The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 PodcastsJared Taylor Archive
How They Plan to Shut Us Up
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

The campaign to make what I say illegal.

Video Link

Thumbnail credit: Gerald Praschl, CC BY-SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons

This video is available on Rumble, BitChute, and Odysee.

The push is on — harder than ever — not just to ban people like me from Twitter and YouTube, but to make what we say illegal. Sheila Jackson-Lee, congresswoman from Texas for the last 28 years, has been fighting “racism” all her life — just ask her — and she was at it again last week.

Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee (Credit Image: © Michael Brochstein/ZUMA Press Wire)
Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee (Credit Image: © Michael Brochstein/ZUMA Press Wire)

On January 9th, she introduced an act in Congress, “To prevent and prosecute white supremacy inspired hate crime and conspiracy to commit white supremacy inspired hate crime.”

The Left has ignored it, but conservatives are paying attention. Breitbart News says the bill would criminalize “criticism of non-white people.”

I’m sure the congresswoman would love to do that, but that’s not quite what her bill does.

It does invent a new category of hate crimes: those that are inspired by white supremacy. What’s white supremacy? We get this: “antagonism based on “replacement theory”, or “hate speech that vilifies or is otherwise directed against any non-White person or group.”

The bill says “hate speech,” but the Supreme Court does not recognize the existence of such a thing, so the new hate crime would be a crime inspired by speech — plain, old speech — directed against non-whites, or a crime motivated by resentment against white replacement. This is pretty broad. If I say “Sheila Jackson-Lee is a damn fool,” that’s speech directed against a non-white person. If I say, “I don’t want to become a minority” that’s resentment against replacement theory. If either of these sentiments motivate me to dump garbage on Shelia’s lawn — which is a crime — I’m guilty of a hate crime and therefore get added penalties. Crazy stuff.

If two or more people “conspire” to dump garbage on her lawn for either of these reasons, they are guilty of “conspiring” to commit a “white-supremacy-inspired hate crime.”

But what has conservatives angriest, is this: They think that if there are two people and one just talks about The Great Replacement or what an idiot Sheila is, and then the other dumps the garbage, they’re both guilty. They seem to think the talker could be guilty if all he did was post ideas on the internet, a stranger saw them, and completely independently dumped garbage.

I’m sure Sheila would like that, but the bill isn’t quite that simple.

Credit Image: © Rod Lamkey/CNP via ZUMA Wire
Credit Image: © Rod Lamkey/CNP via ZUMA Wire

There has to be a “conspiracy” of some kind between the talker and the dumper. The talker may be completely opposed to dumping garbage, but he’s guilty only if there is a conspiracy.

So, what’s a conspiracy? That’s the spooky part, and we don’t even need this goofy new law to worry about that. You remember the Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, Virginia in 2017. Police failed to separate racial dissidents from counter-protestors, and there were fisticuffs.

Credit Image: © Albin Lohr-Jones/Pacific Press via ZUMA Wire
Credit Image: © Albin Lohr-Jones/Pacific Press via ZUMA Wire

Worst of all, a man named James Fields drove his car into a group of protestors and killed a woman. [[3:50 – 3:56]]

The organizers and speakers at the rally were later sued under a Virginia law against conspiring to “commit racial, religious or ethnic harassment or violence.” The defendants didn’t think there was any evidence for a conspiracy, but as the presiding judge, Norman Moon explained, “a conspiracy is often clandestine and covert, thereby frequently resulting in little direct evidence of such an agreement.”

He meant what he said. He told the jury that people don’t even have to know each other to be co-conspirators, and, sure enough, “The jury returned a verdict finding that Plaintiffs had proven . . . that each Defendant was a member of that conspiracy.”

Certainly, some of the defendants had planned the rally together, but not one had ever even heard of James Fields. And yet, they were guilty of having conspired with him.

Credit Image: © Michael Nigro/Pacific Press via ZUMA Wire
Credit Image: © Michael Nigro/Pacific Press via ZUMA Wire

I guess this means that so long as people have some of the same ideas, they can conspire telepathically, so if you watch this video, agree with it, and dump garbage in Sheila’s yard, you and I could be co-conspirators. If that really were the law, I’d be out of business. I couldn’t run the risk that some nut who happens to agree with me on something does something illegal.

This is just like attempts to ban guns by not actually banning them: Make the manufacturers responsible if a criminal uses one to kill someone. That would put them out of business.

There are other approaches to shutting me up. This incident got nothing like the attention it deserved, but Kevin McAleenan, who was Acting Secretary of Homeland Security under Donald Trump, spoke at a seminar on “countering terrorism and targeted violence.”

Kevin McAleenan (Credit Image: © Jerry Glaser/Planet Pix via ZUMA Wire)
Kevin McAleenan (Credit Image: © Jerry Glaser/Planet Pix via ZUMA Wire)

He said “violent white supremacy is an abhorrent affront to the nation,” and then added something hair-raising. He said the Trump administration was fighting that affront by “engagement with the private sector . . . , as Cloudflare did in the immediate aftermath of the El Paso attack, to make a decision to not support a website that’s become a cesspool of hate.”

Cloudflare is a company that protects internet sites against denial-of-service attacks, which are felonies. When Cloudflare stopped protecting the 8chan site, it disappeared. Mr. McAleenan thinks illegal internet attacks are fine if they are against sites he calls “cesspools of hate.” Mr. McAleenen went on: “That’s the kind of decision-making we want to see out there in the private sector.”

The First Amendment prevents the government from muzzling dissidents, so Mr. McAleenan can just tell the private sector to do it. If he thought my house was a “cesspool of hate,” would he ask the police to look the other way while antifa ransacked it? I don’t see any difference.

Of course, thanks to the Twitter Files, we know that government employees were routinely telling Twitter to censor people.

They must have been doing that with Facebook and YouTube, too. It is illegal for the government to ask others to do what the First Amendment forbids it to do: censor people. The Wall Street Journal says you could “File a class action against federal agents seeking an injunction against social-media censorship efforts.”

But that, of course, assumes we still have a First Amendment, and the people who want to shut me up are chipping away at that.

The New York Times had it figured out back in 2019: “Free Speech is Killing Us.”

The author explains that, “brutality that germinates on the internet can leap into the world of flesh and blood.”

Yep, you could watch this video and dump garbage — or do something worse. The author adds that appealing to the First Amendment is “a cop-out.”

Senator Ben Cardin of Maryland is way ahead of him. He says, “if you espouse hate you’re not protected by the First Amendment.”

He noted that Europe has hate speech laws, and “I think we have to learn from each other.” He’s wrong about the First Amendment — at least for now.

Senators say nutty things every day. It’s more serious when judges do. How about this: “Ninth Circuit Judge Urges Supreme Court ‘Not to Give Any First Amendment Protection for Racist Hate Speech’.”

Judge Ronald Gould. Credit: Pathways to the Bench Video Series, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons.
Judge Ronald Gould. Credit: Pathways to the Bench Video Series, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons.

That, of course, happens in Europe all the time. I have been banned from Britain for the last eight years because what I say would be illegal there.

And some Europeans are confident that we will learn from them.

Just this week at the World Economic Forum, there was a panel on “The Clear and Present Danger of Disinformation.”

This lady is Věra Jourová, the European Commission vice president for “values and transparency.” She talked about “what qualifies as hate speech, as illegal hate speech, which you will have soon also in the U.S.”

Arthur Sulzberger, publisher of the New York Times was also on the panel.

Did he object? Not one bit. He said disinformation is an “existential” threat to society. Democrat Congressman Seth Moulton was also on the panel and agreed that Europeans are “way ahead of us” on regulation.

Barack Obama has it figured out. For him, “The internet is the single biggest threat to our democracy.”

Mr. Obama explained to Jeffrey Goldberg of the Atlantic “why he fears for of ‘our’ democracy.”

There has to be a “combination of government regulation and corporate practice” to rein in the internet because, “If we do not have the capacity to distinguish what’s true from what’s false, then by definition the marketplace of ideas doesn’t work. And by definition our democracy doesn’t work.”

What he means is, if you can’t tell true from false. He and his pals in government can — easily — and they will make sure you don’t hear anything they think you shouldn’t.

But if the feds are going to say what’s right and what’s wrong, that pesky First Amendment’s got to take a haircut, and Harvard University Press explains why it should. This book, The Harm in Hate Speech, says that if you say things that undermine the “dignity” of “vulnerable minorities,” that is as bad as a physical assault and should be illegal.

This is a common view. A 2019 poll by the organization First Liberty found that 51 percent of Americans think the First Amendment should be rewritten to ban “hate speech.”

Fifty-four percent of those who thought “hate speech” should be illegal said there should be possible jail time. The rest said a fine would be sufficient.

Eventually, it will be up to this lot.

I have little doubt that Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagen, and Ketanji Brown Jackson would be happy to put me out of business, and I’m not sure about a some of the rest. But with just two more “progressives” on the bench, the First Amendment might be elastic enough to accommodate Sheila Jackson Lee’s crazy bill.

These are strange times. These are dangerous times. And partly, it’s because Elon Musk bought Twitter and believes in free speech.

Credit Image: © Adrien Fillon/ZUMA Press Wire
Credit Image: © Adrien Fillon/ZUMA Press Wire

If people start going to Twitter for the real stuff, YouTube and Facebook might have to ease up. Can’t have that, can we? So they are even more desperate than usual to tighten the screws on people like me.

I used to think that even if Twitter and Facebook and YouTube and Instagram and TikTok all banned me — even if AmRen lost its website — I at least wouldn’t go to jail. Now, I’m not so sure. They used to call this place the land of the free and the home of the brave. That’s beginning to sound like a bad joke.

(Republished from American Renaissance by permission of author or representative)
Hide 155 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. folkvangr says:

    What I am going to say might sound scandalous and upset a few folks here, but I am going to say it anyway.
    “Liberté, égalité, fraternité” is a sham and a swindle and History has proved it too many times. France, Russia, China, usw. usw. Everywhere it was proclaimed things went from bad to worse and always ended up with genocide and fratricide. In America everything points in the same direction.
    What kind of liberty are you talking about if you can’t say even innocuous things on some twatter choke full with bots and trolls?
    What kind of equality are you talking about when you have billionairs flying to Paris every week or living like Gods, when millions of people are living in trailers, shelters or under bridges?
    What kind of brotherhood are we talking about when it’s not even safe to shop at Walmart anymore on a Saturday morning without being attacked by some sick somalian?
    Diversity is a swindle, but most whites don’t seem to care anymore. They are too obssessed with “tolerance” and being “nice” to those who want them dead yesterday. You either have a country or you dont’t. Make up your mind, white man.

  2. Even without such a law, the failure of Taylor to speak on the JQ means he’s already into self-censorship.

    The failure to identify the core source of anti-white agenda has been the bane of whites, and Taylor is no less guilty in this regard.

  3. Exile says:

    Jared doesn’t use the word “White” in this piece. He refers to it, mostly by proxy via the smears in the bill in question, but nowhere does he advocate for White interests. I see appeals for sympathy for “conservatives,” but not White people anymore.

    He’s pissed about shutting “me” up as a conservative, but not as a White man, anymore.

    What changed?

  4. Franz says:

    Diversity is a swindle, but most whites don’t seem to care anymore.


    Did they ever? It’s white folk really won’t take their own side in a fight.

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  5. Soon, somewhere, someone will be standing in court on charges of looking at someone in a hate-filled manner.

    • Agree: TKK
  6. anonymous[126] • Disclaimer says:

    Nice to have the mention above of USA political prisoner James Fields Jr, a mentally vulnerable young man who had come under direct life-threatening attack on those narrow Charlottesville streets, the photo above showing one of the lefties whacking his car … compare the James Fields ‘judgement’ to that of white-despising Lizzie Grubman:

    And regarding the Supreme Court, here is Chief Justice John Roberts’ name on the Jeffrey Epstein Lolita Express flight log:

    • Replies: @CCG
  7. Realist says:

    The biggest problem for the United States is it is full of goddamn nutless idiots.

    As long as Whites allow the buggering, it will continue.

    • Agree: Ulf Thorsen
  8. Realist says:
    @Priss Factor

    Even without such a law, the failure of Taylor to speak on the JQ means he’s already into self-censorship.

    The failure to identify the core source of anti-white agenda has been the bane of whites, and Taylor is no less guilty in this regard.

    That sounds great…what’s the solution?

    • Replies: @Priss Factor
  9. anarchyst says:

    Wait till “holocaustianity™” is declared the new “state religion” from which no dissent or questioning will be allowed.
    Many other western countries have already deified “holocaustianity™” and made any criticism or questioning of its founding principles and dogma a crime.
    Ask Ursula Haverbeck, Monika Schaefer, Sylvia Stolz, Ernst Zundel and others about their being criminalized on the altar of “holocaustianity™”. They have all done “hard time” in maximum-security prisons for questioning “that which may not be questioned”.
    Don’t think it can happen here?
    Ask Fred Leuchter, America’s foremost expert on execution machinery who lost all of his federal and state contracts for proving that the Auschwitz “gas chambers” are fake and could not have been used to execute anyone. Leuchter was effectively put out of business by jewish interests, He was also prosecuted in Massachusetts for “practicing engineering without a license”, a law that hand never been used against anyone previously.
    The First Amendment to the Constitution of the united States may prevent a direct assault on true “free speech” but there are workarounds that have been perfected by the jews to get around that pesky First Amendment.

    • Agree: Zane
  10. what’s the solution?

    There is no “solution”.

    Once you recognize that then you learn the “hack” of history–stop worrying about the rules of the game and change the game.

    Discovering how to do that is the job of a new generation–if they can’t figure it out, then the generation after them….

  11. Mac_ says:

    Think we should focus as if light beam, take real outside view on how we focus, separate from ‘state’, ask ourselves what is this threatening us or attempting to dictate, what am I and others doing for future, who has the water, or drones, is how framing should be in thinking.

    The cons schemed long time to bait assuming phony ‘normal’, which no such thing. As an example zeroed in on article, see how wrong it is other’s ‘deciding’ incursion on us,

    ‘ Fifty-four percent of those who thought “hate speech” should be illegal said there should be possible jail time. The rest said a fine would be sufficient. ‘

    ‘ Eventually, it will be up to this lot.’

    – then a phot of supreme cons under it.

    Argument, it is not up to them or any other, they’re smiley cons in costumes. Kelo v. New London and a hundred others.. Should not assume strangers decide what we say nor not. Have to make self-determination. Supposed paper law has been a con, scrawled con-stituation con, then turned around with ‘sedition bs to threaten, and which obviously made supposed ‘first amendment’ zero, and because we don’t shove back, now pushing no speech, ‘b cuz ‘hate’. point is see whats in front of us, as it is, cons in robes, and be own dictators, while able. Supposed courts prey on people. Have to talk among ourselves, share local, sort people etc, and shut. down. tv. Side mention, good to use paper and pen to make notes, increases sense of sorting.

    Btw comment isn’t knock on article or part, rather just show thinking focus, and how we have to practice, because no one taught us to see past con appearances, to scheme core, instead of assume less. . Appreciate the article Jared.

  12. I find it ridiculous that somehow one man should be obeyed because he spent his life in hairsplitting reasoning about the laws. Collectively the society should be obeyed, and those who differ with the decisions of the society should be allowed to leave if they wish. One man to decide the fate of another man’s life with a bullet is illegal, but if it is a pen, it is legal and obeyed. People should have enough skepticism about the judiciary and the judicial process. American founders assumed every generation will have the same intelligence and wisdom; and now we know it is not correct.

    • Agree: JR Foley
  13. Their sons were agile in the digital sea

    Of their interconnected medium,

    And they used the last days of its freedom

    As pirates waging information war

    Against his agents in the anticulture.

    By monopoly he had maneuvered

    Greedily to own it, and as it proved

    A true threat he installed his acolytes

    And gave them power to snuff the rights

    Of Aryan citizens to freely speak.

    When a single mercenary freak

    Could with his finger consign to oblivion

    Free conversation that had been haven

    For the dissident sane, or identify

    The heretics for attack or to deny

    Their livelihoods, they dared to persevere,

    Finding in themselves something severe

    They had thought lost. Even as they improvised

    To safeguard memory, they realized

    Any worthy future called them to be hard

    In ancient ways, in body and regard

    For the iron disciplines of spirit

    That over ages they did inherit.

    Not as individuals, selfish and vain

    As he wanted them, but to regain

    As men together this potential

    Simply they began by standing tall,

    By setting jaws and leveling eyes

    To recognize their own or the Enemy’s

    Hate in the gaze of his most abject,

    As brother one, the other as object

    Of adamant contempt, not fear.

    To meet the incomprehensible stare

    Of violent accusation, they needed

    The confidence of undefeated

    Men, and this they found in finding

    They were living testaments, binding

    Once and future greatness of the nation

    Whose blood drove them, as by divine action,

    To become who they were, and are:

    Sons of the sun, fathers of another star.

  14. If anyone would like to read the entire WSJ editorial referenced by Mr Taylor, it’s available here:

    Excerpt follows:


    The First Amendment protects not only speakers but also consumers, listeners and viewers. As the high court held in Virginia Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council (1976), when speakers are muzzled, their intended audience suffers a First Amendment violation too. Twitter users, even those who weren’t censored themselves, would therefore have standing to bring suit.

    Suing federal agents would pre-empt the claim that there was no “state action.” The nub of the “nothingburger” argument is that the Twitter Files fail to show government “coercion” and Twitter therefore never became a state actor. That argument is wrong: A private party can become a state actor through voluntary joint action with the government, which the Twitter Files richly detail. But a class action against federal defendants would avoid the entire question. They’re obviously state actors.

    …As the Supreme Court held in Norwood v. Harrison (1973), it is an “axiomatic” principle of constitutional law that the government “may not induce, encourage or promote private persons to accomplish what it is constitutionally forbidden to accomplish.” That’s exactly what the Twitter Files show officials from the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Central Intelligence Agency, the Department of Homeland Security and other federal agencies doing — inducing and encouraging Twitter to censor constitutionally protected speech.

    • Thanks: Almost Missouri
  15. Che Guava says:

    The quote is interesting. Just about everywhere has a ‘free speech’ clause in the constitution. The U.N., too, in the ‘Universal Declaration’. Everywhere, though, it’s fake in one way or another. It’s one thing still to admire about the U.S.A., even if it was long used mainly by pornographers.

    One would hope that a class-action based suit really goes ahead. I don’t Twit, but read about the bullshit. It would be a great development.

  16. Taylor:
    How I plan to shut you up.

    Don’t mention the Jews, the State of Israel, Zionists, Neocons, Zionist control of the American Government…….
    Otherwise I will censor and ban your comments in AR and other websites I control. I won’t reply to your comments on websites I don’t control.
    ( as here )

    The inescapable conclusion is this. Any AR- controlled US Government would ban and censor any comments critical of Jews in any media under its control. The question must be this: would they send these commenters to gaol for so doing ?
    Not that Taylor would ever answer these questions.

    • Agree: Irish Savant
    • Replies: @Vergissmeinnicht
  17. @Verymuchalive

    Just because Jared Taylor’s AmRen censor some speech, doesn’t follow that if Jared Taylor was President he’d ‘tweak’ the current Supreme Court’s interpretation of Freedom of Speech.

    • Replies: @Exile
    , @Irish Savant
  18. @Realist

    That sounds great…what’s the solution?

    Start with the obvious. Don’t just complain about BLM, globo-homo, or Antifa but spread the word that those are funded and exploited by Jewish Master Racism.

    The current order is about Jewish Master Racism and White Servant Racism.

    Jewish Master Racist view is “We superior Jews deserve to rule over inferior goyim’, and White Servant Racism amounts to, “Yes, Master Jews, you are the greatest. Please allow us white brown-nosers to be your favorite servants, oh pretty please.”

    Jared Taylor’s reluctance to touch on the JQ shows that he’s less a white advocate than a white servant racist. No matter how much Jewish Power disabuses whites, Taylor only bitches about blacks and etc. while muting himself on JQ, presumably in the hope that the Jewish Master Race will finally see the light and favor white servant race as its best and most loyal dog.

    • Agree: AndrewR
    • Replies: @Realist
    , @jaye ryan
  19. Exile says:

    Jared’s revealed preference is to ban criticism of Jews on a site he already controls.

    It’s entirely legitimate and advisable to suspect his bona fides re: free speech on the JQ. Can anyone here even imagine Presidential candidate JT saying the word “Jew” on the campaign trail – much less defending the free speech rights of anti-Semites?

    Get real.

    • Agree: AndrewR
    • Thanks: Verymuchalive
    • Replies: @Vergissmeinnicht
  20. @Exile

    I do think it’s legitimate to interrogate Mr Taylor if he supports the Free Speech of anti-Semites.

    The evidence, the snippets of it that I’ve seen, indicates he does!
    My memory isn’t eidetic, but, for instance, I do recall when Le Pen was sentenced due to “Holocaust Denial”… Jared wasn’t happy!

    This ‘logic’ (“he censors on his property, therefore he wants the Gov’t to censor as well”) reminds me of those silly Political Ideology tests… i.e., “Sex before marriage is immoral”, they ask, as if agreeing with that implies such a person wants to make fornication illegal!

  21. @Vergissmeinnicht

    If I was, say, the CEO of Twitter, I’d ban some speech that, in America, is legal. Otherwise, it becomes 4chan, too toxic, people would leave in droves. Not a sustainable business.

    At the same time, I want the websites that hold a monopoly on the “marketplace of ideas” (e.g., Twitter, Facebook etc.) to adhere to the 1st Amendment (!), i.e., can’t ban “sincerely-held beliefs”. But “Die! You ugly motherfucker!” insults should still be bannable.

    I think it’s stupid how copiously AmRen bans speech. Of course, it’s clever to desire a clean place without insults, spam, trolling etc. which’d attract ‘normies’ – agreed! But high-brow critiques of Jews (à la Kevin MacDonald) should be, if not welcomed, at least tolerated.

    • Replies: @Verymuchalive
  22. Realist says:
    @Priss Factor

    Start with the obvious. Don’t just complain about BLM, globo-homo, or Antifa but spread the word that those are funded and exploited by Jewish Master Racism.

    That’s step one. What is step two…and what are the subsequent steps? To what end?

    • Replies: @Priss Factor
  23. @Vergissmeinnicht

    I do think it’s legitimate to interrogate Mr Taylor if he supports the Free Speech of anti-Semites.

    Except, of course, Taylor won’t let you interrogate him on these matters.

    I think it’s stupid how copiously AmRen bans speech.

    So it’s not just some speech, it’s copious censorship.

    Of course, it’s clever to desire a clean place without insults, spam, trolling etc. which’d attract ‘normies’ – agreed! But high-brow critiques of Jews (à la Kevin MacDonald) should be, if not welcomed, at least tolerated.

    But Taylor doesn’t permit any criticism of the Jews whatsoever, not even from highly regarded evolutionary psychologists.

    As Exile wrote: Get Real.

  24. @Realist

    Step one naturally leads to step two, which leads to step three.

    The thing is… it makes no sense to fret about step 2 when most people won’t even take step 1.

    It’s like if you want to learn to swim, first get in the water and get wet.

    As they say, don’t try to do everything at once. Push the first domino and see what happens.

    • Replies: @Almost Missouri
    , @Realist
  25. Ghali says:

    Jared Taylor seems to be obsessed to death by the Black on Whites narrative. However, he has NO courage and dares NOT say anything about Jews who controlled everything American, including American rights to free-speech, what Jews called “antisemitism” and criticism of Neo-Fascist Israel.

    • Replies: @Priss Factor
    , @Exile
  26. Typical useless Taylor garbage where he goes on and on about a puppet of the Jews but doesn’t mention Jewish Power.

    Even after Jews deplatform and debank him, he still chooses not to discuss the JQ.

    As useless as Pat Condell who rants about Mooooslims but never about the Jewish Power that pushed ‘diversity’ on UK.

    Anglos are useless.

    • Replies: @Dave Bowman
  27. Wisely, and to the surreal Realist, Priss Factor wrote: “As they say, don’t try to do everything at once. Push the first domino and see what happens.”

    Thanks so much,PF!

  28. Hypocrisy (noun): the practice of claiming to have moral standards or beliefs to which one’s own behavior does not conform; pretense.


    • Replies: @geokat62
  29. JR Foley says:

    Calfornia 7- 11 shootings but NRA says “Guns don’t kill people!” —-add this to the list of what is screwed up in America —-NO Jesus did not carry a Luger or AK47.

  30. Poetic justice?

    Blue City Chicago scum elected a black lesbian as mayor and called for BLM-led defunding of the police, and guess what? Black thugs are running wild and murdering what seems like ‘woke’ white idiots.

    Don’t waste your sympathy on white ‘woke’ traitors.

    • Agree: spacewonderer
    • Replies: @Eric Novak
  31. @Ghali

    If a Jew dons a black boxing glove and punches Taylor in the face, he will blame the boxing glove but not the Jew.

    • LOL: Trinity
    • Replies: @Ghali
    , @Truth
  32. Dube says:
    @Priss Factor

    Here’s the solution. Jared writes and speaks as himself, discussing a certain point in his interesting manner. You footnote immediately, skewing his point to the side in your tedious manner.

    That way, all of us here who aren’t so smart get full instruction.

    Problem solved, no changes needed.

  33. jared taylor, the epitome of anglo mediocrity. 2,300 words of rambling, nothing interesting or insightful whatsoever. Even without considering the fact that he never says anything about the jews at all, this anglo is already too boring and useless in its own.

    • Troll: spacewonderer
    • Replies: @Truth
  34. USA1943 says:

    The Supreme Court would vote 9=0 AGAINST Sheila Lee Jackson’s Bill it CLEARLY goes against the Constitution and the 1st Amendment and it is NOT Close, A Justice does NOT do what they personally want, they have Guidelines they have to follow and this is a Non Brainer, It clearly has a Bias Double /Standard based on Race, which is NOT allowed, They are supposed to go by what The Founding Fathers wanted and The Founding fathers were not part of the Anti-White Crowd, but it would NEVER get to the Supreme Court, It would not get past any court, they would look at it laugh, say this can’t be real and throw it in the garbage. The Supreme Court also does not want to start a Civil War that would Dwarf the First USA Civil War. NOT GOING TO HAPPEN

    • Agree: Bardon Kaldian
    • Replies: @ia
  35. @Priss Factor

    Isn’t this what everyone is complaining about Jared Taylor not doing: not taking Step 2 when most people won’t even take Step 1?

    Taylor is openly, publicly, under his own name, trying to keep free speech free. Commenters here complain he won’t address the JQ. Okay, but if you don’t have free speech, you can’t address the JQ (nor can you address much of anything else).

    Taylor is doing Step 1: keeping free speech free. He or someone else may do Step 2: address the JQ. Kevin MacDonald, Jung-Freud/Priss Factor, etc. already do Step 2. Maybe Taylor will too someday or maybe not. But it seems illogical (as well as impolite) to complain about the guy holding the door open for you at Step 1 when his door-holding is allowing anyone to go to Step 2.

    Everyone should be glad, even grateful, for Taylor’s efforts. Instead he just gets attacked for not doing everyone else’s dirty work for them.

    It should be no enemies on the right. Instead it’s crabs in a bucket.

    Incidentally, I note that though Mr. Taylor presumably has veto power over comments here, he follows Unz’s light moderation policy and permits all of the comments critical of him as well as all of the JQers. I would think a little gratitude would be in order.

    • Agree: TKK, ia, Achmed E. Newman
  36. They even got the queen of country to submit to their Wakanda new world white enslavement.

  37. @Priss Factor

    CENSORSHIP is nothing new.

    There are many things no one can talk about… still. And with these things began the censorship in the West.

  38. Anon[935] • Disclaimer says:

    Time to vote with your feet. Our forefathers left their homeland for better pastures, we can too. Better a few years too early, than 1 day too late.

    Your descendants will bless you for your choice.

  39. Mr. Taylor, they want to do more than shut us up. They want to kill us.

  40. Dr. Doom says:

    That africant retard is just a fool and a tool.
    The Bagel Boyz write these stupid things.

    Time to choose White Men.
    You outnumber the meat puppets.

    30 to 1. 6 million cancerous cowards.
    You don’t negotiate with cancer.

    War is here. Started in 1933.
    You are the “nazis” now.

    Embrace the idea. Eliminate the Synagogue.
    Dese nuts are not gawds.

    • Agree: A. Clifton
  41. GMC says:

    Great article Mr. Taylor – in the article, the EU was mentioned to be further into protecting the ” minorities , than the Americans , sooo the Americans should learn from them – lol

    Well, if you look further East , the Russians have learned very quickly when it comes to those kinds of minorities. They’ve learned so much , that I have seen only 3 of those Minorities in the past 5 – 7 years. I must also add that these Russian blacks were working and could speak the Russian language- properly. America’s TV is a great Brainwashing tool , but it also can open your eyes to all the BS that your country does not Need…….

  42. P.T. says:

    Sheila is not concerned about black hate crimes against non-black people — Whites and Asians for example. She is just another liberal hypocrite.

  43. @Almost Missouri

    No, step 1 is naming the Jewish Power that is trying to end free speech.

    Speech is free now, and to keep it free, the power trying to end it must be named.

    That is step 1.

  44. @Exile

    Something changed. I have been following him for a long time, and over the past few months, literally any criticism about blacks is OK in his moderated comment section, but too much criticism of the chosen is not.

  45. @anarchyst

    The problem is that the Bushes who are very much intertwined with jewish money power, and the CIA have a desire to have all the goyim contained in a fake reality, as broadcast in media and moderated on the censored internet. The elite care about themselves ONLY, and consider the rest of the world sheep to be fleeced; lied to from cradle to grave and the fruits of their labor harvested like a crop. Also, socially engineered for profit and amusement.

    Once the harvest is “ripe”, they reap and then allow bloodletting by Islam to replenish the soil. Blood and soil.

  46. TKK says:

    Holding the hand of this issue is the ability of the country to function when so many belligerent and ignorant blacks and browns take white’s jobs.

    *Can I order a CD of my MRI from the local hospital without fighting with an aggressive dumb she- boon for hours to do her job?

    *Can I order a burrito at Chipotle that does not have spice levels that make me sweat and cause actual stomach pain because the cooks are all uneducated knuckle draggers from Oaxaca?

    *Can I file a motion and argue it in front of a judge that can read and write?

    If I offer any critique of the blacks and browns – it is made criminal speech?


    • Agree: Achmed E. Newman
    • Replies: @john speke
  47. @folkvangr

    It’s Liberté, égalité, fraternité vs. Life, liberty and pursuit of happiness.

    • Replies: @ia
  48. Well pardon me for a moment of schadenfreude. When we antiwar protesters and civil rights marchers were clubbed down in the streets, you cheered on the cops. When police murdered Black Panthers in their beds, you said hooray, kill ’em all. When the National Guard gunned down ghetto looters and Kent State students, you screamed for more. When every petition for peace and justice was denied or simply ignored, you said, that’s right, don’t listen to those pinko darkies and traitor commie fags. And now the police state you enabled has turned on you and you fuss and fume and moan, how could this have happened, must be them damn Jews. Lot easier than looking in the god-damned mirror, isn’t it?

    • Thanks: Thor Walhovd
    • Replies: @Stonewall Jackson
  49. usNthem says:

    Unfortunately, Whites have allowed this to happen, either standing passively by while various shades of the mud contingent made inroads into positions of power, or actively promoting it – and here we are. At this rate, it’s only going to get worse.

  50. @Priss Factor

    Give it a rest man.

    We understand you don’t like Mr. Taylor because he does not write what you want him to write and he is not obsessed with Jews.

    Good grief but YOU are a bore

    • Replies: @Dieter Kief
    , @WJ
  51. Treg says:

    Well by these new proposed definitions of conspirators and conspiracy, then we could round-up the Left and execute everyone of them for Antifa’s murders, arsen and violence.

    That being the new definitions, then the race to absolute Ceasar-like power is on. Its going to be bloody.

  52. Nat X says:

    Us Dindoos are taking over and there’s not a goddamn thing any of you can do about it. As for those ‘useful idiots’ yts that are actively helping us…they heads will be on pikes too if thats any consolation.

    • Replies: @anon
    , @Anon
    , @HT
    , @Truth
    , @CelestiaQuesta
  53. geokat62 says:

    Police failed to separate racial dissidents from counter-protestors, and there were fisticuffs.

    Failed to separate? More like intentionally shoved them into the arms of Antifa.

    Senator Ben Cardin of Maryland is way ahead of him. He says, “if you espouse hate you’re not protected by the First Amendment.”

    Cardin’s real surname is Kardonsky.

    Senators say nutty things every day. It’s more serious when judges do. How about this: “Ninth Circuit Judge Urges Supreme Court ‘Not to Give Any First Amendment Protection for Racist Hate Speech’.”

    Judge Ronald Gould is Jewish.

    Arthur Sulzberger, publisher of the New York Times was also on the panel.

    Arthur Sulzberger is Jewish.

    Noticing a pattern, goy?

  54. @folkvangr

    white people don’t deserve to feel safe at Walmart given the country’s legacy and unpaid reparations debt to Foundational Black Americans.

    PEACE from Dalian, PRC!

    • Replies: @Automatic Slim
    , @folkvangr
  55. geokat62 says:

    How They Plan to Shut Us Up

    They’re not planning to shut us up. They’re planning to kill us.

    • Agree: TKK
  56. eah says:

    >How They Plan to Shut Us Up

    Who’s ‘they’?

    Of course the ADL, and activist Jews and organized Jewry generally, are the primary instigators of censorship in the US, and have been for some time — but Mr Taylor won’t mention that, and if you bring it up in a comment on his website (, it will either not be published or be deleted, and you may be banned from commenting in the future.

    Not that I resent Mr Taylor for this — his body of work has been, and remains, too valuable; besides, there are others who address the role Jews play in promoting censorship.

    Nevertheless it should be mentioned.

  57. Anon[174] • Disclaimer says:

    So the next time the Feds get a FBI informant to talk some disturbed kid into doing something stupid, and the cyber team feds plant some Derb or Sailer or Hood on his computer, then those writers get charged by the Obama-ites and Biden-ites at the DOJ for something something hate because pointing out changing demography always bad?

    Got it.

  58. HT says:

    If you post on American Renaissance lately, they do a pretty good job of censoring the truth themselves on occasion if you dare say something negative about sacred Israel or the Marxist Jews who are the primary force behind the destruction of America and white Western civilization.

  59. Trinity says:

    J-E-W-S. Go ahead, Jared, you can do it. Do like Mikey, “try you will like it. It’s the Ju-ju-ju * butt cheeks tighten, sweating profusely, the shabbos goy shill tries to reclaim ITS balls.

    Cue: Do It Till You’re Satisfied by BT Express

    • Replies: @HT
  60. anon[334] • Disclaimer says:
    @Nat X

    Next time you see Sheila,please congratulate her on behalf of YTs on her successful plastic surgery. This is her before picture. Unfortunately the surgeons were unable to do much with the upper jaw so the Simian trait is still there. We look forward to having her for our next President. Hoo hoo haw haw haw !!! LMAO

  61. @JR Foley

    That is true, He did not. He didn’t have to. The Apostles were armed. What did Peter use in the Garden to cut off the soldier’s ear, an olive branch?

  62. Where’s commenter Truth? He’s gotta be lurking around here somewhere. Just found a good
    conversation on another site to share with him:

    And then the question remains, how is this the fault of “honkees?”

  63. Anon[334] • Disclaimer says:
    @Nat X

    Before surgery :

  64. HT says:

    J-E-W-S. Go ahead, Jared, you can do it. Do like Mikey, “try you will like it. It’s the Ju-ju-ju * butt cheeks tighten, sweating profusely, the shabbos goy shill tries to reclaim ITS balls.

    You really have to wonder about the thought process of someone complaining about being silenced while protecting the group that is actually silencing him.

    • Thanks: Trinity
  65. Truth says:

    Evey Rich already shut you up, the last time you thought about writing something detractory about her forefathers…

  66. anonymous[314] • Disclaimer says:

    “The push is on — harder than ever — not just to ban people like me from Twitter and YouTube, but to make what we say illegal.”

    Horseshit! That’s what I say to your claim. It’s the Jew that’s egging on the Nigress, otherwise, she would not know which end was up. Now repeat after me: I won’t kiss the Tuchus of my Zionist masters and expose them relentlessly.

  67. Truth says:
    @Priss Factor

    Boxing gloves don’t hit people, PEOPLE hit people!

  68. Truth says:

    Spacewonderer trolled Spacewanderer!

    LMAO! If this site didn’t exist, it would be necessary to invent it.

    Which one of you is the Garlic-Eater again, I could look it up, but I feel too lazy this morning.

    • Replies: @Automatic Slim
  69. Pablo says:

    Now let;s see. Sheila Jackson Lee has been a member of the US Congress for the last 28 years. Yet, she’s worried about ‘white supremacist hate speech’? This hate speech must not be too powerful if a Black Woman can be elected to the US Congress. Jackson Lee is just being cynically used by the Real Rulers–who aren’t Black. Jackson Lee and her kind are very useful to the Real Powers that Be (TRPB) because THEY most certainly are NOT Black. No, they are almost exclusively from a different ethnic group. Their most Powerful Lobby in the USA is called AIPAC. This group spends A LOT of money keeping the USA going the way it wants. This group is just harnessing Jackson Lee’s deep hatred of White People for their own use. Like a puppet on a string Jackson Lee is. They have a good laugh over her behind her back.

    • Agree: Ulf Thorsen
  70. AndrewR says:
    @Almost Missouri

    The attack of freedom of speech is led and funded by Jews. Protecting that freedom requires naming the Jew.

  71. Trinity says:

    How long before we have the J-word to go along with the N-word. Remember when the F-word stood for “fuck?” Cannot even say “faggot” apparently in JewSA.

    Cue: Money For Nothing by Dire Straits

    Psssst, JT, just purse your lips and say it, don’t spray it, breh. Free yo-self, JT. Joooooooozzzzz.

    • Troll: mulga mumblebrain
  72. Problem is white supremacy is a fact. Blacks really are mentally inferior and the gap is enormous.

    1. Black-americans come in last in all standardized tests. Asian-americans do fine on all the tests so it’s not due to cultural bias in the tests.

    2. Africa is by far the poorest and most backward continent on the planet. All of black africa is now controlled by blacks and has been for decades so it’s not due to racism.

    3. No black has ever won a Science Nobel Prize unless you count one in 1979 for the semi-science of economics. They have won many nobels in non-brain fields like Peace and also in Literature so it is not due to racism.

    4. Out of 1725 chess grandmasters in the world, only THREE are black.

    5. 50 years of affirmative action special treatment and blacks have fallen even further behind. What does that tell you?

    • Replies: @Truth
  73. @Supply and Demand

    Sure bro. American whites don’t deserve to be safe in the Walmarts they created, or even in the clean, prosperous, advanced society they created here. We should be forever in danger in our own country because African kings and slave traders sold their people into slavery to the New World, and we short-sightedly took some in, then gave them “equality.”

    And in spite of the fact that they were, and are, STILL better off than they ever would have been in the mudderland. Your hatred of your own race, and inverted realities, would make for a fascinating study in aberrant human psychology.

    • Replies: @Supply and Demand
  74. Trinity says:

    Lavon Affair, JFK, USS Liberty, 911 = ?
    Immigration Reform Act of 1964, Epstein & Maxwell, Jonathan Pollard, Rosenbergs, Open borders = ?

    Multiple Choice

    A) Black Panthers
    B) White Supremacist, KKK, Nazis
    C) Aye-rabs
    D) Chinks
    E) Russkies
    F) Homersexuals
    G) Jews

    • LOL: HT
  75. @MIck Jagger gathers no mosque

    Yep, he doesn’t rock, this man – at all.

  76. JonS says:

    I’m convinced this is why Cardin’s son killed himself, he couldn’t stand having such a bastard for a father

  77. ia says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    It’s Liberté, égalité, fraternité vs. Life, liberty and pursuit of happiness.

    Which now means sexually mutilating children.

    The war in Ukraine is being fought for Gay Pride and Pussy Riot. Not to mention mass non-white migration.

    I think it’s certainly possible, in fact likely, that the curtailing of expression for whites only will be on the agenda, especially when whites are a minority. Do you really think Muslims, Asians, blacks, Indians, Mexicans, etc. and their globalist enablers are going to comprehend such concepts in a few years/decades?

    Myself, I don’t feel we are living in an Age of Reason anymore.

    • Agree: folkvangr
    • Replies: @geokat62
  78. HT says:
    @Nat X

    Us Dindoos are taking over and there’s not a goddamn thing any of you can do about it. As for those ‘useful idiots’ yts that are actively helping us…they heads will be on pikes too if thats any consolation.

    You aren’t taking over. The Jews are just using you until they don’t need you anymore. Then they will put you back into slavery. Suckers.

  79. WJ says:
    @MIck Jagger gathers no mosque

    Was just watching a show call ICrime with Elizabeth Vargas. The show feature lefty type of clips that make libs feel good. Today they had a clip showing some fat white woman outraged by a BLM flag in a yard, being sprayed with a water hose. They have many clips like this. The show’s creator was Hank Cohen and the producer was something Greenberg. They definitely hate us.

  80. geokat62 says:

    Myself, I don’t feel we are living in an Age of Reason anymore.

    … more like we’re living in an Age of Treason.

    • Thanks: Achmed E. Newman
    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  81. turtle says:

    And of course, for purposes of such legislation, Jews will be defined as “non-White persons.”
    Actually, as “Holy Non-White Persons.”

    I can hardly wait for the billboards:

    Criticize a Jew.
    Go to prison.
    It’s the Law.

    • Replies: @geokat62
  82. Publius 2 says:

    Anyone who does not understand that the First Amendment was created for the express purpose of protecting what the communists call “hate speech” should be executed.

  83. CSFurious says:

    America is so racist that a Black woman has served in Congress for almost three decades. LOL!

  84. ia says:

    The Supreme Court also does not want to start a Civil War that would Dwarf the First USA Civil War. NOT GOING TO HAPPEN

    Of course it can happen. Anything can happen. The founders were racist white men. They were also sexist. In a country that is minority white men they would simply throw the constitution in the garbage.

  85. Truth says:
    @Nat X

    As for those ‘useful idiots’ yts that are actively helping us…they heads will be on pikes too if thats any consolation.

    That was nice of you, King. I’m sure you made a lot of people here feel better this morning.

    • LOL: Rurik
    • Replies: @Rurik
  86. Truth says:
    @Hang All Text Drivers

    You do occasionally have other thoughts in your heads that might generate comments, don’t you?

  87. @folkvangr

    It looks like the two most recent mass shootings here in California committed by crazy Chinamen caught media maggots pushing violent white supremacist/domestic terrorist hysteria off guard.
    Now comes intense distractions with classified documents and Ukraine being annihilated by private military Wagner Group.

    It’s beginning to look a lot like keystone cops meets USS Harvey Milk battle group up against real manly Russian warriors.

    • Replies: @folkvangr
  88. Dumbo says:

    Who is “they”? Black women? :-/

  89. geokat62 says:

    I can hardly wait for the billboards:

    Criticize a Jew.
    Go to prison.
    It’s the Law.

    … or

    Criticize the Jewish Supremacist Agenda.
    Go to prison.
    It’s the Law.

  90. @Nat X

    Nigga Pleez, y’all ready have monopoly on Burn Loot Murder and Rape, Snatch ‘n Grab, Carjacking, Drive by Shooting, cRap Rhyming, what more do you niggaz want?

    And for your information, Vibranium is not real, niggaz can’t fly and Wakanda is spelled wrong, it should be Rwanda.

    • LOL: europeasant
  91. Realist says:
    @Priss Factor

    You did a great job of circumventing the issue.

  92. Phibbs says:

    If I were a Jew, I would — like almost all Jews — support the eradication of the First Amendment. Jews are aware that if we Caucasians ever learned how Jewish supremacism and disloyalty have devastated America morally, politically, economically and militarily, “hate” speech against Jews would become a tidal wave.

  93. folkvangr says:

    Oh, come on, Putin’s war has nothing to do with liberating Donbass, he could have done it hands down back in 2014. It’s about re-building The Soviet Reich. Not that there is anything wrong with that. AH did the same and who can blame him for that? White Orthodox Christian Russians need to live among themselves, not being harrassed by any hostile tribe. The issue at stake is that just like ALL Russian dictators he handles the task like a true Barbarian he is.

  94. folkvangr says:
    @Supply and Demand

    Your sarcasm is very much appreciated! lol

  95. Anon[185] • Disclaimer says:
    @JR Foley

    People kill people, inanimate objects don’t kill people!

  96. Team Obama and their cult followers among the Uniparty, media and big tech are the real cesspool of hate. Hatred of those who would question or mock their privilege and entitlement to commodify and suck the world dry in one last neocolonialist orgy before the curtains come down. Hatred of the white working class and founding fathers and anti-war activists. Hatred of the Russian people, of the global south, and of anybody standing between them and the cashier at Target.

    Free speech went bye-bye in the first couple years of the Russiagate Hoax to cheering applause from the “liberals”. Weaponization of the DOJ, FBI and CIA occurred at the same time with full support from the same cheering squad, and Trump let it slide instead of firing the perps.

    Usually a junkie has to hit bottom before turning their life around. If they survive, of course, which is a big if.

  97. @Truth

    I’ve got to admit, this comment is pretty funny.

  98. Conservatives should simply respond:

    an act against another person that deprives them of their rights as citizens is already a violation of the law and can be prosecuted.

    The problem with our history is not that we have laws condoning acts against others. The problem has always been that we as a nation refused to enforce the law equitably. On that we have or are turning a corner.

    Representative Lee’s are valid, but they are predicated on a system that no longer exists or is under considerable pressure to be destroyed. However, there is no need to replicate the sins of the past to remove the sins and consequences of the same. The Republican party absolutely supports the equitable enforcement of the laws of the US, including when said laws are violated by whites with equal vigor as has been enforced against black citizens.

  99. Mathematics Is Racist. Woke Lives Matter.

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  100. I think most of you are making accusations regarding Jews that are interestingly limited. Some twenty years while I was coaching two female students asked me or actually told by the question . . .

    that it should be against the law to criticize anyone’s religion. The two young ladies

    a jew

    a moslem

    The rest of the world hardly understands the make up of the US or Great Britain for that matter. Both countries have a long running history of deep criticisms of anyone about anything and one’s faith and practice were highly targeted. The very notion of not shooting off one’s mouth off or the right to do so is foreign to our shores. And while the critiques do have boundaries inciting violence, I am unsure not sure how one can outlaw the matter and not run roughshod over the 1st Amendment.

    What Rep Lee and most others are attempting to short cut is not the speech but the inciteful nature of the speech.


    “Free speech went bye-bye in the first couple years of the Russiagate Hoax to cheering applause from the “liberals”. Weaponization of the DOJ, FBI and CIA occurred at the same time with full support from the same cheering squad, and Trump let it slide instead of firing the perps.”

    The weaponization of the government and her various agencies to stifle free speech went into effect not long after the Constitution was ratified. Unfortunately, it was done by one of our best president’s, Pres. John Adams

    President Lincoln,individuals%20who%20were%20deemed%20threatening%20to%20military%20operations.

    President Wilson,individuals%20who%20were%20deemed%20threatening%20to%20military%20operations.

    Then came the WWII and the cold war and silencing speech went of the rails to include counter intel programs that actively sought to destroy by reputation and bankruptcy the lives of people, in which class and wealth were empowered to silence dissent

    any suggestion that this was some new fangled threat to democracy under the admin of Pres Obama — needs a look through history on the question.

  101. “When you stand for NOTHING…..

    You WILL fall for ANYTHING”……

    Over and over and over and over again.

    Your ride is over here, goy.

    Next stop for you…..

    the DUMPSTER of history.

  102. KenH says:

    The Jewish led left has been on a propaganda blitz the last several years claiming that “the first amendment doesn’t protect hate speech” and it’s beginning to have an effect judging by the polls. The Jewish left is succeeding in convincing growing numbers of dullards that free speech leads to violence and mass shootings. Oi vey! Shut it down!

    If the poll was broken down by race I think you’d find support for a robust 1A is still highest among legacy white Americans although not as high as even a decade ago while it’s probably underwater with the non-white and third world demographic groups. I think at one time support for free speech was over 80% nationally in the 1990’s but the country was much different back then.

    As with all anti-Constitution and anti-white activism Jewish power is the driving force and a disproportionate number of Jews are on the front lines of the anti first amendment push.

    Hate crime laws were laughed off yet here we are so I think it’s only a matter of time before the deceitful and cunning propaganda wins out and he have hate speech laws. If hate speech laws ever do come to America they will be selectively enforced against whites and specifically white people who don’t hate themselves.

    • Agree: HT, tolona
  103. @Automatic Slim

    Another typical whitey who can’t cope.

  104. @Franz

    Diversity, of race, religion, opinion, life experience etc, is REALITY. Why deny existence and refuse to make it work for human benefit?

    • Troll: Johnny LeBlanc
  105. @geokat62

    It’s the Age of Revelation, ain’t it? The truth is determined, a priori, by tiny cabals and if you disagree, you are anathema, or Amalek if you prefer. Reason IS Treason.

    • Replies: @Sargon3.1415926
  106. Will it really be so different when criticism of any component of the Democrat coalition is made unlawful? Jared Taylor has long been silent about (((our greatest ill))), the one that brings about, directly or indirectly, all of the other wills that plague us.

  107. @Pablo

    She qualifies as what Malcolm X called the ‘House Negro’. One more concerned with the welfare of the White Master than the Field Negros. I believe that she has not achieved much for her long-suffering constituents.

    • Replies: @geokat62
  108. @Supply and Demand

    Another typical whitey who can’t cope[with whom? the feral Bantu?].

  109. Rurik says:


    Supply and Demand?!

    it can’t be!

    where is your gratitude?!!!

  110. geokat62 says:
    @mulga mumblebrain

    One more concerned with the welfare of the White Master than the Field Negros.

    It’s “Fellow White Master.”

  111. Zane says:

    That pile of steaming manure called Obama needs to shut up. What he knows about ” democracy ” would fit on a pinhead. He’s a clown.

    • LOL: Meretricious
  112. @Supply and Demand

    Aren’t you the self-hating white dude from Wisconsin who betrayed your country and ran off to China? Do you honestly think you are in a position to moralize about ANYTHING?

    It sucks to suck, eh?

  113. ATBOTL says:

    Taylor said around 20 years ago that he didn’t consider himself a white nationalist anymore, only a “race realist.”

  114. Cozette says:

    Mr Jackson is very american

  115. This is awesome!

    ‘Blue’ city Chicago gets its comeuppance after Negrolatry that pretends white cops are beasts and blacks are saints. ROTFL.

    For blue cities, we must support DEFUND THE POLICE, ANTIFA, and BLM, as well as covid hysteria. We need more ‘blue’ cities to end up this way.

  116. @Observator

    Not too many of you anti war protesters exist anymore… boomers loved Hillary Barack and now Joe whose leading the US to the brink of WWIII. Three solid fucking warmongers. This isnt the commentary for people who love the military industrial complex totalitarian state or provide Fox news level of support for Ukraine. Your commentary doesn’t fit here… this is a place where the right questions authority, its not National Review cheering on wars for Israel…

  117. anonymous[158] • Disclaimer says:

    The ramifications of Rep. Sheila Lee’s can be Limitless/Unimaginable and ultimately Unmanageable. IF Mark Twain’s Huckleberry Finn, or Stowe’s Uncle Tom Cabin had couldn’t had been published. What would be the impact on Film arts, political debate, scientific studies, academic debate/research/news/etc. The Bill clearly racist itself: ONLY whites are capable of Racism/Hate??. The core issue is that elites want to control/centralize/dominate INFORMATION for their benefit only. I think it will ultimately backfire on blacks/hispanics/asians/ and all Americans …how do you address the issue of violence of Blacks on blacks/on Asians/ etc.. It will keep all those “victims” of racism from talking about racism/racists issues, even filing a police report about black on white/white on black crimes,a police officer can not say “black/hispanic/asian suspect/perpetrator..etc…” is that White supremacist talk/language? ,,,is just insane.

    • Replies: @folkvangr
  118. Jared Taylor: “The defendants didn’t think there was any evidence for a conspiracy, but as the presiding judge, Norman Moon explained, “a conspiracy is often clandestine and covert, thereby frequently resulting in little direct evidence of such an agreement.””

    The chains draw a little tighter, but basically this isn’t anything new. This same tactic was used against White Aryan Resistance founder Tom Metzger way back in 1990. Just as with the Charlottesville defendants, he was sued in civil court for “conspiring” with some skinheads he never even met, who later went on to murder a negro. He lost and it bankrupted him. Also, even before that, in criminal court, Charles Manson was convicted of murder for the Tate and LaBianca killings; killings in which it was never even alleged he was in attendance. How could he be guilty of murdering those people when he wasn’t at the scene? He was found guilty of the murders because he supposedly “conspired” with the people who did the actual killing.

    The legal theory is, broadly speaking, vicarious liability. Ordinarily, everyone is responsible only for his own actions, not those of someone else. Vicarious liability reverses this, making you responsible for someone else’s actions. It’s proving to be an excellent hammer with which to destroy individual rights, especially the right to free speech.

    Where was Jared Taylor I wonder, or indeed, any of you, when Metzger was financially ruined, or Charles Manson convicted? Applauding, I’d guess. Well, now it’s coming ’round for you. Perhaps there is a kind of justice in the world after all, or at least a symmetry.

    • Replies: @Dieboomerdie
  119. @Priss Factor

    Chicago didn’t elect Lightfoot really. Soros injected spoiler candidate Lightfoot, calculating that she may win the greatest demographic of votes among a large field of candidates. She and Toni Preckwinkle won a horse race among 8 others, including Bill Daley. The runoff two months later had a 15% turnout. In the final analysis, more than 80% of voters voted against Lori Lightfoot.

  120. folkvangr says:

    This bill proves only one thing: that those who occupy the necessary positions of authority within the state should be regarded as potential enemies and usurpers. The cherished equality of Americans has always depended on the weakness of their government. This has always been the basis of the American character and should remain so. Sheila Lee’s clear objective is to deprive me of my freedom of speech, my fundamental right, and that makes her one of those who operate on the edge of legality.

  121. Another problem that can only be attacked covertly, by a determined group with sufficient stamina and self-pride. I’m afraid it’s wishful thinking. I could muster a group, but the 90+% fraidycat whites around us would betray us. How whites as a race have degenerated, it’s unbelievable. And how utterly clever those Jews are. The shaming racket works for everything! That’ s why so many other groups use it for leverage, either advised by Jews or on their own initiative. What if we adapted the same tactics? What makes Jews successful? Iron determination, everlasting focus on a goal, energetic zeal, iron memory, vengefulness, a keen sense of self-worth and in many cases even superiority, group unity and adherence to holy causes and destinies. We were once like that. Yes, it was when we exploited colonies and slave labor, but also invented lots of technology. The Jews now have colonized our economies and we are labor slaves to their banks. Their technology is monetary and judiciary. As with any leading tribe, there is crime along with the accomplishments. Name any great people in history and you’ll see the same: crime and accomplishment go hand in hand. So why should we whites be cowered into believing that we were the only criminals in history, and that we should be the only ones with reasons for shame? We are slowly being turned into Gilette-sissies and we allow it to be done to us. Let’s show that we are types not to be trifled with! Epstein, Weinstein, Kissinger, Albright, Soros, Fuld, Blankfein, Nethanyahu, the list of Jewish criminals is long. Let’s bring it out in the open and keep hammering the points home with the fanatic zeal previously known only from Jews. Let’s use their own tactics on them. They want our demise, in spite of us repenting and being leniant to them. We’re damned any which way we approach this, so what the heck. What’s keeping us?

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  122. @Vergissmeinnicht

    Nobody owes you anything, you knuckle dragging imbecile. [email protected] an irrelevant group gets to interrogate anyone. If you don’t like it, you can become even more irrelevant by cutting ties with anyone who doesn’t blame the weather on the Jews.

  123. @Dr. Robert Morgan

    Where were pro white peoples when blacks were getting discriminated against? Probably cheering, so why should anyone care you’re discriminated against now? See, the symmetry applies here too 😉

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @Tallest Skil
  124. Uhhhhh . . .

    So sudden;y the blacks have killed state street . . .

    not a year and a half of lock downs and closed business . . . . state street dependent on traffic . . . . is shut down by gangs instead of lock-downs.

    More likely that the shit downs exacerbated economic tensions emptied hundreds of store fronts if not thousands and the region simply deteriorated into problematic turf country.

    • Replies: @EliteCommInc.
  125. Anon[360] • Disclaimer says:

    Big difference, ass clown. Whites are productive, law-abiding, and maintain prosperous societies.
    Blacks do none of those things. Discrimination against the best of society is insane and a recipe for disaster.

    American society at large was not hurt one iota by discriminating against blacks. And it was a hell of a lot safer. Some people need stern, adult supervision and direction.

  126. @Exile

    Nothing. He was always controlled opposition. “Jews look white to me” is mental illness on his part.

  127. @Dieboomerdie

    No one gives a shit. Africans have no place in white society. They aren’t citizens and can never be, as per the Founding Fathers’ own statements. I don’t give a shit what happens to an entirely separate species. No one but jews cares about the psychosis of “discrimination” as being a bad thing.

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  128. anarchyst says:

    Keep in mind that just about every “white rights” group has been infiltrated by government (American KGB jews) who quite often instigate and get vulnerable whites who want to take action to start their “actions” and then “bust” them for “crimes” instigated by these government types.
    A good example of this is the Michigan “governor” (I use that term loosely) Whitmer kidnapping plot. It was merely “bar talk” with government types seizing yet again, an opportunity to get publicity for the jew-run media while (attempting to make) the government types look like “the good guys”. Those convicted in the “Whitmer plot” were railroaded (entrapment) as many others are.
    Just look at the J6 defendants who are still languishing in the D. C. gulag, for two years plus after their supposed entry (trespass) into the capitol building.
    It would appear that the only way to “get things done” would be a “lone wolf” situation which there is no one else to influence or spoil the “plan”.
    One has to be wary of anyone who introduces themselves and (appears to be) on the same “wavelength” as those advocating action. They are always government types and absolutely cannot be trusted.
    Of course, this does not apply to left-wing antifa and blm groups who act with the full consent and blessing of the government.

  129. Exile says:

    The messaging of paleconservative “race realists” like Taylor, Derb and Brimelow for the past few years, especially since 2020, has essentially been “civic nationalism for everyone but Blacks.”

    VDARE, a site expressly dedicated to fighting “legal” mass anti-White immigration policy, has all but surrendered the issue now and is wink-winking about a White/Brown alliance vs. Blacks. AmRen has gone from “merely” censoring anti-Semitism to playing footsie with kosher entryists like the Loomer-beast.

    Greg Hood has served as a bridge between Counter-Currents and AmRen and become more tepid and paleo-con in the last couple of years in lockstep with the Homo Johnson who increasingly counter-signals anti-Semitism and stumps for NATO patriotism vs. Putler.

    We have every right to suspect these Thiel-friendly “White Nationalists” are selling out.

  130. jaye ryan says:
    @Priss Factor

    There is lots of honest, true commentary about ethnic J sponsorship of these anti White hate speech laws and ethnic Js historic leadership, funding of the worst Bolshevik terror, anti White, anti Christian regicide, genocide today and this week on the Amren comments section.

    Jared Taylor like Pat Buchanan is getting a bit old, who will take up the reign? I sure up the transition goes better than when William F Buckley turned over National Review and Conservative Inc to the worst White hating J Neo Conservatives – Jonah Goldberg, David Frum, David Podhoretz,

    What is the worst J Neo Conservative article, speech.

    David Frum’s “Umpatriotic Conservatives”?

    David Frum’s “Axis of Evil” George W Bush Jr’s speech.

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  131. Dieboomerdie: “Where were pro white peoples when blacks were getting discriminated against? Probably cheering, so why should anyone care you’re discriminated against now? See, the symmetry applies here too”

    I wasn’t calling for sympathy.

    The technological civilization constructed by the white race has generated the vast body of the law, both criminal and civil, an essential component without which it can’t survive. It was foreseeable, but not foreseen, that it would eventually turn on its creators and devour them.

    As Joker says, you get what you fucking deserve.

  132. @loner feral cat

    Have you seen the latest insanity’ The word ‘field’, as in ‘working in the field’ as against ‘working in the lab’, is to be banned because it, allegedly, might remind some descendants of slaves of their ancestors working in the field, chipping cotton etc. The psychopaths seem to have forgotten that whites, yellows, browns, mixtures etc, worked in fields for ten thousand years or so. Many did so as slaves or indentured labourers, too. Meanwhile, in China, academics still pursue knowledge, not mass, coerced, idiocy.

    • Replies: @loner feral cat
  133. @mulga mumblebrain

    By and large, language is a tool for concealing the truth.
    –George Carlin.

    Video Link

  134. Anonymous[352] • Disclaimer says:

    JR Foley: “Jesus did not carry a Luger or AK47.”

    Yup. And what happened after the schmallhatz doxxed Him?

    Supply and Demand: “unpaid debt to Foundational Black Americans”

    “Foundational” my arse!

    Orcs ate watermelons and yams while Whites built the USA: French, Irish, English, Swedish, German, Dutch, and other Caucasian folks. Hell, even Chinese coolies did more than weak-willed, low-skilled Wakandans.

    What did Eggplants actually bring to the table? Cannibalism, violence, superstition, mudhuts, rapine, slavery, bastardized chirrenz, mooching, looting, and the ability to pick cotton (something 4-year-olds can do).

    What did Kang Kongs take from Whites’ bountiful table? Endless gibs: welfare, free education, Section 8 housing, set-asides, affirmative action, million$ from songs and sports, electricity and thousands of other conveniences Whites created (after centuries of sustained effort!) to make the modern world.

    Blacks owe Whites….trillion$!

    • Replies: @folkvangr
  135. Excellent points and i’m afraid you’re absolutely right on all of them. On public surveillance of all sorts, the US is way ahead of Europe. With developments like Homeland Security (an entity or layer unknown in Europe), i would say that the US stranglehold on its citizens outperforms the infamous systems in the former Soviet Union and its satellite states. The Stasi in the former German Democratic Republic was particularly notorious (for European and even Warsaw Pact standards), because it spied intensively on everybody’s life, even rewarding state loyal citizens for spying and reporting on their neighbours and families. Should you get the chance to see the movie “Das Leben der Anderen” by Florian Henckel von Donnersmarck, see it, as it will give you a chilling impression of the Stasi methods. At present, the alphabet soup still works this way, albeit with very modern and fast technology. Here in the Netherlands, we have a dense data network, with lots of important nodes. It’s not a coincidence that Google, Meta and Microsoft want to have data centres here. The flip side is, that the Netherlands also have the most intense wire tapping and automatic internet data gathering in the whole of Europe. On the other hand, our intelligence service AIVD is seriously understaffed and, compared with CIA and Mossad, is not the sharpest tool. So, luckily, we still have a bit of leeway. Farmer protests and anti-covid-measure-protesters can go considerable lengths before the law latches on to them.

    The lone wolf way is still very effective, so that will remain the go-to-strategy for all subversive and destructive measures. But these will not achieve large scale effects other than proving the Jewish claim that they are living under constant threat, and that they need stricter laws and public surveillance to protect them, which they will get. Violence will not win sympathy, unless you can put the blame on others. For instance, take the very first moments of BLM. In that stage, the movement could register a certain amount of sympathy, until the affair went hostile and revolved around looting and arsen and blacks getting away with all sorts of crime. Also, remember the Palestinians. After incessant bullying of the people, lone wolves construct makeshift rockets hitting hardly anything, presented by the Israeli press as a terrible, large scale rocket attack, killing many, thereby justifying disproportionate and gruelling countermeasures.

    For less violent approaches, publicity and information and gradual changing of minds are the only way to turn a larger audience. To achieve this, we must look at the Jewish strategies, because they knew exactly what strategic moves to make and they were there before us, beating us to it. They took at least decades to achieve it, with impressive concerted efforts and unwavering focus, but they got us cornered at every strategic stronghold.

    We would need a free and unbiased press, but alas, the Jews already control it and will make sure that our publications will be distorted and maligned;
    We would need to use our basic rights, but alas, the Jews already control law and justice and will make sure that our rights will be minimized and void for actions previously allowed;
    We would need political representation, but alas, the Jews already control governments, regardless which parties, so they will make sure that politicians put in place and financed through Jews, will make decisions favoring Jewish interests;
    We would need steady jobs, but alas, Jews have influenced the moral and social etiquette in such way that any employee showing tendencies critical of Jews, are considered nazi, risky and undesirable to have in a staff;
    We would need a financial system for depositing the money earned from our work, but alas, the Jews dominate banking and stock trading, and will make sure that we will only get the residual interests after they shaved off everything necessary to fund their own efforts to maximize profit;
    We would need valuable untainted education for our offspring, but alas, Jews have manipulated the curriculum in ways harmful to white interests and progress;
    We would need a leveled image among all the races and peoples in the world, and we already gone considerable length to repair the wrongs of our past, as the only race ever having done so. But alas, Jews have turned our sense of guilt and owing repair against us by making it seem that our crimes are endless and unique and that our efforts are suspect and will never be enough;
    We would need a balanced representation in arts, entertainment, commercials and social event, but alas, the Jews control those and will make sure that whites will be depicted as the source of all evil.

    So, they beat us at every corner and in that sense, they have become superior to us. We lag behind in serious ways, on all accounts.
    Most whites have allowed themselves to be intimidated into docile compliant serfs, driven by their own manipulated good intentions and well-meaning thoughts. How the hell do you penetrate their skulls and reverse such thinking? It will require more concerted efforts and unwavered focus than the Jews have invested for decades, to at least counteract this, and even more effort and determination to win. As most whites are not willing or able to muster this, many people have concluded that the white race is past its prime and finished. It will require a severe shock to wake people up and make them realize what’s been done to them. In the US, this will not succeed. In Europe, still in a phase in which governments do not yet have a firm grip on the total population, and without the hundred or so Jewish lobby groups present in the US, chances are somewhat better.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  136. @Vergissmeinnicht

    I think that JT and Amren do good work but by studiously avoiding the JQ they can never and will never solve the problem they claim to address.

    • Agree: anarchyst
  137. anarchyst says:

    Good post! Thank you.
    You have left out one important item–the deification of “holocaustianity”. In most (if not all) European countries, honest investigation into the “holocaust” fable and public dissemination of the results is prohibited by law. In fact, many good people have done “hard time” for merely questioning the “holocaust” dogma.
    If THAT isn’t establishment of an official “state religion” I don’t know what is.
    Best regards,

  138. folkvangr says:

    This whole reparations thing is just another Jewish scam to suck money out of the pockets of America’s workers. Can you imagine how many parasites will be sucked into this: NGOs, swarms of lawyers, counterclaims from those who have lost the family breadwinner to black criminal violence? Can you imagine how much dirt will be thrown on the white population by the “media”? If we have not yet lost our dignity and intelligence, we should reject and cut dead everything the Jews put before us.

  139. @EliteCommInc.

    Correction: More likely that the shut downs exacerbated economic tensions emptied hundreds of store fronts if not thousands and the region simply deteriorated into problematic turf country

  140. @jaye ryan

    David Frum appeared on the CBC Massey Lectures, ‘Manufacturing Consent’, given by Chomsky, back in ’88, as part of the audience. At questions he asked a whining question on why Chomsky had such selective moral outrage, defending the Palestinians, but not, say, the Kurds. Pure Zionazi shite, of course.
    Chomsky promptly EVISCERATED the swine, noting all the efforts, including speaking in Turkey, he had made on behalf of the Kurds. You can see how scum like Frum always fail upwards, and the likes of Chomsky are relentlessly abused, from all directions. Of course Chomsky has his own lacunae, but he has illuminated so many dark places that he deserves respect. Frum deserves justice.

  141. The ADL created “Hate Crime” laws, and of course “Hate Speech” laws are a logical progression.
    America is unique in the world, having the First Amendment. Perhaps two of the most cherished goals of organized Jewry (besides making America Non-White) are the elimination of the First, and Second Amendments to the U.S. Constitution.
    A bill such as H.R. 16, as proposed by Ms. Jackson-Lee would have been unthinkable even a decade ago. The next Civil War is drawing ever closer.

  142. @JR Foley

    California thugs will kill people with knives, cars, bombs, gang beatings or anything else they can come up without guns. Jesus told his disciples to carry a sword, the 1st Century AR-15. I hope you’re trolling cause that was way to easy.

  143. Anon[421] • Disclaimer says:

    In George Orwell’s “1984” — if I remember correctly — there is a class of people who are free to think and say whatever they want. They are the “proles” who live in the slums of London. They are not a threat to Big Brother because — like ghetto blacks in the U.S. — they do not have the desire or means to organize. Others speak “for” them.

    The Big Brother we live under now must deal with something Orwell’s Big Brother didn’t have to worry about: Namely, the internet.

    Our rulers could tolerate dissent in the past because there was no threat that it would “go viral”.

    The continuing crackdowns on free speech began in 2017 when our rulers were terrified to see young white men bearing torches and marching through the University of Virginia chanting “Jews will not replace us.”

  144. The trick of “it’s a trick, we always use it” is the trick of
    pretending that the content of a statement has any relation to it’s form,
    and then falsely accusing anyone making a statement of the form “Some
    X are Y” as having made the statement “All X are Y”, which is the logical error of going from the particular to the universal, whenever the
    statement contains unapproved content.

    Some rectangles are squares.

  145. @mulga mumblebrain

    It’s the Age of Revelation, ain’t it? The truth is determined, a priori, by tiny cabals and if you disagree, you are anathema, or Amalek if you prefer. Reason IS Treason.

    Sure, anyone resisting in any way this “tiny cabals” gaslighting of the whole world becomes some form of pariah, sometimes in hundreds of ways.

  146. B0lshevik schl0m0 buzzards & their ORC golem need to be jettisoned from the west otherwise civilization will collapse into a South Africa, Haiti or Somalia type hellscape

  147. anarchyst says:

    Message to Jared Taylor…
    (((They))) have already shut you up.
    Your censoring of AmRen posts that point out the TRUTH of the “tribe” is PROOF that you are already compromised.

  148. @Priss Factor

    As useless as Pat Condell who rants about Mooooslims but never about the Jewish Power that pushed ‘diversity’ on UK

    Correct. Pat Condell, for all his eminent good sense and very sweet, harsh words about liberals, “progressives”, and the Islamic men in skirts in the West, is a CATHOLIC – or at least an ex-Catholic. Therefore like very many “lapsed Catholics” he is still almost fully beholden to the memories of his once-beloved childhood religion. But unfortunately the Catholic church now teaches – or at least since Vatican II allows the faithful to believe – that the Jews are ok really, and didn’t actually mean to do what they did to the Son of God, and therefore we should forgive them and always work hard to protect them against their sworn enemies, the world’s evil Nazis / anti-Semites / bloodthirsty Moslems – and anyone else along the way who happens to take a dislike to the world’s most “innocent, defenceless minority”.

    In other words, Condell is as hopelessly brainwashed about the JQ as it’s ever possible to be – but unlike Jared Taylor, I suspect it’s simply because he has no real idea at all of the ugly truth of the lives and times of international Jewry. Taylor, in my view, understands it perfectly clearly – he is far too intelligent and well-read not to understand – but he understands also exactly what will happen if he breathes a word of it in public.

    Sadly, knowledgeable, effective, determined and loyal White leaders will never come from the ranks of the Pat Condells of this world, any more than from the Jared Taylors. Whites need someone altogether different in background – and in tone.

  149. @TKK

    I’m noting the aggression on the phone and in person at Dr’s office more and more. They can tell what I am and they hate my guts (thanks CNN, NPR etc..)
    I should lower my voice and say “yeaaah, lemme get a mri thing”
    Makes me dread getting really sick. I am gonna be in the Phillipines after age 65 so, hopefully when I get sick it will be there. I will take worse medical care from people who are pleasant and who dont hate me, over what I would be experiencing here while dealing with the blacks on the phone or at drs office checkout counters.

Current Commenter

Leave a Reply -

 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Jared Taylor Comments via RSS
The Surprising Elements of Talmudic Judaism
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement
How America was neoconned into World War IV