The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewJung-Freud Archive
Parallels Between China from 1962 to 1966 and the US from 2016 to 2020, or What Mao's Cultural Revolution and the Jewish Deep State's Cult Revolution Have in Common
How the Control of Gods profoundly impacts Politics on the grandest scale — Trump's stardom lost to Jewish divinity
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

The Derek Chauvin case in Minneapolis is a pawn in a much larger power struggle, and in a way, Chauvin is in trouble because even Donald Trump and white populists have succumbed to the same gods controlled by the Jews. When Jews control the gods and when Jews dole out the money(to all the whores, of which there is never any shortage), the US ‘power-brokers’ are essentially in the hands of Jews.

This whole George Floyd thing wouldn’t have gotten so out of hand if it weren’t for the Jewish-run media pushing a certain narrative based on false perception and for the Jewish-run state giving the go-ahead to the entire nation to go full throttle on Negrolatry. Now, blacks being blacks, even had the media been responsible and restrained in their coverage, there would have been riots and the like. But it would have been contained. Now, who gave the go-ahead to turn a local event into a national and then even a global one, what with BLM protests spreading across the EU and even in parts of East Asia? It was the deep state that took orders from Jewish Supremacist Central. And why did Jews do this?

To hurt Trump with black voters and to boost ‘white guilt’ to counter the rising tide of white populism. These Jewish Supremacists are truly awful people. Not long ago, they sought to clean up cities and hired more cops to get tough on black crime. Jews supported more incarceration and policies like stop-and-frisk(the Negro). Jews pressured US police departments to take cues from IDF and Israel security forces that deal harshly with Palestinians. But, when Jews needed black votes(and electoral rigging) to unseat Trump, they pushed the Narrative that innocent blacks are killed by ‘racist’ cops in Trump’s America. Really? Who’s been controlling Minneapolis forever? MAGA folks? That’s about as believable as Jussie Smollett’s story of being jumped by two MAGA-hat wearing thugs.

To better understand what happened between 2016 and 2020, there is something we can learn from 1962 to 1966 in China. Of course, there are vast differences between China then and the US now, but there are certain general patterns in history that match or resemble one another. For some time, it’s been duly noted in some quarters that the US under PC has undergone something akin to the Cultural Revolution in China. But overlooking who’s been behind the US version would be like taking Mao out of the equation in the Chinese upheaval(which was more like a ‘downheaval’, or an event ordered from above, or a youth ‘rebellion’ orchestrated by Mao and the Gang of Four).

In other words, despite the seemingly spontaneous mass-gathering and uprising of Chinese youths, it was actually coordinated by Mao and his cohorts. If Mao hadn’t rallied the minions, there would have been no Cultural Revolution in China. Indeed, when Mao and the military had just about enough(and the usefulness of Red Guards had passed the expiration date), the mass movement suddenly came to a halt, and many young ones were conveniently deployed to villages to ‘learn from the peasants’, thus no longer able to destabilize cities.

Likewise, BLM2 or Floyd-Mania couldn’t have happened without the go-ahead from the Jews. However vocal and violent the riots would have been without blessing and encouragement from above, it would have been a much smaller event. Jewish Power fanned the flames and turned a local fire into a national forest fire. Just like Big Tech companies coordinate their censorship policies, big city Democrats(and some RINOS, who actually make up the majority of actual Republicans) also acted together to use the insanity as a political weapon against Trump and the populists. But then, why were Trump and his supporters so hapless and ineffective in combating this lunacy? Well, Jews control the gods, and both sides worship the same gods.

This is where what happened in China is useful to our understanding of what happened recently in the US. But first, a brief summary of what happened in China. In the late 50s, Mao was full of arrogance and impatience. Especially with the death of Josef Stalin and with Third World liberation movements sprouting all over, Mao regarded himself as the new leading light of the worldwide communist movement. He believed the East Wind was prevailing over the West. He also thought that China could transform into a first-world economy within a decade with mass enthusiasm and sheer power of numbers.

Like Adolf Hitler on the eve of Operation Barbarossa, Mao saw himself as a Man of Destiny. He felt an aura of invincibility. As if to demonstrate this, he embarked on one of the most ambitious projects in human history: The Great Leap Forward. It would turn peasants into steel-producers overnight. Harvests would double, triple, quadruple within years. China would soon catch up with the UK and then even with the US. The will of the Chinese people, orchestrated by Mao, would make anything possible. Mao’s East Wind would indeed prevail over everything. But in fact, the whole thing turned out to be ill-conceived and ill-planned.

Despite all the enthusiasm of the populace swept up in the fervor, it not only undermined the industrial sector but wrecked the all-important agricultural sector(in a nation that was overwhelmingly agrarian). What ensued was the biggest famine in history, losing anywhere from 25 to 40 million lives to starvation. It proved to be so calamitous that it endangered the authority of Mao, a godlike figure at the time. While the criticism of the Great Helmsman was tempered in most quarters, the very fact that some dared to criticize him at all was deeply unsettling to Mao.

And in a way, there was a silent semi-coup of sorts. Mao kept his prestige as the great ruler of China, but the day-to-day operations ended up mainly with Liu Shao-Chi and his right-hand man Deng Xiaoping. Mao began to resent that he was ignored and not duly informed of what was happening at the various levels of government and policy-making. He still held the title but felt more like a national symbol than an actual ruler. It seemed most people in the state took cues from Li and Deng; they hardly had any use for Mao whose reputation was discredited within the state(though no one dared to say it out loud).

Now, Liu and Deng publicly deferred to Mao as the one-and-only ruler of China, but they held more operational power and made most of the key decisions on matters related to economics and culture. Mao suspected they wanted to turn him into a ceremonial figure. And Mao knew why Li and Deng held certain key advantages. Despite Mao’s great prestige, he was associated with the disaster of the Great Leap Forward. While the masses were fed the usual official lies and propaganda, those inside the state knew Mao was most to blame for the failure that affected countless lives, millions of whom perished in horrible conditions. Just like there is inside information(for the elites & connected) and outside information(for mass consumption) on finance and government even in the ‘Liberal West’, it was even more so in China.

To keep the nation together, Mao was hailed as the one-and-only unifying symbol of China despite the disaster of the Great Leap(the failures of which were conveniently blamed on the weather or the Soviet Union’s withdrawal of aid) for public consumption, but in the inner circles of the Chinese state, many knew Mao had grown imperious, impetuous, erratic, and unstable over the years. Whatever sterling qualities he had exhibited as a wartime revolutionary on the path to communist victory, he proved himself a dangerous ruler of a nation that required stability, order, or patience to modernize and bide for time in a hostile environment.

So, even as almost all Chinese officials praised Mao in speech, they lent their ears to Liu and Deng for advice and instructions. Mao felt that it was only a matter of time before he would be completely robbed of power except as something akin to a ‘constitutional monarch’. (A similar pattern in the US would be that it was well-understood that black thuggery and criminality did most to destroy cities and communities. And so, tough measures were taken by Neo-Liberals beginning with Bill Clinton to lock up record numbers of blacks and implement law-and-order policies to control black behavior, such as stop-and-frisk. This did wonders for safer streets, at least in communities on which Section 8 blacks weren’t dumped. These policies were based on what was understood, but this understanding was never articulated into a Narrative. If anything, even Neo-Liberals whose policies were based on Willie-Hortonology pushed the Narrative that the Bush campaign had run an outrageously ‘racist’ ad, and Bill Clinton took every opportunity to appear the ‘first black president’. Neo-Liberals used increasing ‘anti-racist’ rhetoric and Negrolatry to cover up their tough race-ist policies premised on facts of black criminality and thuggery. So, while the nation was made safer by clamping down on blacks, blackness was placed ever higher on the pedestal. Even as white urban progs enjoyed safer streets as the result of the war on black thuggery, they were even more taken with ‘woke’ rhetoric and idolatry about the Noble Negro. They lived one reality while believing in a rhetoric that ran counter to the reality. This explains the insane contradictions of the BLM moment from 2016 to 2020. In China between the end of the Great Leap and opening of the Cultural Revolution, even as the state moved drastically away from Mao’s radical policies in actual policy, it continued with Mao Worship as the neo-religion of the state. Something had to give.)

So, Mao decided to strike back. But how could he? After all, his reputation in party circles had been sullied by the disaster of the Great Leap Forward. Most people in government switched their main loyalties to Liu and Deng who seemed professional and responsible. They seemed rational players as opposed to the radical romanticism of Mao who treated history and humanity as the stuff of myth. After devastating famines that wiped out so many people, Liu and Deng restored the economy(with limited market reforms), and the Chinese people were, at the very least, no longer starving. The worst was over in China, managed by Liu and Deng, and most people in government believed the nation was headed in the right direction under the more techno-bureaucratic minded elites.

So, even as most bureaucrats said all the ‘correct’ things about Mao — how awesomely great he is and so on —, few would have switched their real loyalties from Liu & Deng back to Mao. They believed China needed peacetime builders and managers, not a wartime revolutionary who embarked on economic policies as grandiose campaigns against nature, real and human. They wanted pragmatism and expertise, not hardline ideology and radical passion. They wanted predictability and consistency in the rulers, not the tempestuous style of Mao who drove history like a Chinese man drives a car. So, Mao knew that it was nearly impossible to win back his authority by calling on those within the government and state institutions. This was a huge disadvantage in a country where the state was everything and there was virtually no power outside the state.

But Mao’s one advantage was decisive, and it had remained intact because those who’d pulled the semi-coup against him chose not to defame it(in the manner Nikita Khrushchev had done with Stalin’s cult of personality, though after the great man died, to be sure). Now, sustaining Mao’s lofty reputation wouldn’t have mattered had he died before he could pull off something like the Cultural Revolution. Indeed, even when Deng made a dramatic move toward market economics in the 1980s, he didn’t go all out in attacking Mao. He said Mao made ‘serious mistakes’ and innocent people were hurt; but, he maintained that Mao was still 80% good and only 20% bad, and besides, much of the blame was dumped on the so-called Gang of Four. But as Mao was dead with no Maoist heir-apparent around, China in the 1980s could use Mao as a symbol and not worry about another Cultural Revolution; if anything, the great Tiananmen Square movement owed more to influence from the West than anything owing to Maoism.

At any rate, Mao was alive and well in the early 1960s and very much wanted his full power back, not least because his vindictive egotism could hardly forgive Liu and Deng for having bested him in the power game. After all, he didn’t become the Great Helmsman in the first place by being a slouch in the game of power politics. Mao had few cards in the game but the trump card. Because the Liu-and-Deng faction had dared not discredit Mao in terms of prestige, Mao not only continued to control the gods but was the god himself in China. He was still the one-and-only Red Emperor even if his underlings in the state bypassed him and went to Liu and Deng for instructions. Because he was still the god of China idolized by many millions, especially the impressionable and restless young, he had a magic bullet against Liu and Deng. Masses of violent youths invoking his name could exert tremendous pressure on the state, especially as the state officially propped up Mao as the one-and-only great leader. One other thing Mao needed was the support of the military, and he secured this by recruiting Lin Piao who, for personal and other reasons, was at odds with Liu and Deng. So, Mao, backed by masses of youths whose violence was tolerated and even protected by the military, could deal a serious blow to the Liu-Deng faction and the bureaucracy as a whole.

Now, why couldn’t Liu and Deng fight back? One reason was they didn’t have the iron will and utter ruthlessness of Mao. Also, they lacked imagination and refused to believe(until it was too late) that Mao was capable of something so insane to destroy with his enemies, real and imaginary. They knew Mao could be erratic but couldn’t imagine him waging war on the state itself and destroying his closest collaborators in service of his own ego.

But, more importantly, they’d preserved the idolatry and narrative of Mao as god-emperor of China and World Revolution. So, whatever they’d done(against Maoism) in day-to-day affairs of running the state, they’d maintained and even elevated Mao Zedong Thought as the greatest thing since steamed buns. So, what moral or ideological argument could they have against the millions of Red Guards who were rabid in their passion for all-things-Mao? Indeed, the sad and pathetic thing is Liu, even as the walls were closing in on him, did all he could do to appease Mao and the Red Guards by hunting down ‘class enemies’ and ‘capitalist roaders’ when, in fact, the main target of Mao was none other than himself. So, even as Mao was making him out to be the devil to destroy, he acted as if Mao was the god to appease. (Similarly, Trump desperately tried to get on the George Floyd-and-Covid bandwagon when it was specifically devised to bring him down. It goes to show the power of controlling the gods.)

Things would have been different if, following the disaster of the Great Leap, a proper coup had been pulled off against Mao(like the one against Khrushchev who was not only toppled but disgraced). In contrast, Liu and Deng weren’t willing to bite the bullet and go for total removal of Mao from power. Whether Mao still had too much power/support or Liu & Deng lacked the iron balls to go all in, Mao was allowed to keep his throne and prestige as the Great Helmsman, without whom the sun doesn’t rise in the East. So, even though Mao lost much of the power-of-man, he kept the power-of-god. He was still the object of worship, whereas Liu and Deng, though having the authority of the state, weren’t objects of veneration.

It’s telling that Mao understood this dynamic in regard to Nikita Khrushchev. When Khrushchev fell from power, Mao mused that Khrushchev’s position had been vulnerable due to his unwillingness or inability to cultivate his own myth. Those around him in the Soviet State could remove Khrushchev because he was regarded merely as a political leader than as the god of the nation. Had there been a cult of personality around him, the Soviet state would have thought twice about removing him so unceremoniously.

In contrast, precisely because Mao held onto his quasi-divine status, even Liu and Deng(and their supporters), who’d done much to reverse Maoist policies, nevertheless professed undying fealty to him in their official capacity. They could quietly do ‘no’ to Maoism but had to loudly say ‘yes’ to Mao-Idolatry or Maodolatry.

But this made them vulnerable and defenseless against attacks when the Cultural Revolution came charging at them. If indeed they professed to be adherents of Maodolatry, why had they acted as ‘capitalist roaders’ with their ‘reforms’? Why did they act like the ‘bourgeoisie’ in creating a bureaucracy that acted independently of Mao’s knowledge and approval? At best, they were hypocrites who claimed to revere Mao but pushed anti-Maoism, and at worst, they were crypto-capitalist agents who’d planned all along to subvert communism and set China on the path to ‘reactionary’ capitalism.

So, even though Liu and Deng had much of the CCP government behind them, they were ineffective in pushing back against the Maoist tide because both sides(indeed all sides) had to be pro-Mao. Mao’s side hailed Mao as an all-knowing, wise, and awesome ruler, and Liu’s faction(though having gained power by sidelining Mao in day-to-day running of the state) also praised Mao as the great and tremendous ruler. But, if both sides agreed that Mao is so supremely superb, then the side that fudged even a little bit on Mao Worship must have been at fault. After all, if both A and B agree that C is awesomely awesome, B could be in hot water if it says C is 99% great rather than 100% great. Why the 1% of doubt when C is awesomely awesome? Shouldn’t one be 100% for C and aspire to be 110%?

Even though Liu and Deng had gained at the expense of Mao in the CCP, neither cultivated a counter-cult of their own. Even with expanded political power, they allowed Mao to own all the mythic aura. Liu had political authority, but Mao kept divine authority. Liu had loyal humdrum bureaucrats, but Mao could muster up millions of rabid devotees and crusaders willing to do ANYTHING in his name. So, even when Mao’s red crusaders came knocking on Liu’s door to berate him, rough him up, and remove him from power, his only defense was that he’d been a loyal and stalwart supporter of Mao. When Mao waged a campaign against him, he didn’t dare wage a counter-campaign against Mao but only tried to demonstrate his utmost devotion to Mao. Even after he was brutalized and lay in prison rotting away to a miserable death, his side presented no argument against Mao but only maintained that it’d been misunderstood because its support for Mao had always been unwavering. Deng’s family was also attacked, and Deng himself was put under house-arrest, but his defense was always pro-Maoist, willing to confess errors in having deviated from the Maoist line that was of course infallible.

Now, what parallels can we draw between what happened in China from 1962 and 1966(when the Cultural Revolution exploded on the scene) and what happened in the US from 2016 to 2020(when the Deep State coup against Trump took off in earnest with Covid hysteria and BLM riots)? Even though the problems faced by Americans in the era of globalism pale in comparison with the horrors of the Great Leap Forward, many Americans, especially since the end of the Cold War, have felt that the massive transformations have benefited the cosmo-urban elites at the expense of everyone else. Many Americans, especially white ones, don’t feel this is their country anymore. Not only did the US lose a lot of working class jobs but the cultural degeneracy has negatively impacted so many lives with family dysfunction, drug overdose, and the general culture of ugliness. For the upper elites of America(and in the modern world in general), they never had it so good as under globalism. But for many Americans, middle class and down, things have been getting worse and worse.

What Mao and the globalists share is the confidence, indeed arrogance, of history being on their side. Their way is the way, an inevitability. And they are so totally right, and if anything goes wrong, the fault is always with others than with themselves. And just like Mao, having amassed all that power, became accustomed to everyone agreeing with him and never faulting him for anything, the globalists(with Jewish supremacists at the top) got used to their monopoly hold on power and grew utterly intolerant of anyone who dared to say NO to their agenda, be it Open Borders for Europe or ‘gay marriage’ all around. Jewish megalomania came to match Mao’s megalomania. And just like Mao was prone to thinking big, Jewish power-lust lost all sense of limits. Not only did Jews turn the world upside down with new economic arrangements(mainly to enrich themselves), but they also pushed various wars that drained the US treasury and cost thousands of lives(and maimed many more in wars that never seemed to end). But in all this, Jews got no blame, and/or the blame was shunted off to others, especially white goyim. If the awesome Jews say men can be ‘women’, that’s that, and if you disagree, YOU’RE AGAINST SCIENCE.

Then, just like there was a backlash to Mao’s insanely conceived Great Leap Forward, an agenda driven by blind hubris, there was a backlash to the New World Order or Jew World Order in the form of nationalism and populism as embodied by Donald Trump(among others), a new kind of politician the US hadn’t seen in many years, perhaps since Theodor Roosevelt or, even further back, Andrew Jackson. Especially the fact that Donald Trump won the election despite pushback by the entire Power Apparatus showed how deep the disenchantment was among large swathes of Americans. It seemed to imply that the Jew World Order, which took off with Bill Clinton and accelerated under George W. Bush & Barack Obama, was at odds with many Americans. And even those who voted for Hillary showed no great enthusiasm for the Neo-Liberal order in which the Democratic Party replaced the GOP as the party of the business class, all the while desperately clinging to the mantle of Progressive politics.

It’d be a lot cooler if Niall Ferguson noted that Neo-Maoism is the product of Jewish Supremacist Tribalist Capitalist domination. But he’s too busy being a shill to Zion. Jewish Power undermines the West, but all he can do is bleat about Stalin and Mao. 

Just like the failure of the Great Leap Forward forced Maoism to retreat within the Chinese state, the problems of globalism elevated Trump to presidency, and for his supporters, it meant the restoration of national sovereignty, repairing of US borders, an economic reset with China(that worked hand-in-glove with US globalists), ending pointless overseas wars, and finding common ground with Russia(to avert another stupid and costly ‘cold war’). And even though Trump couldn’t do much(as he was surrounded by hostile Deep State players and also because his main instincts were that of a charlatan-hustler than an idealist and man of principles), illegal immigration did decline, there were no new wars, and ‘woke’ idiocy was restrained some. While Trump couldn’t turn the car around and drive in the opposite direction, he was able to apply some brakes. All said and done, for all his bluster, Trump sought middle-ground with the Deep State.

Partly, it was because the ‘swamp’ was the only game in town but it was also because Trump’s vanity wanted acceptance and validation by the People of Power. Even as he became president by garnering votes from the hoi polloi by vilifying the ruling elites, he used his position to gain respect from the ‘better kind of people’. In this, Trump miscalculated the ruling elites, especially the Jews, as much as Liu and Deng miscalculated Mao in the post-Great-Leap years of stabilization. Even though or especially because Liu and Deng restored the Chinese economy(and got well-deserved credit), Mao’s fury boiled over. Mao’s megalomania simply couldn’t share credit with others; Mao’s pride could barely accept any blame for anything he did, no matter how disastrous. Therefore, Mao was hellbent on using whatever means to bring down Liu & Deng to show who’s the real boss. Likewise, Trump failed to understand the true nature of Jewish Power. Perhaps, if Anglo-Americans still constituted the uppermost elites of America, they might have been willing to accommodate Trump and populism, as indeed such had happened in the past(beginning with Andrew Jackson). But the new ruling elites of America were Jews, and they simply couldn’t brook any criticism or settle on compromise with filthy goyim. By hook or by crook, they were determined to topple Trump and utterly destroy the mass movement associated with him.

Jewish power was so deranged in its agenda to punish American Populism and Trump that it didn’t care about the negative consequences for the country and the world(much of which is a mere satellite of American Power, which in turn is a tool of the Empire of Judea). Mao was willing to do ANYTHING to regain total power as the indisputable ruler of China. It wasn’t enough to be god-emperor of the Red Middle Kingdom. He had to be the Big Boss at whose feet everyone in the government trembled. To intimidate the bureaucrats who were loyal to Liu, Mao needed rage mobs who hollered with clenched fists, ready to accuse anyone of being a foreign spy, a ‘capitalist-roader’, Soviet agent, reactionary, and etc. And of course, one couldn’t debate any of these issues. When mobs of young radicals come at you in a fever-pitch of rabid hysteria, all you could do is plead for mercy or chant along with the mantras in the hope that you’d be accepted as one-of-them. It’s like zombies don’t attack fellow zombies(in DAWN OF THE DEAD), and pod people don’t go after fellow pod people(in THE INVASION OF THE BODY SNATCHERS). Mao knew he was playing with fire, but it didn’t matter. If Red Guards were to turn China upside down, beat up countless people(virtually all of them falsely charged), destroy artworks & cultural heritage, paralyze the state, and create all kinds of havoc across the nation, the price was worth the cost as far as Mao was concerned. His megalomania demanded that he be an absolute ruler in every way. The horrible consequences for many Chinese were merely an afterthought to Mao. He mattered more than the rest. He was China, China was him.

Jewish Power feels much like Mao. Just ask the Palestinians or Syrians. Just ask the Iraqi children whose dead lives were ‘worth it’ in the words of Madeleine Albright. Jewish Power is ethno-megalomaniacal. Jews feel that the US, as the ‘lone superpower’, belongs to them. They believe they are the rightful rulers of America and masters over inferior goyim. Jews are resolved to turn white Americans into a minority. They boast about this with hideous glee but have the gall to blame whites of ‘antisemitism’ and ‘white supremacism’ when whites notice. They are committed to using Diversity to make goyim fight among themselves. They demand that all goyim, white-black-yellow-brown-etc, bow down before Jews.

But then, Trump came along with ‘America First’, which reminded Jews of Charles Lindbergh’s movement. To Jews, ‘America First’ reeked of “goyim should put goy interests first instead of whoring out to Jews 24/7”. Also, Trumpers seemed defiant of the Narrative pushed by Jews. Even after all these years of mass manipulation via media and academia, the Trump movement showed that many Americans, at least half, weren’t with the program or not fully. Of course, Trump and his supporters mindlessly praised Jews and Israel, but that wasn’t good enough. Jews sensed a crack in their total hold on power in America, and they were going to do ANYTHING to regain it.

And just like Mao didn’t care about the consequences of the Cultural Revolution, Zion-First Power didn’t care how negatively America and the world might be impacted under their agenda of mass hysteria and violence. What if countless small businesses were to face ruin? What if many people wouldn’t be treated for serious illnesses? What if school lockdowns would lead to widespread depression and loneliness among students, as well as degrade their education? What if Americans would grow paranoid of another? What if constitutional rights would be violated? None of this mattered to Jews. Whatever threat Covid-19 posed, it could have been handled far more rationally and sensibly, but the most extreme measures were pushed with the aim of consolidating power in the state, favoring mega-globalist corporations at the expense of small businesses, and reducing the majority of people into scared sheeple with faces veiled with masks(though many wore them as face badges of commitment).

But that wasn’t enough. If Covid-19 was a statist attack on Trump & populist-nationalism from the tower, BLM lunacy was an attack on American Patriotism from the streets. Just like Jewish Power didn’t care how many people were harmed by the medical tyranny of Covid Hysteria, they didn’t care about the victims of racial violence and riots as long as they hurt Trump’s chance of re-election. The very Jews who’d pushed mass-immigration and mass-incarceration to reduce black crime(to make way for urban gentrification) did a turn-about and unleashed black rage and mass violence to shore up black support for the Democratic Party and to beat White America once again with the stick of ‘white guilt’. ANYTHING to have it their way. So, just like Mao was willing to sacrifice the well-being of the entire nation to regain total control, Jewish Power was willing to terrorize and brutalize the entire country as a form of quasi-divine punishment upon goyim for having defied any aspect of the New/Jew World Order agenda.

While the Covid Hysteria and BLM violence didn’t impact the US as badly as the Cultural Revolution did China, they were in some ways more troubling. After all, it was hardly surprising that a totalitarian communist system could unleash such mass lunacy. Red Guards had been indoctrinated from the cradle on nothing but Maoism. Besides, Marxism-Leninism at its core was a radical ideology. Combined with Mao’s megalomania and vestiges of Oriental Despotism(as well as the Asiatic tendency to conform and obey), that something like the Cultural Revolution could happen wasn’t exactly all that shocking.

In contrast, the US has long billed itself as a country of Rule of Law guided by secular culture and rationalism going back to the Enlightenment. Americans have also prided themselves on moderation and pragmatism, which was why there was a swift backlash against Sixties radicalism. Americans have also been big on individualism, the idea that one’s dignity is independent of the state or the mob. Richard Nixon’s landslide in 1972 was a testament to that. Even the Liberal Establishment that sympathized with blacks and radicals soon soured of the mass violence and terrorist acts. Besides, the Democratic Party then wasn’t just made up of armchair ‘progressive’ types but white ethnics who dominated the political machines in big cities. They were Democratic but socially conservative and patriotic in many respects.

But things were different in 2020. The white middle class had imbibed all the craziness. Their feelings about blacks went way beyond sympathy; it was more like reverence, even worship. Cut off from their roots, their entire worldview came from PC education(controlled by Jews), mass media(controlled by Jews), and idolatrous pop culture(controlled by Jews). Rootless and spineless, they bent to every fad and fashion, every rage of the moment. Not only had the Silent Majority come close to being a Silent Minority but the very white middle class that one would expect to serve as the bulwark of sanity, stability, and common sense was swept up in what came to be known as ‘wokeness’, rather odd when the so-called ‘woke’ are, far from being sober and awake, drugged by PC.

Indeed, this led to a crisis of confidence among middle class whites. In terms of their livelihoods, they are much like the middle class of old: well-off or affluent with stable jobs. But unlike the past middle class, they are under the spell of ‘radical’ ideology, or more like idolatry, because the new radicalism owes less to a set of principles than the special cult-idolization of certain groups, especially Jews, blacks, and homos. In the past, a middle class person had middle class views. Today, a middle class person, having been influenced by Jewish-run academia, mass media, and pop culture, is likely to have ‘radical’ views, if only out of conceit of being ‘more evolved’ and ‘committed’. This leads to self-loathing, a sense of having compromised with ‘white privilege’, especially when they are so convinced of ‘wokeness’. Thus, if the past middle-class pushed back against the violence of radicals and blacks, today’s middle class is likely to cheer it on(even if from a safe distance in their nicer and whiter neighborhoods). And why not when, even more incredibly, the very apparatus of the state from top to bottom fanned the flames of racial violence as righteous reckoning against so many innocent Americans who were harassed, beaten in the streets, and/or had their properties destroyed? Imagine that, the very state that exists to protect people from mob violence actually fanned the flames of violence against regular people… and so many regular white people cheered this on. The people of power from Washington D.C. down to the local level made excuses for Antifa thugs and BLM rioters(who were called ‘mostly peaceful protesters’ by the Jewish-run media).

Just like Mao unleashed the Red Guards to cause havoc all over China and ordered the military to stand back and let the violence take place, the very power of the US state in 2020 sided with street violence, mob rage, and lunacy. And when Trump called on the state to do something, it rebuffed the president and accused him of ‘fascist tendencies’. (This is the very state that accused the far less violent rioters at the Capitol on Jan 6 as ‘domestic terrorists’ and ‘insurrectionists’ and used heavy military presence to barricade the entire city.) Of course, the state acted thus because the US government is now mostly made up of goy cucks to Jewish Masters. If Jews want it, they get it. Jews want to keep total power, and goy cucks who made their careers under Jewish Power are too ashamed to face the fact of their perfidy. So, they pretend they’re on the side of ‘social justice’ and work with Jews to attack nationalism and populism.

Given how the US bills itself as a Liberal Democracy defined by moderation, rule of law, freedom, individuality, dialogue, and concern for truth, the events of 2020 were more horrific than the Cultural Revolution. Far fewer people died, but how could this happen in a so-called democracy? How could a country based on Rule of Law do nothing to protect regular people from mob violence and, if anything, fan the mob violence by protecting Antifa thugs(who are hardly charged for anything) and coddling black rioters and thugs as ‘mostly peaceful protesters’? Maoist China going nuts was predictable. Liberal Democratic US going nuts in this way was shocking. Indeed, it proved that the US is not a liberal democracy but an ethno-monopolistic tyranny dominated by Jews who now treat white Americans like Israeli Jews treat Palestinians. The US is no longer about negotiations between elites and the masses. It’s about Jews saying, “We want this” and demanding that all goyim meekly comply… or else.

In the past, such would have been impossible for Jews as the great majority of white Americans were patriotic and had pride in their own identity. But especially since the Sixties, generations of whites came under Jewish mind control and don’t know how to stand up for themselves. The very notion of ‘white interests’ has become anathema. Jews have convinced whites that white justification for existence can only derive from its usefulness to Holy Jews, Noble Negroes, and Wondrous Homos. Jews, who’d argued in favor of the Constitution in the past when free speech suited their needs, are now totally against the First Amendment. The Jewish Way is ‘our way or the highway’. Just ask the Palestinians. Thus, current US is less guided by the Constitution than by a Cult. The Cult of Ethnicity, that of Jewish Supremacists who believe they are the best, know best, and deserve the best; therefore, we goyim exist only to obey and follow. If we dare have views of our own and speak truth to Jewish Power, we are to be smeared, de-platformed, destroyed, denied banking services, and etc.

Given all such craziness, one might have expected Americans to finally wake up and push back. And yet, Jewish Power has prevailed for the same reason Mao prevailed against Liu and his supporters in the bureaucracy. In China, Mao was god; and Mao Zedong Thought was the sacred dogma of the land, even as Liu and Deng deviated from it to restore the Chinese economy. So, the conflict wasn’t between pro-Mao people and anti-Mao people but between pro-Mao radicals(Red Guards & the Gang of Four) and pro-Mao pragmatists(Liu and Deng). Even Liu and Deng who built up their own political base and deviated from hardline Maoism nevertheless praised Mao as the great and awesome sun that rises in the east in their official capacity. Thus, when push came to shove in the ideological campaigns, the pragmatists had to answer for having deviated from the Maoist line. If indeed Mao is all-knowing and so great, how dare Liu, Deng, and their supporters embark on any program that could only be heretical to Maoism. Thus, Liu and Deng were doomed.

Likewise, as virtually everyone that matters in the US worships the same gods(controlled by Jews), it was difficult for Trump and his base to push back against BLM lunacy and the Jewish Power behind it. Both parties worship MLK as bigger than god and jesus. Both parties go on and on about Magic Negroes. Both parties say white ‘racism’ was, is, and will be the worst-thing-ever. Both parties believe it’s wrong to blame blacks for anything; why, that’d be ‘racist’. And of course, both parties are totally owned by Jews. Goyim in both parties are obsequious in their awe of Jews and/or deathly afraid of them. So, just like Liu praised Mao even as he was brutalized and driven to death by Mao’s goons, Trump continued to praise Jews and Israel to high heaven even as World Jewry was doing everything to pull his pants down, twack his penis with a mouse-trap, piss all over him, smear him with feces, and ram a big hot pepper up his arse. Against all that, Trump’s response was “I give Jews the best blowjobs and let me prove it once again.” And even as blacks were burning down cities, attacking MAGA people, and badmouthing the Donald, his response was a Platinum Plan for the glorious Negroes.

The parallels with the Cultural Revolution are truly amazing. It goes to show that those who control the gods have tremendous leverage over those who don’t. Those who control the gods decide the terms of heresy. The accused heretic is at a disadvantage because he too claims to believe in the same gods. But if so, why the heresy from the official dogma? Unlike a blasphemer who proudly spits on the dogma, the heretic claims that he is a true believer and pleads for understanding and sympathy. Jews control the gods, and the American Cult(as opposed to the American Constitution) is about the divinity of Jews, Negroes, and Homos. (The fact that the Power turned a blind eye to so many immigrant groups attacked by blacks and Antifa goes to show that Diversity matters far less. While useful against whites, diverse folks of various backgrounds, often immigrant in nature, are ignored when harmed by blacks or Jews. Whether it’s Asians attacked by black street thugs or Muslims/Arabs traumatized by Wars for Israel, they take a backseat to Jews, blacks, and homos.) Trump, for all his attempts to slow down immigration, pledged his fealty to the same gods, those controlled by Jews. For all the Jewish hostility toward him, he was always servile to Jewish Power. Despite most blacks sticking with the Democrats and using election fraud against him, Trump’s attitude has been, “Mr. Super-Negro, can I suck your dic*?” And Trump’s been chicken on the homo issue.

So, how could he push back in his four years in office? Jews attack Trump as ‘worse than Hitler’ and his MAGA followers as ‘deplorable Nazis’, but Trump only praises Jews and sucks up to Israel. Jews punch him in the face, and he kisses their toes. Jews kick him in the stomach, and he goes down to offer another blowjob. Jews fan black rage at Trump’s America, and Trump sings paeans to that scumbag George Fentanyl Floyd. This is why nothing will change unless white patriots stop worshiping the gods controlled by Jews. Though Christianity is now a defunct religion, the cry of ‘Jesus is King’ is somewhat useful against Jewish Power. At the very least, it says there is something bigger, holier, higher, and deeper than Jewishness(and globo-homo and Magic Negro). But for most in the GOP establishment, their sacrament is “Jews, blacks, and homos are king”, and this goes for Trump as well. When your enemy attacks you but you accept his divinity, how can you win? His divinity lends him leverage over you. He is godly, whereas you’re just a man. Worse, what if your type has been associated with deviltry, as Jews have done with whiteness?

Indeed, the core of so-called ‘wokeness’ is all about maintaining Jewish Supremacist Power. Jewish Power relies on white obeisance, and Jews figure whites must be paralyzed with ‘white guilt’ and self-loathing to be made sorry-ass, servile, and submissive to Jewish Power. On the outside, ‘wokeness’ sells itself as ‘equity’ and ‘social justice’, but it’s really a tool of undermining white identity and preventing white liberation to keep whites as soul-slaves of Jewish Supremacists. Whites aren’t, as yet, physical slaves, but many of them are already soul-slaves as they’ve been made emotionally incapable of breaking free of Jewish tyranny and its Noble Negro ‘white-guilt’ trips. It’s as if Jews are doing to the white race what Jewish Mothers had done to their sons over the ages. It’s like what Ramzpaul says about how so many whites have been made more sensitive to black pain than white pain.

Now, in some ways, the analogy of Mao and the Cultural Revolution seems the reverse of what’s been presented above. One could argue Trump has been like Mao whereas Jews and the Deep State have been like Liu & Deng. After all, the Cultural Revolution was an alliance of demagogic Mao and the crowd against the bureaucratic Deep State controlled by Liu and Deng. Prior to Liu’s downfall, he had the bureaucracy on his side. Most people in the state apparatus preferred Liu and Deng over Mao for their relative stability, pragmatism, and consistency. Mao, ever so erratic, seemed unstable and unreliable. Because the deep state of China was solidly with Liu, Mao launched the Cultural Revolution that called on youths all across the nation to converge in Beijing. Then, he ordered the youths to ‘bombard the headquarters’ and to give hell to the bureaucrats and so-called ‘experts’. One may see parallels between that and Trump’s calling on the Deplorables to come to Washington D.C. on January 6 to send a clear message to politicians and the state, which is 96% Democratic in D.C. And when the Capitol building was stormed, it seemed like Deplorables were having their ‘bombard the headquarters’ moment. But as it turned out, the violence was limited, and most people who entered the building just walked around. Order was soon restored and the whole city was put on military lockdown(something that was denied when the city was aflame during the BLM riots).

Indeed, even though Trump sure could work up a crowd, there was very little pro-Trump violence from 2016 to 2020. Trumpian populism was about enthusiasm, not violence. The Red-Guard-like violence came from Antifa types, ‘woke’ mobs, and black thugs. Even college geeks committed more acts of violence than working class Trump supporters. Nothing the Deplorables did resembled the Cultural Revolution or what happened on Kristallnacht in Germany. Indeed, pogrom-like violence was almost entirely carried out by blacks and Antifa types, often with support and protection by the Jewish-run media and Jewish-run legal teams working pro-bono.

Also, even if one were to note certain parallels between Trump and Mao, the biggest difference is Trump didn’t control the gods whereas Mao did(and went one better by being the god of China). Trump, for all his vanity and swagger, never had a godlike aura. He was a star and had star power, but it falls short of divine power. It’s like Muhammad Ali called himself greatest in the ring but was humble before Allah and Muhammad. It’s like Elvis Presley answered the question about him being the ‘King of Rock n Roll’ with “There’s but one King(Jesus)”. Ali and Elvis were stars, not gods. Trump as a politician was certainly a star, but he was no god and didn’t control the gods. All said and done, his gods were those controlled by the Jewish Power: Holy Jews and Noble Negroes. He deviated from the other side in not being so totally into globo-homo, but his political bible was about prostrating himself before Jews and Negroes as gods. Even as he reached out to the white masses, he never said anything positive about whiteness, and he did far more for Jews and blacks than he did for whites(which is why his share of the vote among white males dipped in 2020). In the US of 2020, it was the Jewish-run deep state that controlled the gods. Thus, it had Mao-like power. And having such power, it unleashed the American variant of the Cultural Revolution, which might as well be called the Cult Revolution as it’s about the cult of Jews and Negroes.

On that note, what happened in 2020 America was in reverse dynamics of what happened in 1966 China. In the Chinese Cultural Revolution, Mao called on the mass violence whereas Liu’s deep state sought to contain and control it. In contrast, it was the Jewish-run US deep state that engineered the Cult Revolution of Covid Hysteria and BLM madness, whereas Trump, for all his star power, was helpless to stop or contain it. In more ways than one, Trump was in a far weaker position that Liu and Deng. At the very least, Liu and Deng had the Chinese deep state on their side. But because they were confronted with millions of rabid youths and also acknowledged Maoism as the highest law/truth of the land, they could no longer maintain control.

In contrast, Trump controlled nothing when the madness of 2020 hit. The deep state was totally controlled by Jews and goy cucks. The military was mostly on the side of the Deep State. All the big city mayors worked with Jews to push the anti-populist agenda. The energized youth, brainwashed by academia-media-pop-culture, were the tools of the Jewish elites. If in the Chinese Cultural Revolution, Liu controlled the deep state whereas Mao controlled the gods and the youth, with the military sitting somewhere in the middle(though ultimately siding with Mao), the Cult Revolution of 2020 America pit Jewish Power that controlled the gods, the deep state, the youth, and most of the military(now a cuck organization) against Trump who controlled nothing but only occupied the office of presidency; he couldn’t even keep his Twitter account.

The deplorables were useless to Trump. As most were white, they were devils in the eyes of the gods controlled by Jews. The gods are Jews, blacks, and homos. Whiteness is the new satan in America, therefore the only proper role of whiteness is shame, guilt, self-loathing, and struggle for redemption. If whiteness is satanic, then the sight of whites proudly taking part in politics is blasphemous in the eyes of the current gods. Trump rallied the white crowds but couldn’t salute their identity or inheritance. Appealing to white masses was a double-edged sword. Trump might win over white votes, but his association with white enthusiasm/pride suggested the evil of ‘racism’ and ‘white supremacism’, and of course anything that is mildly pro-white is now deemed ‘white supremacist’. Pro-white politics became the Satanic Strategy according to the gods controlled by Jews. Also, unlike Red Guards who could engage in wanton violence, the Deplorables were mostly nice people. For all the Jewish smears about Trump’s ‘nazi’-like supporters, most Deplorables dared not commit any act of violence, and indeed, most Trumpian violence was in self-defense against blacks and Antifa thugs encouraged by vile Jewish Power.

Because the Cultural Revolution was so crazy, it seemed only an erratic megalomaniac like Mao would dare let such a thing happen. Indeed, it’s difficult to imagine Liu, Deng, and the Chinese deep state pulling such lunacy. It was the child of crazy man Mao. But in the America of 2020, it was the deep state that engineered the Cult Revolution. To be sure, the Covid-Hysteria and its controls seemed very deep-statist as it meant more state power over individuals and entire communities. But the BLM riots were something quite else. The deep state, despite its obsession with control, let loose anarchy in the streets(that even went against Covid lockdown dictates) and allowed cities to burn. The deep state even allowed the mobs to attack government buildings and ordered cops to stand back and do nothing. Some have compared this to Color Revolutions, but those were engineered to destroy other nations. What makes 2020 America an outlier is the deep state attacking its own country in a chemotherapy manner. But then, who controls the deep state? Jewish Supremacism. Jewish Megalomania > Deep State. Jewish Supremacism regarded Trump and populism to be so malignant(and at odds with total Jewish domination) that radical treatment of especially potent anarcho-tyranny was deemed necessary. Use Covid-19 to gain statist tyranny over the populace and then use the anarcho-madness of BLM to terrorize White America into submission out of fear and/or guilt.

And yet, after all that, the gods are still the same. Both parties still worship Jews and blacks(and homos). It’s like Mao’s star never faded in China. Even after the Great Leap Forward that destroyed at least 25 million lives, Mao was god. Even after the Cultural Revolution that caused so much damage, he was god. Even after Deng returned to power and embarked on fundamental economic reforms sometime after Mao’s death, Mao still remained god. Even now, when the Chinese economy has nothing to do with Maoism, he is the god of the CCP.

It seems Jews now possess the same kind of grip over the white world. No matter what Jews do, they are to be praised. This is true even of Russia. After what Jews did to Russia in the 1990s and given the ‘new cold war’ against Russia engineered by Jews, you’d think Putin would be anti-Jewish. But nope, no matter how much Jews abuse Russia, Putin is still all about honoring and praising Jewishness. If the relatively nationalist Russia acts like that, imagine the hold that Jews have over America and the EU. Jews got Mao-power or Mao-Pow over the West. Even after all the foreign policy disasters and economic wreckage caused by Jewish Power, all we hear from US and EU politicians, leaders, and public figures is “Muh Israel” and “We worship Jews”.

Jews really did a number on the West with the Holocaust Narrative that would have us believe wholly innocent Jews were set upon by totally wicked and irrational ‘Anti-Semites’ all through the ages. But so much of what Jews call ‘antisemitic tropes’ are really ‘antisemitic’ truths. Jews need to be toppled from god status for the current madness to ever come to an end. And it’s about time people discussed the Holo-Cause than the Holocaust. Holo-Cause would be an honest examination as to why so many goyim were driven into murderous rage toward Jews. What were the true causes of the events that led to the tragedy of the Holocaust? Sure, there were many bad goy players, but it takes two to tango, and there were plenty of bad Jews. The idea that Jews were totally nice, decent, and wonderful but were mass-murdered for the hell of it is total science fiction… and the basis of Jews being the new-christs of the West.

 
Hide 153 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Trinity says:

    Gawd, feel sorry for that elderly Mexican woman. Yet another negro attacking a senior citizen. Remember though, “White Supremacist” are America’s number one domestic threat. Negro confusing a Jew for a “white guy?” Certainly you would think this would be easier than mistaking a Mexican for an Oriental.

    “Public art?” Lolol. How about that new statue honoring “reverend” MLK?

    • Agree: Badger Down
    • Troll: Supply and Demand
  2. Jews have done immense harm to America and the west in general.

    • Agree: Trinity
    • Troll: john-hopelo
  3. If Mao hadn’t rallied the minions, there would have been no Cultural Revolution in China. Indeed, when Mao and the military had just about enough (and the usefulness of Red Guards had passed the expiration date), the mass movement suddenly came to a halt, and many young ones were conveniently deployed to villages to ‘learn from the peasants’, thus no longer able to destabilize cities.

    Mao told everyone he would use luan, chaos, to start the CR, and send the Red Guards back to school once they had awakened the country to the peasants’ plight. They did and he did. No harm done.

    Since it was a specifically cultural revolution, he forbade violence and the revolutionary decade passed without bloodshed. The CR was the only successful 60’s revolution.

    16 years after the Communists took power nothing had changed in the lives of the peasants. Dismayed by urbanites and Party officials living privileged lives, Mao initiated the Cultural Revolution to emancipate 400,000,000 voiceless peasants whose social status had not changed in 3,000 years and remained unchanged. He succeeded. Throughout the CR’s ten years, Mao drove inequality to the lowest level ever recorded while growing the economy six percent annually–twice America’s rate–and mechanizing agriculture.

    By the end, rural literacy was taken for granted and rural people (no longer ‘peasants’) were as intolerant of oppression and corruption, as vocal about their priorities, as enthusiastic about voting, and as eager to voice complaints as their urban cousins. For the first time in history they were full citizens who could point to the infrastructure they built, the agricultural advances they had made, and the problems they had solved. Though hundreds of millions of rural people benefited from the Cultural Revolution, many elites felt that, by destroying the traditional hierarchy, Mao had destroyed the culture itself–a charge that resonated with foreign elites. They were wrong.

    Though hundreds of millions of rural people benefited from the Cultural Revolution, many elites felt that, by destroying the traditional hierarchy, Mao had destroyed the culture itself–a charge that resonated with foreign elites.

    It is true that officials and intellectuals, especially those responsible for running the country, had struggled to maintain their sanity in the midst of an administrative nightmare while many more were subjected to public humiliation or spent years in prison. A handful, crushed by criticisms they found incomprehensible, committed suicide. Some fled abroad and published semi-fictional books about their sufferings and few forgave Mao.

    A small price to pay for the emancipation of 400,000,000 people.

    During the CR, Mao put a satellite in space, founded the ocean-going ship building industry, miniaturized a nuclear reactor for the sub, miniaturized the fusion bomb for the solid fuel icbm, and integrated a whole variety of technologies that many countries still find difficulty in wielding today before Deng began his reforms in 1978.

  4. @anonymouseperson

    So, what can be done about it? The Maoist problem has been solved. The Jewish problem?

    • Replies: @Deep Thought
    , @Ummmpph!
  5. Franz says:

    Because the Cultural Revolution was so crazy, it seemed only an erratic megalomaniac like Mao would dare let such a thing happen.

    This is both a blessing and a curse on autocratic rule.

    Mao might have fostered the Cultural Revolution but he pulled back the oars and accepted industry when he saw it was not working. And he probably got rid of a lot of his enemies under the cover of “revolution” because that’s how they usually work,

    Mao was just a Chinese Mussolini who had better luck than the Italian model.

  6. 迪路 says:

    I don’t think it’s appropriate to compare the Cultural Revolution to what’s going on in the United States now.
    First of all I should point out that the Tiananmen movement was purely caused by the Soros gang of Jews from Hong Kong who attacked the army for weapons.
    You can find many photos of PLA being brutally killed by gangsters. Even tanks have been destroyed by dozens of gangs.
    Secondly, the nature of the Great Cultural Revolution was that mao believed that the top leaders chose to follow the path of capitalists to a certain extent, which might make the country corrupt.
    This is indeed the case now. As a Chinese I can tell you clearly that the descendants of some senior officials have become the main controllers of the current syndicate. Take the Bo family behind Everbright Group. The Ye family who intermarried with Jews.
    Of course, since they were overseen by communist disciplinary committees, corruption could not spread as fast as in capitalist countries.

    It’s very different when Jews push the gay narrative, and from the very beginning, they’re at the top of the power hierarchy. Starting with Occupy Wall Street, sensitive to the forces that might erupt from below, they pushed the gay narrative in order to chop it up, to erase the forces that might bring them down, and to make a lot of money at the same time

  7. Miro23 says:

    A great article. Another aspect is that these Cultural Revolutions burn themselves out. They have to.

    Bolshevik and Red Guard terrorists target and destroy the people who maintain functioning states – IOW the middle class. And this seems even more relevant in a competitive and highly technological /interconnect globalized world.

    Cultural nihilism* is totally destructive of a nation and one way or another the Bolshevik Jews and Mao’s Red Guards had to be stopped for the national survival of Russia and China. Even more so now regarding the Jewish led Woke Counter-Cultural assault on the West (US and Europe).

    Leaders within these cults can witness their own cult reducing the viability of their societies – so it reaches a point they have to stage coups to rein in their own extremists for national (their own) survival. China was an economic disaster while being attacked by the Red Guards same as the US is collapsing under Jewish Woke extremism.

    If you plan to run a farm longer term, it’s better to look after the animals rather than directly slaughtering them.

    *Nihilism is a philosophy, or family of views within philosophy, that rejects generally accepted or fundamental aspects of human existence, such as objective truth, knowledge, morality, values, or meaning. The term was popularized by Ivan Turgenev, and more specifically by his character Bazarov in the novel Fathers and Sons.

    Wikipedia

  8. xyzxy says:

    I skimmed the article; it’s impossible for me to take it whole because the author is really all over the place. He (or she?) really needs an editor, if they cannot better organize it themself. The disorganization leads me to believe that the author is a woman?

    A major difference between the CR and what is going down in the West is that the Chinese situation was internally directed (that is, by indigenous Chinese), albeit directed by way of chaos. The chief purpose was both simple and transparent, to consolidate Mao’s power against a rival political faction, using traditional culture as an ideological vehicle.

    It was cultural in that its ostensible basis was tradition–it was political because it was directed against those going against ‘Mao Thought’. The Criticize Lin (Biao), Criticize Confucius campaign encapsulated the CR’s dual approach.

    What the CR was not, and this is important to understand when comparing it to current Western oriented ‘Cultural Marxism’, was that it was not an attempt to replace indigenous Chinese with an alien people, and totally destroy the Chinese nation. In fact, the country was mostly closed off to foreign influence at the time. Certainly the idea of a Comintern style internationalism had been abandoned, as China previously turned away from the Soviet Union, before the start of the CR (after Khrushchev’s ‘secret speech’).

    Interestingly, once Mao left the scene, the Jiang Qing clique, principally responsible for the chaos, was rather quickly rounded up and sent to prison. Serious men with a forward looking view took the reigns. And since that episode Mao styled political thinking has been warned off. One can point to the Bo Xilai incident (and his ‘Chongqing Model’ of politics) as an example.

    Since that episode, women have been relegated to subordinate (mostly low level) positions. One can point to Gu Kalai and her imprisonment, as the Party’s warning against Jiang Qing style subterfuge.

    Not only that, but traditional Chinese culture is making an important comeback. However, to be clear, this latter situation markedly contrasts with much of the ‘popular’ media (ie, television shows) which center around ‘strong women’ acting ‘independently’. Chinese censors should look closely at that sort of didactic propaganda, and recognize it not so much for what it is, but what it could become.

    • Thanks: dogbumbreath
  9. Whenever large crowds of people — and especially young people — go about marching in circles, disrupting public order, carrying pre-printed and/or pre-agreed-upon placards (de n’importe quoi) and chanting idiotic slogans, especially ones with lines like “Hey hey, ho ho! Your [insert X] has got to go!” you know you’re in for something stupid and counter-productive.

    And the larger the crowd of morons is, the better is the bet that at the back of the mob, hands rubbing exactly as illustrated, is a small gang of bearded, large-nosed fellows wearing Tiny Hats.

    The way you can tell it’s not the Tiny Hats in charge, is when the authorities arrest and/or fire on them.

    • Replies: @Trinity
  10. Trinity says:
    @The Germ Theory of Disease

    I once read where an (((Antifa))) retard desecrated a synagogue mistaking it for a Christian church. He was reprimanded by his superior. So it seems the ((( Antifa))) crowd only has a problem with Christian churches and NOT Jewish synagogues. Hmm, the (((Bolsheviks))) had the same MO back in the day. Lest we forget in the old (((Soviet Union))) that anti Semitism was a crime.

  11. antibeast says:

    As if to demonstrate this, he embarked on one of the most ambitious projects in human history: The Great Leap Forward. It would turn peasants into steel-producers overnight. Harvests would double, triple, quadruple within years. China would soon catch up with the UK and then even with the US. The will of the Chinese people, orchestrated by Mao, would make anything possible. Mao’s East Wind would indeed prevail over everything. But in fact, the whole thing turned out to be ill-conceived and ill-planned.

    There’s a lot of myths about Mao and why he started the Great Leap Forward. While his initial exhortations seem exuberant at best and delusional at worst, Mao stepped down less than one year after launching the GLF because he was in a hurry to build China’s first A-bomb. So that’s myth number one, that Mao somehow run the GLF for three years wherein he allegedly starved tens of millions of people to death when in fact it was Liu who took over as China’s Head of State and ran the GLF for another two years. Myth number two is that Mao somehow intended to depend upon rural villages to build backyard furnaces — which were scrapped after less than a year — in order for China to surpass the UK in steel production. Instead, Mao encouraged rural industrialization by building modern steel mills located in inland provinces as a way to reduce the concentration of heavy industries in Northeast China, which was vulnerable to potential U.S. military attacks from Japan and South Korea.

    Despite all the enthusiasm of the populace swept up in the fervor, it not only undermined the industrial sector but wrecked the all-important agricultural sector (in a nation that was overwhelmingly agrarian). What ensued was the biggest famine in history, losing anywhere from 25 to 40 million lives to starvation. It proved to be so calamitous that it endangered the authority of Mao, a godlike figure at the time. While the criticism of the Great Helmsman was tempered in most quarters, the very fact that some dared to criticize him at all was deeply unsettling to Mao.

    The famine was caused by natural disasters such as floods and droughts in the North which became worse during the last year of the GLF when Liu stopped the exports of food crops to the USSR but instead started importing food crops from abroad. In fact, Liu blamed Mao for the famine in the North caused by natural disasters during the first year of the GLF which forced Mao to step down in 1958, less than a year into the GLF. That’s myth number three, that the GLF policies such as agricultural collectivization caused the “greatest famine” in human history which is itself myth number four. While the famine did hit China hard during the first two years of the GLF and the hardest in the last year of the GLF, there is no material evidence of any kind to support the fabricated allegations of the “greatest famine” in human history. The death toll of 25M to 40M is a big joke intended to demonize Mao who, by the way, launched the most ambitious scientific project in China’s history — the ‘Two Bombs and One Satellite’ project — during the GLF. How was that possible if people were dying like flies as alleged during the “greatest famine” in human history? If the death toll was more than 10M, there would have been another bloody revolution in China. But there wasn’t any violent uprisings nor any mass migrations nor any photographic evidence nor any intelligence reports from the CIA, KGB, MI6, etc. that would attest to the alleged “greatest famine” in human history, news of which would have been splashed all over the Western Media during that period. Instead, what we have today in the West is a well-orchestrated conspiracy to demonize Mao by fabricating “research studies” using fake stats to invent the alleged “greatest famine” in human history, three, four or even five decades later, with the fabricated death tolls rising every decade. Seriously, the realistic estimate of the death toll during the GLF is more like 5M which is already quite high during peacetime. After all, the death toll caused by war-induced famine during the Second Sino-Japanese War is estimated at 10M. Half of that is 5M for four years of war-induced famine vs 5M for three years of weather-induced famine.

    And, no, building backyard furnaces or killing sparrows did not cause the alleged “greatest famine” in human history. The only reason why Western propagandists cite those events is to demonize Mao.

    • Agree: Godfree Roberts
    • Thanks: dogbumbreath
    • Replies: @Zachary Smith
  12. Trinity says:

    Hitler gained the trust of the German people so quickly because he just spoke what everyone already knew. Mao and Stalin cared little for their people. Hitler should never be compared to (((Stalin or Mao))), both Jew puppets.

    • Replies: @DaveE
  13. @Godfree Roberts

    毛 He forbade violence ?
    He sent the 红卫兵 Red Guards back to school ?
    They awakened the country to the peasants’ plight ?
    Roberts, thou knowest naught.

    • Agree: Che Guava
    • Replies: @Godfree Roberts
  14. lloyd says: • Website
    @Godfree Roberts

    From my ten years experience of mainland Chinese and marriage, the mainland Chinese are impervious to a rational argument. You can argue with them until you are blue in the face with no affect. The hive mind completely rules them. They don’t appear to register with logic. John Derbyshire has thrown out hints about that. Then suddenly, they will again collectively see the light and do the right thing without ever acknowledging they were wrong. The folly of the white man has been to assume when any other group is given the same education as him, he will think the same logic. With some groups maybe, but certainly not mainland Chinese, and of course not white women most of the time. European Communism and fascism worked logically in their own reality and it took foreign invasions to end them. Seen in that light, the mainland Chinese have acted in Great Leap Forward, Cultural Revolution and Covid exactly to their nature. As regards Cultural Marxism. It is not Cultural Marxism. Apart from deviant and fringe Charles Reich, the original Cultural Marxists were morally conservative. Herbert Marcuse never advocated a society run by homos and trannies. The thought would not have crossed his mind. The so called Cultural Marxists are Frankists who are exploiting the jungle nature of unemployable ghetto blacks, illiterate and childish College kids, and deranged sexual deviants. America in its present state is beyond Constitutional repair

    • Disagree: antibeast, Che Guava
    • Thanks: Miro23
    • Troll: d dan, d dan
  15. The folly of the white man has been to assume when any other group is given the same education as him, he will think the same logic.

    True to an extent as there are indeed free-thinking white folks.
    But a misconceived notion as MOST WHITES, educated or not, are not free-thinking and just as irrational as the Chinese or any other people. We only need to look around.

    White Americans are among the most irrational, stupid, and braindead people on the planet, and the West is an empire of lies.

    With China, at least we can blame the autocratic regime and ancient habits.

    But the US is supposed to be a free country, but so many people kowtow to Jews, worship Fauci, and still believe the official narrative after all the lies.

    • Agree: dogbumbreath
    • Thanks: Trinity
    • Replies: @antibeast
  16. lloyd says: • Website
    @lloyd

    I am sorry Godfree. I meant to send this as a comment. I accidentally sent it to you instead. This is not your area. So please don’t reply!

  17. @迪路

    Secondly, the nature of the Great Cultural Revolution was that mao believed that the top leaders chose to follow the path of capitalists to a certain extent, which might make the country corrupt.

    You are full of shit. Mao was railing against 苏修. If you are actually well read in Chinese, you would know the thesis of 高华 and 沈志华.

    And there’s plenty of precedence in Chinese history of what the torture and murder Mao did to Liu Shaoqi and Peng Dehuai. So don’t pretend it’s about the Israelites.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Han_Xin#Downfall_and_Dispute_over_death

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hu_Weiyong

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lan_Yu_(general)#Death

    https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/刘邦#消灭各藩

    https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/朱元璋#誅戮权臣

    • Replies: @Godfree Roberts
  18. antibeast says:
    @Priss Factor

    Most Westerners are brainwashed drones spoon-fed by a constant diet of Western propaganda. Take WWII history as an example. Notice that Western historians do everything they can to ‘sanitize’ one of the greatest mass-murderers in human history — Emperor Hirohito — while ignoring the war-crimes of the Imperial Japanese Army. Instead, Westerners are bombarded with political pornography in the form of historical fiction which attempts to ‘demonize’ Mao by fabricating “fake stats” and inventing pseudo-scientific “research studies” that falsely insinuates the GLF caused the absurdly high death tolls of 25M to 100M! Yet Westerners lap these “fake stats” as if they came from a Biblical source.

    • Replies: @Che Guava
    , @Priss Factor
  19. antibeast says:
    @lloyd

    The folly of the white man has been to assume when any other group is given the same education as him, he will think the same logic. With some groups maybe, but certainly not mainland Chinese, and of course not white women most of the time. European Communism and fascism worked logically in their own reality and it took foreign invasions to end them. Seen in that light, the mainland Chinese have acted in Great Leap Forward, Cultural Revolution and Covid exactly to their nature.

    False equivalence. Your ignorance of Chinese culture does not qualify you to pass judgment on the Chinese people. Westerners are the most brainwashed drones in the history of this planet. Even the author of this article suffers from this affliction. Otherwise, how could anyone believe the unbelievable stuff Western propagandists write about Mao? No, you don’t know anything about China. What you do know about China are nothing more than Western pornography.

    • Agree: Godfree Roberts
  20. Some good points, as usual, but, damn, you need an editor! Not just for the numerous typos but this could be condensed to less than half its size (perhaps more than doubling the number who read the whole thing).

  21. Che Guava says:

    Liu, Lin, and Deng. You could have done a few more words on them. I can see that it is just a framing for the U.S.A. part, which I will read tomorrow.

    Nice to see God-free replying to the C.P.C. part.

    My opinion is that Lin was assassinated, aircraft intentionally shot down (not really an opinion, older pro-conmunist Chinese I have met all said it).

    Deng chose the capitalist road purely out of spite over his time of exile. Destroyed the free rural school and medical systems, among other things.

  22. Che Guava says:
    @antibeast

    A few good points, but your’e only half a wit. Later to grow up, perhaps not so stupid.

    • Replies: @antibeast
  23. @Ann Nonny Mouse

    There is no “Jewish problem.”

    There is a big Whitish problem:

    https://www.unz.com/isteve/concentric-circles-of-loyalty/#comment-4914927

    119. Deep Thought says:

    September 21, 2021 at 4:23 am GMT • very recent • 200 Words

    AUKUS forms the best example of “Concentric circles of loyalty.”

    The French, who really belong to the 4-eye race, are delusional. Why do they expect themselves treated equally by the 5-eye race?

    They are not alone. The Indians (and the japs, etc), who belong to the 3-eye races, also saw themselves being treated badly with regard to the supply Covid vaccines, and vaccine making materials quite recently. And more:

    https://www.scmp.com/week-asia/politics/article/3149446/aukus-fallout-years-us-told-india-it-couldnt-share-nuclear?module=lead_hero_story&pgtype=homepage

    The 2-eye race peoples– the Chinese, Russians, etc– are realistic and expect that the knife can turn against them at any time and therefore make preparations for that contingency.

    The 1-eye race peoples (e.g. the SE Asians) might be co-opted into murrika’s suppression, and oppression, of the Chinese when they are useful for that purpose. Otherwise, they could be promptly agent-oranged…

    The no-eye races might be wanted when 5-eyers need someone for slaves (e.g. the Africans) or want to shoot (or bomb) someone for sport, e.g.

    https://www.cnbc.com/2021/09/17/us-airstrike-in-kabul-last-month-killed-10-civilians-including-seven-children-pentagon-says.html

    I still can’t decide where the Jews might fall into!

    Did the white Christian god make the world this way?

  24. @Sorel McRae

    Not just for the numerous typos

    Wouldn’t spell-check have sorted that out already?

  25. antibeast says:
    @Che Guava

    Last I heard, the West had wanted to award the Nobel Peace Prize to Emperor Hirohito but gave it to Barack Obama instead.

    • LOL: Che Guava
    • Replies: @Priss Factor
    , @Che Guava
  26. @antibeast

    It’s true that Emperor Hirohito was whitewashed by the US, but he was not the decisive figure behind Japan’s expansionism. Sure, he signed onto it, but the militarists were in charge, much like throughout much of Japanese history the emperor was a figurehead and the real power was with the Shogun and the military caste.

    Also, a lot of ink has been spilled about Japan as aggressor, Japan as ally of Nazis, Japan as mass killer, etc. That’s why the US still feels it was justified in firebombings of Tokyo and Hiroshima/Nagasaki. The idea is Japan deserved it.

    Mao’s monstrosity sticks out because he killed many more Chinese than the European Imperialists and the Japanese. And he did it in peacetime. And during the Cultural Revolution, he laid waste to so much of Chinese culture and heritage, far more than the imperialists did in their aggression.

    • Replies: @antibeast
    , @Che Guava
  27. @antibeast

    Last I heard, the West had wanted to award the Nobel Peace Prize to Emperor Hirohito but gave it to Barack Obama instead.

    What irony.

    US lectured to the Japanese, “no man is divine and it’s dangerous to worship a man as a god.”

    But when it came to Obama(and other figures of Negrolatry), White America is into Negro God-Emperor Worship. Obama was The One. MLK is bigger than god. George Floyd is saint angel.

    What morons.

    For all the yammering about ‘white supremacism’, no white figure, even George Washington and Abraham Lincoln, was venerated into cult worship like Negro idols.

    • Replies: @Liosnagcat
  28. Jew spirits and Mao, what about Jew mindsets and Bolsjhevik ways and manner, as in the pertinent Ukraine nationalists slavs being mangled to the glory of the Zelensky clique. What about the cultured international Jew, piping a tune to mask the realm by chanting NAZI all the way, by keeping silent all the way. Nothing more appropriate then the Bolsjhevik early twentieth century episode of Netflicks. Remember the role of the US, France then? Read your Solzhenitsyn commenters.

    The applause of the tribe? Certainly, coming, mr. Freud: bravo to your subtil Freudian pointer to China as the bad guy? What a sucker punch, then it works, the ignorance of the public is endless.

  29. @Godfree Roberts

    “A handful, crushed by criticisms they found incomprehensible, committed suicide. Some fled abroad and published semi-fictional books about their sufferings…”
    You are describing Jews and the so-called holocaust.
    As far as China expertise goes, you really are at the bottom of the pyramid. Do you even speak/read Chinese?

    • Replies: @Godfree Roberts
  30. antibeast says:
    @Priss Factor

    Mao’s monstrosity sticks out because he killed many more Chinese than the European Imperialists and the Japanese. And he did it in peacetime. And during the Cultural Revolution, he laid waste to so much of Chinese culture and heritage, far more than the imperialists did in their aggression.

    LOL! You’ve just confirmed what I’ve just wrote about the brainwashed drones in the West who swallow whatever anti-Mao propaganda fed to their brains. No, you’re wrong about Mao who was responsible for doubling the population of China and nearly doubling the life expectancy of the Chinese people during his 27-year reign. Surely, Mao deserves credit for eliminating a century of opium addiction, liberating women and peasants from millennia of feudalism, defeating US imperialism, and evicting the KMT gangster-warlord-Capitalists in three decades, don’t you think? The fact of the matter is that China was ripe for a social and cultural revolution, not just a political one, after centuries of medieval feudalism under the Qing Manchus and a century of Western semi-colonial subjugation and Japanese imperialist aggression. What Mao accomplished during his Cultural Revolution is equivalent to the Protestant Reformation in the West which led to the Counter-Reformation and the religious wars known as the Thirty Years War in which 40% of the German population died. If the Xinhai Revolution led by Sun was like the American Revolution, then the People’s Revolution led by Mao was more like the French Revolution. The former was a political while the latter was a social revolution.

    Westoids like you spout nonsense such as “Mao killed 25, 40, 50 million people” [sic] during the GLF. Did you know that Mao stepped down as China’s Head of State in December 1958, less than one year into the GLF? That Liu took over and ran the GLF for another two years afterwards? Are you going to blame Liu for the death toll of the GLF during its last two years? Mao was no longer running the GLF in 1959 and 1960 because he was too busy running his ‘Two Bombs and One Satellite’ project which he launched in 1958! Even this well-documented historical fact is ignored by Westoids like you who just repeat the nonsense that Mao is the “greatest mass-murderer” [sic] in human history because he did what? Encouraged Chinese peasants to build backyard furnaces? But that experiment lasted less than a year because those backyard furnaces produced only low-quality pig iron. And that’s why China built lots of small-scale steel mills using modern industrial technology in the inland provinces during and after the GLF in order to promote rural industrialization as a way to diversify its industrial base away from the Northeast which was too close to US military bases in East Asia, making them vulnerable to air strikes during the Korean War. That was the real impetus behind the GLF which was to promote rural industrialization, not to surpass the UK in steel output which more than doubled during the GLF.

    The above are just some of the outright falsehoods being peddled by Western propagandists out to ‘demonize’ Mao. Western historians like Dikötter even managed to invent pseudo-historical narratives to make Mao seem like a Hitler while Hirohito’s image is carefully ‘sanitized’ to make him look like a saint.

    • Thanks: dogbumbreath, Thor Walhovd
    • Troll: Pop Warner
    • Replies: @antibeast
  31. As I’ve written many times on this site, watching the Jew.S.A. from overseas is like watching a clown show.

  32. antibeast says:
    @antibeast

    Don’t take my word for it, take the word of The New York Times, Dec. 17, 1958:

    https://www.nytimes.com/1958/12/17/archives/mao-resigns-post-as-chief-of-state-keeps-party-job-reason-for-move.html

    MAO RESIGNS POST AS CHIEF OF STATE; KEEPS PARTY JOB; Reason for Move by Chinese Red Leader Is Obscure — Communes Held Factor SOVIET ROLE IS ASSAYED Western Envoys in Warsaw Feel Khrushchev May Have Had a Hand in Decision

    HONG KONG, Dec. 16 — Foreign Minister Chen Yi announced today that the Central Committee of the Communist party decided Dec. 10 to approve a suggestion by Mao Tse-tung that he give up his job as Chairman of the Chinese People’s Republic.

    From 1959 onwards, Liu became China’s Head of State responsible for running the Great Leap Forward (GLF) which lasted until 1961. The worst year of the famine occurred during the last year of the GLF in 1960 when Liu stopped the exports of food crops to the USSR which started as part of the 1957 Sino-Soviet ‘grains-for-nukes’ deal. That same year Liu began importing food crops from abroad to remedy the food shortages in China, thereby mitigating the effects of the famine caused by unusually severe weather conditions in 1960.

    QED.

  33. Che Guava says:
    @Priss Factor

    Not correct, Priss. Under the Meiji Constitution, the Emperor did have executive power. The only question for the Showa emperor (Hirohito) was which faction of militarists he would favour at which times.

    However, the point of your essay this time seems to the part about the U.S.A., so I will read that now.

    • Replies: @Priss Factor
  34. Che Guava says:
    @antibeast

    By the way, that LOL was LOL with, not LOL at, much of what you say makes sense where within my own reading and informative where beyond (like quotes from old U.S. newspapers).

    • Replies: @antibeast
  35. @Che Guava

    Under the Meiji Constitution, the Emperor did have executive power.

    The constitution doesn’t matter much. Even in the US, with a far longer and deeper history of constitutionality, few wars were declared by Congress.

    The fact is that Japan’s modern emperor’s followed than led. In the end, Hirohito signed onto what others planned and pushed. Had Japan had no Emperor, the history would have been much the same.
    Squeezed in the imperial game with the West and China, it seemed the militarists had the only answer.

    Of course, the whole thing could have been avoided if Japan kept out of Manchuria, and that might have been the case had Russia won the 1905 war. But once Japan got a toehold on Korea, it was going to make a move on Manchuria, which was going to pit Japan vs China, and the West decided Japan was getting too big in Asia.

    Under the circumstances, Japanese militarists were the only decisive ones, and this came with advantages… until things blew up with China.

    Hirohito didn’t plan this. He listened and gave his blessing, but one wonders if he really had a chance. Do US presidents have any real power when surrounded by Jewish ‘advisors’?

  36. Che Guava says:
    @Priss Factor

    His predecessor, the Taisho Emperor, wasn’t popular with the background forces, so possibly assassinated.

    We have a modern parallel, although under the occupation constitution, where the ‘Support the Emperor’ types were happy to see the Heisei Emperor stand down, he said too many things they don’t like to hear, especially ‘Our family has Korean ancestry.’, but other things he said, too.

    However, post-Meiji, the Showa Emperor had executive power. As had the Meiji Emperor.

    The fact is that Japan’s modern emperor’s followed [rather] than led

    Not true. Really, there are only three examples, and in matters of war, the emperors had the deciding say.

    • Replies: @Priss Factor
  37. @Priss Factor

    You have a simple mind.

    Here’s a homework assignment for you, unpack what’s happening in this photo

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_Fascist_Party

  38. @Che Guava

    Physiognomy is real. Hirohito was a dork without a mind of his own.

    • LOL: Che Guava
  39. @anonymouseperson

    They’ve been thrown out of just about every country they’ve ever lived in. Is there any wonder why?

  40. Richard B says:
    @Trinity

    “Public art?” Lolol. How about that new statue honoring “reverend” MLK?

    How about it indeed.
    It looks like a coiling, shit-covered snake.
    Perfect symbol for Supremacy Inc.

  41. Icy Blast says:

    Andrea writes about interesting subjects, but her writing is not interesting. She likes to write, but she is not a good writer.

    What an albatross. I sense the presence of a government employee.

  42. @George de la Jungle

    If you know more, or better, kindly share your knowledge with us.
    I know two ‘survivors’ of the CR, both from poor villages in different part of the country. Their stories tally with my account, which I developed over year of studying it.

  43. @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms

    the torture and murder Mao did to Liu Shaoqi and Peng Dehuai?

    Really?

    Please provide the sources of this alleged atrocity.

  44. @Australia Infelix

    In what way does my description of the 1970 Cultural Revolution in China also a describe the alleged holocaust in Germany in 1940?
    What on earth are you talking about?

  45. antibeast says:
    @Che Guava

    My remark wasn’t meant to be satirical as much as ironic in pointing out the fact that both Hirohito and Obama are ‘celebrated’ today as paragons of ‘peace’ in the USA. Here’s a fawning US news article on Hirohito celebrating his 85th birthday:

    https://www.csmonitor.com/1986/0429/ohiro.html

    Hirohito has sat on the “Chrysanthemum Throne” longer than any of his predecessors, and he is — by legend — No. 124 in the unbroken line of the oldest surviving hereditary monarchy in the world. Today the Emperor celebrates his 85th birthday and the 60th anniversary of the Showa (“enlightened peace”) era, as his reign was designated.

    That reign, however, has spanned some of the most turbulent events in Japanese history. He ascended the throne in 1926, in the middle of a short-lived, chaotic experiment with parliamentary rule by political parties. He was used as a symbol by the ultranationalist militarists who took control in the 1930s, and he guided Japan into its disastrous war against the Allies.

    In August 1945, when the wartime regime was deadlocked over whether to accept the Allies’ demand for surrender, the Emperor made a rare foray into politics and commanded his battered nation to give in. His comforting paternal image provided an important bridge of continuity from wartime days, through an unprecedented foreign occupation, into Japan’s remarkable postwar recovery and transformation into an industrial nation.

    Can you imagine the Yanks publishing a similar news article on Hitler celebrating his birthday in the USA?

    • Replies: @Deep Thought
    , @Che Guava
  46. Zane says:

    BLM and Antifa are textbook astroturf operations. Nothing organic about them. (As are the climate nutjobs. Green is the last thing they are, lol). All these activist groups are run out of Soros HQ at Rockefeller Central.

    If you think that fat black woman actually went and started BLM off her own bat, I’ve got a bridge to sell you.

    • Replies: @sally
  47. d dan says:

    Too much BS from the author, too little time to read let alone reply.

    Just for a start. Whatever the “failures” of the Great Leap Forward, it was not due to Mao’s “arrogance” or stupidity. US pushed its army to the Yalu River border after the start of Korea War (instigated by Soviet), bombed Chinese villages, and blocked China from unifying with Taiwan. US also repeatedly threatened to drop nuclear bombs on China, flew strategic nuclear-armed bombers close to China coastlines, flew U-2 spy planes across China, including into Xinjiang, US not only had army in Korea, but also in Taiwan, and then Vietnam, and then support India’s border war, …. etc.

    China was never given the time necessary nor the environment to develop normally. Mao had no choice but to hurry and to find short-cut. The author thinks that she could lead China better than Mao did. But with over 70 years of hindsight, she couldn’t even grasp the essence of the issues correctly – the real arrogant and stupid person here.

    Similarly, US problems today are not all caused by Jews-this-Jews-that. Too many fucking racist and supremacist Whites in the country and everywhere, including this site – that is the problem.

  48. Tundra says:

    This article wasn’t nearly long enough.

    • LOL: Zane
  49. The comparison is silly, China was blocked by the United States and even by the UN and nobody threatens the United States, it is greed and racism that destroy it from within.

    • Agree: Deep Thought, d dan
  50. Insightful and interesting, if a bit repetitive.

    A few observations:

    Comparing Mao to Hitler does a grave injustice to Hitler.

    There was no “tragedy of the Holocaust” to examine, and suggesting that there was is bending the knee to the very Jewish power structure that you decry others for kowtowing to.

    The abbreviation etc. is short for et cetera, which translates as “and the rest”, et meaning “and” and cetera meaning “the rest”. To say “and etc.” is saying “and and the rest”. Redundant.

    In sentences such as:

    And they are so totally right, and if anything goes wrong, the fault is always with others than with themselves.

    and

    And even though Trump couldn’t do much (as he was surrounded by hostile Deep State players and also because his main instincts were that of a charlatan-hustler than an idealist and man of principles). . .

    . . . the word you’re missing is “rather”. It would go between “others” and “than” in the first example; and between “charlatan-hustler” and “than” in the second example. The only other person I have ever seen commit this error is the commenter going by the name “Priss Factor”.

    • Replies: @Che Guava
  51. @Priss Factor

    The fact is that Japan’s modern emperor’s followed than led.

    You mean, “The fact is that Japan’s modern emperor’s followed rather than led,” right, Jung-Freud?

  52. Slav says:

    I don’t see degenerate urban bourgeoise youth being send to countryside for being reeducated by productive labour in America.

    • Replies: @The Alarmist
  53. Slav says:

    From class perspective, what is going on in America and other imperialist countries is the opposite of proletariat revolution, it completition of the process of monopolization of capitalism, capitalists were always using lumpenproletarian mobs to terrorize working class.

  54. @Slav

    I don’t see degenerate urban bourgeoise youth being send to countryside for being reeducated by productive labour in America.

    No, they’ll be sent to the fields to work for their UBI, and the heads of the bigger troublemakers will be skewered on stakes pour encourager les autres.

  55. Jim H says:

    ‘the US ‘power-brokers’ are essentially in the hands of Jews.’ — Jung-Freud

    Probably this is true. But Jung-Freud presents not a shred of evidence to support the assertion. It’s just assumed a priori, to support this self-indulgent, 8,900-word, ax-grinding rant.

    One could easily program a computer to spew out various flavors of this circuitous word fog. But why bother?

    • Replies: @Shamu
  56. Malla says:

    Since Murica did sooo much do defeat the enemies of Communism (NS Germany, Imp Japan, Fas Italy), without Murica’s gigantic industrial system of those days & economy working against the anti-Commie alliance, the alliance would have won, Murica deserves what it gets. Real Karma.
    Same with Britain. It was Churchill who got Germany and Britain into war with each other, and thus started WW2 in Europe, it was during Churchill’s reign that many leftists took office in the British government, and British soldiers were already being slowly propagandised with leftism. And now the Marxists want to bring down Churchill’s statues. LOL.

  57. God be with Derek Chauvin.

    • Agree: Zane
    • Replies: @Anonymous
  58. If Rev/Dr. King had launched a crusade extolling the mandatory exercise of fidelity without acknowledging his own struggles, the matter might have some salience. And while I certainly have issues with Dr. King, least of of all with his occasional bouts of infidelity —

    His take on the US and color socialization was pretty much unassailable. One might challenge some of his tactics. However, he took the matter on as it was before him. A blight, a wrong, foolish, nonsensical, hypocritical with deep roots in every facet of US life and against the backdrop of the Declaration, the founding, the very nature of who we claimed to be and what was agitated to war against Great Britain — there simply is no case.

    And Mr Gonzales’ nonsense is just that. As history would have it, people who have initiated change have also been flawed, imagine that Gen. Eisenhower had the same issue. Does not upend his tenure as Commander of the Allied Forces in Europe.

    Good grief, look at the founders: alcoholics, womanizers, lousy stewards of money and family. The entire whine about Dr/Rev King’s dalliances has been silly putty since it was revealed. If one wants to take issue Dr/Rev King, Then one should be frustrated that he allowed himself to be hoodwinked into takin on the Vietnam issue which utterly upended the work in the US.

    Just like the white liberals wanted it to.

    Conservative or liberals black leaders are always getting hoodwinked into some niche issue that whites get in a huff about . . . Vietnam (which liberals got entirely wrong), same relational conduct, or transgender minding . . . or the whites favorite hoodwink — “shouldn’t the black issue be applied to everyone — including white women and immigrants —

    uuhhhhhhhh Noooooooooo.

    As for the roots of CRT, if grasp the theory then one can apply the roots not to Dr/Rev. King but Pres. Jefferson and the claven of revolutionaries advocating war with Great Britain for taxes that all tolled amount to small inconvenience, but an excuse for war

    Blacks should ask Mexicans coming across the border, what happened to all of those slaves that escaped across the Rio Grande to Mexican freedom. Hint, they are not in the Mexican congress.

    No doubt Mr. Gonzales is all for Dreamers as long as they are from brown folks from latin place because: they don’t have relations out of wedlock, don’t cheat on their taxes, deal in drugs, or smuggling, never accept government handouts . . .

    Good grief get a grip. Dr. king is not why the country’s leaders exhibit poor leadership.

    • Replies: @Alita99
  59. @antibeast

    Can you imagine the Yanks publishing a similar news article on Hitler celebrating his birthday in the USA?

    Herow-hetow victimised the “gooks” just as the whites did/do– e.g. Korea, Nam, etc…

    Hitler victimised the whites!!!

    • Replies: @dogbumbreath
    , @antibeast
  60. @d dan

    Similarly, US problems today are not all caused by Jews-this-Jews-that.

    The western MSM blame white crimes on the Chinese. The Alt-Media blame the Jews for the same!

  61. @Trinity

    Best description of the new MLK monument I have heard: Looks like someone giving herself a rim job.

    • LOL: Zane
  62. @Trinity

    It’s the Jewish Anti-Christ spirit of “Hate Thy Neighbor”, which is the at the heart of Apartheid Israhell and moves the entire Jewish mindset, that is spreading in America and the world.

    Besides they have a financial grip on the US that needs to be broken.

    http://biblicisminstitute.wordpress.com/2015/07/28/how-the-ashkenazi-jews-conquered-the-west/

    • Replies: @Trinity
  63. @lloyd

    As I remember my reading of Herbert Marcuse, he said that the working class (proletariat) did not lead the revolution as Marx predicted because capitalism made their lives incrementally better leading to a false consciousness. He said what was needed was a “new proletariate” that consisted of “ghetto blacks” and sexual degenerates to lead the revolution. And that is exactly what the Marxist Jews from the Frankfurt School have successfully promoted and normalized. It was Marxist, Jews Eric Mann and Susan Rosenberg who trained and funded the two black lesbian founders of Black Lives Matter. It’s no accident that AG Garfinkel did not and will not prosecute BLM, Antifa or stop the promotion of sexual degeneracy including the exploitation of children.

    • Replies: @geokat62
    , @Slav
    , @lloyd
  64. Shamu says:
    @anonymouseperson

    Well, that’s an understatement.

    I think the best paragraph I’ve ever read by this guy with the insufferable nom de plume is the opener to this article. But the key is grasping bits full import is to know what the gods of the Jews are. The Jews do not worship the same God as do Christians, not even if we momentarily set aside the Christ, the Second Person of the Holy Trinity.

    Rabbinic Judaism is not just a ‘heresy’ within the religion of Moses but is a heresy so complete that it actually inverted most of the religion. The religion of Moses, going back to the original calling out of Abram, was to have a tribe called out from Semitic fertility cult freak shows of human sacrifice, temple prostititution, and a whole lot of sex with kids. Why was this tribe to be called out of that monstrous evil? Because when the time was full, a Messias, the Christos, would come from that tribe’s lineage, and the world could be blessed with eh religion, and resulting cultures, that would put all that Satanism in action on the run permanently.

    What the Old Testament makes most clear is that the children of Israel were never very faithful to that mission as a group. Many individuals were, but they always had too deal with large numbers of their own tribe who preferrered to have fun with the fertility cult sex games and its various forms of slavery. There was endless money and much exciting sexual perversion in being a full Semite, while being a pious Hebrew was boring and often anything but money-making.

    So even before The Babylonian Captivity, the Hebrew world was filled with apostates, many of them violently sick apostates, from the religion of Mosses who retained their tribal status based on blood, on kinship. And during the Captivity, that situation became one in which the apostates came to dominate the tribe and so inverted the entire religion.

    It happened because the Babylonians killed or at least castrated and whored out virtually 100% of the priests of the Kingdom of Judah when they conquered it. That was part 1.Part 2 was the Babylonians offfered full ‘citizenship’ to all Jews who converted to their form of Semitic fertility cult, which would allow the growth of riches. Part 3 was that the Persians conquered the Babylonians, which meant that Jews came to see an Indo-European people up close, and they were both amazed and filled with envious dread. That hatred of European peoples has never waned, as Jews today see Iran as an ultimate enemy,. And remember, it was the Persians./Iranians who freed the Jews from their Babylonian Captivity.Yet Jews hated them.

    Persian religion at that time was a mix of rather traditional Indo-European paganism and early organized Zoroastrainism, which presented a dualistic cosmology and called all people to spend their lives opposing the evil that is everything that does nor come directly rom Ahura Mazda. Persian religious and moral thought made Jewish religious and moral thought seem anti-intellectual, even childish. And that seems to have led even devout Jews to enter totally into a concept as The Tribe equals the religion.

    And that was an inversion the actual religion, which was meant to work toward the same basic goal as Zorastrainism. That’s the reason for the 3 Wise Men, who came from the East of Jerusalem and all but 100% certainly were Zoroastrains. They were expecting the Zoroastraian version of the Messias to come from the Jews.

    Persians allowed Jews to return Palestine and rebuild Jerusalem, probably for religious reasons having to do with a Messias coming in the future. But as the Jews rebuilt a statelet within the Persian Empire, they completed the total inversion of the religion off Moses into a tribal religion of a unique sort: the tribe itself was deity on earth. The Jewish race became god of its own religion. And that led to the creation of what in the New Testament is called The Oral law, which Jesus damns as Satanic. The Oral Law was the pre-codified version of the Talmud. And all Rabbinic Judaism is Talmudic.

    The actual gods of the Jews are Jewish flesh, Jewish blood, Jewish lusts.

    The openly entity that terrifies Jews is Christendom.

    • Thanks: Malla, Trinity
    • Replies: @Anpn
  65. Shamu says:
    @Jim H

    IT has been true for centuries, because Jews became indispensable financier/bankers of British Empire no later than what their propaganda labelled The Glorious revolution. I say it occurred by then of the Cromwellian rule and the Restoration – Jews dearly love owning ‘royals’ and using them to do Jewish work.

  66. Ummmpph! says:
    @Ann Nonny Mouse

    There is nothing we can do as a nation to stop the Zionist madness that has enslaved us. What you can do is protect your family and yourself from the insanity that is coming. Prepare yourself. Get a gun. Store some extra food. Ride it out or fukk it! Lets get it over with! >> https://letsgetitoverwith.com

    • Replies: @Deep Thought
  67. geokat62 says:
    @OrangeSmoke

    Great comment.

    Re:

    It was Marxist, Jews Eric Mann and Susan Rosenberg who trained and funded the two black lesbian founders of Black Lives Matter.

    Those two “founded” BLM just like blacks before them “founded” the NAACP.

  68. Trinity says:
    @Doug Ryler

    Blacks no doubt are taught to hate from the Jew, but Blacks have always been a violent lot with no impulse control for the most part. They are cruel and vicious to other Blacks. Third World people whether Brown, Yellow, Red, or Black, even in 2023 are pretty primitive when compared to Whites. Look at the violence dished out by the Mexican cartels or look at how the Viet Con tortured POWs.”Necklacing” in South Africa? Good lawd, Whites this sick are the EXCEPTION not the rule. My friend told me he heard of people over in the Middle East burying someone up to their neck, where they will then place a sack over the fellow’s head before stoning him to death. And the American Indians LOVED to torture their victims. “Skinned alive” is exactly what it states.

    Placing these primitive and stone age people in White nations us akin to placing a Poodle in a pack of wolves. The outcome is predictable. (((They))) know exactly what they are doing. It is time for Whitey to become a little less civilized,more racially conscious, and a lot meaner.

    Our Jewish friends? Look at how they torture the Palestinians. Israel would be a part of the third world IF not for the West. ” The only democracy in the Middle East?” lololol.

    • Replies: @Shamu
  69. Che Guava says:
    @antibeast

    That is a very confused but representative quote, I have read similar before.

    No, I can’t imagine Yanks giving Hitler a similar article. Partly, that is from jealousy, peace-time national socialist Germany recovered from a terrible economic depression before being forced into war, the U.S.A. only recovered from a lesser economic depression through a war of choice, from late 1941 to 1945.

    In any case, I would like to write more about polities but that would be off topic.

  70. Malla says:

    Well, Chinese American woman, Xi Van Fleet (same surname as General Secretary of CPC, Xi Jinping!!) is in 100% agreement with Mr. Jung Freud


    Mom who survived Mao’s cultural revolution rips school for critical race theory


    Virginia Mom Likens Critical Race Theory To Chinese Cultural Revolution

    And check out some of the comments

    Asian De Hillbilly sez:
    “I been saying that since last year. This reminds me the culture revolution in China back in the 60s. I lost my grandpa from the culture revolution in China. He was deemed to be oppressor cuz he was a dean in the school. He was tortured and executed by the state”

    CARRELL BLACK sez:
    “My wife and her family had the same experience in China. The stories she tells are unbelievable.”

    自由万岁 sez:
    “I am a Chinese American, I love this country, I agree with her100 % . Thats why so many Chineses Americans voted for Trump! We all l need to wake up and defense our freedom before it’s too late! God bless America”

    JayT FromSaigon sez:
    “As a Vietnamese living 18 years under the Vietnam Communist regime, I totally agree with her. God bless this woman!”

    yongxin shen sez:
    “I am a Chinese living in Canada and totally agree what she said. Admire her courage for speaking out in public.”

    • Replies: @Malla
  71. sally says:
    @Zane

    –orders were given .. by the Jewish Supremacist Central. (JSC)
    strategy: to divide, conquer and manipulate societies, in orde to exercise ideological control.
    theory: competing subcultures can be developed to respond to event featured narratives.
    assert: society expresses features which are essential threats to certain subcultures.
    strategy: discriminate & illuminate features of society that threaten target subcultures.
    method: develop perceptions capable to illicit controlled response from segregated subcultures.
    technology: private media, psychology, narrative content development
    funding: corporate advertising paid into media distribution centers
    Purpose: to monopolize and control the authorized in-charge establishment.

    pressured US Police departments to take cues from IDF and Israel security forces that deal harshly with Palestinians. this allows those in need of votes to do things like unseat Trump by controlling, directing and embedding (CDE) an assertion that “innocent blacks are killed by “racist cops”” the very state that exists to protect people from mob violence actually fanned the flames of violence against regular people. Those who control the gods decide the terms of heresy

    The reason there is little proof that police departments were pressured is because the ground work had been laid out long before the location was known of the useful event and long before the useful event for the purpose of divide and conquer occurred.

    –orders were given .. by the Jewish Supremacist Central. (JSC)
    strategy: to divide, conquer and manipulate societies, IOT exercise ideological control.
    theory: non human organizations (NHOs) are proxies for those who hold the power.
    assert: Nation state is a crucible that teaches that NHOs have super human powers.
    strategy: family, parents, institutions teach from birth to death NHO have super human powers.
    method: force all human activities to accept the voice and mind of the NHOs.
    technology: private media, psychology, mandates, narrative content development
    funding: corporate advertising paid into media distribution centers
    Purpose: to monopolize and control the authorized in-charge establishment.

    agree the textbook astroturf operations are what i call the standard mind control procedure.

    • Thanks: Zane
  72. Che Guava says:
    @Liosnagcat

    You shouldn’t correct the language tics or errors. Posts and (lately) articles wouldn’t be the same without them.

    • Replies: @Liosnagcat
  73. DaveE says:
    @Trinity

    The moral caliber of a man is directly proportional to how much he offends Shlomo. Hitler was one of the very, very few who had the guts, intelligence and moral strength to take on the most demonic ethnic mafia to ever slither on this planet. It took the combined might of world Jewry (and a lot of stupid Goyim) to defeat him.

    Not bad for a humble painter.

    • Thanks: Trinity
    • Replies: @Trinity
  74. neutral says:

    No matter what you can say about Mao, he was not determined to wipe out the Chinese race, also he was still Chinese. So the comparison between Mao and the jews ruling over formerly white lands fails at that fundamental level.

  75. @Ummmpph!

    What you can do is protect your family and yourself from the insanity that is coming.

    Merely protecting your family is not enough. We must protect the world from the multi-eyers:

    {US diplomats are trained to rely on a combination of cold, hard, strategic calculations and ruthless deal-making. While all nations have elements of realism in their geopolitical calculus, few can bring themselves to abandon morality and ethics on the scale that the US does. While other nations may be guided at least partially by human values – say, whether their decisions will lead to civilian deaths – US leaders are unconcerned by such trivialities. US bureaucrats are determined to get the job done and serve US hegemony – no matter the number of murdered children or destroyed cities they leave in their wake.}

    {In essence, the foreign policy of the US regime – and indeed, that of most western regimes from Britain to Nazi Germany – is merely a reflection of western values: institutionalized racism, a willingness to commit military aggression and even genocide to achieve goals, an unbridled nihilism disguised as vacuous optimism, a constant mistrust of others, an inability to appreciate differences, and a civilizational affinity for hypocrisy and deception.}

    https://www.rt.com/op-ed/533574-us-india-allies-against-china/

  76. anon[356] • Disclaimer says:

    The red states are more like Mao’s red Army in the days before the civil war. Mao was a patriot and the Chinese economy grew faster under Mao than Deng. Don’t believe all the crazy things (like this guy) written about Mao’s China by the British Empire presstitutes.

    • Thanks: antibeast
  77. Trinity says:
    @DaveE

    I grew up believing the horseshit about Hitler like every other duped Westerner. I started to become Jew wise in the early 1990s, aware enough to view movies, like “Schindler’s List” as a work of evil propaganda and Jewish fiction. Once the scales were removed from my eyes I began to see Hitler as one of the greatest of men who ever lived. Of course I then began to see (((our heroes))) in a different light. The “great statesman” and “great orator”, Winston Churchill, slurred his words, spoke drunken unintelligible garbage, just a drunk, fat, opportunist, his kind are a dime a dozen. A pompous, wealthy, white trash good ole boy with a decadent, self centered lifestyle. The ideal shabbos goy. Hitler was the hero of the White race, certainly not some drunk fat boy traitor like Churchill. And to make it worse, Churchill wad wise to the Jew, he knew of their intentions. What a POS. Hitler was a man of the people.

    • Thanks: Zane, anarchyst
    • Replies: @anonymous
  78. rienzi says:
    @Godfree Roberts

    During his rule, Adolf developed rocketry far ahead of it’s time, built the first cruise missiles, salvaged and restored his country’s economy, built the first network of super highways, developed the first jet fighters, wiped out unemployment, held a massive, successful Olympic games, built a technically advanced submarine fleet, dominated auto racing with Mercedes and Auto Union. Developing and integrating a whole variety of technologies that, quite frankly, most countries would still find difficulty in doing today. Adolf began his reforms in 1933.

    See how easy that is!

    To tell the truth, even though both Mao and Adolf accomplished a lot, I would probably not be all that happy as a citizen of their respective countries during their rules. Too authoritarian for my likes. Your experience may differ.

  79. Wilhelm says:

    Mao and the rise of the Chicoms was not an organic movement. It was created by the CIA. The CIA is the puppet master of China to this day. Always has been. Most likely, always will be.

    Here is an outline of succession: CIA—>State Dept.—>Carnegie Endowment (CEIP)

    The CIA gets its marching orders from the State Dept. The State Dept. gets its marching orders from the Carnegie Endowment. Want to know what is going down in the Ukraine right now? Just follow that formula. It’s a long game that has been playing out for more than a decade. Follow the .orgs and the money trail. How many .orgs are affiliated with George Soros? He is an agent of that process. He didn’t come into all of his wealth just because he flipped a few bucks into some more bucks in the financial markets. His wealth isn’t even really his wealth. He and his ‘wealth’ are instruments of the above process.

    There is nothing organic about BLM. There is nothing or5ganic about ANTIFA. There is nothing organic about the massive level of illegal immigration taking place across Europe and the US. There’s nothing organic about the huge uptick in crime across our country. It’s all part of a carefully coordinated, choreographed process that is engineering global societies into a particular direction.

    China is a puppet state. The US is a puppet state. The EU is a puppet state. Etc., etc., etc.

    • Agree: Liosnagcat
  80. geokat62 says:

    Gab comment posted by CORVID:

    If a Christian group in israel started facilitating illegal immigration into the country they‘d be shut down and thrown in jail.

    So why must we in the west tolerate all the jewish groups masquerading as ‘charities’ that only exist to grease the wheels of 3rd world immigration into our countries?

    https://gab.com/Corvid1984/posts/109727076504526125

  81. @Deep Thought

    Can you imagine the Yanks publishing a similar news article on Hitler celebrating his birthday in the USA?

    Herow-hetow victimised the “gooks” just as the whites did/do– e.g. Korea, Nam, etc…

    Hitler victimised the whites!!!

    The “whites” (i.e. Slavs) Hitler victimized were considered “sub-humans” and grouped with black people, mixed-race people, Roma and Jews.

    Antibeast’s original comment holds. As usual, this article is more Anglo propaganda using carefully selected bits of incomplete and distorted history to continue the “divide and conquer” modus operandi.

  82. @d dan

    Similarly, US problems today are not all caused by Jews-this-Jews-that. Too many fucking racist and supremacist Whites in the country and everywhere, including this site – that is the problem.

    So true. How can anything be fixed/corrected when a country continues to blindly point the finger.

    • LOL: Trinity
    • Replies: @d dan
  83. Anonymous[670] • Disclaimer says:
    @Godfree Roberts

    Asa former RT viewer, I was annoyed when the US media got that network taken off the air. Eventually, I got around to watching the Chinese network CGTN. It seemed boring – the news shows were what we used to call “talking heads” – static groups of distinguished folks sitting around talking about events. And the entertainment shows reminded me of American shows in the 1940s and 1950s – shows like the “Lawrence Welk” show or “Your Hit Parade” – well dressed singers backed by orchestral groups – singing quiet, pretty musical numbers.
    And then it hit me – as hard as a rock – we have zero chance of beating the Chinese. America is long past the 1950s – when we were more honest, more hard-working, and less represented by Negro behavior and “buck grabbing”. In the 1950s, Americans were basically “corny” – very interested in conforming to older standards of behavior and patriotism. The youth were very earnest and eager to join adult society.
    This month, the Chinese celebrate their Springtime New Year and their entertainment will be “old fashioned” with old standards of polite society. And next month, we will celebrate our Super Bowl and our entertainment will probably be some clown grabbing his crotch and yelling about “f-cking somebody else up”. The rest of the day will be spent in overeating and watching large men slamming into each other
    That is it – the Chinese are imitating our 50s culture and we are celebrating some apocalyptic crap. The Chinese are stuck in our 1950 era of striving and cultural enrichment and we are stuck in some definitely, uncultured era – the era of the Quick Buck.
    Tell me – how the Hell are we going to prevail?

    • Replies: @d dan
  84. Shamu says:
    @Trinity

    Bantu blacks are all that younsay. Other black Africans are less savage, ,less delighted with the kist gruesome tortures.

    So one way to see bantus is that they are like pre-christian Germanic tribes, just lower IQs, which means they are much less a threat unless a high IQ people back them. And that is what the WASP elites began doing before the American ‘Civil War.’ Jews jumped on that bus some time early in he 20th century but it was Anglo-Saxons who’s tarted to use blacks as their weapons Anas pawns against all the white that WASP elites hated or feared.

    • Replies: @Trinity
  85. profnasty says:

    I’m sorry, did he just say the Holocaust is real history?

    WTF??!?!!!

    • Agree: Liosnagcat
  86. antibeast says:
    @Deep Thought

    Hirohito’s war crimes involved Whites too… But the Japs now complain about any comparison between Hirohito and Hitler, as described in the incident below:

    Ukrainian gov’t apologizes for showing Emperor Hirohito’s photo next to Hitler’s in video

    https://mainichi.jp/english/articles/20220425/p2a/00m/0na/020000c

  87. PUTINFAN says:

    Jews recently thrown out of Cuba by Castro, circa 1960. THERE were 30,000, now about 1000. SOUNDS LIKE a little slice of heaven. SBF’s attempted takeover of the Bahamas foiled. Meyer Lanksy almost controlled Batista in Cuba. FORTUNATELY Jews in Latín América are not highly regarded and have no say in anything, as it should be.

    • Replies: @Al Ross
  88. Trinity says:
    @Shamu

    Hmmm, it was the Jew who decided to use Blacks to intimidate Whites. Blacks in America were hopelessly outnumbered, and even where there was a sizable portion of Blacks, they (Blacks) were nearly as docile as post 1970s Whites. Think of a Southern plantation where Blacks outnumbered the Whites. A Black uprising was rare. Blacks were too broken spiritually and just accepted their lot just like Whites of today. At least Blacks had the excuse of being hopelessly outnumbered and outgunned, Whites GAVE AWAY America without a fight. No other tribe has LAID DOWN like Whites, no one.

    The Anglo? Plenty of non Anglo White sellouts as well. White raitor trash can be Greek or Irish or even a Russkie. The Catholic church has done their share of damage. Bringing in all sorts of non whites and setting them up with FREE education, housing, etc. I am pretty sure this is where Black on Yellow hate started to fester. Blackie saw Whitey go off to fight the Yellow man and then turn around and import him to America, giving him freebies that poor Whites and Blacks could not receive.

    Poor Whites kiss Black ass to survive, rich white traitor trash kiss Black ass because of other reasons like money, social status, fashion, etc. Take Anderson Cooper, the dude’s ancestors owned slaves and of course the opportunistic Jew did his share of suppressing Blacks.

    • Replies: @anon
  89. Dually says:

    the general culture of ugliness

    You can have money-is-everything and “diversity”,

    or you can have race and culture

    – but you can’t have both.

  90. @Che Guava

    I’m not correcting it as much as I’m pointing out that this rather unique idiomatic tic is one shared by Priss Factor and Jung-Freud, leading me to infer that they are one and the same.

    • Replies: @Che Guava
  91. @d dan

    Too much BS from the author, too little time to read let alone reply.

    If you had “too little time to read let alone reply,” then how did you manage to reply? Seems to me you should have spent your precious time reading and spared us your vacuous reply.

    • LOL: Trinity
  92. Slav says:
    @OrangeSmoke

    Has Marx himself ever endorse them? If not, they were not Marxists. Marx opposed bourgeoise degeneracy. So did Mao.

    Actually degenerates are product of society with parasitic classes, existed in ancient slave holding societies already. Logically can’t exist in socialist society where everyone works.

  93. Buried by academia long ago was the voice of German sociologist-historian Max Weber as to what to do about the Jewish Question (or Jewish Disconcertion – inability to deal with or understand something).

    Despite that Weber was dubbed the “founder” of academic sociology, sociology was mainly founded as a scientific “conspiracy” to subdue and exterminate the white, bourgeoise and working classes (Marx, Durkheim, Spencer (Oberlin College, Mannheim, Simmel,, Oppenheimer, Coser, Merton, Wirth, Reisman, Adorno, Herberg, Glazer, Arendt, Jacobs, Lowenthal).

    Weber was an outlier who was German who proposed that forced assimilation was the only answer to the Jewish Question (see Max Weber and the Jewish Question: A Study of the Social Outlook and His Sociology by Gary Abraham). Weber had a strong, fundamental bias against pluralism even for Poles and Catholics (see Weber’s books Ancient Judaism and The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism and his writings on the Polish and Prussian Junker labor problem in Germany). He proposed to “find out the ‘secrets’ of the Jewish success”.

  94. What is happening to the US has nothing to do Mao, nor with the Bolsheviks, good Lord. The main big difference is that marxism in early Soviet Union and even more in Mao’s China did tap an infinite reservoir of mass enthusiasm and hatred, the frenzy elicited was real and genuine and of the very same species as experienced under Hitler and under South American populist right-wingers, while now, in the anti-Trump camp, there is neither enthusiasm neither sincerity, especially among the flattered minorities such as the Blacks : they are as a rule very disappointed by the Obama regime, from now on some will march but only for money, and even those who get money from Burn, Loot and Murder or directly from the Jewish media know that these Jews behave as Whiter than Whites when it comes to real redistribution and that the money redistributed is not for them as it was never for them actually during the Civil Rights but for Jews.

    Witness the Black Hebrews who are therein because they know where the pork barrel is. All they were allowed to adore as a leader is Floyd, as a sequel to OJ Simpson, as if there were not thousands of Malcom X’es lurking and being constantly shadow-banned or worse. Well Trump, is (or rather has been, since what he was hired to perform was a dress rehearsal, not the real jazz) next to the same thing as a White equivalent, as dependent on very big Jewish money and having had far more popularity in percentage among Israeli voters than the reddest US states.

    What the big media are pushing for (mark that only the “secular” media have been overwhelmingly and rabidly anti-Trump : the media that abetted Trump were essentially non-secular, mostly evangelical Dixie style and South American style, and actually far more important in volume and in deep state financing and Israeli commitment : it is thanks to them that one US citizen out of two is ready to become a slave of Israel to save his soul not to save his savings) is not a second Bolshevik or Maoist revolution (was there ever an American Long March?) but a second civil war, rather on the Spanish model (another former glorious world empire reduced to misery) this time to be won by the very same baddies that are supposed to have been defeated as a conclusion of the first, and so as to put an end to America’s existence as an industrial empire it had become by virtue of the first civil war, so as to close the parenthesis opened by Lincoln and a few others.

    The Spanish Civil War might give some idea of the things to come and of who will be the victors after all : of course the religious right but not a good one. Franco was a Marrano after all. Make no mistake about it : whenever in history sexual perversion becomes the big priority of mainstream media it means that what is aimed for is a planned defeat and suicide of their own viewership of choice. They promote Woke to make broke anyone who gnaws at it line, hook and sinker. They are there as circling vultures, not as ravenous wolves.

  95. Alita99 says:
    @EliteCommInc.

    I’m curious. What was the right way to view the Vietnam war?

    Respectfully,
    A.

  96. @xyzxy

    I skimmed the article; it’s impossible for me to take it whole because the author is really all over the place. He (or she?) really needs an editor, if they cannot better organize it themself.

    You lasted longer than I did, for I gave up on even the “skimming” 3/4 of the way through this unbelievably incoherent piece.

    Before that point, the only real thing I got out of it was that Mao was even more of a disaster for China than I’d ever imagined.

  97. anon[254] • Disclaimer says:
    @Trinity

    Poor Whites kiss Black ass to survive, rich white traitor trash kiss Black ass

    A true non-White comment if ever there was one. This kind of Jewish triumphalism pretending to be criticism is all over Unz.

    • Replies: @Trinity
  98. @antibeast

    It’s been my experience that whenever Mao’s uglier aspects are mentioned, his defenders quickly arrive.

    The gist of their argument is Mao = Chinese Jesus.

    Much the same thing happens whenever the subject of the Holodomor turns up.. Stalin could do no wrong, and certainly was as pure and innocent as the driven snow regarding the massive die-off he allowed to happen in Ukraine. That the Ukrainians tried to cozy up to Hitler in 1941 is surely understandable.

    • Replies: @antibeast
  99. @Priss Factor

    It’s as if the negro has outsourced his Dunning-Kruger effect, to be performed on his behalf by whites, and whites jump at the chance.

  100. Trinity says:
    @anon

    Nope, it is constructive criticism meant to kick start Whites and WAKE THEM THE FUCK UP. Insults, particularly when the insult is TRUE, help much more than bullshit FAKE attaboys. I have seen Whites kiss nonwhite ass my whole life, particularly Jew and Black ass. I have seen countless Whites all but suck some non whites cawk in public and then confide in me how they really felt in PRIVATE. I have no time for white trash like this at all. I have lots of contempt for the RICH white traitor trash especially. Whites have been door mats for too long.

  101. Another similarity between Mao’s Red Guard and today’s attempt in the U.S. to create chaos that will lead to the Marxist socialist utopia is the destruction of our culture, history, religion and legal structure. In Mao’s time the Red Guard focused on the destruction of the “Four Olds”. The Four Olds were: Old Ideas, Old Culture, Old Customs, and Old Habits. The 1967 “Destroy the old world” poster depicts the Red Guard destroying the structures of old society and can be found on the internet.

    The globalist elite had to be a bit more creative and use the “new proletariate” to promote the idea that white supremacy and systemic racism are the foundation of our society to justify the destruction of everything and the rebuilding of society into a socialist utopia.

  102. Al Ross says:
    @PUTINFAN

    Jews in Latin America may not be highly regarded but that hardly matters :

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Latin_American_Jews

    • Replies: @PUTINFAN
  103. d dan says:
    @Anonymous

    “America is long past the 1950s – when we were more honest, more hard-working, and less represented by Negro behavior and “buck grabbing”.”

    It is true that America was at its peak in the 1950/60s, but that was NOT because the people were more honest / hard-working, or there was less Black behavior. It was because Europe and Asia were totally wrecked. East Asia hadn’t risen, and most colonialized countries still hadn’t gained their independence (or for long).

    “In the 1950s, Americans were basically “corny” – very interested in conforming to older standards of behavior and patriotism.”

    America was bombing and using bio-weapons in Korea in the 1950s. Then they used agent orange in Vietnam in the 1960s. They nuclear bombed and tested radiation on South Pacific islanders. They sprayed bacteria in the street of San Franc. and injected Blacks and prisoners with experimental diseases. They performed color-revolution everywhere… etc. And you are proud that they were even more patriotic?

    “the Chinese are imitating our 50s culture”

    Oh, please don’t flatter yourself. Chinese has been hardworking since ancient time, and celebrated Chinese New Year long before there was a country called USA.

    “we are stuck in some definitely, uncultured era – the era of the Quick Buck.”

    The America of the 1950s was as racist and “quick buck” minded (or maybe more) as America of the 2020s.

    • Replies: @Trinity
  104. @Godfree Roberts

    During his detention, Peng wrote his last letter to Mao Zedong on January 1, 1967. In the letter, he briefly introduced the process of his detention and said, “I salute you for the last time! I wish you a long and healthy life!” This letter was sent to Zhou Enlai from the guardianship point, and after he read it at the meeting of the Central Committee, he sent the letter to Mao Zedong, Lin Biao and Jiang Qing for reading. Mao Zedong saw Peng’s letter in Zhongnanhai, picked up a black pencil, and drew an irregular circle on the letter without any comments.

    With the support of Kang Sheng and Chen Boda, on July 9, 1967, Han Aijing forced Peng Dehuai to confess and beat him, claiming that at the “struggle session” wanted to “see the red with a bayonet”, and asked Peng to explain “why did you write an opposition letter at the Lushan Conference against ‘three sides Red Flag’?” “Why do you oppose Chairman Mao?” Peng was “knocked down” seven times, his forehead was injured and bleeding, his fifth and tenth ribs were broken, and Li Zhongqi slapped Peng Dehuai in public. [64][65]

    https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/彭德怀#文革身死

    In early 1968, Liu was still in solitary confinement in Fuluju, Zhongnanhai [6]:984. Liu’s mental and living conditions continued to deteriorate. Since 1968, he had successively suffered from pneumonia, diabetes, hypertension, autonomic disorders, etc., and his condition worsened after March [6]:984.

    In October 1969, Mao Zedong estimated that the international situation might suddenly deteriorate according to the world dynamics at that time, so he decided to take a large-scale national war preparation operation [6]: 985. The CPC Central Committee decided to evacuate Liu

    Due to bumps and colds on the way, Liu’s condition continued to worsen after he arrived in Kaifeng[6]:985.

    At midnight on November 13, when registering the “cremation application form”, the task force falsely used Liu Yuan’s name to apply[98], and filled in the “name of the deceased” as “Liu Weihuang”[6]: 986, and the occupation as “unemployed”. Liu’s body was falsely claimed to be that of a patient with a severe infectious disease [6]: 986. On November 14, Liu’s body was secretly cremated on the spot at the Eastern Suburb Crematorium in Kaifeng City [99]: 17. The ashes were packed in an ordinary wooden box and stored in the ashes storage room of Kaifeng Crematorium[6]:986.

    https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/刘少奇#病重去世

    • Thanks: Che Guava
  105. d dan says:
    @dogbumbreath

    “How can anything be fixed/corrected when a country continues to blindly point the finger.”

    Sadly true. China [the government, the people, the party] was able to self-correct within a few years after they realized their mistakes. As a result, Chinese of the 1950/60 lived better than their ancestors, and of the 1970/80 lived better than the 1950/60s and so on.

    And it was not because China had/has less problems than America. On the contrary, China’s problems were MUCH more complicated and numerous than what faced US today. For example, China also had a very militant group of Muslim minority called Hui, and their history (dated back to Qinq) of extreme violence against Hans made the American Blacks’ crimes look like kindergarten brawl. So, after almost a century of fights [Ref 1], in 1949, Mao proposed the “three equality”: equality among races, between man/woman, and among all people. Fast forward today, we can see Hui people live harmoniously with Hans, and Hui restaurants striving next to Tiananmen in Beijing.

    If America of the 2020s is really similar to the China of 1950/60s as this author claims, let see how America self-corrects itself in a few years or a few decades. Anyone wants to place a bet? Please count me out.

    Ref 1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vz7p289Eo2s

    • Agree: Deep Thought
    • Thanks: Malla, dogbumbreath
    • Replies: @Deep Thought
  106. lloyd says: • Website
    @OrangeSmoke

    Herbert Marcuse advocated homosexuals and blacks as leading the revolution in his Eros and Civilization. Later he considered homosexuality was also being exploited by the consumer society. Identity politics was completely outside his spectrum and scarcely existed in his era. He gave it a theoretical excuse I suppose. But I doubt LGBTQ read Marcuse.

  107. Trinity says:
    @d dan

    And JewSA is more racist than America ever dreamed about being. No Cohencidence that immediately after WWII the nation wrecking Jew started coming out of the shadows. Make a quick buck while ripping people off is a Jewy trait that unfortunately many Whites have adopted over the years.

  108. @Sorel McRae

    Plug the article into chatgpt and ask it to cut out duplication and simplify

  109. JR Foley says:
    @Godfree Roberts

    The Thoughts of Jiang Jie Shi on the Island of Taiwan lamenting his loss and likewise Song Mae Ling in DC asking for another big handout. China would have been USA today had the old pirate gained control —-actually, Jiang (Ching Kai Shek) forces forcibly took residents from South to fight against Mao and they lost Mao had the people’s ) peasants interests at heart overthrowing Ching Kai Shek but again —absolute power over time corrupts.

  110. PUTINFAN says:
    @Al Ross

    Thanks 300,000 out of 450 million less than 1/10 of 1%. Makes me happy its that low Writing from Costa Rica, where I have only met a few as usual trying to rip everyone off.

  111. anonymous[362] • Disclaimer says:
    @Trinity

    The more you know about Churchill, the smaller he becomes.

    • Agree: HdC
  112. RodW says:

    This writer needs an editor to cut out the endless repetition and self-indulgence.

  113. ” They wanted predictability and consistency in the rulers, not the tempestuous style of Mao who drove history like a Chinese man drives a car”

    LMAO 🤣🤣🤣

  114. Malla says:
    @Malla

    Interestingly this Black Doctor rips apart Critical Race theory.


    Watch Black Father Blast Critical Race Theory At Board Meeting In Viral Video

    • Replies: @Priss Factor
  115. antibeast says:
    @Zachary Smith

    I don’t know much about Stalin but what I do know is that Mao ain’t no mass murderer. I view Mao as a revolutionary leader turned despotic tyrant whose far Left Communism was necessary to cure the Chinese body-politic of its myriad ailments, after the well-known political and social failures of Chiang whose far Right Nationalism was necessary to fight and defeat both Soviet Communism and Japanese imperialism.

    The history of China over the 20th century was shaped by four Chinese men — Sun, Chiang, Mao and Deng — all of whom have been vilified by the West in one form or another. All four of them could not have done what they have achieved without the other. China’s history after the Fall of the Qing should be viewed as a pendulum swinging between the far Right Nationalism of Chiang and far Left Communism of Mao which the centrist Liberalism of Sun could not hold together against both extremes. Only after Deng took over China after the death of Mao did the pendulum stabilize and settle for the center Left Socialism of his ‘market reform’ period. Now Xi is taking China to the center Right Nationalism of his ‘China Dream’ period which harks back to the ancient Silk Road era.

    Westoids like you have too much baggage — whether ideological, racial, cultural — that make you lose any and all chances to view China’s history as anything but ‘Chinese’. At the end of the day, it’s the Chinese view of China’s history that matters, not yours or any Westoid for that matter. Period.

  116. Appreciate the author’s laying out the Maoist Cultural Revolution, which doesn’t get enough air time and displays many parallels with woke madness during the Trump era. Especially appreciate the clear statements about how the Antifa/BLM forces were the goon squads of the establishment, the real insurrectionists, and how they enjoyed broad corporate sponsorship.

    What happened in DC on 1/6/21 was a mild protest compared to the riots and chaos in 2020, just imagine where we would be if a tiny fraction of the 1/6 fed actions were directed to looking into the Floyd riots and destruction. In Portland, Oregon the federal courthouse and city police headquarters have been boarded up like fortresses now for over two and a half years. Nobody talks about that anymore, and the local media stopped showing the world all the pictures last summer.

    The one thing that puzzles me about this piece is the almost complete failure to mention Obama. He is the liberal God figure in this country, America’s Mao, alongside his rich white enablers, not the Jews. Blame the Jews all you want, but it was white and black Democrats on Team Obama that tore up the country, not the Jews.

    Plus, MLK Jr. was killed by the CIA for the way he threatened the US war machine and neocolonial plunder. His national holiday is part of the coverup. Random insertions of MLK denunciation tweets in this piece betray a neocolonialist, CIA-friendly vibe. Do the Jews run the CIA, or is it a bunch of conservative white folks and atheistic liberals joined together to preserve the empire at all costs? I mean seriously, at some point white Americans have to hold themselves accountable for what has happened here, instead of constantly pointing fingers at a religious group in the abstract.

  117. Malla says:
    @Priss Factor

    Squeezed in the imperial game with the West and China, it seemed the militarists had the only answer.

    Facing a serious threat of Communism in East Asia which could lead to the God like Japanese Imperial Family being assassinated (like in Russia), a lot of Commie movements in China leading to the real possibility of a hostile red coast in Eastern Eurasia facing the Japanese Empire. And most importantly of all the so called Democratic, Christian USA not doing much about this red menace.
    Also miscreant politicians riling up populations in China with unnecessary anti-Japanesism (today miscreant politicians rile up Indians with unnecessary anti-Sinoism!!! Karma and history repeats itself) and a rising distrust of the West and specifically the Anglo World with how the Anglo-Japanese treaty was discontinued due to Murican pressure. A move which turned out as a disaster for both Japan and Britain.
    “Britain the Suicidal”, as usual.
    Excessive Christian morality + Jew worship = Suicidal policies.
    Hitler, friendly to Britain and even the British empire (in the beginning). USSR and USA hostile to British Empire. What does suicidal Britain do? Support the USA and USSR. Loses Empire, treated as a bitch by both the USA and USSR during the Suez crisis. Confused pikachu face.

  118. Bhai Log.
    Namaskar to you all. It is me, myself Mehool Bhai to bring facts.

    Cultural Revolution of Charman Meow destroyed 5000 years of Chinese civilization. Except cunning strategies to take and keep power, all other good things about Chinese teachings was destroyed by Communist. Why? As Mr. Wu explains well in video below. Communists are the most power hungry people in World and to gain & keep power they an shamelessly destroy everything in path. The CCP wants absolute power over the World at the end
    First about Mr. Wu. Wu bhai is ethnic Chinese but worked for famous Swedish Company in China, at very high level. While working there as well as because he is Chinese, he understood what was happening and the evil danger brewing inside that country. He smelled the tea and snake curry. According to him, Communist China was only interested in stealing technology from foreign companies.

    Please watch, Mr. Wu’s video below. He explain how power hungry CCP is.


    The Destiny of Chinese Culture: The Cultural Revolution

    —- Your Mehool Bhai. Concered and scared in Mumbai.

  119. @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms

    China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms Bhai, Meow Tze Tung did not give crap about the millions dying in the famines. Meow was squeezing out grain from Chinese farmers and exported food to Eastern European Communist regimes (even when his Chinese people were dying) to get weapons and nuclear technology. He did not mind that millions of people died of starvation. Indeed even before the Great Leap backwards, Charman Meow cold calculated that millions of Chinese may die, he did not care, he wanted global power to dominate world, technology and weapons above all. For his projects to take off, half of China may have to die, Meow did not care. Meow was jealous of the Soviet Union and wanted to overtake Rus as well as Bartania and Amrika at any cost.

    Kingdoms Bhai, please watch this.


    Utopia, Mao and the Empress Dowager Cixi – An SWF 2013 Lecture by Jung Chang
    Check from 6:50 to 12:00

    She found from years of research. She experience Cultural Revolution personally in China.
    —–Mehool Bhai from the India.

  120. @d dan

    And it was not because China had/has less problems than America. On the contrary, China’s problems were MUCH more complicated and numerous than what faced US today. For example, China also had a very militant group of Muslim minority called Hui, and their history (dated back to Qinq) of extreme violence against Hans made the American Blacks’ crimes look like kindergarten brawl. So, after almost a century of fights [Ref 1], in 1949, Mao proposed the “three equality”: equality among races, between man/woman, and among all people. Fast forward today, we can see Hui people live harmoniously with Hans, and Hui restaurants striving next to Tiananmen in Beijing.

    As for integration and assimilation, that is the beauty of the Chinese civilization. By making the minorities accept their own new found Chinese identity, they will become integral and equal parts of us. This is not something that the Japanese or Europeans can achieve. Their societies will forever be ridden with racial animosities, which in China will only manifest as transitional phenomena.

  121. Anonymous[114] • Disclaimer says:
    @Jeffrey A Freeman

    God be with Derek Chauvin.

    Why?

    Why should He comfort Derek when Whites themselves refuse to help Chauvin? Or protect each other. What did Whites, the majority of the country, do for the Proud Boys, Ashli Babbitt, Jansixers, etc.?

    Blacks rioted to support of a violent, drug-addicted, repeat-offending knicker convict who also did pornos (“Big Floyd”).

    Whites did squat to help Chauvin…who had to deal daily with orcs…and now rots in jail.

    Once-proud Whites are now pussies who get boners when pegged by Juden, Inc.

    Miriam Elman, hasbarista for the pro-Israel group Academic Engagement Network eructed thusly:

    “In 2012 some Minneapolis police officers attended an FBI-hosted counter-terror seminar where a few Israeli law enforcement officials were invited to speak.”

    TRANSLATION: AshkeNAZI thugs taught MN cops how to use chokeholds like the IDF (Israeli Donkey Fellators) use on Palestinian schoolgirls. Chauvin followed their training.

    Elman deflects:

    “[T]he notion that this training program…caused or contributed to police shootings by American cops on the beat is ludicrous.”

    If you say so, yenta.

    (Note, though, how she dodged the question of chokeholds.)

    Ludicrous like logging every “odd look” given to odd-looking Matzonians as WWIII?

    Strange like Jews constantly nagging, bitching, kvetching, grifting, mooching, whining, finagling, etc.?

    Weird like Jews disappearing Kanye West after he said Jews “disappear” their critics?

    Now, name a group that constantly brags about how smart, successful, and chosen it is.

    Name one that eternally denies it ever does anything wrong…EVAH!

    Cite one that views goyim as untermenschen who deserve to be lied to, fleeced, and enslaved.

    Notice a pattern?

    Elman snarks that holding Jews accountable…

    “smacks of antisemitic tropes and canards.”

    Tropes and canards that…amazingly…always seem to arise out of thin air, for no reason at all, ‘cuz tribal dindus “dint do nuttin’!”

    Jews get trillions of dollars for a Lolocaust that they forbid anyone to examine.

    >sustained anti-Jewish hatred across the millennia.”

    Due to the Tribe shit-stirring for eons?

    “Scapegoating American Jews for societal ills is one of the hallmarks of antisemtic discourse.”

    And also…true.

    More and more people are waking up and saying, “Gradually I began to hate them.”

    It’ll be interesting to see how Jews react when Putin finally pulverizes Ukraine: a country led by a Jew…who’s supported by key US political-banking-media Jews…who want Ukraine to become Israel II.

    It will also be interesting to see how Jews around the world get treated after cheering on (or silently endorsing) a needless war that killed so many Slavs.

    The arrogance, insolence, and white-hot white-hatred of the Tribe is reaching a boiling point. People are getting sick of hearing that Jews suffer the most. Wearying of their claim to be the smartest, chosenest, most innocent volk of all.

    Why is such a teeny-weeny percent of the world allowed so much power?

    Goyim are getting sick of the Tribe’s constant-constant-constant promotion of ideas and rules it itself ignores.

    Hell, even their own god, Yahweh, repeatedly got sick for their shenanigans, kicking their arses multiple times for being stool-brains:

  122. @Mehool Mehta

    He did not mind that millions of people died of starvation. Indeed even before the Great Leap

    This is the best example of projection I have seen. It comes about because some Indians want to divert attention from the fact that millions of Indians– especially children– die of malnutrition. This is STILL happening every year:

    Infant mortality is 0.8 crore annually or 80,00,000 children die every year in our country before six months of age. This means that on an average as many as 21,917 children die every day in India.2020年9月30日

    https://www.google.com/search?q=millions+of+indian+children+die+of+malnuttrition+every+year&rlz=1C5CHFA_enHK1009HK1009&oq=millions+of+indian+children+die+of+malnuttrition+every+year&aqs=chrome..69i57.20703j0j15&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

    • Replies: @antibeast
  123. TheodoreR says:

    Jung-Freud is always fun to read, no matter what the subject matter is — Jews or movies. In fact, his rambling is what makes his writing unique and interesting, like walking around leisurely in a woods not needing to get to anywhere fast, but still be provided with insightful and colorful observations along the way. I always look forward to his next article, no matter how long it may be, and it comes quite frequently. I often wonder: how does he get the energy to write so prolifically?

  124. Che Guava says:
    @Liosnagcat

    No shit Sherlock.

    Anyone who isn’t a n00b worked that out at the time of the first J-F article. You can also click on ‘Web site’ on any Priss post to read more if you want to. Other u-names are known to non-n00bs here, moi aussi, but who cares?

    Priss seems to spend most of most days composing rants and posting on the ‘net, if it isn’t her (or his?) job, a fortunate person to have so much free time.

  125. antibeast says:
    @Deep Thought

    This is the best example of projection I have seen. It comes about because some Indians want to divert attention from the fact that millions of Indians– especially children– die of malnutrition.

    The best rebuttal I have seen of the anti-Mao ‘demonization’ campaign launched by the West since the 1980s is this article by Utsa Patnaik, a Marxist economist based in India, excerpts below:

    https://mronline.org/2011/06/26/revisiting-alleged-30-million-famine-deaths-during-chinas-great-leap/

    Revisiting Alleged 30 Million Famine Deaths during China’s Great Leap
    By Utsa Patnaik (Posted Jun 26, 2011)

    [MORE]

    Thirty years ago, a highly successful vilification campaign was launched against Mao Zedong, saying that a massive famine in which 27 to 30 million people died in China took place during the Great Leap period, 1958 to 1961, which marked the formation of the people’s communes under his leadership. The main basis of this assertion was, first, the population deficit in China during 1958 to 1961 and, second, the work of two North American demographers, A J Coale (Rapid Population Change in China 1952-1982, 1982) and Judith Banister (China’s Changing Population, 1987). No one bothered to look at the highly dubious method through which these demographers had arrived at their apocalyptic figures.

    The ‘estimate’ was later widely publicised by Amartya K Sen, who built an entire theory saying that democratic freedom, especially press freedom, in India meant that famine was avoided while its absence in China explains why the world did not know that such a massive famine had taken place until as much as a quarter century later when the North American demographers painstakingly uncovered it.

    The capitalist press was happy to reciprocate the compliment by repeatedly writing of “30 million famine deaths,” to the extent that a fiction was established as historical fact in readers’ minds. The London Economist had a special issue on China some years ago, which repeated the allegation of 30 million deaths in three separate articles and refused to publish the Letter to the Editor this author sent contradicting the claim. More recently, in his Introduction to the book Mao Zedong on Practice and Contradiction, which he edited and published in 2006, Slavoj Zizek also mentioned the figure of 30 millions as though it were a given fact. Well-known intellectuals have to be taken seriously and the claim examined.

    There are two routes through which very large ‘famine deaths’ have been claimed — firstly, population deficit and, secondly, imputing births and deaths which did not actually take place. Looking at China’s official population data from its 1953 and 1964 censuses, we see that if the rate of population increase up to 1958 had been maintained, the population should have been 27 million higher over the period of 1959-1961 than it actually was. This population deficit is also discussed by the demographers Pravin Visaria and Leela Visaria. The population deficit was widely equated with ‘famine deaths.’ But 18 million of the people alleged to have died in a famine were not born in the first place. The decline in the birth rate from 29 in 1958 to 18 in 1961 is being counted as famine deaths. The Chinese are a highly talented people, but they have not learnt the art of dying without being born.

    There is a basic responsibility that everyone, and more particularly academics, has to be clear and precise about. To say or write that “27 million people died in the famine in China” conveys to the reader that people who were actually present and alive starved to death. But this did not actually happen and the statement that it did is false.

    China had lowered it death rate sharply from 20 to 12 per thousand between 1953 and 1958. (India did not reach the latter level until over a quarter century later.) After the radical land reforms and the formation of rural cooperatives, there were mass campaigns to clean up the environment and do away with disease bearing pests while a basic rural health care system was put in place. That a dramatic reduction in the rural death rate was achieved is not disputed by anyone. During the early commune formation from 1958, there was a massive mobilisation of peasants for a stupendous construction effort, which completely altered for a few years the normal patterns of peasant family life. Women were drawn into the workforce, communal kitchens were established and children looked after in crèches as most of the able-bodied population moved to irrigation and other work sites during the slack season. We find a graphic description of this period of mass mobilisation in Wiliam Hinton’s Shenfan. When this author spent three weeks in China in 1983, visiting several communes — which still existed at that time — she was told every time that “we built our water conservation system during the Great Leap.” The birth rate fall from 1959 had to do with labour mobilisation, and not low nutrition since the 1958 foodgrain output was exceptionally good at 200 million tons (mt).

    There was excess mortality compared to the 1958 level over the next three years, of a much smaller order. Let us be clear on the basic facts about what did happen: there was a run of three years of bad harvests in China — drought in some parts, floods in others, and pest attacks. Foodgrain output fell from the 1958 good harvest of 200 mt to 170 mt in 1959 and further to 143.5 mt in 1960, with 1961 registering a small recovery to 147 million tons. This was a one-third decline, larger than the one-quarter decline India saw during its mid-1960s drought and food crisis. Grain output drop coincided in time with the formation of the communes, and this lent itself to a fallacious causal link being argued by the academics who were inclined to do so, and they blamed the commune formation for the output decline. One can much more plausibly argue precisely the opposite — that without the egalitarian distribution that the communes practised, the impact on people of the output decline, which arose for independent reasons and would have taken place anyway, would have been far worse. Further, without the 46,000 reservoirs built with collective labour on the communes up to 1980, the effects of later droughts would have been very severe. Recovery to the 200 million ton level took place only by 1965. Throughout, however, the per capita foodgrain output in China even during the worst year, 1960, remained substantially above that in India.

    As output declined from 1959, there was a rise in the officially measured death rate from 12 in 1958 to 14.6 in 1959, followed by a sharp rise in 1960 to 25.4 per thousand, falling the next year to 14.2 and further to 10 in 1962. While, clearly, 1960 was an abnormal year with about 8 million deaths in excess of the 1958 level, note that this peak official ‘famine’ death rate of 25.4 per thousand in China was little different from India’s 24.8 death rate in the same year which was considered quite normal and attracted no criticism. If we take the remarkably low death rate of 12 per thousand that China had achieved by 1958 as the benchmark, and calculate the deaths in excess of this over the period 1959 to 1961, it totals 11.5 million. This is the maximal estimate of possible ‘famine deaths.’ Even this order of excess deaths is puzzling given the egalitarian distribution in China, since its average grain output per head was considerably above India’s level even in the worst year, and India saw no generalised famine in the mid-1960s.

    Relative to China’s population, this figure of plausible excess mortality is low and it did not satisfy the academics in northern universities who have been always strongly opposed to socialised production. Coale’s and Banister’s estimates gave them the ammunition they were looking for to attack the communes. How exactly do Coale and Banister reach a figure of ‘famine deaths’ which is three times higher than the maximal plausible estimate? Examining carefully how they arrived at 30 million ‘famine deaths’ estimate, we find that the figure was manufactured by using indefensible assumptions and has had no scholarly basis.

    In the 1982 census, there was a survey on fertility covering one million persons or a mere 0.1 per cent sample of the population, who were asked about births and deaths from the early 1950s onwards. The very high total fertility rate obtained from this 1982 survey is used by them to say that millions more were actually born between the two census years, 1953 and 1964, than were officially recorded. They ignore the birth rate of 37 per thousand derived from a very much larger 1953 sample which had covered five per cent of all households and was specially designed to collect the information on births and deaths used in the official estimates. Instead, they impute birth rates of 43 to 44 per thousand to the 1950s, using the 1982 survey. There is no justification for such an arbitrary procedure of using a much later reported high fertility rate for a long distant past. We know that a distant recall period makes responses inaccurate. These imputed extra births between 1953 and 1964 total a massive 50 million but according to them did not increase by an iota the 1964 population total, 694.6 million, the official figure which they assume as correct. Thus, although all official birth and death rates are rejected by them, the official population totals are accepted. This opportunistic assumption is clearly necessary for their purpose because it allows them to assert that the same number of extra people died between 1953 and 1964, as the extra people they claim were born.

    But the demographers are still not satisfied with the 50 million extra births and deaths that they have conjured up. Fitting a linear time trend to the falling death rate of the early fifties is done to say that deaths should have continued to decline steeply after 1958 and, since it did not, the difference from the trend meant additional ‘famine deaths.’ Such straight-line trend fitting is a senseless procedure since the death rate necessarily shows non-linear behaviour. It cannot continue falling at the same steep rate; it has to flatten out and cannot reach zero in any population — not even the inimitable Chinese people could hope to become immortal. The final estimate of extra deaths in both authors is raised thereby to a massive 60 million, a heroic 65 per cent higher than the official total of deaths over the inter-censal period.

    Having created these 60 million extra deaths at their own sweet will out of nothing, the authors then proceed to allocate them over the years 1953 to 1964, arbitrarily attributing a higher portion to the great leap years in particular. The arbitrariness is clear from the variation in their own manipulations of the figures. Coale’s allocation raises his peak death rate in 1960 to 38.8 per thousand while Banister is bolder and raises it to 44.6 compared to the official 25.4 for that year, and 30 million ‘famine deaths’ are claimed over the Great Leap years after all this smart legerdemain. Having violated every tenet of reason, these ‘academics’ may as well have allocated all their imaginary deaths to the Great Leap years and claimed that 60 million died — why hang themselves only for a lamb rather than for a sheep! Seldom have we seen basic norms of academic probity and honesty being more blatantly violated, than in this travesty of statistical ‘estimates.’ And seldom have noted intellectuals, who might have been expected to show more common sense, shown instead more credulous naïveté and irresponsibility, by accepting without investigation and propagating such nonsensical ‘estimates,’ giving them the status of historical fact. In the process, they have libelled and continue to libel Mao Zedong, a great patriot and revolutionary. They have unwittingly confirmed the principle attributed to Goebbels — that a lie has to be a really big lie and be endlessly repeated; then it is bound to be believed.

    Thirty million or three crores is not a small figure. When one million people died in Britain’s colony, Ireland, in 1846-47, the world knew about it. When three million people died in the 1943-44 Bengal famine, the fact that a famine occurred was known. Yet 30 million people are supposed to have died in China without anyone knowing at that time that a famine took place. The reason no one knew about it is simple, for a massive famine did not take place at all. The intellectuals who quote the massive famine deaths figure of 30 million today are no doubt outstandingly clever in the small, im kleinen, but are proving themselves to be rather foolish im grossen, in the large. A person has to be very foolhardy indeed to say that 30 million people died in a famine without anyone including the foreign diplomats in China and the China-watchers abroad having the slightest inkling of it. And those who credulously believe this claim and uncritically repeat it show an even greater folly than the originators of the claim.

    • Thanks: Deep Thought, dogbumbreath
    • Replies: @dogbumbreath
  126. Anpn says:
    @Shamu

    Can’t fathom why the “god of Moses” is clung to so fiercely.

    J-F made one point in this dog vomit: Jews define god, and that for themselves as well as for non-Jews.

    The JQ will NOT be resolved unless-until Christians, especially the Anglo spin-offs, get their noses out of Jewry’s premier book of propaganda, the Bibull.

    Speaking of books: 8900 words is 15 pages of Robert Penn Warren’s All the King’s Men, still relevant 75 years on.

    Anyone think J-F’s jottings will have anything valuable to say in 2100?

    From p. 9:

    The end of man is knowledge but there is one thing he can’t know: he can’t know whether knowledge will save him or kill him. He will be killed, all right, but he can’t know whether he is killed because of the knowledge which he has got or because of the knowledge which he hasn’t got and which if he had it, would save him.

    For 2000 years Western culture has been run on “bible” knowledge enforced by Jews.
    Isn’t it time to question it in a radical way?

  127. @antibeast

    Revisiting Alleged 30 Million Famine Deaths during China’s Great Leap
    By Utsa Patnaik (Posted Jun 26, 2011)

    If one digs a little deeper into the “winners version” of History, you find giant leaps of faith and conclusions based on deceptive data or no data (dogma). Two examples jump out:

    1) Western claims of Uyghur Genocide:
    https://thegrayzone.com/2021/02/18/us-media-reports-chinese-genocide-relied-on-fraudulent-far-right-researcher/

    2) Medical Science:
    https://odysee.com/@drsambailey:c/science-vs-dogma:4

    • Replies: @antibeast
  128. @Mehool Mehta

    Mao was a monster but Jung Chang is a nutter. She’s bitter about the Cultural Revolution but her mentality hasn’t changed one bit. In the past, Mao was 100% good, now he’s 100% evil.

    Her revisionist view of Cixi aka dowager empress has some validity but goes too far. It seems Jung Chang can’t understand anything except total good vs total bad. So, she makes the empress out to be totally good against the official narrative.

    Whatever the case, the fact remains China lagged Japan way behind in modernization, and even though she did take some necessary steps, they weren’t enough.

  129. @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms

    16 years after the Communists took power nothing had changed in the lives of the peasants. Dismayed by urbanites and Party officials living privileged lives, Mao initiated the Cultural Revolution to emancipate 400,000,000 voiceless peasants whose social status had not changed in 3,000 years and remained unchanged. He succeeded. Throughout the CR’s ten years, Mao drove inequality to the lowest level ever recorded while growing the economy six percent annually–twice America’s rate–and mechanizing agriculture. By the end, rural literacy was taken for granted and rural people (no longer ‘peasants’) were as intolerant of oppression and corruption, as vocal about their priorities, as enthusiastic about voting, and as eager to voice complaints as their urban cousins. For the first time in history they were full citizens who could point to the infrastructure they built, the agricultural advances they had made, and the problems they had solved.

    Xi’s father, Liu and Peng were treated identically.
    None was tortured.
    All lived far longer than the life expectancy at the time.
    All wanted to keep the peasants enslaved until the Revolution was secure, but Mao knew this meant another 4,000 years of slavery, so sidelined them.
    A small price to pay for the emancipation of 400,000,000 people.

    • Agree: mulga mumblebrain
    • Replies: @迪路
  130. @Malla

    Is he into afro-colonization of white wombs? He’s no better.

  131. antibeast says:
    @dogbumbreath

    But Mao came out the winner against the Yanks who tried everything they could to stop him from building China’s first A-bomb under his ‘Two Bombs and One Satellite’ projects which coincided with the Great Leap Forward. Unlike Stalin, Mao didn’t do stuff like Dekulakization which led to the Holodomor or banish people to Soviet-style Gulags. Western propagandists are so desperate to demonize Mao that they equate Mao’s ‘backyard furnaces’ with Hitler’s ‘gas chambers’ which is utter nonsense. They didn’t even bother to fact-check their innuendos against Mao who stepped down as China’s Head of State in December 1958, just one year into the Great Leap Forward (GLF) which was run by Liu from 1959 when he took over as China’s Head of State to 1961 when he ended the GLF. Since Mao was no longer running the GLF during the worst years of the famine, then how can the West blame him for those famine deaths? Even the ‘excess deaths’ attributed to the GLF are hardly credible, as Utsa Patnaik writes:

    Thirty million or three crores is not a small figure. When one million people died in Britain’s colony, Ireland, in 1846-47, the world knew about it. When three million people died in the 1943-44 Bengal famine, the fact that a famine occurred was known. Yet 30 million people are supposed to have died in China without anyone knowing at that time that a famine took place. The reason no one knew about it is simple, for a massive famine did not take place at all. The intellectuals who quote the massive famine deaths figure of 30 million today are no doubt outstandingly clever in the small, im kleinen, but are proving themselves to be rather foolish, im grossen, in the large. A person has to be very foolhardy indeed to say that 30 million people died in a famine without anyone including the foreign diplomats in China and the China-watchers abroad having the slightest inkling of it. And those who credulously believe this claim and uncritically repeat it show an even greater folly than the originators of the claim.

    The West has a beef with Mao. But where’s the beef?

  132. @xyzxy

    Pot calling the kettle…..your response is all over the place.

  133. @Priss Factor

    Priss Bhai, yes monster. I not know much about the Cixi.
    He mass murder people.
    Zhao Ziyang, former General Secretary of the Chinese Communist Party, once said that “our Party never admitted mistakes. If things got really bad, we just found some scapegoats and blamed them, like Lin Biao and the Gang of Four. If scapegoats were hard to find, we simply blamed natural disasters, such as for the great famine in the late 1950s and early 1960s when tens of millions of people died, which was simply due to political errors of the Party.”
    Bo Yibo, one of the Eight Elders and former Vice Premier of the People’s Republic of China, once said, “During the three difficult years, people across the country went into malnutrition due to lack of food, and edema was prevalent, resulting in an increasing number of deaths due to starvation among many rural areas. It is estimated that in 1960 alone, more than 10 million people died. With such thing happening during a time of peace, we as members of the Communist Party feel truly guilty in front of the people, and we must never forget this heavy lesson! ”
    Wan Li, former President of the National People’s Congress of China, stated that “during the three difficult years after the People’s Commune movement, people everywhere had edema and even starved to death. In Anhui alone, according to reports, there were 3-4 million people died ‘abnormally’ …… We had been ‘ left ‘ for too long, and farmers were no longer motivated to work.”
    Tian Jiyun, former Vice Premier of China and former Vice President of the National People’s Congress of China, stated that “looking back at the Three Years of Difficulty, people everywhere had edema and died of starvation, and tens of millions of people died abnormally, more than the total death toll during the entire Democratic Revolution. What was the reason for that? Liu Shaoqi said it was ‘30% natural disasters and 70% human error.’ But it is now clear that the famine was mainly due to human error, which was the erroneous command, the ‘Utopian Socialism’, and the ‘Left opportunism’.”

  134. @Priss Factor

    More Priss Bhai about monster.

    The excess mortality associated with the famine has been estimated by former CCP officials and international experts, with most giving a number in the range of 15–55 million deaths. According to historian Mobo Gao, those who are anti-Communist want to stretch the death toll number as high as possible, whereas those who are sympathetic to the Chinese Revolution would like to see the numbers as low as possible. Some specific estimates include the following (ranging from lowest to highest):

    Yang Songlin (杨松林), researcher at the Development Research Center of the State Council in Henan, estimated that roughly 2.6–4 million people died during the famine years.
    Sun Jingxian (孙经先), scholar in applied mathematics and professor at Shandong University, concluded an estimate of 3.66 million “anomalous deaths” during the famine years.
    Utsa Patnaik, an Indian Marxian economist, estimated that 11 million deaths were caused due to the famine.
    Daniel Houser, Barbara Sands and Erte Xiao writing in the Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization estimated that China suffered 14.8 million excess deaths during the famine. About 69% of the deaths (or 10.3 million) seem attributable to effects stemming from national policies.
    In 1989, a research team of the Chinese Academy of Sciences concluded that at least 15 million people died of malnutrition.
    Shujie Yao (姚书杰), chair of economics at the Business School of Middlesex University, concluded that 18 million people perished due to the famine.
    Li Chengrui (李成瑞), former Minister of the National Bureau of Statistics of China, estimated 22 million deaths (1998). His estimate was based on the 27 million deaths[8][35] estimated by Ansley J. Coale, and the 17 million deaths estimated by Jiang Zhenghua (蒋正华).
    Peng Xizhe (彭希哲), Professor of Population and Development at Fudan University, estimated 23 million excess deaths during the famine.
    Cao Shuji (曹树基), Distinguished Professor at Shanghai Jiao Tong University, estimated 32.5 million.
    Yang Jisheng, senior journalist from Xinhua News Agency, concluded there were 36 million deaths due to starvation, while another 40 million others failed to be born, so that “China’s total population loss during the Great Famine then comes to 76 million.”
    Mao Yushi, a Chinese economist and winner of the 2012 Milton Friedman Prize for Advancing Liberty, put the death toll at 36 million.
    Liao Gailong (廖盖隆), former Vice Director of the History Research Unit of the CCP, reported 40 million “unnatural” deaths due to the famine.
    Chen Yizi (陈一谘), a former senior Chinese official and a top advisor to former CCP General Secretary Zhao Ziyang, concluded that 43 million people died due to the famine.
    Frank Dikötter, Chair Professor of Humanities at the University of Hong Kong and the author of Mao’s Great Famine, estimated that at least 45 million people died from starvation, overwork and state violence during the Great Leap Forward, claiming his findings to be based on access to recently opened local and provincial party archives. His study also stressed that state violence exacerbated the death toll. Dikötter claimed that at least 2.5 million of the victims were beaten or tortured to death. Dikötter provides a graphic example of what happened to a family after one member was caught stealing some food:
    Liu Desheng, guilty of poaching a sweet potato, was covered in urine … He, his wife, and his son were also forced into a heap of excrement. Then tongs were used to prise his mouth open after he refused to swallow excrement. He died three weeks later.

    Yu Xiguang (余习广), an independent Chinese historian and a former instructor at the Central Party School of the Chinese Communist Party, estimated that 55 million people died due to the famine. His conclusion was based on two decades of archival research.

    Lu Baoguo, a Xinhua reporter based in Xinyang, explained to Yang Jisheng why he never reported on his experience:

    In the second half of 1959, I took a long-distance bus from Xinyang to Luoshan and Gushi. Out of the window, I saw one corpse after another in the ditches. On the bus, no one dared to mention the dead. In one county, Guangshan, one-third of the people had died. Although there were dead people everywhere, the local leaders enjoyed good meals and fine liquor. … I had seen people who had told the truth being destroyed. Did I dare to write it?

    Yu Dehong, the secretary of a party official in Xinyang in 1959 and 1960, stated:

    I went to one village and saw 100 corpses, then another village and another 100 corpses. No one paid attention to them. People said that dogs were eating the bodies. Not true, I said. The dogs had long ago been eaten by the people.

    There are widespread oral reports, though no official documentation, of human cannibalism being practiced in various forms as a result of the famine. To survive, people had to resort to every possible means, from eating soil and poisons to stealing and killing and even to eating human flesh. Due to the scale of the famine, some have speculated that the resulting cannibalism could be described as “on a scale unprecedented in the history of the 20th century”

  135. It’s safe to say that there is more to this situation than meets the eye. There is in fact more to the human condition than can be codified by law or interpreted by faith. The ancients called it Fate, some today call it destiny; maybe it’s just human imagination in overdrive, but the idea is appealing that the “karma” accumulated from a lifetime of evil deeds may have indeed attracted evil to itself in the case of George Floyd, in the form of a homicidal police officer. Net loss to society might be reckoned pretty much as zero. Neither of these dangerous men will ever hurt another innocent citizen. In a perfect world, perhaps, both might have lived to see the hurtfulness of their ways and to seek atonement, but that world is not the planet we inhabit.

    That Mr. Floyd has become the hero of a so-called justice movement only strikes me as yet more evidence of how tightly the narrative is being controlled in our time on behalf of those who profit most from maintaining an unjust status quo. Throughout history, the two great tools of tyranny are distraction and division. We are free to argue among ourselves to our hearts’ content, call one another vulgar names, carry silly protest signs, raise up makeshift memorials or tear down ancient statues. But are we not able to have laws passed and enforced that acknowledge and remedy the fundamental problem of our time, the unprecedented acquisition of vast wealth and influence by a tiny cabal of power-addicted men.

  136. Trinity says:
    @antibeast

    Wendy’s no longer has the beef and a fast food hamburger meal cost almost as much as a sit down restaurant meal. In Jew world you have FAKE egg shortages which effects a long list of products that use eggs. Wendy’s ( no matter which one you happen upon) has become one the slowest fast food burger chains out there. Thanks, Jews, the Kangz of Shit.

  137. 迪路 says:
    @Godfree Roberts

    You don’t really need to talk about China with Japanese. The Japanese don’t even acknowledge the massacres they did, and hypocritical races like the Japanese can only exist as sex slaves for the Americans.

  138. @antibeast

    The West has a beef with Mao. But where’s the beef?

    In China, you ask ‘where pok?’

    • Replies: @antibeast
  139. @Mehool Mehta

    Mehool Bhai, the PLA commander of the Sino-Indian War Luo Ruiqing 罗瑞卿 was purged during the Cultural Revolution.

    On March 18, 1966, Luo attempted suicide by jumping off a building but failed. He was put into a basket and carried for more struggle sessions.

    Liu Shaoqi commented: “Actually, suicide requires some skill, it should have been head first, but he landed feet first, his feet were broken, and his head was not injured.”

    Deng Xiaoping: “Just like a female diving athlete, jumped like a popsicle”.

    Ye Jianying composed an impromptu poem: “The general’s reputation is shattered in one jump”;

    Mao only said: “What a loser.”

    To be fair, Mao’s military strategy, political theory, commentaries on history, poetry, calligraphy, alone qualified him as a literati,

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_Contradiction
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_Protracted_War
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poetry_of_Mao_Zedong
    https://en.thevalue.com/articles/mao-zedong-letter-sothebys-auction

    Mao also made the most of the lifestyle of an emperor, this is implicitly encouraged in Chinese culture,

  140. @lloyd

    Charles Reich? You mean Wilhelm Reich, don’t You?

    • Replies: @lloyd
  141. lloyd says: • Website
    @katzenellenbogen

    Yes I did mean Wilhelm. The Cultural Marxists had interesting insightful things to say until they got into their mostly depraved ideology. Intellectual Jews and women tend to be like that. Charles Reich was an American Jewish professor whose book The Greening of America saw redemption in early 1970s hedonistic College students. Koestler pooh poohed him as not at all original but the book was a best seller. Time magazine reviewer called it the Fourth Reich.

  142. antibeast says:
    @Priss Factor

    In China, you ask ‘where pok?’

    In China, there’s a saying — “Kill the chicken to scare the monkey!” (殺雞儆猴) — which is exactly what happened during the Cultural Revolution. As for the so-called ‘Great Leap Forward’, that was a ‘red herring’ intended by Mao to divert attention away from his secretive “Two Bombs and One Satellite” program which is equivalent to two Manhattan and one Sputnik projects, all started during the GLF. Of course, Westoids like you don’t know about the “Two Bombs and One Satellite” program because Western propagandists only focus on the GLF, specifically his notorious ‘backyard furnaces’ which serves as a meme to ‘demonize’ Mao, as some kind of metaphor alluding to the ‘gas chambers’ of Auschwitz. And to make Mao look like a monster worse than Hitler, the Western propagandists (which includes their paid-for Chinese collaborators) had to fabricate ‘fake stats’ and invent pseudo-historical narratives about the GLF without even bothering to verify their lurid claims against historical facts. What comes out is a tangled web of deceitful half-truths and outright falsehoods which became more bizarre as time went by. As Shakespeare puts it: “Oh what a tangled web we weave/When first we practice to deceive”.

  143. @antibeast

    The Western powers that be and the Western MSM sewer ONLY lie about China. It’s part racist and cultural supremacism, and, lately, as China’s rise went hyperbolic, sheer fucking terror and ‘…rage at the dying of the White’. It’s quite common for deranged, hate-crazed, Western simpletons to accuse Mao, plainly the greatest figure of the 20th century, of ‘killing’ one hundred million. ANY number will do.

    • Replies: @antibeast
  144. @lloyd

    A loathsome racist and misogynist. This place certainly attracts the detritus of humanity. Pig ignorant, too, as usual.

  145. antibeast says:
    @mulga mumblebrain

    I have to give it to the Western propagandists in that they’re so good at inventing ‘fake history’ by rewriting the past. They had to weave a tangled web of half-truths and outright lies, blended together so no one notices the contradictions in their pseudo-historical narrative which gets confirmed in their own echo chamber. Repeated over time, those echoes become accepted not as an article of faith but as a matter of fact as if a Big Lie repeated long enough becomes truth. You can see this process clearly in how Hirohito has been ‘sanitized’ by the Ministry of Truth, so much so that Hirohito’s ‘sainthood’ has become accepted as historical fact in the so-called ‘Collective West’.

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  146. d dan says:

    Mao’s letter to Zhou En-Lai on Dec 27, 1966 which showed his position about Cultural Revolution:

    “恩来同志:最近,不少来京革命师生和革命群众来信问我,给走资本主义道路的当权派和牛鬼蛇神戴高帽子、打花脸、游街是否算武斗?我认为:这种作法应该算是武斗的一种形式。这种作法不好。这种作法达不到教育人民的目的。这里我强调一下,在斗争中一定要坚持文斗,不用武斗,因为武斗只能触及人的身体,不能触及人的灵魂。只有坚持文斗,不用武斗,摆事实,讲道理,以理服人,才能斗出水平来,才能真正达到教育人民的目的。应该分析,武斗绝大多数是少数别有用心的资产阶级反动分子挑动起来的,他们有意破坏党的政策,破坏无产阶级文化大革命,降低党的威信。凡是动手打人的,应该依法处之。

      请转告来京革命师生和革命群众。”

    Google translate:

    “Comrade Enlai: Recently, many revolutionary teachers and students and revolutionary masses who have come to Beijing have written to me asking me whether wearing high hats, punching their faces, and parading the streets of the establishment who take the capitalist road is considered martial combat. I think this practice should be regarded as a form of armed combat. This is not good. This practice does not serve the purpose of educating the people. Here I would like to emphasize that in the struggle, we must persist in literary fighting and do not use armed combat, because armed fighting can only touch people’s bodies, not people’s souls. Only by persisting in fighting with literature, not using armed combat, laying out facts, reasoning, and convincing people with reason can we fight to the level and truly achieve the goal of educating the people. It should be analyzed that the overwhelming majority of armed struggle was instigated by a small number of bourgeois reactionaries with ulterior motives, who deliberately sabotaged the Party’s policies, undermined the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution, and lowered the Party’s prestige. Anyone who beats someone with his hands should be punished according to law.

    Please convey to the revolutionary teachers and students and the revolutionary masses who have come to Beijing”

    — My bolded text
    https://www.marxists.org/chinese/maozedong/1968/5-235.htm

  147. @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms

    Thanks Kingdom Bhai

    Luo attempted suicide by jumping off a building but failed

    Hahaha Karma. Attack India and then face karma. Bhai, Communism is like mafia. Just like Amrika. In Communism there is always power struggle in between mafia.

  148. @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms

    Kingdom Bhai,
    The cursed Luo died on August 3, 1978, while in West Germany for medical treatment. How he go to Germany for medical treatment? How many common people in Chin could go to Germany for medical treatment? And why he go to West Germany and not Communist East Germany?
    Bhai, Communism is Communist elite enjoying good life while majority of people live like the gulams (slaves). Communism is Gulami, it is slavery.

    Mao also made the most of the lifestyle of an emperor, this is implicitly encouraged in Chinese culture,

    Exactly my point Bhai. Communist elites enjoy life while majority live like slaves. Even Nehru was doing such dirty things because even he was Communist thug mind as well he was English thief type. He did not have Indian-Bharatiya mind. One who thinks like Muslim, like English, like Marxwadi, he can never be a true Indian, he is lost to dirty foreign thinking, not the great thinking of our ancient sages.
    Compared to that, our Modiji not do such dirty things as this is not part of our ancient Bharatiya culture. Modiji gave his life as pracharak for RSS. He sacrificed his life for welfare of nation and now he takes us to new heights.

    Take care Bhai.
    Mehool Bhai.

  149. Exactly my point Bhai. Communist elites enjoy life while majority live like slaves.

    The ordinary Indians today are very, very lucky indeed. Their standard of living is so much better than that of the ordinary Chinese! I have learnt from Indian posters on the web that all those supposed progress (e.g. HS trains, brand new cities, etc) in China is nothing but commie propaganda. 🙂

  150. @antibeast

    It’s easy when the MSM is a sewer of vicious liars. NO presstitute in Austfailia would dare to outline the truth of Russia’s position re. the fascist Ukronazi regime, the truth of MH17, the truth about Israel, the truth of US aggression, the truth of Lockerbie, the truth regarding Xinjiang etc, etc, because it would not be published and they would be unemployable. No wonder the curs, particularly the feminazi bitches, turned on Assange, a truth-teller, which such uniform viciousness. Not so much the Big Lie but Universal Lies.

  151. Anon[266] • Disclaimer says:

    what an empire of lie!
    make such parallels so conveniently simply because such kind of projections about China and Mao have been made in decades.
    build up new lies, based on old lies, and sounds all concrete, amazing!!!

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply -


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Jung-Freud Comments via RSS
PastClassics
The Surprising Elements of Talmudic Judaism
How America was neoconned into World War IV
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement