The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewJames Petras Archive
President Emmanuel Macron
Reversing Five Decades of Working-Class Power
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Introduction: Whatever has been written about President Emmanuel Macron by the yellow or the respectable press has been mere trivia or total falsehood. Media lies have a purpose that goes beyond Macron’s election. Throughout Europe and North America, bankers and manufacturers, NATO, militarists and EU oligarchs, media moguls and verbal assassins, academics and journalists, all characterized the election victory of Macron as a ‘defeat of fascism’ and the ‘triumph of the French people’.

Macron and ‘What People’?

First of all, Macron received only 46% of the actual vote. Over 54% of eligible French voters either abstained, spoiled their ballots or voted for Marine Le Pen, the nationalist populist. In other words, 26 million voters rejected or ignored Macron’s candidacy versus 20.6 million voters who endorsed him. This was despite an unremitting push for Macron from the entire French and European mass media, all of the major political parties and the vast majority of academics, journalists, publishers, undertakers and doormen.

In a word: Emmanuel Macron is a minority President, unpopular to most of the French electorate.

There are some very sound political and socio-economic reasons why Macron’s candidacy would be rejected by most of the French people, while receiving full support from the ruling class.

Secondly, there was a phony image of Macron as the ‘novice, untainted by old-line corrupt politics’. The financial and business press busily painted an image of the virgin Manny Macron bravely prepared to introduce ’sweeping reforms’ and rescue France – a sort of banker-Joan of Arc against the veteran ‘fascist’ Marine Le Pen and her ‘deplorable’ supporters.

The reality is that Macron has always been a highly experienced member of the most elite financial-political networks in France. He served as a senior executive in the notorious Rothschild banking conglomerate. In a few short years ‘Saint Manny’ had accumulated millions of euros in commissions from fixing corporate deals.

Macron’s financial colleagues encouraged him to accept the post of Economic Minister under the decrepit regime of President Francois Hollande. Banker Macron helped the ‘Socialist’ President Hollande shed any of his party’s pro-labor pretensions and embrace a radical anti-worker agenda. As Economic Minister Macron implemented a 40 billion euro tax cut for businesses and proposed far-right legislation designed to weaken workers collective bargaining rights.

The Hollande-Macron proposals faced massive opposition in the streets and parliament. With the government’s popular support falling to the single digits, the anti-labor legislation was withdrawn or diluted …temporarily. This experience inspired Macron to re-invent (or re-virginized) himself: >From hard-assed rightwing hack, he emerged the novice politico claiming to be ‘neither right nor left’.

The totally discredited ‘Socialist’ Hollande, following the example of France’s financial elite, supported presidential candidate Macron. Of course, whenever Macron spoke of representing ‘all France’, he meant ‘all’ bankers, manufacturers and rentier oligarchs – the entire capitalist sector.

In the first round of presidential voting, Macron’s candidacy divided the elites: Bankers were split between Macron and Fillon, while many social democrats, trade union officials and ‘identitarian’-single issue sectarians would end up voting Macron.

Macron won by default: Fillon, his far right bourgeois rival was snared in a political- swindle involving ‘family’ and his finicky supporters switched to Macron. The Socialists defected from their discredited Hollande to the ‘reconstructed choirboy’ Macron. Meanwhile, the ‘left’ had rediscovered ‘anti-fascism’: They opposed the national-populist Le Pen and slithered under the bankers’ backdoor to vote for Macron.

Almost one-third of French electorate abstained or showed their contempt by spoiling their ballots.

Throughout the election theatrics, the media breathlessly reported every frivolous ‘news’ item to polish the halo of their ‘novice’ Macron. They swooned over the ‘novelty’ of Macron’s teen age ‘love affair’ and subsequent marriage to his former schoolteacher. The media played-up the charmingly ‘amateurish’ nature of his campaign staff, which included upwardly mobile professionals, downwardly mobile social democrat politicos and ‘off the street’ volunteers. The mass media downplayed one critical aspect: Macro’s historic ties to the big bankers!

Behind the carefully crafted image of a ‘political outsider’, the steely eyed Macron was never influenced by the swooning media propaganda: He remained deeply committed to reversing fifty years of working class advances in France in favor of the financial class.

Macron’s Power Grab : En Marche to Defeat the Working Class

Immediately upon his election, Macron presented his first major piece of legislation: The ‘liberalization’ (reversal) of France’s progressive and socially protective labor laws.

President Macron promised to eliminate industry-wide labor-capital negotiations, in favor of factory-by-factory negotiations. Undermining industry-wide collective power means that each monopoly or conglomerate can dominate and isolate workers in their work place. Macron envisions a complete shift of power into the hands of capital in order to slash wages, increase work hours and reduce regulations on workplace safety and worker health. The proposed anti-labor laws represent a return of capitalist power to the golden age of the late 19th and early 20th centuries – precisely why the financial elite anointed Macron as ‘President of all France’.

Even more important, by destroying a unified, labor movement and the power of workers’ solidarity, Macron will be free to radically restructure the entire socio-economic system in favor of capital!

Concentrating all power and profits in the hands of the capitalist class, Macron’s legislative agenda will free him to fire over 150,000 public employees, drastically reduce public spending and investment and privatize critical public financial, energy and industrial sectors.

Macron will shift the balance of power further away from labor in order to increase profits, reduce middle and working class social, health and educational services and to decrease corporate taxes from 33.3% to 25%.

Macron plan will strengthen the role of the French financial elite within the European Union’s oligarchical structure and allow the bankers to impose harsh ‘austerity’ policies throughout Europe.

In the sphere of foreign and military affairs, Macron fervently supports NATO. His regime will back the aggressive US military policies toward Russia and the Middle East – especially the violent breakup of Syria.

President Macron’s reactionary, ‘liberalizing’ agenda will require his party and allies to gain a majority in next month’s parliamentary elections (June 2017). His strategy will consist of ‘diversity in appearance and hard, single-minded reactionary policies in content’.


The ‘diverse’ groups and individuals, allied with Macron, are largely composed of fragmented collections of opportunists and discredited politicos mainly in search of office. Under Macron, the parliament will include everything from old-line rightwing social democrats, as well as single-issue environment and gender opportunists, allied with conservatives looking for a chance to finally savage France’s labor laws.

If successful in the coming elections, Macron’s parliament will legitimize the policies of his far right Prime Minister and Cabinet. If Macron fails to secure an outright majority, he is sure to patch together a coalition with veteran right-wing politicos, which, of course, will be ‘balanced’ with 50% women. Macron’s coalition of dinosaurs and ‘women’ will eagerly smash the rights and living standards of all workers – regardless of gender!

Macron hopes to win sufficient parliamentary votes to negotiate alliances with the traditional conservative parties and the rump of the Socialist Party to consolidate the rule of the Troika: the bankers, the EU and NATO.

President Macron: By the Ballot or the Bullet

There is no doubt that the French working class, the salaried public and private employees, the unemployed youth, students and public health workers will take to the streets, with the backing of 60% or more of the public, including the 33% who voted for Marine Le Pen.

Strikes, general and partial, of long and short duration, will confront the Macron regime and its far right, self-styled ‘transformative’ agenda.

Rothschild’s errand boy, Manny Macron cannot mobilize supporters in the streets and will have to rely on the police. Many parliamentary backers are fearful of both the problem (strikes) and the solution (police repression).

The Corporate Elite: President Macron Adopts Napoleonic Decrees

In 2016 when Macron was the Economic Minister in the President Francois Hollande’s regime, he introduced a new regressive labor policy dubbed the ‘El Khomri’ law (named after the reactionary Labor Minister Myriam El Khormi). This led to massive street demonstrations forcing Hollande to withdraw the legislation. Now as President, Macron proposes a far more rigid and destructive labor law, which his corporate colleagues insist he implement by the ‘ballot’ if possible or the ‘billy club’ if necessary. In other words, if he cannot win the support of the National Assembly, he will implement the labor law by presidential decree.

The President of MEDEF (Mouvement des Entreprises de France), the employers’ federation, Pierre Gattaz, has demanded immediate implementation of policies to crush labor. Macron will outlaw labor protests via presidential decree and cut parliamentary debate in order to transform the elite’s ‘El Dorado’ of all (labor) reforms (sic) into reality.

The entire leadership of the capitalist class and financial press backs Macron’s bid to govern by decree as a ‘good idea in the circumstances’, (Financial Times, 5/10/17, pg. 2). Macron’s ‘Napoleonic’ pretentions will inevitably deepen class polarization and strengthen ties between the militant trade unions and Le Pen’s industrial working class supporters.

We face an approaching time of open and declared class war in France.


Reality has quickly cut through the lies about the origin of Emmanuel Macron’s electoral victory. Brutal police truncheons, wielded in defense of Macron’s election triumph, will further reveal the real faces of French ‘fascism’ better than any editorial by the French ‘left’. The fascists are not to be found among Le Pen’s working class voters!

The fools within the French academia, who backed the Rothschild candidate in the name of ‘fighting fascism at all cost’, will soon find themselves wandering among the workers’ street barricade, dodging the clouds of teargas, on the way to their cafes and computers.

The ruling class chose Macron because they know he will not back down in the face of street demonstrations or even a general strike!

The intellectuals who backed Macron as ‘the lesser evil’ are now discovering that he is the greater evil. They are not too late to be . . . irrelevant.

Macron’s grandiose vision is to introduce his hyper-capitalist ideology throughout Europe and beyond. He proposes to transform the EU into a ‘competitive capitalist paradise under French leadership’.

Given the historic role of the French worker, it is more likely that Macron will not succeed in implementing his ‘labor reforms’. His decrees will surely provoke powerful resistance from the streets and the public institutions. When he falters, his parliamentary supporters will fracture into little warring clans. Factory owners will bemoan the workers who occupy their plants and bankers will complain that the farmers’ tractors are blocking the roads to their country villas.

The Germans and British elite will urge their ‘little Napoleon’ to hold firm, for fear the ‘French contagion’ might spread to their somnolent workers.

On the one hand, Macron’s successful decree can open the way for a transformation of capital-labor relations into a modern 21st century corporate state.

On the other, a successful general strike can open the door to a Europe-wide revolt. Macron’s enigmatic (and meaningless) slogan ‘neither right nor left’ is now exposed: He is the “Bonaparte of the Bourse”!

(Republished from The James Petras Website by permission of author or representative)
• Category: Foreign Policy • Tags: Emmanuel Macron, France, Neoliberalism 
Hide 10 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. I wonder to what extent the police will respond to orders to crush demonstrators–some polls I’ve seen indicated that support for the FN was quite widespread among the gendarmerie and military. We may be facing the classic, “Will soldiers fire on workers, or will they turn their guns around and fire on the order givers?” Another factor that the article doesn’t really deal with (it can’t deal with everything) is how the Arabs and Africans in the already-seething banlieues will respond if français de souche are fighting it out on the streets.

    All in all, I don’t see five years of peace and tranquility in France.

  2. macron is the end of the line not the start for the euro project within france.

    he is the elites personification of desperation to hold on to powerat any cost while refusing any and all needed reforms. it is fitting the anti democratic french elites should choose of all candidates a modern day oedipus and jocasta to lead the sad and watered down french people into the future.

    history is if nothing else ironic!

  3. Macron’s electoral ‘victory’ is even less legitimate than described since he, like Hillary, received so much fawning and favorable treatment by the established French media.

    The French MSM worked for Macron and produced ‘news’ that was flattering and favorable towards him and which tarnished the aspirations, character and integrity of Le Pen and her supporters. This mirrors what played out in the US between ‘fascist’ Trump and ‘progressive’ Hillary.

    Political operatives and media activists–not Russia–continue to steer, maneuver and manipulate public perception in the West as well as the voting preferences of low-information voters–millions of whom are illegal immigrants or their block-voting offspring.

    Trump and his agenda faces a death by a thousand cuts. And if that doesn’t work, there’s always the Special Prosecutor.

    In fact, the sinister (and unproven) conspiracy between Trump and the Russians to ‘steal’ the US election is counter-factual since it was the pro-Clinton media (and Deep State operatives) that tried to achieve just the opposite; namely, inject enough anti-Trump propaganda and innuendo into every news cycle to produce a synthetic Clinton victory. The contest between Macron and Le Pen was similarly rigged.

    There continues to be a global effort involving international Big Media, committed militarists, and High Finance oligarchs to sustain the teetering political trajectory that presently targets Iran, Syria and Russia while demographically transforming Europe and America.

    • Replies: @Authenticjazzman
  4. eD says:

    To be fair, in elections you always have people who abstain or don’t vote. In the US, people who abstain are treated by the media as people who passively accept the result, which is why I don’t try to protest by abstaining. Abstentions in US federal elections usually run from over 40% or so for President to around 60% for Congress.

    About a third of American voters voted to elect Reagan to a second term, and that stands as a record high percentage for elections in my lifetime (I’m almost 50). Macron’s quarter is actually really impressive by American standards. No one got this in 1996, 2000, maybe 2012, and 2016 due to a combination of low turnout and failure of anyone to get a majority of the vote.

    However, France historically has had much higher voter participation than in the US -it runs its elections much more cleanly and these two factors are linked- so the second round abstentions were noted for this reason, also the fourth place first round candidate effectively called for abstentions (the third place candidate endorsed Macron). And as it happens you can do a direct comparison of 2017 with the last election where the FN got in the second round, 2002, and there is no question the establishment has lost support. So I tend to agree there is a fin-de-regime atmosphere about this move, they should have been able to just have the pendulum swing back and hand power to a more established conservative politician.

  5. Veritatis says:

    @ “To be fair, in elections you always have people who abstain or don’t vote. ”

    Exactly, and agree with the rest of your post. So France’s election process (meaning actual voting and ballot-counting) was lawful, the results valid, Macron is France’s legitimate president. (Not that I like the guy). Anything else is at least being sore losers, but can also degenerate to outright undermining of rule of law which is not the way to go. Just look at the marches, judge’s rulings and sanctuary babble in the US.

    Now, if the man is wily, he will govern in such a way as to increase his popular support. He can adopt some of his defeated rival’s policies, or appoint people who can ‘reach’ the dissatisfied electorate. He can gain on the job what he couldn’t in the campaign, the good will of the majority governed. That’s par for the course in democracies and that is the ‘legitimacy’ of presidents in between elections: opinion poll results. I doubt Macron will change his policies, and I don’t think he is competent anyway.

    That’s not to say that modern elections are level playing fields. So if the FN is to win next time, it must do so with a hugely charismatic candidate. Marine Le Pen is a courageous person, but not charismatic. And the two-round system practically guarantees that you cannot get an “anti-establishment” president.

    Of course, there’s the saying “people have the government they deserve”. Harsh, but often true.

  6. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    “I cannot see how Emmanuel Macron’s Presidency can be anything other than a failure. He comes from exactly the same elite school as all the other recent failures, he is in fact a strong supporter of France’s EU-loving metropolitan left, which has made such a mess of things for the past 20 years or so, and he largely owes his position to the uncritical support of France’s elite left-wing media, which applauded him into office and savaged his only mainstream conservative rival, Francois Fillon.”

    Peter Hitchens, british journalist:

  7. hyperbola says:

    The Germans seem to expect that Macron will try to copy their own Harz 1-4. That is, reducing wages to “starvation” level to compete in “globalization”. Some of them are smart enough to recognize that this will lead to competition between nations in a race to the bottom for workers.

    Die Anstalt vom 16. Mai 2017

    • Replies: @Fredrik
  8. @Mark Green

    Hat off to you : A perfect dissection of the situation
    EM is in cahoots with GS , BO, BC, HRC, the DNC, etc.

    And the brainless Germans love him like they do BO.

    Authenticjazzman “Mensa” society member since 1973, airborne qualified US Army vet and pro jazz musician.

  9. Fredrik says:

    Hartz IV is also a very important reason why the German economy and German businesses are working so well.

    Lots of Anglos want to blame some sinister Nazi for the German relative success compared to Greece, Italy, France and others. The difference is really that the Germans attacked their own structural problem and solved it. Greeks and French are refusing to do so and are paying the price.

    Race to the bottom is inevitable as long as people refuse to pay a few cents more for better quality…

    • Replies: @hyperbola
  10. hyperbola says:

    Sure thing. Only another example of “government”-business abuse of the population by bought politicians. The sort of “alliance” that Mussolini’s fascism represented.

    Minimum wage unlikely to remedy rising poverty in Germany

    Twelve million people in Germany are categorised as poor, more than ever recorded according to a study by a German welfare association, which indicates the country’s new minimum wage is not likely to help the situation. EURACTIV Germany reports.

    Poverty has reached a historic high in Germany, according to a report by the welfare organisation Paritätischer Wohlfahrtsverband. The report indicates around 12.5 million people were affected in 2013 – an increase from 15% to 15.5% compared to the previous year.

    “Since 2006, there has been a clear and dangerous trend toward more poverty,” said Ulrich Schneider, managing director of the umbrella association Paritätischer Gesamtverband. Within this period, the report indicates that the number of poor in Germany grew by 11%.

    “Poverty in Germany has never been so high and regional fragmentation has never been as serious as it is today,” Schneider warned. The German government’s assertion from the last poverty report, claiming the income gap is closing, Schneider described as “simply false”.

    As a result, Germany is nearing the European average with regard to poverty. EU statistics indicated that close to one-fourth of the EU population were at risk of poverty or social exclusion in 2013…..

Current Commenter

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone

 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All James Petras Comments via RSS
Our Reigning Political Puppets, Dancing to Invisible Strings
The unspoken statistical reality of urban crime over the last quarter century.
Talk TV sensationalists and axe-grinding ideologues have fallen for a myth of immigrant lawlessness.