The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewJayMan Archive
Comment Policy
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

3d-concept-group-discussion-21549918

Thanks to a persistent troll, I’ve enabled first-time comment moderation. New commenters will be required to have their very first comment approved by me. After that, you may comment freely. This means you won’t be able to leave the name box blank if you want to be able to comment without moderation. An e-mail address is NOT required.

(Republished from JayMan's Blog by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: Science • Tags: Commenting, Go Away Trolls 
Hide 2 CommentsLeave a Comment
2 Comments to "Comment Policy"
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Latias says:

    Off topic…

    http://jaymans.wordpress.com/2013/08/18/even-george-w-bush-has-heart-disease/ (some thoughts on that post)

    I briefly read some of your posts about cardiovascular disease and death, and you noted the IQ is the strongest predictor of health and more importantly conventional wisdom dietary and lifestyle interventions do not alter mortality rates. If so, this should predict that conscientiousness has no link between mortality rates (as conscientious individuals are more likely to implement the recommended “common sense” interventions). Of course, this supposes that IQ and conscientiousness are not linked. I remember one study showing a negative correlation between IQ and conscientiousness, but it was probably in an academic setting. Perhaps, outside of an academic environment, the correlation may be positive between them,

    http://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/2004-20177-003

    Asides from avoiding tobacco consumption, since you do not think behavioral interventions affect health, how can conscientiousness mediate health outcomes?

    But I am lazy. I have not done much research to even challenge your conclusions, and I took the conventional wisdom for granted: while I do believe genetics significantly affected health outcomes, I thought moderate lifestyle interventions could exert a significant modest effect.

    • Replies: @JayMan
  2. JayMan says: • Website
    @Latias

    @Latias:

    The comments don’t close at my posts. You could have just commented at the relevant one. Please do so in the future. Anyways, thanks for this info. Will continue the discussion there.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments are moderated by JayMan


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All JayMan Comments via RSS