RSS
Useful links:
https://infogalactic.com/info/History_of_Germans_in_Russia,_Ukraine_and_the_Soviet_Union
https://infogalactic.com/info/German_Americans
Germany proper as the heart of Central Europe occupied the lands between Western Europe and Eastern Europe & Russia. It could also be regarded as situated between Northern(or northern-most) Europe and Southern Europe. Thus, it could radiate outwards in all directions(like the sun) or find itself caught between a rock and a hard place, surrounded by suspicious or outright hostile powers. The only other European entity with similar geo-political potential was Poland, especially during the peak period of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, but Polacks being Polacks, it collapsed under weak monarchs and petty noblemen(who trampled on the Slavic masses by partnering with Jews as middlemen and tax-collectors, whose excesses led to an explosion in Ukraine that sent shockwaves throughout the empire).
Unlike the lazy(and/or dumb) Polacks, Germans proved capable and even united as a ‘volk’ in national character and consciousness. If the Polish hierarchy had stuck-up Polish elites snubbing lower-tier Polacks who, thus neglected, ended up dumb and clueless, the German way cultivated a sharing of virtues and responsibilities from top to bottom, resulting in a talented ruling elite & managerial class, first-rate craftsman, hardworking merchants, industrious workers, and moralists/reformers.
Something of the Germanic character is conveyed in Henryk Sienkiewicz’s historical epic WITH FIRE AND SWORD. The Cossack rebels stumble upon a ship full of German mercenaries with a contractual obligation to the Polacks and present a counter-offer: Come over to the Cossack side and be rewarded handsomely. Germans mull it over but insist a contract is a contract, and they must first serve out their term before working for the Cossacks. Soon after, a battle ensues, and all the Germans are killed. The point is even the Polish-nationalist Sienkiewicz acknowledged something impressive about the German character. When Germans gave their word, it meant something.
Then, following national unification, it was no surprise to anyone that Germany had an outsized role in the coming century. Besides, not only was the German nation on the rise, even surpassing Great Britain in many fields, but the German populations spread out across the globe, especially in Russia and the United States, were making important contributions in their host countries. Clearly, the two big nations(or countries or empires) to watch at the dawn of the 20th century were America and Russia. Both were vast and bountiful with as yet untapped resources. Both had more than room enough to grow, or plenty of ‘lebensraum’. And both prized Germans as the gold-standard of immigrants and settlers.
Anglo-Americans, who founded the United States on awesome race-ism, naturally favored their racial cousins, the Germanic peoples: Germans, Dutch, and Scandinavians. And German immigrants were indeed a great asset in the development of America. Even today, areas settled by German(and/or Germanic) peoples are among the most pleasant parts in the United States. Germanics built cleaner and more orderly communities than most. Compare parts of Wisconsin(minus those ruined by blacks) with parts of Indiana and West Virginia settled by Scotch-Irish hillbillies. Compare areas settled by German immigrants to those settled by Slavic immigrants(and never mind the corrupt and criminal Italians, the kind in GOODFELLAS — honor among Italians isn’t about keeping your word but keeping your mouth shut).
And despite cold winters, what a wonderland Minnesota was before soul-hollowed cuck-maggots bent over backwards to the new god of Negrolatry pushed by Jewish Radical Racists. Even at the political level, communal German-Americans(and their ethnic cousins) ran better governments, certainly more so than the clannish Irish(with their big city machines) and the Italian hoodlums with their criminal culture.
Furthermore, the socialist-sympathies of large segments of German-Americans generally didn’t manifest as firebrand radicalism so common among Jewish immigrants from the Pale of Settlement, no more so than the religiously devout sectors of German-America with their piety, which tended to be inner-directed than outwardly aggressive; rather, both groups directed their focus and energy on running their own communities, just like German socialists at home generally preferred national reform than world revolution, which was more the obsession of Jewish radicals(who had little use for goy national identities). Indeed, Bismarck’s Germany led the way in nationalists(and even conservatives) working with Social-Democrats to provide safety-nets for the rapidly expanding rolls of urban dwellers and industrial workers.
Prior to World War I, if any ethnic group seemed primed for prominence in America, even at the expense of Anglo-Americans, it was the German-Americans(and other Germanics). Latin America had also taken notice in the 19th century and courted German immigrants(even from Russia) uber alles for their reputation for diligence, orderliness, and productivity(and relative lack of corruption compared to the Latins and local browns). Also, their ‘national character’, perceived as more communal than individualistic, suggested a higher likelihood of sociable camaraderie than ruthless competition, the feature of Anglo ‘cowboys’.
Pan-German-Demography did wonders not only for the US(and parts of Latin America). In many ways, Germans played an even more crucial role in the nascent modernization of Russia. If Anglos matched the Germans in (Protestant)Work Ethic, managerial ability, due diligence, and pragmatic reformism, Russians in the 19th century made Dumb Polacks seem like geniuses. Unlike the German elites who regarded Germans as national ‘volk'(or Anglo elites who regarded Anglo peoples as fellow citizens), Russian ruling class looked down upon their subjects as mental children or human cattle.
Instead of capitalizing on Russian potential and cultivating a domestic talent pool, the tendency(especially beginning with Peter the Great) was to import foreign talent for big tasks while using dimwit Russians to serve as beasts of burden, an attitude that persisted even after the Bolshevik Revolution, especially with the Trotskyite faction arguing for German Revolution on account of Russians being poor human material; this attitude seems internalized even to this day, what with the elites looking outward for guidance and investment, without which they fear Russia will sink back into a morass of inertia. (Some Western Marxists argued communism failed because it took on Russian characteristics that could only revert back to a kind of neo-Byzantine tsarism, thus snuffing out the flames of revolution.)
When Japan modernized, it learned from the West, but most of the talent was native and homegrown(even if educated in the West). In contrast, many involved in Russian modernization were non-Russians, especially the Germans who took on prominent roles in bureaucracy, military, industry, and trade. While Russian rulers appreciated and encouraged the full potential of non-Russian talent, they suppressed Russian potential with an attitude of paternal condescension, especially in cahoots with the moribund Orthodox Church that preached stoic acceptance of misery and subservience to the Tsar as a sentimental father-figure. In contrast, the German monarchy recognized the importance of educating/training the German masses to maximum potential in the new order. (Perhaps, Russian rulers wanted to have the cake and eat it too. They wanted a modern Russia but also a servile population. They feared ‘excessive’ reforms and education may turn the people restless, even rebellious against the status quo. Therefore, it was safer to import or outsource modernization to outsiders and minorities, much like ultra-conservative Arab monarchies do today. They keep their societies closed and hire foreign talent for modern tasks.)
That said, Russia could have done worse than with Germans at that crucial time in history. The most capable(and possibly conscientious) people on Continental Europe, Germans got the job done. Comparatively speaking, they were duty-and-honor-bound, mindful of reputation and good name. Russia’s considerable achievements were due in no small part to the contributions of Germans, many of whom assimilated into the Russian nation.
Now, imagine the interconnective, even ameliorative and conciliatory, role that Pan-Germania could have played in world affairs, with Germans and ethno-German minorities serving as a kind of bridge between the two great rising powers of the 20th Century, the US and Russia. The German case would have been different from that of the overseas Chinese as extension of Chinese dominance and that of the Irish diaspora as feisty sidekicks of the Anglos, as Ireland itself hardly constituted a great power. In contrast, Germany was destined to be a major power but not a superpower, and as such, Germans could maintain national sovereignty while also deferring to greater powers. Thus, German prestige and influence could have been a balance of national autonomy and international involvement.
Yuri Slezkine characterized the 20th century as the Jewish Century, but it could just as well have been the German Century, and in a way, despite the calamities of World War I and World War II, it was because Germany and Germans(especially in the US) did so much heavy-lifting in nation-building-and-managing. German-Americans, from generals to soldiers, not to mention all the engineers and educators, were surely one of the main pillars for America’s rapid rise to great power status. Besides, even many of the most consequential Jews were the products of German/Austrian cultures and systems of thought, even if in creative and/or destructive conflict with the ‘Aryans’. And, post-WWII European economic recovery would have been incomplete without West Germany as the main engine(and East Germany played an outsized role in the economy of the Eastern Bloc). Throughout the 20th century, German-Americans possibly contributed the most to American growth.
Indeed, before mass non-white immigration permanently transformed American demographics, German-Americans and other Germanics constituted the largest ethnic bloc. Anywhere in America one can readily notice the German Factor in towns and infrastructure, though degraded in some places by the influx of non-Germans, especially the Negroes from the South(or Somalia), and the degeneration of cultural values among all white groups, German-Americans included.
Especially following World War II, German-Americans became the Silent Ethnicity(just like West Germany became a Silent Power), diligently contributing to America but keeping a low profile as Nazism had become the Mark-of-Cain of German-ness, much like the the Yellow Star(or the Holocaust) became the hallmark of tragic Jewishness. For all their professional successes, things got increasingly problematic for German-Americans as Jews gained predominance and tirelessly rubbed the German nose in the Jewish ashes(while across the Atlantic, German children were weaned on guilt-milk of eternal damnation).
The turning point for German prestige can be traced back to World War I when the politics of Anglosphere, the combined conspiracy of the British Empire and the US, took a decisively anti-German turn, pressuring German populations to take the knee and assimilate as generic ‘good citizens’.
The German fate in Russia proved even more tragic with World War I, and the last real chance of rapprochement between Germany and Russia was squandered with Operation Barbarossa and the ensuing calamity, the most destructive war of nations ever. Of late, there was renewed talks of German-Russian economic partnership, especially via the Nord Stream pipelines, but recent events have shown Germany lacks the requisite agency and autonomy to push deals through on the basis of national interests, which means the plan was doomed from the start. (Besides, even if the plan had gone through, will the German nation even exist in fifty years when it’s ‘morally’ invested in the Great Replacement? To make things worse, German decline has been hastened in the past two decades with the ‘resettling’ of Jews who gleefully and sadistically take full advantage of their privilege vis-a-vis guilt-ridden Germans.)
The international role of Germany and Pan-Germania in the 20th Century need not have been (counter)hegemonic. Germany could have pursued peaceful relations with Russia, and furthermore, Russo-Germans could have smoothed ties between the two civilizations, especially as the economies of Germany and Russia were symbiotic(and still remain to this day). Besides, despite the occasional rash remark by Kaiser Wilhelm II, Germany was poised for peaceful coexistence with the British Empire. Thus, Germany had much to gain via productive interaction with the biggest land power to the east and the biggest naval power to the west.
By and large, German immigrants in the US became law-abiding American citizens whose habits and values complemented those of the Anglos. With a powerful Germany at the heart of Europe and with peoples of German descent contributing to the US and Russia, Pan-Germania could have been the hardy spine of the global white order. Anglos had the pioneering(and individualistic) spirit in settling North America, and the Germans were an ideal rear-guard demography. And vast Russia, with its slothful and/or sloppy Slavs, had much to gain from the more industrious and/or meticulous German population. Imagine an inspired Pan-Germania from the Urals to the Rockies.
German contributions to modern education and nature-appreciation were positive and immense. The rise of the modern university is largely credited to the German model(though the kindergarten was a terrible idea that normalized the statist control of children at the youngest possible age), and German Romanticism rekindled man’s profound(and pagan) connection to nature(at odds with the Semitic-Biblical view of the world as ‘fallen’). German nature cult in its original incarnation was virile and soulful, unlike today’s Greens who are priggish, flaky, and decadent, not to mention hypocritical.
Why did Pan-Germania fail to materialize? Again, the most obvious answer is World War I, the modern era’s equivalent of the asteroid that doomed the dinosaurs(and profoundly altered the evolutionary trajectory of life on earth), not only because it was midwife to Bolshevism(that further antagonized the Germanic and Slavic worlds, though it might have been different if Germany also had gone communist) and the Great Depression that opened the path for National Socialism and World War II. (In contrast, the Napoleonic Wars were followed by a century of stability.) World War I traumatized the German World, within and outside Germany. It ruptured ties between Germany and Russia. Great Britain, increasingly anxious of rising Germany, used the war to ramp up anti-German hysteria to fever pitch, from which the Brits never quite outgrew.
And eventually, it impacted German-Americans who came under both political persecution and populist pressure to renounce their German loyalties, even heritage and identity(as all-things-German, even the names of foods, came under derision or attack). And with humiliation and defeat, effects of which were amplified by severe depression, the people of Germany were radicalized against moderation, some turning far-left(inspired by Bolshevism) and some turning arch-right. Eventually, National Socialists won over a substantial share of the industrialists, bourgeoisie, and the working class with a ‘creative’ fusion of economic leftism and cultural rightism. As an alchemy of rightist and leftist themes, National Socialism could have served as a formula for the world, especially because, unlike Italy, Germany had the means to be a great power, but it was not in the cards for two factors. National Socialism’s radical racism reeked of contempt for much of humanity, and its main perceived enemy, the Jews, held great sway over the Anglo World. (Though Soviet Union’s elites were disproportionately Jewish, Stalin’s word was final, as during the period of the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, whereas the Anglo ‘democratic’ order couldn’t suppress Jewish pressures backed by vast financial resources and media power.)
National Socialism’s radical antisemitism roused World Jewry to ‘wage war on Germany’ via pressures on various governments against Germany(though not half-as-effectively as today when Jewish Demand is the West’s Command in a world of Jewish Masters and Goy Dogs), and Hitler’s own radical racialist worldview created what proved to be an unbridgeable gap between the ‘Aryan’ Germans and the ‘Asiatic’ Slavs(who happened to occupy the lands coveted by German Imperialism).
If Germans had peacefully settled across and contributed to the development of Russia and the Americas in the 19th century, Germany found itself at loggerheads with world powers in the 20th century, and German minorities came under suspicion and intense scrutiny in their host countries. Stalin was especially ruthless with ‘Volga Germans’ and ‘Baltic Germans’.
Then, after World War, especially with Jewish ascendency in the US, German culture-history-people became inseparable from Evil Nazism and Holocaust Guilt, leaving submission and atonement as the only recourse for survival and rehabilitation(which recent events have exposed as more craven obeisance than genuine remorse/conscience given current Germany’s arming of the Sub-Nazis in Ukraine against Russia, which was ravaged by the German onslaught in World War II and marked for slavery and/or genocide by Nazi ‘Aryan’ ideology; it now seems German Redemption was really predicated on cowardice before Jewish Power than true moral agency; Germans merely went from Brown-Shirts of the 1000 Yr Reich to Brownnosers to Forever Zion).
How might have history unfolded if National Socialism, like Italian Fascism, had steered clear of excessive antisemitism, working with pro-German Jews while targeting only the radicals and subversives? Then, an overt Anti-German campaign by World Jewry might have been averted, allowing Germany to build bridges with the great powers. The problem was that Jewish Power(excessively degenerate, criminal, and/or radical) had so degraded Germany during the Weimar Years — as certain Jewish-German elements were far more extreme and subversive than the Jews of Italy — that it was hardly surprising that National Socialism took shape as an Anti-Jewish movement. Besides, if Fascists came to power in Italy before the Bolsheviks showed their true colors under Stalin, National Socialism ascended with full knowledge of Soviet atrocities, in which Jewish radicals played a significant role. As Hitler noted, Soviet communism had finished off whatever vestiges of German presence that survived in Russia after World War I.
Still, it’s tantalizing to imagine what-might-have-been if Germany had taken a different course in the aftermath of the Great War. Prior to Germany’s fatal alliance with Imperial Japan, it played a key role in shoring up the KMT regime. Chiang Kai-Shek’s forces encircled and drove out the communists with the advice of German military experts. But Germany severed ties with China as it drew closer to Japan, which turned disastrous with the onrush of the Pacific War that finally turned majority American opinion against Germany as an ally of the ‘Japs’.
Everything turned to so tragic. In the earlier century, the German model was favored by the Japanese who valued its balance of tradition and transformation, authority and liberty. The German model also inspired other parts of the non-West that needed catching-up, not least because Germany itself had been a late-starter in national unity and industrialization.
During the Cold War, there was little chance of West Germany forging meaningful relations with the Soviet Union(aka the Evil Empire) as it was a member of NATO that, more or less, operated on Lord Hasting’s dictum: “Keep the Soviet Union out, the Americans in, and the Germans down”. As for East Germany, it symbolized communist repression than anything else in Western eyes. East Germany was a rump-state satellite of the Russians, and West Germany, for all its ‘economic miracle’, was politically ‘down’ and bereft of civilizational prestige. Things only got worse with Jewish preeminence in the US, especially as the Jew Taboo increasingly eroded European criticism of US policy.
Whereas Anglo elites, for all their disdain for the ‘irrational’ aspects of the ‘Teutonic’ character, tended to regard Germans(and Germanics) as racial brethren(deserving of forgiveness and a second chance), the Hyper-Semites were hellbent on implementing, even if in piecemeal manner, the original Morgenthau Plan of total German demolition(which we are witnessing today). As for Anglos in the UK and US, they are now so petrified of the accusation of leniency with Nazi Germans that they double down on their prostration before Jewish Power, with the ironic result of their unconditional support for the Jewish alliance with Sub-Nazi elements in Ukraine(LOL). The current Anglo-Cuck Narrative holds that Britain fought Germany to save the Jews from the Holocaust, a retrofitting of history if there ever was one. While it’s true that Jewish influence steered the UK against Germany, the Anglos then were still sufficiently powerful to pursue national and imperial interests over narrow Jewish ones.
Perhaps, the Pan-Germanic Promise/Project would have failed regardless of whether World War I happened or not. There could have been many other variables leading to the inevitable friction among national characters and the clash of empires. One thing for sure, the simultaneous rise of Pan-Germanism and Pan-Slavism made for darkening clouds over Germany and Russia. And, revanchist France just couldn’t let go of its crushing defeat to Prussia in 1871. Meanwhile, the British Empire grew alarmed by Germany’s rapid rise and growing ambition. If the French Empire was like a manageable mistress, Germany seemed like the new stud in town, and short on manners.
Historical speculations aside, it was World War I that decisively drove the wedge that destroyed the possibility of Pan-Germania. It led to Russian animus toward not only Germany but Russo-Germans and, in the Stalinist period, to forced mass-migrations of peoples of German stock, many of them perishing under harsh conditions in labor camps or some godforsaken wasteland. As for Germans in the UK and US, despite faring immeasurably better on the material level than the poor souls trapped in the Red Empire, the only option was assimilation at the expense of any meaningful German consciousness. Increasingly, German-ness had to stick to beer and pretzels.
Granted, it might have been different IF Germans were stronger in will and defiance, at least in the more liberal West, but the average German, in the home country and elsewhere, tended toward conformity and deference to authority. Despite the element of WILL as a central theme in German culture and philosophy, only a tiny fraction of Germans exhibited qualities of vision and drive. For every Ludwig van Beethoven, Richard Wagner, Friedrich Nietzsche, Martin Heidegger, (half-Jewish) Fritz Lang, or Adolf Hitler, there were a thousand Germans who only knew obedience and consensus. Indeed, so many swarmed to Hitler’s great will because they lacked it themselves.
In contrast, one out of every five Jews has the defiant-gene, e.g. personalities like Lenny Bruce, Mel Brooks, Woody Allen, Howard Stern, Adam Sandler, Don Rickles, and Ron Jeremy(who even had the balls to suck his own dick). Ironically, Jews are less likely to live under a Nazi-like system for the simple reason that more of them are Hitler-like. If Germans produce a hundred sheep for every wolf, at least one out of every five Jew is a fierce weasel; therefore, Jews are less likely to abandon their agency to some would-be super-duper Jew, even Moses, which is why God had to step in and help out the prophet. Too many Jewish guys were baring their dongs and daring Moses to suck on it.
It explains why Jewish-Americans, unlike German-Americans once the US entered World War I, didn’t cave under pressure during the so-called ‘McCarthy Era’ when many of the Tribe came under suspicion for radical sympathies and subversive activities. Not only were Jews defiant but eventually managed to turn the tables and made Joe McCarthy akin to an American Hitler… though now, the Jewish regimen of Censchwarzship goes far beyond anything even conceived by so-called ‘red-baiters’.
Those who rather praise German-American behavior(as a pledge of patriotism) in the final year of World War I apparently subscribe to the assumption that Anglo-American elites, as the true standard-bearers of national policy, triumphantly imposed their norms for the sake of national pride and unity. But, from the vantage point of what transpired later(when Anglos caved to Jews as the New Normalizers), one could argue the Anglo-Americans merely won the contest of wills than of integrity with the German-Americans. After all, when Anglos were met with the stronger will-power of Jews(a far smaller minority than German-Americans) who demanded that Goy America assimilate to and appease Jewish Power than vice versa, they totally caved and now run around headless(and ball-less) as cucky white dogs of Zion.
Even if Anglo-Americans wielded the most levers of power in the early 20th century, German-American pride could have remained intact as among the Jews during the ‘McCarthy’ period. German-Americans just lacked the will. (Perhaps, one reason was German stoicism. While kvetching endlessly is part of Jewish culture, indeed even a matter of pride, most Germans would feel ashamed to be regarded as incessant complainers. In the Age of Complaint, the voices of the top three complainer groups, Jews-blacks-homos, are heard most. In the less vocal world of the pre-electronic era, stoicism was better appreciated as a virtue. But in the world of talking heads, those who do the most talking always win as even spoken nonsense is amplified over unspoken or muted truth. When Richard Nixon ran as the voice of the Silent Majority, his real message should have been ‘be silent no more’. These days, so-called ‘conservatives’ speak a lot more, especially with the rise of Talk Radio, but they still remain a selective-silent-majority-though-turning-into-a-minority because they continue to remain silent on the most crucial issue, the JQ.)
If German-Americans had shown greater defiance and will against the anti-Germanism so prevalent in the last years of World War I, they might eventually have prevailed over the Anglos. Sadly, most caved, just like the sheepish Japanese-Americans, many of whom volunteered to fight for the US that robbed them of property and tossed their families into ‘internment camps’. (If the US government rounded up Jews, dispossessed them, and sent them to ‘internment camps’, can you imagine Jews bending over backwards to prove their worth as ‘patriots’?)
In some ways, for all their nastiness, Jews are admirably made of tougher stuff because they aren’t so weak and wussy. The US had no business entering World War I, and German-Americans had every right to sympathize with their mother country, but the US waged a socio-cultural war on German-America, and the Germans caved like wussies. Shame!
Jews later demonstrated that Anglos are really pussies, i.e. if you push back hard enough amidst the adversity, they eventually crack and bow down before you. Just get a load of all these Anglo cucks rolling over before Jews in the UK, US, Canada, and Australia. All those groups that assimilated into the Anglosphere were fools because Jewish Power exposed Anglos to be a bunch of wheaks and whummies whose worldview now revolves around Judeo-centrism, no matter how ludicrous, like the current tranny craze. Today, assimilating to the Anglo Model means mindless cuckery to Jewish Supremacism, e.g. Rishi Sunak of the UK who emulates Anglo fellating of Jewish Power.
What were the deeper factors for Pan-Germania’s failure to materialize? Was there something inherently problematic in the German character, perhaps an ‘impossible’ combination of wild neo-barbarian romanticism and dutiful Protestant Work Ethic? Such an unlikely fusion of chaos and order may have seemed outlandish and threatening to others. It was one thing for the Brits to be restrained & efficient and for the Italians to be expressive & inefficient(and for the French to be somewhere in between), but how did the Germans manage to be both ‘irrational’ and ‘mechanistic’, a kind of a national clockwork-orange? So impassioned in music and so impressive in machinery? So unruly in spirit and so punctual in habit?
Britain as a nation of shopkeepers was led by a class of gentlemen. In contrast, Germany as a nation of craftsmen seemed led by intemperate bullies or madmen. Among the monarchs of his time, Wilhelm II was something of a firebrand. Though a first-rate diplomat and statesman, Otto von Bismarck was famous for his temper. It was as if German civilization, though outwardly advanced and industrial, remained pagan-barbarian at its core. Besides, the English language, though Germanic in origin and basic structure, had been softened by French-Latin influence whereas German retained much of the original character.
Now, if Germans were only wild and crazy, they would have been too disorderly to pose any real threat. Or, if they were only orderly, they would have been more temperate and predictable.
This combination of ‘beast’ and ‘machine’, like a tightknit Roman legion raging with barbarian soul, was something other civilizations couldn’t quite wrap their heads around(and still can’t on the evidence of all those books on Hitler and Nazism that still seek to understand). Germanism turned even Elmer Fudd into a frightful figure. And “The Ride of the Valkyries” in APOCALYPSE NOW drives even antiwar types into war frenzy.
Still, one could argue the German threat was greatly exaggerated, at least prior to the rise of Hitler. Germany prior to World War I had no plans of world domination. True, the Kaiser was an irascible egotist, but by and large, Germany simply wanted a role in the world commensurate to its power and prestige. The Anglosphere could easily have accommodated German ambitions instead of spinning into paranoia.
Anglos deserve a good deal of blame for the failure of the ‘Germanic Peace’ to serve as bridge from Russia to the Americas. Even with the outbreak of the Great War, the conflict could have been short-lived without intervention of Britain, which had no real dog in the fight, and things might have been patched up between Germany and other continental powers. The perennial British formula of preventing any dominant power in Continental Europe finally led to tragedy for all involved. To make things even worse, Anglo-American also got involved, creating a rift between Germany and German-America.
Russia too deserves its share of the blame. Tsar Nicholas’ reputation was already damaged as the result of the 1905 Russo-Japanese War. What was Russia doing picking a fight with Industrial Germany? And why form an alliance with France that had no concern for Russia, the modernization of which owed far more to the German element? And with all the problems within Russia itself, why play Big Daddy to Slavs everywhere, obligating Russia to intrude into minor conflicts that might have been easily resolved? (But then, short-sightedness is the bane of mankind. What were the Germans doing sending Lenin and other Bolsheviks into Russia to stir up trouble?)
And of course, the Jews had something to do with World War I, Bolshevism, Weimar degeneracy, Anglo foreign policy(not least through control of British and American politicians via purse-strings), World War II, and etc.
In the end, it was the Jews who came to play the pan-global role that the Germans could have. At one time, Jewish Power was prominent in both Russia and the US, as Yuri Slezkine detailed in THE JEWISH CENTURY. Many Jews looked to the Soviet Union as the first fulfillment of the Jewish dream of power, progress, and justice. Later, Jews leaned more toward America where their long-term success seemed more assured(whereas Jewish influence began to wane in the Soviet Union as egalitarianism naturally favored Slavic mediocrity over Jewish superiority).
Pound for pound, Jews are surely the most talented people in the world, but has Pan-Jewishism worked out well for the goyim? For all the endless fulminations about German ‘ubermensch’ supremacism(as part of Holocaust Remembrance), Jewish attitudes toward the Other seem more contemptuous, dismissive, and exploitative than any other. Also missing among Jews is the sense of noblesse oblige and honor, hardly surprising as the roots of Jewish ‘tribal character’ come Rabbinic Talmudism and merchant mentality, both obsessed with hoodwinking dimwit goyim as the devil’s spawn. Honor derives from warrior culture, something Jews have little experience of. (Today, many of the top US generals are Jewish, but they seem to be mere extensions of the Neocon cabal as few Jews will do the actual fighting and dying.)
A strain of Pietism molded the German conscience. Christianity, for all its hypocrisy, has emphasized compassion for all mankind, as well as reflection of one’s trespasses unto others, and Germans around the world played their part in reformist movements.
While many Jews also joined progressive movements, they often favored radicalism over reformism, justifying bloody revolutions that ended up doing more harm than good. And, most so-called Jewish Liberals turned out to be wolves-in-sheep’s-clothing who betrayed tolerance and liberty once the power was theirs.
When we survey the state of Pan-Judaica of the current world order, it is a kind of hell. What Jews did to Russia in the 1990s was truly unconscionable. What Jews are doing now with the war in Ukraine is one of the great evils of the 21st century. Jewish influence is leading to White Nakba all across Europe. And consider the state of the US under Jewish Supremacist rule that erected BLM-Negrolatry, Globo-Homo, and Jew-Worship as the ‘spiritual’ pillars of New America.
A proud and confident Pan-Germania might have countered the worst excesses of Pan-Judaica, but the double whammy of World War I and World War II ended that possibility. (To be sure, so much of 20th century tragedy could be interpreted as a conflagration arising from the friction of Teutonism and Semitism in creativity and hostility.) Broken in will and hollowed of soul after World War II, Germans at home and abroad only knew how to take care and take orders. Germans became phobic of their own nature and soul in their earnest efforts at rehabilitation and redemption, a people always out on parole but never truly free.
If indeed Germans were entirely evil and Jews entirely innocent in the Nazi Period, this would be understandable. In truth, the WWII era was really about German supremacism vs Jewish supremacism, and whereas the former was totally crushed in the war, the latter has only grown more pathological with the Holocaust Narrative as moral shield. Thus, German goodwill can only be exploited than appreciated, which is why Jews are now demanding that Germans, who expended so much time and energy expunging themselves of their Nazi past, send more arms, such as Panzer tanks, to Sub-Nazi elements in Ukraine allied to Jewish Gangster-Supremacists.
As for the Anglos, they’ve been proven to be a hollow and soulless bunch whose entire civilization actually ran on fumes of snotty status, haughty manners, and glib wit. Theirs was a wit-to-power, not a will-to-power, and when met with superior Jewish wit and will, the Anglos folded fast and now cuck to every Jewish demand. What might have been, the promise of Pan-Germania, was lost forever.
English
Arabic
Chinese (Simplified)
Dutch
French
German
Hebrew
Hindi
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Russian
Spanish
Swedish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Yes, sadly, jewish cash causes whites to sell out.
This is the root of the problem.
Organized jewry is pure evil, no doubt.
But whites sell their souls and the souls of their countrymen for a pittance.
It’s rather inconvenient to your narrative that Ukraine is not a Jewish country, nor is it Nazi. Putin thinks he’s fighting Jewish gay Nazis in Ukraine, but his hysteria can be understood by the fact that he is at his wits end on how to beat Ukraine. So far, all he’s managed is to squander what manhood was left in Russia and destroy his country’s future.
By the by, Germany is sending obsolescent tanks. Ukraine has plenty of such equipment captured from Putin’s fools. They are presently taking care of the badly needed maintenance of Putin’s former equipment, and that stuff will appear on the battlefield fairly soon.
The two world wars were a tragedy!
He says so but IMHO for the average russian and internal propaganda purpose, I don’t think he believe that.
J-F reveals again his great genius in this masterly piece of writing. I want to thank him for this excellent article which reveals a deeper understanding of human and world affairs.
Excerpts from the Polish Statutes of Kalisz in the Middle Ages:
1. …Should a Jew be taken to court, not just only a Christian must testify against him, but also a Jew, in order for the case to be considered valid.
2. … If any Christian shall sue a Jew, asserting that he has pawned securities with him, and the Jew denies it, then if the Christian refuses to accept the simple word of the Jew, the Jew by taking oath must be free of the Christian.
10. … As punishment for killing a Jew, a suitable punishment and confiscation of property is necessary.
11. … For striking a Jew, the usual punishment in the country shall apply.
13. … Jews shall not pay for the transport of their dead.
14. Christian destroying cemetery except normal penalty will lose assets.
22. … If any of the Christians rashly and presumptuously jeers at their synagogues, such a Christian shall be required to pay and must pay to our palatine their guardian two talents of pepper as punishment.
30. … No Christian may summon any Jew into the ecclesiastical court in any way whatsoever, or for whatever property or summons he be summoned, nor shall the Jew make answer before the judge in the ecclesiastical court, but the Jew shall appear before his palatine appointed for that term, and furthermore the aforesaid palatine, along with our governor for that term, shall be required to defend and protect that Jew, and prohibit his responding to the summons of the ecclesiastical court. No Christian is to accuse a Jew of blood libel.
The Poles gave the Jews these special treatments 800 years ago. SMDH.
Well, two out of three is not a bad score.
This tired trope again?
Will: I know that I’m not smarter than you.
Lecter: Then how did you catch me?
Will: You had disadvantages.
Lecter: What disadvantages?
Will: [matter-of-factly] You’re insane.
— Manhunter
https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Quotes/YoureInsane
In other words, “Stop hitting yourself! Stop hitting yourself!” Or when you finally hit the bully back, and the principal blames you for the fight and makes you apologize to the bully.
A better clip from Goodfellas would have shown how Paulie sent Tommy and Henry to the restaurant to terrorize the owner (Tommy to Henry: “You’re supposed to be doing this stuff too, you know!” in the famous “How am I funny?” scene), who then goes to Paulie for “protection”; Paulie then rips him off and finally burns down the building for the insurance.
“Sure, we’re devoted 24/7 to destroying your country, but play nice and we’ll consider “helping” you fight the other, bad Jews.
Of course, since obviously World Jewry would have simply allowed Germany to neutralize “only the radicals and subversives” among Jews. Maybe they would even have helped out?
The Fallacy of Fair Play. The Germans correctly deduced that “only the radicals and subversives” were not the real problem; they were “small potatoes” (as Hyman Roth says of Frankie in Godfather II), easily replaceable from the hive of World Jewry (“German mean behavior has radicalized more previously peaceful Jews!”)
After being thrown out of 109 countries, maybe someone figured out there needed to be a Final Solution?
“If a country decides to exterminate its pests, what business is that of any other country?” — Revilo Oliver.
My German ancestors were involved in farming. Fortunately, they got out before the commies came along.
But he was free once again at the end of HANNIBAL.
Still, is it worth attacking Brother Nathanael too just because Rob Reiner is an a**hole?
Unlike the lazy(and/or dumb) Polacks, Germans proved capable and even united as a ‘volk’ in national character and consciousness.
So defeating a Soviet invasion isn’t evidence enough of national character?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polish%E2%80%93Soviet_War
Frued once again shows off his selective take on history.
Like most Hitler apologists he doesn’t know the details of what happened in between the wars.
Poland was one of the most anti-Communist nations at the time but Hitler ignored their courageous battle against the Soviets. He fully planned on eliminating their identity as seen by his immediate implementation of Intelligenzaktion. The great anti-Communist was actually having Aryan looking children kidnapped and their Polish parents were marched off to serve as forced labor. If that wasn’t bad enough he gave half of Poland to the devil himself. The great anti-Communist made a deal with Stalin to chop up Eastern Europe.
Besides, despite the occasional rash remark by Kaiser Wilhelm II, Germany was poised for peaceful coexistence with the British Empire.
It was the Kaiser that chose to take on two empires at once.
German greed is what you are missing in all this.
It was the Germans that thought they could quickly defeat France and then turn back to defeat the Russians (schlieffen plan). It was the Germans that gambled on unrestricted warfare knowing full well that it would draw in the Americans. They gambled and lost.
The Germans in both wars needlessly gambled on drawing in the Americans. Hitler even said he wouldn’t make the mistake of the two front war….and what did he do? Opened a second front before defeating Britain.
In both wars the Germans could have gone East without provoking France and Britain.
That is what is completely ignored in all this. Nothing was stopping the Germans from building their empire outside of Western Europe. Chamberlain and the conservatives in fact wanted Hitler to go East. It was Hitler that broke the Munich agreement and embarrassed Chamberlain. That led to Churchhill who both Hitler and Ribbentrop completely underestimated.
In both world wars we could have easily ended up with a German hegemony. Well they went big in both wars and lost. Get over it. Hiter even said he wanted a massive German empire or for Germany to be destroyed. Take it up with mr. mustache for opening a second front when his generals and economists thought it was a terrible idea.
In Russia, comparatively recently, they lifted the ban on the books of Nietzsche, the brilliant philosopher of culture and founder of the ethics of “nobility,” and made his books available to the plebs. An exercise in futility. You see, the problem is that the Russian plebs simply can’t help but pervert even such simple concepts as “war” as understood by Nietzsche, who said: “You say that a good deed sanctifies even a warrior? I tell you: a good war sanctifies any cause!” And now these intellectual perverts like Dugin and other national Bolsheviks are already foaming at the mouth to prove that “Putin is our helmsman and we will not accept the price” and are rushing to sanctify the bloody slaughter of Christian nations. And the thing is that these pseudo-intellectuals have never understood that Nietzsche meant a “war of ideas”, i.e. an honest and courageous fight for one’s “beyond”, for one’s beliefs and ideals. Only such a “good war” truly sanctifies “any cause.
I find it amazing that while taunting Russia, Poland is also taunting Germany for a trillion dollars in World War II reparations. Poland played tough with both Russia and Germany in 1939. It didn’t work well.
Video Link
They are the most talented, but at what?
Propaganda, guilt mongering, ruthlessness, tribalism, nepotism (although dot Indians give them a run for their money in the last two).
NATO aka the US military, still keeps Germany down.
Video Link
It’s a pity that the author of the text stuck only to the official history, which still includes falsifications created mainly by the German historical school. For example, it should be said that the Germans were not Goths. It should be said that the Germans came from Asia to Serbian historical territories (the term Slavs can be used after the 7th century). So, the Serbs were Aryans and not Germans. One of the forgeries is the so-called ‘Indo-Germanic’ languages, later renamed to the equally meaningless term ‘Indo-European’ languages/people(!).
Very few people know that there were Serbian principalities in the Baltic and that they founded many cities in today’s Germany and gave them names (Berlin, Leipzig, Brandenburg, Dresden, etc.). Many Germans have Serbian origins (Martin Luther, Leibnitz, Bismarck, Empress Catherine). Even Adolf admitted it (although he called them Slavs). The Serbs gave the Germans a physiognomy. For example, the Prussians are a ‘typical’ German physiognomy.
The prominent noble families and dynasties are of Serbian origin (House of Hohenzollern, Mecklenburg, dukes/kings of Prussia, etc.). who had their principalities that ruled the area of Germany for centuries. Very little is known about the genocide the Germans carried out for centuries against the native Serbs in today’s Germany. Few people know that it was these natives who gave them their name – Germans. It is a falsification that the Germans are the heirs of the Roman Empire (that was why the Goths/Dacians were called Eastern Germans), but the Serbs gave the dozens of the Roman emperors.
The Germans established a ‘Serbian border’ even though Serbs lived on both sides. Perhaps all this is not the most important, but it is symptomatic that strict care is taken, not to mention any of the previous things. The Germans must sooner or later reveal the truth about their history, or they will be considered intruders who have occupied someone else’s territory.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sorbian_settlement_area
Some volunteered but most were drafted. The arrogance was amazing, stealing their property and locking up their innocent family members, most of whom were American born citizens. Then demand they serve to fight America’s foreign war. Some 300 “Japs” refused and were sent to a harsh prison for their crime.
Over 10,000 German-Americans were also interned (locked up.) Unlike the Japanese, the US government never officially apologized to these German-Americans for this crime, and never provided a token reparations payment.
Video Link
Where do you get your information from, anyhow?
No mention that the English (aka Anglo-Saxons) are descendants of German immigrants. This is why Great Britain excelled and prospered.
Books and historical documentaries.
Frued may provide a lot of historical background but he is skipping some key points to promote a narrative.
If German-Americans had shown greater defiance and will against the anti-Germanism so prevalent in the last years of World War I, they might eventually have prevailed over the Anglos.
…
In some ways, for all their nastiness, Jews are admirably made of tougher stuff because they aren’t so weak and wussy.
So you are saying that Jews are tougher than German-Americans?
German-Americans were the largest White ethnic group in WW2. Meaning they were the largest group that fought the actual war.
The Germans rounded up the Jews and they went along with it. The was only one Jewish backlash against the Germans and it failed. Politically incorrect but true.
Try putting German-Americans on trains. Even without guns they would find some way to thwart you. Germans are nasty in war and German-Americans are no exception. Hitler was in fact worried that America would always dominate without some type of Reich involvement of Europe because so many strong-headed rural Germans had emigrated.
No mention that the English (aka Anglo-Saxons) are descendants of German immigrants. This is why Great Britain excelled and prospered.
Yes he seems to be imagining clear racial distinctions between British descended Anglos and German-Americans.
It is true that there was more distinguishable German-American culture before WW1 but most German/British Anglo communities were merged as American.
Anglo is often used to describe Germanic Whites but that also includes the British.
Of course there are Celts but no one cares. When people describe the Anglosphere it includes everything British/American/Australian/Canadian and those populations include a lot of ethnic Germans. Canada includes a lot of ethnic French but again no one cares. It’s a general term.
In 1915 you had more plain White Americans than distinguishable Germans or Brits.
German-Americans were more likely to oppose intervention early in the war but that changed after events like the sinking of the Lusitania. They didn’t “wimp out” as Freud implies. Germany lost a lot of moral credibility in WW1. German-Americans downplayed their German side and identified as American. That is why there are very few German restaurants in America today.
Like Daniel Jonah Goldhagen, who never even mentioned Soviet atrocities in his book “Hitler’s Willing Executioners”. If only Americans knew of Soviet WWII atrocities, carried out under Joseph Stalin. They would think twice about saying that the Germans are Uniquely Evil. And, when they say The Holocaust is Uniquely Evil, that always seemed to me to be a disguised way of saying that they that they thought the German people themselves, as a people, are Uniquely Evil: that only the Germans are truly evil, or some such nonsense.
Indeed, people in the Western World do not seem to realize how much the Soviet Gulag, of Stalin, was like the Death Camps of Nazi Germany. They may not exactly had those vast, homicidal gas chambers or experimented with turning human fat into soap, but boy did the NKVD come up with some rather horrid ways to torture their victims to death! If only people knew.
Still, the reputation of Germany has never recovered from The Third Reich. It probably never will!
It is time for the Anglo Saxons and the Teutonic people to put aside their hatred of each other. They have many common enemies, now. This is especially so, due to Multiculturalism.
The English were and still are mostly Britons, i.e., Celts. The Angles, Saxons and Jutes constituted a ruling class, just like the Franks and the Normans.
Jutes-shmutes; the English are descendant of the Dutch, and the Dutsch (low-Germans) hate high-Germans with passion. The Jutes are, naturally, crossbreds between Danes and Dutch.
Mind you Roosevelts are Dutch, and FDR , who did personally and socially met the Keiser , a fellow yachtsman, really hated Germans for being Germans.
This brings us to the flaw in the very long article: what was (and is) wrong with them Germans so that despite possibilities, they have failed so spectacularly, and now are but “angry liver sausages”? Why even Ukrainians now wipe their feet of doormat Germans?
You can find the reason in Russian literature. Brother Karamazoff, or what was it? Many texts. Germans for all their virtues, are very annoying, self righteous, inflexible people. They annoy locals and are politically kind of stupid. The said Tzars were themselves Germans, and lost it all.
So, jedem das zeine, and Germans got what they deserved. All is well in this best of the worlds (as a German Pangloss would undoubtly say, when them Germans were allowd to say anything).
No, most English are Anglo Saxon. They drove out the Celts!
Those who hate the Germans in particular hate Whites in general; those who hate Whites in general hate Germans in particular.
President James A. Garfield learned German for his electoral campaign, which brought him many votes as he was able to deliver his speeches in those districts where English wasn‘t the dominant language. As he was determined on fighting corruption, he got assassinated after only six months. Another lost chance for building a decent society.
The only people worse than the Germans are the Jews!
It should also be added that the US and Great Britain both formed a strong alliance with the Soviet Union in WW II, whose first government was 80 to 85% Jewish according to President Putin. That strong Jewish power remained until after WW II was over and the Jewish nature of the Soviet government lasted longer than that. The Soviet Union outlawed anti-Semitism and banned Christianity, attacked Christians, murdered nuns and priests and burned down its churches. For this reason and others, German troops were not infrequently welcomed as liberators by common people across the USSR, in Ukraine, Belarus, the Baltic republics and Russia itself. Churchill and FDR did not fight to free those people. They fought to persecute them and ingratiate themselves to powerful Jews.
Winston Churchill wrote a long article on the huge role the Jews played in the founding of the USSR and the New York Times covered up the massacres taking place in the USSR in the 1930’s, but Germany did not, blaming it squarely on what it called “Judeo-Bolshevism”. The Germans viewed this as a danger to Europe and the world, and any objective analysis can see Jews have been the most dominant power in the world, certainly the west, since the end of WW II. One can also see that for the first time in centuries, if not much longer, the west (Europe for centuries) is no longer the leading power in the world. It’s not just that Asia has arisen (good for them), the west is a cesspool of degeneracy and failure brought to it by Cultural Marxism and other things Jewish.
Despite Churchill’s opposition to communism, his friendship with Jews was strong enough that he would not allow the slaughter of millions of Russians, Ukrainians and others interfere with that friendship and he would not allow his hatred of Germans be interfered with by a peace plan from them that would have prevented WW II. Also helping Churchill in his efforts to bring WW II about were huge financial payoffs by wealthy Jews starting in 1936. It was made clear to him that money meant he was to attack Germany, in the media at first and then with outright war once he was levered into office.
To this day, the world’s mass media has knowingly lied and denied the huge Jewish power in the communism and the USSR and much more. It has lied about the deliberate massacre of at least 135,000 Germans in three days in Dresden, the biggest atrocity of WW II, while outright lying in accusations made at the Germans with invented atrocity stories, such as claiming Jews were made into soap and lampshades, and much more. Books or speeches that don’t acknowledge the so called Holocaust and counter it are banned in almost half of Europe, and the authors are thrown in jail in the western culture of lies.
Video Link
Watch from minutes 29 through 44 for the discussion of the huge financial payoffs a major Jewish organization and Jewish individuals made to Churchill in 1936.
https://altcensored.com/watch?v=MLloM6ufVgk
Apparently you (and others) assume an inescapable determinism stemming solely, or overwhelmingly, from biological race. Britons are very different from Germans. Those two nations have distinct histories and different cultures. Those cultures were adaptations to their respective environments, which were vey different. Britain is a “sea culture” and Germany is a “land culture”.
The land, the sea and the water in between — On the liquefaction of culture
https://balticworlds.com/on-the-liquefaction-of-culture/
Though they say The Holocaust is like no other atrocity in the world, it sounds remarkably like, of all things, standard operating procedure of Communist regimes. Think the Communists had no Prison Camps? Think again! After all, what do you suppose The Gulag was?
Not just race. Language too. English is a Germanic language and their language evolved from the Saxons that went to England. Of course they are two distinct peoples, but few peoples have so much in common. The English royalty often intermarried with German royalty too. The English king during the revolutionary war was German and famous Queen Victoria’s husband was married to a German. There may have been many more.
There was no holocaust!
The existence of any homicidal gas chambers in any German concentration camp was completely disproved during the Zundel trials in Toronto.
Read the transcripts if you must.
This article basically explains how all of the Western World deserve what is coming. Fine by me tbh.
MTG once again calls for national divorce.
I think it’s workable on a small scale. A small 5 million person country with white Christians with an ocean port. It would probably involve Idaho and the parts of Oregon necessary for the port.
It’s important to understand that one of the PRIMARY motives, psychologically, for Russia and America’s war on Germany was aversion and contempt for Germans living in their countries. Why would so many Yankees want war with Germany? Why would Russians mobilize their invasion army so the Black Hand wouldn’t be punished? Germany did not seek war with Russia or America. That war was, given the psychological composition of Yankees and Slavs, inevitable.
Do the Russians still not understand that they will never appease the United States? Unfortunately, they take the wrong lessons from America’s Civil War. They think of the popularity of Uncle Tom’s cabin in Russia and Alexander II’s liberation of the serfs. They love to talk about American racism. They don’t understand the people who harbor an ineradicable pathological hatred for them were the same people who were happy to use them diplomatically in the Civil War. If they showed sympathy for the Soviet Union it wasn’t because they loved Russians, it’s because they hated them.
The Dutch are simply Germans, period. Now if the Dutch historical state and “national consciousness” is anti-German, that is for the same reason there were Synagogues in Amsterdam hailing Sabbetai Zevi in the 17th Century. The Dutch state is trying to close down Dutch farms! The Dutch state and the people who accept its legitimacy may hate the Germans, but that is just their internalized hatred of gentiles, to the point of trying to shut down the nation’s agricultural production.
The Anti-Germanism in the US was adjacent to Prohibitionism, which is adjacent to today’s scandal of child-mutilationism.
How is it that Slavs are able to start wars on the side of the final winners and then still lose the war?
The Bohemians managed to start the Thirty Years War, but Prague remained in the hands of the Emperor until the final peace.
The Serbian Black Hand and Imperial Russia managed to start WWI. Colonel Apis ended up shot (after the death of a huge proportion of the adult male population) and the Tsar ended up dead, after Russia signed a separate peace.
The Poles refused to negotiate with Germany in 1939, and we all know what happened to Poland after WWII!
Ukraine is fighting to the death for the US aligned Jews that control it!
Is this caused by an inferiority complex in a kind of parasitic “symbiosis” with anglo-judaic superiority complex?
Jewish World War 1 & Jewish World War 2 and Jewish World War 3 will rectify JWW1 + JWW2;
JWW3 is up and “running”. Its darkness will end darkness – Judaism – and its Christian satellites (incl. Vatica). The unfortunate survivors who will live to see, if fortunate, the new light will be “light & bright”. The new Light-Brightades, risen out of ashes, will be true while new and beyond priests & politicians and their forever changing past (his stories).
In the time of Eugenics, they used to sterilize undesirables. Nowadays, they try to promote Homosexuality and Transgenderism. I think the goal is really the same. To prevent too many babies from being born.
The White Race simply has no future!
I’m not in the position to claim expertise on this subject, but let’s just say that this goes against all stereotypes. Just as an example, the British are famous for their sense of humor, whereas the Germans are often mocked for their lack thereof. You cite language and some royal marriage. I don’t see those as very relevant for this discussion.
P.S.: Though my previous comment was addressed to John Johnson, I’ve noticed that the only sentence to which it might apply is the first one in his comment, and then again I might have misinterpreted him. The remainder of his comment seems to be very reasonable.
That is very strange!
The question of who started WW1 is a litmus test to see who a moron is. With their 3 million inhabitants exhausted by the two Balkan wars, the Serbs did not start the war by attacking the combined Austro-German empire of 100 million, which had been preparing for an attack on Serbia for at least two decades. That is why that question is used for the above mentioned purpose.
But that’s why the Serbs ended the war by completely smashing the Bulgarian and Austrian armies, all running toward Berlin. That’s why the Kaiser wrote to the Bulgarian emperor that it was a shame that 62,000 Serbian soldiers, whom they thought were dead, decided WW1. Too bad the Allies stopped the Serbian troops halfway through Austria before they got to Berlin and saved the Germans from defeat by choosing that WW1 ended in a draw. It was a unique opportunity for the Serbs to regain their historical territories in the Baltics, seized by the Germans 800 years before.
Considering the current situation in Europe and the Balkans, where the US and NATO exert intense pressure on Serbia, some analysts wonder if the Serbs will also decide the fate of WW3. Maybe now the Serbs will have a chance to regain their historical territories in the Baltics since there will be no allies to stop them from doing so.
Someone already mentioned that after coming to America, the Germans became Americans very quickly and did not support Germany much in the subsequent world wars. This is interesting considering that they were one of the largest ethnic communities and that by just a few votes German language did not become the official language of the US. Someone pointed out the consequence that German ethnic restaurants in US almost do not exist.
We have already said that a large percentage of Germans are in fact a Germanised indigenous Serbian population, whose territories were seized by the Germans upon their arrival from their Asian homeland. It might be interesting to mention few names of the Americans who have exactly that indigenous origins from the territory of today’s Germany.
Here are some famous names: Davy Crockett, John Tyler and Andrew Johnston (10th and 17th US presidents), Ralph Waldo Emerson, General Custer who perished at the Little Bighorn, Stephen King and of course – Chuck Norris.
Actually, yes, that’s exactly what the Serbs did. Because they were led by murderous fanatics. They could have let the Austrians into the country to see to it that Apis was shot before they lost a significant part of their male population. We can see today how well Serbia “won.”
The reason people dislike slavs is because they harbor and idolize murderous bigoted fanatics like Princip. The Serbs especially are known to have many barbarous people among them. This would not be a fair way to judge the people as a whole. I support Russia I opposed the bombing of Serbia. Let’s be clear though: the murderers in the Black Hand and the Kings they installed decided IT WAS NOT a violation of Austrian sovereignty to shoot the Archduke heir to the Austrian throne when Franz Josef was near death. But it was WAS a violation of their sovereignty to see to it that the murderers were punished. Until their country was occupied and they wanted a separate peace, then they shot Apis anyway.
Your swineherd Karageorgevic dynasty didn’t win anything. Look at Serbia today. Your country was only fighting for its deceitful bloodlust. Krvna Osveta
You obviously failed the above test. Princip was a minor and part of the pro-Yugoslav youth. Austria was the aggressor in his country. From the beginning of the world, Bosnia was a Serbian land, later occupied by the Ottomans. Austria came to steal Serbian land. What was Austria looking for in Bosnia when it was never their country? There was already a text here about ww1 where it was presented that Austria and Germany tried to provoke a war with Serbia on several occasions.
Obviously, your hatred towards Serbs is irrational. I don’t know your background (you are afraid to bring it up). If you are a German, how many genocides did Germany commit against the Serbs since they came from their Asian homeland, how many times did they commit aggression against the Serbs, how many times did they bomb the Serbs, how many Serbs and Serbian children were they taken out of schools and shot in WW2, where they shot 100 Serbs for every resistance for one German Nazi killed, how many historical falsifications did the Viennese-German school of history make up by inventing the elusive so-called ‘Indo-Germanic’ language and promoting themselves as Aryans and Goths even though they were Serbs, the inheritors of the world’s oldest civilization, culture and language in Vinca and the natives of Europe who even gave the Germans their name and they still don’t even know what that name means.
Dont tell it close to any Dutch, though, anymore than “the Poles are simply Russians” to the Poles.
Never forget the French, they are the ones worse than Germans.
(European Jews are a form of metis Germans and thus lacking the arrogance and ignorance of Germans while stillretaining many of the good businness qualities of the later).
Princip was a gud boy – irresponsible minor – national hero – assassin.
The term ‘Indo-European’ (previously called ‘Indo-Germanic’) is meaningless and without any substance. English language was formed in the 12th century, German in the 14-15th. century. The Serbian language is the oldest in Europe and has continuity since the Paleolithic. It gave rise to all Slavic languages, Sanskrit and influenced almost all European languages.
Most of the noble families from Germany are of Serbian origin (House oh Hohenzollern, Mecklenburg, etc.). The husband of Queen Victoria, Albert, had a Serbian surname and Victoria took it as the official surname of her dynasty, but it was not used. Instead, the House of Windsor is used. Gothic-Serbian kings ruled Sweden, Denmark and Norway several hundred years ago. From them came the Danish royal house, where Christian IX was the grandfather of the English king, the German Kaiser and the Russian emperor who visited their granddad during the summer and as children played with him.
The Germans are false Goths, false Aryans, false heirs of the Roman empire, they are Asiatic people who stole the land from the natives of Europe and committed countless genocides, including the tens of millions of Russians killed during WW2 and by sponsoring the Croatian genocide against the Serbs.
The word Dutch literally means German, so yes, they are Germans. Rusyn you might call Russians, (less Russian than the Dutch are Germans) but not Poles.
Gavrilo Princip was a minor and could not be sentenced to death. He was imprisoned in Theresienstadt where he was tortured most terribly for 4 years, he was not given food, he was put in a barrel with nails and rolled like that, his arm was gangrenous, torn off and thrown to rats. He died as a hero, an idealist, fighting almost as a child for the freedom of his people, against the aggressors on his land. Princip is a hero who will serve as an example to new generations and a warning to all future aggressors, murderers and usurpers of foreign lands.
That’s why, after the German aggression against Serbia in ww2 and after the killing of thousands of civilians with incendiary bombs, the shooting of children and civilians, the first gift to Hitler for his birthday brought from Yugoslavia was a memorial plaque dedicated to Gavrilo Princip.
https://www.google.com/search?q=Frankfurter+Allgemeine+Zeitung%2C+http%3A%2F%2Fwww.faz.net%2Faktuell%2Fpolitik%2F70-jahre-kriegsende%2Fin-slowenien-und-kroatien-wird-vor-allem-titos-gedacht-13573981%2Fadolf-hitler-betrachtet-nach-13574018.html&rlz=1C1GCEA_enAU1046AU1046&oq=Frankfurter+Allgemeine+Zeitung%2C+http%3A%2F%2Fwww.faz.net%2Faktuell%2Fpolitik%2F70-jahre-kriegsende%2Fin-slowenien-und-kroatien-wird-vor-allem-titos-gedacht-13573981%2Fadolf-hitler-betrachtet-nach-13574018.html&aqs=chrome..69i57.1285j0j15&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#imgrc=pOkybzEva97NdM
The Dutch sure got in a scuffle with the Anglos in South Africa. Maybe a tell-tale warning of what might brew later.
Well, having lived extensively in both cultures, let me put your mind at ease.
Germans believe that the English have no sense of humour! Imagine that! Nasty Nazis believing that.
Fact is both nations/cultures have a great sense of humour, they only find different situations humorous.
This isn’t only between Germans and English. Other cultures find different situations humorous. This theory was tested with movies having subtitles. In different countries the people laughed at different points in the movie.
Moronic level of lying. If you are going to lie and prostitute yourself as such, at least be convincing or offer a more tantalizing tidbit than wimpy bar splutterings and low class Mossad lickspittle palaver.
He must have been a really tough person to survive all that.
Your scribbles have a distinctive Jewish flavour! Every one of your misfortunes is someone elses’ fault. That is not the thinking of a mature and healthy adult human.
The English NOW have no sense of humor. It’s been criminalized while the clownshow has been institutionalized. From stiff upper lip to sealed lips.
Video Link
Benny Hill was quite a humorous show in my opinion.
Another one I really enjoyed was “On the Busses”. Hmmm, giving my age away.
Princip did not survive, he died of severe torture a few weeks before the end of the war without waiting to see the freedom he and his generation fought for. You can’t know this feeling. Germans throughout their history attacked others, stole their land, robbed them, hypocritically lied, forged, misrepresented themselves, hid their Asiatic origins, committed genocides and started new wars over and over again to steal as much as possible. This is a natural state for Germans. They do not know what it means to fight for freedom, for the protection of their homeland, family, culture, religion.
Here, it is enough that we now see this German cowardice and hypocrisy, the fear that they will notice that their gas pipeline has been blown up with explosives. Now there is no arrogance towards the weak but serving those you mentioned in your comment. We see the idiot of a foreign minister, the hatred of Russia that prevented the Morgenthau plan and the destruction of the German nation. If the Russians had not protected the Germans, they would not exist as a nation now. In fact, they don’t even exist anymore, they have become America’s doormat.
Agree with this. People come to knowledge at parts, because of having nearly no actual knowledge from supposed education, so it’s valuable to have articles such as this, and with some edge, and which can add to sense of self also.
Appreciate the article JF.
.
Princip carried out the assassination in part because he had tuberculosis. He was such a gud little Serbian boy, wasn’t he? National Hero, murderer, tortured like a martyr!
The innocent swarthy teenager Princip was a month short of 20 years old when he got into trouble for going with a bad crowd that was carrying out the assassination of the next in line to be Emperor of Austria and King of Hungary. I read the trial transcripts translated by WA Dolph-Owing many years ago.
@HdC
It wouldn’t surprise me if this “Odyssey” figure had Polish background.
The in Poland opinion is that all of the disasters that ever had affected the Polish nation (i.e. the mixture of peoples united in language and religion, if you ask me) is the fault of the “barbarian” German race. This outlook is standard with ordinary Polish churchgoers, but those who perceive themselves as more educated take it further, claiming that the Germans allways have been striving to exterminate all peoples of Slavic descent. Some of the highly religious among tha latter believe even that Poles are the original Christian people, because their language was, unlike the Germanic ones, based on the Sanskrit. That is why Poland has the Virgin Mary as Queen and Jesus Christ as King.
Poles seem to be afflicted with an inferiority complex that was “enriched” with a chauvinistic pride. The fact that Poland’s puppets in power are supportingUkraine naturally does not mean that every day Poles love- or at least like- the Ukrainians. I would say, it is rather the opposite, as accounts about Ukranian atrocities against Poles are to be found on a big number of websides and pods. The ancient “divide et impera” has thus not faded into the woodwark but proves itself very efficient.
You have a lot to say about Germans. Why?
Your rat-hole country doesn’t keep you busy enough?
Why don’t you go and do better? You know, show up the “stupid” Germans how science, engineering, construction, societal organization, etc. ought to be done.
Polish attitudes towards Germans are a lot like Irish attitudes towards English.
I new this was coming! Bingo!
You’re a semiliterate moron who can’t even read English, a loudmouth who goes around spreading your megalomaniacal fantasies. Wasn’t it you who claimed that the ancient Norse goddess Freya was of Serbian origin? And now you are making a fool of yourself again by making claims about the Germans. Holy kamoly, tell me more about it, Dumb-o-sey. lol
The entire Panzer brigade has lined up to oppose my arguments but is unable to produce a single fact. The whole brigade could not find a single wrong detail in my accounts. We only see racist frustration (though, the word ‘race’ is a Serbian word and has the same meaning as ‘Srb’, i.e. Serb).
One repeats the same ‘argument’ in various comments to other people (‘rat-hole’ country). I have presented dozens of statements. It was enough to find only one that was incorrect and destroy my credibility in relation to all the others.
Let’s look at only one ‘argument’ that is still present in the mainstream – ‘Germans were Goths’.
Let’s see if someone has the courage and knowledge to confirm this (s/he doesn’t have to prove it).
Alternatively – does anyone know the meaning of the term ‘German’?
Btw, let me refer to the comment about the Poles. I don’t know what is being discussed there but I can comment on what is stated here.
First – ‘the Polish language is based on Sanskrit’.
In fact, it’s the other way around. Sanskrit arose from the so-called ‘Indo-Iranian’ language which even the mainstream claims came from Poland/Belarus by splitting off from the so-called Baltic-Slavic. According to that logic, that language should be called Polish and not Indo-Iranian. But that ancestor of Sanskrit did not originate in Poland than in Vinca, from where it spread over the entire Europe. That language can be called Vincan until the first industrial revolution in Vinca (7500 years ago) and after that – the Serbian language. This language has continuity since the Palaeolithic up to today and influenced the formation of almost all European languages.
Second – ‘Poles are original Christians’
It’s technically correct. The first Christian diocese was formed in 34 AC in Sirmium, one of Roman capitals, 40 km from Belgrade. St. Paul and Peter visited modern Serbia before they went to Rome. Paul performed the first baptisms in Serbia. Later, the Serbian-Roman emperors persecuted Christianity (Diocletian and others), legalized it (Galerius, Licinius, Constantine) and built churches (Justinian). Besides them, there were dozens of Serbian emperors. At that time, the Poles did not exist yet as a separate entity, but were part of the common proto-Slavic (i.e. Serbian speaking) corpus. The term ‘Slavs’ can only be used for events after the 7th century.
The first translation of the Bible into Latin, which is still in service, was done by St. Jerome, who was a Serb. The founder of the Protestant Church, Martin Luther, was also a Serb.
Third – ‘The Germans always looked to destroy the Slavs.’
This is true and has been happening for 1000’s of years. Drang nach Osten. Give one example when it was the other way around. Moreover, the Russians saved the Germans from destruction by the Morgenthau Plan. Otherwise the Germans would not exist as a nation now.
Well, I don’t know about that as Stalin did not abolish the Volga German ASSR until Aug. 28, 1941, little more than two months after the German invasion of the USSR in June 1941, whereupon the Volga Germans were sent into exile in Siberia and elsewhere, along with several other groups of ethnic Germans who had found their own lebensraum in Russia beginning in the 18th century, thanks to invitations from Russian Empress Catherine the Great, herself a former German princess, and Tsar Alexander I. These exiled ethnic German groups included also the Black Sea Germans, but there were still more:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Sea_Germans
German singer Helene Fischer, who is sometimes called the “Queen of Schlager,” was born in Krasnoyarsk, and is the granddaughter of exiled Black Sea Germans. As a child, she emigrated with her parents to Germany.
Helene Fischer “Дорогой длинною” (By the Long Road), or “Those Were the Days”
Yes, if not for WWI, it would have been a different world, and there probably never would have been an Adolf Hitler to lead Germany to a 2nd disaster.
What’s happened? At first, you were funny, and I tried on several occasions to protect you from others by claiming that you are not a moron (IQ<60) that you just write moronic comments. Now you're not funny anymore, you're just frustrated and spouting nonsense. You didn't have the courage (nor knowledge) to address any of my assertions above.
One reader said above that many are very surprised by what they read in the text (I would add – also in the comments) since they didn't learn it in school. This is the case with all Panzer brigadiers here who graduated from (((schools))) according to the appropriate (((program))). That can explain ignorance but not IQ<60. See and listen your FM and your Chancellor. Morons (and cowards)!!!
You promised you wouldn't read my comments, but you lied. It's not a problem, you could use the opportunity to learn a lot just in this thread, especially because you couldn't find anywhere else.
The last bit of nonsense I noticed is your claim that the Catholic Church was the fundamental Christian church. It's another proof of your moronism and it's not just a lack of knowledge. The Catholic Church separated as a sect from the mother church and was considered as such for a long time. You can see what it has turned into – a mafia organization that aspires to be a state within a state with its banks, secret service, mafia strategy to take over as much as possible and turn as many people into slaves as possible.
We see what they made of Galicians in Ukraine or in Croatia. They created the worst strain of people who do the dirtiest jobs, genocides in the Vatican's campaign to the East. In Romania they made an artificial nation with an artificial language and sent 160K Romanians to die under Stalingrad.
Do I need to describe how the Catholic William the Conqueror conquered Orthodox England and imprisoned and killed all Orthodox bishops who did not want to crown him? What to say about the mafia crusaders who went to loot and destroy the capital of the Eastern Roman Empire? People still remember such barbarity. There is much more but all this will hardly improve your knowledge, IQ will remain unchanged, but you will remain one of the most frustrated trolls here.
Pol-Potin’s Disinformation Agent Alert:
The crimes of the Serbs.
The International Criminal Tribunal for Yugoslavia found that more than 8,000 adult Bosnian Muslim men were murdered. The investigation found that the killings were carried out by soldiers of the army of the Republika Srpska under the command of General Ratko Mladic.
Following these events, NATO adopted a program of bombing Serb targets and used the threat of force to prevent the Serbs from attacking another “safe zone,” Gorazde.
Atrocities committed by Serbian partisans in Hungarian Bačko (“Petrovo Selo”) in 1944. 70 people were executed.
The partisans gathered about a hundred Hungarian inhabitants of “Petrovo Selo”, while Father Ferenc Takács was arrested. These men were tortured in the school building for three or four days without food or water. Finally they were taken to the river and shot.
The hatred of the local Serbs turned the vengeful partisans against Dr. Ferenc Takács, a Catholic priest and Hungarian patriot. He was stripped of his cassock and tortured by sadistic female partisans. Their actions were directed mainly at the genitals of the priest, who had taken a vow of celibacy. First they tortured him with pliers, then they burned his penis with a piece of iron heated in a nearby forge.
This physical torture was an expression of intolerance and hatred for the “other faith” and the rules of the Catholic religion, which does not allow its priests to marry. They condemned to death a man who, according to the Serbs, might have considered himself superior to them because of his vow of celibacy, not only as a Hungarian but also as a priest.
The Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes, later renamed the Kingdom of Yugoslavia, proclaimed on December 1, 1918, consolidated its sovereignty over Kosovo.
Centuries of enmity could not but affect the attitude of the indigenous Serbian population toward the Albanians: a policy of assimilation or expulsion of the Albanian population from the kingdom was forcibly pursued.
Is that your gang, Odyssey? I think you are the one in the center:
Ha-ha
A few years ago I read a book by Peter Watson “The German Genius”. Among so many truly great men of art and literature, science and medicine, one name was forever etched in my mind: Johann Joachim Winckelmann, the man who completely revolutionized the study of art.
Born in 1717 in Stendal, Prussia, the son of a cobbler, Winckelmann grew up in a one-room house that doubled as his father’s workshop. He urged his parents to give him an education beyond their means, and somehow found his way to Berlin to study with Christian Tobias Damm, “one of the few men then alive in Germany who elevated Greek above Latin at a time when the study of the Greek language was almost entirely neglected”.
After Berlin, Winckelmann moved on to the universities of Halle and Jena, where he studied medicine, philosophy, and mathematics, supporting himself as a tutor. He would read Greek until midnight, sleep in an old coat in an armchair until four in the morning, when he would resume reading. During the summer months he slept on a bench with a block of wood tied to his foot, which would fall down and wake him at the slightest movement.
If I need to learn something, you would be the last anonymous troll I would bother looking up for an epiphany.
You’re not here to educate anyone, just to bash whites and “Aryans” because those pesky creatures have always been targets of your Islamic jihad, and don’t even try to disprove that. You are waging your jihad here, so you are my ideological enemy. Funny how you jihadists use the tactics of your perennial enemies, the Jews, which only proves that your IQ is even lower than mine, since you can’t come up with anything better than copy-cat maneuvers.
Being a semi-literate muslim, you are not qualified to pass judgement on this subject. Why don’t you go and proselytize your Islamic fairy tales to the many disenfranchised people of Serbia, like the gypsies? Looks like they could use some help from useless trollmites like you.
Some people spend their whole lives writing books, making speeches, using diplomacy, and even getting killed for it, while Serbs just take a shortcut to their fucking freedom by killing a beautiful woman and mother of four, Sophie, Duchess of Hohenberg, wife of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria. Fucking savages.
https://geneee.org/g?m=IM;d=1517595969;p=sophie;n=chotek+von+chotkowa;k=/sophie.0.chotek_von_chotkowa
I have had several unpleasant real estate dealings with Germans in the last couple of decades. I would paraphrase that to be:
German stubbornness and rationalization and Jewish art of lying, distorting and obliterating any argument with bullshit are a toxic combination.
Throughout my career I have had a few dealings with German business people.
They always delivered on time, on budget, and as per contract specifications.
Of course that means that you sit down and discuss what it is you really want; this can be time consuming and boring.
Some years ago in another forum was a guy who bitched and moaned about Germans and German women in particular. Turned out he had been married to a number of German women and it had not turned out well for him.
He got real huffy when I opined that perhaps it was a problem with their husband.
I live in Canada and, while not a legal requirement, the great majority of real estate transactions are handled by lawyers. Why? Because these people carry errors and omissions insurance that hold the transacting parties harmless in case things go awry. In the last 10 years or so these legal fees have become a very small part of the cost of the transaction, and such is very cheap for the protection and peace of mind it offers.
“Odyssey” is one of Milosevic’s gerillas who invested their hopes in Putz-In-Dung to rebuild the “Great Kingdom of Serbia” by dragging Slovenia and Croatia into their shitty Serbian gulag.
Is it possible that you are such a moron? It seems you are the dumbest in the entire Panzer brigade. Also, you seem to have serious mental issues which are reflected here in the diarrhea of idiotic comments. Milosevic was killed 20 years ago by the same team that now supports Ukries. Slovenia and Croatia never existed as countries until about 30 years ago. Serbia was the winner of the WW1 and was able to take back all earlier occupied areas inhabited by Serbs. Croats and Slovenes begged them to be accepted into the new Yugoslavia because they knew that they would disappear within one generation. This is how the Slovenes in Carinthia who decided to stay in Austria and the Macedonians in Bulgaria and Greece disappeared.
King Alexander made a mistake by accepting their request and got cancer in his country because in 20 years they would commit genocide and kill more than a million Serbs. Who needs Croats, who have been repeatedly confirmed to be a genocidal group and the worst kind of people together with Galicians? And was it normal for Slovenes and Croats to be in Austria-Hungary where they had no territorial rights or the right to use their language? Why did the AU not give them the right of self-determination? Croats in Yugoslavia had their president for almost 40 years (Tito), who ensured the fastest development of Slovenia and Croatia with systematic measures, while the rest of Yugoslavia was treated as a colony.
Even if it is from a fake Goth, fake Aryan, fake holy Roman descendant, fake Priyanka worshiper – it is too much.
I don’t care about your Serbia & shit. Your pro-Putin/anti-Ukrainian/anti-German/anti-American/anti-Rest of the World clap-trap is getting more and more annoying. If this site ever gets shut down, it’s because of your 24×7 pro-Russia crude propaganda. Some people are not going to like it. I’m putting you on notice.
Pan-Slavism is a Jewish project and you are a feverish imposter of it.
There were no “vast, homocidal gas chambers”. Get up to speed, please.
Putin was just repeating Robert Wilton’s fake story where he provided an alleged list of the Council of People’s Commissars claiming that it had 22 members and that 17 were Jewish. But it was a bogus list. The Council that was formed after the October Revolution had 16 members and Trotsky was the only Jewish name on the list. Russian news commentators noted this fallacy by Putin at the time he made it:
https://web.archive.org/web/20130618091544/echo.msk.ru/programs/interception/1095292-echo/
V.DYMARSKY – A major historian. I cannot understand whether Vladimir Vladimirovich himself is reading these figures somewhere, or whether his wonderful advisers and experts are slipping him these figures? Where does he get that from. Yesterday– the fate of the famous Schneerson Library was discussed there. And so, I quote him, “You know what I’m thinking right now? The decision to nationalize this library was taken by the first Soviet government; and about 80-85% of its members were Jews. They, guided by false ideological considerations, then went to arrests and repressions. And Jews and Orthodox, representatives of other faiths, Muslims – they all rowed under one comb.” Dear Vladimir Vladimirovich and his advisers, dear listeners, please open the list of the first Soviet government, which includes 16 people. Of course, maybe someone was hiding under some names, but you can look, and you will see that this is not the case. There is one person there, one Jew– Leon Davidovich Trotsky. Well, those who doubt Lenin’s origins…
V.RYZHKOV – I think that Vladimir Vladimirovich read the tabloid press during the years of perestroika, because this theory was very common – that there were only Jews there – in such nationalist tabloid literature it was low-grade.
Wrong. Many people back when the USSR was created said the same thing. Not just Germans like Goebbels, although they would know better than anyone else, except for the Russians themselves. Churchill said the same thing in an article he wrote and Solzhenitsyn wrote of the leading position Jews had in the USSR and his wife was Jewish. That is why it was called “Judeo-Bolshevism”.
Lying about Judeo-Bolshevism
https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2019/03/02/lying-about-judeo-bolshevism/
Are you two morons for real?
Robert Wilton’s propaganda was regurgitated by a lot of people in the 1920s. But it was not factual. While the White pogroms did force Jews in Russia to side with the Bolsheviks (they had no choice), the record of events in the Russian Civil War showed that whenever Denikin’s armies captured a Ukrainian town they were effusively welcomed by the local Jewish population. Then the Whites would start a pogrom and subsequently the Jews would realize that they could never support the Whites.
In Russia of 1917, there were exactly three parties which had significant popular support. These were the Social Revolutionaries, the Mensheviks and the Bolsheviks. The SRs were the most popular, with their base of support among the peasants. The Mensheviks and Bolsheviks originated from a split in the Social Democrats and rooted their supporters among urban workers. Generally, the Mensheviks usually held higher support, although during times of labor conflicts the Bolsheviks would usually surge in support. Out of these 3 parties the Mensheviks were the one with the highest proportion of Jewish members, the Bolsheviks with the lowest. The SRs fell midway between the other two in terms of having important Jews in leading positions. These 3 parties were the only serious contenders for public support.
The Whites were defeated because things like Admiral Kolchak’s coup d’état against the popular government set up by the SRs in Siberia meant that Russians refused to support them. The vast majority of Russian peasants supported the SRs with the demand for land redistribution. This was not by any means a particularly Bolshevik program. But Denikin, Kolchak et alia refused to support it and the White forces carried out violent terror against peasants who had tried taking over landed estates. Hence, all support for the Whites quickly once their politics were clear and this guaranteed the Bolshevik victory.
Re: Friedrich Nietzsche
In a letter to Meta von Salis Nietzsche wrote, “I thank Heaven, that
in all of my instincts I am a Pole and nobody else.” Nietzsche despised
Prussia, and by extension most of Germany
Although you may be of (part) German origin, you sound like you never lived in Europe because nothing you say seems to be based on lived experience.
1. Germans were doomed from the start: Today there are 240 million Slavs and only 120 million Germanics (incl. 20 million Scandinavians). Similar ratio 1000 years ago. Fact: Germans don’t like each other very much – as tourists, they will cross the street to avoid saying “Hi” to other Germans. That’s one reason why so many Germans have left their homeland in the last several centuries. Steve Sailer always says, “Bad Germans stayed in Europe, and good Germans came to America.” Ethnic Germans are disappearing in Germany at the rate of 200-250,000 a year. Foolishly, they are being replaced by Muslims. And there is no fool like a German fool, e.g. tiny Germany declaring war on the U.S. in December 1941;
2. Germans are as dumb as a doorknob when it comes to politics, as Bertrand Russell pointed out (although he put it more diplomatically). This no doubt is partly due to the fact that Germans have been afflicted by bloated egos and delusions of grandeur so they are incapable of seeing things as they truly are. Philosophically, they never developed British-style empiricism which would have kept them closer to empirically verifiable facts. Instead they always develop ideologies which become progressively more and more psychotic, e.g. Lutheranism which has little to do with Jesus’ teachings (for example, would Jesus have said, “Sin boldly!” as Luther did), then Marxism and Nietzscheanism (both psychotic), and finally Nazism – the most psychotic of them all. The adage, “Neurotics build castles in the air, and psychotics move in” applies better to Germany than any other nation;
3. But there is no greater example of dumb Kraut behavior than consistently making enemies only in Europe, and primarily in Central and Eastern Europe. History of Germanics can be summarized in one sentence: From the Sack of Rome in AD 410 by the Visigoths to the Sack of Warsaw in 1944 by the Germans. 1500 years of history, and zero evidence of moral progress. 1500 years of making enemies in Europe with constant invasions (Goths etc, Vandals, Vikings, Berserkers, Crusaders, Teutonic Knights, etc etc). No wonder that in 1945 and beyond Europe and the U.S. came down on the Germans like a ton of bricks. Germany has been reduced to a non-entity, and Germans are being kept on a short leash because it’s clear that Germans are incapable of ruling themselves in a civilized manner, and therefore are liable to produce another Hitler. At least the Brits, the Dutch, and the French, unlike the Germans, were smart enough to go and make enemies overseas.
ZIONISM versus BOLSHEVISM.
A STRUGGLE FOR THE SOUL OF THE JEWISH PEOPLE.
By the Rt. Hon. Winston S. Churchill.
Terrorist Jews.
“There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistical Jews. It is certainly a very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin[Lenin was 1/4 Jewish], the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders. Thus Tchitcherin, a pure Russian, is eclipsed by his nominal subordinate Litvinoff, and the influence of Russians like Bukharin or Lunacharski cannot be compared with the power of Trotsky, or of Zinovieff, the Dictator of the Red Citadel (Petrograd), or of Krassin or Radek – all Jews. In the Soviet institutions the predominance of Jews is even more astonishing. And the prominent, if not indeed the principal, part in the system of terrorism applied by the Extraordinary Commissions for Combating Counter-Revolution has been taken by Jews, and in some notable cases by Jewesses. The same evil prominence was obtained by Jews in the brief period of terror during which Bela Kun ruled in Hungary. The same phenomenon has been presented in Germany (especially in Bavaria), so far as this madness has been allowed to prey upon the temporary prostration of the German people. Although in all these countries there are many non-Jews every whit as bad as the worst of the Jewish revolutionaries, the part played by the latter in proportion to their numbers in the population is astonishing.”
https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Zionism_versus_Bolshevism
Good analysis… (I will not spoil it by pointing out some inaccuracies).
Churchill certainly did go on a wild ideological rant in his day. Even he wasn’t the worst of them. The fools who supported Admiral Kolchak’s coup against the government elected in Siberia that was dominated by Social Revolutionaries were really destructive. It was always apparent that the only parties in Russia in 1917 which held any popular support from Russians were the SRs, the Mensheviks and the Bolsheviks. No Right-wing conservative party was ever in the running for public support among the Russian populace. It was obvious that of these 3 parties the Bolsheviks had the fewest Jews among their leadership, and the Mensheviks had the most. The Social Revolutionaries were mid-grade in this respect (although the SRs were the most popular party among Russians).
Instead, Churchill turns this into a silly thing about Zionism and Bolshevism. While it certainly is true that many more Russian Jews supported Zionism rather than Bolshevism, this is an irrelevant sidetrack. Churchill, if he had been at all informed, would have been talking about “Menshevism versus Bolshevism” or better yet “SRs and Mensheviks versus Bolsheviks.” If he and the White commanders such as General Denikin and Admiral Kolchak had been rational enough to do this, then the political outcome would have been a government formed of a coalition of SRs and Mensheviks where people like Abram Gots (SR), Julius Martov (Menshevik), Chaim Zhitlowsky (SR), Fyodor Dan (Menshevik), Pinhas Rutenberg (SR), Raphael Abraham (Menshevik), Fanny Kaplan (SR) and other such would have played prominent roles. But there was no valid conservative alternative and the brutality and corruption of the Whites simply caused Russians to default in favor of the Bolsheviks.
These were lessons which the CIA learned in the Cold War, and they’ve obviously been forgotten today. The CIA sponsored things like the Congress for Cultural Freedom because it was obvious western Europe was demanding some kind of Left-wing and attempting to ram a Rightwing agenda on west Europeans would only work to the advantage of the Communist parties. The Whites in the Russian Civil War had no such appreciation of this and simply thought a military coup d’état would brush the Leftists aside. It turned out that that didn’t work.
There are two primary paradigms that folks use to perceive reality, race and class. It seems that both paradigms play a part in shaping reality. It is a mistake to assume as many leftists do that race is immaterial and class is everything. Likewise, it seems even more foolish to ignore the class perspective and to see everything through the lens of race.
Reality results from the culmination and interconnectedness of everything. The racial ideology of the Nazis intertwined with the anti-socialist interests of the Western ruling class. The Western ruling class was haunted by the spectre of Socialism and they were engaged in strategies to destroy it. By appealing to antisemitism and disparaging it as a “Jewish plot”, the wealthy elite hoped to turn the masses away from socialism. Meanwhile, many European Jews who had been second class citizens for centuries, were undoubtedly keen to embrace an ideology predicated on the fraternity and equality of all men and resistance to to ruling class that had for centuries, oppressed them.
What seems absolutely obvious is that in furtherance of their capitalist class interests, the ruling capitalist class has perpetuated racism in order to accomplish two primary objectives: The first objective is the fractionalization of the working class along racial lines, and the second objective is to provide an explanation of history and of current events that obfuscates the fundamental reality (and indeed primacy) of oppositional class interests, in order to turn everything into a question of race.
The idea of racial purity and ultranationalism have been ideas that have been historically proliferated and exploited by the ruling class in order to further their own imperial ends. I actually feel sorry for the many folks here that are so preoccupied by there own genetics and who have a misguided animus towards those with different genetics, to such an extent that it is impossible for them to conceive that others don’t see things the same way. Their ignorance would be comical if it were not so sad.
Americans have more respect for the Russians than they do for the Germans. After all, although the Soviet Communists did carry out many of the very same types of bad things that the German Nazis did, at least the Russians never grovel about what they did in the name of Marxism Leninism. The Germans, by contrast, go all out of their way to say how sorry they are for The Holocaust and every other horrid little thing that was done in the name of National Socialism. This, of course, is perceived by Americans as a sign of weakness, pitiful weakness.
Moreover, I seriously doubt that many US Soldiers, and other US Military personnel actually died in The Second World War. For if they did, if that many US Military personnel actually died in the War, then Americans would respect the German military, and the fighting spirit of the Germans, if nothing else. Indeed, I suspect very, very few US Military personnel died in Europe. Otherwise, why would Americans have such disdain and contempt for the German people, as a people? Now, answer me that!
The Ruling Class desires a divided working class. That is precisely why they bring in Mexicans and Muslim Arabs into America. They know, or at any rate calculate, that said Mexicans and Arabs will be incompatible with the White working class already here. And, that they will all fight each other, rather than demand worker’s rights (or, so they hope)!
Exactly like how Medieval Europeans blamed the entire Jewish Race for the Crucifixion of Jesus Christ, Modern Americans blame the entire German Nation for The Holocaust against the Jews. It is like the Crucifixion has been eclipsed. That no longer is it said that the Crucifixion of Christ was the worst event in history, but rather The Holocaust.
Personally, I never liked the topic of The Holocaust. When (((they))) say that The Holocaust is Uniquely Evil, that sounds like a very disguised way of making the claim that the German people, as a people, are Uniquely Evil– indeed, that the Germans, as such, are the only truly evil people. Of course, I would counter by bringing up what has been done in the name of Communism, especially in Russia and China. Would seem the Commies did many, many of the very same type of bad things that the Nazis did! I would also point out that there were non-German perpetrators of The Holocaust.
Still, as CHRISTianity wains, a new religion, HOLOCUASTianity, takes its place. I suppose, it was only a matter of time.
It seems that Odyssey is clinically insane or that he has been indoctrinated by madmen.
Poor he.
Well, I would disagree that the Commies did anything of the sort that was done by the Nazis. Let’s take Mao as an illustration of the absolute historical inversion that is engaged in by the anti-communist propaganda that you have imbibed and regurgitated above.
China was known as the land of famine because it averaged a famine a year for the 2000 years prior to communist rule. Yet within barely a decade, the CPC had totally eradicated famine from China. While Mao was Chairman of the Party, longevity nearly doubled in China, total population nearly doubled in China, health care expanded tremendously, illiteracy was nearly eradicated, and caloric intake was doubled for nearly a billion people. This was the foundation that today Xi is building upon. So, I believe that a strong argument can be made that Mao was perhaps the single greatest humanitarian to ever live as no one in all of recorded history has done so much good for so many people.
But how is Mao popularised in the West? How does the West invert Mao’s legacy? By calling him the greatest mass murderer of all time. Mao, the man who objectively did more good for more people than anyone else in the history of the known universe, is known in the mindless West, as the greatest mass murderer of all time. This is simply a testament to the efficacy of propaganda and the susceptibility of the human mind to be indoctrinated into believing things that are entirely disconnected from, and literally the opposite of, objective truth.
I agree that there is a conscious strategy by the ruling class to promote “multiculturalism” in a transparent and obvious effort to create as many divisions among the working class as they possible can. Then they exploit these divisions as well as the wedge issue of immigration, to the fullest possible extent (not to mention identity politics) in order to ensure that the working class is a fractured amorphous mass that will never act together.
Nevertheless I am personally a big proponent of multi-culturalism and I believe that the only way we can overcome the obstacles set out before us, is to set aside our differences and work together to further our shared interest of replacing the dictatorship of wealth with a legitimate government of, by, and for, the working class majority. If we, the working class, are incapable of getting our shit together and getting past our biological differences, we deserve the perpetual exploitation that they have in store for us. I am optimistic though and ultimately believe that our collective consciousness will evolve. Hopefully we won’t have to wait until we are all more or less the the same color to do this. There is no reason why we should wait though our shared interests are enough to overcome our biological differences now!