The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewJung-Freud Archive
Slavocaust, Past and Present, or the Aryan and Semitic War on Slavic Peoples and Cultures
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks
Slavocaust from the Semites. The Great Famine of the 1930s. Stalin and Jewish Bolsheviks implemented Forced-Collectivization that led to 7 million deaths in the Soviet Union. 3.5 million were in Ukraine alone, mostly Christian Slavs. As Jews were urban-dwellers and safely ensconced in elite positions, they evaded the brunt of the famine and ate well while millions of Slavs across the country faced death by starvation. At the time, the Jewish-owned New York Times ran articles denying the existence of the famines, and the reporter, the homosexual Walter Duranty, was awarded with the Pulitzer Prize for one of the greatest Fake News stories in journalism.
Slavocaust from the Aryans. Nazi Germans invade Russia with genocidal plans to wipe out tens of millions of Slavs to be replaced with German farmers. Had the Germans won the war and carried out the Slavocaust in full measure, Russian Slavs would have been turned into slaves or slaughtered like cattle. Unlike Jewish Bolsheviks who hid their ethnic animus with socialist ideology, Germans were blatant in their contempt for Eastern Slavs as untermensch who must make way for superior Germans.

20th Century was no stranger to tragedies. There were the two great World Wars. There was the mass killings of Armenians, the Shoah, Nanking Massacre, Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Rwandan Genocide, the Killing Fields of Cambodia, Mao’s famines and campaign against culture, wars in Vietnam and Algeria, and many more. But perhaps one that has been overlooked could broadly be called the Slavocaust, or Slavic-Holocaust. Now, the tragedies that fall into this category have been studied and discussed — the Great Famine in Ukraine under Bolshevism is one of the most well-known example — as individual events, but perhaps what we need is a more comprehensive overview of a pattern of events that could be summed up as a War on Slavs. When we ponder the entire forest than fixate on individual trees, a pattern emerges. One such pattern may explain the particularly tragic history of the Slavs, especially Russians/Ukrainians. And in a very real way, the animus behind Slavocaust of the 20th century is still with us, especially as so much of the world is under the hegemony of the Empire of Judea or EOJ. Jewish hatred of Slavs is now near-genocidal.

The main pattern that emerges from Eastern Europe and Russia in the 20th century concerns the Jewish(Semitic) and Germanic(Aryan) Wars of Enslavement and Extermination against the Slavic Peoples. Why did Germans and Jews play key roles in this? This seems all the odder considering that, especially from 1933 to 1945, the Semites and Aryans were the fiercest enemies in the world. To be sure, there was a supporting cast of characters in the Slavocaust by Anglos, British and American. And to a lesser extent, Japan that was used, prior to WWII and during the Cold War, as an collaborator against Russia.

Now, I don’t mean to suggest that Slavs have been some pure-as-snow saints of history. As we all know, Slavic history is filled with warriors, conquerors, ruthless tyrants, imperialists, and lunatics. Russia got so big because it conquered other peoples, and it’s understandable why many peoples, including non-Russian Slavs, developed hostilities toward Russians as overbearing invaders and despoilers. People are people, and Slavs could be as good or bad as anyone(though perhaps Negroes are one race that defies imagination in terms of morality; DNA tells us that all of humanity could roughly be divided between Sub-Saharan Africans and Everyone Else).

That said, geography condemned the Slavs(especially those further to the East) to a rather troubled place in history. Like Southern Europe — Balkans and Spain, Italy, & Portugal — , the Slavic territories were exposed to non-European invaders. Spain came under Moorish rule for several centuries. Parts of the Balkans came under Turkish rule(though some may include Turkey as part of Europe). As Slavic peoples lived in the Eastern territories, they were the first Europeans to be ravaged when the Mongols moved westward from the Gobi steppes. And Russians were constantly at war with the Turkic Muslim peoples. For nearly three centuries, Russians lived under the Mongol yoke. And with the Muslims of Turkic regions and Central Asia, the Russian gave as good as they got(but they ‘got’ a lot). According to Andrei Tarkovsky in THE MIRROR, Russia played a christ-like role in European history. If not for Russia as sacrificial bulwark, the West could have been flooded with the Mongol Horde, and then, who knows what the history of Christendom and Europe might have been. Weakened by threats from North Africa, Turkic peoples, and Mongols, maybe the European pageant would have been quashed… like the glory of Greece was lost long ago when invasions upon invasions left only skeletons of Hellenic glory.

And yet, it was precisely because Russia underwent that ‘christ-like’ sacrificial role that it came to be despised than appreciated by the West. Instead of gratitude toward Slavs for serving as the demographic brunt against the Mongols, many in the West came to see them as whites tainted with Asiatic blood and poisoned with Oriental Despotism. They were seen as the lesser Europeans, if European at all.
And even in the Modern Era, Russian aristocrats came to regard their people in a condescending, even contemptuous, manner. If Russian rulers like Ivan the Terrible were infected with the virus of ‘Oriental Despotism’ and ruled like a ‘Khan’, the later Russian rulers held themselves aloof from the Slavic rabble; they took special pride in their ‘western’ cultivation. The famed Catherine the Great was actually a German. And Russian elites who modeled themselves on Western attitudes and manners snubbed their own national folk. Given that only a sliver of privileged Russians had the means to be educated in the West, it led to a widening divide between the elites and the masses. Russian royalty married with non-Russians, especially the Germans. Many preferred to speak French than Russian, considered as a barbarian tongue. These elites weren’t ‘oriental despotist’ but despotic just the same because they turned up their noses at Russian commoners as semi-barbarian louts and boors munching on raw potatoes and mired in superstition. So, whether Russian elites followed the Oriental model or the Western model, they generally disdained their folks. In Oriental Despotic mode, the masses were seen as obedient cattle. In Western Enlightenment mode, the masses were seen as ignorant dummies. Peter the Great was a westernizing modernizer, but he treated his people as chattel in the building of St. Petersburg. Catherine the Great patronized Western artists and thinkers but only reinforced the institution of serfdom. Enlightenment was for the washed and perfumed.

Looking further back into history, we find more reasons as to why the West generally came to disdain the Slavs. Christianity spread to Western and Northern Europe before it moved deep into Slavic territory. So, the Christian West once regarded Slavic peoples as unredeemed pagans. For this reason, the Christian West’s prohibition of slavery(among Christians) didn’t apply to pagan Slavs who were regarded as lowly heathens. The fact that the term ‘slave’ derives from ‘Slav’ is sure indication of the massive scale of the slave trade involving Slavs. Christian West and Jews sold millions of Slavs to North Africa and Near East. For much of Western and Central European history, the Slavs were regarded as barbarians, the last ones to be civilized and converted to Christianity. Western Europeans looked upon Slavs like the English once regarded the Scottish or how today’s urban yuppie elites feel about rural white folks in the South. (It’s no wonder that Andrei Konchalovsky had such rapport with the subject of rural white folks in SHY PEOPLE set in Louisiana.)
Furthermore, Russian Slavs always seemed to bet on the wrong horse. When Russians finally adopted Christianity, they chose the Eastern Orthodox Faith than Catholicism. (Certain Slavic groups became Catholics, drawing them closer to the more advanced West.) At the time, the two great centers of Christianity were Rome and Constantinople. Russians bet on the everlasting glory of Constantinople, but it would fall into decline and eventually fall to the Turks whereas the Roman Church would grow bigger and stronger, until it was confronted with the ‘heresy’ of Protestantism. Even though the wars between the Catholics and Protestants were many times more violent than anything between Catholics and Orthodox, the two great Western Churches arrived at a way to tolerate and even cooperate with one another. Besides, even if in opposition, Protestantism was a direct outgrowth of Catholicism. It was all-in-the-family. In contrast, the Orthodox Church evolved in a universe all its own. So, even though Western Europe and Russia were both Christian, there was a cultural-spiritual gulf that could never be closed.

In a way, the prelude to the Slavocaust of the 20th Century was the Napoleonic invasion of Russia. Not only did it lead to the deaths of millions of Russians under an emperor who emerged from the French Revolution but it led to resentment against Russia among radicals and progressives in the coming years.
In one way, Russia was appreciated as the savior that finally broke the back of the increasingly aggressive and arrogant French Empire. Defeat of France meant liberation all across Europe. And yet, in yrs to come, many radicals came to revere Napoleon as a romantic figure who’d once nearly united all of Europe under Enlightenment values. So, from this viewpoint, Russia was not so much the savior of Europe from French domination but the reactionary ditch that destroyed the wheels of revolution. After all, following the downfall of the Napoleonic Order, most of Europe came under aristocratic rule for the next hundred years before it all came tumbling down in the catastrophe of World War I.
In the wake of Napoleon’s defeat, the kings and aristocrats swiftly regained control in nearly all of Europe, France included. Especially because Russia was the most backward part of Europe — it still had serfdom — , its role as the molder of the post-Napoleonic Order didn’t bode well with idealists restless for change. Then, it is understandable why there was a special fury against the Russian order from radicals both within and outside Russia. Russia was seen by radicals as the haystack that broke the camel’s back of the revolution. When the October Revolution happened in 1917, it was the sweetest revenge to finally witness the most backward part of Europe undergo the most radical transformation. The element of revenge against Russia wasn’t only with Jews. It was with radicals and revolutionaries all across Europe. (Jews, along with Mongols, are the only people who conquered Russia. Jews did it again in the 1990s and are planning another Slavocaust.)

As the movie NICHOLAS AND ALEXANDRA finely illustrated, Russia was both a great power and weak power. Immense and limitless in raw materials with a population bigger than any other European country yet burdened by that very size. Also, ruling over so many ethnic groups meant the Russian core would come under constant assault by radical elements of every one of them, from Latvians to Georgians. Also, the concentration of power in the Tsar meant that the fall of that one edifice would throw all of the empire into turmoil, leading to civil war and chaos until a new regime took control with an iron grip.
Even though Russians are racially closer to Anglos and Germans than to Mongols, Turks, or Mexicans, the national character of Russians(and some other Slavs as well) was closer to that of Mexicans: Deficient in spark, initiative, and drive. Mexico was once immense, almost as big as the United States. So, why did it lose the SW territories? Because while Anglos swiftly moved westward to settle new lands and build enterprise, most Mexicans remained in their villages and eat tacos. If Mexicans had had the drive of Anglos, they would have developed the SW territories and turned Mexico into a great power. (The great migration of Mexicans into the US since the 1960s hasn’t been about initiative and spark but the opposite. Because Mexicans can’t do much on their own, they want to come to the US to just work for ‘gringo’.) Russians, to be sure, were far bolder than Mexicans in territorial ambition. They took all of Siberia and even claimed Alaska before stupidly selling it to the US. Still, Russians were far less good in developing than in merely conquering new lands. Look what a handful of Anglos did with Canada compared with what Russians did with all the territory they conquered.

Because Russia was both a great power and a weak power, both a strong man and a sick man, it was seen as predator by some, prey by others. Or as both predator and prey. To the Chinese whose star had fallen in the 19th century, Russia was just another predatory power scrambling to grab parts of North Asia. The Ottomans, also in decline, regarded Russia with growing fear. The British lion both despised and worried about the Russian bear. The Brits, the rulers of the greatest empire in the world in the late 19th century, knew Russia was backward in industry and technology. But the Brits also knew that Russians had embarked on industrialization on a massive scale to catch up with the West. Also, able Germans ran many Russian institutions and industries. Also, the sheer size of Russia intimidated the Brits. British Empire was huge but vulnerable because small numbers of British overlords ruled over increasingly restless natives. The British dominated the seas, but water wasn’t as firm as land. British hostility against Russia grew to such intensity that the UK once sided with the Turks against Russia. And the UK also sided with Japan against Russia in the early 20th century. But the real tragedy that would befall the Slavs in the 20th century had to do with Jews and Germans, for reasons different and similar .

Upon German unification under the Prussian helm, the mentality of the Germans began to change. Though a capable people over the centuries, the Germans were too fragmented to be a great power. But the fact that Prussians, though limited in number and territory, could gain a vital foothold in Continental politics was a harbinger of things to come. If tiny Prussia could assert itself as a major player in Europe, what would happen if the German folks were to unite as one? Soon after the unification of German peoples, the new nation overshadowed France, traditionally the great land power in Europe. German victory against France that opposed further unification of Germany was so overwhelming that the French never fully recovered their pride. (Even though France won WWI, it was due to the grand alliance with UK, Russia, and US.) With such power, the Germans began to think in terms of their ‘place in the sun’. It was no longer enough to be part of a good nation, rich nation, or strong nation. Germany had to be a great power, even a world power. But the world was already taken. Brits and French had grabbed much of Africa, Middle East, and Asia. The New World was also colonized and taken. Plenty of Germans settled in the US, but they were losing their links to Germany. So, in order for Germany to become a world power, it had to move eastward and grab territory from vast Russia. And Germans felt justified in this for the same reason Anglo-Americans did in taking the SW territories. Anglos figured, “Mexicans are such useless, clueless, and uninspired bunch of bums, so we proud and tireless Anglos with work ethic should make something of the land.” Germans felt the same way. They felt that Russians were too lazy, stupid, and drunk to deserve all that land. Germans could do so much more with it. Why let Russians have all that land and make nothing of it? If Germans took it, they could it up and become a great power. Now, such feelings weren’t necessarily genocidal, just like the Anglo-American conquest of SW territories was really just a land-grab. It was not a racial war on the Mexicans, and indeed, Anglos and Mexicans learned to co-exist in many communities, like we see in PAT GARRETT & BILLY THE KID.

But overtime, certain radical-racist elements of the German Population came to develop a racial rationale for invading and dominating over the Slavs. In their eyes, Slavs(especially Russians) weren’t merely lazy and underachieving whites but ‘untermensch’ whose lot was to serve as helots as Germans or be gradually eliminated to make way for German settlers. Even though the ‘Aryan’ vision of German-ruled Russia was frightening, there was a certain cold logic to it. A people who rule but come to rely on the labor of another people will eventually fall. White Americans in the North and Zionists both understood this. White Americans in the South made a huge mistake by bringing black slave labor from Africa. It made for profits in the short-term but losses in the long-term. Same happened to whites in South Africa who came to rely on black labor. In contrast, whites in the American North and Zionists in Palestine/Israel understood that a people must both rule and do the labor. This is why Jews are safe in Israel whereas whites are all but finished in South Africa. Spartans also failed in the long run because they relied on non-Spartan helots to do most of the work.

Anyway, even though the National Socialists were correct about their ethno-theory-of-management-and-labor, its implementation in Russia would have been ghastly. In order for Russia to be converted into a world of German ownership and labor, the native populations would have to be eliminated by the tens of millions. So, the ethno-theory-of-management-and-labor is morally applicable only in one’s own nation, not in other lands as it’d necessitate either genocide or mass expulsion. For Israel to become a Jewish state, the existing Palestinian population(700,000 of them) had to be removed by massive pogroms and ‘ethnic cleansing’. But at least, the Zionists didn’t kill too many people.

The Nazis, in contrast, had diabolical plans in the East. Even though the Nazis eventually lost the war and suffered horrible war crimes themselves, their Lebensraum plan was partially implemented in conquered areas, and the results were horrific. Even Slavs who had initially greeted the Germans as liberators from Godless communism came to fear the ruthless Germans more than the Soviets. Even though the Nazi Slavocaust ultimately failed, the Russian and other Slavic died in the millions by execution, starvation, and retaliation. To the extent that the Nazi Aryans weren’t merely out to grab some territory — something Europeans have been doing to one another since time immemorial — but carrying out a racial ideology of enslavement and extermination, it was indeed an act of genocide. Thus, the term ‘Slavocaust’ is most appropriate. Even though the brunt of Slavocaust fell on Slavs of the Soviet Union, the Nazis also acted brutally in Poland, vacillating between treating Poles as fellow second-rate Aryans or Slavic scum. And even though Nazi violence against Czechs was far less than toward Poles and Russians, there’s no telling what the long-term plan would have been. Germans, especially of Austrian background, hated Czechs because of bad blood between the two communities in the eras prior to WWI and immediate thereafter when German minorities in Czech-controlled territories were mistreated.

If the Nazi Slavocaust against Russians was blatant enough — the Nazis wore their radical-racist ideology on their sleeve — , it was more complicated with the Jews. Indeed, it could be argued that because Jewish Bolsheviks acted out of ‘social justice’, their war on the Slavosphere wasn’t really genocidal in nature. And it is true enough that Jews didn’t mean to wipe out entire populations of Slavs and replace them with another population. Still, despite all the egalitarian rhetoric, the fact is many Jews were motivated by a powerful animus against Russia. Partly, it was revenge for Russian ‘oppression’ of Jews. Even though the Jewish victims of the periodic pogroms weren’t exceedingly high(compared to 20th century horrors), Jews knew things were much better for their kind in Western Europe. On the basis of such contrasts, Russia seemed like an especial hell. It seemed even more so when Jews began to move to America. Suddenly, Jews compared Jews-over-here with Jews-over-there, and they concluded Russia as the worst place for Jews.

But there was also the long-existing Jewish view of goyim, especially Christians. Jews hated Christians as the people who stole their religion, their God. Also, Jews, who became adept in business and learning, came to regard the vast majority of Russians as dumb, lazy, and childish morons. Jews hated Russian elites as pompous a**holes and loathed Russian masses as ignorant, stupid, and boorish. So, even though Jewish Semites didn’t have an ideology of enslavement and extermination against the Slavs like the Nazi Aryans did, their radical cause wasn’t merely fueled by idealism and vision of justice. It was driven by animus, hatred, contempt, arrogance, and revanchism.

Jewish Bolsheviks were clever in cloaking their bilious impulses with prophetic promise of a better tomorrow. But in the end, a person is more about what he feels than what he says. If a person hates you, it doesn’t matter how he rationalizes his actions toward you in the name of goodwill and camaraderie. His gut instinct is out to get you. It’s like Jewish supremacists in the US always talk about curing white people of their ‘sins’ of ‘racism’, ‘white supremacism’, and etc. Jews talk like they’re doing whites a favor. But in truth, they are driven by ethnic animus, paranoia, and supremacism. They want to take over as the superior group and simply cannot abide by any goy group that says NO to the Jewish agenda.
If Jews feel contempt for Russian Slavs for being too stupid and lazy, they fear Anglos and Germanics for being too capable. In both cases, Jews act like Bad Faith Doctors who say they’re offering medicine when it’s really poison. Even though some Bolsheviks, Jewish or non-Jewish, were sincere in their hopes for a better world, there were too many nasty, vicious, sadistic, and psychopathic Jews among them who took up the cause because it opened the door to power and control. And in the guise of moral progress, they could wipe out entire classes of enemies. When certain farmers wouldn’t hand over the grain, they were classified as ‘kulaks’ and were eliminated without mercy.

Granted, Jews didn’t do this alone. They worked with the Georgian Stalin who regarded people as pawns. Jews weren’t the only ones with blood-soaked hands, but they were the main drivers. And in the early period of Soviet history, they were the most determined ethnic players at the elite level. (Also, once the ball got rolling, there was no turning back. The Bolshevik terror was so extreme that is the Bolsheviks were to fall, they’d surely be torn limb from limb. Just like it was a zero-sum-game of win everything or lose everything for the Germans when they invaded Russia in WWII, Jewish Bolsheviks knew it was win or lose with nothing in between when Russia fell into the throes of Civil War. So, Jewish Bolsheviks doubled down on the terror with no show of mercy. We see the same psychological pattern among Jews today. They’ve pushed anti-white and anti-Christian PC so far that they fear it’s win or lose; there is no more middle ground. Jews went all in for the jackpot. Jews sure can be degenerate gamblers.)

If history has taught us anything, Jews are the people with the deepest, bitterest hatred. With a nomadic-merchant ‘parasitic’ mentality, Jews have developed this ethno-megalomania that everything exists to be claimed and owned by them. If most people get upset when others try to take their stuff, Jews get upset when others won’t let Jews take their stuff. Granted, there is a partial justification as to why Jews may feel this way. Unlike Vikings and Mongols, Jews generally didn’t just plunder stuff outright. Rather, they came to non-Jewish places and set up businesses or services that expanded economic activity. So, Jews felt the bulk of the wealth should belong to them. This makes some sense, even good sense. If Jews in Russia build up businesses and generate revenue, why shouldn’t they keep most of the profits after taxes? The problem is Jews went further. Since Jews are adept at making money off the land(by means fair or foul), they began to feel that the land itself should belong to them.

For example, since Jews are the best businessmen in Russia, they should have the primary claim to Russia itself. It sounds crazy to us, but it sounds totally logical and justified to Jews. And in some nations, Jews have convinced the native population of the justness of such attitude. Jews did this by promoting the Shoah and presenting Jews as the most tragic, wise, wonderful, funny, endearing, and lovable people. So, many goyim in US and UK want to go out on a limb to help the Jews to take over more and more. It’s like fans want their celebrity idols to become richer and richer, even at their own expense. For many cucky goyim, it’s not enough to make Jews the richest people in the US and UK. Jews must have de facto ownership of US and UK so that THEY get to decide the national policy. So, if Jews say “America is a nation of immigrants” and that tons of non-whites must come and replace white people, it must be so because Jews are such a wise people, a sacred people, a wonderful people, a genius people. Many white Christians believe that their main mission in life is to appease and serve the noble, tragic, and wise Jews. In their eyes, there is nothing alarming about Jews, as the 2% of the population, controlling over 90% of the media. it only seems right. For white progs, there is nothing wrong with Jews replacing Christianity with Homomania. There is nothing wrong with Jews turning the US from a white nation into a ‘brown’ nation. Jews know best, and they should be allowed to call the shots. If you disagree, you are a ‘white supremacist’ or ‘nazi’. Jew-worship is so ingrained in the hearts and minds of Americans that even after Jewish oligarchs moved in concert to de-platform him, Alex Jones is full of praise of Jews and blaming the censorship on the ‘Chicoms’ or Chinese-Communists. (For some reason, attacking China is not considered a ‘hate speech’ by the Establishment because Jews find it useful to distract people from Jewish Power by making them babble about Yellow Peril.)
Anyway, the communist revolution in Russia(spearheaded by many Jews) led to the deaths of millions of lives by starvation, execution, or hard labor. Many innocents were tortured. Much of arts and culture was ransacked, plundered, stolen, or sold to foreigners. Tens of thousands of Churches were smashed. Slavs came to live in fear. To be sure, plenty of Slavs took part in the Revolution, and they also carried out bloody purges and killed people left and right. But it’s possible that the ‘Russian’ Revolution might not have turned out so extreme if not for the ethnic animus of Jewish Bolsheviks for whom the conflict was a matter of total victory or total defeat. (Ironically, the main threat to Jews came from within the Revolution in the figure of Stalin.) After all, the Kerensky regime after the Tsar’s abdication in February was also socialist, but it was closer to social-democracy than radical communism. It was patriotic, not anti-Russian. And when an election was held in the new Soviet Union, the great majority of the people voted for agro-socialist parties, but the results were nullified by the Bolsheviks who created a vast secret-police apparatus to terrorize and/or kill anyone who might pose a threat to the regime. Even though Stalin the Georgian took it to new heights, we need to keep in mind that Stalin came to power with the help of Jews.
Indeed, Jews miscalculated Josef Stalin, just like the German conservative elites underestimated Adolf Hitler. Jews thought they could manipulate Stalin, and the German conservatives thought they could keep Hitler on a leash. As it turned out, both men were of immense will-to-power and deviousness. In time, both Stalin and Hitler made their allies know who was boss in the grand scheme of things. That said, many Jews played a crucial role in the Soviet system all throughout Stalin’s rule. And Stalin also appointed lots of Jews to rule Eastern European nations that came into Soviet orbit at the end of World War II.

All in all, many Slavs and Eastern Europeans felt the brunt of both Jewish radical-socialism and German radical-racism. In the aftermath of WWI, countless Slavs in Russia and Ukraine were destroyed through the meat-grinder of the Revolution that even went so far as to kill all of the Tsar’s family. It is estimated that at least 3.5 million died in the Great Famine in Ukraine. Stalin wasn’t the only heartless bastard. Jewish Bolsheviks shed no tears for all the dead. And Jews in the West never called on the world to save Slavic Christians from Communism and Jewish mass-killers. (It’s like few Jews cared about the 100,000s of Iraqi women and children killed by Jewish-controlled US sanctions. And Jews sure don’t care about the 500,000 Syrians who died in the recent war due to Jewish machinations with US foreign policy.) Eric Hobsbawm the Jewish historian never expressed any moral outrage over the millions crushed by communism. Like what Madeleine Albright said of all those dead Iraqi kids, Hobsbawn’s attitude was “It was worth it.”
Jews endlessly bitch about how the world didn’t care when Nazis were killing members of the Tribe, but most Jews around the world were utterly indifferent to millions of Slavs being killed by Stalin and the Jews. Even capitalist Jews in the US and Europe felt closer to Communist Jews in the USSR than with ‘capitalist-kulak’ victims. Even Leon Trotsky, the dearly beloved god-hero of Neocons, didn’t protest Stalin’s forced collectivization program. At the height of the tragedy, Trotsky’s only criticism was it wasn’t radical enough.

Now, all these Jews who took part in the bloodbath justified themselves as agents of History; and if they got carried away, it was due to excessive enthusiasm for Justice. Over-zealous maybe but for noble ends. But, the communist horror was too grim for such self-serving excuses. And the sheer lack of reflection and remorse shown by the Jewish Community suggests a deep animus, arrogance, and contempt for Slavs. (Jews insist all Germans til the end of time must share in the Shoah Guilt, but they treat the Jewish Slavocaust as a tissue to blow their noses with and toss away.) Even though Jewish Bolsheviks didn’t have an explicit program for the extermination of Slavs, their attitude was one of megalomania and contempt. As such, Christian Slavs were seen as expendable cannon-fodder for the Revolution, laying the groundwork for radical policies that would lead to mass terror and deaths. The Slavs were seen as so many guinea pigs to be experimented by all-knowing Jews.
If Russia and Ukraine had majority Jewish populations, would Jewish Bolsheviks have been so reckless in their social experiments? Of course not. Jews hold Jewish lives as precious. They acted the way they did because they saw Slavs as hammer-and-sickle than flesh-and-blood. A people to be molded anyway the Jewish Bolsheviks deemed fit regardless of the human cost. Whether it’s George Soros pushing for Open Borders(and all the chaos that ensues) or Neocons calling for Wars for Israel, Jews don’t care about their consequences to goy lives. Jewish ‘leftists’ may believe in ‘justice’ and ‘equality’ in the abstract, but their emotions are driven by animus, arrogance, hatred, and contempt when dealing with goyim.
One thing for sure, Jewish globo-capitalists didn’t care how many Russians were destroyed by the Jewish looting of the economy in the 1990s. Jews never cared about the Zionism’s impact on Palestinians. Jews don’t care about the effect of Neocon policies on Iraq, Libya, Syria, Ukraine, or any other country.

As it happened, it was in Russia that Jews first got the chance to run riot and do as they please. Even though Jewish elites had gained immense fortunes and privileges in certain European nations, it was only with the ‘Russian’ Revolution that a bunch of Jews were flush with near-total power over a nation and could do as they pleased(at least for a time). The result was tragic, indeed catastrophic, leading to cultural destruction and deaths of millions. Back then and even now, Jews feel ZERO accountability for what they did. Jewish moral outrage only concerns the plight of Jews. Of course, on occasion, Jews will prop up some other group as deserving of special victim status, but it is purely strategic. The ONLY reason why Jews make a fuss about Black Slavery and Apartheid is because they are useful in baiting and paralyzing whites with ‘white guilt’. (Never mind Jews played a key role in the slave trade, and never mind Jews were the biggest exploiters of diamond mines and black labor in South Africa. Never mind Israel was the #1 ally of South Africa during Apartheid years, and never mind Mandela had the deepest admiration for Arafat and the PLO. Jews, with their media monopoly and whore-politicians in their pockets, rewrite history as they see it.) That is why Jews keep bringing up Emmit Till over and over but ignore all those dead Palestinians as statistics or faceless victims to be forgotten like yesterday’s papers.

Tragically, the Jewish Slavocaust mentality is still going like the Energizer Bunny. Not only are Jews unrepentant of what they’d done in Russia in the 1990s, they are calling on the US and EU to apply more sanctions on Russia(on cooked up charges) no matter how many people might suffer. As far as Jews are concerned, because the majority of Russians support Vladimir Putin(the New Hitler), they must all be made to suffer and brought to heel. Jews love to play God. They think they should have the right to smite any people and play the game of “Jews giveth, Jews taketh away”.

The Slavic peoples suffered greatly in the 20th century due to Slavocaust coming from two directions: Radical Semites and Radical Aryans. Radical Semites thought they knew everything and everything must conform to their agenda. Even though they adopted a ‘universal’ ideology, it was used to serve their tribal supremacist ambition against Slavs-as-cattle, just like the pigs in George Orwell’s ANIMAL FARM talk a good game about ‘equality’ but lord over the other animals.
Even today, notice how Jews really operate on the basis of “Is it good for the Jews?” but mask their tribal agenda with talk of ‘social justice’. Funny how this ‘social justice’ only makes Jews richer and more powerful at the expense of everyone else. If Jews really care for equal justice, who does Israel get showered with billions in aid while Iran is hit with sanctions? Doesn’t Israel have 300 illegal nukes while Iran has none? Why favor Israel over Iran? It makes no sense to waste goodwill on Jews. Jews simply feel, “We are smarter, we are better, we are holier, and we should rule over you, and you exist to serve us and obey us and believe everything we tell you. If not, you’re an ‘anti-Semite’ and ‘Nazi’.” In the US, Jews force all of us to support their mass tyranny over Palestinians. Jews, who are only 2% of the population, get to control over 90% of media and virtually all internet platforms. Yet, we never hear of Jewish supremacism or Jewish privilege. Instead, Jews cover up their immense power by making people fixate and foam at the mouth over ‘White Privilege’.

In other words, Jews have learned NOTHING from the Slavocaust. Of course, Jews remember the Holocaust and remind us to erect more monuments and watch more Holocaust movies and weep for Jews and die for Jews and worship Jews. But Jews, by and large, feel zero accountability for their role in the Slavocaust. Also, they would rather not ponder the perverse irony that both Jews and Nazi Aryans took part in the Slavocaust. Jews did it from the ‘far left’ and Nazis did it from the ‘far right’. But then, to the extent that Jewish Bolsheviks felt profoundly Jewish despite their universalist and egalitarian ideology, they were subconsciously motivated by ‘far right’ ultra-tribal passions: “Is it good for the Jews?”

Well, if Jews learned nothing from the Slavocaust, did the Germans learn something? No. Even though Germans endlessly kvetch about their boo-hoo-hoo guilt for the Holocaust, they now feel NOTHING about what they did to Slavs in Poland, Czechoslovakia, and Russia. Germans feel nothing about the millions of Slavs they’d slaughtered in WWII and, furthermore, now work in concert with George Soros to push massive invading armies of Muslims and Africans into Eastern Europe. And Germany is fully on-board with the Jewish-controlled US to ‘punish’ Russia no matter how many people may be direly affected. Even though Germans no longer feel a murderous zeal for Slavocaust(as Jews still do), they feel no conscience or guilt for all the horrors they’d visited on Poles, Czechs, Ukrainians, and Russians during WWII. If Aryans and Semites had one thing in common in the 21st Century, it was their supremacist contempt for Slavs as Inferiors. Aryans chose extermination but failed in WWII. Semites slaughtered millions of Slavs in the name of ‘progress’.

We must remember the Slavocaust and make sure it doesn’t happen again. To prevent another such tragedy, we must call out on the depraved evil that has become of Jewish Power.

Slavocaust Files:

https://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3342999,00.html

http://www.kevinmacdonald.net/slezkinerev.pdf

http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1991-08-02/news/9103250140_1_lazar-kaganovich-ukraine-moscow

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2003/jan/25/russia.books

https://nypost.com/2001/02/15/how-marc-helped-plunder-russia/

http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=57http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=57

https://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/01/15/did-privatization-increase-the-russian-death-rate/

The gulf between US and Russia owes to just one thing: The Jewish factor.
Since the end of the Cold War, the US has become more servile to Jewish power with each passing year.
Meanwhile, since 2000, Russia has become less servile to Jewish power with each passing year.

So, it’s not really about US vs Russia. It’s about Servility to Jewish Globo-Homo Supremacism vs Independence(relatively speaking) from Jewish Globo-Homo Supremacism.

IF not for the Jewish ethno-supremacist hatred for Russia, I don’t think US-Russian relations would be so bad. It wouldn’t be close but it would be cordial and respectful. It is Jewish Hysteria that is so afraid that white gentiles make takes cues from Russia and throw off the Jewish Globo-Homo yoke. That’s about it.

It is also a religious war. In the past, the US was a mostly Christian nation. So, the Cold War was about Christian America vs Godless Russia(whose real religion was Marx and Lenin). But ever since Jews took power in the US, they’ve done everything to weaken and destroy Christianity. Jewish Bolsheviks in Soviet Union destroyed 50,000 churches. In the US, Jews attacked Christianity in subtler ways. While covering up Jewish corruption and Rabbi sexual scandals, Jewish media exposed Christian corruptions, especially in the Catholic Church. Also, Jews promoted hedonism that made Americans addicted to sensual pleasure above all else. Gambling, Porn, and other vice industries are all controlled by Jews. Also, Jews not only pushed for ‘gay rights’ but Gay Rites, a near-worship of homos(and even trannies) as holy angels.

So, a whole new generation of Americans grew up worshiping Homos. In the US, you don’t lose your job by badmouthing God, Jesus, or Christianity(or white people, as the Sarah Jeong brouhaha illustrated; if anything, she was hired mainly for her anti-white vitriol that is useful to Jewish elites). But if there’s the slightest whiff of ‘homophobic’ sentiments, you are a heretic and you are out. So, Homo-Worship or Homomania is virtually the new religion of the US. As Joe Biden said, Jews spread it and made converts of Americans addicted to TV. Alex Jones was shut down on account that he said unkind things about Trannies corrupting children. The media and platforms are mostly owned by Jewish oligarchs.

So, it was easy for Jews to manipulate Americans into hating Russia. Russia is no longer communist but nationalist and Christian. In contrast, Jewish-controlled US is globo-imperialist and filled with missionary zeal of spreading Homomania as the rainbow-faith all over the world. So, when Russia said NO to ‘gay pride’ parades on Red Square(used annually to commemorate the 20 million dead in WWII), so many Americans seethed with moral and quasi-spiritual outrage. How dare those ‘heathens’ not accept the sacraments of Holy Homomania!

 
• Category: History • Tags: Aryans, Bolshevism, Germans, Jews, Semites, Slavocaust, World War II 
Hide 189 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. g8way says:

    It’s not just us goy, it’s “Aryans” and “Christians” who abused and enslaved poor “Slavs”. Here, read another ten page article where we explain again how much of it was your fault.

    • Replies: @Gg Mo
  2. If any man see Russians as whites “tainted” by Asian blood then he is a faggot. Asian women are hot. White women are hot. Combined they become as hot as the sun. Thus it is in Russia. Amen.

  3. jluker says:

    The author should get his facts straight. ” White Americans in the South made a huge mistake by bringing black slave labor from Africa.” It wasn’t Southerners who brought black labor from Africa. It was Yankees. You need those things called ships that float on the water to carry that human cargo. The Yankees held the carrying trade, the South possessed no merchant fleet. Indeed, in 1859 more slave ships left New York to trade slaves in Cuba and South America than in the whole decade of the 1850s. The Yankee slave trade built all of New England as well as Philadelphia and New York. A mistake it may have been, but there would have no slaves had there been no Yankee slavers.

    • Disagree: Ole_ed
  4. The fact that the term ‘slave’ derives from ‘Slav’ is sure indication of the massive scale of the slave trade involving Slavs. Christian West and Jews sold millions of Slavs to North Africa and Near East.

    This implies that in the enlightened West there had not been a word to name a slave, until the Slavic peoples appeared on the stage and let the courageous Westerners begin to enslave themselves. Or what had the slaves been called in Europe before that massive scale of the slave trade, involving Slavs?

    The word is from Middle English sclave, from Old French sclave, from Medieval Latin sclāvus, from Late Latin Sclāvus. The Latin word is from Byzantine Greek Σκλάβος (Sklábos), the Greek word does not come from the self-name of the Slavs, but from the Greek verb σκυλεύο – “to extract spoils of war”.

    Christian West got his arse kicked a lot and often, Byzantine Empire and Poland most of all but the Swedes and the Prussians also, all westerners got their share when tried to mess with the Slavic peoples in the East. Never had it indeed happened that millions of Slavs were sold to North Africa.

    Delusions of grandeur, as usual. You, the Christian West were the true barbarians. You learned science from the Arabs and forgot what the Greeks had taught. Your Christian religion was the most barbaric invention ever. You were burning people alive in public places, and tortured women.

    And for sure there had been slaves in the West before it was Christian. The Greek historian Strabo wrote that Britannia was in particular a prominent source of slaves to which he referred as an export merchandise. The Anglo-Saxon tribes were hiding in the forest in fear to be captured and sold to Mediterranean pedophiles.

    And all this bullshit in the article is what it is – bullshit!

  5. Wokechoke says:
    @Here Be Dragon

    The Mameluke rulers of Egypt were slaves bought in Crimean Slave Trading markets. The Crimean Tartars and Mongols regularly raided as far north as Moscow. The Ukraine was a spring board for Tartar Slavers. Although it’s a false etymology the English Slave is rooted in Greek for “War Spoils” it is still a word that conveniently overlaps the Slava ‘Glory’ translation of Slavonic Slav. In old English a a slave was a called a Thrall. Which is Norse\AngloSaxon.

    I’m sure the Greek word Sklabos and Slav would have been a handy mutually understood pun back in the day among the Crimean Tartars. Glorious Slaves etc.

  6. Anon[159] • Disclaimer says:

    … the Shoah…

    Really?

    Guess you just outed yourself.

    • Agree: RedpilledAF
  7. I’ve read a lot of Jewish history and one thing’s for sure: Jews could never have exploited Christians without the cooperation of the Christian elites, who could count on their greed and their alienness to focus the people’s resentment. Russia seems to be a special case where Western elites helped the Jews screw Russia. Totalitarian countries are great for business, foreign business that is. Surely that’s why the Chosen took down South Africa’s Whites because they knew that rich, beautiful country would be easier to strip-mine (financially and otherwise) if ruled by semi-literate tribals. And don’t forget my least favorite demographic on the planet: Christian Zionists!

    • Thanks: JimDandy, Trinity
  8. Franz says:

    Meanwhile, since 2000, Russia has become less servile to Jewish power with each passing year.

    Optimism springs eternal.

    Still, keep up the drumbeat about the other thing: Europeans were slaves many centuries before Africans. They’ll never catch up. Despite which, they’ll whine till the end of time.

  9. Franz says:

    Note that “Nicholas and Alexandra” clip — excellent movie. It bombed when it came out (too depressing maybe) but it is one of the best historical re-creations you’ll ever see. The Tsar and most of the cast were selected because they looked like the real ones. The ending is brutal but history can be that way. Available for free on various places in the net. Four hours well-spent.

    • Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard
  10. @Franz

    The Academy loved it despite the ticket sales. 6 nominations and 2 oscars.

    I like this part:

    • Thanks: Franz
  11. Dirge says:

    No.
    National Socialist Germany had no plans to genocide the Slavs, that’s soviet propaganda.
    The actual plan was to separate the wheat from the chaff, the good Slavs of good Aryan stock would be retained & folded into the greater German Reich. The bad Slavs would be shipped east to form states of their own east of the Urals.
    You can read about it in ‘Hitlers Second Book’ (Kemp translation).

    • Thanks: Malla
    • Replies: @Dutch Boy
    , @Curmudgeon
  12. Get Real says:

    You have serious antisemetic biases. The American press, gov’t at al are totally in the grips of ivy league morons and pathetic blue bloods in a panic that they are losing their power. Not some Jewish power structure that’s been influential for the last centennial. We should care about Iran shouting “ death to America” for 30 years and not support Israel our ally?
    The Slavs have been decimated by Germany, then Russia, not Jews. Get a grip.

    • Disagree: Derer
    • LOL: Trinity
    • Replies: @Gg Mo
    , @Robert Dolan
    , @Mike Tre
  13. – Where to begin?

    • I already noted all European royalty married Germans because they had unemployed princes by the wagonload, what with 400 independent entities.
    • As for the Junker the author more or less regurgitates (((bolshevik)))
    propaganda … the soils of Brandenburg (sand and peat) were not even shitty
    (which would have been a definite improvement), so far from being feudal overlords
    they were desperately poor country bumpkins with a title; all they did do was
    furnish the Prussian officer corps because there were no other careers for the
    afterborn (as the Swiss became mercenaries, the Italians priests, the Tibetans toyboys
    and the English colonials). Only Justus von Liebig (artificial fertilizer) changed
    that somewhat; indeed service in the military had been considered the gentry´s
    self-evident tax ever since Heinrich der Vogler invented knighthood to fend off
    Arpad´s mischpoche (the results of which justify the time and effort it took to
    domesticate them 😀 ).
    • The Natzees ™ were not under any delusions of lording it over the sclavi
    roughly “heathen”(it´s Jewish projection again cf. “sit like effendis and eat”, Ovadia Yossef);
    indeed they were clear that Operation Civilization East –
    when the Order plucked Poles and Baltics off the trees and taught
    them to walk upright – failed because they did not bring German settlers
    (Catherine the Great and Alexander I invited German farmers and artisans to
    develop Noworossija partly because it was depopulated and partly because those
    left behind by the Turks were useless).

    • Slabbery ™ in the US was … incidental; Germans and Irish were cheaper,
    smarter and more industrious but they died like flies in the Mississippi lowlands;
    Marx famously called the colonies “worthless” without slavery, and indeed the
    plantations were the only source of FX until ~1840 (-> War of Northern Aggression).
    La France turned towards Africa to compensate for the defeat of 1871
    and the loss of Elsass-Lothringen; speaking German might have been a better plan
    (hindsight is always blah/blah)

    – One last point re: Jews and Christendom … Jews were already a dominant class in
    Berlin when they were still under curfew in Switzerland (!); tolerance had served
    Brandenburg well, especially the large numbers of Huguenots
    (the Poles wouldn´t be half as Catholic weren´t their beloved neighbors Protestant).
    Orthodoxy has proven far more – exclusive, a major source of Jewish ressentiment
    (Canetti, always the oversensitive observer, held that Jewish hatred for the West
    in general and Germany in particular was rejected love).
    We will see if it helps Mother Russia have the last laugh.

    • Replies: @Anymike
  14. @Wokechoke

    The Crimean Tartars and Mongols indeed raided as far north as Moscow but the Christian West and Jews had nothing to do with it. And the period of time we are talking about is related to the Middle Ages.

    To be short it comes from the Bible. The Latin translation used the Greek word which was assimilated as Sclāvus. And it has nothing to do with the self-name of the people who were called Ruthenians at that time.

    Not to mention that the original self-name of all the peoples of that origin in that time in general was not Slavs but Slovenes. The o was changed to a a lot later.

  15. @Fidelios Automata

    You bring up a very good point. It always seemed to me that the real villain in the 1940 German movie Jud Süß was the German duke, not Süß or any other Jew. While Süß committed specific crimes, the duke endangered the people he was sworn to protect due to his own greed and ego.

    • Agree: Miro23
  16. Ole_ed says:

    I’m Southern myself–if one can call present-day Richmond, Va. southern–and you can’t give Southerners a pass on this. Yankees and ((people)) brought the slaves to colonial North America, but wealthy southerners were quite willing to buy them, thus enabling the Negro settlement of North America–perhaps the dumbest action ever in human history.

    • Agree: mark green
    • Replies: @Trinity
  17. KA says:

    “Henry describes nearly identical patterns of behavior in these raids, and given his keen interest in military matters, I suspect that his observations accurately represent common raiding strategies of parties whether pagan or Christian and regardless of ethnic identity. A basic slave raid began with a mustering of forces including members of allied groups. After a journey of several days – a timeframe that itself indicates the frequency and extent of localized trafficking – the raiding party splintered and each subgroup then followed a different route through various villages in the immediate area, effectively creating a dragnet. Raiders focused on the villages, but they also monitored the roads for refugees in flight. Once in the villages, homes and fields were burned creating a panic within the local community. Raiding parties usually, although not always,14 killed the men, and carried off the women and children, livestock, and moveable wealth, but in some cases the women and young boys were also butchered and the girls alone were carried away.15 After several days in the field, the various parties regrouped at a predetermined location to divide the captives and spoils among themselves before returning to their own lands.”
    If we now turn our gaze westwards from the Baltic to the region between the North and Baltic Seas, we have evidence for human trafficking in the thirteenth-century Skåne law codes from southwest Sweden, which stipulate, ‘If a freeborn man comes into slavery, because he is captured and afterwards sold, and he is killed, then his relatives and nearest kinsmen have the right to take full compensation for him and give to the master who owned him as much of the compensation as the dead man cost him when he bought him.’17 The possibilities of descent into slavery via raid or war and then entry into trafficking networks form the circumstances for this particular statute.
    Slavery itself continued in Scandinavian society into the fourteenth century, presumably through internal recruitment such as hereditary slavery, penal enslavement, and debt slavery,If long-distance trafficking routes were dwindling across Western Europe and the Northern Arc during the twelfth and thirteenth centuries, new long-distance routes were opening in the Mediterranean, fueled by the growth of northern Italian cities such as Genoa, Pisa, and Venice. As the economic centers of activity in the Italian peninsula gradually shifted from Amalfi, Bari, and Taranto in the south to the northern cities of the Po River plain, trafficking networks responded accordingly, and the Po River grew into the dominant Italian artery for human traffickers throughout the Late Middle Ages.Starting in the early thirteenth century, Italian merchants established a lucrative trade route supplying the Eastern Mediterranean with slaves from the Caucasus region of the Black Sea and Eurasian steppe via the Bosporus.By late July of 1268, Venice had reacquired rights to free trade in the Black Sea and in Byzantine ports throughout the Empire.Having secured commercial rights and privileges from Byzantium and bolstered by economic connections with the Mongols, Italian trafficking operations now reached deep into the heart of the Eurasian steppe, reflected in the growth of Genoese Caffa as the major Levantine slaving center. Venice remained a power based in Tana, and in Soldaia by 1288, even during the Genoese administration of the former between 1332 and 1471. Italian influence continued to expand in Black Sea ports such as Trebizond during the late thirteenth and early fourteenth centuries.23 Iris Origo has shown through extensive archival research in northern Italy that these Black Sea ports attracted not only Italian merchants, but also traders from across the Africa-Eurasian world.24 Through these international ports, Genoese and Venetian commercial connections stretched north into Russia and the Baltic, east into the Caucasus, Armenia, Anatolia, and the Eurasian steppe, south into Syria and Egypt, and west into Provence, Catalonia, and Corsica, according to notary deeds of sale. These trade networks also trafficked Mongol youths, Russian and Circassian girls and young women, Georgians, Alans, Laks, and Armenians, and apparently a little girl of Chinese origin named Charatas (orta ex generatione Cathayorum), from the east into Caffa and into Tana via the Don River.25

    Human Trafficking in Medieval Europe
    Book Subtitle: Slavery, Sexual Exploitation, and Prostitution Book Author(s): Christopher Paolella
    Published by: Amsterdam University Press. (2020)
    Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv18x4hw8.8

    • Thanks: RedpilledAF
  18. Trinity says:
    @Ole_ed

    The dumbest was letting the Jews/Khazars in and then secondly allowing them to hijack America. European Americans should have certainly been Jew wise by then. A leopard never changes his spots.

    After this, yes, greedy Yankees and lazy Southerners, made a huge mistake in bringing the Dindu Nuffins to the New World.

    Without the Jew instigating White guilt and Black rage, the negro problem wouldn’t be near as problematic. Distraction, division, and chaos, is the long time modus operandi of the J people.

    • Agree: Miro23
  19. Vinnie O says:

    It is CONTINUOUSLY obvious that English (especially American English) is NOT your primary language. You get a WHOLE lotta cultural stuff wrong. Most especially, you attempt to explain Slavic influence in the West as some kind of pass-along from the Russians.

    I grew up in Chicago. Not only does it have a HUGE Irish community, but it has an EQUALLY huge Polish community. And thus I have a niece named “Colleen Marie Slawnikowski”, a name that surprises NO Chicagoan. Because of our shared Catholicism (not merely competing brands of Protestantism), Irish and Poles get along just fine. Both of us having LONG histories of oppression by stronger neighbors, who were off-brand Protestants.

    BUT… you scored enough points to make it onto my “NEVER Read This Guy AGAIN” list.

    Have a nice day.

    • Agree: Towey
  20. Jon Chance says: • Website

    Since the mid-20th century, the world has only ever heard one side of an incredible story. The story of a boy from an ordinary family whose ambition it was to become an artist, but who instead became a drifter.

    His destiny however was not to drift into the awaiting oblivion, but to rise to the greatest heights of power, eventually to become one of the most influential men who ever lived.

    Now for the first time, here is a documented account of a story many believe to be The Greatest Story NEVER Told.

    Learn the untold story about the most reviled man in history. Hitler, The Greatest Story Never Told is a 6-hour Documentary by TruthWillOut Films.

    This ground-breaking documentary chronicles the rise of Germany from defeat in World War I, to communist attempts to take over Germany; hyperinflation during the Weimar Republic, widespread unemployment and misery, and Adolf Hitler’s rise to power.

    It also reveals a personal side of Adolf Hitler: who he was, his family background, his artwork and struggles in Vienna and what motivated him to come to power.

    There’s so much hidden history to recount; FDR Pearl Harbor conspiracy, Soviet brutality, betrayal and treachery on all sides. Do we really know the true cost of war? Do we really possess all the facts?

    Watch this series and uncover the real root causes of World War II. Do your own research and decide what you choose to believe. Think differently.

    https://TheGreatestStoryNeverTold.tv

    • Thanks: mark green
  21. Uh-oh. The author repeats the mantra that Jews are only 2% of the US population. I’ve heard this figure thrown around a million times, without any proof of its authenticity. Fact is, Jews refuse to be counted, going back to Henry Ford’s rejected request to have their ethnicity listed on the census. It’s to their benefit to downplay their numbers, except when it comes to the inflated number killed in Nazi gas chambers. Especially with so much intermarriage with non-Jews (whose children are often raised as secular Jews) nobody knows how many Jews there are. I’m surprised that Jung-Freud has reiterated that 2% nonsense.

    • Thanks: Trinity
    • Replies: @Trinity
    , @Jon Chance
  22. Trinity says:
    @follyofwar

    I have heard that 2% horseshit for at least 40 years and I am sure it was the same or lower pre 1980s.

    Kind of like we heard the “11 million” illegal invader figure for at least 10-12 years minimum.

    • Replies: @follyofwar
  23. Vinnie O writes in Comment #19: “I grew up in Chicago. Not only does it have
    a HUGE Irish community, but it has an EQUALLY huge Polish community.”
    Did the Irish and the Poles really vote for the horrendous Chicago mayor,
    Lori Lightfoot?? And why didn’t they rise up in rebellion and throw her out
    of office when she and her nasty cohorts allowed rioters to run amuck and
    loot and destroy many businesses in Chicago?
    Seems like Poland and Ireland are still oppressed by stronger neighbors,
    since these countries have just admitted hundreds of thousands of Ukrainian
    “refugees” who will compete with the natives for jobs and housing, a reckless
    government policy that is very unpopular with the natives. Looks like the
    ruling elites of these countries don’t really care about the people they’re
    supposed to serve.

    • Replies: @silviosilver
    , @anon
  24. Ron Unz says:

    I happened to notice this new piece and I’ve seen these sorts of claims floating around for years. Here’s a very relevant comment of mine from a couple of months ago:

    My impression is that aside from fully authenticated official documents and private diaries, Hitler’s Table Talk, despite its flaws, is the most reliable source of his private views, and last year I finally got around to reading it.

    In mid-1942, he expressed a great deal of concern that that under orderly German rule, the subjugated Slavic population of the Ukraine and other conquered territories would undergo a gigantic population explosion, causing all sorts of future problems. To avert this danger, he urged that birth control and abortion should always be made freely available to the Slavs, unlike in Germany, where they were severely restricted or outlawed.

    This hardly seems consistent with a diabolical Nazi plan to exterminate most of the Soviet Slavs.

    Based upon Table Talk, Hitler certainly intended to politically subjugate the Slavs, but he also seemed to assume that their material lives would be vastly better under Nazi rather than under Soviet rule, especially given the recent massive famine and Stalinist killings. A reasonable analogy might be how many Third World peoples had fared much better under orderly European colonial rule.

    https://www.unz.com/mwhitney/twice-in-a-century-russia-faces-a-war-of-annihilation/?showcomments#comment-5232896

    • Thanks: chris, mark green
  25. Jon Chance says: • Website
    @Ron Unz

    Action is eloquence.

    Which matters more? What Hitler said and imagined to be true, or what Hitler actually accomplished?

    Most of the essential truths regarding Hitler, the Nazis, WW1 and WW2 had been quite well-known up to the 1970s thanks to Albert Speer, Carroll Quigley, and many others.

    But the academic establishment and media monopoly have been aggressively dumbing-down the planet since then, in no small measure because Eastern European Jews (Russian and Polish Khazarians) emigrated to Western Europe, Palestine and America during the demise of their regime known as the “Soviet Union”.

    Having thoroughly destroyed Russia, these super-retarded Jews moved on to America, Palestine, and the “European Union” to suck the blood of Goys. For the pleasure of this experience, perhaps we can thank the Immigration and Naturalization Act of 1965.

    These Communist Jews quickly rebranded themselves as “Conservatives” and “Libertarians” and “Capitalists”, but as is true of all Jews, they’re just fanatical parasites with no comprehension of European-American civilization and genuine liberalism.

    “The man who read nothing at all is better informed than the man who reads nothing but newspapers.”

    – Thomas Jefferson

    Inside the Third Reich (1970) – Albert Speer

    Inside the Third Reich is a memoir by Albert Speer, the German Minister of Armaments from 1942 to 1945.

    At the Nuremberg Trials, Speer was sentenced to twenty years in prison for his use of slave labor as Minister of Armaments. From 1946 to 1966, while serving the sentence in Spandau Prison, he penned more than 2000 manuscript pages of personal memoirs.

    Because he was not allowed to write such memoirs while in prison, he smuggled these notes out and returned to them after his release.

    By 1945, Speer was disillusioned with the National Socialist Party and Adolf Hitler, despite being one of the few people to stay close to Hitler until the end.

    Thanks to his unique position inside the National Socialist government, Speer is able to provide faithful descriptions of many German leaders, including Joseph Goebbels, Hermann Göring, Heinrich Himmler, Rudolf Hess, Martin Bormann and, of course, Adolf Hitler himself.

    • Replies: @Truth Vigilante
  26. @ManOfCulture3321

    Pure bullshit. There will be no hope – zero, zilch, zip, nada, bupkis – of racial preservation if mental faggotry like yours is allowed to influence developments. You can’t mix whites with non-whites in any appreciable numbers and expect white preservation to result. If Russians are still white, it means any asiatic infusion was minimal. THAT is the salient point, not crap about asian “hotness.” Fuck me, you’d think it’s rocket science.

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
  27. @Sidewalk Meanderings

    And why didn’t they rise up in rebellion and throw her out of office when she and her nasty cohorts allowed rioters to run amuck and loot and destroy many businesses in Chicago?

    Well faggot, if you were to grow up, you may just notice how heavily outnumbered Poles, Irish and indeed any whites in Chicago are by blacks, hispanics and asians. The idea you can effect political change in 21st – even 20th – century America simply by sending a corrupt politico out on a rail is the stuff of unserious fantasists, even if the city were 100% white.

    • Replies: @Hacienda
  28. anon[174] • Disclaimer says:
    @Sidewalk Meanderings

    Poles are hated in IL .First that racket involving the truck driver’s license in late 90s followed by racketeering consecution businesses and rental properties- both have left bad taste and memories . Poles are kind of uncouth arrogant more like combination of Pakistani and Puerto Rican into one. They are hated in New York for same dirty schemings ,bribery, and illegally obtained permits for tax payer funded works -originating from city halls.

  29. gT says:

    Poor Russians, they defeated the best of the French under Napoleon, but are still inferior to the French. The Russians defeated the best of the Germans under Hitler, but are still inferior to the Germans. Looks like its one’s culture which determines one’s superiority instead of one’s warfare ability. Funny enough, this is exactly what happened between the Muslims and the Mongols, the Muslims regarded themselves as superior to the Mongols even though the Mongols defeated them, and wiped out the biggest Muslim concentrations at that time.

    So the Russians have nothing better left to do than drown their inferiority in vodka while keeping warm with fossil fuels and eating healthy non-gmo food, while the people in the West are soon going to be without food or fuel. Inferiority is tragic.

    • Agree: JR Foley
    • Replies: @karel
  30. Anymike says:
    @nokangaroos

    It would be nice if we knew what “FX” meant. It’s not really that hard to spell things out. The alternative is as many dialects of Newspeak as there are people.

    You do make a point though. Marx understood slavery. Credit him for that. We don’t.

    • Replies: @Sorel McRae
  31. @Trinity

    Thank you. As for 11 million illegal invaders, there may be that many coming into the US each year (no one knows the number). Senile hater of heterosexual white men Biden strives to make Whites a minority before he leaves office. When he was Obama’s VP, Biden bragged that he looked forward to the day when Whites would become an “absolute minority.”

    • Replies: @Robert Dolan
  32. Marcali says:

    “According to the calculations of Fridtjof Nansen, beginning in 1500, every seven years Russia added as much territory to its empire as that occupied by the Kingdom of Norway. Imperialism is a traditional, basic, and integral trait of Russia – its chief trait in fact.”
    (Solovyov – Klepikova: The map is the message in mother Russia, The Christian Science Monitor, August 11-17, 1986.)

    As to being a neighbour of Russia, let’s read the beginning of William G. Bray: Russian frontiers: from Muscovy to Khrushchev, Bobbs-Merrill, 1963, pp 11, 13:
    ’” For five centuries, Russians have been seeking a final frontier which they never find.” This statement by A. L. Kennedy in a lead article in the January, 1947, issue of The Quarterly Review sums up our problem with Russia. … A brief study of five centuries of Russian history makes it clear that Russia’s aggression today follow the same pattern that has guided her every maneuver since approximately 1462 AD. …This territorial hunger can be compared to the farmer who, when queried as to why he was acquiring so much land, said: „I don’t want much land, I just want that which joins my farm.”

  33. Hacienda says:
    @silviosilver

    Chicago is a weird outlier city. Of no special relevance to the modern world. Whites won’t rally around her.
    But her individual neighborhoods will save themselves.

    • Agree: GMC
  34. @jluker

    OK, so the Yankees (and Jews, from what I hear) enabled and exploited the slave trade and ought to be held accountable. Still, they didn’t create the demand. For that Southern planters are primarily responsible.

    This issue comes up time and again, especially with Jewish low-time (and ethnic in-group) preference practices vs. goyish high-time preference proclivities to borrow money, consume pornography, and drink liquor, etc., irresponsibly. Jews don’t create the demand although they do exploit, encourage, and enable more abuse than there would otherwise be, often with specifically malign intent.

    To combat this constructively, we need an appropriate and realistic way to apportion responsibility. Exploiters should be expelled but we also must get our own shit together. In fact, were our shit well and truly together, there’d be no opportunity for exploitation. Still, human nature is inherently corrupt and weak and the exploitation of weakness and corruption must be prohibited, perhaps as a first step to any large-scale human improvement. Still, even now: put down the porn, cork the bottle, and hit the gym!

    • Agree: Miro23, W
  35. @Fidelios Automata

    This is my reply to jluker, above, but it is also appropo to this comment (I just don’t know how to attach a reply to more than one comment):

    “OK, so the Yankees (and Jews, from what I hear) enabled and exploited the slave trade and ought to be held accountable. Still, they didn’t create the demand. For that Southern planters are primarily responsible.

    This issue comes up time and again, especially with Jewish low-time (and ethnic in-group) preference practices vs. goyish high-time preference proclivities to borrow money, consume pornography, and drink liquor, etc., irresponsibly. Jews don’t create the demand although they do exploit, encourage, and enable more abuse than there would otherwise be, often with specifically malign intent.

    To combat this constructively, we need an appropriate and realistic way to apportion responsibility. Exploiters should be expelled but we also must get our own shit together. In fact, were our shit well and truly together, there’d be no opportunity for exploitation. Still, human nature is inherently corrupt and weak and the exploitation of weakness and corruption must be prohibited, perhaps as a first step to any large-scale human improvement. Still, even now: put down the porn, cork the bottle, and hit the gym!”

    • Agree: Old and Grumpy
  36. Tainted by Oriental blood, hardly. At Fashion Island in Newport Beach, the place is overrun by Russian mail order brides. Affluent guys choosing them. Their accents are irritating but they are head and shoulders over the American women.

  37. Miro23 says:

    As it happened, it was in Russia that Jews first got the chance to run riot and do as they please. Even though Jewish elites had gained immense fortunes and privileges in certain European nations, it was only with the ‘Russian’ Revolution that a bunch of Jews were flush with near-total power over a nation and could do as they pleased(at least for a time). The result was tragic, indeed catastrophic, leading to cultural destruction and deaths of millions. Back then and even now, Jews feel ZERO accountability for what they did. Jewish moral outrage only concerns the plight of Jews.

    And they’re edging towards that same complete dominance in the US and would delight in the same result.

    It makes no sense to waste goodwill on Jews. Jews simply feel, “We are smarter, we are better, we are holier, and we should rule over you, and you exist to serve us and obey us and believe everything we tell you. If not, you’re an ‘anti-Semite’ and ‘Nazi’.”

    Agreed that it’s a one way street leading to the destruction of the Jews themselves or to the destruction of the host population. The people of the US are going to get one or the other.

    Well, if Jews learned nothing from the Slavocaust, did the Germans learn something? No. Even though Germans endlessly kvetch about their boo-hoo-hoo guilt for the Holocaust, they now feel NOTHING about what they did to Slavs in Poland, Czechoslovakia, and Russia.

    Also true. Germans believe/do what they’re told and appear to have no capacity whatsoever for independent rational thought.

    The gulf between US and Russia owes to just one thing: The Jewish factor.
    Since the end of the Cold War, the US has become more servile to Jewish power with each passing year.
    Meanwhile, since 2000, Russia has become less servile to Jewish power with each passing year.

    Hence the unfolding drama between East and West – with China next in line for daring to face down Jewish power.

    • Agree: mark green
    • Replies: @Gg Mo
  38. Miro23 says:
    @Ron Unz

    My impression is that aside from fully authenticated official documents and private diaries, Hitler’s Table Talk, despite its flaws, is the most reliable source of his private views…

    Agree with that. There’s a more reflective tone than his writing/ pre-prepared speeches and, in my opinion it gives the best record of his world view. Especially as the principal themes keep repeating.

    These are some extracts that I noted with the conversation number ( ) ref. Slavs, Germans, Jews and Anglos.

    SUBJECT PEOPLES – (20) “We’ll supply the Ukrainians with scarves, glass beads and everything that colonial peoples like. The Germans – this is essential – will have to constitute among themselves a closed society, like a fortress. The least of our stable-lads must be superior to any native.” (11) “We’ll take the Southern part of the Ukraine, especially the Crimea, and make it an exclusively German colony. There’ll be no harm in pushing out the population that’s there now. The German colonist must be the soldier-peasant and for that I’ll take professional soldiers, whatever their line may have been previously.”

    GERMAN COLONISTS – His project doesn’t include the British concept of “trusteeship” in Empire. (17) “The German colonist ought to live on handsome, spacious farms. The German services will be lodged in marvellous buildings, the governors in palaces. Beneath the shelter of the administrative services, we shall gradually organize all that is indispensable to the maintenance of a certain standard of living. All around the city to a depth of thirty to forty kilometers we shall have a belt of handsome villages connected by the best roads. What exists beyond that will be another world, in which we mean to let the Russians live as they like. It is merely necessary that we should rule them.”

    SLAVS – (281) “As for the ridiculous hundred million Slavs, we will mould the best of them to the shape that suits us, and we will isolate the rest of them in their own pigsties; and anyone who talks about cherishing the local inhabitant and civilizing him, goes straight off into a concentration camp!”

    MOSCOW & ST. PETERSBURG – (617) “The foundation of St. Petersburg by Peter the Great was a fatal event in the history of Europe; and St. Petersburg must therefore disappear utterly from the earth’s surface. Moscow too. Then the Russians will retire to Siberia.”

    JEWS – A constant theme connected to Bolshevism and Jewish influence in Weimar Germany and the U.S. (145) “Just like the throne and the altar in former times so now the Jews and the political profiteers form a silent association for the common exploitation of the democratic milch cow.” (180) “Although the Jew has seized the levers of control in the Anglo-Saxon world (the press, the cinema, the radio, economic life), and although in the United States he is the entire inspiration of the populace, especially of the negroes, the bourgeois of the two countries with the rope already around their necks, tremble at the idea of rebelling against him, even timidly. What is happening now in the Anglo-Saxon world is absolutely identical with what we experienced here in 1918.” (63) “Simply the Jew has put a religious camouflage over his racial doctrine.” (119) “For my part I restrict myself to telling them they must go away. … but if they refuse to go voluntarily , I see no other solution but extermination.”

    AMERICANS & BRITISH – (302) “The Americans are a completely unpredictable crowd. In a tight corner, the British are infinitely more courageous than they are – there’s no comparison! How they have the nerve to cast aspersions on the British passes my comprehension.” (99) “I don’t see much future for the Americans. In my view it’s a decayed country. And they have their racial problem, and the problem of social inequalities. Those were what caused the downfall of Rome, and yet Rome was a solid edifice that stood for something. Moreover the Romans were inspired by great ideas. Nothing of the sort in England today. As for the Americans, that kind of thing is non-existent. That’s why, in spite of everything, I like an Englishman a thousand times better than an American.”

    LIFE’S WORK – (180) “As far as we’re concerned, we’ve succeeded in chasing the Jews from our midst and excluding Christianity from our political life.” (50) “If I try to gauge my work, I must consider, first of all, that I’ve contributed, in a world that has forgotten the notion, to the triumph of the idea of the primacy of race. Second I’ve given German supremacy a solid cultural foundation.” … “I believe blindly in my nation. If I lost that belief we would have nothing left to do but shut up shop.”

  39. peterAUS says:
    @Miro23

    Hahaha…….oh boy.

    Pathetic.

    Don’t see Rusophiles chiming in here. Two reasons, most likely:
    1. They are simply too dumb for such intellectual effort. Nahh…….
    2. They don’t want to contradict the dear host and, potentially, lose one of disappearing online places where they can indulge in their delusions.

    So, I’ll say it, for them :
    For anyone with a modicum of intelligence is more than clear what was the future of Slavs under Nazi regime. That tells something about some commentators here; cancel that; confirms already known.

    Anyway, apologies for intruding, fellas. Carry on, please.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  40. Uncle Sam says:

    The word Slav has no connection whatsoever with slaves or slavery. That is a gross misconception. Depending on the Slavic language in question it can mean different things such as fame, greatness, glory, courage, nobility, a religious holiday, among things.

    The current war in Ukraine validates my point. The battle cry of the Ukrainians is “Slava Ukraina”, which literally means “glory to Ukraine”.

    People need to do their homework.

    • Replies: @anon
  41. @Here Be Dragon

    Delusions of grandeur, as usual. You, the Christian West were the true barbarians. You learned science from the Arabs and forgot what the Greeks had taught.

    Indeed. Byzantium was the true HQ of the Christian church, most of which was in the East (Antioch, etc., and as far as China), a fact buried by the Islamic conquest, which, after Constantinople was betrayed and sacked by the Pope and his pet “Holy Roman” Emperor, under the guise of a “crusade” to “liberate” the Holy Land (some things never change), left only a rump church of barely converted barbarians to claim to be “Christendom”.

    Constantinople was also the center of what remained of Greek wisdom, which only flowed West after the aforementioned sacking of Constantinople, leading to the Renaissance and, you know, the modern world. Otherwise, we’d likely be living in mud huts and dominated by loony priests. Sort of like Africa.

    All this is either forgotten, or denied, or just not taught, or buried beneath the Islamic conquest, or attributed to the Arabs (anything rather than admit the existence of Constantinople; guilty much?)

    In fact, the chronological revisionists discussed here on Unz have proposed that ROME NEVER EXISTED, only Constantinople, and the whole story of Rome and the Western Empire was fabricated by Emperor Otto, retconning events from the true history of Byzantium.

    You Unz people should get together and get your stories straight, this back and forth is too confusing.

    • Replies: @Poco
    , @Goonty
  42. Wokechoke says:
    @silviosilver

    agree with that. People are fucking hopeless in their mental cuck cages. They wore a mask so to speak and their face grew to fit it.

  43. Wokechoke says:
    @Here Be Dragon

    The raids carried on into the renaissance era.

  44. Miro23 says:

    Furthermore, Russian Slavs always seemed to bet on the wrong horse. When Russians finally adopted Christianity, they chose the Eastern Orthodox Faith than Catholicism. (Certain Slavic groups became Catholics, drawing them closer to the more advanced West.)

    Poles adopted Catholicism and at one time it may have united them with the West – but it’s currently only separating them from the new post-Christian Europe.

    However, Poles still have this illusion that they’re leading the fight for Western freedom. They’re taking the lead in supporting the ZioGlob CIA colour revolution in Ukraine but in reality the NWO is only offering them for sacrifice. Western Jewry will be more than happy to see Poland destroyed in a war with Russia – also Germany for that matter.

    The Poles big chance came when Putin first wanted to engage Western Europe a new era of productive engagement and mutual respect, and they should have taken it – but it’s too late now.

    • Agree: chris
    • Replies: @GMC
  45. First off, there were 2.6 million famine deaths in Ukraine, not 3.5:

    “As a result, 0.9 million must be subtracted from the 3.5 million arrived at above, which means that the mortality effect of the crisis seems to account for 2.6 million of the total losses over the period, 1927-38.”
    — “A New Estimate of Ukrainian Population Losses,” Population Studies, November 2002.

    In addition, there were about 1.2 million excess deaths in the Volga and likely a few other hundreds of thousands scattered around the USSR generally. Probably more than 4 million deaths due to the crop failures of 1931-2. But the “7 million” number was just a Cold War fabrication assembled using fraudulent reports.

    Anyone familiar with the reporting done at the time, especially through the Goebbels and Hearst presses, will know that stories about an ongoing famine were circulated widely all the way through 1935. One of the more prominent bits of fakery was done under the pen name of “Thomas Walker” by Robert Green who claimed to have made travels across the USSR all through 1934, witnessing famine. Those fake stories by Green/Walker were subsequently recycled subsequently retconned by Cold War propagandists like Robert Conquest and James Mace into sources to be cited in books like Harvest of Sorrow, where Green/Walker reports from 1935 are referenced as if they were valid evidence of what happened in 1933.

    Walter Duranty never denied the occurrence of a famine, when an actual famine was going on. Duranty’s report of August 1933 makes it clear that excess mortality leading to at least a couple million deaths had occurred. When Duranty reported the next month in September from Kharkov that “the harvest is splendid” he was telling the truth. Duranty’s reputation as an alleged “famine-denier” is based upon matters from September 1933 onward, when the real famine was definitely over but the Hearst media continued promoted claims of famine for another 2 years.

    It is true enough that when the show trials began from 1936 onward, Duranty then maintained an apologetic stance towards these with much less justification. This is where the reputation of Duranty as “Stalin’s apologist” comes from, insofar as it is based on fact. The show trials of late 1930s clearly had no evidence for charges except confessions, but Duranty expressed unwarranted confidence that these confessions were authentic. They were not. But that has no direct bearing on Duranty’s earlier reporting about the actual famine.

    What is true is that when reporting on the famine of 1931-3, Duranty rejected the notion that this was an “intentional manmade famine” as Cold War propaganda later put it. The historical record revealed from Soviet documents since 1991 proves Duranty to have been correct on this. The leading expert is Mark Tauger who has produced such studies as “Natural Disaster and Human Actions in the Soviet Famine of 1931-1933.”

    https://ia800608.us.archive.org/12/items/891762PB/89-176-2-PB.pdf

    It is clear that poorly misunderstood natural disaster created crop failure which were not grasped at the time and led to confusion. But there was never any intentional decision by the Soviet government to want to create an avoidable famine. Duranty was correct on that.

    As far as the photograph featured above, can you identify the source? While no one disputes that a famine caused by crop failure resulting from natural disaster did indeed occur, the Goebbels and Hearst medias in 1933-5 published a series of photos which were taken from the famine of 1921-2 and were recast as photos from 1933-5. Douglas Tottle gave the most exhaustive coverage of the reiteration of such photos in his book Fraud, Famine and Fascism:

    http://www.garethjones.org/tottlefraud.pdf

    As recently as 2009, the Ukrainian government held an exhibition where they not only featured photos from 1921-2 as if they were from 1933, but they also featured photos from the US in 1935-6 as alleged “Ukrainian famine” photos:

    https://web.archive.org/web/20090310001016/nr2.ru/crimea/223417.html

    Most likely the photo featured at the top comes from 1921-2, not from 1933. But if you identify where you got it from then that can be checked. It would have been newly released 1991 if it were to be authentically from 1931-3. All of the photos circulated in Cold War publications of the 1980s simply contain photos from 1921-2 that were falsely rebooted as 1930s photos.

    • Disagree: chris
  46. Anon 2 says:

    In terms of the territory and the population the Slavs are by far the most successful of all European groups. They inhabit a vast land area stretching from the Adriatic Sea all the way to Vladivostok near the Sea of Japan. There are 240 million Slavs in Eurasia vs only 100 million Germanics. That’s one reason why Hitler never had a chance. The Germans are clearly the least successful, the unluckiest, group in Europe. In the 20th century they’ve been defeated and humiliated twice, ultimately being reduced to a tiny area and a small population which is rapidly becoming heavily Muslim.

    The word Slav is, of course, derived from ‘slavo’ or ‘slovo,’ meaning the ‘word,’ or ‘people of the word’ in contrast to ‘nemtsy’ meaning the ‘dumb ones’ or people who cannot speak, a contemptuous term referring to Germans. The key point is that there are three kinds of Slavs: Western Slavs (Poles, Czechs, Sorbs, Kashubs, Slovaks), Eastern Slavs (Russians, Ukrainians, Belarusians, etc), and Southern Slavs (Bulgarians, Croats, Serbs, etc). The Slavocaust can arguably only apply to the Eastern Slavs (Holodomor etc), and not at all to the Western Slavs who are perhaps the luckiest people in Europe.

    The Western Slavs along with the Hungarians (who are so heavily Slavic you might as well call them Honorary Slavs) inhabit Central Europe, roughly the area between Germany and the Eastern Slavs. The triangle formed by Prague, Cracow, and Budapest is the heart of Central Europe, and is perhaps the most magical part of Europe. Note that Central Europe has been extremely safe. For example, Prague, Cracow, and Budapest, all very beautiful cities, were left unharmed by WW II (with the minor exception of Budapest). Specifically Poland was unaffected by the Black Death (ca 1350), was at peace when the Western Europeans were butchering each other during the Religious Wars, never suffered a major revolution like France, and unlike in England or France Polish kings were never harmed. Perhaps that’s why Poland has always attracted thousands of refugees – from the Jews in the Middle Ages, Scots and Italians during the 1500-1600s, French nobles during the French Revolution, and finally millions of Ukrainians in the last couple of months. It’s almost as if there is a Higher Power watching over Poland, and over Central Europe (which, by the way, never participated in colonialism or the slave trade).

    • Replies: @chris
    , @Dule
    , @Fox
  47. Jon Chance says: • Website
    @Miro23

    It’s easy to claim that the designated villain said all sorts of nonsense.

    The ludicrous propaganda and slander about Adolf Hitler has been continuously shoved down our throats for ninety years.

    Why don’t we ever see photographs of Hilter smiling?

    In truth, Hitler was a rather peaceful and unimaginative Socialist, not much different than The Great Dictator depicted by Charlie Chaplin:

    Examine The Greatest Story Never Told by Dennis Wise and Inside the Third Reich by Albert Speer.

    Read exactly what Hitler publicly said from the 1920s until his death. The most shocking thing about the truth is that it’s hiding in plain sight.

    • Disagree: Carolyn Yeager
    • Replies: @Carolyn Yeager
    , @karel
  48. Gg Mo says:
    @Miro23

    And this is where all of the above was leading; to this LIE. Chabad Lubavitch Bolshevik Billionaires RUN “Russia” and “Ukraine”. They are just busy with a BRUSH-Burning to plant their “New Jerusalum” and Central Rothschild World Knesset in Ukraine …DUH !

    • LOL: 36 ulster
  49. Gg Mo says:
    @g8way

    Yes, That last bit, the LIE that “Russia” is Christian, when it is well known it is 99% Chabad Lubavitch/ISLAM controlled , with Bolshi Billionaire having re-constructed the “churches” THEY TORN DOWN !!Chabad Lubavitch Bolshevik Billionaires RUN “Russia” and “Ukraine” with the Muslim as broom like every where else . They are just busy with a BRUSH-Burning to plant their “New Jerusalum” and Central Rothschild World Knesset in Ukraine. This shaggy dog story, with the TWIST (LIE) ending is just evidence to the extent that these pigs have skill in Propoganda . suprise suprise

  50. Anon 2 says:

    Old Paradigm:

    Western Europe (non-Slavic): Good
    Eastern Europe (Slavic): Bad

    New Paradigm:

    Western Europe (and the US): Bad Why? Due to colonialism and slavery. The West is experiencing imperial blowback or racial reckoning. Colonialism was not primarily about resource extraction or territorial expansion. Modern (post-1500) Western European countries colonized pre-modern (often neolithic) societies. It was like shooting fish in a barrel. The dominant effect was humiliation, and humiliation is hard to forget or forgive. That’s why there is so much hatred toward whites today.

    Central Europe (Mostly Slavic but part of Western Christendom): Good It includes Poland, Czechia, Slovakia, Hungary, and possibly Lithuania, Slovenia, and Croatia. The triangle formed by Prague, Cracow, and Budapest is the heart of Central Europe. The countries within Central Europe like or even love each other. Poland and Hungary have been allies for at least 500 years. It’s even been said that the Polish like the Czechs a bit too much. None of the countries in Central Europe participated in colonialism or slavery, so unlike the West they feel no guilt in racial matters. No country in Central Europe is interested in opening its borders to illegal migrants, esp. Muslims and Africans.

    Eastern Europe (Slavic and part of Eastern Christendom): Bad It includes primarily Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus (to use modern terminology for regions that were never separate countries except very recently). A poor area with horrible history of tyranny and lawlessness, and not much to admire politically or economically.

    Due to racial reckoning raging in the West, for an American to land, for example, in Poland is to feel you’ve arrived from a Third World sh*thole into a country that’s truly civilized: cities are clean and safe, there is no urban blight, violent crime levels are very low, and almost everyone is white, and often blue-eyed blonde. Life expectancy in Poland is longer than in the U.S. There are no mass shootings or terrorist attacks. Moreover, Poland has consistently scored much higher on PISA exams than the U.S.

    • Replies: @antibeast
    , @Dule
  51. antibeast says:
    @Anon 2

    You forgot about Northern Europe (except for the Netherlands) which didn’t participate in the African Slave Trade nor in Western colonialism. But they’re being forced to accept African migrants and Muslim refugees today lest they be labeled ‘racist’ for the imperialist wars against African and Muslim countries waged by the US-led NATO. For Nordic countries like Norway, Sweden, Iceland, Finland and Denmark, their best option is to opt out of the US-led NATO and maintain strict neutrality with respect to Russia, just like Switzerland. Otherwise, they’ll be dragged into the imperialist wars of the US-led NATO for which they’ll pay not only with their blood and treasure but also face the massive blowback that eventually ensues in the form of refugee crises, terrorist attacks, sexual violence, etc.

    • Agree: chris
    • Replies: @Anon 2
  52. Anon 2 says:
    @antibeast

    One problem is that the Scandinavians identify as much with the US
    as they do with Europe so they copy the United States too much.
    20-30 years ago it was already said that the Swedes think they
    are in the middle of the Atlantic somewhere.

    • Replies: @antibeast
  53. antibeast says:
    @Anon 2

    One problem is that the Scandinavians identify as much with the US as they do with Europe so they copy the United States too much.

    Nordic countries are very different from that diseased whore of Mammon known as the USA, in terms of their social democracy, welfare benefits, public education, socialized healthcare, environmental consciousness, egalitarian society, high-tech industries, etc. That could explain not only their very high GDP per capita but also their very high HDI, among the highest in the world. And they achieved their high standard of living without their national histories being ‘tainted’ by Western colonialism/imperialism. So the standard Western Woke argument blaming ‘Evul White Pipul’ for the evils of Western colonialism/imperialism do not apply to them. Norway, in particular, is the richest country in Europe with one of the world’s largest Sovereign Wealth Funds, whose national wealth derives mostly from their majority State-owned oil company, Statoil.

    • Replies: @Miro23
  54. Miro23 says:
    @antibeast

    And they achieved their high standard of living without their national histories being ‘tainted’ by Western colonialism/imperialism.

    The blanket term “colonialism” doesn’t work. Truthfully, colonialism comes in many different flavours – not all bad.

    For example, it’s generally acknowledged that the Roman Empire greatly increased the quality of life in its “colonies” through road networks, trade, coinage, public works like aqueducts, a fair legal system and centuries of peace (pax Romana). The influence of Rome is seen to this day.

    Same with the British Empire. Commenter Malla has been leading a lonely fight to show how the British united the country and made a tremendous effort to develop its infrastructure in the 19th century. They provided a famously uncorrupt administration and legal system that selected the very best British graduates for the ISC (Indian Civil Service), learnt local languages and developed an Indian middle class.

    Kartar Lalvani’s book “The Making of India: The Untold Story of British Enterprise” is a revelation for readers in 2022.

    • Replies: @antibeast
  55. antibeast says:
    @Miro23

    That may have been true for certain parts of the British Empire but the record of the nearly five hundred years of Western colonialism/imperialism is pretty dismal for most of its victims. For every shining example of the successful colonial enterprise in the tradition of Rudyard Kipling’s ‘White Man’s Burden’, there are countless others which became disastrous failures. Afghanistan is but the latest example of the failed attempt by the US-led NATO to impose its Western Will by force of arms onto the recalcitrant Muslim Afghans. Vietnam is another.

    Looking at the Americas, some of the worst instances of genocide and slavery took place in that benighted continent over the last five hundred years of Western colonialism/imperialism. The White descendants of European settlers/immigrants hardly even acknowledge that the lands they’re living on were stolen from the native inhabitants, rationalizing the criminal nature of the Western colonial/imperialist enterprise in the Americas by invoking racial, cultural or ideological superiority. This ‘Conquest Culture’ is especially evident in the Banana Republic of Yankistan, which is nothing more than a criminal enterprise that is about to implode financially from its own gangster militarism.

  56. Juvenalis says:

    BS. “Jewish Bolsheviks” talk is way way way overplayed to try to absolve the ‘Great Russians’ (Velikaja Rus) of their own guilt. Russians put Bolsheviki into power. As first line of Soviet anthem proudly proclaims: “Unbreakable union of freeborn republics Great Russia has welded forever to stand!”

    Murderous imperialist aggression, forced Russification, cultural genocides, ethnic cleansings, forced population transfers to undermine national identities, using Jews as State intermediaries to collect taxes and inflict punishment on peoples to whom they felt no ethnic loyalty…all practices originated in “holy Orthodox” Tsarist Russian Empire.

    For centuries Tsarist Moskal State kept its own Slavic subjects as serfs, only formally abolishing serfdom in the 1861 at same time USA was freeing its black slaves (in practice serfdom continued in parts of Russian Empire like Caucasus, especially after ‘Good Tsar Alexander’ II was assassinated and replaced by reactionary hardliners Alexander III and especially the last and worst tsar Nikolai II). That’s how highly Russian government has always thought of its own people, like America saw disposable negro slaves. Bolsheviki did not invent murderous Moskal terrorist practices; Soviets merely refined old Mongol Russian ways in practice since oriental despotism Tsardom of Muscowy conquered and destroyed the last vestiges of Kievan Rus in Pskov and Novgorod mercantile republics.

    Tsarist Russian government in “Window on Europe” St. Petersburg (capital built in XVIII century as imitation of Western European city) was even less Slavic Russian than Soviet Russian government restored to original capital in Moscow. Tsar Nicholas II of Russian Empire looked like a twin of his cousin King George V of United Kingdom, and only slightly less identical to their cousin Kaiser Wilhelm II of German Empire.

    Whether barbaric despot is named Nicholas Romanov, Josef Stalin, Vladimir Putin, the repressive murderous genocidal essence of the mongol khanate Muscowite State remains the same. All that changes is the name—merely cosmetic.

    Muscowy Tsardom = Russian Empire = Soviet Union = Russian Federation
    Oprichniki = Okhrana = Cheka = OGPU = NKVD = KGB = FSB

    Слава Україні🇺🇦Героям слава🔱 Слава Азовуꑭ‼️
    Смерть🇷🇺московсько-більшовицьким☭ загарбникам🐖‼️

    • LOL: GMC
    • Replies: @anonlb
  57. Anon[404] • Disclaimer says:

    Read the first few paragraphs. Can’t remember the last time I read such cunning political horseshit.

  58. anon[345] • Disclaimer says:

    The movie NICHOLAS AND ALEXANDRA is a piece of anti-Russian anti-Christian propaganda created by the children of Bolsheviks.

  59. @Here Be Dragon

    Hey, the Khazars did a far bit of slave trading.

  60. German Nazism seems to be a philosophy which had its roots in the east as much as in the west. The author Michael Kellogg has shown how white Russian emigres influenced the young members of the NSDAP in Munich. Germany had not been notably Anti-Semitic in WWI and even Hitler may have had no strong feelings about Jews during that war. The White emigres, who were Ukrainian, Baltic German, and Russian, influenced the young Nazi party to become Anti-Semitic but also pro-Slavic to some extent. The most interesting thing is that the Nazis later became anti-Slavic, perhaps this was the influence of German chauvinism taking over. German Nazi ideology was certainly a powerful witches brew.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aufbau_Vereinigung

  61. @Miro23

    ‘…”The German colonist ought to live on handsome, spacious farms. The German services will be lodged in marvellous buildings, the governors in palaces. Beneath the shelter of the administrative services, we shall gradually organize all that is indispensable to the maintenance of a certain standard of living. All around the city to a depth of thirty to forty kilometers we shall have a belt of handsome villages connected by the best roads. What exists beyond that will be another world, in which we mean to let the Russians live as they like…”…’

    This sounds curiously like the existing German Mennonite colonies in Paraguay and elsewhere — albeit on a grand scale.

  62. @peterAUS

    ‘…For anyone with a modicum of intelligence is more than clear what was the future of Slavs under Nazi regime…’

    Meh. Jews aside, I don’t think anyone can predict what anyone’s future was going to be like under the Nazi regime — or even what that regime would have been like.

    The Nazi empire was in wild flux, with one policy being pursued in one place and something completely different happening next door. Moreover, it only existed for a few years — and for even less time absent the pressure of impending defeat.

    On the one hand, there’s no particular reason to expect a kinder, gentler Nazism to have emerged. On the other hand, there’s equally little reason to have expected it to pursue the most brutal and genocidal of the various possibilities. We simply don’t know how it all would have panned out.

    • Disagree: peterAUS
    • Thanks: mark green
    • Replies: @Old and Grumpy
  63. GMC says:
    @Miro23

    Maybe the Poles are so embedded in the USA and Western Europe, that they can’t see that those places are going down the drain. Most likely, the majority of Poles have ties – not to their country but to those outside countries. – work, family/friends etc. Dreams. I grew up on No. side of Chicago.

    We also seem to forget the strong effects of propaganda and the programing from the Jew news against Russia , all these decades. It has been relentless and it works – even on the Ukrainian slavs, who have really been transformed in just 8 years. Some of these people in the West might wake up after the Jews take full control but I doubt it. Once the CIA/Mossad, State Dept. and te Pentagon show up in your country – you are totally screwed, esp. if you are living there. That’s what happened to Ukraine.

  64. chris says:

    Ok, so I see the point the author is trying to make, in comparing plunderers across the world to each other. However, (without being German myself) I do consider German interactions with native populations in Eastern Europe to be of a different than that of other people’s.

    The ruthless 5 years of World War II have have to be contrasted to 800 years of peaceful coexistence and cooperation, witnessed by the almost complete lack of animosity or history of strife between them and the more primitive native populations.

    This difference is certainly not one of degree but of kind.

  65. chris says:
    @Anon 2

    It’s almost as if there is a Higher Power watching over Poland, and over Central Europe

    Well, that power sure seems to have forsaken them from 1939-1989.

    A more corrupt group of, shortsighted, criminally treasonous leaders they can’t possibly have had. They willingly sacrificed their entire population in order to provide the UK and France an excuse to declare war on Germany, neither of which was in a position to fulfill.

    Only Zelensky comes close to that level of criminality in the complicity he bears in bringing on such a calamity on the country he supposedly leads.

  66. S says:

    In contrast, whites in the American North and Zionists in Palestine/Israel understood that a people must both rule and do the labor.

    If only that were true.

    In the early 19th century chattel slavery and its trade was monetized, rather than abolished in the US North-east, with the introduction of wage slavery, ie the so called ‘cheap labor’/’mass immigration’ system, the economic and political basis of the modern progressive multi-cultural state.

    The Massachusetts textile factory magnate, Abbott Lawrence, founded the factory Town Lawrence ‘Immigrant City’, Mass circa 1845. He was also the US ambassador to the United Kingdom during 1851 when he made a tour of Ireland.

    [MORE]

    The London Times triumphantly editorialized about Lawrence’s visit, declaring that as a direct result of the Irish people’s then enmasse predation as wage slaves (ie so called ‘cheap labor’) by the United States, that they would be ‘known no more’. That where the Irish people had once been in Ireland, imported immigrants who have mixed with the locals forming a new slave race (ie ‘more mixed’, ‘more docile’, and ‘which can submit to a master’) will take the original Irish people’s place. [See ‘hathitrust’ link below and ‘The American Minister in Ireland’].

    The 1847 Spectator of London article linked below, ‘Extermination and Vengeance’, tells how the Irish also concluded their enmasse predation as wage slaves (‘cheap labor’) would destroy them, calling it ‘extermination’. Members of the British aristocracy in Ireland were being shot for promoting their going to the US as ‘cheap labor’ was a good thing for Ireland and the Irish people.

    The 1850 Spectator article linked below, ‘American Factories in Ireland’, speaks about plans to move US manufacturing plants (textile mills) from the United States to Ireland. If you can’t get enough of the slaves to come to you, you go directly to where the slaves are.

    Lastly, as the YouTube video below says, Lawrence ‘Immigrant City’, Mass, is now New England’s first ‘minority majority city’, Abbott Lawrence’s own well paid local Anglo-Saxon ‘Yankee girls’, whom had once been doing the work in such places, having long since been displaced.

    That’s the real and true genocide, being forever ‘mixed’ out of existance, for both those preyed upon as a source of wage slavery (ie ‘cheap labor’), and for those whom by diktat are on the receiving end of the ‘mass immigration’.

    Correspondent Diane Roberts went to Lawrence to see how this historical mill town became New England’s first minority-majority city.

    Lawrence, Massachusetts is a historically immigrant town established in the 1800’s when European immigrants came to work in the famed textile mills. Today, more than 80 percent of the population is Latino. Matter of Fact Correspondent Diane Roberts went to Lawrence to see how this historical mill town became New England’s first minority-majority city.


    Lawrence, Mass (1910)

    https://www.matteroffact.tv/lawrence-mass-immigrant-city/

    https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=coo.31924079600965&view=1up&seq=296&skin=2021

    http://archive.spectator.co.uk/article/20th-november-1847/12/extermination-and-vengeance

    http://archive.spectator.co.uk/article/22nd-june-1850/15/american-factories-in-ireland

    • Agree: Mefobills
  67. Especially because Russia was the most backward part of Europe…

    In the meantime what has changed is that nowadays Russia is not even considered to be part of Europe, with the possible exception of Saint Petersburg.

    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
  68. @Jon Chance

    You wrote:

    These Communist Jews quickly rebranded themselves as “Conservatives” and “Libertarians” and “Capitalists”

    You clearly know nothing about untainted Libertarianism (ie: that which is aligned with the Austrian School of Economic thought) .
    Nothing could be further from Communism than Libertarian ideals.
    To the extent that there have been some Jews that were prominent in the Libertarian movement (eg: Von Mises, Rothbard), these are far outnumbered by those that weren’t.

    More importantly though, those few Jews that were affiliated with Libertarianism were righteous Jews. ie: Jews that exposed the financial chicanery of the Zionist owned Federal Reserve, those that exposed the corrupt machinations of Zio influenced politicians and bureaucrats.

    Bottom Line: You can rebrand yourself as anything you like, but if you’re a war mongering Statist that promotes central planning, promotes the expansion of Big Government and control of the western financial system by the Zionist Usury Banking Cartel, you are no Libertarian.
    Such people are the antithesis of a Libertarian.

    Meanwhile, I’m well aware of those Trotskyists (and their kin) that rebranded themselves as Conservatives and have since taken over the Republican party in the U.S over a couple of generations.
    They are of course the neocons that masterminded PNAC in the lead up to 9/11 and control the reins of the GOP today.
    These are the same neocons in the Republican National Committee (RNC) that cheated the prominent Libertarian Dr Ron Paul out of the GOP nomination to take on Obama in the 2012 Presidential election.
    That’s why the GOP of today bears no resemblance to the GOP of the past.
    That’s why the most profligate, the most socialistic President in the history of the republic was Donald J Chump.
    No POTUS has done more to ensure the demise of the USD as the world’s reserve currency and bankrupt the U.S than this man.
    Biden follows in his footsteps and, as bad as he is (and he is very bad indeed), he has actually been less fiscally reckless than the Orange Man (or, as I like to call him, the Orang-u-tan).

    • Replies: @Jon Chance
  69. @Been_there_done_that

    Well thank God for that! What’s so great being part of Europe. You got something against Asians? Or Eurasians? Feel superior do you? Living in the glory of a past long gone?

    • LOL: GMC
  70. Ole_ed says:

    @jluker:

    So we–Southern whites–lack agency? That’s what you imply. Yankees and (Js) brought blacks here because OUR ANCESTORS wanted them as slave labor.

    • Disagree: Robert Dolan
    • Replies: @Robert Dolan
  71. Interesting.

    “These elites weren’t ‘oriental despotist’ but despotic just the same because they turned up their noses at Russian commoners as semi-barbarian louts and boors munching on raw potatoes and mired in superstition. ”

    However potatoes at the time of Ivan the Terrible, Peter the Great and Catherine the Great were unknown in Russia, particularly to peasants/ serfs (potatoes only were planted as a novel crop in the 1830s after wheat crop failures.)

    They might have been munching on turnips in earlier times.

  72. The constant nonsense that we hear about the Nazis planning to wipe out millions of Slavs and that Hitler considered them to be an inferior race needs to be buried with the skin lampshade stories. Hitler could see with his own eyes and could read books on anthropology to see that the “Slavs” didn’t look much different from the Germans and had built beautiful cities like Warsaw, St. Petersburg and Moscow. We need to separate British, American, German and Soviet war propaganda from real history. In Hitler’s time, as well as today, there were more people with Slavic names in the Berlin phone book, than German names. Southeast of Berlin, there are a Slavic minority called the Sorbs that have lived in the same area for 1500 years. Hitler had 12 years to wipe them out, but he didn’t and they were right on his doorstep. Rehashing old war propaganda like this is only further playing into the hands of our enemies and divides whites against each other.

    • Replies: @Iva
  73. @Vinnie O

    So true. A waste of time.

    • Agree: Towey
  74. Nat X says:

    Jibba jabba. Screeds like this will be preserved as an example of yt on yt violence.

  75. Iva says:

    I thought that all ships bringing slaves from Africa belonged to Jews. Jews were also first slave traders of Slavic people. I don’t understand why Jews accusing whites as resists when they were the worst resist of all. Not many people are aware that Jwish communist that came to central Europe after WWII, sent thousands of Polish WWII underground army soldiers to Siberian gulags. This was also extermination of Slaves. What about 140,000Poles killed by Ukrainian in Wolyn between 1941-43?

  76. Iva says:
    @Joe Paluka

    According to Prof Henry Makow, Hitler didn’t want to exterminate Jews either until some Jewish “elites” pressured him and his people to kill Jews so they got rid of poor, filthy, lace infested Jewish communities. Jewish “elites” wanted to become the world’s elites and this image was not good for them. They wanted to be seen as rules.

  77. Bromazepam would do good to the article’s author, and to quite a few commenters. Less soy in the diet is recommended too.

  78. @Fidelios Automata

    The traitorous elite have always been the problem. Christian Zionists are ugly prostitutes. Jews bought and paid for the top ones, and the lower caste ones have been molded into cult like Jewish idolaters. Makes the Christian Zionist elites a special kind of diabolical traitors.

  79. McGeeHee says:

    So much wrong amidst the tropes landmining this opinion piece.

  80. anonlb says:
    @Juvenalis

    LOL! You must be careful what you wish for. Russia cannot loose this war without being absorbed by China in one way or another. And then you will get real ‘mongol khanate’ on your doorstep.

  81. @Colin Wright

    How such a brief regime can have such control seventy some years later boggles my mind? Losers don’t write history, and often are humiliated in history. Not Hitler and his Germany since it seem they will be kept around forever in spirit. No we don’t know what a successful Hitler regime would have looked like. By some accounts it would not have even included Hitler due to his health issues from mustard gas exposure. Nor did it seem like the average German and legacy military command were all that interested in any Slavic territories other than the ones they lost due to the Treaty of Versailles.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  82. @Ole_ed

    jews and muslims ran the slave trade for thousands of years until white men ended slavery.

  83. @follyofwar

    The open border invasion is being engineered by jews.

    Joe Biden does the bidding of the small hats and he never hesitates to obey them.

    Mayorkas runs the open border while Biden shakes hands with ghosts.

    • Agree: Kolya Krassotkin
  84. anonymous[481] • Disclaimer says:

    As awful as Nazism as an ideology was, it was still in accordance with the theory of the evolution. If the Nazis succeeded in defeating the Russians, then exterminated them – they would have proved that the more successful evolutionary design prevailed, and humans of greater quality get to move forward and evolve into something even better.

    As it turned out – the Russians proved that they were the more successful evolutionary design, they handed the Germans their asses and for the life of me I can’t understand why they didn’t ended them all. They Germans were certainly asking for it.

    Evolutionary theory aside, Nazi ideology is based on extreme narcissism, and behind every narcissist there lies hidden inferiority complex. Same thing is happening today. Behind the “west’s” narcissism described as “exceptionalism” lies inferiority complex vis a vis Russia. They can’t fathom why this “backward” “inferior” country doesn’t bow to them.

    They don’t bow to you, because they are better then you. If you don’t believe me, ask Napoleon and Hitler and everybody else who ever had the illusion that they are superior to the Russians. At least in military terms they proved that this is false time and time again, but I would argue that even in general civilisationary accomplishments, Russians are not even one step behind the narcissists from the West.

    Only dull and humorless people can come up with theories such as Nazism. I had the displeasure to work with few Germans in the past and one of the things that I noticed about them, is their total lack of sense of humor. They couldn’t tell a joke to save their lives. That’s why I think that they should be placed in the witless protection program, not the evil “multiculturalism” that their masters imposed on them to force them to atone for the past Nazi sins.

    https://www.udemy.com/course/arrogance-narcissism-and-vanity/

  85. Perhaps, Putin will put an end by nuking his enemies to smithereens… one can only wait and watch!

  86. Small comment on the comparison made between Russians and Mexicans. Spain ruled Mexico and many other places in “Latin America.” They preferred oligarchical rule with a small European elite in charge of the masses. Unlike the settlers of the English colonies of North America, there was no big desire to colonize places in the same manner as the English did –family groups with their own small holdings. The same could be said of the French in America. With the exception of cold cold Quebec and Acadia, the French did little with all that beautiful land they had in the Mississippi valley except set up trading posts and send over priests to convert the Indians to Catholicism. What a waste. Places like Argentina, Chile & Uruguay became Europeanized (made white largely through immigration) after independence from Spain. The same could be said for Cuba, which before Castro was about 60% European (with a large immigration from Asturias & Galicia followed by a large Spanish immigration after their civil war in the 1930s). So, Spain and its type of governing can be as much to blame for the lack of industriousness among the Mexican and other peoples of former Spanish colonies.

  87. The author treats the fake WWII Jewish Holocaust as true?

    To read the truth about Jewish Holocaust lies, please read:

    Breaking the Spell
    The Holocaust: Myth and Reality, Overview of the book by Dr. Nicholas Kollerstrom
    ANTONY C. BLACK • APRIL 17, 2022
    Breaking the Spell, by Antony C. Black – The Unz Review

  88. @Old and Grumpy

    ‘How such a brief regime can have such control seventy some years later boggles my mind? Losers don’t write history, and often are humiliated in history. Not Hitler and his Germany since it seem they will be kept around forever in spirit. No we don’t know what a successful Hitler regime would have looked like. By some accounts it would not have even included Hitler due to his health issues from mustard gas exposure. Nor did it seem like the average German and legacy military command were all that interested in any Slavic territories other than the ones they lost due to the Treaty of Versailles.’

    I think another element in the equation is that it’s unlikely the Germans would ever have been able to recruit the settlers Hitler’s more extravagant fantasies would have required. They had trouble resettling even those areas of Western Poland they annexed — and did what little they accomplished primarily with the ethnic Germans Stalin had agreed to let out of Bessarabia et al. Few Reichsdeutsch ever went.

    Here, part of the problem must have been self-inflicted. Ironically, the Nazi social welfare programmes and measures to protect small farmers would have removed much of the incentive to resettle. If now you’re economically secure and have access to higher education, etc right in the land of your forefathers — well, there goes half your reason to agree to settle the Wild East. Emigration requires push as well as pull: conditions have to be intolerable at home, and if they’re not, fewer will go.

    Then too it can be tempting to decide Hitler wouldn’t really have been that bad — but he had a lot of ideas. Maybe he would have focussed on giant Volkshalle in Berlin and super-highways to Trondheim instead of making it always winter and never Christmas for the Slavs of the East. A feller can only do so much.

    Planet Reality might have seen Bohemia simply tacitly absorbed into the Reich, the Poles beheaded and subjected to a kind of apartheid regime-with-frequent-hangings, and points east eventually brought under a kind of ad hoc colonial regime in the vacuum left after the collapse of Soviet power. There would simply have been a lack of Germans to implement anything much more ambitious. Again ironically, there simply wouldn’t have been a use for that much lebensraum.

  89. Hitch says:
    @Ron Unz

    This is somewhat off topic, but somehow also relevant when a thread is about semitic wars on slavic peoples…

    A Twitter “hate speech” plot by the German government.

    Where is unz.com? How is it that Ron Unz can repeatedly state that Germany did not want to exterminate all Slavs in denial of what the Jewish propaganda organs keep shrieking at us, yet unz.com does not show up on their hate-speech plot?

    • Agree: chris
  90. Dutch Boy says:
    @Dirge

    Slavs are Aryans, i.e., descendants of the Indo-European invaders (as are the Germans and most other Europeans). The Germans recruited huge numbers of Soviet Slavs into their army (I believe in the neighborhood of one million). They also had Slavic allies in their anti-Soviet war (Croatia, Slovakia) and many recruits from the Slavic parts of the Baltic Republics, where large numbers still celebrate the WWII German war against the Soviet Union. Nazi theory aside, as a practical matter it would have been impossible to wipe out the huge numbers of Slavs in the Soviet Union. Some kind of rapprochement was inevitable.

    • Replies: @Curmudgeon
  91. Mike Tre says:
    @Get Real

    I’ve noticed that every commenter that inserts the word “real” or one of its derivatives into their name usually provides examples of the exact opposite.

  92. Mike Tre says:
    @Vinnie O

    Agreed. I spent a lot of time in the West Lawn (K-town off of 63rd street – where Jack Ruby is buried) neighborhood back in the 80’s as a kid with my Irish cousins, and most of the neighborhood kids were Polish, with some Italians sprinkled in. We used to walk to the Ford City mall before its blackout.

    Now, West Lawn is overwhelmingly Mexican.

  93. Pratt says:

    Whatever Hitler / the Nazis may have planned (or more loosely: had in mind) for the Slavic-speaking populations of Eastern Europe in case of victory, it’s by no means assured that it would have been carried out as this or that personal statement or ideological Nazi treatise suggest. Hitler would have aged and eventually died, prolonged contact with reality changes perceptions and courses of action, etc.

    So, difficult to gauge and impossible to know what would have happened with defeated Slavs. Likely not all peaches and cream for them — but mass genocide, which is increasingly questioned even with regard to Jews? Not terribly probable.

    What is fact though, not speculation, is that millions of Germans were ethnically cleansed from their centuries-old areas of settlement in Sudentenland, Silesia, Pomerania, East Prussia, by Russians, Poles, and Czechs.

    Incidentally, from my sporadic travels in Slavic Eastern Europe (exempting Russia) as well as from contacts with Eastern Europeans in the West it appears to me that talk of a distinct and separate Slavic race is nonsense. Clearly, they are on a racial-genetic continuum with non-mediterranean Western Europeans and their descendants in the Americas.

    • Thanks: Fox
    • Replies: @karel
  94. @jluker

    Every word you say is true, but you left out an important part. The center of the slave trade was Newport RI. The ships you speak of were not only owned by Jews but were manned by Jewish crews and sailed under the command of Jewish captains.

    And best of all the slave auction houses up and down the east coast of America closed only on Jewish holidays.

    Source: New World Jewry: 1493-1825

    Jews ran the slave trade they can afford reparations and should pay them.

  95. @Dirge

    I would add that it was the UK and France that worked hard to separate cousins Willi and Nikki and break the German-Russian relations established under Bismarck.
    As for the German invasion of WWII, stuffed down the memory hole is the fact that the documentation of the Soviet build-up, which led to Operation Barbarosa, was denied to the defendants at the Nuremberg Kangaroo Court. Fortunately, that has been revealed (and ignored) by several authors over the last 40 years.

  96. @Dutch Boy

    Thanks. I read Mein Kampf over 50 years ago, because a WWII vet, foaming-at-the-mouth history teacher insisted the plans to do the magic 6 kagillion were in it. While there is a lot of, what could be called, dislike of the nature of Jews and Slavs, in general, I saw nothing that would lead me to believe mass extermination was in mind. There is absolutely no question that communism was seen as the enemy, and that the NSDAP was vehemently anti-communist. Given communist Jews were behind the Bolsheviks as well as the undermining and brief overthrow of the German government forcing the Kaiser to abdicate, and that communism had taken root in Slavic Russia, that is not unexpected. The Slavs were never the target, communism was.
    Similarly, until the SHTF, their policy toward Jews was fuzzy, given the significant number of `half Jews`in Germany. It ended up being along the lines of – are you a Jew who happens to be living in Germany, or a German who happens to be Jewish. Even then the lines were fuzzy.

  97. I stopped reading at the second sentence with the mention of the Shoah. If you start an article with a lie, your credibility is shot for the rest of the piece.

  98. @anonymous

    Germans surely can’t be as humorless as lesbians.

    You could fit “The Big Book of Lesbian Humor,” (not to be confused with “The Book of Big Lesbian Humor”), in your back pocket.

    • Agree: Trinity
    • Replies: @Anonymous
  99. “We are smarter, we are better, we are holier, and we should rule over you, and you exist to serve us and obey us and believe everything we tell you. If not, you’re an ‘anti-Semite’ and ‘Nazi’.”

    And you can gauge the power of the zionists by extracting an apology from Putin recently for comments made by Lavrov.
    https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-61339749

  100. profnasty says:
    @Wokechoke

    Yadda yadda.
    “Jung-Frued ” pretty much says it all.
    Teutons, Saxons, Angles, Slavs.
    White Christians all.
    Freud wanna drive that wedge.
    Kike. Oops, I meant, ‘Kook’.

  101. chris says:
    @Ron Unz

    To avert this danger, he urged that birth control and abortion should always be made freely available to the Slavs, …

    And this was pretty mild eugenics Level talk for the times also. George Bernard Shaw, the Fabian Society, and their likes had openly discussed much more revolting things from the late 19th century onward.

    Come to think of it Schwab and the gang are at it again.

  102. Anonymous[661] • Disclaimer says:
    @Kolya Krassotkin

    This is true. There are theologians who in fact believe the guardians of hell are not the demonic dogs of our imagination but actually German lesbians.

    To become sadly acquainted with the wages of sin, I heartily suggest taking a close look at such visual documents as the famous Bosch Triptych. You can clearly see scores of German lesbians carrying out their infernal duties with an assiduous, though completely humorless, efficiency.

    • LOL: Kolya Krassotkin
    • Replies: @Trinity
  103. Trinity says:
    @Anonymous

    Nah, those demons are Jewish lesbians who have German sounding names like “Jorge Zimmerman.” Teehee.

  104. Dule says:
    @Anon 2

    Actually, the Slavocaust applies to the highest degree to Serbs who belong to the South Slavs. Serbian losses in two world wars are not mentioned here, although they were probably the highest relative to the total population. In WW1 Serbia lost more than 1.1 million people, almost a third of the prewar population and almost 60% of the active male population. These tremendous losses were inflicted by the Austro-Hungarians. In WW2 an even bigger number of Serbs lost their lives. Only in Serbia and Belarus the German occupiers conducted the 100:1 rule (100 Serbs or Belorussians murdered for one German killed by the guerilla resistance) and as a result several cities in Serbia were almost completely wiped out. The situation was even worse in the parts of former Yugoslavia run by the Croats and Muslims (recently re-branded as Bosniaks). As many as 700 thousand Serbs were slaughtered by the Croatian ustashe in the concentration camp Jasenovac and additional hundreds of thousands were killed in their villages. Needless to say, Serbs never participated in colonialism or the active slave trade, but were enslaved and sold during the centuries of Turkish dominance.

    • Agree: Odyssey
  105. @Wokechoke

    Slava Ukraini indeed.

    Anyway the people who are on the top, many of whom are descended from Jews love antisemitism; and they are going to love reading this essay. I found it a little tiresome.

    Do you think Ivanka Trump’s husband prays when he is alone or studies the Bible? Do you think any of their kids will?

    I’m pretty sure that her grandchildren will not. I doubt Jason or whatever his name is has done so for more than sixty seconds since his bar mitzvah. Pure speculation. I don’t have any more of a window into the man’s soul than jung freud does in any of his/her/its guises.

    • Replies: @Flo
  106. Hess says:

    Aryan war on the Slavic people??

    When did Iran waged war on the Slavic people?

    Those Germans were as much Aryan as the Negros are Saxons.

    But I guess advertisement sells.

  107. karel says:
    @gT

    This prevarication of yours
    Poor Russians, they defeated the best of the French under Napoleon, but are still inferior to the French. The Russians defeated the best of the Germans under Hitler, but are still inferior to the Germans.
    reminds me of the quote by Mike Tyson, “Everyone has a plan ’till they get punched in the mouth”. Several fools like Charles of Sweden, Napoleon and Hitler stupified by years of self engrandizement were all eventually punched. Their sad fate is not an evidency of their superiority but rather human degeneracy with a dessicated survival instinct.

  108. @anonymous

    Of course the West feels inferior and is jealous and envious of Russia as it is a true empire and it t has been so for a very long time while their empires are gone. Russia may have lost some territories round the edges since the fall of the Soviet Union and it may not have an emperor king but it is an empire. They even dubbed the USSR the Evil Empire for no good reason other than jealousy. The West so misses its colonies where it could look down on the coloured folk that it imports immigrants into their home countries to look down upon and give themselves some sense of superiority although of course they hide their true feelings, but the psychology is there and easy to spot if you look, especially among the “do-gooder” and “charitable” type liberals. They’re pathetic.

    • Agree: Derer
    • Replies: @Derer
  109. karel says:
    @Pratt

    What is fact though, not speculation, is that millions of Germans were ethnically cleansed from their centuries-old areas of settlement in Sudentenland, Silesia, Pomerania, East Prussia, by Russians, Poles, and Czechs.

    Perhaps that was prize for their stupidity. If you loose money in a casino you can only blame yourself and not the white ball.

    • Agree: Miro23
    • Replies: @Pratt
  110. “So, even though Jewish Semites didn’t have an ideology of enslavement and extermination against the Slavs like the Nazi Aryans did, their radical cause wasn’t merely fueled by idealism and vision of justice. It was driven by animus, hatred, contempt, arrogance, and revanchism.”

    When the moschiac comes he will make all goyim our slaves. Gtfoh with that bs the religion is based on using the rest of humanity as slaves through usury.

  111. Avery says:
    @Ron Unz

    {…and I’ve seen these sorts of claims floating around for years}

    Ron, in spite of Hitler’s Table Talk, did Operation Intelligenzaktion — whereby (reportedly) ~100,000 Polish intelligentsia were murdered by Nazi Einsatzgruppen — happen or all the info about it is fake?
    Did it or did it not happen?

    That is just one example.
    There are many, many examples of what Nazi invaders actually did to the Slavic peoples (and others), despite what Hitler table-talked about.

    Did the Lidice massacre (…of women and children) happen or is it a myth?
    Did the Oradour-sur-Glane massacre (of French civilians, including women and children) happen or is it a myth?
    …………….

    • Replies: @Jon Halpenny
    , @bronek
  112. Poco says:
    @James J O'Meara

    The Byzantines themselves acknowledged the existence of Rome. The chronological revisionists are looney.
    Invariably the revisionists are of the Western tradition too.

  113. @Jon Chance

    If you think Dennis Wise and Albert Speer are the authorities to listen to on Adolf Hitler, you know nothing. It’s so often those who know the least who are the most confident they are right.

    • Replies: @Jon Chance
  114. lloyd says: • Website
    @Ron Unz

    Hitler too was capable of intellectual development and changing his mind. That is if we stop ascribing him to a diabolical force. The 1920s was a highly racist and eugenics era. Mein Kampf reflects that. Authors of that era, such as D H Lawrence really sounded much the same when writing about race. By the 1940s, there was already developing a notion of common humanity. Sort of all humans are equal but some are more equal than others. Anyway, Mein Kampf was the writing of a thirty something self taught political agitator in prison. Table Talk were the practical contemplations of a European head of State.

  115. Derer says:

    Also, Jews, who became adept in business and learning, came to regard the vast majority of Russians as dumb, lazy, and childish morons.

    Unfortunately, this sentiment has moved to the post-war Christian America and has been cultivated and cleverly guarded for many decades…it works perfectly on different unsuspecting subject.

  116. Derer says:
    @Commentator Mike

    “Russia may have lost some territories round the edges since the fall of the Soviet Union”

    Unloading Islam oriented fringe impoverished former USSR territories was actually welcomed occurrence. The issue became Ukraine and North Kazakhstan which is inhabited by Russians.

  117. Derer says:
    @Here Be Dragon

    Your Christian religion was the most barbaric invention ever. You were burning people alive in public places, and tortured women.

    A total ignorance and incomprehension of evolving civility standards…we execute by lethal injection as oppose to guillotine. Although, some less civilized still use beheading.

  118. karel says:
    @Jon Chance

    Although not quite correct, it is great discovery that

    Why don’t we ever see photographs of Hilter smiling?

    Well there are some pics.

    This may seem odd for someone who has brought so much joy to Europe. While watching Hitlers speeches, it is impossible for me not to laugh.

    But it is somewhat difficult to find a German who will laugh. What a strange world.

    • Replies: @Fox
    , @Commentator Mike
  119. Athena says:

    I don’t understand his logic:

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  120. @Sorel McRae

    OK, so the Yankees (and Jews, from what I hear) enabled and exploited the slave trade and ought to be held accountable. Still, they didn’t create the demand. For that Southern planters are primarily responsible.

    It wasn’t unheard of for a southern planter to be born in the North. Lots of prominent families in the antebellum South had ties to the North. Jews in the South also owned slaves at a high rate. It’s even possible that the average white man in the South gained less from slavery than a white man in the North who was employed in industries that manufactured goods from materials produced by plantations in the South, manufactured the machinery that produced those goods, or somehow took part in that industrial economy.

    I don’t carry any guilt over slavery.

  121. Fox says:
    @Anon 2

    Germany’s territory has shrunk continuously over the last 600 years and is now perhaps a third of what it was then. Every neighbor, in the North, in the South, in the East and in the West has taken a bite out of it or undermining its unity. It was an easy task to make pacts between the neighbor surrounding Germany, attack and share the booty. Even the Americans from across the ocean joined in the fray to help divide up Germany.

    As an addition to your statement that many Scots were emigrating to Poland, I’ll mention the interesting comment in Francis Neilson’s Volume 6 of his Tragedy of Europe, namely that in 1939 there lived more people of Scottish descent in Danzig than Poles. A commentary that highlights nicely with what kind of neighbors Germany had (and has) to contend, as in 1939 Poland claimed the German city of Danzig as a Polish city.

    • Replies: @Odyssey
  122. Fox says:
    @karel

    I suppose it would be difficult for a German to have a laugh with a black-galled ‘karel’, desendant of Benes and Masaryk.

    • Replies: @karel
  123. Odyssey says:

    Some notes:

     “Even though the ‘Aryan’ vision of German-ruled Russia was frightening” —Aryans were proto-Slavics who brought the language (which became Sanskrit) and mythology to S.Asia. Germans were no Aryans although a very high percentage of Germans are of Slavic (i.e. Serbian) origin.
     The term ‘Slav’ was coined in the 7th c.AC. Before that, Slavics called themselves Serbs (meaning – cousins, members of the same race) and spoke Serbian language. From this language all other Slavic languages developed.
     “Russia got so big because it conquered other peoples, and it’s understandable why many peoples, including non-Russian Slavs, developed hostilities toward Russians as overbearing invaders and despoilers.” — Not true. Russia was under ice when proto-Slavics populated the land. When ice melted, it was a lake I Russia which was big as Mediterranean.
     “Christianity spread to Western and Northern Europe before it moved deep into Slavic territory. When Russians finally adopted Christianity, they chose the Eastern Orthodox Faith than Catholicism.” —The first Christianity and a Christian diocese was established in today’s Serbia, in the Roman capital town of Sirmium, 40 km from Belgrade.
     “like the glory of Greece was lost long ago when invasions upon invasions left only skeletons of Hellenic glory.” – neither ‘Greek’ nor ‘Hellenic’ were Greek words. When Greeks came to today’s Greece, where from and who gave them a name?
     “Upon German unification under the Prussian helm, the mentality of the Germans began to change.” — Prussians were Serbs, germanised in the 12th c.AC but spoke Serbian until 200 years ago when it was prohibited by law. They founded Berlin, Leipzig, Dresden and other East German cities.
     “The famed Catherine the Great was actually a German” — Not true, she was a Serb so as the whole East Germany.
     “The fact that the term ‘slave’ derives from ‘Slav’ is sure indication of the massive scale of the slave trade involving Slavs.” — this is a bs conclusion

  124. Pratt says:
    @karel

    Karel,

    from your name (or chosen nick) I infer you are Czech. That assumption informs my following statements. Apologies in advance if my assumption is mistaken.

    Concerning the post-WWII ethnic cleansing of Germans from Eastern Europe you write: “Perhaps that was prize for their stupidity. If you loose money in a casino you can only blame yourself and not the white ball.”

    Just to make sure I understand you correctly: Are you saying that the ethnic cleansing of Germans from Sudetenland specifically (how many were they? One million perhaps? Too lazy to google at the moment) happened with law-of-nature-like inevitability, without any moral calculus to be made on the part of the Czech authorities and population? That the Czech actors who drove out the Sudeten Germans out were mere automatons who could not possibly have acted otherwise, and whose actions therefore cannot come under moral scrutiny in any way?

    • Replies: @karel
  125. @karel

    I noticed that East Europeans/Slavs tend to smile much less than Westerners or some Asians and often seem to have a sombre or serious countenance. A bloke told me once that only village fools and idiots go around smiling for no reason.

    • Replies: @karel
  126. Jon Chance says: • Website
    @Carolyn Yeager

    Who is a more authoritative source on Hitler than Albert Speer, Dennis Wise, Alfred Rosenberg, and Adolf Hitler himself?

    What exactly makes such sources more authoritative?

    https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/25415123-mein-side-of-the-story

  127. Miroslav says:

    I think the war on Slavic people has been going on for at least 2000 years, It started when they began calling the common language Koine Greek instead of just Koine. The Italian linguist Mario Alinei has shown that the Canaanites spoke( would you believe) Slavic. The Serbian linguist Slaviša K. Miljković has shown that ancient Hebrew was full of Slavic words. My public library had many books some 60 years ago showing the connection between English and Serbian, but these books have now been banned and all books about Serbia are anti- Serbian. Instead of saying ‘ I goed” the English speaker says “I went” which is not logical. However by saying this he admits that he is a ‘Wendt” from Germany.My belief is that the English language is Slavic and that is not hard to prove. A common word is ‘dupe’ which is not of French origin,but Slavic, and it means your behind.

    • Agree: Odyssey
  128. @Athena

    The war criminal Levy. The Ukrainian Institute of America? The ‘Genius of Judaism’?. My God. Words fail.

  129. Juat because Hitler had views of dominating the slavs doesn’t prove that there was a genocide. It just reflects the slavs cultural achievements of that time, compared to where Hitler saw the Germans. So he was superior in his mind, i would say to Russians get over it, I think he would have a much greater respect in our time. But let’s face it back then you weren’t doing so well with the jews sitting on top of you as a communist state. And saying that “oh but Russia won the war so that’s proof of who was actually greater”, that also is dumb. The Russians had powerful allies, and also I believe that Stalin had the advantage in that he didn’t care how many Russians got toasted in the scorched earth mode of fighting. Russia wants to blame it all on the Germans – hogwash.

    • Replies: @HeebHunter
  130. Dule says:
    @Anon 2

    To be consistent with your otherwise well-grounded argument of high scores at PISA tests in ‘good’ Poland, you should also try to explain the roots and consequences of the world-class accomplishments in math, physics and engineering in ‘bad’ Russia, as well as the undesputed Russian leadership in fundamental sciences, achieved without imports of high IQ individuals from non-Russian countries. Hint: development of hydrogen bomb in late 1940’s and of hypersonic missiles in 2010’s.

  131. Funny how the slavs still worship kike lenin, mordechai levi and stalin then. They even built a cathedral with commie symbology.

    I pity these bunch tbh. Imagine calling yourself Christian and Commie at the same time. But this is why God has put the slavs for centuries at the place where they belong: cheap, drunken labor.

  132. @Bruce Waye

    At least they are honest about not being real Christians. They built churches to venerate commie soldiers who massacred Christians! They still refuse to remove heeb lenin from the “mausoleum”, haha

    Devout Christians indeed.

  133. karel says:
    @Commentator Mike

    Where have you been? East Europe is a hard to define entity. Perhaps you did seem amusing enough to the natives. Visit some gypsz camps man, or are you a woman?

    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
  134. karel says:
    @Fox

    Very funny liško. Have to be careful with the diacritics as “lisko” means a lizard in Finnish. I read somewhere that laughing is infectious, does it affect you as well?

    I am a simple man and do not claim to be a descendant of any past or a living presidents. Do you take any pills to suppress confabulation?

  135. @karel

    I have been to the Balkans and Hungary but also I can tell the same countenance among East European and Russian residents in the West and their tourists I’ve seen in holiday locations around the world. I’ve no need to visit a Gypo camp but sure Gypsies seem much happier, laughing, dancing, singing, and generally fooling around. Look I’m not complaining but there seems to be this difference between western and Eastern Europeans, with exceptions. Of course there are grumpy and frowning Westerners too aplenty, and smiling happy East Europeans but it doesn’t seem to be in their character to behave like say, Latin people and that’s fine, that’s the beauty of diversity.

    • Replies: @karel
  136. karel says:
    @Pratt

    I guess that you know nothing about history. After Munich treaty in 1938 the Nazis evicted almost all Czechs (about 370000) from the Novogermania. They would have kicked out more, had there been more. How many have to be expelled to justify the description of genocide? During the Protectorate the occupants emptied whole regions in Bohemia (e.g. Sedlčansko) to settle there all kinds of Volksdeutsche coming in their horse carriages from the East. This gradual process of land expropriation is what we have seen and still see in Palestine.

    Talking about robots, you probably meant Germans who have been convinced throughout centuries that everything east of the Böhmerwald belongs to them. Are you so ignorant or just spewing nazi propaganda to win some kind of ukroprize from Zelensky?

    • Replies: @Fox
  137. @Avery

    “Did the Lidice massacre (…of women and children) happen or is it a myth?”

    The Germans never denied Lidice. They admitted it.

  138. Dule says:

    It is not correct to say that at the time of the European invasion, led by Napoleon in 1812, Russia was the most backward part of Europe because it still had serfdom. Actually, at that time only two countries in Europe had abolished serfdom, France (in 1789) and Serbia (in 1804). All the rest retained some sort of it basically until 1848, mere 13 years before the emperor Alexander II’s proclamation. It is also worth noting that the Serbian uprising against the Turks that ended the feudalism in that country was fully endorsed and aided by Russia. So much so that the main achievements of the Serbian struggle, including the abolishment of the serfdom, were preserved by the Russia-Turkey peace treaty of Bucharest even after Serbia was temporarely occupied by the Turks after the Russian army retreated from the Balkans in 1812 because the ‘good and progressive liberator’ Napoleon invaded the ‘bad and backward’ Russia. Another interesting detail from this Serbian-Turkish war is the fact that the ‘backward Turks’ did not possess the state of the art artillery. It was immediately provided by the ‘good and progressive’ French, together with crews, officers, and technicians. These participated in several battles with the Serbs, attempting (unsuccessfully) to suppress their struggle for national freedom and emancipation from serfdom.

  139. This article is more Freud than Jung. First of all, Slavs are Aryans. Aryans literally came from the Pontic Steppe. There is no conflict between Aryans and Slavs. Secondly, the Germans never committed genocide against Slavs. The National Socialists didn’t hate Slavs, they literally had entire divisions of Slavs in the SS. The only people who committed genocide against Slavs were Jews and the only people who today continue to hate Slavs are Jews, and it’s purely for racial reasons.

    • Replies: @Marcion
  140. Flo says:
    @Emil Nikola Richard

    The Trump grandkids are being taught Mandarin right alongside English. Remember when their toddler daughter serenaded the visiting Xi with a traditional Chinese hymn of praise, in perfect (if childish-sounding) Mandarin? And Ivanka has converted to Judaism, taking the name Yael. They’re leaving the Trump family’s German-American heritage behind and joining what they believe will be the winning team.

  141. English. Remember when their toddler daughter serenaded the visiting Xi with a traditional Chinese hymn of praise, in perfect (if childish-sounding) Mandarin? And Ivanka has converted to Judaism, taking the name Yael. They’re leaving the Trump family’s German-American heritage behind and joining what they believe will be the winning team.

  142. karel says:
    @Commentator Mike

    If you come to Prague and buy me a drink I will smile at you. What more could you expect?

    The Reichsprotector Reinhard Heydrich had some appreciation of Czech humour that led him to describe his ”protected” inhabitans as “lachende Bestien”. Sadly, it failed to increase his popularity and he was assasinated in 1942.

  143. anon[164] • Disclaimer says:
    @Uncle Sam

    Yeah, it’s funny how that persists. “Slav” has nothing to do with “slave.” It’s a false cognate (I think that’s what they call it.) People with no background in other languages, which is true of most non-Spanish speaking people in the U.S., don’t always understand that. The words are not related.

  144. Goonty says:
    @James J O'Meara

    Ah yes, the New Chronology, pioneered by a totally-Western guy named Anatoly Fomenko.

  145. anon[209] • Disclaimer says:

    The “slave” thing started with Turks. Ukrainians have some Asian blood too.

  146. Marcion says:
    @Staudegger

    I don’t know whether to believe you or Freud -Jung’s opposite view. Somebody clear this up, please.

  147. Fox says:
    @karel

    I suppose you leave much out of history. The “370000” Czechs you say were kicked out from the German provinces: Did they move into these areas in the years from 1919 to 1938 as promoted for the purposes of disrupting the German communities, expropriate German industries (such as the glass industry or mining) and establish a presence there by the government in Prague? A stipulation of the Munich agreement was that Czechs who wanted to stay and become citizens of the Reich could choose. I would also like to know about “the whole regions in Bohemia that were emptied”. I think that especially for Americans with their concept of vast spaces it is not immediately clear just how small the space you are talking about is. In any case, the Czech state as existing between 1939 and 1945 was not part of Germany, but existed as a protectorate, I think Puerto Rico and Guam are protectorates of the US, to provide a point of reference.
    A Frenchman, Pierre-Antoine Cousteau characterized “Czecho-Slovakia” in Les originals secrêtes de la guerre 1939-1945 as a “nonsensical geographical harlequinade without the least historical or economical justification”. That was in 1957. Since the time since 1945, the Czechs were killing the Slovak leaders Tiso and Tuka on the gallows for dissolving the forced membership in Benes’ and Masaryk’s “Czecho-Slovakia” and re-occupying the independent state of Slovakia. Remarkable, don’t you agree?! I thought that you were so much for respecting other nations’ independence, and Slovakia wasn’t even in a military alliance to act as an airplane carrier, such as Czecho-Slovakia was to act in the various pacts it made under Czech leadership. However, by now the Slovaks re-opened the book on “Czecho-Slovakia” and decided on a divorce from this unhappy and forced marriage with a dictatorial and fanatical spouse.
    The Munich agreement is still a valid international treaty, by the way.
    The decision to make a pact with far-away powers to establish through a conflict, crowned by a murder spree of unimaginable extent, one’s “independence” left out the possibility that these far-away powers might falter, lose interest or make another horse trade with someone else, and it also didn’t take into account that the neighbor so brutalized will always be there, even in a hundred , or two hundred years.

    • Replies: @karel
  148. Odyssey says:
    @Fox

    The original Germans’ land was in today’s France, on the west side of the Rhine river, which was the historical border between Serbs and Germans. Over time, Germans conquered today’s Germany, especially East Germany which was the Serbian land. All old East Germany’s toponyms were Serbian (Berlin, Dresden, Leipzig, Brandenburg, etc). Germans destroyed Serbian Baltic kingdoms/principalities and also fought Polish. Prussians are germanised Serbs who gave today’s Germans their typical (Aryans) physiognomy.

    So, Germans have no rights to complain that someone took their territory. They germanised and conducted genocides on indigenous Serbs. The last genocide was by Hitler who exterminated the most of pre-war Serbs in Germany. The paradox is that Serbs had a big role in the development of Germany – Bismarck united Germany, Leibniz founded the German Academy of Science, Martin Luther founded the Protestant Church, Empress Catherine II was also a Serb…

    • Replies: @Fox
    , @OilcanFloyd
  149. Fox says:
    @Odyssey

    You must be the anonymous who offered this piece of imaginative story about two weeks ago. Your version is the same as the one the Poles presented at Versailles, according to them, a good part of Europe had been Polish in the past. Now it’s Servian. I don’t know how to take it, who lived in these Servian areas before the Serbs came? Did the Poles and French and Romans etc. also take the rightfully Servish lands? What about the Bulgars or Greeks?

    • Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert
  150. karel says:
    @Fox

    The “370000” Czechs you say were kicked out from the German provinces: Did they move into these areas in the years from 1919 to 1938 as promoted for the purposes of disrupting the German communities, expropriate German industries (such as the glass industry or mining) and establish a presence there by the government in Prague?

    The same old nazi fables. Well, I am not certain how many moved there before 1938, but you are trying to insinuate that is fine to terrorize and expell people because they have lived say, in Karlovy Vary for only ten years? Most german-speaking jews, german communists and social democrats escaped with the Czechs to avoid being arrested or murdered. Not every German was a nazi in those days.

    A stipulation of the Munich agreement was that Czechs who wanted to stay and become citizens of the Reich could choose.

    Where is it written in the treaty? I cannot find it in the text bellow.

    Agreement concluded at Munich, September 29, 1938, between Germany, Great Britain, France and Italy

    [MORE]

    GERMANY, the United Kingdom, France and Italy, taking into consideration the agreement, which has been already reached in principle for the cession to Germany of the Sudeten German territory, have agreed on the following terms and conditions governing the said cession and the measures consequent thereon, and by this agreement they each hold themselves responsible for the steps necessary to secure its fulfilment:

    (1) The evacuation will begin on 1st October.

    (2) The United Kingdom, France and Italy agree that the evacuation of the territory shall be completed by the 10th October, without any existing installations having been destroyed, and that the Czechoslovak Government will be held responsible for carrying out the evacuation without damage to the said installations.

    (3) The conditions governing the evacuation will be laid down in detail by an international commission composed of representatives of Germany, the United Kingdom, France, Italy and Czechoslovakia.

    (4) The occupation by stages of the predominantly German territory by German troops will begin on 1st October. The four territories marked on the attached map will be occupied by German troops in the following order:

    The territory marked No. I on the 1st and 2nd of October; the territory marked No. II on the 2nd and 3rd of October; the territory marked No. III on the 3rd, 4th and 5th of October; the territory marked No. IV on the 6th and 7th of October. The remaining territory of preponderantly German character will be ascertained by the aforesaid international commission forthwith and be occupied by German troops by the 10th of October.

    (5) The international commission referred to in paragraph 3 will determine the territories in which a plebiscite is to be held. These territories will be occupied by international bodies until the plebiscite has been completed. The same commission will fix the conditions in which the plebiscite is to be held, taking as a basis the conditions of the Saar plebiscite. The commission will also fix a date, not later than the end of November, on which the plebiscite will be held.

    (6) The final determination of the frontiers will be carried out by the international commission. The commission will also be entitled to recommend to the four Powers, Germany, the United Kingdom, France and Italy, in certain exceptional cases, minor modifications in the strictly ethnographical determination of the zones which are to be transferred without plebiscite.

    (7) There will be a right of option into and out of the transferred territories, the option to be exercised within six months from the date of this agreement. A German-Czechoslovak commission shall determine the details of the option, consider ways of facilitating the transfer of population and settle questions of principle arising out of the said transfer.

    (8) The Czechoslovak Government will within a period of four weeks from the date of this agreement release from their military and police forces any Sudeten Germans who may wish to be released, and the Czechoslovak Government will within the same period release Sudeten German prisoners who are serving terms of imprisonment for political offences.
    Munich, September 29, 1938.
    ADOLF HITLER,
    NEVILLE CHAMBERLAIN,
    EDOUARD DALADIER,
    BENITO MUSSOLINI.

    It is easy to catch you while lying. Not everyone is as stupid as you. Furthermore, to become a German was not as easy as you pretend , but Czechs just did not want to be Germans. Geddit?, as Glenda Slagg of Private Eye used to say.

    I would also like to know about “the whole regions in Bohemia that were emptied”. I think that especially for Americans with their concept of vast spaces it is not immediately clear just how small the space you are talking about is.

    Aha, so land expropriation was ok, if done on a small scale. The germans would have stolen much more if there was more land to steal like in there is in the USA. Geddit? Using this technique of land theft about a fifth of Okinawa is now covered by US military bases. Have you ever heard of Diego Garcia?

    The Munich agreement is still a valid international treaty, by the way.

    It may be your opinion but it is another lie. If I may conclude this, it must be clear to all, but the very stupid, that there are lies or confabulations in every sentence of yours and I have no time to deal with all of this.

    • Replies: @Fox
  151. @Odyssey

    The Roman’s spoke of the Germanic tribes being east of the Rhine, and the ancestors of the Germanic tribes entered Europe from the east, so it’s pretty much a given that the original homeland of the Germans was not west of the Rhine in what is now France.

  152. @Fox

    Exaggerated historical ethnic claims are always a sign of an ethnic inferiority complex.

    Consider for example Afrocentrism which not only claims that the ancient Egyptians were black, but also that the ancient Greeks derived all their culture from those “black” Egyptians, and that thus European culture has black roots. And of course farao Echnaton, Cleopatra and Hannibal were also black (“because they were African”).This is of course an attempt at compensating an ethnic inferiority complex of black Africans, who never created a high culture.

    This Serb obviously suffers from a similar ethnic inferiority complex. What is the contribution of Serbs to European culture? Very little (if anything), hence the need to compensate.

    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
    , @Fox
  153. Odyssey says:

    @Fox, @Franklin Ryckaert

    Why you guys don’t say something specific to discuss this? For example, is it true that Prussians are germanised Serbs or not? Is it true that Serbs founded e.g. Berlin and gave the name? Is it true that Leibniz was a Serb or not? Is it true that Serbs are indigenous European people who originated in the oldest and highest culture in Europe? Is it true that Serbian language succeeded ancient Vincha language, several 000 years old and that is older than Greek, Latin and Hebrew? Is it true that Yamnaya nomads (the ancestors of modern w.European) came to Europe in 2800-2500BC. They did not know for metals, agriculture, houses, literacy, while indigenous people 5K before them had the first industrial revolution, gold processing, agriculture, multistorey temples, cosmetics, buildings, trades, literacy, calendar? Is it true that Aryans were proto-Slavics who brought the language (which became Sanskrit), Rg Veda and mythology to India and where 16% of Indians today have their genes?

    What is the contribution of Serbs to European culture? Vincha was a cradle of European civilisation? Have you heard about Lepenski Vir and Vincha? Who were Alexander the Great, Spartacus and dozens of Serbian Roman Emperors (Constantine, who legalised Christianity, Diocletian, Justinian who built St. Sophia and introduced the Roman Law which is still the basis for Euro legal system, except England)?

    Nikola Tesla changed the stream of human civilisation. What do you need more? Sports? Who were world champions in basketball, volleyball, water polo, handball, tennis, etc? Who plays basketball in NBA apart from Afro-Americans? If you guys knew G of genetics you would knew almost all previous. Serbian University professors can establish two universities in US and Canada. Do you have 1000+ years old monasteries and churches? Why don’t you tell us about your backgrounds to compare our notes and to see what is your contribution?

    OilcanFloyd> At some moment in time, the border was on the river Rhine. Can you tell us when Germans came to Europe and where from? Do you agree that all toponyms in East Germany and Baltic were Serbian (Germans started printing old historical maps with these toponyms)? Who gave the name to Germans? Who gave the name to Greeks?

    • Replies: @Fox
  154. @Franklin Ryckaert

    Maybe Odussey exaggerates some but by Serbian he implies those originating from the land of present day Serbia (and we could include medieval German Serbia also called Sorbia) going back all the way into prehistory.

    Now we could debate the ethnicity and genetics of all these people, and as people come and go, move, settle, conquer they could be quite mixed by now. Many historians assume that when one people conquers or settles in a land that they replace (genocide or ethnically cleanse) those who were there before and that is often not true, if you look at very few Mongols and Huns remaining in that region today although some of their genes sure did remain but were greatly diluted and mixed in with the locals. Many peoples were able to keep their own ethnic distinctions and distinct languages and folklores although some may have evolved or adopted those of their neighbours. Odyssey seems to think that they are all, more or less, ethnically Serbs some of whom adopted foreign languages and cultures so becoming distinct but that originally they were one people. I’m not quite sure about that but there is some sense in assuming that the ancient people living there did not disappear but that settlers over the ages just added their own, like the Ottoman Turks did too while they ruled those lands.

  155. So, the Christian West once regarded Slavic peoples as unredeemed pagans. For this reason, the Christian West’s prohibition of slavery(among Christians) didn’t apply to pagan Slavs who were regarded as lowly heathens. The fact that the term ‘slave’ derives from ‘Slav’ is sure indication of the massive scale of the slave trade involving Slavs. Christian West and Jews sold millions of Slavs to North Africa and Near East. For much of Western and Central European history, the Slavs were regarded as barbarians, the last ones to be civilized and converted to Christianity.

    What on earth are you talking about? The Slavs had been Christian for nearly half a millennium by the time that the Teutonic Knights launched their crusade against the last significant holdouts of tribalism and paganism in Europe.

  156. Fox says:
    @karel

    I am sorry for you that you feel so smart and clever. What leads you to this opinion of yourself?
    What remains is that you and the people of your mindset will have to live with the incessant, whispering little voice in your mind that tells you over and over again that you put the torch to the world in order to titillate your organ of fanaticism and that your pathetic selfishness has initiated the chain of events that now lets us all stare in the abyss.
    And ahead of you stretches the future that promises you the same, and your old alliances will fade away, just as the might of the countries which signed these alliances will fade way, yet you will still be the neighbor of the people you so fanatically wronged.

    • Replies: @HeebHunter
  157. Fox says:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    I thought of the current Afrocentricism in leftist PC ideologising as well. It leaves out the answer to the obvious question: Why are there no traces of a once-flourishing culture in Black Africa? Likewise, the Serb with the name ‘anon’ ought to wonder why the Serbs would have retreated into the obscurity of a little area at the lower Danube after dominating most of Europe, as he says. However, there is one Serb you will know, Nikola Tesla, and yet, he needed to go abroad to succeed: He studied engineering in Germany and became the amazing inventor in the United States. He had to leave the confines of Serbia to become a notable element in the modern world.
    Exaggerated depictions of former glory and might suggest that they are a compensation for a lack of such power in the world, or an expression of resentment.

  158. @Fox

    >expecting the most inferior, low IQ subset of Europeans to be capable of self instropection

    These subhumans are not capable of real philosophy or moral developement. Lets put their war mongering and barking in the 20th century on the side and look at the repetition of history before our eyes.

    Which cuntries in Europe ARE viruently pro USA/ZOG, begging pathetically for more nigger/spic mercenaries every year and threaten Europe with nuclear annihilation against the ruskies EVERY GODDAMN YEAR SINCE WE WERE BORN?

    The bohemian horde passed a law to put their own away for 3 years if they dare to speak against jewlensky’s puppet government. You can’t expect much from a loud mouthed cuntry of meth addicts and porn actresses.

    Honestly, like you said, either we survive this century of humiliation and put these subhumans back to where they belong again, or we all go lights out. But we will never have to worry about muh Visegrad, since we all know it is bullshit and the smarter slavs will never trust the kike puppets called “czechs” and poland.

    • Replies: @Fox
  159. Fox says:
    @Odyssey

    I don’t know about the things you are presenting as established facts. I consider it very probable that the Sorbs living in a small area in Central Germany have their name not from the Serbs; a similarity of a name does not imply one origin. The Germans (who were many different tribes) came from the East and if I remember correctly, it was thought that the Germanic tribes had their origin Scandinavia.
    Such considerations are interesting, but they establish neither an ownership of land, nor any ‘rightful dominion’, nor a direct descendency. If 1500 years ago the Ostrigoths, a Germanic tribe, were settled in the Ukraine and then left on a long migration to the west, this does not establish that the Ukraine is Germanic. There is a remarkable number of words which occur both in Slavic and Germanic languages, suggesting that Slaves ad Germanics have had close contact, perhaps even a common origin in the past. When one looks at people from the East, one does get that idea.
    Why, in your opinion, did the Serbs quit all of the land you say they had inhabited?

    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
  160. Jon Chance says: • Website
    @Truth Vigilante

    Twenty years ago, I was suggesting that Ron Paul should be our Secretary of the Treasury.

    http://www.indypgh.org/news/2003/03/1663_comment.php

    Since then, I’ve learned why “Austrians” are clever liars.

    “Austrians” and “Federalists” are globalists, corporatists and socialists disguising themselves as “Libertarians”.

    Examine Fools’ Gold by Robert Carroll, Progress and Poverty by Henry George, Common Sense by Thomas Paine, and the 1776 Declaration of Rights by George Mason.

    Then read the First US Constitution (Articles of Confederation).

    https://HenryGeorge.Org

  161. @Fox

    This may explain a few things to you:

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Origin_hypotheses_of_the_Serbs

    It covers the various theories.

    I suppose the traditional view is that Serbs migrated from regions in Germany and that the Sorbs are remnants of these original Serbs, but where is the evidence for this?

    It gets difficult to prove anything with hard evedence going back so far in time. I guess Odyssey’s view is that Serbs were indigenous to the entire area from the Baltics to the Adriatic and Black seas and that later Asiatics like Huns, Mongols, Turkik peoples inserted themselves into certain regions like Hungary and Bulgaria, and by mixing with the Serbs produced modern day Hungarians and Bulgars. I suppose it is no worse than any other theory.

    Isn’t there now genetic evidence that Serbs are indeed indigenous to the Balkans and that other Slavs, like Russians, originated from migration of Serbs to the north, a reversal of the traditional theory? So the Sorbs too could have resulted from migration of Serbs from the Balkans.

    Take your pick

    • Replies: @Fox
  162. Odyssey says:

    Let’s employ the logic in our discussion. The genetic haplogroup ‘I’ is the only haplogroup originated in Europe. It split later to I1 and I2. During the Ice Age (up to 12K BC) almost all people lived in a Danube microclimate of Lepenski Vir/Vincha. After ice melted, people started migrating in all directions (roughly 7k BC). I1, future Scandinavians, moved to the north. So, I1 and I2 can be considered as indigenous European people. Germans have different haplogroup and it is easy to distinguish them from (proto)Slavics. Can anyone say, when they came to Europe and where from? I2 gen (one half of Serbs), 10 K years old was found in Lepenski Vir, it is confirmed in the Nature’s paper.

    Vincha developed the oldest and highest Euro civilisation. From these people and their language directly originated protoSlavics (i.e protoSerbs) and their languages. They called themselves ‘srb’ (‘serbs’ =cousin, the member of the same race’). From them, all future Slavic nations and languages (including modern Serbs, who preserved the original name) developed. Much before they became so-called ‘Slavics’ (7th cAC), they were Aryans (2000BC) who brought this language and mythology to India. There are still several thousands of Serbian toponyms in South and Central Asia, Tibet and China (so as in the whole Europe). Toponyms are a very reliable indicator of the prevailing language at that time.

    It is difficult to talk to someone who is ignorant. There was a question – were Prussians ethically Serbs or Germanics, have Serbs founded Berlin, Leipzig, Dresden, Brandenburg, etc? Was Martin Luther an ethnic Serb (and strong ‘serbophobe’, as all converts are)?

    • Replies: @j2
    , @Fox
  163. bronek says:
    @Avery

    You forgot to mention the Jagiellon university of Krakow. The nazis had all the professors exterminated.

  164. j2 says:
    @Odyssey

    “I1, future Scandinavians, moved to the north.”

    This is not so clear. No Y-DNA Hg. I1 is found in Scandinavia in older samples. The paleolithic population there had I2. I1 is usually thought to have developed in Denmark from I, with the implication that there was a population with I and I2. But is it also possible that I1 came to Scandinavia with Germanic people at some point and I1 was not a haplogroup of Scandinavians (hunter-gatherers) earlier. There were several waves of Indo-Europeans to the Baltic coast: Latvian and Lithuanian languages are from some early branch of Indo-European. They probably were the Battle-Axe people.

    • Replies: @Odyssey
  165. Odyssey says:
    @j2

    That’s right. Under ‘future Scandinavians’ I meant ‘modern Scandinavians’ who relatively recently came to Scandinavia. Excellent observation re: I2 present since Palaeolithic. This confirms that I2 people are indigenous European people. I2 also populated the entire Europe, Scandinavia and British Isles. Before Yamnaya nomads came from Russian steppe to Europe in 2500BC, I2 was 100% on British Isles (e.g. Druids). I2 was subjected to genocides and now consists only 5% on British Isles, mostly on the north of Scotland. Some of I2 descendants, who migrated to US – US president Munro, Dave Crockett, Chuck Norris, Bill Gates, Elvis Presley, Ted Dunston, etc. I2 language from Vincha influenced Scandinavian and later Germanic languages. Germans are not European people and cannot be I1 or I2 genetics. We are waiting for someone (Fox?) to tell us when and where from they came to Europe.

    • Replies: @Alexandros
  166. Fox says:
    @Odyssey

    What is it you re driving at? Are the Romans Serbs?, the Greeks, the Egyptians, etc.? No one denies that we all have ancestors, but you are approaching this common insight from the position of a chauvinist. All chauvinists claim to have had dominion over large swaths of land in the past and that they were deprived of their greatness through conquest, genocide, machinations, etc., and it is always coupled to the idea of a right of return and ownership.
    The fact that in Scotland, according to your statement, still 5 % are “I2 people” after several thousand years with all the attendant changes suggests that there was not a “genocide” but rather a slow assimilation or mixing of the various peoples moving in, moving out, or passing through.

    Ignorance (the notion you are bringing up) is not a lack of knowing more or less much – Schopenhauer makes the astute observation that people who read all day are reading themselves stupid by depriving themselves of the ability to think and substituting their own insights and thinking ability by morsels of others’ productions – ignorance is the lack of understanding and insight. It is possible to be stupid and ignorant with a Ph.D. degree or whatever Nobel Prize of professorship, and it is possible to be knowledgable, insightful and understanding without attendance of public knowledge factories.

    Therefore, I am repeating my question: What are you driving at, what is it that drives you to pore over maps of gene distributions, seeing relationships between similar-sounding words in vastly different languages with the foregone conclusion that at the center of your system the Serbs are sitting? And what conclusion regarding the accomplishments and customs of their own people would you like others to draw?

    • Replies: @Odyssey
  167. Fox says:
    @Commentator Mike

    It is possible that the Sorbs moved to the small area in Eastern Central Germany where they are still living (unmolested, by the way, unlike what happens to on-Slavs in provinces under the rule of some Slavic peoples). The Sorbs used to be also called ‘Wenden’ in German. Incidentally, Western non-Germans used to be and still can be called ‘welsch’ in German, without the implication that they are ‘Welsh’ as if coming from Wales. Word similarities are by themselves not strong indicators of a relationship.
    Thank you for your link, which I will peruse, but haven’t had time yet to. The migration of peoples in Europe is an interesting facet of Europe came about, but to take more than a casual note of such events 1000 or 1500 years ago and even reach conclusions regarding rights is something I can’t subscribe to. The latter has unfortunately led to catastrophic events in the world, and no one was served by it.

  168. Fox says:
    @HeebHunter

    Chauvinist Slavic -i.e., Polish and Czech – covetousness has led to the downfall of Europe. This covetousness was used by England and France to achieve their own goals, but it has backfired, now we are all in a big mess.

    • Replies: @Fufu
  169. Odyssey says:
    @Fox

    It seems you are frustrated because of your lack of knowledge (‘when and where from Germans came to Europe’?). Have a look the title of the thread. Your behaviour indicates where all this came from (hundreds of times) in last 4800 years. Re Romans – two dozen of Serbs were Roman Emperors (Diocletian, Constantine, Jovian, Justinian, Justin, etc). Serbs were the iron fist of Roman army which consisted of 80% of ‘non-Italians’, the capital town was in Sirmium, 40 km from Belgrade. Is it chauvinism to say this? Towards whom? It is an idiotic statement that someone claims the land ownership from 10K years ago and now claims a right of return and ownership of this land. Simply, you know nothing about this topic and old history, but you very easily stick chauvinistic labels on someone. The genocide conducted by Yamnaya nomads on indigenous population (one estimate is almost 90% of men) is well documented.

    “Chauvinist Slavic greediness has led to the downfall of Europe”??? Unbelievable! Hundreds of wars and genocides came from the West, from Yamnaya descendants, not from Slavic people. Maybe Slavics are guilty for all genocides conducted on them??

    Schopenhauer? He was talking about people like you:

    “All truth passes through three stages: First, it is ridiculed; second, it is violently opposed; and third, it is accepted as self-evident.”

    • Replies: @Fox
  170. Fufu says:
    @Fox

    #175 Fox

    “Chauvinist Slavic -i.e., Polish and Czech – covetousness has led to the downfall of Europe.”

    Stupid Czechs and Poles are destroying whole Europe. Wow! I didn’t know that! They must be really smart if their plot was unnoticed by brilliant Westerners until now.

    I add them to my list of enemies responsible for Fall of Western Europe:  jews, illuminati and reptilians.

    • Replies: @karel
  171. karel says:
    @Fufu

    Right on, Fufu. I started destroying Western Europe at the age of three and have not finished yet. How has this clever Foxie boy managed to sniff it out?

    • Replies: @Fox
  172. Fox says:
    @karel

    You are a cleverly funny one! Subtlety in wit, a sharp-edged mind, quick and precise repartee and a self-assuredness based on a shining, sunny past and a future amongst neighbors who so dearly admire your attitude, all of that combines to an image of a fine holder of attitudes and opinions in the center of the Bohemian trough.

  173. Fox says:
    @Odyssey

    How do you know that I am frustrated? I can’t imagine that the acerbic Schopenhauer would have not made a dismissive remark about this, your opinion, and about its bearer, that all of Europe is rightfully a Serbian domain.

  174. TempoNick says:

    Three things:

    1. The difference between the Roman Catholic Church and the Eastern Orthodox Churches is mostly style over substance. The underlying dogma is virtually the same. In fact, they are both Catholic. It’s more of a turf war than anything else. The Orthodox consider Rome just one of many bishops. Rome wanted to exert power over all of the other bishops. Given the problems the Roman Catholic church has had, the Eastern Orthodox got the better end of the deal.

    2. Most of the indigenous Christians in the holy land follow the Eastern liturgy. Some, like the MARONITES, are aligned with Rome. Others are Eastern orthodox, Oriental Orthodox / Coptic. I also think you had better check your dates on when Christianity first touched the Slavs.

    3. An alternate theory is that the word slav has nothing to do with the word slave and that it means something along the lines of being faithful to god. Slava means fame, honor worship and is believed to be in the context of honoring God.

    • Replies: @Odyssey
  175. Odyssey says:
    @TempoNick

    1. There are many differences between Catholic and Orthodox Churches but the biggest is what you mentioned that RC has imperial character, they raised a man above the God and declared him infallible, they do not recognise the Holy spirit. They have a corporate and colonial character, don’t want to be equal with other religions and in every country, they require a special status above all other religions. Basically, they operate as a state within a state, having own banks, investments, court, education, diplomacy, marketing/lobby companies, media, hospitals, inquisition, political parties, secret service, army (crusaders), etc. In several centuries after the split up to today, they were considered as heretics by Orthodoxies.

    2. “I also think you had better check your dates on when Christianity first touched the Slavs.” Excellent question and I bet no one can and will not try to answer. Why? Because the history so falsified (mostly by Vatican and English) that is difficult to answer. In previous comments I expected from the researcher in this field, JayJay, to answer but he was so arrogant and plus, he repeated a falsification that for e.g. Serbs were baptised in 870 AC.

    3. You are right, the term ‘slav’ originated in the 7th c.AC and it is ‘slavophobia’ when it is equalised with ‘slave’. ‘Slava’ is the family feast dedicated to a family saint patron which has been inherited for centuries from father to the son. It is a relic of pre-Christian pagan mythology and it is present only among Serbs (why?). Their ancestors revered their dead what remained until today. More than 10000 years ago, they buried their dead under the fireplace or under the doorstep, to preserve their spirits in their homes. They assumed that the spirit of their ancestor resides in some intentional traveler and because they offered the best hospitality, food and drink, to coincidental visitors. This hospitality remains until today everywhere, especially in rural areas. Guests are not officially invited but anyone is free to come (usually, extended family, neighbors and friends). It is incorporated in the Christianity, but no other Christians have ‘slava’. St Nicholas is the most frequent Serbian ‘slava’. For e.g., my ‘slava’ is St. George, which is always on May 6th.

    • Replies: @Sarah
  176. Anon[105] • Disclaimer says:

    Rumkowski was the head of the Jewish Council of Elders in the Łódź Ghetto appointed by Nazi Germany during the German occupation of Poland.

    Rumkowski accrued much power by transforming the ghetto into an industrial base manufacturing war supplies for the Wehrmacht in the mistaken belief that productivity was the key to Jewish survival after the war. The Germans evacuayed the ghetto in 1944. All remaining prisoners were sent to camps in the wake of military defeats on the Eastern Front.

    As the head of the Judenrat, Rumkowski is remembered for his speech Give Me Your Children, delivered at a time when the Germans demanded his compliance with the deportation of 20,000 children to Chełmno camp. In August 1944, Rumkowski and his family joined the last transport to Auschwitz,[1] and he was murdered there on August 28, 1944, by Jewish Sonderkommando inmates who beat him to death as revenge

  177. Fufu says:

    Why Slavs call themselves Slavs?

    1. False “Slave-Slav” term is promoted by Westerners to keep Slavs low (put them in inferiority complex).

    2. Slav from “Slava”- “Glory, Fame” “Slava Ukraine!” means “Glory to Ukraine!” not “Enslave Ukraine!”

    3. “Slav” from “Slovo” – literally it means “Word”,so Slavs are people who know language.

    In contrary to Germans (slavic “Niemtsy”) it means people who don’t speak clearly (“Niemtsy” from “niemy” which means “mute”, “mumbling” or “what this guy from West is talking about??”).

    Besides…

    How Slavs had conquered half Europe and survived 1500 years if they had though about themselves as “inferior people”? It has no sense.

    • Replies: @Odyssey
    , @Fox
  178. Odyssey says:
    @Fufu

    All agree, except for ‘1500 years’. What Slavics were before and which language they spoke? Did they get their language from someone or it was organically developed for thousands of years? Where is the Slavic Urheimat? The answer on all questions – Lepenski Vir/Vinca was the cradle of the oldest European civilisation where the oldest European language originated!

    • Replies: @Fufu
  179. Fufu says:
    @Odyssey

    In fact, I think that Slavs are a few thousand years old and I like idea that Vinča culture from 5000 b.c. was a cradle of Slavs.

    I used ‘1500 years’ just to avoid being accused of ‘Slavic megalomania’.

    In my opinion, official theory that Slavs appeared in IV-V cc. and are the youngest ethnos in Europe is stupid.
    It is another attempt to put Slavs into inferiority complex.

    Western Anti-Slavic propaganda promotes:

    “Slave-Slav” association and
    “Slaves are the youngest and the most primitive ethnos in Europe”.

    Unfortunatelly, many Slavs still believe in this s**t.

    • Agree: Odyssey
  180. Sarah says:
    @Odyssey

    1. There are many differences between Catholic and Orthodox Churches but the biggest is what you mentioned that RC has imperial character, they raised a man above the God and declared him infallible, they do not recognise the Holy spirit. They have a corporate and colonial character, don’t want to be equal with other religions and in every country, they require a special status above all other religions. Basically, they operate as a state within a state, having own banks, investments, court, education, diplomacy, marketing/lobby companies, media, hospitals, inquisition, political parties, secret service, army (crusaders), etc. In several centuries after the split up to today, they were considered as heretics by Orthodoxies.

    👌

    • Agree: Odyssey
  181. @Odyssey

    The story about how “Germans” came to Europe was written down.

    The first King of Athens was Sekrops, an Egyptian. He became King after mediating a conflict between immigrating Dutchmen and native Hellenes. The Dutchmen had a Mother called Gert. The deal was those who wanted to stay in Athens could do so, the rest, the followers of Gert, took to their ships and emigrated to India. This would be about 1600BC.

    There they stayed until Alexander the Great hired them to sail back to Babylon. Later they would fight in the campaigns of the Successors, particularly Demetrius Poliocertes. Their leader became Friso, another native Dutchman. After Demetrius had raped the children of Friso they decided to emigrate back to Holland. There they were allowed to settle and soon the people became “Greekified”. Caesar mentioned this. When later the Romans met these “Gertmanne” the name “Germans” was born and would later come to describe all the peoples living North of the Rhine, much like the Hellenic tribe of Graekoi would become the name for all Hellenes.

    But I don’t think any of this explains the haplogroup. The Gertmanne did not mix with the Indians as far as we know.

    A more probable explanation is that it arose from mixing between European genes and Asian genes in the steppes of Russia and Eastern Germany where the two races have met for millennia.

  182. Fox says:
    @Fufu

    But when did the notion of ‘Slav” as a racial (or ethnic) group appear? Did the peoples living to the East of the Germanic and Celtic areas in Europe call themselves as a whole slavs , or was that done by someone else in order to give them a common designation through their languages which appear to be so closely related as to make it possible for a Russian to communicate with a Croatian based on that similarity alone (an example which I know of)? The earliest mention of “Sclavi” I have come across relates to Charlemagne in the year 805.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Jung-Freud Comments via RSS
PastClassics
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement
The Shaping Event of Our Modern World
The Surprising Elements of Talmudic Judaism