The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewJayMan Archive
Wise Words
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

If you consider how conditional probability works there actually is not anything stupid or irrational in judging another based on a properly formed racial stereotype (based on a statistically representative sample) provided you don´t know anything else about the other being judged besides race (or other category, like sex). Unfortunately a lot of people have a hard time updating their [beliefs] based on new information, which is what you should be doing (quickly) when you learn more about a specific individual. (emphasis added)


(Republished from JayMan's Blog by permission of author or representative)
• Category: Science • Tags: Shorts and Funnies, Words of Wisdom 
Hide 7 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. Jack says:

    You had me and then you lost me. This quote betrays some naïveté about how learning (either in the Bayesian or behavioral sense) works. Depending on the nature of the belief we’re talking about, if your priors are solidly formed, a single anomaly isn’t going to be sufficient to overturn the belief. It takes some reinforcement.

    Also: sometimes those priors are formed on actual experience, not just free-floating stereotypes.
    Also also: sometimes prior beliefs, justified or not, can act as self-fulfilling prophecies, in that they can bias interactions toward reinforcing priors rather than undermining them.

    It’s interesting to think about though. I wonder if anyone’s done any serious work on this. My intuition is that it would not be hard to train a computer to be “racist” based on some rules most people would agree to and real-life data, with obvious implications for many of the charges of racism that get thrown around so casually these days.

    • Replies: @Adalwolf
  2. Adalwolf says:

    I don’t think the point was that if the person in question acts contrary to your established stereotype, you should re-evaluate that stereotype. Rather, you should stop trying to apply the stereotype to that person, and recognise them as the individual they are.

    • Replies: @JayMan
  3. Chuck says: • Website

    “Unfortunately a lot of people have a hard time updating their [beliefs] based on new information, which is what you should be doing (quickly) when you learn more about a specific individual. (emphasis added)”

    And yet, see table 10.3 in “The Unbearable Accuracy of Stereotypes” and read the discussion You will see that the statement above is meta-analytically unsubstantiated. In the real world, People discriminate primarily on the basis on individual, not group characteristics.

    • Replies: @JayMan
  4. JayMan says: • Website

    Thanks for that point. Maybe widespread knowledge of HBD won’t necessarily lead to widespread unchecked racism.

  5. szopen says: • Website

    Jayman, I am not sure about this. I used to talk with my daughter about the HBD, and I always tried to tell her that she should always differentiate between an individual and the population means. However, quite recently during a discussion about one of her collegues in the class it came that the collegue is a person of partial-black ancestry, and she said several openly racist statements. This disturbed me quite greatly. I mean, if I spent hours to explain what a mean is, a median, an average, to explain that she can’t judge people just by the average of the population they came from – and she still cames with abrupt, racist statements – damn, what would be reaction of the population if the HBD concepts would start to be popularised by the media?

    I still have to find out a method of popularisation of the knowledge, which would not lead to the spread of racism at the same time.

    • Replies: @JayMan
  6. JayMan says: • Website

    My fiancée was quite happy to read this and see that someone agrees with what she has been telling me since I started talking about HBD. She believes that it’s impossible for the masses to learn about the truth of HBD and not resort to overtly racist behavior.

    This is why I am opposed to the advice that Heartiste has been advocating: “shaming” overweight people as a way of getting them to lose weight. There is simply no way that will lead to good places

Current Commenter

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone

 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All JayMan Comments via RSS