The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 PodcastsJared Taylor Archive
Evolution Goes Into Reverse
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

What to do about it.

This video is available on BitChute.

Ever since the first single-celled creature appeared — maybe four billion years ago — evolution has followed a pretty simple rule: survival of the fittest. If a genetic mutation led to a new trait that made something more likely to survive and reproduce, the trait became more common. Evolution had to grind away for almost all of those 4 billion years before homo sapiens came along — only about 300,000 years ago.

And we kept evolving. Traits like good health, strength, and intelligence make people more likely to survive and have children, and children inherit those traits. As soon as there was agriculture and complex societies, powerful men had a lot of children. Chinese emperors had thousands of concubines, whose job was to have as many children as possible.

They were cycled through to the emperor at the most fertile point in their menstrual cycles. Chinese emperors, along with Genghis Kahn, probably fathered more children than anyone else in history.

The guy for whom we have the best records, though, is Moulay Ismail, who was sultan of Morocco for 50 years, from 1672 to 1727. He had four wives and at least 500 concubines, including many Europeans. He had between 888 and 1,042 children, depending on which source you read.

The top guys probably had good qualities, so when they had a lot of children, the population was improved.

In Western countries, up until the 19th century, rich, powerful men had a lot of children, and poor, powerless men and women often had none. Bastardy was deeply shameful, and if people did not have enough money to start a household, they didn’t marry.

This kind of childbearing was eugenic, that is, good traits were passed on more often than bad.

In Europe, this began to change in the 1870s, with the invention of rubber condoms, the first reliable contraceptive. Rich people could still afford to have a lot of children, but once they had the choice to have fewer, they cut back. At the same time, society got richer — and, crucially, Western countries set up welfare programs so that poor people could have children and not starve. Having children outside of marriage became common.

Contraception means thinking ahead. Dim, impulsive people don’t think ahead, and now can have children at a clip that was unthinkable 100 years ago. “Tennessee’s deadbeat dads: The three men who have fathered 78 children with 46 different women . . . and they’re not paying child support to any of them.” I’m afraid it takes a British paper, the Daily Mail, to run a story like this,­ not the New York Times.

Three men, 78 children, 46 different women, no child support. This kind of reckless procreation is possible only because taxpayers — you and I — pay for it.

This story appears to have an all-black cast. Here are the three fathers. The one in the upper left seems to be at least temporarily out of circulation.

And here is a small sampling of the 46 mothers, pining for their men.

You won’t get a Ford Foundation grant to find out, but I suspect black men hold all the records, coast to coast. Does anyone think those 78 children are going to be a credit to their race?

Credit Image: © Pigi Cipelli/Mondadori Portfolio via ZUMA Press
Credit Image: © Pigi Cipelli/Mondadori Portfolio via ZUMA Press

Welfare means that responsible tax-payers who limit their own child-bearing are forced to subsidize the proliferation of people with bad traits and bad habits.

When people with above average traits have fewer children than people with below average traits, evolution goes into reverse. The species degenerates. This is called dysgenics, the opposite of eugenics.

And it’s definitely happening. This recent paper from Britain is called “Human Capital Mediates Natural Selection in Contemporary Humans.” That’s a fancy way of saying evolution is affected by the traits of people who have children.

This paper used what are called polygenic scores. If you don’t know what they are, you should learn about them, because they are a vital tool for analyzing the influence of genes — everything from how smart you are to whether you will get diabetes or even a divorce. This graph shows how a polygenic risk score (PRS) predicts the chances of getting a disease as you get older.

The paper used a sample of more than 400,000 white people in Britain, and compared the number of children they had to the traits they had — good and bad — as shown by their polygenic scores. Here are the 33 traits the researchers looked at, listed on the left. The traits with the dots furthest to the right are the traits found in parents, in the aggregate, that are the most above the norm for the whole population, and the ones furthest to the left that are most below the norm.

Traits are passed on to children, so the next generation will have more of the traits to the right of the dotted line, and fewer of those to the left. You can stop the video and look at this carefully. At the top, the traits most rapidly spreading in the next generation are ADHD, smoking, extraversion, high BMI, and large waist circumference. These last two are measures of fatness. Heart disease, depression, Alzheimer’s, and schizophrenia are also on the right. To the left are the traits that are being bred out, and at the bottom, being bred out most rapidly, are three measures of intelligence.

The authors of the study are blunt: Consistently over time, polygenic scores associated with lower earnings, education, and health are selected for, and higher earnings, education and better health are selected against.

Evolution has gone into reverse. If this keeps up, Westerners will degenerate to the point that society collapses, there is no more welfare, and evolution will resume its normal direction. Ordinary folks know that the children of most people on welfare are going to be a drag on society. If they had a chance, I bet a lot would vote to give all welfare recipients implantable contraceptives.

This book, Eugenics: A Reassessment, by Richard Lynn, is the best discussion of the subject. He writes that in the West, reckless procreation is more common among blacks than whites, especially in the underclass, and that smart, well-educated black women have very few children. Prof. Lynn estimates that the genetic basis for the average white American IQ is declining about one point per generation, with the black American IQ dropping at twice that rate: two points per generation.

We’re not supposed to talk about this stuff, but Americans and Europeans in the 1920s understood very well that evolution had gone into reverse, and they took firm eugenic measures. However, eugenics became wrongly and stupidly associated with the Nazis, so it’s now taboo. But I’ll say it again: Each generation is now worse off than the one before.

Americans recognize that some people shouldn’t have children. Courts allow involuntary sterilization of mentally retarded people, and it’s called sterilization of the “intellectually disabled.”

Infertile women who need donor eggs also understand how much genes matter. Here is a site called Donor Concierge that talks about what you might have in mind: “your ideal may be a blonde egg donor, or a beautiful egg donor, or even an athletic egg donor.”

Why not all three? Because you might not be able to afford it. This site warns that depending on how finicky you are, eggs can run from “just over \$10,00 and some well over \$40,000.”

If you want a fashion model with an IQ of 140, it will cost over \$100,000.

There are other ways to improve your stock. If a couple does in vitro fertilization, it can do what’s called embryo selection: Harvest a bunch of eggs, fertilize them all, and then pick the embryo with the best health odds.

This girl, Aurea Smigrodski, is the first baby born after an embryo was screened for polygenic risk scores. Her father says they chose the embryo with the least likelihood for disease because parents have a duty to give a child the healthiest possible start in life. He said you can select for high IQ, too, but when you start talking about enhancing intelligence, suddenly knives come out.

In the West, we get worried articles like this one in the Financial Times. “When does genomics become eugenics?” Answer: When it stops screening out disease and starts screening in brains and beauty — that’s what Hitler would have done, you see.

The Chinese aren’t bothered. Four years ago, Nature magazine was already worrying that “China’s embrace of embryo selection raises thorny questions.” Thorny, only because the Chinese want smarter, stronger, healthier people.

We will degenerate, faster and faster, until “eugenics” is no longer taboo. The Chinese are moving forward, full speed ahead. Place your bets, ladies and gentlemen: Which country will come out on top?

Credit Image: © Liu Dawei/Xinhua via ZUMA Wire
Credit Image: © Liu Dawei/Xinhua via ZUMA Wire
(Republished from American Renaissance by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 61 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. R.C. says:

    Not America, since its death throes were ended January of this year. RIP America 1776 – 2021.
    R.C.

  2. The Chinese are meat robots, as that photo amply demonstrates. Especially the chap in the middle.

    However, the lazy face of the man on the far right suggests a smidgen of African ancestry.

    • Replies: @It's Ovrer
  3. Anon[134] • Disclaimer says:

    Evolution Goes Into Reverse

    From an evolutionist standpoint, this statement makes no sense.

  4. onebornfree says: • Website

    Another thinly disguised, “America needs to be more like China” article, written by some state indoctrinated halfwit promoting state enforced eugenics as the “solution” to state enforced welfare, to produce what?- state indoctrinated uniformed morons similar to those 5 in the last pic?

    He’s kidding, right😎?

    “China’s Charm Has Expired”
    https://www.aier.org/article/cracks-in-the-great-wall-part-3-chinas-charm-has-expired/

    “China Won’t Be Taking Over the World”
    https://mises.org/wire/china-wont-be-taking-over-world

    “Regards” onebornfree

    • Replies: @Rahan
    , @Ray Caruso
  5. onebornfree says: • Website

    “If the US Wants to Beat China, Why Is It Copying China’s Socialism?”
    https://mises.org/wire/if-us-wants-beat-china-why-it-copying-chinas-socialism

    Regards, onebornfree

  6. @Anon

    It’s obvious Jared’s point: In the West (at least), evolutionary pressures were selecting for intelligence – but NOW they’re selecting precisely against it!

    • Replies: @Bite Moi
    , @Francis Miville
  7. Go to Breitbart (or similar website) and you’ll see something to the effect, “Evil Democrats permit abortions of babies with Down Syndrome! That’s eugenics!”

    I can’t stand ’em! The ‘Modern American Right’ will destroy this once-great country, I tell ya!

  8. A movie was made about this topic a few years back. Here is the trailer.

    You can watch the entire movie for free if you log into Youtube:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Tv5shB4Gg0

    • Replies: @MarkU
  9. @Reg Cæsar

    It’s the Army, like way back when in America the Army is for the lowest class, dumbest, poorest schmucks in China.

    They are the shortest, darkest, ungracile looking people in China.

    • Replies: @Dennis Dale
  10. zx says:

    The Nazis gave eugenics a bad rap but it still is widely practiced under different names. The article gives the example of egg or sperm donor selection. But others are aborting say Downs fetuses and migrant selection by the few nations that allow immigration. Australia, for instance, wants only young, healthy, skilled or very rich people. If you are 60, unskilled, and with little money and several chronic diseases, they will not want you.

    The genetic selection for lower IQ has been going on for many decades. It just was masked by the Flynn effect; environmental improvements raising IQ scores until they reached their limits.

    It really makes no sense to say that evolution has gone into reverse. The environment has changed, as it often does, and different characteristics than IQ and self-control now are selected for. Natural selection now is for low IQ, lack of self-control, and maybe being a short-lived drug dealer. Look at the three rappers in the article; top of the evolutionary tree now.

    • Replies: @TTSSYF
  11. Rahan says:
    @onebornfree

    “China’s Charm Has Expired”
    https://www.aier.org/article/cracks-in-the-great-wall-part-3-chinas-charm-has-expired/

    “China Won’t Be Taking Over the World”
    https://mises.org/wire/china-wont-be-taking-over-world

    “Taking over the world” can be the criteria of success only to a race of psychopaths (brilliant or not).
    Kikes, Anglos, Germanics, Islamists, and such. Normal people just want a normal relationship with the world.

    Autists like the Chinese and the Japs, if given the choice, will encapsulate and keep the world out.

    That being said, Mr. Karlin does indeed see China as pulling back from the race toward a glorious cyberpunk future. https://www.unz.com/akarlin/china-isnt-going-to-make-it/

    Maybe they’ve decided that the brilliant psychopaths have devoured themselves to the extent that they’ll be stalling soon and for long, so everyone else can just maintain current position and chill.

  12. Dumbo says:

    There is no “reversal” of evolution. Nonsense.

    “Evolution” is actually badly named, because there is not necessarily an “evolution” towards betterment or improvement. “Survival of the fittest” merely means “survival of those who are most likely to survive” (at a specific circumstance). So now, Africans are more “fit” to reproduce more, for n reasons.

    Anyway, I don’t think that this is really how things work, but that’s another story.

    Yeah, before we selected more for intelligence, good manners, whatever, now we are selecting more criminals and lazy people.

    But it’s really more of a cultural thing. If what society values intelligence, hard work, high culture, etc, then it will select more for this type of thing. Our current societies select more for thuggishness and dumbness, because those are the values that are more appreciated.

    Abortion and state-mandated eugenics are not really the best way to control a population, in any case.

    Just end welfare and get back to portraying “single motherhood” as a bad thing. This will quickly change things.

    • Replies: @Vergissmeinnicht
    , @Rosie
  13. Rahan says:

    Edward Dutton has a number of terrific books on the subject.


    [MORE]

    Which is why at a still relatively young age he is no longer welcome in the West and is currently a professor in Poland.

    Mr. Dutton is one of the last of the smart and brave namefag writers in his age cohort, I’m afraid. A final echo of a previous age.

  14. Darwinian evolution does not occur; it is not a scientific theory but a crypto-metaphysics for the philosophically challenged. Polygenic scores is pseudoscientific nonsense resulting from statisticians mistaking the map for the territory. And embryo selection is mass murder.

    You can add Jared Taylor to the long and growing list of Unz contributors who seem to have nothing useful to say on any subject.

    • Troll: Realist, jamie b., lavoisier
    • Replies: @jamie b.
  15. @Dumbo

    There is no “reversal” of evolution. Nonsense.

    Surely Jared Taylor knows that – but to entitle this article “Evolutionary pressures go into reverse” (or the like) would not be as apt compared to how he entitled it, in the sense that many people would get confused, and, probably, wouldn’t get as much attention as in the title he gave.
    .
    .
    .

    What has gone ‘into reverse’ is what’s being selected for – it used to be intelligence (in the West, at least), but NOW, according to this terrific new paper¹ (that Jared, by the by, cited), it’s the OPPOSITE of intelligence!

    1. https://ideas.repec.org/p/uea/ueaeco/2021-02.html

  16. TTSSYF says:
    @zx

    The current “environment” is an artificial construct…a mere eddy or foam on the waves of evolution. Which isn’t to say we still can’t go the way of the dinosaurs.

    • Agree: The Anti-Gnostic
  17. Y’know what’d be ‘funny’…

    State-mandated sterilisations for everyone who refuses to support State-mandated sterilisations!

    The creation of a new ‘race’ – of genetically-engineered eugenicists!

    That’d ensure, for sure, eugenics as highly popular!

    (Paradise on Earth can be achieved, I tell ya!) (Do immanentise the eschaton!)
    .
    .
    .

    (P.S.: I’m mostly joking.)

  18. Bite Moi says:
    @Vergissmeinnicht

    Vergissmeinnicht————The American Eugenics Movement advocated sterilization of so called mental defectives.The money quote from the trial of Buck v. Bell was from Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. Quote,” Three generations of imbeciles is enough”. I quite agree. The least 2021 America could do would be to stop paying stupids to breed. Without this drain on the family paychecks, average and above IQs could afford to have another child.

    • Replies: @Kratoklastes
  19. Dennis Dale says: • Website
    @It's Ovrer

    Cope away gents–to the sound of marching columns. They’re on parade. They’re supposed to be robotic. It’s called “drill”. They look impressive enough to me, especially in light of the current context.
    Have you seen our troops lately?

    • LOL: nokangaroos
  20. Realist says:

    Straight talk with no punches pulled…excellent as usual.

  21. jamie b. says:

    As I’ve suggested before…

    Addictive birth control pills (for women and men). Pregnancy would then require a specific and coordinated effort by both parents, resulting in strong selection in favor of intelligence and conscientiousness.

    • Replies: @Ilya G Poimandres
  22. jamie b. says:
    @Intelligent Dasein

    …a crypto-metaphysics for the philosophically challenged.

    Says the guy who writes at length about microbial ensoulment, crystal ‘metamorphosis,’ “essential forms informing preexisting matter,” etc. etc., all in the most pompously baroque style possible.

    You can add Jared Taylor to the long and growing list of Unz contributors who seem to have nothing useful to say on any subject.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection

    • Agree: MarkU
  23. MarkU says:
    @Carlton Meyer

    The film appears to have lifted the idea from a short story written in 1951 by Cyril M. Kornbluth called ‘ The Marching Morons’.

  24. George Soros, much of the radical left, Gavin Newsom, the abominable governor of California and their ilk have a good solution–defund the police as they are doing in Los Angeles and other places in California. Yeah, one result will be the creation of, X/nth more baby daddies, as these clowns will have more time on their hands to be “productive”.. Leave alone the increased crime rate.

  25. Mikael_ says:

    Rubber condoms, LOL!

    Try Social Security / pension plan schemes, i.e. old-age folks get supported even if they raised their kids very badly, or voluntarily had no kids at all.

  26. @jamie b.

    I’d say go for cross-generational eugenics: for a given race’s IQ, forbid the bottom 25% from having more than one kid, the middle 50% from having more than 2, and let the top 25% have as many as they want. Allow only the top 1% to donate sperm to everyone. Make it a duty even.

    No need to kill or sterilise anyone, just create a selection pressure towards higher intelligence over generational time. We did it with our fruit, veg, and farm animals for millennia safely, we can do the same to ourselves.

    What we’re more likely to do however imo, is skip this pretty natural process for GMO babies.

    • Replies: @jamie b.
  27. jamie b. says:
    @Ilya G Poimandres

    I like my proposal because it’s non-coercive. Simply make addictive birth control pills ubiquitous and freely available, and the dysgenic trend reverses itself.

  28. Bertrand Russell, in his book ‘The Impact of Science on Society’ (1953) gave a clear indication of the long term goals of the Satanic globalists: “Gradually, by selective breeding, the congenital differences between rulers and ruled will increase until they become almost different species. A revolt of the plebs would become as unthinkable as an organised insurrection of sheep against the practice of eating mutton.”

    • Thanks: Adam Smith
  29. Hannity interviewed one of the Tennessee guys several years ago. Hannity tried to be angry, but the guy was just so damn likeable that Hannity couldn’t keep a straight face. He ended up smiling and laughing with the guy.

  30. @Anon

    De-evolution would be a more accurate term.

  31. Amon says:

    The top guys probably had good qualities

    The top guys in society were inbred, feeble minded and in the case of the Hapsburg so thoroughly cursed with defective genes that one of the last members spent his time with his mouth open like a gold fish unless he focused on keeping it closed.

    I don’t know who the guy who wrote is, but he clearly has zero idea of what life was really like for the nobility and the peasants. Peasants has more children than the nobility, they always did. Sex was the only entertainment outside of church and beer that they could enjoy while the top 1 percent had access to concerts, feasts, dinner parties, gentlemen’s clubs, hunts and vacations.

    A simple glance back through history would reveal that the two top concerns in the mind of the elite were and still is that they are of a unique breed while the peasants are animals who had/have too many children.

    Before embracing eugenics it is a must to observe the nations who practiced it the most to see the long term outcome of that practice.

    • Replies: @Dutch Boy
  32. Tom T says:

    I believe the average IQ of Americans has diminished in the past 70 years and I believe the root cause to be a polluted gene pool; (black/white) reproduction. And as time passes and black/white reproduction continues, the average American IQ will continue to plummet.

  33. @Vergissmeinnicht

    The US people no matter the policy in fashion, no matters Jews assisting or not, has always been devolving mentally, with the result that it always had to count upon a recently immigrated intelligentsia for being a great nation at times. That can be seen in all typically American products being of lower aesthetic quality as a rule. The longer the number of generations having been on American soil, the more mediocre the intelligence, the greatest number of American generations being in Appalachia. 1776 was a Satanic Pact (celebrated by Jewish kabbalists, as they were the sole who really could). The newly-formed American people was offered a certain period in history when it would be the richest of the world, while its intelligence would dwindle in the same time, down to the point it would join the world human burden beast average (82), after which it would be treated as the very same beasts of burden.

  34. Dutch Boy says:

    So, thinking ahead means preventing the expansion of your hereditary line? In that case, I prefer non-thought.

  35. Dutch Boy says:
    @Amon

    You remind me of my father’s family story. He was one of eight and had three older half-siblings (his father was a widower who remarried). Why so many, people ask. Well, I say, my grandparents were members of the Dutch Reformed Church and in those days drinking, smoking, dancing, and going to the theater were all sinful and there was no radio or TV. So, what does that leave? You guessed it.

    • Replies: @Wielgus
  36. @Bite Moi

    One mental defect that was never, has never, and will never be the subject of this level of discussion, is sociopathy and megalomania.

    These traits seem to be reasonably explained by relatively few SNPs –
     • MAO-A (2R and 3R variants) – antisocial behaviour and (some) propensity for violence;
     • AA or A/G in OXTR – reduced empathy due to downregulated Oxytocin processing);
     • 5HTR, 5HTT and D2 – reduced ‘reward signalling’ via dopamine and serotonin pathways

    Instead of worrying too much about the reproduction of stupid lazy obese smokers (and their impact on the public purse due to welfare budgets), it would make more sense to screen out dead-souled sociopaths from positions of political authority.

    [MORE]

    The latter make up the preponderance of the political class, particularly in the upper echelons. The upper echelons of the parasite classes get tax-funded salary packages a minimum of two orders of magnitude greater than the return on being a schlub – plus side payments, graft and what-not.

    To get some idea of how irrelevant the unemployed are to one’s tax bill: the Australian government tells each taxpayer where their tax money was spent.

    Note that each amount listed in the graphic below includes the salaries of the bureaucrats who administer that part of the system.

    The unemployed plus their bureaucratic hangers-on take up about 2% of the average tax bill. Here’s a representative tax return of a non-bureaucrat (from Reddit).

    (Not for nothin’, but aged pensions [plus their bureaucratic hangers-on] are the bill for the unemployed – and those old buzzards have lived their entire lives during periods where governments racked up public debt: they have, on average, been a drain on the public purse for their entire lives… they have not ‘paid their way’).

    I am on the record as noticing (and deploring) the dysgenic effects of 3 generations of tax subsidies to reproduction of the Delta and Epsilon classes, but the downtrodden are not a ‘big ticket’ item.

    (Don’t get me wrong: I don’t want any more of them wandering around like tattooed monogoloid walruses. If the conspiracy theory about ‘depopulation’ is correct, I have made it abundantly clear that I wish the perpetrators the very best of luck)

    More on bureaucrats: the average bureaucrat is paid 115% of the average full-time wage (and has a higher employer contribution to pension, and softer working conditions). The average unemployed person gets just over 20% of average weekly earnings in transfers.

    So bureaucrats outweigh the unfortunate by about 5:1 on a pound-for-pound basis.

    Worse: Australia has 3× more bureaucrats (2 million) than it has unemployed people (620,000).

    • Thanks: mc23
  37. Jared Taylor talked about the average African American IQ declining and said or at least implied that it was a bad thing. Since African Americans are hostile to European Americans, that might be no bad thing, because if they were as intelligent on average as Europeans are it would increase the threat they posed, because it would improve their ability to organize AntiWhite political activity.

    It seems illogical to both believe that African Americans are mostly AntiWhite, and also believe that it is a bad thing that they have a lower average intelligence. If I had an enemy, I would prefer that he be stupid, because it would reduce his ability to plan ways to harm me.

    • Replies: @The Anti-Gnostic
  38. @Paul Bustion

    The stupid poor can align with the clever rich to keep the jackboot stomping on the face of the clever rich’s main rival: the despised middle class. This is less likely to happen in a racially homogenous society, in which welfare is viewed as simply taking care of one’s own.

    In a racially diverse society where the stupid poors are disproportionately people of color, public welfare and civil rights become potent weapons of inter-ethnic and inter-class rivalry. This is why we can’t have nice things.

  39. KenH says:

    Pairings between black males and white females does nothing to advance eugenics and is very dysgenic. There is no such thing as “hybrid vigor” and if there were then Jews would be mating with black Africans and Arab Muslim in Israel yet that nation has strict race laws to preserve Jewish DNA.

    It seems like the only whites reproducing in America are the poor and the upper middle class and wealthy. The white working class and middle class are taking a beating in the economy with job offshoring, mass immigration both “legal” and illegal displacing them from the workforce in addition to set asides for non-whites and women. This is making it next to impossible to form families.

    Unchecked breeding among the black underclass is destroying major American cities and could soon destroy the nation. It’s past time to sterilize black welfare queens.

    An idiocracy type society is a very real possibility in America with the dysgenic breeding and importing of low IQ third world immigrants and refugees. America is on the road to being an ungovernable third world train wreck thanks to Jews.

    China does’t have this problem since they don’t adhere to Jewish leftism or Christianity with its worship of Jews and negroes and promotion of blank slatism and universal human equality just like Marxism. The Chinese embrace race and anything that will improve their gene pool so they may soon have an empire on which the sun never sets.

    • Replies: @Rosie
  40. ‘Unchecked breeding among the black underclass is destroying major American cities and could soon destroy the nation. It’s past time to sterilize black welfare queens.’

    If Africans are such a problem then they should be expelled to Africa. Sterilizing them would give them a victim narrative to use against Whites. I am suspicious of people who propose things like this because it seems similar to how both Jews and AntiJews predicted the Holocaust before it happened, which shows that the Holocaust was either a Jewish planned hoax or if it was real was a project by Jews, either way, whether it was real or a hoax, the purpose of the Holocaust was to give Jews a victim narrative. Similarly comments like yours seem like a plan by AntiWhite Jews to give Blacks a victim narrative. Holocaust propaganda very frequently includes anti-eugenic propaganda and often includes the claim that Hitler’s regime had mass sterilizations of mental defectives. You proposing something similar to that makes me suspicious of you.

  41. I used to be in favor of eugenics but I am now opposed to it, in most cases. The only cases where I favor it are ones with people with extreme genetic problems where allowing the person to pass on his genes would be extremely bad for the child and society.

    The reason that I turned against eugenics is that I notice the large Jewish role in the movement, and that made me suspicious of it, because Jews have very high rates of hereditary problems, particularly hereditary mental problems. It seems to me that the reason for Jewish sponsoring of eugenics is to sponsor controlled opposition AntiJewry. By having White countries sterilize mental defectives, inevitably a large minority of Jews would be sterilized as a result, giving Jews another victim narrative. More broadly, eugenics would lead to mass sterilizations of Africans. While they are not Jews, they are golems who Jews use against Whites, and so Jews love to have victim narratives for them too. The slavery of Africans is a similar victim narrative to the Holocaust, and the narrative is promoted obsessively by Jews just like the Holocaust narrative is. Jews already promote an anti-eugenic victim narrative, because of the sterilizations of mental defectives in Britain, America and Germany. Reviving these policies would just give Jews another victim narrative to use against Whites.

  42. Rosie says:
    @Dumbo

    Just end welfare and get back to portraying “single motherhood” as a bad thing. This will quickly change things.

    The reactionary can think of nothing better than going back to the bad old ways of the bad old days, as if they know better than our ancestors who rejected them. It’s kind of pathetic, really.

    • Agree: MarkU
  43. Rosie says:
    @KenH

    set asides for non-whites and women.

    I seriously doubt affirmative action for women is having a serious impact on family formation, or much of anything for that matter. The thing about affirmative action for women is that it only applies in fields that hardly any women want to work in. Women don’t need affirmative action in, for example, law and medicine, because they can hold their own.

    That’s nor to deny the frustration that men experience when constantly accused of sabotaging women when in fact they are bending over backwards to be accommodating. James Damore is a perfect gentleman and his firing and demonization were reprehensible. I just don’t think it’s a problem at the macroscopic level.

    • Replies: @KenH
  44. KenH says:
    @Rosie

    I seriously doubt affirmative action for women is having a serious impact on family formation, or much of anything for that matter.

    Women want to work in white collar office professions and thanks for AA it’s bumping men from positions, which means some men struggle finding gainful employment. I’ve seen this process play out in real life. HR is placing a lot of pressure on managers to fill open positions with women and non-whites.

    When a man is not gainfully employed he has a harder time finding a female mate or if he does have a mate the lack of money will cause them to put off family formation due to lack of income.

    • Replies: @Rosie
  45. Rosie says:
    @KenH

    Women want to work in white collar office professions and thanks for AA it’s bumping men from positions, which means some men struggle finding gainful employment. I’ve seen this process play out in real life. HR is placing a lot of pressure on managers to fill open positions with women and non-whites.

    This is, essentially, a conspiracy theory. It might be true, of course, but then lots of things might be true. Even if it is happening, there would be no business reason for ongoing discrimination once parity has been reached and the risk of litigation minimized.

    When a man is not gainfully employed he has a harder time finding a female mate or if he does have a mate the lack of money will cause them to put off family formation due to lack of income.

    That is a separate issue altogether. What you are saying here, essentially, is that there are not enough jobs to go around, and men should get priority. I can certainly imagine scenarios (such as a Great Depression 2.0) where this might he a fair argument. For the time being, however, the absence of women in the workplace would just be used to justify more immigration and wouldn’t help native men at all. TPTB would see to it.

    Even if such a policy were called for, it would have to be offset by strong alimony and child support protections for women and children, and of course, any such preference should be reserved for married men.

    • Replies: @Quartermaster
    , @KenH
  46. @Rosie

    If by “conspiracy theory” you mean some odd ball theory that is ridiculous, then what KenH said doesn’t qualify. I’ve seen what he relates many times over. HR departments tend to be dominated by feminist fools that does exactly what he said they do.

    • Replies: @Rosie
  47. Rosie says:
    @Quartermaster

    If by “conspiracy theory” you mean some odd ball theory that is ridiculous

    Not at all. I mean an unsubstantiated theory about an alleged conspiracy, such as all-powerful HR ladies pressuring managers to hire women over equally or more-qualified men.

    I’ve seen what he relates many times over.

    Maybe you have. In the ordinary course of things, some people will see more of something than others. Maybe that’s why you’re here complaining about it at Unz while most men are not.

  48. KenH says:
    @Rosie

    What you are saying here, essentially, is that there are not enough jobs to go around, and men should get priority.

    I did not say that men should get priority but the best candidate should be hired based on their education, work experience and accomplishments and in most cases that is a white male. Hiring should not be based primarily on race and gender and secondly on tangible qualifications. But most large companies have adopted the hiring practices of the U.S. Post Office.

    White males getting passed over in favor of “minorities” is not a conspiracy theory. It is a fact and most everyone who has worked at medium to large companies sees it.

    Thanks to mass immigration large numbers of women in the workforce there is a massive labor oversupply which means there’s more labor than available jobs. With this much labor compared to available jobs someone has to lose and right now white males are getting the short end of the stick unless they possess technical skills and know-how not found in other groups.

    • Replies: @Rosie
    , @follyofwar
  49. Rosie says:
    @KenH

    I did not say that men should get priority

    So noted. (Pardon my assumption, but generally, when men start talking about how they need jobs more than women, that’s what they’re getting at.)

    and in most cases that is a white male.

    Oh dear. It is precisely this overconfidence (cockiness) that has brought us to this pass.

    You do realize that Asian women are smarter than you, right?

    • Replies: @KenH
  50. anon[979] • Disclaimer says:

    “You do realize that Asian women are smarter than you, right?” – Rosie

    If that’s true, “Rosie” is not Asian.

  51. KenH says:
    @Rosie

    You do realize that Asian women are smarter than you, right?

    So you are an Asian woman, right? That explains your visceral reaction to me saying positive things about white males and their contributions in the workplace. But of course it’s ok for you to claim that Asian females are better/smarter than white males.

    Those SAT scores are an average so there are plenty of white males who score way above the Asian female average of 585 and male average of 611. Since whites are a much larger population than Asians in America we have more people scoring low to depress our overall average.

    It was white white males, not Asian females, who created all of America and Europe’s industries and advanced technology up to this point. But as I said in my first post China is on the rise and might eclipse us since they value education, achievement and eugenics unlike the woke, equalitarian, pot smoking West.

    • Replies: @Rosie
  52. Rosie says:
    @KenH

    So you are an Asian woman, right?

    Lol, no. I’m a White woman married to a White man. Why would you think I’m an Asian woman? Not all of us are chauvinists boosting our own group. I just recognize the facts for what they are.

    If you don’t want to be replaced wholesale by Asians, you should probably stop antagonizing women and focus on the race issue.

    https://nypost.com/2021/04/29/nyc-schools-chancellor-calls-for-end-to-elite-school-test/

    That explains your visceral reaction to me saying positive things about white males and their contributions in the workplace.

    I disagreed with your claim that affirmative action for women is having a significant negative effect on family formation. By what twisted logic did you conclude that this was a “visceral reaction” to you “saying positive things about White males and their contributions in the workplace”?

    Those SAT scores are an average so there are plenty of white males who score way above the Asian female average of 585 and male average of 611.

    So what? There are also plenty of Asian females, White women, and Asian males who “score way above the Asian female average. Taken together, these three groups are more numerous than White males, so why the assumption that the most qualified person is “in most cases…a White male.”

    • Replies: @KenH
  53. @KenH

    Where ya been, KenH? There is a huge “labor shortage” in most of the country. One reason, of course, is that “enhanced” tax free federal UC benefits (\$600/wk last year, \$300 wk until recently), on top of the regular state amount, plus a months long rent moratorium, has eliminated the need to work for millions. Now that the extra \$300/week has gone away (at least for now), companies are STILL unable to find workers, even though starting wages are now up to \$15/hr at Walmart, and McDonald’s is offering signing bonuses.

    Another reason for the labor shortage, usually unacknowledged, is that there are too many retired aging Baby Boomers, in need of all kinds of services, and not enough younger workers to provide them. Maybe the Covid vaccine will rectify this condition, as seniors are first in line for Boosters, a Pfizer concoction which could kill them, since the first two shots didn’t get the job done.

    • Replies: @KenH
  54. KenH says:
    @follyofwar

    The labor shortage is artificial for many of the reasons you cited and is affecting mostly lower wage industries like restaurants, retail, light manufacturing and nurses aides. And now stupid hospitals are firing unvaccinated nurses and other staff which will create an artificial shortage in health care.

    You haven’t heard most major corporations, who have a much higher wage scale, bemoan a labor shortage because for them there isn’t one although they will sometimes falsely claim that there is when they want to gun the number of H1B visas allowed into the country.

    At any rate when all the layabouts are ready to go back to work they’ll crash the job market at the same time which won’t be pretty.

  55. KenH says:
    @Rosie

    Lol, no. I’m a White woman married to a White man. Why would you think I’m an Asian woman? Not all of us are chauvinists boosting our own group. I just recognize the facts for what they are.

    Based on your comments anyone saying positive things about white male workers obviously rubs you the wrong way. This is strange for someone supposedly married to a white male.

    You have posted your opinions and not facts. The 2015 SAT scores doesn’t disprove anything I said. Most employers don’t care what your high school SAT score was.

    these three groups are more numerous than White males, so why the assumption that the most qualified person is “in most cases…a White male.”

    You’re entitled to your own opinion but it’s obvious you’ve never worked at a medium or large company to see how qualified white males are passed over and discriminated against to meet “diversity” hiring and promotion targets. The largest, most well known companies tend to be the worst offenders.

    Of course, in your next response you’ll claim to be a captain of industry who has seen it all and that Nigerian immigrants make the best workers.

    • Replies: @Rosie
  56. Wielgus says:
    @Dutch Boy

    Much time and little to do. As in the post-apocalyptic world of Dr Strangelove, they would breed prodigiously.

  57. Rosie says:
    @KenH

    Based on your comments anyone saying positive things about white male workers obviously rubs you the wrong way.

    This is absurd. Just acknowledge your nonsequitur and move on.

    The 2015 SAT scores doesn’t disprove anything I said. Most employers don’t care what your high school SAT score was.

    As usual, test scores matter when they favor you, and are irrelevant when they don’t. You know perfectly well that test scores determine college admissions, which in turn influence hiring decisions.

    Of course, in your next response you’ll claim to be a captain of industry who has seen it all and that Nigerian immigrants make the best workers.

    I’m definitely not a captain of industry, but it wouldn’t surprise me in the least if Nigerian immigrants excellent workers. There are over 200,000,000 of them, and emigrants are, I would assume, highly selected for intelligence and grit. The population of Ireland, a common destination country for Nigerians, is 5 million. I suggest you take a break from thumping your chest and think about the implications of that.

  58. “Western” countries are dystopias—the US in particular, since it’s the most dominated by Jews. Being a dystopia, of course its policies will be dysgenic. That will not change as long the democracy/diversity/Jewish supremacy regime endures.

  59. ” . . . maybe four billion years ago — evolution has followed a pretty simple rule: survival of the fittest.”

    Two issues:

    1. nonsense, the fittest don’t always survive, nor are they selected to do so.

    2. you don’t mean evolution, you mean adaptation

    using an axiom for an environment which does not exist cannot make the case you assume to be accurate.

    ————————

    civilizations expand, contract, morph and dissipate entirely and if history is any teller, then it says not even technological superiority and higher intellectual ability is no guarantee of survival, sometimes not even a hedge.

    Ants have been around far longer than humans as have germs of a thousand varieties. And germs have been suspected of wiping out entire civilizations or close to it. The native populations coming into contact with whites were more felled by the germs they brought with them. In other-words, the healthier stronger populations were significantly damaged by the weaker.

    (I guess one could debate the health efficacy of those that brought diphtheria, measles, chicken pox, etc. against those that never had said exposure)

    ————————-

    I agree that the labor shortage is disinformation by advocates for the the easing or removing immigration en-total. Bad faith contention

  60. @onebornfree

    China doesn’t have to do much to become the world’s leading power. Do you seriously think the US will be any competition going forward? Or low-IQ India?

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Jared Taylor Comments via RSS
PastClassics
The Shaping Event of Our Modern World
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement
The Hidden Information in Our Government Archives