The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewJung-Freud Archive
The Power of Racination vs the Weakness of Deracination, or the Tale of Two White Groups: The Racinating Jews and Deracinating European-Americans
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Notably since the end of World War II(though the process began earlier), white people in America could be lumped into mainly two groups. European-Americans(or ‘whites’) and Jews. Jews have long been considered as whites in the US even though most ‘full-blooded’ Jews(Ashkenazim) tend to be 50% Semitic. Indeed, many (white)Hispanics are more white than the Jews. ‘Hispanics’ in America can be of any race, color, or nationality as long as they are of Latin American descent and/or culture. Despite Italians(from the Southern regions) and Greeks being genetically more similar to Jews than to Northern Europeans, they’ve melded into generic whiteness whereas Jews increasingly stand apart, often regarding non-Jewish whites as ‘fellow whites’.

Furthermore, given the vast increase in mixed-marriages between Jews and mostly white goyim since the 1960s, a good many of today’s Jews are more European than ever and look it. Indeed, Jewish-Americans range from almost entirely white to almost entirely Semitic, evident in their varying appearances. Some Jews look more Anglo or Nordic than Semitic, while some Jews look like Groucho Marx and Alan Dershowitz. Given these racial or interracial complications, why does it makes sense, politically and culturally, to speak of Two White Americas, Jewish and ‘white’? It has to do with the factor of ‘Racination’ vs ‘Deracination’.

While it’s true that race is real in the biological sense, everything human is also defined by consciousness. Consider blackness. It’s biologically real that black races evolved in Sub-Saharan Africa. And yet, consciousness about blackness varies from place to place, from period to period. This is further complicated by mixed-race-ness. How people with black blood define themselves differs from Brazil to Venezuela to Mexico(where most blacks became mixed into the racial brew) to the US. A light-skinned person with some blackness may identify as mixed-race or quadroon or octoroon in Brazil as part of the cultural legacy. But in the US, he or she may identify fully as ‘black’ for reasons of racial pride or solidarity(or self-aggrandizing sense of tragic nobility and/or badassery). But that is in the present.

In the past, when the US was more race-ist, a light-skinned black person might have considered himself/herself as superior to darker blacks. Or, if possible, a light-skinned black with mostly white looks would have tried to ‘pass’ as white’. Consciousness of blackness used to be more of shame than pride in the era of slavery. So, cultural and ideological Zeitgeist goes a long way to determine whether a people emphasize(and even exaggerate) their racial/ethnic consciousness OR suppress(and even erase & deny) it.

Perhaps the most famous(and maybe shameful) case was of Germans in the US and UK during World War I. Germans have many virtues, but their subordination to authority and anxiety for social approval isn’t one of them. On the constructive level, it could make them more unified in politics and united in purpose. But it could also mean a herd-like tendency to do anything to GO ALONG. Ironically, both German hyper-deracination in the US & UK and ultra-racination in Nazi Germany owed to a common underlying psychological structure.
In both cases, German masses bowed to the prevailing authority. German-Americans and German-Britons folded under pressure and out of fear as ethnic minorities. Germans under National Socialism rallied en masse in total devotion to Der Fuhrer as the invincible Man of Destiny.

In one respect, one could say German-Americans blended easily into Anglo-America and Anglo-Britain because of racial likeness and also because Anglos accepted them(at least upon assimilation) as racial brethren. But given the rich and proud history of German Civilization & Culture, it seems rather shameful that so many Germans were willing to erase and suppress so much of their rich identity and culture for the sake of acceptance and approval.
It was one thing for Germans to learn English and become Good Americans and Good Britons in foreign lands. But to go so far as repress or reject so much of Germanness(except for ‘harmless’ cultural identifiers such as beer, sausage, sauerkraut, and pretzel) seems almost contemptible. There are so many Americans of German stock who have nothing German about them in historical or cultural consciousness(except maybe Holocaust Guilt). If Germans were a tiny minority, it wouldn’t have mattered. But, for a long time, they were the biggest ethnic minority and contributed so much to the building of the US.

From a political viewpoint, perhaps it was a good thing that German-Americans became fully Anglo-Americanized for the sake of national unity. As European Conflicts pitted Anglos against Germans in the first half of the 20th century, perhaps the US avoided similar ethno-national tensions because German identity was more or less subsumed into Anglo-America, especially during World War I when the German-American community came under immense pressure.
But politics aside, what’s rather depressing is that so many Germans took it to heart and waged war on their own identity, even beyond what was called for.
It’s like there were times when Jews, under social or political pressure, had to pretend to go along to get along. But apart from their external behavior, Jews never surrendered their Core Identity of Jewishness. Jews went along in body, not in soul. But German-Americans erased their identity like Lutherans purge their souls.

Does this mean that religion is stronger than race or ethnicity? More likely, race + religion is the strongest identity. Jews have held steadfast onto the idea of the Covenant with God. And this sense of the Covenant, more than any political policy by Jews or ‘whites’, was most indispensable to the resilience of (sacro-)racial identity of Jews. Wherever, whenever, and whatever, Jews primarily see themselves as Jews. They may be ‘American’, ‘French’, ‘Polish’, ‘Russian’, ‘Iranian’, ‘Egyptian’, or whatever, as there are Jews all over the world, BUT the goy nationality is the hyphenated dress, not the fleshy noun, of Jewishness. In flesh and blood, Jews are Jews.

If an American Jew was forced to choose between being only American(and not Jewish) OR Jewish(and merely affixed to another goy nationality), he will choose the latter. Jews value Americanism as a vehicle for opportunity and power. It’s a tool, not a matter of heart and soul.

Besides, as just about anyone can become an ‘American’(in mere five yrs necessary for citizenship), it’s not a very meaningful identity. It is a means to material success, privilege, and power. If something is open to everyone, it doesn’t really belong to anyone. America has become a Globo-Cow for all the world to squeeze for milk. The teats for treats for the world. And Jews now have primary ownership of the cow. Just like a farmer doesn’t identify himself as a cow even though he profits handsomely from it, when a Jew says he’s an ‘American’, it means something like “I’m a dairy farmer.” ‘American’, to a Jew, is more an occupation, status, or position than an identity.

The Jew’s true identity is Jewishness, not least for its deep roots in history, and it belongs to Jews alone. It is immutable, therefore precious to Jews. It is Jewishness, the binding of religion and race, that has made Jews unique throughout history(though there are elements of that in Hinduism as well, another ethno-religion. But if caste-less Judaism bound all Jews together as one people, the powerful caste-element left behind a much divided and fractured India).

Religion is powerful but mainly a matter of faith, of the heart. Universal religions are mutable and thus weaken tribal or racial identity. No race or identity owns Christianity, Buddhism, or Islam. Religions can impart meaning and inspire people to noble deeds, but in emphasizing heart over blood, it does little for identity, roots, and history.

As for tribalism, it too has its advantages and weaknesses. Naturally tribal, people like being part of a community that comprises members of similar looks, alike temperaments, and shared symbols. But tribalism as mere tribalism can be crude and ham-fisted, a vision of the world where it all boils down to ‘my tribe(or country), right or wrong’. Such emotions may be powerful but not necessarily ennobling, and in worst cases, dark and despicable, as in wars when nations mercilessly kill countless civilians of one another in an orgy of tit-for-tat macro-tribal vendetta.

The great advantage of Jewishness is that their religion is wedded to their race. So, when Jews think of God, He isn’t just a universal abstraction but their own God, the one and only Deity who made them the Chosen. Also, because Jews believe that their race is blessed by God and History, they regard serving their own tribe as a spiritual and moral endeavor, as opposed to mere brute tribalism.
Rabbis believe the world can only be blessed by Jews, the Chosen.
So, Jews deserve the most power in order for the rest of humanity to be redeemed(by serving Jews).

As for the rest of humanity, they exist to aid and abet the Jews as the Chosen of God. Jews claim to be for universal justice, but Jewishness can only be about Jewish mastery & supremacism as it’s premised on the conviction that humanity can’t do without Jews, the only people who can redeem and bless the world. The logical conclusion is all goyim must praise and serve Jews as the Master Race because Jews and only Jews can deliver justice to the world(by lording over inferior goyim who would be lost without Jews).

But, if Jews must be elevated above humanity to bring about a just world, isn’t that unjust by modern standards? Isn’t it about Jewish supremacism and mastery? This mentality was manifested through Jesus as well. The mythic Christ insists that humanity can be saved only through Him. But at the very least, Christianity calls on Jews and Gentiles to be equal and alike. (Unlike Judaism that sacralizes one group against all other groups, Christianity sacralizes an individual at the expense of group-sanctity, as among Jews, thus allowing all peoples equal access to God and Salvation through the one and only Christ.)

In contrast, Judaism posits that each and every Jew is like a mini-messiah deserving the veneration of goyim. Thus, Jews and Gentiles can never be one people; Jews must be the master race over goyim, albeit one that promises to practice just rule. Thus, Jewish concept of justice isn’t premised on equality or equal worth of all individuals of all groups but on the cosmic justness of the superior Jews lording over goyim, somewhat akin to the monarchical concept of ‘divine right to rule’, except that every Jew, no matter how lowly, feels as a king over all goyim.
In a similar sense, animal justice isn’t predicated on the equality of man and beast but on the superior man’s benevolence toward inferior animals. Dogs and cows can never expect(nor conceive of) equality with their human masters/owners and can only hope for ‘humane’ treatment. Likewise, justice-for-goyim is about the Jewish responsibility not to treat Gentiles like total shit, that is if goyim are willing to accept the rightful mastery of the tribe; goyim who defy this notion of cosmic justice need to be punished harshly or even eradicated, just like animals deemed threatening are put down without mercy. Jewish view of goyim is rather like the attitude of the mad scientist in THE ISLAND OF DR. MOREAU.

One thing for sure, the US has been a most fascinating macro-experiment in this Jewish Idea of Justice. One might make a case for the Soviet experiment as well, but in the end, the system demanded the same commitment and enforced the same rules for Jews and goyim alike, i.e. Jews could have a stake in the system as comrades, not as Jews. In the US, however, Jews gained power as proud Jews and came to be revered for their identity. Jews gained near-total power, and what has been going on in finance, gambling, entertainment, real estate, law, liberty, foreign policy, and culture?

The most important lesson in the 21st century may be that only a people with their own covenant will survive and grow in power. As it stands, Jews are the ONLY PEOPLE with the Covenant. And that is why their power keeps growing while those of ‘whites’ keep diminishing. Covenant is like the freezer. Frosty the Snowman can survive in the Cold but not in warm weather. Covenant does to identity what freezer does to ice. It keeps it solid. Without the Covenant, identity melts into the common pool under the heat of globalism. White identities are melting like ice outside a freezer(or inside a broken one).

Meanwhile, Jewish ice remains within its own freezer and grows harder and bigger. And this isn’t just a matter of blood but consciousness. While one must have Jewish blood to be Jewish, there is an added element of self-awareness. In the US, someone who is 1/4(or even 1/8) Jewish may feel more Jewish than someone who is 100% Swedish-American feels Swedish. Why would this be?

Why would someone with a fraction of Jewish blood feel so powerfully Jewish while someone who is fully Swedish or German feels hardly Swedish or German? The Jewish Covenant, like a freezer, hardens identity. In contrast, even people who are 100% German are so deracinated that they don’t know what to make of their German blood, culture, and history. Even Germans in Germany have lost their sense of meaning and purpose. Many feel consciously sick to be German and adopt a kind of anti-national consciousness to feel justified; it’s no wonder so many Germans are welcoming of political, cultural, and economic policies that are sure to bring about Germany’s doom.
Many have settled for German culture being just about food, beverage, music, and books, products to be marketed to or shared with the world. And since holy Jews say German history and culture are tainted forever by Holocaust Guilt and ‘racism’, many Germans are convinced the ONLY way to redeem Germanness is to fully expunge it of its ethno-racial component and turn it into a ‘world identity’, like the Bahai church or Mardi Gras festival in New Orleans.

A perfect demonstration of how Jewishness has been empowered by Racination while whiteness has become dis-empowered(or disemboweled) by Deracination was Paul Ryan’s last year in Congress. He made much fuss about the need to reject and suppress white identity and white nationalism, but upon discovering through a DNA test that he is 3% Jewish, he was wild and ecstatic with joy that he had some precious Jewish blood. Racination of Jewishness has made even traces of Jewishness precious, like gold powder. Deracination of whiteness, in contrast, has convinced so many whites that their identity, blood, and roots have NO value, even negative value, an identity deficit that owes eternal debt to other identities, especially Jews(and Negroes). Paul Ryan reacted to the 3% Jewish side of him as if he stumbled upon a gold nugget in a stream. As for the 97% of him that is white, let it wash away like dirt and sand. So, we see the effects of Racination and Deracination on the Human Consciousness.

This is all the more ironic because, for most of the world(and even to Jews), whiteness is the ultimate gold to have and behold, by proximity if not by possession. Why do so many nonwhites want to migrate(often permanently) to white nations, white-made nations, or white-majority nations? The reasons are many: Economic, political, moral, cultural, sexual, and material. Non-whites feel white people do things better, maintain superior social & economic systems, tend to be more fair-minded, and are more attractive as mates.
And deep down inside, Jews know that they rode to supreme power on the Great White Horse. Without Europe and white-made US, would Jews be ruling the world? Could Jews have gained the kind of power and wealth they did on the backs of blacks, Muslims, Asians, or etc.? No, despite their problems with the Christian Europe/West, Jews gained most in association with white civilization that rose to heights of achievement and glory.

But, the relations between Jews and Europeans were uneasy, and not only because of religious friction but economic tensions. Jews provided invaluable service as moneylenders but could also be parasitic and, over time, amass fortunes in an exponential manner. And Jewish loyalty was questionable since they always regarded themselves as Jews first.

Jews have bitter memories of past discrimination, but their very identity was discriminatory, exclusionary, and even supremacist. Because of the relationship between Europeans and Jews that was, at once, productive & mutually beneficial AND fraught with distrust & contempt — with Jews getting the worse of the conflict(due to numerical disadvantage) when things got out of hand — , Jews remain anxious that the current white-Jewish partnership may also end badly, even in bloodshed. Jews remember how they got expelled from many nations as a beleaguered minority. (Of course, when Jews had the power, they violently expelled Palestinians from what is now Israel. Expulsions of Jews were simply a matter of power, i.e. more numerous Europeans pushing out smaller numbers of Jews. What is notable about the Nakba Pogroms is that the smaller Jewish population managed to push out the larger Palestinian population. When Jews got the power, they don’t choose to be noble victims. They prefer being ruthless victors.)

In order to maintain the partnership between Jews and whites, Jews insist on further racinating Jewishness(with pride of identity, nobility, tragedy, glory, spirituality, and awesomeness) and deracinating whiteness(as ‘nazi’, ‘white supremacist’, ‘evil’, ‘far-right’, ‘extremist’, etc.) So, all the US politicians singing hosannas to Israel, the US waging Wars for Israel, the media spreading Hate News against ‘enemies of Israel’ and any nation antagonized by Jews, and endless blather about Jewish This & Jewish That is perfectly ‘normal’ and ‘American as Apple Pie’. But, even the sentiment, “It’s Okay to be White” or a supposed ‘white power’ hand sign must be objects of witch-hunts. In other words, Jewishness is so awesome that we must praise and worship it uber alles, whereas whiteness is so wicked that even the slightest whiff must be treated like poison gas.

And yet, people may wonder… if Jews hate whiteness so much, why don’t they just pick up their stuff and leave? Why don’t Jews depart from white nations and go resettle in the non-white worlds of Africa, Asia, Latin America, and etc.? Get away from whites as far as possible. If indeed whites suck so bad, why were Jewish Immigration Patterns so often about GOING WHERE WHITE PEOPLE ARE GOING, GOING WHERE WHITE PEOPLE ARE? And why did Jewish bankers fund white imperialists who colonized other parts of the world? Why did Jews come to the US created by whites who committed ‘genocide’ against Indians? And why do Jews ask white nations above all to support Israel and praise Jews? Why associate wicked whiteness with Zion? If whites are so awful, why do Jews rely so heavily on whites as their main support system? It’s like someone cursing Satan and then asking Satan to come to his aid at every turn. It makes no sense, at least on the surface.

It all points to a Jewish love/hate thing with whites. Jews love whiteness as the gold standard of high civilization, social order, technological progress, political stability, and etc. They also lust after whites as the ‘best fuc*’. But this love of whiteness also makes them feel angry and envious. After all, if Jews are indeed the Chosen people, why should whites be more attractive and appealing in personality? Why do Jewish men prefer white women over Jewish women? Why do Jewish women prefer white men over Jewish men?

Also, it bothers Jews that their religion is relatively ‘petty’ and brutal compared to the loving and embracing universality of Christianity, historically the religion of whites. To resolve the problem, Jews maintain the exclusivity of Jewishness while appropriating the universal aura of Christianity that is inspiring to all mankind.
But how does one remain an exclusionary Jew while pontificating about justice for all mankind? How do you preach love and brotherhood while sticking to an identity that says, “WE are the Chosen, not you filthy goyim.”
There is no honest way to resolve the issue, and that’s why we have a crazy kind of neo-universalism in the West. If Christianity offered the hope that ALL peoples could be equally precious in the eyes of God, Holocaustianity or Jew-Worship as universal-faith means All Peoples must bow down before the Jews as the Chosen(or the Shoah-sen). It’s a perversion of universalism whereby all peoples are urged to reject their own tribalism only to revere the uber-tribalism of the Jews.

Similar logic operates behind Homo-mania, a proxy of Jewish Power, the message of which is all the straight and normal people around the world must bend over to a tiny minority of vain sexual deviants whose idea of ‘sex’ is homo-fecal-penetration or whose idea of ‘gender’ is tranny penis-cutting.
But then, consider the astronomical ascension of Jewish and Homo power precisely because their identities have been ‘racinated’ or ‘consecrated’. Meanwhile, look at the dissipating identities of whites, Europeans, and Japanese who have accepted soulless consumerism and status-competition as their main fixations.

What this teaches us is that genuine universalism of equality is bound to fail. It’s too vague and abstract, turning into a plaything of the group with the greatest will and ability. Indeed, Jews have taken advantage of universalism to make all the world worship them.

Then, the hard lesson for each and every people is to define, shape, and guard their own identity in terms of race, range, and roots. Blood, soil, and history. And finally, in order to turn one’s identity into a covenant, a people need to create a visionary narrative that says they have a special contract with the Great Being, the Ultimate Power of the Universe. If Jews sought it out and got themselves the Covenant, other people can also attain a covenant for themselves through their own prophetic striving. This and only this will secure the existence of a people. For most of history, it didn’t matter so much as history moved at snail’s pace, and most people lived where they were born. Even without trying, one was part of a culture and community. But against the vast globalist tides that seek to upend everything, people need a counter-global mechanism, if only for balance.

It must be race, roots, and range BLESSED BY religion. As Christianity has finally come to an end, there must be an Age of White Prophets who seek the voice of the Ultimate Power, with whom a covenant can be written for the white race and for the white race alone. If Jews have their own Covenant, why shouldn’t whites have one of their own(or several among the main ethnic groups)?
Christianity failed for the white race in the end because its all-inclusive covenant belongs to everyone. And if something can be had by everyone, it belongs to no one in the end. It’s like the air we breathe. It doesn’t belong to any of us but to all of us. You are not the air you breathe. You are your blood, your organs, your body, your brains with unique memories and thoughts. Christianity will continue to have meaning and purpose as a spiritual heritage. It can be appreciated as blessed oxygen for all the world. But if Europeans and whites are to survive as a people, they need a covenant that is about their particular place and purpose on Earth and in the universe. It is a covenant that must be the stuff of vision and depth but also devoid of hubris and vanity. It must be of both heroism and humility.

Why did whites become deracinated in the US while Jews got more racinated? To be sure, Jews were always racinated due to the Covenant. Jewishness was always more than a matter of religious faith but of ancestry and memory. But another factor was Jews talked and read more. More talk means Jewish kids heard more from grandparents and parents about past history and heritage. Jews also read more, and they also produced much of their own literature. So, they not only learned a lot about history and the world but through their own words.

Also, Jewishness vis-a-vis Christianity had a doubly reinforcing effect. Not only did Jews insist on excluding goyim from their own community but the Christian community regarded Jews as the Other. Even in the US where anti-Jewish feelings were less pronounced, there was a sense of Jewish-Christian Divide that Jews cleverly manipulated because Jews wanted to gain access to the white(esp WASP) world but didn’t want whites to pry into the Jewish World.
Such a formula has become dangerous in a world shaped by Jewish Supremacism. When Jews weren’t yet dominant in elite fields, the notion of ‘Jewish community’ simply meant their ethnic enclave or cultural space(like the one featured in Woody Allen’s RADIO DAYS or Neil Simon’s BRIGHTON BEACH MEMOIRS). As such, there was no reason for non-Jews to stick their noses into Jewish affairs, as with the affairs in Chinatown or Polish Town.

But, what happened as the result of more and more Jews entering elite fields to the point where entire elite spheres turned into Jewish Communities? When elite institutions were ruled by WASPS, the Jewish Community was about neighborhoods and distinct Jewish organizations. A handful of Jews within elite circles didn’t change the equation. But when so many college departments, courts, media outlets, law firms, financial firms, and etc. came to be dominated by Jews, it means the elite spheres themselves have turned into one big Jewish Community.

This is dangerous because elite power has not only been tribalized into Jewish supremacism but into one that cannot be criticized. For example, it’s one thing to let Chinese be Chinese and do their own Chinesey things in dinky Chinatown. Such people are not going to have power over us. But, suppose this convention of Leaving the Chinese Community Alone is extended to Chinese Power that hypothetically takes over the elite institutions and industries of America. Those powerful Chinese will have power over us, but they will be protected from criticism on account that they constitute a ‘Chinese Community’.

Jewish Community now comprises the globalist-imperialist rulers over us, but we are to pretend that it still constitutes some hapless Jews eking out a living in a poverty-stricken shtetl. Jews in the Jewish Community can do their Jewish things for Jewish reasons. But as elites of a multi-racial and multi-ethnic empire, Jews in high places need to take leave of the Jewish-Community-Mentality but refuse to do so(as in the virtual bailouts of the fellow tribal brethren in the Silicon Valley Bank). They play the New Romans while eating bagels among themselves than breaking bread with all Americans and humanity.
Jewish Community has gone from Rags to Riches, but we are supposed to see just the rags. Paradoxically, it is Jewish riches that make us see Jews in rags. Jews expend great sums to keep cranking out Holocaust movies that, GROUNDHOG-DAY-like, remind us that Jews are eternally the poor victims of the Holy Holocaust. Jews buy off politicians to give speeches about how Jews are a hapless and powerless people in need of protection. Jews steal land from Palestinians and use IDF death squads to mow down women and children in Gaza, but the Jew-run US narrative is “We must protect Jews from Hamas.”

In contrast to Jews, white Americans of all stripes have become deracinated. Because Judaism is about identity + religion, Jews feel as Jews even as they become secularized. Even if they no longer literally believe in the Torah or read the Talmud, they feel Jewish in the ethnic sense.
In contrast, because Christianity is a matter of the heart, once the Faith fades, it comes to mean little to the ex-faithful. One can be an atheist and still feel powerfully Jewish because Judaism has a powerful historical-and-ethnic component. But once a Christian begins to feel doubt about God and Jesus, his loss of faith is near total. As Christianity for so long served as the cultural center of white folks in Europe and the US, the loss of faith had a profound effect. Even without faith in God, Jews got ethno-identity and history from Judaism. But without Faith, whites got nothing from Christianity, except maybe the secularized form of ‘muh guilt’.

That being the case, in an increasingly irreligious modern world, could whites recover their identities on ethnic, cultural, and historical grounds? This was doable in Europe with distinct ethno-states but ran into problems due to imperialism, communism, National Socialism, and war. Imperialism of various kind suppressed many forms of ethno-nationalism. National Socialism and WWII gave white forms of nationalism a bad name. Communism suppressed national identity in the Soviet Union.
But it was even more problematic in the US. Anglo-Americans, German-Americans, and Ethnic-White Americans of various stripes, for the sake of greater harmony, settled upon a very generic sense of Americanism. In order to accommodate non-Anglo-whites, Anglo-America had to water down an already rather bland Anglo-American culture. As a result, Anglo-American identity became near-anemic.
Furthermore, the American Myth of independence(from the ‘tyrannical’ Mother Country) to forge a new civilization created a blank-slate mentality among too many Anglo-American elites. As for Irish-Americans and even more problematic arrivals from Eastern and especially Southern Europe, their assimilation into Anglo-American necessitated the loss, repression, or neglect of entire aspects of their original cultures that grew weaker down the generations.

Ian Buruma opined that the problem of Singapore is that no single language — Chinese, English, Hindi, Malay, etc. — is spoken well because everyone tries to accommodate other groups and get along. Likewise, because so many kinds of whites had to get along together in the US, White-American-ness is both everything and nothing. It was flexible and practical enough to accommodate the various white ethnic groups, and as such, a very successful formula.

But the end result was that all these White Americans came to lack a sense of distinct roots, history, and identity. Anglo-Americans with deeper roots had to pretend that late-arrivals from Eastern and Southern Europe were also part of American Civilization. And Italian-Americans, Greek-Americans, and Polish-Americans had to pretend George Washington was the ‘father of my country’ when their ancestors arrived a full century after the founding of the American Republic. So much depended on make-believe and consensus-thinking than on blood-and-soil and true ancestry. Same problems now exist in France where Arabs & Africans are expected to embrace French history as THEIR OWN history while the white French(the real French) are made to believe that Arabs & Africans are(and always have been) part of Core French Civilization. Such things don’t work out well. Look what happened to the Roman Empire.

Of course, there are other reasons why white identity, along with racial and national identities all over the world, have grown weak in the hyper-modernizing world of the 20th and 21st centuries. Rapid urbanization led to atomization and individualism, followed by suburbanization that led to genericism, boredom, and mall culture. While suburbs had the look of small-town-living, they were extensions of urban life, not rooted communities that developed from the soil.
Also, consumerism and non-stop barrage of electronica turned culture mainly into one of fashion and celebrity than community, values, and remembrance. And the sheer vastness of America and the mobility of Americans made it difficult to maintain a sense of place and purpose. In the US, Italian-Americans could be in New York, Chicago, Los Angeles, Miami, and etc. Chinese-Americans could be East Coast or West Coast. Or they could be in Texas. Anglos in the West have often been at odds with Anglos in the East. According to Woody Allens’ ANNIE HALL, NY Jews and LA Jews don’t see eye to eye on much of anything… except their Jewishness.

That said, the fact that Jews were able to not only maintain but, in many respects, strengthen their Jewishness despite urbanization, globalization, and modernization goes to show that a people can control their consciousness despite all material transformations. Karl Marx said material conditions determine consciousness, but Jews have certainly been an outlier in this insofar as they managed to preserve and empower their identity despite the widely held belief that globalist trends are bound to weaken all ethnic & national ties in favor of the global hubbub where all people become atomized individuals in pursuit of pleasure, happiness, and opportunity.

Then, how is it that Jews, the most globalized and modernistic people on Earth, are also the most rooted in cultural heritage, historical memory, and ethnic loyalty? It goes to show what the power of will and consciousness is capable of. Of course, plenty of Jews have fallen by the wayside. And there is no guarantee that Jewish Identity or Power will last forever. But the fact that Jews have immersed themselves in both modernity and identity demonstrates that it is POSSIBLE for other peoples IF they too were to summon the will, imagination, and vision to do likewise(and with more decency and principles).

Now, we know why Jews insist on racination for Jews and deracination for whites. As Jews are a minority, their power depends on the blind loyalty and obedience of whites. Jews know that whites are far less likely to obey and serve Jews IF whites have a proud and powerful identity of their own. Just like the pride of the slave must be broken in order for him to serve the master(the sole owner of pride), the identity of whites must be erased in order for them to serve the master-identity of Jews.

But as the current morality is against slavery and master-race ideology, Jews have cleverly shaped the Narrative to suggest that it’s all about whites suppressing their own ‘supremacist’ and ‘extremist’ tendencies to lend a hand and offer protection to poor, hapless, and beleaguered Jews who are beset on all sides by irrational ‘Anti-Semites’ and ‘Nazis’. So, we are to believe that White Supremacy is still the Way of the World, and therefore, Good Whites must make an extra effort to keep the Nazis and KKK down to protect saintly Jews and prevent another Holocaust.

Honest and well-informed people know that Nazis and KKK have zero power. We know that sporadic acts of violence toward Jews in the US and EU are reactions to Jewish Supremacism and Zionist Imperialism, often by nonwhites. While these acts of violence are often unpleasant and even contemptible, Jews have the power and hold most of the cards. And Jews have abused the power in so many ways. They angered Muslims with the Nakba and Wars for Israel. Jews have angered Eastern Europeans by pushing the Great Replacement. And guess who provoked the Ukraine War but insists the Russian invasion was ‘unprovoked’?

And many Americans are angry due to policies pushed by Jews but haven’t yet realized Jews are behind them. Many of them still do not know the full truth because the media they rely on for news & info are controlled by Jews who scapegoat everyone but themselves for all the social, economic, and political problems. If the scapegoats are not ‘white supremacists’, it’s Russia, China, Iran, or whatever.

If whites realized what’s really happening and why, they’d opt for White National Liberation movements against the Jewish Empire. If they are asked what they seek liberation from, they’d say from the Empire of Judea or EOJ(aka ZOG). But because many whites are confused and ill-informed and don’t know what to think or say, some of them stupidly fall into crazy Neo-Nazi strains of thought-and-expression, which are advantageous to Jews who can point to it and say, “Looky! Didn’t we tell you? It’s the Nazis all over again.” Thus, these ‘neo-nazi’ fools hand moral advantage to Jewish Supremacists once again.

But, if white folks characterized their movement as White National Liberation, people would ask, ‘liberation from what?’ The very notion of LIBERATION would imply that whites are under a supremacist control from which they seek emancipation and autonomy. And this tyranny is the Empire of Judea. White National Liberationists need liberation from the Wars for Israel, the immoral support of Zionist-Imperialism, and the Jewish Hatred toward Russia, Iran, and Syria. White National Liberationists want freedom from Homomania as the new-satanic-christianity, or Queertianity, all of it invented and employed by Jews. White National Liberationists want freedom from sexual colonization by blacks, aka ACOWW or Afro-Colonization of White Wombs being pushed by blacks.

There are many ways a people can be colonized. Their land can be taken by others. Their women can be taken, heir wombs colonized by others. Their children can be taken(as Greek boys who were recruited and indoctrinated to become Janissary to the Turks, a form of mental and soul-colonization). White National Liberationists would seek freedom from white sports being colonized by blacks, white history being retro-colonized by blacks & Diversity who were NOT a crucial part of European history. And above all, White National Liberationists would seek freedom from the demands of the Jewish Master Race. White National Liberationists would dare to be uppity against the Jews unlike all those cuck-collaborator House Honkey or House Goy whites who ho-de-do before their Jewish Massuhs.

But there is still a problem. What does it mean to be white? Even without(and before) ‘wokeness’ and anti-white propaganda, the notion of whiteness in America was useful and practical enough to maintain unity & order but not strong enough to constitute a united identity of depth and meaning. It is precisely that lack of substance in cultural and historical meaning that makes ‘white power’ sound more rude & abrasive than, say, the power of rooted identity.
For instance, Irish Power or Greek Power has some resonance with history and culture. It’s not just about power for power’s sake but a collective will to defend a tradition and community. But because whiteness is so vague, both too narrow and too broad, it comes across as a nihilism of power. It’s like refined sugar, which packs lots of calories but has zero nutrients.

In contrast, Jewish Power isn’t just about power-for-power’s-sake but power to defend a history and culture. It has nutrients and fiber along with the calories. As for Black Culture, it has gained an element of nobility as an identity of resistance against racial oppression. So, even though blackness is as vague as whiteness — what do blacks in the US know or care about real black cultures of Africa? — , it seems more justified as empowerment in search for justice and equality.

But, because whiteness has been synonymous with power and domination in the US, the notion of ‘white power’ seems redundant, like ‘power power’. What’s the point of calling for more power for what is already powerful?
Such an argument would have been valid in the past but is no longer in the rapidly transforming America. History isn’t static. At one time, China was the richest and most powerful civilization on Earth. Then, it was the Sick Man of Asia beset by imperialist powers. Then, it was a poor communist nation, united but backward. Now, it is on the rise, and it would be foolish to pretend today’s China is like the China of 100 yrs ago. Just as the Chinese changed so much in 100 yrs — along with Jews and their status in the world — , whites today are not what they were 100 yrs ago, and this goes for both those in US and EU.

Jews know very well that history is always in a state of flux(more than ever in the turbulent age of globalism), but they seek to lock the Narrative and Iconography permanently with Jews as Eternal Victims and Whites as Eternal Victors NO MATTER WHAT HAPPENS. This way, Jews get to guilt-bait whites and manipulate them into serving the poor, noble, and hapless Jews FOREVER regardless of changing conditions. And many whites go along with this Narrative because, even in their new role as cuck-servants, they get to stand next to the new master. The more deluded whites can pretend to be noble white knights defending poor noble Jews from the Dragon of Hate. It’s so much like Hollywood. Jews own the place and hold all the cards, but the movies are of Great White Knights fighting forces of White Hate and Bad Muslims to ‘save the world’.

In order for whiteness to be something other than political sugar, it has to gain in nutrients. While Jews seek to deconstruct whiteness, White National Liberationists must seek to reconstruct whiteness into meaning. This doesn’t mean this newly constructed whiteness must replace European identities such as Polishness, Hungarianness, Irishness, Russianness, and etc. Rather, it would be another plane of identity. Identity can be multi-layered. Before there were many European peoples, there was the white race. White Race biologically and ‘mytho-spiritually’ pre-existed all European cultures, ethnicities, and nationalities. It is the root, truly of blood and soil. And in the US, even as so many European identities have faded and been forgotten, there remains whiteness as a biological and genetic inheritance.

What can be done with this identity that cannot be done away by ideology or propaganda? Jews seek to deconstruct and invalidate it. But WNL or White National Liberators can construct whiteness into a meaning of depth and substance. One of blood and soil, of one history and continuity, one of evolution and environment. A Book can be written on the subject, and it can be shared and read. And then, whiteness will have justification for power and revival. It may even gain a covenant.

 
Hide 43 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Franz says:

    Here’s an easier way to look at it:

    The Secret Society of Moses: The Mosaic Bloodline and a Conspiracy Spanning Three Millennia by Flavio Barbiero

    Barbiero is a retired admiral. He also read deeply into the past and discovered the amazing fact that Jews pretty much infiltrated ancient Rome through the cult of Mithras, then created Christianity for non-Jews to make them easier to control, and so on.

    Admiral Barbiero makes a strong case, and backs his research up with tons of proof, the heraldic insignia of all European royals that are Judaic and much more.

    If Christianity “weakened” German identity, that’s because it was designed for that purpose. Only Jews seem to realize that religion is like steel, it must be shaped and tempered to be useful. The Christian “just believe it and shut up” is what is destroying all Germans and Europeans generally.

    • Replies: @Twin Ruler
    , @Corpse Tooth
  2. The Ashkenazim are NOT 50% Semitic. Perhaps you mean 0.05% Semitic.

    Be very careful of Jewish claims of their own DNA research results on the subject. The primary characteristic of the Jews collectively is not hatred of Gentiles, that comes comes second. Lying about Jews and Judaism comes first.

    See Shlomo Sand, The Invention Of The Jewish People. See Genesis 10:3 and realize that Ashkenaz was a Japhethite. See Matthew 23:15 and grasp that massive proselytizing throughout the world where Greek was the lingua-franca (post-Alexander) gave us the Jews of today.

    Look very very carefully at Jewish claims and evidence. Stop falling for that Semitic and Antisemitic stuff.

  3. Creation created naturals – natives – within natural habitats within natural boundaries…to recognize themselves as soul; soul is that which makes man walk, the tree grow and the bird fly.
    Man is the crown, the top of creation and the only creature with free will to turn conscious of soul as the be all and end all.
    If one goes with the free will across natural boundaries once goes beyond creation; beyond creation can only be the opposite. Creation is racist. Bastardization is anti creation. At the end of the day man is bound by the law of creation instead of the law of priests & politicians; e.g. the laws of motion, of action and reaction.
    As long as man’s free will ist dedicated to lust, greed, anger, attachment and ego instead of man’s free will being dedicated to soul – life, the true life, man has little chance but to keep on spinning that wheel of death and rebirth; the wheel of life on earth, the valley of death, where everyone and everything dies; the life on earth where the Jew has moved farthest from nature and created the most bastardization. Such he wants other to come closer to his bastardization, so that he does not have to feel so outcast – outcast from true life, from truth, because he has chosen to live a life of lies.
    The Jew is a thief and Jewmerica is all his and his lust, greed, anger, attachment and ego will never stop and keep going and want to suck in the whole world into his negativity for him to turn positive – and be special yet again.
    Nothing is as sick as the Jew and he infests (“invests”) the whole world. The Jews’ Third World War is up and running and it will be his last for eons to come. After that there will be no more Judaism and no more Moses religions but only religious man with religious inclination of creation – the end of bastardization and the rebirth of natural life within natural law.

  4. When (((they))) say that The Holocaust is Uniquely Evil, that is merely (((their))) thinly disguised way of making the claim that the German people, as a people, are Uniquely Evil. That they believe only the German people are Truly Evil. And none else are.

    What better way to respond to that, except to point out that Soviet and Chinese Communists carried out many, many of the very same types of military atrocities and crimes against Humanity, that Americans usually only associate with the Germans and their Nazis? Indeed, only those ignorant of Communist extermination programs would ever say that the Germans are Uniquely Evil!

    • Agree: anonymouseperson, HdC
  5. @Franz

    An interesting theory, prove it!

    • Replies: @Franz
  6. However one may feel about the Germans, or even the Nazis, the idea of the Aryan Master Race is not all that different, in truth, than the idea of the Jewish Chosen People. Both are bronze age, supremacist doctrines based upon religious superstition. The concept of the Aryan Master Race, though, came not so much from Germany as from Northern India and Iran. I find this really interesting.

  7. Intriguingly, who has ever read the Holy Bible has noticed the contrast between The Old Testament and the New Testament: the former was about revenge; the latter, forgiveness. Mind you, I cannot quite reconcile how any would assume that the Jews were both The Chosen People and The Children of The Devil, can you?

    • Replies: @Priss Factor
    , @lloyd
  8. The foundation of irreligious criticism is: Man makes religion, religion does not make man. Religion is, indeed, the self-consciousness and self-esteem of man who has either not yet won through to himself, or has already lost himself again. But man is no abstract being squatting outside the world. Man is the world of man – state, society. This state and this society produce religion, which is an inverted consciousness of the world, because they are an inverted world. Religion is the general theory of this world, its encyclopaedic compendium, its logic in popular form, its spiritual point d’honneur, its enthusiasm, its moral sanction, its solemn complement, and its universal basis of consolation and justification. It is the fantastic realization of the human essence since the human essence has not acquired any true reality. The struggle against religion is, therefore, indirectly the struggle against that world whose spiritual aroma is religion.

    Religious suffering is, at one and the same time, the expression of real suffering and a protest against real suffering. Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world, and the soul of soulless conditions. It is the opium of the people.

    The abolition of religion as the illusory happiness of the people is the demand for their real happiness. To call on them to give up their illusions about their condition is to call on them to give up a condition that requires illusions. The criticism of religion is, therefore, in embryo, the criticism of that vale of tears of which religion is the halo.

    — Karl Marx —

    • Replies: @al gore rhythms
  9. anonymous[299] • Disclaimer says:

    Steve Sailer has become deracinated in the last few years on Jewish influence. He used to write blunt articles like this https://www.takimag.com/article/are_jews_losing_control_of_the_media_steve_sailer/

    Now he’s silent about Jewish power. And at the same time I notice he has become more informed in the last year about biglaw (he made an interesting observation about agreements prepared in biglaw resembling a programming language). I wonder if a family member of his is now working at a big law firm? Is the direct action arm of the ADL threatening to cause career havoc on a family member? The ADL may well do direct action considering their history of espionage (1993 San Francisco Police Department mole scandal that was widely reported at time but never brought up again).

    • Replies: @Priss Factor
  10. @Twin Ruler

    the contrast between The Old Testament and the New Testament: the former was about revenge; the latter, forgiveness.

    But if you don’t accept Christ’s forgiveness, you get holocausted forever in the flames of hell.

    • Replies: @Twin Ruler
    , @Corpse Tooth
  11. @Priss Factor

    Try explaining that to a devout Jew!

  12. anarchyst says:

    If not for White acquiescence and absolute stupidity, jews would be rag merchants, furniture merchants, and other retail merchants, nothing more, not much different than their middle-eastern relatives.
    Looking the other way and allowing jews to amass financial, political and social power within a society is an eventual death-knell for ANY civilization.
    It has culminated in the enactment of so-called “civil-rights” laws, “public accommodations” laws, and other forced race-mixing schemes that do not apply to jews themselves. These are destructive laws whose sole purpose is to break up and fragment civil societies.
    This is the “rot” that is evident in just about every western society.
    Jews claim to be “a people who shall dwell alone”.
    It’s long overdue to remove this parasitic element of modern society and give the jews just what they claim to be–“a people who shall dwell alone”.

    • Agree: anonymouseperson
    • Replies: @Twin Ruler
  13. @anarchyst

    Come on, to be fair to the Jews, not all are pro-Black. Some, like Meir Kahane saw the Blacks for the monsters they really were!

    • Replies: @Priss Factor
  14. @Twin Ruler

    Some, like Meir Kahane saw the Blacks for the monsters they really were!

    The real problem is lots of Jews, even ‘liberal’ ones, agree with Kahane’s view of blacks(and Arabs), but they also see the usefulness of blackness as a debilitating factor against whiteness.

    Privately, Ed Koch’s view of blacks wasn’t much different from Kahane’s. But as a ‘liberal’ and Democratic mayor, he had to pretend Jews and blacks were on the same side against the ‘racists’.

    • Replies: @Twin Ruler
  15. What is termed the West would be more properly called The Jewish Empire.

  16. Franz says:
    @Twin Ruler

    prove it!

    Barbiero wrote the book and presents evidence. If you’ve already covered Atwill’s Caesar’s Messiah and pretty much any of Gerald Massey’s writings, Barbiero does the “dust up” as to the family lines and so on. Main point — the admiral DOES offer proof.

    OR believe what you want. After thirty years and having read a library on the subject, I find the Flavian explanation for Christian origins compelling. Whether it’s pro or con as far as Jesus is concerned I don’t bother with. Thomas Jefferson thought JC was a wise and even holy man but not a god. Jefferson’s bible is the one Deists still use, so obviously there was a lot of agreement with Tom.

    • Replies: @James J. O'Meara
  17. lloyd says: • Website
    @Twin Ruler

    Actually there is forgiveness in the Old Testament. Esau forgave and embraced his younger twin brother Jacob Israel who had stolen his inheritance. At least, unlike modern Zionists, Jacob didn’t continue stealing. Ishmael forgave his father Abraham and attended his funeral. Neither Esau nor Ishmael are of Hebrew lineage. They are like the long suffering Palestinians. Saul forgave the King of the Amalekites until he followed the prophet Samuel’s orders. The only really unpleasant character in the Old Testament is Yahweh. He is entirely genocidal and vengeful.

    • Replies: @Corpse Tooth
  18. @Franz

    “If Christianity ‘weakened’ German identity, that’s because it was designed for that purpose.”

    Germanic identity, Celtic identity, and the other Nordic “pagan” systems. The worship of Christ became the de facto religion of Rome and its territories after the Council of Nicea 325 AD.

    “Jews pretty much infiltrated ancient Rome through the cult of Mithras”

    The infiltration continued through the Middle Ages with Christianized Jews belonging to sects like the Marranos and Conversos. The apogee of medieval infiltration came with the founding of the Jesuits in 1540 AD.

  19. @lloyd

    “Yahweh”

    The demiurge, or spider god of the Gnostics.

  20. @Priss Factor

    Or you spend eternity on Yahweh’s prison planet.

  21. Greetings Jung-Freud,

    The interpretive key is the contest between Jacob & Esau. Esau is the proverbial “deplorable” shaped by carpentry, plumbing, hunting & fishing. Jacob understands that the contract is more important than labor. Esau is too busy working to notice he’s being outmaneuvered. A key component to the Jewish Identity is “manual labor is for schmucks.”

    In order for white people to become white, they must be confined. Hence the sublimation of ethnic, religious & national identities into “whiteness” occurs on the yard at San Quentin. Whiteness occurs most readily in a closed environment.
    “Whiteness” may also be inextricably linked to the Industrial Revolution. Perhaps the decline in this mode of production will spell the decline of Whiteness. Perhaps the Railroad & Steam Engine were the apotheosis of white culture.
    The numbers indicate the Church of Latter Day Saints will be the great repository of the Caucasian Genome going forward. I think they’ll do a better job than plug-ugly, tattooed, Soccer Hooligan in the English Midlands.
    And if young, white boys want to promote “whiteness,” why don’t they become diesel mechanics or plumbers or metal workers? Can I take credit for Bach, Mozart & Beethoven if I can’t read music. The chief interpreters of great music are Asians & Ashkenazis.
    The first thing fat, white, boomers need to do is stop watching television. It’s time to retreat, in the manner of Washington after the first few skirmishes in the Revolutionary War. Retreat is a legitimate military strategy.
    Modernity is Judeo-Masonic. This is their time. The Jew solidifies his mastery everytime the goy purchases something on credit or “relaxes” in front of the Television.

    “These fragments I have shored against my ruins…” T.S. Eliot

    It’s all over Casanova.

    Keep up the good work. I’ve got your back.

    • Replies: @Priss Factor
  22. @anonymous

    Steve Sailer has become deracinated in the last few years on Jewish influence.

    Not quite. He was always something of a philosemite. His criticism of Jewish Power was meant to be constructive, i.e. Jews as the new elites should be more mindful of the responsibilities. Unlike others in the dissident right, his argument wasn’t that Jews shouldn’t have power but that they should use it more wisely.

    Given the recent course of history, one could argue such a view is naive and foolish, and I personally agree with those who believe Jewish Power cannot be reformed. It’s too far gone in nuttery and must be totally defeated, like Nazi Germany or Imperial Japan, or it must collapse, like the Soviet Union.

    So, why the sentimentality? It could be a boomer thing. In the formative period of the boomers, Jews weren’t yet all-powerful and were often interesting critics of society and culture. Even neocons at one time were more than about ‘muh Israel’. In contrast, people like Nick Fuentes who grew up under the full weight of Jewish Power have no such sentimentality.
    Also, while some boomers were into the fight, others weren’t fighters and rather laid back in their approach. Sailer is more Charlie Brown than Lucy Van Pelt, more Beach Boy than Street Fighting Man.

    There’s also the Moses Complex factor. Sailer’s under the delusion(despite his very un-semitic physiognomy) that he’s Jewish or part-Jewish(LOL), like how Moses found out he’s a Hebrew and not an Egyptian. Moses led the troublesome Jews toward the Promised Land, and Sailer seems to see himself as a kind of intellectual Moses who’s leading the Jews-gone-batty to the rational HBD pasture where they really belong.
    Like Charles Murray, this neo-covenantism says Jews should embrace race realism because it can only reveal them to be the superior race with the highest IQ and lots of potential wisdom(if they stopped acting so paranoid and hostile). In other words, Jews are indeed the superior people, and they’ve no more reason to fear whites as whites are into ‘muh Israel’, and so, Jews should stop voting like Puerto Ricans and take the throne as the loftiest of the whites.

    Because Jewish Power is so total and absolute, some feel that the ONLY chance whites have is to turn the Jews to their side. Jewish Power is deemed immovable, almost godlike. It simply can’t be beat, and those who try will end up like Richard Spencer.
    So, the new idea is the Sailer Highfalutin Strategy. The classic Sailer Strategy was to win more whites to the GOP. But this ran into problems with Trump, who was more implicitly pro-white than other candidates. Now, why would so many whites be turned off by pro-white Trump?
    Because Jews control the gods and filled educated white minds with the view that whiteness is deplorable and NOT OKAY. This is why Sailer Strategy failed. Appealing to whiteness is regarded by too many whites as ‘racist’. So, the only hope left is the Sailer Highfalutin Strategy of never alienating Jews and gently and patiently trying to convince them that stuff like BLM and Diversity will hurt them as fellow whites. So, Jews should drop that crap and use their control of the gods to be more white-friendly.

    There’s also the respectability factor. Sailer’s not a true ‘gangster’. Now, his views are disreputable, part of crime-think. The respectable community see Sailer as a thought-criminal, though somewhat tolerable because he still uses ‘racist’ as epithet and claims he’s opposed to stuff like BLM because it ends up killing more Negroes(when that’s the only thing about BLM that I like).

    The respectable community sees Sailer as disreputable, but Sailer wants to be respectable(and be part of the conversation with Nassim Taleb and Julio Yglesias. He won’t give up his racial views, but he’s eager to make them respectable as part of social science and biology.

    It’s like the number-crunching Ace Rothstein character in CASINO. Though involved in the criminal world, he wants gambling to be respectable, part of the legitimate order. He deals with gangsters because he has to but would prefer not to.
    In contrast, Nicky(Joe Pesci) is happy to be a gangster and sees Las Vegas as one big gangster paradise and doesn’t care what the respectable community thinks.

    Among dissidents, there are two types. Those who relish being outlaws and those who find themselves on the ‘wrong’ side the law just because.
    It’s like during the Prohibition, some took to liquor business because they loved being gangsters while others consumed it illegally because they had no other choice.

    • Replies: @anonymous
  23. @7crabwalk11

    The numbers indicate the Church of Latter Day Saints will be the great repository of the Caucasian Genome going forward. I think they’ll do a better job than plug-ugly, tattooed, Soccer Hooligan in the English Midlands.

    Mormies rejected race-ism and will go the way of other Christian sects. It caved to globo-homo and plays sidekick to Jewish Supremacism. It has no future.

  24. Jews are NOT white and in fact have done the greatest harm to whites.

  25. Although some of this author’s obsessively long drawn out articles are interesting, all the “thans” without “rathers” in front of them are nauseating. It is like some kind of unappealing, bastardized pig latin. Does he / she speak binary?

  26. Whites are a dying race!

  27. On the article, the author Jung-Freud…

    This Jew knows his issues, peddling effortless-ly through the alleys and country-roads of racism+religion+tribalism+generational consciousness (tradition, the bagel, rye bread) is the consequence of well absorbed formal knowledge, instinct, tradition.

    The article is better synthesis, useful to the ones who are willing to capture the drift of human evolving. Thanks.

  28. @Franz

    More recently, Creating Christ : How Roman Emperors Invented Christianity, by James S. Valliant & Warren Fahy.

    https://counter-currents.com/2022/08/better-call-saul-christian-romanism-as-the-first-psy-op-part-1/

    • Thanks: Kim Jong Il
    • Replies: @James J. O'Meara
  29. anonymous[333] • Disclaimer says:
    @Priss Factor

    The ability to name the Jew ended in 1981 and the ADL made sure to enforce the rule.

    https://www.nytimes.com/1981/07/13/us/mccloskey-defends-remarks-on-success-of-jewish-lobbying.html

    In 1976 it was possible to casually talk about the Jewish Lobby. Mike Wallace did not hesitate to use the term in an interview with the Shah. https://www.nytimes.com/1976/10/22/archives/the-shah-on-israel-corruption-torture-and.html

    Wallace: Surely, Your Majesty you’re not telling me that the Jewish lobby in the United States pulls the strings of the Presidency?

    Shah: Not entirely. But, I think even a little too much, even for Israel interests.

    Wallace: You think the Jewish lobby in the United States is too powerful for the interests of Israel?

    Shah: I think so. Sometimes they are disserving the interests of Israel.

    Wallace: Explain

    Shah: Because they’re pushing around too many people.

    Wallace: How do you mean “pushing around”?

    Shah: Well, pressuring. They have many means at their disposal. They are putting on pressure on many, many people. And at the end, I don’t think that it will even help Israel.

  30. White Gentiles have no future!

  31. Germany is no longer a separate and sovereign country anymore. It is merely a Colony of THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. It is nothing more now. Most US Military bases are in Germany, and to a lesser extent in Japan. Of course, in the past, Germany did some bad things. But, that was when Germany was still a country. Germany is no longer a country anymore!

  32. @Twin Ruler

    The article is muddled and difficult to read.

  33. So many flights-of-fancy here….flitting this way and that, trying vainly to fill the heavens with their dodging-and-weaving and dipping-and-diving, their trilling-and-screeching and honking-and-hooting. In that always-necessary reckoning known as the final analysis, though, they all effectively cancel each other out, having entirely lost The Ground from which they all got launched to begin with, and to which they must all inevitably return. So why put that off any longer? “Let’s go back to Luckenbach, Texas,….back to the basics of Life.” Let’s look at it all within the context of that Essential Thing, Organic Functional Integrity

    Let’s start with the Natural Fact that Humans, for all of their baseless “civilized” pretensions to being THE “exceptional” Kind here in the LivingLoving Arrangement of Earth and Sky, remain nevertheless a Species of Animal. As such, and in-common with many other Species of Animal, they are easily observed to be made-up-of different Breeds of each Kind. Many of the Humans captivated by the immune-suppression regime of the Planet-wasting “civilization” disease process have long since been foolishly obfuscating the plain language of Basic Biology (where their own supposed “self”-interests are involved) by trying vainly, for example, to substitute for the accurate and specific term Breed, the vague and semantically valueless word “race.” We’ll just stick with plain-speaking here.

    So, just as it is with various Breeds of other Animals, those of Human Animals will exhibit particular characteristics that (in mostly-superficial ways) differentiate one from the other Breeds of their Kind. There are also within Breeds particular traits, again mostly superficial, that further differentiate one from another. Among that Breed of Humans whose members are characteristically pale-skinned, there are those who are generally fair-haired and blue-eyed, for example, as-well-as those who are not. Any sensibly aware and attentive Human here can of-course come-up with plenty of pertinent illustrations and examples of such obvious Natural Facts. They’re welcome to have at it!

    So let’s cut right to the chase. Among the Breed of pale-skinned Peoples are some who “self”-identify as “Jews.” They can be and have over-time been observed to exhibit certain characteristics of appearance and behavior that, while hardly unique to them, are seen generally to be prominent “markers” of their sort among the Breeds of pale-skinned Peoples. What these might or might not be is not germane to our treatment here, which is about Basic Biology. So details will be dispensed-with.

    We can see that all the various Breeds of Human, including such “self”-selected and “exclusive” types as “Jews,” have in-common the capacity to interbreed with each other….resulting obviously in plenty of mixed-breed members of the Human Animal Species, because they all do it. Whether that is a “good” or “bad” thing is again beyond our scope here….except to note that it too is entirely a matter of Basic Biology, and won’t ultimately be determined by anything anybody “believes” about it.

    From here in Indian Country us surviving Free Wild Peoples of-course note the differentiating features of various types of, for instance, the pale-skinned Peoples. How could we not, given our long and very often difficult experience with them. We would not, though, give anybody a wooden nickel for the effects of those minute and trivial variations, for better or worse, on that experience. They are all of them pretty much the same to us.

    The “race”-ists can make of that what they will. Meantime, our precious attention will stay on such Essential Things as Organic Functional Integrity.

  34. @James J. O'Meara

    Ongoing summary discussion of Carlotta’s argument that “Jesus” was Julius Caesar:

    https://barsoom.substack.com/p/the-gospel-of-mark-antony-2-parallel

  35. It all started with Deism! From Deism came The Separation of Church and State. After all, the Founders did not desire a country ruled by any revealed, scriptural religion. That is why “America” is not a Christian Nation. Whoever ever said it ever was, or was ever meant to be, is either an idiot or a liar. It is all to due with Freemasonry, which is a Secular Religion-or, to put it equally oxymoronically, a Legal Mafia.

    After The Civil War, the War of Northern Aggression, not only did The Separation of Church and State extend to the States, but they introduced a new legal innovation, namely The Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment, which could only have come into existence due to The Separation of Church and State. Indeed, the 14th Amendment is merely The Separation of Church and State taken to its logical conclusion.

    • Replies: @Priss Factor
  36. @Twin Ruler

    But Western nations without separation of church and state ended up the same way.

    • Replies: @Twin Ruler
  37. Their semiteness is their bonding glue. Those of semiteness have a people where White people have a race but not a people. Individualism has been the downfall of Western man.
    Look how everything can be construed as antisemitic racism. All Jews collectivise against antisemitic racism and it serves them well.

    • Agree: Twin Ruler
    • Replies: @Twin Ruler
  38. @Chris Geel

    German Americans should reassert their Germanness, come hell or high water. German culture and heritage should make a come back. If other Ethnic Groups do not like it, that is their problem. Besides, Anglo Saxonism is merely a watered down version of Germanism, nothing more!

  39. @Kim Jong Il

    That’s a fascinating quote. I found myself agreeing with his assessment on the role of religion. In his case, I guess he felt that it was not enough to abolish religion, but replace it with a system which does offer an ‘essence’ to human existence. If this is the case, this is where i would part company with Marx, because Godless state-enforced religions seem to me infinitely scarier even than religions like Islam.

    • Replies: @Kim Jong Il
  40. TYU says:

    “Indeed, Jewish-Americans range from almost entirely white to almost entirely Semitic, evident in their varying appearances.”

    For god’s sake, please use valid terminology.

  41. @al gore rhythms

    i am glad that someone can get what Marx wanted to say. there are many interesting things about Marx’s view on religion, especially when he criticized Feuerbach’s view on religion which is a critic on hegel’s view. if you have some leisure time, read hegel’s, then Feuerbach’s, then Marx’s view on religion. you would find that the religious problems are social problems. they come from the society and have to be treated as social shortcomings, social incompetencies, social failures, and so on. the society that created the religion always has the potential to wipe it out.

    religion is not sacred and scary, just like human society is not sacred and scary. there is nothing mystical about it, just like there is nothing mystical about human society. religion is a problem, and hegel had said that every problem contains the seeds of its own solution.

    • Thanks: al gore rhythms
Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply -


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Jung-Freud Comments via RSS
PastClassics
Which superpower is more threatened by its “extractive elites”?
The Surprising Elements of Talmudic Judaism
The Shaping Event of Our Modern World
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement
From the Leo Frank Case to the Present Day