The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewJung-Freud Archive
Beware of Nominalism — Why Russian & Chinese National Fascisms Are Necessary Bulwarks Against Jewish-Gangster-Globalist-Fascism — Paradox of How the US Destroys True Democracy Around the World by Promoting Its Parasitic Brand of Deep State Imperial Democracy
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Michael Lind: “Another answer is that members of the establishment are almost all nominalists. That is to say, if they give something a name, it takes on real existence in their minds. The Afghan National Army offers a perfect example. Because we called it an army, gave it lots of American money, equipment and training, and knew its order of battle, it was an army. But it wasn’t.”

‘Democracy’ is a word game in our political culture of nominalism, or judging things by name or brand than what it really is.

Fascist Theory of Power is true. All things of power turn ‘fascist’. Ideology gives into the true dynamics of power, and the winners(or at least survivors) subscribe to all or most of the pillars of power-essentialism.

Jews used to be socialist, anarchist, communist, liberal, libertarian, or etc. Today, Jews are overwhelmingly tribal. They are now focused on power, not principles. Of course, they tirelessly invoke principles but only to twist and bend them to the needs of power, not the other way around. Fascist theorists understood this nature of power and human nature. In time, all things, at least those with the will and wherewithal to survive and gain in strength, turn fascist. A movement can start from the right or the left, but the end result for survivors and winners is the intersection where fascist truths converge. It’s been said fascism was defeated in WWII, but only a kind of fascism met such fate. What we’ve seen since is the rise of new fascisms but guised as something other. Indeed, all post-WWII fascisms have postured as ‘anti-fascist’. Even fascists hate the label because it’s too candid and forthright about the nature of power. Just like people wear clothes to conceal their nakedness, most forms of power cloak themselves with rhetoric about ‘higher principles’, ‘freedom’, ‘social justice’, or ‘the people’. Indeed, even Italian Fascists and National Socialists did this with their overripe reliance on myths and cult of personality. It was to hide the essentially gangster nature of those in power who, far from embodying the noblest qualities of their civilizations, gained position by a good measure of cunning opportunism and backroom compromises.

Supposedly, the end of the Cold War was also the End of History, with liberal democratism and free markets triumphant all over the world. But Francis Fukuyama got it all wrong. The passing of the Ideological Age didn’t lead to the rise of the Individual Age but to the Globo-Tribal Age, one where a group(Jews) that refused to abandon its tribal identity &power urged upon all others to do just that. Following WWII, the ideal had been universal nationalism or universal tribalism: Each nation would embrace nationalism but against imperialism as a violator of national independence. Indeed, both the US empire and Soviet empire during the Cold War justified their hegemony as the guarantor of nationalism against the imperialism of the other side, e.g. USSR supported Cuban and Vietnamese nationalism against American Imperialism, and the US supported Polish and Hungarian nationalism against Soviet Imperialism.

But following the end of the Cold War, the new mantra wasn’t nationalism-for-all but one-world globalism, or the (not-so)gradual erasure of all nationalism to bring about a New World Order with US as the lone superpower guaranteeing freedom of individuals and markets all over the world. According to Fukuyama, the future was about universal individualism for all nations under the protective power of the US as the great post-national empire, one that used its might not to dominate and exploit others but to emancipate them and open them to opportunities.

Whatever one thinks of this idea, pro or con, the people who gained dominance in the West had other ideas. While Jews pushed deracinated globalist individualism to everyone around the world, they themselves stuck to Jewish supremacist tribal-nationalist-imperialism. Thus, the New World Order was really Jew World Order, with one set of rules for most of the world and another set of rules for the Jews. This contradiction has perhaps been best exemplified by the diabolical figure of George Soros.
Jewish aim wasn’t to simply join the global humanity but to rule as the master race over the rest. Notice Jewish Power has been about mass migration for all nations but NOT for Israel. Jews insist on white deracination but demand that whites praise and champion Jewish Power and Zionism.

As such, the agenda of universal individualist-globalism was deeply marred(and even doomed) because its most fervent proponents, the Jews, refused to apply it to themselves. It’s like the Sacklers pushing opioid junk on goyim. As far as Jews were concerned, globo-individualism was for goy suckers, not for themselves. It was to weaken goyim and bring about their dissipation into atomized individuals, all the while Jews would empower their networks and embolden their identity. (True, many Jews intermarry with goyim, but the children are raised as Jews, just like black-white pairings lead to ‘black’ kids. In any race-mixing, one race gains dominance over the other. It’s like all those mestizos are labeled as Latino, a European-derived identity.)

So, the New World Order after the Cold War was a two-faced beast. On the one hand, as Fukuyama pontificated, it was about the spread of post-ideological and post-national global-universalism of individualism, free trade, and rule of law. (Rule of Law is problematic in a world where a tiny cabal uses its legal and financial dominance to rewrite any set of laws. While goyim are expected to obey the laws, Jews get to rewrite them as they please. Rule of Law used to mean defense of free speech as a Western principle, but with Jewish rewriting of laws, it now means the police can arrest you for speaking truth to Jewish power, Homo idolatry, or Black thuggery. Worse, Rule of Law is useless when Jewish-controlled US, as the lone superpower, does as it pleases around the world. US is illegally occupying the oil-rich parts of Syria but gets away with it. So much for Rule of Law.)

Now, post-national globo-individualism is anathema to many on the Right(and some on the Left who oppose capitalism), but it was doomed to create havoc because of Jewish supremacist hypocrisy. Perhaps, the globalist agenda would have panned out better in Russia had Jewish advisers been more principled and dedicated to fairness and justice. Instead, Jews exploited the opportunity to rape Russia… which turned most Russians against globalism. And in the US, Jewish Power grew ever greedier. Via ethically dubious machinations of finance and big tech, Jews got richer and richer. By suppressing BDS, Jews created a system where Jews can call for boycott of any political group or any Muslim nation but no one can call for boycotts against Jews and Zionism. Jews in power get to decide what is ‘terrorism’. When Israel does it or supports it, it’s never called ‘terrorism’, but false-flag events in Syria, of which Assad isn’t guilty, are labeled as such. Even non-existent crimes of Assad are deemed ‘terrorist’ by US State Department and Jewish-controlled mass media, whereas Israel’s endless terror-bombings of Syria and its support of ISIS goons never are.

What Jews did to Muslims, they’ve also done to whites who are now being denied platforms, free speech, and financial services. Samuel Huntington wrote about the Clash of Civilizations, but the most important one was not between the West and the Muslim World. It was between the West and the Jews, but people failed to see this because (1) there were too afraid to speak truth to Jewish Power (2) they were too philosemitically beholden to Jewish Power (3) Jews are regarded as part of the West because of assimilation.

Huntington spoke of Western Values vs Muslim Values, but the main threat to Western Values came from Jews who’d penetrated deep into Western institutions. While tolerance for homos can be said to be a part of Western Value, since when was Celebration of Sodomy a Western Value? Since when was Western Values about fifty genders and the fantasy that a fat guy with penis and balls is a ‘woman’? Since when was the deification of black thuggery and Afro-savagery as neo-sainthood a Western Value? Since when was Jungle Fever and White Male cuck-maggotry a Western Value? No, all these sicknesses had no roots in Western Civilization but were planted as poison seeds by Jews. But Huntington focused on Muslims. Sure, Muslim values are at odds with Western values, but why were there so many Muslims in the West in the first place? Why did Europeans become so accepting of the Great Replacement and Diversity? (For most of European History, the West was about defense of the race, preservation of Classical Civilization, faith in Christianity, and/or Rationalism & Enlightenment. What passes for ‘western values’ in the Age of Globalism is anything but.)

And why did the West stir up the hornet’s nest in the Middle East with interventions, wars, and support of terrorists(usually against Arab secular regimes war with Islamic fanatics who were mainly funded by Saudis, key allies of the West)? Granted, Huntington expounded his views before the West went fully ‘woke’ with globo-homo and BLM nonsense. Still, the main flaw of his thesis resulted from fixating on Muslims than on Jews. Even 9/11 wouldn’t have averted if the US, under Jewish pressure, hadn’t gotten so mired the Middle East, especially beginning with the Gulf War under George H.W. Bush. 9/11 was essentially blowback with the winds fanned by the hidden hand of Zionist gangsterism. Idiot Muslim terrorists were the sailboat, and Jewish Power was the gods blowing the winds in certain directions. Just like how the gods guide men vs men in THE ILIAD.

The Jewish refusal to surrender to globo-individualism(that was really meant for goyim) doomed the principled foundations of globalism. Whether one supports or opposes globalism, one could at least acknowledge its principled universalism had it demanded the same of ALL peoples. But for Jews, it was a case of ‘you goyim take the medicine while we Jews play doctor’. Russians woke up to this, and globalism failed in Russia. But there was another factor. China, like the Jews, took part in the business-aspect of globalism but clung to its nationalism under the leadership of CCP, the only Asian government, apart from that of Vietnam, that wasn’t created more-or-less under US neo-imperialist domination.

So, while white cucks in the West became totally spellbound by Jewish Power, Chinese(and Russians and of course Iranians) kept their independence. In a way, this explains why white cucks(libby-dib or conzo-wonzo) are so angry with Russia and China. Why should Russian and Chinese goyim remain independent of Jewish Power when whites in the West have totally groveled and cucked to it? The anger is partly based on ideology and partly on envy. Many white cucks sincerely believe they are the ‘most evolved’ people on the planet because they are into self-debasement, Negro Worship, cuckery to Jews, and globo-homo mania. They really believe this. But, on the subconscious level, they feel envious of Russians and Chinese who say NO to Jewish globalist authority. White cucks can’t help sensing that Russians and Chinese are more like defiant wolves while they themselves are totally obedient dogs. John McCain barking at Putin was so much like a dog barking at a wolf. It was in total servility to the Jewish Master but also in envy of Putin’s relative independence from him.

White cucks will say they hate Russia and China because those two states reject ‘liberal democratic’ values, but if that’s the case, why are white cucks so supportive of Jewish supremacism, Zionist tyranny over Palestinians, and Black megalomania? It seems white cucks also have their tribal favoritism: Blacks over non-blacks and Jews over Palestinians & Iranians. And it seems white cucks believe that Muslims, such as Afghanis, have human value ONLY WHEN they adopt ‘gender studies’ and globo-homo. Are white cucks even aware of their hypocrisy? Cold Hypocrisy of cynical politicians is bearable because so many people say one thing while doing another. But, white cucks are into Hot Hypocrisy, the kind where passions are at odds with principles. If we tend to despise religious hypocrites more than political ones, it’s because politics is about cold hypocrisy of saying whatever to get elected.

In contrast, when religious types invoke God and morality but then act like louts, thieves, and perverts, it comes across as far worse. Because ‘woke’ craziness has all the fervor of a religious movement, the hypocrisy is hot and beneath contempt. And of course, Jews are among the hottest hypocrites, always sermonizing about ‘hate’, Holocaust, ‘racism’, and ‘white supremacism’, all the while acting like Zio-Nazis or Jewzis. Just ask the Palestinians. Also, Jews who, for so long, never tired of denouncing ‘McCarthyism’ as the darkest period in US history are now 100x worse than the anti-communists. The former bitchers about ‘red-baiting’ and ‘anti-communist hysteria’ are into white-baiting, Christian-bashing, Constitution-smashing, and free-speech-attacking. Jews also warned people of how the Nazis used medicine as cultural metaphor and political tool, but now Jews use medical tyranny to lend the impression that those who say NO to the ‘vaccine’ are germs that must be stamped out.

21st century has been about the resurgence of fascism even though all these new forms of fascism hides behind the nominalism of ‘liberal world order’, ‘democracy’, ‘socialism’, or what have you. While some governments admit to being nationalist, a term less toxic in the globalist-controlled discourse, none dares to admit it has anything to do with fascism. It goes to show that World War II still casts a long shadow on the future. Because the peak of Soviet/Russian prestige came with the defeat of National Socialist Germany and full independence for China followed the total defeat of Japan(an ally of Germany), both the Russians and Chinese carry on the charade that they’ve been the main victims of and victors over fascism. And because Jews met their greatest enemy in the German fascism of National Socialism, Jews have since postured as the biggest anti-fascists in the world(though it hasn’t restrained them from supporting quasi-nazi elements in Ukraine).

Of course, the main reason Jews denounce fascism is they want to keep its magic formula for themselves. After all, fascism fuses rightist and leftist elements, whereas other ideologies pit right against left, thus creating division, distrust, and general havoc among a people — indeed, whites are so divided because they reject fascism and opt for ideological partisanship(or even purism) as a ‘blue-stater’ or ‘red-stater’, whereas Jewish neo-cons and neo-libs work together to make both rightism and leftism serve the Jews. It’s why the secret to power for whites isn’t found in the new right or the dissident right but in the left-right, which was the source of success for Adolf Hitler and FDR — Hitler adopted leftist elements into German rightism, and FDR adopted rightist elements into American leftism; and if communism had a saving grace, it fused socialism with nationalism.

Now, there is no guarantee that a nation will be good and decent because it is fascist. Fascism, like any ideology, can be used in bad ways — democracy too can be a disaster, like Russia of the 1990s, South Africa under black majority rule, and all Anglosphere ‘liberal democracies’ today that have facilitated the rise of Zio-globo-oligarcho-gangsterism. Fascism can lead to brazen rule by gangsters, a case of Machiavellianism. While fascism as theory of power brings us closest to the true nature of power, the moral worth of fascist rule depends on how those lessons are reflected upon and practiced. After all, the truth can be used for good or ill, just like a gun can be used to protect or rob people or chemistry can be used to create medicine or poison. Just because fascism makes us better understand the nature of power doesn’t mean we will be better people with power.

Despite the problems of corruption and general abuse of power in China and Russia, it’s fair to say their use of fascism is preferable to that of Jews. Besides, paradoxically enough, the biggest enemy of democracy around the world is the Jewish-controlled US as the most fervent promoter of ‘democracy’. True democracy must organically grow from the soil of any nation. American democracy worked relatively well because it developed independently of foreign meddling. It was democracy by Americans for Americans.

In contrast, whenever some nation around the world tries to open up and liberalize, the US takes advantage of the freedom to infiltrate its institutions & networks and subvert its sovereignty & integrity as a unique homeland of a people and culture. It was Yanqui meddling that undermined attempts at democracy in Latin America, especially in Guatemala. Whether democracy succeeds or fails in some Latin American country, it should be up to the people there, not for Americans to interfere and decide what’s what. If anything, things have gotten worse ever since Jews took over the US. In the past, white Americans, being the national majority and imbued with sound values, had no problem with majority rule and true morality. If anything, the core values of White Christian America weren’t all that different from those of the Non-West; the only major difference was more tolerance of deviance and more individual liberty in the West.

In contrast, Jewish-Americans seek to undermine majority authority and moral sanity in every country by spreading globo-homo and Afromania, the idea being that all European and Asian nations should elevate homo minority over the majority and care more for black thugs than their own peoples. Of course, such minority-privilege and moral inversion is means by which Jewish Power gets to sink its hooks into other nations. Jews think any nation that elevates homos and blacks over their own majority population no longer has a strong sense of national identity & security and is therefore ripe for Jewish globalist picking. Because of Jewish-controlled US meddling, democratic experiments have failed everywhere. The only kind of ‘democracy’ that the US and its EU satellite will tolerate is one that bends over to the Jewish-controlled afro-globo-homo-schlomo agenda. Whenever freedom and democracy lead to a system that has other ideas and says NO to the afro-globo-homo-shlomo agenda, the US does everything to undermine that country. It’s like the US was for the Arab Spring until free elections brought Muslim Brotherhood into power. Then, the US backed the Egyptian military in the coup against the rightfully elected government. And Jewish-controlled US recruited thugs and stirred up mob violence to unseat the democratically elected leader of Ukraine. In other words, US support of democracy is really a kind of ‘demockery’. It’s not about the freedom of peoples around the world to choose their own values and destinies but about the US exploiting freedoms in other countries to infiltrate, subvert, corrupt, and prop up puppet regimes onboard with the afro-globo-homo-shlomo agenda.

In other words, it’s not about spreading true democracy or freedom but propping up puppetocracies. It’s a form of Imperial Democracy, the cloning of ‘new democracies’ around the world to serve as shills of Jewish-controlled US as the Imperium. If all the houses in the neighborhood agree to keep their doors unlocked, such openness can work ONLY IF everyone agrees not to trespass onto other people’s homes and steal stuff. Whenever a nation around the world unlocks its door, the US trespasses and rearranges everything in the house and even steals stuff. Naturally, the doors must be locked again to keep out the Americans(who now do the stealing for the Jews). So, even though freedom is preferable to autocracy, some measure of the latter is necessary to maintain national sovereignty in a world where the US, as the tool of Jews, promotes freedom not to bolster but to destroy national independence. It’s like Jews promote youth culture not to make young people more free and independent but more dependent and addicted to junk culture and dumb fads pushed by Jews. ‘Liberal Democracy’ has come to mean conformity to the demands of Jewish Globalists. Of course, any honest person would notice that what Jews demand of goy nations, they never demand of Israel. What is good for Israel is not good for Hungary. What Jews demand of Hungary, they never ask of Israel. This is why the national fascisms of China and Russia are, at least at this moment in history, laudable as bulwarks against Jewish Supremacist gangster-fascist-terrorism.

21st century is turning out to be about three dominant fascisms, those of China, Russia, and the Jews. Chinese rule China, Russians rule Russia, and Jews rule US, EU, Anglosphere, and its cuck satellites(like Japan). China has arrived at a fascist equilibrium. Confronting Western Imperialist aggression in the 19th century, China was like a turtle that hid deeper into its shell of ultra-conservatism and reaction. It only kept China weak when faced with the challenges of modernity. Then, as if to compensate for its long decay under rigid traditionalism, China embarked on radicalism under Mao, but this war of culture and ideology led to great havoc and destruction. Then, China embarked on what seemed like a pro-market-oriented neo-liberal path, but the fates of Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan under US ideological and idolatrous hegemony have proven to be culturally hollow, dissipating, and suicidal.

Therefore, China seeks a balance of tradition and change, of international relations and national sovereignty. Same could be said of Russia. If rule under the Tsars was too reactionary, the rule by Bolsheviks was too radical and traumatizing. Also, mere communism held back initiative, enterprise, and economic growth, and then, following the collapse of the Soviet Union, the surrender to unfettered globo-capitalism led to Jewish economic rape, which dwarfed even the horrors of the Weimar Period in Germany. Vladimir Putin, for all his faults and limitations, have tried to steer Russia toward a balance of tradition and modernity, of markets and socialism. His method too is essentially fascist though he would be loathe to admit it in public.

At any rate, what Russian and Chinese neo-fascisms have in common is the conviction that power must be consolidated and constructed toward nationalist goals. Power must ultimately be about what is good for the nation and the people, not only for here and now but into the future. Therefore, even though Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin can act like gangsters at times, they do have some qualities of statesmen and genuine national leaders with a sense of patriotism and common good. Putinism is about what-is-good-for-Russia in Russia that is overwhelmingly Russian, and Xi-ism is about what-is-good-for-China in China that is overwhelmingly Chinese. Those are national-humanist fascisms. In contrast, Jewish supremacist fascism is purely tribal-gangsterist, indeed even worse than British and French rule over their colonies.

Nominalism(useful term invoked by Michael Lind) explains why so many people are fooled about the true nature of what’s really happening. They are fooled by labels. Take ‘gay rights’. It gives the impression that the globo-homo agenda is about allowing homos the right to be ‘gay’ and do their ‘gay’ thing. But that is not what the Agenda is about. It’s about forcing everyone to celebrate and revere homos and even trannies. It’s about official promotion of Anno Sodomini as the new faith for the educated elites, the ‘more evolved’. Nominalism is used alongside symbolism, e.g. the ‘rainbow’ homo flag. So, even though homosexuality is about gross bung-donging inside the dark and dank anus, many people associate it with bright colors.

So, all this talk of ‘democracy’ vs ‘autocracy’ is BS. The current world is really about autocracy vs autocracy, except that Jewish Power hides behind labels of ‘democracy’, ‘liberalism’, ‘tolerance’, ‘diversity’, ‘equity’, and ‘inclusion’. Right, Jews are so into diversity that New York Times is full of Palestinian-American writers – not. Jews are so into equity that…. now, that is too funny. Jews, the richest and most privileged people into equity, ROTFL. As for ‘diversity’, what is it really about? It’s about White Preferism, Capitalist Greed, Jewish Supremacism, and White Cuck Saviorism.

It’s White Preferist in that non-whites prefer to move to white nations and live with white majorities than with their own kind. If Diversity is so great, why don’t browns stay put as all of Latin America is pretty diverse? India is said to be very diverse along cultural, ethnic, and linguistic lines, but all these Hindus wanna move to white nations. Diversity is White Preferism.
As for businessmen, they just want cheap docile workers who complain less than native folks. We can understand why they’d rather hire newcomers than blacks, but it goes much further. Big Business would rather hire cheaper inferior foreign workers to superior American ones just to cut costs.

There is also a Jewish Supremacist angle: Increase non-white numbers and use them against whites. Also, more diversity among goyim means more division among them… which ensures Jewish Power.
As for white cuck savior complex, so many whites are not only stupid enough to fall for Jewish Diversity BS but subconsciously hanker for a kind of white supremacism. They feel that nonwhites are too dumb to take care of themselves and must live under paternal white guidance to see the light and enjoy the fruits.

So, beware of nominalism.

After all, what is ‘racism’ really about. It’s not about treating all races equally and rejecting racial favoritism. No, it means the ‘moral’ necessity and even sanctity of treating blacks as our superiors in every way. In reality, blacks are the biggest thugs and pose the gravest threat to white people, but in stupid Hollywood horror movies, whites are hunted down by space monsters or flesh-eating goblins(or Evil White Males) and must rely on heroic and/or saintly blacks as their protectors or saviors. ROTFL. When Paul McCartney was accused of possible ‘racism’ for having badmouthed Pakistanis in the UK, his defense was he can’t be ‘racist’ because his favorite people are blacks. If ‘racism’ is racial favoritism, isn’t it ‘racist’ to favor blacks over others? But then, the agenda around ‘racism’ is to favor blacks for sympathy and consideration, even admiration and reverence. It’s not about racial equality but superiority of blacks.

And what is politics around ‘antisemitism’ about. It’s not about treating Jews the same way as the rest of humanity. No, it’s about the obligation that Jews be treated better, always be favored, always be forgiven, always preferred. It’s not about treating Jews and whites the same way. No, it’s about Jews dictating to whites as to what’s what, what is right or wrong; and whites must nod along without debate. It’s not about treating Jews and Palestinians the same way. No, it’s about letting Jews act as they wish with Palestinians. Even when Jews are clearly in the wrong, we must support them over Palestinians, and to say otherwise is to be an ‘anti-semite’. So, the politics of ‘antisemitism’ is really about Jewish Supremacism, not about the need to treat Jews like everyone else, i.e. neither more deserving nor less deserving of justice and fairness.

But people are blind to this because of nominalism. ‘Racism’ gives the impression that it’s opposed to ALL forms of racial hatred. But if so, why is there total silence about non-black victims of black mayhem and violence? ‘Antisemitism’ gives the impression that Jews are especially targeted by irrational haters and that we need to treat Jews as human beings deserving of equal justice. But ‘antisemitism’, as framed by ADL, SPLC, and Jewish-run media & deep state, really boils down to Jews having the divine right to control everything and do as they please as the ‘made men’ who cannot be questioned. In other words, its actual practice is Jewish Supremacism. The hell with nominalism and say yes to ACTUALISM.

We need to reject nominalism and accurately describe and name what is really what and what is really happening. The problem isn’t ‘racism’ but black-thug-supremacism. The problem isn’t ‘antisemitism’ but Jewish supremacism and Zionist gangsterism. The problem isn’t that homos are denied ‘gay rights’ but that Gay Rites are pushed as the new mandatory cult in the West and that anyone who won’t bend over to this devil-god and take it up the ass is blacklisted and destroyed by the Power.


Video Link

Of Related Interest
American foreign policy produces dangerous alliances
Decline and fall of Western Civilization part one
Hide 30 CommentsLeave a Comment
  1. That is really a good point. Democracy is a good idea in theory, but it never works in practice!

  2. That isn’t really the meaning of “nominalism.” This guy has it at least backwards, and more to the point, intractably garbled.

  3. Trinity says:

    Jews were NEVER “liberal.” Jewish women were and are second class citizens in Jewland. That (((feminism))) shit was all about anti male instead of pro woman. Woman, go make me a sammich and stay in your lane. haha. That is probably how some heterosexual Israeli couple live in muh Israel and probably how most Jewish couples around the world play. Jews and “liberal” are as opposite as hate and love or Satan and God. Honestly, other than being more cosmopolitan and more treacherous, I see little difference between the Jew and Arab. Both primitive and backward cultures, even more backward than us hillbillies down here. Definitely more inbreeding and sex with farm animals going on with “those people.”

    • Replies: @Malla
  4. It all goes to prove the adage Diversity + Proximity = War.

  5. Thanks for the article. I enjoyed reading it.

    But Huntington focused on Muslims. Sure, Muslim values are at odds with Western values, but why were there so many Muslims in the West in the first place?

    I disagree. How are Muslim values at odds with traditional “Western” values? Has the (((special tribe))) infected you so much that even in an article dealing with the jewish problem you will perpetuate their lies?

  6. … and if communism had a saving grace, it fused socialism with nationalism.

    Yeah. Just ask Marx and Trotsky. Just trot to the First, Second, Third International.

    But, that silliness aside, is concern for the well-being of one’s society, society, society not oligarchy, really evil? What’s bad about socialism?

  7. @Ann Nonny Mouse

    The last sentence, entire last paragraph of the Communist Manifesto: “Working men of all countries, unite!”

    So socialism is nationalism, the two made one, fused by communism? It doesn’t seem very nationalistic to me.

  8. anonymous[166] • Disclaimer says:

    You’re being overly-picky, I think. Classic mediaeval philosophy ‘nominalism’ is the idea that universals & abstractions aren’t real things, they’re just labels … which dovetails nicely into the point Michael Lind and Jung-Freud are making.

    Confucius (c. 551-479 BCE) said that times are evil, and there is social disorder, when things are described in misleading ways –

  9. Dear Jung-Freud: Thank you for yet another bold and provocative essay. I admire the way that you cut through the cant and double-speak of Jewish discourse and the (((dominant))) narrative. Direct. Unflinching. You are a bomb-throwing genius of political revisionism.

    • Agree: Odd Rabbit
  10. @true.enough

    [How are Muslim values at odds with traditional “Western” values?]

    Ask the thousands of white women and girls around the world that have been beaten, raped, and murdered by Muslims. Akin to Jews, the Muslim faith demands world dominance via divide and conquer. That’s one reason Jews pimp “diversity”. Second reason is to dilute and eventually eliminate the European Caucasian (White-skinned) ethnicity, which Jews perceive as their greatest threat to world dominance. But they’re wrong.

    Akin to Jews, the Muslim faith demands world dominance via divide and conquer. That’s going to be a problem for Jews. Jews expect Muslims to subordinate. #ThatsNotHappening. As the article states, neither will Russia, China, and Iran, to name a few. The NWO is doomed. It’ll NEVER happen.

    • Replies: @Che Guava
  11. @obwandiyag

    Then please reply your definition of Nominalism.

  12. Ask the thousands of white women and girls around the world that have been beaten, raped, and murdered by Muslims.

    I’m guessing that many more “white woman and girls” have been abused over the years by “White” men…not to excuse or in any way lessen the horrors of such behaviours. BUT you haven’t answered my question.

    …the Muslim faith demands world dominance via divide and conquer.

    I’m not aware of any teaching in Islam that “demands world dominance via divide and conquer”. Please provide references if you can.

    I ask again: How are Muslim values at odds with traditional “Western” values? Trad Catholics are the only ones in “the West” who have preserved their faith and traditions, despite the efforts of Bergoglio (Jorge the Heretic) and his globo-homo minions. Islamic values are not at odds with traditional Western values. The modern “West” is degraded and desecrated, secularized and self-indulgent. Debt slavery rules most of you (and I’m very sorry for those of you for whom this is true).

    The article mentions Huntington and his focus on Muslims. I insist that there are self-styled Muslims that act like beasts just as there are self-styled Christians that don’t follow the teachings of Christ.

    Islamic values, in my opinion, are not at odds with traditional “Western” values.

    • Thanks: mark green
    • Replies: @Ann Nonny Mouse
  13. JimDandy says:
    @Twin Ruler

    Multicultural democracy with open borders and a huge black population and a militant obsession with identity politics? What could possibly go wrong?

  14. @true.enough

    Didn’t “trad Catholics” burn at the stake anyone who disagreed with them?

    • Replies: @true.enough
  15. Germany’s fascism was a necessary bulwark against soviet communism and western capitalism too but try to say that anywhere in public and see where it gets you. Communism demands too much of people and capitalism expects too little; but both are different sides of the same authoritarian coin. Fascism gave people what they wanted: a shared national identity and common purpose, with a somewhat fairer distribution of wealth. The shitstorm of lies about Russia today is identical to those constructed about the Third Reich, even as the US is using Kiev almost exactly as London used Warsaw in 1939. Ironically, perhaps, Putin too remains in thrall to the myths of the “Great Patriotic War,” ignoring the clear evidence that Stalin was just as complicit as Churchill and FDR in provoking the genocidal attack on the German people’s successful revolution. The former British PM summed it up quite lucidly after the war; in a 1953 comment to Conservative MP Lord Robert Boothby Churchill said, “Germany’s most unforgivable crime before the Second World War was her attempt to extricate her economic power from the world’s trading system and to create her own exchange mechanism which would deny world finance its opportunity to profit.” So was Iraq’s and Libya’s, what a coincidence.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  16. anarchyst says:

    If those who fought in WW2 had a “crystal ball” and could see what the world has degenerated into, they would have sided with Germany. The term: “Germany bad, Allies good” is false…and must be relegated to the dustbin of history.
    Those we “saved” during and after WW2 were actually the enemy even before WW2, during the Wiemar Republic days, and yes, the communist bolshevik revolution of 1917 that was formulated and instituted by “you know who” (those of the “tribe”).
    Tribe member Theodore N. Kaufman’s genocidal book “Germany Must Perish” advocated the complete destruction of German culture, art, architecture, technology, and anything German. Just as in the biblical book of Deuteronomy–nothing was to be left alive. That being the case, who could blame Germans for fighting back? This sickening book is available on the internet for free and shows the mentality of those of the “tribe”. I encourage anyone interested the the mentality of those of the “tribe” to obtain and read it. It will change your perception about the buildup to WW2 and Germany.
    Kristallnacht was a one-night zionist-planned and executed false-flag riot against certain “tribal” interests, while the “tribe’s” pogrom against Germany lasted the entirety of WW2. As a matter of fact, Hitler was livid about Kristallnacht as he did not advocate violence against Germany’s internal “enemies”, but an orderly transition with already-in-place agreements with the “tribe’s” leaders.
    During the reign of the Wiemar Republic, the average German did not have a “pot to piss in” while his wealthy “tribal” neighbors were trading bread for land, disenfranchising Germans for their own interests. Of course, extreme WW1 “war reparations” imposed by the “victors” played a large part in Germany’s troubles. German women were reduced to selling “themselves” for a loaf of bread or a bowl of sugar just to stay alive.
    Even General George S. Patton realized that Eisenhower and his “tribal” enablers destroyed one of the greatest European cultures known to humankind.
    Eisenhower’s Rheinwiesenlager death camps (which almost no one in the western world has knowledge of) was tribal “revenge”. For those who are unaware, these “death camps” were used to intern German POWs after the conclusion of the war. Eisenhower purposely refused to define these internees as POWs, thereby denying them human treatment under Geneva Convention protocols. Eisenhower defined these internees as “disarmed enemy combatants”, not worthy of humane treatment. These “death camps” were open-air facilities with no buildings. The internees lived outdoors in all weather. Food was starvation rations. The internees were reduced to eating grass or any plants they could find. Anyone who attempted to feed these prisoners was shot on sight. Eisenhower should have been tried for war crimes for this. Instead he was made president.
    Patton decried the truly unwashed “masses” of those we saved, who refused to use latrines and sanitary facilities, preferring to defecate and urinate in the corners of the rooms they occupied. Soldiers had to use rifle butts on those who refused to “clean themselves up”. Of course, Patton was murdered by those who opposed him and wanted to silence him.
    Let’s not forget the Nuremberg “show trials”, the “kangaroo courts” which codified feelings into “crimes against humanity” where defendants were tortured in order to achieve the desired results. Not only that, “rules of evidence” were suspended. Hearsay was presented as historical “fact”, despite every “holocaust” claim being proven false.
    We are living with the very results of WW2 to this day.

    • Agree: Twin Ruler
    • Replies: @Twin Ruler
  17. anarchyst says:

    Traditionally, labor is looked upon as a “necessary evil” to be minimized at all costs. This mistaken attitude is prevalent all throughout capitalist societies.
    The problem arises-without labor there are no consumers. As I previously stated, a “balance” must be maintained. Labor is not evil, but a necessary and valuable component of capitalism.
    Pre-WW2 Germany’s economic successes and the rapid rise of the German economy was predicated on labor being assigned “value”and monetized-something that is (and has been) missing in capitalist societies today.
    In fact, Germany was an economic powerhouse at the same time the western world was attempting to dig itself out of a depression which was caused by the banksters.

  18. It always seemed strange: people do not usually feel as angered at what the Soviets did, as what the Nazis did. Still, the difference is this: most of Stalin’s victims were non-Jews, were mere Goyim– cattle in human form. Jewish lives, it would seem, are considered so much more valuable than those of the rest of us!

    • Replies: @Priss Factor
  19. @anarchyst

    You make a very interesting point. And notice, the Germans are vilified above all others. I doubt that the German people would welcome the Muslim Arabs, unless of course they were forced to by the US Government. The Germans, it would seem, have a gun to their head.

    A also suspect that the Americans destroyed the Nord Stream pipeline out of hatred of both Russia and Germany. Notice, of all the countries in Europe, they are vilified above all others in the US Media.

  20. @Ann Nonny Mouse

    Burning at the stake was a horrible capital punishment used by many cultures as far as I know, and it was used by the Catholic establishment centuries ago.

    My use of the phrase ‘trad Catholic’ refers to traditional Catholics in the present day who worship according to norms which were in place pre-Vatican II. But you know this, surely.

    Can anyone answer my sincere question? Are Islamic values at odds with traditional “Western” values?

    • Replies: @Ann Nonny Mouse
  21. Malla says:

    Both primitive and backward cultures, even more backward than us hillbillies down here.

    Murican Hillbilies are way more advanced than most populations on Earth.

  22. alba/. says:

    In europe those with a religious sentiment gave birth to orphic mysteries that bear a striking similarity to the Indian beliefs of the same period that would later influence the platonist utopia. (that highly resonate with religious indian structure) but the lack of of a petrified caste system let the natural brahminate that codified the indo european gods and myths and gave birth to orphism to transition earlier to a secularist project trasforming thenselfs in the philophers and scientists that would trasform the world .the graeco roman culture that give rise to the scientific method , phylosphy , thetre , literateure , olympic sports , proto liberalism ….the world of the 7 muses that would irradiate their influence all across the would in the next comming milenia were again an european creation . if the myth of jewish ethnoracial supremacism purity is a pure farce , a group of phoenician merchant with not a single blood ” of abrahmanic” ancestry except in a residual manner in the levites , the secularization of the ethnoracial supremacist founding myths of jews as the divine seed that spread the art and science and codified throw masonry and other institutions is a cosmic joke in comparison

    In the same way that the traumatic event of the conquest of rome shook the hebrew conscience giving rise to christianity, it is not possible to understand the evolution of the jewish historiography without understanding the decisive weight of the hellenic influence before and after the conquest of alexander. if alexandria and other hellenistic cities served as a vector of expansion to spread the greek philosophy and to print the syncretic character in the most secular sectors of the jewish population, the influence in the traditional hebrew dogmatics could not be ignored.

    there are hundreds of small examples of the progressive infiltration of the Greek logos in the Hebrew religious and philosophical doctrinal corpus, let us take a small example, the wisdom speaking of itself (Ecclesiasticus XXIV, 3ff.): written in the middle of the Hellenistic period (200-170 BC).

    I came forth from the mouth of the Most High.
    And like a cloud I covered the whole earth.
    I dwelt on high
    and my throne was a pillar of cloud.
    Alone I traversed the circle of the heavens
    And I wandered in the depths of the deep.
    Through the waves of the sea and through all the earth.
    I ruled over every people and nation.
    From the beginning and before all ages I was created by him
    and to the end I shall not cease to be.
    In the holy tabernacle I ministered before him.
    And so I have had a fixed and settled dwelling in Zion,
    I rested in the city of his beloved,
    and in Jerusalem I had the seat of my empire.
    I grew like a cedar of Lebanon,
    like a cypress of the mountains of Hermon.
    I grew as a plant of Engedi,
    as a rose bush of Jericho.
    As a beautiful olive tree in the plain,
    like a plane tree by the waters.
    Like cinnamon and fragrant balsam I exhaled my aroma,
    and like choice myrrh I gave soft scent.
    Like the terebinth I spread my branches,
    magnificent and graceful branches.
    Like a vine I cast forth beautiful branches,
    and my blossoms bore tasty and rich fruit.
    I am the mother of love,
    of fear, of knowledge and of holy hope.
    [I am given to all my children
    as an eternal gift;
    but I am given to those
    who have been chosen by God.

    and thats how the metaphysical king and queen of jewish historiografy came to be , yahve as the sublimation of the pure will to power of the aryans that conquered the semites and the queen as the divine logos of the greeks that conquered and enlightened the jews . and ultimely subjected to yahve . a royal marriage of power (for the jews) throw knowloadgue ,a conception that would materialize thousands of years later when the jews launched a coup d state against the entire soul our entire civilization throw masonry playing as the divine seed that spread the art and scineces across the world , basically a secularization of the founding myth of jewish religious supremacism .whose first steep can be easily apreciated here or in any jewish philopher alexandrian authour ,that on a basis of platonism and pythagorism they built similar systems subjecting the divine wisdom of the greeks to yahve .well maybe not the relation of king and queen but a king and his loyal servant .

    its incredible that so few people in the west investigate the core concepts and their evolution throw time to understand and dismantle the spider web that jews have built around to reclaim what belong to us , the only one who seem to understand the idea of the center and the importance of domination its ultimate principles (in a religious , poetic or metaphisical way) are the jews .they know once you have taken spiritually over the core you can zombify an entire civilization with the general aplause of a population that see you as their legitimate representative , deconstructing our identity to nothingness and recontructing it as an extension of jewish power , thats what the farse of american ultraliberalism is all about .

    the cancer have metastasized so far that europeans can no longer imagine a different scenario than the present one , its a natural tendency to mentaly rewrite our conception of history based on our present situation so “whites” cant imagine that aryan became the architects of the ancient world and jews were just one of their little priestly little mutted excision, they cant imagine that greeks were the center of the proto scientific revolution that trasformed the world in the comming milenia enlightening the jews and its harder and harder to imagine a past where a city like rome conquered alll the mediterranean banishing israel from the history books for nearly two housands years now that israel is thriving again and we are being ethnocultally exterminated .but is truth and truth and more TRUTH and precisely because everything is truth and the potencial is so inmense that a general barrague of propaganda and brainwhasing is necessary to mantain this unnatural situation under control. they know that if whites start to see thenselfs as antunomous agents and unite under one banner all across the world jewish little game would be over before it start .
    the same way that aryans spread all across the world in the past europeans did once again in the modern era , the reconquista mimick point by point the early indoeropean expansion . the limpieza de sangre decrets that banned jews from any public ocupation formulated to fight against the jews during the reconquista would end up forimng a racial and religious identity that would trasplant to the new world stablishing a etno religious cultural caste system with pure iberians from the peninsula at the top , in the end the conquista was just an extension of the reconquista . while warrior caste imposed its will the the world the natural european brahnimate mounted the giant undercovered puzzle of the past aryan expansion resurrecting protoindoeuropean a dead language for more than 5000 years , they resurrected the proto indoeuropean mythological core uniting all the pieces spread across the world and im sure we would be able to resurrect the aryans thenselfs throw technology if there is till a will. a vertical and horizontal project , a interdisplinary and intercontinental endevour of jesuit misionaries , filologists , archeologists , historians from all across the continent with help the warrior caste that opened the way to the discovery and the common people that support the project , all of them focused without knowing it in a single point during hundred of years in the rediscovery of the center of our identity, DESTINY CAN SPEAK MORE CLEARLY .

    what was supremacism yesterday is pure survivalism today , or europeans natural priestly class start to think as the center of their own civilization and the have courage to impose our will over our own creation and embrace and internalize our roots expurguing the poisonous jewish influence myths or there wont be a future ,the way i have been crucificated the last two years only show the tremendous terror that exist among jews that those ideas germinate specially among the more educated europeans and rebuilt their identity in a way that directly confront and threaten the jewish power in his own terrain , its a fair and necessary battle .

  23. alba/. says:

    you are welcome if you want to joing the right battle

  24. Che Guava says:
    @Ann Nonny Mouse

    Good point.

    I would alter the below

    … and if communism had a saving grace, it fused socialism with nationalism.


    … and if communism had a saving grace, it was that it came to fuse socialism with nationalism.

    Uneven, sure, but increasingly true from the late thirties. Certainly true of Belarus, China, Laos, North Korea, Vietnam of now, the only states that could be said to be true successor states of old-school communism.

  25. Che Guava says:
    @FreedomWarrior14 (Gab)

    Numbers are fewer, and they are more heavily controlled, but they’d like to try it on east asians, too.

    I live near a fairly big public housing complex in Tokyo, there was a man there, always wearing pyjamas, always parked his car illegally, he set himself up as some kind of local Islamic Big Man, driving around with his fans, lecturing them in a local park.

    I complained to the police about his illegal parking. They did nothing.

    I asked a woman who lived there ‘Why don’t you complain about his illegal parking, I did?’

    She said ‘We have, but they don’t want to do anything. He was married to a Japanese woman when he moved here, but she’s dead. They say a suicide.’

    Suicide or murder, he and his acolytes aren’t around now, I’d guess thanks to coronamania.

    In Burma or Myanmyar, we recently saw the ‘Rohingya’, would-be invaders from Bangladesh, largely driven out, great!

    Oh, the weeping and gnashing of teeth by the usual type of western leftists. Same on that point, of course, for Xinjiang.

  26. Look, man, I’ve got books to read and subjects to master, mkay? If you want to write a thesis about what you think is going on in the world, and expect people to actually trudge through that, then I’ve got news for you. It’s really actually simple enough to put in a few sentences. Nature operates through evolution, and species evolve into subspecies, also known colloquially as “races”. Races form behavioral adaptations to their environments and sustain themselves and seek their flourishing of their offspring. They require territory and resources, and they must be organized conspecifically for that purpose. At the human level this requires as much organization and discipline as the race can muster in proportion as it understands its struggle and can envision adaptive measures to overcome its challenges. That’s the situation, and if you can’t extrapolate from that to what should be going on in the “the nation” then that’s partly due to your being under the influence of what actually did happen rather than what should have happened. What should have happened to European peoples within their nations was just summarized by me. What actually did happen is a certain sort of diseased parasite took over their existence starting with the Roman Catholic Church, and ending with a zombie British Empire infested with the most virulent and modern version of the same Ziovirus that infected Rome. Now that Zombie British Empire has transmogrified into a new “thing” with its colonial offspring (including the USA), and all are host to the same damned parasite that took over all of White Civilizations and converted them into nothing but resources for the consumption of the parasite class that rules over these people’s completely. But these people can’t understand why they are being mentally and spiritually, and also socially destroyed, nor how their bodies are being destroyed and degraded, even though it is happening right in front of them FOR DECADES AND DECADES AND DECADES ON END. I just told you why, but it will probably bounce off of your thick skull like a tennis ball off of a steel plank.

    • Replies: @Priss Factor
  27. @true.enough

    My understanding or assumption is that that burning to ash was to ensure that God would be unable to resurrect the dead person. Why did they dig up Wycliffe’s body and burn it to ash and throw the ashes into the river?

    It was only that Church that did it, burnt the living person as execution. I’ve never heard mention of that process, which would be quite a bothersome process of execution, being used by anyone else but the Roman Pope’s Church.

  28. @Afshin Nejat

    It’s really actually simple enough to put in a few sentences.

    Yeah, stop cucking and name the Jewish Power.

  29. @Twin Ruler

    Democracy and capitalism are the two most antithetical concepts imaginable. China has a Government of, by and for the people, whereas the USA is run entirely for the rich owners of the country.

Current Commenter

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone

 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Jung-Freud Comments via RSS
The Surprising Elements of Talmudic Judaism
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement
Shouldn't they recuse themselves when dealing with the Middle East?