The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewJung-Freud Archive
What Biological Slavery Under Blacks Has in Common with Social Slavery Under Whites
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Contrary to the impression viewers have been getting lately from films like 12 YEARS A SLAVE(not without a certain degree of masochistic ‘white guilt’ self-righteousness), the lives of black slaves in the South were not uniformly bleak, cruel, and inhuman. While there were cruel and sadistic slave-owners, there were also many kindly and decent ones who took care of their slaves reasonably well. In this regard, the TV series ROOTS was closer to the truth. Some slaves lived under nice ‘enlightened’ masters while others lived under nasty masters. It was rather like the condition of dogs and cats. If a dog or cat’s master is real nice, the dog or cat might as well be in heaven. If the master is nasty, it’s hell for the poor creature. Of course, all slaves in the South had to work hard, but in this regard, their lives were no different from most white folks around the world, America included, who had to toil from sunup to sundown. Most American whites were not large plantation owners or rich folks. They spent their entire lives working on farms and in factories. The conditions of many whites could be harsher than that of black slaves. Black slaves worked no harder than most white farmers in Europe and were, in most respects, much better off than Russian serfs. And of course, black slaves in the South had it much better than most people in non-white nations, especially under the barbaric rule of non-white elites.

But man doesn’t live on bread alone. Even if a free white farmer and a black slave had to work equally hard and ate the same kind of food and lived under similar conditions, the white man had the advantage of full legal rights and all the psychological benefits that came with it. While the law in Southern states made provisions for the well-being and decent treatment of black slaves, it was nothing like being free and being legally protected under the system of democratic government. Also, no man wants to feel himself to be the property of another man, at least in a world defined by concepts of liberty and freedom. To be sure, in certain societies, some people didn’t mind being the properties of the king, noblemen, or the state since they were raised to think and feel that way from cradle to grave. In Japan, elements of the lower castes were willing to give their lives for their masters and preferred death in the name of honor and loyalty(to their masters) than be free of their obligations. (Obligations and servitude, even if often unjust and harsh, at the very least provided the servants or slaves with a sense of purpose and meaning. It’s like dogs would rather serve a master than roam around freely. There is an element of dog-psychology in all humans. Indeed, when slaves are suddenly freed by their master, they might feel anxiety than liberation for they knew their lot under slavery but don’t know their future under freedom. This explains why a large segment of Russians longed for the old Stalinist days after the fall of communism and the economic devastation of the 1990s. At least things were steady in the good ole bad ole days. And Germans were all too willing to give up their freedoms to Hitler in exchange for security and stability. And even black slaves in America, when offered the chance of freedom and return trip to Africa, declined. They’d rather live under white folks than be free as an African savage. At least under white folks, you knew where the next meal was coming from, whereas in Africa, you might have to hunt a hippo that turn around and might bite your black ass in two, or worse, some black tribe might capture you and have you for dinner, especially if you were an albino.) And the Janissaries(enslaved boys from Christian families trained to fight for the Sultan) in the Ottoman Empire were raised to believe in the honor of serving their Muslim lord. They took pride in their roles as warrior-slaves against Christendom, the very realm into which they’d been born.

Sure, mention or blame Biden but not the blacks who burn things down and the Jews who added fuel to the fire.

Even so, not all forms of slavery are the same. Some forms of slavery may take away your freedom and property but ‘spiritually’ make you feel empowered as a part of the collective. This was the appeal of communism. It took away individual property and freedom, but the people were made to feel as ‘comrades’ united in struggling for the common goal of creating a ‘better world’. In contrast, some forms of slavery are more nakedly honest, and perhaps the most extreme was Nazi slavery(of non-Germans) that made the slaves know that they were no better than cattle and would be treated as such. As Nazi ideology was rooted in biology than spirituality, Nazis didn’t care if non-Germans had souls or not. Germans were seen as the higher breed of pure wolves while certain other races were seen as inferiors breeds of dogs or mongrels.

The American South justified its slavery on loftier grounds, not least because the dominant cultural heritage even in the South was Christianity(even more so than democracy, which had been gained through independence from the British as the result of the efforts of mostly northern and mid-southern forces than deep southern ones; more key battles were fought in the north than in the south). Defenders of slavery argued that black Africans, being so wild and savage, needed to undergo a historical and cultural transformation so as to become worthy of living as free men alongside white folks. This line of argument believed that even though slavery would be wrong when applied to civilized white folks, it would do some good for Negroes who’d learn the virtues of hard work, discipline, order, organization, and obligations. (After all, before white folks gained freedom, they too had been civilized from brutality and barbarism through long yrs of iron discipline and servitude under kings and noblemen. In other words, there could be no short cut from barbarism or savagery to civilization. Spiritually, culturally, and perhaps even biologically, a people had to progress gradually from brutality — the world of black African savages — toward civilization where free men had rights. It took whites thousands of years to become civilized enough to be finally worthy of democracy and freedom, and so, it made no sense for blacks, the least civilized people in the world, to make a sudden jump from savagery to freedom. Ideally, they had to undergo the process of discipline, organization, thrift, and industriousness under the presumably benign guidance and management of white folks who’d made the arduous historical transformation earlier. So, if slavery was an evil when applied to civilized men, it could be a blessing, a helping hand, if applied to savages who had no concept of God and higher values. It’s like it’s wrong to treat an adult as a child, but it’s also wrong to treat a child as an adult. Of course, modern Americans scoff at views such as this when applied to Negroes, but the Liberal and even Conservative reluctance to pass proper judgment on bad black behavior suggests that there is a tendency to view Negroes as a bunch of children who simply cannot be judged like the rest of humanity. It’s like we shouldn’t expect Negroes to act like full-fledged adults since they are naturally ‘childlike’.) Thus, white Southerners rationalized black slavery as a kind of civilizing mission. The Negroes had to be fully tamed through the generations before they could rightfully claim equal freedom and full legal rights.

In any case, the Negro’s lot as a slave essentially depended on the moral character of his master. Was the master kindly and decent and did he take care of his slaves? Or was he mean and nasty and treat his slave like a dog and unduly call him ‘nigger’ too often? Of course, even the kindly master used cruel means to maintain order and discipline when Negroes rebelled or ran off. Even a kindly master may order a whipping to teach a lesson to the runaway slave, and other slaves would be made to watch the whipping as a lesson lest they too ‘get rabbit in their blood’. It’s like what the Strother Martin character says in COOL HAND LUKE. He can be a real good guy or a real mean son of a bitch. And of course, there were a whole bunch of masters who were neither too kindly or too mean but something in between.

Therefore, it’s difficult to defend slavery on the basis that some masters were indeed humane, relatively speaking. The fact remains that the slave’s condition depended on forces beyond his control and will. If a master was mean and nasty, he still had to work for that master. He couldn’t, like a free worker, just quit and go off to find another job. The slave was stuck in his place. Also, even if a master was nice and kindly, the slave had to always be mindful to be on his best behavior and act servile to ensure that the master will continue to treat him nice. So, when push came to shove, a slave under a good master was no freer than one under a bad one. So, at least from the moral perspective of our times, slavery cannot be defended on the basis that some masters were decent and good. At best, it can be argued that slavery in the Deep South was not uniformly the horror show that film-makers and others would like us to believe.

At the very least, we can all agree that the central fact of the SOCIALLY SANCTIONED SLAVERY in the American South was that the slave was at the mercy of the master. The master had to be good for the slave to lead a decent life since the slave lacked the freedom to make his own mind and decisions. And to that extent, American slavery was an unjust system — though much preferable to the kinds of slavery practiced by barbaric Asians, cruel Arabs, and savage black Africans, none of whom saw anything wrong with slavery(even of their own kind).

But the same kind of problem exists in the case of BIOLOGICAL SLAVERY. American Slavery in the South was a form of Social Slavery. White masters ruled over black slaves because whites were better armed, had the power of law on their side, and were better organized to maintain their form of power structure. Whites ruled over blacks not because they were tougher or naturally more dominant than blacks but because they’d created a mighty civilization that had given them a decisive advantage over the non-white parts of the world that lacked big ships, guns, factories, and the like.

Abolitionists demanded the ending of slavery on the religious/spiritual ground that all men of all races and colors were equally the children of God and imbued with souls equally dear to Him. Abolitionist, who were religious fanatics, didn’t care about biological factors or issues — and were even hostile to science. They thought in terms of God, God, and God, and they were certain that as long as all humans had souls equally loved by God, it was sinful for one group to enslave another group for whatever purpose or reason. Of course, not all Abolitionists were religious fanatics. Some came to support the Abolitionist Movement and sought to free the blacks, but they still believed in the inequality of races and wanted to keep blacks separate from whites. Abraham Lincoln was such a man. He wanted to free the slaves but also saw them as dangerous innate savages and wanted them shipped back to Africa or to relocated to some place in South America.

In the 20th century, many white liberals swallowed the notion that all races are the same except for skin color. The leftist Jewish takeover of anthropology had a deep impact on social thought. Also, WWII and the great crimes of Nazi radical racism cast a pall over the very notion of the science of races; the baby came to be thrown out with the bathwater. With the so-called ‘free world’ having defeated the oppressive systems of Fascism, Nazism, and Japanese militarism, Americans felt good about themselves as not only the proud defenders of but ardent crusaders for the land of freedom and equality. Also, the Cold War with Communism pressured the US to make social reforms, especially in the area of racial equality, so as to neutralize Soviet Union’s accusation of ‘racism’ as the defining characteristic of American capitalism/imperialism. For US to win over the hearts and minds of the Third World(the main battleground during the Cold War), it just wouldn’t do to have TV images of Bull Connors unleashing his dogs on Negroes beamed all over the world.

But as things turned out, the races were not equal, and the differences weren’t limited to skin color. In general, blacks are less intelligent than whites, though blacks have superior talents in certain mental areas, just as rhythmic patterns and making jazzy and funky music. Blacks also have more colorful ape-like charisma. Like a chimpanzee, blacks can talk and act in an amusingly brash manner that delights white folks to no end. It’s no wonder THE JEFFERSONS was one of the most popular shows of all time even though George Jefferson did little else but insult white folks by hollering at them like an intelligent ape. He was colorful. So was Eddie Murphy during his heyday. (In a way, whites have valued blacks as their darker id, the repressed animal nature that has no inhibitions about sex, aggression, dominance, and pleasure. So, white people sometimes let loose and try to dance like blacks, talk like blacks, gesticulate like blacks. The have sexual fantasies of having sex with blacks or even indulge in such acts. Jewish-controlled porn peddles such fantasies, and not surprisingly, much of porn since the late 90s involve black males and white females. It’s as if white girls want the singing voices of black females, as if white guys want the muscles and penises of black males, and as if white girls wanna be ravaged by the Negro stud. White boys wee in their pants in awe of feats by black athletes, and white girls cheer for black sports kings and put out to them after the games. They celebrate and suurender to BAMMAMA: Blacks Are More Muscular and More Aggressive.

Thus, part of the appeal of blackness is in the allure of animal amorality or even immorality. The natural black beast, like King Kong, breaks free of the shackles of civilization & its obligations and rampages around seeking total dominance for the sake of power and pleasure. It’s like the experiment in ALTERED STATES where William Hurt’s character reverts to a stronger and more aggressive form of early ape-man. It’s a gangster fantasy, which accounts for the popularity of the ‘gangsta’ image of so many black rappers, which white rappers try to ape with varying degrees of success. Thus, it’s rather ironic that so many white ‘progressives’ are upset with black attitudes against homosexuality.

On the one hand, white ‘progressives’ take delight in the wild and unruly aggressiveness of black masterfulness that ruffles the feathers of white society — white ‘progressives’ credit wild black energies for having liberated repressed and dull white people from their old priggish and prissy ‘Victorian’ and ‘Puritanical’ hangups — , but on the other hand, white ‘progressives’ — who are ideologically neo-puritanical in their bent — are so very distressed and perturbed by the fact that so much of wild black energies are of a hostile, nasty, and vicious nature, especially against certain groups favored by ‘progressives’, such as homosexuals. But, this is rather like celebrating the glorious wild energies of a tiger or grizzly bear but then getting upset over the fact that they don’t make for good table manners. ‘Progressives’ want black to run wild and free but not punch out nice Liberals like Matthew Yglesias. They admire and cheer on blacks for singing and shouting whatever’s on their minds — or lack of them — without inhibition, but if the words coming out of the mouths happen to be ‘faggot’ or ‘Jew motherfuc*er’, ‘progressives’ get awful upset, which is rather like setting a wild dog loose to run around in a kitchen but then getting all miffed because it ate all the caviar. This is further complicated by the fact that ‘progressives’ subscribe to the notion that there’s no such thing as a race, which means there can be no racial differences; if that is really the case, why do ‘progressives’ worship blacks for being better athletes, having more powerful voices, being better dances, being more colorful personalities, and having bouncier butts on the women and bigger penises on the men?

To confuse the matter even further, the appeal of black animality is intermixed with the notion of the Negro as the spiritual savior of white folks. This side of the myth would have us believe that blacks are so noble that they have no time or energy for sexual interests or violence. Even a mountain-sized Negro in GREEN MILE has no thoughts of vengeance, no thoughts of sex with white women — or any kind of women — , no desire to beat up white boys and fuc* them in the ass as so many powerful black males to do white men in America and South Africa. The ONLY thing the Noble Spiritual Magic Negro ever wants to do is to love and redeem mankind, and of course, MLK played this role to the hilt, though his closeted real nature was closer to King Kong, as his main passion away from the camera and microphone was to have endless orgies, drink like a fish, and cuss like Eddie Murphy. Western morality since the 1960s is utterly confused and unstable since its core myth tries to have the cake and eat it too, i.e. it would have us believe that the ‘Nigga’ as the amoral animalist fantasy of raw power and domination is compatible with the Magic Negro as the spiritual fantasy of higher truth and transcendence.) But when it comes to most areas of intelligence involving logical problem-solving, math, and reading, blacks have been proven to lag behind other races.

To be sure, there are cultural factors to this, but if blacks were naturally smart like Jews, they would show more interest in brainy matters as smart people generally gravitate to things that challenge their minds, just like fast and strong people naturally gravitate toward athletic or physical pursuits. No amount of cultural upbringing is going to turn a dumb black woman into an intellectually curious person. Even Michelle Obama, who had the advantage of being admitted to Princeton and Harvard Law School via ‘affirmative action’ never had a single original thought in her entire life. She’s just a bundle of politically correct and Afro-centric cliches picked up from patronizing professors who passed and recommended her on the basis of race.

But all said and done, the most crucial factor that underlies the racial relationship between whites and blacks is not intelligence but physical-and-emotional differences. While it’s true that dumb people achieve considerably less and end up as economic burdens on society, they are not necessarily destroyers of civilization nor much of a threat to the smarter members of society purely on the basis of their lower IQ. Suppose most blacks had low IQs and were physically like Emanuel Lewis, the little Negro child star of WEBSTER. While a bunch of them might fail in school and live on welfare(and be something of an economic burden), would they pose a threat to the white race? Of course not. There are plenty of dumb ‘white trash’ folks, but the problems they cause to the general population is nothing like the damage done by blacks.

So, what is the crucial difference between whites and blacks? It’s about time that the White Right stopped beating around the bush. White Right always complains that the media — controlled by Jews and Liberals and cowardly Conservatives — don’t properly report black-on-white crime, but the White Right itself is too wussy to deal with the true nature of such violence, namely that blacks are physically stronger and tougher than whites(by a considerable margin) and emotionally more aggressive. Blacks are also naturally more psychopathic, i.e. lacking in qualities such as empathy, self-criticism, reflectiveness, conscience, and shame. And I suspect in due time, with advances in genetic research, all these observable facts will be proven with hard data, which may be why the forces of political correctness are currently working extra-hard to expose whites to such a heavy dosages of ‘white guilt’ radiation so as to render them defenseless against political correctness even with the emergence of scientific data proves that many blacks are unfit to live alongside whites — or, more accurately, whites are physically unfit to live safely alongside stronger and nastier blacks. White people will still go on weeping over sanctimonious MLK speeches even when the hard facts of biology demonstrate that whites would be much better off living separate from blacks.

Anyway, the problem with social slavery was that even though some white slave owners were decent and kindly men, the indisputable fact was that blacks lived at the mercy of white power. Blacks had to hope and pray that whites who had power over them were good because if they weren’t, blacks could be treated harshly, and worse, there wasn’t much they could do about it.

A similar problem hangs over white people living under the system of BIOLOGICAL SLAVERY. In an integrated neighborhood, whites might be left alone or treated kindly by decent blacks who are kindly and conscientious, and of course, such blacks exist just as there were decent white slave owners. But there are also nasty and brutal blacks who are lacking in conscience and any sense of remorse. (Worse, the ‘white guilt’ narrative that predominates in America imbues even horrible blacks who commit the worst kinds of crimes with a sense of righteousness, i.e. their violence against whites was just payback for what the ‘cracker honkeys’ had done to blacks in the past; and of course, films like TWELVE YEARS A SLAVE will only harden such perspectives, not least among violent black thugs.) Since blacks are generally stronger than whites, nearly all whites in an integrated community are biological slaves of blacks. Though whites have legal rights that protect them from bullying, intimidation, hostilities, and crime, the fact is there is no way a white person can effectively rely on the law all the time for protection from Negro bad behavior. For one thing, the cops have better things to do than to be protecting whites from every case of intimidation and bullying from blacks as the integrated community could be reeling from rapes, shootings, robberies, murders, and other kinds of mayhem. Also, even when the police arrive, it’s often too late as the thug took off already after brutalizing the white victim.

All talk, no walk.

Also, many whites are afraid to call the cops for fear of reprisals. If the cops arrest a certain Negro for having attacked you, his family members and friends might come after you and your family in ways big and small. So, even though the law and the police do exist to ensure equal protection for all citizens, the fact remains that in an integrated community, blacks will biologically rule over whites because the power of the law only goes so far in our lives. In schools, white guys who are attacked by blacks will also be unlikely to report the abuse since (1) little will be done about it as the bullies aren’t legally adults and will only be slapped on the wrist (2) white guy will be seen as a ‘pussyboy faggot’ for not fighting his fight and instead relying on school authorities and (3) the black attacker doesn’t care if he’s suspended since such types don’t give a crap about studying anyhow and (4) the black attacker will hurt the white kid even worse for having told on him. (There is also the problem of ‘micro-aggressions’ against whites. A black guy might ‘play’ with the white boy like a toy. He will do everything within the law to belittle, taunt, and humiliate the ‘white boy’ without throwing the first punch. Thus, he hasn’t violated any law. If the ‘white boy’ walks away, he’s been pussy-whipped. If he talks back and escalates the situation or, in a fit of uncontrollable white rage, throws the first punch, the black guy will be justified in whupping the white boy’s ass. There are psychological means by which tougher guys can mess with weaker guys, as in the scene in SHANE where Jack Palance’s character legally manipulates the ‘sodbuster’ to dig his own grave. He is ‘owned’ by Palance’s character. The oft-heard term among young people today is ‘own’, and Oprah’s channel has the same name. In an integrated neighborhood, blacks OWN whites physically and psychologically. Physically, blacks can beat up whites. Psychologically, blacks can mess with whites without whites doing anything about it out of fear.

Also, blacks sexually own whites. If blacks have a thing for a certain white girl in school, they can make sure that white boys don’t go near her for if they do, they’ll get their asses kicked. And white girls often submit to such sexual ownership by blacks since women naturally want to be dominated and conquered by alpha males. The only chance for whites in such a situation is to study harder, make something of their lives, and move out of the neighborhood, but ‘affirmative action’ hampers the social progress of poor whites as it favors blacks and rich whites over poor whites; and even if they make it out of the troubled community, there are Section 8 programs to relocate lots of bad blacks to the very areas that whites fled to.) Of course, such white victims don’t have any defender in the Jew-run media that cackle with glee over black-on-white-gentile violence(Jews only care when blacks attack Jews) nor among white conservative elites who seem more eager to recruit more blacks to the GOP(as trophy Negroes that prove that Republicans aren’t ‘racist’) than to call attention to the problems of biological slavery suffered by so many whites who are stuck in integrated communities and OWNED by blacks.
Thus, under biological slavery, whites have a choice between decent black biological masters or nasty black biological masters. Either way, whites are under a form of slavery, a biological one at that, which is far worse than the social one, because, while social slavery can be ended by new legislation and social values, nothing will change the nature of biological slavery. It’s like no matter how many laws we pass and enforce, most sexual violence will be male on female since men are stronger than women. Thus, the sexual threat of violence is always male-on-female, and that makes women the biological slaves of men, and to this extent, feminists have a point. But what feminists overlook is that women have a natural attraction to the power of men. By their very nature, women want to be with strong men who can ‘own’ them emotionally and sexually, if not legally. This passion and desire make the unequal relationship between men and women not only tolerable but meaningful and blissful for both partners. Even if women want to be equal with men legally, they want to meet men who are stronger and more masterful. Even lesbians have an hierarchy of the alpha female and beta female. And this sexual attraction between unequal sexes is what ensures the survival of humanity. Without the unity of men and women, no race can survive.

In contrast, there is no need for one race to co-exist with another race to survive. Japan will be Japan even if not a single Negro sets foot on the island. Norway will continue to be Norway forever even if not a single Japanese or African sets foot on Norway. So, races don’t need one another. While all races have much to gain by learning from one another, trading with one another, and even mating with other races, no race needs to mix with other races in order to survive and thrive. And some races are bound to lose out if they mix with other races. Suppose we were to mix Russians with Vietnamese. Clearly, Russian men, being stronger and bigger, will win out over Vietnamese men. While Russian men will be taking lots of Vietnamese women, Vietnamese men will not only lose their own women to beefier and bigger Russian men but they won’t be getting much Russian poon either since Russian women will still prefer bigger and beefier Russian men to scrawny Vietnamese men. Of course, one could argue that Russians will lose out too. If a whole bunch of Russian men mix with Vietnamese women, their Russian-ness will become diluted in a genetic sea of yellowness.

Same goes for blacks and whites. Despite all the rosy and idealistic yammering of ‘thinkers’ on both the mainstream ‘left’ and mainstream ‘right’, the fact is racial integration between blacks and whites can only lead to the biological slavery of whites being OWNED by blacks. In schools all across the nation, the racial violence is overwhelmingly black on white. In prisons, black thugs rape white inmates in the ass. In sports, blacks dominate over white guys who are relegated to bench-warming status and to the humiliation of watching white blonde cheerleaders shaking their asses for black athletes who mostly clobber white guys. In streets, in buses, and other public places, blacks swagger around like they OWN the whole world while white boys are reduced into dickless wimps who are afraid of being knocked out by ‘teens’.

Sure, there are good, kindly, and decent blacks, but that means whites are at the mercy of blacks being nice to them. Since blacks are stronger than whites, blacks don’t have to worry about whether whites are nice to them or not. Even nasty white guys can easily be whupped by tougher blacks. So, blacks can rule over both nasty whites and nice whites, but whites, being weaker, cannot rule over blacks. Thus, whites have to hope and pray that blacks are nice than nasty. If a black guy is like Arthur Ashe, wonderful. But if he’s like Mike Tyson, it’s big doodoo.

Now, suppose whites were stronger than blacks, i.e. stronger than both nice Negroes like Ashe and nasty Negroes like Tyson. Whites need not worry since the nice Negro won’t mess with them and since, if the nasty Negro messes with them, they can whup his jigger-jiving ass.

But reality being what it is, whites are only okay with blacks when blacks are nice, whereas blacks are okay regardless of whether whites are nice or nasty. Nice whites won’t mess with Negroes and even nasty whites are too afraid of blacks to mess with them. Thus, blacks are the lions, the masters of the community, whereas whites are like the weaker hyenas who always have to be on the lookout for nasty lions. (Also, even nice Negroes will come to sexually own the white race since even nice Negro men will lust after white chicks no less than nasty Negroes; and since nice Negroes are tougher than white men, white women will go with nice Negroes. Whether white women go with nice Negroes or nasty Negroes, it’s a humiliating loss for white men. Similarly, regardless of whether Negresses slept white nice white masters or nasty white masters, it was a case of white social slavery owning and humiliating the pride of black males. Would it have been much of a consolation for black males in the Deep South during slavery if the nice white massuh than a nasty white massuh slept with their mother, wife, or daughter? Pathetically enough, a whole bunch of white guys welcome the union of nice Negroes and white girls. It’s as if they’re so afraid of the accusation of ‘racism’ that they wanna show “how far they’ve come in the goal of racial harmony”, though, of course, this “racial harmony” is premised on stronger Negroes making their moves on white territory and owning white females sexually and owning white males psychologically. Of course, some white guys hope that by offering or surrendering their white women to nice Negroes, the latter will protect the whites from nasty Negroes. And indeed, the psycho-politics as to why so many whites voted for Obama owes to such an psychology. White folks OWE and black folks OWN.)

During the age of social slavery, all whites has legal and institutional advantage over all blacks. Even a poor white knew he was a free man and legally on equal footing with rich whites. He also knew he could never be a slave. But even relatively well-off blacks who were given decent tasks by their rich and kindly white slave masters knew that their welfare depended on the kindness and mercy of decent whites. If they were to fall into the hands of nasty whites, their rights could be stripped overnight and they could be reduced to being ‘cotton picking Negroes’ again.

So, if one thinks about it, the dynamics between social slavery and biological slavery is pretty much the same. The slave side depends on the good will of the master side. As long as whites live next to lots of blacks, their well-being depends on the decency of blacks since nasty blacks can push them around and beat them up real good. Also, even nice Negroes will come to OWN white women and wussify white males as beta-male second-raters in the sexual marketplace.

Thus, the ONLY WAY for white people to be free at last, free at last, and free at last is to invoke the necessity of RACIAL RIGHTS, i.e. all races have a right to live in peace and safety for the sake of their own self-preservation and posterity. Since integration with blacks leads whites being biologically OWNED by blacks, whites are being reduced to the status of the slave race under stronger blacks(and more intelligent Jews). For whites to be free and to determine their own future and fate, they need to break free from this biological bondage.

Video Link

So much of PC idiocy is the product of a mono-moral narrative where one side was totally good and the other side was totally bad. That is the template of how the US sees race relations. Whites were totally bad, whereas non-whites, esp blacks, were totally good. It’s a cartoon vision of history, and it mortally wounds white moral pride since NO JUSTIFICATION has been offered for the Segregationists. Thus, they had no reason but PURE EVIL in having opposed Martin L. King and Civil Rights Marches.
So, all the rightness and justification during the Civil Rights Era are placed with blacks & allies and NONE with whites who opposed the movement.

Now, if blacks were just whites with dark skin, the anti-segregationists would have been right, more or less. Why deny full rights to a people solely based on skin color? But races do exist and racial differences are real and go beyond skin color. Whites southerners(and northerners too as it turned out) had good reasons to fear social equality with blacks since blacks are the superior race when it comes to physicality, aggression, thuggery, and etc. It’d be like integrating retrievers with pit bulls. Same species, but different races.

So, while the laws were legally unfair to blacks, getting rid of those laws would have been biologically unfair to whites. Blacks would act aggressively toward whites, and lots of whites would get hurt. White guys would lose male pride and see their women go with stronger Negroes. What humiliation, what shame. Interracism is ‘racism’ insofar as women go with men of another race on the premise that they are superior as men.

And even though white northerners mocked white southern ‘bigots’, the Liberals in NY an Chicago and Detroit and etc. all discovered the same truth. They too began to be terrorized by black thuggery and moved away from darkening areas. White flight was due to white fright of the stronger meaner more aggressive Negro.

So, a mono-moral narrative is bogus. We need a duo-moral narrative that tries to understand both sides. (We do such for Jews and Palestinians in the Middle East Conflict. We know Jews are oppressing Palestinians, but we also know that if angry Palestinians were given full equal rights, they will violently strike out at Jews whom they see as occupiers and imperialists. So, both sides have legitimate fears and rages. We don’t use mono-moral narrative on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.)
Now, the Civil Rights Movement was a compelling one for blacks. They had a right to be angry and demand justice. BUT, justice for blacks could only lead to all sorts of problems of whites who were likely to be treated like Jerry Quarry at the fists of Ali and Frazier. THAT side of history should be told as well. From a biological viewpoint, whites did have some compelling moral justifications for opposing racial integration and social equality.

And given what happened to NY and other cities due to rising black crime and thuggery, we’ve seen how White Liberals sneakily resorted to massive incarceration, gentrification, and stop and frisk to control blacks or push them out demographically. They talk of ‘racial justice’ but act in ways that increase haute-segregation for themselves. Notice how rich Lib cities just get whiter and more Jewish(and maybe more Asian).

Also, if Nixon used the Southern Strategy against Democrats in 68 and 72, Liberal elites used the Foreign Strategy. They used immigration to use yellows and browns as buffers between themselves and dangerous blacks. In other words, let yellows and browns get beat up by blacks instead. And by filling the Democratic Party with more immigrants, the party became more viable in the long run because a Black Party is bound to fall to ruin like Detroit. In contrast, a party where browns and yellows increasingly count more than blacks is viable for the white/Jewish/homo overlords of the Dem party. Foreign Strategy vs Southern Strategy.

Video Link

Hide 120 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. Chris Moore says: • Website

    The Satanic ((Jews)) did a horrible thing when they enticed Whites to buy Black slaves so they could make an easy 30 pieces of silver on the deal. If you think about it, this embryonic Judeofascism led to Nazi ideology, which led to what Zionists today call the “Holocaust.”.

    As Nazi ideology was rooted in biology than spirituality, Nazis didn’t care if non-Germans had souls or not. Germans were seen as the higher breed of pure wolves while certain other races were seen as inferiors breeds of dogs or mongrels.

    Nazis could see what the ((Jews)) were up to with slavery, how they were simply using masses of lower IQ peoples to profit and to take control the globe by shipping them to this place or that. They had to put an end to that when the ((Jews)) targeted Germany using ((Communism)). So they collaborated with the Zionists to get the ((Jews)) out of Germany. When the war turned against Germany, the ((Jews)) then stabbed the Nazis in the back, just as they’ve stabbed the rubes of the GOP in the back when their war on “Islamofascism” blew up in America’s face, just as they’ll stab the Dem rubes in the back as their war on “Ivan” Russia continues to unravel, and the U.S. with it.

    The rube world is smartening up, and can finally identify the ((Jews)) and their stooges as the Satanic menace they are and have been since Moses and Christ. Those two towering figures decided to do something about the ((Jews)) and their Synagogue of Satan, but the rube world has taken their sacrifices for granted.

    Order needs to be restored, and the ((Jews)), their stooges, and their Satanic overlord put in its place once and for all.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  2. Trinity says:

    Jack Johnson would have not beat a prime Jim Jeffries. Jeffries had been retired 5 years, had to lose 100 lbs, was 35 years old which back then was ancient for a fighter. Johnson was from Galveston, Texas, where he said he played with poor Whites and would receive snacks at their homes. While the treatment of Blacks in the South was not pleasant by any means, it was not nearly as brutal as portrayed. I have heard tales from reliable sources about Blacks raping White females as well as White males taking advantage of Black females, whether it was rape or consensual, I have no idea, but I am sure some were bullied into sex. My own ancestors, dirt poor, had Black playmates. This s REAL life not (((REEL ))) Jew lies.

    Staying with boxing, Tyson Fury, an Irishman is clearly the heavyweight champion and next in line is Ukrainian Oleksandr Usyk. Artur Beterbiev, a Russian, is the light heavyweight champ with record of 18-0, 18 knockouts. If boxing were still a top tier sport, Beterbiev should be as famous as Mike Tyson. MMA helped destroy boxing’s popularity but so did (((sports media.))) As soon as Whites started dominating in boxing ( mostly Eastern Europeans), boxing became a third tier sport like tennis or golf with companies like (((ESPN.))) Even ex champion, Timothy Bradley, a Black fighter acknowledged, ” there is something about that Russian dna.”

    • Agree: Pastit
  3. Trinity says:

    One needs to only look at Mary Phagin. A child, and a girl at that, exploited in a pencil factory in Georgia, subjected to working long hours for pennies. Mary was raped and murdered by (((Leo Frank))), a useless overpaid Jew with a title instead of a job. While the South wasn’t a Nose haven like the Northeast, there were still Jews there exploiting Blacks and poor Whites. And it happened not only in the large cities but small towns as well. I personally knew of a case in a small southwestern Georgia town where a Jew worked Blacks and poor Whites like dogs for peanuts in a lumber yard. South Georgia heat in the summer is brutal, that had to be tough work. The Heeb POS also owned a small store in this tiny town where the workers would buy their food and other needs. I can definitely see why those camps in Germany were REALLY WORK CAMPS. One would think Lefties would have no problem with lazy (((money grabbers))) having to actually WORK and/or produce something for a living.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
    , @anarchyst
  4. anarchyst says:

    You are absolutely correct.
    Jews are p!ssed off about being interned in German-run work camps as for the first time in their lives, (((they))) were forced to perform honest labor.
    Best regards,

  5. anarchyst says:
    @Chris Moore

    To this day, jewish texts have never abhorred slavery. In fact, slavery of gentiles is still condoned and even exalted in jewish circles. It’s all in their “holy book”, the talmud.

    • Replies: @RadicalCenter
  6. anarchyst says:

    One aspect of the exaltation of blacks that the author of this excellent article has not explored is the externalized altruism that is a part of White womens’ psyche.
    This nurturing altruism is necessary in the formation of families as long as it is internalized toward the family and not externalized. Massive, irreversible problems do arise when this altruism is externalized.
    A good example of this is when a black man approaches a White woman and after attempting to ask for a date states: “You won’t date me because I’m black”. This black predator often successfully plants a “guilt trip” on the White woman who succumbs to the “charms” (uggh!) of the black man, quite often with disastrous results–externalized altruism at its worst.
    The proper response for a White woman must be: “That’s right, I don’t date outside my race”.
    White women must be given the “talk” by both mothers and fathers. It must be emphasized that no matter how “nice” the black person seems, they are “different” and incompatible with White societal norms, there being always the probability that impregnation and abandonment will occur, the black man only showing up to get the welfare check from the white woman. You see, conquest and domination of whites is a black dream that does get realized with the domination that White women succumb to when giving in to blacks. It’s just not worth it.
    This “talk” must be reinforced from time-to-time and in later years toward adulthood, the possibility of family estrangement and abandonment if racial norms are not honored must be discussed.
    As White women achieve adulthood, many of them will see that racial awareness is for the best.

    • Agree: Trinity
    • Replies: @Curmudgeon
  7. Abolitionist, who were religious fanatics, didn’t care about biological factors or issues — and were even hostile to science.

    People who get their history from “inspiring” Hollywood movies, think that the law the Scopes Trial was about had to do with promoting Creationism. Actually, the law against teaching evolution in high schools was a “cunning plan” to subvert eugenics, which many Progressive states were writing into law.

    Tell me again about how “Christian Nationalism” will promote the survival of the White race.

    • Replies: @Vergissmeinnicht
  8. @Trinity

    ” there is something about that Russian dna.”

    Nah. It’s all about socio-economics. Boxers come from the lowest strata, where getting beaten up can seem like a lucrative way up and out. And like acting, it was seen as a utterly degrading profession. No one boasts of “my son, the boxer.” Once your group “makes it” in general, it become less attractive.

    In America, that meant the Irish (John L. Sullivan, the “fighting Irish” of Notre Dame, etc.), then the Italians (Graziano, Marinaro, De Motta, etc.). Segregation of course kept the bleks out, but after Joe Louis they began to dominate. After the end of the Warsaw Pact, and the social dominance of bleks (e.g Obama), (*) East Europeans began to take their place (like mail order brides, “models”, and drug gangs).

    Once Putin sets things right, you won’t see them in the ring any more.

    (*) “The Knights of Columbus were real head-breakers; true guineas. They took over their piece of the city. Twenty years after an Irishman couldn’t get a f***ing job, we had the presidency. May he rest in peace. That’s what the n*ggers don’t realize. If I got one thing against the black chappies, it’s this – no one gives it to you. You have to take it.” — The Departed

    • Replies: @Trinity
  9. Trinity says:

    There are plenty of Whites who try to dance like Blacks but MOST Whites don’t want to have sex with Blacks, especially White males. Those guys in the South having sex with Black females back in the day? Well the average YOUNG heterosexual male has an insatiable appetite for sex and will screw just about anything. I can’t tell you how many guys I have seen with attractive wives or girlfriends go out and have sex with women that are far less attractive than their wife or girlfriend. AND MOST of the NORMAL White women out there find sex with a Black guy repulsive. Even porn ACTRESSES DEMAND more money to do Black guys or anal sex. Lol. So much for the Black stud muffin.

    I saw a washed up (((Nina Hartley))) dancing in a club in Tampa one night. The clientele was nearly all White, but in strolls a small group of Blacks who saddle up to the stage. (((Hartley))) does her dance number, ( cue:
    Low Rider by WAR), the Blacks start heckling Hartley, asking her why she didn’t like Black guys, etc. ROTFL. Talk about poetic justice. Obviously these nigras were not familiar with (((Hartley’s))) career which included interracial sex with Blacks, anal, lesbian sex, etc. Needless to say, an obviously uncomfortable and embarrassed Nina completed her act but was obviously a little pissed off. hehe. I found it amusing.

    • Replies: @Truth
  10. Polistra says:

    Another Proud Black Man to get the anonymous author aroused.

    Missed opportunity: it was almost Naked George Floyd.

    Daily Mail: “Oh he’s just a nudist.”

    • LOL: Legba
    • Replies: @Sir Launcelot Canning
  11. SafeNow says:

    The author neglects to mention that blacks hunt in small packs. These packs are small (2 or 3), but that is sufficient to overcome a white victim who has lifted weights to become equally muscular, or even taken boxing lessons. Thus, the problem is not a biological slavery of lesser strength. It is the social custom of pack-hunting. Unless you are a recent county track champ at 400 meters, or are armed, you will be overpowered.

    While you are thinking about this, at least watch a few YouTube videos about how to “turtle-up”and practice so it becomes reflexive. (If you were a county track champ, this is not necessary.)

    • Replies: @anarchyst
    , @RadicalCenter
  12. anarchyst says:

    Blacks are a separate sub-human simian species which (unfortunately) has the ability to reproduce with fully human Whites and Asians…NOT a good thing.
    All one has to do is to observe normal black behavior which closely approximates simian behavior.
    Any “chimp-out” against a White or Asian is always a “group chimp-out” by blacks, never a one-on-one confrontation. Not only do they attack vulnerable Whites and Asians, they hoot and holler and jump around just like their simian relatives in the African wild. It turns out that majority black urban areas are no different than the African wild.
    Even in spats among their own kind, discussion and accommodation is not a part of the picture. Impulsive behavior, and the desire to use violence as the first response is always the norm among blacks. A recent black “chimp-out” on a cruise ship is but one more example of dysfunctional black behavior.
    There are no “good” blacks, and when the SHTF, primitive black tribal instincts will take over.
    Jane Goodall and Diane Fossey could have studied simian behavior in many of the urban areas in the USA instead of traveling to the African continent. Of course, they would have to be armed to defend themselves against the resident simians.

    • Replies: @Truth
  13. Trinity says:
    @James J. O'Meara

    Ali might have been one of the few successful fighters to have grown up in middle class or low middle class home. I think Gene Tunney might have had relatively comfortable upbringing, not sure. Roberto Duran was a street urchin, Dempsey rode the rails, lived the hobo lifestyle, often going days without eating. Tyson had an alcoholic mother who might have worked as a prostitute ( not sure) but from 13 on, Tyson lived in comfort in Upstate New York. I definitely think that hardship and poverty produces the best fighters not genetics.

    Bragging about your son being a world champion boxer?? Are you kidding me?? 98% of all fathers would be proud as hell IF their son were a world champion fighter, especially the world heavyweight champion.which USED to be the greatest title in sports.

  14. Trinity says:

    Oops, more boxers from comfortable environments. Gerry Cooney, Ray Mancini, Bobby Czyz, Sean O’ Grady.

    Mildly successful, Henry Milligan went to Princeton while Czyz and O’Grady briefly went to medical school. Czyz was a member of Mensa. Roland LaStarza was a college boy. Just some of the outliers in boxing who don’t fit the stereotype.

  15. I think it’s no coincidence every¹ “World’s Strongest Man” champion has been a White guy!’s_Strongest_Man

    1. Correct me if I’m mistaken.

    • Replies: @lloyd
  16. @James J. O'Meara

    In the 1927 decision for Buck v. Bell, Butler was the only Justice who dissented from the 8–1 ruling and Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.’s opinion holding that the forced sterilization of an allegedly “feeble-minded” woman in Virginia was constitutional. Holmes believed that Butler’s religion influenced his thinking in Buck, remarking that “Butler knows this is good law, I wonder whether he will have the courage to vote with us in spite of his religion.”

    P.S.: Justice Butler was Irish Catholic.


  17. Dimitrie says:

    The biological factor is negligible or nonexistent:
    – blacks are apparently better in running;
    – whites are better in powerlifting and team sports
    – in combined running and dexterity (like tennis) blacks are almost nil
    – in combat sport I see an advantage to whites (box+martial arts+ mma + greco roman wrestling

    So no discernible biological advantage for blacks, quite the contrary.

    Besides, hippos and bears are more powerful than men. I don’t see any society where men are constantly frightened by these animals 😀

    In arabic countries were black slavery has a history of 3000 or 4000 years and people are clearly weaker and frail than blacks nothing like this white madness happened. We can wonder why.

    The problem I see is spiritual and ideological. Spiritual because whites (many of them) lost any view that we are image of God. That is directly linked with loose of self esteem and self destructori comportament. Disunity and lack of colectiv and often individual courage.

    Ideological because instead of faith and Tradition we have an ersatz of ides like : darwinism, freudism, psihologism economism etc which concentrated on the material part of life only. In such mental environment no wonder that the most grosolan aspects prevail and “biological” is seen as source of authority and power.

    • Agree: Legba
  18. @anarchyst

    The proper response for a White woman must be: “That’s right, I don’t date outside my race”.

    Why should that be the “proper” response? If she refused to go out with a White man not of her “blood” e.g. German or Italian, her response would likely be: “No, it’s because I don’t like you”. Why should it be any different for a Knee-grow?
    I get where you are coming from, but “I don’t like you” can also be I don’t like Italians, Catholics, Blacks, or Jews.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  19. One thing missing from this article, is that it wasn’t only Blacks who were enslaved, and Blacks were also slave owners – sometimes White slaves. The British Isles were a massive source for slaves until the Revolution. Yes, some were indentured servants, but even there, many of those failed to have the indenture lifted. White slaves were treated no better than Black slaves by their owners.

  20. Jung-Freud, you are out of your mind–it’s only the inferior white or Asian woman who cavorts with the buck, and this idea that alphaness is determined by physical strength alone is preposterous. Just think what it must have been like for an affirmative action buck like Obama to be a law student at Harvard–the inferiority of it all! The reality is, Negro bucks NEED affirmative action, something that is anti-alpha. White males still rule this country, big boy.

  21. lloyd says: • Website

    Yung-Freud despite correction by commentators keeps ranting on that blacks are stronger than whites. Except for school where they are stronger because they physically mature quicker, they are not. In weight lifting except for a few mixed race, they simply don’t exist. In jobs requiring intense strength and stamina, they would not exist except for affirmative action. Boxing smashes body tissue which is why they often excel there with their attributes of flair and speed.

    • Replies: @Che Guava
  22. despite correction by commentators keeps ranting on that blacks are stronger than whites

    Look, the strongest men in the world might be European or some Iranian(the guy who won olympics in weight-lifting).

    But generally speaking, blacks are more muscular than whites. There is no question. Your average black guy in an integrated school is tougher than white guys. Faster, stronger, and meaner.

    Why did white flight happen? Whites were afraid of black criminals, thugs, and bullies.

    Another thing. Mere size and strength don’t decide who wins a fight. Ali fought plenty of men, white and black, who were bigger and stronger. He beat them. Same with Sugar Ray Leonard.
    How come a tiger can kill a bear twice its size? Because cats are built to be more agile, faster, and coordinated. How come a lion can bring down a buffalo three times its size?
    Blacks are more fluid in their movement, whereas whites are stiffer. Blacks are more multi-motional, probably due to evading strikes from baboons, hyenas, and hippos in Africa.

    Pride can be good but it can also be bad. White male pride couldn’t swallow the fact that it got its ass handed to them by blacks and came up all sorts of excuses. Or it pretended that black athletes are All-American and patriotic, so it doesn’t matter who wins because ‘we are all Americans’.

    It’s just denial, and denial of reality will leads to destruction.

    • LOL: Truth
    • Troll: Pastit
  23. Trinity says:

    Jerry Quarry beat Black contenders Thad Spencer, Mac Foster, Ron Lyle, Floyd Patterson, Buster Mathis and knocked out Earnie Shavers in one round. Quarry gave away size. Only 6′ and about 194-198 in his prime. Quarry fought when there was no cruiserweight division so he did quite well considering he often gave up height, weight and reach.

    White Joe Bugner went the distance with Ali twice and Frazier once. A big man at 6’4″ about 225 in shape, Bugner was a true heavyweight. Really did not like the fight game, had he taken it more seriously he very well had the style to beat Foreman.

    Italian Oscar Bonavena who fought out of Argentina gave Frazier hell in 2 fights, a lot of people think Bonavena beat Frazier in their first fight, Frazier was decked twice. Oscar also gave Ali a rough go until Ali stopped him in the 15th round.

    • Replies: @Priss Factor
  24. black Africans, being so wild and savage, needed to undergo a historical and cultural transformation so as to become worthy of living as free men alongside white folks

    Will someone please let me know when this actually occurs?

    • Replies: @Anon
  25. Unit472 says:

    One of the problems in generalizing about how things were or came to be as they are is we can’t experience how life was. A white farmer and a black slave circa 1800 lived extraordinarily physical lives. Physical toil tended to shut down during winter but the white farmer, being intellectually superior. could and had to plan for the rest of the year. Written accounts of life as it was were penned primarily by the few with the time and wealth to observe and write about the life as they observed it. There are relics of times gone by though. It is here we can see what work was being done and by whom.

    A stone chimney for an 18th century farmhouse was a back breaking undertaking and required a decent amount of know how to build. A farmer couldn’t just set aside a month or two to build it even if he had a slave and a horse. Plowing and planting came first. Difficult for me to believe a white man would be less muscular than a negro when turning trees into lumber and stone into walls was why white houses from those times still exist but not a single negro structure does.

    Something similar could explain the sexual dynamic we see today. Like a nice house its in large part a function of time preference. A female’s sexual value declines rapidly with age so having the prettiest girl in high school can have a high cost but the male who owns a nice house can still find a pretty woman and avoid a lot of chaos in their life or the expense of a divorce if they wait. So too a negro hoodrat may seem stylish and flashy but his shelf life tends to be even shorter than a silly teenage female. He may well still have a teenage income at 25 which he can only supplement through armed robberies or extremely dangerous drug trafficking. I was always puzzled by ”Epstein” types who wanted teenage girls over an attractive woman and many is the cute white girl who came to regret, if she survived, her involvement with a young negro. If she had a niglet she is stained forever as far as I am concerned and I will not leave her a penny in my will.

  26. @Trinity

    Jerry Quarry beat Black contenders Thad Spencer, Mac Foster, Ron Lyle, Floyd Patterson, Buster Mathis and knocked out Earnie Shavers in one round.

    Quarry was a tough Irishman and a genuine top contender. But he was totally outgunned by the best, Ali and Frazier. It wasn’t even close. And he got clobbered by Norton.

    White Joe Bugner went the distance with Ali twice and Frazier once.

    Big tough Hungarian. He could go the distance but couldn’t beat the best.

    Oscar also gave Ali a rough go until Ali stopped him in the 15th round.

    Tough Argentinian but hardly any technique. With Ali, it was like matador vs the bull. The bull almost always loses. Essentially a mass of muscle, like Chuvalo of Canada.

    Anyway, keep in mind blacks were the minority in the US but came to dominate sports. They are smaller minority in Europe but have taken over lots of sports.

    As a collective, blacks lose to just about anybody. Imagine any African army vs any white European army or Asian army. Even runty Japanese army will crush any African army. But one-on-one, blacks beat everyone, and this is why sports are so effective as tool of Jewish globalism and anti-nationalism. Blacks win in sports and become admired as idols around the world. Some nations invite blacks to play for them, and blacks become their national heroes. It’s happened to Japan, and that country is going down. Mark my words. Blacks hump Japanese men and these mulatto kids take over Japanese sports, and jungaru feebah spreads and Japanese men, already cucked by defeat in WWII, become totally defeated, not only by White America but Black Planet. Dumb Japanese.

    Blacks vs Browns in minority politics makes for interesting contrasts. As a collective blacks just ruin cities. Browns, on the other hand, are somewhat capable. They do make good workers in low-tier fields and some do maintain decent communities. But blacks matter as individuals in sports and rap, whereas browns amount to nothing as individuals… except as butt of jokes, like Guillermo on Jimmy Kimmel. I wonder how that will play out. White America doesn’t care about brown victims of blacks but made a big deal about the skittle kid killed by George Zimmermanez.

  27. Unit472 says:
    @Priss Factor

    A 400lbs Tiger isn’t going to kill a Grizzly. They are just too big and strong and have huge claws. Boxing is however a sport with rules. Even a savage like Deonte Wilder had to obey them and the big rule is never, ever let a man the size of Tyson Fury unleash a full thrown right hand into your temple. Wilder boasted how he wanted to actually KILL an opponent. Only his thick bony skull saved him from dying in the ring against Fury because his head was not a vital organ.

    • Replies: @Priss Factor
  28. anarchyst says:

    I have dealt with blacks all of my life and know what they are like. Reason and logical thinking is not a part of the black psyche.
    Framing a white woman’s response in racial terms is the “proper response” because any other answer will just enrage the black and encourage him to attempt to further pursue the white woman and to still attempt to get a “date” regardless of the white woman’s non-racial response. Blacks do not like to take “NO” for an answer. By injecting race into the conversation, the black man is put on notice to “back off”.
    Making it a racial issue is the only way to get the black to “back off”.

    • Agree: anonymouseperson
    • Replies: @Curmudgeon
  29. Dimitrie says:
    @Priss Factor

    “How come a tiger can kill a bear twice its size?” surprisingly but is viceversa: almost always bears kills big cats in a fight.

    in boxing: there are more whites winning against blacks

    “Why did white flight happen?” simply because whites made up easier on social ladder and preferred a better environment. Blacks tried this to but they couldn’t climbed.

    Somewhere are some holes in premises

  30. Trinity says:
    @Priss Factor

    Quarry couldn’t get past Frazier or Ali, but he sure beat a lot of good heavyweights in the golden era of heavyweight boxing. Had Quarry fought in the Marciano era I can see Jerry besting an old Joe Louis, Walcott and Charles, LaStarza, Moore, and the other guys that Rocky beat.

    The fight with Norton can be discounted. Norton was supposed to fight Bonavena, but Oscar pulled out, Quarry only trained two weeks and weighed a flabby 209lbs. Quarry was past it, had troubles with alcohol and drugs while on tour with rock group Three Dog Night, and still he had a few occasions where he rocked the in shape 6’3″ 217lb Norton. Prime Quarry beats Norton.

  31. Polistra says:
    @Priss Factor

    Dumb Japanese.

    So you say, but they’ve been remarkably effective at keeping the third-world hordes out of their country, which is a whole lot more than you can say for European and European-descended nations such as ours.

    What’s more, they built an advanced, high-tech society which is notable for its high standard of living and even more importantly, its remarkable civility and public safety. Women and children can walk alone in any Japanese city, at any time of day or night, completely without fear.

    But yes, ((western propaganda)) is doing damage there as it does everywhere else it’s permitted. It should be forbidden.

    • Agree: Pop Warner
    • Replies: @Priss Factor
  32. “Stranger Things Actor Blames RACISM For Only 15 Million Followers”

  33. @Unit472

    A 400lbs Tiger isn’t going to kill a Grizzly.

    A 400 lb tiger can easily kill a 400 lb grizzly or brown bear.

    A bear has to be at least twice as the tiger to be competitive. A big powerful bear can kill a tiger, but pound for pound, the cat is the supreme hunter/killer. Only reason why dogs beat cats is cuz they’re much bigger. A dog and a cat that weigh the same won’t be competitive. Cat will kill the dog in less than a minute.

    I read a book on bears by someone who studied the beasts in Siberia. He noticed that whole bunch of bears were killed and eaten by a tiger that weighed half that of the bears.

    • Replies: @Pastit
  34. @Polistra

    So you say, but they’ve been remarkably effective at keeping the third-world hordes out of their country, which is a whole lot more than you can say for European and European-descended nations such as ours.

    Japan, like SK and Tai-cuck-wan, isn’t having kids. And the current globalist regime is pushing for mass immigration, and over the yrs, Japan has been darkening. It’s noticeable in the streets. Also, Japanese people are now constantly influenced by worldwide internet and became more globalized. Japanese women who have black babies are lionized by Japanese corporations that imitate the West. It’s like Polish and German advertising are full of black faces. And Japanese are being admonished for their ‘racism’. Japan will fall first because Japanese are an especially perverted people. What is Japanese culture today? It used to be rich and complex, but now it’s anime and porn(and anime porn). And video games maybe. And because Japanese are so porny, they are far more tolerant and celebratory of kink and weird stuff, and jungaru feebah is now big in Japan, and it’s pushed by big media. You don’t need a lot of blacks in Japan to change the culture. As Japanese are short, runty, and weak, even a few blacks in Japan can beat all the Japanese and take over sports. And then, Japanese elites will use media and academia to convince Japanese people that they must celebrate and honor the brakuzu because Japanese elites look to the West for fashions on what is hot and what is not. As cuck West worships blacks, Japanese follow suit. SK and Taicuckland do too, but Japan is a totally perverted porny society and that factor will make it more accepting of jungle stuff. Yoko-Ono-ism has taken over Japanese culture.

    Japan used to produce men like Kurosawa and Mishima(who was nuts but truly patriotic). Now it produces total garbage in culture and people.

    • Troll: Pop Warner
  35. AceDeuce says:

    Niggbo Johnson, then in his early 20s, got his ass beat but good in 1901 by White boxer Joe Choynski, who was ten years Johnson’s senior. He knocked Johnson’s ass out in the third round.

    Choynski later befriended Johnson, and, seeing that he had good potential, trained him. Johnson himself credited Choynski for his later success.

    OT: This Jung Freud person has got to be the same person who used to post as some Russian with a female name–Andrea Maria Ostrovia or something–in fact, there were a couple names like that.

    Has to be.

    • Replies: @Trinity
    , @James Forrestal
  36. Trinity says:

    Joe Choynski was a great fighter but he was a Jew, not White. Johnson feasted on smaller fighters. Can you imagine Tyson Fury taking on a 5’9″ 165lb Stanley Ketchel or a 5’7 1/2″ 170-180lb Sam Langford??? Johnson beat 5’7 1/2″ 180lb Tommy Burns for the title.

    • Replies: @Meretricious
  37. @Trinity

    Ashkenazi Jews have >50% European DNA, Einstein

    • Replies: @Trinity
  38. The title reads, “What Biological Slavery Under Blacks Has in Common with Social Slavery Under Whites”.
    This is a peculiar use of the word “under”. I wonder whether the author of this headline (“Jung-Freud”) is more at home in German than in English. In German, “unter” means both “under” and “among”.

  39. @Priss Factor

    Turn off your TV. Quit watching the interracial cuck porn you seem to enjoy so much.

    Blacks tougher?

    Not hardly. Look up some pictures of the military spec op units. A few blacks, but overwhelmingly white. Even straight infantry is overwhelmingly white.

    Look up the participants of Iron Man competitions, overwhelmingly white.

    Has the average black been exposed to more violence than the average white? Yes, probably.

    How come a tiger can kill a bear twice its size?

    A 400 lb tiger can easily kill a 400 lb grizzly or brown bear.

    Which is it? Same size or twice it’s size?

    That 400lb grizzly is either a female or a young male. And in any fight between two prime males, if the tiger does not get a kill with it’s first ambush attack, the bear wins. The bear will have better stamina, longer reach, and a greater bite force. Strikes from the bear will break bones. Meaning the tiger will lose it’s momentary speed advantage. Strikes from the tiger will have to defeat the bear’s fur and fat layer.

  40. Trinity says:

    Blacks are more like hyenas than Whites. I will be the first to admit that some of what the author says about Whites is TRUE. But Blacks behave like hyenas. The hyena will attack a lone or injured lioness in packs. The hyena steals food and is an opportunist.

    White cowardice and fear of Blacks? MOST Whites do fear Blacks and most physical fights involving even one on one contests involving Black vs. a non Eastern European White favor the Black. It isn’t as much physical superiority as it is psychological. Whites are taught to fear Blacks, Whites fear legal trouble from fighting, Whites have jobs, families, Whites are taught to walk away, etc. Blacks also grow up fighting,
    Whites grow up where street fights happen but they are rare.

    A few years back a beach full of White males did nothing as 3 Black males gang raped a female in broad daylight on a Panama City, Florida beach. No mention of the race of the victim??

    • LOL: Meretricious
  41. Anonymous[374] • Disclaimer says:
    @Priss Factor

    one-on-one, blacks beat everyone

    On what planet?

    Jews (for example) dominated sports like basketball in NYC when they first arrived as immigrants. Then they used the city’s free libraries, schools, and colleges. They realized they could succeed more by using their minds than bodies.

    On the other hand, after 403 years…holding the collected wisdom of the world on their iPhones…Niggards still choose to vomit out hip-hop than ingest History.

    Jungaru feebah

    Bwahahahahahaha! Good one. Nice term.

    Nips aren’t stupid. They let Nig atholetes play, but not stay. They know good salads are not made in blenders.

    • Replies: @Trinity
    , @Priss Factor
  42. @Priss Factor

    Japan is a country with a population of 126,000,000. The number of foreigners in Japan is less than 3,000,000. The number of blacks is probably less than 15,000.

    Blacks taking over sports? Less than 10% of Major League Baseball is black. Black hockey players make up less than 5% of the players.

    • Replies: @Priss Factor
  43. Trinity says:

    I don’t consider Khazars aka Ashkenazi “Jews” “white” nor Arabs, Turks, Armenians, etc. They are Caucasian, because there are only 3 races. But they are ” white” in complexion only, or olive skinned, hell, some East Indians are darker than Blacks.

    So what you are telling me is Ashkenazi Jews are MUTTS. No argument there, I have been saying that for years.

  44. Che Guava says:

    Jung-Freud = Priss Factor.

    Until a few months (or weeks) ago, if one clicked on ‘website’, it was under a woman’s name.

    It is the same for the same person on other sites where she or he posts (usually under a woman’s name).

    Perhaps it is a collective organism.

    • Thanks: Pop Warner
  45. Che Guava says:
    @Priss Factor

    If Mishima had truly been patriotic, please explain why he, by his own account, faked TB symptoms at his medical examination for the draft, thus avoiding any actual military service?

    I am quite sure that his shame at that influenced his actions over twenty years later, but those actions were a mix of homosexuality and theatricality that eventually came to suit many in the ruling party, and not, at root, patriotic as such.

    • Replies: @Priss Factor
  46. Trinity says:

    With all due respect to outliers like Mike Spitz, Hank Greenberg, Barney Ross, Benny Leonard, Dave Rigert, Sammy Koufax, Ike Berger, etc., I can’t imagine Jews dominated any sport, much less a sport like basketball. ROTFLMMFWAO.

    On a side note, Max Baer was more German than Jew. His trainer, Ray Arcel, a Jew quipped, “I’ve seen him in the shower and he ain’t Jewish.” Now why Arcel was a pecker checker is another story.

    • Replies: @Trinity
  47. Trinity says:

    Oops, that is Mark Spitz not Mike Spitz, sorry Mark but 1972 and that iconic poster has been a half a century ago.

  48. Nancy Pelosi Slammed For Racist Comments About Cotton Pickin’ Migrants

  49. @Anonymous

    On what planet?

    On this planet. Blacks are still a minority all across Europe but are prominent in many sports. Look at French soccer, UK boxing.

    White pride can admit Germans can beat Mexicans and Japanese but can’t admit blacks can beat whites.

    Look at most school fights or street confrontations, and blacks beat whites.

    This is Occam’s Razor stuff. It’s funny how white right dissidents blast the ‘woke’ and PC crowd for denying race and racial differences but can’t admit that blacks can turn white manhood into mush. To save white manhood, there needs to be separation. Without white manhood, there’s only cuckery and ACOWW, and that’s a fact, especially as Jews control academia and media and are spreading Jungle Fever all over the place.

    Jews (for example) dominated sports like basketball in NYC when they first arrived as immigrants.

    Jews took to basketball more than other ethnic groups and did quite good at it, but it was a time where blacks were still discriminated in many sports. Also, even though Jews were good against other whites, they generally lost to blacks.

    When they used the city’s free libraries, schools, and colleges. They realized they could succeed more by using their minds than bodies.

    Average Ashkenazi IQ is 115, which means not all Jews are cut out for brainy stuff. Also, if a Jewish kid had a choice between becoming an accountant making decent salary and a NFL or NBA star raking in tens of millions and being adored by fans, what would he choose?

    • Replies: @Trinity
  50. @Che Guava

    If Mishima had truly been patriotic, please explain why he, by his own account, faked TB symptoms at his medical examination for the draft, thus avoiding any actual military service?

    He knew it was a lost cause.

    Also, he changed over time. Post-War Japan and its total prostitution to the US and the rise of idiot Japanese Left turned Mishima to the ‘far right’.

    Before Japanese defeat, he was patriotic and afraid. At any rate, there was no lack of patriotism in a country still committed to the Emperor and war. Mishima’s patriotism was hardly anything special.

    After Japanese defeat, however, patriotism meant something. In a way, the rapid recovery and materialism made things worse, as far as Mishima was concerned. It’s one thing to lose a war and know you’re defeated and ruled by Americans. At least, you know who your enemy is and that you live in shame. Palestinians know this. They know they are oppressed by Jews.
    But as Japan became prosperous as whore of US, Japanese turned amnesiac and pretended WWII didn’t happen and turned to hedonism and status and materialism as the meaning of life.
    In this climate, patriotism meant something. It was no longer dime-a-dozen, like during the war. True patriotism was an oddity, and Mishima took up the flag.

    But he was a funny-headed homo and made a mess of things.

    Who’s the biggest Japanese writer promoted by the Jewish West since the 90s? The soulless and anti-nationalist globalist idiot Haruki Murakami.

    • Thanks: Happy Tapir
    • Replies: @Che Guava
  51. @anarchyst

    I dealt with Blacks, Arabs, Pakistanis, and East Indians. All of them, to a greater or lesser degree won’t “back off” when hitting on White women. Injecting race only gives them an excuse to pester in a different way. Shooting them would be ideal, but, unfortunately illegal.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
    , @Priss Factor
  52. The only way this scenario plays out as described is if whites allow it. That can only happen if they believe it is moral or at least highly expedient to do so. This is the purpose of all of the cultural demoralization and lies society is subjected to by those currently holding the megaphones. It will not hold; believing horseshit instead of your own eyes is a luxury that will be – and is being – quickly abandoned as the dire and insufferable cost becomes obvious to ever increasing numbers.

  53. Trinity says:
    @Priss Factor

    Name outstanding Jewish basketball players??
    I honestly can’t think of any but admittedly I don’t know much about basketball.

  54. @Trinity

    Google it–there are a bunch. Jews were incredible B ball players back in the day

    • LOL: Trinity
    • Replies: @Trinity
  55. Che Guava says:
    @Priss Factor

    Thx. Priss, it is a very good reply, many good points.

    However, at the time he faked TB, to avoid service, the wars (in Japan, there is a clear separation of great east Asian, and Pacific) were not clearly a lost cause. At that time, he could not have expected that.

    Murakami had his high points, not least in, not fiction, but writing about the Aum Shinrikyou gas attacks in Tokyo. The English translation is poor. The original is better.

    Abe Kobo was the first inspiration for Murakami, read and see. Abe Kobo is almost forgotten in western countries and among young Japanese now, then again, the latter don’t even recall Murakami.

    For his writing, Mishima sure deserved the Nobel in Lit., and expected to receive it, I think not having received it was part of his final self-decision, but only a relatively minor factor.

    • Thanks: Happy Tapir
    • Replies: @Priss Factor
  56. Trinity says:

    I googled best Jewish basketball players.


    You got to be kidding me. SMDH

  57. @Trinity

    This was an interesting documentary on race and sports.

    But once again, the problem was the debate was limited to sports. It doesn’t discuss its implications on reality, which is far more important. In reality, the fact of BAMMAMA leads to black kids beating up white kids, white boys losing manhood and turning cucks to ACOWW.

    Still, Brokaw touched on a controversial subject.

    In the docu, there is discussion of how Jews used to be dominant in White Basketball long ago.
    And in my highschool full of Jewish kids, I noticed plenty of Jews were crazy about basketball as players and spectator sports. Jews really do love it. Maybe it’s because it’s the most conman-ish of sports. It’s all about feints and fooling the opponent as to your movement. Feint left, move right, feint right, move left. It’s also a sports that requires a high degree of individuality and team work, and Jews are about strong individuality within tribal team network.

  58. @Che Guava

    Abe was a first-rate writer, comparable to Kafka, his inspiration.

    Murakami is a gutless globalist who writes about listening to pop music while drinking soda pop.
    It’s literary origami.

    • Replies: @Che Guava
  59. @Trinity

    Name outstanding Jewish basketball players??

    Peter Falk. At 14:03

    Robbie Benson

    The most unlikely black basketball star:

    • LOL: Trinity
    • Replies: @AceDeuce
  60. Che Guava says:
    @Priss Factor

    When Makimura or Muramaki was copying that part of Abe’s writing that may be called ‘hard-boiled’, it wasn’t all bad. I liked it at times.

    However, it was a long time ago now.

  61. anarchyst says:

    Actually injecting “race” into such situations does work much better than just about any other “excuse”.
    Ever call a black “racist”?
    I have. It defuses the situation almost immediately as blacks are not used to being called out as “racist”, especially by whites.
    I utilize the services of a major medical center for my health conditions as they provide the best medical care for my situation.
    As I live a considerable distance from the medical center, I am careful to allow for traffic conditions and generally arrive at the center with time to spare. I consider punctuality to be important and am never late for appointments.
    Arriving early for my appointment, the black security guard gave me the third-degree asking me multiple times about where my appointment location was.
    I was told that I could not enter the facility at that time and would have to wait in a waiting area full of junk which appeared to be a storage room or outside in sub-freezing weather.
    The security guard was a black female.
    While I was waiting, I observed this same security guard allow a number of blacks to enter the facility without questioning them at all about their destination.
    This infuriated me, so I went up to the security guard and accused her of racism. It is obvious that she had never been called “racist” before” and demanded that I wait outside. She called her supervisor, who was a black retired police officer. To his credit, he was cordial and professional and after hearing my explanation did allow me to go to my appointment location.
    Someone must have gotten the message. Currently, when I arrive for my scheduled appointments, I am always allowed to proceed to my appointment location without delay.

  62. @Curmudgeon

    I dealt with Blacks, Arabs, Pakistanis, and East Indians. All of them, to a greater or lesser degree won’t “back off” when hitting on White women.

    Hindus hitting on white women? You don’t see much of that in the US. Maybe in UK.

    But here’s the difference.

    If a silly Hindu or Arab hit on a white man’s woman, the white guy could challenge him to a fight and has a good chance of winning.

    But if a black guy hit on a white woman, the white man would pee in his pants and would be too afraid to stand up for his woman or for his pride. He will just be pussified.

    Take the scene in Robert Altman’s SHORTCUTS below. This is how must white male/black male confrontations end. White males being reduced to wuss-ass white boys. So, it’s not just a matter of how Hindus, Arabs, and blacks act. White males can handle most hindus and Arabs but will be beaten up by blacks. The white guy becomes the ‘bitch’ or bio-slave of the Negro.

    video at 1:56:50

    • Replies: @Meretricious
    , @Treg
  63. @Priss Factor

    Priss Factor,

    Do any white professional athletes exist? That’s a yes or no. If even one white professional athlete exists then the answer must be “yes.”

    If the answer is yes – how does that fit with your theory of ABSOLUTE black superiority?

    • Replies: @Trinity
  64. Polistra says:
    @Priss Factor

    Interesting. I admit that my Japan intel is twenty years old, and a lot can happen in twenty years. Heck, look at how much the USA has changed in just the last two or three. And entirely for the worse.

    I wish you’d tone down the negrolatry, though. It sort of seems as though you grew up in a milieu devoid of virile, masculine strength and sense. Then you compound this with a thorough immersion in Hollywood propaganda. Even people like you, who are generally wise and perceptive, can be influenced unconsciously by the filth emanating from that place.

    • Agree: Chris Mallory
    • Replies: @Priss Factor
  65. @Polistra

    I wish you’d tone down the negrolatry, though.

    I’m not making that stuff up but noticing what is promoted on tv, news, academia, media, the state.

    We have FBI agents kneeling to BLM and getting promoted for it.

    Young ones worship rappers and MLK.

    TV ads feature jungle fever 24/7.

    It’s hard to see any new movie without some Awesome Negro or interracial crap.

    Walter Hill is onboard as well. His new western is about some white woman who ran off with a Nice Negro from a mean evil white hubber.

  66. Pastit says:
    @Priss Factor

    They weren’t full grown male gruzzlies I guarantee you that.

    • Agree: Trinity
    • Replies: @Priss Factor
  67. AceDeuce says:
    @Priss Factor

    Ironically, the YouTube clip in your post, showing ugly niggro Jimmy Walker in the 70s TV film The Greatest Thing That Almost Happened, doesn’t tell the full story.

    The Greatest Thing That Almost Happened is based on a novel of the same name-it’s the third book in a trilogy, written by a Cleveland-based author, the late Don Robertson, a cruelly underrated writer whom Stephen King counts as one of his favorite authors of all time.

    The trilogy is based on the fictional life of a young boy who lives in Cleveland in the 1940s and 1950s, named Morris Bird III, who, in the books, was White.

    Great novels–all three of them. That film, with the hideous niggbo in the title role, is revisionist crap.

  68. @Priss Factor

    Priss, u’ve been watching too much TV. In the real world Negroes end up dating pigs like the Kardashians or some 350 lb hillbilly

    • Replies: @Trinity
    , @Priss Factor
  69. Trinity says:
    @Jeff M. Smith

    Tom Brady must be Black. lolol.

    Take non flashy Joe Flacco. Flacco always performed best under pressure and captured a Super Bowl for the Baltimore Ravens. Lamar Jackson, the Black QB who took Flacco’s job can’t win when it counts, chokes on the regular.

    Sportscasters routinely try to hype up less talented Black quarterbacks. All the all time great quarterbacks are WHITE.

    • Agree: Meretricious, Pastit
  70. Trinity says:

    Nope, most end up with 250 lb Yankee white traitor trash in places like Chicago or NYC, some tattooed freak in Seattle, Portland or Frisco, or some ditzy bleach blonde LA woman in Los Angeles like Nicole Bown.

    Cue: LA Woman by Billy Idol * cover is better than the original version by The Doors.

    • Agree: Meretricious
  71. Anon[111] • Disclaimer says:
    @Sir Launcelot Canning

    It’ll never happen.

    Blacks are like the dinosaurs of the human species. In ancient primitive times where maundering and such was the norm, Blacks were the prime. The Caucasoids and Mongoloids had to migrate away from Africa to avoid the predatory Negroids. From that point on, the two groups began to advance and flourish. Consequently, because the Negroid race cannot produce, but can only steal, kill and destroy, were dependent on the other ‘races’ as a source of sustenance, undergoes the opposite effect.

    Now, in modern times with advanced society and culture, Blacks are relegated to the bottom. At best they are a nuisance, at worst they are dangerous liabilities. The old world they once were designed for is no longer here and as time goes on evolution continue to take it’s course.

    Blacks will likely be the first to go extinct.

  72. anarchyst says:

    I’ve been criticizing White men for supporting professional “sports” for more than a few decades. I never watched that garbage…
    Not only the “Negro Felon League” and the “Negro Basketball Association” but even that bastion of truly white skills, NASCAR has been infected with “woke” ideology. When (((they))) banned the “Stars and Bars” flag, NASCAR sealed its fate, along with substandard negro driver “bubba” wallace complaining about “racist” garage door pulls, NASCARs fate was set.
    Let’s not forget the billions spent by White male “sports fans” on negro ball jerseys, caps and other “trinkets”, overpriced game tickets and taxpayer-subsidized stadiums (playpens), criminal steroid-addled costumed players who are paid millions of dollars to play children’s games.
    “Bread and circuses” which are provided to “quell the masses” are just as successful now as they were in ancient times…
    I realize that negro ball is “entertainment for the masses” and do look down derisively on grown White men who sport their favorite negro ball players clothing or other accouterments. I think to myself: “don’t you have anything better to do?”
    There are much better things for white men to do than watch negro ball sports.
    Build something…repair something…study philosophy or technical journals on something that interests you, make something better, improve yourself and your standard of living and devices…use your wisdom and knowledge to get your fellow Whites to THINK for themselves, not what to think, but HOW to think and to not just accept the pablum, lies and falsehoods of the mainstream media and useless professional sports.
    Message to White men: get away from the negro ball. You are much better than that…

    • Replies: @Priss Factor
  73. Trinity says:

    Back in the day they had H-O-R-S-E contests in the NBA. Pistol Pete Maravich was nigh unbeatable. How much skill does it take for a 6’7″-7′ foot tall person with ape length arms to dunk a basketball through a hoop 10 feet in the air????

    Olympic weighlifters have vertical leaps and broad jumps.that best many NFL and NBA players. I have seen Olympic lifters who were 5’9″-5’10” dunk. Shot putter Brian Oldfield dunked a 16lb shot putt while weighing 270-280lbs.

  74. Truth says:

    Contrary to the impression viewers have been getting lately from films like 12 YEARS A SLAVE(not without a certain degree of masochistic ‘white guilt’ self-righteousness), the lives of black slaves in the South were not uniformly bleak, cruel, and inhuman.

    So you’d recommend slavery as a lifestyle choice to your children (pretending of course, you had some)?

    • Agree: RadicalCenter
  75. @Chris Mallory

    Japanese can be plenty nuts or natsu.

  76. @anarchyst


    Ephesians specifically and clearly commands “slaves” to obey their “masters” with “fear and trembling, with a sincere heart, as you would christ.”

    Explain that away.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  77. Truth says:

    There are plenty of Whites who try to dance like Blacks but MOST Whites don’t want to have sex with Blacks, especially White males.

    How about “Mr. Coffee?”

    • Replies: @Trinity
  78. Truth says:

    Any “chimp-out” against a White or Asian is always a “group chimp-out” by blacks, never a one-on-one confrontation.

    Really? Do you think the Army has an apprenticeship program to train generals?

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  79. @SafeNow

    Fair points all, Safe.

    I’d add, always be armed. Always.

    IF your city / county state purports to “prohibit” you from owning and carrying handguns in self-defense, openly or concealed, then MOVE. Yeah I learned that lesson the hard way.

  80. @Trinity

    Our feelings and opinions don’t change the facts. Ashkenazim typically have around 40% white European genetic contribution, primarily Italian from their centuries marrying non-Jewish Italian women foolish enough to do so.

    Then there are the obvious Germanic and Slavic genetic components of many Ashkenazim. They often picked up more than German, Polish, and Russian names during those centuries.

    The rest of the Ashkenazi’s genome, barely the majority if that, is typically “Middle Eastern”/Semitic, I.e. Arab / Sepphardic Jew.

  81. anarchyst says:

    The “Bible” is NOT the “inspired word of God” but is merely a “guide” WRITTEN BY MEN WITH THEIR OWN AGENDAS INSERTED WITHIN.
    It is Protestantism that came up with the concept of “sola scriptura” a major flaw in Protestant Christianity.
    Flaws in the Bible story are not limited to slavery, but to the concept that there are those with the “divine rights of kings” which the Bible commands that subordinate humans obey.
    Under that Biblical command, “prima noctus” would have been considered a command that “non-royals” would be required to obey.
    Christians must get away from “sola scriptura” and realize that the Bible may be a useful text but is definitely not “inspired”.
    There are many flaws in the Bible…

    • Troll: Chris Mallory
  82. anarchyst says:

    What is THAT all about?
    Please explain…

    • Replies: @Truth
  83. anarchyst says:

    Blacks are more closely related to simians than humans, although they are able to reproduce with real humans (uggh!).
    Black group behavior being studied proves that they act just like chimps, gorillas, and other simian beings in their natural habitats.
    Poor impulse control, the immediate response of group behavior “lashing out” against those not of the group and the inability to reason and compromise are all simian traits that are evident in black behavior.
    It would be interesting to see the great simian researchers such as Diane Fossey or Jane Goodall study and report on the “americanus pavement ape”. I’ll bet that their conclusions would mirror that of their studies of simian behavior on the African continent.

  84. @Anon

    In ancient primitive times where maundering and such was the norm, Blacks were the prime.

    Whatchoo talkin bout Willis? In 2022 Chicago and Philadelphia there are plenty of “teens” marauding.

  85. Trinity says:

    My brother aka ” Mr. Coffee” was a young lad back in the late 70s and early 80s, 19-21 years of age, young, dumb, and full of cum. Even in the disco age one still had to work for sex with MOST White girls while a White dude could EASILY have sex with Black chicks. Didn’t take any smooth talking, wining or dining. My friends and I, as well as my brothers friends talked some sense into the poor misguided young lad. His jungle fever is ancient history, the poor lad was cured and is now sane.

  86. RestiveUs says:

    The fact remains that the slave’s condition depended on forces beyond his control and will.

    Logically, that leaves very few who aren’t “slaves”.

    • Replies: @Priss Factor
  87. @RestiveUs

    White weaklings or wheaks are mentally colonized by Jewish Power. They are soul-slaves. No agency, no will. They do the bidding of their masters and they shall perish.

  88. @Meretricious

    I don’t watch TV, and I sure don’t watch rap videos and the like.

    But I have eyes and even when I travel to white areas in state and national parks, you see more and more jafric relationships. Once I was in Kentucky around Daniel Boone National Park, and the jafric couples were all over. White South has totally cucked. Daniel Boone National Park might as well be renamed Daniel Baboone National Park.

    And you cannot go to a beach in summertime even in white areas without some white women with her mulatto kid.

    And it will spread like wildfire because kids are being raised with jungle fever as the New Normal.
    It’s like all the globo-homo stuff convinced 50% of British kids that they are not straight.

  89. @Pastit

    The book talked about a tiger that routinely hunted and ate bears twice its size.

    And Siberian tigers are huge, some weighing near 1000 lbs.

    Also, most brown bears aren’t bigger than Siberian tigers.

    The biggest brown bears feed on salmon, and those can grow up to 1500 lbs, even more.

    But most brown bears are much smaller, usually ranging from 400 lbs to 600 lbs, and they don’t stand a chance a tiger that weighs 600 lbs.

    Pound for pound, the only predator that may be tougher than felines are the weasels. A wolverine the size of a bear would likely beat all animals.

    • Disagree: Pastit
    • Replies: @Truth
    , @Pastit
  90. Truth says:

    That’s what armies do, they attack smaller armies and steal their stuff.

  91. Truth says:
    @Priss Factor

    Bears are the “King of the Jungle” so to speak, and the only animal that has a routine chance of defeating the Grizzly Bear (I.e; more than occasionally) is the Elephant, Rhino, or Polar Bear.

    No legitimate Zoologist will tell you anything else.

    • Replies: @Trinity
    , @Bardon Kaldlan
  92. Truth says:

    Hippos have a chance, but only one weapon. They are nasty MFs though. Hippos kill more people in Africa than anything else.

    • Replies: @Trinity
  93. Trinity says:

    Even crocodiles steer clear of the hippo.

  94. @Truth

    The king of the jungle is the Strong Black Woman!

    • Replies: @Meretricious
    , @Truth
  95. Reality says:

    This guy needs to stop watching so much porn. His mind is truly warped. Plus no offense but are so many of you really that dense? Every single example you would hold up as an example of black superiority is on steroids. Most whites are afraid to do them but trust me after a few cycles you’d be much less intimidated and pathetically reverential in your attitude toward black physical prowess

    • Replies: @Truth
  96. Pastit says:
    @Priss Factor

    Your full of shit. The only siberian tiger that weighs close to a 1000 lbs would be some poor slob in a zoo that is riddled with fat.

    • Replies: @Priss Factor
  97. @anarchyst

    UK is into movies like MOUNTAIN BETWEEN US and UNITED KINGDOM, junglo-saxon stuff.

    UK is gone.

    Truss the ‘conservative’ fills up gov with Negroes.

    Anglos are so effed.

  98. @Pastit

    Geptner and Sludskii (1972) stated that bears are generally afraid of tigers and change their path after coming across tiger trails.

    • Replies: @Truth
    , @Pastit
  99. @Bardon Kaldlan

    speaking of “strong black woman,” I tried to Google Images “Sheboon”–looks like the censors have blocked the charming results

    • Replies: @Priss Factor
  100. Blacks don’t own the Whites sexually. First of all Blacks are NOT the most sexually gifted of all races, let that sink in. In East Africa, the Arabs own the Blacks, and they own them better in as much as they are either as white as European Whites or gold-hued. Arabs are one of the most naturally sex-obsessed ethnic entities on earth. In West Africa, the French used to own the Blacks sexually, until the second half of the XXth century when the Whites all got castrated through media action, both right and left, by turning sex into a rare commodity in the hands of hypergamous females. Blacks own Whites sexually only thanks to the role they have been playing in Jewish media since the 1960’s. Before that period Blacks were not known as sex symbols in the literature or musical production of both sides. In the French-speaking culture the Blacks were known as more caressing but less sexual. That was the only culture where Blacks were considered attractive. But in absolutely no other European culture both Northern and Southern were they considered tempting as sex symbols. Italy had absolutely no attraction for them (Arabs were far more feared as rapists). Blacks now own the West only thanks to a Jewish race-mixing project, but they have very little agency in it. It is clear that the attraction of White females for Black athletes is a manufactured affect, a very arbitrary and artificial one. And don’t forget that today’s Whites are castrated.

    • LOL: Truth
    • Replies: @Priss Factor
  101. Truth says:

    Every single example you would hold up as an example of black superiority is on steroids.

    Where is your lab and how much do you charge?

    I am starting to wonder about my stepson.

  102. Truth says:
    @Priss Factor

    300 Lb. Fellers.

    Cute, kinda like Smokey.

    Asian black bears are black and have a light brown muzzle. They are white on the chin, and have a distinct white patch on the chest, which sometimes has the shape of a V.[5] Their ears are bell shaped, proportionately longer than those of other bears, and stick out sideways from the head. The tail is 11 cm (4.3 in) long.[4] Adults measure 70–100 cm (28–39 in) at the shoulder, and 120–190 cm (47–75 in) in length. Adult males weigh 60–200 kg (130–440 lb) with an average weight of about 135 kg (298 lb). Adult females weigh 40–125 kg (88–276 lb), and large ones up to 140 kg (310 lb).[4][6]

    • Replies: @Trinity
  103. Trinity says:

    Hmmm, are you describing the Sun Bear? The Sun Bear is the smallest bear IF I am not mistaken. I am thinking those upper figures of 400lbs are a bit high. Have to do a search but I am GUESSING a male Sun Bear wouldn’t weigh more 160lbs even a large male.Vicious disposition and huge daggers for claws. A formidable animal but no match for a 500lb Bengal tiger.

    Tigers avoid fights with other tigers. A 400lb African male lion with fighting experience against other male lions takes out a Bengal tiger 100lbs heavier.

    • Replies: @Priss Factor
  104. @Francis Miville

    Blacks don’t own the Whites sexually.

    It’s like this. Even if the majority of whites stick with whites, the FACE of the West is jungle fever where black males take white females. And it’s the FACE of civilization that matters. When Romans took over Egypt, most of the population remained as before. But the new pharaohs were Romans, and their faces defined Egypt.

    Majority in Latin America are brown or mestizo, but the FACE of Latin America is still European. That defines it, not the brown beaners.

    So, even if your average white woman sticks with some white guy, it’s increasingly the case that elite white women and celebrity white women hook up with blacks or star in movies or TV shows or music videos where they’re paired with blacks. THAT becomes the DEFINING face of the face. Idols define a civilization.

    The current FACE of Britain is a black guy athlete humping tons of white whores. Even if most British women don’t go that way, that is now how Britain defines and represents itself ideally as a civilization. That has a profound psychological effect.

    A movie by Edgar Wright, LAST NIGHT IN SOHO, has a white girl stalked and murdered by a white guy while her hero and lover is a ghastly negro. Inversion of reality, but there you go. Jews push it, but Anglos suck it up because wheaks are soulless.

    • Troll: Pastit
  105. @Trinity

    What the sun bear needs to fear most is the vile and cruel Chinese who torture the animal for bile juice.

    Morrissey is right about Chinese being morally deficient when it comes to animals. Just vile and vicious sadists.

    • Agree: Trinity, Pastit
  106. @AceDeuce

    OT: This Jung Freud person has got to be the same person who used to post as some Russian with a female name–Andrea Maria Ostrovia or something–in fact, there were a couple names like that.

    Andrea Ostrov Letania

    Good call. I got the same impression. The combination of the rambling, incoherent writing style with the sexual fetish for black men is unmistakable. But “Letania” is not just an Unz poster — “she” has left a fairly wide (but shallow) track across the digital realm. A quick search reveals, among other virtual spoor, a couple of blogs, a VK account, and a Gab account in that name.

    And if we look at the “AOL” Gab account, what do we find? Two pinned Gabs: a link to this piece, and a link to another “Jung-Freud” piece. Huh. The sample is small, but the indices are strong, as they say.

    A couple of the playlists on the AOL YouTube account might perhaps be relevant as well:

    • Replies: @Bardon Kaldlan
  107. @James Forrestal

    Yes,Priss,Andrea,and jung-Frued are the same person. What of it? Are you a cuck maggot??😮

    • Replies: @James Forrestal
  108. @Bardon Kaldlan

    Priss,Andrea,and jung-Frued[sic] are the same person

    Well there it is, then — the AOL/ J-F confluence has just been confirmed by a leading representative of the hasbarat brigade. And if you can’t trust an ignorant, hate-filled semitic supremacist, who can you trust?

    Let’s take a look at the other part of BK’s claim. A quick scan through the “Priss Factor” comments, and… Yep, it looks like Bardo’s assertion seems to check out on that one.

    PF’s comment #90, for example:
    White weaklings or wheaks

    Ah, the pointless portmanteau. Like the nonsensical neologism and the asinine acronym, it’s a characteristic feature of the AOL “writing” style. See also “jafric” in #90, and “bio-slave” in #64. The latter is obviously a failed attempt to reinforce the main conceit of the OP; “Factor” is the only commenter to make such an attempt, however feeble.

    So Jung-Freud/ Andrea Ostrov Letania/ Priss Factor has a rather tenuous grip on reality, and spends a lot of time talking to herself/ himself/ itself? Huh.

    Shabbat shalom!

    • Thanks: AceDeuce
  109. Pastit says:
    @Priss Factor

    Again, the hunted are mostly young bears recently apart from the mother, and NOT full grown males. Also you fail to acknowledge your bs about 1000 lb tigers. The average is about 450lbs for males while brown bear males average about 600 lbs.

  110. Also you fail to acknowledge your bs about 1000 lb tigers.

    Some siberian tigers are 800 lbs and after they devoured 200 lbs of bear or elk meet, they become 1000 lbs.

    • Troll: Pastit
    • Replies: @Pastit
  111. Anon[153] • Disclaimer says:

    Jewish-controlled porn peddles such fantasies, and not surprisingly, much of porn since the late 90s involve black males and white females. It’

    This is a nice thing to believe if you’re an unattractive white female, as Jung Freud is, but it’s the farthest thing from the truth.

    Most porn is white male + non-white female. Because white women look like garbage, and are masculine, whereas Asian and Latina women look better and are more feminine.

    Gender, Race, and Aggression in Mainstream Pornography

    Shor, Eran; Golshan Golriz. 
    Archives of Sexual Behavior; New York Vol. 48, Iss. 3, (Apr 2019): 739-751. DOI:10.1007/s10508-018-1304-6

    Table 1 also presents statistics on the racial composition of our sample. The majority of male performers were White.

    Women were more evenly distributed between the racial/ethnic categories, with

    37.2% White (81.6% in the “All” category),

    27.9% Black,

    15.7% Latina,

    and 17.4% Asian.

    As for racial/ethnic combinations, the only combinations with at least eight occurrences (4.7% of the sample) were the following:

    White men with any of the four main racial/ethnic categories of women,

    Black men with either White or Black women,

    Asian men with Asian women,

    and Latino men with Latina women.

    White women are therefore a minority in porn, with only 34% having visibility, whereas Asian and Latina women are massively over-represented relative to their population size in the Western general population. Even black women are more prominent in porn, per capita, than white women.

    Non-white males are of course under-represented in heterosexual pornography.

    Everything about Jung Freud’s posts boils down to the psychological insecurity of white women, who know that they are being replaced by women of color + white male interracial relationships. White women are the failures of natural selection.

    • Replies: @Priss Factor
    , @Anonymous
  112. @Anon

    We aren’t concerned with details of porn itself. Rather, we need to consider the POLITICAL and CULTURAL weaponization of porn, precisely because pornification has seeped into everything, even Disney shows and childhood education.

    Two main themes are:

    Globo-Homo that leads to tranny stuff and finally to pedophilia.

    Jungle Fever and Afro-Colonization of White Wombs or ACOWW.

    Now, kids are instilled with those are the New Norm.

    Even veteran directors are going along. Walter Hill and George Miller.

    In the 60s, over 80% of Americans opposed interracism. Today, 97% are totally for it. American minds were seeded with ‘anti-racism’, which really amounts to black sexual colonization of whites, in the following decades, and look at the result.

    The full extent of current propaganda will be apparent in yrs to come.

    BLM lunacy and Negrolatry of 2020 were sure signs that so many white minds were turned that way by education and media. What was once unthinkable not only became thinkable but predominant.

  113. Treg says:
    @Priss Factor

    PF … That is an interesting theory that you have there. And a lot of people think it is so. So I get it, and I hear you, and I can see your point about black athletes, and even other points that could have been made about testosterone, muscle mass, muscle fast twitch vs slow twitch, and inner-city hoodlums leading their tough lives of being tough or dying young, etc — all reasons people give.
    But still, I think the “black-is-tougher” is shit theory.

    The reason that it is a shit theory is that White people are on par with Blacks physically, and no they are not subpar. But these soft times and easy-life conditions we live in today, can and do make most white Americans subpar. I am saying that ANY TIME PERIOD can make an entire people weak or strong. Every generation can be made “hard as nails” and “tough as iron”. But I will agree with you that we are living in a time period today with a lot of soft white people living next to hard black people, hence they are “tougher” on the whole, but again I say we are on par, not subpar with black people.

    So since we are on par with blacks physically, what is happing is more of a reflection of a cultural thing in this particular time period, say the last 100 years. Time periods that make one hard or soft, work on you both physically and psychologically. This is a “psychological time period”.

    The next dimension is it is always and forever a numbers game and a question of how organized, loyal and tight together your numbers are. That too is lacking in white people today, they can barely hang together. Hardened people tend to “stick together” like a battle-worn large extended family It is funny too that you picked a movie clip for your example that is in Russian. It is funny because Russian men don’t take such shit. They are battle-worn, tough as nails and laugh at white softness the way you laugh at Jewish softness — quietly, with a tiny bit of respect cause you got all the money n power and so it does one no good to call you out (for now).

    Here is what is going on with you when you see these black brawls, among themselves or other people — they are hearing the fun-times music. You, on the other hand, don’t hear the light-hearted “fun-times music” in your head when these black brawls break out. Yet in a time period before in the past, you once did. And just like the black brawls of today, you would only stop fighting when gunshots were fired and someone got killed. When you watch this clip from your cowboy past, do you hear the light-hearted music? Gee wasn’t it fun to just punch someone?

    Look, I grew up in the deserts of Arizona, not too far from John Wayne’s Red River Ranch. We little 1960s/1970s “cowboy kids” fought hard, worked hard and hung together tightly when the long hairs came around with their soft shit and sexual drug shit. Still today, a phone call brings twenty-odd trucks and motorcycles to any bar brawl I might get myself into on the dark side of town. Now they will come racing to help and kick some ass, 20 vs 100 would be about a fair fight. But today, even these old guys would turn around and kick my ass for being so stupid as to get myself into fix like that. And I would deserve the ass-whooping by them too, it would be stupid to put myself there. But it is not because blacks are the alpha crip and blood. That shit doesn’t scare. But show me the white dude in the black gang, now that is one scary-ass murderous killing crazy ass dude.

  114. Anonymous[207] • Disclaimer says:

    Nice try, browncel. You are obviously not a white male.

  115. Pastit says:
    @Priss Factor

    More BS spewing outta your twisted mouth.

Current Commenter

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone

 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Jung-Freud Comments via RSS
The Surprising Elements of Talmudic Judaism
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement
Shouldn't they recuse themselves when dealing with the Middle East?