The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewJohn Derbyshire Archive
The Brunswick Three—Monstrous Miscarriage of Justice Shows “Civil Rights” Now Just Means Anti-White Spite
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

[Excerpted from the latest Radio Derb, now available exclusively through VDARE.com]

See also: JOHN DERBYSHIRE: “Civil Rights”? After Breonna Taylor, SESAME STREET Lynchings—I SPIT ON THEM

We like to think that we make progress from a less fair, less just society to one that is more fair and more just. Indeed, our loudest and most powerful political faction flatters itself with the adjective “Progressive.”

But on the evidence of last week’s news we are not progressing but regressing, to something coarser, stupider, and more primitive. The phrase “banana republic” has been given a good airing this week. Yes, that’s where we’re headed. In fact, on this week’s evidence, we’re pretty much there.

The week’s greatest outrage—even more than Merrick Garland’s raid on Mar-A-Lago, because Trump can defend himself—was of course the sentencing on Monday at a federal court in Georgia of the Brunswick Three: Gregory McMichael and his son Travis, and their neighbor William Bryan. The two McMichaels were given life sentences; Bryan, who is 52 years old, was given 35 years.

What federal crimes did they commit? The Brunswick Three, who are all white, allegedly interfered with the civil rights of a black man, Ahmaud Arbery. So judged the court. They were also judged to have attempted to kidnap Arbery; and in the cases of the two McMichaels, to have carried guns during a crime of violence.

These were federal charges, mind. The Brunswick Three were tried on state charges last year. All three were given life sentences then.

So now they effectively have two life sentences apiece: one state, one federal.

This is a monstrous miscarriage of justice: two miscarriages if you count the state and federal trials separately. These were three honest, hard-working citizens, none of whom had any criminal record. Both the McMichaels had in fact served in law enforcement. Their intentions in confronting Arbery were plain: to defend their neighborhood against a likely thief who, whether or not they knew it, did have a criminal record.

Travis McMichael shot Arbery in plain self-defense when Arbery was trying to wrestle away his gun. Gregory McMichael didn’t shoot anybody—he was trying to call the police. Roddie Bryan wasn’t even armed.

Now their lives have been brutally destroyed, along with the lives of Mrs. McMichael (who has cancer), her daughter, Travis’ five-year-old son, and Roddie Bryan’s fiancée and their two children.

Some listeners acquainted with Georgia State statutes have emailed me to say that everything had proceeded properly; that the Brunswick Three were murderers under Georgia law.

All I can say to that is what the Beadle said in Oliver TwistIf the law supposes that, the law is an ass—a idiot.

And that Georgia State law does in fact suppose that was not the opinion of the D.A. who first investigated the case. His carefully-argued conclusion was that “there is insufficient probable cause to issue arrest warrants at this time.” [Ref: Glynn County , The Shooting death of Ahmaud Arbery , Feb 23rd , 2020]

But for Heaven’s sake: Two life sentences apiece? We don’t treat hardened criminals this way, and these are not hardened criminals.

To add insult to catastrophic injury, both state and federal trials were attended by all the reptilian parasites of the Civil Rights racket, their eyes all aglow with dollar signs: Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, Benjamin Crump, …

And then, for yet further insult, the court this week denied the three defendants’ request that they serve their time in federal prison.

Why did the Brunswick Three request that? Because in the Georgia state prison system, to quote Monday’s New York Times: “safety issues are so dire that they are the subject of an investigation by the Civil Rights Division of the U.S. Justice Department.” In the years 2020 and 2021 there were 53 homicides in Georgia’s state prisons. [Two in Arbery Case Sentenced Again to Life in Prison; Third Man Gets 35 Years, by Richard Fausset, NYT, August 8, 2022]

So, given that not only must a high proportion of Georgia State inmates be black but also a lot of the corrections officers, you can see why the Brunswick Three would prefer the federal pen.

However, the federal judge presiding this week, Lisa Godbey Wood, a George W. Bush appointee, denied their request, saying, according the Times’s Fausset, that she had “neither the authority nor the inclination” to accede

Once again: the sentences handed down on Monday were on federal charges, in a federal court. The charges were, in other words, more of the rotten, poisonous fruit of the 1964 Civil Rights Act.

But the sentences don’t actually make sense even in the 1964 context. At the time the Civil Rights Act was passed, it was not unknown for whites who killed blacks in the states of the Old South to be unjustly acquitted by local white juries. I don’t think it was common, and certainly not normal, but it happened—in the Emmett Till case, for example[The Murder of Emmett Till, Library Of Congress].

The remedy established by Civil Rights legislation was, that in such a case the accused could be tried again on federal charges.

It made sense as a remedy sixty years ago, notwithstanding its plain offense to the centuries-old common law prohibition against double jeopardy, and provided it was used very judiciously, where the local acquittal had followed on from some flagrant violation of rights.

But federal Civil Rights prosecutions make no sense in the case of the Brunswick Three. They hadn’t been found not guilty by a local jury of grinning whites for crimes they were obviously guilty of. They had been found guilty by a local jury—nine white women, two white men and one black man—and given life sentences.

There was no need for a federal prosecution to rectify an injustice. The federal case was just an act of prosecutorial spite—antiwhite spite.

That in fact is what these Civil Rights prosecutions always are nowadays.

Nineteen sixty-four is most of a lifetime ago. Federal Civil Rights prosecutions today remedy no wrongs. The phrase “Civil Rights” in 2022 is just a euphemism for “black privilege” and naked, shameless double jeopardy.

The really astonishing thing here—and to me, and surely to anyone else with a sense of fairness, the most depressing thing— is the near-total lack of support the Brunswick Three have received in the media.

ORDER IT NOW

I don’t expect anything from the regime outlets of course. Even The New York Post, the nearest thing we have to a counter-regime newspaper, tells us about the death of Arbery only that “the younger McMichael fired a shotgun into the jogger at close range.” [Gunman Travis McMichael gets another life sentence for hate crime in Ahmaud Arbery murder, by Evan Simko-Bednarski, August 8, 2022]

That leaves Post readers with the impression that Travis McMichael squared off, took aim, and deliberately fired at Arbery. In fact Travis was in a struggle for his life, with Arbery’s hands on his weapon.

I’ll admit I don’t watch a whole lot of Fox News, but the bits I did watch this week had nothing to say about the Brunswick Three. Tucker Carlson does, though, have a new show about flying saucers at Fox Nation.

Major media aside, even out here on the Dissident Right nobody’s had much to say. Is everyone so spooked by the Civil Rights racketeers?

It was the same with the state trial and sentencing. I posted on the Brunswick Three back in October, and Jared Taylor covered the case much more professionally with two fine spirited posts in November and January. Jared also alerted us in April to a website to help Mrs. McMichael.

Those posts aside, and my savage indignation at the state sentences in January, I’ve seen surprisingly little on what seems to me a major outrage.

I urge listeners, and readers of the transcript of this podcast, to look up those posts—just do a site search at VDARE.com with search argument “arbery,” or follow the links in the Radio Derb transcript when it’s posted on the 17th.

Like Aztec sacrifices to the Gods, the Brunswick Three have had their hearts ripped out and their bodies rolled off down the temple steps.

But they should not be forgotten.

(Republished from VDare by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 283 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. USA1943 says:

    If you can convince the Governor of that state (Brian Kemp) This was not a fair case, Kemp can Pardon their State Charges, They need the President to pardon the Federal charges and it is extremely unlikely that Biden would Pardon them, but if a Republican gets in He/She would likely Pardon them if he personally if that Person felt it was unfair, I know DeSantis would if he felt they were railroaded. So they have a great shot at having State Charges dismissed by Kemp (If Kemp felt the conviction was unfair) Federal charges being dropped depends if a Republican wins in 2024, DeSantis pretty much guarantees a pardon, he may even campaign on it.

  2. @USA1943

    Kemp is a clueless exurban goober who lives in a bubble.

    • Replies: @JamesinNM
  3. This case demonstrates clearly the utter rot in the justice system. Mob rule of the first order. Dudes threw their lives away trying to keep a robber out of their neighborhood. It’s a good example of how far things have gone, but doubtful that the jailed individuals set out to be martyrs in demonstrating mob justice.

    People already know to avoid the “justice” system at all costs. The best thing one can hope for is that it leaves you alone. A verdict meted out by the Taliban in Afghanistan would have a much greater chance of being just.

  4. Blacks are politically unified, militant, thuggish, violent, scary.

    Jews are politically unified, mega-organized, mega-wealthy, savvy, and militant.

    Whites are disorganized, guilt-ridden, racially atomized, ideologically divided, and scared.

    Is it any wonder that these three good men would be thrown to the wolves like this?

    This verdict amounted to a thinly-disguised human sacrifice designed to keep American cities from being looted and torched (had the ‘wrong’ verdict and sentences been handed down.)

    The phenomenon is antiwhiteism.

    Who/what is behind antiwhiteism?

    Mystery solved:


    Video Link

    • Agree: Gordo, Bernie
    • Thanks: Richard B
  5. I agree that this matter is tragic. And it is tragic all way round.

    “Both the McMichaels had in fact served in law enforcement. Their intentions in confronting Arbery were plain: to defend their neighborhood against a likely thief who, whether or not they knew it, did have a criminal record.”

    Then I am unclear why they did not know netter than to chase down someone who was unarmed and according to their own view had only been wandering around – trespassing – on property they did not own. Then the story they gave police is contradicted by evidence. There is no record of string of robberies on property. There was on reported theft of weapon from a vehicle. Apparently, multiple people had been trespassing on the property without incident or interference.

    Most troubling is the claim of a string of burglaries and just how intense this chase.

    The prosecutors’ conflict of interest is another matter.

    And telling for anyone, if there had been no evidence of the pursuit and the shooting, we would only have the word of the three pursuers.

    • Replies: @Fhjfxcvj
    , @YesYesCircle
    , @Anon
  6. bert33 says:

    Observation and conversation and note-taking skills will become more important in the future along with reasoning and critical thinking skills. Had George Zimmerman been capable and competent with the above then his name would not be steeped in controversy.

    pretty much the whole country is still unhappy with the outcome of the George Floyd saga such that the courts are now heavily biased in favor of minorities especially blacks. Chauvin went to prison but the underlying issue of lack of good training and managerial direction and support for officers in the field still has yet to be addressed. less bullets, more reason, thats the order of the day.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
    , @anonymous
    , @Anon
  7. @USA1943

    Those guys are screwed. Even Desantis won’t go there, similar to how Floyd’s “saint hood” was never questioned by anyone in the mainstream parties.

    • Replies: @Jack P
    , @Anon
  8. meamjojo says:

    “What federal crimes did they commit? The Brunswick Three, who are all white, allegedly interfered with the civil rights of a black man, Ahmaud Arbery.”

    They did not “allegedly” do anything. They killed a man in cold blood. That is not alleged. It was real. They didn’t get what they deserved.

    In a just world, all three would have been sentenced to death. And all their worldly assets that were in their name at the time of the incident would have been stripped from them and their families and used to make reparations to the guys family after paying the lawyers and court/police costs.
    .

  9. @USA1943

    There is zero chance any mainstream politician will pardon them or grant them clemency. It seems like you haven’t quite processed the reality that the Judeo-Satanic rulers of the US have imposed black supremacy over the country as a way to humiliate White Americans and hasten the destruction of the country.

  10. I watched the video of the shooting, and also watched a new’s program that showed a graphic chronology of the movements of the four men prior to the shooting. See link below.

    I think the first DA made a huge mistake in not prosecuting the younger McMichael for involuntary manslaughter and the father for accessory.

    This mistake allowed the national media attention to go from a murmur to a scream. We see the result.

    The the two vehicles were trying to box in a man on the street. That in and of itself is aggressive.

    The father, at the end of the vehicular hunt, was standing in the bed of the truck with a pistol: that’s a threat.

    The son, at the end of the vehicular hunt, was standing outside the truck with a shotgun: that’s a threat.

    In response to the threat, and after the vehicular hunt, Arbery went towards the younger McMichael, but clearly this was in response to a perceived threat and followed a period when he was the target of vehicular aggression. This was, in hindsight, a stupid move. However we shouldn’t ignore the fact that he almost succeeded in wresting away the shotgun before he was killed.

    If you put yourself in Arbery’s position, being followed and trapped by two vehicles and in one of those vehicles were men with drawn weapons, his behavior can be seen as a response to a perceived deadly threat.

    On the other hand the younger McMichael pulling the trigger was clearly not premeditated and was in response to Arbery grabbing his gun. Hence, in my opinion, a charge of manslaughter and then let the jury sort it out. That didn’t happen of course. The ‘civil rights’ charges and sentences are indeed political and so are the other charges in fact. The charge should have been manslaughter.

    • Agree: Red Pill Angel, JR Ewing
    • Thanks: Hibernian
  11. Charon says:

    The Brunswick Three, who are all white, allegedly interfered with the civil rights of a black man

    They were convicted mainly for looking like Evil White Devils from Central Casting.

    That’s how trials are decided nowadays, and (Central Casting) is a wholly owned subsidiary of the (MSM). How many white women on the jury again? I’d have asked them how much TV they watch, but we all know the answer to that.

    The other thing juries like this consider is which lawyer is better looking, or which lawyer is female. Justice!

  12. no one says:

    The fundamental transformation into W. South Africa.

  13. Today in America if you are white and kill a black hoodrat in defense, you while be stripped of any rights and incarcerated for life.
    Then there’s former US President Trump, who was vigorously attacked by a illegitimate regime who fear him more than God himself for no other reason than he and his 70+ million supporters represent the end to there destruction of everything male and female, good and right.

    Well Derb, I wouldn’t spit on them, they aren’t worth the spit in my mouth.

    Winters coming……

  14. conatus says:

    Will any White citizen volunteer to help the cops in the future? These three tried to be helpful and got involved with our Anti-YT Kulture.
    They defended themselves(was he supposed to let Aubrey take the loaded shotgun?) and now they have been sentenced to life for their mistaken beliefs in an orderly society.
    The message to the former majority… “Stay home, get bars for your doors and windows…Let Chaos reign”

    The nation’s motto used to be the fifties Disney chant “Let freedom ring!” now?….”Let chaos reign!”

    But this should provide material for the NYT and the Posties to write hand wringing articles about the newly minted non participating citizenry.
    ‘New material is good, it gets people past the firewall.’

  15. My understanding is that at the time Georgian law allowed “citizens arrest”. (It was scratched out immediately after this naturally).
    To me, this is, at worst, a lower order manslaughter. It warrants no more than approx 5 years, max.
    Of course, I’m ignoring the racial/political environment…..

    • Replies: @Hans
    , @mocissepvis
  16. Sean says:

    Bryan, who is 52 years old, was given 35 years.

    He supplied the dash cam that let them give him that. What was he thinking?

    • Replies: @GerryH
  17. Emma S. says:

    Of Course, what do you expect in America, a country that practically worships Black people?

    • Agree: Ace, Kolya Krassotkin
  18. Emma S. says:

    America is a country where black people must not be criticized and must be praised and worshiped instead.

    • Agree: ruralguy
  19. sally says:

    ……………………………………………civil rights act 1954………………………………….
    racial terror— prosecutorial spite—–politics —antiwhite spite —racial terror

    I wonder how does the USA rate on the five-point fixed Political Terror Scale? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_terror_scale

    thanks for the article.

  20. Dumbo says:

    Perhaps bringing in millions of African slaves was a bad idea? (*)

    Perhaps bringing in millions of Mexican and Arab slaves immigrants is a bad idea?

    And people like Derb and Sailer still say that White people are more forward-thinking and better at long-term planning than the other races… OK…

    (*) With a little help of the friendly Jews, sure, but still.

  21. There’s supposed to be equal protection under the law. The plain fact is that the law is different for different people.

    A law student with a word processor could correct this situation. Run every law through a word processor and replace every reference to an individual with the word ‘person’. Any reference to any particular characteristic a person might have like male, female, black, white, old, young, etc gets replaced with the word ‘person’. If after the change, the law no longer makes sense, then it is void for stupidity.

    Anyone that has any respect for the law and the criminal apparatus that enforces it is a moron.

    • Replies: @Realist
  22. ((Soros)) runs the judiciary, not the written law.

  23. These 3 men are nothing but political prisoners. We’ve had some before in America – the J6 being an example – and there will be many more.

    What did they do in all those Latin American countries when people were taken as political prisoners? Mothers of the Disappeared loitered about the prisons and government offices with signs, and people appealed to the “International Community” for help. Yeah, that’ll work … patriotic Americans must fine our own model to deal with this. The first part of any plan is to STICK TOGETHER.

    Americans have a hard time with that. Note VDare’s tweet above:

    The jurors know that failure to return a guilty verdict will result in them being fired from their jobs, their kids being beaten up at school, and Antifa and BLM showing up to torch their houses while the police, with Derek Chauvin’s fate in mind, watch.

    That’s indeed the case, because White people won’t STICK TOGETHER.

    • Agree: mocissepvis
    • Replies: @Realist
    , @anarchyst
  24. bomag says:

    This was a sacrifice to the mob.

    Do such things work, long term? Usually makes things worse, but at least the victim cohort eventually gets the message that appeasement is a bad strategy.

  25. Hello? Stay away from niggers. Far away. The days of worrying about careers and housing values and which restaurant to patronize are long gone. The justice system is against you as a White. The education system is against you. Defend yourself against black attack? Sorry Whitey, you’re going to Federal prison. Have a thriving business?? Sorry, Whitey, you’ll need to have your nog quota filled before you can renew your business license. Oh my, look at that nice White school! Sorry, Whitey, you gotta teach these brainless and violent nogs, too, and you can’t discipline them!

    Balkanize. Move to a majority White area or state. Run for the School Board and town council. Run for state representative. Any White still living in Atlanta is a fool.

  26. Rich says:

    They convicted the guy with the camera. The guy with the camera. For filming the episode. With 9 Whites on the jury. Does anyone believe that with 9 blacks on a jury, a negro in a similar situation would be convicted? Georgia is shot, down the tubes. I’d take the extra day to drive around the state if I had business south of it.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  27. Fray222 says:

    I don’t see why anyone would want to stick their necks out for these fools.
    Firstly these dudes literally are old school backwoods redneck racists who don’t want no n**gers coming round their parts. Its just not a good look for the modern conservative movement.
    Secondly it is murder. Derb might think that these laws are stupid, but these people would have been convicted in any court in any civilized nation on earth. They wouldn’t have found a more favorable jury or more favorable self-defence laws anywhere else on the planet. You just don’t get to threaten someone with a shotgun without a damn good reason, and these people didn’t have one. If someone dies as a result its murder according to Georgia law and everyone who took part is an accomplice.
    Thirdly, in all probability Aubery was actually, honest to goodness, going for a jog and there is no evidence otherwise.
    Fourthly the mandatory sentence for murder in Georgia is life in prison. Pretty dumb if you ask me but that’s the law.
    Its not a winning battle as i’m concerned, but knock yourself out.

    • Replies: @3g4me
    , @Peter Frost
    , @NotaLib
  28. onebornfree says: • Website

    Derbyshire: ” Federal Civil Rights prosecutions today remedy no wrongs. The phrase “Civil Rights” in 2022 is just a euphemism for “black privilege” and naked, shameless double jeopardy.”

    The Civil Rights Act [and all subsequent additions and similar federal laws] are entirely unconstitutional, and need to be abolished and replaced with: _nothing_.

    So what can be done? I ask.

    I say :

    “Ive got to start me a new revolution
    And get back to the old constitution
    Got to stand up and fight
    For the whole Bill of Rights
    Its time to start over again…..”

    And: “…..If Jefferson was alive here today
    He’d be locked up for life in Guantanamo Bay”

    Song: “New Revolution”: https://soundcloud.com/onebornfree/new-revolution-demo

    Regards, onebornfreeatyahoodotcom

    • Agree: Jimmy le Blanc
  29. “But for Heaven’s sake: Two life sentences apiece?”

    Mr Derbyshire, Gregory McMichael and his son Travis, and their neighbor William Bryan failed to follow the Derbyshire rules. If they had followed your rules they would be enjoying their freedom.

    When will the White man learn. After Ferguson, after Chauvin, after Travon etc.. Maybe the White man is too busy eating Doritos, drinking beer and watching sportzball to understand what is going on.
    This is not the White man’s country anymore. It is time for separation.

  30. Anonymous[288] • Disclaimer says:

    How do gun totting Jews in Israel keep Palestinians in check? Why don’t Americans keep Jews in check in a similar fashion? Two can play the same game!

  31. @mark green

    The irony with the two teams is that the “too white” one is the only national team of winners England has, while all the “racially correct” ones are teams of losers.

  32. @europeasant

    That last sentence says it all.

    America is no longer a free country, yet many can’t grasp that obvious fact.

    There is without question a full scale worldwide attack on white people and white countries, yet the white masses are still so brainwashed they are expecting the attackers to save them.

    Get out of the “system” while you can, and learn to feed yourself. Nobody else is going to do it….

  33. Ted Colt says:

    Emmett Till wasn’t murdered. That’s what the acquittal established.

  34. Dr. X says:

    Exactly. In a sane world, if the whites were guilty of anything, it would be manslaughter, fifteen years max (which is the max James Fields should have gotten).

    Of course, we don’t live in a sane world. The courts are a stage for political theater and holier-than-thou moral posturing. It should not be forgotten that it was not blacks who did this, but whites who put their fellow whites away on these monstrous charges:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lisa_Godbey_Wood&oldid=1091972790

    Moral of the story: you cannot trust “The System,” you have no “rights,” and never let them take you alive.

  35. @europeasant

    When will the White man learn. After Ferguson, after Chauvin, after Travon etc.. Maybe the White man is too busy eating Doritos, drinking beer and watching sportzball to understand what is going on.

    The mental crisis most Whites would need to endure to accept the truth would shatter them. They would need to accept that almost everything they’ve been told all of their lives by their parents and teachers is a lie. It is very hard for people to break free from brainwashing,

    • Replies: @anonymous
  36. Really pathetically weak article.

  37. Nat X says:

    Dese deplorable yts bout to git dey bums enlarged by my boi fleece johnson and the dindoo brigade!!!

  38. @mark green

    Whites are disorganized, guilt-ridden, racially atomized, ideologically divided, and scared.

    Truer words may have never been uttered.

    • Agree: Lancelot_Link
    • Replies: @Republic
  39. You know, you can’t argue self-defense when you accost a stranger with a firearm and he tries to defend himself. Your negrophobia seems to have stolen your ability to reason as well as your humanity. It’s a tragedy all around, no good outcomes for anyone except those who stay in power over us by spreading hatred and division.

    • Disagree: Robert Dolan
    • Replies: @beavertales
    , @YesYesCircle
  40. They thought they were doing the right thing the whole time. The right thing is protecting your neighborhood. The right thing is going after criminals. And if it all goes wrong, the right thing is to go to the police.

    So, the lesson is: Don’t do the right thing. Don’t make your stupid citizen’s arrest. Don’t go to the cops with anything.

    Instead: Dump the body in the swamp, destroy the evidence, and swear an omertà. I don’t like any of that, but it’s where we are. We are in a gangster state and we have to adapt. There’s nothing new or unusual about it. The Republic actually had a pretty good run, but it was anomalous and now it’s gone.

  41. Nat X says:
    @USA1943

    These crackers gonna die in jail Nancy boy.

  42. Anonymous[119] • Disclaimer says:

    Meanwhile white boys from the U.S.— a good percentage from the South— are in Ukraine as volunteers fighting on behalf of GloboHomoShlomo against Christian Russia.

  43. Realist says:
    @RoatanBill

    Anyone that has any respect for the law and the criminal apparatus that enforces it is a moron.

    This is true. But this is just one aspect of the Deep States’ effort to disorganize our society. There is a full-court press(pun intended)to facilitate the power elite’s total control. By the end of this year, the changes to this country will be almost ineradicable…then only extreme physical means will have a chance to resolve the situation.

    • Replies: @RoatanBill
  44. A white guy I know was shot by Hispanic gang bangers 15-20 years ago as a young man. He was all set to go in the Army and looking forward to it. Wasn’t killed, but he lost a kidney, had intestines/GI tract damaged somehow. Has a big scar down the front of his torso. Life changed for the worse, forever.

    Showing up for the trial with his family, and bunch a other Hispanic gang bangers were outside the courthouse, threatening him and his family, saying they knew where they lived, were going to kill them, etc. The white guy and his parents got scared and dropped the charges The beaner gangsters got away with their crime. This is how it is for white victims now.

    Did I mention that when Nancy Pelosi flew to Taiwan, her delightful tiddies arrived an hour before her?

  45. Realist says:
    @Achmed E. Newman

    …patriotic Americans must fine our own model to deal with this. The first part of any plan is to STICK TOGETHER.

    I agree with your premise, but first patriotic US citizens must GET TOGETHER, and then STICK TOGETHER.

  46. KenH says:
    @USA1943

    Neither Trump nor DeSantis will even consider a pardon. Both are centrist cucks at heart and are so desperate to make blacks Republicans that they won’t even consider it for a minute. Trump’s DOJ and half Jew Bill Barr were already planning to file civil rights charges against these men.

    • Replies: @Avery
  47. Any confusion about the “intentions” that the prosecution, (which seemed gifted with clairvoyance) had about this entire scenario should have been answered with one fact. THE MEN VIDEO TAPED THE ENTIRE EVENT!! People with intentions of committing first degree murder don’t do shit like that. The man voluntarily turned over the video in the hopes that it would help clear up the matter, again murderers don’t do shit like that. Who knows what would’ve happened had the video evidence not been introduced, but I can tell you this for a fact, it’s better to just video and not confront these slimy shitskins, nothing good can come from it nowadays. Hell they tell retail stores to not defend against smash and grabs now, what does that say about where we’re at as a society? Just let the retarded miscreants take what they want, what could possibly go wrong?

    • Thanks: anarchyst
    • Replies: @Katrinka
  48. Mike Tre says:

    Their only option now is hunger strike and passive non compliance. Force the screws to drag them everywhere they need to be taken. Do not eat, do not accept medical attention. They are dead anyway.

    Goddamn this negro worshiping shithole that our country has become.

  49. Anonymous[119] • Disclaimer says:
    @WingsofADove

    That’s a good and reasonable summary. I agree.

  50. “Mostly Peaceful Protests in Honor of George Floyd”



    Video Link

    • Thanks: Automatic Slim
    • Replies: @NotaLib
  51. Suicide by negro….those three men are totally innocent.

  52. “Travis McMichael shot Arbery in plain self-defense when Arbery was trying to wrestle away his gun.”

    Actually he didn’t shoot in self-defense, the gun went off because the gun he held was pulled on by Mr. Arberry and he activated the “bang switch” thereby killing himself.

    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
    , @Menare4
  53. Avery says:
    @KenH

    {Neither Trump nor DeSantis will even consider a pardon.}

    POTUS can pardon for Federal crimes, e.g. Civil Rights “violation”.
    POTUS cannot pardon for State crimes: they got life for State crimes first, so it’s a moot point whether a future POTUS will pardon them or not.

    He or she never will: there is no benefit to the POTUS, since the 3 will still be in jail for life on State convictions, and there is 100% certainty of blowback from the POC community.

    There is a hypothetical possibility that both the State’s governor and POTUS can simultaneously issues pardons, but that will happen when Hell freezes over.

    • Replies: @KenH
  54. 3g4me says:
    @Fray222

    @29 Fray: Anti-White nogger worshipper.

    • Agree: AceDeuce
  55. awry says:

    Derb still refuses to NTJ. Understandable, but this is not a case of “black privilege”. It’s another case of the Nose signaling to whites that the Nose are the masters of the Universe.

  56. @Frank Walus

    I agree with your comment about the Taliban. I would prefer to be ruled by them than the (((anti-white scum))) now in control of the USA.

  57. Katrinka says:
    @Robert Dolan

    Ahmaud Arbery was a career criminal. A hood rat of the highest order.

    • Replies: @Anon
  58. @Realist

    The upper level criminals in the Fed Gov mafia are now in the looting phase as they know it’s winding down. They’re going to get out at some point and at least attempt to disappear. The next level of crooks will then take over and attempt to re-inflate the economy so that their prospects for looting are better, but there’s not enough resources left to accomplish that. The tipping point has passed with the bulk of the world now leaning away from the US and the US so seriously dependent on imported goods of all kinds with local manufacturing capacity at all time lows.

    The mafia known as the USSR quietly took their loot and let the whole thing die. The US won’t be that lucky. There are too many weapons systems and too many costumed morons to not use them to try to hold on. The deep state will turn inwards as their power overseas diminishes. That’s why I think there will be street level fighting at some point and an in your face dictatorship could result. The only thing that can prevent this is if the dollar rapidly fails so the amoral cops and military types walk off the job and thereby remove the coercive power the gov’t mafia relies on.

    • Agree: Patrick in SC
    • Replies: @Realist
  59. @onetwothree

    Such tactics used to be practiced by all, we need to take this to its logical extension. The reason black neighborhoods are the way they are is because outsiders don’t make the rules for them, outsiders are shunned or acted out against.

  60. Any Black or White with a grain of common sense or reasoning would have simply stopped and explained why they were running through the neighborhood.

  61. Whites must remove themselves from any area run by (((anti-whites))) or their pet groids. I live in a redneck paradise in rural Oklahoma. Whites are rough characters and don’t back down from anyone. The groids know it and tend to behave themselves.

  62. Anonymous[386] • Disclaimer says:
    @spacewonderer

    That poor guy. Another white victim of “diversity.” Now I just read some little incel hispanic went on a rampage yesterday in small town Pennsylvania, mowing down whites at a fund-raiser with his car and beating a white woman to death with a hammer. 3 dead so far. And despite a few naysayers here like Dolan who are prolly in denial, I also think Nancy’s “tiddies” are superb for her age.

    • Replies: @AceDeuce
  63. @meamjojo

    “They killed a man in cold blood”, discredits anything you say before and after. Obviously you haven’t looked at the video recordings. You are lazy and dishonest and your self aggrandizement makes you a net detriment to the human race.

    Have you no sense of honor? Apparently not. I simply cannot empathize with as dishonest a rogue as you are. Truly, we live in different universes. As long as there are people like you around, civilized life is impossible.

    • Agree: WSG
    • Thanks: Mark G.
    • Replies: @Lurker
  64. anarchyst says:
    @bert33

    The initial prosecutorial decision regarding George Zimmerman was NOT to prosecute him, citing legal self-defense. It was only when the case became public and “poor little trayvon martin” was deemed to be am innocent “teen” is when a prosecutor charged Zimmerman. Thankfully, Zimmerman was acquitted. However, the Zimmerman case should never have gone to trial.
    The same should have been the case with the “Brunswick Three”. Once the initial prosecutor refused to indict, THAT should have been the end of the case. Prosecutor shopping” is no different than any other “double jeopardy” situation and must be outlawed.
    The case of Amhad Arbery and the three (white) Brunswick residents who are presently doing “hard time” for defending themselves is but another prime example of prosecutorial misconduct and double jeopardy, which MUST be addressed and outlawed.
    Arbery was a criminal POS who was casing construction sites for tools and other materials that he could steal and sell. He was observed at the same site previously on video as well.
    As there were break-ins and increased criminal activity, the three men were merely defending their neighborhood.
    Arbery refused to be questioned which was within his right.
    Arbery felt “disrespected” by being questioned and “doubled back”, attacking the man with the shotgun. Arbery attacked the man by pulling on the barrel of the shotgun causing it to fire. Anyone familiar with firearms knows that pulling on a barrel of a shotgun can cause it to fire.
    Arbery could (and should) have run off in any other direction, would not have been pursued, and would still be alive today. He chose to confront the man with the shotgun. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
    The original prosecutor refused to indict. The powers-that-be had to “shop” for a prosecutor who would take the case. It took three tries before they found one who would indict.
    This is prosecutorial “double jeopardy” which must be addressed and outlawed nationwide. The way it stands now, what is stopping a prosecutor from one jurisdiction from indicting someone from another jurisdiction when a local prosecutor having legal jurisdiction refuses to indict? We are all in trouble if this is allowed to stand.
    Also, the court was stacked against the white men just because they are white.
    Arbery’s previous extensive criminal record was not allowed to be disclosed and put into evidence.
    So-called “civil-rights icons”, Antifa and BLM types were in the courtroom, threatening violence if the “correct verdict” was not rendered.
    The jury was also warned that there would be violence if they did not convict.
    The “judge” went along with the threats and refused to run a proper court proceeding. the mainstream media fanned the flames of racial hatred against whites, making Arbery out to be a mere “jogger”, (yeah, right). Who in their right mind jogs in work boots? The “mainstream media” stated that Arbery “was studying to be an electrician” and was merely observing construction sites…yeah, right. Arbery was looking for copper wire or anything else of value to steal, that being his stock in trade as an “electrician”.
    I pray that any appeals that the Brunswick three place will be successful.
    Their prosecutorial double jeopardy and kangaroo court “trial” were both sh!tshow railroad jobs from the outset.

    • Replies: @follyofwar
  65. TKK says:

    Based on my CRIPA case, and what I know of the Georgia DOC- and I know a lot – the best hope for them is for a family member to bring them about 100 oxycodones or street heroin crushed in Sprite and let them go to sleep forever.

    The only way to commit suicide in prison is hanging or stabbing yourself with a homemade “sticker” and if you don’t succeed, they will come for you in the infirmary, where you would be better off with a witch doctor and a rusted spoon.

    What have I warned the white working class, over and over and over:

    You do not want to end up in a state prison in the South, or any state where there is a large population of blacks as inmates or guards.

    Truly, you cannot fathom the howling misery of these God forsaken pits.

  66. Avery says:
    @WingsofADove

    {The charge should have been manslaughter.}

    Good post and good observations.
    Mostly agree.

    However, disagree that it was ‘manslaughter’.
    Clearly there was politics involved in piling up the State charges.
    But I viewed the presentations of the lead DA and she explained the what and why of the charges.

    The 3 idiots weren’t just ‘following’ him, but were chasing him.
    For 5 minutes.
    They went after him, cut him off, blocked him, ran him off the road……
    What for? for alleged burglary ? No threat to anyone’s life*: call 911 and let the cops deal with it.

    They scum were on a N___r Hunt.
    They got what they deserved.

    [Ga. judge gives powerful statement before sentencing Ahmaud Arbery killers to life]

    I really don’t understand why many in the White community are rallying behind these losers.
    It’s no different than the POC community rallying behind and bestowing sainthood on the drugged up low life thug George Floyd, who in his previous illustrious career had pulled a gun on a pregnant Black woman.
    ________________________________________________
    * the young idiot Travis McMichael left his infant son at home to go out and chase someone and put himself in danger. the kid will grow up without father. what a tragedy.

  67. anarchyst says:
    @Rich

    Both the jury and the judge were threatened with violence if the “right” verdict was not rendered.
    This is both jury tampering and judicial misconduct which should be able to be used in the upcoming appeals by the Brunswick Three.

    • Agree: Rich
  68. KenH says:

    I’ll admit I don’t watch a whole lot of Fox News, but the bits I did watch this week had nothing to say about the Brunswick Three. Tucker Carlson does, though, have a new show about flying saucers at Fox Nation.

    FOX daytime shows originally cheered the guilty verdicts in November of 2021. Tucker acts like this case doesn’t even exist. Tucker’s ignoring this story is just rank cowardice on his part. He knows that showing sympathy to three working class white men could imperil his career. Had Kyle Rittenhouse shot 2-3 blacks instead of 3 whites (Rittenhouse shot at but unfortunately missed the black terrorist) Tucker would not have covered the story to the degree in which he did.

    The Jews have turned so called civil rights into a racial caste system where whites have no civil rights. What worse is that a substantial number of whites are ok with being at the bottom of the racial heap so America can “heal” from its “racist and sinful” past.

    There doesn’t even appear to be one case where the DOJ’s civil rights division has charged blacks or other non-whites with violating the civil rights of white people. This is inexcusable considering the staggering number of black on white crimes every year. The civil rights division of the DOJ exists solely to attack and punish whites. It is now headed by radical black nationalist Kristen Clarke.

    If Arbery was shot by three black or Latino gangbangers nobody would know who Arbery is and there wouldn’t have been any nationwide coverage of this case because it doesn’t fit the anti-white racial narrative. It was the heavily slanted media coverage that led to social media outrage which led to idiot governor Brian Kemp giving this case to the GBI and a special prosecutor. The fix was in.

    This is why Jews should not only be banned from owing national media outlets but also working in the media.

    • Agree: europeasant
  69. @Jimmy le Blanc

    Jimmy, Glynn County is nowhere near Atlanta. I have no idea how long these 3 men have been there, but that IS one of the fairly White areas that people DO run to. The problem is that the “problem” follows them. These 3 men WERE doing their civic duty, trying to clean up problems that their particular neighborhood was having.

    They’d already taken action like your recommendations. The Establishment won’t allow this. What next?

    • Agree: Gordo
  70. anarchyst says:

    Blacks are dysfunctional, cannot “behave” in normal civil society and should be repatriated to the African continent. I don’t care where ((they)) go as long as it is out of civilized American society.
    Black DNA IS different; violent African tribal mores are the norm.
    Disputes are “settled” with violence, not with logic and reason. Instant gratification is the rule, not the exception. The DNA for logic and reason does not exist within the black psyche. Blacks thrive under a “strong man” form of government, where one’s social status is determined by proximity to the “chief”.
    Keep in mind that African blacks have never inventing anything. From the wheel, to mining the wealth of minerals beneath their feet, to wondering “what is beyond that ocean or river”, blacks do not possess the DNA for future planning or exploration.
    I realize that almost everyone has interacted with a “good black”. However, truly “good blacks” who accept the “rules” for living in civilized society are few and far between. When the SHTF, black tribal instincts will take over and gullible whites will “pay the price”, possibly with their lives.
    Fatigue resulting from having to deal with and coddle this dysfunctional race is not only tiring, but getting to be truly intolerable. Whites who “walk on eggshells” to avoid possible by violence by blacks are doing themselves and white society a disservice.
    I, for one, am tired of pandering to this dysfunction subset of (sub)humanity…

    • Agree: RoatanBill, Realist, Katrinka
  71. @europeasant

    I’m pretty sure that these 3 men are more familiar with Mr. Derbyshire’s rules (The Talk) from experience than most reader of that National Review column. They were trying to protect their kin and neighbors from having to break these rules, by what, moving again?! How long can White people keep running? They will eventually run out of places.

  72. @onetwothree

    [Thanks] wasn’t enough. You nailed it completely there, 123.

  73. KenH says:
    @Avery

    POTUS can pardon for Federal crimes, e.g. Civil Rights “violation”.
    POTUS cannot pardon for State crimes: they got life for State crimes first, so it’s a moot point whether a future POTUS will pardon them or not.

    I’m fully aware of this, but a federal pardon would put pressure on a Republican governor in Georgia to do likewise or at least commute their sentences to something reasonable. A federal pardon for the bogus civil rights charges are in order and would be a major f*ck you to the Jewish led radical left and white hating blacks.

  74. Rooster16 says:
    @USA1943

    I want whatever you’re smoking. You actually think a mainstream politician is going to blow their entire career up over getting a few White guys out of prison after a jury has found them guilty, and almost the entire country has forgotten about the case? Kemp is an opportunistic slimeball politician, if it meant putting away 1,000 innocent White guys to stay in office, he’d do it in a heartbeat.

    No politician cares about you. Let me state that again: no politician cares about you. At this point we’re left voting on a candidate that does the least amount of damage to us. Your best bet is to stay as far away from these black creatures as possible because the system will steamroll you even if you’re innocent; this is the state of America today. Watch out for yourself, because no one else will.

    • Agree: Charon
  75. profnasty says:

    Communists have physical characteristics, including words: Get to know them. Your life may depend on your knowledge.
    Be ready at a minutes’ notice.

    [One clue- British accent.
    Up the Boer.]

  76. Anon[418] • Disclaimer says:
    @Katrinka

    If this situation happened in Panama, how would the Police have treated this upstanding citizen ?

    • Replies: @Katrinka
  77. If they had killed a Russian or an Iraqi or a Libyan or an Afghan or a Syrian we’d be thanking them for their service. They came, they saw, he died. Ha Ha Ha!

  78. “Any Black or White with a grain of common sense or reasoning would have simply stopped and explained why they were running through the neighborhood.”

    Laughing.

    Uhhhhm because he was bnei8ng chased by three guys with weapons . . . perfectly reasonable to assume they meant him harm. Also reasonable, do I het shot while putting up a fright or5 hope these guys are lousy shots or maybe they are just duck hunting.

    “This guy coming at me thinks I am a duck — I think I will put up a fight.”

    • Troll: anarchyst
  79. @Lancelot_Link

    They do that. One night in Malaysia I watched as a couple of small Malaysian cops armed with Heckler and Kochs came to deal with a disturbance caused by some Africans. As they approached one huge African grabbed the barrel of the gun and pulled it at his own chest shouting at the cop to shoot as he didn’t care. Unfortunately they didn’t shoot not did the gun go off. Actually the best way to have dealt with them would have been to call up the K9 unit manned by Chinese cops (as Muslim Malays don’t like to handle dogs) and just set them loose on the African troublemakers while staying a good distance away. That cuts the risk of being disarmed by an African grabbing your gun and turning it on you.

  80. @WingsofADove

    An innocent individual – a lover of construction sites – without a guilty conscience, would have stopped, asked the McMichaels what they were after, why they had guns trained on him. If their intention was to shoot him in cold blood, they had plenty of opportunity to do it before he went for the gun. They had called the police. For an innocent person, waiting for the police to arrive would seem a much better option than wrestling the gun away from one guy when his buddy had one, too.

    But perhaps Arbery wasn’t all that sane, or all that innocent.

    • Agree: AndrewR
    • Replies: @anarchyst
  81. @anarchyst

    You bring up another huge problem, anarchyst. When juries are too intimidated by blacks to reach a fair verdict, the trial become nothing more than a kangaroo court.

    In such cases, why not have the jury hear testimony from a remote location, where their identities can remain hidden? Why not sequester them for the duration of the trial?

    Several Fox News talking heads were relieved that Derrick Chauvin was found guilty, (former judge Pirro said it was Murder 1), afraid of the coming riots if he was acquitted. Only Tucker Carlson, to my knowledge, had the guts to state that Saint George wasn’t murdered by Chauvin but died from a drug overdose.

    If the two aggressors whom Rittenhouse killed in self-defense had been black, he’d have likely received the same sentence as the McMichael’s.

    Lastly, Derbyshire blames Carlson for not commenting on this unfair verdict, but he doesn’t say that Tucker was on a well-deserved vacation. In this quickly sinking country some new outrage happens every week. If one never takes some time-off to recharge his batteries, he is bound to go crazy.

    • Replies: @KenH
    , @David In TN
  82. Mr. Katt says:

    Take a native and put shoes on them, they cease to be a native and become a problem. And you can tell by his wardrobe that he’s got the I.Q. of a spoon.

  83. @USA1943

    Republicans worship blacks just like democrats. They will never go against the Sacred Race so blatantly because some pollsters claim that if the GOP bows to blacks then .2% of them will switch parties, in addition to their tribal donors who are fine with degenerate negro worship as long as they get their blood for Israel. And Kemp is as bad as any of them in this regard, Southern Republicans are still Republicans

  84. Realist says:
    @RoatanBill

    That’s why I think there will be street level fighting at some point and an in your face dictatorship could result.

    Agreed, that’s what I am saying.

  85. @spacewonderer

    Something similar happened to me. I could not prosecute a violent crime because I was threatened by the perp’s extended family and police would not have protected me. This is of course what happens to black victims all the time. They may themselves be blameless (say, a bystander who gets shot in a gang war), they may know the person who shot them but cannot tell the police for fear. I am afraid that our legal and political systems in the West are not equipped to deal with these realities, just as they are ill equipped to deal with organized crime and graft in high places, but that is a completely different problem.

    • Agree: Automatic Slim
  86. Anonymous[103] • Disclaimer says:
    @spacewonderer

    A white guy I know was shot by Hispanic gang bangers 15-20 years ago as a young man. He was all set to go in the Army and looking forward to it.

    That’s so awful. How unfair. Poor guy never had a chance to go thousands of miles away to foreign lands to bomb and kill people who did nothing to him or his family.

    • Replies: @spacewonderer
  87. anarchyst says:
    @Achmed E. Newman

    Gentile white men have been marginalized and demoralized for the last seventy years or so by the jew-run “civil-rights (for everyone but gentile whites)” crowd.
    This is one “white boy” who NEVER accepted this whole jew-run “civil-rights (for everyone but gentile whites)” scam.
    On an individual basis, initially, I treat everyone I encounter with respect, but do whatever I can to “avoid the groid”. It’s just not worth it to deal with them.
    It is brainwashing by jew-run government, education and entertainment systems that are responsible for the emasculation of gentile white males.
    Let’s not forget the “bread and circuses”, the professional sports franchises like the “Negro Felon League” or the “N!gger Basketball Association” which many white men gravitate towards. It is sickening to observe white men buying and wearing overpriced sports jerseys and other sports memorabilia of their favorite negro players, having the ability to spout off sports statistics for their favorite negro players while not giving a damn about what is really going on in the country.
    Hearing of so-called “civil-rights (for some)” violations by whites, but NEVER by blacks shows how one-sided the system is, and has been for a very long time.
    Us white children growing up in 1950s and 1960s American cities where neighborhoods were “changing” learned to be wary of blacks who were ALWAYS bent on criminality directed against us whites. The old “poor racially oppressed black” never existed.
    I, among other whites walked out of a Catholic Mass when the priest declared that “negroes were not only as good as whites, but were better than whites”. I never went back…
    I am convinced that blacks sprung from a simian root (unlike whites and asians) who accumulated a small amount of human DNA, but not enough to make a real difference in their temperament, actions or mental capacity or ability. To prove the “simian connection” all one has to do is observe the behavior of blacks when they are in their criminal “attack mode”. They “hoot and holler” and “jump around”, mimicking their simian relatives. In common parlance among us aware whites, such behavior is known as a “chimp-out”. Diane Fossey didn’t have to travel to Africa but could have studied simian behavior in any of the American black-run urban cities. Of course, being well-armed would be a requirement.

    • Thanks: Katrinka
  88. Hmm, are the McMichaels regretting it that they didn’t play by the rules?

    After all, they did call the police, didn’t they?

    That would indicate that they had no murderous intent towards the victim.

  89. anarchyst says:
    @Frank Walus

    It’s a black thing…
    Arbery felt that he was “disrespected” by the white men who inquired about his reasons for his being on the construction site. Any normal person would have answered the questions or just run off. To avenge his “disrespect”, Arbery had to attack the man with the shotgun. His defective dysfunctional DNA gave him no other choice.
    You see, blacks have an false notion of “respect” and “disrespect” which violations of must be settled in the most immediate way possible.
    Blacks are too stupid to think of the consequences, although prisons are actually “finishing schools” for blacks, not unlike colleges and universities for Whites and Asians. Most blacks are proud to have done a stint in jail or prison. Incarceration is a “badge of honor” for them…establishing ”street cred”.
    “Three hots and a cot” are good enough for most blacks, along with the “down low” camaraderie that exists among blacks in prison.
    Segregation is a temporary solution. Repatriation to Africa (or even Haiti) is a permanent solution.

    • Replies: @WingsofADove
  90. “”But federal Civil Rights prosecutions make no sense in the case of the Brunswick Three. They hadn’t been found not guilty by a local jury of grinning whites for crimes they were obviously guilty of. They had been found guilty by a local jury—nine white women, two white men and one black man—and given life sentences.””

    11 whites and 1 black on the jury and they still convicted them of murder??? Whites are the most cowardly race in history.

    I understand what felony murder is but it’s bad law and the jurors should have employed jury nullification.

  91. wolf man says:

    The story of these three white men is the equivalent of Emmett Till in 1954. The difference is that now it is being done to whites because they are white. I guess that is progress.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  92. Hans says:
    @animalogic

    Yes, AL. And under Georgia law McMichael was not culpable once St. Arbery tried to seize the gun. All under the (((rug))) now but at least Georgia has created St. Arbery Day.

  93. @anarchyst

    ‘Respect’ and ‘Disrespect’ in fact are at the foundation of western culture, if we take seriously that the Iliad and the Odyssey are two of our foundational narratives.

    The Iliad, set during a few weeks of the siege of Troy by a motley crew of Greeks, is centered on the wrath of Achilles, who is pissed because he feels DISRESPECT from the Greek king Agamemnon, who took a choice slave girl captured when Achilles was pillaging a local village.

    In the Odyssey Ulysses could spare the suitors who he has trapped in his dining hall and thus perhaps avoid a civil war and his own possible demise. They offer him peace and money to refrain. Instead he attacks and fights and kills them all because of their DISRESPECT for him, his wife, his son, and his possessions.

    So, with due RESPECT, I don’t think concerns about RESPECT/DISRESPECT are limited to only one cultural group in the USA.

    • Replies: @WSG
    , @anarchyst
  94. Lurker says:
    @ThreeCranes

    He’s a pos (((troll))).

    • Replies: @meamjojo
  95. Peter Frost says: • Website
    @Fray222

    Firstly these dudes literally are old school backwoods redneck racists who don’t want no n**gers coming round their parts.

    How do you know this? If you could substantiate that point, you would certainly change my opinion of the verdict.

    Its just not a good look for the modern conservative movement.

    What is a “modern conservative movement”? Give an example.

  96. KenH says:
    @follyofwar

    Lastly, Derbyshire blames Carlson for not commenting on this unfair verdict, but he doesn’t say that Tucker was on a well-deserved vacation.

    It’s not like this story just broke. Tucker never said anything about this case when they were first convicted in the state trial at the end of 2021. This case is so racially charged that Tuck doesn’t want to damage his brand and be accused of defending three white men who attempted to “kidnap” and kill an innocent negro jogger who was planning on attending university and majoring in aerospace engineering.

    Tucker likely did a cost-benefit analysis and realized it wasn’t worth the shit storm that would ensue. This is inexcusable because Tucker routinely brags about how FOX management lets him do as he please.

    But reverse the races in this case and Tucker would be virtue signaling like crazy.

    • Replies: @follyofwar
  97. @Robert Dolan

    He was a straight A student.

    Don’t laugh!

  98. @TKK

    You do not want to end up in a state prison in the South, or any state where there is a large population of blacks as inmates or guards.

    Truly, you cannot fathom the howling misery of these God forsaken pits.

    These are the good boys that the state chooses to turn loose in a civil society. The ones the state actually keeps locked up, I can’t imagine.

    • Thanks: TKK
  99. It isn’t a crime to be stupid, of course, but one thing I believe those three men were truly guilty of is not thinking enough about the potential consequences before hopping in their truck with a shotgun to chase down a thief, especially a black one. A proper cost/benefit analysis would surely have led to the conclusion it wasn’t worth it. And I’m guessing they are all thinking that right now.

    • Replies: @Philmuhcrevis
  100. Menare4 says:
    @Lancelot_Link

    You make an excellent point.

    How many people, being confronted with a man holding a shotgun, would charge the man, grab the barrel of the shotgun, and try to wrest it away from the man holding it? The gun no doubt fired when Arberry pulled it towards himself, causing the trigger to be pulled. In short, he was responsible for his own death. Take a close look at the video.

    It is unclear why the defense attorney did not make more of this point during the trial, or on closing argument. A simple demonstration with the shotgun (unloaded, of course) would have proved the point.

    McMichael may have been negligent for having the safety off and his finger on the trigger, but Arberry’s action in grabbing the gun had to be the proximate cause of his death. This was not a case of murder. Manslaughter perhaps (negligent homicide), but not murder.

    • Replies: @Philmuhcrevis
  101. WSG says:
    @WingsofADove

    Would you kill someone because they looked at you the wrong way? Stepped on your shoes? Biked on your lawn? Blacks do this regularly. You clearly have never dealt with them as a whole.

  102. jamie b. says:
    @USA1943

    Why do You write Like that, it’s Really weird, Is it Some odd Millennial style?

  103. @hardlawjockey

    A proper cost/benefit analysis would surely have led to the conclusion it wasn’t worth it.

    The truth of the matter is this, and I’ve mentioned this to a lot of people I know that conceal carry, the American Nig-grow is a protected species at this moment in history. Unless you are being severely beaten or they have a weapon you’d better not even think about confronting, questioning, or escalating anything with these knuckle dragging shit skins. Even though I know these verdicts are garbage, as anyone that see’s the sentences that they get for murdering each other it’s reasonable to come to the conclusion that the justice system in the US clearly deems a black death at the hands of any white person is automatically assumed to be a hate crime based on the mind reading that went on at these trials. Jury and officers of the court intimidation are issues that should be front and center at their appeals if they are even eligible to receive them at some future date. Avoid them as if your life depends upon it, because it does.

  104. @TKK

    I know quite a lot about prison too. They will have to join the Aryan Brotherhood to survive. Blacks are scared of the AB. They are tough, mean SOB’s. The downside to joining a prison gang is that they will require you to do things that could cause you to be convicted of more crimes and doing a longer stretch. Since these guys have life sentences, that is not a factor.

    • Agree: TKK
    • Replies: @TKK
  105. NotaLib says:
    @Frank Walus

    The Hoodrat Arbery was “jogging” like i’m Santa Claus

  106. @Menare4

    In short, he was responsible for his own death. Take a close look at the video.

    Even though those that can think would agree, that would go against the current narrative that they’re not responsible for anything anymore. It doesn’t matter the grievance, somewhere, someone has a preloaded excuse for any shortcoming or despicable behavior displayed by the NAPA. The jogging lie is a perfect example, easily argued away by the shoes and clothes he was wearing. And the premeditated murder lie also by the simple fact that they filmed the entire event and voluntarily turned it over to LE. Who would do that having murder in their plans? Any White males not understanding the message yet had better wake up.

    • Agree: europeasant
  107. anarchyst says:
    @WingsofADove

    You are missing the point.
    It is the defective black perception of “respect” and “disrespect” that I was addressing.
    If a white person stares at a black person for more than a few seconds he will be confronted in a negative way: “What choo lookin’ at, white m’fer” being a favorite phrase used by blacks.
    If you are in a car accident with a black, especially in a black neighborhood, and you decide to “do the right thing” and stop to exchange information, you risk great bodily harm to yourself and the passengers in your car. Not only from the black driver of the other car, but neighborhood residents who will attack you on sight, just because you are white.
    Blacks have a totally different dysfunctional perception of “respect” and “disrespect”, much different than that of other races.
    It is wise for those of other races to know these differences and act accordingly.

  108. NotaLib says:
    @Fray222

    How did they know that he was unarmed libcuck? Yeah sure Arbery was going for a jog HAHAHAHAHA GFY

  109. @WingsofADove

    You are using trigger words like “hunt”. You omitted the bit about them being beside Arbery asking to talk to him, and he refused to do so. The McMichaels drove to the next intersection and waited to see which way he was going to go. They made no attempt to confront Arbery. It was Arbery’s decision to make a turn toward the younger McMichael and run at him. He could have turned right or kept jogging. Arbery’s grabbing the weapon could just as easily been determined to have been attempted theft. William Bryan only followed because he saw the McMichaels chasing Arbery. He released the video, because he believed that it would prove their innocence.
    You have left out the bit about the younger McMichael seeing Arbery leaving the construction site one evening a couple of days previously, and when trying to ask him what he was doing there, saw Arbery reach for his waistband, leading him to believe Arbery was armed. The younger McMichael then called police to report the incident, reporting that he believed Arbery was armed, although he did not see a weapon.
    Missing in the article, and your analysis is the prosecution argument on the law in question.

    “A private person may arrest an offender if the offense is committed in his presence or within his immediate knowledge. If the offense is a felony and the offender is escaping or attempting to escape, a private person may arrest him upon reasonable and probable grounds of suspicion.”

    The prosecution argument, allowed by the judge, was that the law was ambiguous. One of the first things taught in law, is that every word in a document has a meaning, and the meaning must be consistent. In the above, it is clear that the first sentence is an entirely different circumstance for arrest than the second. The meaning of each sentence is clear and unequivocal, separating a felony any offense. Given that the owner of the building site had reported thefts, and that the younger McMichael had seen Arbery, whom be believed was armed, twice, within a couple of days, exit the property where thefts had been reported, to suggest that there were not “reasonable and probable grounds of suspicion ” of a felony is ridiculous.
    Had it not been for the shit show caused by St. George of Fentanyl, Black Lives Splatter, and the entire”woke” psyop, this would have been a yawner. The only thing missing from the court room was the kangaroos.

  110. anarchyst says:
    @wolf man

    Not true…
    Emmett Till ACCOSTED and ASSAULTED a white woman.
    He should have been arrested, tried and convicted in a court of law.
    That being said, if he had apologized for his misbehavior, he would be alive today.
    This is but another example of the misplaced dysfunctional black notion of “respect” and “disrespect” that blacks subscribe to.
    Most people are unaware that one of Till’s tormentors was a black man.
    Till’s father was executed by the U S military for multiple rapes and murder.
    Emmett Till was wrong…
    The Brunswick Three were right…

  111. AceDeuce says:
    @Anonymous

    I hate Pelosi with all my heart, but she does have a righteous rack for an old broad.

    As for the tacobreath who ran over the White folks, killing one and sending 17 to the hospital, and then fleeing the scene, only to hit another woman with his car some distance away. He then got out and finished her off with a hammer. (last I heard, it was a 56 year old woman with the same last name as the perp–mother?)

    They haven’t played this up on the national news too much–it’s still all Mar-a-Lago all the time, but there was a brief clip, showing the perp, a cartoonlike short fat ugly brain damaged looking brown squat monster out of central casting. He looks as tough as a muppet, but of course toughness isn’t required when you drive into unsuspecting people with your car.

    Interestingly enough, the news stooges these days, usually affirmative action hires themselves, always give the exaggerated spanish pronunciation of a hispanic’s name on the news whenever there’s a positive mention, including all the names he/she/it has (“Mexican president Andrés Manuel López Obrador”) and rolling the r’s etc.

    In the case of this killer creep, who the police report refers to as “Adrian Oswaldo Sura Reyes”, the news clown did no such thing, just quickly saying, Anglo style, like “Adrian Rays” very quickly, I wonder why.

    • Agree: spacewonderer
    • Replies: @Anon
  112. Dually says:

    “Civil Rights” is now the exclusive right of rich political donor guys to wear dresses on their estates and to be considered real women in public. The effrontery of such perversion is that it completely perverts the original meaning of civil rights.

  113. anonymous[918] • Disclaimer says:
    @Jimmy le Blanc

    I don’t care about the niggers you speak of. But, since I live in another land, I do care about how to get you albinoniggers to stay away from plundering, subjugating, oppressing and terrorising everyone else.

    But, the colourless mofing race which lives by the adage, everything I own is mine and everything you own is ultimately mine too, just won’t listen to reason. So, they must burn.

    The 3 fugly albino apes got what they deserved. Hooray for justice served.

    • Replies: @Donald A Thomson
  114. @Anonymous

    Shut the fuck up, you worthless non-white. Or jew. Or brain dead white liberal.
    You are one of those three for sure.

    • Agree: NotaLib
    • Replies: @Anon
  115. SafeNow says:

    Is everyone so spooked by the Civil Rights racketeers? – The Derb

    “Spooked”? Uh oh. Philip Roth wrote a novel based on this. “The Human Stain.” A professor innocently uses this word,..spooks meaning ghosts. It is taken as an insult to African-American students, and the professor is toast. The novel was based on a real-life situation.

    Bty, Wikipedia declined to say that it was based on a real-life situation. Roth attempted to correct this. Wikipedia‘s reply was that the author of a book is not a credible source. Roth later contested this.

  116. NotaLib says:
    @loner feral cat

    Looks like a real insurrection to me by this leftist scum

  117. Richard B says:
    @mark green

    Blacks are politically unified, militant, thuggish, violent, scary.

    Jews are politically unified, mega-organized, mega-wealthy, savvy, and militant.

    Whites are disorganized, guilt-ridden, racially atomized, ideologically divided, and scared.

    All true.
    But the key point here is that the “success” of the first two groups is entirely dependent on the failure of the third.

    In other words, they are dependent on the very thing they are violating.
    And the ultimate purpose of their violation is total destruction. So they are dependent on what they are destroying. Or destroying what they depend on for their “success.”

    A better example of a Pyrrhic Victory would be impossible to imagine.
    Then again, one doesn’t have to imagine it because it’s happening.

    • Replies: @anonymous
  118. @follyofwar

    Speaking of (possibly) intimidated juries, Google: “Tracie Hawlett J.B. Beasley.”

    Tracie Hawlett and J.B. Beasley were two (White) 17-year old girls murdered near Ozark, Alabama in 1999. A DNA hit 20 years later revealed a (black) suspect, one Colin McCraney.

    The trial was supposed to begin last Monday with jury selection, but too few prospective jurors showed up. The Judge said, “Come back in 2023.” At the Websleuths Forum somebody claiming to be local said people were afraid to be on the jury in this case.

    The initial defense strategy was “a white cop did it and the police covered it up.” This defense was ruled out when the woman purveying it admitted she was lying.

  119. These three gentlemen should not lose hope, and nor should the January 6 political prisoners languishing in the Deep State’s gulag without formal charges, trials, or convictions of any crimes. ALL of these people will be set free, by force of patriot arms if necessary, once the Great Collapse occurs, the rule of law is restored, and the demons who currently rule over us illegitimately are brought to justice. I don’t think that they have very long left to wait.

  120. @Robert Dolan

    He was the secret love child of Mother Theresa and Barack Obama. He was only three weeks away from his Doctorate in Comparative Theology. He ran a private soup kitchen feeding homeless puppies. It was not his fault. In fact, he was not even there. His doppelgänger did it!

    On a more serious note. If (big if) reason, liberty, and justice ever return to this nation, I hope that the Brunswick Three are given a pardon and restitution. Lets, face it. The Constitution is dead and the rule of law is a joke. Not even the military will defend We The People — otherwise they would be surrounding Washington DC right now.

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
  121. AceDeuce says:
    @spacewonderer

    Of course, the classic mob intimidation story is the Central Park Jogger case. Mobs of niggros were allowed inside the courthouse and took over the halls, shouting expletives and threats to the female prosecutor and others, including the victim herself when she testified. There were constant phoned and mailed threats sent to the court and the prosecution side.

    Before that, while she was in the hospital fighting for her life, mobs of howling negroes filled the hospital parking lot, shouting that she was a whore, that she wasn’t really injured (she was in a coma for 12 days with 89% blood loss, and her face so disfigured that her family had to identify her by a ring she was wearing), and chanting her name over and over again. Two black newspapers, and a black radio station ignored the rule of not naming rape victims, printing it over and over.

    Interestingly, the name that they chanted was “Patricia Meili” That was her legal name, but since she was a baby, she was known as “Tricia” Family, friends, coworkers-no one called her “Patricia”. It was assumed that a nigro employee of the court, NYPD, or hospital saw her actual name on a form and leaked it.

    • Thanks: spacewonderer
    • Replies: @spacewonderer
  122. @mark green

    This verdict amounted to a thinly-disguised human sacrifice designed to keep American cities from being looted and torched (had the ‘wrong’ verdict and sentences been handed down.)

    I have to ask: who gives a sh!+ about America’s cities? They are, almost without exception, inhabited in the majority by niggroes and (((liberals))), both groups being primarily responsible for the rot that is destroying this once-great nation. If sh!+skinn3d vermin want to destroy and burn these urban garbage dumps to the ground, let them! Why the hell would any self-respecting White person give a damn? Indeed, self-respecting White people should provide extra gasoline and matches for such an event.

  123. @animalogic

    My understanding is that at the time Georgian law allowed “citizens arrest”. (It was scratched out immediately after this naturally).

    Can we assume that this was a result of demographics, with niggroe-majority Atlanta, Georgia’s largest city in population, being the driving force behind repeal of this part of the law?

  124. anonymous[918] • Disclaimer says:
    @Jimmy le Blanc

    The mental crisis most Whites would need to endure to accept the truth would shatter them. They would need to accept that almost everything they’ve been told all of their lives by their parents and teachers is a lie. It is very hard for people to break free from brainwashing,

    But, of course!

    After all, these soul-diseased vermin you speak of, and no doubt identify with, do subscribe to such mind bending and utterly deceitful abominations such as, 3 persons in 1 god, 100% man 100% god, god reincarnated/tabernacled into his son, father and son are distinct but the same, the oxymoronic monotheistic-trinitarianism, and so on, right? This is totally retarded.

    That said, accepting the truth about all this deceitful sewerage can set these soul-diseased vermin free, rather than shatter them.

    Will they not listen to reason?

  125. USA1943 says:

    Whites went from, My only regret is I have but one life to give for my country to even if I believe it is the right thing to do, I can not do it or I might be called racist, What happened to Men who stood for doing what they believe is right?, Who believed in and stood for Principle, Morals and Ethics? Men willing to Fight and Die for what they believed is right? Of course evil will triumph when they are not challenged, there is no pushback, To be honest if one or a group is not willing to fight, they deserve what they get, no one was willing to fight for any of the cases in the article, so the result is predictable, BLM and Antifa did not go to Russia to protest the Basketball players conviction even though they have billionaires like Soros who will pay for transportation to tear up cities, They did not go as they know Putin would not play games with thousands of people looting and burning down Russian Cities, like the American American Politicians who had the Police stand down, Soros, BLM and Antifa feared Putin would not have his Men stand down so they were scared. Sometimes you need to be willing to fight, Americans USED TO BE willing to Fight. What happened?

    • Replies: @Katrinka
  126. Jimmy1969 says:

    I remember seeing a white guy prostate in South Africa being shot by blacks and begging for help …it was bak in the 80s…no one came to his help in the press…he looked like a bearded fat Boer South African peasant…and no one supported him…and he was killed by blacks…to me that was the turning point when we lost it all

  127. Rules and regulations regarding citizen’s arrest in Georgia can be found under Section 17-4-60 through 61 of the Georgia Criminal Code. Established during the late 1860s, the law authorizes private citizens to make an arrest of others if a crime is committed in their presence or in cases in which they have immediate knowledge that one occurred. It applies when a suspected felony crime is committed, such as:

    Armed robbery, burglary, and other types of theft crimes;
    Arson and other types of property crimes;
    Assault and battery;
    Drug distribution, manufacturing, and trafficking;
    Embezzlement, fraud, and other ‘white-collar’ crimes;
    Kidnapping, rape, and child molestation;
    Murder, manslaughter, and homicide.

    https://zimmermanatlantalaw.com/georgia-and-citizens-arrest/index.html

    and the former officers should have known better as well as the first prosecutors who were assigned the case. The gentlemen in question had no warrant (reason) to effect a citizens arrest.

    § 6:19. Arrest by citizen based on immediate knowledge, reasonable, and probable suspicion

    • Replies: @Prometheus Martel
  128. TKK says:
    @Mis(ter)Anthrope

    Agree 100%.

    Excellent point. They will absolutely have to procure cell phones and drugs if they run with the AB. It is advanced to the point that drones make drops over the prison fences with parcels of cell phones and drugs.

    It’s a shame the Mexican gangs will not let a white join- they have no tolerance for the black sodomites and will response with force en mass.

    Isn’t it a disgusting irony- our white tax dollars taxes pay for their food, hospital and schools as they saunter over the border and yet they treat whites with disdain- even in prison!

    You could not make it up- in a dystopian novel- it would be seen as too deeply insane…..the doom Whites face in America.

    • Replies: @Mis(ter)Anthrope
  129. unNthem says:
    @Sam Hildebrand

    Jesus, a troop of chimps would be more intelligible. Yet somehow they’re this (former) country’s greatest asset. The end can’t be too far off.

    • Agree: Sam Hildebrand
  130. Corvinus says:
    @onetwothree

    In other words, break the law because supposedly everyone else is doing it, too. That’s an elementary school mentality.

  131. “If all men are created equal, that is final. If they are endowed with inalienable rights, that is final. If governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed, that is final. No advance, no progress can be made beyond these propositions. If anyone wishes to deny their truth or their soundness, the only direction in which he can proceed historically is not forward, but backward toward the time when there was no equality, no rights of the individual, no rule of the people. Those who wish to proceed in that direction cannot lay claim to progress. They are reactionary. Their ideas are not more modern, but more ancient, than those of the Revolutionary fathers.”
    Calvin Coolidge
    30th President

    • Replies: @Anon
  132. JamesinNM says:
    @The Anti-Gnostic

    Kemp is fully compromised deep state. Deep state sent him a clear message when then murdered his daughter’s boyfriend.

  133. Soccer says:
    @meamjojo

    They were certainly guilty. They’ll never get out. To add civil rights violations doesn’t mean shit.

  134. TKK says:
    @Sam Hildebrand

    My God. Everyone should watch the video you posted.

    They all seem retarded, vicious, dirty. Note how they talk about murder like it’s funny….like its a real hoot. Is their catastrophic stupidity genetic? I have not traveled in Sub Sahara Africa because I have no desire to pay money to be around blacks, but does ANY RACE act as disgusting and disturbing as the American black?

    I feel a horrifying deep sorrow for the Brunswick Three. An abyss of grief for all the things they have lost. Simple pleasures. A cup of hot coffee and scrambled eggs with toast. Walking on the beach in the fall with your dogs at dawn or dusk. Clean sheets. Someone who loves you giving you a birthday card. Coming home to a clean house and supper cooked.

    And what did they lose it for? A black violent punk criminal who would rob our houses and laugh in glee.

    I know the rage blinded them…they were sick of being robbed and they felt justified.

    We all have to take note of this: not matter how self righteous or enraged blacks make us, we are not allowed to confront them or fight back in America 2022.

  135. @Jimmy le Blanc

    Defend yourself against black attack? Sorry Whitey, you’re going to Federal prison.

    Odds of this are reduced greatly if:

    1. You off the offending niggroe in the presence of a crowd of sympathetic fellow Whites who know the truth about what happened and are willing to back you up.

    2. You dispose of the dead offending niggroe’s remains in a manner that ensures they won’t be found or connect you to its demise and disappearance in any way. This can be a very difficult and very, very unpleasant task, so the assistance of other Whites who value justice is invaluable.

    3. You and everyone else involved or witness to the act keeps their mucking fouths shut (“shoot, shovel, shut up”). The more incidents of the Arbery type that occur as time goes on, the less that will be needed to convince even zoologically stupid White normies that “playing by the rules” is a suicidally moronic thing to do.

    The mistake that the Brunswick Three made was calling “the law” for help. A SUICIDALLY STUPID move.

    • Agree: Cauchemar du Singe
  136. @AceDeuce

    Typical, and maddening as hell. Imagine what it will be like when whites are 50% or less of US population. I think I know what’s going to happen, and it definitely won’t be the non-whites giving us “minority’ status, affirmative action, etc.

  137. Anon[146] • Disclaimer says:
    @AceDeuce

    ” I hate Pelosi with all my heart, but she does have a righteous rack for an old broad. “

    I feel ya Ace. See, I live in a state where a huge number of women of all races, are misshapen, over-sized in the tummy, hips, and butt, and quite under-sized in the tiddy department. Even many younger women. So I don’t mind seeing a Pelosi type with ample tiddies without huge gut/hips/butt. The negro men can have all the gigantic butted women they seem to crave.

    • Agree: AceDeuce
  138. God be with these 3 innocent white men.

    • Agree: anarchyst
  139. I heard there was “racist” texting.

    Between the 3 white men.

    Has it been released?

    What did they actually say?

    Spook? Porch monkey?

    Or did they call a nigger a nigger?

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  140. Anonymous[216] • Disclaimer says:

    2 more weeks, patriots in controls, watch the benis.

  141. Katrinka says:
    @Anon

    I’m not sure I understand the question.
    The vast majority of Panamanians don’t own or carry firearms.
    They fortify their homes with barbed wire, fences, gates, walls, and barking dogs.
    Arbery wouldn’t be able to just wander onto the property.
    Many homeowners own a machete, a legal weapon.
    The legal system in Panama doesn’t give two sh*ts about the fact that you are black.
    If you get caught stealing you receive punishment.
    This general rule may not apply to crooked politicians.

    • Replies: @Anon
  142. Anonymous[369] • Disclaimer says:
    @Sam Hildebrand

    They say in jurisprudence that hard cases make bad law (i.e., an extreme [rare] case is a poor basis for making a general law). Well, so too in inductive reasoning— and judging groups of people— do rare bad cases make a poor basis for making generalizations.

    Hopefully black people wouldn’t extrapolate from the rare bad actors like the Dylann Roof and view all white people as mass-murdering racists.

    I know there are a lot of racists on Unz— especially the tea and crumpets racists on Steve Sailer’s blog— who also pride themselves in being reason and statistically based, but when they harp on rare events and extrapolate major ideas from them, especially about a entire racial group, they show themselves as complete 🤡.

    • Replies: @Sam Hildebrand
  143. Katrinka says:
    @USA1943

    American men have become the helpless Eloi in the “Time Machine”.

  144. Fhjfxcvj says:
    @EliteCommInc.

    Maybe the McMichaels knew that Georgia law allowed them to make a citizens’ arrest in just such a case, as did the Georgia legislature, which is why it changed that law before the trial.

    arbery wasn’t simply wandering and trespassing. He’s on video with his hands in a boat that thousands of dollars of electronic equipment had been stolen from.

    • Agree: Bernie
    • Replies: @Anon
  145. Fhjfxcvj says:
    @meamjojo

    You obviously don’t know what “cold blood” means, and simply used it for its sensationalism.

  146. @The True Nolan

    He was the secret love child of Mother Theresa and Barack Obama.

    Mother Teresa turned 51 the month Barack Obama was born. Are you suggesting an Abrahamic miracle took place?

  147. lloyd says: • Website

    The Arbury case that they were convicted and sentenced for the same murder twice. I suppose the equivalent would be hanging in a tree a dead man in segregationist Georgia. The first is a tragedy. The second a farce. Chauvin convicted of first degree intentional murder and second degree unintentional murder. Every principle of justice has been flouted by the mob. It makes America sound like Uganda under Idi Amin. Possibly that is an insult to Uganda. The derangement in Uganda was confined to the leader and his cronies. America sounding now like sub Sahara Africa at its more deranged may be not entirely a co-incidence. The farce of these cases may be the one thing that gets these guys out of prison in the next few years or even months as America comes to its sense.

  148. Rob W. says:

    Whites need to urgently form intentional communities in order to survive the coming anti-White storm.

    Buy farmland. Remove to rural areas or small towns. Acquire basic medical training. Create a local alternate economy.

    We need cultural secession to survive.

  149. Anon[369] • Disclaimer says:
    @Fhjfxcvj

    Maybe the McMichaels knew that Georgia law allowed them to make a citizens’ arrest in just such a case, as did the Georgia legislature, which is why it changed that law before the trial.

    British Broadcasting Corporation director makes a citizens arrest:

  150. anonymous[286] • Disclaimer says:
    @Richard B

    Whites are being persecuted and displaced because of their arrogant insouciance and decadence. Never assume it can never happen to you. Never “go big”on people. And never let women run the group or tribe, because they think with their uteruses and will always betray their tribe or community without regard for what it will mean for their offspring down the road. I don’t think it is surprising that, as soon as white women realized they could push their own men around with nothing to worry about, they turned on them viciously. And white women don’t care about the wreckage they’ve created, because they’ll gladly take it up the rectum from their simian or joo lovers since they’ve shown themselves to be stronger and more formidable than their own men; again, white women are disloyal by nature. Once white men became weak, it was all over. White men have been a target in the United States since the end of WWII, and some of the people doing the most effective firing have been their own women.

    • Replies: @anonymous
    , @Richard B
  151. @Anonymous

    I truely wish the behavior of the boys in the hood depicted in the video was rare. It would just be funny not sad. Try driving down Lamar Street in south Memphis and randomly start conversations with groups of young black men hanging out on the corners, you will quicky discover that you are risking your life and anti social behavior by inner city young black males is the rule not the exception.

    A based black guy on youtube has made 100s of videos just driving around ghettos in US cities. Some scary shit.

    https://www.youtube.com/c/CharlieBo313/videos

    I live in one of the poorest rural areas in America. Stereotypical white trash, methheads, run down trailer courts, poachers you name it. If I drove around taking videos I couldnt get 100 views on youtube because the videos would be boring compared to what the black guy records in inner cities.

  152. Anon[369] • Disclaimer says:
    @spacewonderer

    Shut the fuck up, you worthless non-white. Or jew. Or brain dead white liberal.
    You are one of those three for sure.

    I’m sure Derb didn’t appreciate the comment by “Anonymous 103” as Derb’s son served honorably in the U.S. Army.

  153. anonymous[236] • Disclaimer says:
    @anonymous

    Whites were/are foolish, insouciant, trusting, easily rattled, easily led, gullible, and pathologically altruistic.

    And that’s just the women.

    A group without survival instincts is unlikely to survive. But keep praying to a god the jews created to control other human beings. A lot of people are, horrifyingly, not going to survive what is to come.

  154. On the bright side, these are certainly three white men who have learned their place.

  155. anarchyst says:
    @Rob W.

    One problem: Keeping government types OUT. If they get wind of a “whites only” community, they will do anything and everything to destroy it and jail the leaders on false charges.

    • Agree: Automatic Slim
  156. anarchyst says:
    @Jeffrey Freeman

    It is interesting to note that the Brunswick Three’s prior statements (thoughts) were entered into the court record while disclosure of Arbery’s criminal past was disallowed.
    This looks like good grounds for appeal, along with the double jeopardy prosecutor, ineffective judge and tampered jury.
    One can hope.

    • Agree: mark green
  157. anonymous[172] • Disclaimer says:
    @bert33

    fbi+doj = bias in justice outcome or just plain ole politics?
    https://consortiumnews.com/2022/08/13/john-kiriakou-j-edgar-hoovers-evil-brainchild/

  158. Bernie says:
    @meamjojo

    This is as lie as proven by the video. Arbery attacked one of the men, hit him and wrestled for his gun. A clear case of self-defense if not for the usual black skin privilege (it is illegal for whites to defend themselves against a black attacker).

  159. Mac_ says:

    Just scanning the situation, don’t see much question from other comments. We know those in govrmnt and cabalist types scheme to oppress and endanger whites, and other schemes also going on, food situation, migration, continued jabbering on ‘more’ disease etc, beside the anti white focus, this sort of thing beside oppression is also distraction from the wider things we could be focused on, which taken together with a few things I see as improbable, have a few questions. It seems unlikely suburb guys would decide to chase a jogger for no real reason, also the guy standing up on the back of the truck etc. There isn’t anything else about being neighborhood watchers or activists etc, just one day they decide to take a rifle to threaten a black jogger, hmm. I’m all for making action on things but why not just say what are you doing and keep the rifle down at side, not waive it around. Also video, cut aways so don’t see much, as if its only enough to pose supposed situation without detail, and make the white guys look over the top.

    On oppressing, so-called courts work to reward predators, and to stop us acting for ourselves, as they, lawyers/judges claim to put themselves over the rest of us, and dictate down our own rights or abilities, function as oppression, and distraction, along with media, year on year, recent obvious bogus distraction roe wade etc, trump jan sixth, now supposed ‘raid’, now this, and others. Then look at the sentences, as someone noted before, guy who had the camera, supposed sentence is way off.

    Beside they can jail people who don’t deserve it, they can also fake putting people in jail, then just let them out, some of those we assume to be in jail, aren’t. Not pointing out names just for instance couple years ago was a media blurb of supposed judge reviewng supposed sentence of someone supposedly in jail, put on act as as if the person was in jail, though the person was already let out and the supposed judge obviously knew that, but put on an act as if in jail, and which media furthered the con, not pointing out the person was out of jail, a bs act in dupes faces. Happens all the time, and if people say ‘but people would know if someone was out’, who’s going to ‘tell’ you, media liars, no. With hundreds of millions here, is easy to blend in as dupes sit and ignore, not bothering knowing who is who in this territory. Depending on the fake system to tell you what’s going on or to ‘protect’ you is stupid.

    At base the framing of this oppresses and dog-trains whites away from handling our territory ourselves, just have few questions. It is fact whites do need to man up, including females, and focus, or go-along slavery and suicide by the ‘system’ and other predators won’t be much choice much longer. That much is obvious.
    _

  160. @TKK

    You are right about Mexican gangs not tolerating rapists in prison. White gangs don’t tolerate it either. There are Mexicans and whites that are rapists in prison, but they are considered scum by their co-ethnics.

    Groids, on the other hand, see it as a sign of power. Much like one male dog humping another to show dominance. Whites who fight back (peckerwoods in prison slang) are the most feared guys in prison. Groids are typically cowards who attack in numbers or with a significant size advantage. But they know not to mess with a true peckerwood.

  161. Dr Dave says:
    @USA1943

    These men have been sacrificed. No one will rescue them for NO ONE has the courage.

    • Agree: Jeffrey Freeman
  162. @Sam Hildebrand

    Reminds me of high school in the ghetto of Hampton, Virginia. Not an iq over 70 in the bunch.

  163. “Maybe the McMichaels knew that Georgia law allowed them to make a citizens’ arrest in just such a case, as did the Georgia legislature, which is why it changed that law before the trial.”

    There is nothing amiss with making a citizens arrest. However if one examines the examples used by Georgia courts

    the circumstances regarding the trespass, just don’t meet the standard. Looking like someone in a tape is not a cause, not even trespassing amounts to warrant. And further undermining the issue is the use of force — such as t5he brandishing of weapons. In every way, the person being chased has access to stand your grounds statutes.

    Again this is a case where suspicion is used at warrant. It is not enough.

  164. @EliteCommInc.

    What also stands out is that none of these men are recorded having stopped or made citizens arrests against other trespassers.

    • Replies: @YesYesCircle
  165. @EliteCommInc.

    The jogger would be alive if he hadn’t attacked McMichael. Being low IQ, lacking impulse control and being violent is what ended his useless life.

    White conservatives need this to be a valuable lesson: AVOID NEGROES AT ALL COSTS! Let the liberals enjoy their company.

    • Agree: NotaLib
  166. @EliteCommInc.

    I agree, White conservatives need to avoid every negro at all costs. Let White liberals enjoy all they have to offer.

  167. Life in prison for stupidity is harsh. However the construction site and policing the neighborhood was not their responsibility.This is what happens when people leave things unsecured – it invites crime. Didn’t learn from the over zealous “white-Hispanic” neighborhood watch dunce who had to kill saint skittles because he was getting his ass kicked. Zimmerman’s not doing life, because the prosecutions witness was an ignorant,visually unappealing and unnecessarily hostile witness that turned the whole trial into a shit show. Seriously what do think is gonna happen when a couple of armed middle aged white guys are chasing a black kid down the street in a pickup for trespassing? Even if they hadn’t killed the “jogger” they would have gotten jail sentences from the feds. Choose your battles wisely.

    • Replies: @WSG
  168. meamjojo says:
    @Lurker

    Eat shit Lurker. You’ll enjoy it. 40 billion flies love it.

  169. Anon[391] • Disclaimer says:
    @The Davidtollah

    Easy words to utter when you live in a 90% white primacy society.

  170. Now you know how Palestinians feel.

  171. “I agree, White conservatives need to avoid every negro at all costs. Let White liberals enjoy all they have to offer.”

    You seem to be making a suggestion that color is t5he issue here. That despite t5he fact that others trespassed it was ok. I am not making any suggestion that anyone avoid anyone by skin color – that’s a personal choice. I am saying, it hurts their case that they never stopped any other trespassers.

    I certainly can’t plow through the nuances of the law . . . no way.
    But o9n its face, if you claim you are protecting property and there are trespassers, i would be curious why you found this particular trespasser so suspect, you chased him down with your truck and with weapons in tow.

    • Replies: @EliteCommInc.
    , @Fhjhddhh
  172. @EliteCommInc.

    Again, at face value, looking at events. Someone is is being chased to the point of exhaustion. They have weapons, They are yelling at you. You are avoiding them. They chase you through ravine, over road and yard. They are in vehicles, you are on foot. You tired of running, And one of them approaches you on foot. He has a weapon. it’s continue fight or flight time. Flight did not work, so you are left to fight . . . there is nothing peaceable this situation.

    Looking at how males are generally socialized — it’s nor hard to understand why he chose to grab the weapon as a last resort in his mind.

    And despite the quarterbacking from our distance out of that time, space and place . . . i think every male commenting here understands exactly why he chose to to stand. Even a rabbit when cornered should it get a chance will sink it teeth in to its attacker.

    • Replies: @Fhjhddhh
  173. “The jogger would be alive if he hadn’t attacked McMichael. Being low IQ, lacking impulse control and being violent is what ended his useless life.”

    Maybe. And as someone with a low IQ, I can only say, his conduct appears even more reasonable. His impulse to void a confrontation is not abnormal. There’s no reason to place any extraordinary burden on his person. He is clearly afraid for his safety and reasonably so. His defense — his violence is completely reasonable given his attackers behavior.

    I think the country has spent so much time expecting some people to be complacent about their lives constantly pursued, chased down, under threat, against reason, that it is sim-ply shocked when the the pursued simply decide enough is enough, they are too tired to run and running has made little difference — might as well face my attackers head to head. And against all expectation risking a good deal in the face of what has been a societal, age old demand that they stop on demand — what galls is that they dare break tradition of — it even galls many of one’s own — so to speak. Because standing is ruining it for the rest of them.

    Or maybe because they stand in some manner considered, inappropriate to the masses. Or maybe, the impulse and expectation gas just worn out it staying power.

    And why we now — look back and say — that guy must have been crazy to stand against the odds. I suspect had he been successful, we would be calling him a wanton worthless murderer, who without reason shot a man or three in cold blood. Because once he got the weapon he was no longer at threat . . .

    for some people, the US is a catch – 22.

    but that is me low IQ reasoning.

    • Replies: @martin_2
  174. Sjogttiou says:
    @EliteCommInc.

    You couldn’t be more wrong.

    Recognizing arbery from the video is reasonable suspicion that he’s the same man, as he was, and he wasn’t merely trespassing, but burglarizing, as they had reasonable and probable cause to suspect.

    There was no prohibition on the McMichaels from keeping and bearing arms, although there was on arbery, and he clearly violated that.

    Also, “stand your ground”doesn’t mean “run 50 yards to grab a gun from someone and shoot him.

  175. Racism is caused by black low intelligence and high sociopathy, not vice versa. The regime wants you to believe that racism causes poor black outcomes, but that’s exactly backwards. Blacks have a much lower IQ distribution (average IQ 15% lower) and much higher criminality (10x more criminality). For centuries people have observed these facts and concluded that they ought to stay away from blacks generally.

  176. Arbery almost certainly burgled and it was reasonable to conclude that he had. McMichaels’ pursuit was therefore justified. Arbery attacked them, Travis shot him in clear self-defense. The first prosecutor, Barnhill, got it right. This was a show trial to flex the regime’s power – to show that whites will not be allowed to defend themselves, their neighbors, their property, or their neighborhoods. Opposing our sacred cows will be punished.

  177. “Recognizing arbery from the video is reasonable suspicion that he’s the same man, as he was, and he wasn’t merely trespassing, but burglarizing, as they had reasonable and probable cause to suspect.”

    Look, if whites want to avoid african americans, no one is forcing them to do otherwise. My suspicions based on a video camera of someone walking around a property (trespassing) does not rise to the level of detaining them for a citizen’s arrest. I am not challenging anyone’s right to set some “brightline” for suspicious conduct or becoming suspicious. It just that my suspicion alone is not a warrant for a citizens arrest, not even in Georgia.

    And a former police officer should have known as much, that as a private citizen the standard is different. Furthermore, a citizen being confronted by other citizens with weapons in this circumstance where the citizen has no idea by dress or anything else they represent any manner of unique service —

    come now — it is a very reasonable conclusion that said citizens are a threat and mean you ill, regardless of how suspicious they are. They have to see the burglary, not merely be suspicious that a burglary occurred. Again, in comparison to other trespassers who were not uncommon, they gentleman in question seemed to have taken opportunity to confront them. ( I do make room that they never saw any others.) Furthermore in the previous videos there was no “burglaries” either. The context doesn’t wash. It is unfortunate set of circumstances. Turns out there are no string of reported burglaries either. Upon examination, there does not even appear to be a cause for a unique alert in the neighborhood. I am confused, the camera on the property — it seems to have been a community access, as these gentleman had access to previous recordings — the property owner claims he never saw a crime committed on the property. The video shows no criminal conduct. Ter is no string of robberies . . .

    https://www.theblaze.com/news/ahmaud-arbery-murder-evidence-burglaries

    On its face, even minus the video — this should have been a problem for prosecutors.

  178. @James Scott

    The USA is regressing to a something “coarser, stupider, and more primitive”.

    Spot on. The gentlemanly reconciliation after the Civil War is being undone. The blood libel against Germans for WW2 is being revived. The unnecessary hatred of Russians is being stoked as we speak.

    Our change of values is being driven by a tribe based in the Middle East who blows up and bulldozes the homes of it’s enemies, while believing it is chosen to rule the world.

    These people are small minded and f-ing evil, and we should cast them out of our power structures.

    • Agree: Jeffrey Freeman
  179. Who’s got the “racist texts” what did they say?

  180. @Observator

    “you can’t argue self-defense when you accost a stranger with a firearm and he tries to defend himself”

    Travis McMichael was yelling, “Hey man, we just want to talk to you.” Pretty reasonable “accosting” if you ask me.

    Arbery knew that if he tried his jogger shenanigans in a black neighborhood, it would have got him a severe beating at the very least. In Chicago, a bullet in the back guaranteed.

    Arbery was casing a White neighborhood, because he knew that Whites are fairly civil, play by the rules, and give people the benefit of the doubt. He knew he wasn’t going to get arbitrarily shot, otherwise he would have already been dead.

    • Replies: @Nat X
  181. @EliteCommInc.

    At no point did the McMichaels say “I am placing you (Arbery) under citizen’s arrest”. That’s a straw man argument.

    They knew 911 had been called, and they only had to delay Arbery long enough for the responding officers to arrive.

    To this end, Travis was yelling “Hey man, we just want to talk to you”, i.e. he was trying to get Arbery into a circumstance where law enforcement could take over the encounter.

    • Replies: @Detroit Refugee
  182. PJ London says:

    This case has removed three idiots from the (white) gene pool. As Floyd removed another really stupid cop.
    To confront a possible felon who is not actually on your property, whilst not being a police officer in uniform is stupid. The days of civic duty and responsibility are over.
    If the victim had been white then nothing would have happened, but taking on a Black in the current racist environment is really stupid. As stupid as walking in front of a train and expecting it to stop.
    I have taken such steps, but only on private property and only when life and physical safety was in danger.
    I have to admit that had I been Arbery I would have confronted the pricks myself. Good ol’ boys flexing to show who’s boss.
    Well Arbery is dead and soon these three will wish that they were, but at least on all 4 counts, the human race is better off.

  183. Anon[304] • Disclaimer says:
    @Katrinka

    You answered the question ! I dont know of any South American country who would entertain an Arbery/ Floyd type of circus as is common in the US and many of them have large black populations.

  184. Here’s the Vimeo link, in full, to the bodycam and dashcam footage of an earlier encounter between the rural Glynn County (GA) police and Mr. Arbery.

  185. “Travis McMichael was yelling, “Hey man, we just want to talk to you.” Pretty reasonable “accosting” if you ask me.”

    if they called t5he police they should have left it that. But they went the extra step. Ohhhh stop, me telling you I am just trying to talk to you after that chase with weapons in hand —

    I approach you with weapon in hand — absolutely incongruous, mixed message and unrealistic expectation.

    —————

    most of you don’t even seem to realize that even the police have limitations on detaining people. A citizen by the law and circumstance in this case loaded to bear — even less. It does not matter how many times I tell you I 2want to talk to you

    citizen to citizen, there is no duty to comply. And should I attempt to force the mat5ter — i have just committed a crime. Unlawful pursuit (stalking) unlawful attempt to detain and the person stalked and avoiding unlawful detention has every right to protect themselves from my threat.

    ———————

    you do understand that on the issue of talking — even the police are prevented from coercing a conversation. One you indicate you have no desire to talk, that is it. conversation over. And should they detain you and you indicate you have no desire to talk. they have choices or obligations

    place you under arrest and state why

    or

    release you.

    Here the citizens in questions have no even witnessed a crime that rises to warrant for detention or arrest.

    • Replies: @PhilMuhCrevis
  186. @EliteCommInc.

    Burglary is entering a dwelling with intent to commit a crime therein.
    Obviously, no one can be 100% certain of another’s intent without reading his mind. So the law allows us to reasonably infer intent from the context. Here, Arbery had repeatedly trespassed in that same house, he had left quickly when spotted, and there had been thefts from the property. Even police had said he seemed to be a burglar and might be dangerous. So it was objectively reasonable to conclude that he’d committed burglary and was running away from that burglary. This fits Georgia’s citizen arrest statute perfectly. The McMichaels were 100% justified in pursuing him to make a citizen’s arrest, and in addition when Arbery attacked and grabbed the gun McMichael was holding at port arms (not threatening Arbery) McMichael had a perfect right to defend himself. No prosecutor could prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt that my version happened. That’s why multiple prosecutors declined to bring charges. The jury just didn’t care about any of the law or these facts – they convicted anyway, as happens in show trials.

  187. Correction “Here the citizens in question have not even witnessed a crime that rises to warrant for detention or arrest”

    ———–

    ” . . . i.e. he was trying to get Arbery into a circumstance where law enforcement could take over the encounter”

    They had already done that when they called 911. Once “skin color” is removed from equation, there are no valid reasons for any attempt to detain, muchless bandy about weapons. The minute I show you a weaponry in acquiring compliance — that is the use of force.

    What concerns and surprises me in these conversations is that not many of you seem to know what your rights are or care . . .

  188. Richard B says:
    @anonymous

    I agree with almost everything you wrote in both of your comments.

    I say almost because, of course, there are exceptions. Though not enough to make a difference.

    In any event, my point was, even though most of what you wrote is true, Jewish Supremacy Inc., their black proxies and white women useful idiots are all still dependent on those white men, strong or weak, for pretty much everything.

    They are dependent on them for their sense of value, their sense of identity, and their livelihood, since they would have none of any of that without white men.

    True, that relationship is entirely negative, but it has to exist for those three groups. That’s what I meant by their Pyrrhic Victory. They are destroying the very thing they are dependent on. People that doped in hate rarely think very carefully about the long-term.

    Also, the love affair (if that’s what you want to call it) between white women and black men is not a happy one. Blacks guys know the white women are traitors and users and go with whoever has the power, no matter how blacks exploit that power. And, of course, their exploitation is as barbaric and as violent as one would expect.

    As I like to say, No Mercy For Mudsharks. And, apparently, blacks feel the same way about white women. Their behavior toward them is often merciless. Good!

  189. Ya but what about the “racist” texts?

    What did they say?

    Junebug? Picnic??

    Inquiring whites wanna know.

  190. “At no point did the McMichaels say “I am placing you (Arbery) under citizen’s arrest”. That’s a straw man argument.”

    Excuse me, but if you can find any comment where I make the assertion that they said this you are welcome to note. I did nit say they said that – not ever. I said that is what they intended to do. Though, had they actually said that, it may have shifted the focus away from the weapons to something else entirely. I don’t make any claims they said that – though perhaps they should have.

    You claim of straw man never happens.

    If you don’t have to the to the police, even after being arrested, I see know reason why you would have to speak to me about anything US citizen to US citizen. Seems to be tidal waves on people seeking to coerce speech these days, they will manufacture any free wheeling cause to do so.

    There’s a good reason why the initial law enforcement entities wanted to let this go. It embodies the worst of complications for law enforcement. What constitutes lawful detainment and or arrest. It is during these exchanges where things go wrong . . .

    • Replies: @PhilMuhCrevis
    , @Fhjhddhh
  191. @EliteCommInc.

    I approach you with weapon in hand — absolutely incongruous, mixed message and unrealistic expectation.

    I know this is a waste of time but I’m going to ask anyway.. Considering the obvious fact these 3 men had ample time to commit “premeditated 1st degree murder” (Lol) long before this knuckle dragger attacked the guy with the shotgun, is it safe to say that if somehow he’d have unarmed the man and used his own weapon to kill him with it you’d be fine with calling that a justifiable, self defense homicide?

  192. KenH says:

    Trying to find information on Arbery’s criminal and very checkered past was difficult even using alternative search engines like DuckDuckGo. About 95% of the sources are pro-Arbery and anti-McMichaels and attacking the original prosecutors who believed they were acting lawfully, but this link has good information.

    https://www.conservativebusinessjournal.com/2021/11/ahmaud-arberys-extensive-criminal-record-blocked-by-judge/

    Arbery used jogging as a cover to commit crimes but the judge in the state trial excluded all evidence that would have aided the defense. So the jury thought that Arbery was a innocent tuxedo wearing negro with a shy smile.

    To his credit the judge also barred the jury from hearing past racist comments alleged to have been made by the defendants but previous “racist” statements made by the defendants should be irrelevant since it’s politically protected speech and they had no history of confronting any other negroes. Their alleged racist statements did not include the desire to do harm to negroes unlike the black nationalist who drove his SUV into a white crowd in Waukesha who’s twitter feed was filled with anti-white hatred.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  193. @EliteCommInc.

    There’s a good reason why the initial law enforcement entities wanted to let this go. It embodies the worst of complications for law enforcement. What constitutes lawful detainment and or arrest. It is during these exchanges where things go wrong . . .

    Interesting you brought that up. The people I know that work in law enforcement would agree with you 100%. And the race of people they say are almost always the ones that cannot, or will comply with simple lawful commands are nig-grows. Seems it doesn’t matter who is trying to talk to or detain munts, to use your words, “It is during these exchanges where THINGS go wrong.” It’s their stupidity and inability to control their rage that so often leads to their own demise. Had he been upset and just yelled at the 3 idiots, I have no reason to believe that he’d have been killed that day. The premeditation and other hate nonsense were just lies installed to appease the 13.

    • Replies: @YesYesCircle
  194. WSG says:
    @blueyedevil

    George Zimmerman did NOTHING wrong. He was a neighbor watchman keeping tabs on a suspicious orc. The orc jumped him. He blasted the fur off the beast. The world is now a better place. If we lived in sane times, these 3 men from Brunswick wouldn’t even have been charged. Once again, the world is a better place due to the removal of an orc from the gene pool.

    • Agree: YesYesCircle
  195. “I know this is a waste of time but I’m going to ask anyway.. Considering the obvious fact these 3 men had ample time to commit “premeditated 1st degree murder” (Lol) long before this knuckle dragger attacked the guy with the shotgun, is it safe to say that if somehow he’d have unarmed the man and used his own weapon to kill him with it you’d be fine with calling that a justifiable, self defense homicide?”

    I am not commenting on the specific charges, with some caution, I don’t think the gentlemen in question intended to kill anyone, but that is my take. But it made no sense to chase the gentleman down – especially with weapons. He was unarmed. What is clear is that their conduct exceeded what the law says is warrant.

    Now as to the counter factual — in the mind of the person being attacked having turned the tables, by taking the weapon, I am unclear what his state of mind would be. But as tragic as it might have been, it would not be unreasoned for him to place him in a state of self defense to ensure his own life, even if that meant killing al three men.

    you will have to explain to me, why the man being chased had to comply with three strangers with weapons and why he should not have considered his life at threat. i am just unclear what mandate you would be under to obey my commands under those circumstances.

    curious this expectation

    • Replies: @PhilMuhCrevis
  196. “George Zimmerman did NOTHING wrong.”

    according to neighborhood watch and the mandate to fo9llow police instruction — he did nothing right except call the police.

    • Troll: AceDeuce
  197. “Interesting you brought that up. The people I know that work in law enforcement would agree with you 100%. And the race of people they say are almost always the ones that cannot, or will comply with simple lawful commands are nig-grows.”

    Well, the reason they want to avoid the matter has more to do with the implications regarding their authority to detain citizens. And US citizens who are intent on standing on their rights are really a pain.

    And why most people just keep quiet. We have granted far more authority to avoid the hassle than is is actually required, I suspect. Hence the legalization of disrespect or respect whatever that is. Attitude being the optimum term. Given the number of police interactions with african americans

    https://reason.com/volokh/2020/06/06/how-adversarial-is-the-relationship-between-african-americans-and-the-police/

    ——————–

    Note: nothing in comments advocates being disrespectful to anyone. But disrespect, attitude . . are not by definition violations of the law nor are they some unique attribute of black citizens of the US.

  198. anarchyst says:
    @KenH

    Here you go:

    On March 14, 2013, security camera Video from South Georgia Technical College reveals Mr. Arbery provided a friend a pair of wire cutters to use as a weapon as he, the friend, and others waited for another group of men to appear. When the other group arrived, Mr. Arbery and the others engaged in a violent fight; .’

    On December 3, 2013, Glynn County Police reports reveal Mr. Arbery unlawfully concealed a handgun into his waistband and tried to gain admission into a high school basketball game. Officers noticed the butt of the gun protruding from his waistband and ordered for him to stop. Mr. Arbery ran from police, which resulted in two officers sustaining injuries: one because Mr. Arbery scratched his arm to get away; the other because the officer fell and sustained injuries during his chase of Mr. Arbery. Also, the Chief of Police reported that as he chased Mr. Arbery in his vehicle, Mr. Arbery reached into his waistband as if searching for his firearm. Police eventually surrounded Mr. Arbery and charged him. He was later convicted for several felony and misdemeanor charges, including gun possession and obstruction; …

    In June of 2018, 911 audio reveals Mr. Arbery’s mother, Wanda Jones, called 911 due to Mr. Arbery’s refusal to give Ms. Jones her car keys. She made the call from inside her car While Mr. Arbery stood outside her car. During her call to 911, she cautioned the operator that Mr. Arbery had a mental condition that had ”escalated” over time. Additionally, Ms. Jones told the officer that Mr. Arbery might get violent with the officers due to his mental illness, if they were too confrontational with Mr. Arbery or tried to arrest him or take him into custody;

    5. On August 21, 2018, Burke County Witness reports and Burke County Office body cam Video reveals Mr. Arbery was caught by a stay-at— home mom who saw him in her backyard looking into the windows of her cars. She called police who found Mr. Arbery at his grandmother’s residence. Police officers arrived to give Mr. Arbery a trespass warning about his conduct and behavior. When confronted by the officers about the eye-witness report, he lied said he had ”gone running in the street,” and then became aggressive, confrontational, and repeatedly threatened that he would “whip the officer’s ass” if they didn’t leave him alone. He was not arrested;

    6. On October 23, 2018, Burke County reports and Burke County officer body cam video reveal Mr. Arbery and two juveniles were confronted in a vacant mobile home by the Burke County Sheriff’s Office. Mr. Arbery ran when confronted by the authorities. He was later caught and lied, stating he was just out running, when asked about being in the mobile home. He was charged with misdemeanor obstruction for running when given lawful commands to stop;

    7. On December 1, 2018, Glynn County officer body cam video reveals Mr. Arbery was arrested, charged, and later convicted for felony shoplifting by entering a store and attempting to steal a television;

    8. In 2019 and 2020, witness interviews reveal Mr. Arbery was seen by his own neighbors, removing screen from Windows and trying enter their homes through the windows. When confronted by the neighbors about his conduct and behavior, he appeared ”nervous or agitated” and ”trying to figure out where to go.” Then he said he was interested in buy[ing] the house but ”took off running. ” On the second occasion, the home owner observed Mr. Arbery trying to gain entrance through a door. They again tried to talk to Mr. Arbery but he would not speak or say anything, he simply ran away;

    9. In 2019 and 2020, local convenience store Witness interviews reveal Mr. Arbery became known as ”the jogger” for his repeated conduct and behavior of running up, stretching in front in, and then entering several convenience stores where he would grab items and run out before he could be caught; and

    10. In 2020, witness cell phone video reveals Mr. Arbery was confronted at a convenience store by employees about his theft conduct and behavior. Mr. Arbery, cornered about his thefts, chose to fight a man who worked on location at the adjacent truck stop who tried to confront him about it.

    3. While counsel believes the following additional acts are intrinsic to the events on February 23, 2020 and explain why Mr. Arbery ran and why Travis and Greg McMichael pursued Mr. Arbery, and are, thus, not subject to the notice requirements of O.C.G.A. § 24-4-404(b) and USCR 31.1, counsel includes them in this notice out of an abundance of caution:

    1. On October 25, 2019, home surveillance video at 220 Satilla Drive captures Mr. Arbery at night and in the dark canvassing the interior property and valuables contained within;

    2. On November 18, 2019, home surveillance video at 220 Satilla Drive captures Mr. Arbery at night and in the dark canvassing the interior property and valuables contained Within;

    3. On February 11, 2020, Witness testimony, 911 recordings, and home surveillance Video at 220 Satilla Drive details that Mr. Arbery was once again canvassing the interior and exterior property and valuables at night and that he ed after police were called.

    • Replies: @Cauchemar du Singe
    , @KenH
  199. @EliteComminc.

    gentleman

    That’s funny.. A criminal record that went back to 2012 that had to be quashed so as to not taint the jury pool, and you think he was a model citizen. He was a thug and a thief, did he deserve to die? I’d say no.. But his actions caused his own death, because like so many of these “hard” gangsta’s he wasn’t going to let whitey diss him come hell or high water. Stupid is stupid, on both sides of this story to be sure.

    I never said he had to comply. He could have argued or even yelled at them, but again, when he attacked the guy with the gun, he killed himself. I’m not saying the one man doesn’t belong in prison, I say he does, but not for 1st degree premeditated murder which in my opinion was fabricated to appease the 13%. The other two should have never been charged.

  200. “Here you go:”

    There was no evidence that day, or at any other time that the gentleman in question engaged in any
    criminal activity that warranty the conduct of his pursuers that day.

    • Troll: anarchyst
  201. @Frank Walus

    Late 90’s-early 2000’s, one could kick a negros ass that was caught attempting to steal in the night. Been there. Done that over a \$1,200.00 mountain bike.

    But, there was no witnesses, no cell phones, just a pos Crack head. Once caught he just wanted to escape. And go find a soft target, easy score.

  202. If there’s a next time, and there will be, us White Guys should take the knee grow out back to the woodshed. Crack that coconut open. Wood shampoo.

    Just don’t shoot an innocent, un armed Dindu.

  203. @anarchyst

    The legalistic travesty of “the Arbury case” is overdue to be overturned and pressed by really savage defense attorneys.
    The guys that represernted Sandman and Rittenhouse should be retained by crowdfunding to advance an appeal demanding admission of previously barred evidence and the extensive criminal record of the “jogger”, first instance defense incompetence and change of venue; also, no BLAK professional race hustlers allowed in court, or on courthouse grounds.

  204. @beavertales

    You may be right. That’s probably what they were attempting to do. It’s just that they went about it wrong. They, (pardon my language), fucked up.

    Should’ve just stayed in the trucks, and maybe follow while observing the Dindus direction and movements. While staying on the phone with dispatch.

  205. Fhjhddhh says:
    @EliteCommInc.

    Others trespassed, and the owner called the cops on them, too. arbery was the ONLY repeat customer.

  206. “That’s funny.. A criminal record that went back to 2012 that had to be quashed so as to not taint the jury pool, and you think he was a model citizen. He was a thug and a thief, did he deserve to die . . .”

    Well,

    I appreciate the US ideals, so the idea that someone deserves to die based on our current system is more than a tad dubious.

    But there’s no skipping the a central issue here at least one of them. The gentlemen in question simply had no warrant to do what they did, save calling the police.

    ——————————–
    “He could have argued or even yelled at them, but again, when he attacked the guy with the gun, he killed himself. ”

    This simply cannot be overstated, they simply had no choices here but to defend himself. He could have done that by yelling, talking, bit by any measure they were attacking him and they were doing so outside of the scope of the law. The tactic of removing the preceding events of that encounter are all relevant.

    What any of these did yesterday was not, save to evidenced. If one were looking at a robbery, previous robberies might be relevant. But there is no robbery here. In fact on that property, there are no robberies related to the man being chased down. So in looking at the matter related, i.e, the response to other trespassers — singling out this one because he looked like so and so is simply not enough to warrant a detainment by the men in question.

    I make no light of their predicament – none. But their choices here are extreme and unwarranted.

    All three men engaged in a pursuit that was illegal, and none of them attempted to dissuade the same.

    —-

    Even without the video, the matter demanded further investigation, because their story is contradicted by the evidence.

    • Replies: @Philmuhcrevis
  207. Fhjhddhh says:
    @EliteCommInc.

    Was the “point of exhaustion” 50 yards from the McMichaels, when arbery turned to double back to them, or was it after running those 50 yards and grabbing the shotgun from the wrong end?

  208. Fhjhddhh says:
    @EliteCommInc.

    The McMichaels had a right to talk to arbery, but arbery had no obligation to talk to them. arbery DID have an obligation not to try to steal Travis’ gun and shoot him with it , an obligation he failed to meet.

  209. KenH says:
    @anarchyst

    Good work. I had read some of his police blotter on VDare and other sites last year but couldn’t find it when I went looking today.

    I think the December 3, 2013 case Arbery actually assaulted the arresting officers similar to what he tried to do to Travis McMichael. At least that’s what I remember reading from a link to a local Georgia news site last year.

    He was prowling around the McMichael’s neighborhood for several months before they finally confronted him. It seems Arbery had fled several times previously and the police were unable to catch him, so I understand why the McMichaels had had enough and attempted a citizen’s arrest. I wouldn’t feel safe with Arbery prowling around at night either.

  210. @EliteCommInc.

    This simply cannot be overstated, they simply had no choices here but to defend himself. He could have done that by yelling, talking, bit by any measure they were attacking him and they were doing so outside of the scope of the law. The tactic of removing the preceding events of that encounter are all relevant.

    Do enjoy lying? Yeah they followed him, but the only attack that took place was by the dead moron. The other 3 are merely alive morons, stupid enough to think that following a munt was going to lead to something positive. I also like how you edited out my quote that I didn’t believe he deserved to die. I know this though, his death albeit tragic for his family probably saved the life of someone else down the road just based on looking at his track record. Much like the prosecution using “reasonable inference” to read the minds of the convicted, I’m doing the same with the dead thug.

    • Replies: @YesYesCircle
  211. “Burglary is entering a dwelling with intent to commit a crime therein.
    Obviously, no one can be 100% certain of another’s intent without reading his mind. So the law allows us to reasonably infer intent from the context. ”

    Uhhh there is not way to know , minus the conduct and therefore why the requires seeing the actual act. No the law does not, he is not carrying anything that even hints at intent. He’s walking around as others have walked around. Maybe does rise to the standard.
    “prowling around: yet not a single contact, no police report of said prowling, no report of robberies save one, a missing weapon from a vehicle several months prior

    Frankly, there’s not even a clear reading that the previous images were actually him. The home owner makes no complaints of anyone . . .

    —-

    not by by means of any coercion. And he is well within his to say no, not interested, avoid any contact with them whatsoever.

    hence the dance about the gentleman’s past record.

    • Replies: @EliteCommInc.
    , @anarchyst
  212. @EliteCommInc.

    I just took a peek at something regarding the trail . . . according to police the only people acting in a suspicious manner beyond the trespass were

    one male and on another occasion one male and on a different occasion a male and female carrying a large bag – who did not appear to live in the neighborhood and were

    – even the officer who had been called out the location more than once stated — he would warned the trespassers — he doesn’t even mention givi8ng anyone a citation.

    It is further troubling that the men saw him while he was already running/jogging not even at the residence in question – they gave chase because he looked like . . . said person — so its not even an intent to question someone they saw actually trespassing —-

    • Replies: @Fhjhddhh
  213. “Troll: anarchyst, Automatic Slim”

    As deep and thought provoking as the above is — it remains irrelevant.

  214. Jack P says:
    @Jeremy Frett

    DeSantis ain’t going there, except *maybe* at the end of a second term. And that’s doubtful. But he does seem to “get it” – at least to an extent. Maybe he’d help out the video guy.

    I agree this is a travesty, and the biggest travesty of all is that a white jury did the railroading. In South Georgia. With armed blacks outside. And with a Republican leadership in Georgia that literally did the bidding of BLM! Such pathetic people we have become.

    • Agree: Cauchemar du Singe
  215. Jack P says:
    @Rob W.

    This. Lots of room in this country. We create and defend our own societies. Wherever we can. And we’re taking the suburbs back too.

  216. Fhjhddhh says:
    @EliteCommInc.

    It’s interesting that the “jogger” was on video several times at and near the house, but only seemed to “jog”away from the house, never toward it. It’s called “fleeing”

  217. “It’s interesting that the “jogger” was on video several times at and near the house, but only seemed to “jog”away from the house, never toward it. It’s called “fleeing”

    I think you skirting the point here. The suggesion by the gentleman ntebnding to detain was t
    that they saw him trespass. But that is not what they describe at all. They saw him jogging by — or running, so their pursuit does not even include seeing the a trespasss, further removing any warrant to pursue for any reason.

    He would not be considered in flight until the pursuit. There is no indication he had knowledge of them while ion th proiperty that might have prompted him to flee. So its clear he was jogging running regardless of being at the property. Based on the descriptuion by the men in question, they did not encounter him oin the property or nar the property, but saw him as he jogged, ran down the street.

    Clearly at some point he fled, no doubt. But that was not until the actual encounter with the gentlemen in question. There were no other pursuers, so it seems unlikely that his actions were indicative of some manner flight from something. He apparently looked around and then headed out.

    There suspicions are not at an issue. The pursuit is. The pursuit with weapons in hand. And clearly the gentleman they were chasing down was in legitimate fear of his person/life.

    As far as ui am concerned you can own an M1 tank, but if how you operate causes harm, that is on you. I have no issues with gun ownership, but if you use said weapon in an attempt to corce cooperaton minus a warrant — that is on you.

    I remain befuddled by their choices.

  218. Jimmy1969 says:

    This is a great article

  219. @Observator

    You are more than welcome to live with the negroes, Dian Fossey. I choose to stay the hell away from them…and you.

    • Replies: @WSG
  220. @Philmuhcrevis

    There is something White people don’t understand about blacks that I do, having lived around them for decades. Blacks do not care for their family members. The fake tears in front of the camera next to Crump is for extortion only. What parent is Ok with their 11 year old not being home until 3:00am, roaming the streets? Black mothers DO NOT give a shit about their children. They are ONLY concerned with finding another man.

    Black women getting abortions actually laugh in the clinics. This was before the Internet and attention whore social media. Can you imagine how they behave now?

    With the exception of a tiny fraction of blacks, the far majority are like this.

  221. @PhilMuhCrevis

    If the criminal jogger would have said, “hey, I’m just heading back home” and turn around and went back home, nothing would have happened to him.

    But no, low IQ, low impulse control and violent joggers have to attack. JFC, how did that race ever survive given how utterly useless they are?

  222. @anonymous

    All races in the USA believe the USA should rule the world. It’s naive to think it’s only the Whites.

    Most supremacists who want to rule the USA are Jewish White Supremacists although Jews are only 2.1% of the population (dropping to 1.8% of 18 year olds). Don’t forget the vicious racist discrimination by the Jewish run Ivy League against Asian and non-Jewish European Americans.

    Jews didn’t expect any competitive ability from Blacks and Latin Americans. As Latin Americans become increasingly successful, they’ll be targetted as enemies too. There aren’t enough smart African immigrants to change much so there’s a pretence that Hindu Indians are just the same as a traditional US Black. That can’t last because smart and well educated Indian migrants are very successful in any country. Even their not so smart do well in small businesses. They’re not a people anybody can keep down without severe repression.

    An alliance of the Jews, Blacks and the religious fanatics of the Church of Woke has no long term political future. Ask Tulsi Gabbard, Senator Kennedy or even a racist but realist like Al Sharpton. How many Yanks really support castrating their sons and cutting the breasts off their daughters? Normal Yanks don’t hate their kids that much if they’re actively homosexual, let alone if they fear they might be when they enter puberty. [email protected]

  223. “Black women getting abortions actually laugh in the clinics. This was before the Internet and attention whore social media. Can you imagine how they behave now?’

    And white women: apparently shout, laugh and celebrate t5heir murders o9f children in the womb. Flippancy regarding the murder of children is not color specific.

    https://www.dailywire.com/news/its-aborted-woman-celebrates-her-abortion-with-cake-and-party-brags-on-twitter

    https://www.globalnea.com/woman-who-holds-record-for-most-abortions-celebrate-her-100th-abortion-at-38/

    https://shoutyourabortion.com/

    • Replies: @AceDeuce
  224. anarchyst says:
    @EliteCommInc.

    Your statement:

    “Burglary is entering a dwelling with intent to commit a crime therein.
    Obviously, no one can be 100% certain of another’s intent without reading his mind. So the law allows us to reasonably infer intent from the context. ”

    …is laughable on its face.

    Example: A criminal breaks into your home. By your reasoning, you do not know his “intent” so, by your way of thinking, you would not be permitted to defend yourself or even attempt to “take him down” or prevent him from stealing your possessions because you cannot “read his mind”. You would allow the criminal to do whatever he wants without interference from you because you cannot “read his mind”.

    You, my friend are “full of (sh)it”.

    As to Arbery himself, the “Brunswick Three” did their community and society at-large a favor by “taking out the garbage”, unfortunately at the cost of their own lives and freedom.

  225. You are skewing, mischar4acterizing what took place. There was no break in per se, though tecnically f you want to call it that — i guess it works. There was no one else at the dwelling. There was no threat to anyone in the space, there was no property damage, the gentleman walked in and walked out upon leaving — and no one saw him enter the property. The three gentleman in question did not see him enter the dwelling nor did they see him leave —

    in otherwords they did not even see a trespass.

    and as that is the case, they had no justification to detain him in any manner. i have posted the statute for citizens arrest or detention — one has to have witnesed the conduct in question, and it does not include trespassing

    Because the men did not even witness the trespasss, intent should be off the table — even the after the fact video reveals nothing about intent to burglagarize anyone
    ———————

    If the home owner wanted to press charges of trespass I am sure he could. But a case fo0r theft would largely hull and void. Based on the video

  226. “Example: A criminal breaks into your home. By your reasoning, you do not know his “intent” so, by your way of thinking, you would not be permitted to defend yourself or even attempt to “take him down” or prevent him from stealing your possessions because you cannot “read his mind”. You would allow the criminal to do whatever he wants without interference from you because you cannot “read his mind”.”

    your description is entirely nonsensical — nothing that you describe is pertinent to what occurred.

    laugh . . . if someone enters your home without permission (in nearly every circumstance), one is automatically in the right to act in defense of self, others or property.

    That scenario has nothing in common to the incidents that took place regarding all four men.

  227. “Do enjoy lying? Yeah they followed him, but the only attack that took place was by the dead moron. The other 3 are merely alive morons, stupid enough to think that following a munt was going to lead to something positive. ”

    The gentleman in question saw a gentleman running/jogging, to them he looked someone they saw in a previous video trespassing, they immediately grabbed their weapons and gave chase —

    they had no cause to give chase, they did not witness a crime at the time, running, jogging, walking, dancing, sauntering, shuffling, meandering , unless otherwise noted, are not crimes warranting detention by anyone.

    They brandished their weap0ns to coerce compliance — that is the use of force and considered a violent act, not to mention the pursuit is a violent act. Everything they did exceeded not just the law, but basic prudence — from the moment he became aware that he was being pursued by the gentlemen with guns, he could absolutely reasonably conclude he was at threat of violence and the pursuit is absolutely violence. There is no evidence of flight until, the pursuit — he fleeing an attack on his person. At some point tired of running, he approached by a gentleman brandishing a firearm — whether too tired to run or simply deciding to stand his ground from the obvious threat he attempts to remove the shotgun from the equation — reasonable and not at all without merit.

    I was thinking about an earlier comment regarding his choices — and I had quite a laugh, because the suggestion that he could yell at them is certainly accurate, but upon reflection, the history of an african american citizens raising his voice to any white usually does not bode or end well for said african american. The age old image of “angry black man”

    Sure that is a reasonable choice, but hardly a defense given the seriousness of the circumstances. I am not sure how one survives in a world in which so many legal choices are catch-22’s.

    —————————

    i fully acknowledge that none of the below is relevant to the incident in question

    As for the irrelevant material regarding the police — I am sure there is video, but I am no longer impressed by police claims of being attacked by african americans as though there is some natural trigger .. . no this is standard police conduct, and reporting that works because we as a nation have some propagandized the black male population that of course — the officers never overreact or instigate issues. They don’t lie in police reports, exaggerate, taint witness testimony, even plant witnesses . . .

    and here I thought the the last several years have actually been object lessons to why government authority should be on a shirt leash. nothing wrong with law enforcement, but their interest as members of government are pressed by the desire for expedience and avoiding law suits —.

  228. @KenH

    Ken, after commercials, Tucker only has about 40 minutes of broadcast time. He, along with his staff of writers, must choose which few stories to cover daily. I don’t know if it’s true or not that he never mentioned the McMichael case in a previous program. If he hasn’t, shame on him. But he sure hasn’t been afraid to go against the rest of the media lies regarding the Chauvin travesty of justice, which also created a “shit storm” and was all about race. Tucker is very used to being in the middle of racial shit storms and has survived them all thus far. So, I doubt if he’s afraid to talk about the McMichael “hate crime” verdict. I hope he mentions it this week. But that federal verdict DID come down the week that Tucker was on vacation, a fact that Derbyshire overlooks.

    • Replies: @KenH
  229. Anonymous[181] • Disclaimer says:

    Another example of how the people defending these three don’t know even the basics of the laws they cite is the claim in the beginning of the comments that a governor could pardon these three. In Georgia the governor does not pardon you. Georgia is one of 9 states that has a board of pardons and paroles and that board has that exclusive power. Members of that board are appointed to staggered seven year terms and they are each subject to confirmation by the Georgia state senate. My point bringing that up is that there is no way you are going to get an entire board of Steve Bannon worshipping Trumpers all on the board at once who would give these three a pardon.

  230. AceDeuce says:
    @EliteCommInc.

    And white women: apparently shout, laugh and celebrate t5heir murders o9f children in the womb. Flippancy regarding the murder of children is not color specific.

    Welp, Mr. Blowhard, one of the biggest problems that we have in this country is that, for the past 30 years or so, young Whites have taken up the manners and morals of niggros. Essentially, 80% or more of White kids are niggros without the built in excuses. Loud, ignorant, lazy, rude, immoral, amoral. Those rappers who said that they were going to take control of White kids were right.

    Funny that niggrows have always been paranoid about being turned into Whites (As if. You can’t turn dogschitt into a brownie) when the real problem is Whites under 50 who have basically turned into niggros.

  231. “Welp, Mr. Blowhard, one of the biggest problems that we have in this country is that, for the past 30 years or so, young Whites have taken up the manners and morals of niggros. Essentially, 80% or more of White kids are niggros without the built in excuses. Loud, ignorant, lazy, rude, immoral, amoral. Those rappers who said that they were going to take control of White kids were right.”

    oyyyy . . . and veh! Seems a rather dubious claim that white women are imitating black women on celebrating the murder of children in the womb. sadly, and your press is not all that important to me. Murdering a child is a serious and that anyone celebrates it is tragic.

    But as i recall the very policy of legalizing child murder was advanced by whites in Texas. I am unaware of any such movement as part of the civil rights struggle related to concerns of blacks citizens. But that african americans have fo9llowed suit is tragic and they do so of their own accord. i won’t blame white women for the choices made by black women to follow them in murdering children in the womb.

    They above all in the country should reject the idea of redefining humaness for the purpose of abuse, inhuman property and disposal. They will have to own that choice to murder – the number one killer of black citizens in the US.

    tragic

  232. @YesYesCircle

    I’ll admit I have zero knowledge of how black women behave or act in the lobby of an abortion clinic. That’s something I never wanna see.

    But I do know for fact, what you’re saying about their “youth” running wild all night in the streets is true.

    Just yesterday a 12 year old was shot on a Detroit street, in a “robbery gone wrong”.

    Every single night, on FOX2DETROIT.com and/or 7ACTION NEWS DETROIT.com proves how little blacks care.

  233. Nat X says:
    @beavertales

    “Arbery knew”
    “Arbery was casing”

    And who are you incel Miss Cleo???
    Those 3 piece of shit Barney Fife yts about to get dey bums stretched lol! I heard, from a reliable source, that the BGF gonna turn the shooter into a prison prostitute. Gingers are high value hos in the Georgia chaingang.

  234. JR Ewing says:
    @WingsofADove

    I think the first DA made a huge mistake in not prosecuting the younger McMichael for involuntary manslaughter and the father for accessory.

    This mistake allowed the national media attention to go from a murmur to a scream. We see the result.

    That’s a very good point that I hadn’t considered. By not prosecuting them, it drew even more attention on the case that eventually led to them being railroaded.

    There still would have been some attention, but it would have died out more quickly without the outrage over there being no charges at all.

    • Agree: Jeffrey Freeman
  235. @Nat X

    Thanks for proving yet again that nig thoughts generally revolve around “muh dik.”
    God, it must suck to be a member of the over-sexed and under-intelligent race. But I guess it’s easier to bash whitey than try to improve yourselves. Watching local news right now and it is just story after story of black crime and dysfunction.

    • Replies: @Detroit Refugee
    , @Nat X
  236. A woman walks into her rabbis office. She is distraught, the kids, the dog, the house cleaning, her husband, the bills are just too much. For several weeks he ]r sessions ware a repeat of the same complaints the woman is at her wits end . . . on the fifth week she utterly beside herself with worry, anger and frustration.

    The rabbi says to her, I have a solution. But she has to do what he prescribes to the letter. So he says, this week, I want you to bring a five live chickens in your home and care for it. The next week, the woman has hair loss, , she’s pale . . . exhausted. She wails and that matters are worse with the chicken. The rabbi listens and then says, now go home and add a horse into the household and care for it . . .the next week the woman is shaking uncontrollably, the horse has upended everything . . . the rabbi sys, now i want you to go home and and add a talking parrot. That next week . . . the woman arrives in a wheel chair , , , barely coherent. The rabbi says to her, now there is one final thing i want you to do

    go home and take out the parrot, the horse, the chicken — remove them from the house.

    The next week, the woman waltzes into the rabbis office singing dancing and praising her home her children — how wonderfully things are . . .

    There are some 48 million black citizens in the US ,. . . . if you focus on the 4% percent of those that exhibit dysfunction — that will be what you see. You will of course miss the 96 percent or so . . who are just living out their lives like whites.

    maybe watch less urban news.

    just to avoid the inevitable: the rabbi could be a priest, pastor, a counselor . . .

  237. MEH 0910 says:

    https://vdare.com/radio-derb/prosecutorial-spite-making-trump-a-victim-and-sanctuary-city-mayors-no-more-illegals-etc

    https://www.johnderbyshire.com/Opinions/RadioDerb/2022-08-12.html

  238. WSG says:
    @YesYesCircle

    These frauds are almost never willing to put their “beliefs” into practical application. The few that do generally end up like Amy Biehl.

  239. KenH says:
    @follyofwar

    Ken, after commercials, Tucker only has about 40 minutes of broadcast time

    Not to quibble but Tucker has lost a lot of advertisers due to his “white nationalist” content so many times his show is 45-50 minutes.

    If Tuck doesn’t want to include the McMichael’s saga on his normal broadcast then he can do a special about it like he did for Jan 6th “insurrection/erection” and Kyle Rittenhouse where he can interview family members and people in the neighborhood about the crime problem, Arbery’s many visits and previous calls to 911 about Arbery. He can also speak to the original prosecutors who believed the McMichaels to be acting fully within applicable Georgia statutes.

    But he sure hasn’t been afraid to go against the rest of the media lies regarding the Chauvin travesty of justice, which also created a “shit storm”

    But that story included 2-3 non-white officers so that gave Tucker some cover.

    I think Tucker’s done the political and racial calculus on the McMichael’s/Arbery case and feels it isn’t worth the fallout.

    • Replies: @Jack P
  240. martin_2 says:
    @EliteCommInc.

    He is clearly afraid for his safety and reasonably so. His defense — his violence is completely reasonable given his attackers behavior.

    I think a reasonable person will agree that the McMichaels were by no means completely innocent, and that since their actions led to the death of a man, therefore they should be punished. OTOH a reasonable person will also agree that their punishment is unjust, and they have been sacrificed to a mob. I thought that the unique characteristic of white people was their desire to be fair. This isn’t fair. How whites can tolerate this I don’t know. What will be the straw that breaks the camel’s back?

    • Agree: Philmuhcrevis
  241. “OTOH a reasonable person will also agree that their punishment is unjust, and they have been sacrificed to a mob. I thought that the unique characteristic of white people was their desire to be fair. This isn’t fair. How whites can tolerate this I don’t know. What will be the straw that breaks the camel’s back?”

    I have stated my views on “hate crimes” in my first or second comments on this subject.

    On fairness in the system, without taking anything away from the concerns in this case. The african american population has done a fairly extensive job of documenting how unfair the system can operate. it might be a good idea to review their findings.

    As for the mob, the black commu8nity has yet to catch up with the record of whites storming jails, homes, businesses, schools, homes even churches. I was disappointed to learn that the cases since the 1960’s of so called black rioting to this day has nothing on the unbecoming conduct of whites in the other direction. The black population has had to repair and buy new camels unceasingly.

    Note: I am not excusing violence, just the opposite — the country has tolerated that violence as long as it was against african americans and law enforcement and the justice system were participants. Fortunately the gentleman in question had no late night visitations or jail storming blacks. You say the system is unfair, I think a large portion of the black community would agree with you.

    That is how we got “hate crimes” legislation and BLM and, etc. etc. The record is very clear.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  242. @spacewonderer

    Know what else must suck?
    Being such a lowlife POS, that you aspire to elevate to the status of Fleece Johnson “The Booty Warrior”.

    That piece of garbage is a hero to young knee grows males.

    • Replies: @Nat X
  243. anarchyst says:
    @EliteCommInc.

    ALL crimes are “hate crimes” especially since a “crime” is defined as unjustly affecting the life or lives of another or more.
    “Hate crime” laws are unconstitutional as they provide “enhancements” to already standing statutory punishments because of a person’s “thoughts”, not his actions.
    “Hate crime” enhancements to punishments should be abolished and outlawed. This also includes prosecution for violations of “civil-rights”.
    Punishing a person for his “thoughts” is never OK.
    All one has to do is observe the draconian punishments for those who believe in “holocaust” revisionism in many countries, Canada included.
    For those who say “it can’t happen here”, it is already occurring.
    In many states, in order for an individual or business to be awarded a state contract, the individual or business must sigh a statement swearing fealty to a foreign country–israel.

    • Agree: geokat62, mark green
    • Replies: @KenH
  244. KenH says:
    @anarchyst

    Punishing a person for his “thoughts” is never OK.

    Couldn’t agree more and it was the ADL who spearheaded the movement to make politically incorrect speech before or during a crime a “hate crime”. If a white guy uses racial epithets while he’s assaulting a black guy that’s politically protected speech. You punish the assault but not the speech but hate crimes do both.

    Thanks to judicial activism hate crimes have now officially expanded to include politically incorrect speech or racial epithets you uttered months and years before a crime or visiting heterodox websites.

  245. “ALL crimes are “hate crimes” especially since a “crime” is defined as unjustly affecting the life or lives of another or more.”

    Well,

    all crimes are not hate crimes –

    but it is clear you did not read my comments on the issue of hate crimes.

    i see no hard connections between the incident in question and the holocaust, so i won’t speak to that.

  246. Jack P says:
    @KenH

    It’s not just Tucker. Basically no prominent person on the right has pointed out the injustice done to these men. They say they oppose BLM but won’t touch the sacred cows. Not at all.

  247. all crimes are not hate crimes –

    We know this though for a fact, “hate crimes” are almost always reserved for Whitey. As a matter of fact I cannot recall the last time I saw a filthy violent munt charged with a hate crime, not to say it doesn’t happen but the lamestream lying media damn sure doesn’t seem to be concerned with reporting on them. A perfect example of a nig-grow hate crime was the three “teen” munts that attacked and kicked the head of a 70 year old Asian woman in an apartment lobby. Media covered it for about 10 seconds and poof, gone like a fart in the wind. One thing that is patently obvious is the clear, raw hatred that oozes from the black community today, whether it’s hating cops, hating whites, or hating the fact that by and large they bring nothing to the table in a first world society, it without a doubt runs rampant in their culture. Yet ignorant guilt riddled cucks still think they’re a valued asset to society when in reality what they excel at is cultural and societal fatigue.

    • Agree: Achmed E. Newman
  248. Nat X says:
    @Detroit Refugee

    Dont u have a tiki torch march to go to incel?

    • Replies: @Detroit Refugee
  249. “We know this though for a fact, “hate crimes” are almost always reserved for Whitey. As a matter of fact I cannot recall the last time I saw a filthy violent munt charged with a hate crime, not to say it doesn’t happen but the lamestream lying media damn sure doesn’t seem to be concerned with reporting on them.”

    You know I was researching this topic long before the cite existed. And i am sure, that the first prosecution of a het crime was an african american youth, in Ca. At any rate your comment is incorrect about who gets prosecuted.

    https://www.newsweek.com/hate-crimes-documented-police-disproportionately-list-black-people-attackers-report-1613945

    https://www.justice.gov/hatecrimes/hate-crime-statistics

    • Replies: @mark green
    , @Philmuhcrevis
  250. Nat X says:
    @spacewonderer

    “nig thoughts”
    ???
    ROTFLMBAO!!!
    You deplorable pasty faced incels are brave on line aint you sweetie???

  251. @EliteCommInc.

    ‘Hate crimes’ were designed to target whites. But you apparently refuse to believe this.

    According to the DOJ link that you provided (https://www.justice.gov/hatecrimes/hate-crime-statistics) over 51% of Hate crimes were committed by Whites and only 22% by Blacks. This is absurd.

    These statistics are impossible to take seriously. Not only do Black Americans commit most of our nation’s (recorded) murders and assaults, but most of our interracial violence (though a good deal of it goes unreported.)

    These ADL-engineered statistics concerning ‘Hate crimes’ underscore the political design and nature of all ‘Hate crime’ statutes. The Jews invented ‘Hate speech’ penalties and now it’s getting worse with enhanced punishment for saying the wrong word during a fight.

    • Thanks: anarchyst
    • Replies: @AceDeuce
  252. “According to the DOJ link that you provided (https://www.justice.gov/hatecrimes/hate-crime-statistics) over 51% of Hate crimes were committed by Whites and only 22% by Blacks. This is absurd.”

    How about research that indicates that blacks are prosecuted for hate crimes i won’t address t5he differences between the FBI and the DOJ

    both indicate that the matter is not soly aimed at whites which ids my point. But bully for you you actually read the material — though you utterly miss the point.

  253. @EliteCommInc.

    You know I was researching this topic long before the cite existed.

    Lie #1

    And i am sure, that the first prosecution of a het crime was an african american youth, in Ca.

    Lie #2

    At any rate your comment is incorrect about who gets prosecuted.

    Lie # 3

    And your ridiculous article, that clearly states that blacks are disproportionately represented as attackers is yet another lie. “Disproportionately” alludes to the notion there is something out of proportion in regards to who’s doing what. Nig-grows far and away attack and murder people at higher rates everywhere. Cops don’t just go out willy nilly and arrest people based on skin color you dolt. They respond to either what they see, or what they’re told by the people asking for help. But by all means keep on believing we’re all gods chillens, and we’re all alike. I’m sure the people that fled Detroit, Philly and Baltimore would agree with you.

    • Thanks: Detroit Refugee
  254. “You know I was researching this topic long before the cite existed.”

    I think the hate crime legislation was enacted in 1996 or before. I was already teaching by t5hat time and hate crimes discussions were already underway

    “And i am sure, that the first prosecution of a het crime was an african american youth, in Ca”

    I am pretty sure that is accurate, i could be incorrect, but I think so. if get a moment I will continue to look for that site.

    “At any rate your comment is incorrect about who gets prosecuted.”

    Your comment was that such legislation was used to get or only prosecute “white people” paraphrased. My response was cite references that demonstrate that the matter is not soley used against whites. i even provide some stats that in an article that differs from that of the FBI — imagine that Hardly a new proffer on my part, providing information that tells two perspectives. However, you missed the larger point

    — blacks are prosecuted — which as the record makes clear, and this is the third time in do so

    is the point.

    i have no idea what your nonsensical retort below the unsupported list of accusations means. I don’t make any comments or arguments that even hint at you at what you are saying. have an issue with the articles content — well take it up with the author. Name — again, that’s new not so much.

    excuse my flippancy here . . . african americans kill more people everywhere

    Not in Wyoming — Laugh.

    ————
    “Cops don’t just go out willy nilly and arrest people based on skin color you dolt. They respond to either what they see, or what they’re told by the people asking for help. But by all means keep on believing we’re all gods chillens, and we’re all alike. I’m sure the people that fled Detroit, Philly and Baltimore would agree with you.”

    i am going to avoid most of the above quotation because I have no idea what it means, it is not connected to anything I have claimed or arguments I have made. Almost all people all of the world flee areas in which they are at risk as the result of criminal conduct, civil dysfunction or social deviance. If they can move they will usually seek to do so – this is a human phenomenon, not some white sign of wisdom.

    ———

    i do tend to lean in the direction that human beings are in fact God’s creation —- chidren if you will

    there you have me i do actually lean in that direction. As for the rest of your comments

    i remain where I came in supported by the data.

    • Replies: @EliteCommInc.
  255. @Nat X

    Shouldn’t you be back in your cell, engaging in unprotected anal sex with a dirty black?

  256. I have claimed or arguments I have made. Almost all people all of the world flee areas in which they are at risk as the result of criminal conduct, civil dysfunction or social deviance.

    Amazing, I finally agree with something where at least you tried to tell the truth. Now, if you can be honest about why Whites and every other person’s with the intelligence and means fled the cities I mentioned (many others as well) maybe we can be onto something that might even ever so slightly be the beginnings of your trip to reality. Watch the comedy clip of Chris Rock and his description of American “Niggaz”, his word, not mine for some educational information that White’s are not allowed to mention without losing everything they’ve ever worked for.

    Everything in that last reply is pretty much like everything else you write here, unrealistic horse shit. Hundreds of words that either cannot or will not even remotely come to terms with what is happening right under our noses, yet some just dismiss as racially bigoted, disinformation. Think I’m full of shit? Put your money where your ignorance is and move to East St. Louis, a (used to be) quaint little town about 15 miles west of another once decent place to live, Belleville Illinois. I hear in both places real estate has become quite affordable, so money shouldn’t be a problem with your relocation.. Write us some more drivel a year after your move so you can tell us how your gentrification effort is working out.

  257. @EliteCommInc.

    And it is important to note that t5he hate crimes legislation came as the result largely by the murder of Matthew Shepherd, someone who engaged in same relational conduct a white male killed by other whites It is a devastating reflection of a simply historical repetitive truth —-

    despite numerous examples of discriminatory conduct — complaints by african americans don’t matter until something happens to white people.

    i think I will call it the JD Vance Effect, in which unemployment and poor economic conditions are responsible for the dysfunction of whites but apparently the volumes of research and reports including the

    Kerner Commission Report Refernce Dr. Alice L George

    JD Vance effect — if it is bot happening to white people, it is not happening.

    by the way the murder of Matthew Shepherd had nothing to do with his relational preference, it was simply a robbery.

  258. AceDeuce says:
    @mark green

    In a related vein, the old complaint that states/FedGov never passed separate antilynching laws in the South is similar to the “hate crime” BS. Just like with “hate crimes”, laws covering lynching are already on the books-murder, manslaughter assault, battery, etc. No need for new ones.

    Contrary to popular belief, the usual legal definition of lynching is, essentially, a specific illegal mob violence committed against a person/persons, usually but not always in connection with accusations of crimes committed by the victim(s). Tarring and feathering and other nonfatal actions are technically lynching. In our dumbed down age, it refers to death by hanging of nigros, although that’s not the true definition.

    Anyway, some cucked Southern states have passed antilynching laws. South Carolina is one–passed it several years ago (1951) “Lynching” is defined in the statute as any act of violence by two or more people against another person. It also specifies that it applies regardless of race of attackers or of victims.

    Cool, huh? Well not so much. You figure nigros would be happy to be protected like that, right?

    Here’s the WaPo from 2003:

    Though they make up just 30 percent of the state’s population, blacks account for 63 percent of the lynching charges, according to an Associated Press analysis of crime statistics.

    For every 1,000 blacks in South Carolina, 2.07 were charged with lynching, compared with 0.46 charged per 1,000 whites — meaning blacks are charged with lynching at 41/2 times the rate for whites.

    In all but two of the state’s 46 counties, blacks are charged with lynching out of proportion to their representation in the population. In Oconee County, for instance, blacks make up 8 percent of the residents but 44 percent of those charged with lynching.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/2003/06/08/lynching-law-has-unintended-results/1a85bf5c-b25c-4eef-8137-968d8a1b64b9/

  259. Anon[356] • Disclaimer says:
    @Jeremy Frett

    Really? You must be a CNN devotee.

  260. Anon[356] • Disclaimer says:
    @bert33

    “but the underlying issue of lack of good training and managerial direction and support for officers in the field still has yet to be addressed. less bullets, more reason, thats the order of the day,” so sayth the Defund movement.

    One can see his posts decrying Antifa and BLM violence.

    You’re the kind of fool who created Porteland, Chicago, NYC, LA, etc. What did you major in gender studies or black studies.

  261. “Amazing, I finally agree with something where at least you tried to tell the truth. Now, if you can be honest about why Whites and every other person’s with the intelligence and means fled the cities I mentioned (many others as well) maybe we can be onto something that might even ever so slightly be the beginnings of your trip to reality. Watch the comedy clip of Chris Rock and his description of American “Niggaz”, his word, not mine for some educational information that White’s are not allowed to mention without losing everything they’ve ever worked for.”

    I would prefer that you censor colorful language in response to my comments. No whites fled the city at the mere arrival of african americans who could afford to live in their communities. The gamesmanship of Insurance companies and homeowners offering money for the same african americans not to move in had nothing to with crime.

    It was skin color pure and simple.

    And i will straighten you out about Mr. Rock’s comment. He was talking about the few that he would note as the cause for issues from whites about blacks in general. In otherwords, Mr Rock is saying whites are incapable of seeing black person do something wrong without disparaging an entire population, resulting in various negative impacts. In response, blacks, in this case pinpoints the harm on that small contingent of blacks who are in fact engaged in untoward contact.

    As I have noterd before — Mr. Rock is not talking about all black people or black people in general.

    ——–

    You are forever making up some argument and claiming I said or suggested the same. Again, your latter comments are unreflective of anything I have said. And in these last two days what I have said I have provided data sets to support. Get a grip. If you can find a single comment where I claim the information is as you describe cite it. You have taken the one comment you reference completely out of context from the whole which in short

    says that people in general seek greener pastures regardless f their skin color. It was not an indictment of anything – but a generalized truth —

    Oyyy veh . . .

    white flight had nothing to do with crime . . . the crime rates increased as a result of the loss of wealth – take note, the same arguments are generated around Italians, Irish, Polish and other immigrants as they moved into the cities of the US. What made the matter more polarizing is that skin color barred the usual avenues of assimilation:

    change language
    change dress
    change behavior
    change in cultural practices
    intermarriage
    employment networks

    Black skin made all of that near impossible.

    https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/what-is-white-flight.html

    do some homework on “redlining” “zoning policy”

    Good grief. . . and for heavens to betsy stop making up arguments or comments I don’t make. Unfortunately for you, I have lived and worked among and with black people. And in my experiences the most illegal events against my person has been from whites and hispanics — now maybe blacks are responsible for something I am unaware of —-

    but then that is my experience. But regardless, I stand by comments and the data sets to the same.

    I have no idea if every comment made that differs from own has anything to do with “racism” — and I have never made any such comment.

    If don’t respond further its because I am too busy. Believe the matter has run its course. No intention of being rude by a lack of response — just think my case(s) is/are made and well supported. You might actually want to do some research or at least read the articles, I think they are all written by whites.

    In our exchanges, the only person complaining about personal bias is you

    • Replies: @Philmuhcrevis
  262. Anon[356] • Disclaimer says:
    @EliteCommInc.

    Bet you have are fixed to MSNBC.

    -Who jogs 20 miles from where they live?
    -I always believe a convicted felon with a rap sheet that Hunter Biden aspires to.
    -Why confront an unarmed burglar who outweighs you by 100 pounds. He is unarmed. With logic like that you must be a gender studies major or an Enron investor.
    -Yup there was a long series of crimes by the choirboy using the same MO according to his arrest record.
    -The story was confirmed by the police. I bet you can’t define what a woman is.
    -The multiple people is the thug. Try again skippy.

    Only a fool or a guilty person grabs the barrel of a shotgun. Murder? It was suicide.

    I anticipate your nomination to SCOTUS by Bidensoon. Remarkable mastery of evidence, logic and the law.

    • Thanks: anarchyst
  263. “-Who jogs 20 miles from where they live?”

    i have been known to walk more than twenty miles

    Before i was run over by a car I routinely would drive to the coast, and lake locations to ride. i have even traveled as far north as los Angeles to ride

    There simply was no warrant for the gentlemen in question to do what they did. They did not even see any trespass. I was run over in Palm Springs . . .

    why I was riding in Palm Springs is not warrant to run me over. Being out of one’s neighborhood is not a crime.

    —————-

    “-I always believe a convicted felon with a rap sheet that Hunter Biden aspires to.
    -Why confront an unarmed burglar who outweighs you by 100 pounds. He is unarmed. With logic like that you must be a gender studies major or an Enron investor.
    -Yup there was a long series of crimes by the choirboy using the same MO according to his arrest record.
    -The story was confirmed by the police. I bet you can’t define what a woman is.
    -The multiple people is the thug. Try again skippy.

    Only a fool or a guilty person grabs the barrel of a shotgun. Murder? It was suicide.

    I anticipate your nomination to SCOTUS by Bidensoon. Remarkable mastery of evidence, logic and the law.”

    I have no idea what you are on about. Laugh. I am a conservative, right or Pres Reagan and probably right of Atilla the Hun.

    They never saw a crime. There is no evidence that he stole anything, he did what others apparently did as routine, walk onto that property and he left with nothing in hand. he just jogged on. That’s when they saw him and they should have left it at the phone call to p0lice.

    The size is not warrant for being stalked either . . . and there’s nothing that indicates he out weighed all three men who shouldn’t have interfered with route of travel in the first place. even if said person was in fact Atilla the Hun.

    these men had no idea about his record and had they, it would have remained irrelevant, they did not see a crime, not even a misdemeanor.

    People will engage in all manner of tactics to defend themselves, even at great risk to themselves. even people with criminal records have the right to jog, run, walk . . . unimpeded by those without warrant

    • Replies: @Patrick McNally
  264. @EliteCommInc.

    If the younger McMichael had been convicted of manslaughter, his father convicted as an accessory, and the fellow with the camera let off as someone who was just in the wrong place at the wrong time, then I wouldn’t see much to contest about the verdict. But this was definitely a case of excessive charging and sentencing that was driven by a wish to appease the mob. That is not justice and it’s naive to think that you will be safe just because you might not make the same mistakes these fools did. I agree that they should have stayed in their truck and kept the weapons mostly out of sight while waiting for police to arrive. But the convictions which they received were so wildly out of proportion to the events that this case must be challenged.

  265. “Only a fool or a guilty person grabs the barrel of a shotgun. Murder? It was suicide.

    I anticipate your nomination to SCOTUS by Bidensoon. Remarkable mastery of evidence, logic and the law.”

    When all else fails and this is an old story resort to personal attacks.

    “Bet you have are fixed to MSNBC.”

    Two issues more than any other have soured my diet of TV News in general

    Iraq/Afghanistan War reporting
    Economic reporting 2007/2008

    We are in deep trouble. And we are not in deep trouble because BLM or because of some debate regarding crt. We are deep trouble because the leadership in this country has been blindsided by notions created social construction circles regarding the nature of rights advanced behind legitimate concerns regarding blacks, but had little or nothing to do with their core concerns. The civil rights issues which were fairly straight forward and simple got sidelined for

    1 calling children skin tissue to murder them
    2 a violent protest/hijacking for the second time of the APA conference in 1973
    3 Kinsey’s careless theory application regarding intimate relations
    4 the full frontal attack on family and organized faith and practice

    Special note: the comment below is not about some misogynistic press. There are some legitimate issues regarding women, but the legitimacy thereof has been a careless application, built on exaggeration, ignorance of impact — hard in our face reality — instead of applying affirmative action as a means to reset nearly every ill regarding black employment and education — resulting from the end of slavery, it has been used as a battering ram to include women in the name of women and as the dominant society used AA programs into fast tracking women. But actually having the courage to tell one’s daughter, wife, girlfriend, mistress, etc. That truth men — white men engaged in a go fetch aya ma’am crusade ignoring several million years of constructed relationship built on the extreme value of womanhood to society at large. And women have used every ill regardless how slight overall to the dynamic to indict and deconstruct the single most powerful force on the planet in healthy society — male female bonding and relationship – and that has been by and on behalf of white women.

    dangerous for me to even mention this —- brass tack issue military service

    5 and the massive effort to include women at the expense of sound policy — and again the country hid behind the matters of black skin but anyone taking a look will uncover that no other segment of society resulted in lowered standards than the complaints made by women and almost exclusively white women – who remain in the forefront of the transgender movement so bizarre that even the young Men’s Christian Association is tossing out grandmothers from the gym who object. In polity in nearly every way, we have adopted the most bizarre concepts regarding human conduct and relations in against making some simple changes to ensure black citizens have a fair stake. The states that barred playboy did so because it included african american and whites mixing, not because it advanced pornography’s . . . as I recall a woman now runs playboy

    Really, one black guy running is cause for the cavalry loaded to bear, but no fault divorce teaching same relational conduct by instructors as condoned by Gov Reagan is ushered in governors not a whimper . . .

    I simply don’t buy the upside down advocacy here.

    6 immigration policy — there’s a low level war taking place from our southern border and white are up in arms about a jogger — foreigners are taking billions out of the country but by all means drop everything and catch that jogger. women in the forefront of open borders

    United states in trouble —– no kidding.

    Our financial system owned and operated almost exclusively by whites sent millions out of hearth and home — millions of whites who lost not only home but pensions that comptroller boards on local and state reps invested in the stock markets without ever checking the mechanics of value and the party to which I belong having conniption fits about a basketball player in Russia . . .

    The country is in trouble . . . but no one seems to be attending to where the actual fault are despite the quakes upending the foundation.

    Keenly aware that noting this as with almost anything that does not black jews or african americans, is treading on dangerous ground.

  266. @EliteCommInc.

    It was skin color pure and simple.

    And yet again another bald faced lie.

    No one Gives and damn about the color their skin. I have said this before and your refusal to come to terms with it is stunning.. It’s their abhorrent behavior that people run from. Businesses throwing up their hands and closing doors is just one more thing on the list that their behavior destroys. There are quite a few black families that live in my subdivision and no one, I MEAN NO ONE gives them any grief, do you want to know why? Because they don’t behave like niggaz. Your butt hurt response is simply another dishonest novel trying to explain that which cannot be explained with the typical nonsense that reality cements as truth.

    white flight had nothing to do with crime . . . the crime rates increased as a result of the loss of wealth

    Another load of crap proven by the fact that there are far more whites in the US that are mired in poverty yet even with that they don’t commit violent crime and robbery at any where near the rates that blacks do. And many of the ones that have crossed over into the stupidity have developed a taste for black culture, proven by how they talk, dress and act. The culture of the NAPA is a lose lose for all in this nation, especially Whites that don’t have the means or desire to escape that situation.

  267. “No one Gives and damn about the color their skin. I have said this before and your refusal to come to terms with it is stunning.”

    Then you are ignorant of your own US history and socialization. The data sets as presented and more are well honed and known.

    Laugh . . . sadly there certainly are now. And you are tad late here. i have made the case that the small percentage of of americans who might engaged in varying levels of dysfunction are outstripped by the large numbers who despite poverty and a host of challenges are not criminal.

    As for your constant complaint about blackness . . . i say you are deeply concerned about skin color. You have said it before at t5he same time you have engaged in some very intense rhetoric about skin color. but this is us . . .

    a needless war for freedom — endowed by a creator, except for saves, who by and large almost all happen to be black in color. no criminal record, past almost entirely 7unknown, all mixed together wholly ignorant that the skin color of one is hardly reflective of the myriad of ciliztions from which they came . . . but that is past history . . . wrestle with the data

    And i would that your complaint view were accurate about skin color — entirely benign trait and yet we as a nation have invested an entire polity to ensure the status of people with black skin . . . not an opinion, but the record and have done so regardless of their conduct.

    the gentleman was just jogging down a street . . . , a kid was walking home to his father’s appointment

    the matter is so stark and rich in evidence , police surveys of police admit they so respond to skin color. At any rate, I am foolishly engaged in the obvious based on the record, not my world view.

    ———————

    nothing i have written denies agency of the black population.

    ——-

    Have fun defining black culture.

  268. Then you are ignorant of your own US history and socialization. The data sets as presented and more are well honed and known.

    Yeah, I like history too.. And I understand what happened, and yeah its bad. I’m talking about today, and what is happening now. Simply looking at areas where they inhabit in large numbers is proof enough for those with more than four brain cells to understand that a large percentage of blacks either cannot, or will not adapt to 1st world culture.

    I wonder in the minds of people like you what the monthly dollar amount in reparations it’d take to make these third world heathens behave like something that remotely resembles human beings.

    The story I posted about the 67 year old white man that was murdered by the black fast food worker is a perfect example. Got his feelings hurt and punched the old man so hard that it killed him. Essentially crickets from the media in this country on that horrific story. WLDM..

    Yeah the three idiots made the mistake of thinking that trying to confront a black man for suspicious behavior and the ensuing homicide that followed is front page news like every other munt that’s killed by someone White, or a cop nowadays. I wonder what sort of difference it’d make in black communities if the left wing Jew controlled media machine reported on every black on black murder that happens in this country? It would be a tall order though, as it’d be running in a 24/7 loop, 365 days a year with essentially no end in site. But maybe, just maybe a scintilla of shame at some point might begin to soak into their empty heads, and we could possibly begin to work toward some understanding of racial realities in this country. I suspect that may be just too much of an affront to the tender sensibilities of those that say race doesn’t exist, except when it’s a black person being killed by anyone that isn’t one of their own.

  269. I cannot unravel history for you nor its impact and consequences. i won’t respond to the bait you offer as it has no relations to the data sets. You said no one care about color, you then switch it up that you mean current history, but in the present, your entire premise is based on color.

    Furthermore, t5he evidence today makes clear that color unfortunately still matters, no less for whites than blacks and i9n my view for most whites even more. but i am not interested in traveling at5hat road now — too busy.

    Again the record demonstrates that prosecution of african americans has not gone unabated – even for the crime of murder. So much for your grasp of contemporary history.

  270. “I always believe a convicted felon with a rap sheet that Hunter Biden aspires to.”

    The issues surrounding Mr Hunter Biden and Pres Donald Trump are reflective of a privilege’s most US citizens would never get.

    “I bet you can’t define what a woman is.”

    a biological construct determined by DNA. on rare occasions there are some people who are born with a biologicals anomaly that requires more care and concern exhibited by the trans advocacy.

    “Remarkable mastery of evidence, logic and the law.”

    keep it simple based on the data sets — the issues of the article are not hard to comprehend. i am far from remarkable, but i appreciate your confidence and your compliment.

  271. GerryH says:
    @Sean

    He thought he was being a good guy. All three of the men are in jail because they wouldn’t recognized the legal danger they were in and couldn’t shut the hell up. I think father and son actually talked to the media after no charges were brought initially which lead to nationwide outrage and their jailing for life, all because they we determined to prove they were actually the good guys.

  272. “the legal danger’

    because in their view skin color overrode prudent consideration. Had they ever challenged a single other person traversing that property . . . but they were fixated on this one particular gentleman.

    sad and sad tragic for all involved.

  273. Bigfoot says:

    When Whites kill Blacks, they are out

    “Defending themselves and their property”

    When Black kill Whites, its because

    “they are criminals committing their usual crimes”

    With such a warped view, and you wonder why “Progress” is actually “Regress”

    Good luck with that!

  274. With such a warped view, and you wonder why “Progress” is actually “Regress”

    Your analogy is interesting.. Considering the severe overreach in the double prosecution and sentencing (cuz we’z gots to make sure doze white muddafuckaz pay) that introduced the notion of mind reading to come to the “reasonable” conclusion that not only were they vile racists, they were also guilty of 1st degree murder, when in reality there was no real evidence of either accusation, other than they were white. Since this is what happened, isn’t it reasonable to assume that Arbrey, a known thief and had been arrested numerous times in his life was in fact up to the “usual” activity of the NAPA? Considering the fact that they video taped the entire event and turned it over to LE and could have shot him down like a dog at any time during the whole ordeal proves what a fucking joke that entire sham prosecution was from start to finish.. Shotgun boy should be doing 12 to 15 for manslaughter and the other two should be home with their families.

    • Replies: @Detroit Refugee
  275. @Philmuhcrevis

    I agree. Two should be free, and the “shooter” should be serving 15 or even less.
    And the NAPA was well, just being a NAPA.

  276. @Robert Dolan

    Filthy God damned Chimpoid should have been shot dead there, missed opportunity.

    Not a total waste, dead Negristicals make excellent gator bait.
    Also, if one is tandem hooked and trolled behind a boat, a shark is likely to take its darkness for a seal and hit the bait hard. If the hooks don’t set, that’s OK…the visual of the strike is reward enough.

    In case any readers haven’t noticed, I REALLY hate niggers…as opposed to Blacks that are made to look bad by the other 99%.
    Moreso, I REALLY hate nigger (((apologists and enablers))) as well as delusional Cucks that have no direct experience with the sub-human Chimpoids.

  277. @Nat X

    Low value cotton picker, experienced ass bandit, ex-con, turd flinger, Eggplant, waste of square footage, air and water sez… WHUT ?

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All John Derbyshire Comments via RSS