The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewJung-Freud Archive
White Americans as Mere EXTENSIONS of Jewish Supremacist Power Than as Free Individuals
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
List of Bookmarks

Jewish Powerites understand a crucial truth. People tend to be Extensions than Individuals. As a complex domain of social organisms, the human world is more like an ant colony or a bee hive than a random assemblage of lone creatures like tigers or bears. People constantly pick up signals, all the more so in our age of electronic media and gadgets. Every time someone uses ‘my’ device, he or she is being tuned to signals emanating from a center of power/influence. He or she may think, “I’m a free individual with ‘choice'”, but in fact, the possible ‘choices’ are fed into his/her mind through electronic signals.

In a way, people became less individualistic with the rise of radio and TV. Prior to such technologies, everyone in the US did something different on any given night. Some read books(countless different titles) and magazines, some went for social gatherings, some went for a walk, some stared at the moon, and etc. If ANYTHING unified the masses in the US and the West prior to Radio and TV, it was the Bible, which of course was interpreted differently by every reader.
With the advent of the TV, however, countless viewers could be watching exactly the same thing at the same time, the only notable difference being the qualities of TV sets. Despite the ‘participation’ of millions, the programming was decided by just a handful of people, among whom Jews were prominent; they controlled the signals fed into the Collective American Mind.

As the character in A SERIOUS MAN(by Coen Brothers) messes with the TV antennae on the rooftop for better reception of signals from ‘heaven’, he worries that the impact of television, serious in influence but unserious in content, isn’t all for the good of his children. It’s as if the antennae on the roof replaced the fiddler on the roof, a figure of unique folkloric significance.

Still, Jews in general had less to worry about as the Jewish Media Masters were careful not to send signals that might negatively affect Jewish interests. Instead, signals instilled the mass public with the message that one’s moral character is a measure of his/her ‘philosemitism’.
The signals did carry animus, hostility, and hatred far and wide, but they were mostly aimed at whites because Jewish supremacist power needed white submission and obedience, the logical offshoots of white shame, moral paralysis, and self-loathing instilled into white hearts-and-minds via media(and academia). Jewish Powerites needed whites to be in permanent-atonement-and-redemptive mode(for the ‘historical sins’ of ‘racism’, ‘antisemitism’, and etc.) because it could be exploited to steer white thoughts and actions toward serving Judeo-Centric goals. Whites came to think thus: “Because Jews are so good and holy whereas whites are so vile and loathsome, whites must look to Jews for wisdom and guidance and appease them at every turn.”

In a way, libertarianism, especially the kind pushed by Ayn Rand, has been of great advantage to the Jews. Libertarianism served as a loosening agent. First, the bonds that hold a structure together must be weakened; then, the structure can be disassembled piece by piece. That said, the ultimate trick isn’t to break things apart to keep them separate indefinitely. No, they’re taken apart to be used as building blocks for a new structure based on YOUR blueprint.
Libertarianism promised individuality, freedom, and choice for everyone. It was especially useful in disassociating the White Right from its bonds of conservatism. White Conservatism upheld the bonds of heritage and the bonds of race(and of Christianity).

While Americanism(and Western Culture in general) had long been more individualistic than others, it rejected radical individualism. If one had to make a choice between unity/community and division/individuality, the former was almost always prioritized. So, while American Conservatism wasn’t anti-individualist, it put unity before the individual.
Libertarianism was committed to reversing the formula. Among the more moderate libertarians, it was individuality and choice before unity and tradition, but they weren’t necessarily hostile to the latter. Ron Paul belongs to this school. (His is the school of Virtue Libertarianism, the idea that more freedom and individuality will mean more choice and means by which people can make more rational and sensible decisions. More freedom means more opportunity to be good and moral. In contrast, there is the school of Vice Libertarianism that looks upon traditional virtues as ‘square’ & ‘lame’ and believes that the vices will cancel each other out and lead to a kind of natural equilibrium. It might be called the Anton LaVey school of libertarianism. LaVey argued that the problems of gluttony will be solved by another vice, vanity and narcissism, i.e. gluttons, in their desire to be attractive, will naturally control their appetite; but then, what is to be done about the ‘body positivity movement’ that says ‘fat is beautiful’?)

If moderate Libertarians placed individuality before unity(but still valued unity), the radical libertarians were opposed to any kind of unity and heritage. It was all a matter of ‘me and my choice’. It’s no wonder they oppose nationalism that consolidates the organic whole for survival and power. Radical libertarians see such policies as standing between the individual and choice. In their eyes, the evil of Group Interest stands in the way of individuals and their freewheeling options in a borderless world.

At any rate, unbeknownst to most goy libertarians, Jewish elements pushed libertarianism as a means to an end, not as the end itself. Consciously or subconsciously, Ayn Rand and other Jews would have sensed that Jewish Power would grow immeasurably if whites could be made more atomized while Jews maintained their tribal consciousness. Unity generates a gravitational core whereas individuality scatters everything to the winds. The universe is filled with stardust, but stardust remains adrift in the dark. Powerful suns are formed by the gathering of stardust into great concentrations of matter.
No wonder cities have always ruled over the countryside. Cities concentrate power, countryside scatters it far and wide. Even Mao Zedong, who called on his peasant armies to ‘surround the cities from the countryside’, got his education in the cities and, when his side won the war, made sure that the communists controlled the cities with an iron grip.

Video Link

Paradoxically, city life is more rootless and individualistic, yet power is concentrated there into a singular unity. In contrast, country life is more rooted and communal, but people are smaller in number and separated from one another. Perhaps, city folks are more individualistic because they can take their systemic unity for granted. They live in such an elaborate form of social order that they don’t have to work so hard at basic survival.

At any rate, dimwit goy libertarians thought that individualism was for everyone. Everyone would become deracinated and come to regard himself or herself primarily as an individual, as a ‘me’ or ‘myself’. Everything else — national loyalty, racial identity, religious affiliation, kinship, or etc. — would be secondary or nonexistent. And all groups would move in this direction. Not only whites but Jews, blacks, browns, and the rest.
But just when whites were moving toward individuality at the expense of any other consideration, Jews were playing up the Holocaust Cult, Zionist Ideology, and Yiddish sensibility. Jews were reminded to never forget their Jewish history and unique ALL-TOO-JEWISH suffering. So, even as Jews prized the utility of individualism, it remained within the orbit of unity.
Philip Roth, for example, pursued a highly individualistic literary career, but all said and done, he was steeped in his sense of Jewishness(even truer of David Mamet). Jews were JEWISH individuals, not generic individuals, which is what Jews urged whites to become(like John Updike whose daughters married Negroes).

As for nonwhites, Jews favored varying agendas depending on their relative usefulness or dangerousness to the Tribe. Jews did everything to weaken the identities of Muslims, Asians, Hindus, Latin Americans, and Africans. All immigrant groups had to be thrown into the Melting Pot and mixed with the demographic white base.
And yet, if nonwhites were urged only to be just like whites, ‘generic individuals’, they wouldn’t be of much use to Jews. Indeed, whites and nonwhites as ‘generic individuals’ might come to see eye-to-eye on lots of things. Instead, Jews aimed to use nonwhites against whites. But what kind of useful identity could nonwhites have if they were fully dissolved in the melting pot?
Jews pushed Negative Identity on nonwhites, an identity based on hostility toward whites. Thus, being non-white, be it black, brown, yellow, Hindu, Muslim, or whatever, became less a matter of positive connection to one’s racial or cultural background than a matter of being AGAINST whites.
Blackness, for example, is essentially about being ‘victims of white supremacist racism’. Brownness is mostly about resentment toward the Gringo. And yellowness is about complaining about the ‘model minority’ trope as just another form of ‘white racism’.

While Jews also possess a powerful sense of Negative Identity — “Evil White goyim did pogroms on us and threw us into gas chambers” — , they also have a powerful sense of Positive Identity rooted in history, heritage, and remembrance. In contrast, as most non-white goy groups arrived with weaker cultures and identities, their only identifier is the ‘moral pride’ of being wronged and victimized by White ‘racists’ and ‘supremacists’. It’s like Jews tell Muslims, “Forget about Islam, let your daughters grow up to ‘twerk’ & act like sluts, let your sons ape black rappers, and wave the ‘gay pride’ flag.” So, what would be the meaning of being a Muslim in America? It would be as a member of People of Color who are forever ‘victimized’ by nasty ‘white supremacist Islamophobes’.

As things stand today, Jews have both positive and negative identities, nonwhites have negative identities, and whites have generic identities. Jews have a sense of history and unity(separate from whites) and a sense of moral outrage(in negative opposition to white ‘Anti-Semites’). Non-whites, in their historical/cultural amnesia, lose a sense of who they are and where they came from, and as such, their identities have meaning only in relation to whites: “White racists did us wrong.” Indeed, without their sense of aggrievement in relation to whites, they would hardly know who or what they are.

As for whites, they are worse off as they’re not only deracinated but reviled. Whites are discouraged from looking into their racial, historical, mythical, and spiritual roots. Whites are now utterly post-cultural. When the European past is invoked, it is to willfully misinform whites that Vikings and Romans were black(as Europe was apparently always about ‘inclusion’ and ‘diversity’) OR to remind whites that they’ve been uniquely guilty in some way or for some reason.
Can whites at least be free individuals left alone to do as they please, like the fellas in Richard Linklater’s DAZED AND CONFUSED? No, not even that. Whites are branded with an identity with the reverse moral dynamic of the non-white Negative Identity. If nonwhites define themselves with Moral Pride vis-a-vis whites, whites must define themselves with Moral Shame/Guilt vis-a-vis nonwhites(and Jews of course). Non-whites see themselves as “people who were always wronged by whites”, whereas whites are pressured to see themselves as “people who always wronged nonwhites”. Thus, both non-white identity and white identity lack autonomy and independence.

Jews have a sense of who they are independent of their relation to whites, whereas nonwhites, having far weaker memories, only have a sense of ‘victimization’ under whites, i.e. the Negative Identity of Moral Pride. For whites, there’s the Negative Identity of Moral Shame. As whites aren’t allowed any sense of who they are independent of the rest of humanity — the mantra of ‘Diversity Is Our Strength’ across both North America and Europe has made it taboo for whites to conceive of a world of their own, past, present, or future — , whites have been conditioned to always think of themselves in relation to the Other. Accordingly, there is no whiteness independent of non-whiteness. White Identity is always a function of its relational dynamics with Jews and nonwhites. Because it had long been ‘white supremacist’, it must henceforth be white-subordinate in perpetuity. White minds must obey the Jewish super-mind. White arms and legs must serve the Zionist Empire. White faces exist to be punched by the black fist. White wombs exist to be colonized by black seeds(and those of other races). White industries exist to be shipped to other countries. White history exist to honor other races, especially blacks, e.g. keep believing that the great European figures were black(or would have been a lot cooler if they were black, so let’s pretend).

Of course, all throughout history, whites sometimes trampled on other peoples and vice versa. After all, whites were invaded by the Huns, Moors, Mongols, Arabs, Turks, and etc., and they are currently being invaded by Third World hordes. Whites were also fleeced by Jewish money-lenders, and countless Christian Slavs died at the hands of Jewish Bolsheviks.
But, such thinking is usually verboten. Whites must only dwell on the wrongs they did to others, except of course when in service to Jewish Supremacists. Whites could write off the guilt of having supported Zionist wars on Palestinians, Iraqis, Iranians, Syrians, etc.
That said, when the ‘refugees’ from the Wars for Israel end up on European and American shores, THEN whites must feel shame and guilt for not taking in more of them. When it comes to smashing Arab/Muslim nations, Jews urge white military men to be like ruthless and heartless Nazis. But when the ‘refugees’ come knocking on the doors of the EU and US, the faceless victims suddenly take on the aura of ‘New Jews escaping the holocaust’.

In the 1960s and 1970s, one could believe that Jews preaching Free Speech and youth culture were mainly for a freer and less hung up American on matters such as race, culture, and identity. And yet, what Jews were really doing was using libertarianism to loosen the white bonds of historical heritage and political unity. Once loosened and divided, however, individual whites were to be molded into a new unity, one of servitude and shame than of pride and power.
As for Jews, they sure as hell weren’t going to generic and ‘white bread’, or rootless individuals. (If Jews seemed rootless to goyim, it was because they refused to become rooted to goy cultures. They insisted on rootedness to the much deeper history and identity of their own.)
Once whites were reduced to atomized individuals, the plan was to reconstruct them into a new sense of whiteness, the Negative Identity of Guilt & Shame. And this was to be realized through Political Correctness permeating not only education but entertainment, advertisement, endless social crusades & purges, and ceaseless public announcements.

Jews did it to mold whiteness into an instrument of their Power. Also because Jews sensed that arch-individualism is not natural to humans who are social creatures. After all, there were signs of Christian Revival and the counter-revolutionary Conservative tide in the 1980s after the tumultuous Sixties and the Me-Decade of the Seventies. It was a high water mark for Evangelicals in the post-war era.
Against such trends, Jews concocted Political Correctness, Magic Negro Cult, Globo-Homo, Diversity-mania, and Holocaust Cult as the new secular religions. Jews figured that whites would feel lonely as mere individuals and coalesce into some kind of ‘spiritual’ community. But what kind of community? The kind that is about white pride, Christianity, conservatism, family values, and nationalism? Such was a nightmare scenario for Jewish Supremacism.
If whites were to be steered away from individualism back toward some kind of unity and identity, it had to be one where white sense of worth was predicated on guilt and atonement. Whites feeling good about being white was absolutely unacceptable. Whites could only feel good about atoning at the feet of Jews and blacks, celebrating Diversity, cheering globo-homo, and praising white female race-traitors who go for Afro-Colonization of White Wombs(or ACOWW).

Over time, the Jewish-conceived formula even spread to once conservative American suburbs and small towns. After all, no matter where anyone lived, he had a TV set that emitted signals from Jewish-controlled centers of news, information, and entertainment. As Joe Biden said, Jewish media made America accepting of ‘gay marriage’. All those electronic signals beamed into the eyes and ears of Americans made them regard homos, the proxies of Jewish Power, as ‘angels’ while despising anyone opposed to the ‘gay agenda’ as a subhuman ‘homophobe’, the face of which became the Greensboro ‘church’, which might as well be a Jewish Front(just like all those phony Neo-Nazi groups led by Jewish hucksters).

As such, all those white people turned into mere EXTENSIONS of Jewish Power. Even as goyim today feel themselves to be free and independent, they are bombarded by Jewish electronic signals on a daily basis. The airwaves are essentially mental whips, rods, and leashes. They tell us what is ‘true’ and ‘false’. They work on our emotions. Consider all the stupid white people who were led to believe it is ‘Nazi-like’ to support or enforce border security. Reliant on Jewish-controlled sources for news and opinions, they’re like dogs on a leash. They are like horses with blinders on, constantly goaded with cracking whips.
They flatter themselves as rational individuals, but most of the news they absorb comes from a handful of Jewish-owned-or-controlled conglomerates that work hand-in-glove with the Deep State. Jewish Propaganda and Mind-Control techniques pervade all electronic devices, and even A.I. has been rigged to heed the Jewish playbook. (The devices are like crack pipes. You may own the pipes, but the drugs are supplied by the pushers. You’re owned by the drugs sold by the kingpins.)

If members of the educated class were truly rational and independent, they would be for Free Speech and open discourse, but having been so relentlessly brainwashed and conditioned by Jewish Power, they support speech control and Censchwarzship lest they be ‘triggered’ by something that runs counter to the Official Narrative that defines their lives. Because ‘woke’ virtue rests on whites tirelessly expunging themselves of ‘white guilt’, they prefer censorship to any threat to their worldview. As with Christian sanctimony where obsessive humility is a path to self-righteousness, ‘woke’ self-loathing is perversely life-affirming to many whites who genuinely feel ‘saved’ in their near-worship of the new gods of Holocaustianity, Negrolatry, and Globo-Homo. They got to have their psychological safe spaces.

The preservation of psychological safe spaces invariably leads to unsafe physical spaces. Mind is conflated with matter, as if reality is a projection of subjective wishes. As the effects of BLM have shown, you can’t have both safe spaces for the mind and safe spaces for the body. If the mind, especially the elite mind, shuts out reality in favor of fantasy, the ensuing policies can only do harm, eventually forcing society to learn the hard way.
So many whites feel psychologically ‘safe’, secure and justified, with the conceit of the Magic Negro and the scapegoat of ‘racism’ or ‘white supremacism’. They hiss and holler at those who dare to expose the fantasies. Their turtle-minds retreat into ‘safe spaces’ when confronted with reality.

So, what did their fantasies lead to? Stuff like Defund the Police, resulting in manifold increases in dangerous spaces. Ideally, psychological safe space should be in sync with physical safe space, which was indeed the very basis of suburban expansion since the Sixties. Whites knew that moving away from blacks would make for safer neighborhoods. They knew it in their minds and saw it in the streets.
But over time, Jewish-controlled media filled white minds with false stories and symbols of the spiritual war between soulful blacks and soul-cold whites. So, blacks were always good and true, whites were always bad and false. Whatever the actual reality looked like in the schools and the streets, the media/academia insisted on the false dichotomy as the basis for the standard American view of race relations. Things have gotten even worse, as it’s always Groundhog Day with Emmett Till, as if American race relations are perpetually stuck in the 1950s, while brushing over all the cases of black-on-white violence that have grown to epidemic proportions with BLM’s effective knighting of black thuggery.

Under relentless indoctrination and pressure, even whites who’d taken flight from black blight came to regard Diversity and Blackness as holy while disparaging their own whiteness. So, instead of trying to defend and preserve their own nice communities, they chipped away at the foundations of their own physical well-being in subservience to the prescribed psychological safe space, the crib in which the Magic Negro resided rent-free.
Consider the white idiots in the suburbs who held rallies in honor of Fentanyl Floyd and invited blacks to wash their feet. But then, it’s fitting that the druggy Floyd has been ‘canonized’ by secular progs in search for new gods. In a way, psychological safe space is like addiction to opium. Someone sucking on an opium pipe is in his la-la land. He thinks he’s in heaven, and even though his habit is actually ruining his physical and material well-being, he prioritizes mental bliss over physical reality. Of course, it’s only a matter of time before the deteriorating reality breaks down the walls of one’s delusions(like the Chelsea Hotel fire in the film SID AND NANCY).

In the end, white people didn’t so much become individuals as EXTENSIONS of Jewish Power. Of course, most are too ignorant or stupid to have realized the direness of their condition. Granted, having been instilled with Jew-Worship, Homo-Mania, and Magic Negro Reverence, many probably feel good about themselves, like that pathetic excuse for a man, Will Stancil.
Not that most American ‘conservatives’ are much better, what with the likes of Ron DeSantis, Chris Christie, Mitt Romney, and Marco Rubio. They too are essentially Extensions of the Jewish Will.

Now, it’s natural to be an ‘extension’ given the social nature of man. The real question is of what. Of white identity/interests or Jewish identity/interests? It’s like the Bob Dylan’s song(during his Christian phase) called “Gotta Serve Somebody”. It could be the Devil or the Lord, but you gotta serve somebody. Ants on their own are nothing without the queen ant. But then, the queen ant would be nothing too but for the fact that all other ants are extensions of her key role in the order. They protect and feed her, and she produces the offspring that keeps the species alive.

In the case of slave-taking, the ants of one colony can be made to serve another. The raiding ants take the larvae of another colony, and the baby ants grow up to serve the colony of their captors. Of course, they don’t know it, even as they dutifully function as extensions of the colony that raided and/or destroyed their colony of origin.
Whites brought over black slaves to serve as Extensions of whites. Because whites were far more advanced, blacks(even as slaves) gained a good deal, but the fact remains that they were no longer serving their own kind but working for the white race. And even as a free people, blacks in the US military continue to serve as Extensions of the US Empire, now controlled by Jews who are most hellbent on Wars for Israel and Judaic Hegemony.

Video Link

That said, if blacks knew that they were slaves because their subjugation was so visible and physical, most whites don’t know that they are essentially mental slaves of Jewish Massuhs(who use blacks, Diversity, and Antifa Janissary idiots as overseers to bully and intimidate the white masses). If whites enslaved blacks physically, Jews enslaved whites psychologically. Jews shylocked the white soul.
In a way, what Jews have done to whites is worse than what whites did to blacks. Despite their physical bondage, blacks were gifted with Christian souls. For all the backbreaking work, blacks learned that God is bigger than any number of white folks with guns & whips, and that Jesus, the Son of God, loves the wretched of the Earth, the poor, and the oppressed. So, even as whites shackled blacks physically, they freed black souls from the depths of jungle savagery. And in time, black Christians would embark on a spiritual as well as political struggle for freedom and dignity.

In contrast, Jewish Power used the media and academia to rob whites of their hearts and minds, their souls. Jews, the masters of psychology, devised the most effective methods of mind control. Within the corridors of white psyche, Jews placed all sorts of traps and poisons so that whites would feel nauseous at any thought of ‘white pride'(like Alex in A CLOCKWORK ORANGE) and nervous at any thought of offending Jews, blacks, and homos.
Jewish mind-control crept into the hearts of white goyim and convinced them that the essence of Christianity is the worship of sodomy and some Negro junkie named George Floyd.

Any man, however smart or strong he may be, is only so much on his own. He is just one person. He gains power by turning other men into extensions of himself. Their bodies serve as extensions of his mind, will, and vision. He is the will-to-power. Under Adolf Hitler, it was as if all Germans were extensions of the Fuhrer’s arms and legs. And under Mao, countless Chinese were carriers of his will. More Extensions means more Power.

Jewish Powerites can tolerate goyim only as extensions of their tribal will. There are many more Extensions than Extenders, just like there’s only one Sun but several planets in the Solar System. THE GODFATHER is not about individuals but about a handful of characters, Vito and Michael(and Barzini), who are Extenders while the rest are mostly Extensions or Buffers of one kind or another.

At one time, Jews rose up the ranks in the US as Extensions of WASP Power, but the tables were turned, and now WASPs serve as Extensions of Jewish Power. The difference is that even Jews-as-extensions had a powerful sense of who they were and looked to the day when they might rule.
In contrast, today’s WASP Extensions of Jews are truly a sorry and pathetic lot. They are without identity or pride, sappily servile as minions of Jews. They are like ants serving another colony without the slightest trepidation. They are ‘white uncle toms’ or ‘white toms’.
And if WASPs in the past thought it was rather uncouth to be overly ‘Anti-Semitic’, Jews today are utterly shameless and relentless in insulting, humiliating, and dehumanizing whites at every opportunity.

And what do whites react to all this? They on their knees and beg the Jews, “Can I suck your dic*?” At most, some whites will boast, “I sucked but didn’t swallow” as a point of pride. How utterly pathetic. In the movie MY BODYGUARD, the small kid is bullied by tougher kids and recruits a much bigger guy to serve as his Extension. Jews are nothing without their Extensions.

Video Link

Ironically, white people are the most valuable extension of Jewish Power even as Jews employ Diversity as a bulwark against a possible White Awakening. Jews regard whites as the most indispensable but also the most dangerous horse that may throw off the Jewish rider and kick him in the skull and run off to be free. It’s no wonder that Jews use Diversity as added baggage on the horse to weigh it down. Of course, if Diversity serves as the straw that breaks the white horse’s back, Jews will end up with nothing. With whites, it’s a game of carrots and sticks. Carrots for the white ‘House Goyim’ who collaborate with the Jewish Massuh but sticks for the white ‘Field Goyim’ who refuse to pick cotton. (It’s like Leon Wieseltier’s formula for dealing with Muslims. Total ruthlessness OVER THERE where they pose a threat to Israel but kindness OVER HERE where they are part of the coalition against whites.)

Jews use Diversity against whites but worry that excessive anti-white bashing may lead to diminished white energies, in which case whites won’t be so useful as managers and foot-soldiers of the empire. In MY BODYGUARD, we naturally sympathize with the small kid because we don’t like bullies. We understand his recruitment of the big guy as an extension. But the kid is also a smart-ass and a jerk. A darker version of him is Sean Penn’s character of Davey Kleinfeld in CARLITO’S WAY. Kleinfeld is all brains and no brawn. He can get people to do all kinds of things for him. And yet, he is a crook and an arch-criminal in the making.

Video Link

Over the years, many Americans have come to believe that Jews are the smartest, wisest, most decent, most judicious, and most understanding people on Earth, not least because of the Covenant and the Holocaust. Then, why not have Jews take over as the new ruling elites? Why not be guided by Jewish intellectuals, activists, and scholars? What better kind of elites could one hope for? Let the US be led by such wise-men and let the goyim accept their proper roles as eager Extensions of Jewish Power.

The problem with such a view is it misunderstands the nature of power. It may well be that there are wise, smart, and judicious Jews, but such people almost never gain power. Power almost always ends up with the cunning, devious, egotistical, ruthless, greedy, vain, nasty, vicious, corrupt, unscrupulous, and/or decrepit.
Indeed, the wisest Jews prefer truth to power, meaning they can never fill the power vacuum, which ends up being filled by power-mad Jews(like Victoria Nuland). What kind of Jews gained power? The likes of Norman Finkelstein(who, for all his faults, is sincere in trying to come to terms with the Palestinian issue) or a sleazebag like Chuck Schumer?
Therefore, Jewish domination didn’t lead to the rule by wise-men but by gangsters with law degrees. George Soros, Paul Singer, Mark Zuckerberg, and the like. The Question is, “Do you want to be an Extension of this Power, or do you want to cut free and become an Extension of the forces that defend, support, and preserve YOUR OWN race, culture, and history?” Choose the Proper Extensionism for yourself.

 
Hide 27 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Anon[242] • Disclaimer says:

    i learned a lot in college leftist indoctrination. one thin i learned is that subjectivity can be constructed. the white american is a construct of jews. jews own all the “means of identity-formation” and white redneck “christian” zionists are the most brutal golems they have ever made.

    here is the big maneuver jews are doing now: reconstruct a “law and order” “right.” then make sure this right wing populist energy is re-directed into christian zionism, demonize “leftists and woke antisemitism.” make antisemitism another “woke” ideology. and the authoritarian nature of the christian right will go along with it and we will see more freedoms curtailed. more and more christian zionists will be recruited into this bloc, and they will pass laws against both “trans athletes and woke anitsemites.”

    it is a risky and desperate move, but they have enough meathead rednecks to do it.

  2. Chebyshev says:

    Libertarianism was an end in itself for Jews, financially. From the 1970s onward, it led to a massive shift in the income distribution towards the top decile or so, which very disproportionately benefited Jews. That has been written about well by the Jewish writer Jonathan Chait.

    Not unlike younger whites of Christian background, younger Jews are probably more deracinated than their grandparents. In a really perverse way, Hamas’s successful October offensive in which civilians were treated as decently as you could ask for, plus Israel’s retaliatory mass murder and destruction of Gaza, is being used by organized Jewry in America to galvanize Jews into supporting Israel and Jewish causes more. Jews not named Jeffrey Sachs or Philip Weiss are generally indignant at the flak their community is getting because of Israel’s atrocities. They have mostly responded by continuing to support Israel and mindlessly oppose “antisemitism”.

    In my opinion, Jews should team up with non-Jewish whites to lead a regime change in Israel, and establish a pluralistic Palestinian and Jewish state. That state eventually could reduce its national security spending, and use the freed-up funds to address other problems. For example, the hypothetical state of Palestine could spend more money to manage the area’s very large and rapidly growing stray cat population.

    https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/the-massive-problem-with-israels-cats/

    • Replies: @Redpill Boomer
  3. In the future, anti-Semitism will come not so much from blond haired, blue eyed Whites but rather from the Negro and other People of Color. Once it is realized who actually brought the Negro, as slaves, to Amerikan shores, that will be the real game changer!

  4. The Christian Zionists are really interesting. They are either lying about being Christians or lying about loving the Jews, or possibly both. After all, Christianity is inherently anti-Jewish. There is the replacement theology. In any event, I perceive these Christian Zionists as the biggest heretics around. What do the rest of you think?

    • Agree: Che Guava
    • Replies: @KnutHamsun
    , @Che Guava
  5. Pythas says:

    Ya right Twin Ruler. And now these groids are temporarily running our Western cities that they had nothing to do with creating. They wouldn’t even know what Greco-Roman architucture is or Gothic architucture is or even a skyscapers is. They had absoulety nothing to do with creating anything they see around them, case in point the Brooklyn bridge thank you Washington Roebling. That’s why our Western cities are going to a hell in a hand basket.

  6. @Twin Ruler

    One could argue that early Christianity aka heresy or gnosticism wasn’t just explicitly anti-Jewish – they were explicitly anti-life! That sentence makes reactionaries see crimson so let me explain.

    Early Christians such as the Marcionites, the Encratites, the Sethians and the Nassenes teach this: that Yahweh/Yaldabaoth/El/Baal, is a wicked, jealous lesser-god who created the material world in a perverted image of a higher creation. They realized that:

    – the material world is inherently corrupt
    – that worldly laws such as those of the Torah or of the Roman Empire were not to be submitted to
    – that worldly hierarchies, much as the planetary hierarchies of astrology, were not to be submitted to – this life is a test to temper one’s desire and lust, in order to strive for the knowledge needed to break free from the material world and psychological dualism
    – knowledge comes from many sources in sync, not from dogmatic authority, not from “faith” or “belief” alone

    How does one break free? They taught temperance, refusal of procreation, and abstention from barbaric behaviors such as warfare, sacrifice and meat-eating.

    From my interpretation, early Christians had ZERO issues with voluntary and peaceful human extinction. They DID NOT hold creation and the material world as something “good, true or beautiful” as the Jews and Romans (and later Roman Christians) did. They WANTED OFF of this Plantation Planet, where base desires such as greed and lust spin the Wheel of Birth, Procreation and Death to the enjoyment of those who love to hold others in mental and physical slavery.

    My two cents – be well.

    • Replies: @Twin Ruler
    , @anon
  7. @KnutHamsun

    Almost sounds Buddhist, or Hindu!

  8. The last Manichean temple is located in China – disguised as a Buddhist one! Haha!

    • Replies: @Che Guava
  9. anon[362] • Disclaimer says:
    @KnutHamsun

    Early Christians such as the Marcionites, the Encratites, the Sethians and the Nassenes teach this: that Yahweh/Yaldabaoth/El/Baal, is a wicked, jealous lesser-god who created the material world in a perverted image of a higher creation.

    Should still be taught with Yahweh’s spawn highlighted.

  10. man says:

    For a start, Jews are not Israelite’s. This whole argument is based on wrong assumption.
    Revelation 3:9

    “Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee.”
    Who wants to subvert everything? – synagogue of Satan.

  11. People tend to be Extensions than Individuals.

    You don’t say! This kind of stuff seems so often to crop up in the beginnings of (poorly edited) articles.

    • Replies: @inspector general
  12. @Chebyshev

    Yes, they (some of them) pulled one over on us. The Powers that Be took libertarian ideology serious ONLY when it applied to the powerful. We Dirt People never received its benefits, except with the occasional (and reversible) tax break. In fact, however, libertarianism never forbade White consciousness. That was implied, but it was always a lie. What good is freedom without the freedom to associate?

  13. Anon 2 says:

    Europe has had over two thousand years of experience in dealing
    with Jews, and has concluded that the best policy is to be counter-Semitic,
    not anti-Semitic, that is they feel that Jews are like salt – a tiny bit may
    improve the taste, but a little too much may kill the host. As a result,
    in the E.U countries the Jewish percentage is typically 0.1 – 0.3 %.
    It’s much higher in France, which was flooded by Jews in the last
    100 years, but it’s still under 1%. The biggest drop has been in Poland
    which at 10% had the highest Jewish percentage in the world in the
    1930s. It’s now down to about 0.1%, just like in Western Europe.
    Counter-Semitism as a Goldilocks (i.e. optimal) solution is the result
    of many centuries of trial and error, in which, for example, Jews
    were expelled from Western Europe during the Middle Ages, and ended
    up mostly in the Polish-Lithuanian Republic where they promptly
    had a population explosion.

    It’s clear that at 2% the current level of the Jewish population
    in the U.S. is much too high. Younger Americans are way more
    counter-Semitic than their elders so processes are at work in
    the U.S, regarded as a self-equilibrating system, that will try to
    reduce the Jewish population to the E.U. levels. We can trust that
    social processes will work their magic automatically, just as they
    did in Europe, and the Jewish percentage will drop down to the
    optimum levels. Jews themselves have already noted that their
    Golden Age, reached presumably in the mid-1990s, is already over.

    • Replies: @PetrOldSack
  14. Romulus says:

    I can think of a few other choice adjectives to describe “Christian” Zionists besides “interesting.” These are people who not only sell out their own Christianity but their own kith and kin to please their masters. I think their US citizenship should be revoked, they should be conscripted and sent to Israel to serve as perpetual slaves to their betters. They should be ecstatic. In fact put them on the front lines fighting Hamas and Hezbollah. Maybe they can help bring about Armageddon and the Rapture that they’re so fond of and Jesus will come down from heaven and invite them all up to the big house. Yippee! At least then we citizens here would have a fighting chance when voting against Jewish supremacists and Quisling goyim Israel first politicians.

    • Agree: Twin Ruler
  15. @N. Joseph Potts

    J-F does not know, evidently, how to make comparative statements in proper English. It is rather embarrassing that someone so verbose refuses to learn simple things.

  16. Trinity says:

    Remember the bully in My Bodyguard, “Mike.” It took balls to rock a chrome dome in 1980. Lolol.

  17. Everyone forgets about the wars of religion, and what horrid atrocities the Protestants and Catholics carried out against each other. Mind you, when most, Christians in particular, think of people whom they hate and dread they usually think of the National Socialists of Germany and/or the Soviet Communists. Indeed, it is easy for Christians to feel morally superior to such Totalitarian movements, until of course said Christians look in the mirror, and consider their own horrid histories!

  18. The article is relevant.

  19. @Anon 2

    Poisoning the thread are you not?

    Or are you an insider to reliable data that none of us has. Quantified data that are reliable is what is seriously lacking here at unz. You must be sucking your thumb.

    • Replies: @Anon 2
  20. Anon 2 says:
    @PetrOldSack

    Here are some data,

    1. According to the Wikipedia article “History of the Jews in the U.S.” the Jewish share of the American population reached its peak of 3.61% in 1940, and has been declining ever since, down to the present value of ca. 2%. Still, that’s 10-20 times the Jewish levels in the E.U. countries. Based on the rapidly growing counter-Semitism in America, we can expect that share to start dropping fast closer to the Goldilocks percentages of 0.1-0.3 %. As we know, secular Jews (i.e. about 75%) have very low fertility levels:

    2. Jewish IQ is whatever you want it to be. It’s not a well-defined number since Jews are not a well-defined group. If you include many Orthodox and ultra-Orthodox Jews (whose IQs are in the 80s), you’ll get a low number. That’s why Israel as a whole is a low IQ state. If you include more Reformed or secular Jews, the numbers will be higher. Do we include hundreds of thousands of half- and quarter- Jews in the sample? The Jewish IQ is a meaningless concept, and there is nothing to indicate that Jews are particularly smart. In fact, there are boundless examples of Jewish stupidity, starting with the fact that they had 2000 years to build and defend a prosperous Jewish country of, say, 40-50 million people. Where is it?

    3. Protestant Zionism has no future. It reached its peak in the late 1980s with people like Pat Robertson, Billy Graham, Swaggart, etc. The big Rapture was supposed to happen in the fall of 1988. There were people ready to max out their credit cards they were so sure they would be taken up into heaven. I knew people like that. And what happened? Nothing. Biblical skepticism is much stronger today than in the 1980s. People today realize that there is not the slightest piece of empirical evidence that people like Abraham, Moses, Solomon or David ever existed. Despite enormous effort nobody has found any remnants of Solomon’s temple. So the Old Testament is at best a work of literature. However, the New Testament is based on a much stronger empirical foundation, and is more reliable.

    • Agree: HdC
  21. He or she may think, “I’m a free individual with ‘choice’”, but in fact, the possible ‘choices’ are fed into his/her mind through electronic signals.

    Right, which is why it is vital for the Dissident Right to keep alternative channels of communications open, like the Internet.

    But it isn’t enough to have more “channels” for passive viewing. A major difference between the Left and Right is that the Left translates its media into activism in the real world: protests, civil disobedience, lawfare. The Right? Not so much. One can listen to all the rightwing talk radio in the world, yet there is little in the way of actual movement building.

    The motto of Right media appears to be: “Consume content so you can consume more content.”
    The Left? “Consume content then take it to the streets, comrades!”

    As long as the Regime can keep conservatives in front of the “tube” they are warehoused and out of trouble.

    This is one reason that the Regime has down so hard on the Alt Right. Actions like Unite The Right ’17 had the potential for sweeping the nation as they were out in the streets (and parks!). Same is true with MAGA 6 January 2021. We also see movements such as the Euro farmers and anti-migrant (invader) protests in Ireland having some effect.

    As the saying goes:
    KILL
    YOUR
    TELEVISION
    !

  22. barr says:

    1 “But the salacious news and financial upheaval have appeared to overshadow that Axel Springer, named for its founder, had not only acquired Politico for $1 billion, but that the US government–focused publication would be expected “to adhere to the parent company’s principles, including support for Israel’s right to exist” (Ha’aretz, 10/17/21). Editorial staffers, however, “will not be required to sig
    n a written commitment to these principles, as employees in Germany must,” to keep their jobs.

    The pro-Israel press has been cheering on the rumored acquisition and the company’s commitment to Israel, quoting the company line that “anti-Israel” staffers should resign (Israel Hayom, 6/21/21; Jerusalem Post, 6/30/21; Tablet, 8/19/21). The media company has not pretended to maintain any semblance of objectivity in covering the Middle East; the Jewish Telegraphic Agency (8/31/21) noted that in the spring, “during the latest round of fighting between Israel and Hamas in Gaza, the company’s headquarters raised an Israeli flag as a show of support.”

    https://fair.org/home/politicos-staff-must-toe-new-owners-line-including-endorsing-israel/

    2 But Stephens, and The New York Times, did hide something else: Stephens has a glaring conflict of interest between his Israel-related commentary for the Times and his side gig, working for an organization“committed to the future of a U.S.-Israel relationship that safeguards the security of the Jewish State and connects future generations of Jews with our shared values.” That’s just one of the goals of the Maimonides Fund, a pro-Israel advocacy group where Stephens recently took up the role of editor-in-chief of Sapir, Maimonides’s “journal exploring the future of the American Jewish community and its intersection with cultural, social, and political issues.”

    Stephens’ opining on U.S. support for Israel seems to pose an undisclosed conflict of interest with his outside role at a group dedicated to promoting the “U.S.-Israel relationship.” It also comes fresh on the heels of Times columnist David Brooks drawing a second salary from The Aspen Institute, a role that was funded by Facebook. Brooks ultimately resignedfrom his second job after Buzzfeed reported on the potential conflict of interest.

    https://responsiblestatecraft.org/2021/05/17/nyt-fails-to-disclose-columnists-side-gig-at-pro-israel-advocacy-group/

  23. Che Guava says:
    @KnutHamsun

    Where is it, or was that just a joke? I don’t know about Manicheans in China, Nestorians were certainly there, at least until after the time of Marco Polo’s visit.

    Roman forts, too, in the west, basically to contain the same barbarians as also the Han Chinese.

    My one mainland Han Chinese friend of now had a gf just before coronamania, he seems to have detected from her accent that she was from Xinjiang, so dumped her.

    Odd thing, though, when explaining why he dumped her, he said ‘She is European’, she did not at all look European, definitely east Asian, so I guess that in some confusion of ancient graves that are certainly ethnically European and the Roman forts in the west of China, some younger Chinese like my friend have been taught that Turkic tribes are somehow European in origin.

    If not for her accent in speaking, he would never have doubted her ethnicity.

    He’s been with what he thinks to be a Han Chinese woman since late 2020, but really would have no idea if she was, for example, Manchu. I suppose she must have been born far enough away from the far north to avoid such suspicion.

  24. Che Guava says:
    @Twin Ruler

    More correctly it isn’t replacement at all, the correct term in theology is supercession. The new covenant supercedes the old.

    In the reverse view, it seems that many Jews have a pure hate mentality.

    • Replies: @Twin Ruler
  25. @Che Guava

    Jews are not the most forgiving people. They are actually quite vengeful. They cannot get over The Holocaust, and move on!

    • Agree: Che Guava
    • Replies: @Che Guava
  26. Che Guava says:

    I don’t think ‘Libertarian’ was ever a word before Anna Rosenbaum (little randy Ayny) invented it. Liberal, libertine, sure, those words existed, but ‘libertarian’ did not.

    I havedn’t read much of randy-Ayna’s writing, only Atlas Shrugged and a few very short articles.

    Her thoughts are rubbish, but if you look at Atlas Shrugged in a correct way, except for the 100-page plus radio lecture from John Galt, and the ending, much of it is fun.

    Dagney is a bodice-ripping character.

    It is steampunk. Has many good B-grade SF elements.

    Ayn Randy was enough of a bitch to depict other women of like kind accurately.

    Really, worth reading.

    Except for Galt’s speech.

    As a cynic and a stoic as well as a Catholic, the part after the speech, largely based in place on James Hilton’s Lost Horizon, is very ugly, one of my dreams is to write an equally ugly sequel.

    • Agree: M.Rostau
Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Jung-Freud Comments via RSS
PastClassics
The JFK Assassination and the 9/11 Attacks?
How a Young Syndicate Lawyer from Chicago Earned a Fortune Looting the Property of the Japanese-Americans, then Lived...