this cluster shows, you can make fine distinctions. On the left, you can distinguish high-caste Indian Brahmins, in blue, from Lower Caste Indians in green.

Ancient DNA testing shows that light-skinned Indo-Europeans conquered India some 4,000 years ago and ruled over darker skinned natives. The purpose of the caste system was to prevent interbreeding, and that’s why their genes are still different.

For 100 bucks you can learn your own biological origins. This is the principal components map for Europeans that the company 23&Me uses. It’s not measuring a social construct. It’s looking at biology. This guy is 100 percent Northwestern European. He is white and nothing else.

Another thing the Lewontin crowd love to say is that human beings are 99.9 percent genetically identical. This is somehow supposed to mean that there can’t be enough genetic variation for there to be different races. But even if people differ in only 0.1 percent of the genome, that’s still six million base pairs, and that’s plenty. As this article points out, we are about 99 percent genetically identical to chimpanzees, and we share 90 percent of our DNA with mice, for heaven’s sake. Small genetic differences can have huge effects.

Babies notice race before they can even talk. This article, called “Babies Are Racist,” points out that at age three months, babies prefer to look at faces of people who are the same race as themselves.

You can tell someone’s race from the bacteria in his mouth. As reported here, “each ethnic group in the study – that was blacks, whites, Hispanics, and Asians – was represented by a “signature” of shared microbial communities. “This is the first time it has been shown that ethnicity is a huge component in determining what you carry in your mouth.

Race shows up in medicine all the time. Hispanic women get cervical cancer at twice the rate of white women. Sickle cell anemia and the hemolytic anemia are found almost exclusively in blacks and have a direct genetic cause. This article finds that whites are especially vulnerable to cystic fibrosis. They get it 7.5 times more often than in blacks and 17.5 times more often than Asians. Doctors have discovered the gene patterns associated with these differences.

Here’s a headline: “Strange Colon Discovery Explains Racial Disparities in Colorectal Cancer.” In blacks, the right side of the colon ages more quickly than the left side, and cancer generally shows up on the right. Researchers have found the genetic causes, and this helps explain why blacks are 40 percent more likely than whites to die of colon cancer.

And how about “Polynesian ancestry linked to obesity, heart failure and diabetes in Native Hawaiians,” Every 10 percent increase in Polynesian ancestry means an 8 percent increase in the chances of being diabetic, and an 11 percent increase in the chances of having heart failure.

Another headline: “What to Know About BiDil, the First Heart Medication Marketed Specifically for Black Patients.” It works for black people but not for white people.

A doctor who believed Richard Lewontin would be guilty of malpractice.

In America, blacks are 34 percent more likely than whites to be obese. One reason is race differences in metabolism. This study found that if you put black and white women on exactly the same diet and exactly the same activity regimen, the white women lose more weight. “There are racial and genetic differences in obesity,” said Dr. Mitch Roslin who did the study. “These things are real.”

Very occasionally, some of this slips into big media. In this article called “How Genetics is Changing Our Understanding of ‘Race’,” David Reich argues that race is a biological fact and people better get used to it. He writes that there are genetic differences that completely account for the fact that black Americans are 70 percent more likely than white Americans to get prostate cancer.

This is biology. David Reich adds: “I am worried that well-meaning people who deny the possibility of substantial biological differences among human populations are digging themselves into an indefensible position, one that will not survive the onslaught of science.”

Consider this video an onslaught of science.

The race deniers look more idiotic all the time. When you find a dead body rotted beyond recognition, a forensic anthropologist can look at the bones and tell you the race. As this article notes, this is a puzzle: “if races don’t exist, why are forensic anthropologists so good at identifying them? The author admits he can even tell Japanese from Chinese bones, but then goes full Richard Lewontin and writes, We should “not fall into the trap of accepting races as valid biologically discrete categories because we use them so often.” It’s in the bones. It’s real. It’s useful. But it’s not biology.

Here’s the latest lunacy. Programmers are spending millions trying to get artificial intelligence software to read X-rays and scans. Really good AI catches things doctors can’t. When a doc reads an X-ray he can’t tell a Japanese foot from a Norwegian foot. But, AI can: “Reading Race: AI Recognises Patient’s Racial Identity In Medical Images.” Are the people who cooked up the software pleased? No. They’re appalled. They don’t want the computer seeing race and they don’t know even know how it does. But the machine gets it right every time, even from just part of the body, and even if the image is artificially blurred so people can’t make it out at all.

On August 2, one the researchers tweeted: “Medical AI has the worst superpower . . . Racism. . . . AI can do something humans can’t: recognize the self-reported race of patients on X-rays. This gives AI a path to produce health disparities.

Does this loon really think that because the software can tell races apart, it’s going to discriminate? Does he think some malicious motive gave the software the “worst superpower” of detecting race? How hard cant his be? It sees race because it’s there.

And guess what: You have the same superpower. Three-month-old babies have the same superpower. And every time our rulers want to set up preferences for “people of color” they use their “superpowers” to detect race, too.

How much longer can this foolishness last? Richard Lewontin would be very proud of the evil that lives on.

(Republished from American Renaissance by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 179 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Realist says:

    Jared, another excellent article…with lots of substantiation…very impressive. Thanks.

    • Agree: Bert, Rich, Joseph Doaks
  2. Taylor, as usual, fails to mention that Lewontin was an Ashkenazi Jew. Does Taylor recognize that their DNA is somewhat different from Gentiles, or does he believe there is no genetic difference? Why is the JQ a subject he avoids like the plague?

    Regarding genetic differences, does that help explain why so many US marriages are unhappy and end in divorce? Nordics marry Italians, and French marry Russians. Does the fact that their ancestors came from different cultures, with thousands of years of evolutionary history, help to explain it? Not even getting into black-white bonding pushed by Kalergi Globalists, would Nordics be happier if they married fellow Nordics, and if Italians married fellow Italians?

    Orthodox Jews in the US are aghast that so many of their children marry gentiles, thus diluting their tribe? Does the fact that Whites in the US, coming from so many different Euro ethnicities, help explain why they seem unable to band together to fight the inexorable tide out to destroy them?

  3. Realist says:

    Evidently, there is hypocrisy at American Renaissance. I tried to mention The Unz Review on their website, but it was rejected. So it is Okay for the Unz review to carry an article from Jared Taylor, but not to mention this website on American Renaissance.

    • LOL: aj54
    • Replies: @throtler
    , @Verymuchalive
  4. “The book [Lewontin’s 1985 book ‘The Dialectical Biologist’] is dedicated to Friedrich Engels, shown here on the right with his buddy, Karl Marx.” Clicking on this sentence takes you to a picture of their memorial in Berlin.

    Why did the fans and Marx and Engels choose such an incompetent sculptor? He (or she) doesn’t know how clothes drape on the human body, gives Karl and Friedrich floppy clown shoes, and gives them monster-size finger-spread hands. On the other hand, scientific socialism found a buttonless way to keep vests fastened, with some kind of communist velcro.

  5. Chris Moore says: • Website
    @follyofwar

    Taylor, as usual, fails to mention that Lewontin was an Ashkenazi Jew. Does Taylor recognize that their DNA is somewhat different from Gentiles, or does he believe there is no genetic difference? Why is the JQ a subject he avoids like the plague?

    Ironic, isn’t it, that Taylor is so fanatical about biological differences, yet refuses to acknowledge that ((Jews)) are biologically different than the Whites he purports to represent.

    I would trace that to Taylor’s Mammonite biology. It blinds him to fellow Mammonites, so long as they’ve earned their way into the Mammonite hierarchy. Taylor apparently thinks only ((Jews)) have “earned” their way in, ignoring the fact that their ethnic cabal has swindled its way in by hook and crook. But I guess to a Mammonite, that counts.

    The Hindu Indians have earned their way in too, at least in Britain, so we can expect that Taylor will eventually welcome them too as fellow Whites.
    http://jppi.org.il/en/article/india/toc/chapters/triangle/english-jewish-outreach-to-the-indian-diaspora-in-the-united-kingdom/#.YRgNy2llAzQ

    What is the lesson from this? Never trust a Judas white. They’re no better than a ((Jew)). In fact, they may be worse because they’ll stab in the back for Mammon while presenting themselves as an ally.

    Taylor’s silence on ((Jews)) speaks volumes.

  6. Juvenalis says:
    @follyofwar

    Regarding genetic differences, does that help explain why so many US marriages are unhappy and end in divorce? Nordics marry Italians, and French marry Russians. Does the fact that their ancestors came from different cultures, with thousands of years of evolutionary history, help to explain it? Not even getting into black-white bonding pushed by Kalergi Globalists, would Nordics be happier if they married fellow Nordics, and if Italians married fellow Italians?

    Do you have any evidence for these claims? That native-born Anglo-American language/culture-assimilated White Americans of European ancestry have higher divorce rates if they marry a White person with different ancestral national origins in Europe—rather than inbreeding like Ashkenazim? And likewise this dubious theory would explain the concurrent rise in divorce rates in European countries since the 1960s?

    European nationalities are not races. All Europeans—north, south, east, west—are virtually identical in genome when compared to genetic distance of all Europeans vs. all non-European races. There are not “thousands of years of evolutionary history “separating “Nordics, Italians, French, Russians”, as there are 70,000 years of isolation and DNA divergence between Caucasoids vs. Negroids in Africa and Mongoloids in the Orient.

    On the contrary, all modern Europeans are descended from some mix of a few different migratory populations on the European continent—Early Hunter-Gatherers, Bronze Age Bell Beakers, Neolithic Farmers who migrated from Anatolia/West Asia bringing agriculture.

    And European nations formed even far more recently—all of them some mix of the same tribes that existed all across Europe, there was no France or French people at the time Cæsar conquered Gaul—a mix of Celtic, Frankish, Latin DNA elements come together only in the last few centuries to invent the French nation—and France was one of Europe’s earliest nations to form, far before e.g. Italy and Germany.

    Britain is a genetic mix of pre-Celtic indigenous peoples, Celtic Britons, Romans, Anglo-Saxons, Vikings, Normans, etc. The Vikings and Normans genetically link the English to the Nordic countries, northern France, south to Italy and Sicily (conquered by Normans around the same time they conquered England), and way out east to the Kievan Rus, and Byzantine Roman Varangian Guard of Constantinople in the eastern Mediterranean…

    Across nationstate borders, Europeans are all genetically intermixed among themselves from constant migrations and invasions across the continent of Europe—which is a very small continent to begin with. European countries are smaller than U.S. states. All Europeans are about the same genetically as all Chinese in China; the countries of India and China alone each have populations double the size of the entire population of the continent of Europe. The rich linguistic/cultural diversity of Europe masks what could genetically all be one nation.

  7. @Mark Spahn (West Seneca, NY)

    The sculpture is a fine example of the Marxist aesthetic itself: brutalism. This being said, it’s interesting to note that communism – for all its evil and destruction – is observably less destructive to nations than the monstrosity referred to as “Liberal Democracy” by Lewontin’s fellow devil-worshippers (may they rot in hell for eternity) who control what Saker calls the Anglo-Zionist empire. China, Russia, Hungary, Poland all exist today as nations despite communism. Unless there is serious repentance, the place referred to as the United States will likely be a memory in 50 years or less, ditto for Britain, France, Germany and the other satrapies of the evil empire.

    • Agree: Druid55, Ace
  8. Shel100 says:

    I had to do a double take when looking at that photograph of the white man in Africa.Didn’t think they were women at first.

    • Agree: Irish Savant
  9. John L says:

    So now the best scientific “authorities” are preaching that human beings cannot be who and what they are, but, rather, should be seen through the homogenizing prisms of the “very best” scientific authorities. What happened to “live and let live”? What’s wrong with that?

    • Replies: @follyofwar
  10. Richard B says:
    @follyofwar

    Taylor, as usual, fails to mention that Lewontin was an Ashkenazi Jew.

    He’s never going to mention it. And he doesn’t have to. Maybe it would be better if he did. But he doesn’t. He’s still worth reading. Fortunately, there are others who do write about Jews like Lewontin and they’re very much worth reading too.

    Regarding genetic differences

    I’ve come to the conclusion that Ashkenzis like Lewontin have a Hate Gene and a Crime Gene that goes with it, and, above all, The Dark Triad Gene.

    They live the way they do, think the way they do, and act the way they do to satisfy those genes, and not out of any real sense of justice or even justifiable revenge. But simply because they are filled with hate and all the rest and need targets. Everything else is literally a rationalization, an elaborate excuse.

    This is the real reason they do not want to talk about race.

    After all, a defining feature of all psychotics and psychopaths is a tenacious resistance to exposure.

    Conclusion

    They are the cancer of the human race. Of course!

    Treason against them is loyalty to humanity. Obviously!

    • Agree: aj54, Druid55, TheTrumanShow
    • Disagree: thotmonger
    • Replies: @joe862
  11. Right_On says:

    human beings are 99.9 percent genetically identical.
    AND
    The 15 percent, where there are racial patterns, produce the very clear differences we see between human groups

    Help someone out who is a bit slow on the uptake.

    Does the 99.9 percent figure mean: It’s possible there are a few Japanese blondes or Irish with slanting eyes – it’s rare, but those gene variants have been found in those populations. HOWEVER . . .
    The 15 percent figure refers to gene ‘clusters’ in the genome that can identify the different racial groups.

    • Replies: @Badger Down
    , @Stoic_seeker
  12. @Chris Moore

    No, he’s just a classist (nothing wrong with that), which causes him to WANT Jews to be part of his race.

    He wants to take all of their contributions, intellectual superiority, etc. and declare them as belonging to his own people.

    It doesn’t matter that they are 40-50% Middle Eastern genetically, he’ll take’em because they’re so successful lmao.

    • Replies: @profnasty
    , @Geowhizz
  13. J says: • Website
    @follyofwar

    Levontin is from another era, when it was thought that Marxism was appliable to everything. Of course, it is not, it is an antiquated economic theory, and it is also wrong. You are beating a very dead horse. Proving that Levontin was wrong or lying changes nothing. One could write a book about how the phlogiston theory was wrong and evil too. If you knew that George Stahl, of the phlogiston theory, was Jewish, you would write that book.

    • Replies: @awry
  14. Evil of Lewontin. The refusal to see the reality of race and pretending it was for Marxism’s sake when it was for Jewish Power.

    Evil of Taylor. The refusal to mention Lewontin’s Jewish identity when so many of his ilk have led the anti-white racket.

    Refusal to see race, refusal to see Jewish power. Both are lies, therefore a kind of evil.

  15. @John L

    “Live and let live” died once all power was vested in Washington. Centralized power became dominant over State’s Rights once Tyrant Lincoln decreed that the Southern States were subservient to Washington, and had no right to secede from the “Perpetual Union,” – the Constitution be damned.

    Now there is no turning back from more and more freedom crushing mandates coming from Washington, the latest of which is Biden’s demand that all citizens, but not illegal aliens, be vaccinated with an experimental concoction, which has already killed tens of thousands. The only slim hope for the dying majority of Whites is, once again, secession, which senile Biden has promised to crush. The whole rotten edifice, as in the former USSR, will implode before that happens.

    • Replies: @profnasty
  16. @follyofwar

    “Why is the JQ a subject he avoids like the plague?”

    Because he writes using his real name. You could do the same, AND write about the JQ.

    I assume you don’t do that for the same reason Jared Taylor chooses to focus on other things, no?

    • Replies: @MarkU
    , @Truth
  17. @Mark Spahn (West Seneca, NY)

    Maybe they used the same discount Chinese sculpturer that they used for the MLK statue which made him look Chinese.

    • LOL: Joseph Doaks
  18. @follyofwar

    The turning away from religion, feminism and easy divorce laws are the number one cause of the breakdown of the family in the western world today. Before man-hating feminism became the norm, women respected men and men respected women. Women were happier with their role in life as were men. As for similar genetics making marriage more successful, genetics leads to culture an similarity of culture plays a part in a successful marriage. Countries with similar genetics with very few foreigners, still seem to suffer a high divorce rate. Good examples of this would be Iceland, the Scandinavian countries, Finland and the Baltic countries. Most white Americans have a similar culture and are generally far from their European roots, they share a similar view of life, most like beer, barbeque and football, the three linchpins of white American culture.

    • Replies: @Rosie
    , @anon
    , @Blubb
  19. ((Lewontin)) like so many of his supposedly race-blind cronies somehow lived most of his adult life in lily white Vermont.

    • Thanks: Joseph Doaks
  20. @follyofwar

    The likeliest explanation for JT’s Nelson eye on the JQ is that Amren has a significant Jewish donor or donors keeping him on track, as it were. His wife is not Jewish by the way.

    • Agree: Rosie, Pierre Simon
  21. aj54 says:
    @Mark Spahn (West Seneca, NY)

    the sculptor was undoubtedly Jewish judging by his surname, Ludwig Engelhardt, and like many of his brethren, untalented in the visual arts

  22. Rosie says:
    @Joe Paluka

    Before man-hating feminism became the norm, women respected men and men respected women.

    I’m so tired of this hogwash. For some reason, young college women attending universities and supposedly learning to hate men wind up more likely to marry one and less likely to divorce him than their less-educated counterparts.

    • Disagree: GazaPlanet
    • Replies: @HallParvey
  23. Z-man says:

    Richard Lewontin, let me guess… a Jew.
    Yes I noticed, like the first few posters here, that Taylor didn’t mention the Jooz.

    • Replies: @Johnny Rico
  24. What about the evil done by the Powdered Wig Gang, aka “the Founding Fathers”? They broke up the patriarchal and ethnically-based British Empire in favor of a deracinated republic where Jews were immediately given citizenship. Just to be clear: no other country at the time gave citizenship to Jews, and for good reason. But the Powdered Wiggers thought they knew better than all past generations. Two hundred years later, the US had Richard Lewontin and today, fifty years after that, Jewish influence has transformed the country into a dystopia where every single of aspect of life is marred by the corruption they devise and promote in numbers far disproportionate to their share of the population.

    The US is inherently bad because it was born out of radicalism and treason. That made Lewontin and his ilk inevitable. The sooner the final collapse of the Anal Empire happens, the better off White men worldwide will be, but in North America in particular.

    • Agree: Z-man
    • Troll: frontier
    • Replies: @Ace
  25. If race is just a concept, then black people were never enslaved. Because there is no such thing as black people.

    • Replies: @martin_2
  26. Dumbo says:
    @follyofwar

    Jared Taylor doesn’t talk about Jews because he has many Jewish donors who don’t like Blacks but don’t want to call attention to Jews.

    Your other point about marriage of Germans and Italians makes little sense. I doubt this is the reason for happiness or unhappiness or the dissolution of the family. I know many pure and still relatively young German couples, all divorced with children early on. On the other hand, I know a German girl married to a Negro. Their marriage is still going strong.

    Also the disunity of America being caused by several European ethnicities doesn’t seem right, as a) whites in European countries aren’t also united and b) most of the disunion is on ideological and not etnhical basis.

    • Agree: frontier
    • Disagree: profnasty
    • Replies: @Currahee
  27. Jared is still glowing after his crushing victory against blacked shill E. Kikel Jones. Hail Jared!

    • Disagree: profnasty
  28. Putting aside for a moment the fantasy that people have as many genders as insects have different shaped sex organs

    The sea change in identity politics has gone from: race is a myth, let’s all do our best pretty please to behave as if we are color blind, to: race is all important, do not try deny it or dare to pretend otherwise, honkey.

    I find it strange that a giant of the “deniers” would be handled with such kid gloves by the mainstream media. What in the world could possibly explain this? Probably because he is man. They get all the breaks.


  29. tito says: • Website

    I do enjoy this discussion, but I am impatient to move to a higher level and begin organizing a political movement to destroy the african and jewish genomes down to the last atom. With gene editing, we now have a chance to construct a North America 99 and 44/100% ARYAN. A population like that and we could colonize the sun.

  30. HbutnotG says:

    Cervical cancer is in several ways a “social disease” with risk factors determined by behavior, not genetics.

    1. Hispanic men are usually uncircumcised. The carriage of HPV, at least in the short term, in uncircumcised men is much greater than in circumcised men. It is the only valid fact regarding epidemiology and circumcision status.

    2. Hispanic men have mistresses more often than non-Hispanic men; it’s part of their culture. Their potential exposure to HPV is greater.

    3. PAP smears are more frequently and regularly sought in Anglo women than in Hispanics.

    Therefore cervical cancer incidence in Hispanics vs non-Hispanics is not inherently a racial thing based on genetics.

    • Agree: Jim Bob Lassiter
    • Replies: @Mike Tre
  31. Anon[325] • Disclaimer says:

    Jared.

    J A R E D.

    Jews Are Racially Evil Devils.

    There you go.

    • LOL: Trinity
  32. @follyofwar

    Taylor went to Yale. Many believe he is a CIA plant or asset. Yale is a notorious hot bed of CIA recruitment. . Taylor is also a businessman who worked in the Far East for a long time. He is friends with Norman Podhoretz who is a Jewish Neocon and worked for the CIA in various capacities. Many other Jewish Neocons are his friends and many have connections to the Mossad and other Intelligence Agencies.

    He was born in Japan and is well educated in languages. However, I’ve heard him speak numerous times on tv over the years and he doesn’t come off sounding so educated. His article is correct about Lewontin. Lewontin wasn’t as brilliant as the Left thinks he was and was a lot like Gould another Jew who thought he was smarter than everyone else.

    Taylor may be getting quite a bit of money from some of his Neocon and Jewish friends so perhaps you don’t bite the hand that feeds you. Quite a few people that I know that have had intelligence connections believe he is working for the government.

    • Agree: Pierre Simon
  33. Oracle says:

    Which group initiated and promoted feminism? What was the purpose? Qui bono?

  34. Sarah says:

    For me, the question is settled.

    If there is something that is a “social construction” it is what we call “human”.

    People called other animals “human” because they looked like them at first sight and from a distance: they walked upright on two legs, had an articulated language, had two free front legs allowing them to grasp objects and used tools and weapons. But that is all.

    In fact on Earth, among those we loosely call “humans”, there are not only hundreds of races, itself divided into ethnicities, but different species.

    Some species have disappeared, but there are still several: at least three usually defined as such: Caucasoid, Mongoloid and Negroid but in fact there are several others.

    And, importantly, these “human” species do NOT have the same origin and do NOT have common ancestors.

    • Replies: @Dave Bowman
  35. anon[204] • Disclaimer says:

    Lets try to understand the genetic differences underlying racial differences or identities.
    First the number of chromosomes- no,it has no relevance.

    [MORE]

    2nd- Positions of centomer- no,it has nothing to do.
    3rd- overall number of junk DNA- no research data on effects on human traits are available
    4 th number of introns and extrons – no data availble on human trait
    5 the number of genes ( mixture of Aa alleles )that underly basic metablism – no differnces between 2 human in any meangful way other than when causing diseases
    6 th number of genes pool ( mixture of Aa alleles) that code human skin colors – same pool and combinations of them are random
    7 number of genes (mixture of Aa alleles) forming the pool that code height – same pool differnt combination and no differnces stand out as causing one taller than other
    8 number of genes( mixture of Aa alleles) forming the pool that underly IQ as measured by stndard IQ test – same genes, same pool differnt combination but differences between geniuses and average intellignce or low average intelligences are not visible . No set of genes ,or epigrnetic difference account for the seperationnor divergence of IQ
    9 reproducible consistent differncenc in genes between religious and atheist
    10 no reproducible consistent differncenc in genes between shy and adventerueses
    11 no reproducible consistent differncenc in genes between antisocial and moral or ethical gys
    12 no reproducible consistent differncenc between piano genius and monutaneer or between music lover and rapist or between couch potatoes and avid outdoor activist
    13 no reproducible consistent differncenc between self selected military personnel and peace activist
    14 no reproducible consistent differncence between Ultralrthkdox Jews and polytheists
    15 no reproducible consistent differncenc between high school drop -out and PhD
    16 no reproducible consistent differncence between celibate and ployamorous
    17 no reproducible consistent differncence between drug addicts and non addicts
    18 no reproducible consistent differncenc between misogynist and non- misogynist
    19 no reproducible consistent differncenc between religious and atheist

    20 no reproducible consistent differncenc between black and white skin color

    so how does gene account for race ?

    Thanks
    Bulu.

    • Replies: @anon
  36. Sarah says:

    Have you noticed that those who promote bastardization (the true result of mixing races and species) NEVER apply it to themselves?

    Not only that, but they promote strict inbreeding and even forbid outbreeding under penalty of exclusion.

    • Replies: @ricpic
  37. Mike Tre says:

    Before I even read the article – control F “Jew”. Nothing.

    Mr. Taylor, what did Marc Antony say of the ignorance that men embrace?

  38. throtler says:
    @Realist

    American Renaissance is also anti-female.

    • Replies: @SMK
  39. Altai says:

    It’s in the bones. It’s real. It’s useful. But it’s not biology.

    I think it’s down to the standards of rhetoric that Lewotin and Gould set up. I once had a professor say during a lecture “So there is no basis for racism” after doing the Lewotin and Gould bit. But, I thought but didn’t say, how silly an argument that is. Surely racial discrimination is wrong because it’s cruel or because it violates the rights of other people. Why is it only wrong because, actually, some arbitrary amount of the difference in shared ancestry between groups is below a certain threshold percent means they don’t exist. The implication, that it would be fine if the races and groups based on shared ancestry that obviously exist, exist, is one that is taken seriously by these very confused authors.

    I think it just stems from the very early 20th century New York City Jewish malaise both men were born into, it’s the same instinct as changing your name to sound less Jewish or claiming that Jewishness is just religious or whatever, always lying to outsiders about the existence or cohesion of your group to try to get them to open to you as you don’t to them. So they lied again to the goys to pretend there weren’t any real groups, not really. It’s like a codified scientific form of crypsis. Franz Boas, who also settled in the early 20th century Jewish ghetto in New York was the father of this.

  40. I read Lewontin’s book ‘Not In Our Genes’ and found it a useful corrective to extremist DNA reductionism

    Reductionism allows the technocratic society to ignore, for example PTSD in soldiers and instead say the soldiers are to blame because they have a ‘chemical imbalance in the brain. Thus the technocratic state leaders are absolved of responsibility.

    Reductionism allows the technocratic society to blame children for being children and thus the ‘hyperactive’ child has a ‘biological problem’ curable with a profitable drug. It’s not the fault of schools and the coercive classroom that rewards children who can ‘sit still’. A normal child ‘in the wild’ gets to run around and learn at the same time.

    Imagine all the socially created ills that are being ‘explained’ by using reductionist DNA pseudo science, which usefully distracts from elites who are the source of the socially created ills.

    No doubt we’ll soon have experts claiming that people who criticize the federal reserve control over our economy as having a ‘conspiracy theory gene’ which accounts for the critics’ obvious faulty representation of economic reality.

    • Agree: frontier
  41. Sarah says:

    Have you noticed that those who promote and help the massive immigration of non-Europeans, especially from Black Africa, North Africa and the Middle East, to non-European countries, forbid it at home?

    • Replies: @TheTrumanShow
  42. BorisMay says:

    The MONEY…as the saying goes ‘follow the money if you want to discover the truth’.

    There’s more money if you are not a racist and a lot more if you are anti racist.

    If you are racist you will probably lose your job, your home and your wife/husband/ parents/friends etc.

    That is why people pretend there are no races or are horrified artificial intelligence can perceive the obvious.

    It is also politically correct and is rewarded by the (((biggest racists of all))) to hide their duplicity. And the goyim go along with it just as good funding goes with it.

    Most blacks stink of a sickly odour the closest of which is that of horses.

    The Chinese claim whites have a peculiar smell, especially those that drink milk.

    I have a friend who is a white nurse within the London Chinese community. She says almost all Chinese get up late and spend most of the night working or socialising.

    South African policemen in the days of apartheid noticed that if you kicked a black man’s leg calfs or slapped a black man’s ear you could seriously disable him enough to overwhelm and arrest him!

    Blacks noticeably are unable to cope with sub zero temperatures and in winter in the UK take a disproportionate amount of time off.

    There are lots of other anecdotes that proves races have differences…blacks make a lot of noise, Asians are addicted to food, whites tend to work and save for a rainy day, blacks spend their money on frivolities, Islamists are addicted to sex.

    In multicultural societies people of one colour or one culture tend to stick together. Thus you get black ghettos, Latino ghettos, white enclaves, Jewish quarters, Chinese communities etc.

    The evidence for the existence of race is all around us.

    • Agree: frontier
    • Thanks: Sarah
  43. Drew says:

    “But there are tremendous differences in dog breeds, not only in appearance, but in intelligence, lifespan, temperament, you name it. Would anyone argue that these differences are a meaningless social construct?”

    There are a couple points that I feel are worth making, as someone who once bred and trained Jack Russell Terriers for fun. First, genetic traits in dog breeds are the result of deliberate inbreeding and they begin disappear with out-breeding, and go away with lots of out-breeding, as I discovered when one of my females mated with a non-Jack. That different breeds of dogs can interbreed means that they are more genetically similar than dissimilar, at least in the sense of heritable variant genes, which is why, say, a dalmatian can mate with a golden retriever, but not a common house cat.

    Second, genetic traits in a dog breed are not a given even with highly selective breeding. By this I mean that two dogs of the same breed aren’t clones. At one point, I had a Jack that was skinny and wire-haired, one that was uncommonly short (and excessively fat), two that were stereotypically sized and colored (though was dumb as rocks and the other was to clever for her own good), and one that was taller than typical and a malcontent. All of these dogs were genetically Jacks, but were also genetically dogs, and so inherited traits that were atypical of their breed but common of their species, because sub-species ate not limited to the genetic potential of their sub-species alone.

    Third, I also had dogs of other breeds at the same time and can say that the Jacks were able to live harmoniously with other breeds in spite if genetic differences. I like to believe this is because I was a good trainer and dig master who worked hard to keep them in line and maintain a pack hierarchy, but perhaps I was just lucky. Anyway, my point is simply that generic differences in dog breeds are not an intrinsic cause of violent conflict between them. In fact, from what I can tell, wild dogs are more likely to fight each other than domesticated dogs of differing species that live within the same pack (read: household).

    To bring this point to humanity, of we believe that humans have free will, then there is no point in obsessing over genetic differences because those can be overcome by education and social training. Honestly, you don’t even have to believe in free will, you just need to believe that human behavior is as malleable as dog behavior. Frankly, it seems to me that “race realists” believe that humans are more slaves to genetic influence than even dogs are, and have no point to their scientific assertions.

  44. @Right_On

    Dig this: 100 million years ago, there were no humans and no cats. But there was an animal from which humans and cats descended.
    https://www.quora.com/Do-cats-and-humans-have-a-common-ancestor?share=1

  45. MarkU says:
    @Reactive Reaction

    Seriously? You think you have real anonymity on the internet?

  46. The so called Indian (Hindoo) Brahmins look more like the modern day Puerto Ricans at the best or darker Afghanis at the least… no more, no less.

  47. Patriot says:
    @Chris Moore

    I am guessing that the reason that Mr. Taylor (and other White advocates) avoid mentioning Jews is because of their immense political, propagandistic, and financial power. If you cross Jews, they can literally destroy you and your family.

    It’s better to NOT mention Jews and still have a voice, than to mention Jews and get totally cancled. For example in Germany, if you discuss Jews, you will be imprisoned.

    • Replies: @SMK
  48. ariadna says:
    @Mark Spahn (West Seneca, NY)

    I like the symbolism of their positions. Photos and paintings of the time representing a couple conventionally had the wife seated and the husband — the provider and protector– standing at her side. Marx, who was kept most of his life by Engels, is shown in this sculpture in the appropriate uxorial position.

  49. awry says:
    @J

    Did you read the article? Marxism is very much alive and kicking; it mutated to “Postmodern Neomarxism” (Peterson’s term) but it is still calling itself Marxism. It still wants to force its ideology on science, quite successfully. The modern equivalent of Lysenkoism is the “scientific” positions that race and gender don’t exist (but “dialectically” (interestingly dialectic was the favorite buzzword of Marxist mumbo-jumbo – not so much different from capitalist corporate mumbo-jumbo or Western mainstream media mumbo-jumbo – during Communism, probably none of the ideologues knew what it meant, but they used it nonetheless), at the same time they define everything).

  50. SMK says: • Website
    @throtler

    How is AR “anti-female” as opposed to anti-feminist/sexual egalitarian? The comment section at AR isn’t nearly as vitiated by misgynist lunatics as the comment section at unz.com.

  51. On August 2, one the researchers tweeted: “Medical AI has the worst superpower . . . Racism. . . . AI can do something humans can’t: recognize the self-reported race of patients on X-rays. This gives AI a path to produce health disparities.

    On the contrary, by examining an X-ray, AI can discern race and therefore susceptibility to different illnesses. In most cases this will not be a big deal, but it can only help with diagnosis and treatment.

    Attempting to suppress this capability of AI is not only bad for medicine, but has even more sinister implications.

  52. PolarBear says:

    (((Tim Wise))) looks as White European as his neighbors. That Jews are anti-White is their main malfunction and the measure on which they should be judged.

  53. profnasty says:
    @follyofwar

    Size matters.
    We benefit from free travel, and language thru 48. Hwi and I’ll ask her, are frosting on the cake. We sacrifice some liberty for convenience.
    North Dakota Indians want to take the entire state and secede. Unh unh, ain’t happenin baby.

  54. Offer “Race is a Social Construct” dipshits their choice of American inner city ghetto to walk through at midnight. Offer them body armor and weapons of their choice, though they won’t need them.

  55. profnasty says:
    @It's Ovrer

    Middle Eastern? Sephardic?
    More to 75% Central Asian (Kazakh), 25% Asian(Mongol).
    fify
    You’re velcome.

  56. @Chris Moore

    I think you’re being a little too hard on J.T. If anything, Taylor showed us that friendly treatment of Jews means, at best, accusations of anti-semitism, but spoken rather than shouted. The man is still far from a household name.

    Amren’s First-Person Accounts might be one of the best ways to awaken thoughtful normies, as those testimonials are written by the formerly-colorblind.

    https://www.amren.com/blog/2021/01/every-first-person-account-of-race-published-in-2020/

  57. SMK says:
    @Patriot

    The reason that Jews have such “immense political, propagandistic, and financial power” in the US is not only because of their average intelligence, which flourishes under a system of merit in which discrimination against Jews has been eliminated, but also because of gentile guilt over centuries of anti-Jewish violence and persecution, culminating in Hitler and the holocaust.

    The reason one can be charged with a “hate crime” for telling the truth about Jewish power and influence, and sentenced to jail or prison not only in Germany but also the UK and France and other nations, is because Germany under Hitler and the Nazis enslaved and exterminated 5-milion Jews.

    And the reason one can be charged with a “hate crime” in the UK and France and other nations for criticizing and telling the truth about blacks and Muslims (who, ironically, are the worst Jew-haters on earth), and punitvely fine and/or sentenced to prison, is because of slavery and colonialism.

    Given the power of the anti-white left, gentile and Jewish (especially in the U.S.), which controls almost everything in the U.S. and Canada, the UK and the nations of Western Europe, Australia and New Zealand, and will ultimately control everything, white gentiles in these nations will be increasingly persecuted and dispossessed for the crimes and atrocities of their white gentile male ancestors.

    • LOL: 3g4me
    • Replies: @Patriot
  58. Maddaugh says:

    As I said in a previous comment on another thread , I can find a Phd to argue that a piece of shit with peanuts and a spoon stuck in it and covered in chocolate sauce is a chocolate sundae.

    All the better if the Phd is a Jew.

    His conclusion would be something like this. “I have spent 92 years studying race. There is no such thing. Therefore people should not be concerned about other people supplanting them because we are replacing ourselves. One exception is Jews. we are not a race but a Tribe and hence we will not allow tribes of East Indians, Pakistanis, Saudis, Mulattoes, Blacks, Asians, Whites, Bantus, or Eskimos into Israel…….even of they convert to Judaism”.

  59. HT says:

    Change the title to the evil that Jews do.

  60. it is fascinating that both you and Dr. Jones are correct. kudos to both of you for your work.

    it is clear that this Richard Lewontin chap was engaging in what Michael Yon terms “information warfare”

    That this warfare involved the rejection of Logos , the killing of reality and the nifty trick of reframing biology as a Category of the Mind which is then wielded as a weapon against those who want Truth, including Jared Taylor demonstrates that you are both correct. Jared Taylor on the reality of race and Jones on the uselessness of those facts against the current enemy.

  61. @Rosie

    The supply of husband material is qualitatively better, in most cases. Plus the 2 or 3 percent of women who really do hate men are generally much more vocal and their views are more likely to make the Nightly News with Walter W. Crankcase.

    And their quips are more attention getting. One of them supposedly said something like, “A woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle”.

    How can “Support your local Girl Scout Troop. Buy your cookies here.” compete with that?

    Fortunately, most of the time, nature triumphs over stupidity, no matter how elegantly stated. A woman may not need a man, and a man may not need a woman, but a baby needs it’s mommy and it’s daddy.

    • Replies: @Rosie
  62. @follyofwar

    Perhaps he’s more skillful than you,
    So he tactfully skips “The J.Q.”.
    He may know the sad story
    Of poor Rachel Corrie
    And would rather be 3D than 2.

    • Replies: @John Johnson
  63. Maybe the best allegory about PC.

  64. martin_2 says:
    @The Original Rebel

    Yes, there is a black British MP by the name of David Lammy who thinks the British Government should apologise for slavery, but surely if he is as British as the rest of us and there is no such thing as Race shouldn’t he apologise for slavery?

    • Replies: @Dave Bowman
  65. as an Asian man, who grew up in the innercity of Philadelphia, PA, mostly with Blacks.. i was indoctrinated to believe race is irrelevant. i believed this until my 20s.

    until 911 happened. that was when i realized i was indoctrinated & questioned everything.

    im not a racist. i try like hell to give EVERYONE the benefit.

    that said, based on my years of observation: Blacks do seem to have VERY low IQ/intelligence, are surface level thinkers incapable of deep thought and are DEFINITELY more violent & aggressive.

    ANYONE (non-Black) can put this observation to the test: simply take a stroll through any innercity & tell me what you see, how Blacks behave, how Blacks treat you.

    FYI: i’ve been trying to escape America since 911 happened. dear Blacks.. please stay in America. DO NOT come to Asia. thank you.

  66. Somehow, none of the obituaries mentioned that in 1985, he co-authored a book called The Dialectical Biologist. On page 165, it says that “as working scientists in the field of evolutionary genetics and ecology, we have been attempting with some success to guide our own research by a conscious application of Marxist philosophy.”

    I’ve read most of the Marxian core canon: The Communist Manifesto; German Ideology; ca. 60% of The Capital; Grundrisse; Theses on Feuerbach; The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State; Dialectics of Nature; Ludwig Feuerbach and the End of Classical German Philosophy; Critique of the Gotha Programme … as well as critical examination from Schumpeter to Kolakowski.

    There is not much to gain from the so-called Marxist philosophy. It is a 19th C alloy of Hegelianism and various strands of Darwinian type of evolution, all soaked in apocalyptic mythology.

    We can see Friedrich Engels’ summation of Hegel’s “laws of dialectic”, as Engels wrote them in his small book on Feuerbach, one the central scriptures of the Marxian canon. Later, Engels repeated them in the posthumously published book on philosophy of nature (Einstein, when German Social Democrats offered him to read the manuscript before the publishing, somewhere in the 1920s, observed that, while it may contain a valuable material for the history of natural philosophy, it is an example of the way how a physicist should not think).

    Engels imagined that Hegel had formulated three “laws” (actually, Hegel never did such a thing):

    1. negation of negation – this is Engels’ simplified version of Hegel’s Aufhebung or sublation

    2. quantity turning in quality – for instance, a few battalions organized into a brigade have a quality of its own, a brigade is a more potent fighting force & not just a combined forces of battalions

    3. unity & conflict of the opposites – say, sex

    Although various Marxist scribblers wrote about those “laws” in a few decades, Russian politician Nikolai Bukharin added a 4th “law” in his ABC of Communism: everything changes, which is just a repetition of Heraclitus’ observation.

    Stalin later codified these “laws” by adopting Bukharin’s contribution, but tacitly relegating the negation of the negation to obscurity, because it could have been interpreted that he, Stalin, could also be “negated”.

    This all is:

    a) a simplistic reading of Hegel’s confusions &, sometimes, seminal ideas

    b) basically – bunkum

    For those having a spare time on their hands, I would recommend Magee on Hegel, proving that Hegel was, in his core thinking, a Magus & not a philosopher in the usual sense:

  67. Patriot says:
    @SMK

    SMK,

    You are absolutely correct.

    But it is amazing that while Jews are vigorously pushing for massive Third World immigration into all White countries, and relentlessly pushing multiculturanism and the Holocaust story, they prohibit all immigration into Israel (except Jewish immigration), fight viciously against multiculturalism and miscegination for Jews, opperate the largest and longest-running concentration camp the world has ever known (Gaza), and at this very moment are committing a Holocaust against the poor Palestinians.

    Jew = hypocrite = Jew

    Of course a few moral Jews are horrified by the behavior of their race, but too few to make a difference.

  68. ricpic says:

    Communism is the religion of reality deniers.

    What’s another term for a reality denier? Rebel.

    As to why so many “brilliants” like Lewontin are driven to rebel. Why was Satan?

  69. Truth says:
    @follyofwar

    Taylor, as usual, fails to mention that Lewontin was an Ashkenazi Jew. Does Taylor recognize that their DNA is somewhat different from Gentiles, or does he believe there is no genetic difference? Why is the JQ a subject he avoids like the plague?

    Is this question rhetorical?

  70. You can take the Negro out of the Jungle but Not the Jungle out of the Negro

    • LOL: Sarah
  71. Truth says:
    @Reactive Reaction

    “Why is the JQ a subject he avoids like the plague?”

    Because he writes using his real name.

    Oh, so he’s a coward?

  72. John1955 says:

    I read a couple of Mr.Lewontin books.

    Well,if you need to sharpen your debating skills he is your guy.He is spinning mendacious narratives but the performance is abso-f…-lutely brilliant.

    One of these days you’ll be able to prove that 2+2=5 beyond reasonable doubt.

    Meanwhile Forensic Anthropology is progressing by leaps and bounds.It is possible to identify sex,race,stature and ancestry (to within 300 mile radius of one’s Ancestral Point of Departure) even if you have decomposed body with hands and head cut off.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forensic_anthropology

  73. @Chris Moore

    Ashkenazi Jews have 50% European DNA, so “Jews” are half European/half semitic. duh

    • Replies: @Rich
  74. GMC says:

    One good thing about the Black music in the 40s, 50’s 60’s etc. they told it like it was – ” What they Do ? They smile in your face – All the time they want to take your Place — The Back Stabbers — Better be ware”. Listening to music is an education in itself and many times it opened your pea brain , in what was really going down on the streets and with the Man.

  75. ricpic says:
    @Sarah

    What about the extraordinarily large number of mixed male white female oriental couples? I see them everywhere. Most of these unions came out of contacts made in colleges and universities. In other words among the “enlightened-educated” who both promote race mixing and practice it. The number of female white male oriental couples is smaller but not insignificant.

    • Replies: @Dan Hayes
    , @Sarah
  76. @Drew

    that different breeds of dogs can interbreed means that they are more genetically similar than dissimilar

    They can only interbreed up to a point and the further in genetic distance you get the more likely there will be complications. The same is true for humans but this isn’t shared with the public for obvious reasons. Black women that breed with White men are more likely to require a c-section because their birth canal isn’t designed for White babies.

    But more importantly none of what you shared about dog breeding changes the basic fact that differences exist to a degree that affects outcome. Everyone accepts this in dogs and no one and I mean NO ONE thinks you can just replace a pointer with a yorkie and get the same outcome. Telling us that they are “X% genetically similar” doesn’t actually mean anything to someone that tries to train a yorkie as a pointer.

    However egalitarians such as yourself *want to believe* that humans are different even though privately you probably don’t really believe it but support establishment liars like Lewontin that at least help dupe the masses.

    To bring this point to humanity, of we believe that humans have free will, then there is no point in obsessing over genetic differences because those can be overcome by education and social training.

    Oh ok so gaps in education that liberals have spent billions on fixing are merely a matter of education and social training? Billions upon billions spent on race denial based theories were never needed?

    How far do you take this non-sense?

    Is a lack of Asian forward guards in the NBA due to a lack of education and social training?

    Explain very carefully how gaps in sports can exist but not in education.

    Then extrapolate as to how none of this matters to the economy or nation development.

    I will be really surprised if you respond since most egalitarians here do a “hit and run” post even though they have all these establishment scientists on their side.

    • Agree: frontier, Sarah
  77. Mike Tre says:
    @HbutnotG

    You know what else “Hispanic” men are? Less hygienic than whites. Take your fake ethnic classifications and genital mutilation advocacy elsewhere.

    • Replies: @HbutnotG
  78. KenH says:

    Jews like Lewontin were selling their snake oil for decades to white, Western audiences that race isn’t real and that it’s mostly the environment that shapes who we are. He was just a modern day Franz Boas.

    You’ll notice that Israel doesn’t buy into any of this “race isn’t real” garbage and and even makes incoming immigrants submit to DNA tests to verify their Jewish genetic heritage. The Jewish diaspora peddles racelessness to the guilty and masochistic white goyim who they live among and exploit.

    If race isn’t real then critical race theory should be renamed critical social construct theory since race was just a social construct until 2020. But the Jewish strategy has changed and suddenly race is real and whites have immutable characteristics that make them irredeemably evil according to CRT theory.

    • Replies: @John Johnson
  79. @Eustace Tilley (not)

    Perhaps he’s more skillful than you,
    So he tactfully skips “The J.Q.”.

    This is the most likely answer.

    Most Whites on the street will think you are stark raving mad if you talk about Jewish scientists.

    They will think but what does their religion have to do with anything?

    They aren’t going to give you 10 minutes to explain how Judaism is more than a religion and you are actually talking about atheistic left-wing Jews.

    Race denial is best approached by instigating doubt from an apolitical position.

    If you talk about Jews in any context then people assume you are pushing a political agenda.

    I don’t see any political gain from bringing up Jews and the same is probably true for JT. The typical liberal doesn’t read Lewontin or much at all for that matter. Most liberals watch TV and have their emotional desires affirmed by corny shows like Law and Order. Liberal intellectualism is mostly fiction just like their theories. The left that dominates academia is well aware that Jews have done a lot of their heavy lifting and don’t care. They view that as part of the past and now view White women and mulattoes as the future. They don’t want another Boas or Freud in their books since they teach that male dominance of that period was entirely artificial.

    • Replies: @Rosie
  80. anon[335] • Disclaimer says:
    @Joe Paluka

    Hitler gives a knockout blow to feminism with this September 7/8 speech:

    [MORE]

    For the first time in years, I am once again taking part in a convention of National Socialist women and thus of National Socialist women’s work. I know that the prerequisites for this have been established by the work of innumerable individual women and, in particular, by the work of their female leaders. The National Socialist Movement has not only seen but also found in woman its most loyal assistant from the time of its conception onwards.

    I remember the difficult years of the Movement’s fight and especially those times in which good fortune seemed to have turned away from us; those times when many of us were in prisons, others had once more become fugitives, still others were in foreign parts; many of us were lying wounded in sick bays or had been killed. I remember the time when there were those among us who turned back, believing that we would never make it in the end; a time in which the spirit pervading Germany arrogantly believed that it could approach the problems only from the angle of reason, and when many lost faith in us as a result. I know that back then there were innumerable women who remained unshakably loyal to the Movement and to me.

    At that time, the power of emotion truly proved itself to be stronger and better. We have seen that the clever mind can be misled only all too easily, that ostensibly intellectual arguments can cause men of weak intellect to falter, and that it is particularly in these times that the most profound inner instinct of preservation of the self and of the Volk awakens in a woman. Woman has proven to us that she knows what is right! In those times when the great Movement seemed, to many, to falter and all were united against us, the stability and sureness of emotion prevailed as stable factors when confronted with brooding intellect and supposed knowledge. For only very few are endowed with the talent of penetrating superficial knowledge to the most profound inner meaning. But this most profound insight is ultimately the root of the world of emotion. That which perhaps only few philosophically gifted intellects are capable of analyzing scientifically can be sensed by the nature of an unspoiled human being with instinctive certainty. The feeling and, above all, the nature of woman has always acted throughout the ages as a supplement to the intellect of man.

    And if at times in the course of human life the working spheres of men and women have shifted to become unnaturally aligned, this happened not because woman aspired to rule over man; rather, the reason lies in the fact that man was no longer capable of completely fulfilling his task. That, of course, is the miraculous thing about Nature and Providence: no conflict is possible in the relations between the two sexes as long as each fulfills the task assigned to it by Nature.

    The catchword “Women’s Liberation” is merely a phrase invented by the Jewish intellect, and its contents are marked by the same spirit. The German woman will never need to emancipate herself in an age supportive of German life. She possessed what Nature gave her automatically as an asset to maintain and preserve; just as the man, in such an age, never had to fear that he would be ousted from his position in respect to woman.

    Woman has been the last to contest man’s right to his position. Only when he was no longer sure of himself in recognizing his duty did the immortal instinct of survival and preservation begin to revolt in woman. After this revolt, a shift took place which was not in accordance with Nature’s design, and it prevailed until both sexes returned to what an eternally wise Providence assigned to them.

    If it is said that a man’s world is the State, that the man’s world is his struggle, his willingness to devote himself to the community, one might perhaps say that a woman’s world is a smaller one. For her world is her husband, her family, her children, and her home. But where would the larger world be if no one wanted to care for the small world? How could the larger world survive if there was no one who would make the cares of the smaller world the content of his life? No, the large world is built upon this small world! This greater world cannot survive if the small world is not firm. Providence assigned to woman the care of this, her very own world, and it is only on this foundation that the man’s world can be formed and can grow.

    However, these two worlds are never opposed to one another. They mutually complement each other, they belong together, just as man and wife belong together.

    We do not feel that it is right when a woman forces her way into a man’s world, in territory belonging to him; instead, we feel it is natural when both of these worlds remain divorced from one another. One of the worlds is home to the power of feelings, the power of the soul! The other is home to the power of recognition, the power of toughness, of resolution, and of fighting morale! In one case, this power requires the full willingness of the woman to devote her life to maintaining and multiplying this important cell, and in the other case it requires the willingness of the man to safeguard life.

    What a man sacrifices in struggling for his Volk, a woman sacrifices in struggling to preserve this Volk in individual cases. What a man gives in heroic courage on the battlefield, woman gives in eternally patient devotion, in eternally patient suffering and endurance. Every child to which she gives birth is a battle which she wages in her Volk’s fateful question of to be or not to be.

    And hence both must mutually value and respect each other by recognizing that each part is accomplishing the task assigned to it by Nature and Providence. The performance of these two tasks will necessarily result in mutual respect.

    What the Jewish intellect maintains is not true-that respect is determined by the overlapping of the spheres of activity of the two sexes-but rather this respect requires that neither of the sexes endeavors to do what belongs to the other. This respect ultimately lies in the knowledge of each half that the other is doing everything necessary to maintain the whole! Therefore, woman throughout the ages has always been the helpmate of man and thus his most loyal friend, and man, too, has been the protector of his wife throughout the ages and thus her best friend. And both perceived in this manner of living the common foundation for the existence of what they loved, and of its continued subsistence in the future. Woman is an egoist in maintaining her small world, putting man in a position to preserve the greater world, and man is an egoist in maintaining this greater world, for the one is indissolubly bound up with the other. We will stand up against an intellectualism of the most depraved sort which would tear asunder what God hath joined.

    Because woman originates in the most basic root of all, she is also the most stable element in the preservation of a people.

    Ultimately, she has the most infallible sense for whatever is necessary to prevent a race from ceasing to be, for her children would bear the major brunt of all the suffering.

    Man is often far too mentally instable to find the right path by means of these basic insights. However, given favorable times and a good education, man will know just as well what his task is. We National Socialists have therefore protested for many years against deploying woman in political life, for in our view this would be unworthy. A woman once said to me: you must see to it that women join parliament, for woman alone is capable of ennobling it. I do not believe, I replied to her, that human beings were meant to ennoble what is bad by its very nature, and a woman who became caught in the gears of this parliamentary system would not ennoble parliament; rather, this system would dishonor such a woman. I do not want to leave something to women which I intend to take away from men. Our opponents claimed that we would then never gain women for the Movement. But we have gained more than all of the other parties put together, and I know that we would have won over every last German woman had she been given but one opportunity to study parliament and the degrading role women play there.

    For this reason we have integrated woman in the fight of the völkisch community in accordance with the decrees of Nature and Providence. To us, our women’s movement is thus not something which inscribes on its banner the fight against man as its program, but rather something which takes up in its program the mutual fight together with man. It is thus that we have strengthened the new National Socialist Volksgemeinschaft, thus that we have gained, in millions of women, the most loyal and zealous fellow fighters. Female fighters for a life together in the service of together preserving our life. Fighters who fix their gaze not upon the rights which a Jewish intellectualism pretends to offer them, but upon the obligations which Nature has burdened upon us all.

    Whereas in the past, the liberal and intellectualistic women’s movements included many, many items in their programs which originated in a so-called intellect, the program of our National Socialist Women’s Movement actually contains only a single item, and this item is: the child, this tiny creature who must come into being and flourish, who constitutes the sole purpose of the entire struggle for existence. For what would be the purpose of our fighting and struggling if there were not something to come after us which can make use of and pass on what we attain today for its own benefit and avail? What else could be the purpose of humanity’s entire struggle? Why else the worry and the suffering? For the mere sake of an idea? Only for an idea? Only for a theory? No, that would not be worth traversing this earthly vale of tears.

    The only thing which allows us to overcome all of that is shifting, our gaze from the present to the future, away from ourselves to that which is growing up to follow us.

    A few moments ago, I spoke before the youth rally. It is a glorious thing to look out over this golden youth in the knowledge that it will one day be Germany when we no longer exist! It will preserve the sum of what we are creating and building up. It is for this youth that we are working. That is the real purpose of the entire struggle! And in recognizing this, the most elementary and lapidary goal of Nature, the labors of the two sexes will logically and rightfully fall into place for us, no longer in conflict, but in a common fight for the real life.

    You, my female party comrades, are waging this battle as leaders, organizers and helpers. You have joined in taking on a glorious task. That which we wish to shape within our Volk on a large scale is that for which you must internally form a firm support and a solid foundation. You must impart spiritual and emotional reinforcement and stability from within! In this battle which we are waging today for the freedom, equality of rights, honor, and peace of our Volk, you must be a complement to man, so that we can prevail as real fighters before our Volk and for our Volk with our sights set on the future.

    Then strife and discontent will never be able to flare up between the two sexes, but they will instead traverse this life fighting together, hand in hand, fulfilling the wishes of a Providence which created both of them for this purpose. And then the blessings of these mutual endeavors will not be withheld.

    Then no mad fight over theories will flare up, then man and woman will not turn against one another because of false notions, for then the blessing of the Almighty will rest upon their joint struggle for life!

  81. Blacks don’t only have low IQs on average in the US. Sub-saharan Africa has the lowest IQs in the world.

    – Shaun Snapp

  82. I quit reading American Renaissance after almost every comment I posted was censored.
    You don’t muzzle your supporters, you nurture them.
    Thanks to UNZ, we have a voice.

  83. All we have to do is apply Darwin theory to humans.

  84. @KenH

    Jews like Lewontin were selling their snake oil for decades to white, Western audiences that race isn’t real and that it’s mostly the environment that shapes who we are. He was just a modern day Franz Boas.

    Why is there so much focus here on Jews that sell race denial while conservative masters of the practice like Rush and Hannity are given a pass?

    Rush Limbaugh did far more for race denial than Lewontin.

    Rush convinced millions of Whites that “teacher’s unions” were causing racial gaps even though the same unions weren’t a problem in White areas. All while living alone in a mansion in a liberal area with his cat and talking about the importance of family values. A True White Hero. Meow.

    It seems that on Unz and elsewhere it’s perfectly fine to promote race denial as long as you blame the outcome on unions/socialism/big government.

    Rush had millions and at any point could have spilled the beans. Instead he preferred to talk about football and censor any honest talk of racial differences.

    Gould/Lewontin sell their trash in academia while race deniers like Hannity sell it on Fox news. I fail to see a difference other than Gould sold books while Hannity sells through Tide commercials.

    What could be holding back Baltimore? Big government? FOX NEWS INVESTIGATES AFTER THE BREAK. NOW WATCH THIS PILLOW COMMERCIAL.

  85. Ace says:
    @Ray Caruso

    I think one of the Founders was clear that the US would succeed because its people came from one common stock. It’s odd that they were blind to Jewish separatism and hostility when all of Europe were aware of the problems from Jews. I wonder if Cromwell’s betrayal guaranteed that Jews would always be part of anything stemming from England. Maybe people dedicated to Enlightenment values assumed ALL people would rationally see that their future lay with the new order.

    BTAIM, the Nation really screwed the pooch when we went whole hog on mass immigration. That was the real radicalism and treason, foreshadowing that of 1965.

    It’s true what you say of the Globo-Homo Empire.

  86. @Priss Factor

    You can best believe those black hoodrats received A+ grades and a scholarship to a woke university.
    Now I know why they removed math and reading skills in order to graduate from K-12.

  87. Jared Taylor doesn’t want to alienate Jews because he thinks he can convince some of them to come to the “race realist” side.

    • Replies: @Dave Bowman
  88. Sarah says:

    For me, the question is settled. The essayist you mention in the article is not a scientist but a politician, an ideologue, a propagandist with a political agenda.
    Real geneticists and anthropologists published unquestionable works about races and differences between races. The most recent discoveries only reinforce this.

  89. @Drew

    What do you suppose happens if a female Chihuahua is artificially inseminated with a St. Bernard’s sperm?– or vice versa?

  90. Dan Hayes says:
    @ricpic

    In NYC it’s almost always amongst the educated NE Asian females and Jewish males escaping their overbearingly oppressive mothers.

  91. @Realist

    I know you don’t like this, Jared, but it’s one of those inconvenient facts. This is lifted directly from Lewontin’s Wikipedia bio:

    “Lewontin was born in New York City, to parents descended from late 19th-century Ashkenazi Jewish immigrants.”

  92. martin_2 says:

    If Mr Taylor is so much in thrall to the Jews as some on here claim he is, then why would he dare to write an article critical of Professor Lewontin in the first place?

    • Replies: @some_loon
  93. Blubb says:
    @Joe Paluka

    Men stopped respecting women when the pill robbed them of the power to say “no”.

    Feminism is a reaction to the sexual commodification of white women by white men.

    Exploited, of course, by (((them))), but still.

  94. Sarah says:
    @ricpic

    Most of these unions came out of contacts made in colleges and universities. In other words among the “enlightened-educated” who both promote race mixing and practice it.

    These people are not “enlightened-educated”, they are indoctrinated; they don’t promote race-mixing, they repeat the propaganda, sometimes direct but often subliminal, by MSM, by advertising agencies (only 4 major agencies in the world direct and choose the contents) and by politicians.

    Those who promote (puppetists) race-mixing are not those who practice it.

  95. @John Johnson

    Well, this is a correct statement re. most dumb commenters. Actually, commenters as such, because most of them are as dumb as a sack of hammers.

    It has nothing to do with Jared Taylor.

    https://www.amren.com/news/2015/07/an-open-letter-to-cuckservatives/

    An Open Letter to Cuckservatives

    Let’s consider your principles. Do you dream of a traditional, religious, free-market society with small government, low taxes, and no gun control, where same-sex marriage is illegal, and abortion, divorce, prostitution, and illegitimacy are scorned? There are such places: the tribal areas of Pakistan and Somalia.

    And what about countries that violate your principles–with high taxes, huge government, clogged markets, a weak church, strict gun control, and sexual license of all kinds? There’s Scandinavia. And yet if you had to leave the United States you’d much rather live in Denmark than in Waziristan.

    Do you see the pattern? Even when they violate your principles, white people build good societies. Even when they abide by your principles, non-whites usually don’t.

  96. @Chris Moore

    One reason Taylor may be open to Jews, or at least neutral toward them, could be his religious affiliation. We must remember that Taylor was born in Japan to missionary parents. Missionaries are not “normal” by any means. Further, Taylor may be Presbyterian, and this denomination has an affinity for Jews bordering on adulation. Taylor could clear this up for us by being a little more transparent about these issues.

  97. @follyofwar

    Does the fact that Whites in the US, coming from so many different Euro ethnicities, help explain why they seem unable to band together to fight the inexorable tide out to destroy them?

    Yes, it does. And Europeans joined in support of the European Union are in the same situation.
    All the “White” enthusiasts want to deny it, but in truth “White” is a meaningless term racially and carries no emotional content. These promoters of the ‘White’ race get upset if you pose this question and/or problem to them — the more so depending on just how their own ancestral mixture is perceived.

  98. @Chris Moore

    “Taylor’s silence on ((Jews)) speaks volumes.”

    I can sum it up with one sentence: Jared Taylor is a fraud and has no integrity.

  99. @Right_On

    Anyone who has ever had a genetics class (in the last 20 years at least) would know that “99.9% genetically identical” is meaningless. Genomes are differentiated by how they are arranged, not by what is in them.

    • Thanks: Right_On
  100. Corrupt says:

    “Medical AI has the worst superpower . . . Racism”

    Given that there are maladies that are more prevalent in certain races, I would argue that the ability of AI to determine the difference is a superpower for good, not evil. The users and developers of this software are morons.

    • Replies: @John Johnson
  101. AReply says:

    Honestly, how does utter shit such as this article even cut mustard any more? Who reads this stuff and is compelled by it?

    That asshole on the right is the weird one:

    What’s he thinking?

    [MORE]

    “Fucking pygmies!”

    Pull!

    We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. …Zzz

    MEANWHILE

    …First ve must test ze purity of your blood!

    THE QUESTION HAS NEVER BEEN WHO GETS TO BE IN THE HUMAN RACE. THERE’S NO SCIENCE TO BE SETTLED. THE QUESTION HAS ALWAYS BEEN WHO IS ENTITLED TO LORD OVER WHOM, WHICH IS AN EVER-GIVING SHITSHOW OF DESIRE, GREED, AND ANIMALISTIC INSTINCT. YOU CAN CHOOSE TO LET YOURSELF OUT OF HUMANITY, BUT NOT IN.

  102. First thing I wondered, is Lewonton a Jew. Turns out yes and Taylor neglects….thanks everyone for red-pilling me on Taylor. I thought at first when I came across him that Taylor had a few good things to say, but I’ve changed my opinion on him rather quickly.

    Yes, there are obvious races, as a commenter said the other day, it’s kind of like a shorthand, everyone knows what you mean when you say white, black, Asian, etc.

    However, someone riddle me this, if a kid has a white parent and a black parent, is the kid white or black, I mean biologically? These medicines targeting black people, would they work on the 50/50 kid? If the kid marries an Oriental and has a kid, is that kid white, black, or Oriental, and would the medicine targeting black people still work on the kid? And so on. When does the DNA change? Tiger Woods is half black, half Asian, but in an interview for whatever reason he said “I’m really about 90% Asian”…?? Did he mean attitudinally?

    I don’t doubt the IQ tests and obvious racial differences among the races broadly, but so what? Would you rather have high-IQ arrogance and evil giving you propaganda for news, making you get vaxxed, writing laws and casting judicial decisions that continually screw you over, and causing black ghetto problems, or would you rather just live in peace with average and lesser IQ people? How much freakin’ IQ does it take to be content in life?!?!…good grief!

    Finally, white people, if you want more white people, have more kids!!

    • Replies: @Jim Bob Lassiter
  103. I can’t help thinking Lewontin’s Marxism was a cover. Maybe he honestly considered himself a Marxist or some such, but the question is… did he devise his worldview to conform to Marxist ideology or did he selectively employ Marxism to serve an essentially tribal mindset?

    If he were a true Marxist, he surely would have condemned Zionism and Israel as well, as well as the very notion of Jewish Identity. Did he? If not, it suggests he merely used Marxism as a tool to subvert white racial identity and consciousness not so much in the service of universalism but to make deracinated whites serve the still standing identity of Jewishness.

    Indeed, the history of Marxism shows that many adopted communism in service to nationalism. Cuban communism was about Cuban nationalism. Vietnamese communism served Vietnamese nationalism. Communism was ultimately subordinate to nationalism.
    I can’t help suspecting it was no different with Lewontin.

    Indeed, NYT’s liberalism is also a cover, i.e. whites are deracinated into serving universal liberalism while Jews selectively manipulate liberalism to serve Jewish Power. So many demands for ‘white guilt’ about blacks but hardly any mention of Zionist tyranny over Palestinians.
    But this ultimately perverts white universalist liberalism as well. After all, Jews not only demand that whites surrender white identity in favor of universalism but also demand that whites suck up to Jews. As Jews are tribalist and supremacist, white liberalism doesn’t so much adopt universalism in rejection of white identity but in obeisance to Jewish tribal-supremacism. Total bait-and-switch. Notice all those white ‘liberals’ who condemn white identity but hail Jews and Israel to high heaven. Lest this trick be too obvious, Jews have included blacks and homos in the pantheon to lend impression that it’s about ‘diversity’.

    Indeed, what has ‘antisemitism’ come to mean? It says…

    If a good white guy favors a bad white guy over a good Jewish guy, he is an anti-semite. A good white person should side with good Jews against bad whites… like the good Brits did against Bad Nazi Germans in WWII.

    But if good whites should favor good Jews over bad whites, does it also mean good Jews should side with good whites against bad Jews? No, and demanding such of Jews is ‘antisemitic’. Notice how this works? Whites must reject the ‘bad’ of their kind in favor of ‘good’ of other kinds, especially Jews, but Jews may work with bad Jews against all whites, good or bad.

    But if this is the way of Jewishness, is Jewish Goodness possible? Goodness results from rejecting the Bad, but if Good Jews are willing to side with Bad Jews against all whites, even good ones, then it means Good Jews aren’t good. But it gets even worse. If good whites are told they must join forces with ‘good’ Jews who openly work with bad Jews, it not only means so-called Good Jews aren’t good but that good whites must support bad Jews as well. But if good whites support bad Jews, how can they be good whites when they aid and abet Jewish Evil? No wonder the US is so messed up.

    The only meaningful application of ‘antisemitism’ would be one where good whites reject bad whites and side with good Jews AND good Jews reject bad Jews and side with good whites. But in our world, there can’t be good whites nor good Jews because so-called Good Jews are willing to work with and provide cover for Bad Jews, which means most Jews are on the side of Bad, and if whites feel compelled to favor such Jews, they too are bad.

    • Replies: @John Johnson
  104. Zen says:
    @Priss Factor

    High class Gentile and Noble performance

  105. @Priss Factor

    If he were a true Marxist, he surely would have condemned Zionism and Israel as well, as well as the very notion of Jewish Identity. Did he? If not, it suggests he merely used Marxism as a tool to subvert white racial identity and consciousness not so much in the service of universalism but to make deracinated whites serve the still standing identity of Jewishness.

    His position on Zionism or Israel wouldn’t mean anything.

    Secular Marxist Jews were divided on Zionism even before the Soviet Union existed.

    The anti-Israel position as typified by Howard Zinn has been the minority.

    • Replies: @Johnny Johnny
  106. @Corrupt

    Given that there are maladies that are more prevalent in certain races, I would argue that the ability of AI to determine the difference is a superpower for good, not evil. The users and developers of this software are morons.

    Everyone and I mean everyone in medicine is aware of racial differences. There all kinds of race based formulas that are used daily.

    Someone is playing stupid.

    I have seen this before with certain studies. The investigators act surprised because it is the only way they can continue to get funding. WOW WE HAD NO IDEA RACE WOULD SHOW UP.

    • Agree: Corrupt
  107. @John Johnson

    I disagree….Marxism is class based, not religion or ethnicity based, if Lewontin were a Marxist he would be anti-Zionist and anti-Israel. In fact, Marxism goes deeper, is really based on evolution and hence hates religion, so there is no way a true Marxist would ever favor any religiously-based anything.

    However…if he saw Judaism as a national enterprise, not a religion, which may be the true way of seeing it since 70 AD, then maybe a classless jewish state as the start of the worldwide revolution would fit Marxism…

  108. I disagree….Marxism is class based, not religion or ethnicity based

    We just went over this in another thread. Marxism has morphed into an anti-White racial movement that really isn’t about economics. There is no class based Marxism anymore. Marxists know they look like idiots if they try to push Marxist economics. That failed numerous times so they rallied around Frankfurt school/postmodern anti-White garbage.

    if Lewontin were a Marxist he would be anti-Zionist and anti-Israel. In fact, Marxism goes deeper, is really based on evolution and hence hates religion, so there is no way a true Marxist would ever favor any religiously-based anything.

    You mistake here is assuming that Marxists care at all about being ideologically principled or consistent.

    The early Bolsheviks couldn’t wait to burn down Christian churches but actually made a deal with the *stans to keep Islam. In fact they even promoted Communism as pro-Islamic. Did it matter that Marx called for all religions to be destroyed? Obviously not.

    We see this today with the left. They give a special pass to Islam even though it stands against everything they supposedly support.

    Leftsts/Marxists are losers that want power. They are an alliance of the resentful and will happily side with anyone that is anti-White or anti-Christian. They don’t care if it “makes sense” or not from a classic Marxist perspective.

    Marx was a bitter loser as well. Never ran a business and thought he could redesign Western economics from the ground up from his living room while sometimes taking a break to shag his maid.

    • Replies: @Johnny Johnny
  109. Geowhizz says:
    @It's Ovrer

    Let’s not forget the nukes gifted to humanity by the tribe’s brilliant nerds. Their Sampson Option, according to Sy Hersh.

  110. @Realist

    Just by the name and the look, you can tell he’s one of the tribe, but he probably made this false assumption for political reasons as he probably knew darn well that race is real, jus like another tribesman did: Boaz.

  111. @follyofwar

    According to extraordinary passed-away journalist, Michael Collins Piper, Taylor is a Mossad asset, a false opposition. Jews play all the cards they can get. You can read about this in Piper’s book available on line for free, Judas Goats. The Enemy Within : https://archive.org/details/MichaelCollinsPiperTheJudasGoatsTheEnemyWithin

    • Replies: @Druide
  112. Agent76 says:

    February 26, 2020 The eugenics debate isn’t over – but we should be wary of people who claim it can fix social problems

    Andrew Sabisky, a UK government adviser, recently resigned over comments supporting eugenics. Around the same time, the evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins – best known for his book The Selfish Gene – provoked controversy when tweeting that, while eugenics is morally deplorable, it “would work”.

    https://theconversation.com/amp/the-eugenics-debate-isnt-over-but-we-should-be-wary-of-people-who-claim-it-can-fix-social-problems-132055

  113. @Chris Moore

    Maybe his major donors are Jews. They can buy anybody that’s got no morals. And Jews like to cover every angle possible. They can hate Whites on the one hand and pay off with the other hand a guy like Jared that defends Whites. Of course, he will never blame the ones who have him on his payroll. It’s called doublethink in 1984.
    Ilana Mercer in SA, Eric Zemmour in France, and Judith Reitman all function the same way: they are very good at denouncing downhill the results of their tribe’s actions but never point the finger at the culprits: Their own tribe. It’s understandable in their case because they are all Jews, but not in Taylor’s case, he’s not Jewish, he’s suppose to fight for Whites..

  114. Currahee says:

    As usual Taylor avoids the obvious: Lewontin, Jew.
    Enough said.

  115. @Drew

    Breeds do behave according to their genes, but if you mix them up in a dog park for example, they don’t mingle according to their breed because unlike humans they were not artificially selected to recognize their breed as one of their own. Pit bulls in a dog park, for example, will not mingle with pit bulls more than they will mingle with any other breed. In other words, they do not have a special attraction for dogs of their own breed. Dogs are breed-blind. Liberals like pro-pit-bull-advocates, wrongly assume that if dogs are breed-blind, humans are also race-blind. They forget that humans were naturally selected to recognize those of their breed or race. So if you mix a bunch of people from different races, in a jail or in a high school for instance, they will eventually mingle with those that are genetically similar to them (theory of genetic similarity by Philippe Ruston: people are naturally attracted by people who have similar genes). This is not at all the case for dogs or any other domestic animal of the same species. But wild animals will mingle according to their breed. There are hundred of breeds of ducks, they are all ducks first and foremost but they divide naturally into their respective breeds because of natural selection. The same for humans, unless they are forced to do otherwise by totalitarian types of ideologues like Trudeau and friends.
    https://charles-danten.blogspot.com/2018/07/the-killer-dog-problem-how-globalists.html

    • Agree: Joseph Doaks
    • Replies: @John Johnson
  116. anon[234] • Disclaimer says:

    What type of Christianity likes Jews the least? I hear Anglicans and Presbos love Jews.

  117. KenH says:
    @John Johnson

    Why is there so much focus here on Jews that sell race denial while conservative masters of the practice like Rush and Hannity are given a pass?

    Pro-whites haven’t let those two fraudsters off the hook but this article concerned Richard Lewontin and his impact on academia. When someone writes an article implicating Rush and Hannity as complicit in perpetuating equalitarian propaganda I will gladly chime in.

    But I will say that Rush (when he was alive) and Hannity passively go along with the racial status quo to protect their status. Their crime was in not contradicting the lies. They weren’t activists and anti-racist ideologues like Lewontin and many other Jews.

    Rush, Hannity and the rest of conservatism, inc. are merely the symptoms of a Jewed society while Jews are the cause.

    • Replies: @Sarah
  118. But I will say that Rush (when he was alive) and Hannity passively go along with the racial status quo to protect their status. Their crime was in not contradicting the lies. They weren’t activists and anti-racist ideologues like Lewontin and many other Jews.

    Stop making excuses for them. Rush had millions of dollars stored away from race denial and could have broken from the status quo. No one forced him to sit on millions of dollars and live with his cat. The guy was a lying entertainer that knew full well that race existed. He wasn’t afraid of Jews, what he was afraid of losing was his celebrity status and golf games.

    Our Anglo elites are not some innocent pawns of Jews. They have chosen greed and globalism over their own people.

    Well before the Jews of Eastern Europe arrived by the boatload the Anglo 1% had already chosen to push race denial. An Anglo by the name of Abraham Lincoln lied to the masses, shut down the press and kept his real opinions about race to himself. Wilson got us into WW1 and supported lying about race. Nixon was secretly recorded talking about racial realities and yet expanded affirmative action on his own accord. Oh but this is Unz where all these powerful men are all just poor wittle victims of Jews.

    Even if you removed Lewontin and Gould type Jews you would still have an Anglo 1% that doesn’t want the dirty masses to talk about race. They are afraid of another Hitler coming along and ruining their precious stock market. That is the harsh truth that few here can face.

    How many here have actually spent time around the wealthy 1%? They view us all with contempt and don’t give a damn about what the Jews are doing. All they care about is making sure their kids can inherit their wealth and any talk that could undermine the system scares them.

    If racial realism even starts to go mainstream I guarantee our wealthy Anglo elites will dump millions into race denial think tanks. They will hire every unemployed Lewontin they can find to tell the dirty masses that their lying eyes deceive them. Anything to keep the Whites from learning the great lie.

    • Agree: Z-man
    • Replies: @joe862
    , @KenH
    , @AnotherDad
  119. @Pierre Simon

    The tactic of denying race because races can interbreed was always a leftist distraction scheme.

    That was never characteristic to any definition of race.

    Even if we play their semantic game and toss the word race that still leaves the question if humans have subspecies.

    The Official Establishment answer to this question is: no because we are humans.

    Humans are given an exemption to the standard taxonomic definition of subspecies because humans. That is really the answer.

    What they really want is for people to stop thinking and just accept the status quo which is to blame Whites for everything. The establishment also allows blaming big government/socialism as long as you don’t suggest that race exists.

  120. some_loon says:
    @martin_2

    If Mr Taylor is so much in thrall to the Jews as some on here claim he is, then why would he dare to write an article critical of Professor Lewontin in the first place?

    My impression is that Taylor is not really bothered by or beholden to anything specifically jewish.

    His issue is mostly with lower IQ blacks, and to a lesser degree some lower IQ others.

    I think he sees the higher-IQ set generally, including Jews, as his hoped for audience. It must be frustrating that he knows that so many of that description see him as an enemy and a bad guy.

    Taylor would clearly rather live next door to a Lewontin than to a newly-rich rapper, no matter how much grease the former may have thrown on the fires of racial tensions.

  121. joe862 says:
    @Richard B

    The need for targets is something I’ve observed with a lot of jews. I tend to think it’s their overpowered tribal instinct. When it detaches form the tribe directly it tends to go looking for other ways to assert itself.

  122. joe862 says:
    @John Johnson

    Agreed. The gentile elites are terrible people as well. You’d think there’d be more who got rich enough to not care about popularity and who would support honest discussions regardless of the political climate. You just don’t see it though.

  123. anon[395] • Disclaimer says:
    @anon

    I find a lot of typo errors in your comment . But I have some relevant questions . Your post has opened my eyes . It is not an easy task to pin down the role of the genetic on the race . Not a single human trait of higher cognitive functioning can be yet traced to the population genetic map . Genes do facet brain developments just like it does affect any other organ developments . These are shared genes with location and tissue specific expressions . Moderate to severe mental retardation of non -traumatic origin do show abnormal development across organs . But we do not see that in mild or borderline intellectual functioning and we cant find meaningful difference between normal low normal and high IQ persons .

  124. Rich says:
    @meretricious

    Ashkenazi are 100% European. They actually have no Semitic blood. Sephardic Jews appear to have a small amount of Semitic blood. All evidence of Ashkenazi connection to the middle east comes either from intermarriage to Sephardic Jews, or recent immigration.

  125. @Sarah

    “Have you noticed …?”

    Yes, as a matter of fact I have noticed. How could anyone not?

  126. Currahee says:
    @Dumbo

    Jewish donors to American Renaissance? Puuleeez!

  127. MBlanc46 says:

    He was the lead stirrer-upper of trouble at the University of Chicago during the Kent State ordeal, when I was a grad student.

  128. anon[234] • Disclaimer says:

    Anglo elites are no more. The World would be better off without Jews, not Anglos. Henry Ford types held Jews back. I know a guy here with a very small amount of Jew blood but he defends Jews regularly. Anyone defending Jews or shifting blame onto White groups is sus. I’d lay odds there’s quite a few crypto-Jews on this site. “Yeah, Anglos are as bad as Jews.” *rubs hands together.”

    • Replies: @John Johnson
  129. Rosie says:
    @HallParvey

    The supply of husband material is qualitatively better, in most cases.

    Indeed.

    Plus the 2 or 3 percent of women who really do hate men are generally much more vocal and their views are more likely to make the Nightly News with Walter W. Crankcase.

    This. Around here, people act like the media is totally FOS, except that their depiction of (White) women is 100% Gospel Truth.

    A woman may not need a man, and a man may not need a woman, but a baby needs it’s mommy and it’s daddy.

    That is certainly the ideal and it should never be compromised. OTOH, there are some parents who are so bad that the child is better off without them. Unfortunately, this is becoming ever more common with the opioid epidemic and associated criminality.

  130. Rosie says:
    @John Johnson

    Perhaps he’s more skillful than you,
    So he tactfully skips “The J.Q.”.

    This is the most likely answer.

    Yet, his concern for optics and normie sensibilities go out the window in regards to the female half of the White community he claims to represent, so I call b.s. Follow the shekels.

  131. Rosie says:
    @John Johnson

    Rush had millions and at any point could have spilled the beans.

    And stayed on the air? I seriously doubt it.

    • Replies: @joe862
    , @John Johnson
  132. joe862 says:
    @Rosie

    But why would he care about staying on the air when he knows he’ll be dead soon? It doesn’t make sense. At some point you shift from worrying about staying on the air to something more significant.

    • Replies: @Rosie
  133. Rosie says:
    @joe862

    But why would he care about staying on the air when he knows he’ll be dead soon? It doesn’t make sense.

    That’s a really good question, and no it doesn’t make sense, which is precisely why I don’t buy the idea that gentiles are to blame.

    The kind of lockstep silence about race and immigration we have seen for these past few decades could not possibly have come about without top-down control of some sort. Someone would have spoken up. You can’t tell me that every single member of the House of Representatives agreed with the censure of Steve King. Not one single White person disagreed? Really? Come on! That is just not credible. These people are marionettes.

  134. Man, you sho is one Rocky Scintillaist genius yas you is!

    Ever see a Saint Bernhard?

    Ever see a Chihuahua?

    Them is the exact same species. They can mate naturally, and produce viable offspring.

  135. @Realist

    This is part of a much bigger problem. Many “right wing” websites won’t let you link to UR or similar websites. Usually this is because the website isn’t “right wing ” at all and doesn’t want links to UR where race and the Jewish Question are discussed freely. Alternatively, they’re worried about their sponsors cutting off their money.

    TheDuran is one such website. It deals mainly with Russian and East European matters. Its Editor-in-Chief, Alexander Mercouris, has repeatedly praised the UR Blogger Anatoly Karlin. When I tried to link to a Karlin article at UR, it rejected my comment. The same goes for other UR articles.
    The Duran was set up by RT host, Peter Lavelle, when he stopped writing for Russia Insider. RI editor, Baussman, had let contributors deal frankly with the JQ. This was too much for Lavelle.
    As its main sponsor, Lavelle obviously calls the tune at the Duran.

  136. Sarah says:
    @John Johnson

    Why is there so much focus here on Jews that sell race denial while conservative masters of thethat sell race denial while conservative masters of the practice like Rush and Hannity are given a pass?

    These people are indoctrinated; their promotion of race-mixing does not come from themselves, they repeat the propaganda with which they were impregnated.

    Same phenomenon in religion: converts are often more fanatical than those born in the said religion.

  137. Sarah says:
    @KenH

    Rush and Hannity as complicit in perpetuating equalitarian propaganda

    But I will say that Rush (when he was alive) and Hannity passively go along with the racial status quo to protect their status. Their crime was in not contradicting the lies

    These people are indoctrinated; their promotion of race-mixing does not come from themselves, they repeat the propaganda with which they were impregnated.

    Same phenomenon in religion: converts are often more fanatical than those born in the said religion.

    • Replies: @John Johnson
  138. Maddaugh says:
    @Priss Factor

    Priss you are behind the times. If we did not have these Chimps graduating from school with an average grade of Z, I would have to wait longer for my fast food order.

    As usual, when we highlight the sophisticated behaviour of Blacks we get a sophisticated counter comment from Truffles.

    I really dont even know why they bother to go to school. One reason could be that there is not much left to steal and all street corners have already been claimed by this and that gang.

    These Orcs seem to have nowhere else left to go.

    • Replies: @Johnny Rico
  139. @Rosie

    Rush had millions and at any point could have spilled the beans.

    And stayed on the air? I seriously doubt it.

    He could do a podcast, write a book, etc.

    Stop making excuses for these lying millionaires.

    • Replies: @Rosie
  140. @Sarah

    These people are indoctrinated; their promotion of race-mixing does not come from themselves, they repeat the propaganda with which they were impregnated.

    Oh give me a break.

    Everyone at Fox News is aware of race. They live in NYC after all.

    They are carrying out the plan of Con Inc which is to deny race and try to pin everything on “big government” or socialism.

    It’s a stupid plan that has failed miserably but the more people defend it the more they will carry it on.

    They are rejecting basic cause and effect thinking in favor of some feely-good ideology that pretends race doesn’t exist and government is always the problem.

  141. @anon

    Anglo elites are no more. The World would be better off without Jews, not Anglos. Henry Ford types held Jews back. I know a guy here with a very small amount of Jew blood but he defends Jews regularly. Anyone defending Jews or shifting blame onto White groups is sus. I’d lay odds there’s quite a few crypto-Jews on this site. “Yeah, Anglos are as bad as Jews.” *rubs hands together.”

    Anglo elites are no more? Good lord there is some serious reality denial here.

    What exactly is stopping an Anglo billionaire from telling the truth?

    The harsh reality that few here can handle is that when Anglos get wealthy they go globalist. They see themselves as gods of the planet and reject the idea that they have any loyalty to their nationality.

    Trying to understand this problem would be more productive than just blaming Jews.

    It’s completely absurd to try and depict Anglos with endless wealth and influence as slaves to Jews.

    This is why I don’t have a problem with massive taxes on the wealthy. Anglo billionaires are unable to put down the globalist crackpipe. They really, really want to believe that the world just needs Great Anglo Men like them to guide it. That includes telling lies about race so the dirty White masses don’t disrupt the great capitalist order. They view the reality of race as unfair and not the province of common Whites. We are supposed to just work our daily jobs and let the Great Anglo Men manage everything. That is how they think.

    • Replies: @Alexandros
  142. @John Johnson

    You can’t be an anglo elite without a country. What has changed since Henry Ford and Count de Gobinau is that our countries are no longer independent. If you want to be elite you have to submit to Jewish values, not Anglo.

    The old anglo elite have turned into white jews, just like most of the population in those countries. They don’t resist because it is impossible for them to even conceptualize why they should. From their perspective things have never been better.

    The elite will always resist if you threaten their position. Currently that threat is not Jews, it is “Nazis” who want to end their gravy train.

    • Replies: @John Johnson
  143. @Alexandros

    More excuses for millionaires and billionaires.

    Nothing is stopping Elon Musk from defending South African Whites. Nothing.

    But he knows that if he told the truth about South Africa then he would lose his celebrity status and all that goes with it. Not that he really cares in the first place about his origin but he would lose all his glorious praise if he spoke the truth.

    Anglo elites don’t want to give up their celebrity status and fans even if it means they would still be rich.

    William Shockley could have become a billionaire but chose to study racial genetics instead. He even said that it was more important than anything he did with semi-conductors.

    Of course the mainstream media turned against him which was expected. They weren’t going to shower him with praise for talking honestly about race. But his example shows that this is not simply a problem of the Jews. If he can seek truth over status then so can others.

    Our Anglo elites want their media praise and their private islands and their fans and everything else that goes with it. They aren’t going to give any of that up to tell the truth.

    This is an age old problem of wealth corruption. It is magnified in the modern world with mass media celebrity status.

    But any of our Anglo elites could buck the system if they wanted to. Instead they support the great lie and relish in their power and influence. They are cowards that prefer money to their own people so stop defending them. They are not naïve about the world or under the control of Jews.

    Eventually someone will come along and tell the truth and your shallow excuses will seem even sadder.

    • Replies: @Alexandros
  144. @John Johnson

    If “diversity” is cancer, the 1965 Immigration Act was that cancer metastasizing into stage 4. An undesirable development to be sure, but the cancer was already there. Blacks were already citizens, with special rights thanks to the previous year’s Civil Rights Act. Jews had already hoarded a great amount of wealth and were using it to harm their hapless hosts.

  145. John1955 says:

    “On the Phenomena of Hybridity in the Genus Homo”

    https://archive.org/details/onphenomenaofhyb00brocuoft/page/114/mode/2up

    Paul Broca was a French anthropologist,member of the Academy.Region of human brain (located in frontal lobe) is named after him (hence the title of one modern book “Broca’s Brain”)

    Since we all must be woke,politically correct and bend over backwards to accomodate every radioactive fad emanating from Ivory Towers let’s just state allegorically:

    YES,200LBS MASTIFF CAN INTERBREED WITH 1LB POODLE !

    BUT IT DOES NOT MEAN THAT IT MUST.OR EVEN SHOULD.

    Meanwhile we may observe the case of “hybrid vigor” in Barak Obama.Pretty feisty fella I might say.Frolicking in Martha’s Vineyard w/o Covid mask 😀

  146. KenH says:
    @John Johnson

    The Anglo elite are not the wellspring of anti-racist activism and ideology. The Anglo elite are not the architects of censorship and social media deplatforming and now debanking. Jewish elites like the ADL are. Jeff Bezos is largely bowing to ADL and SPLC pressure when he burns books by removing them from sale.

    He wasn’t afraid of Jews, what he was afraid of losing was his celebrity status and golf games.

    That’s what I said in my original reply to you. Like Pat Buchanan, who used to speak regularly about race problems and the perils of mass immigration until Jews orchestrated a hate campaign against him and got him kicked off MSNBC, Rush chose continued fame over the truth about race. If he went full Daily Stormer his show would have lost all of his advertisers which means his show would have ended. Then he would be relegated to his own website but even then his web host probably would have been booted him under not Anglo elite but Jewish elite pressure.

    You’re also overlooking that Rush and Hannity apparently love the Jewish people and with Rush it was near worship, so they’re true believers in the fairy tale of Jews as blameless chosen people.

    An Anglo by the name of Abraham Lincoln lied to the masses, shut down the press and kept his real opinions about race to himself.

    In the Lincoln Douglas debates Lincoln boldly declared that he opposed granting the negro social and political equality. The debate was in public so he wasn’t hiding his opinions about race. Lincoln also wanted to relocate the blacks to Central America or back to Africa.

    Even if you removed Lewontin and Gould type Jews you would still have an Anglo 1% that doesn’t want the dirty masses to talk about race.

    Get back to me on that when the Anglo elite wrest media control from the Jews.

    The Anglo elite are guilty of ceding cultural, media and institutional power to the Jews and failing to use their power to protect their less fortunate kinfolk from Jewish depredations. Similar to author Christopher Lasch’s thesis in “The Revolt of the Elites” Anglo elites have effectively seceded from the rest of us and foolishly believe they have more in common with other elites, including Jewish elites, than their own people.

    Hannity and those like him didn’t celebrate the latest census figures showing a decline of the white population on Twitter. But lots of Jewish elites did.

    • Replies: @John Johnson
  147. Mevashir says:

    The Anglo elite are not the wellspring of anti-racist activism and ideology. The Anglo elite are not the architects of censorship and social media deplatforming and now debanking. Jewish elites like the ADL are. Jeff Bezos is largely bowing to ADL and SPLC pressure when he burns books by removing them from sale.

    In South Africa, where I lived from 2000-2004, the Anglo elites were responsible for pandering to and placating the ANC and undermining white Afrikaner rule. The Anglos owned the mines that employed thousands of black workers and went out of their way to accommodate their demands. The Anglican Church also sent missionaries out to black tribal areas against the policy of the Afrikaner Dutch Reformed Church that avoided them totally.

  148. @John Johnson

    Why should Elon Musk defend SA whites? In his mind there isn’t even a problem, and if it was, he does not identify with them. Why? Because nobody ever told him otherwise.

    Nobody is saying the elite has a lot of honor or care for ordinary people. Even Henry Ford caved on the Jews when they started threatening his money. But at least there was a Henry Ford, or a Charles Lindbergh in those times.

    The reason there is nobody like that today is because the entire culture has been conquered. Even if they cared they would be unlikely to understand. Like the vast majority of ordinary folks are too.

    • Agree: Mevashir
  149. Mevashir says:

    I think Mr. Taylor could make his racialist perspective more palatable to a wider audience in the following way. Accept the claim of anthropologists that humans originated in Africa. According to this we were all equal. For some mysterious reason according to the anthropologists humans migrated North Out of Africa into Europe and Asia. You then can argue that the environmental stresses in those areas, especially the cold weather and the different kinds of agriculture, forced humans to evolve to a higher degree of intelligence.

    In other words according to Darwin’s theory the environmental pressures of living in a more stressful place selectively adapted humans for greater levels of intelligence. You can argue that white people are simply a product of special environmental pressure. That removes an element of pride. (You could even formalize this theory into something like a special theory of racial relativity, to parallel Einstein’s theory in physics of special relativity!)

    I think the same thing would apply to Jews. Jews in the middle east two thousand years ago probably were not particularly intelligent. Especially if you compare them to Muslims in the same region today, who are adept at textual casuistry and argumentation, but the practical technical skills of life, engineering electronics physics, they are shockingly incompetent in and that’s why Saudi Arabia has to import foreign workers to fill these crucial positions.

    I think it is safe to assume Jews from the Middle East were similarly non innovative and technologically backwards. It’s only the Diaspora experience in Europe and Russia that created selective adaptive pressures so that Jews became more intelligent. Their emphasis on convoluted Talmudic study also selected for intelligence as did their breeding practices in which elite Talmudic scholars were offered enormous dowries by rich businessmen to marry their daughters and to propagate their seed.

    I think if you invoke this kind of Darwinist argument it would make your perspective less objectionable. After all Lewontin was himself a Darwinist and he could hardly argue against the points that I am suggesting you marshall on your behalf.

    Shalom

  150. Mevashir says:

    I would add this point is well. I think physically POC are more attractive than white people. Especially the females. Everyone knows that black women are voluptuous. I suspect that the melanin that darkens their skin also confers biochemical advantages so that POC are more emotionally balanced and healthier than whites.

    White people look pale and anemic. They are not nearly as physically attractive as POC. When you live in a stressful environment then brainpower has selective advantages. But when you live in a culture like ours, where machines are doing the work that people did in the past; and knowledge is being disseminated globally; and the degradation of popular culture and the lack of respect for organized religion leads to an idolization of the physical and the carnal: all of these factors confer an advantage on POC.

    The same can be said for Jews. They are not physically very attractive people. Just look at Ron Unz as an example! Perhaps beauty and brains are like a see-saw where when you have an excess of one there will be a deficiency of the other.

    (Jonathan Revusky on the other hand has the best of both worlds, intelligence from his Jewish heritage and attractiveness from his Chinese heritage.)

    • Replies: @Mevashir
  151. Rosie says:
    @John Johnson

    He could do a podcast, write a book, etc.

    Stop making excuses for these lying millionaires.

    Except that the publishing companies are run by the same people who run the TV networks, which are run by the same people who are currently deplatforming dissidents from online platforms. Twitter censored the President of the United States for f***’s sake. Let that sink in.

    Seriously, I don’t disagree with you that Anglo elite cowardice has been disgraceful and unforgivable, but we can’t ignore the fact that there is tremendous pressure on them to keep mum.

    • Thanks: Sarah
  152. MrE 3001 says:

    So Taylor was clearly lying and patronizing E Michael Jones when Taylor pretended not to know how race-denying, jewish academics managed to attack White people from the race-denying perspective. Well, I’ll spell it out for you (((Uncle Jared))). When race disappears, the only explanation for group differences is White racism and the only cure is the destruction of the White race. You absolute snake-in-the-grass.

  153. omg. i just found the funniest video on YT! she be spittin’ truth about Black low IQ. LOL!
    if you need a good laugh.. watch 🙂 oh snap! it’s Tila Tequilla! HAHA

    • Disagree: Mevashir
  154. Mevashir says:
    @Mevashir

    I would also add this warning. Intelligence is not the same thing as wisdom. Often cultures with low technological prowess have high levels of wisdom. Witness (non-Chinese) Buddhism for example. Just because a person is technologically savvy does not mean s/he possesses life wisdom. If climate change is a product of human technology, then that kind of intelligence may prove to our ultimate detriment.

    I think tropical cultures, where POC originate and are concentrated, are more mellow and accepting of fate. They live in the moment and enjoy life with its pleasure and pain, ugliness and beauty. Much of white technological prowess is designed to thwart the dangers of the natural world, to stave off death, to delay the inevitable. Who can say that is truly wise?

    Given a choice I would rather live on a tropical South Pacific island with its beautiful Polynesian natives than in Da Vinci’s Renaissance Italy with its plagues, open sewers in the streets, corrupt clergy, constant warfare, and rampant prostitution. In fact I’d take such an island over contemporary America as well.

    • Replies: @Mevashir
    , @Mevashir
    , @Anon
  155. Mevashir says:
    @Mevashir

    Further thoughts on the difference between intelligence and wisdom. Consider some of the fruits of “white intelligence”:

    Genetically modified biowarfare agents that trigger global pandemics.
    Nuclear weapons to threaten global Holocaust.
    Cyber spying and surveillance that threatens individual freedom.
    Catastrophic global warming from the aggregate of white industrial civilization.

    So thanks Caucasoids for destroying the planet with your amazing brilliance!

    Consider that European-fought wars have been the bloodiest in history. That’s because they utilize their technological genius to create industrial-scale mass murder machines. And I’m not talking about the Jewish Holocaust but about European warfare in general. Some say European wars caused one hundred million deaths in the 20th century alone.

    People of color are not nearly as bloodthirsty because they’re happier more mellow more living in the moment more in tune with their feelings and emotions. If you will counter with the Rwandan genocide, consider this.

    Few people realize that Rwanda was a Catholic civil war caused by the French colonialists. 85% of Rwandans were Roman Catholic, equally both warring tribes Hutus and Tutsis. The French caused this genocide because for years while they were the colonial masters of Rwanda they favored One Tribe to the detriment of the other giving them the choice civil servant positions and allowing them to become the economic elites. Eventually frustration boiled over and resulted in what the world thinks is a Rwandan genocide even though it was caused by French Europeans.

    So if white people have higher IQs than people of color, it’s not much to boast about. It seems that the higher their IQ the lower their morality and the greater their depravity. Sure there are a lot of black-on-black killings across America in impoverished ghettos. But those killings are dwarfed by the mass killings of the American Military machine fighting wars against people of color across the globe.

    Try to keep things in perspective. I realize it’s not pleasant looking in the mirror and seeing someone ugly staring back at you. But that’s what courageous and ethical people do rather than looking for scapegoats.

  156. Mevashir says:
    @Mevashir

    Further thoughts on the difference between intelligence and wisdom. Consider some of the fruits of “white intelligence”—>

    —>Genetically modified biowarfare agents that trigger global pandemics.
    —>Nuclear weapons to threaten global Holocaust.
    —>Cyber spying and surveillance that threatens individual freedom.
    —> Catastrophic global warming from the aggregate of white industrial civilization.

    So thanks Caucasoids for destroying the planet with your amazing brilliance!

    Consider that European-fought wars have been the bloodiest in history. That’s because they utilize their technological genius to create industrial-scale mass murder machines. And I’m not talking about the Jewish Holocaust but about European warfare in general. Some say European wars caused one hundred million deaths in the 20th century alone.

    People of color are not nearly as bloodthirsty because they’re happier more mellow more living in the moment more in tune with their feelings and emotions. If you will counter with the Rwandan genocide, consider this.

    Few people realize that Rwanda was a Catholic civil war caused by the French colonialists. 85% of Rwandans were Roman Catholic, equally both warring tribes Hutus and Tutsis. The French caused this genocide because for years while they were the colonial masters of Rwanda they favored One Tribe to the detriment of the other giving them the choice civil servant positions and allowing them to become the economic elites. Eventually frustration boiled over and resulted in what the world thinks is a Rwandan genocide even though it was caused by French Europeans.

    So if white people have higher IQs than people of color, it’s not much to boast about. It seems that the higher their IQ the lower their morality and the greater their depravity. Sure there are a lot of black-on-black killings across America in impoverished ghettos. But those killings are dwarfed by the mass killings of the American Military machine fighting wars against people of color across the globe.

    Try to keep things in perspective. I realize it’s not pleasant looking in the mirror and seeing someone ugly staring back at you. But that’s what courageous and ethical people do rather than looking for scapegoats.

    • Replies: @joe862
  157. @Z-man

    Well, I mean, I think that was the point Jared was trying to make. He’s preaching to the choir, right? He knows his audience. You understand. He understands. He knows you are going to make the point. You make it. We good here?

    • Replies: @Z-man
  158. @Maddaugh

    The real question here of course is why your mother didn’t bother sending you to school.

  159. PolarBear says:

    David Duke accepts the Out of Africa Theory but the only thing palatable to normies is race denial + blame Whitey. The Blackest Nilotic Sudanese are not voluptuous. Blacks are the least emotionally balanced I’ve seen. I often see Ghetto Blacks and Black Professionals have emotional breakdowns. When Jessica Simpson went Black Africa, she was seen as the most beautiful and a Black African tribesman offered to trade his wives for her. There’s beauty in every race. Black Africans best asset is their body, Orientals often have cute youthful facial features, but most all the perfect 10s on planet Earth are White.

  160. joe862 says:
    @Mevashir

    The main difference is that whitey has written history so we have a record of what happened. Nobody really knows what people with no written history were doing before the arrival of literates. It’s the difference between written history staring back and nothing staring back.

    • Replies: @Mevashir
  161. @John Johnson

    LOL, you can’t even get Lincoln and Wilson remotely right.

    There is a class issue and “capitalist” issue. But not being rude and trying to manage the society you have reasonably are not remotely the same thing as the minoritarian–bad white gentiles, bad, bad, bad!–ideology we have today.

    We’d still have issues with modernity and our DOS diversity, but absent the rise of the Jews we would not have minoritarianism as our reigning ideology, would not be in the abject dystopia we are in and certainly would not have Soviet style narrative enforcement.

  162. Mevashir says:
    @joe862

    You make a good point. Maybe you are right. Supposedly the Aztecs engaged in brutal forms of tribal warfare enslavement and mass murder.

    I tend to the opinion that people are uniformly evil and depraved. In my experience more intelligent people simply have more opportunities to indulge their depravity. I wish I was wrong but I don’t think I am.

    Theodore Kaczynski was trained as a scientist and was extremely intelligent but he came to view most scientific research as having negative destructive applications and as the Unabomber he took extreme actions to protest our culture that venerates science technology and high IQ people. I think it’s worth considering his negative perspective on our society.

  163. @KenH

    In the Lincoln Douglas debates Lincoln boldly declared that he opposed granting the negro social and political equality. The debate was in public so he wasn’t hiding his opinions about race. Lincoln also wanted to relocate the blacks to Central America or back to Africa.

    That debate was open to the public but in his speeches to the public he preached equality.

    Lincoln made statements here and there about resettling Blacks and then changed his mind.

    He NEVER brought up the Liberia plan with congress. That was all lip service before the war.

    By his actions it was clear that he wanted to leave Blacks in the South.

    He hated Southern Whites and wanted to humiliate them as much as possible. His actions during and after the war made that clear.

    Like Pat Buchanan, who used to speak regularly about race problems and the perils of mass immigration until Jews orchestrated a hate campaign against him and got him kicked off MSNBC

    Oh give me a break. As if the GOP was lining up to listen to him.

    What you and others here don’t want to face is that conservative White men don’t like the reality of race.

    Evangelical Christians are offended by the evolutionary aspect.
    Capitalist conservatives want the largest market possible.
    Traditional conservatives are offended by the implications.
    Libertarians believe that individualism is everything.

    Racial realists are a minority for a reason and it is far more complicated than “the Jews”.

    Most of you need to spend time around conservatives in real life and not the internet.

    The ideology is half the problem. Conservatives are prone to favor feel-good sloganeering (‘Merican values, pull up ur boot straps, etc) over thinkers like Buchanan. PB has been right in all of his predictions and they still don’t want to listen to him. They will take a “feel good” candidate like a Bush or De Santis any day. Have you ever sat and watched CPAC? It is amazing as to how much they can talk without actually saying anything.

    Get back to me on that when the Anglo elite wrest media control from the Jews.

    Ok sure.

    Fox – Started by an Anglo. 24-7 doofus level conservatism and race denial.
    CNN – Started by an Anglo. Promoted race denial and globalism from the start.

    Get back to me when Fox News does an investigation of the Frankfurt School or a real investigation of anything for that matter.

    FOX NEWS INVESTIGATES A RACIAL CONFLICT AT 10.
    Could big government be the problem or perhaps the Democrats are to blame? WE ARE ON THE CASE.

  164. And… umm… here’s the thing you may have missed there, Jared:

    Lewontin, naturally, was an expressly self-declared JEWISH Marxist liar, fraud, charlatan and scumbag.

    We just can’t get away from the people you never talk about, can we ?

    Funny, that.

  165. @martin_2

    There are many things you could call David Lammy – but “British loyalist” will never be one of them.

    Lammy is an unhinged, hate-driven, anti-White racist with an agenda as determined and ruthless as that of his long-time co-ethnic in Parliament – the murderously-minded Labour party Black witch Diane Abbott.

    But whereas Abbott has an IQ in single figures, Lammy has a very sharp edge, high verbal IQ, and a strength for spotting strategic weaknesses in the enemy. With his newspaper columns, regular stints on national radio talk-stations, and a very determined power-base in Black inner-city London, Lammy is still, away from Parliament, one of the most dangerous men in Britain.

  166. @Sarah

    Great pic.

    But the cat is a Photo-shop – claws fully out in a tense climbing position, plus 90-degree back-arch. And tail far down for sensitive balance – it’s ALWAYS up and out in a jump or drop.

    Pedantry ? I dabble.

    • Thanks: Sarah
  167. @Richard Sampson

    LOL

    Everything I’ve ever read of his writings has made it crystal-clear to me that Jared Taylor is nowhere near that stupid.

    Good try.

  168. This all started with a charlatan “Anthropologist” named Franz Boas. It was promulgated by his disciples, including Ashley Montagu. They were both Jews.

  169. HbutnotG says:
    @Mike Tre

    Class per class and person to person,, Hispanics probably scrub their doobies (and their peeholes) just as carefully as any white guy. It’s an individual thing and soap is everywhere these days. Differences in odor are due solely to eccrine glands and diet. HPV is more associated with the number of different partners possibly carrying that virus. Cut men can carry it, though probably for a lesser period of time than the uncirc’ed..

    I’m a radical anti-circumcisionist, btw. My ethnic classifications (you may have encountered) are based on more pertinent stuff than DNA sequences which have, to date, a limited established relationship to apparent, phenotypic real life traits. When you’ve done 1000 or so (white) guys, get back to me. The nose knows, and a fresh cake of Dial can’t cover it up!

  170. Druide says:
    @Pierre Simon

    More detailed info on Jared Taylor and his friend the crook Mark Weber, both of them being connected to intelligence (CIA, Mossad) and probably intelligence assets, in this excised section (censored by court order at the demand of Weber) of Piper’s book The Judas Goats, entitled “Coup d’Etat”, available right here for free: https://balderexlibris.com/index.php?post/Piper-Michael-Collins-Coup-d-Etat

  171. MEH 0910 says:

    “The idea that there was more variation within a group than across groups is an old one. That had been there for decades,” says Jonathan Marks, professor of anthropology at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte. “What Lewontin did was put numbers on it. And that was very powerful.”

    [MORE]

    https://www.unz.com/isteve/is-science-racist/

    In 1995 leftist anthropologist Jonathan Marks coined the term “human biodiversity” in his book of that name. I came up with the phrase independently but second in history, as I immediately discovered by entering the phrase into the early Alta Vista search engine.

  172. @Johnny Johnny

    “Did he mean attitudinally?”

    Are you kidding? With the number of White women he banged while he was married?

  173. Anon[134] • Disclaimer says:
    @Mevashir

    I don’t know about you, but I’ve actually lived in a tropical culture (not the South Pacific) and, while part of what you say is true, people there are more or less like people anywhere else– the same jealousies and rivalries, the same capacities for love and spirit, only that they don’t pretend that they are somehow better than everybody else.

    I don’t think I would mind living in the Renaissance Italy which produced St. Catherine of Siena, or the very similar medieval Italy which produced St. Francis of Assisi or St. Thomas Aquinas.

  174. MEH 0910 says:

    There is a good precedent for this kind of concern. In “Blueprint,” Robert Plomin wrote that polygenic scores should be understood as “fortune tellers” that can “foretell our futures from birth.” Jared Taylor, a white-supremacist leader, argued that Plomin’s book should “destroy the basis for the entire egalitarian enterprise of the last 60 or so years.” He seized on Plomin’s claim that, for many outcomes, “environmental levers for change are not within our grasp.” Taylor wrote, “This is a devastating finding for the armies of academics and uplift artists who think every difference in outcome is society’s fault.” He continued, “And, although Blueprint includes nothing about race, the implications for ‘racial justice’ are just as colossal.” Harden has been merciless in her response to behavior geneticists whose disciplinary salesmanship—and perhaps worse—inadvertently indulges the extreme right. In her own review of Plomin’s book, she wrote, “Insisting that DNA matters is scientifically accurate; insisting that it is the only thing that matters is scientifically outlandish.” ​(Plomin told me that Harden misrepresented his intent. He added, “Good luck to Paige in convincing people who are engaged in the culture wars about this middle path she’s suggesting. . . . My view is it isn’t worth confronting people and arguing with them.”)

  175. @John Johnson

    I still disagree, but it sounds like a matter of semantics more than anything. But I think any argument would be better served by calling the current movement by whatever it has morphed into, not just calling them Marxists which isn’t helping to enlighten anyone who doesn’t know about the Frankfurt School, what Bolsheviks did, etc., and is frankly not accurate historically or philosphically.

    Why not just call “them” anti-White, anti-Christian losers?

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Jared Taylor Comments via RSS