The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewJung-Freud Archive
How Jewish Bagel-Brains Came to Own Irish Potato-Heads and Effected the Mis-Alignment of Self-Preservation and Self-Righteousness in Irish Politics, Values, and Spirituality.
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks


There are two ways of responding to the world around us, two ways of feeling about who we are and how we relate to others, near and far. They define much of our lives as a constant struggle and/or exertion(and even excitement). One is about self-preservation and the other is about self-justification(that can easily turn into self-righteousness). Most ideal is when self-preservation is aligned with self-justification. Most dangerous is when self-justification comes to malign self-preservation. Consider Body and Soul(or Spirit). Consider Health and Sensation. Though the soul/spirit is an extension of the body, excessive indulgence of the body or excessive purification of the spirit can lead to misalignment of the two. A person who prioritizes only the needs of the body will neglect the spirit, and a person who seeks spiritual perfection will neglect the body. The narcissism of the body will conflate physical beauty with sanctity itself. The purist strains of Hinduism, Buddhism, and Christianity have led to problematic, even pathological, rejection of the needs of the body. And even though sensations exist to preserve life and health — hunger makes us eat, cold leads us to warmth, pain alerts us to seek relief, sexual desire leads to birth of new life to perpetuate the species, etc — , they can take on a life of their own and deviate from their original/main purpose. Normally, pain and strain alert us that something is wrong, and pleasure assures us that health has been restored. Hunger is a kind of strain/pain and makes the organism seek out food that provides pleasure and ensures its preservation. But what if the organism overly fixates on pleasure of eating and keeps eating beyond what is necessary for health and preservation? Consider all the fatsos who keep eating and eating when they don’t need all that food. They’ve fallen into the Pleasure Trap where pleasure no longer serves its primary purpose of preservation but exists for its own sake. We see such behavior with sex, drugs, and leisure of all kinds. These kinds of pleasures aren’t correctives to Pain Alarms that something is wrong but sensations that demand more and more stimulation, titillation, and scintillation for an organism that has become addicted to excessive jolts of intense pleasure. This is most problematic with drugs such as crack, meth, and heroin. Pleasure offered by such drugs do NOTHING for preservation of health of the organism, but it is sought out by the organism that finds itself increasingly divorced from reality. It’s like the 1980s commercial of the monkey that became so addicted to cocaine that it neglected everything else to get more highs from the drug… even unto death. Same could be said of pleasures offered by vice industries such as gambling and prostitution, real-life or electronic(aka video-pornography).

Ideally, body and soul are united in purpose. Though body and soul are different, they must be complementary, like negative and positive charges of electricity. Likewise, pleasure associated with eating should primarily be associated with needs of health. When hungry, people should seek out good food and consume essential calories and nutrients. While a bit of junk food snacks like cookies and ice cream are okay in small amounts, they should be avoided as main course or staple diet. (Consider that much of the obesity and diabetes problem in the West has to do with people constantly munching on snacks of all kinds away from the meal table.) Even healthy activity such as exercise must be in sound coordination with the needs and limits of the body. Consider all the people who end up with chronic aches(or even debilitating injuries) because they pushed their bodies too hard in search of pathological narcissism or egotistical glory. Unless one is a professional athlete or adventurer, one should never push too hard. No sense in pushing oneself to become tougher and stronger only to end up crippled or dead.

The same rule applies to self-preservation and self-justification. They must be balanced and aligned with one another. One must serve the other with an understanding that they aren’t synonymous. Just as it’s wrong to conflate self-preservation with self-justification, it’s wrong to risk self-preservation for sake of self-justification(morphed into self-righteousness). Nazi German soldiers fought to preserve themselves in Russia, and to that extent, they were working in the mode of self-preservation. But were they in the right to invade and terrorize another nation? At least on Russian soil, didn’t Russians have the priority of self-preservation against the German invaders. Thus, Russian self-preservation was aligned with Russian self-justification whereas, by normal standards of universal nationalism, German presence in Russia was not justified. Of course, there were Nazi radicals who argued that Germans had the racial right to invade and conquer Slavic territories since ‘Aryans’ are the superior and more deserving race. To be sure, it’s been a common justification all through the ages. For example, Latinos and Anglos certainly felt justified in conquering and taking the New World from the natives who were seen as savage, primitive, backward, inferior, or satanic(especially with the massive human sacrifices in South America and Mexico). Nazi Germans felt likewise justified in their invasion of Russia to create lebensraum for the Teutonic ubermensch. Humans certainly feel this way about animals and nature in general. Human races the world over have wiped out entire floras and faunas to create safer and securer habitats for themselves as the premium and more deserving species. And the West says the Jews were justified in carrying out Nakba Pogroms against lowly Arab Palestinians who were colonized, conquered, and expelled from their ancient homeland.

Still, while mankind has always been invasive, the defenders of blood & soil were always more justified in protection of homeland from invaders. And in cases where invaders did take over and put down roots, they went into defensive mode to protect their acquired territory from further invasion. And after many years passed, the descendants of the invaders came to regard the land they were born on as their homeland of blood and soil. History has always been complicated in this respect. Invaders become defenders, and defenders can become expansive and invade territories defended by others. History of imperialism has been like a football game where the only meaningful boundary is the latest scrimmage line. That said, the persistence of homeland often survived despite the anarchy of borders. For instance, even under Roman Imperial rule, the Jews regarded Jerusalem as their sacred city. And even after Poland was effectively wiped off the map, most Poles between Prussia/Germany and Russia had a general sense of their heritage and territory, which is why it was relatively easy to reconstitute Poland once Russian and German empires fell in World War I. And despite the vastness of the Soviet Empire, various ethnic groups maintained a sense of territorial integrity that emerged into full-fledged nationhood once USSR came to an end.

A people are most justified when their sense of self-preservation is paired with a powerful sense of self-justification. Indeed, such a people tend to be the fiercest fighters with the highest morale and determination. Take the Vietnamese under Ho Chi Minh. They believed in Vietnam as their motherland to take back from foreigners, be they French or Americans, and this sense of national self-preservation(or self-restoration) was almost synonymous with their sense of self-justification. They felt 100% justified in fighting for defense of their homeland. Justification = Preservation. They felt this so powerfully that they were willing to fight the French and then the Americans against all odds and despite losses of millions of lives. The Irish too were a fierce people at one time because their sense of self-preservation was one with their self-justification. They believed in national liberation and independence of Ireland from British Imperial rule. Their sense of nationhood was justification enough. Their sense of national memory & territoriality was powerfully wedded to their sense of political morality, historical necessity, and ideological commitment. Ireland for the Irish, the Irish for Ireland. Thus, despite the great military advantage of the British Empire, the greatest in the world at the time, the Irish independence struggle remained a major thorn on its side.

And of course, the reason why Jewish Power and Israel/Zionism are so mighty has to do with the complementary relation between Jewish self-preservation and Jewish self-justification. Jews don’t need to invoke GDP numbers or variety of -isms(and catchphrases and mantras about ‘diversity’ and ‘inclusion’) to justify the existence of Israel. The fact that it is the homeland of the Jews is justification enough for Jewish national self-preservation. Jews don’t need to ideologically defend their identity and territory. The mere fact of preserving Jewishness and Jewish homeland is more than sufficient. Then, it’s no wonder that Israel is so powerful and confident. (Granted, Israel was created by destroying Palestine. Indeed, Jewish-European imperialism kicked into gear just when Christo-European imperialism was beginning to recede from the Third World following the end of WWII, but Jews do have ancient roots in the land, the holiness of which wouldn’t make sense apart from Jewish ethno-spiritual narratives.) In a way, Israelis today feel as Irish did a century ago. Or, as the Vietnamese did as they struggled against the French & Americans. Algerians and Cubans also had a unity of self-preservation and self-justification in their struggles against imperialism/colonialism, respectively, of the French and Anglo-Jewish-Italo-Americans. And both Algerians and Cubans prevailed.

Still, it seems national identities have been fading all over the world, that is except for Jewish Identity. Part of the reason is Jewish Globalist agenda of weakening goy identities to make it harder for various goyim to unite into particular nationalities against Jewish globalist-imperialism. After all, even though Jews prize Israel as their sacred homeland, they also operate in neo-imperialist mode and derive most of their wealth and power from manipulating and exploiting goyim. Jews seek to flood the entire goy world with mass global migration while Israel alone remains afloat like Noah’s Ark in a mixed sea of miscegenationist confusion that shall engulf all goyim like the Sea of Reeds crashed upon Pharaoh’s chariots. Jews keep the crown and the rest of us drown. But, there is another reason for the fading of goy national identities. Many goyim around the world have artificial constructed identities, and ironically enough, their sense of nationality wouldn’t exist if not for European imperialism. After all, what is an ‘Indian’ or ‘Indonesian’? How did some Arabs end up as ‘Syrians’ while others ended up as ‘Saudis’ or ‘Iraqis’? How did some Kurds become ‘Iraqis’ while others became ‘Turks’, ‘Iranians’, or ‘Syrians’? While Arabs and Kurds pre-existed the coming of European Imperialism, they ended up in nation-states that resulted from often arbitrary lines drawn on the sand by the imperialists. To be sure, the line in the sand in the Middle East wasn’t certain even prior to European Imperialism.

What is the crucial difference between Israel and Ireland today? In Israel, there is virtual synthesis of Self-Preservation and Self-Justification whereas in Ireland the passion of Self-Justification has come unglued from Self-Preservation. There was a time when nothing was more just, necessary, and sacred in Irish hearts and minds than the independence and self-preservation of Irish people, land, and culture. But the great majority of Irish no longer feel that way. Indeed, many feel that the notion of Irish Self-Preservation is offensive, immoral, ‘racist’, ‘xenophobic’, and even downright evil. Their primary sense of Self-Justification comes from raving about Globo-Homomania, celebrating Diversity, welcoming ‘immigrants’(who are really invader-colonizers), Afro-worship(as Irish women got jungle fever, Irish men worship black athletes, and all Irish regard black music as the highest and deepest expression of soulful truth), and Jew-worship. (Many Irish still tend to be pro-Palestinian as legacy of past struggles when IRA and PLO were allies, but their anti-Zionist stance is ironically the consequence of their mindless Jew Worship. The Irish are so morally awed by Jews as the greatest victims of all time — the holy holocaust people — that it bothers their sensitivities to see wonderful Jews acting like a bunch of bullies against a powerless people such as Palestinians. Indeed, many Europeans have similar views. They are so committed to worshiping Jews as a holy people, the new christs who died for the sins of white folks, that they simply can’t digest the fact that powerful Jews in US and Israel are acting rather like Nazis.)

Because of the divergence between self-preservation and self-justification, the Irish are now a very schizo people. At the gut level, all organisms(which includes humans) instinctively want to secure their existence and ensure their continuance. So, even among Irish progs, there is some buried organismic want for survival. This side of them, no matter how repressed, is present in their drives and passion. But as Irish self-preservation has been ideologically and ‘idologically’ pathologized as ‘racist’, ‘far-right’, ‘exclusive’, and ‘xenophobic’, the majority of Irish now feel ashamed to harbor such nationalist passions. But because the feeling is there(as it’s natural), the Irish go out of their way to condemn it with even greater fury. If society deems something as sinful and if this sinful something happens to be ineradicable(as all natural feelings are no matter how repressed), extra measures must be taken to attack and condemn it day in and day out. It’s like the vilification of sexuality led to especially hysterical attempts to suppress natural passions in the witch-hunts of the Middle Ages. And communist societies had to be endlessly vigilant and alarmist about ‘greed’ precisely because self-interest is a permanent feature of human nature, even in the so-called New Man of Marxism-Leninism. Repressive hyper-virtue that runs against nature wants to be rid of all temptations and anything that reminds them of temptations. Then, it’s no wonder that campaigns against nationalism are so hysterical, relentless, fervent, and dogmatic. (Granted, human nature comprise opposites. Just as nationalism is natural, so is internationalism. Human nature is both naturally conservative and liberal, both cautious & wary and open & exploratory. Though the term ‘xenophobia’ is thrown around a lot, it should really apply only to societies where the order hysterically tries to suppress the natural inclination of humans to be curious, adventurous, and open to new experiences. North Korea would truly be a xenophobic nation. It is the mirror opposite of current Ireland. If North Korea ruthlessly suppresses the natural tendency of a people to look beyond their own domain, New Ireland fervently suppresses the natural tendency of a people to protect and preserve their own domain. Both are out of balance.) When people are pressured to do what goes against their nature, they must be drummed with constant reminders that the inquisition or purging is most necessary, desirable, and justified. Take the ritual of Seppuku in Japan, aka Harakiri. Suicide goes against organismic nature since life wants to live. People dread not only death but the pain involved. So, if samurai listened to their nature, they would have run like a mothafuc*a if expected to rip open their bellies. In order to counter such natural reaction, Japanese society devised an elaborate rules of duty and redemption whereby one’s honor could be restored ONLY BY MEANS of ritual suicide. To make the unnatural seem most natural and necessary(if circumstances demanded it), samurai from a young age were conditioned and tasked with an outlook that reminded them day in and day out that it was glorious to die an honorable death and that they must have absolutely no fear of it. The unnatural was made palatable through poetics and spirituality.

There is this sense in the death of Jesus as well. According to Christian mythology, the human side of Jesus feared pain and torture of Crucifixion as any man would. It went against human nature for Jesus not to be like a Negro and run like a mothafuc*a. More human/natural would have been for Jesus to go with the ‘last temptation’ of Martin Scorsese’s film. So, why was Jesus willing to surrender His body to such agony, humiliation, and death? He spun a myth about Himself whereby self-justification demanded His body be sacrificed for the redemption/salvation of mankind. A powerful sense of mission for humanity. And there was the matter of His massive Jewish ego. Still, He agonized all night, even panicking at moments and bewailing God for having putting Him in a bad situation. Finally, He was able to go through with the plan because His sense of self-justification overpowered His sense of self-preservation. His spiritual sense convinced Him that His physical demise would open a way for spiritual resurrection and everlasting glory. He needed an elaborate mythology of spiritual justification to overpower the physical demand for self-preservation.
And something similar happens in wars too. Every soldier knows he could get killed or horribly wounded in battle, and a part of his human nature tells him to take flight than fight, especially if the war happens to be imperialist in nature and has nothing to do with national defense or survival. (No wonder so many Americans were demoralized in Vietnam. Why did they need to fight rice-eaters to protect the American Way? While most didn’t desert, few felt eagerness to put their lives on the line for the sake of foreigners.) Still, most soldiers pick up their guns and charge into battle because there is also the fear of court-martial and/or contempt as a coward(and being killed by the other side of course). As humans are social animals sensitive to how others feel about them, their natural fear in one area could be overcome by natural fear of social opprobrium or legal sanction(that could even lead to execution. e.g. Soviet troops who retreated in WWII were summarily shot by commissars — more honorable to be killed a hero by the Germans than killed a coward by one’s own side).

FRANCE, GREAT BRITAIN, AND IRELAND, WHAT’S THE DIFFERENCE UNDER ‘DIVERSITY’ INVASIVIST AGENDA?

Video Link

In a similar way, there is a natural Irish will to survive. It wants to preserve the people, culture, and land of Ireland for the Irish. But the elite Irish powers-that-be, especially the media and academia that take cues from the US as the metropole of the Empire of Judea, have inculcated generations of Irish children that the highest goods are Diversity(created by mass-immigration), Homomania, Afromania, and Jew-Worship. Now, some degree of cosmopolitanism is good and natural — as humans are naturally expansive as they’re naturally defensive — , but current Political Correctness goes far beyond a healthy balance of nationalism and internationalism. Rather, it calls for total eradication of traditional nationalism in favor of turning one’s own nation into an interchangeable bloc in the World of Glob, world where globalism runs rampant like the broomsticks in SORCERER’S APPRENTICE with Mickey Mouse. As current globalism is utterly radical and crazy, the natural response among the Irish should be for More Nationalism and efforts at Self-Preservation. But this is proving difficult and even near-impossible as the ‘Poz’ has utterly disconnected Irish sense of Self-Justification from Self-Preservation. So, if past Irish felt most justified in struggling for preservation, they now feel most justified in working against it. And precisely because the current National Suicide(or Irish Harakiri) goes against human nature, the delusional Irish must make an especially rabid effort to convince themselves that it’s ALL FOR THE GOOD to turn Ireland into New Africa-India-Arabia. (It’s like whites cheer with artificially heightened enthusiasm for the Great Replacement to drown out their natural fears that it will turn out to be disastrous as the ‘evil racists’ have warned. Or, it’s like gamblers get especially excited as they place big bets to suppress the very natural fear that they will lose everything. Consider Julie Hagerty’s delirium in LOST IN AMERICA as she hangs all her hopes on ’22’. It’s like the globalist whites are collectively betting and shouting for ’22’ while the odds are totally against them. Crash-22 here it comes.)

Just like a samurai on the eve of Seppuku mustered all his energy to convince himself he felt no fear and welcomed this most honorable death, the Irish are forcing themselves to believe they’re having the grandest time in utterly transforming their nation into the Third World. This is all very ironic considering that Ireland was once one of the poorest nations in Europe, indeed its own little bit of ‘third world’. Irish had to work extra hard to turn poor Ireland into a genuine First World Nation, but they now seem hellbent on turning it literally into a Third World nation by importing tons of blacks, Hindus, and Muslims at the behest of globalist intellectual elites who take their cues from Jews. And yet, it all makes sense in a way. Due to centuries of deprivation and backwardness, the Irish had always felt an inferiority complex vis-a-vis the most advanced nations of Europe, and once they really began to make money, they(like the Spaniards) went out of their way to prove that they are just as intellectually, culturally, and politically advanced as the most modernized nations. So, a mindset developed whereby status-seeking Irish elites came to crave, above all, the approval of the elites of nations like Germany, Sweden, France, Canada, the US, and even UK, its old enemy. If Irish Celtics and British Anglos now have one thing in common, it’s that they are both neo-colonial subjects of the Empire of Judea and, as such, desire nothing more than to win the approval of Jewish overlords and super-elites who rule the world. So, if Jews say Globo-Homo and Diversity are the highest goods for white goy nations, both Anglo and Celtic cuck-elites are eager to prove that they are more ‘pozzed’ than the other. It’s a race among dogs before the Jewish Master.

But then, the Irish mindset was always compromised as the Irish were both the biggest victims and biggest beneficiaries of Anglo Imperialism. They were the first victims of British expansionism and often treated harshly, not least because the British were appalled by all the drinking, wife-beating, and brawling among the ‘micks’. But, no non-Anglo people benefited for as long and as much as the Irish in sharing the spoils of Anglo imperialism. Wherever Anglos went, the Irish followed along as soldiers, traders, adventurers, and pillagers. The Irish sure gained a tremendous deal from the US, essentially the product of Anglo Imperialism and Colonization. So, the Irish were both tough resisters against and happy collaborators with the worldwide Anglo Empire. Then, maybe it’s not so difficult to understand why UK and Ireland are going down at the same time in the same manner for the same reasons. The Irish and Anglos have been more joined at the hip than any Irish or Briton would like to admit.

Any nation of people, culture, memory, and territory must have unity of self-preservation and self-justification if it is to secure any long-term survival strategy. It is simply not possible for a people to preserve themselves as a nation IF their main sense of self-justification is at odds with the demands of self-preservation. The danger could be spiritual, ideological, or ‘idological’. While spirituality lends deeper/higher meaning to a people, it can also divorce them from worldly demands of survival. Consider all the Hindu yogis who dropped out of society to beg for alms while they stuck needles into their noses and arses. If one takes Buddhism to its logical conclusion, he should cut all his ties, duties, & attachments and just meditate to reach Nirvana. This is why Buddhist societies that survived restricted the scope of Buddhist influence or somehow managed to associate Buddhism with tribalism, like the Tibetans. Likewise, if Christians decided to become spiritual purists and live by every letter of Jesus, they will end up dead like the hero-priest in Roland Joffe’s THE MISSION. Without spirituality, life becomes too mundane, but excessive spirituality can lead to loss of reality. This is why Judaism is favorable in many ways to Christianity. Its universalist spiritual content is balanced by the tribal element of the Covenant, and its moral concerns are tempered by demands of the real world is understood not to be a place for saints. Judaism is about conviction and commitment but not about sainthood that came with Christianity. It is moralistic but not sanctimonious, the element that makes Christianity insufferable at times in its holier-than-thou piousness.

Video Link

Of course, even as Jews feared the power of Christianity, they closely examined its psycho-spiritual anatomy for its Achilles Heel and found it. Jews realized how they could own and manipulate the Guilt Complex of Christianity for their own ends. Manipulating the nerve centers of Christian Guilt was as effective as toying with erogenous zones as a means to gain sensory control over goyim. Is it any wonder that Jews are both masters of Holocaustianity and Pornography? Jews understood that there is a kind of spiritual-erogenous or ‘spirogenous’ zone within Christian Psychology, not least because Christianity, far more than Judaism and certainly more than Paganism, was repressive about sexual matters, what with the Catholic Church even saying you will burn in purgatory if you masturbate. So, sexually repressed Christians had to transfer their repressed sensual passions over to the the spiritual realm, and this explains why so many churches developed services where people go into fits of rapture that are like spiritual orgasms. Rapturous Christian bliss results from friction of guilt and redemption. The faithful arrive at church and feel as sinners who need saving. To be washed of their sins for the week, they holler and shake their bodies to be rid of the Devil, and they feel joy when the angels shower them with God’s glory. It’s about connecting with God, but it doesn’t work without the element of guilt, the sense that one’s body is filled with Devilish temptations.

Likewise, sexuality gains its power from friction of shame and release. If all people were naked all the time and could have sex with anyone anywhere anytime, sex would be nothing special. It’d be about as interesting as eating a bag of potato chips. But even in a libertine society, there is the fear of rejection, shame of reputation, suspicion of betrayal, and the reality of exclusion, especially by the most desirable members of society. So, when an average person finally arrives at a sexual union of sufficient quality, the sense of release is far greater than if sex were so easy all the time for all people. Jews understand the usefulness of controlling the ‘spirogenous’ and erogenous zones, and that’s why they pushed for Globo-Homo and Pornificaition of society. Via Globo-Homo, they’ve replaced inherently ‘antisemitic’ Christianity with Queertianity where one feels redeemed and most justified for having washed oneself of ‘homophobia’ and ‘transophobia’. Also Homomania is far easier than Christianity because it makes no arduous demands for sanctity other than waving the ‘gay’ flag and regarding trannies as new angels. And via pornography(and pornification of society in general), Jews gained direct control of erogenous zones of countless goyim. Also, by peddling stuff about incest and the like, Jews charge sexuality with that potent combination of shame and release. While pornography has been made readily available(even to young ones), it still maintains the aura of being forbidden fruit filled with dark themes of humiliation, incest, and miscegenation.

This is where the neo-spiritual meets the ‘idological’ where idolatry eclipses ideology. Idols can be either beneficial or harmful to the self-preservation of a people. Ideally, the idols of a people will feature heroic or vaunted members of the tribe. Greeks had Achilles as their hero. And Greek Olympics were limited to Greeks who became champions among the Greeks. When white people have white champions who become the basis for white idols, idolatry can become a potent symbol for the nation. But if, say, black idols replace white idols in a white nation, it will undermine self-preservation as white people will come to admire and even worship blacks as their heroes, champions, and top studs. It will lead to cuckery among white men and spread jungle fever among white women, and THIS is precisely what is happening all over the West under the hegemony of Jews who regard blackness as their surrogate body conjoined to the Jewish head. Jews could outwit whites but couldn’t beat them physically to win top trophy of manhood, but Jews could use blacks to beat down white manhood. Thus, whiteness could be both outwitted and out-muscled by a combination of Jewish brains and black brawn.

https://nationalvanguard.org/2020/01/thanks-jews-black-violence-now-stains-the-emerald-isle/

We’ve been told endlessly that blacks need BLACK role models in prestigious areas because people identify with their own kind. If this is true of blacks, it must be no less true of whites. When white idols are replaced with black ones, it leads to white demoralization and white death, which has now reached near-genocidal levels in the West. In order for whites to feel self-justification in the name of self-preservation, they must write their own ideology that rejects the mindless mantras of ‘Diversity’ handed down by Jews as would-be-overlords. Whites must have their own idols in a world of their own that excludes other races, especially blacks who can beat up white men in sports and streets in an integrated social order. Just like human physical pride can exist only apart from wild animals — as humans are no match for wild boars, bears, tigers, rhinos, hippos, crocodiles, etc in physical confrontations — , white pride of manhood can ONLY EXIST apart from blackness that will defeat and humiliate white men because black men got longer limbs, harder muscles, faster reflexes, and bigger dongs. The world is truly diverse in that there are different races with different attributes and advantages. And every race should be wary of other races that pose a potential threat to them. This mania for Diversity is leading to a world of Universal Imperialism where every people, even the imperialists, are being drowned in non-stop floods of invasion, confusion, and alienation. But then, it all happened before with the Romans long long ago. The greatest conquerors the world had ever seen were overwhelmed by those they conquered, and in time, the empire was about every people conquering and being conquered by every other people until finally it all fell apart. If Jews get their wish, all nationalisms will be washed away EXCEPT for their own as the Noah’s Ark nationalism of all eternity. The US used to be a nation where white imperialists conquered others and then demanded that newcomers assimilate into Anglo-Americanism or accept its authority. There was once a sense of who the real masters and owners of America were. But now, non-whites come to America to lose their identities and heritages along with white American cucks who’ve lost all sense of identity, roots, and heritage. Indeed, their only concern regarding nationalism is “Muh Israel”. What did Nancy Pelosi say? Even if the walls of Congress come tumbling down, the US will always be there for Israel! How pathetic can you get?

Ireland destroyed by Mass Immigration from Africa and Third World

Video Link

 
• Category: Culture/Society • Tags: Ireland, Jews, Political Correctness 
Hide 27 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. I always love how elderly women – long past reproductive years – want society to be populated by others. Madonna for example in addition to the old woman in the video.

  2. lloyd says: • Website

    Here is the common myth that blacks win out physically because they are stronger. Their longer limbs win them out on on base ball and sprinting. Their harder cranial structure wins them out in the boxing ring. In such sports as wrestling and weight lifting which require all round bodily strength, they are rarely represented. Also in fire fighting occupations which require all round strength and alertness, they are under represented. Black criminals terrorise by hunting in packs and using weapons as these videos demonstrate. When a white man takes on a black man in a fight face to face, he is more likely to win out. Whites recall the blacks at school when they were bigger than them. But that is due to earlier physical maturation. But they keep that image of them.

    • Agree: Irish Savant
    • Thanks: Right_On
    • Replies: @Trinity
  3. Chris Moore says: • Website

    Just as it’s wrong to conflate self-preservation with self-justification, it’s wrong to risk self-preservation for sake of self-justification(morphed into self-righteousness). Nazi German soldiers fought to preserve themselves in Russia, and to that extent, they were working in the mode of self-preservation. But were they in the right to invade and terrorize another nation? At least on Russian soil, didn’t Russians have the priority of self-preservation against the German invaders. Thus, Russian self-preservation was aligned with Russian self-justification whereas, by normal standards of universal nationalism, German presence in Russia was not justified. Of course, there were Nazi radicals who argued that Germans had the racial right to invade and conquer Slavic territories since ‘Aryans’ are the superior and more deserving race. To be sure, it’s been a common justification all through the ages. For example, Latinos and Anglos certainly felt justified in conquering and taking the New World from the natives who were seen as savage, primitive, backward, inferior, or satanic(especially with the massive human sacrifices in South America and Mexico). Nazi Germans felt likewise justified in their invasion of Russia to create lebensraum for the Teutonic ubermensch. Humans certainly feel this way about animals and nature in general. Human races the world over have wiped out entire floras and faunas to create safer and securer habitats for themselves as the premium and more deserving species. And the West says the Jews were justified in carrying out Nakba Pogroms against lowly Arab Palestinians who were colonized, conquered, and expelled from their ancient homeland.

    So you’re of two minds. Conflicted. Two-faced. Schizophrenic. The ((Jew)) wouldn’t even allow itself to consider the Palestinians perspective. His “chosen” doctrine rules out any inkling of humanity in the Other. The ((Jews)) are Chosen, the Goyim aren’t, and that’s that.

    So why are ((Jews)) even tolerated in Christendom, built on good will and good intentions? Why are any scumbag tribalist? Their very presence is destroying Christendom, turning it into a nest of vipers. And who is the top viper in the snake’s nest? The Serpent — the ((Jew)).

    But keep talking the issue to death; maybe you can eventually convince yourself that selling out to the ((Jews)) is somehow justified because we’re living in the post-Christian West. That’s what the schizos do. In fact, that’s why there are so many schizos.

    The ((Jews)) don’t have that problem. They’re not conflicted at all.

    https://4.bp.blogspot.com/_nyBXIog5rb8/TRVHNkKKsFI/AAAAAAAAHRw/4dFqwdM0mfc/s1600/1292805378612

  4. With regard to the Irish,I am horrified by their fanatical adaption of the good white philosophy. I think they’re doomed,to endless “multiculturalism” bullshit.,and Jew worship. I’d like to say Goddamn them,but I fervently wish they could save themselves.
    Women and faggots.
    Just today a white woman was on the news here in Chicago. She has been raped by a negro. She said that the “man” followed her into her vestibule,and she didn’t think anything of it. Til he attacked her.
    Now that is pure bullshit. She saw a negro following her,you know damn sell she was bothered. But she had to pretend that she wasnt! Lest she offend this holy negro!! And thus is she raped.
    Of all the reasons to call women stupid,not the least is the fact that under feminism,hatred of white men,women get the shit kicked out of them.

  5. Trinity says:
    @lloyd

    There have been some good Olympic lifters who were Black. I think there is a kid out of South Carolina who is putting up some impressive numbers. Mark Henry was decent in Olympic lifting and excellent in powerlifting. Jim Bradford, Johnny Davis were two Black Olympic lifters who excelled back in the fifties and early sixties when America actually ruled Olympic lifting with guys like Paul Anderson, Norb Schemansky, Tommy Kono, etc. Drugs helped Eastern Europe and later China trounce America in weightlifting, plus Olympic lifting is popular in Eastern Europe and China, while it is hardly practiced outside of retards butchering the lifts in cross fit in America. Tons of accomplished Black powerlifters. Jim Williams aka the Scranton Black Bear benched 700lbs unofficially back in the early 1970s wearing a regular t shirt ( no bench shirt scrap like today.) And back then you had to really pause the bar on your chest. I see tons of strong Black guys in the gym. Tons of accomplished Black powerlifters. Americans, both Black and White could excell at Olympic lifting if it were more popular.

    As for boxing and baseball, the average young Black American doesn’t give two shits anymore about baseball and Eastern Europeans along with some Irish dude named Fury are beating up Mexicans and Blacks on the regular. There is a rumor that the Klitschko brothers might have been tainted with Jew blood but I doubt the brothers have very little kosher blood, same as the uncircumcised Max Baer who was actually more German than Jew, just ask his Jewish trainer, Ray Arcel. Poverty breeds the best fighters not race. It is a stretch to even call boxers, athletes. Ever seen Mike Tyson shoot hoops? Manny Pacquiao in a batting cage? It is pathetic. White fighters who grew up hard back in the day like Mickey Walker, Harry Greb, Jake Lamotta, Gene Fullmer beat tons of Black fighters. The manager of Carlos Monzon said the best fighters come from jail not the ghettoes.

    • Replies: @lloyd
  6. Trinity says:

    Gerry Cooney is an excellent example of how hard it is for a middle class kid to succeed in boxing. The only middle class kid that succeeded big time in boxing was Ali. Guys like Jack Dempsey would go hungry, ride the rails, Roberto Duran and Carlos Monzon would live in squalor. When Monzon first started boxing, his manager was amazed at how skinny the malnourished Monzon was at the time.

    Cooney had the tremendous size, power, and other physical attributes that would appear to guarantee him a world title, but for all his physical gifts, Gerry was very weak mentally and emotionally. Another Irish heavyweight a decade earlier and another Jerry, Jerry Quarry, grew up hard, but lacked size and was somewhat erratic. He could look like a world beater one night against capable and larger guys like Ron Lyle, Earnie Shavers, Mac Foster, etc., but then look out of sync when it counted most. Some people fear success more than failure. Like Cooney, Quarry had a domineering and abusive father. By the time Cooney lost to the much smaller Michael Spinks, he was addicted to cocaine and alcohol. A mentally tougher Cooney, with all that physical talent should have and could have decimated a blown up light heavyweight like Spinks. Give Cooney, Jerry Quarry’s heart and he would have been a world champion.

  7. lloyd says: • Website
    @Trinity

    Thanks for your reply as an expert. Out of interest, I googled Olympic weight lifters. I saw every race but not a single black person. I also checked out Johnny Davis. As I suspected, he had the Caucasian squat body shape and was actually brown. When New York erected a monument of fire fighters who died in the World Trade Center, there was controversy that they made a racial balance when in reality all the dead fire fighters were white. When black fire fighters were brought in through affirmative action, they got a rough time from the white fire fighters. I very much doubt that was discrimination. I gently suggest we end the conversation.

  8. … but Jews do have ancient roots in the land [Palestine]…

    They don’t, Mr Bonkers! The Palestinians are the Hebrews, the original, real Jews.

    Around 100 BC, European converts to Judaism, Sephardic, Ashkenazi, Hellenic, were astronomical in number, came to 99.999 percent of the world’s Jews.

    They were not Semites, of course. Ashkenaz was the grandson of Japheth. But then, around 500 BC the Hebrews, Abrahamites, were 0.001 percent of the world’s Semites. Already.

  9. meamjojo says:

    TL:DR lot of words

  10. Nazi Germans felt likewise justified in their invasion of Russia to create lebensraum for the Teutonic ubermensch.

    Stalin having stacked up 295 divisions along Europe’s eastern border just might have had something to do with that decision. These consisted of 125 new infantry divisions, 30 new motorized divisions, and 61 tank and 79 air divisions organized in 16 armies, plus another six million men in reserves. Larger than all the other armies of the world combined, this host had been raised in compliance with Stalin’s total mobilization order of August 19, 1941, given just four days before the signing of the Motolov-Ribbentrop pact – the one which Germany is accused of betraying in the conventional narrative.

    Also fatal to the “lebensraum” theory is that Hitler made none of his customary highly detailed plans for colonizing the conquered territory. The Reich’s limited resources for planned expansion were already consumed in the ongoing resettlement of Germans in Posen and other German land liberated from Poland in 1939. And there was a little thing called the war with England going on, with a new war with an increasingly belligerent United States clearly on the near horizon.

    • Agree: Cking
  11. Brown people coming to Ireland are rational economic actors of self-preservation.

    Irish immigration-enthusiasts, welcoming the flood, are delusional cuckolds. The immutable laws of God and Nature will reward them with misery and death, for turning their backs on their own self-preservation.

  12. ‘The fact that it is the homeland of the Jews is justification enough for Jewish national self-preservation. ‘

    That fails on the point that it’s not a fact.

    The Jews who helped themselves to the land aren’t from Palestine.

    Over the centuries, those Jews who were from Palestine variously converted to Christianity and Islam — and they’re still there!

    They’re called ‘Palestinians.’

  13. @Ann Nonny Mouse

    They don’t, Mr Bonkers! The Palestinians are the Hebrews, the original, real Jews.

    Indeed. As I pointed out in another thread, the current situation in Palestine is an exact re-run of the past.

    The so-called “Books of Moses” were forged by Hebrews returning from Persia after being Zoroatrianized (Persian = Parsee = Pharisee) and convincing the Persian emperor their tribal god, YHVH, was the same as the Universal God of the Persians (see the article above on Jewish tribalism, and the articles of Laurent Guyenot here on Unz). These books, with their story of “conquering” the Promised Land, exterminating the idolatrous indigenous Canaanites, etc., were a cover story to justify these Pharisees doing exactly that to the actual Hebrews, still living in Palestine, who were portrayed as “backsliding”. (And forget about the Samaritans, who stayed behind in Palestine and still practiced the original, non-Jerusalem version of Judaism; sweet, gentle Jesus calls them “you dogs” and “swine” toward whom he will cast no pearls of wisdom).

    And, as you say, we see exactly the same thing today: Poles pretending to be “Hebrews” and claiming the land from the actual Semites who have lived there for centuries.

  14. dimples says:

    “So, why was Jesus willing to surrender His body to such agony, humiliation, and death? He spun a myth about Himself whereby self-justification demanded His body be sacrificed for the redemption/salvation of mankind. A powerful sense of mission for humanity. And there was the matter of His massive Jewish ego. Still, He agonized all night, even panicking at moments and bewailing God for having putting Him in a bad situation. Finally, He was able to go through with the plan because His sense of self-justification overpowered His sense of self-preservation. His spiritual sense convinced Him that His physical demise would open a way for spiritual resurrection and everlasting glory. He needed an elaborate mythology of spiritual justification to overpower the physical demand for self-preservation.”

    This elaborate quasi-orthodox explanation is not correct. The real version is in the gospels.

    1. Jesus, having obtained miracle working powers after his 40 days in the wilderness, originally assumed he was or could be the Messiah or Chosen One of Israhell. His task, as he saw it, was to convince the sinners of the nation of Israhell to repent, but he failed to do this.

    2. Since the Kingdom of Heaven did not come as he had prophesied, Jesus saw that he had failed to bear fruit and was thus condemned by God for having delivered a false prophecy. False prophecy is a mortal sin according to the Law of Moses.

    3. Jesus at first attempts to escape his fate by disappearing to Lebanon, but is found and brought back. Jesus’s other big problem is that by now the disciples and rabble following him think he is the Chosen One, but Jesus knows now that he isn’t.

    4. The only honorable way out is to get himself executed.

    For a symbolic rendition of the above rationale provided by Jesus himself see,

    The parable of the gardener and the fig tree Luke 13:1-9 (the gardener is Jesus the man, the fig tree is Jesus the Messiah)

    Barren fig tree: Mark 11:12-14
    The fig tree withered Mark 11:20-21 (bracketed around the act that leads to his execution)

    Note that this does not diminish the Godness of Jesus, since anything is possible in the supernatural realm.

  15. ivan says:

    Ireland is an example of a country that believed its own lies. Now all countries lie to themselves. A nation is after all an “agreed set of lies”, but in the Irish case due to the long past sell-date of their irrational hatred of the English, some kind of pathology set into their body politic. For example can one explain why Sinn Fein fought so hard against the Ulster Loyalists if in the end, they’ll put up Nigerian candidates? How is a person of Nigerian origin more entitled to Ireland than an Ulsterman whose ancestors came 350 years ago? The Irish it seems to me are full of bullshit.

    • Replies: @Priss Factor
  16. Cking says:

    This article went a little haywire for me. The Irish and Ireland has been in the sights of destruction for at least 70 years now. The 1970’s ‘Troubles’ in Ireland was directed from the British government to wreck havoc on the Irish people, an extreme ‘divide and conquer’ offensive. The Irish have since learned to become more Liberal and British. The English/Irish accent is now the most preferred. The Woke Immigration system is another submission to British Liberalism, acceptance of the dissolution of the native population sans Catholicism.

    US Senator Javit’s project, culminated in the Hart-Celler Act, the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 was directed at Irish immigration, as well as other nationalities of Northern Europe, the Germans in particular. This ‘moral’ challenge, as Senator Javits framed the issue, was driven by ethnic competition devolving into the ethic war we see today.

    At one time the Irish Americans were the highest earners, the highest family income, the highest educated and 2nd to the WASP Americans in positions of authority and administration in the private or public sector. Indeed nothing could get done in this country without speaking to an Irishman or American born. Ask Franklin Delano Roosevelt who loathed the Irish and Catholics, yet needed their Democratic Party political organization to become president. The destruction of Senator Joe McCarthy, for a witch hunt for Reds that consumed the hunter, betrayed the future for Americans who spoke out of line or above their position. After all the Democratic Party was full of Communists. The FDR Administration had so many Communist and British spies, American Anglophile sycophants, Red agents that one doesn’t bother to look.

    The Kennedy’s tried very hard to be the ‘right’ kind of Irish Americans. However like Joe McCarthy JFK tried to elevate our, the American people’s, political perspective and paid dearly. ‘They’ are still killing the ‘Kennedys’ in the MSM pointing out that Joe Sr. was a Nazi during WWII. Joe Kennedy lost a son in that war. Another MSM news expose’, revealing that the Kennedy brothers killed Marilyn Monroe, while disowning the allegations, stating there’s never been any proof of course. Another scandal, Ted Kennedy, who couldn’t have been in the car at Chappaquiddick, got away with murder, etc. Senator Schumer and Speaker Pelosi kicked the Kennedy’s out of the Democratic Party and laughed about it. Schumer boasts his power; ‘who do they think they are?’

    Since Ted Kennedy, after Chappaquiddick, went back to the Senate to work for the mob that killed his brothers, Irish American political power has undergone a mental and spiritual alteration and acceptance of liberalism as the ‘American’ political reality. Joe Biden is the perfect example of the Irish American politician who walks, talks, and professes to be a Zionist, undergoing a decades long, political formation thoroughly informed by Jewish ideology, political perspective, aims and agenda.

    Demography is destiny. Cancelling white Americans wholesale is already underway as a matter of woke policy. Are the American people looking at the dissolution of the white Americans of Northern European heritage? Beyond the supposed lofty imperatives in immigration policy ‘that is fair, right, and morally imposed on us’, as Senator Javits once lectured President Kennedy, “We gotta do this”, what could possibly be the benefit here in marginalizing and suppressing the very people who created the now squandered surplus, the people who have made America so attractive for others to come here?

    • Replies: @Irish Savant
  17. @ivan

    For example can one explain why Sinn Fein fought so hard against the Ulster Loyalists if in the end, they’ll put up Nigerian candidates? How is a person of Nigerian origin more entitled to Ireland than an Ulsterman whose ancestors came 350 years ago? The Irish it seems to me are full of bullshit.

    Because a Nigerian is more than a foreigner or even a New Irish. He is black, thus God.

    Irish adopted foreign Catholicism and worshiped Jesus a foreign God for a long long time. They’re used to worshiping foreign deities.

    Now, the god of West is Negrolatry. It’s the new catholicism for the Irish.

  18. @Cking

    “The 1970’s ‘Troubles’ in Ireland was directed from the British government to wreck havoc on the Irish people, an extreme ‘divide and conquer’ offensive.”

    Sorry but that’s complete nonsense.

    • Replies: @Cking
  19. I agree fully with this article’s take on the Irish demise. And demise it is, have no doubt. Surely no other nation has embraced the poz to the extent and with the speed that we have? Sinn Fein (Ourselves Alone, I kid you not) was the political wing of the IRA that fought for a United Ireland throughout the 20th century. This party, both in Northern Ireland and the Republic, bends over backwards to place Africans and Muslims in positions of prominence. They even have an LGBT/transgender wing which flounces around under the rainbow flag. And SF are feared as extreme nationalists!

    When the Bishop of Dublin says of a bearded Egyptian-born Muslim Brotherhood member “he’s as Irish as any of us” and gets widely praised for such platitudinous garbage you know the country is close to irrecoverable. The role of the multinationals has also been crucial, a subject covered very well by E Michael Jones.

    The only hope is an economic catastrophe. When people are fighting for food they might start getting their priorities right again.

  20. Cking says:
    @Irish Savant

    Ireland had real grievances that demanded violence sure, yet the majority of the Irish stayed on the sidelines. The Republic certainly wanted no part in it. It’s more than plausible the ‘Troubles’ were a giant PsyOp out of the British government’s ‘Intelligence’ agencies with the idea to slow the reunification of Ireland. IMHO. How many members of the IRA turned out to be double agents on the payroll? What are the implications of the 2011 visit by Queen Elizabeth?

    • Replies: @Irish Savant
  21. @Ann Nonny Mouse

    Don’t forget the Khazars, the Ashkenazis who dominate Israel came from north of the Caucasus.

  22. @Cking

    There was certainly a great deal of chicanery, false flags etc. by the British authorities and yes the IRA was riddled with spies. Happened all through Irish history by the way. I only take issue with your belief that the British want to thwart a united Ireland. I’d say the corridors of power in London would resound with joy were Britain finally shot of its troublesome and expensive Northern Ireland offshoot.

    • Agree: Cking
    • Replies: @Cking
  23. Dr. Rock says:

    Please,

    For the love of all that is holy…

    Get some paragraph breaks in this article!

    Jeez!!

    It’s BRUTAL!!

    • Agree: Cking
  24. Cking says:
    @Irish Savant

    Agree, ‘Here you take her’, That is the inference I get from the Queen’s 2011 visit. Further, Ireland will be united and she, like a Scot Republic, will also be a part of the British Union, in realpolitik, if not in name or declaration.

  25. The Irish and Anglos have been more joined at the hip than any Irish or Briton would like to admit

    It was interesting reading about Russia’s threat to nuke the Atlantic sea bottom near Britain and drown the island in a radioactive tsunami. The Brits reacted with their typical scorn; then a couple of days later, the Irish said hey, wait a minute, we might drown too! That gave British commenters the perfect launching pad to bash Ireland on the moral bankruptcy of its neutral status, which is funny considering that it was British actions and comments which triggered the Russian threat. Imagine being Britain’s neighbor right now. It would be like having the Azov Battalion in your apartment building.

  26. Anon[306] • Disclaimer says:

    The Irish, in their relations to the English, have always had a large dose of the self-destructive Palestinian in them. It’s not surprising the Irish would welcome blacks only to be screwed over by those very blacks, because the Irish lack common sense.

    • Replies: @Priss Factor
  27. @Anon

    But Palestinians resist in the name of nationalism. What’s killing Ireland is embrace of Afrope(or afro-europe) and Globalism.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply -


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Jung-Freud Comments via RSS
PastClassics
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement
The Shaping Event of Our Modern World
The Surprising Elements of Talmudic Judaism