The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 PodcastsJared Taylor Archive
Elizabeth II, a Life of Devotion — But to What?
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

She got the most important thing wrong.

Video Link

This video is available on Rumble, BitChute, and Odysee.

The British people – at least white British people – have just given Queen Elizabeth II a more universally loving farewell than perhaps anyone in history. At the news that she was dying, a great crowd gathered silently before Buckingham Palace.

At the moment she died, her subjects broke into the new national anthem. [[0:00 0 0:04]] There were mountains of flowers in front of all the royal residences.

Wherever they could, enormous crowds paid respects to the royal cortege.

Westminster Abbey was packed for the funeral, which was broadcast on every channel of British TV.

Rather than stay home, many Britons gathered in public to share their grief.

At the conclusion of the service, a two-minute silence was observed throughout the country, and many people then sang “God Save the King.”

Perhaps the most touching tribute was the uncounted thousands who filed by to say farewell to their queen as she lay in state in Westminster Hall. [[6:11:06 – 6:11:32]] People bowed their heads, and soldiers saluted. Some had stood in line for as long as 20 hours to spend just a few seconds in homage to their queen.] Westminster Hall was open 24-hours a day for four days, and the queue was five miles long.

This was a typical comment: “Walking all night is a small price to pay.”

What explains this love? Queen Elizabeth was Britain’s longest reigning monarch, on the throne for 70 years. She devoted herself to her people, as she promised she would on her 21st birthday, five years before she even became queen: [[0:00 – 0:15]] She kept her vow. Until she died, she did her duty as she saw it, and did so with grace and dignity. [[ 0:23 – 0:41 ]] [[14:38 – 14:48]] [[0:45 – 0:55]] She married Prince Phillip of Greece and Denmark, and loved him for 73 years without scandal. Aside from a few hiccups, she seemed to become more beloved every year.

God Save the King has a second verse that ends like this: “May he defend our laws, And ever give us cause, To sing with heart and voice, God save the King.” It’s a two-way deal. The monarch must give his people cause to pray to God to protect him. Queen Elizabeth kept her end of the bargain. When the British sang “God save the Queen,” they thought she richly deserved divine protection.

But what became of Britain during her 70-year rule? When Elizabeth was crowned, Britain was a world power with a great empire. [[23:07 – 23:16]] When her subjects sang “Rule Britannia,” it wasn’t satire. But she then presided over one of the most catastrophic peacetime declines a nation has ever seen. Could she have stopped it? Maybe not. She didn’t try.

On one of the few occasions when Elizabeth mixed in politics, she helped shove Rhodesia into barbarism. Her Prime Minister, Margaret Thatcher, was suspicious of black rule, but the queen pressured her to attend and support the 1979 Commonwealth Conference that began the process that delivered a marvelous, white-run country into the hands of Robert Mugabe.

The Queen supported black rule in South Africa as well.

In 1991, Nelson Mandela attended a Commonwealth conference only as an observer because South Africa was still outside the commonwealth. The Queen insisted that an exception be made so that he could join her banquet of Commonwealth heads of government. Nelson Mandela and Kenneth Kaunda of Zambia were the only people the queen allowed to call her “Elizabeth,” without any titles.

She set the tone in 1961 on a visit to Ghana, where she danced smilingly with President Kwame Nkrumah.

The Queen didn’t have to do it. It was her choice. It shocked many of her people.

But much worse than losing the empire was losing Britain itself, beginning with London. From 2000 to 2010, 620,000 white British moved out, as whites became just 45 percent of capital’s population. The dark areas on this map saw white flight – as much as 50 percent – while the blue areas saw small gains.

Now, Britain has race riots just like the United States. [[00:34 – 00:47]] [[8:57 – 9:06]]This would have been unimaginable when Elizabeth came to the throne, and the British are powerless even to name the problem, must less save their country from a rising tide of color that is expected to reduce white Britons to a minority by the end of the century.

The new King Charles will not stop the rot. As this 2021 Guardian article explains, in 1986, the then-Prince of Wales complained that there were too many whites in the Queen’s horse guards.

Twenty-six years ago, he was already backing The Great Replacement. And here he is, future head of the Church of England, telling Hindus, Sikhs, Jains and Muslims that he “has a personal duty to protect [the] diversity of our country.”

Charles can trace his ancestry back to Alfred the Great in the ninth century.

Every one of those ancestors was white. No matter how much his non-white subjects flatter and deceive him, how can he possibly think the monarchy can survive The Great Replacement? How can little Britain — not even Great Britain — survive replacement?

Here’s Professor Uju Anya, antiracist and specialist in blackness.

Here’s what she thought about the Queen’s last hours: “I heard the chief monarch of a thieving raping genocidal empire is finally dying. May her pain be excruciating.”

She got thousands of likes and retweets before she took her tweet down. As the great Enoch Powell already saw in 1968, Britain is “heaping up its own funeral pyre.”

And yet, I am a monarchist. Queen Elizabeth was wrong about what matters most, but she was a compelling symbol of British unity.

Like any sovereign, she took her position by birthright, not through politicking or maneuvering. She was one of the richest people in Britain, so she could not be bought. And a monarch, in a sense owns his country, which he keeps in trust for his heirs. He is to a politician what a property owner is to a tenant. An elected official is in office only for a time. Some just line their pockets while they can

Bill and Hillary Clinton were perfect tenant rulers.

They took an estimated $200,000 worth of White House furniture when they moved out. Their staff deliberately wrecked the offices George W. Bush’s people were going to move into. The Clintons were white-trash renters, not owners.

Monarchs also answer a deep human need. For the British, their queen was the head of the national family, both a sovereign and a matriarch. As the Supreme Governor of the Church of England and Defender of the Faith, she was even a link to the Almighty.

She made her people proud to be British, even as their islands settled into mediocrity. She embodied a thousand-year-old dynasty that was theirs and only theirs.

I grew up with a royal family. I was born in Japan and was eight years old when the Imperial Crown Prince Akihito married Michiko, who became Empress Consort.

All Japan was bursting with joy – and so was I. In my excitement, I bought this souvenir postage sheet, which I have to this day.

When their time comes, there will be an outpouring of love and grief in Japan, just as we have seen in Britain.

People need leaders. Nations need leaders. Sometimes they lead badly. What is happening in Britain is a tragedy. The millions of white Britons who wept for their departed queen should be weeping for their dying country. [[59:36 – 59:48]] They are like the middle and working-class American whites who salute Old Glory with a fervor their cynical rulers never feel, the whites who only vaguely understand that they live in a country that used to be theirs, but that now treats them with contempt. Symbols can be so strong they fool people into thinking they are permanent and unchanging.

The British are throwing away all they ever had. They are squandering a priceless heritage on Africans, Asians, Muslims, and Hindus, who will never love a history of which they cannot be a part. It grieves me to see a once-great people defiling their future even as they try to honor their past. Unless they act to protect it, that magnificent past will not belong to their children, but to the children of strangers who will despise them as well as everything that went before.

(Republished from American Renaissance by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: Foreign Policy, History • Tags: Britain, Monarchy 
Hide 23 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. This author needs to learn one thing from the Sanatan Dharma: the concept of karma.

    Britain is going to pay for their centuries of thievery and genocide, from Ireland to India and they deserve it all.

    • Troll: Pastit
    • Replies: @Brian07
  2. northeast says:

    If the Queen took a stand with Enoch Powell in the 60s the UK would be a very different place than it is today. She turned her back on him and all of the UK.

    • Agree: Franz, RadicalCenter, Pastit
    • Replies: @Brian07
  3. It amuses, perhaps bemuses, me to walk the streets of London nowadays and see more hijabs than I saw on the streets of Beirut in 1985.

  4. The millions of white Britons who wept for their departed queen should be weeping for their dying country

    Ohh, but we are, Mr Taylor. I assure you that we are.

  5. TGD says:

    I predict that King Charles III will be the last British monarch. That’s all I have to say .

    • Replies: @Pastit
    , @Brian07
  6. The Queen’s death marks the end of European dominance of the world. She is not just the Queen. She is the last Queen.

    The White Queen is dead and there will never be another.

    The Queen is not responsible for the decadence of the West. By her example she stood against it.

    • Agree: Curmudgeon
  7. Franz says:

    It’s a two-way deal. The monarch must give his people cause to pray to God to protect him.

    The Oath of Fealty remains the oldest and only compact between ruler and ruled.

    The commoners will pay their share of crops, wield their swords, keep the bridges standing — ONLY if the monarch’s every law and edict works in the interest of the ruled.

    All western nations have violated this. Whether they have a monarch, democracy, or, like the USA, a Geek Junta.

    This tells me that none of them are real. Time to withdraw our Oath of Fealty.

  8. Realist says:

    The monarch has no power in the British government.

    • Agree: Curmudgeon
  9. The author’s intellect leaves much to be desired. He is so off the mark. Race does not define a nation, or nationality. The British or English are not defined by their skin color, it just happened that most were caucasian. They are defined by their languages, shared histories, settled lands and developed cultures. Many great empires and countries in Southern Europe, the Middle East, Asia were not race based and progressed tremendously because they were open to other cultures, tribes, nationalisties and religous followings.

    The Queen whatever her short comings, played the role of a Monarch, representing all their people not just a few who might claim special privilege. Monarchs tend to be a symbol of unity for their people whether diverse or not or fragmented as the British Isles always was and even more diverse and fragmented as their colonial empire was.

    So Jared Taylor super narrow outlook of what Britain is and the role of the Queen is way off the mark.
    E. Michael Jones, is more correct when he says that it is Ethnicity not Race color that is what differentiates and unites people, not skin color. Take the Arabs, all races and historically multi- religious but with dominant religious trends, and languages, which prove to be the base line for unity, not genetics.

    • Disagree: Pastit
    • Replies: @silviosilver
  10. Her Prime Minister, Margaret Thatcher, was suspicious of black rule, but the queen pressured her to attend and support the 1979 Commonwealth Conference that began the process that delivered a marvelous, white-run country into the hands of Robert Mugabe.

    Unless some spy agency bugged the joint, only those present in the weekly meetings of the Queen and the Prime Minister would know what was said, including the corgis. Mrs Thatcher herself denied this allegation. You may recall Press Secretary Michael Shea was fired over leaking bullshit.
    As a balance to Mr. Taylor`s screed, I offer the following:

  11. Jared Taylor is completely right.

    • Agree: silviosilver
  12. 1223 says:

    she was a satanist, who raised a pedophile and a best friend to a pedophile and necrophilliac-who she also considered a friend.
    she dissapeared with 10 natives of canada, kids, never to be seen alive again.
    there is A video online of a naked young man climbing, then falling out of a window from buckingham pallace-they said AFTER THE FACT it was for a TV commercial.
    1. where is said commercial?
    2. if your kids did what hers have done, would you make a commerical that let people think something bad was happening like that? NO WAY.
    its not fake its real, people have been found murdered on her property, on guy who harassed her was found dead in a tree outside her room.
    the ruling elite, which she is one, now charles, are evil as fuck. people need to rise up and drag these fucks to the gallows

  13. I have an Indian “friend” who was very happy about the Queen’s death. I don’t care much about the monarchy but I’m completely bored of third worlders coming here and hating us.

  14. When their time comes, there will be an outpouring of love and grief in Japan, just as we have seen in Britain.

    This isn’t unique to monarchy. The deaths of communist dictators like Stalin and Tito saw similar outpourings of emotion. Even people who later on claimed to despise their rule reported feeling overcome with emotion at these rulers’ passing.

  15. @Tommy Thompson

    E. Michael Jones, is more correct when he says that it is Ethnicity not Race color that is what differentiates and unites people, not skin color. Take the Arabs, all races and historically multi- religious but with dominant religious trends, and languages, which prove to be the base line for unity, not genetics.

    Race is much more than skin color. Plenty of Indians and new world blacks have the same skin color (Indians sometimes being even darker), but only very seldom does anyone mistake them for being the same race; and when the mistake is pointed out, only the deliberately dense cannot understand it.

    Race is real and it matters. Some people can handle this, others can’t. Taylor is in the former category, you and E. Michael Jones are obviously in the latter.

    • Agree: loveshumanity
  16. Just a thought from a British person.

    I think the First and Second World Wars did us in.

    The huge casualties, which were not randomly distributed, but biased towards getting rid of the best – the most altruistic, the most patriotic, the bravest – massively diminished the quality of the white British (which of course was basically all British at that time.)

    Orwell wrote that if there hope it is in the proles, but I am afraid the good old salt of the earth British working class no longer exists in any significant numbers. They died in the wars, or they moved up to become middle class in the 1950s and the following decades – which now makes them to a large extent the allies of the globalists.

    Or – the third choice – they have become a low-skilled, substance-addicted and very unhealthy underclass.

    Obviously they have a very uphill fight too, but I am a little more optimistic about the French patriots getting somewhere than the ones in the UK. They have more educated types on their side, their white working class is not an underclass.

  17. Pastit says:
    @TGD

    He will labor mightly to destroy white Briton.

  18. Bon says:

    Queen Elizabeth passed away on September 8 and she left a 70-year archive of millions of photos and videos that proved that she did not exalt the Cross of Christ (feast, September 14) but she exalted the throne of mammon of the London Money Power also known as the Great Red Dragon.

    In her 70-year reign, Queen Elizabeth was the robotic puppet of the NWO and the Globalists. Through her automated obedience to the Freemasons, she led 100’s of millions of people to be as sheeple incapable of critical thinking thus making them subservient to the Globalists that were exploiting their countries until today. Through her hats and couturier clothes, she carried out the royal pomp and pageantry that kept 100’s of millions of people focused on her like the circus in the coliseum of Rome that kept the people blinded, subjugated and oppressed and perpetually exploited by the Elite.

    Queen Elizabeth as head of the Anglican Church never venerated the Blessed Virgin Mary, the Mother of God Jesus Christ, during her 70-year earthly reign. Therefore Catholic pundits must NEVER associate her with the Queen of Heaven. As Christ said, “Therefore, But he that shall deny me before men, I will also deny him before my Father who is in heaven”. (Matthew 10:33 DRB) Queen Elizabeth denied the Queen of Heaven, so please, do not associate her with the Throne of the Queen of Heaven like a Hollywood fictitious movie.

    The most appropriate Scriptural verse for Queen Elizabeth (and all her rich relatives and the Globalists) is The Rich Man and Lazarus in Luke 16:19-31 DRB.

    19 There was a certain rich man, who was clothed in purple and fine linen; and feasted sumptuously every day.

    20 And there was a certain beggar, named Lazarus, who lay at his gate, full of sores,

    21 Desiring to be filled with the crumbs that fell from the rich man’s table, and no one did give him; moreover the dogs came, and licked his sores.

    22 And it came to pass, that the beggar died, and was carried by the angels into Abraham’s bosom. And the rich man also died: and he was buried in hell.

    23 And lifting up his eyes when he was in torments, he saw Abraham afar off, and Lazarus in his bosom:

    24 And he cried, and said: Father Abraham, have mercy on me, and send Lazarus, that he may dip the tip of his finger in water, to cool my tongue: for I am tormented in this flame.

    25 And Abraham said to him: Son, remember that thou didst receive good things in thy lifetime, and likewise Lazareth evil things, but now he is comforted; and thou art tormented.

    26 And besides all this, between us and you, there is fixed a great chaos: so that they who would pass from hence to you, cannot, nor from thence come hither.

    27 And he said: Then, father, I beseech thee, that thou wouldst send him to my father’s house, for I have five brethren,

    28 That he may testify unto them, lest they also come into this place of torments.

    29 And Abraham said to him: They have Moses and the prophets; let them hear them.

    30 But he said: No, father Abraham: but if one went to them from the dead, they will do penance.

    31 And he said to him: If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they believe, if one rise again from the dead.

    Check out : London Money Power. or Great Red Dragon in Archive org (It’s a free book). https://archive.org/details/greatreddragonor00wool/page/8/mode/2up

    September 21, feast of St. Matthew the Evangelist

    • Replies: @TGD
  19. Brian07 says:
    @AmusedIndian

    There was no genocide in amy part of the British empire which, at the end of the day, developed through trade and alliances with local rulers. Youre just sore because your country couldn’t create a global empire AT THE SAME TIME as transforming the world with its industrial and scientific revolutions.

    If the British were so bad, the great majority of its former colonies wouldn’t voluntarily agree to be part of the Commonwealth and millions of its former colonial subjects wouldn’t want to move there to live under “white supremacy”.

    All that said, I am glad to see your bitter resentment is eating you up.

  20. Brian07 says:
    @northeast

    Apparently he criticized her in the 80s claiming that she was more interested in the affairs of other countries than the well being of her own people.

    And he’d be right.

  21. Brian07 says:
    @TGD

    I think he might be forced to abdicate, the UK will collapse but William and Kate will revive the monarchy for a newly independent England.

    In that sense you would be correct.

  22. TGD says:
    @Bon

    The parable of the rich man and Lazarus reminds me of the Doc Watson song, “Little Orphan Girl.”

    • Replies: @Bon
  23. Bon says:
    @TGD

    Thanks for sharing this song. It’s a secular version of the Parable of the Rich Man and Lazarus that is more harsh because it shows the eternity of the punishment of Hell. There is such a thing as Divine Justice and even people who don’t believe in God believe in a supernatural punishment for evils committed on this earth.

    Sadly, there is now the movement to canonize Queen Elizabeth to be a saint in the Anglican Church which will be a total deception. And the Catholic church’s Princess Gloria of Germany is part of that deception. I hope that UNZ will expose the sheer deception of Queen Elizabeth’s sanctity who adored her corgis dogs more than the Cross of Christ.

    This was my comment in YouTube that was removed.

    Princess Gloria von Turn and Taxis saying she hopes that Queen Elizabeth is now in Heaven with the Blessed Virgin Mary, the Queen of Heaven by virtue of her son King Jesus, insinuates as if earthly monarchs will also be also heavenly monarchs. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OmAw7swZvzc. This is very dangerous for the Catholics to hear from princess Gloria that “queen Elizabeth is now with the Queen of Heaven” when there are many evidence that as the head of the Anglican Church, queen Elizabeth never venerated Mary the Blessed Mother of God, and she committed many unholy things according to this Christian historian https://henrymakow.com/2022/09/queen-elizabeth-and-britains.html Please be careful about canonizing someone outside the Church.through lay persons because it reduces your credibility to naught.

    Martin Luther and the Anglican monarchy looted most of the Catholic churches buildings and treasury in their attempt to destroy the Catholic Church on behalf of the Freemasons. So don t be fooled by pomp and ceremony of the earthly queen and king of England. The so-called reformation by Luther was actually a deformation, here are the reasons why it was deformation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1XZdamx7l6M

    Here is a free book that explains the London Money Power that Queen Elizabeth cleverly covered-up and served as their puppet for 70 years https://ia800202.us.archive.org/27/items/TheGreatRedDragon/great-red-dragon-l-b-woolfolk-1890-history.pdf Every soul on earth should read this book to know why and who are responsible for what is happening in the world today.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Jared Taylor Comments via RSS
PastClassics
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement
The Surprising Elements of Talmudic Judaism
Shouldn't they recuse themselves when dealing with the Middle East?