The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 PodcastsJared Taylor Archive
Race-Blind Criminal Law Is Officially Over
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Whites to get harsher treatment.

Video Link

This video is available on Rumble and Odysee.

Just a few days ago, on June 9th, something very ominous happened that hardly anyone noticed. The Washington State Supreme Court ruled that the criminal law should officially treat people of color more leniently than it treats whites.

Civil law was perverted long ago. Laws that were supposed to stop racial discrimination are now routinely used to justify blatant discrimination in hiring, promotion, and college admission – so long as the victims are white and sometimes Asian.

And criminal law is enforced unfairly all the time, but the pretense has always been that it was blind to race. Not anymore.

The case in Washington was about “seizure of a person.” The police can seize you without arresting you. It’s when you are not free to go, even if you have not been arrested. You lose certain rights when you are seized. You can’t walk away, and you have to answer the police truthfully.

Back in 2019, police found Palla Sum sleeping in his car in a public place. An officer asked some questions about the car and asked Mr. Sum to identify himself. Mr. Sum wasn’t under arrest. He wasn’t seized. He could have said, “Good day, Officer,” and driven off. There is no dispute about that, but instead, Mr. Sum lied about who he was, and this led to unpleasant consequences that needn’t concern us here.

Mr. Sum’s lawyers argued that although Mr. Sum was not seized, it was reasonable for him to think he was seized, because he is a person of color. It was reasonable for him to think he couldn’t just drive away, which he might have done if he were white, and therefore his lie to the officer must be treated as if it never happened. It was an unlawful seizure of information, and cannot be used as evidence.

All nine members of the Washington Supreme Court agreed. They stated flatly – without any evidence – that “implicit, institutional, and unconscious biases, in addition to purposeful discrimination, have resulted in disproportionate police contacts, investigative seizures, and uses of force against Black, Indigenous, and other People of Color (BIPOC) in Washington.”

They wrote that America is so awful that “generations of children have had to grow up with ‘the Talk,’” in which Mom and Dad tell them how dangerous white policemen are.

There is no evidence Mr. Sum ever got “the talk.” There was no evidence he was ever mistreated by the police. In fact, Mr. Sum is Asian, which means people of his race are stopped, arrested, and convicted less often than whites. The judges said it didn’t matter. They wrote that Mr. Sum had no obligation to show that Asians are mistreated. The only thing that mattered was their assertion that BIPOCs are mistreated, and he was BIPOC. The judges didn’t even care what race the officer was. He could have been Asian. It didn’t matter. Nor did the judges care whether the officer even noticed Mr. Sum’s race. Mr. Sum was a BIPOC, and for that reason alone, he gets a break.

Think of where this could go. BIPOCs are more likely than whites to die at the hands of the police. Therefore, it’s not a sign of guilt if they run at the sight of a cop car. They are just getting out of pistol range. Likewise, it could be reasonable for BIPOCs to resist arrest, even kill an officer, out of legitimate fear that the police might kill them. This madness could go anywhere. For now, it’s law only Washington State.

Justice Mary Yu wrote the opinion. In 2014, “She became the first Asian-American, the first Latina, and first openly gay supreme court justice in the state.”

Getting a unanimous decision was easy. As the Seattle Times explained in an article called “Washington Supreme Court tries to chart a different path on race” “Among the nine justices there is only one white man. There are seven women, four people of color, three Jewish justices, two lesbians, the court’s first Indigenous justice and a Black immigrant from Trinidad and Tobago.”

The Chief Justice is Hispanic. Washington, by the way, is still two-thirds white.

The US Supreme Court would probably strike down this ruling, but the truth is, our system doesn’t even need it in order to be anti-white.

Just this weekend, 31 members of a white nationalist group called Patriot Front were arrested in Coeur d’Alene Idaho, on their way to protest a gay-pride event.

They were all booked on charges of conspiracy to riot. Riot? Jon Lewis studies violent extremism in America.

Right after the arrest, he explained what Patriot Front does: “Their playbook, according to Lewis, involves identifying local grievances to exploit, organizing on platforms like the messaging app Telegram, and ultimately showing up to events marching in neat columns, in blue- or white-collared-shirt uniforms, in a display of strength.”

Again, I ask: Where’s the evidence they would riot?

Even this hostile article called “Who are Patriot Front? An intro to the sinister US neo-Nazi group,” couldn’t think of a single violent act from these guys, let alone a riot.

It seems to me that their only crime is standing up for white people.

This was part of the event Patriot Front was going to protest. [[0:00 – 0:33.]] This is a man, by the way, which became clear when he squatted down and exposed himself – rather to the surprise of the little white children who were watching. Exposing himself to children was a felony under Idaho law, but, so far as I know he was not charged, unlike the members of the Patriot Front, who planned only to exercise their First Amendment rights.

The Democrats are now holding what they call “hearings” on the January 6 riot at the Capitol. They seem to have forgotten all about the BLM riots, especially the three days of mayhem in 2020, when mobs injured 60 Secret Service as they tried to break into the Trump White House.

It got so bad, the Secret Service hustled Donald, Melania, and their son Barron into an underground bunker.

This mob of curfew breakers at the White House later burned St. John’s Church, just across the street.

In the War of 1812, the British burned the White House but no churches. What happened to these rioters and arsonists? As the Washington Post reported, “D.C. police said they made 106 arrests from Saturday through early Monday, including dozens involving charges of felony rioting. But when the arrestees appeared in Superior Court on Monday, the U.S. attorney’s office dismissed rioting charges against most of the defendants. A handful still face that count.

Were any of them ever indicted, much less convicted? I can’t even find out. No one seems to care.

This is a little different from the merciless FBI manhunt for the January 6 rioters. Just two months after the riot, it was already “the biggest criminal investigation in U.S. history.”

The building was cleared in just four hours, but as of this week, “at least 865 people have been charged.”

The feds are still trying to track down and arrest every single person who was in the Capitol, even if he just walked through an open door, looked around, and went home.

Even the AP admits this is strange: “hundreds of people were charged only with misdemeanors such as illegal entry that typically do not land first-time offenders behind bars.”

Remember: After the attack on the White House, people charged with felony riot had charges dropped.

Some judges have sent those first-time offenders straight to jail. No community service; no probation. Judge Trevor McFadden, who has handled some of the Jan6 cases, is astonished: “In my experience as a judge and former prosecutor, it’s almost unheard of for someone who is essentially a first-time offender to get jail time for a nonviolent misdemeanor.”

But, as the AP notes, “In the Jan. 6 cases, 1 judge stands out as the toughest punisher.”

Who might that be?

Judge Tanya Chutkan, who was born in Jamaica.

She routinely hands out harsher punishment than prosecutors ask for. That, too, is almost unheard of. She says if you break the law in the name of civil rights, you deserve to walk. But Jan Sixers wanted to “overthrow the lawfully elected government.” Same crime, different outcome, depending on the judge’s politics. That’s what the rule of law means for Tanya Chutkan.

Back to the Supreme Court of Washington State. Just 10 days after George Floyd laid down his life for civil rights, the justices sent a letter to the state’s entire legal profession. Our pal Mary Yu drafted it, and it said: “As judges, we must recognize the role we have played in devaluing black lives.” When in their lives did this lot ever devalue black lives?

In a state that never had slavery or Jim Crow, and where only 6 percent of the population is even black? Or are they just reciting the creed of a new religion? They call the building they work in “The Temple of Justice,” so I guess I know the answer.

In their letter, the justices also wrote: “We can develop a greater awareness of our own conscious and unconscious biases in order to make just decisions.”

I’d say they have conscious biases – against white people.

Just like their buddy Judge Tanya Chutkan.

They don’t even pretend that justice is blind. It’s for punishing political enemies and coddling protected groups. There’s no blindfold on this lady.

(Republished from American Renaissance by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 19 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. I generally support the police, just doing their job. But if it’s legal for them to lie to us, it should be legal for us to lie to them. If this law is changed for everyone, Black criminality will have accidentally achieved something possible.

  2. Just a few days ago, on June 9th, something very ominous happened that hardly anyone noticed. The Washington State Supreme Court ruled that the criminal law should officially treat people of color more leniently than it treats whites.

    Why complain now? For the longest time, Jews have been above the law.

    Jews did USS Liberty, but whites looked the other way.

    So many Jewish crooks got pardoned for serious crimes while goyim got sent away forever.

    Even Pollard is out and living like a king in Israel with a fat middle finger at the US.

    When whites failed to hold Jews to the same standards and when these Jews took power, this was going so spread like a cancer.

    We have Jewstice than Justice. Jews and their allies get special treatment while white patriots and Palestinians get it in the neck.

    And of course, Israel is notorious for its two-tier justice system, but US has been supporting Israel 100%. Well, it seems the Zionist way has come here.

    Jews and their allies get special treatment while whites are treated like Palestinians.

  3. Atle says:

    Race-blind criminal law has been gone for a while now. We’ve been moving to different laws for different ethnicities as a way to mollify various failing groups and I don’t see it ending anytime soon.

    • Agree: Realist
    • Replies: @SMK
  4. Realist says:

    Thanks for the informative video, one has to wonder when White people in this country will get tired of being buggered. Nothing will change until then.

    • Replies: @Ulf Thorsen
  5. @Realist

    If you think it’s bad now, just wait to see what happens if these rats are successful in their efforts to disarm us.

    • Agree: Realist
  6. tanabear says:

    Even those on the Right have gone along with the Leftist narrative regarding January 6th. Maybe it wasn’t an actual insurrection, but it was a protest that got out of hand. This is not the case. January 6th was a Deep State massacre of Trump supporters. Everyone killed that day supported Trump. People know of Ashli Babbitt but how many people have heard of Benjamin Phillips, Kevin Greeson and Rosanne Boyland. The fake news media made up a story that Capitol police officer Brian Sicknick was bludgeoned to death with a fire extinguisher by a pro-Trump mob. This fake story was even introduced until the official record of Trump’s impeachment. Note: Many liberals today still believe this happened.

    What happened on January 6th was comparable to the Boston massacre of March 1770, where British soldiers opened fire on American colonists. This was one of the events that sparked the American Revolution.

    It also looks like the January 6th investigation is now going after those who opposed the lockdowns and vaccine mandates.

    Civil liberties heroine and medical freedom advocate Dr. Simone Gold struck with 60-day prison sentence based on false statements by Judge in highly partisan January 6th event indictment case.

    Washington, D.C. – June 16, 2022. Physician and attorney, Dr. Simone Gold, founder of America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS), a division of the Free Speech Foundation and the nation’s premier civil liberties organization, was issued a 60 day prison sentence issued by U.S. District Judge Christopher R. Cooper. The judge also imposed 12 months of supervised release and a \$9,500 fine…over a dozen law enforcement agents armed with assault rifles broke her door and arrested her inside her home, and the two days she spent in jail… Judge Christopher Cooper, who served on the Obama/Biden transition team and as an advisor for the Obama administration before being appointed as judge by Obama, included the actions of political activists on January 6th when he sentenced Dr. Gold to prison: ‘What I haven’t heard is about the five people who died that day. The four people who committed suicide because of the trauma they suffered that day because of the mob.’…
    https://americasfrontlinenews.com/post/fbidojcourt-jail-dr-simone-gold-for-trespass-politicizing-medicine

    Note: The judge’s statement is completely false. This shows the power of the fake news media. They can make up story that is verifiably false and someone can be sentenced based off this fake news. This is clown world on steroids.

    • Agree: René Fries
  7. Rich says:

    Why is the White majority in Washington voting for candidates who bring about these policies? Is there some kind of brain disease going around? I can’t understand it. How many years until the name of the slave holder, Washington, is changed? Or maybe they’ll just say it’s named after former Oakland A’s player, Claudell Washington so they don’t have to change the stationary?

    • Replies: @Katrinka
  8. Princeone says:

    Why didn’t these Patriot Front guys physically fight the police for violating their Constitutional right to protest? Thirty-one guys would have been a formidable force. Meekly surrendering to the enemy isn’t the answer.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  9. Anonymous[356] • Disclaimer says:
    @Princeone

    If we assume they are not a Fed Op, I suspect they did not fight back because for those who are switched-on and out there watching it was a watershed moment. Arrested for essentially nothing in the “reddest of red” state by local police.

    Ok, data point incorporated.

  10. Katrinka says:
    @Rich

    Name the state after actor Denzel. Everybody will agree to that.

  11. Jansen says:

    The question could be where are the lawyers on anti-white discrimination, why not even white lawyers, hmm. At base though its on every person to make effort, and people should realize over thirty percent of goverment are lawyers, and have been piling laws, as they -shield themselves. People don’t know this but lawyers can lie and judges can commit criminal acts and there is no repercussion most of the time. About sixty percent of attorneys are predatory, including females, they basically hide behind phony ‘bar rules’ which claim they can’t lie etc, but then also wrote themselves ‘litigation privilege’ and ‘immunity’ that lets them lie, use false documents etc if they can get away with it, the same time the ‘rule’ they stick to is that lawyers don’t out each other, ‘be respectful to other lawyers and judges’, so robbery continues. The amount of theft and fraud and assault in courts is mass, which their ‘bars’ are a con to cover over. So, though the Jan. sixth thing is a sort of wake up, there are thousands of Jan. sixths going on in state ‘courts’ every day, can search corrupt lawyers judges, divorce probate etc.

    One of many other problems such as above is there only a few hundred judges in states of millions of people, which makes a structure of tyrany, we could assume at some point they will be ‘secure’ behind computer screens, dictating, with drones to protect whatever scheming. So much has gone on without revolt, they seem sure there is no one to stop them, and are acting it. People should be more serious than they are. Appreciate the article.

  12. Slader says:

    On the group going to Idaho it seems a bit sketchy. Need to not follow groups, or worry about gays. I think there are bigger problems. People should prioritize. I also wonder about the ones who went to Washington DC, because there is enough going on in every state to focus on. I don’t know why anyone would go to Idaho to chase gays, or to DC. Seems some people are missing focus. All politics is local, as they say.

  13. SMK says: • Website
    @Atle

    “Race-blind criminal law” has been unofficially over since the 1960s and this decades-long bias in favor of blacks and leftists of all races and against white that blacks and leftists hate and seek to punish and destroy is now worse than ever since the “murder” of saint George.

    I could give myriads and myriads of examples, but I’ll focus on the case of Floyd and Derrick Chauvin. In the “racist” hellhole of Mississippi, Floyd was sentenced to 5=years in prison and released after serving only 3-years for terrorizing a white woman by breaking into her house with 3 other black criminals and pressing the barrel of a gun into her pregnant stomach. In contrast, in leftist-controlled Minneapolis, Chauvin was sentenced to 22-years and 6-months in prison for simply doing his job in subduing and arresting Floyd -if, at worst, a bit carelessly.

  14. SMK says: • Website

    The comment section at Unz.com is a forum for lunatics, Nazis and other Jew haters, misogynist vermin, genocidal haters, conspiracy theory psychotics, ad nauseam, who can say anything, no matter how false, vile, deranged, bigoted, delusional, ludicrous, etc.

    At Amren, in contrast, a recent comment of mine wasn’t published because I called the violent recidivist black criminal who tried to murder a 62-year-old woman by pushing her down a long flight of stairs, twice, causing serious injuries, a “savage” and “monster.” Apparently, such language -calling a monster and savage who tried to murder a woman a savage and monster- was construed and censored as “slurs” by the petty and priggish commissar and moderator, Chris Roberts.

  15. @SMK

    I think it’s good that there are websites which allow COMPLETE Free-Speech in its threads (e.g., Unz.com), but it’s also good that there are websites which moderate their threads (e.g., AmRen.com).

    • Replies: @René Fries
  16. @Vergissmeinnicht

    “I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it” [Evelyn Beatrice Hall (S.G. Tallentyre), summing up Voltaire’s position]

    • Replies: @Vergissmeinnicht
  17. @SMK

    Jew haters

    when I see such, I often write about Luxembourgers (being one myself, I know what I’m writing about) being far worse than Jews. Nobody knows and nobody cares, of course.

  18. @René Fries

    You have the right to say whatever you want but not at any place you want. AmRen is a private property, they can censor how much they like.

    And no: Twitter, Facebook etc. don’t have the right to ‘censor how much they like’ because they’re monopolies.

    • Thanks: René Fries
  19. Umm… umm.. so, I’m a bit confused. Maybe I’m coming in late. Never mind WHAT the actual crime is – it’s about race? Right?

    So, if a black man murders somebody during the commission of a robbery attempt, his sentence will be more lenient than a white man sticking up a convenience store and not killing anyone?

    Or should I really get down to the nitty gritty and say that if a group of young black men (nicely put) attack, rape, and seriously injure someone – versus a white man doing the same thing (which is more rare) then they’d get less time?

    And libturds love this, media promotes this, and we have those horrible white privilege cards (sorry mine got stuck in the vending machine when I was trying to get my trapped coins inside..) which don’t do squat. Unbelievable how farcical this is.

    But yeah, this is rooted in Affirmative Action, Equity, etc. If I hear DEI (or DEIB) again, I’m gonna scream. Let’s make sure we start constantly pandering to blacks, browns, and those BiPoc. I’m sure #OscarsSoWhite probably had to do with the backlash of seeing like 8 out of 9 or 10 commercials have black or mixed race people in them.

    Moments like this give way to the sad realization that this is looking like the direction of things to come.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply -


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Jared Taylor Comments via RSS
PastClassics
The Shaping Event of Our Modern World
Becker update V1.3.2