The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 PodcastsJared Taylor Archive
Prince Harry: Jumped-Up White Trash
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

A traitor to family, nation, crown, and race.

Video Link

This video is available on Rumble, BitChute, and Odysee.

It can no longer be denied: Henry, Duke of Sussex, prince of the blood, fifth in line to the throne, is jumped-up white trash.

He would be an absolute nobody if he had not been born into royalty, but he has now taken a wrecking ball to the very institution — one that goes back 1,200 years — that is the only reason we even know his name.

After complaining for decades that the press gives the royals no privacy, he is settling family scores in the most exhibitionistic, public way possible.

Most unforgivably, despite his upbringing, he doesn’t even understand the nature, purpose, and role of the British monarchy.

Sir Robert Viner, 1st Baronet, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons
Sir Robert Viner, 1st Baronet, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

I suppose he can’t help being a self-absorbed ignoramus, but he has paraded his swinishness before a prurient and smirking public — for money. He is a traitor to family, nation, tradition and, of course, to his race.

This all comes tumbling out in his new book, a Netflix series for which he and his wife got $100 million, and in a series of shamelessly promotional television interviews with some of the biggest names in British and American media.

First, what does he say about himself? He confesses to intense anxiety attacks and extensive therapy. His beard is “a shield to my anxiety.”

He wonders whether it is a “security blanket” or a “mask.” He says that to console himself for the loss of his mother, Princess Diana, when he was 12, he puts on her perfume: “‘Her scent, her perfume and spraying it and being able to unlock memories that I never thought I had . . . but there are memories of pre-12-year-old Harry that I will never be able to unlock and that sucks.”

There are the details about getting frostbite on his penis during an Artic hike, and he tells the world that his brother, the future king, is circumcised. We hear how he lost his virginity in a field behind a pub to an older woman who, he says, thought he was “a young stallion.”

Now, old sex partners go on TV to boast about how they taught the young prince a trick or two.

Harry lacerates his father, Charles III, as “never quite ready for parenthood.”

Copyright House of Lords 2022 / Photography by Annabel Moeller, CC BY 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons
Copyright House of Lords 2022 / Photography by Annabel Moeller, CC BY 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons

He didn’t have the “time” or the “patience” for it, and didn’t cuddle him when Mummy died. He describes his father as “peacocking in front of Meg” “with much theatre” as he explains something.

His stepmother Camilla, the queen consort, is a “villain,” “in bed with the devil,” leaking nasty stories to the press to make herself look good.

Credit: The Big Lunch, CC BY-SA 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons
Credit: The Big Lunch, CC BY-SA 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons

There were “bodies left in the street because of that.”

His brother William was jealous because the future king always had to play the part of heir to the throne, while Harry could do more of what he liked.

Harry says that William and his wife Kate thought it would be funny if he wore a Nazi uniform to a private costume party when he was 20 years old.

That, he says, was “one of the biggest mistakes in my life.” It was their fault.

And then, there’s Meghan Markle. How could he have possibly thought that a two-bit actress, a classless American, could ever be royalty?

Credit: DOD photo by D. Myles Cullen/Release
Credit: DOD photo by D. Myles Cullen/Release

She couldn’t even understand why royals dress carefully even when they’re not in the limelight.

Harry says that from the beginning, his brother William found Meghan “difficult,” “rude,” and “abrasive,” but that was only because William was hypnotized by the British media, which hated her.

This is absurd. William got his impressions straight from the woman herself, at a time when the British media was positive, even effusive, about her.

Credit: Northern Ireland Office, CC BY 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons
Credit: Northern Ireland Office, CC BY 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons

One insider says tolerable relations with the family didn’t last long into Harry’s marriage in 2018, and that the “fantasy was always doomed.”

Just three days after her $40-million fairy-tale wedding, she was invited to the 70th birthday party of her father-in-law, the future King of England.

Credit Image: © Christopher Furlong/PA Wire via ZUMA Press
Credit Image: © Christopher Furlong/PA Wire via ZUMA Press

He had agreed at the last minute to give the bride away.

Credit Image: © Jonathan Brady/PA Wire via ZUMA Press
Credit Image: © Jonathan Brady/PA Wire via ZUMA Press

Why? Because her bumpkin father was claiming to be too sick to travel after a scandal in which he admitted he took money from paparazzi to take pictures of him.

So, did the freshly minted Duchess of Sussex show any gratitude at the birthday party? Fifteen minutes into the event, she turned to Harry and said, “Harry, this is really boring. Let’s leave. . . . this is so boring. We’ve done our bit. Everyone knows we’ve been here. Let’s go.”

Harry told her to stay.

When Meghan was living with the prince in Kensington Palace, she was a tyrant to the palace staff. She reportedly reduced several young ladies to tears and bullied at least two into quitting.

Jason Knauf, her PR man, made a formal complaint to palace authorities, calling her behavior “totally unacceptable.” Harry, of course, says she was a model of decorum and solicitude.

Harry claims the real problem was that he and his coarse wife were “stealing the limelight” from William and Kate, the future queen, and that Meghan was “doing the job [of royal] better than someone who was born to do this.”

Yes, he really said that. Now, he is telling the world he was just trying to modernize the monarchy for the 21st century, and the family missed a “huge” opportunity by not falling in love with and behaving just like this American upstart.

“It’s what she said to me right from the beginning, representation. And I, as a privileged white man, didn’t really understand what she was talking about.”

Meghan Markle is a scheming egomaniac — even her half-brother publicly warned Harry not to marry her.

But I don’t go so far as the British columnist Jeremy Clarkson: “At night, I’m unable to sleep as I lie there, grinding my teeth and dreaming of the day when she is made to parade naked through the streets of every town in Britain while the crowds chant, “Shame!” and throw lumps of excrement at her.”

What did Harry think of that? It fuels a “pandemic of violence against women,” he said, idiotically.

That’s how he thinks. About Rupert Murdoch, who owns Fox news, he says, he’s “evil,” with political views “just to the right of the Taliban.”

Naturally, in the eyes of egalitarians, Harry’s greatest achievement is to have exposed royal “racism.”

Ever since the interview with Oprah Winfrey in 2021 in which Meghan said that some unnamed royal wondered about the skin color of their future children, Harry had never denied the swirling accusations of “racism.” Now he says the family has only “unconscious bias” of the kind he had until Meghan cured him. Libs are furious: “Prince Harry slammed for denying royal family ‘racism’ claims.”

Everyone so wanted the King of England to be a racist!

To my amazement, Harry defends Lady Suzan Hussey, who had been Queen Elizabeth’s lady in waiting for 60 years, until she was banished from the castle for “racism.”

At a palace reception, she quite naturally asked a black woman — dressed in African regalia and sporting a name tag that said Ngozi Fulani — where she was from, even after she said she was “British.” “Ngozi Fulani says racism she experienced from Lady Hussey was ‘abuse’.”

Of course, next thing you know, “Ngozi Fulani to meet King Charles, Queen Consort Camilla amid racism row.”

Harry now says he understands what Lady Hussey meant, that she did no harm, and that even Meghan “thinks she’s great.”

The duke better make up his mind about the royals. Just last month he and Meghan accepted a Ripple of Hope Award from the Robert F. Kennedy Foundation. RFK’s daughter Kerry Kennedy “handed them their award for fighting racism within the royal family.”

It was in early 2020 that the duke and duchess announced they were “stepping back” from royal duties, and left the country.

The New York Times explained why they went: “Black Britons Know Why Meghan Markle Wants Out. It’s the racism.”

First, they buggered off to Vancouver Island in Canada, in a bid for privacy, but what do you know: They didn’t like privacy after all.

They moved into a $14 million 18,000-square-foot house in Southern California for — let’s face it — the opposite of privacy.

Harry said he had “outgrown” the island.

Even as they heap abuse on the royal family and glory in American-style celebrity, these two insist on keeping their titles of duke and duchess — even as they give ammunition to people who want to wreck the monarchy.

The Guardian loves every minute of it. “We might pity the institution’s inmates and escapees, or be horrified by them, or turn a blind eye to the inherent coldnesses and cruelties of their existence.”

You see, the British now understand there are two types of royals: “obviously tortured and damaged and miserable but enduring it for their whole lives out of duty” (good) and “obviously tortured and damaged and miserable but saying so out loud and at length” (bad).

Now that he has ditched Britain for America, Harry goes on TV here and gets whoops and cheers from the audience by telling it America is a great place to live.

And, once again, the New York Times explains why America has “fallen so hard for Harry and Meghan.”

“The fact that the Sussexes ditched a country they characterize as anti-immigrant, overrun with racists and burdened by the legacy of colonialism makes Americans feel better about their own country, which also (whoops) might be described as anti-immigrant, overrun with racists and burdened by the legacy of colonialism.”

This is all so pathetic, so tiresome, you wonder how the libs can keep at it.

Harry claims he isn’t trying to wreck the monarchy. He says he wants to reform and improve it, and he may be fool enough to believe what he says.

Has he completely forgotten the love and admiration with which his grandmother, Elizabeth II was sent off by a grieving people just last fall?

Credit: Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, CC0, via Wikimedia Commons
Credit: Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, CC0, via Wikimedia Commons

Did he even notice? Or was he too busy with his beard and Mummy’s perfume and the thrill of “fighting racism”?

A monarch is a unifying symbol of a people; he is patriarch, guide, leader. He embodies what the nation wants to think is best and noblest about itself. The British crown is an ancient and precious thing. Wearing it is a hard job, but Elizabeth wore it well. The British people clearly yearn for a crowned head to admire, even in this an age of malevolent egalitarianism.

Credit: Ross Dunn – Gate in front of the Queen’s Sandringham Residence in Norfolk, England – CC BY-SA 2.0
Credit: Ross Dunn – Gate in front of the Queen’s Sandringham Residence in Norfolk, England – CC BY-SA 2.0

Charles is a weakling, but by all appearances, William is preparing to do his best. Harry’s idea of royalty seems to be reality-TV in a palace, dressed in funny clothes, with plenty of boorish non-whites to prove he’s not racist. What a dunce!

A millionaire dunce. Its first day on sale in Britain, his book set a record, selling 400,000 copies. Throw in the US and Canada, and it sold another million.

It will be translated into 15 languages. Thus does the traitor-prince shore up the British crown. The publisher’s fluff page says his book is full of “hard-won wisdom about the eternal power of love over grief.”

That’s his story, and he’s sticking to it.

I’d say it’s full of narcissism, revenge, betrayal, and white-trash vulgarity.

(Republished from American Renaissance by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 49 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Trinity says:

    “white trash” = rich “successful Whites” who sold this nation and other White nations down the tube. “Royal Family?” Lol.

    • Agree: Pheasant
    • Replies: @Pheasant
  2. Notsofast says:

    harry must be the most bloodthirsty, woke snowflake in the world, who’s chalked up more kills than the ginger avenger? of course it’s easy to chalk up kills when your mowing down afghans from a helicopter using a chain gun. notice how he’s got the black dudes kneeling before him.

    https://shar.es/afZGpW

    • Agree: RedpilledAF
  3. Harry the cuck got sprung on a black vagina…..and the black vagina now tells him what to do.

    It’s sad.

    • Agree: Clark Kent
    • Replies: @Realist
  4. Harry’s got a lot wrong with him, he’s a broken lad. He’s also the first of his family to break out of their gilded cage since William of Orange entered that prison. That’s what Americans can’t understand – the royal family have been prisoners for centuries. They fly on private jets wearing patched, hand-me-down clothes.

    • Replies: @al gore rhythms
  5. In Harry’s earlier years, he had relationships with tall, fair-haired Englishwomen, who were beautiful – like his late mother. But he could not seal the deal and get married, despite being a very good catch, in a hierarchical society. There must have been something wrong with him, even then. Perhaps he is foolish, and impossible to put up with. Or, he may have a substance abuse problem.

    He keeps saying that he is “lucky” to have got a woman like Meghan, and no one who hears it can believe their ears.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  6. SafeNow says:

    Don’t under-estimate the artfulness of this book, thinking, well, Harry is a doofus, and a book does not fall far from the authordoofus. Harry and his publisher selected first-tier memoirist and ghostwriter J.R. Moehringer to be Harry’s ghostwriter. If perchance one is highly interested in the Royals, this book would make compelling reading. For my part I only wanted to read a quality book review. Although I hate the New Yorker, I turned to that magazine for what might well be the best of the book reviews.

    https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2023/01/23/prince-harry-memoir-spare-review

    • Replies: @Philip Neal
  7. Pheasant says:
    @Trinity

    Jared Taylor rejects the Jewish problem you see and this explains why his take here is so awful. The people who ruined the royal family are the royal family themselves. They treated Diana so appalingly it is difficult to feel sorry for them. The English/British crown has been a skinsuit for the Jews since at least the time of James the first and possibly going back to Henry the eighth.

    • Thanks: Trinity
    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    , @Curmudgeon
  8. He’s a bastard. He doesn’t like the family because it’s not his. Why don’t they say that every time they speak about him? He’s a bastard. A real bastard. Even if he was a nice guy, he’d still be a bastard. Because he is.

    • Replies: @Dumbo
    , @Realist
  9. Franz says:

    The further adventures of Harry the Red and his dusky Bantu tramp, OK.

    It’s the insult to white trash I find unpleasant. Surely Jared knows this is a term loosely thrown at poor whites of any caliber.

    We need a harsher word for a fellow who betrays 1200 years of royal service, whatever we might consider about some of the years. Harry the Red us untouchable, and exposes the weakness of the three nations (so far…) involved with these unpleasant twits. I mean the UK, Canada, and the USA.

    What ever happens to this weird duo, as far as these three countries are concerned “It’s all about the Benjamins” as one of Meghan’s sisters put it. Cold hard cash rules all three. As Harry pulls in the cash, the natives cheer then on, if only by allowing it to continue. It’s come to that.

  10. Miro23 says:

    A monarch is a unifying symbol of a people; he is PATRIARCH, GUIDE, LEADER.. He embodies what the nation wants to think is best and noblest about itself. The British crown is an ancient and precious thing. Wearing it is a hard job, but Elizabeth wore it well. The British people clearly yearn for a crowned head to admire, even in this an age of malevolent egalitarianism.

    Elizabeth II was a good person who worked hard with her social events – but still always FOLLOWING Zio-Glob scripts.

    The British people liked and admired the Queen but she was not a GUIDE or a LEADER. She was a FOLLOWER. For a long time the real leaders of Britain have been the WEF infiltrated administrations (both Conservative and Labour) that have nothing to do with democracy or the will of the people. Those Tony Blair clones and their Woke counter-cultural allies push mass immigration, anti-White hate LGBT + endless neo-con wars.

    The issue is that the Queen (or anyone else from the Royal Family) never said one word about any of this. The Royal Family could have tried saying that Harry and Meghan are Woke activists and that they (the RF) and the UK public reject Woke activism and don’t want open frontiers population replacement + official LGBT, militant feminism + militant multiculturalism + endless Jewish wars.

    But not a squeak from them. Until it all went wrong, they thought that they could gain some Woke credentials by getting Meghan on board.

    • Agree: Realist, Pop Warner, Rogue
    • Replies: @Curmudgeon
  11. Dumbo says:
    @obwandiyag

    Yes, I wonder why this is not discussed it more openly, even on this piece. He’s Diane’s son alright, but it’s not at all clear that he’s Charles’ son. Everyone knows his mother has having several affairs at the time, notably with someone who looks a bit like Harry (William at least looks more legitimate). And why is he ginger when neither Charles nor Diane were?

    • Replies: @ThreeCranes
    , @Alden
  12. @Fozzy Bear

    He hasn’t ‘broken free’ though, because he is still trading on his name and family. If he had given up his titles and tried to forge a life and career of his own, the situation would be entirely different.

    • Agree: TitusAlone
  13. The poor boy is just trying to earn a lot of money to keep his beloved tormentor happy and luckily on this side of the Atlantic he is like a king among a democratic people.

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
  14. CMC says:

    Self-appointed race realist White advocate calling an R1b “trash”?

    This just keeps getting better and better.

  15. As the old legal saying goes, mater certa, pater incertus. If there’s anything to this royal blood stuff, a DNA test couldn’t hurt. Yet the Windsors have long had a misfortunate tendency to fall under the spell of American adventuresses. At least this one didn’t get to be king like his embarrassing great-uncle (or whatever the exact relation) when he chuckled the crown itself for the shapely Mrs. Simpson.

  16. Realist says:
    @Robert Dolan

    Harry the cuck got sprung on a black vagina…..and the black vagina now tells him what to do.

    It’s sad.

    It’s not sad; it’s poetic justice.

  17. Realist says:
    @obwandiyag

    He’s a bastard. He doesn’t like the family because it’s not his. Why don’t they say that every time they speak about him? He’s a bastard. A real bastard. Even if he was a nice guy, he’d still be a bastard. Because he is.

    The royal family must have DNA evidence of his paternity.

    • Replies: @Notsofast
  18. Wokechoke says:
    @Pheasant

    I disagree.

    Harry simply thought he gets to check out of being Royal. However, he now swims in Jewish infested waters. Very naïve.

    He’s a sort of False Dimitri or Bonnie Prince being paraded around by the racial enemies of the English.

    • Replies: @Pheasant
  19. Wokechoke says:
    @Liborio Guaso

    he should take on US citizenship and sooooon.

  20. AceDeuce says:

    1. #NegroesRuinEverything. No exceptions.

    2. This guy is an uber-cuck. Wow! Dumb as his mom; weak as his dad.

    3. That said, he doesn’t have to show the world, over and over, just how messed up he is. As Forrest Gump said, in one of Winston Groom’s books “Most people don’t look stupid until they start talking.”

    4. Funny how G-I-N-G-E-R is an anagram for N-I-G…..

  21. ruralguy says:

    The English aristocracy never valued education nor work skills, merely training their children to take over their increasingly ceremonial roles. The males tended to marry anyone who was rich, pretty, or acted their roles well, not selecting mates who were educated. The resulting “natural selection” is what you see in Princess Diana and Prince Harry. The Royal Family is almost entirely uneducated white trash. The celebrated Princess Diana dropped out of their equivalent of high school at age 16, subsequently becoming a nursery-room assistant at a Kindergarten. Her son, Prince Harry struggled with high school (Eton College which is a boarding school for boys 13-18) and very nearly dropped out. The remaining Royal members took easy art and geography subjects for their “A” and “O” level studies (England concentrates studies, instead of our high school general studies), or never even attended school (the Queen).

    Life is often rough, when you can’t comprehend the world. People like Harry often virtue signal, adopting popular beliefs, because it gives them feedback that they are accepted. So, he blathers endless woke platitudes. But, it’s not his fault, because he is just a product of that aristocratic breeding that tended to produce dumb people who merely acted their roles.

    • Thanks: JohnnyWalker123
    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    , @Exile
  22. @Dumbo

    Ya gotta admit, he’s got the same close-set eyes of Charles.

    • Agree: MEH 0910
    • Replies: @MEH 0910
  23. This stems from the fact he was never going to be king and he hated that. Edward is class, Harry is an ass. Look at who they married. Tells you all you need to know.

    • Replies: @Alden
  24. Notsofast says:
    @Realist

    in harry’s book, he comments on how his father would “torment” him by “joking”, who knows if he is really the prince of wales and if he is really harry’s father.

    imo harry looks like the spitting image of di’s ginger “riding instructor” with whom, she admitted to having an affair. apparently harry got to meet his “real dad” in afghanistan, where he attempted to deal with his inner angst by shooting the indigenous people with a chain gun from his helicopter, while screaming “daddy didn’t love me”.

    chain gun harry killed 25 “taliban”, by his count, who he described as “chess pieces”, the guy on the horse was obviously a knight.

    • Replies: @Curmudgeon
  25. Pheasant says:
    @Wokechoke

    Well I agree that if his family and friends really loved him they would never let a predator like Markle anywhere near him but I think Diana did the most to make the British monarchy trash.

  26. Wokechoke says:
    @ruralguy

    both Princes are good pilots as I understand it. Good Polo skills too.

    • Replies: @ruralguy
  27. Mac_ says:

    The title and phot on the book, ‘spare, and complaining, seems to be to feed self-absorbed focus, whining, so others focus on selves, or trivia, which works for division. The con’s schemes depend on division, and pushing self focus, so people don’t focus what matters. Think also he and they’re in a box, do an act, agree second sentence in comment four. On supposed leaders the cons pick their fronts, so people look at false leaders, so fail to steer whatever territory ourselves. The twelve hundred years expecting leader fronts to do anything, and otherwise being steered by bogus media govt state or religions otherwise, the cons around the fronts, and ignorance, is how situations are as they are now.

    Appreciate the article.

  28. I generally agree, but the decadence goes well beyond Harry.

    Once royal and aristocratic leadership is shunted out of real power, it’s only a matter of time until you hear the cherry orchard being chopped down. All the worst, most self-indulgent traits of their class are fertilized by modernity.

    Edward VIII set a precedent for choosing personal preference over duty. George V and the late Queen Elizabeth rowed back from that disaster but the next two generations have been a study in disintegration. First the divorces, then the humiliations of Edward and the Royal Marines, Andrew as a courtier of Epstein and now Harry as patricidal, fratricidal clown prince.

    Again though, you could go back to the Prince Regent, later George IV, to see decadence in early bloom.

    It’s sad, because Britain–white Britain, that is–needs something. But it does seem that the iceberg has been hit, and now it’s only a matter of time.

    • Replies: @Alden
  29. @Pheasant

    The English/British crown has been a skinsuit for the Jews since at least the time of James the first and possibly going back to Henry the eighth.

    It wasn’t until the Puritans (aka sycophants of the tribe whose name must not be spoken) took their 30 pieces of silver from (((Amsterdam bankers))) to conduct their regicide, that Jews returning to England was even a pipe dream. Even the Jews believe that Britain was hostile before James.
    https://www.thejc.com/news/uk/how-elizabethan-society-responded-to-jews-and-prejudice-1.34296

  30. @Miro23

    It seems to me, that you haven’t a clue how the Queen/King functions as Head of State. They are forbidden from making political statements, and virtually everything is political. Commenting on economic policy (WEF) is off limits. Expressing a concern for loss of sovereignty by Britain joining the EEC in 1973 was considered off limits, as was the benign statement that people should think carefully about what they want, during the run-up to the Scottish independence referendum. The Monarchy has no veto power. The best that can be done is delay signing into law (Royal Assent), what is considered to be offensive legislation, hoping for the government to fall. Unlike the US, the elected representatives actually do control the Head of State. Unfortunately, like the US, their politicians are every bit as much political whores accepting their 30 pieces of silver.
    I will grant you that Charles, not being Head of State, was long been into organic farming and concern about the environment, but that is linked to agri-business eliminating small farmers and producing poisoned food. His own organic farming has been successful as a business enterprise.

    • Replies: @Miro23
    , @David Davenport
  31. @Notsofast

    His resemblance is at many levels. Charles’ eyes, Prince Phillip https://www.instagram.com/p/BL_VARPDVXg/?utm_source=ig_embed&utm_campaign=loading
    and Earl Spencer, Diana’s brother https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/entertainment/celebrity/why-the-james-hewitt-is-prince-harrys-dad-conspiracy-doesnt-add-up/news-story/92d096f469d3757500bf1b441789e751

    On another note, I disagree that he is a “bastard” or “White Trash” at any level. He is a paranoid, delusional drug addict completely out of touch with reality, which includes his own self importance. Keep in mind that all of his claims and disclosures of conversations are unsubstantiated. The texts appear without context. This is an exercise in grabbing money before people understand just how irrelevant the two of them are.

    • Replies: @Notsofast
  32. Notsofast says:
    @Curmudgeon

    my money is still on hewitt, me thinks he was giving di riding lessons long before the horses arrived.

    • Replies: @Curmudgeon
  33. Miro23 says:
    @Curmudgeon

    It seems to me, that you haven’t a clue how the Queen/King functions as Head of State. They are forbidden from making political statements, and virtually everything is political.

    Everyone knows that . The government supports the monarchy as long as it is powerless.

    Just like the WEF supports British politicians as long as they follow New World Order rules.

  34. ruralguy says:
    @Wokechoke

    It’s not clear that Prince Harry is qualified to be a helicopter pilot. He attempted four times to pass his written exam to be a helicopter pilot, but failed, finally qualifying as a commander: co-pilot and gunner. The UK defends this, saying he is qualified to pilot Apache helicopters, as a co-pilot, because his training is the same as a pilot. But, it sounds dubious.

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
  35. ‘White Trash’ is too kind.

    He’s White Excrement.

  36. John1955 says:

    “Hegel remarks somewhere that all great world-historic facts and personages appear, so to speak, twice. He forgot to add: the first time as tragedy, the second time as farce.”
    Karl Marx

    Well, 85 years ago American Double Divorcée Wallis Simpson showed Edward VIII the Wonders of Unrestricted-No-Holds-Barred-Kama-Sutra (one of their favorite places being the bathtub). Which led to King Edward VIII (extremely pro-German) abdication on Dec 10,1936.

    While former Edward VIII went into exile and faded into irrelevance, his closest relative Obergruppenführer Prince Charles Edward, Duke of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha fought on Hitler’s side to the bitter end:

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Edward,_Duke_of_Saxe-Coburg_and_Gotha#:~:text=Charles%20Edward%2C%20Duke%20of%20Saxe%2DCoburg%20and%20Gotha%20(Leopold,30%20July%201900%20until%201918.

    And what do we see now ? Pathetic Poodle Harry lifting his hind leg and urinating on the Ruins of British Monarchy… Earning $100M in the process…

  37. Philip Neal says: • Website
    @SafeNow

    Thanks for the link. Deadly.

    “THE HAUNTING OF PRINCE HARRY”

    “I tried to change,” he recalls. “I opened Hamlet. I slammed it shut. No, thank you.”

    “Why were we here, lurking along the edge of that ‘undiscover’d country, from whose bourn no traveller returns?’ ”

    Published in the print edition of the January 23, 2023, issue, with the headline “The Royal Me.”

  38. Wokechoke says:
    @MEH 0910

    Phillip had a long stay in Mexico and California banging movie stars from what I understand. He’s his grandfather’s grandson alright.

  39. Anonymous[411] • Disclaimer says:
    @TitusAlone

    In Harry’s earlier years, he had relationships with tall, fair-haired Englishwomen, who were beautiful – like his late mother

    Are you kidding me? Those women look like dogs.
    Mixed race and Asian women look best.

  40. Exile says:
    @ruralguy

    Harry’s the living counter-argument to NRX and TradCath spergs with powdered-wig Twitter avatars (yes, you Kantbot).

    Muh elites in 2023 are guys like Harry and his pedo uncle Prince Andrew. Aristocracy has been dead since the 19th century.

    More tepid nostalgic conservatism from Jared. This would have been weak tea in 2015.

  41. @Notsofast

    I suspect that they actually do know who sired the turd. Had it been Hewitt, Harry would have died a “war hero” in Af-shit-hole-stan. I actually think he’s more like Mommy than William. Both play(ed) the victim while being promiscuous, and both play(ed) the media like a fiddle.

  42. Mike Tre says:

    Mrs. Prince Harry likes to strap it on and give Mr. Meghan a good spell of diversity training under the 4 poster, lubing up the black fag with a bit of mummy’s perfume, if he’s lucky.

    Seriously, why did these two cockroaches decide on the most racist place in the world to live: in the US? Jesus Christ every single net loss of humanity finds their way here (think pretty much every Asian and Hindu crybaby in these comment sections) and does nothing but bitch and moan.

  43. Alden says:
    @Dumbo

    Re: the red hair Dianna was one of 4 siblings. Two have light brown hair Dianna and the brother. Dianna’s two sisters have very bright red hair. Harry inherited his red hair from his mother’s family. As Harry ages we can see that he looks more and more like King Charles at 40. Look closely at the eyes nose and bones around the eyes King Charles and Harry’s are identical.

    William looks nothing like King Charles.

    Look at Prince Andrew. Look at pictures of Andrew’s father. Henry Herbert Lord Porchester lifelong friend of Queen Elizabeth 2. Andrew Herbert is not the son of Elizabeth’s husband Philip. Her sons King Charles and Prince Edward look very much like their mother’s husband Philip Andrew looks like his father Henry Herbert

    Harry wanted to marry 3 blonde English women . Well bottle blondes. Chelsy Cressida and Carolyn all 3 refused because royal life is unbearable with the tabloids endless TV shows endless royal observers writers experts writers and editors endlessly blathering away. Plus the non royal employees who rule the family.

    Prince Charles proposed to 4 English women. Jane Wellesley Amanda Knatchbull Anna Wallace and one other forget her name. All turned him down because of the press and I guess you could call them handlers supervising every move.

    By the time Charles was 30 the press was screeching for him to get married. Things were so desperate Elizabeth and Philip reached out to horrors of horrors!!!!! Catholic European princesses. Princess Astrid of Luxembourg was one. She refused to even meet Charles. So that’s 5 refusals of marriage.

    And then as Elizabeth and Philip searched British aristocratic families, they realized there was “ that youngest Spencer girl”.

    Speaking of White trash the article is totally trashy and beyond vulgar. The article and comments are exactly the same as the tawdry vulgar royal observer writer biographer expert.

    Go to YouTube and google Lady Colin Campbell River Royal commenter and royal TV talk shows.

    Frumpy women and homosexual men yapping away about the royal family.

    One thing Jared Taylor and the commenters don’t know is that each member of the royal family has their own publicity team. The vulgar grumpy women and homosexual men praise the royal person they work for. And trash the other members of the royal family.

    I stopped reading amren years ago because of what Mark Twain called Walter Scott disease. Americans, mostly southerners worshipping the British royals and our British heritage. When actually the two largest ethnicities in America are German and Irish, not British.

    Go on YouTube and look for Lady Colin Campbell, river royal commenter and the one hour talk shows about the royals. You’ll see yourselves. Yackety yackety yak frumps and fags blathering away making up ridiculous stories.

    The article is beyond vulgar and tacky. So are the comments. You all, especially Jared Taylor should be embarrassed.

  44. Alden says:
    @Oscar Peterson

    I see you’ve been reading and watching the blathering frumps and fags styling themselves royal writers biographers editors editors experts etc. incredibly egregiously vulgar and tacky. White trash indeed.

    If anyone wants to know the truth about why and how Edward 8 was booted off the throne watch the YouTube titled A Very British Coup. I concluded years ago that Edward 8 was kicked out by his father brothers and politicians. The YouTube A Very British Coup confirmed what I concluded long ago.

    Really, after reading this vulgar tacky article I have no respect for Jared Taylor. White trash indeed. Sitting on a shabby couch in an English housing project watching trash royal commenters

  45. Alden says:
    @TheRandyGuy

    “Edward is class, Harry is an ass”. Who’s this Edward who’s going to be king ?????

    The brother who’s going to be king is named William, not Edward.

  46. @Curmudgeon

    They are forbidden from making political statements ..

    What law or constitution bars Britain’s royalty from making political statements?

  47. The British Royal Family are doomed, but they only have themselves to blame. They are a perfect reflection of what Britain has become, a self-hating parody of what it once was. The whole British system is rotten to the core and deserves to die with them.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Jared Taylor Comments via RSS
PastClassics
The Surprising Elements of Talmudic Judaism
How America was neoconned into World War IV
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement