The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 PodcastsJared Taylor Archive
Latest Interracial Crime Stats
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Just how bad are they?

Video Link

This video is available on Rumble, BitChute, and Odysee.

The latest National Crime Victimization Survey, known as the NCVS, is now out.

This one covers 2021, and it’s the only reliable nation-wide report on violent crimes that cross racial lines. Other reports may tell you how many blacks or whites were arrested for violence, but it’s almost impossible to find out the races of their victims.

The NCVS tells you. It’s an annual survey of American crime victims who describe every attack they suffered during the survey period, including crimes they didn’t report to the police. This means the results are a very accurate picture of what actually happened, not just crimes the police heard about.

Leaving out the police makes the race data all the more convincing. A lot of people claim – wrongly – that because of “racism,” too many blacks and Hispanics are arrested and too few whites. In the NCVS, crime victims themselves tell you the race of the rapist or mugger. The NCVS doesn’t include murder because it’s a victim survey, and you can’t survey dead people.

The survey sample is carefully selected to mirror the American population, and it is huge. Last year it was 238,043 people or nearly a quarter of a million. For opinion polling, a sample of 1,500 people is a big sample, and that gives a margin of error of about 2-1/2 percent. A sample of 233,000 is gigantic, and gives good results.

So let us turn to the justly celebrated and aptly numbered Table 13, which includes the figures for interracial crime.

Let’s look at the numbers for white victims. In the second column from the left, you see that in 202,1 there were 2,641,720 cases in which whites were victims of violent crimes. Moving to the right, about a million and a half of their attackers were white, 480,000 were black, nearly 200,000 were Hispanic, and 93,000 were Other. This other category was almost entirely Asians, Pacific Islanders, and American Indians, but they are not broken out separately.

You can also see black victims and the 600,000 or so incidents of black victimization, and who their attackers were, as well as figures for Hispanics. What conclusions does the NCVS draw about race differences in crime?

It cares be no more controversial than this: “The share of violent incidents involving black offenders (29%) was greater than the population percentage of black persons (12%).”

Well, yes, that’s true, but there is a lot more to say than that. For example, we can add up all the white perps on this table, to get a total of 1,767,930 bad guys who attacked either whites, black, or Hispanics.

The NCVS says nothing about how many Asians or anyone else whites attacked, but we can calculate the percentages of the victims of whites who were either white, black, or Hispanic, and those three groups make up 91 percent of the population.

We find that when whites commit violence, they choose other whites 84.5 percent of the time, blacks just 4 percent, and Hispanics 11.5 percent of the time. Violent whites restrict their violence almost exclusively to other whites.

We can also add up the total numbers of black and Hispanic perps and do the same calculations.

We get something very different.

When blacks and Hispanics commit violence, whites are their most frequent victims, followed by their own race, and then the other race. So, it’s all very well to worry about black-on-black violence, for example, but according to the NCVS, there were actually 121,000 more cases of black-on-white than black-on-black violence. Hispanics attacked about 2,400 more whites than they attacked fellow Hispanics.

We can get other interesting numbers. The NCVS says that whites are 61 percent of the US population, blacks are 12 percent, and Hispanics 18 percent. Since we know the number of perps of each race who attacked someone of another race, we can calculate the likelihood that any given person of any of these three groups will attack someone from another group. For blacks and whites, the numbers are shocking. A black person was 35 times more likely to attack a white rather than the other way around. A black person was three times more likely to attack a Hispanic than the reverse, and a Hispanic was 3.3 times more likely to attack a white rather than the other way around.

The Bureau of Justice Statistics reports the data to the public every year.

It takes only simple arithmetic to calculate these figures. But have you ever heard them from anyone else, much less from any mainstream source? No. Journalists are not so stupid they can’t do simple math, but it probably never occurs to them to do these calculations. If it did, they would slit their wrists rather than tell you the results. The media have biases, and one is not to tell you the truth about race.

If a liberal were even aware of these numbers, he would probably say blacks attack whites so often only because there are more whites than blacks – about five times as many, in fact. However, do you think for a moment that the kind of blacks who rape or rob or beat up white people live in places where there are five times as many whites as blacks walking around? This guy, for example.

Of course not. They mostly live around other blacks. They have to hunt for white people to attack. I have no doubt that this lopsided figure – blacks 35 times more likely to attack whites than the reverse – is due, at least in part, to constant media repetition of how bad white people are and how much we owe blacks. That justifies anger, which justifies violence. I suspect it’s also in part due to white passivity. All too many whites don’t fight back, and that also makes them tempting targets.

Thirty years ago, when I first started looking at the NCVS, it included interracial violence rates for specific crimes. Not anymore. For example, you can use these figures from 1994 to calculate that a black was more than 100 times more likely to rob a white than the other way around, and a black men was 34 times more likely to rape a white woman than a white man was to rape a black woman.

In those days, the NCVS reported multiple-offender crime rates, too. Groups of blacks were nearly 300 times more likely to rob a white than groups of whites were to rob a black.

Even then, though, the NCVS did not separately report multiple-offender interracial rapes. I suspect the blacks attacking whites likelihood was very high. The Bureau of Justice Statistics doesn’t make those data available anymore. I can’t imagine why not.

There are some less explosive findings in the NCVS that are worth noting. Because blacks commit so many crimes and often commit them against people of other races, they are 1.8 times more likely to commit violence than be a victim. Whites were 1.4 times more likely to be a victim than an offender. Hispanics were about as likely to be perps as victims. Asians and Pacific Islanders are peaceable. They were 3.8 times more likely to be a victim than an offender.

Needless to say, men are more violent than women. If you ignore the five percent of incidents in which there were both male and female attackers, men committed 77 percent of the violence. Men were seven times more likely than women to be violent.

As is well known, the last two years have seen a big jump in the number of murders, but interestingly, other violent crimes have been flat for the last 10 years, and are way down from the mid-1990s. This graph from the NCVS shows the percentage of Americans, age 12 or older, who were victims of violent crime.

The top line is all violent crime, and the bottom line is everything except simple assault, which includes hitting someone or even just pushing him. There is a lot of that, but it’s the least violent of violent crimes. As you can see over on the left, total violent crime peaked in 1994, when 3-1/4 percent of all Americans 12 or older were victims. That number has dropped to just one third of that, or 1 percent. This contrasts with murder, which has been rising. Here are homicide rates from 1990 to 2020.

Like the other graph we just saw, the peak was in the 1990s. The jump in 2001 is due almost entirely to the 9/11 attacks. But as you can see, in 2020, while other violent crime was flat, murder rose a record 30 percent. In 2021, it rose another 4-1/2 percent. Why did murder surge while other violent crimes didn’t? I don’t know. But I can say that the record-breaking jump in 2020 and the continuing rise last year were due almost exclusively to more blacks killing each other.

But back to the NCVS. It includes crimes both reported to the police and those not reported, and the percentage reported varies a lot according to the crime. Here are the percentages of crimes reported to the police for 2020 and 2021.

Interestingly, rape and sexual assault is the violent crime least likely to be reported. Why is that? Because sexual assault includes unwanted touching. There is a lot of it, and women report it on a survey but don’t usually call the police for it. You would expect what’s called intimate partner violence not to be reported very often, but police get quite a few calls. This is usually physical violence, not rape. Of all violent crimes, the one most likely to result in a call to police is an attack with a weapon. However, the single crime most likely to prompt a 911 call is car theft. People want their cars back, and they think the police might actually be able to find them.

More on calling the police. Not surprisingly, women are somewhat more likely to report crime: 49 percent to 42 percent for men.

More interesting is the fact that victims of the big three races – in yellow: white, black, and Hispanic – are all almost equally likely to call the police, with blacks slightly in the lead at 48 percent.

Blacks are supposed to hate and mistrust the police, and Hispanics are supposed to be cowering in the shadows, afraid that ICE will show up if they call 911. It doesn’t look that way. Curiously, it’s Asians who were least likely to call the police in 2021 but most likely to call them in 2020. The samples must be too small to give consistent results.

So, these are the highlights from the latest National Crime Victimization Survey. Again, these data are available to big media, but you can be sure that if you hear anything at all about them, it will be that Joe Biden is doing a great job keeping violent crime under control.

And anything about race? You heard it from me, not from the TV news.

(Republished from American Renaissance by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 25 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. For blacks and whites, the [NCVS] numbers are shocking. A black person was 35 times more likely to attack a white rather than the other way around. A black person was three times more likely to attack a Hispanic than the reverse, and a Hispanic was 3.3 times more likely to attack a white rather than the other way around.

    [Black on White violent crime] is due, at least in part, to constant media repetition of how bad white people are and how much we owe blacks. That justifies anger, which justifies violence.

    This is no accident. Incessant media depictions of Blacks and Jews being attacked, ridiculed, or persecuted by Whites is a major literary and cinematic industry. These depictions surely contribute to feelings of anger and hostility (towards Whites) by both groups.

    With that in mind, it’s interesting to note that even though the (((Left))) is constantly monitoring (and attempting to suppress) so-called ‘hate speech’ (i.e., expressions of contempt uttered by Whites towards certain minorities) cinematic depictions of Whites initiating unprovoked inter-racial violence is commonplace in American movies, literature, and TV. Yet these depictions are a form of group libel. The evidence cited by Jared Taylor proves it.

    The case can therefore be made that countless acclaimed literary and cinematic dramatizations depicting White-on-POC violence are an indirect form of ‘hate speech’ (against Whites) since they deliberately incite anger and hatred in non-Whites by misrepresenting interracial crime and violence as it actually occurs.

    • Agree: Renard, ThreeCranes
    • Replies: @Chensley
    , @HammerJack
  2. Polistra says:

    National Crime Victimization Survey

    Thanks for your work, Mr Taylor. It’s darkly entertaining to see how carefully the DoJ stage manages its own stats, lest anyone get The Wrong Idea about things.

    And yes, as you state, one may search far and wide through the morass which is the MSM without finding even a hint of the trenchant observations you offer here.

    Speaking as someone who quit reporting violent crime many years ago, I have to agree that the murder stats are often more meaningful, since it’s harder to hide bodies. (Though it is done!) And “snitches get stitches” means that the rate of violent crime among America’s negroes is woefully understated. As though it weren’t high enough already.

    • Agree: Renard
  3. Chensley says:
    @mark green

    The case can therefore be made that countless acclaimed literary and cinematic dramatizations depicting White-on-POC violence are an indirect form of ‘hate speech’ (against Whites) since they deliberately incite anger and hatred in non-Whites by misrepresenting interracial crime and violence as it actually occurs.

    An excellent example of this is John Grisham’s A Time To Kill, where Grisham race-swapped the victim and the perpetrator from the real story that inspired it. What a demented mind one must have to mislead people like that.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Time_to_Kill_(1996_film)

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Time_to_Kill_(Grisham_novel)#Inspiration

    Grisham has described the book as “very autobiographical” in that the novel’s “young attorney is basically me” and the drama is based on a case he witnessed.[2] In 1984 Grisham witnessed the harrowing testimony of a 12-year-old rape victim at the DeSoto County courthouse in Hernando, Mississippi.[3] Two sisters, Julie Scott, 16 years old, and Marcie Scott, her twelve-year-old sister, had both been raped, brutally beaten, and nearly murdered by Willie James Harris.[4] Unlike Grisham’s depiction, however, the Scotts were white and their assailant was black.[5]

    • Thanks: mark green
  4. Truth says:

    Your opinion on the JQ is the 10,000 elephant in the room, Old Sport; you can ignore it as long as you can, but eventually… it is going to have to eat.

    • Thanks: Trinity
  5. Jossie Smallette (whatever regarding spelling) claimed he was attacked in the middle of the night during an extremely cold blizzard. He was attacked by violent Whites, yet he fought them off. He then enjoyed his Subway sandwich before calling the police. The media jumped on this story.

  6. Realist says:

    The problem with unreported crimes is no authentication.

  7. lavoisier says: • Website

    Can you show your calculations? This is an important topic that needs to be discussed further.

    I see that black perps commit 50% of their crimes against whites while white perps commit only 4% against blacks. That ratio is 12.5 to 1. .5/.04.

    Given that whites are 61% of the population and blacks 12% how do you come up with a figure of 30 times more likely to commit crimes against whites?

    Thanks

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  8. Trinity says:

    Jared, it’s 2022/2023, change your tune.

  9. anonymous[270] • Disclaimer says:

    Don’t worry, your ‘huwhite’ amerimutt scumbags bombed and murdered 6 gazillion times more numbers of people than all niggers combined, all around the world for centuries.

    • Replies: @Bro43rd
  10. Bro43rd says:
    @anonymous

    But first the huwhites murdered 600k of their own to “free” the slaves. It worked so good they’ve been using the same template all around the world. It goes to show how the world doesn’t appreciate the sacrifices of the huwhites.

  11. @lavoisier

    ‘…I see that black perps commit 50% of their crimes against whites while white perps commit only 4% against blacks. That ratio is 12.5 to 1. .5/.04.

    ‘Given that whites are 61% of the population and blacks 12% how do you come up with a figure of 30 times more likely to commit crimes against whites?’

    At least as you present it, the answer’s fairly obvious.

    Blacks commit a lot more crimes per capita in general. Then add in a greater willingness to attack members of different races…

    Whites — like Asians, Hispanics, and almost everyone else — tend to simply avoid members of different groups. Blacks see members of different groups as simply prey that is less likely to resist.

    • Replies: @Truth
    , @lavoisier
  12. Truth says:
    @Colin Wright

    Whites… — tend to simply avoid members of different groups.

    Or; they just consider whites easier victims.

  13. @Truth

    ‘Or; they just consider whites easier victims.’

    I moved up here to live in a virtually all-white community for the first time in my life, and it is true: the level of trust is almost absurd.

    • Replies: @Truth
  14. Truth says:
    @Colin Wright

    That’s good Old Sport, I’m glad you’re happy.

  15. lavoisier says: • Website
    @Colin Wright

    I think the number I am having trouble with is the higher number of white potential victims vs black potential victims and how that is used in any calculation.

    If blacks are 2.5 x over-represented by their numbers in criminal acts and the ratio of black on white violence is 12.5 to 1 you get the approximate thirty times more likely to commit crimes against whites that JT states.

    Scary numbers for sure but I still don’t know how you deal with a much larger population of whites than blacks. I don’t think that is factored into the equation or how it even could be?.

    • Replies: @HammerJack
  16. @mark green

    The case can therefore be made that countless acclaimed literary and cinematic dramatizations depicting White-on-POC violence are an indirect form of ‘hate speech’ (against Whites) since they deliberately incite anger and hatred in non-Whites by misrepresenting interracial crime and violence as it actually occurs.

    Hollywood movies and television are essentially one great big extended ‘hate crime’ against white people. The Powers That Be won’t be doing anything about it because 1) they’re down with the program and 2) they’re mostly the same people anyway.

  17. @lavoisier

    The Color of Crime report took that into account.

  18. @Truth

    Or; they just consider whites easier victims.

    From a physical standpoint its overwhelmingly obvious that Whites are “easier” victims. For the same reason they don’t put chimps in with gorillas at the zoo, “Ole Sport”. Whites by and large want to be left alone and live their lives, but niggaz, well we see what they want playing out in our inner cities on a daily basis. Why that is may still be up for debate with some, but for those with the gift of even the slightest amount of critical thought know exactly what’s up.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  19. @Philmuhcrevis

    ‘…Whites everyone except blacks by and large want to be left alone and live their lives, but niggaz, well we see what they want playing out in our inner cities on a daily basis…

    I’ve lived in majority Hispanic neighborhoods. I’ve traveled — and felt perfectly comfortable — in Muslim and Asian countries.

    Now, having moved to a virtually all-white, all-gentile area, I have discovered the virtues of my own people in particular — but I can live with everyone else I’ve encountered. (okay — not Gypsies).

    Except blacks. They stand out. Oh boy, do they stand out.

    • Replies: @Trinity
  20. Trinity says:
    @Colin Wright

    I’ll take Blacks over Jews any day.

    • Replies: @Truth
    , @Colin Wright
  21. Truth says:
    @Trinity

    Mah Dude!

    Puh cho chain on, Nigga!

    • LOL: Trinity
  22. @Trinity

    ‘I’ll take Blacks over Jews any day.’

    This is a bit like comparing toasters and bicycles — which is better?

    They’re two different cases.

    As I’ve said, the problems we have with blacks are horrific — but largely self-inflicted. It’s clear enough how to ameliorate those problems, and it’s been done in the past. Drop the hammer, and blacks will behave. The Jews are demonstrating this right now.

    Blacks will never be an ornament and asset to America, but we can reduce the problem to manageable proportions. We just have to face facts.

    Jews are different. Individually…prepare to get shocked, but I suspect I get along better with the average Jew than I do with the average gentile.

    At the same time, their aggregate effect is intolerable, and a response leads directly to some ethical problems — I would say dilemmas, but I say we just suck it up. We’re going to have to say: ‘‘Jews are mighty fine — they cannot be allowed to participate in the political process or have access to power.’

    Your individual black is, on average, stupid, dishonest, and often both noxious and vicious. It’s clear enough they can’t be allowed the same liberties as the rest of us. Jews are — individually — no better or worse than the gentile average, when it’s all totted up. It’s the aggregate effect that can’t be borne.

    • Thanks: mark green
    • LOL: Trinity
    • Replies: @Truth
  23. Truth says:
    @Colin Wright

    prepare to get shocked, but I suspect I get along better with the average Jew than I do with the average gentile.

    At the same time, their aggregate effect is intolerable,

    Quick social experiment, Collie; I believe you should tell the former, the latter the next time you and Maury and Sandy are kvetching at the deli. We will see how long the goodwill lasts…

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  24. @Truth

    ‘…Quick social experiment, Collie; I believe you should tell the former, the latter the next time you and Maury and Sandy are kvetching at the deli. We will see how long the goodwill lasts…’

    Gee…ya think?

    Thanks for the heads up, Truth. Boy, you sure are sharp, spotting that one.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Jared Taylor Comments via RSS
PastClassics
The Surprising Elements of Talmudic Judaism
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement
Shouldn't they recuse themselves when dealing with the Middle East?