The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewJohn Derbyshire Archive
Storm in a Teacup
On Coulter, American Jews, and the Pandering GOP
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks
Ann Coulter. Credit: Vdare.com
Ann Coulter. Credit: Vdare.com

A side story from Wednesday night’s GOP candidates’ debate—covered more thoroughly in the full Radio Derb to be posted today—was the fuss about Ann Coulter getting exasperated with all the candidates’ asseverations of solidarity with Israel and tweeting, “How many f—ing Jews do these people think there are in the United States?”

The beep that Radio Derb listeners will hear, by the way, is Ann’s, not mine. Her actual tweet said “f-hyphen-hyphen-hyphen-i-n-g.”

This caused a lot of shrieking and swooning, especially of course from ethnocentric Jews. Actor Seth Rogen told Ann that, quote, “You are a horrible f—ing idiot.” John Podhoretz harrumphed back on Twitter.

Novelist and former British Member of Parliament Louise Mensch, who is Jewish by marriage, predicted that the offending tweet would end Ann’s career.

https://twitter.com/LouiseMensch/status/644521340645548032

I seriously doubt that. Those of us who love Ann—and to judge by her book sales, our numbers are legion—love her for the same reason people love Donald Trump: she breaks the mold of conventional political rhetoric.

Trump does the same. The more he does it, and the more the Establishment pundits say “That’ll finish him for sure!” the higher his poll numbers go. I predict the same for Ann’s book sales.

And the mold of conventional political rhetoric has needed breaking. For more than a generation now—for thirty or forty years—politicians have observed the PC proprieties, walking on eggshells around anything that might give offense to anyone, pandering to favored groups and influential donors. The result has been that important issues don’t get discussed i n the political arena—immigration policy being the outstanding example.

From the point of view of those of us who are fed up with that style of political diction —half mealy-mouthed schoolmarm prissiness, half unctuous fawning—Ann’s Wednesday tweet was a scream of protest against the latter: against unctuous fawning on what GOP candidates seem to think is a key voting segment.

Why do they think that? Estimates of the proportion of self-identifying Jews in the U.S.A. range from two to four percent, depending on whom you ask; and not all of them are fans of Israel. Why so many shout-outs from GOP candidates to such a tiny demographic? That’s a politer form of Ann’s question.

What’s the answer to Ann’s question? The answer is of course that Ashkenazi Jews punch way above their demographic weight in media and intellectual circles, and in big-money political donations, because their high average intelligence brings them success in the relevant fields.

That’s a fact of life in the U.S.A. I don’t myself think it’s a particularly deplorable one. Whether it is or not, it surely doesn’t justify the shameless and blatant pandering that Ann was targeting.

That pandering just fortifies the impression that our candidates, when they speak, are speaking to wealthy donors and influential commentators, not to us dull-witted, no-account proles: precisely the impression that is driving Donald Trump’s success.

Ann’s tweet was of course well-received by anti-Semites, opening her up to charges of guilt by association. Is she herself an anti-Semite?

adiosamericaA good place to go seeking an answer to that question would be Ann’s recent book, ¡Adios, America!

The book has 12 index references to Israel. Some are duplicates, references to the same passage under different headings. Here is a very brief summary of the eight referenced passages.

  1. The U.S.A. should be just as wary of changing our nation’s ethnic structure as Israelis are of changing Israel’s.
  2. Israel is among the nations with the lowest rate of sex trafficking.
  3. Israel has a robust policy against illegal immigration. Quote: “I admire Israel’s policy and wish we could adopt it,” end quote.
  4. Israel’s border fence works really well. U.S. politicians who scoff at the efficacy of border fences should direct their remarks to Israel.
  5. More praise for Israel’s firm policy against illegal immigrants.
  6. Quote: “Jews forthrightly ask: Is it good for the Jews? Why can’t Americans ask: Is it good for Americans?” End quote. There follows a comparison of our troubles with Mexico versus Israel’s with Palestine. This section ends with, quote: “Could we move Israel to our southern border? They know how to defend a country.”
  7. She pooh-poohs the lie that diversity is a strength, and raises counterexamples all over the world, including, “Israel with its Jewish and Palestinian populations.”
  8. The anomaly of the New York Times giving over an editorial to boosting money transfers from the U.S.A. to Mexico when there was plenty of more important stuff going on in the world. There follows a paragraph listing that stuff, amongst it “Israeli airstrikes on Palestinians.”

That’s all Ann has to say about Israel in her book—not exactly a catalog of frothing Jew-hatred. The main impression you get about Ann’s attitude to Israel is that she admires their politicians for doing what ours will not do: defending their national sovereignty and keeping their ethnic balance intact. See Ann Coulter Calls Fury Over Jewish-Debate Tweet “Fake Outrage”: “I’m Pro-Israel”, by Paul Bond, Hollywood Reporter, September 17, 2015.

And as Ann has been pointing out in response to the fuss over her tweet, mass Hispanic immigration, which GOP candidates like Jeb Bush and Marco Rubio have also been pandering to, is simply terrible for the Jews. [Ann Coulter Defends ‘F–king Jews’ Rant, By Jay Michaelson, Daily Beast, September 18, 2015 ] Hispanics have high levels of anti-Semitism. Where do you think all the old Nazis retired to? [In Argentine Haven for Fugitive Nazis, April Means Chocolate Eggs and Hitler Parties, By Meredith Hoffman, Tablet, April 29, 2014]

That’s not even to mention the mass immigration of Muslims into the U.S.A., which is giving anti-Semitism the kind of boost that mass immigration of rabbits would give to sales of lettuce.

Ann lays into that in her book very vigorously, under headings like Muslim Rape Culture and Muslim Terrorist Farmworkers.

If Ann’s down on the Jews, why isn’t she welcoming all these Jew-haters we’re bringing in?

Bottom line here: I call this a storm in a teacup based on a willful misrepresentation of a shout of frustration. I note that Ann’s tweet came near the end of Wednesday’s three-hour, Hamlet-length debate-a-thon. Any intelligent patriot has a right to be frustrated at such a time. If I had watched the wretched thing, the wise Mrs. Derbyshire would have known to hide the key to my gun safe at around the one-hour mark.

And no, I don’t believe for a minute this will hurt Ann’s career—although I doubt we’ll be seeing her byline in future issues of Commentary magazine.

ORDER IT NOW

John Derbyshire [email him] writes an incredible amount on all sorts of subjectsfor all kinds of outlets. (This no longer includes National Review, whose editors had some kind of tantrum and fired him. ) He is the author of We Are Doomed: Reclaiming Conservative Pessimism and several other books. His most recent book, published by VDARE.com com is FROM THE DISSIDENT RIGHT (also available in Kindle).His writings are archived at JohnDerbyshire.com.

(Republished from VDare by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 320 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Priss Factor [AKA "The Priss Factory"] says: • Website

    Shouldn’t the main issue be Jewish control of GOP(and America) than Coulter’s remark?

    When Japan attacked Pearl Harbor, surely Americans said, ‘fuc*ing japs’. Now, what is more serious? Japan’s attack or the insensitive remark?

    The fact is Jews are oppressing all of us. We are an occupied people. That should be the main issue, not Coulter’s language which is understandable.

    If you’re a slave and refer to your slave-owner as a ‘fuc*ing slave-master’, are you the bad guy for noticing your enslavement?

    The main issue should not be Coulter saying ‘fuc*ing Jews’ but the fact that Jews fuc* us all the time. GOP is made of cuckservative whores to allow themselves to be butt-fuc*ed by the Jews.

    Besides, Jews encourage non-whites to use all sorts of horrible words about white folks. That demented Jew Sabrina Erdely Rubin and the entire media complex tried to destroy white males at UVA, but the Jewish bitch still has her job.

    And never forget the Newsweek Cover of General Obama and how GOP is a party of old white men who should die.

    When Jews fuc* the white race in the ass, it’s about time white folks referred to Jews as ‘fuc*ing Jews’.

    Besides, aren’t Jews promoting vulgarity all the time as healthy? Lena Dunham, Sarah Silverman, Rap music.

    But I guess gentiles should speak about Jews only in the most reverential way.
    Jews can spit in your face but you have to get on your knees and kiss their ass.

    • Agree: Realist, JSM
    • Replies: @hanoi paris hilton
  2. anon • Disclaimer says:

    If the GOP’s foreign policy is paid for by lobbyists then every other policy is probably paid for also.

  3. mad1 says:

    Israel is a demographic disaster that requires the most intensive military occupation on Earth to keep a lid on it. Bringing any Russian who claimed jewishness in to replace the almost 1/3 of
    native born Israelis who will not live in their own Nazified country was a brilliant move by the
    politicians that Ann admires so much.

  4. That about sums it up, Priss.

  5. Fred Reed says:

    Coulter’s question is a good one which I suspect many tens of millions would second. I am not sure that everyone understands the strictness of the taboo against offending—not Jews, exactly, but those whose loyalty is to Israel over all else. In my decades in journalism in Washington, any criticism of Israel was death.

    I was hired by the Washington Times just as it was forming under Smith Hempstone and sent to cover the Israel’s then-incursion into Lebanon. I went to Beit Agron to be credentialed and was told by one Zev Chafetz that I worked for a Nazi paper and Israel would not cooperate with me. It didn’t. The Times was not then, and has never been, a Nazi paper. The intention seemed to be to let the new paper know from the get-go who was boss. It worked.

    For a considerable time after the paper’s start Jewish owned movie theaters, which was a lot of them, refused to supply showtimes to the Times.

    Years after, I went to cover another incursion into Lebanon and wrote that it was unlikely that Israel would really repair towns devastated by the IDF. The result was a lengthy denunciation of me by some important Jewish guy which the then-editor, Jim Whalen, published but would not let me reply to, and a threatening call from the Israel embassy. They play hardball and, then anyway, editors were afraid of them.

    I am not a fan of Coulter but, for what it’s worth (nothing) I support her right to say anything she pleases, whether Podhoretz and other Israelis like it or not. Or whether I like it.

  6. Priss Factor [AKA "The Priss Factory"] says: • Website

    There is the canard-canard.

    Jews say it’s an ‘antisemitic canard’ to say Jews are abundant in certain kind of negative traits or overly associated with certain kinds of negative deeds.
    But it is a fact that Jews are more highly represented in certain kinds of behavior than other groups are. And this goes for non-Jews too. For instance, would it be an ‘anti-Italian canard’ to say that Italian-Americans are more likely to be associated with organized crime than, say, Swedish-Americans or French-Americans?
    Would it be an ‘anti-Chinese canard’ to say that Chinese are more opportunistic than the Japanese when it comes to exploiting American immigration laws?
    Would it be a canard to say that privileged Anglo-Americans in the past did rig the game to favor their own kind over others?
    Of course not. Those are all true. Now, no stereotype or general observation is entirely true for every individual. After all, most Italian-Americans were not gangsters. But it is true enough that the Italian-American community was more prone to supporting that kind of criminal culture than, say, a Norwegian-American community. GOODFELLAS is an honest film; it is not a canard against Italian-Americans.

    So, it shouldn’t be surprising that Jews, given their ethnic culture/character/agenda/history/heritage/values/skills/etc, would have certain tendencies and propensities that encourage certain negative behavior in various areas they specialize in. This is no canard.

    But the way the game is rigged, any negative aspersion about Jews is ‘an antisemitic canard’ on the basis that, since ‘antisemitism led to the Holocaust’, any negative observation of Jewish behavior must be blaming every single Jew and calling for the next holocaust.

    Jews invoking ‘antisemitic canard’ all the time is itself a canard that would have us believe that Jews are no different from any of us.
    But the irony is Jews often point out the faults, shortcomings, crimes, and failings of other groups. So, if Jews say that they are like other peoples and if other peoples have unique failings/flaws, then Jews too must have their own problems and failings that should be called to attention.

    But then, Jews get pissed at anyone who notices such things, and that would imply that Jews are pure as snow and never at fault(unlike other groups who have their own unique failings). But that would indicate Jews are not like the rest of us but different from all of us, i.e. they would better than us.
    But if Jews are better than us and so flawless, they shouldn’t be doing all the bad shit they are doing. But when we notice the bad thing, we are said to indulging in ‘antisemitic canards’.

    This canard-canard must end.

  7. Svigor says:

    [email protected] One more thing to thank the Jewish people for – your career is over.

    Jewish Power and Privilege. Jews can say this kind of hand-rubbing, mustache-twirling, movie villain type stuff in earnest and in real life and get away with it.

    I seriously doubt that. Those of us who love Ann—and to judge by her book sales, our numbers are legion—love her for the same reason people love Donald Trump: she breaks the mold of conventional political rhetoric.

    and in big-money political donations, because their high average intelligence brings them success in the relevant fields.

    I think I hear your balls shrinking. High Ethnocentrism + High IQ = better nepotism.

    That’s a fact of life in the U.S.A. I don’t myself think it’s a particularly deplorable one.

    Way to take a stand, there Derb. 🙂

    Strong Faux Leftism (little different from the Faux Leftism of blacks, browns, MENAs, etc.) + High IQ = powerful force for leftism. How is that good? You’re smart enough to know this, thus “not particularly deplorable.” Damn with faint praise, much?

    Ann’s tweet was of course well-received by anti-Semites, opening her up to charges of guilt by association. Is she herself an anti-Semite?

    Who cares?

    • Replies: @Mr. Anon
    , @Hail
  8. Svigor says:

    Hey Priss, don’t sugarcoat it.

  9. Ann Coulter is sailing a bit close to the wind lately.

    Love her more than ever, but worry about her.

    Anyway, the ‘number of jews’ meme is a diversion…it’s their wealth, not their numbers, that confers power.

    • Agree: Travis
  10. bunga says:

    What a climbdown for Coulter She has to sing hosanah- I am pro Jews and then attack immigration because it is bad for Jews in campus.
    i see the author kind of segueing into same passive do -nothin , think- nothing mindset .It is safe to play muslim card .

    But like VDARE he also forgets as does Coulter that the newly resurgence angst at Israel now labeled as antisemtism in Europe is related to atatcks on Gaza,Lebanon,Syria from 2001, to settlements and to perpetual claims of victimhood or threat to existence that cripples EU economy ,imposes Israeli engineered sanction on other and creates massive refugee crisis from a war made by America under the direction of Israel.

    • Replies: @HLMunchkin
  11. unit472 says:

    Wasn’t there in a time in America, when a small minority of WASPS controlled most everything? Rockefellers, Vanderbilts, Morgan, Hearst and the Big Four from California, Crocker, Hopkins, Stanford and Huntington were some of the Robber Barons of the Gilded Age.

    They had their faults, Hearst hated Mexicans back when there were hardly any Mexicans in the US to hate and the Big Four and the Vanderbilts used their railroad monopolies as ruthlessly as any modern day Jewish media mogul did in more recent times. They took the heat for it too. Hearst using his newspaper empire to whip up public opinion became known as ‘Yellow journalism” though it would be hard to distinguish it today from what the New York Times and CNN do routinely. OTOH Morgan and Rockefeller never needed government bailouts of their banking empires and when the occasional financial panic took place they used their resources to assist the US government restore confidence in the country.

    Reviled as plutocrats they tried to burnish their public image with extraordinary gifts to the nation they had built. Vanderbilt and Stanford Universities bear the names of two of these families but there were a lot of other low key donations made by these immensely rich families. If the schools they showered with their wealth discriminated it was only to limit the Jewish component of the student body to a reasonable size, not exclude them entirely. For this they were hated though, as Ron Unz has demonstrated ,the Jews of today don’t behave as magnanimously as those old WASP aristocrats did.

    That’s the thing of it. By almost any standard, the old WASP aristocracy was more generous and tolerant than the modern day Jewish financial and political elite. Hell, Jews were always a part of the American ruling class and, if their biggest complaint was not being 12 times their proportion of the population at an old line WASP university ( founded as a Christian divinity school in 1636 when there were no Jews in New England) you really have to wonder what in the hell is the matter with these people! Can’t Sumner Redstone or Mark Zuckerberg endow their own elite university and exclude WASPS?

    • Replies: @Rich
    , @dahoit
  12. The answer is of course that Ashkenazi Jews punch way above their demographic weight in media and intellectual circles, and in big-money political donations, because their high average intelligence brings them success in the relevant fields.

    That’s actually the Official Jewish Version.

    The reality–well known to those of us who have ever worked anywhere near the upper echelons in business, government, the media, or education–is that Chosenites will get just a couple of their number into positions of power and then use their influence to prefer other members of the Tribe. This situation naturally metastasizes until critical mass is obtained.

    Naturally, a few especially accomplished and/or obsequious shabbos goys will be included–enough to give the lie to tales of total exclusion–but that’s just window dressing. Within a few decades of these tribal preferences being in place, near-total control will be achieved. This was the situation in America about 50 years ago. That many still deny it is testimony, chiefly, to the efficiency and effectiveness of mass-media programming.

    By this method, the virtues, goals, and principles of democracy can be thoroughly subverted within the space of a single lifetime. And if the entertainment-propaganda is adequately skilled, the host society won’t even be aware of its dispossession. Worse, as we see in modern-day America, large segments of the host society can be trained to assist–enthusiasticaly!–in their own demise.

  13. Chuck says:

    Derbyshire accomplishes the rather remarkable feat of shameless pandering while decrying shameless pandering.

  14. @bunga

    Yes, they seem to have a little trouble connecting the dots.
    The U.S. didn’t have any problems with the Arabs prior to ’48.

    • Replies: @MSimon
  15. J1234 says:

    Yep, she’s a big fan of Israel and Jewish people. That’s the only quasi-critical thing I’ve ever heard her say about Jews or Israel. She’s probably made 20 blatantly pro-Israel comments in just the few days prior to her heresy. I suppose it’s possible she’s evolving, as she did on immigration. Not likely, though.

    Makes little difference to me. I’m neutral on Jews and Israel. I’m bothered by neither positive or negative comments about them. I do recognize, however, that the media has made it a line that can’t be crossed. And that there is a definable Israel lobby with considerable influence.

    This will likely blow over like Glenn Beck’s rabbi comments. Beck is a moron and within a few days of their “gaffe”.

  16. Christian says:

    I thought conservatives valued self reliance. There is no nation on earth that deserves the “Welfare Queen” label more than Israel. If the US withheld aid and military protection, Israel likely wouldn’t last another decade.

  17. Priss Factor [AKA "The Priss Factory"] says: • Website

    When you let Jews own your mind, they own your body. If Jews tell your mind that it is evil to defend your nation, race, and culture, your body doesn’t act to defend itself.

    There is a Jewish fingerprint all over this. Jews control the western mind. When Jews tell your mind that you have to blow up the Middle East, then your body goes about blowing up the Middle East for the benefit of Jews. If Jews then tell your mind that you must be defenseless against hordes of Arabs pouring in from the Middle East, your body indeed does little or nothing to stem the invasion.

    You are like a dog. You attack and bite when told to do so. You roll over and do nothing when told to do so. Jews are the masters of western goyim. You are emotionally and intellectually bound to the Jewish master.

    Look at the world. Who are telling the West to be defenseless against the invading hordes? Who are guilt-baiting the West? Who are shaming the West? Who are condemning the West for not doing enough?

    Is China putting pressure on Europe to be defenseless? Is Russia? Is Japan? Is Brazil? Is Iran? Is South Africa? Even Arab nations are mostly silent about the refugee crisis, especially since they don’t want to take in refugees themselves.

    No, the people who are saying the West must do this are the Jews who dominate the Western media, government, and finance.

    What western man must do is disinfect his mind of the Jewish virus that keeps telling the white goy mind to disable its body for the service of its own survival.

    • Replies: @Sherman
    , @Sam Shama
  18. Rurik says:

    That’s a fact of life in the U.S.A. I don’t myself think it’s a particularly deplorable one.

    perhaps not Mr. Derbyshire, but it seems to me that virtually all the things that you do deplore .. since I’ve been reading your work, are a direct consequence of the very thing that you don’t deplore.

    like massive third world immigration and hysterical reverse racism and all the trite banalities of our increasingly crass society

    and all the rest

    are a direct consequence of the elephant in the living room that you don’t deplore

    just his smell and that inconvenient proboscis and all the water splashed about …

    if only we could do something about all that !

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
    , @Hugo
    , @Bill Jones
  19. Priss Factor [AKA "The Priss Factory"] says: • Website
    @J1234

    “Yep, she’s a big fan of Israel and Jewish people. That’s the only quasi-critical thing I’ve ever heard her say about Jews or Israel.”

    She could be damning with hysterical praise.

    When Coulter ‘praises’ Israel, the implication is that powerful Jews are enforcing a policy that says ‘nationalism is good for Jews but bad for white gentiles’.
    Indeed, she once brought up the issue of why someone like Adelson is for strong borders in Israel but weak borders in the West. I suspect she knows WHY Jews push different policies for themselves and for others. But she can’t say that yet, but by hysterically praising Israel’s policy, she is exposing the hypocrisy of the Jews.

    She is beginning to Sobranish.

    PS. A ‘white racist’ is someone who feels about his kind the way Jews feel about their kind.
    Jewish way: nationalism for me, no nationalism for thee. Jews know that nationalism is the most powerful force of unity and resistance.

    This has been the feature of GOP politics forever. Gingrich, classic cuckroach.

    If at least most Jews were supportive of white folks and conservatism, we could overlook their bit of nastiness in the Middle East. But when Jews are doing all they can to destroy whites in both US and EU, it is time to get even. Hurt Jews as much as possible in any way possible.

    • Replies: @geokat62
    , @Ivan
  20. MSimon says: • Website
    @HLMunchkin

    Ah. You must have forgotten the Barbary Wars of the early 1800s. You might wish to find out what the Arab Ambassador told the Americans.

    • Replies: @Chris Mallory
  21. helena says:
    @Fred Reed

    “I am not sure that everyone understands the strictness of the taboo against offending—not Jews, exactly, but those whose loyalty is to Israel over all else. ”

    Under EU legislation, the strictness of the taboo is exactly against offending – not just Jews but – Jewishness and anything remotely associated with Jewishness. We have laws. Hate speech is determined by the person who is on the receiving end; any remark that a Jewish person says they ‘feel’ was anti-Semitic, would thusly constitute an anti-Semitic remark. (Ditto racist remarks.) Most people in the EU have not a clue about such a thing as, ‘an Israeli lobby’.

    • Replies: @geokat62
  22. There’s also a more shallow reason why people are getting tired of PC, walking on eggshells rhetoric – it’s boring and makes bland newspaper headlines.

    The media thrives on conflict and drama, but political correctness is suffocating the conflict and drama on which the modern media depends for its livelihood.

  23. MSimon says: • Website

    Well the Jews are a small number. But the number of Christians in America that like Israel is rather large. The pandering is not to Jews – who vote Democrat – it is pandering to Christians.

    Coulter evidently is ignorant of American politics. As is the Derb. A lot of that going around these days.

    But no problem. The Jews can take a hit. They have been taking them for rather a long time. And still keep coming out on top.

    • Replies: @OilcanFloyd
    , @Hunsdon
  24. @Priss Factor

    Yo, Prisss…C’mon, don’t be shy, let it all hang out… Tel us all what you really think about the f—ing Joooooos.

  25. MSimon says: • Website
    @Christian

    Well the Israelis are doing rather well selling weapons to the US and Russia. And they have a huge field of natural gas.

    The Americans pay them and Egypt to not fight each other. Israel doesn’t need the money. Egypt does.

    And then there is Raphael Mechoulam – famous for his work on cannabinoids and the endocannabinoid system of the body.

    And the Intel Design Center.

    Evidently the critics of Israel are ignorant of the subject. I’m trying to figure out why that is no surprise to me. Oh. I remember. Hate makes people blind.

  26. D. K. says:

    Four percent of the current population of the United States (https://www.census.gov/popclock/) would amount to close to thirteen million Jews living in this country. That amount also would be close to the entire population of Jews currently alive, everywhere in the known universe.

    A few years ago, a major study by a Jewish organization, led by a couple of Jewish academicians, put the percentage of the American population that is Jewish, religiously or otherwise, at about 1.7%. With our resident population continuing to mount steadily, due to a tidal wave of (mostly Third World) immigration, while native-born Whites fail to reproduce at even a replacement rate, the percentage of our resident population that is Jewish, religiously or otherwise, continues to sink incrementally. An estimate of 1.5%, as of today, is probably a fairly sound one.

    The pandering that is done to that tiny minority is mind-boggling– until one realizes that other White countries, with much tinier Jewish minorities, pander as much or more to their resident Jews than do we. That is why people are sitting in prisons, in several countries of what used to call itself “The Free World” (admittedly, a Cold War anachronism), for publicly questioning, to any appreciable degree, any given aspect of what has become the self-admitted primary aspect of Jewish-American identity, in the Twenty-First Century C.E.: http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2013/10/01/jewish-essentials-for-most-american-jews-ancestry-and-culture-matter-more-than-religion/.

    • Replies: @Jonathan Revusky
  27. Lot says:

    I love Ann, even though I disagree with her comment. I am not offended in the least however, for the reasons Derb describes.

    Israel is so popular with Republicans because it is a civilized Western state fighting Islamic barbarians for control of the Holy Land.

    • Replies: @The Grate Deign
    , @anonymus
  28. Kyle a says:
    @Christian

    Wrong. If the us withheld that aid from Israel , there wouldn’t be a Muslim left standing within a thousand miles. They would kill them all.

    • Replies: @Christian
  29. @Chuck

    Pandering? Because he is not full 1488? I appreciate the shades of gray in the Alt Right.

    • Replies: @unpc downunder
  30. Dave Pinsen says: • Website
    @Kyle McKenna

    Derb must not have seen Ann’s subsequent tweet, in which she acknowledged that the pandering was largely aimed at Evangelicals, rather than Jews.

  31. Sherman says:
    @Priss Factor

    The Jews are rich and powerful and you’re just some loser posting rambling bullshit on the Internet.

    Frustrating, isn’t it?

  32. In this article, Derbyshire shows an extremely flawed understanding of very basic concepts. You can see it in the way he bandies about the terms “anti-semite” and “anti-semitism”.

    You see, there is a basic rhetorical trick that they are constantly trying to pull on us. An example is when mainstream media sources talk about all the “anti-Americanism” that exists in the world. What does this anti-Americanism refer to? A general dislike of ordinary Americans?

    In fact, as far as I have ever been able to tell, in all my varied travels, there is no widespread dislike of ordinary American people out there. No, the “anti-Americanism” is mostly antipathy towards the policies of the U.S. government — though it goes beyond that, I think. It is also the dislike (horror, even…) of an ideology, globalized capitalism if you will, of which the U.S. is at the center.

    But what does the elite in the U.S. do? They try to convince you that the anti-American sentiment out there is just some kind of irrational hatred of ordinary Americans, when it is really that people disagree with a power structure and its associated ideology. This is quite a trick because it relieves them of the need to deal with the real critique. It is far easier just to pretend that all these people expressing “anti-American views” just hate you (and your mommy and your favorite uncle…) just for being from the U.S.

    Similarly, all these people going on about “anti-semitism” want you to believe that these “anti-semites” have some irrational hatred of ordinary Jewish people. You know, these horrible people who hate, let’s say, your third grade teacher, Mrs. Morgenstern, a sweet little old lady, just for being Jewish. Those horrible anti-semites! Same game…

    Of course, just as there is hardly any anti-Americanism out there that is a general hatred of ordinary Americans, there is also no similar anti-semitism, in the U.S. anyway, that is a similar hatred of ordinary Jewish people. Very very little, anyway. On this site, all of the “anti-Semitism” being expressed is opposition to a very real power structure and the underpinning Zionist ideology.

    In passing, people get conned by this sort of framing in all sorts of contexts. People who should know better will casually refer to a black nationalist leader like Louis Farrakhan as a “racist”. But think a second: when Farrakhan rails against “white people” and what they have done to his people, is he really talking about ordinary white people, plenty of whom are as poor as about any black? Or is he talking about a power structure? (Or a system… an ideology…) Well, get on youtube and listen to the man a bit. Get beyond the 10 second out of context sound bites. You’ll realize fairly quickly that he is not a stupid man, to say the least. So, you really believe that he hates you and your family and so on just for having lighter complected skin?

    But getting back to Derbyshire, the question is whether all this is a symptom of sloppy, careless, half-baked thinking on his part. Or is it willful obtuseness? Like maybe he understands the issue better than he is representing, but for expedience sake, he pretends otherwise.

    Which is it? I think that’s the real question. I don’t claim to know the answer.

    • Replies: @Rurik
    , @Deduction
    , @Ace
  33. @Christian

    Can’t really agree, it’s impossible to overestimate the incompetence of the Arabs and Muslims in general. That said, there’s absolutely no reason for US taxpayer dollars to go to Israel or to any other nation for that matter.

    • Agree: JSM
    • Replies: @Christian
    , @anonymus
  34. Svigor says:

    I was a bit uncharitable before. Damning Jews with faint praise is bravery indeed, in this era.

  35. Svigor says:

    They had their faults, Hearst hated Mexicans back when there were hardly any Mexicans in the US to hate

    You say bug, I say feature.

    Yep, she’s a big fan of Israel and Jewish people. That’s the only quasi-critical thing I’ve ever heard her say about Jews or Israel. She’s probably made 20 blatantly pro-Israel comments in just the few days prior to her heresy. I suppose it’s possible she’s evolving, as she did on immigration. Not likely, though.

    Ann Coulter Calls Fury Over Jewish-Debate Tweet “Fake Outrage”: “I’m Pro-Israel”

    Coulter manages to pack more implicitly pro-white sentiments into her pro-Israel schtick in that piece (though someone else actually packed it, obviously) than any other prominent talking head has done, at least in my experience. Pro-Israel sentiment is not a problem when you’re using it to fight against diaspora Jewry’s interests.

    It’s totally fake outrage from frauds who want to continue the dump of third-worlders on the country, including Muslim Jihadists

    In an interview with The Hollywood Reporter, she also says that the ones who are using her tweets to bash her are “mostly Israel-hating liberals and pro-mass-immigration Republicans. Both of whom don’t want anyone to notice how immigration is changing the country, putting Americans — and Israel — at risk.”

    The columnist and TV personality set off the firestorm with tweets criticizing Republicans for talking too much about Israel in Wednesday’s CNN debate

    “Cruz, Huckabee Rubio all mentioned ISRAEL in their response to: ‘What will AMERICA look like after you are president,’ ” read one tweet.

    “How many f—ing Jews do these people think there are in the United States?” read another post that accused the presidential hopefuls of pandering to Jewish voters.

    “I like the Jews, I like fetuses, I like Reagan. Didn’t need to hear applause lines about them all night,” she tweeted.

    “The GOP wastes half these debates on issues on which there is already 100 percent agreement,” she told THR. “The GOP is pro-Israel. I’m pro-Israel. … How, exactly, do these Republicans propose to defend Israel, when no Republican can get elected president anymore because of immigration? How is an endless series of President Obamas going to protect Israel?”

    “The hypocrites who are mad at me are the ones who support anti-Israel college professors, who refuse to condemn Islamic barbarism, who supported the overthrow of Mubarak for the Muslim Brotherhood, who spread the deadly libel that Jews in America are only successful because of ‘white privilege.’ ”

    (Now, why would she go and link the Jewish diaspora and “white privilege” in the minds of her readers? Seems like such an odd thing to do…)

    “There has been a huge spike in anti-Semitism across Europe due to the massive influx of Muslim immigrants. The same people in a faux uproar about my tweets are also leading the charge to import Muslims into the U.S.A. Half a million girls in the U.S. are now at risk for female genital mutilation. I doubt their dads are voting for pro-Israel politics. I’m the one who just wrote a book about these problems.”

    If that’s what shilling for Zionists looks like, I’ll have seconds, please.

    • Replies: @Lot
  36. Wounded Warrior Project Commercials=Limbless brain damaged Native Born White Christian American Teenagers Walter Reed Army Hospital basket case canon fodder for Jewish Nazis….Why does Anne Coulter have to shut her mouth?

    I have 0 allegiance to the Jewish Nazi State of Israel.

    Abe Foxman is a greedy cheating Jewish Nazi sweaty rancid fat cockroach!!!!!

    • Replies: @Realist
  37. geokat62 says:
    @Priss Factor

    Jewish way: nationalism for me, no nationalism for thee. Jews know that nationalism is the most powerful force of unity and resistance.

    You don’t know how right you are. Here’s a comment I posted previously:

    The question that has to be asked is: who… is responsible for promoting Political Correctness (PC)?

    The brain-trust behind the promotion of PC is the Frankfurt School. The FS identified nationalism as the root cause of the holocaust. To ensure that another holocaust never occurred again, the FS prescribed cultural Marxism (better known as Political Correctness) as the antidote to nationalism.

    Theodor W. Adorno, a leading member of the Frankfurt School of critical theory, wrote The Authoritarian Personality in 1950. In it, Adorno invented a set of criteria by which to define personality traits, ranking them on what he called the ‘Fascist scale’.

    Here’s how one observer characterized the book’s goal:

    [it] was to eliminate antisemitism by “subjecting the American people to what amounted to collective psychotherapy — by treating them as inmates of an insane asylum.” (emphasis added)

    And hell bent on eradicating PC is a zionist entity with the front name of The Clarion Fund. It is keen on destroying PC, especially in Europe, as the birthrate of Muslims is outstripping that of Christians. The concern is that the jungle will be expanding rather than contracting, thereby making it less safe for the villa.

    The Clarion Fund has produced a trilogy of films – Obsession: Radical Islam’s War Against the West, The Third Jihad, and Iranium – in an effort to get the goy to get there act together and re-embrace nationalism.

    With all this toing and froing between nationlism and political correctness, one gets the sense that the goy are perceived to be puppets whose strings are constantly being pulled by the puppet masters.

  38. geokat62 says:
    @helena

    Most people in the EU have not a clue about such a thing as, ‘an Israeli lobby’.

    Most people, but not the French comedian Dieudonné M’bala M’bala.

  39. Christian says:
    @MSimon

    “Hate makes people blind”
    There was no hate in my comment, just pointing out the obvious, that shameless pandering to Israel goes against the conservative value of self reliance. It is no more hateful than if I said Costa Rica needs to be more self reliant.
    As far all the high tech talent in Israel, I am willing to be all these people have passports in the US or Russia. Without the knowledge that the US will back Israel up no matter what, this talent would likely immigrate back to these countries, if things heat up beyond a certain point. If this is difficult to imagine look no further than the all the Iraqi, Syrian and Libyan refugees.

  40. KA says:

    She told THR, “It’s totally fake outrage from frauds who want to continue the dump of third-worlders on the country, including Muslim Jihadists, and voted for the guy who just gave a nuke to Iran.”

    http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/ann-coulter-calls-fury-jewish-824476

    What a moron! Even a prostitue will not try to protect her business by stooping so low intellectually . Even if the lady knew that the whole GOP brigade just offered their asses on a platter for financial evaluation by Israel.

  41. Christian says:
    @Kyle a

    How so? with completely dominant air and sea power they were unable to achieve any of their military goals against heavy infantry from Hezbollah in 2006. Face it the IDF make great pilots, tankers and users of high tech warfare, or harassing Palestinian children throwing rocks; but when it comes to grunts slugging it out in the mud against a determined enemy, they fail miserably.
    Those high tech hipsters, making great new tech for Intel, are they going to sign up for infantry duty where they could really get their head blown off? or would they hightail it to silicone valley for a cushy job?
    Syrian hipsters when push came to shove, even thought they have much more connection and history to the land than the Israelis are leaving for Germany rather than fight ISIS/ISIL/DAESH/Al Queda/IS. I think the Israeli hipsters would be even quicker to leave.

    • Disagree: Orville H. Larson
  42. Abe Foxman=Fat greedy cheating sweaty money grubbing Jewish Nazi Cockroach type…..Definitely not Our Native Born White American Christian Kind Monad.

  43. Christian says:
    @Zed, Lord of the Brutals

    “Can’t really agree”
    So you agree that the US should stop pandering shamelessly to the needs of Israel and let it survive on its own. You just disagree that aid from the US is necessary for Israel’s survival.
    “overestimate the incompetence of the Arabs”
    It is not so much that I think the Arabs are competent, it is just that I think without US protection, the chaos sown in the ME by the neocons would spread to Israel, and the core high tech hipster base of their economy would not need much chaos before they shipped themselves back to the US or wherever their dual citizenship is.
    It would not take a great deal of talent emigration before the economy collapsed, if the US withheld aid.

  44. @Lot

    Lot,

    You’re right that Israel is a western, civilized state fighting against Islam. That alone should be reason enough to classify Israel as one of the guys on our side.

    One sure sign that a person isn’t paying attention is that he’s not an “Islamophobe.”

    Peace, love, truth,

    The Grate Deign

    P.S. I’ll never forget your wife. (Luke 17:32)

  45. Rich says:
    @unit472

    The difference was that the WASPs in charge were basically the same ethnicity as the overwhelming majority of their citizens. To this day the US is basically a Northern Europe people, but the elites, most of whom are still WASPs, reject their fellow people and follow the pseudo-Semites into the destroying of their nation.

    • Replies: @IA
  46. KA says:

    “But Center for Security Policy vice president Jim Hanson argued on his organization’s podcast that the clock “looks exactly like a number of IED triggers that were produced by the Iranians and used to kill U.S. troops in the war in Iraq.” He said the clock “was half a bomb.”

    Frank Gaffney, the center’s founder and president, agreed with Hanson, while suggesting that there is reason to be suspicious of “what we’re told was a clock” because “the story is not being fully explored and explained.”

    Gaffney also said that the entire controversy over Mohamed’s clock appeared to be an “influence operation” by the Council on American-Islamic Relations, a Muslim civil rights group that Gaffney claimed is using “professional victim-promoting” to wage a “civilization jihad” in connection with the Muslim Brotherhood.
    https://theintercept.com/2015/09/18/prominent-anti-muslim-group-says-ahmed-mohameds-clock-resembles-ied-trigger-produced-iranians/

    Hatred against Muslim has blinded a lot f folks who draw their inspiration from the ilk like Coulter , Gaffney or whole line ups in Dick Cheneys AEI .
    This very effort has been tried in Europe . Greece and Spain and Italy are not shrinking into their former shell because of black Sub Saharn or Moroccan. Neither is American middle class is clinging to gun,and bible,and flag because their houses were foreclosed or jobs were taken away by Muslim nor because their churches and school prayers were sprayed with the death to America graffiti . But in the Age of the new Ape, people will have great difficulties in standing upright to speak truth to the Power .
    Coulter just figured that out. Displacement is the new norm. Even the Stockholm Syndrome victim don’t blame the strangers on the street for their plight .

    • Replies: @Sam Shama
  47. KA says:

    Ann Coulter has reached the point in time just before the dawn . Will she wake up and read the patterns of the veins on the tea leaves?

    There are liberal Zionist who are thinking that may be its the American folklore ,heroes , history and the Pilgrim on the City on the Hill made them do it

    “This month has seen another breakthrough in the U.S. media: two leading publications have run important and often-eloquent pieces on Jewish terrorism. Both are from a liberal Zionist perspective, but both bring news to the U.S. public about the frightful state of Israeli political culture today.

    The New York Times two weeks ago ran Sara Yael Hirschhorn’s piece called, “Israeli Terrorists, Born in the U.S.A.,” saying that the Jewish settler/terrorists often have American roots. The piece was unflinching about the American support for Jewish terrorism. Hirshhorn urged Jews to take “aggressive steps within their own communities” and asked, where is the rage is in the United States Jewish community.

    [W]hy have their rabbis not held news conferences loudly denouncing the terrorists in their own communities and families? Where are their op-eds in American and Israeli newspapers condemning violent Jewish extremism?

    American Jews at home and abroad can no longer condone these blind spots and damning silences when it comes to Jewish extremism in Israel.

    This month too, Assaf Sharon has a piece up in the New York Review of Books on “The Jewish Terrorists”. It traces the Revisionist terrorist gangs of the 1930s, Irgun and Stern, on up to their heirs Naftali Bennett and Benjamin Netanyahu, who are atop the Israeli government.

    The recent election of Benjamin Netanyahu–who after trailing in the polls made racist statements that were clearly intended to arouse fear–shows that the violent sentiments and views discussed by [authors Bruce] Hoffman and [Patrick] Bishop are still very much alive. Netanyahu’s father, a formidable scholar of the Inquisition who died in 2012, was a revisionist ideologue who belonged to the “maximalist” circle. He was an Islamophobe who supported pre-state terrorism and opposed any agreement with Arabs, even the peace accord with Egypt.

    His son shares many of his views despite opportunistic rhetoric about a two-state solution, which he opposed during the election and then limply endorsed afterward. In early May he formed a new government including members of [Bennett’s] Jewish Home party, which supports expansion of West Bank settlements and opposes a Palestinian state. The Likud, under Netanyahu’s leadership, has shed the last remnants of [Revisionist Vladimir] Jabotinsky’s liberal commitment and became a party willing to exploit racist contempt for Arabs. Understanding the ideological roots of Israel’s current leaders is indispensable if they are ever to be successfully challenged and replaced.

    Let’s celebrate the publication of these articles. “The more of this the better. These pieces are a big step forward,” James North reminds me. “Hirschhorn writes about Jewish terrorism, which is hardly ever talked about in the Times. I was delighted to read her reporting; and the Times commenters were impressive. Her article also undercut the idea that Israel is a haven for persecuted Jews. No one in their right mind is going to believe these Americans are fleeing anti-Semitism. They’re going there to throw their weight around with Palestinians.”

    Now let me get to my criticisms. Hirschhorn is blaming America for the extremist ideology; Sharon is saying that terrorism is an aberration of Zionism. Both pieces leave out the degree to which violence has for decades served Israel and Zionists in acquiring more land with fewer Arabs on it. Both express the romance of an Israel somehow redeemed of its extremist elements overnight, when as even the Jerusalem Post makes clear, the terrorists in the West Bank have quiet support inside the right wing parties that help constitute the government.

    The Times piece actually begins with a falsehood; the headline (chosen by the editors) states, “Israeli Terrorists, Born in the U.S.A.” These Jewish settler terrorists may have “American roots,” as Hirschhorn states in her piece; but they weren’t born here; in some cases their parents were.

    Hirschhorn’s contention is that American settlers are among the most virulently ideological:

    This disproportionately large American contingent — relative to the total number of American-Israelis — has joined secular, religious and ultra-Orthodox Israelis, and other more recent immigrants. Few of them live in extremist hilltop outposts; a majority live in suburbanized settlements near Jerusalem, but they are considered among the most highly ideological.

    She blames an ideology composed in part of American liberalism:

    Rather than quoting the Bible or rhapsodizing about a messianic vision, they tend to describe their activities in the language of American values and idealism — as an opportunity to defend human rights and live in the “whole land of Israel” — often over a cup of Starbucks coffee in their boxy aluminum prefab houses or in the mansions of settlement suburbia. To them, living in the West Bank is pioneering on the new frontier…

    many law-abiding American settlers continue to see themselves as good liberals.. Not only is this belief still intrinsic to the self-image of many mainstream American settlers, they have also learned the value of speaking fluent liberalese on the international stage

    I don’t believe that these settlers are less likely to quote the Bible than they are American liberal traditions. I have talked to at least two dozen American settlers in my times in Palestine, and they invariably quote the Bible. I have never heard them talk about Martin Luther King or speak liberalese. Virtually everyone of them has given me religious claptrap about which ancient Jews bought the land and who God gave the land to.

    Hirschhorn’s forthcoming book surely also blames an American ethos. It is called City on a Hilltop, in a variation on the Puritan ideal of a City on a Hill. It would seem to be a variation on Power, Faith and Fantasy, by Michael Oren, an effort to implicate U.S. ideologies in the racism and ethnic cleansing involved in colony-building. I blame a European Jewish ideology, Zionism, which of course borrowed intellectually from nationalism and colonialism, but was always a promise of tribal deliverance, and motivated people to cross an ocean and a sea and a desert.

    Hirschhorn leaves out Zionist violence entirely. She quotes Yitzhak Rabin saying that America is a “murderous swamp” that gave Israel the mass murderer Baruch Goldstein, but doesn’t mention the Nakba massacres, or the Labor-approved massacres in Gaza. She says that American Jews “at home and abroad” are now compelled to heed Rabin’s “clarion call” to “spit out” the terrorists and sympathizers in “our midst.” But the Israeli political establishment is shot through with terrorist sympathizers, and this is an Israeli Zionist problem before it is an American one.

    Assaf Sharon’s piece in the New York Review of Books also has a bad headline, thanks to the editors. The magazine’s cover headlines the piece “Jewish Terrorists!” as if this is some surprise or aberration. Who knew!

    Sharon says terrorism has “marred Zionist history” since the 1930s, and that terrorism has never been politically effective, even though its living tradition goes from Menachem Begin to Yitzhak Shamir to Netanyahu and Bennett. He believes that the terrorism did nothing for Israel. It served the emotional self-interest of the terrorists, he says, though yes, maybe it also hastened the end of the British mandate, he concedes, but that’s about it.

    His definition of terrorism leaves out a lot of violence; and Zionism has used violence often to great political effect, and considerable terror. The good Jews of his Zionist history, the Labor Jews, used it to expel Palestinians from the coastal cities in 1948, and they used the terrorist massacre at Deir Yassin to capture Jerusalem. Sharon cites Arthur Koestler; I’ve read Koestler’s Zionist books, and they treat the Jewish terrorists as an important and necessary military arm of a colonial struggle to establish the Jewish presence in a Palestinian landscape, the Galilee and Jerusalem. Sharon leaves out several effective uses of terror: the murder of Chaim Arlosoroff on the beach in 1933, which helped to end the co-existence model of Zionism, and the murder of U.N. mediator Folke Bernadotte by a gang led by a future Israeli prime minister in 1948, resulting in Jewish control of West Jerusalem, and not the internationalization Bernadotte was planning. If Begin and Shamir were so useless, why were they made prime ministers even with their terrorist past? Why was Netanyahu with his dubious record during the Rabin days? Because they are seen as heroes of a Zionist struggle to wrest land from Arabs that continues to this day.

    Sharon says that terrorists use violence to prevent diplomatic resolutions. Isn’t that just what the Jewish terrorists are doing on the West Bank today? As the Jerusalem Post writes,

    many [in the political establishment] quietly sympathize with the [murderous] attacks as helping to bring about the Jewish-dominated Greater Israel they seek.

    Sharon treats the recent Dawabshe murders in the West Bank as acts of pure viciousness. But they also have a political aim, to demonstrate to the state the impossibility of making a two state solution; and they appear to be effective in that goal. Sharon is a friend of mine; he accompanied me on a protest of settlements five years ago. It was not clear to me then or now, how he hopes to save Zionism from its colonizing racist strain.

    – See more at: http://mondoweiss.net/2015/09/publish-important-terrorism#sthash.sy7N9Ab3.dpuf

  48. KA says:
    @Fred Reed

    “Right to say whatever “has been turned into the best and surest means to squelch a debate .

    America has been perfecting the art of the defense mechanism of the displacement .
    Coulter is good at following the footsteps of the post 911 doctrine that was revealed to Wesley Clark – America is going to take the violence to Libya to Iran and Yemen to Sudan.
    But years ago ,after the brutal burning down of the symbol of national identity by the British in 1812 ,American good citizen turned its anger against … The Arabs. In 1815 it declared war on Barbary ” pirates” and defeated them with great patriotic exultation ,fanfare,and enriched the psyche with new vocabulary.

    Kowtowing to Adelshon is easy . Standing up not . Blaming the ills on Iran ,Mexican and third worlders is also cheap ,easy,and serves of the purpose of the icing on the hidden cake of the pure unmixed ignorance.

  49. Rurik says:
    @Jonathan Revusky

    Well, get on youtube and listen to the man a bit.

    1:40 to 3:00

    or watch the whole thing

    you’re very right about the paradigm

    any criticism of things like Operation Cast Lead or mentioning the Zionism (and simple evil) behind Shock and Awe and rest of the wars = you want to push little Jewish girls into ovens!!

    No one I know denigrates or otherwise criticizes Jews for being Jews. Rather it’s for what some of them do that there is criticism. As well there should be. Even more so for the cucks than for the Jews themselves. Like Farrakhan says, ‘you’re not free if you’re afraid to tell the truth’

    that’s what this whole shebang is all about

    Couture did nothing more than brush up against the simple and obvious truth

    The very truth that Mr. Derbyshire has to sugarcoat with oblique language suggesting there’s no down side to the Zionist domination of our rapidly dying civilization. He’s not free to connect the dots, like the Priss does so well, because he has his reputation to consider.

    It’s the truth that Fred Reed mentions as being a tab0o in journalism.

    So yea, it isn’t because they ‘hate our freedom’ or because of our sense of fashion or even how loud and obnoxious some Americans can be overseas. Rather it’s because of the bombs our government drops on them. It’s because of the way ZOG imposes corrupt tyrants as their leaders, like the Shah for instance, or the House of Saud, or so many others. It’s for the moral and spiritual sewage Hollywood and Madison Ave. inject into the souls of their/our children. It’s for the savagery visited upon the Palestinians and the cruel and endless humiliations they’re forced to suffer. It’s as revolting as it is sadistic.

    And for all of this no one I know or have ever heard of condemns all Jews or all Americans. But that is the way they spin it. That’s the paradigm. If you criticize Jewish manipulation of our politics and foreign policy and the way it gets so many innocents killed and countries destroyed, it can only mean you’re Adolf Hitler and want to gas all Jews. *sigh*

    I wish there were some way to turn on people’s brains and minds. Force them to think

    Perhaps in a small way that is what Ann Couture and Calypso Louis (and Ron Unz) are trying- in their own uniquely courageous ways to do.

    • Replies: @KA
    , @Jonathan Revusky
  50. There’s probably 5x as many Buddhists in the US but nobody panders to them. Nobody gives the Dalai Lama 20 + standing ovations during a speech – only Stalin could ever surpass that kind of necessary adulation.

  51. @MSimon

    Christians are not the power behind the Israel Lobby. Christians lose on every social issue they back, especially the pro-Israel kind of Christians, yet they have the power to run U.S. foreign policy and set speech codes for the nation and presidential candidates? I don’t think so.

    • Agree: Bill
  52. @Rurik

    are a direct consequence of the elephant in the living room that you don’t deplore

    Funny, looks more like a donkey to me. Or at least a sterile mule.

  53. Big Bill says:
    @Christian

    Face it the IDF make great pilots, tankers and users of high tech warfare, or harassing Palestinian children throwing rocks; but when it comes to grunts slugging it out in the mud against a determined enemy, they fail miserably.

    Same problem all Western peoples have. Trying to fight a determined populist army from 30,000 feet doesn’t work. Boots on the ground work, but only if they are followed by colonists. And the colonists must include women who are willing to breed, not abort. That is why the Jewish takeover of the West Bank has been so successful.

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
  54. KA says:
    @Rurik

    Churchill one in one of his inebriated moments let out an unspeakable truth- America does right thing after exhausting each and every other alternative .

    ( He did not apply that maxim to himself or to his country though

  55. Svigor says:

    You’re right that Israel is a western, civilized state fighting against Islam. That alone should be reason enough to classify Israel as one of the guys on our side.

    The politics of the stupid. Germany was more civilized than Russia, but we sided with Uncle Joe because (inter alia) that’s where our elite decided our national interests lay. Don’t let this contradiction explode your head, or anything.

    Israel is working hand-in-glove with diaspora Jewry (they have no better or more powerful friend), a group that works ceaselessly to undermine white solidarity and ethnic interests. Diaspora Jews are at the vanguard of every movement to pathologize and oppose whites having for themselves what Jews have for themselves in Israel. These hard facts trump any silly abstracts about western, civilized Apartheid states fighting Islam.

    • Replies: @Seamus Padraig
  56. Svigor says:

    Jewish way: nationalism for me, no nationalism for thee. Jews know that nationalism is the most powerful force of unity and resistance.

    I think religion is at least as powerful. Jews seem to know this, too, hence their perpetual war on Christianity.

    The Americans pay them and Egypt to not fight each other. Israel doesn’t need the money. Egypt does.

    We pay Egypt to cozy up to Israel. It’s effectively just more aid to Israel.

    What a moron! Even a prostitue will not try to protect her business by stooping so low intellectually . Even if the lady knew that the whole GOP brigade just offered their asses on a platter for financial evaluation by Israel.

    Actually, what she’s doing is very clever. She’s wrapping implicit white ethnopatriotism in pro-Israel packaging. I’ve been advocating this for years, and I’m glad to see someone prominent finally doing it. Bravo to Coulter, I say.

    It’s not her fault you are anti-Israel and don’t care about white interests. I don’t hold your anti-Israel position against you, mind; it just happens that my anti-Israel position is motivated mostly by my pro-white position.

    • Replies: @KA
  57. War for Blair Mountain [AKA "Great Battle for Blair Mountain"] says:

    Abe Foxman=The attack on the USS Liberty!!!!!!!

    Abe Foxman…not our kind!!!!…Neither is Victoria Nuland…don’t forget Elliot Abrams also….all three->wrapped them in the Israeli Nazi Type……

  58. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    I think the constant references to Israel were not pandering to the small,percentage of Jews but rather the to evangelical base of the party.

    • Replies: @Mr. Anon
  59. Realist says:
    @Great Battle for Blair Mountain

    “Wounded Warrior Project Commercials=Limbless brain damaged Native Born White Christian American Teenagers Walter Reed Army Hospital basket case canon fodder for Jewish Nazis…”

    With this I agree.

  60. Wally says: • Website

    “What’s the answer to Ann’s question? The answer is of course that Ashkenazi Jews punch way above their demographic weight in media and intellectual circles, and in big-money political donations, because their high average intelligence brings them success in the relevant fields.”

    They ‘punch above their weight’ because they engage in blatant hiring discrimination. This has little to do with IQ. In fact when real Germans, real Scandinavians are separated out from their much lower IQ ‘immigrants’ they have higher IQs than Ashkenazi-Kazars. The ‘we are smarter than everyone else’ is part of the scam to justify their clear racist discrimination.

    Also note their own confessions. ‘Coulter’s career is finished’ is proof of their methods.

    • Replies: @Rurik
    , @Realist
  61. KA says:
    @Svigor

    You are right the way that man in Trump’s debate was right when he asking about the Moslem cell in US .It is not his idea.Someone must have inserted it in his soft brain pulverized by Syndicate Columnists over the years . He is the new Joe the Plumber . Coulter is the latest in line to be the interlocutor of that class .
    If she were so clever ,why the heck she is parroting same trolls that Obama has given a nuke to Iran. Isn’t it the same gambit that promotes the demands for more money and more love and more fealty to Israel?
    Isn’t the one of those types of agreements that will go a long way in promoting American business ?

    Without central American war and without the devastating effects of NAFTA ,there would have been no invasion by the Latinos.
    Without current destabilization from Afghnaistan to Libya over a period of 30 years ,there would have been no invasion of Europe .
    If tomorrow America gets bombarded by China , you also would be fleeing to somewhere .

    So next time before the obligatory adulation , speak the the truth to her . Ask her to shut up until we hear from her that she is opposing invasion and opposing war . You can give her a starting point to embark on that personally unfruitful journey – she can start by supporting full throttle the Iran deal. She can mask the pure “white motive “by saying it is good for Israel.

  62. Mr. Anon says:
    @Svigor

    “” [email protected] One more thing to thank the Jewish people for – your career is over.””

    “Jewish Power and Privilege. Jews can say this kind of hand-rubbing, mustache-twirling, movie villain type stuff in earnest and in real life and get away with it.”

    Exactly. What they say always boils down to this: Jews do not have disproportionate power in the media. And if you say that we do, we will crush you.

    • Replies: @Hail
  63. Mr. Anon says:
    @Anonymous

    “I think the constant references to Israel were not pandering to the small,percentage of Jews but rather the to evangelical base of the party.”

    And you don’t think the opinions of Sheldon Adelson, Paul Singer, and all the other well heeled jewish donors had anything to do with it? Nothing at all?

    And anyway, where did that slavering love of Israel come from? The GOP didn’t used to be that way. Since the late 70s, evangelicals have tended to vote Republican (though, not exclusively). And also, since the 70s, evangelicals have increasingly adopted those end-times beliefs that center on Isarel. As Steve Sailer has pointed out, the views that Hal Lindsey made popular were a kind of freaky new-age mythology for Christians. Why don’t those holy-rollers just go back to believing that the second coming will happen sometime, but not necessarily soon?

    • Replies: @Realist
  64. War for Blair Mountain [AKA "Great Battle for Blair Mountain"] says:
    @Realist

    What I wrote should be a new meme spread virally across the internet….it can be done….it only takes a minimum of three links for every Native Born White American Patriot.

    • Replies: @Realist
  65. Stogumber says:

    One of the traditional Jewish slurs against Germans is an application of Freudianism: German don’t use “fuck…” as an expletive, but use “shit” and similar words instead – which in Freudian perspective proves that Germans are retarded and psychologically abnormal (stuck up in the “anal” phase, didn’t reach the adult, “genital” phase).
    So shouldn’t the expletive “fucking” have a positive appeal for Jews?

    • Replies: @Realist
  66. Mr. Anon says:
    @KA

    “Churchill one in one of his inebriated moments let out an unspeakable truth- America does right thing after exhausting each and every other alternative.”

    Whatever Winston Churchill said about America is now irrelevant. I’m pretty sure that Churchill never contemplated an America where popular culture consisted of Miley Cyrus twerking or Eli Roth’s and James Wan’s torture-porn, or where Network TV anchor Brian Williams beams with pride about his daughter engaging in sodomy on national television, or where security guards at military bases have visible arm tattoos of voodoo skulls wearing top-hats, or where the secretary of the army is a poofter.

    Statements by 19th and 20th century notables about the national character of this country are no longer important. That country doesn’t exist anymore. That America is dead and gone. It is already ancient history.

    • Replies: @Ace
  67. @Rurik

    As regards Farrakhan, part of the reason that Farrakhan is so demonised by the Zionist controlled media is that he refused to be their puppet. There were meetings he had with Jewish leaders, in fact, and if he had given them some amount of control over what he could say or not (in particular, as regards criticising Jewish power) they likely would have even promoted him. But he didn’t agree to their terms, so now he is basically persona non grata in the U.S. mainstream media.

    In this clip, Farrakhan describes one of his meetings with Jewish leaders.

    And, of course, Farrakhan also tells the truth about another taboo topic:

    Aside from what he says, the other thing is that the Nation of Islam is, as far as I can tell, the only religious organisation with a real record of lifting up poor black males caught in the revolving door prison system. Individuals who really seemed to be totally dead end, without hope of any redemption, they become members of NOI and really clean up their act, and become responsible, clean living citizens. I think all of that is worthy of respect.

    As for Farrakhan’s alleged “racism”, I think that’s mostly baloney. Actually, I think Farrakhan is an advocate for poor, downtrodden people generally, but he is still primarily focused on his own people. And really, what’s wrong with that?

    Regardless, the man is demonised for telling the truth. As one can see from what he recounts in the first video, they don’t like a black leader that they don’t control.

    • Replies: @Rurik
  68. Mr. Anon says:
    @Sherman

    And you’re just a felator of the powerful. And that make you feel……manly, somehow?

  69. @KA

    Churchill one in one of his inebriated moments let out an unspeakable truth- America does right thing after exhausting each and every other alternative .

    The “right thing” that Churchill was referring to was getting into a European war to save England’s hide. That was the “right thing” from Churchill’s point of view. It seems clear to me that America, in terms of her own self interest, never had any reason to get into the first world war certainly. And, in fact, if the U.S. had stayed out of that, there likely would not have even been a second world war.

  70. @Priss Factor

    For instance, would it be an ‘anti-Italian canard’ to say that Italian-Americans are more likely to be associated with organized crime than, say, Swedish-Americans or French-Americans?
    . . .
    Of course not. Those are all true. Now, no stereotype or general observation is entirely true for every individual. After all, most Italian-Americans were not gangsters. But it is true enough that the Italian-American community was more prone to supporting that kind of criminal culture than, say, a Norwegian-American community. GOODFELLAS is an honest film; it is not a canard against Italian-Americans.

    You forgot one “canard” the “truth” of which your comment gives irrefutable evidence:

    Most Americans are stuck on stupid and gets their truthiness and history from Hollywood (which is run by Jews).


    Interesting that canards were not ascribed to German-Americans — at 58 million the largest ethnic-origin cohort in USA ; nor to Irish-Americans or Russian-Americans.
    German-Americans have made and continue to make some of the most beneficial contributions to American culture. But if PF’s criteria were consulted, that is, if the understanding of German-Americans were based on Hollywood, German-Americans would be perceived as murderous, militaristic worthy-to-be-eternally-hated Huns.

    Irish-Americans don’t even have cuisine to contribute to the American stew, and did you ever notice how many US military leaders and hung-ho NSA apparatchiks and warmongers have Irish surnames?

    If organized crime is the canard-du-jour, probably hard to beat Russian crime gangs.

    These three examples reinforce the canard that it is a stupid American trait to characterize ethnic groups based on their Hollywoodization, a process dominated by Jews, rather than on sound historical scholarship — which itself is increasingly biased if not, indeed, censored out of universities as well as popular history publishing by the chilling effect imposed by Jews.

    One more thing — Reed is apparently still suffering the lingering after-effects of years of felting the donkey.
    Consider:

    The answer is of course that Ashkenazi Jews punch way above their demographic weight in media and intellectual circles, and in big-money political donations, because their high average intelligence brings them success in the relevant fields.

    More bullpucky dressed up as critical analysis.

    To the extent that Jews dominate in media and intellectual circles, it has more to do with Jewish networking going back to FDR’s administration that arranged for the more intelligent German Jews to gain hugely disproportionate advantage and migrate to the USA, where they similarly used networking, whining, and blackmail to displace Americans in numerous universities and other endeavors. 200,000 Jews were privileged to break immigration quotas to USA in the 1930s and 1940s, and were given generous US taxpayer subsidies as well as preferential treatment in employment.
    Does GOODFELLAS report on the number of Italians who were admitted to USA and given government subsidies and jobs?

    Furthermore, as Michael Ledeen revealed in his interpretation of Machiavelli, “Jews killed Jews.”

    In February 1933, a time when Stalin was killing Slavs and Ukrainians by the millions, Rabbi Stephen Wise recorded that “Louis Brandeis directed that all Jews leave Germany. . . .All 587,000 Jews must leave Germany.”

    The zionist project in Israel was planned by an award-winning eugenicist who considered German Jews the cream of the crop — the wealthiest and most educated, while Slavic Jews were considered to be lesser “human material” in the creation of the “new Jew” who would populate Israel.

    No doubt it’s just a coincidence that relatively few German Jews died in WWII but that the vast number of Jews who died were of Polish and Slavic origin.

    Jews culled the herd, sending the best to USA (see above) and Palestine, and assigned Eichmann the task of tending to the lesser Jews and whatever fate might befall them.

    The children of the “survivors” of those preferentially migrated Jews compose the “high Ashkenazi intelligence” cohort that Reed cites. Of course they boast higher achievement; they started out half-way up the ladder.

    • Replies: @Realist
  71. @D. K.

    It doesn’t really matter whether Jewish ethnics comprise 1, 2, or 3 percent of the population — at least not in terms of properly framing the discussion.

    Even if, for the sake of argument, it’s only 1 percent, and there are thus only 3 million Jews, the vast majority of those 3 million people have basically nothing to do with the overall Judaeo-Zionist power structure.

    The pandering that is done to that tiny minority is mind-boggling– until one realizes that other White countries, with much tinier Jewish minorities, pander as much or more to their resident Jews than do we.

    That is quite correct. And again, most of the ordinary Jews in those various countries have nothing to do with the Zionist power structure.

    The politicians pandering to the “Jews” are not pandering to the overall Jewish population — whether that is 1, 2, or 3 percent. They are pandering to a certain power configuration that is more like 0.01% of the population.

  72. pyrrhus says:
    @Kyle McKenna

    If Ann had mentioned the wealth issue, and the fact that 50% of national campaign contributions come from jewish interests, the shrieking would have been much more intense, and her career really might have been over….

  73. Realist says:
    @War for Blair Mountain

    I thought you were mad at me and hide my comments.

  74. Rurik says:
    @Wally

    They ‘punch above their weight’ because they engage in blatant hiring discrimination. This has little to do with IQ.

    They also have their own counterfeiting machine; The Federal Reserve Bank, that can use to >>poof<< create Federal Reserve Notes and then loan out trillion\$ to other Jewish banksters that they can use to consolidate even more money/power.

    This has been Ron Paul's main thrust at why our system is so hopelessly corrupt and why he tried to audit / END the Fed.

    if you have the power, unaccountable to the highest levels of our federal government,

    to loan out trillions of dollars to your insider buddies who then loan it out to other bankster buddies, you have the economic power to buy and dominate and control everything. And that’s what we see happening today. It’s isn’t their esoteric minds or their genius, it’s their blank check to swindle our wealth and impoverish us all as they corrupt our politics to work for them and against the rest of us.

    Loaned out money that they create out of thin air but then the rest of us have to pay back plus interest. It’s an amazing scam and capable of enriching this tribe to the heights we see today. Heights so stratospheric they can own the scotus and put their agents there. Heights so high that when one of their own is the comptroller of the Pentagon, a few trillion can go missing and no one seems to care.

    When you have that kind of funding/power, you don’t need an IQ

    • Agree: Marian
    • Replies: @Realist
    , @Sam Shama
    , @Blobby5
  75. @Svigor

    These hard facts trump any silly abstracts about western, civilized Apartheid states fighting Islam.

    Yes. To my mind, it makes far more sense to defend Western civilization in the West, rather than in the Middle East.

  76. Priss Factor [AKA "The Priss Factory"] says: • Website
    @Sherman

    “Frustrating, isn’t it?”

    Sho is. We all be Palestinians.

  77. Realist says:
    @Wally

    I agree there are many white people with very high IQ’s particularly with ancestors from northwestern Europe. But in a democracy idiots can vote and they way out number the intelligent whites. You can see the results throughout the European democracies such as Britain, France, Germany and the Scandinavian countries.

  78. Priss Factor [AKA "The Priss Factory"] says: • Website

    http://barelyablog.com/israel-all-the-time-crowd-should-lay-off-ann-coulter/

    We know Coulter is still a whore of Zion. She just blew her top because the fellow-whoring of GOP candidates was too much. Even a whore can be outraged by super-whorishness of other whores. (I think she was subconsciously ashamed cuz it wasn’t long ago when she used to sound like these fellow whores. She’s now a whore who is aware of her whore-role whereas the cuck candidates think they are genuine lovers of Israel when they are mere whores.)

    What happened with Coulter was the dick-bite syndrome. It’s not that she finally refused to suck the Cock of Zion—let alone bobbitt it off—but that in frustration, she slightly sank her teeth into the dick that’s still in her mouth and made the Jew jump a bit.

    Jews are so used to having their Cock of Zion sucked so smoothly by cucks that any deviance from the philo-blow drives them crazy…. like with Nicholson in CARNAL KNOWLEDGE.

    • Replies: @Rifleman
  79. Realist says:
    @Mr. Anon

    “And anyway, where did that slavering love of Israel come from? The GOP didn’t used to be that way.”

    It started in earnest after the Supreme Court ruled that money was ‘free speech’. And a few Jews have a lot of money and are not adverse to buying politicians and politicians are not above being bought. It’s known as John/whore.

    • Replies: @Astuteobservor II
  80. Realist says:
    @Stogumber

    “So shouldn’t the expletive “fucking” have a positive appeal for Jews?”

    It does, as long as it up a white person’s ass…..back to shit.

  81. Realist says:
    @SolontoCroesus

    “Most Americans are stuck on stupid and gets their truthiness and history from Hollywood (which is run by Jews).”

    Oooh, yes indeed.

  82. Priss Factor [AKA "The Priss Factory"] says: • Website

    Prostitution is useful metaphor for American politics.

    You know, it’s like a hooker cannot just leave the lifestyle. If she tries to run, the pimp will catch her and punish her real good.
    The only option for the hooker is change pimps, which is accepted by the Law of the Pimp.
    In US politics, a whore of Zion can leave the J-Street pimp only by seeking the protection of the Neocon pimp, or vice versa. Once you enter the life of a whore, you are stuck as a whore. If you stop whoring for Zion, you get Sobranned or Sobranded. You must continue as a whore, either for J-steet pimp or neocon pimp. There is only abuse and pain otherwise.

    Coulter is a neocon whore. But when she sees other whores going beyond what is even necessary, she’s bewailing “must we be whore ourselves out more than we need to?”
    It’s one thing to be a whore cuz you must, but another thing to have a whore-race-to-the-top.

  83. Realist says:
    @Rurik

    “They also have their own counterfeiting machine; The Federal Reserve Bank, that can use to >>poof<< create Federal Reserve Notes and then loan out trillion\$ to other Jewish banksters that they can use to consolidate even more money/power."
    Yes, and the dumb ass whites that walk among us allow it through votes.

    • Replies: @JSM
    , @Jonathan Revusky
  84. @J1234

    “I do recognize, however, that the media has made it a line that can’t be crossed.”

    “The media?”

    And who compelled “the media” to establish that taboo?

  85. JSM says:
    @MSimon

    The Americans pay them and Egypt to not fight each other. Israel doesn’t need the money. Egypt does.

    Ok, so let’s stop sending money to Israel. Then Israel will kill all the Muslims — solve two problems with one fell swoop! BOOYAH!

    • Replies: @SolontoCroesus
    , @anonymus
  86. @MSimon

    HLM is going a bit early with the US having problems with Islamic terrorism. The US didn’t have an issue with Islamic terrorism until Reagan started playing with Libya in 1981. So we had 166 years from the last attack on Muslim forces in 1815. 166 years without any problems is a pretty good record.

    • Replies: @Jonathan Revusky
  87. Buzz Mohawk says: • Website

    This is the problem with limiting expression to 140 characters, as required by Twitter.

    We understand what Ann meant, but a lot of duller minds just didn’t get it. They need things carefully explained to them. They should read what Derb just wrote.

    The same thing happens to candidate Trump, by the way. His mind is quick, so he often speaks in ellipses.

    • Replies: @SolontoCroesus
  88. @MSimon

    The US should stop all payments to both Israel and Egypt. Let Israel sleep in the bed it has made.

    Republican politicians pander to Sheldon Adelson, not American Christians.

    • Replies: @Priss Factor
  89. JSM says:
    @Realist

    Yes, and the dumb ass whites that walk among us allow it through votes.

    Those dumb-ass whites are dumb because nobody explained it to them.

    Keynes himself said: “Lenin was certainly right. There is no subtler, no surer means of overturning the existing basis of society than to debauch the currency. The process engages all the hidden forces of economic law on the side of destruction, and does it in a manner which not one man in a million is able to diagnose.”

    I explain it to my “dumb-ass” White fellows thusly: If we play Monopoly and *I* get to go make myself more Monopoly money when I run out, but *you* don’t, would you wonder why you lost?

    If only I had known when my first baby was born. I *thought,* having been taught, that when you agree to pay, you do so, you don’t default on your loans, because otherwise it’s theft from your neighbors who worked and deposited that money you’re borrowing.
    So, I put my precious baby in daycare and went back to work, to pay my home loan. If I had *known* that the banker had created the money he “lent” me out of thin air, I’d have told him to take my house and stuff it up his…
    Every day of her infancy, I cried myself to work (at least on the days when I wasn’t struggling to *stay awake* while driving, due to sleep deprivation.)

    • Replies: @Realist
  90. Priss Factor [AKA "The Priss Factory"] says: • Website

    This Coulter War or Coulter Shock…

    it’s when the ‘canard’ in the coalmine turns into a canary.

  91. Marian says:

    Those few minutes dedicated to an Israeli lovefest at the debates was just pandering to the rapture Christians. Coulter knows this like most of us commenting here. It was some sort of tactical move on her part. Perhaps she is setting up her next book. Or maybe she is just getting ahead of the coming economic collapse brought to you by those high IQ Ashkenazi Jews. My personal guess is she suspects they are engineering the collapse of European whites via guilt and multiculturalism. In the end I don’t really know, but internet will prolong her career for a bit. You know with high IQ types like they Ashkenazis, who needs apocalyptic weapons and wars?

  92. Rurik says:
    @Jonathan Revusky

    thanks for the videos JR,

    I wish all Americans had an advocate with as much integrity and charisma and gravitas. Blacks and the NOI are lucky to have such a man. And not just because he seems to be incorruptible, but because his message is always one I considered righteous for the blacks. Even if I did and do have some issues with his sometimes blanket criticism of whites.

    He tells young black men to get off their arses and stop begging whitey to feed and take care of them. He tells them to act like men and have spiritual faith and pride and be a husband to their wives and a father to their children. He tells them to be roll models for their sons to emulate. He tells them the black woman’s honor is a sacred temple of respect and the motherhood and womb and future of their people. Basically the opposite of what Hollywood and pop culture them; that they should “celebrate” ‘thug life’ and Hip Hop culture and denigrate their women as bitches n’ hoes. To snivel and cringe around the edges of society and blame whitey for it all and waste their lives away hating people who have tried and spent trillions trying to raise up the black race. But you can’t raise up a demographic who don’t want to be raised up. Farrakhan’s message has the effect on the black men I see following him to put on a suit and tie and carry themselves with an upright dignity. They don’t seem so full of hatred and despair and anger like so many street blacks with their asses hanging out of their slung-low britches with murder in their eyes. The kind of attitude that Hollywood and the media tweaks and encourages relentlessly with their one-sided race-hate media hysteria they use to pit blacks against whites. Telling blacks that whitey is the cause of all their troubles and making them lose sight of the wonder and beauty of life wasting it all away in blind race-hate.

    Farrakhan tells blacks they don’t need whites. He tells them they don’t need to sit next to a white kid in class in order to be able to learn. He tells them they don’t need to assimilate into whitey’s neighborhoods and do all they can to be white and act white and live white. He tells them to live black and Muslim and be proud of it. He wants for blacks to have their own land and their own culture and their own Gods and their own families. Blacks don’t need to mingle and blend with whites to be free. Blending away with whites is genocide to the black gene just as it is with the white ones.

    So his anti-white stuff aside, I wish there were more men like Farrakhan out there.

    • Replies: @Ace
  93. Rifleman says:
    @Priss Factor

    What happened with Coulter was the dick-bite syndrome. It’s not that she finally refused to suck the Cock of Zion—let alone bobbitt it off—but that in frustration, she slightly sank her teeth into the dick that’s still in her mouth and made the Jew jump a bit.

    Jews are so used to having their Cock of Zion sucked

    More evidence from you Prissy that you are a raging closeted homosexual. Andrea, stop hating and blaming the Jews for you homosexuality.

    Your non stop stalking of Jews online and blaming them for homosexuality in the West is nothing but your own sickness projected onto them.

    Ironic considering it was the Jews who introduced the condemnation of homosexuality in the West through Judeo-Christian culture.

    Greeks, Romans, Germanics ALL indigenous European boy lovers just like the Pashtuns in Afghanistan.

    Maybe that’s the other reason for your obsessive Jew hatred….they taught you as a homosexual to hate yourself.

    • Replies: @5371
    , @Priss Factor
    , @Mr. Anon
  94. @Chris Mallory

    The US didn’t have an issue with Islamic terrorism until Reagan started playing with Libya in 1981.

    The U.S. does not and never has had an “Islamic terrorism problem”. 9/11 and the other lesser “Islamic” terrorist attacks have all been false flags.

    In fact, “Islamic Terrorism” is a hoax.

  95. @Realist

    Yes, and the dumb ass whites that walk among us allow it through votes.

    Not really. The dumb ass whites may well be dumbasses, but they did not allow this by their voting. They have never been given a chance to vote for this one way or the other. Irrespective of which grinning idiot they vote for when given the chance every four years, it will not change who controls the Fed.

    • Replies: @Rurik
    , @Realist
  96. @Buzz Mohawk

    . . .Trump, by the way. His mind is quick, so he often speaks in ellipses.

    Trump also reads in ellipses. Or maybe invisible writing. (remember that old trick with onion juice?)

    For example, on Sept. 9, 2015 Ayatollah Khamenei tweeted

    Khamenei.ir @khamenei_ir
    After negotiations, in Zionist regime they said they had no more concern about Iran for next 25 years; I’d say:
    3:56 AM – 9 Sep 2015

    A few hours later Trump, followed by “speaker after speaker” blared to Tea Party rabble arrayed in Washington DC that

    “The Ayatollah said in a tweet that Israel will be gone in 25 years.” http://www.amny.com/news/donald-trump-hillary-clinton-set-dueling-speeches-on-iran-deal-1.10825102

    I hereby promise to give \$1 million of Trump’s dollars to the person who can find “Israel will be gone in 25 years” in the Ayatollah’s tweet.

    • Replies: @Rurik
  97. @JSM

    US congresscreeps were reminded a few times that while they were contemplating cutting funding to Planned Parenthood, Israel, to whom Congress will pledge an additional billions, provides Israeli state support for abortions.

    The Congress voted to defund Planned Parenthood because it uses US taxpayer dollars to fund abortions.

    Will it vote to defund Israel because it uses US taxpayer dollars (which are fungible) to fund abortions?

  98. Priss Factor [AKA "The Priss Factory"] says: • Website

    Get a load of this:

    http://www.bizpacreview.com/2015/09/19/vatican-officials-us-catholic-leaders-outraged-at-obamas-guest-list-for-the-pope-254050

    Jewish slimy-ness extends everywhere.

    Obama is a Jewish puppet and homos are Jewish proxy for replacing natural/normal values of gentile communities with worship of homos. (All this about Obama throwing Jews under the bus with the Iran Deal is utter BS. The Iran Deal was cooked up by J-street Jews and it has the support of the power elite in Israel despite Bibi’s huff-and-puff antics.)

    Personally, I’m not opposed to freedom for homos to indulge in their deviant fecal-penetrative behavior.
    The problem is Jews are not content to promote freedom/liberty for homos. Jews promote homo-theism as the new religion. Jews want straight gentiles to look up to the minority homos as saintly, angelic, and godly.
    After all, if homo agenda is ‘secular’, why do Jews and their boy Obama target the Church(esp Christian church) to become the holy home of homos? Why not just go for separation of church and state, i.e. let homos be free in the secular world and let the Church preach the old time Gospel?
    Instead, Jews seek to homo-ize the Church to the point where Christianity becomes synonymous with homo-worship. In other words, Jews want Christians to believe the Jesus and Disciples lived to serve the homos and that Christians’ worshiping homos is what Christianity is all about. The cuckeral Jimmy Carter even says Jesus would have been for ‘gay marriage’. And of course, millennial dummies who blabber like robots(without an ounce of reflection or rationality)were raised from cradle to worship homos. Just look at their glazed eyes as they pontificate about homos decadence as the New Normal decency.

    This homo agenda is a globo quasi-religious crusade by Jews to destroy gentile/straight cultures. Jews use homo minorities in every nation to undermine nationalism and soften it up for globalist backdoor penetration led by Zio-supremacists.

    If Obama were to host a famous homo person at the White House, would he invite Christian leaders who are opposed to the homo agenda?? Of course not.
    But when he invites the Pope, he also invites homo subversives who entered the church only to cross-dress it to serve the Jewish globalist agenda and their own vanity. Jews are supremacist and homos are narcissist, and they work together to make the world not only tolerate them, not only to obey them, but to worship them.

    We need to talk about this ‘fuc*ing Jews’ and ‘butt-fuc*ing homos’.

    When the so-called new secular culture is about mindless worship and obedience to Jews and homos, it’s a sick world indeed.

    Homo-agenda is not about freedom or liberty for homos. It is about making us worship the vain narcissistic homos who serve the globo-supremacist Jews.

  99. AndrewR says:
    @Priss Factor

    I realize this is tangential to the point you’re trying to make but I don’t think the Chinese vs Japanese is a good analogy. Japan is unquestionably a nicer place to live than China, so it’s not surprising that more Chinese want to emigrate and are willing to resort to dishonest means to do so. A fair comparison would compare today’s China to Japan at a comparable state of development, although this may be impossible because I’m not sure Japan was ever as polluted as China and I’m sure it was never as corrupt.

  100. American Jews as a group are ethnocentric enough to clinch support for Israel although it is against America’s geopolitical interests, and wars for Israel, ditto.
    They are also ethnocentric enough to promote a fairly liberal stand on Muslim immigration.
    To a believer in awesome Jewish power to play both ends against the Host’s middle this is a prime exhibit.
    On closer examination however it reveals more the phenomenon of Jews latching onto a weak Host and playing a key role exacerbating the weakness until collapse. A strong Host of Tradition can opt to get and at times actually get the best out of Jews while discouraging the corrosive element.
    That would not be the American host.

  101. Priss Factor [AKA "The Priss Factory"] says: • Website

    A people who are unable/unwilling to defend their homeland from masses of migrants are also unlikely to have the will to defend their identity and interests from hostile invasive alien elites, and vice versa. Jews, of course, know this.

    There is a tendency among white rightists to see the elite invasion and mass invasion as two separate issues, but they are actually interlocking issues because the one aids and abets the other.

    One who is defenseless of mind will become defenseless of body, one who is defenseless of body will become defenseless of mind. Jews understand this, which is why they combine their invasion from above with the invasion from below by masses of non-white migrants/immigrants.

    But too many white conservatives seek an alliance with Jews(on the hope that Jews will finally see themselves primarily as white than as Jewish, members of a minority elite). They live with the hope that elite Jewish power will lead and defend white identity and interests. But Jews gained power by invading, raiding, and taking over the master nest of western power. So, why would they defend white identity and interests? Jews want to break the eggs of white power forever. So, they naturally ally with the massive invasion of the West by non-white migrants.

    Suppose you’re defending a castle full of white folks. Suppose Jewish warlords wanna take over the castle with their amassed troops of non-white hordes. Suppose Jewish warlords sneak into your castle and pretend to be merchants who mean no harm. Suppose you allow the Jewish arrivals to make a shitload of money and gain elite power within the castle.
    But then, suppose these new Jew lords order your men to open the gates to the hordes.

    Now, would it make any sense to plead with the Jewish overlords to protect your people? It would be ridiculous! Jews, as the new elites, have taken over, and in order to ensure their elite rule forever, they must break white identity and interests since such may turn against the Jews. So, Jews welcome the hordes of non-whites to storm the castle.

    The only way for whites to survive is to push against both the non-white horde masses and against the invasive Jewish elites. One is not possible without the other. Indeed, the main priority should be taking on Jewish elite power since it directs all the policies and ‘values'(loaded with taboos) of the West.

    The reason why the West is being invaded of body is because it’s already been invaded of mind.
    Unless the Jewish virus is removed from the white mind, whites will just go on pathetically pleading for protection and support from the very elites who are most committed to the destruction of whites.

    And once Jews finish with US and EU, they will target Russia, then Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, and Vietnam(which is turning into a colony of the Jomo-ruled US).

    It’s like fighting malaria. It makes no sense to just fight the fever of the body without combating the malarial germs that are causing the fever and ruining body’s immunity to other germs.
    It would be stupid to welcome the malarial pathogens while decrying the fever of the body. But that is what whites are doing. They praise and serve the Jewish malarial germs while bitching about the diseased fever of the white body.

  102. 5371 says:
    @Rifleman

    [Germanics ALL indigenous European boy lovers]

    Not according to Tacitus. He says they drowned their faggots in swamps.

    • Replies: @HA
  103. anon • Disclaimer says:

    Yes. To my mind, it makes far more sense to defend Western civilization in the West, rather than in the Middle East.

    I agree that the defense of the West should start in the West – which means cleaning out the banking mafia, media, anti-white lobbyists, halting immigration etc but after that we’ll still have a problem.

    The gap between a fixed Europe and the Arab world will never be closed enough for them to want to stay in their own countries so if Europe manages to survive the current existential threat – which is currently doubtful – then there will need to be some kind of forward policy to reduce the threat in the future.

    Just a reminder – maximum reach of Islamic conquest

    HLM is going a bit early with the US having problems with Islamic terrorism. The US didn’t have an issue with Islamic terrorism until Reagan started playing with Libya in 1981. So we had 166 years from the last attack on Muslim forces in 1815. 166 years without any problems is a pretty good record.

    They were colonized during that time period and that created the lull. As soon as the colonial era ended it started again. I’d call that a hint.

    • Replies: @Bill Jones
    , @Mr. Anon
  104. Priss Factor [AKA "The Priss Factory"] says: • Website
    @Rifleman

    “Ironic considering it was the Jews who introduced the condemnation of homosexuality in the West through Judeo-Christian culture.”

    Look, ancient Jews went too far with their anti-homo stuff. I don’t condone stoning of homos. I think homos were born that way and should be tolerated. And homos have certain skills and gifts that were essential to the rise of civilization. But then, homosexuality in and of itself is pretty ewww and weird.

    So, we can have tolerance of homos and a moral society governed by real values.

    And this balance was reached in the West around the 70s.

    But then the supremacism of Jews and narcissism of homos got together, and they decided to make everyone else worship and obey them. That is the problem. If such self-centered-ism is inherent to Jewish and homo personalities, we have a big problem. If it isn’t and if Jews and homos can be sensible minorities than supremacist ones, then there can be some kind of peace.

    As of now, such prospect seems bleak. I mean when Jews wanna destroy Russia cuz it won’t bend over to homos-as-proxies-of-Jews, the world is crazy.

    As for Christian Conservatives in the US, they must be feeling very confused. They are now led to support Jewish homosexuals as the face of New Conservatism at war with Russia that now stands for genuine conservative values like nationalism, European identity, heritage, and etc.

    It’s like a weasel at war with muskrats fooling other muskrats that it is on their side.
    White cons and Russian nationalists have so much in common, but white cons are being misled by talk radio into believing that subversive Jews/homos(like James Kirchick and Jennifer Rubin and Victoria Nuland even Pussy Riot) are their allies against Russia that stands for national identity and heritage.

    • Replies: @Kilo 4/11
  105. Rurik says:
    @Jonathan Revusky

    They have never been given a chance to vote for this one way or the other. Irrespective of which grinning idiot they vote for when given the chance every four years, it will not change who controls the Fed.

    well they did have a chance for vote for Ron Paul in 2012, at least in the GOP primaries

    and I did see a lot of idiocy and flagrant venality

    otherwise intelligent women I know said they preferred Romney’s looks

    men I know (Republicans) were concerned about his ‘foreign policy’

    liberals I know who loved his policy on drugs were scared he might end the freebies to all ‘the people’ and slow down the gay rights train and other things they liked being foisted on America. Affirmative Action and all the federal programs.

    I remember being at a Ron Paul rally and waving a sign and a woman drove up and was enraged at us. Shouting at us and red-faced. I figured she must have been a Dept. of Education or Energy type who Paul had said would have to get a real job.

    Many Americans knew in their heart of hearts that our trajectory was/is unsustainable, but they didn’t want to sacrifice anything personally for the benefit of the country as a whole. They were too worried about some loss to their bottom line if Paul won. Like the recent Scotland vote where the old pensioners were willing to keep the chains on the next generation if it meant the slop continued to flow in the trough. The proud American spirit of individuality had/has atrophied and been systematically rotted away by generations of an entitlement mentality at every level.
    I don’t see it so much as dumb as rather venal and cowardly, and some sheep-like gullibility. The Republicans tuned into Bill O’reilly and Shawn Hannity to get their dosage of neocon venom and daily lies. Which they ate up with gusto.

  106. anon • Disclaimer says:

    Greeks, Romans, Germanics ALL indigenous European boy lovers just like the Pashtuns in Afghanistan.

    No evidence for Germanics that I know of. The boy thing is probably related to female infanticide creating a gender imbalance which is probably connected to particular farming conditions and marriage cultures.

    (Germanics practiced infanticide of defective children but not females specifically – which possibly explains a lot.)

    • Replies: @Lot
  107. Rurik says:
    @SolontoCroesus

    “The Ayatollah said in a tweet that Israel will be gone in 25 years.”

    and let’s not forget how far the apple can fall from the tree

    because it was the vile any cravenly dishonest “anti-war” candidate Rand Paul who told the bald-face lie about Iran’s nuclear ambitions

    Sen. Paul cited what he said were the Ayatollah Khamenei’s words:

    “The Americans say they stopped Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon. They know it’s not true.”

    Claiming that this contradicts the administration’s contention that the deal “would prevent [the Iranians] from getting a nuclear weapon,” Paul averred that “the Ayatollah is saying the opposite.”

    But what did Khamenei really say? Here’s the entire quote:

    “The Americans say they stopped Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon. They know it’s not true. We had a fatwa, declaring nuclear weapons to be religiously forbidden. It had nothing to do with the nuclear talks.”

    This was no mistake on Rand Paul’s part. It was a lie, and he repeated the lie to Fox News in an interview with Lou Dobbs:

    http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2015/07/28/rand-paul-fraud-failure-liar/

  108. Sam Shama says:
    @Priss Factor

    You are like a dog. You attack and bite when told to do so. You roll over and do nothing when told to do so. Jews are the masters of western goyim. You are emotionally and intellectually bound to the Jewish master.

    Priss,
    Roll over! roll over! good doggie, this is what you get for dinner (its kosher for canines):

    http://www.wholepetcentral.com/store/product/3005/Taste-of-the-Wild-Pacific-Stream-Canine-Formula-30lb/?gclid=Cj0KEQjwj_SvBRC7k4DfkLHiuMABEiQAvPOaqeWTyPgA3hIxu720IwcRTx9JWZkoA-F1z2Y6gGpdMa8aAibI8P8HAQ

    are you wagging that tail?

    • Replies: @Sam Shama
  109. Mr. Anon says:
    @Rifleman

    “Ironic considering it was the Jews who introduced the condemnation of homosexuality in the West through Judeo-Christian culture.”

    Really? Jews introduced Judeo-Christian culture? Tell us again how Jews have promoted Christian ideals. You probably figure that Europe in the middle-ages was referred to as “Judeo-Christendom” or that Queen Victoria’s favorite hymn was “Onward Judeo-Christian Soldiers”. You are clearly pretty ignorant of history, so I don’t see any particular reason to give the slightest damn what you think. The Romans disdained homosexuality prior to the onset of their decadence, which by the way coincided with the importation of foreign, near-eastern religions and cultural customs.

    Once again we see the spectacle of someone who goes by the handle “Rifleman” (How’s it going there, Chuck Connors?) accuse others of projection and over-compensation. Before criticizing others you should stop to consider how ridiculous you come off.

    • Replies: @Rifleman
    , @anonymus
  110. Sam Shama says:
    @Chuck

    No he is not. Measured understatedness and poise are the descriptives you are searching for, two qualities sorely lacking on this side of the pond; more’s the pity.

  111. The great Robert Parry asks the essential question

    Are Neocons an Existential Threat?

    https://consortiumnews.com/2015/09/15/are-neocons-an-existential-threat/

  112. Sam Shama says:
    @KA

    Let’s be honest shall we?

    One look at that device (apparently a disassembled electronic clock), packed in some sort of briefcase, with a circuit board, wires and various other parts, emitting tweets periodically should have prompted all unaware of the boy’s great skills of dis-assembly, to immediately run like the blazes!

    The police acted entirely as they should have.

  113. Lot says:
    @Svigor

    If that’s what shilling for Zionists looks like, I’ll have seconds, please.

    Well we are in agreement on a Jew issue, first for everything. I like everything she said you quoted.

    The single, out-of-context tweet could have been phrased better, but so what. Conservative whites have concentric circles of tribal loyalties, with fellow Americans in the first circle, and Israel and the Anglosphere in the second: the two peoples whose shared history is carving out civilized nations by expelling barbarian heathens.

    Warnings about Muslim immigrant demography, and explicit concern for the welfare of Jews, is a covert appeal to whites, who are demographically similar in their birthrates, and also will help get a few actual Jews on board, who contribute both directly to the movement and help to immunize it from “racism” charges.

    Retards like Priss would prefer American whites ally with and appeal to inbred Muslim fanatics and try to drive out guys like this:

    Special Report: Behind U.S. race cases, a little-known recruiter
    SOUTH THOMASTON, Maine | By Joan Biskupic

    Sometime in the next few months, the U.S. Supreme Court will decide two cases that could fundamentally reshape the rules of race in America.

    In one, a young white woman named Abigail Fisher is suing the University of Texas over affirmative action in college admissions. In the other, an Alabama county wants to strike down a law that requires certain states to get federal permission to change election rules.

    If they win, the names Fisher and Shelby County, Ala., will instantly become synonymous with the elimination of longstanding minority-student preferences and voting-rights laws. But behind them is another name, belonging to a person who is neither a party to the litigation nor even a lawyer, but who is the reason these cases ever came to be.

    He is Edward Blum, a little-known 60-year-old former stockbroker.

    Working largely on his own, with the financial support of a handful of conservative donors, Blum sought out the plaintiffs in the Fisher and Shelby County cases, persuaded them to file suit, matched them with lawyers, and secured funding to appeal the cases all the way to the high court. Abigail Fisher is the daughter of an old friend of Blum’s – a man who happened to call when Blum was in the midst of a three-year search for a white college applicant who had been rejected despite solid scores. Blum eventually got Shelby County to file suit after trolling government websites and cold-calling a county official.

    Blum introduced Fisher’s father and Shelby County officials to the same high-priced but politically sympathetic Washington lawyers, who agreed to work for a cut rate to be billed to Blum’s backers.

    Over the past 20 years, Blum has similarly launched at least a dozen lawsuits attacking race-based protections. In addition to the Fisher and Shelby County cases, two other Blum-backed cases reached the Supreme Court. One struck down majority-black and majority-Latino voting districts in Texas. The other prompted the court to suggest it might eliminate a major portion of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which the conservative-majority bench may now be poised to do in the Shelby County case.

    Blum was born in Benton Harbor, Mich., and moved around as a child. His father, Joseph, was a salesman, mainly of shoes. …He speaks in plain-Midwestern tones sprinkling his conversation with the Yiddish word emes (pronounced “EM-ess”), which means “truth.” A 1973 graduate of the University of Texas, Blum said he started out as a Democrat, but by the early 1980s began reading the neoconservative Commentary magazine and changed his views.

    • Replies: @Lot
    , @Priss Factor
  114. @anon

    And oddly enough the Swiss don’t seem to have any problem with terrorists.
    Then again they don’t have the FBI to manufacture them.

    • Replies: @Jonathan Revusky
  115. Kilo 4/11 says:

    Notice how the Podhoretz putz hides behind the cutesy toddler? (Ah, they’re cute now, but wait till they are full grown.)

    But oh, how the Jewish occupation forces in Palestine are always complaining of the terrorists using women and children for human shields.

  116. Lot says:
    @Lot

    More instances of Jews not just yap yapping on race, but fighting against anti-white policies:

    1. CIR, the law firm that has filed the most affirmative action cases, has Michael Rosman as its Chief Counsel:

    https://www.cir-usa.org/staff/

    Rosman also represented a kid in NJ suspended for wearing a confederate flag shirt.

    2. The three people who filed suit against Michigan’s AA programs, and nearly killed AA in education nationwide, were named Gratz, Grutter, and Hamacher. Hard to believe none of the three are Jewish with those names, “Gratz, Grutter, and Hamacher” sounds like a law firm name. (Many gentile Germans of course have those names too and Michigan Jews are very heavily German rather than Russian, so it is hard to tell.)

    3. Cato’s Bob Levy was the man behind the biggest 2nd Amendment victory in 100 years:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/District_of_Columbia_v._Heller

    He also defends a limited form of nullification:
    http://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/yes-states-can-nullify-some-federal-laws-not-all

    • Replies: @Mr. Anon
  117. Wilkey says:

    The more relevant matter is that Israel’s survival is not really in doubt. If there were any doubt to Israel’s survival I would understand perfectly the obsession with it in the debate. But there is zero doubt that Israel will survive – Israel has nukes – and thus all the talk at the debate was just a lot of ass kissing.

    And I’m even fine with the ass kissing. I just wish Republican politicians would do a better job kissing the asses of the people who actually vote for them. There are far, far more Republican voters who want our borders secure than there are voters who give a flying flip about Israel’s survival, or Jewish voters who will even contemplate voting for a Republican.

  118. Lot says:
    @anon

    The ancient Greeks and Romans were pederasts (mid to late teens), not pedophiles like the Pashtuns whose “dancing boys” start out age 9 or 10. This was in part because men ideally married around age 30, after they’ve proved their courage in war and skill in politics and commerce, to women around age 18.

    I agree that there does not seem to be any evidence of old Germans engaging in either practice. Rich northern European pederests tended to head south, like these two gentlemen:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friedrich_Alfred_Krupp

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lord_Byron

    Of course in England they also became boarding school teachers.

    • Replies: @Mr. Anon
    , @anon
  119. Sam Shama says:
    @Rurik

    Loaned out money that they create out of thin air but then the rest of us have to pay back plus interest.

    There is so much rubbish to clean in this post, that is difficult to know where to start. Ditto for the uninformed chavs like Kucinich etc, ranting incessantly of matters they have little understanding. I won’t even grace that asinine remark about some Jewish money printing machine with a rejoinder.

    What loans are you speaking of that ‘the rest of us have to pay back plus interest’? Be specific, since we are talking about dollars and cents.

    Every bloody cent that the Fed extended as emergency liquidity and equity injection in banks, (without which, rurik, your ATM would likely have blown out a raspberry in your general direction, back in 2008), has been returned to the Fed. every dollar that the Treasury had loaned, invested or swapped has been returned with profit to the Taxpayer. So pray what are you talking about?

    The Fed’s balance sheet is there for all to view with weekly updates. Every dollar is accounted for. Currently that balance sheet is around \$4.4tr and most of it in the form of Bank Excess Reserves. Meaning those reserves that the banks do not access due to a lack of loan demand. Do you understand?

    http://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/bst_fedsbalancesheet.htm

    • Replies: @anon
    , @Rurik
  120. Sam Shama says:
    @Sam Shama

    Priss
    Actually I reckon I should adopt you!

  121. Realist says:
    @JSM

    “Those dumb-ass whites are dumb because nobody explained it to them. ”

    Intelligent people can figure it out for themselves. Particularly after it happens a dozen times.

  122. Ivan says:
    @Priss Factor

    Everyone who thinks about this problem with a clear mind ends up in Sobran territory. It doesn’t matter how much Coulter backpedals, she’ll be marked like Mel Gibson.

    • Replies: @HLMunchkin
  123. @Bill Jones

    And oddly enough the Swiss don’t seem to have any problem with terrorists.
    Then again they don’t have the FBI to manufacture them.

    Alert! Alert! This one can see!

    (Drat! Where did he get those sunglasses??)

  124. @Christian

    ” . . . Face it, the IDF make great pilots, tankers and users of high tech warfare, or harassing Palestinian children throwing rocks; but when it comes to grunts slugging it out in the mud against a determined enemy, they fail miserably. . . .”

    The IDF are real badasses when they’re demolishing Palestinian homes, beating up people at checkpoints, and the like. But hard-core Russian or USMC infantry would wipe their ass.

  125. @Realist

    more like before the ruling, all the flood gates were open. after the ruling, the dam was gone 🙂 hahahaa. I 100% sure the supreme court justices are bought/influenced also.

    • Replies: @Realist
  126. Realist says:
    @Jonathan Revusky

    “They have never been given a chance to vote for this one way or the other.”

    They vote for the one who picks the Fed Chairman.

    “Irrespective of which grinning idiot they vote for when given the chance every four years, it will not change who controls the Fed.”

    That’s the problem with democracy….idiots electing idiots.

  127. @White Guy In Japan

    Unfortunately when it comes to Jews there is no middle ground – you are either an establishment supporter of Jews who is blind to ethnic differences or a beyond the pale anti-Semite that thinks Jews are to blame for most of the world’s problems. If you stake out a nuanced middle-of-the-road position you with labelled a sell-out by the anti-Semites yet will still be called a far-right racist by the liberal establishment.

    I personally don’t care less what Israel does it in own backyard, and I don’t believe that Jews are a primary cause of white self-loathing (though they’re certainly in the mix). On the other hand I do find a high percentage of Jews to be arrogant and self-obsessed, and believe there is probably a good case for white affirmative action in countries with a relatively high percentage of Jews.

    • Replies: @Hugo
  128. Mr. Anon says:
    @anon

    “They were colonized during that time period and that created the lull. As soon as the colonial era ended it started again. I’d call that a hint.”

    For most of that time they were ruled by the Turks, not western powers. Maybe what is best for the west is for the arab world to be ruled over by an islamic hegemon. Persia, for example.

    • Replies: @anon
  129. Mr. Anon says:

    “Sam Shama says:

    What loans are you speaking of that ‘the rest of us have to pay back plus interest’? Be specific, since we are talking about dollars and cents.”

    The Fed creates money by loaning it to member banks at nearly 0%, and then those banks loan it to us at 3%, 5%, 10%, 18%. Why can’t I get money lent to me at nearly 0%? And those same banks pay virtually nothing on deposits anymore. Why should they pay their depositors 3% when they can get magic-wand created Fed money for nothing (and, for all I know, chicks for free). That’s a pretty nice racket if your in on it. If you’re not, it just seems corrupt and iniquitous.

    • Replies: @Sam Shama
    , @skinnyhoops
  130. Mr. Anon says:
    @Lot

    The Romans thought themselves very different than the Greeks for a variety of reasons. Their disgust at pederasty was one of them.

    • Replies: @Rifleman
  131. Realist says:
    @Astuteobservor II

    ” I 100% sure the supreme court justices are bought/influenced also.”

    Quite probably.

  132. Mr. Anon says:
    @Lot

    “The single, out-of-context tweet could have been phrased better, but so what. Conservative whites have concentric circles of tribal loyalties, with fellow Americans in the first circle, and Israel and the Anglosphere in the second: the two peoples whose shared history is carving out civilized nations by expelling barbarian heathens.”

    The British were not so good at expelling barbarian heathens like those Irgun and Stern Gang thugs who blew-up so many Britons at the King David Hotel. I think you conflate too much. You may like Israelis, and you may like the British. But that doesn’t mean they have a lot in common. From my vantage point, and my ancestry is entirely British, I just don’t see it. In the post-war era, probably most Republicans had a generally positive attitude toward Israel. But the devotion that so many convservative christian Republicans now have towards that country, completely out of line with their own interests, and despite the often thinly veiled hostility of many american Jews towards christians, is unnatural and unhealthy.

    Hard to believe none of the three are Jewish with those names, “Gratz, Grutter, and Hamacher” sounds like a law firm name. (Many gentile Germans of course have those names too and Michigan Jews are very heavily German rather than Russian, so it is hard to tell.)”

    Who would have guess that? That gentile Germans have german names. Gratz, Grutter, and Hamacher sound very much like the kind of german name that Jews tend not to have.

    You are right that there are plenty of Jews who seem to be with gentile Americans in opposition to the destructive liberal agenda; even sometimes on the issue of immigration. But you must admit that Jews as a whole vote Democrat and that a majority of american Jews, amounting to 60-70%, support a liberal agenda that includes massive immigration. And further that most Jews with really deep-pockets, the centi-millionaire and up so-called “donor class”, overwhelmingly support immigration. Surely we gentiles are not out of line in noticing this?

    • Replies: @Lot
  133. Mr. Anon says:
    @Realist

    “They vote for the one who picks the Fed Chairman.”

    They vote for the guy who announces the pick for Fed Chairman. I don’t think we really know who actually picks them.

  134. JohnDough says:

    The mistake people make is always saying Jews control this or Jews control that. The Jews are all ready to pounce on these statements. What should be said is that Jews represent a statistically improbable number of positions in let’s say media and Hollywood. This is a fact when approx. 96=98% of people in America aren’t Jewish.

    Although the author of the above article says, “The answer is of course that Ashkenazi Jews punch way above their demographic weight in media and intellectual circles, and in big-money political donations, because their high average intelligence brings them success in the relevant fields.” This is not a fact when placed against a statistical model.

    The only answer to this is that in addition to ability, lots of non Jewish groups in America have the ability to take these roles, Jews use exclusionary ethnic group networking. Those roles are not easily available to anyone other than a Jew. Hollywood is rife with this.

    Good of Ann Coulter to be brave enough to make a comment on these things. Israeli influenced foreign policy has been tremendously destructive and expensive. Even the EU is reeling from it’s unintended consequences as millions of immigrants, displaced from a destroyed Middle East are trying to head to safety. This will be a gift that keeps on giving to the EU and I don’t mean this in a good way.

    Ms. Coulter is also brave enough to speak of the negative consequences of mass uncontrolled and illegal immigration. Something many people in the US and EU agree about but are stifled to express by heavily and statistically improbable Jewish influence in politics, media, and stink tanks.

  135. @Big Bill

    That is why the Jewish takeover of the West Bank has been so successful.

    Just like the Mohammedan takeover years before.

    Or was that one legitimate?

  136. Rifleman says:
    @Mr. Anon

    Really? Jews introduced Judeo-Christian culture? Tell us again how Jews have promoted Christian ideals.

    Little fringe Jews like Jesus and ALL of his disciples.

    Jews like the people who wrote THE BIBLE!!

    European anti gay attitudes are mostly Biblical in origin. Other than personal disgust.

    And stop pretending that Greeks and Romans and others had no homos in their socity.

    Homosexuality doesn’t = child sex.

    Also, anti Jews like the Nazis were heavily homosexual. Ernst Rohm and the brown shirts were rabid fags.

    The promotion of homosexuality all over the Western world is being done mostly by people who are not the least bit Jewish.

    Same with the Zionization of the Republican party, yes some rich Jews and neo-cons but mainly Evangelical Christian kooks.

    • Replies: @Priss Factor
    , @Mr. Anon
  137. anon • Disclaimer says:
    @Mr. Anon

    The Turks conquered large chunks of SE Europe where they instituted a child tax to supply them with recruits for their armies. In north Africa they were pirates and slave raiders.

    The gap in attacks on Europe coincided with western colonialism.

    Obviously the neocon wars are unnecessarily stirring the pot for no benefit to us but that doesn’t change the base reality – in their current form they can’t create countries they want to stay in so if the currently poisoned Europe can be saved and then fixed some kind of forward policy will still be needed.

    • Replies: @Mr. Anon
  138. Rifleman says:
    @Mr. Anon

    The Romans thought themselves very different than the Greeks for a variety of reasons. Their disgust at pederasty was one of them.

    Not true and homosexuality does not mean only sex with boys.

    You are just a paranoid White racist who overvalues ancient Europeans and demonizes Jews.

    Homosexuality was not introduced into the White world buy Jews.

    It was always there.

    Jewish texts introduced overt condemnation of homosexuality and forms the basis for Christian conservative condemnation of all forms of homosexuality.

    You are simply in denial about history due to your White supremacist and anti-semitic biases.

    • Replies: @Mr. Anon
  139. Christian Zionism is the uncertain variable in this. How numerous/influential are these people? I see widely differing evaluations of this. Are they becoming more powerful? Why?

    I know Bush #1 didn’t like these people and openly insulted them after he left the White House. I don’t think such a thing would be possible today.

  140. anon • Disclaimer says:
    @Sam Shama

    Total nonsense.

    For a start the Fed has bought trillions of dollars worth of the banks’ toxic assets. It doesn’t show yet because those assets will only blow up if/when the interest rates go up but when they do the public will take the hit and not the banks.

    There’s a lot more but not in the mood.

    The ongoing bank bailout (ZIRP is actually part of the bailout package) is/was the biggest robbery in history and the biggest welfare payment in history.

    Wall St are financial racketeers and the whole lot should be RICOed.

    • Replies: @Sam Shama
    , @Rurik
  141. anon • Disclaimer says:
    @Lot

    Nowadays I expect they’d visit private islands owned by billionaires like Epstein.

  142. Priss Factor [AKA "The Priss Factory"] says: • Website
    @Lot

    “Retards like Priss would prefer American whites ally with and appeal to inbred Muslim fanatics and try to drive out guys like this…”

    What?!? I never said whites should side with the raggers. I think the current crisis of Europe being overrun by Arabs is terrible(though not as horrible as being overrun by ghastly African Negroes; a 1000 Syrians are preferable to a single jiver).

    I might have said that IF all is lost and Europe will be raggerized, whites might as well side with the raggers against the Jews since Jews used all sorts of political, financial, military, and moral bullying to pressure whites to embrace racial suicide or at least sueycide, where white race is wiped out physically but mixed with other races to the point where it turns into genetic chop suey.
    If Jews ruin Europe, why should Europeans bother to help Jews when raggers come after Jews next?

    Preferably, the world will come to its senses and adopt universal nationalism that respects the racial, historical, cultural, and political sovereignty of all peoples. In the past, imperialism made certain nations rule over other nations. Also, nationalism was hard to come by in many parts of the world since modern nation-states didn’t exist in Africa and Middle East(and had to be created by imperialists themselves, a job they did terribly by mixing different tribes and ethnic groups together).

    When the Syrian War began, I initially thought it wasn’t such a bad thing since the rule of the Alawite minority over the Sunni majority was problematic(just like Sunni minority rule over Shia majority rule had been problematic in Iraq). Perhaps, Syria needed to break up and fracture into several nations like what happened to Yugoslavia.
    But as events unfolded, it was obvious that the West, Saudis, and Israel had no serious interest in helping create a new better Syria. Instead, their main goal was to see that country turn to rubble by aiding any bunch of lunatics.

    US recently admitted that \$500 million spent in Syria wielded only 5 ‘freedom fighters’. But actually, that is a red herring. It sounds like an admission of failure, but’s it’s actually a cover-up of success — the destruction of Syria. That money wasn’t funneled into Syria to really train ‘freedom fighters’. It was funneled to fund the jihadi rebels. So, from the POV of neocons, it was money well spent. It helped ruin Syria further. But by spinning the story into ‘we only got 5 freedom fighters’, it makes the story sound funny and cute, as if the all that money did no harm. But think of all the damage done by \$500 million. You know a lot of that money went to the jihadis.

    Anyway, the world needs more stable nationalisms, and we need universal nationalism that respects national sovereignty around the world. Every nation need to be more nationalist precisely because the world is so globalized. We need nationalism to balance out globalism. Globalism has its benefits and advantages, but it also has a way of undermining and subverting cultures and heritages. So, the more the world turns global, the more each nation needs to go national. Use globalism, don’t surrender to it.

    • Replies: @Jonathan Revusky
  143. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    Contributing to the rapidly increasing coarseness, smuttiness and vulgarity as yet another factor contributing to the breakdown of the moral fiber of our sinking society is inexcusable, whether it’s Shepherd Smith or Ann Coulter. Those who make a living purporting to be cognoscente of the political landscape owe their paying public more respect.

    • Replies: @Kilo 4/11
  144. Hugo says:
    @Rurik

    Derbs weak. That doesn’t mean that some of what he writes isn’t well written but, at his core he is not a warrior but, merely an academic. And academic’ s don’t have the intern composition to tackle the elephant in the room.

    • Replies: @Rurik
  145. Hugo says:
    @unpc downunder

    Disagree. I believe there are many that can have an objective discussion regarding Jews but, the media doesn’t allow that. There are numerous of us who don’t have issues with individual Jews but, have realised that the Judaic culture is corrosive to European host nations.

  146. Sam Shama says:
    @anon

    For a start the Fed has bought trillions of dollars worth of the banks’ toxic assets. It doesn’t show yet because those assets will only blow up if/when the interest rates go up but when they do the public will take the hit and not the banks.

    A mixture of little knowledge mixed with fire and brimstone.

    There were several emergency actions targeted to relieve financial stress and provide liquidity to the banking system, which services the consumer economy. The toxic assets that you refer to were put into TARP. Thhere was also TALF and others for purely liquidity purposes. In TARP the Fed and Treasury complex purchased MBS and others that were highly distressed due to a deep economic downturn. Most MBS have either run off with full default or have recovered with the economy. The Fed and Treasury additionally bought bank preferred shares. The net realisation of the preferreds, MBS recovery and runoffs have been a NET POSITIVE for the Treasury and the TAXPAYER, with principal fully returned. So speak from knowledge and not through your arse!

    http://www.treasury.gov/initiatives/financial-stability/reports/Pages/TARP-Tracker.aspx

    What do you actually understand about ZIRP? Its a situation in which the global central banking system finds itself stuck in, where short term interest rates are zero or near zero, due primarily to low credit demand, excess global savings, and chronically unemployable resources, including the labour force. Short term interest rates cannot go up easily through policy as the chances of triggering another recession is extremely high.

    THERE IS ZERO CHANCE OF HYPERINFLATION, or even inflation similar to the 1970s (10%+), a fear mongering, practised by a certain section of the crackpot political class, with surnames shared with St. Paul the Apostle, relentlessly. To their chagrin, inflation has not obliged, preferring to remain comfortably under the grand level of 2%. And it continues to fall.

    http://www.macrotrends.net/1458/core-cpi-vs-core-pce-historical-chart

    So how is that end-of-days prediction announced with much fanfare since 2008 going?

    • Replies: @anon
    , @5371
  147. Sam Shama says:
    @Mr. Anon

    Finally someone making a moderately interesting point:

    (1) Banks loan funds to the general public based on the maturity and credit-worthiness of the borrower in question. High quality borrower Mortgages, for example, have been originated at levels like 2.5%. Credit cards are 10%-14%. These levels reflect the overall loss expectations in pools of general purpose loans, Mortgages and credit cards. Generally banks profit margins are thin for mortgages but higher in credit cards.

    (2) I do believe that credit card rates can and should be brought down. Mortgages not so much. Student loans should be interest free.
    – No, the Fed is not in the business of loaning the general public zero interest funds to go and enjoy a vacation or blow it at the races. However it should definitely consider extending zero interest student loans and funding critical infrastructure investments.

    • Replies: @anon
    , @Mr. Anon
    , @Rurik
  148. anon • Disclaimer says:
    @Sam Shama

    More nonsense.

    The banks were stuffed to the gills with mortgage based assets that would be underwater if marked to market and even worse if the interest rates hadn’t been suppressed – trillions of dollars worth.

    The Fed bought all this **** with public money and when they raise rates it’ll all go up in smoke and the public will have paid off the banking mafia’s gambling debts – until the next time.

    Biggest robbery in history.

    This have been the essence of the West’s problem for centuries. Having the money supply in the hands of people who financially benefit from expanding it means a constant cycle of boom and bust including regular massive boom, busts like now and the 1920s which end in depressions – like now – and usually war.

    The banking mafia are racketeers and the whole lot of them should be RICOed.

    ps

    “the banking system, which services the consumer economy”

    lol, that is what the old separation of the banking system ensured and precisely what the TBTF banks *don’t* do since the repeal of Glass-Steagal removed the separation.

    • Replies: @Sam Shama
  149. GW says:

    I’m with Svigor here. It’s amazing how many people have misread Ann’s message. On a night where three of the candidates in their closing remarks stressed they’d defend Israel if elected president of the United States, it makes sense to wonder aloud why they were pandering so much to a nation-state whose coethnics only make up 2% of the American electorate. Ann wants Republicans to fight for our interests.

    In her response to the backlash of her tweets she went full Sailer and asked if importing millions of Muslims was good for Jewish interests. This did an end-run on accusations of anti-Semitism while simultaneously arguing for more secure immigration restrictions. This is much more effective at shifting the debate than the Unz Review’s comment section’s left-half of the bell curve which spends paragraphs to rant against a Jewish elite so omnipotent it couldn’t even get all Jewish senators to oppose the current Iran deal.

    • Replies: @anon
  150. @Ivan

    Try as she might they’ll never be convinced of her sincerity even if she goes down on her knees with tears streaming down her face, sobbing and heaving uncontrollably on national teevee. It’s just as well, one less neo-con polluting the air waves.

  151. Priss Factor [AKA "The Priss Factory"] says: • Website
    @Rifleman

    “Homosexuality doesn’t = child sex”

    All this obsession with homo stuff in your posts…

    Admit you’re a repressed closet homo.

    • Replies: @Rifleman
  152. Priss Factor [AKA "The Priss Factory"] says: • Website

    When it comes to Israel, GOP candidates all go tampopo.

    It’s like the scene in the movie TAMPOPO in the French Restaurant where everyone orders the same thing.

  153. anon • Disclaimer says:
    @Sam Shama

    Banks loan funds to the general public based on the maturity and credit-worthiness of the borrower in question.

    Banks are supposed to do that but when they have one of cyclical greed stampedes they don’t.

    This is especially the case with the TBTF banks whose profits didn’t primarily come from the interest on the loans themselves but on gambling with the securities based on the loans.

  154. Mr. Anon says:
    @Sam Shama

    “These levels reflect the overall loss expectations in pools of general purpose loans, Mortgages and credit cards. Generally banks profit margins are thin for mortgages but higher in credit cards. ”

    And what are the loss expectations for banks that have portfolios stuffed with reckless loans? And yet, if I am not mistaken, they still get to borrow money at the federal funds rate of nearly zero. If you can exploit a differential of 0% vs. 14%, then you essentially have a licence to make money – off of us.

    When that money was rooted in something other than how Janet Yellen is feeling today – something like deposits purchased with non-zero interest rates on savings accounts – it was perhaps not so fickle in nature.

  155. Hail says: • Website
    @Fred Reed

    Facing facts, the anti-Semitic position that Jews control everything in some kind of sinister cabal the purpose of which is to destroy institutions they oppose (up to and including nations) actually is closer to the truth, when viewed in the light of day, in the light of lived experience of those who rub up against it, as in Fred Reed’s testimonial here, than the Hollywood/U.S. Media notion of Jews as a pitiful and powerless yet noble and even saintly little group of heroes, always overcoming the latest outrage by arbitrarily-anti-Jewish ogres.

    It’s a shame that the venerable Mr. Derbyshire concerns himself with “whether Ms. Coulter is anti-Semitic or not,” when, as other commenters suggest, he should be on the side of the fence with his fellows of Western Civilization, standing up for our own interests and not stooging for the interests of a particular Middle-East-based ethnic group, no matter how powerful that group may be.

    • Replies: @ogunsiron
  156. Mr. Anon says:
    @Rifleman

    “Rifleman says:

    Jews like the people who wrote THE BIBLE!!”

    Gosh I never knew that. Of course you mean the old testament, right? The new testament was written mostly in Greek (at least in the form we know it now), perhaps largely by Greeks, and decades after Jesus lived. Anyway, I said you were historically ignorant because you evidently are. The term “judeo-christian” is a modern American coinage, dating to the mid-to-late 20th century. Nobody before that ever used it. It was a non-term. It didn’t exist. Christian civilization was “Christian Civilization”, full stop.

    “European anti gay attitudes are mostly Biblical in origin. Other than personal disgust.”

    A baseless assertion which you are entirely unable to prove. If you can, do so.

    “And stop pretending that Greeks and Romans and others had no homos in their socity.”

    I never said any such thing. Certainly the ancient Greeks practiced homosexuality. I’m sure the Romans had some too. Every society has homosexuals. Including the jewish society. However, you seem to be pretending that they don’t.

    “Also, anti Jews like the Nazis were heavily homosexual. Ernst Rohm and the brown shirts were rabid fags.”

    And the SS eventually purged them pretty ruthlessly too. The rest of the Nazis weren’t too cool with homos. Of course, when homosexuality was frowned upon, a common meme was that the nazis were all degenerate poofters. Now that homosexuality is celebrated, the Nazis were a bunch of fag-bashers. The truth is pretty fluid in the hands of homosexualists.

    “The promotion of homosexuality all over the Western world is being done mostly by people who are not the least bit Jewish.”

    What proportion of those who are pushing the homosexual agenda are Jewish? Harvey Milk (universal gay icon and saint), Tony Kushner (playright, author of Angels in America), David Kohan and Max Mutchnik (creators of the TV show “Will and Grace”)………….are they WASPS do you think? I’m sure one could name many others who have been influential in pushing the gay agenda. Maybe other people could join in. Go ahead – send some names to “Rifleman”.

    “Same with the Zionization of the Republican party, yes some rich Jews and neo-cons but mainly Evangelical Christian kooks.”

    Well nothing else you’ve said is remotely true, Chuck Connors, so I have no reason to believe that that statement is either. You know – Phallic-Symbol-Man – you seem to get awfully bent out of shape over the whole gay issue. It’s okay. This is a safe-space. Any secrets you might have are safe with us.

  157. Hail says: • Website
    @Svigor

    Svigor took issue with Mr. Derbyshire’s “[B]ecause [Jews’] high average intelligence brings them success in the relevant fields”, after which he says not one word more about the origins of Jewish power.

    A tiny minority population doesn’t come to dominate one or more aspects of a society, which they themselves had no hand in building, simply through “intelligence”. It takes a a coordinated and sustained effort, aggressiveness, a willingness to toss aside ethics and decency, and promoting your own while excluding others (nepotism) — All of these are traits associated with the Jews as seen through the eyes of their various host populations.

  158. Mr. Anon says:
    @Rifleman

    “You are just a paranoid White racist who overvalues ancient Europeans and demonizes Jews.”

    That is a lie. What have I said that demonizes Jews? And your use of the term “racist” – a magic word intended to shut down any attempt by whites to defend their own interests – pretty clearly labels you as an enemy of those same interests.

    “Homosexuality was not introduced into the White world buy Jews.”

    It was always there.”

    I don’t know who you are arguing with. The voices in your head, perhaps. I never said any such thing. Of course homosexuality has always existed in western civilization. It has always existed in jewish civilization too.

    “You are simply in denial about history due to your White supremacist and anti-semitic biases.”

    I know far more about history than do you, evidently. I am neither a white supremicist nor an anti-semite. You, however, appear to be a mentally unbalanced blowhard.

  159. Mr. Anon says:
    @anon

    “anon says:

    The gap in attacks on Europe coincided with western colonialism.”

    No, you are quite wrong. For most of the 250 year-or-so gap under discussion, most of the near east was under Ottoman rule. And, during that time, the turks were in retreat and were not attempting to conquer any additional parts of Europe. They went to war with Russia. But then so did the French and English, while in alliance with the Ottomans it should be added.

    • Replies: @anon
  160. Hail says: • Website
    @Mr. Anon

    Jews do not have disproportionate power in the media. And if you say that we do, we will crush you.

    They can’t crush you if you outfawn everybody else.

    This dynamic is also the origin of the “evangelical Christian Zionist” phenomenon, some of whose preachers (Hagee) are more pro-Jewish than pro-Jesus to judge them by their own words.

    Jewish power has completely changed America in fundamental ways, like this, and it is taboo to so much as mention the the J-word.

  161. @Christian

    I agree the US should spend zero dollars in bribe money, as foreign relations. Let the diaspora Jews support their own, should they so choose. Besides, in a world filling up with stupid and therefore useless 3rd worlders, paying them to not kill each other is counterproductive.

    OTOH, I think holding out for those US dollars do have a moderating effect on the actions of the IDF. Absent that restraint, I would think they’d seize a whole shedload of lebensraum and dump the Pals onto their Arab brothers and the West.

  162. 5371 says:
    @Sam Shama

    [What do you actually understand about ZIRP? Its a situation]

    ZIRP is not a situation but a policy. It says so right there on the tin.

    • Replies: @Sam Shama
  163. @Realist

    “They have never been given a chance to vote for this one way or the other.”

    They vote for the one who picks the Fed Chairman.

    Uhh, true, except that the one who picks the Fed Chairman was in turn selected, actually is a puppet of the power structure that the eventual Fed Chair is part of.

    You can vote for a Clinton, a Bush, a McCain, a Romney, an Obama… doesn’t matter… the power structure that the Fed is part of does not change.

    That’s the problem with democracy….idiots electing idiots.

    That’s a problem, yes, but the other, probably bigger problem with democracy is that it doesn’t really exist in the first place! At least not in regards this particular issue, the central bank.

  164. @Priss Factor

    “Retards like Priss would prefer American whites ally with and appeal to inbred Muslim fanatics and try to drive out guys like this…”

    What?!? I never said whites should side with the raggers.

    You know, what is very strange is that a commentator like yourself, very conscious of, and opposed to, the Judaeo-Zionist power configuration — you still buy into their mythology.

    I’m well into middle age and, as long as I can remember, Hollywood movies and TV shows have portrayed Arabs, and Muslims, generally, as a bunch of ultra violent demented nutcases. In recent years, I have come to realize that all the terrorist acts attributed to Muslims in the West are actually false flag events.

    So we have a multi-decade campaign to vilify Arabs, Muslims, their culture, their religion… — along with a false flag spectacle of the scale of a 9/11, framing Muslims for it, to reinforce the programming. Who is behind all of this? Your favorite people, right? (If you don’t understand this, then you have no political judgment finally and need to go back to the drawing board…)

    But here you are, engaging in this rather arrogant, contemptuous — really quite despicable — language. “Raggers….” You’re like some kind of programmed muppet or something.

    It’s not just about you, I just happen to be responding to you specifically, but it could be a response to any number of people here. You guys cannot see through the most ridiculous propaganda and mental programming. Stuff like:

    “Oh, the suicide pilot had a Koran in his luggage (the suicide pilot’s luggage!!!???) so… yeah… he must be a terrorist.”

    “The Tsarnaev brothers started going to the mosque a lot and getting all serious about religion, so…..”

    I mean to say, you guys can’t see through this kind of garbage? What kind of fools are you? Sheesh…

    • Replies: @OilcanFloyd
    , @Mr. Anon
  165. Deduction says:
    @Jonathan Revusky

    They try to convince you that the anti-American sentiment out there is just some kind of irrational hatred of ordinary Americans

    Actually this really exists. And some of it is caused by the Manchester United effect – being on top really does generate enmity.

    • Replies: @Jonathan Revusky
  166. Priss Factor [AKA "The Priss Factory"] says: • Website
    @Chris Mallory

    “Republican politicians pander to Sheldon Adelson, not American Christians.”

    Money goes a long way in politics, but it cannot be the only reason.

    Money can buy whores, but it can’t buy respect, let alone reverence.

    Adelson is super-rich, and politicians pander to him. But whorishness in politics has its limits.
    The reason why Adelson is so respected and feared is because he is rich and Jewish. Why should this matter? Jewishness has been sacralized via the Holocaust and Christian Zionism(that sees Jews as the Chosen People).

    Let us suppose the richest people in America are not Jews but Iranian-Americans or Chinese-Americans or Brazilian-Americans. Would American politicians be as slavish? No. Sure, they would suck up to the elites for money, and etc.
    But there would also be lots of criticism of the power of such elites. Indeed, prior to the rise of Holocaust Cult, especially before WWII, it was not unusual for those on both the Left and Right(more on the Right) to criticize and even attack Jewish power. Jews gained immense power in several European nations, but that didn’t prevent people from calling out on Jewish power and abuse. If anything, the power of Jews made them the target of much gentile ire–just like the rise of Japan in the 80s led to much Japan-bashing in the US despite Japan spending lots of money on lobbying for Japanese interests.

    So, power and wealth are not guarantees of protection from criticism and even hatred. All through history, there’s been social critics and prophets damning the rich and powerful.
    Wasp elites were very powerful in the US at one time, but they were often the target of criticism, hostility, hatred, and condemnation — not only from Jews but other ethnic groups and even Liberal social reformist Wasps who thought all that Wasp privilege was unfair.

    Southeast Asian nations have rich and powerful Chinese tycoons, but there’s a lot of hostile criticism of Chinese wealth, influence, and etc. sometimes even leading to pogroms and worse.

    [MORE]

    So, if American Jews had only their great wealth and privilege, they would be vulnerable. Suppose there was no Holocaust cult, no worship of the mythic saintly Jew who suffered at the hands of ‘irrational’ and devilish ‘anti-semites’ all throughout the ages.
    (There is a certain contradiction at the core of Jewish condemnation of the Eternal Anti-Semite. According to the Jewish critique, these Eternal Anti-Semites have thought they way they do because they are ‘irrational’ and incapable of seeing the objective truth. They have lurid and delirious fantasies of the powerful and conspiratorial Jew. And yet, the Jewish vision of the Eternal Anti-Semite is itself lurid and hysterical because it ascribes ‘irrationality’ and ‘hysteria’ even to gentiles who have made objective and well-detailed, aka rational and empirical, critique of Jewish power, privilege, and influence. In accusing the Eternal Anti-Semite of ‘irrational fears’, Jews imply that they themselves are rational and making a rational diagnosis of the malady that has afflicted mankind since it came into contact with Jews. But the Jewish charge of ‘antisemitism’ is, as often as not, irrational, really a form of accusing gentiles of being possessed by demon spirits. If indeed ‘antisemitism’ is so ‘irrational’, a rational solution would have been found already, just like a scientific cure for gonorrhea has been procured. But since Jews insist that ‘antisemitism’ is ineradicable, the disease must go beyond the power of reason. It must be diabolical, like with the girl possessed by the Devil in THE EXORCIST — a Catholicist movie with Jewishy overtones. And if that’s the case, Jews aren’t making a rational analysis but accusing the gentile of being possessed by the Devil. But if indeed gentiles are afflicted with such demons, then the world must fundamentally be irrational than rational. Furthermore, if gentiles can be afflicted with demons, then why couldn’t Jews be afflicted with the same demons or different demons? After all, Jews are human like everyone else. If Jews say that they themselves cannot be afflicted with such an ‘irrational’ malady, that would mean Jews are racially superior, which would be odd since Jews denounce the notion of racial supremacism. But if only gentiles can succumb to such ‘irrational’ lunacy, it must mean that they are inferior to Jews who apparently don’t fall for such delusions and are much more rational. If Jews are indeed rational and believe in a rational world, they should be able to explain and cure ‘antisemitism’. But Jew after Jew has concluded that this ‘antisemitism’ is really a diabolical disease that seems to go on forever no matter how hard rational people try to understand it or cure it. One would have to conclude that either ‘anti-semites’ are indeed infected with demonic possession or they are rational and objective in their criticism of Jewish power. Rational people are not supposed to believe in demon possession, but ‘rational’ Jews often conclude that ‘anti-semites’ are indeed possessed by some sickness of the soul that is beyond reason and science to explain, understand, and cure. Now, if Jews applied this observation only to diehard holocaust deniers/rejectionists, they would have a point. But most critics of Jewish power are not holocaust deniers and have a better grasp of reality than those who push the philosemitic canard of saintly Jews, but Jews bunch all critics of Jews with Nazis.)
    Anyway, Jewish power cannot be understood merely in terms of money and privilege. If money and privilege ensure eternal power, Wasps would still be on top in the US. Also, Germany is mostly German-run, so Germany wouldn’t be so slavish to Jews.
    If Chinese-Americans bought the NYT, if Russian-Americans bought WSJ, if Iranian-Americans bought AT&T, if Asian-Indian-Americans bought Walmart, and if Arab-Americans bought Texaco, it would still be permissible to talk shit about the Chinese, Russians, Iranians, Indians, and Arabs in America and in their homelands. Sure, politicians would pander to them for donations, but the media, academia, and all of us would be talking about their power, often derisively.
    Power and wealth alone are no guarantee of total control and respect/reverence. Shah had tremendous power in Iran, but Iranians badmouthed him and kicked him out. The Queen of England has tremendous wealth, but it’s okay to bash the Queen. Walmart family is rich as hell and donate generously to politicians, but it’s routine for people to denounce Walmart(though the criticism has been somewhat muted in media circles cuz Walmart is now so into homo-promo; they seek protection from the Tinkerbell Effect).

    So, Jews can have all the money and privilege in the world, but it cannot buy protection from criticism. After all, US is the most powerful nation in the world, but so many nations blame and insult US all the time — even people in ally nations. Even American critics routinely bash US politics and policies(as long as they identify the problem as ‘American’ or ‘white’ or ‘Christian’ or ‘capitalist’ instead of Jewish or Jomo). Capitalists are the richest people on earth, but that doesn’t protect them from criticism and abuse. Colleges are full of professors who rip capitalism and the vilify oligarchs. Books are frequently published that bash capitalism. Bernie Sanders calls himself a socialist. One can attack capitalism and oligarchs as long as they are not identified as Jews, as long as we make believe that most oligarchs are white males, Saudis, or Russians.

    So, how come Jews are so revered and protected from criticism? It’s the Holocaust Cult that elevated Jews to sainthood, angel-hood, god-people-hood, holy-hood, and etc. This is sort of amusing since Jews are among the least kind-hearted, earnest, and innocent people on earth. Jews are savvy, cunning, abrasive, pushy, nasty, vulgar, sneaky, and etc. Jews are passive-aggressive. Along with homos, they are masters at coming at you with weepy eyes and begging for help while conspiring to rob you of everything you have. They act like the John Turturro character in MILLER’S CROSSING.

    Anyway, Jews understood that the only way they would be protected from criticism was by sacralizing themselves through something, and of course it was the Holocaust.
    Once all Jews were associated with the Holocaust hyped as the most evil event in history, Jews weren’t merely victims of a historical tragedy but the eternal victims of the Eternal Tragedy. The Holocaust went beyond epochal. It was made eternal, a forever passion play, like how Christians replay the Crucifixion of Jesus and His Resurrection over and over and over, as if it just happened yesterday. Once all Jews were holo-holied, they were immune from criticism as they were seen as Holocaust survivors literally or spiritually. Furthermore, anything deemed to reek of ‘antisemitism’ wasn’t merely deemed as wrong or incorrect but evil, sick, demented, crazy, diabolical, insane, rabid, virulent, etc, beyond the pale of respectable discourse. So, if Jews burned down the house, you could discuss everything and anything about the fire except the fact that Jews burned it down. And you could blame everything and everyone — fire department, improper fireproofing, wiring, construction, etc — but the fact that Jews did it.

    Indeed, the fall of Jewish power in communist nations proves this. Power alone is no guarantee of protection from attack on that power. Even though Jews gained immense power in communist nations, why was it so easy to depose them and persecute them? Because communist nations didn’t holy-ize the Jews. (Stalin insisted on the cult of personality but not the cult of ethnicity for any people. Stalin was protected because of his cult that had sacralized and apotheosis-ized him while he was alive. When Germans attacked, Stalin thought he was finished. He thought his henchmen would turn on him. But because Stalin’s cult of personality had been so elevated in the USSR, his henchmen decided he had to lead the people. He was the one whom the people revered. Mao said of Khruschev that he was deposed because he didn’t insist on his own cult of personality that would have deified him in the eyes of the nation. It would have been more difficult to get rid of a deified Khrushchev. Jews know this, which is why they insist on their own cult of ethnicity that makes them more special than any other group.) Sure, the early USSR enforced laws that forbade ‘antisemitism’, but it didn’t elevate Jews into the holy people. It just said that Jews could be good comrades LIKE ANYONE ELSE. So, while early communism didn’t target Jews as a group, it didn’t officially sanctify them as a special holy kind of people either. And that is why when it was time to purge the Jews, it was easily done. Stalin got rid of a whole bunch of them. And even though Stalin appointed a lot of Jews to run Poland, Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Romania, and etc after WWII, he decided to get rid of them when the Zionists threw their lot with the Americans despite their socialist ethos. The fall of Jews in Eastern Europe would seem counter-intuitive since Eastern European Jews suffered the most. You’d think Eastern European gentiles would have been filled with redemptive guilt for having collaborated with the Holocaust — or not having sufficiently resisted it — , but there was no such guilt since the Holocaust in communist nations weren’t seen particularly as a Jewish tragedy but as a tragedy of ‘anti-fascists’. For instance, Poland under communism didn’t make a big deal about Jews when it came to the Holocaust. The tour guide was likely to include the dead Jews as just ‘Poles’. There was no Jewish Holocaust Memorial in communist nations. Rather, the victims of Germans were seen as heroic communists and workers without much emphasis on ethnicity.

    So, it was easy for communist nations to turn on Jews and purge them and criticize Jewish and Zionist power. But something similar became impossible in the West as years went by because Jews gained power over media and academia and came up with neo-religion that sacralized the Holocaust and its Jewish victims. It went from a historical issue to a spiritual one. Anne Frank became a Virgin-Mary-like figure. Today, Holocaust films constitute a genre of its own. Europe doesn’t make Biblical films but cranks out Holocaust ones. It’s their religion. It’s this sacralization that makes even a creep tycoon scumbag like Adelson into a godlike figure.

    It’s not surprising to see politicians shmooze those with money. But would GOP hopefuls have acted before Warren Buffett or Bill Gates the way they acted before Adelson? No. They wet their pants before Adelson as if they were face to face with god because Adelson is a Jew, and that makes him a holy god-man in a world where the reigning religion is Jew-worship. If not for his Jewishness, everyone would see Adelson for what he is: a rich scumbag and sleazy turd monster. The ONLY way a Jew might lose his mantle of holiness is by exhibiting ‘racism’ toward the Noble Negro, another ‘spiritual construct’ of the Jewish-run media and academia. Donald Sterling was once praised and showered with awards like Adelson is today but then he said some not-so-nice things about Negroes. Had he said such about Muslims or Russians — “I don’t want you to appear in public with big Russian guys” — , there would have been no controversy. But Sterling said that about Negroes, and Jews couldn’t have that. Jews need the holy trinity alliance of themselves, Negroes, and collaborator homos to destroy white power forever.

    So, how did Jews gain such sacralization. It wasn’t only by self-promotion but waging a Moral War on white goyim. There is a difference between moral criticism—which is good and should be used by all sides—and Moral War. Moral criticism highlights the failings of other peoples, whereas Moral War says that the other side is wicked, sick, demented, vile, and foul beyond belief; their history is all evil and vicious, and their very existence is an affront to human decency. Jews have waged such a war on the white race. Whites are all sick and evil for the guilt of slavery and holocaust. Even Polish-Americans are guilty of black slavery and even Irish-Americans might as well be burdened with holocaust guilt. If you’re white, you’re not alright.

    Moral War is a total war on the moral stature of another people. It not only notices the problems and failings of other peoples but condemns them for being essentially and fundamentally evil.
    It is a kind of Etho-cide for it wages total war on the ethos of a people. The Moral War says that the enemy has either demonic ethos or has no ethos at all. Ethocide, an extermination of the moral content of a people, precedes ethnocide or genocide.
    Indeed, this is what the Nazis did with Jews. Before Hitler decided to ethnically exterminate the Jews, he exterminated them ethically, i.e. Jews were made out to be utterly without moral scruples, principles, values, and etc. Jews were moral vermin. Having thus waged a total Moral War on the Jews, Germans then could feel not-too-disturbed about carrying out physical genocide or ethnocide against Jews. After all, if Jews are without moral souls, then killing them would be killing animals without souls and moral reasoning.

    What is happening now is that World Jewry is carrying our a total Moral War or Ethocide against the white race. Jews are saying that eternal generations of whites should be blamed for the holocaust and slavery. Jews would have us believe that whites and only whites are guilt for the crimes of mankind. Only whites are to be blamed for slavery even though all peoples practiced slavery. And even though WWII generation of Germans carried out the Holocaust, Germans must forever be accused of being Jew-killers; and rest of Europe must also be blamed for either having collaborated or not having done enough to stop the killing.
    Do Russians at least get the credit for defeating the Germans? No, Russians are evil because they resist the holy-homo-agenda, and that makes them the New Nazis.

    Now, what’s wrong with this picture? The problem is not that Jews are full of criticism of non-Jews. I think that is a good thing. All peoples should criticize one another. Without criticism, there is less awareness, less dialogue, less reform, etc. But total condemnation via Moral War or Ethocide goes way beyond criticism. It is not about pointing out the flaws of other people but condemning them as less-than-human, especially wicked, monstrous, and diabolical.

    Furthermore, while Moral War seeks to totally attack and demolish the other side, it won’t tolerate even the slightest rebuff or counter-attack from the other side. It’s like a war where you believe it’s okay for your side to kill millions but you throw a fit when the other side kills just one of yours. It’s like Israel vs Palestinians in Gaza and West Bank. Jews can accuse and attack all they want, but if Palestinians resist just a bit, they get bombed to the stone age, and of course, the US Congress pledges to send more aid to Israel to save Jewish lives from Palestinian bottle-rockets when, in fact, it is Jewish bombs and missiles that are killing and maiming 1000s of Pallies.

    The asymmetrical war between Israel and Gaza works as a metaphor of Jewish Moral War on whites. Jews believe they can lob all the bombs as they please on whites, but if whites just shoot one bottle rocket — like Coulter’s remark –, all hell breaks loose. Jews can commit total Ethocide against whites, but whites better just submit to Jews and revere them. Jews would have us believe that whites have no soul, no history to be proud of, no identity worth preserving, no heritage full of glory, nothing they can claim for moral pride.
    Instead, whites are so deficient in morality and soul that they must grovel before Jews and Negroes. Whites must apologize forever for slavery, apartheid, and holocaust… and for ‘white privilege’ and even for imaginary crimes like the Duke Lacrosse rape and UVA fraternity rape. Even when blacks do wrong, whites must be blamed. So, if black students act up and get suspended, white teachers must be blamed. If too many blacks commit crime and end up in prison, whites must be blamed for being victimized and locking up blacks. The only good whites are interracist women who use their wombs to birth black babies or homos who collaborate with Jews to subvert and undermine white morality and values. In that sense, homos are shock troops of the Jewish Moral War on whites. By promoting ‘gay marriage’ as the new holy matrimony, Jews have totally upended the rules of morality as once understood and practiced by a healthy and proud white community.

    So, what is to be done? White must fight fire with fire, meet force with counter-force.
    Whites must wage a Moral War and Ethocide against Jews UNTIL Jews call a truce and stop their vile aggression. But if Jews insist on waging this war forever and ever, whites must go all the way and fight with full force too.

    It’s like relations among nations. Nations understandably have differences and criticize one another. It can be done peacefully and under agreed-upon rules and international agreements. But if one nation attacks another nation, especially to destroy it totally, then the declaration of war must be met with counter-declaration of war and a will to fight and win. When Japan chose war over diplomacy, US had no choice to fight the war. When Germany attacked Russia, Russia had no choice but to fight back and destroy Germany.
    There was nothing wrong about Japan criticizing American policy or vice versa. But when Japan sneak-attacked Pearl Harbor, it was ‘no more Mr. Nice Guy’.
    Same goes for Jews. If Jews wanna call out the problems of white folks while also taking criticism from non-Jews, then no problem. All peoples should have a discourse where mutual criticism is part of the debate. But when one side totally condemns another people but then forbids any criticism against it, it is not a discourse but a form of ethocide.

    Now, Jews were no worse and no better than other peoples. All peoples have their history of war, violence, mayhem, oppression, and war-mongering: Romans, Greeks, Persians, Assyrians, Chinese, Mongols, Russians, Anglos, Aztecs, Zulus, and etc. And all peoples have their story of achievement. Jews committed their share of horrors but also contributed great things to the world. Okay, so we can all have a discussion and criticize one another and also admire the notable things about other peoples.

    But Jews won’t play this game according to any fair set of rules. Instead, they act so holier-than-thou and faultless. They don’t tolerate any criticism of themselves and have rigged the rules whereby they can dismiss any criticism or attack on Jews by invoking the Holocaust and ‘rabid and virulent antisemitism’ that covers everyone from neo-nazi nuts to Mearshirmer and Walt Stephen. When the most powerful people in US, the most powerful nation in the world, play according to such rules, we are living in dangerous times.

    But since Jews insist on playing dirty and impugning others with their total Moral War, white gentiles must wake up and do the same. Fight fire with fire. Don’t apologize or grovel when accused by Jews. If Jews accuse whites of anything, rationalize and spin whatever white folks did as something that was either good or understandable-given-the-time. Or say that the ‘historical crime’ belongs to a specific time and place and has no bearing on the present. Meanwhile, shoot endless rounds of katusha rockets on every Jewish moral and historical failing. Dredge up every ‘evil’ committed by Jews and put Jews on the moral defensive and give them a taste of their own medicine. Bring up Jews and communism. Jews and finance capitalism. Jews and gangsterism. Jews and vice industries. Jews and Nakba. Zionism as ‘racism’. Jewish war on marriage. Jewish war on whites via racial integration that exposes whites to black thuggery.
    Unless the Narrative is fundamentally changed, nothing can be done with Jews.

    It’s like the Nazis wouldn’t listen to reason. They had to be defeated totally with ruthless counter-force. It was only when Germany totally lost a total war that they had viciouslyh waged that they sobered up and became reasonable. Same goes for Jews. Unless they are totally defeated and shamed in this Moral War, they won’t stop with their rabid and virulent Ethcide on the white race.

    And if the Jewish Ethocide against whites isn’t stopped, it will eventually lead to the Ethnocide of the white race. Indeed, we are seeing the result in Europe today. Why are Europeans helpless to halt the ethno-cide of their own people? Because they’ve been rendered helpless before the firepower and poison gas warfare of Jewish etho-cide against whites.
    Jews are saying that white Europeans are evil cuz they are forever tainted with ‘racism’ and ‘antisemitism’. All Europeans were born, are born, and will be born with the ‘original sin’ of ‘antisemitism’ and ‘racism’. So, the only way such an innately evil people can be saved and redeemed is by embracing the enrichment of ethno-cide by allowing countless and endless numbers of non-white invaders from the Middle East and Africa.
    If your people are robbed of the pride of ethos, it won’t be long before they are robbed of right of ethnos as well.

    • Replies: @KA
    , @Rifleman
  167. @Jonathan Revusky

    @Jonathan Revusky

    I largely agree with you about the false flags, but I don’t believe that there are no Muslim terrorists, or that there is no problem with Muslim violence, if those are your beliefs.

    Without remembering a whole lot about the case, I would say that the Achille Lauro hijacking didn’t seem like a false flag. Was Leon Klinghoffer just a convenient sacrifice?

    • Replies: @Jonathan Revusky
  168. IA says:
    @Rich

    but the elites, most of whom are still WASPs, reject their fellow people

    Lots of Jews are/were influential in Russia. But, the Russian and Eastern European elites still look after their own. Write to the Hungarian ambassador, expressing support and solidarity.

    Also, there are very few Jews in Scandinavia but elites loathe their own.

  169. Astorian says:

    Underneath her venom, racism and antisemitism, Ann Coulter has one small but very valid point: Jews make up only two or three percent of the population in the USA. The majority of them are going to vote a straight Democratic ticket in 2016, and most of them live in states that the Republicans have no hope of winning.

    So, if a GOP candidate is vocally, enthusiastically supporting Israel as a matter of principle, I think that’s that’s wonderful and highly admirable. But if he’s doing so in order to win Jewish votes, he’s wasting his time and energy. There simply aren’t enough winnable Jewish votes out there to bother with or to make any real difference in the 2016 election.

  170. @Mr. Anon

    Yes there are lots of Jews running the Central Bank but nothing prevents small investors from borrowing at low rates approaching .25% in the public securities and futures markets.

    • Agree: Sam Shama
    • Replies: @Mr. Anon
  171. Hunsdon says:
    @MSimon

    The Jews are a small number . . . of voters. With a large number . . . of dollars to donate. If the political class was responding to the desires of American Christians who love Israel, they might, you know, respond to the desires of those same American Christians on other issues, like immigration, crime, political correctness, etc. Funny, though, how they don’t respond to those desires.

  172. @Deduction

    – being on top really does generate enmity.

    Are you sure it’s just being on top, or is it more like being on top AND kicking the other person repeatedly in the face?

  173. @Astorian

    So, if a GOP candidate is vocally, enthusiastically supporting Israel as a matter of principle, I think that’s that’s wonderful and highly admirable.

    Uh huh… so, do you think these politicians are enthusiastically supporting Israel as a matter of principle?

    But if he’s doing so in order to win Jewish votes, he’s wasting his time and energy. There simply aren’t enough winnable Jewish votes out there to bother with or to make any real difference in the 2016 election.

    But these are professional politicians, so they know the electoral calculus as well as you and I do, right? So if they are not doing this to win actual Jewish votes, then, why, in your opinion, are they doing it?

  174. anonymus says:
    @Christian

    “If the US withheld aid and military protection, Israel likely wouldn’t last another decade”

    That is if you like the idea of a nuclear missile up your a\$\$ (in other words, the Samson option).

  175. Sam Shama says:
    @anon

    The banks were stuffed to the gills with mortgage based assets that would be underwater if marked to market and even worse if the interest rates hadn’t been suppressed – trillions of dollars worth.

    The Fed bought all this **** with public money and when they raise rates it’ll all go up in smoke and the public will have paid off the banking mafia’s gambling debts – until the next time.

    Yes of course the banks were overloaded with mortgages and MBS, to finance the housing expansion, mandated by Congress. What exactly is your great insight? It is precisely because the banks were levered and MBS were severely distressed that the financial crisis occurred, and the Fed-Treasury complex had to assume the role of lender of last resort, the very reason for its creation in 1913.

    You are not revealing anything new or insightful, but gamely continuing with half-baked assertions of ‘nonsense!’. All the securities that on a mark-to-market would have caused banks further distress were removed and placed in TARP, a vehicle funded by the Treasury (the Taxpayer), The Treasury further injected liquidity and preferred equity in these banks. As the economy recovered and the financial stress dissipated, the value of the preferred equity and TARP assets rose, and on the whole the Treasury made a profit. So really your position is a combination of deliberate obtuseness, wrong information and “I won’t believe my lying eyes” type of indoctrination.

    http://money.cnn.com/2014/12/19/news/companies/government-bailouts-end/

    However I am not surprised by your attitude. I have seen it elsewhere, especially among those dearly vested in Jew hatred and the “Jews own the Fed” trope. Until they are faced with the facts, that is. The cleverer amongst these doctrinaires quickly see the folly of their positions and decide to study the unvarnished economic truth (without value judgements), but the true believers of course, plod on mindlessly.

    All the assets that the Fed bought, including MBS and Treasuries (and what TARP owns, which btw is now getting sold to private investors at a fast clip), are NOT going to “go up in smoke as interest rates rise” as you claim. For at least two reasons. One, the Fed is not subject to mark to market rules and hold securities to maturity (a policy instituted precisely for the lender of last resort in a modern, credit based economy – something I suspect you will have a pavlovian objection to – and in which case I suggest you retire to the Himalayas, subsisting entirely hand to mouth of your own “production”). Second, interest rates are not about to rise any time in the near future. We are sort of locked in a world awash with excess savings which flow into US treasuries in an inexorable manner, just as inflation continues to track below 2%. So therefore, one more time, for you to look at at it, here is inflation:

    http://www.macrotrends.net/1458/core-cpi-vs-core-pce-historical-chart

    • Replies: @skinnyhoops
    , @anon
    , @Rurik
  176. Sam Shama says:
    @5371

    Yes do enlighten us with your wise insights why don’t you. Anything deeper than making a distinction between the the zero interest rate policy and the zero lower bound in interest rates, which amount to essentially the same thing, the former being a policy to correct a market failure and the other a nominal economic situation that I was using as an equivalent? I don’t so much mind pedantry, but only if it comes from someone who actually knows what they are talking about.

    • Replies: @5371
    , @skinnyhoops
  177. @OilcanFloyd

    I largely agree with you about the false flags, but I don’t believe that there are no Muslim terrorists, or that there is no problem with Muslim violence, if those are your beliefs.

    Okay…. you don’t believe there are no Muslim terrorists — tricky false negative, should avoid that…. you mean, you believe there are Muslims terrorists. Okay, fine. I presume this means Muslim terrorists who really exist and operate independently from CIA, Mossad etcetera, not Al-CIAH-duh. They exist… they are out there…

    Well, okay, maybe they are out there, I don’t know for absolutely sure, but I would pose this question: if there really is an Islamic Terrorism problem out there, then why do the various Deep State organs feel the need to stage phony incidents, false flags?

    Without remembering a whole lot about the case, I would say that the Achille Lauro hijacking didn’t seem like a false flag.

    Well, there’s a good reason you don’t remember the Achille Lauro case very well. It was 30 years ago!

    I’m not sure about that. I just typed in the string Achille Lauro Mossad false flag into google and I get a bunch of hits and I glanced at a few of them. I don’t know how reliable the information is. You can look at that yourself and report back maybe, since you brought it up.

    But, look, if you are saying that you have to go back 30 years to find such a terrorist attack that as NOT a false flag, then you are in very bad shape here. I mean, you would be tacitly admitting that everything since then WAS a false flag! So, we’re talking about Charlie Hebdo in Paris earlier this year. Obviously a false flag of some sort…. The 11-M train bombings in Madrid in 2004. Very murky, some sort of false flag. The patsies they claim did it could not possibly have done it. The 7/7 subway bombing in London. Also a false flag. AND…

    9/11 in Manhattan in 2001. Also a false flag. The Arabs they say did it could not possibly have done it since they had no technical means of loading the buildings with explosives prior to the event!

    Was Leon Klinghoffer just a convenient sacrifice?

    WTF is this this, dude? Silly season? Klinghoffer… the old Jewish guy in the wheelchair they dropped in the sea… Well… sure, he’d be a convenient sacrifice, I guess. Just like all the people who were conveniently sacrificed in all the aforementioned false flags. What are you even asking here?

    • Replies: @OilcanFloyd
  178. anonymus says:
    @MSimon

    Ah yes, the usual trumpeting; We built this and that. We are brilliant.

    So what?

    You are all just like the fkg nazis. I hear the nazis were quite smart too.

  179. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    If you’re a politician, Jews aren’t dangerous because they might vote against you, they’re dangerous because they will smear you in their newspapers and funnel money to your political opponents.

    The internet may have undermined the first threat but the second is still very much alive.

  180. anonymus says:
    @Lot

    “because it is a civilized Western state fighting Islamic barbarians for control of the Holy Land.”

    LOL.

    Anyway, my heartfelt praises to God, that he made me a ‘barbarian’, and not one of your kind.

  181. anonymus says:
    @Sherman

    The Jews are rich, powerful and evil geniuses and you’re just some loser posting rambling bullshit on the Internet.

    Corrected it for ya.

  182. anonymus says:
    @Zed, Lord of the Brutals

    “Can’t really agree, it’s impossible to overestimate the incompetence of the Arabs and Muslims in general.”

    Let’s see if you can remember that, while you are roasting nicely in Hell:)

  183. 5371 says:
    @Sam Shama

    You wrote something stupid, you were called on it, you are experiencing butthurt. Run along.

    • Replies: @Sam Shama
  184. @Sam Shama

    TARP as conceived and implemented was disasterously unnecessary. The Fed could and should have supported Lehman in the Fed’s role of lender of last resort. No need for Treasury. It was a colossal and poorly explained screw up by the Bernanke Fed.

    • Replies: @Sam Shama
  185. @Sam Shama

    There is no “zero lower bound in interest rates.”

  186. anonymus says:
    @JSM

    “Then Israel will kill all the Muslims”

    Only, you or somebody close to you will also be on the kill list. Is that ok with you, honkey?

  187. anonymus says:
    @Mr. Anon

    “which by the way coincided with the importation of foreign, near-eastern religions and cultural customs.”

    What? Are you saying all your christian ‘keepers of the faith’ are closeted near-eastern “religioners.”

    Who would have thought.

  188. Sam Shama says:
    @5371

    I wrote something eminently clear from the discussion that followed. You on the other hand wrote a content-free one liner, typical of idiotic individuals who cannot contribute anything material to the discussion.

    • Replies: @5371
  189. Sam Shama says:
    @skinnyhoops

    Well I agree with you that Lehman should never have been allowed to go the way it did. The reasons proffered for the action, or inaction really, never made much sense to me. On the ZLB issue: not in this country. We cannot have nominal negative rates, it has been proposed and discussed as recently as Yellen’s last presser, and she categorically ruled it out. Certainly we have seen it in some small European countries like the SNB allowing it, but I doubt if a major CB can do it as a standing policy.

  190. anon • Disclaimer says:
    @Mr. Anon

    No, you are quite wrong as you explain yourself.

    during that time, the turks were in retreat and were not attempting to conquer any additional parts of Europe

    In retreat from the lands they’d conquered earlier i.e. constant war except with the Europeans winning for a change.

    To be strictly fair my “the era of western colonialism” is not 100% accurate – I’ll change it to “the era of reconquista and colonialism” instead as that covers both pushing them back out of Europe and the colonization period.

    The simple truth is “Christendom” was under constant attack from the Arabs from the day they came out of Arabia until Europeans outpaced them in technology.

    I agree blowing up their countries for stupid reasons makes it worse but hostility to neocons shouldn’t blind people to the earlier history.

    For most of the 250 year-or-so gap under discussion, most of the near east

    North Africa is part of this as well. They were slaving in Europe for c. 1000 years until Europeans built better ships and colonized them.

    • Replies: @Mr. Anon
  191. anon • Disclaimer says:
    @GW

    to rant against a Jewish elite so omnipotent it couldn’t even get all Jewish senators to oppose the current Iran deal.

    There’s clearly a split between the globalist-first faction and the Israel-first faction.

  192. Mr. Anon says:
    @Astorian

    “Greg says:

    Underneath her venom, racism and antisemitism, Ann Coulter has one small but very valid point:”

    Coulter is neither a racist nor an antisemite. And you completely missed her “very valid point”. Are you dense? Those Republican candidates are not trying to win jewish votes. They are trying to win jewish campaign dollars and media coverage that is not overtly hostile.

  193. Mr. Anon says:
    @Jonathan Revusky

    “In recent years, I have come to realize that all the terrorist acts attributed to Muslims in the West are actually false flag events.”

    Then you are a credulous nitwit who engages in magical thinking. You know what you just announced to the world? “I am an idiot. Ignore everything I say”.

    OK. Done deal.

  194. anon • Disclaimer says:
    @Sam Shama

    Long and full of ad hominems is a good way to tell if something is wrong or not.

    Anyway, no point debating with someone who already knows the truth and tries to cloud it, so…

    In a nutshell the root of all of it imo is having the money supply controlled by people who benefit from expanding it.

    As well as the damage done by boom and bust generally it’s also the engine behind the wealthy/persecution cycle in Jewish history which has made them so nuts.

    So it would be grand if someone could come up with an alternative method to controlling the money supply.

    • Replies: @Sam Shama
  195. 5371 says:
    @Sam Shama

    [I wrote something eminently clear]

    Yes, you did. You wrote something eminently, clearly wrong. And for whatever reason, it was a clearly wrong attempt to get central bankers off the hook.

  196. Mr. Anon says:
    @skinnyhoops

    “Yes there are lots of Jews running the Central Bank but nothing prevents small investors from borrowing at low rates approaching .25% in the public securities and futures markets.”

    What does that involve? Who does that? I’m talking about regular people, borrowing money for a house or a car. Given that nobody does that, is it really the case that “nothing prevents them”? Abstruseness is itself a barrier.

  197. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    Jon: I’ve had a soft spot for Farrakhan ever since I saw him on C-SPAN years ago. He was talking about Jewish power and Jewish Supremacy, and about how blacks needed to organize against them. Then he gave a sly look to the camera and softened his tone and said something like, “and you white folks might want to think about doing that, too.”

    • Replies: @Ethniclear
  198. Mr. Anon says:
    @anon

    “@Mr. Anon

    No, you are quite wrong as you explain yourself.”

    No, we were discussing a partiucular time, and during that time the muslim world didn’t give Europe much trouble.

    “”The simple truth is “Christendom” was under constant attack from the Arabs from the day they came out of Arabia until Europeans outpaced them in technology.”

    Yes, that’s true. But by the 18th century, the technological and organizational gap between Europeans and Muslims became so great that the muslim world ceased to be a threat. That gap has only gotten wider. Europe has the means to insulate itself entirely from the Muslim world, if it only had the will. It would of course help if Europeans didn’t arm them. If they didn’t, I suppose the Chinese would. However, it wouldn’t matter much; modern armaments in the hands of Arabs are quickly turned into scrap.

    “I agree blowing up their countries for stupid reasons makes it worse but hostility to neocons shouldn’t blind people to the earlier history.”

    Yes, I agree. The fact that necons are not our friends does not mean that muslims are. They aren’t.

    • Replies: @anon
  199. Sam Shama says:
    @anon

    Ad hominem refers to an attack on the person, not the proposition. Read what I wrote carefully. I merely excoriated your assertions of ‘nonsense’ with the actual facts: namely the result that TARP turned a profit, among many others.

    Also remember, you have claimed (or at least sided) with the notion – along with rurik and with ‘5371’ the curiously marked digital – on various ludicrous charges, relying on the basic theme that the Fed is owned by Jews, has a counterfeit machine that enriches Jews, etc. So when presented with balance sheets and profitability numbers, you are unable to come back with any analytical refutation.

    That is about the size of it.

    • Agree: geokat62
    • Replies: @anon
  200. KA says:

    A commissioner for the city of Berkeley, California was fired for supporting a resolution calling on the city to consider divesting from corporations that operate in the illegally occupied Palestinian territories.

    Commissioners are not themselves elected; City Council members appoint commissioners to serve on the various commissions. Commissioner positions are unpaid and filled on a volunteer basis. At a commission meeting on the evening of September 16, Davila was informed that she had been fired by Council Member Darryl Moore for refusing to withdraw the resolution.

    Cheryl Davila served on the Human Welfare and Community Action Commission (HWCAC) for over seven years, where she oversaw numerous human rights resolutions.
    – See more at: http://mondoweiss.net/2015/09/berkeley-commissioner-resolution#sthash.ZgxdsLQa.dpuf

  201. Lot says:
    @Mr. Anon

    Gratz, Grutter, and Hamacher sound very much like the kind of german name that Jews tend not to have.

    Wrong.

    Gratz College is a general college of Jewish studies founded in 1895 offering a broad array of credentials and programs in virtually every area of higher Judaic learning to aspiring Jewish educators, communal professionals, lay people and others seeking to become more knowledgeable of Judaism.

    Located in Melrose Park, Pennsylvania, Gratz College traces its origins back to 1856 when banker, philanthropist and communal leader Hyman Gratz, and the Hebrew Education Society of Philadelphia (established in 1849 by Rebecca Gratz and Isaac Leeser) joined together to establish a trust to create a Hebrew teachers college.

    Jewish Encyclopedia:

    Barnard Gratz: American merchant; born at Langendorf, Upper Silesia, Germany, 1738; died at Baltimore, Md., April 20, 1801.

    It goes own to describe many other Jewish Gratzes in Pennsylvania.

    Hamacher means “Hammer-maker” and is found in both gentiles and german jews. The most famous was Armand Hammer, founder of Occidential Petroleum,

    A surname map search shows in 1920 that Grutter is mostly in New York, which is a strong sign it is primarily Jewish. It is a rare name though.

    Also, the U of M case got its start when a Jewish professor requested admission data that included race and test scores, was denied, and obtained it via Freedom of Information Act:

    https://www.cir-usa.org/1999/05/what-is-affirmative-action/

    The Detroit judge who ruled for the student plaintiffs is Jewish as well. And the ADL submitted a brief to the Supreme Court that argued “THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN UNDERGRADUATE AND LAW SCHOOL ADMISSIONS SYSTEMS VIOLATE THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE AND TITLE VI.”

    • Replies: @Mr. Anon
  202. @Mr. Anon

    Then you are a credulous nitwit who engages in magical thinking. You know what you just announced to the world? “I am an idiot. Ignore everything I say”.

    Are you sure that’s not projection?

    You say I’m wrong. Well, okay, that’s possible. I’ve been wrong before. About many things. Why don’t you make the slightest attempt to demonstrate that I’m wrong?

    Which terrorist attacks in the West attributed to Moslems were not false flag events? 9/11, 7/7, Charlie Hebdo? All of the above? None of the above? Which ones, in your opinion?

    I mean, I studied all of those and concluded they were false flags. If my conclusion was wrong, present some factual and/or logical argument to demonstrate that I am wrong. Okay?

    Do that, and if not… then… go f*** yourself, troll.

    • Replies: @Mr. Anon
  203. anon • Disclaimer says:
    @Sam Shama

    on the basic theme that the Fed is owned by Jews

    I view the banking mafia as a collection of families who are a group unto themselves.

    has a counterfeit machine that enriches

    The banking mafia’s 2% inflation target is counterfeiting pure and simple.

    That’s a problem in itself but as stated the bigger one imo is how they create mega boom/busts every 80-100 years which generally end in world war – and now there’s nukes their tendency to create world wars by accident is concerning and problematic.

    • Replies: @Sam Shama
    , @Bill Jones
  204. @Anonymous

    Years ago a Nation of Islam rep handed me some propaganda on a city street corner. I liked what I read about racial separation especially blacks relocating back to Africa. I even felt ok with their reparation demands if conditional on leaving for Africa.

  205. Sam Shama says:
    @anon

    Well then, in your view of the world the 2% inflation target is somehow exclusively benefiting the Fed (how? Please explain. It actually benefits the treasury, ie all taxpayers) and all the corporate bond issuers, private individuals accessing mortgages (essentially selling a bond), the municipal bond issuers are all defraying real costs through inflation. Is it clear, or getting clearer to you now, that your contention is flawed? A bit of honest thinking should be therapeutic.

    • Replies: @anon
    , @Mr. Anon
  206. @Mr. Anon

    Then you are a credulous nitwit who engages in magical thinking. You know what you just announced to the world? “I am an idiot. Ignore everything I say”.

    tripped across this blog, by a Jewish guy who migrated — aleyahed, i guess they call it — from Miami to Israel. He’s a financial writer or something.

    among other howlers he wrote these:

    The few Jewish Holocaust survivors liberated by the Americans and British were simply the beneficiaries of a historical accident. Nothing more. If Stalin had specifically gone after Jews, Roosevelt and Truman would have, and indeed did – hand over to Stalin every Russian Jew they could get their hands on.

    In the end, what I’m saying is this on a calculus basis. On a scale of horror 1-1000, 1000 being the most horrific, the Holocaust was a 998. Very few survived. Total annihilation would have been 1000.

    that is, according to the stated calculus, 2/1000 or 99.8% of Jews did not survive, i.e. were killed.

    in the comment section, the same writer wrote:

    Just know that I consider the Holocaust to be an extra-historical event. The only way one third of Jewry was going to get killed was if God willed it. It was inevitable, not historically, but extra-historically. I expect only Jews will understand what I’m saying here. Just like the Egyptian enslavement of the Israelites was inevitable. But that doesn’t mean the Egyptians weren’t punished or weren’t wrong. They were both. And so were the Nazis.

    what is a sane person supposed to conclude from this drivel?

    “99.8% of Jews were killed, no, make that 33% of Jews were killed in an extra-historical event that only Jews can understand but just as it was right to punish Egyptians for killing Jews — which there’s no record of Egyptians doing, btw, so it’s right for Nazis to be punished for killing either 99.8% or 33% of Jews which was wrong even tho God willed it —–”

    this guy’s a freaking finance writer!

    any arguments citing chapter and verse about how he’s in error got wiped off the board!

    don’t bother me with the facts my mind is made up. and based on that “understanding” that is available only to Jews, Nazis must be punished, for all eternity, it looks like, and anybody else about whom Jews develop such an “extra-historical” understanding accessible only to Jews is similarly subject to being wiped out.

    this dude’s got a whole list of people/nations/planets — no, not planets, that’s an exaggeration — that one supposed Jews understand should be wiped out —

    The United States government is the cause of evil not good.

    bye bye USA

    Abraham Lincoln was a murderer, not a hero.

    taken care of

    The South was justified in seceding from the US,

    raise high the Confederate flag

    and the North was the aggressor for invading the South.

    bye bye Boston, New York, Philadelphia, Jersey City

    Iran is not going to nuke anybody.

    lucky break, Iran

    AIPAC is a detrimental organization and should be shut down.

    bye bye AIPAC???
    maybe we could like this dude.

    Those who claim Israel controls much of US foreign policy are correct, not anti Semitic.

    ditto

    The US should have sent Japan a letter of apology for the oil embargo after Pearl Harbor instead of declaring war.

    now this one is really confusing.

    here’s the back story: the blog article was about this Jewish guy realizing that it was Churchill and not Hitler that wanted a war. Hitler offered to make a peace deal with Churchill but Winston would have none of it.

    so the blogger dude applied the same logic as above, which is to say no logic at all and maintained the assertion that from the very beginning Hitler wanted to kill either ALL or 99.8% or 33% of the world’s Jews.

    Hitler didn’t do anything to demonstrate that at the time that he offered a peace deal to Churchill that Churchill refused — in contrast to the Japanese who bombed Pearl Harbor, for which act blogger dude wrote that “US should have apologized to the Japanese.”

    Blogger dude is on a roll– even tho Hitler didn’t do anything to Jews up to 1940, when Churchill refused peace offers, he would have done bad things to Jews even if Churchill had agreed to a peace deal.

    blogger dude knows this because “God willed it” and it’s something that “only Jews understand.”

    There is a winner in this whole scenario.

    Miami has one fewer psycho waiting in line for a magical mystery tour.

    • Replies: @D. K.
  207. Mr. Anon says:
    @Lot

    Then I stand corrected on that point. You were right on that.

    Care to address my other point?

    • Replies: @Lot
  208. anon • Disclaimer says:
    @Sam Shama

    It doesn’t benefit the Fed it benefits the banking mafia (who collectively own the Fed) who create and spend the new money via loans to the inner circle. Inflation doesn’t occur when new money is created but only after it is spent into the economy and over decades this process acts as a slow but sure wealth transfer mechanism.

    The analogy is people putting gold coins into a bank and the bank melting them down and adding 2% tin. 100 gold coins are turned into 102 with the bank keeping the extra two. Repeat year after year and the banking mafia end up owning everything – except now no one else has any money the economy collapses.

    Doh!

    Repeat every hundred years or so.

    • Replies: @Sam Shama
  209. Mr. Anon says:
    @Jonathan Revusky

    “Are you sure that’s not projection?”

    No, I’m sure that you are an idiot.

    “You say I’m wrong. Well, okay, that’s possible. I’ve been wrong before. About many things. Why don’t you make the slightest attempt to demonstrate that I’m wrong?”

    How do I demonstrate with the finite word limit of the reply window that “all the terrorist acts attributed to Muslims in the West are actually false flag events.” Anyway, why should I have to? You are the one making the outlandish claim. You prove that you are right. But, of course, you can’t.

    You idiots think that everything is a false-flag. There are, in your estimation, no real flags. Ever, apparently.

    “Which terrorist attacks in the West attributed to Moslems were not false flag events? 9/11, 7/7, Charlie Hebdo? All of the above? None of the above? Which ones, in your opinion?”

    All of the above. But please, regale us with you cartoon knowledge of physics and an autists understanding of human nature to prove – prove with geometric logic, damnit! – that WTC 1 and 2 fell faster than they could of by gravity alone!!!!

    “I mean, I studied all of those and concluded they were false flags.”

    Oh, you studied them. Well, if that isn’t conclusive, I don’t know what is.

    “If my conclusion was wrong, present some factual and/or logical argument to demonstrate that I am wrong. Okay?”

    No, that is on you. You are the one with the ridiculous assertion.

    “Do that, and if not… then… go f*** yourself, troll.”

    I’ve been posting here under this same screen name for over ten years. I was posting here long before you popped up like a prairie dog out of a hole. I think that makes you the troll.

  210. Mr. Anon says:
    @Sam Shama

    “Well then, in your view of the world the 2% inflation target is somehow exclusively benefiting the Fed (how? Please explain. It actually benefits the treasury, ie all taxpayers) and all the corporate bond issuers, private individuals accessing mortgages (essentially selling a bond), the municipal bond issuers are all defraying real costs through inflation. Is it clear, or getting clearer to you now, that your contention is flawed? A bit of honest thinking should be therapeutic.”

    The Fed is nothing but an executive committee that acts for the benefit of it’s member banks. They are the entities who make money off of the central banking racket. And inflation screws over savers, especially when the savings rate is far below inflation. But bankers and financiers don’t really want common people to save. They don’t want us to own our own wealth. They want us to live on credit and be perpetually in hock to them.

    And since you are so quick to dismiss any critique of the Federal Reserve System as anti-semitism, answer us this: Are a disproportionate number of people in the banking and financial sector jewish (executives and owners I mean, not tellers)? Yes, or no. For how long now as the chairman of the Fed been jewish? Are there, literally, no gentiles who can perform that function? Even to the extent that we had to hire an Israeli national to serve as the deputy chairman?

    Is it wrong of us to notice that within a powerful and influential sector of the economy (finance) a disproportionate amount of power is wielded by members of a particular tribe who maybe, just maybe, don’t really have our interests at heart? Is that really out of line of us?

  211. D. K. says:
    @SolontoCroesus

    According to an estimate out of an Israeli Holocaust organization, there were slightly more than one million Jewish “Holocaust survivors” still alive in the world, as of January 1, 2004– nearly six decades after the end of World War II! If there were over one million still alive, as late as 2004, how many millions of Jewish “Holocaust survivors” were there when the Germans surrendered, over seventy years ago, now? How did those millions of Jewish “Holocaust victims” ever survive the Third Reich’s supposedly industrialized extermination campaign, which was supposedly intent upon the total annihilation of European Jewry? Were the supposed “death camps” overrun by the Soviets so quickly and unexpectedly that there was not enough time to murder the inmates through some more efficient manner, like machine-gunning them, or locking them in their barracks and then burning them alive?

  212. Sam Shama says:
    @anon

    Well here it finally comes out, the goldbuggery!!

    I’ll leave you to your devices as you ponder what Warren Buffet said about gold: Its an useless metal.

    Cheerio

    • Replies: @Mr. Anon
    , @anon
  213. Rifleman says:
    @Priss Factor

    All this obsession with homo stuff in your posts…Admit you’re a repressed closet homo

    Prissy, please. You give your self girly/faggy names like Andrea Ostrov Letania and The Priss Factory and then endlessly bash Jews for promoting homosexuality in the West. I think you called it Jomo power or something.

    You are a right wing fascist repressed homosexual and deranged antisemite who blames the Jews for both promoting homosexuality and at the same time through the Torah condemning homosexuals like yourself.

    You need the Jewish technique of psychotherapy. Although you seem like a lost cause.

    • Replies: @Mr. Anon
  214. Rifleman says:
    @Priss Factor

    Anti-semitic aspergers alert!!

    Nobody is going to read it prissy.

    Be more concise and save the ‘sperg mania for your own site.

  215. Rurik says:
    @Sam Shama

    What loans are you speaking of that ‘the rest of us have to pay back plus interest’?

    setting aside your ill-mannered reply

    The loans I speak of are the loans that the Federal Reserve Bank makes to the government. When the worms in our government spend more than they get, they have to get the balance from somewhere don’t they? So some of it comes from foreign countries like China and some of it comes from selling treasury bonds and some of it comes from loans from the Fed. All of those ‘loans’ must be paid back with interest. Countries like China and individuals are forced to earn the dollars they use to buy those treasury bonds, but the Fed just hits some keys on their computer. It’s not rocket science.

    Every bloody cent that the Fed extended as emergency liquidity and equity injection in banks, … …has been returned to the Fed. every dollar that the Treasury had loaned, invested or swapped has been returned with profit to the Taxpayer. So pray what are you talking about?

    for a smart guy you sure talk a lot of nonsense

    just TARP will cost the taxpayers between 50 and 100 billion. And I suspect much, much more. But they’re doing all they can to hide it. But the real cost will be in keeping all the crooks at their jobs who blew up the bubble in the first place, especially the Fed whose job it is to regulate the banks and make sure such bubbles don’t get blown up, but then they’re the ones blowing it up. That’s what I’m taking about Sam.

    Every dollar is accounted for. Currently that balance sheet is around \$4.4tr and most of it in the form of Bank Excess Reserves. Meaning those reserves that the banks do not access due to a lack of loan demand. Do you understand?

    Every dollar is accounted for? How much profit did the class A stock holders of the Federal Reserve Bank make in 2014?

    How much profit have the member banks made by loaning out our money to other banks at 0% interest and then charging us taxpayers real interest on that money when our government has to borrow some and pay it back?

    To whom and under what terms does the Fed loan out trillions of our dollars to foreign central banks? Do you know? Do you care?

    You make a point of letting us all know you’re a proud Jew. Why not and God bless. But this is the thing, I say that Jews benefit from the activities of the Fed. That Jews control it and basically own it and profit from it in ways we can’t even begin to imagine- it’s so vast.

    And most people are like, well, yea, I suppose so, if you really think about it. But what does Sam say?

    Sam get apoplectic. Hysterical. He becomes verbally abuse and froths invectives. ‘How dare you make such an asinine remark !!! You’re ranting!!!

    You’d think I’d just posted a transcript of the Protocols the way you come off. It’s like ‘Jews don’t benefit one God damn penny from the Federal Reserve Bank!!!! Their activity is completely transparent!!!!

    Me thinks Sam.. thou doth protesteth a bit much, eh?

  216. Rurik says:
    @Sam Shama

    – No, the Fed is not in the business of loaning the general public zero interest funds to go and enjoy a vacation or blow it at the races.

    because Goldman Sachs and Chase and Shitibank and AIG and BoA and Freddy and Fanny would never gamble in a casino with your money! Huh Sam?

  217. @anon

    Your cycles are wrong.
    Financial boom and bust every ten years, Major wars every twenty, world war every 50-60.
    The latter overdue.

  218. Rurik says:
    @Hugo

    he doesn’t have to tackle it, just mention it

    still I enjoy his work

    • Replies: @Hugo
  219. Rurik says:
    @Sam Shama

    Until they are faced with the facts, that is.

    this is going to be a long conversation

    we’ll get at all the facts and the truth

    we won’t need esoteric sounding language, acronyms or acrimony

    but together Sam, we’ll explore the Fed and its effects on us all

    We’ll delve into it’s beginnings and its machinations. I hope we can all learn from the experience. It’s vitally important that all American and in fact, all peoples of the world understand the Federal Reserve Bank- that controls the US dollar- and therefor the entire global economy is dependent and effected by what goes on there. This should be fun.

    I don’t have enough time tonight to really get into it, but I look forward to an enlightening exchange. : )

  220. Technomad says:

    The problem is not Jewish voting power. The problem is legions of ignorant evangelicals—the sort of people who think Left Behind is great literature. And part of the problem is an American public that’s been marinaded in utterly one-sided coverage of the Israeli-Arab conflict since well before World War II.

    • Replies: @Mr. Anon
  221. Mr. Anon says:
    @Sam Shama

    “I’ll leave you to your devices as you ponder what Warren Buffet said about gold: Its an useless metal.”

    And how much does he own? I’ll bet the answer is not “none”. He probably owns more than everyone who posts on this board (including Ron Unz) put together. So what should I believe? His words? Or his actions?

    • Replies: @Sam Shama
  222. Mr. Anon says:
    @Rifleman

    “You are a right wing fascist repressed homosexual and deranged antisemite who blames the Jews for both promoting homosexuality and at the same time through the Torah condemning homosexuals like yourself.”

    Did you get that “fascist = homosexual” meme from Oliver Stone movies? He was a big proponent of it back when it was acceptable. I guess it isn’t anymore. Perhaps “Priss Factory” is right that you protest a little too much. Then again, if he is a closted homosexual, as you assert, who has better gaydar than a queer?

    “You need the Jewish technique of psychotherapy. Although you seem like a lost cause.”

    And you still think that psychotherapy is somehow scientific, rather than what it really is: a discredited bullshit pseudo-science that was purely the product of Freud’s own inner demons. You really are living in the past. Things have changed since 1970, Cigarman.

    Hey, you also didn’t answer my question: Were Harvey Milk, Tony Kushner, David Kohan, and Max Mutchnik WASPS? Germans? Orthodox Russians? Do tell.

    • Replies: @Priss Factor
  223. Mr. Anon says:
    @Technomad

    “The problem is not Jewish voting power.”

    Nobody ever claimed that the Republicans pandering to Israel was the result of jewish voting power. Jews, by-and-large, don’t even vote for Republicans. Their pandering is down to jewish money.

  224. geokat62 says:

    Ron Paul just posted this article today on Antiwar.com. Here’s an excerpt:

    It has become common to discount any criticism of US foreign policy as “blaming America first.” It is a convenient way of avoiding a real discussion. If aggressive US policy in the Middle East – for example in Iraq – results in the creation of terrorist organizations like al-Qaeda in Iraq, is pointing out the unintended consequences of bad policy blaming America? Is it “blaming America” to point out that blowback – like we saw on 9/11 – can be the result of unwise US foreign policy actions like stationing US troops in Saudi Arabia?

    http://original.antiwar.com/paul/2015/09/20/blame-america-no-blame-neocons/

  225. Hugo says:
    @Rurik

    And that’s sensical. You can enjoy something while recognising exactly what it is and what it’s limitations are.

  226. Sam Shama says:

    Let’s have a go at it then, shall we?

    Only arguments based on research, data, analytics and logic. Cast aside your own prejudices, rather well known in these parts.

    They also have their own counterfeiting machine; The Federal Reserve Bank, that can use to >>poof<< create Federal Reserve Notes and then loan out trillion\$ to other Jewish banksters that they can use to consolidate even more money/power.

    Start with the above. Prove the existence of a counterfeiting machine, which according to the of definition of ‘counterfeit’ is a machine that produces illegal notes, which are then illegally once again (trillions of \$), exclusively passed on to ‘Jewish banksters’. Prove this. Name your sources. Provide analysis. I am not willing to read verbiage based on your prejudices.

    I shall hold myself to precisely the same standards.

    • Replies: @Rurik
    , @Blobby5
  227. Rurik says:
    @anon

    There’s a lot more but not in the mood.

    there’s so very much more

    where does all those QE billion\$ go to?

    who has been blowing up the Wall Street stock market bubble since the housing bubble blew up?

    who’s been manipulating precious metals?

    talk about RICO act

    and the thing is, the Fed was intended to protect and preserve the value of the dollar !

    there’s so enormously more to this foul tale of treachery and theft and wars and wars and more wars

    Bernanke admitted that the Fed caused the Great Depression

    That’s what they do.. they blow up bubbles in some market by keeping interests rates artificially low and then using their minions to push a product. Stocks, tech, housing, back to stocks. And they blow the bubble up and then get all their insiders ready (Fuld must have pissed someone off) and then >>boom<<, it blows up- and then they swoop in to buy up all the carnage at pennies on the dollar. (just like they did to Germany after WWI) So grandpa's investments and pension are looted and people are tossed out of their houses that the president told them to buy.

    It gets worse too. Much worse. Because these are the guys we trust to regulate the banking industry, and they're the greediest, most corrupt worshipers of Mammon in the entire world. The fox 'proteccting' the hen house on steroids. And so you get a Treasury Secretary who's an X-Goldman Sachs (no such thing as X-Goldman Sachs) who’s beholding to Wall Street with direct ties to the Fed. It’s an incestuous cabal of completely unaccountable uber-corruption. Especially after that crook Robert Rubin got his idiot Bubba to end Glass Stiegel. Then the flood gates of theft and graft really opened up.

    The malfeasance is so staggering that I too only have so much time and energy to give to it all. I’d rather watch youtube videos of babes in bikinis shooting Uzis, but I’m forced to pay attention to the man behind that curtain pulling the levers and turning the dials of our republic and civilization because our survival literally depends on us all looking behind that curtain, no matter how bad the smell.

    Since the Fed has come into existence New York bankers funded Trotsky and they shot the Romanov girls in a basement. WWI laggered on and the flower of Europe and Russia lay dead and frozen in the mud. Followed by a WWII that no one wanted, especially not Hitler. But just like today, they foist their wars from London and NY. And who’s behind these endless, endless wars for fun and profit? And who does the dying?

    • Replies: @MarkinLA
  228. Sam Shama says:
    @Mr. Anon

    And how much does he own? I’ll bet the answer is not “none”.

    Well you bet wrong.

    moral: don’t wager without sufficient knowledge, would be my advice. In the latest (Aug 2015) 13-F filings with the SEC, consistent with his publicly stated position, Buffet does not own any gold or gold shares;

    http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1067983/000095012315009404/xslForm13F_X01/form13fInfoTable.xml

    I suppose you will now come back with some asinine remark like “well have you checked what’s in that safe in Buffet’s basement?”

    Look, you gold-buggers are perfectly welcome to dwell in your own parallel universe, but should you choose to debate this matter, please respond with data and analysis. I am fairly familiar with your fairy tales, having subjected myself to reading your economics torture manual for an actual public debate I participated in 2 yrs ago.

    • Replies: @Mr. Anon
  229. Rurik says:
    @Sam Shama

    Prove the existence of a counterfeiting machine, which according to the of definition of ‘counterfeit’ is a machine that produces illegal notes, which are then illegally once again (trillions of \$), exclusively passed on to ‘Jewish banksters’. Prove this.

    This is the thing Sam, the Federal Reserve Act made their counterfeiting machine legal.. It gave them the “legal” right to print our money, and then inject it into the economy in ways that benefited them. Who are them? The boyz that own the banks that own the Fed, that’s who. So if you want to split hairs on the specific definition of the word counterfeit, then sure, their machine is legal, if not in the least ethical. (legal and ethical not being the same thing Sam). And I never said the money “exclusively passed on to ‘Jewish banksters’.” Jews are not the sole beneficiaries to the lucre exclusively. They’re just massively over-represented as the beneficiaries. Sort of the way the largest banks are owned and run by Jews and gentiles both, but Jews are hugely over-represented. Just like Jews are inordinately over-represented on Wall Street, where most of the lucre from the QEs have been flowing. Is that a coincidence do you suppose? Do you think there’s a possibility that Jews might use their positions of power and influence to aid and assist other Jews Sam? Is that a canard? A blood libel to suggest such a thing?

    Please don’t get the wrong idea Sam. As I’ve said before, I’m not bashing Jews or the Jewish people or Judaism. Never. I like Jews. Why wouldn’t I? They’re a likable people! Humanity has benefited immensely from the unique genius and lovable antics of Jews. They’ve given us all a spiritual poetry in their biblical ruminations that have uplifted the human spirit. Jesus was as close to a perfect human that it’s possible to be (IMHO), it’s understandable so many consider him God Himself.

    Jews are like all others. They have their lovable side and their not so lovable side. And their financial swindles and penchant for intriguing others into wars are some of the not-so-lovable parts. I like and admire many Jews Sam, but I don’t give them all a pass. When they’re right (Solomon and Jesus and Sagan) I’m a big fan. When they’re wrong (financial swindles, eternal wars, moral degeneracy) I’m not. Please don’t consider some of my criticism of some of the things some Jews do as a blanket condemnation of all Jews. That would be silly and wrong and tragic. Indeed, I have literally loved Jews intimately and count some Israelis as friends. We don’t always agree, but there is mutual respect at least. And in my short time here on the Unz Review, I’ve come to respect your intellect as well. But being intelligent is not always the same as being correct. So as we explore the Fed, please try to remember that when I’m being critical of the men (Jewish and non-Jewish) who run this scam, I’m not trying to condemn all Jews.

  230. Mr. Anon says:
    @Sam Shama

    I don’t even know what that form purports to show. It doesn’t even have Buffets name on it. how do I reaaly know it has anything to do with him. In any even, are those Berkshire-Hathaway holdings? Buffet undoubtedly has other assets than Berkshire-Hathaway. Are those his own personal holdings? Well that form had this at the top of it:

    “The reader should not assume that the information is accurate and complete.”

    “I suppose you will now come back with some asinine remark like “well have you checked what’s in that safe in Buffet’s basement?””

    Why is that assinine? I don’t think it would be at all. He probably does have a safe. Maybe several. More importantly, he probably has lots of safety-deposit boxes squirrled around the country, or even the world. It was reported in the Economist a couple years ago that the ultra-wealthy were buying up physical gold practically by the ton. Are you going to make an assinine statement like that you know for certain that Buffet hasn’t bought any at all. Right, like we would believe that Warren Buffet confides his most personal financial information with Sam Shama.

    You can argue all day in defence of a corrupt banking establishment – you won’t win many adherants to your cause. People revile them with good reason. Why don’t you try to stick-up for used car dealers or pay-day loan operators. You might find it easier going.

    Why are you doing it? I don’t think it’s ouf of a sense of disinterested public service. Perhaps you are a part of that same foul machine – another reason not to give a damn what you think.

    • Replies: @Sam Shama
  231. MarkinLA says:
    @Rurik

    Bernanke admitted that the Fed caused the Great Depression

    No he asserted this and wrote his PhD thesis on it. Bernanke did what he said we should have done to end the Great Depression and did it really work?

    Only if you think endless welfare payments aren’t real and that endless deficit spending is a solution to breadlines. If we had the welfare system we had in the 1930s Bernanke would be just as big a failure as then. There is no real difference in the jobs situation – the real way to end a depression. People are just paid now to do nothing and many like it like that.

    • Replies: @Rurik
  232. anon • Disclaimer says:
    @Sam Shama

    My point was the opposite of “gold-buggery” as it illustrated how physical money can be debased also – it just takes more effort.

    The fineness of the silver content varied with political and economic circumstances. From a purity of greater than 90% silver in the first century A.D., the denarius fell to under 60% purity by the end of the second century A.D., and plummeted to 5% purity by the end of the third century A.D.[11] By the reign of Gallienus, the antoninianus was a copper coin with a thin silver wash.

  233. Sam Shama says:
    @Rurik

    This is the thing Sam, the Federal Reserve Act made their counterfeiting machine legal.. It gave them the “legal” right to print our money, and then inject it into the economy in ways that benefited them.

    ok Rurik, so we are talking about Federal Reserve Notes, the only legal notes issued in the U.S. So why are they issued? They are legal tender, for all debts private and public, used as a medium of exchange for most transactions and act a store of value. Now one might have an argument that any of those functions are not performed by the notes. For example, you may say that you won’t accept payment in USD and that would be perfectly fine, however it appears that the overwhelming majority of nations, individuals and businesses are actually saying the reverse, i.e. they wish to receive compensation in USD. Which is why the dollar has climbed in value against a basket of other currencies:

    http://www.marketwatch.com/investing/index/dxy/charts?symb=DXY&countrycode=US&time=20&startdate=1%2F4%2F1999&enddate=9%2F21%2F2015&freq=2&compidx=none&compind=none&comptemptext=Enter+Symbol%28s%29&comp=none&uf=7168&ma=1&maval=50&lf=1&lf2=4&lf3=0&type=2&size=2&style=1013

    Now in my attempt to understand why you call it counterfeiting, I noticed that someone up the thread, remarked that it is akin to adding tin to pure gold coins, thereby diluting its value, and inflation does the same to savings. Fair enough, I do agree that if you were putting all your money in a savings account earning 0.2%, you are falling behind the 1.5%-2% inflation that this country is experiencing. However most do not do that, as they own homes with mortgages and have money invested in stocks through 401(k)’s etc. When you have a mortgage, it is exactly the same as selling the bank a bond with your home as collateral. Suppose you are paying 4% on your mortgage, and inflation is 2%, then the real rate of interest you are paying is 4% – 2% = 2% on your mortgage. This is exactly the same as the US Treasury making smaller real payments on their issued bonds than the nominal coupon states. Therefore it is wrong to say that the Fed/Treasury complex is the sole beneficiary of inflation. Now if Hyperinfaltion occurred (50%+ inflation per month, a possibility smaller than getting hit by a meteorite imho), what woould happen? Well your home value would go up about 50%+ per month, but the payment on your mortgage would be the same in dollars, (and presumably indexed wages & salaries) would also track inflation, thereby making you a big winner, since the fixed-rate mortgage issuing bank would be hosed!!

    [MORE]

    Who are them? The boyz that own the banks that own the Fed, that’s who. So if you want to split hairs on the specific definition of the word counterfeit, then sure, their machine is legal, if not in the least ethical. (legal and ethical not being the same thing Sam). And I never said the money “exclusively passed on to ‘Jewish banksters’.” Jews are not the sole beneficiaries to the lucre exclusively. They’re just massively over-represented as the beneficiaries.

    Read about the ownership of Reserve Bank Shares. Where do we get the information that “Jews exclusively or majority own” these shares?
    http://www.federalreserve.gov/faqs/about_14986.htm

    These are the members of the Federal Reserve system. Now I need you to tell me how, from this given membership, you magically extracted the conclusion that these banks are owned by Jews exclusively or in majority.

    https://www.richmondfed.org/banking/federal_reserve_membership/bank_holding_companies

    https://www.richmondfed.org/banking/federal_reserve_membership/state_member_banks

    https://www.richmondfed.org/banking/federal_reserve_membership/savings_and_loan_holding_companies

    Ok, now I also looked up the the shareholding information for the Large Banks:

    (1) J.P. Morgan: Institutional 82.62%, Insider 0.26%, Largest Institution type: Investment Advisor : 88.23%

    (2) Wells Fargo: Institutional 84.66%, insider 0.13%, Investment Advisor 87.8%

    (3) Bank of America: Institutional 66.15%, insider 0.-7%, Investment Advisor 85.69%

    (4) Citibank: Instituional: 83.92%, insider 0.16%, Investment Advisor 82.44%

    (5) PNC Bank: Institutional 96.72%, insider 0.19%, Investment Advisor 90.4%

    (6) BoNY Mellon: Institutional 86.39%, insider 0.36%, Investment Advisor 77.24%

    The list can continue, but what is so clear is that the ownership is hugely skewed to “Investment Advisor”s, which means individual investors and their IRA’s and 401(k) accounts, and other individual brokerage accounts! To the extent that Jews are wealthy, certainly they hold a greater proportion in the individual a/c’s than their population share would indicate. That however, is a far cry from your inflammatory accusation of outright theft!

    The cash flows to other well connected Jews and gentiles, but Jews are MASSIVELY over-represented as the recipients of the swindled lucre.

    On what do you base the charge of “swindling” ?

    Here is the Balance Sheet of the Federal Reserve: http://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/files/quarterly_balance_sheet_developments_report_201508.pdf

    look at page 12. It shows that \$4.485 tr of assets are on the books of the Fed. They have not been secretly stuffed or vanished into Jewish or privileged gentile pockets! The money is sitting THERE! Held in MBS, Treasury bonds, bills and notes. Every dollar of interest from these assets are sent back to the U.S. Treasury, i.e. the TAXPAYER, its called seignorage. When you hold physical currency in your pocket or under your mattress, you are not getting paid interest on those, which is also seignorage. Some of the reasons that have contributed to the rapid decline of the U.S deficit is that QE interest gets returned to Treasury. Also Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac recovery profits continue to benefit our annual budget!!

    http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2015/01/26/381639118/2015-will-continue-streak-of-shrinking-u-s-budget-deficit

    Do you think there’s a possibility that Jews might use their positions of power and influence to aid and assist other Jews Sam? Is that a canard? A blood libel to suggest such a thing?

    It is certainly plausible, but I have no personal experience of it. I never said it is a blood libel or anything of the sort, I only objected to the charge of thievery from public purses on an organised basis.

    Please don’t get the wrong idea Sam. As I’ve said before, I’m not bashing Jews or the Jewish people or Judaism. Never. I like Jews.

    Allright, I take you for your word.

    I like and admire many Jews Sam, but I don’t give them all a pass. When they’re right (Solomon and Jesus and Sagan) I’m a big fan. When they’re wrong (financial swindles, eternal wars, moral degeneracy) I’m not.

    I am with you on this.

    • Replies: @Rurik
  234. Rurik says:
    @MarkinLA

    Bernanke admitted that the Fed caused the Great Depression

    No he asserted this and wrote his PhD thesis on it. Bernanke did what he said we should have done to end the Great Depression and did it really work?

    What the Bernanke did was keep interests rates at zero and flood Wall Street with massive quantities of artificially cheap cash that they used to blow up the housing bubble (with the dutiful complicity of the GSEs and CRA and other fecal government treasons). Just like what the boyz did in the 20s with the stock market. And then they cut off the spigot and watch the carnage and then swoop in like vultures and pick at the tasty bits. Only the Bernanke waited too long and then had to go to the treasury to make sure Goldman Sachs didn’t lose any money on their casino sub-prime derivatives swindles.

    • Replies: @MarkinLA
  235. Sam Shama says:
    @Rurik

    I posted a longish reply, mostly with info and agreeing with you on a number of points, but it appears to have vanished in the ether.

  236. @Jonathan Revusky

    That’s an odd response to someone who largely agrees with you.

    I think the official stories behind 9-11 and Boston Marathon bombings are highly suspicious, and the CIA links to Al Qaeda are obvious going back to support for the Mujahadeen. But the false flag acts often require Muslim patsies, which seem to be easy to find. I don’t believe that the Iran embassy hostage situation was a false flag op, and I don’t believe that the Achille Lauro hijacking was, either. Blowback happens.

    • Replies: @Jonathan Revusky
  237. Sam Shama says:
    @Rurik

    When they’re wrong (financial swindles, eternal wars, moral degeneracy) I’m not. Please don’t consider some of my criticism of some of the things some Jews do as a blanket condemnation of all Jews. That would be silly and wrong and tragic. Indeed, I have literally loved Jews intimately and count some Israelis as friends. We don’t always agree, but there is mutual respect at least.

    I have never claimed the absence of Jewish swindlers, nor that the top CEOs of banks, many of whom are indeed Jewish are individuals pure as the driven snow. Quite the contrary actually, many of them, through a distortion of laws relating to executive compensation, tax laws relating to dividends and carried interest are earning far more than they would have in the absence of those distortions. Repealing Glass Steagall was a mistake. Allowing banks to hold very small amounts of capital was another. And in this regard, I have little difficulty in saying that the Fed failed in its supervisory capacity. However saying that the Fed is in the business of counterfeiting is, well, crazy.

    • Replies: @Rurik
  238. Sam Shama says:
    @Rurik

    PART I:

    This is the thing Sam, the Federal Reserve Act made their counterfeiting machine legal.. It gave them the “legal” right to print our money, and then inject it into the economy in ways that benefited them.

    ok Rurik, so we are talking about Federal Reserve Notes, the only legal notes issued in the U.S. So why are they issued? They are legal tender, for all debts private and public, used as a medium of exchange for most transactions and act a store of value. Now one might have an argument that any of those functions are not performed by the notes. For example, you may say that you won’t accept payment in USD and that would be perfectly fine, however it appears that the overwhelming majority of nations, individuals and businesses are actually saying the reverse, i.e. they wish to receive compensation in USD. Which is why the dollar has climbed in value against a basket of other currencies:

    http://www.marketwatch.com/investing/index/dxy/charts?symb=DXY&countrycode=US&time=20&startdate=1%2F4%2F1999&enddate=9%2F21%2F2015&freq=2&compidx=none&compind=none&comptemptext=Enter+Symbol%28s%29&comp=none&uf=7168&ma=1&maval=50&lf=1&lf2=4&lf3=0&type=2&size=2&style=1013

    Now in my attempt to understand why you call it counterfeiting, I noticed that someone up the thread, remarked that it is akin to adding tin to pure gold coins, thereby diluting its value, and inflation does the same to savings. Fair enough, I do agree that if you were putting all your money in a savings account earning 0.2%, you are falling behind the 1.5%-2% inflation that this country is experiencing. However most do not do that, as they own homes with mortgages and have money invested in stocks through 401(k)’s etc. When you have a mortgage, it is exactly the same as selling the bank a bond with your home as collateral. Suppose you are paying 4% on your mortgage, and inflation is 2%, then the real rate of interest you are paying is 4% – 2% = 2% on your mortgage. This is exactly the same as the US Treasury making smaller real payments on their issued bonds than the nominal coupon states. Therefore it is wrong to say that the Fed/Treasury complex is the sole beneficiary of inflation. Now if Hyperinfaltion occurred (50%+ inflation per month, a possibility smaller than getting hit by a meteorite imho), what would happen? Well your home value would go up about 50%+ per month, but the payment on your mortgage would be the same in dollars, (and presumably indexed wages & salaries) would also track inflation, thereby making you a big winner, since the fixed-rate mortgage issuing bank would be hosed!!

  239. Kilo 4/11 says:
    @Priss Factor

    “White cons and Russian nationalists have so much in common, but white cons are being misled by talk radio into believing that subversive Jews/homos(like James Kirchick and Jennifer Rubin and Victoria Nuland even Pussy Riot) are their allies against Russia that stands for national identity and heritage.”

    You reveal that you have a severely warped understanding of what motivates many Americans to support Ukraine and oppose Russian aggression against that beleaguered country.

    • Replies: @Priss Factor
  240. HA says:
    @5371

    >Not according to Tacitus. He says they drowned their faggots in swamps.

    Rifleman, I’d trust him on this. When it comes to fluffing, or self-castrating eunuchs, or even masturbating children, 5371 is an expert. The sicker the topic, the more likely it is that he’ll take an interest.

  241. Kilo 4/11 says:
    @Anonymous

    Thank you, jhep for reminding us of the importance of decency.

    Coulter, by adhering to the convention that obscenity enhances one’s argument, only helps legitimize the Hollywood/New York axis of evil. She was already walking very close to the line with her provocative manner of dress, but now she’s crossed it.

    Of course, dropping the f-bomb massively increased the attention given to her remark, and therefore its short term effectiveness. But aside from the fact that no good end can come of bad means, if she continues in this vein, she will embarrass many who want a good example for their wives and children.

  242. Priss Factor [AKA "The Priss Factory"] says:
    @Kilo 4/11

    “You reveal that you have a severely warped understanding of what motivates many Americans to support Ukraine and oppose Russian aggression against that beleaguered country.”

    Right, US is helping that country a lot by promoting Jewish oligarchs, Neo-Nazis, and homo paraders.

  243. Priss Factor [AKA "The Priss Factory"] says: • Website
    @Mr. Anon

    “Then again, if he is a closted homosexual, as you assert, who has better gaydar than a queer?”

  244. MarkinLA says:
    @Rurik

    I won’t argue with that only that what Bernanke said caused the Great Depression is one of those things that can never really be proven. Bernanke’s point was that the Fed restricted liquidity in the face of the Depression and that was the wrong thing to do. This reduction in liquidity lead to a cascading effect of all the failures of banks and credit tightening that caused businesses to fail. That is why Bernanke opened the flood gates in 2008. His blaming the Fed never addresses the decline in manufacturing output almost a year ahead of the 20s crash and all the ensuring layoffs because of those industrial declines or how relatively impoverished the working class was.

    The bubble in stocks in the 20s was not caused by the Fed it was caused by the margin buying in the 20s when you could borrow as much as 90% of the stocks value so there was really very little money supporting the market. This was similar to the famous Kuwaiti stock market where people paid for their stock with post dated checks. As the market started to collapse you had a cascade of margin calls that could not be answered forcing even more selling when there were no circuit breakers. Now the most margin you can have is 50% and sometimes even less than that.

    • Agree: Sam Shama
    • Replies: @Rurik
  245. Ace says:
    @Christian

    I am not up on all that the Israelis faced in Lebanon but I think one of the problems they faced was a well dug in enemy that had had a long time to prepare their positions. I think, too, there were interlocking tunnels allowing movement under cover, plus pre-positioned supplies.

    I apologize if my memory is faulty.

    I recall also that the Israeli commander took some flak from his highers. Apparently even they thought the battle could have been fought better, though the highers may have been looking for a scapegoat.

    Urban combat is every infantryman’s nightmare and I hesitate to say that some commander or his troops screwed up when it’s house to house.

    I’m not willing to say that the IDF are just good tank or airplane drivers. IDF troops have always struck me both as technically competent and as being formidable foes. Anyone who might say they are pussies in certain environments is engaging in the kind of grr woofery that can lead to nasty surprises from time to time.

    • Replies: @Rurik
  246. Ace says:
    @Jonathan Revusky

    Farrakhan is much less than you make him out to be. Black Muslims perpetrated the Zebra killings which involved targeting the most ordinary white people you can think of. Stranded white motorists, for example. Farrakhan rushed to fund the legal defense of those killers who were caught and denied funds to the only one who turned state’s evidence.

    Farrakhan maybe smart but he’s a greasy man whose parents were not married to each other. He doesn’t just hate the white power structure. He hates whites. His call for 10,000 loyal sons to kill whitey was similarly a missile addressed “to whom it may concern.”

    Farrakhan was Rev. Wright’s man of the year, let it be said. And we are talking now of just one degree of separation between Farrakhan and another well known person.

  247. Ace says:
    @Mr. Anon

    Much, much more than we realize. There’s no longer a visceral reaction to invasion of foreigners and it’s pathetic that primitive, ridiculous Islam can’t be called what it is — subversive. Previous generations would never have stood for Hassan’s murders being called “workplace violence.”

  248. Ace says:
    @Rurik

    Apart from the fact that I’m an axe murderer, Mr. Jones, I’d be a wonderful husband for your daughter.

    • Replies: @Rurik
  249. Mr. Anon says:
    @Sam Shama

    Ok – so those are the holdings of Berkshire Hathaway. That’s a very different thing than Buffets’ personal finances. So what you proferred as evidence that Buffet owns no gold is no evidence at all.

  250. Rurik says:
    @Ace

    you’re the kind of poster I’ve been waiting for

    : D

    let’s get this party started ~ !

  251. Blobby5 says:
    @Rurik

    Perfect! And never mentioned. Why is Zuckerberg worth billions? Because of The Fed. Inflating asset values since 1913.

  252. Blobby5 says:
    @Sam Shama

    The Fed’s balance sheet went from 800 billion on the mid 2000’s to 4.5 trillion today. Where do you think that money came from?

    A note implies backing, there is none to our ‘federal reserve notes.’

  253. Rurik says:
    @Sam Shama

    Which is why the dollar has climbed in value against a basket of other currencies:

    the only reason the dollar is doing well against other currencies is because all other currencies are also manipulated

    the breadth and width of the power of the Fed is international. The central banksters of the world are all in cahoots. It’s a little club, a cabal. And if Australia’s dollar or Norway’s krone get too high, adjustments are made. That’s what’s so nice about fiat currency. It isn’t tied to anything. It’s worth what they say it’s worth. It is currency by fiat.

    When you have a mortgage, it is exactly the same as selling the bank a bond with your home as collateral. Suppose you are paying 4% on your mortgage, and inflation is 2%, then the real rate of interest you are paying is 4% – 2% = 2% on your mortgage. This is exactly the same as the US Treasury making smaller real payments on their issued bonds than the nominal coupon states. Therefore it is wrong to say that the Fed/Treasury complex is the sole beneficiary of inflation

    the beneficiary is the one with the counterfeiting machine. The guy who prints the money and then spends it to benefit himself and his buddies. He’s the one that benefits. The rest of us all lose the value of the money we’ve spent a life working and saving, so we could tuck away a little for later. But no. They’re so busy running those presses that by the time we go to use our savings, it’s worth a fraction of what it was worth when we earned it with our sweat and tears. Or we could try to put it into the rigged casino of Wall Street or some other thing like precious metals. But then the boyz at the Fed manipulate those things too. It’s all rigged for the maximum benefit of the boyz running the scam at the expense of all the rest of us.

    It shows that \$4.485 tr of assets are on the books of the Fed. They have not been secretly stuffed or vanished into Jewish or privileged gentile pockets! The money is sitting THERE!

    that’s funny

    what’s to stop the boyz at the Fed from walking up to their computer and doubling that five trill by hitting a couple of keys on their keyboard? “The money is sitting THERE!” Nothing is sitting there. That five trill is nothing more than an illusion. Is there any gold or silver or orange juice or anything of value to represent that “money”? Or is it just a number on a computer that the man behind the curtain at the Fed can capriciously change on a whim?

    Also Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac recovery profits continue to benefit our annual budget!!

    I’m worried about you Sam

    I only objected to the charge of thievery from public purses on an organised basis.

    well, I’ll let the readers decide if they think there’s any reason to believe that some Jews (and gentiles) would actually participate in thievery from public purses on an organized basis. As for myself, that’s about all I’ve been witness to my entire life on this planet; a small and organized cabal of criminals who have enriched themselves by thieving from the public purse. Men like Robert Rubin whose tools of theft are idiot politicians like Bubba who would put such a man in charge of the Treasury.

  254. Rurik says:
    @Sam Shama

    However saying that the Fed is in the business of counterfeiting is, well, crazy.

    ok, how about we call it printing our money and handing it out to their buddies at other banks in secret deals that massively degrade the value of the money we’ve saved? While giving the men and women who print this money and use it to their own advantage spectacular power to alter the way the world works. Often to foment wars that get governments to borrow more and more money that the Fed and other banks get to charge interest on. So American boys and girls go and fight and die in contrived wars for fun and profit of the banksters and slaughter innocents in far away lands and come home in body bags or missing limbs or are so spiritually destroyed from participating in evil wars on innocent people that they just kill themselves to end the living nightmare that their lives have become because bankers and politicians have forced them to do things they can’t live with? If we can’t call it counterfeiting, can we call it treasonous subversion of our government by controlling the money supply? And using that power to foist wars that increase their wealth and power? Is that a fair characterization?

    • Replies: @Sam Shama
  255. Rurik says:
    @MarkinLA

    Bernanke’s point was that the Fed restricted liquidity in the face of the Depression and that was the wrong thing to do

    it depends on your perspective

    the (men at the) Fed wanted to cause the Great Depression. That’s how they use their power to impoverish and then loot a country by pulling the rug out from an economy and then buying up the assets at pennies on the dollar. This is all nothing new. Men like Andrew Jackson warned us about it all. Thomas Jefferson even before Jackson..

    “If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all property until their children wake up homeless on the continent their Fathers conquered…I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies… The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs.”

    It’s what they do. The last people a nation should trust to control their money supply are the world’s banksters. They’re the most greedy, avaricious, pernicious, corrupt, psychopathic, demonic fiends ever to slither out of the belly of Moloch. And we trust them with the public good?! That’s like trusting Dick Cheney or Donald Rumsfeld with levers of your military industrial complex. Not good.

    When people talk about the Fed causing the Great Depression by accident, all I can think of is the way people talk about the wars in the Middle East having gone so wrong because those countries are in smoking ruins and the people’s lives are a living hell on earth. But what they don’t understand is that that is exactly what the people who foisted those wars wanted!

    Depending on your perspective, the Great Depression was a fantastic success. The banksters were able to consolidate their total power over the governments of the world. And the few that they didn’t own fee simple, they destroyed in contrived wars. Just look at which countries have a Rothschild central bank and which countries are targeted for military destruction. The Great Depression worked just as they intended. The war on Iraq and Afghanistan and Libya are all perfect successes. The only fly in the ointment today to their absolute realizations of all their demonic (from my perspective) designs on the world is Vlad Putin, who isn’t letting them do to Syria what they have in mind for all Muslim countries in the Middle East. Were it not for Putin, Syria and Iran and God knows how many other countries would be dystopian hells on earth too. It’s what they do.

    Now the most margin you can have is 50% and sometimes even less than that.

    I suspect that’s not the case with the big investment banks on Wall Street Markin. I suspect they’re back to their old ways of trading on massive margins, but I confess I don’t know for sure.

  256. Rurik says:
    @Ace

    Farrakhan maybe smart but he’s a greasy man whose parents were not married to each other.

    Wow

    really Ace?

    God damn him for that!!!

  257. Hrw-500 says:
    @Ace

    Could we imagine Farrakhan one day, doing a 180 degrees turn just like Robert Mugabe, president of Zimbabwe, who vowed that ”Whites will never be allowed to own land in Zimbabwe ever again” and after he screwed his country so badly, he wants white farmers to come back?

  258. Rurik says:
    @Ace

    Urban combat is every infantryman’s nightmare and I hesitate to say that some commander or his troops screwed up when it’s house to house.

    what you’re referring to here is the Sabra and Shatila massacre Ace

    What happened there is after the Zionist terrorists drove the indigenous Palestinian Muslims and Christians from their homes and farms and businesses so that the Jewish terrorists could steal it, some of the fleeing Muslims and Christians fled to places like Lebanon. From there they agitated to get their homes back from the Jewish terrorists who had murdered their relatives and stolen their houses and land. But there was one Jewish terrorist, known as the Butcher of Beirut (you can google it) who didn’t like there being Palestinian Muslims and Christians left alive. So he drove his tanks into Lebanon and tried to kill them all. But it caused some international and diplomatic grief, so the US went in as a negotiator and talked to the PLO (Palestinian Muslims and Christian who had fled the Jewish terrorist blood bath). They decided that the Palestinian men would leave Lebanon and there would be the peace. But the men didn’t want to leave their families to the tender mercies of the Butcher. So guarantees were given by the US and Israel and Lebanon that the Palestinian women and children and old men would not be harmed. And with these guarantees the men agreed to leave. Then. Shortly afterwards, after all the men had left and all that remained were unarmed women and children and old men, the Butcher just could not resist. It was an opportunity that had his name written all over it. Defenseless women and children! It was for Ariel Sharon like crack to a junkie! So, the brave general did what he did best. He set about surrounding the camps where the women and children were with his mighty tanks and his brave IDF. Now we all know that unarmed woman and children are mostly harmless to armed soldiers with machine guns and grenades, but please note I said “mostly”. So there is still some possibility that some harm could have come to one of the brave IDF soldiers by a woman with a rock or a stick. What to do, what to do… Well that’s when the Butcher came up with the idea of having some local thugs do his killing for him! Pure military genius! Pure Ariel Sharon! So, as I said, he surrounded the camps where the Palestinian women and children had been guaranteed sanctuary from the Butcher, and he had his brave IDF light up the skies with flares, and then his thugs did his dirty work for him and they went from house to house, as you say, and they murdered every single woman and child they could find. Many hundreds of them. Often in particular grisly ways.

    So afterwards there was some handwringing over the way the brave general made the US diplomats look like liars by arranging the mass murder of women and children at Sabra and Shatila. Today it’s known as the Sabra and Shatila Massacre, and Ariel Sharon was charged by his own government with being personally responsible for the massacre and was forced to resign. But later, the Zionists in Israel were so impressed by the Butcher’s bravery and brio that they elected him prime minister.

    • Replies: @SolontoCroesus
  259. The answer is of course that Ashkenazi Jews punch way above their demographic weight in media and intellectual circles, and in big-money political donations, because their high average intelligence brings them success in the relevant fields.

    Wrong.

    The answer is that Jews have established a ultra powerful national victim cult in the United States and Israel.

    This American-Israeli national victim cult is a anti-Nazi scheme.

    The Jewish scheme demonizes people that fit a Jewish concocted profile of a Nazi-white supremacist, and artificially elevate with undue privileges all people that don’t fit the Jewish concocted profile of a Nazi.

    Currently, the number of people that don’t fit the Nazi-white supremacist profile are a super majority of voters. over 90%. The number of people that do fit the Nazi profile are a tiny minority of voters, less than 10%.

    With increased illegal immigration and paths to citizenship for illegals, all of which are victim cult people, the number of anti-Nazi people will increase to more than 95%.

    Even Israel doesn’t have over 95% of it’s voting populace being victim cult (Jewish) people.

    A 95% victim cult voting populace will mean total Jewish lead victim cult domination of the US, and probably the transformation of the 2-party system into a 1-party system.

  260. vinteuil says:

    Thank goodness for Steve Sailer’s editing “at whim” of his comment threads. Once you let the likes of Priss Factory publish whatever they want on your site, however ridiculous &/or obscene, you’ve got an open sewer of Jew-hatred on your hands. Coulter, Derbyshire, Sailer, & commenters like Lot & Svigor all strike about the right balance – but when Priss Factory starts going off about fellatio…forget about it.

  261. Lot says:
    @Mr. Anon

    Jewish voting records at the national level and political contributions are deplorable, I agree.

    I am not convinced they are worse than demographically similar Gentiles. There are plenty of gentile billionaires, and not a single one funds restrictionists who all operate on shoe string budgets.

    Nor do I think that Jewish voters are that bad when controlling for demographic factors, meaning compared to the well educated northeastern and west coast big city Gentiles who are their neighbors and very frequently spouses.

    And in big cities that are majority non white or close to it, Jews seem to block vote to keep centrist whites in control, ie Guiliani in NY and Faulconer here in San Diego. In the past 30 years or so the only time a Dem won the mayor race is when they ran a Jew and Jews and their allies defected.

    • Replies: @Rurik
    , @Mr. Anon
  262. Sam Shama says:
    @Rurik

    I ‘ll leave this short, as a response to both your previous posts (and I apologise for my entries getting double-posted).

    The answer is ‘no’. The Fed was guilty of one thing: that of not supervising the banks properly, and to a large extent that was driven by an absence of a proper regulatory structure, notably due to the repeal of Glass Steagall. Our political chappies did that particular mischief (for the benefit of the banks led at the time of the repeal by J.P. Morgan).

    All the awful evil you speak of, most revoltingly the wars, were engineered by the neo-con cabal. They were financed through Congress and showed up as deficits. The economy was deeply distressed, and would have been best served through expansionary public investments which were not forthcoming from a Congress that much preferred to go along with the POTUS on war games. The Fed was left to lift the weight of the entire economic burden on the general population. Having learn’t from the mistakes committed during the Great Depression, Bernanke the keenest scholar of that history, literally unleashed all available monetary policy (this is what MarkinLA alluded to up the thread).

    Gold does not have any intrinsic value, unlike food, oil, technology and human capital. It is precisely the last four resources, the abundance of them, that impart to the dollar its premier reserve position. The day we lose our productivity – not the store of gold, will be the one where the dollar will lose its value and hyper-inflation will rear its ugly head. That I am happy to say is not the condition the U.S. faces (even though it does face other problems such as inequality)

    To understand the intrinsic impotence of gold, simply conjure in your mind two island economies – The first with nothing but gold and the second with no gold at all but bits of paper money yet endowed with much agricultural capacity, technology, energy resources and a healthy well-trained populace. Whose currency would you pick?

    • Replies: @Rurik
  263. Rurik says:
    @Lot

    Hello Lot,

    It isn’t their votes or even their contributions so much

    it’s their ownership of the media

    they own it lock, stock and barrel- from the NYT to all the newspapers of record to all the network television stations and all the cable television and the magazines and ad agencies. They can make or break any politician just by having their media trounce on them like they did with near perfect unison after Howard Dean’s ‘yell’ or they way they all acted like Ron Paul was from outer space.

  264. dahoit says:
    @unit472

    Do you think the Zionist Jews would come up with;All men are created equal?Those wasps were in a nation of wasps,it was the predominate immigrant group at that time,and yes,they wewre head and shoulders over todays scum.
    A real nationalist,who I guess Coulter advertises herself,would have been hootin and a hollerin on 9-11 about the Zionists and their obvious power top obfuscate the reality of that event.But no!Another clown in the posse of neolibcon idiocy.
    Jewish intelligence;Yes,they have or learn a special gene in creating wealth,but as far as general knowledge and education?Fuggetabboutit.They are the most miserable people on this planet,so miserable,they had to invent psychotherapy.To posit their misery as intelligence?Ha.
    But they have a lot of toys!

  265. Rurik says:
    @Sam Shama

    The Fed was guilty of one thing: that of not supervising the banks properly,

    And the inflation that has driven down the value of the dollar to 2% of what it was when the Fed was created? Who did that? Wasn’t the Fed authorized as a means of protecting the value of the dollar? Then why today is it worth a tiny fraction of its original value? Why will the money you and I save today and tomorrow be almost worthless by the time we retire? Why Sam?

    and why didn’t the Fed raise the interest rates when it was obvious to so many people that the housing bubble was a pending disaster? Why did they allow complicated schemes like credit default swaps and trading in derivatives and bundling toxic sub-prime mortgages with triple A rated investments to be sold to municipal pension funds? Why Sam? Why did they let Goldman Sachs and AIG and County Wide and all the other crooks like Franklin Raines run these wild schemes completely unsupervised and unregulated? Were they just too dumb to know what was going on?

    The Fed was left to lift the weight of the entire economic burden on the general population.

    wow Sam, I couldn’t agree more!

    Bernanke the keenest scholar of that history, literally unleashed all available monetary policy

    and kept virtually all the crooks who caused the financial meltdown in the same positions of power they had before. And Freddy and Fanny are still there, guaranteeing loans. And all the boyz at Goldman and Chase and all the rest are there, flush with multi-million dollar bonuses. From the Fed to Goldman Sachs to the Treasury, it’s all a cabal of thieves and crooks and guess what? Since none of them were held accountable, they’re going to do it again Sam. Only this time it will be even worse.

    It is precisely the last four resources, the abundance of them, that impart to the dollar its premier reserve position.

    no it isn’t Sam, and you should know better. It is the Bretton Woods agreement that gives the dollar its reserve status, and the BRICS are trying to quash that as we speak.

    as for gold vs. paper

    as long as the illusion of the Federal Reserve Notes has its (waning) power, the dollar is still of value, insofar as you can still buy things with it, most notably gold. But only as long as the illusion holds. On the day people start waking up to the scam, then we can both watch as people scramble like animals to trade that increasingly worthless paper for the intrinsic value of tangible and eternal precious metals.

    • Replies: @Sam Shama
  266. Sam Shama says:
    @Rurik

    Hi Rurik,
    so let me attempt to address your concerns and offer agreement where I can.

    And the inflation that has driven down the value of the dollar to 2% of what it was when the Fed was created?

    This is a highly misleading line of thought. Of course since the early 1900s to the present, what a dollar could purchase then and now, are vastly different, and certainly that is due to the steadily increased general level of prices as measured by the price Index. When you say that the value of the dollar is 2% of what it used to be, you are comparing it to the price of gold, correct? So what really? Gold is just some commodity. You can’t eat it, use it in any significant industrial process (well tooth filling maybe 🙂 for those so inclined). During the period (1913 – present), American median household income went from \$400 to \$49,000 per annum, about a 125 fold increase, so dollar earners are just fine! A really important thing to understand is that an hour’s worth of work today fetches a much much wider array of goods and services, than could possibly have been imagined back in 1913!! The fact that Bretton Woods led to the Dollar’s ascendancy and the demise of the Standard is fully in keeping for a nation with the highest economic power. That is nothing to be apologetic or regretful about. I, reiterate : a dollar, from the time of Bretton Woods is the premier reserve because the U.S. is the strongest power in every respect, most of all in economic resources (let’s leave aside issues of morality, fairness aside for the moment). Certainly BRICS can try to do whatever they wish, its really not that easy to dislodge the dollar, for the BRICS are beholden to the vagaries of commodity price fluctuation. (Witness China as is tries to attain reserve status for the Renminbi and struggling severely to stabilise its economy, a necessary condition). The U.S. has 2000 yrs worth of coal deposits in CA, and in a pinch can convert it to gas. It has technology with DoD research that far outpaces any country without breaking sweat. It has the most fertile and productive land on earth and most importantly it is the strongest magnet for the best brains in the World and last but not least it is the inheritor of the most valuable language on Earth! Replicating these things are not easy.

    and why didn’t the Fed raise the interest rates when it was obvious to so many people that the housing bubble was a pending disaster?

    There is a touch of validity to this point, yet affordable housing was a mandate of Congress, facilitated by the GSEs, financed by extremely eager investors the world over who lapped up the MBS issued. So, was it overdone by the financial markets? Its easy to say yes with 20/20 hindsight, but would you have refused a no money down mortgage available at 5% when offered in 2005? I’ll wager most people would not. There were liar mortgages originated, but the vast majority were not so. It was the unquenchable global thirst for American Mortgages that drove the markets, from China to Germany to Finland to Canada to Japan, they could not get enough of American MBS! The Fed was not the regulator of the GSEs back then.

    Why did they allow complicated schemes like credit default swaps and trading in derivatives and bundling toxic sub-prime mortgages with triple A rated investments to be sold to municipal pension funds? Why Sam? Why did they let Goldman Sachs and AIG and County Wide and all the other crooks like Franklin Raines run these wild schemes completely unsupervised and unregulated? Were they just too dumb to know what was going on?

    It was the giddy concept called financial innovation, in which mathematicians came to Wall Street and designed these securities, arbitraging small deviations from fundamental pricing. The “innovations” were just a bit too risque and with the leverage they applied without the comprehension of regulators set the stage for the inevitable meltdown in 2008. I am in agreement with you regarding the culpability of many of the top investment banks in NY, but while most people sense their culpability, we are a nation of laws, and proving their guilt in court, especially in a highly complex legal structure, with talented lawyers in aid, is an entirely different matter. The Fed cannot put anyone behind bars; our courts have to.

    as long as the illusion of the Federal Reserve Notes has its (waning) power, the dollar is still of value, insofar as you can still buy things with it, most notably gold. But only as long as the illusion holds. On the day people start waking up to the scam, then we can both watch as people scramble like animals to trade that increasingly worthless paper for the intrinsic value of tangible and eternal precious metals.

    To a large extent life is an illusion, Rurik, we might be dwelling in an Universe, whose parallel might be a affine transformation of ours! Anyway the right way to think about it, again, is what any random citizen of the world can buy with a dollar, today and in the foreseeable future versus other units of exchange, and on that count, warts and all, the dollar reigns supreme, not to be displaced anytime soon. “eternal precious metals….” my god man! You sound like the Incas, and what happened to them? 🙂

    • Replies: @Rurik
  267. geokat62 says:

    I thought I’d weigh in on this discussion by adding my two cents.

    I think I’m in agreement with Sam that a fiat money system is superior to the gold standard. What Rurik is pointing out is that the monetary system is subject to corruption. Who could disagree with that observation? Any system man implements is going to be gamed… to the extent it can – always has been, always will be the case.

    Now, why do I say that fiat money is superior to the gold standard. Well, as we all know, money performs the following functions within the economy:

    1. As a medium of exchange.
    2. As a unit of account.
    3. As a store of value.
    4. As liquidity.

    Fiat money performs all of these functions exceptionally well, except for function #3, a store of value. That’s because the central bank is responsible for regulating the money supply. Not a trivial exercise, by any means. And if they get it wrong, it could lead to either deflation or inflation.

    While the gold standard outperforms fiat currency with respect to function #3, it has the following weakness:

    A fixed link between the dollar and gold would make the Fed powerless to fight recessions or put the brakes on an overheating economy. “If you like the euro and how it’s been working, you should love the gold standard,” said economist Barry Eichengreen. Beleaguered Greece, for instance, cannot print more money or lower its interest rates because it’s a member of a fixed-currency union, the euro zone. A gold standard would put the Fed in a similar predicament. Gold supplies are also unreliable: If miners went on strike or new gold discoveries suddenly stalled, economic growth could grind to a halt. If the output of goods and services grew faster than gold supplies, the Fed couldn’t put more money into circulation to keep up, driving down wages and stifling investment.

    And the chances of the gold standard coming back are remote, according to a University of Chicago poll:

    not one of 40 top economists surveyed supported a return to gold. The last gold standard commission, established by President Ronald Reagan, voted by a wide margin against bringing it back.

    So while the fiat money system is subject to manipulation, the same can be said of this system as what is famously said about the system of democracy: it is the worst monetary system, with the possible exception of every other monetary system.

    (btw – how’s that for deep insights, Sam?)

    • Replies: @Sam Shama
    , @Rurik
  268. @Rurik

    1 Then Shechem said to Dinah’s father and brothers, “Do me this favor, and I will give you whatever you want. 12 Tell me what presents you want, and set the payment for the bride as high as you wish; I will give you whatever you ask, if you will only let me marry her.”

    13 Because Shechem had disgraced their sister Dinah, Jacob’s sons answered Shechem and his father Hamor in a deceitful way. 14 They said to him, “We cannot let our sister marry a man who is not circumcised; that would be a disgrace for us. 15 We can agree only on the condition that you become like us by circumcising all your males. 16 Then we will agree to intermarriage. We will settle among you and become one people with you. 17 But if you will not accept our terms and be circumcised, we will take her and leave.”

    18 These terms seemed fair to Hamor and his son Shechem, 19 and the young man lost no time in doing what was suggested, because he was in love with Jacob’s daughter. He was the most important member of his family.

    20 Hamor and his son Shechem went to the meeting place at the city gate and spoke to the people of the town: 21 “These men are friendly; let them live in the land with us and travel freely. The land is large enough for them also. Let us marry their daughters and give them ours in marriage. 22 But these men will agree to live among us and be one people with us only on the condition that we circumcise all our males, as they are circumcised. 23 Won’t all their livestock and everything else they own be ours? So let us agree that they can live among us.” 24 All the citizens of the city agreed with what Hamor and Shechem proposed, and all the males were circumcised.

    25 Three days later, when the men were still sore from their circumcision, two of Jacob’s sons, Simeon and Levi, the brothers of Dinah, took their swords, went into the city without arousing suspicion, and killed all the men, 26 including Hamor and his son Shechem. Then they took Dinah from Shechem’s house and left. 27 After the slaughter Jacob’s other sons looted the town to take revenge for their sister’s disgrace. 28 They took the flocks, the cattle, the donkeys, and everything else in the city and in the fields. 29 They took everything of value, captured all the women and children, and carried off everything in the houses.

    • Replies: @Rurik
  269. Rurik says:
    @Sam Shama

    This is a highly misleading line of thought. Of course since the early 1900s to the present, what a dollar could purchase then and now, are vastly different, and certainly that is due to the steadily increased general level of prices as measured by the price Index.

    no Sam, it’s due to inflation (the inflation of the money supply which drives down the value of the money by sheer prolificacy of the dollar) by the Fed increasing the money supply by ‘printing’ money they loan to our government and foreign banks that we the tax payer have to pay back with interest.

    If inflation was just a causal effect of some amorphous increase of a “general level of prices”, then why did the dollar hold its value for the 100 years prior to the imposition of the Fed?

    When you say that the value of the dollar is 2% of what it used to be, you are comparing it to the price of gold, correct?

    no, I’m comparing it to the price of everything. Bread, milk, eggs, a pint of beer, a horse, a dress, a wagon, a hat, and yes, gold and silver too, which tend to remain more or less of the same value vis-à-vis commodities even as our currency (worthless paper) is degraded.

    You can’t eat it, use it in any significant industrial process (well tooth filling maybe 🙂 for those so inclined).

    You’re wrong about that of course. Gold has intrinsic value for its unique properties. Not least of which is its value as something people like to decorate things with. Most often themselves. And its used often in electronics and other things. Computer circuit boards for instance.

    During the period (1913 – present), American median household income went from \$400 to \$49,000 per annum, about a 125 fold increase, so dollar earners are just fine!

    just because people’s earnings chase the value of the dollar and eventually increase to represent the increasingly worthless paper, is no reason to celebrate. What about those people who earned those dollars at \$400 by working their asses off all year, and then a few years later they go to use that money to buy a house for their child but the money is now relatively worthless? Is that a good thing Sam?

    Certainly BRICS can try to do whatever they wish, its really not that easy to dislodge the dollar, for the BRICS are beholden to the vagaries of commodity price fluctuation.

    forget about the BRICS. You know who is doing more to destroy the dollar than anyone or anything else in the world? Yep, that’s right. The Fed! By their endless, relentless running of that counterfeiting machine with endless quantitative easing’, it almost seems like they want to destroy the dollar!

    The U.S. has 2000 yrs worth of coal deposits in CA, and in a pinch can convert it to gas. It has technology with DoD research that far outpaces any country without breaking sweat. It has the most fertile and productive land on earth and most importantly it is the strongest magnet for the best brains in the World and last but not least it is the inheritor of the most valuable language on Earth! Replicating these things are not easy.

    You’re right, it would take a herculean effort to destroy a country with all those things going for it and more, but that’s what’s being done. America is in drastic decline. You’d have to be blind not to notice. And the reason for that decline is due to the treachery and malevolence of the men and women who make our policies. Who saddle us with un-payable debt. Who treasonously foment wars of aggression to get us into even more debt. and use our military for their own personal thug on the world’s stage. It’s disgusting and it’s also a transparent manifestation of the power the banking class (yes Sam, often Jewish) over our government. Like the way that vile ‘Bibi’ comes and lectures a craven and venal crowd of traitors in our congress on the need for more American boys and girls to die in wars for Israel. Yes Sam, America has amazing things going for it, but those things are not infinite, and we’re watching the rapid decline of our nation.

    “Once we squeeze all we can out of the United States, it can dry up and blow away.” Benjamin Netanyahu, 2002

    they could not get enough of American MBS!

    but it was a fraud, perpetrated by our financial elites on Wall Street and presided over by the SEC and the fecal government at the highest levels. Even as you say- the fecals even foisted it by authorizing the GSEs and the CRA, all intended to destroy the middle class by having them guarantee the loans made to illiterates and immigrants with no ability to pay them back. While Goldilocks and County Wide made billions. And then when the fraud blew up, did they arrest the banksters at Chase and Goldilocks? Or did they just force the American tax payer to pay for their gambling losses?

    we are a nation of laws, and proving their guilt in court, especially in a highly complex legal structure, with talented lawyers in aid, is an entirely different matter. The Fed cannot put anyone behind bars; our courts have to.

    I disagree Sam. I’d say we are not anymore a nation of laws. What John Corzine did should have landed him in jail. What many of these financial uber-crooks did should have landed them in jail. But the SEC is filled with wannabe Wall Street crooks themselves one day, so the criminality has infested the regulatory aspect of the entire fecal edifice. All presided over by the boyz at the Fed, whose job it is to enforce policy to protect the dollar and America’s economy from being swindled out from underneath the American people. But the Fed does the opposite and rewards the swindlers and crooks by forcing the working and middle class to pay for the staggering fraud and greed and colossal criminality of our financial elites. (some of whom are Gentiles ; )

    To a large extent life is an illusion,

    Life is what we make is Sam : )

  270. Rurik says:
    @geokat62

    I think I’m in agreement with Sam that a fiat money system is superior to the gold standard. What Rurik is pointing out is that the monetary system is subject to corruption. Who could disagree with that observation? Any system man implements is going to be gamed… to the extent it can – always has been, always will be the case.

    You don’t see a contradiction here geok?

    Unless of course you think it’s a good thing that our monetary system is being gamed. If you’re Jamie Dimon or Lloyd Blankfein I’m sure you’d agree !

    Just about everything that is lamented on this site is due to the corruption of our political system and increasingly crass and deliberatlly dumbed down populace being foisted by a financial elite. The wars, the debt. the out and in-sourcing, the corruption of our social mores and the tenor of our societal discourse and demeanor. All of it has the trajectory it does because of the captains of our ship of state. And those captains are the men with the money. And most of them are as crooked as the day is long. In fact the entire edifice of our power structure is rotten to the core. And why? Because some men have become so fantastically wealthy and more to the point, powerful, that they are above the law. That is the end result of a system that can be gamed to maximum effect. Perhaps gold isn’t the best thing to tie our currency to. I don’t know. But it should be tied to something. That much I do know. Because the alternative is a cabal of men with a counterfeiting machine that can buy anything and (almost) anyone they want. And the results of that are what we’re witnessing today – with all the wars and torture and atrocities and mass-murder and destruction of entire countries willy-nilly all day long (including ours if you’re an American). You can’t separate the effects of giving a small cabal of men the power to game the system with the results of that power in the real world. One = the other.

    • Replies: @geokat62
  271. Rurik says:
    @SolontoCroesus

    Well SC, they’ve been stuck in that stone age religious mentality for two millenniums and more, so it isn’t surprising that they haven’t changed their methods or mentality. Except in the biblical version at least Shechem was accused of being guilty of something. In today’s version the Palestinians are simply guilty of existing.

    That for me is what’s so unnerving. When the Euro-American colonists came to this continent and broke ground, the Amerindians were forced back. But there was much handwringing and soul-searching over how to treat these peoples. They tried to convert them to Christianity and assimilate them. They tried to resettle them but then eventually genocided them, but with much angst and misgivings. They knew what they were doing was morally questionable at best.
    But the idea of condemning the indigenous peoples as ‘evil’ for simply being an inconvenience to the colonists would have been incomprehensible. Such an arrogance would have been impossible. No European Christian could have been capable of such a mindset. For that it requires an entirely different kind of world view. I honestly can not even begin to understand such arrogance even when I know it exists right in front of me and see it in practice. I still can’t fathom it.

    I guess it comes from being told your entire life that you are just sooo special and God only loves you and all the other people were put here to lick your feet and serve you and how dare they not do it when God Himself has ordained it!!!! How DARE they live on YOUR land!!!! God gave it to you and only you and look at them! They’re on your land! And they’re not serving as your slaves like God wants!!!

    In some ways, that is one really fucked up religion, IMHO

    • Replies: @Sam Shama
  272. geokat62 says:
    @Rurik

    Perhaps gold isn’t the best thing to tie our currency to. I don’t know. But it should be tied to something. That much I do know.

    There’s the rub. My point is that not tieing it to something is the lesser of the evils. Rather than reverting to the gold standard, the focus should be on minimizing corruption by establishing robust regulations with teeth. And that won’t happen unless the existing democratic process is overhauled completely.

    • Replies: @Sam Shama
    , @Rurik
  273. Sam Shama says:
    @Rurik

    Rurik,
    You must have written this in a hurry, or perhaps state of inebriation?

    The essence of what you communicated was this: genocide is acceptable, or, if you will, of superior morality, if accompanied by a bit of hand-wringing and soul-searching.

    Carry on.

    • Replies: @Rurik
  274. Sam Shama says:
    @geokat62

    This is where we are approaching the truth about money supply. What should we tie it to? The Gold Standard is a non-starter as we saw. Tying it to GDP is the best solution, I think however, the question will naturally arise “in which units do we count GDP?”, a constantly expanding array of goods and services and on a global basis! Well, its possible to value/count goods and services through an internationally agreed price lndex (say the previous year’s value) of a basket of globally traded and consumed items. The Central Banks can then plan for money supply based on index projections. It leaves open, however, the pressing question as to how a CB should act when faced with recessions driven by collapsing consumer confidence.

    However one approaches it, I think CB flexibility is a key need in a modern society organised around functioning credit. I cannot see a way around it.

    Completely agree that anti-corruption measures and financial regulations are critical and must be a part of a successful democracy.

    • Replies: @Seamus Padraig
  275. Rurik says:
    @geokat62

    My point is that not tieing it to something is the lesser of the evils.

    huh?

    the problem is that the men who’re supposed to regulate it are the men with the counterfeiting machine

    and with that machine they can buy all the politicians they want or need

    humans are too morally frail to be trusted with the power to create money out of thin air

    they’ll soon discover how much power that gives them and they’ll soon want to use that power

    it’s human nature

    • Replies: @geokat62
  276. Rurik says:
    @Sam Shama

    The essence of what you communicated was this: genocide is acceptable, or, if you will, of superior morality, if accompanied by a bit of hand-wringing and soul-searching.

    no Sam

    the point flew right over your um, head

    the point is that as bad as the genocide of the Amerindians was, (and it was a monstrous atrocity and terrible sin).. at least the Euro’s tried to ameliorate it at the time. They tried to move the tribes, rather than slaughter them. They were tormented by it all. Even to this day there is a tremendous amount of sympathy for the plight of the Indian tribes. Most white Americans I know are very happy some of the tribes are flourishing with the casinos and other means for them to thrive, even if there’s a long way to go.

    vs. the Zio nuts who are blowing up little boys playing on a beach and claiming they’re doing God’s work. Perhaps they are, but if that’s their ‘God’, then they’re worshiping a demonic fiend, and watching them shoot children for the fun of it, (I can post videos) I guess perhaps they are. And hence my criticism..

    If your religion teaches you that the victims of your murder and theft deserve it and more, then I’m just saying it’s a religion that I can’t comprehend. Maybe I’m too dumb.

    • Replies: @Sam Shama
  277. geokat62 says:
    @Rurik

    My point is that not tieing it to something is the lesser of the evils.

    huh?

    I should have been clearer. Rather than tieing the money supply to a single commodity like gold, it should be tied to a metric that indicates the overall performance of the economy, like GDP.

    So to be more accurate, my previous statement should have read:

    My point is that not tieing it to something [like gold] is the lesser of the evils.

    • Replies: @Sam Shama
  278. Sam Shama says:
    @Rurik

    I do admit to a failing of mine in which the literal tends to gain the better advantage of the rhetorical. So upon reading the further explication of your thoughts, I am comforted that when you said the following:

    They tried to resettle them but then eventually genocided them, but with much angst and misgivings.

    You were indeed not the accidental creator of a new ecumenical discourse or practice, one that might be termed Reluctant Genocide? 🙂

    Indeed, such deep philosophies tend to “fly over my, um… head”.

    • Replies: @Rurik
  279. Sam Shama says:
    @geokat62

    Your position, was perfectly clear and in keeping with the simple logic associated with organising a modern economy. It however in my experience, rarely changes the minds of the faithful (the religion being goldbuggery), and I am convinced that otherwise sane and honest individuals are practising a version of willful ignorance

  280. @Sam Shama

    Tying it to GDP is the best solution…

    Unfortunately, that would make expanding the money supply to combat a recession/depression impossible, as you yourself hinted later in your post.

    Something similar happened in 1930, when the Fed contracted the money supply in response to the GNP contraction going on. They did so in the mistaken belief that leaving the money supply untouched while the economy was shrinking would cause inflation. It was a disaster.

    • Replies: @Sam Shama
  281. Sam Shama says:
    @Seamus Padraig

    Quite.

    Which is why the Fed needs discretion and independence to conduct counter-cyclical and not pro-cyclical monetary policy.

  282. ogunsiron says:

    I wrote on Steve Sailer’s bog within the past year or so that Ann Coulter discovering the jewish question was a real possibility.

    She hates and despises the left. She studies the left. When you study the left seriously, you start to notice patterns. If you care about respectability, you try hard not to do anything with those patterns that you’ve noticed. Coulter feels contempt for our “moral betters”, so she cares not one bit about being a good person according to their criteria. She cares not one bit about being respectable in their eyes.

    Coulter is almost certainly staunchly philosemitic at this point. One thing that sometimes happens to philosemites is that they end up noticing that as much as they care and cherish jews, organized jewry and jews in general just don’t seem to reciprocate.

    The jewish powers may want to be careful with how hard they come down on Coulter. Inside Coulter may be hiding a Dieudonné 🙂 I’m pretty sure that had the french jewish powers chastised him only lightly, instead of trying to destroy him completely, Dieudonné would not have become their enemy.

    • Replies: @OilcanFloyd
  283. ogunsiron says:
    @Hail

    I hope this is not inappropriate to mention, but John Derbyshire is on record as being aware of at least some version of the jewish question. John, in an interview to a jewish hipsper mag (Jewcy, i think), basically said that he was afraid of speaking about that question. I think that a lot of pro-white and pro-western civ people figure out that there is no safe way to handle the JQ and that it’s better to just not talk about it.

  284. ogunsiron says:
    @Priss Factor

    I’ve been using “antisemitic duck” but it’s only funny to those who know french 🙂 (canard = duck in french).

  285. ogunsiron says:
    @Kyle McKenna

    Anyway, the ‘number of jews’ meme is a diversion…it’s their wealth, not their numbers, that confers power.
    —-
    Not just wealth. Not just their cohesion. It’s also the absolute certainty that they must lead!
    Please google “douglas rushkoff corrosive force”. What Douglas Rushkoff admits to is shocking and I’m NOT talking about any shadowy conspiracy. I’m talking about a seemingly widely shared cultural outlook that they are natural leaders for humanity and that it’s their duty to be lights unto the rest of humanity and that it’s their duty to shatter the false idols that we hold dear.

  286. @ogunsiron

    I don’t think anyone with Coulter’s experience and education is just now discovering the Jewish Question. She may be trying to decide if she should raise the issue in full, but she knows the score. I’m as far on the outside as a person can get, but I’ve understood that there is something to Jewish power for a long time, because it’s obvious. What average Americans need is for people like Coulter to fill in the blanks. So far, Coulter hasn’t made up her mind since she’s blaming Evangelicals.

  287. iffen says:

    not to us dull-witted, no-account proles

    I denounce your cultural appropriation.

  288. Priss Factor [AKA "The Priss Factory"] says: • Website

    Dem slogan should be For More Queers

    and

    Repub slogan should be Whore More Years

  289. Mr. Anon says:
    @Lot

    “I am not convinced they are worse than demographically similar Gentiles. ”

    Yes, I think there is some truth to what you say. However, the demographics between the two groups (Jews and Gentiles) are entirely the same. Controlling for income, at any given income level, I suspect one would find a greater number of non-believers (or at least not especially religious people) among Jews than among gentiles. And I think it likely that while Jews may vote not unlike gentile liberals of comparable income, their motives for how they vote may be different.

    In any event, even though most Jews are liberals, that in itself doesn’t have that much influence on American politics, as most Jews are not super-wealthy or super-influential people. It is (as it usually is) at the margins that Jews are different. Among the super-rich who throw around a lot of money to influence our political system, a lot of them are Jews.

  290. Rurik says:
    @Sam Shama

    Reluctant Genocide? 🙂

    Indeed, such deep philosophies tend to “fly over my, um… head”.

    That’s a shame Sam, because would that the world and some of its people were only a little reluctant in their crazed imperative to genocide others off this planet for all eternity.

    I’m musing for a moment on the Palestinians, who are being genocided as we speak, and not unfortunately ‘reluctantly’, but rather in all earnest. When our congress groveled before Bibi and gave him those triumphant Caesar-like thunderous standing ovations, part of what they were applauding was what the man stood for, and what he stood there representing was genocide Sam. Genocide and ethnic cleansing. What they were applauding was a man who represents mass-murder and theft and ethnic cleansing. Indeed, mass murder of school children and old women and the ongoing torment and genocide of a people off the planet for all eternity. Everyone knows that given the free hand that our congress would give Bibi, that he’s either displace the Palestinians off their ancient lands for all time or slaughter them to the last man, women and child if he were allowed by the international community. It’s very well known that this is what that man stands for, and the applause was thunderous. Yes, Sam .. a little reluctance would suit me just fine.

    And perhaps more to the point, since this thread isn’t so much about Palestinians as it is about Ann Coulter’s musings and the influence Jews have on our country and our civilization. On that score too it would be nice if Jews were a little bit reluctant in their will to see us white Christians genocided. It’s no mystery to most of the people here the influence the Jews played as the leaders of the Bolshevik mass murderers or the fiends who operated the NKVD who genocided so many white folks. They were not reluctant Sam.. hardly. Just the opposite in fact. They were bloodthirsty and rabid in their genocidal hate. The starvation of millions of Kulaks or the open trenches they had the leadership of Poland stand at the edge of as they put a bullet into the back of each one’s neck was dug with purpose, no less genocidal than the Einsatzgruppen. Would that there might have been some reluctance Sam.

    But more to the point, is the on going and purposeful, methodical and systematic genocide of all white, Christian nations today. You’d have to be a complete idiot or fundamentally disingenuous not to see the Jewish hand in all of this. The second anyone questions the massive third world immigration into Europe or North America the screeching is earsplitting. NAZIS!!!!! RACISTS!!!!!!
    And it always comes from the same organizations. The SPLC, or ADL or NYT and all the rest. When Jorg Haider became prime minister of Austria on an anti-immigrant platform, Israel recalled their ambassador. All white nations MUST be inundated. It is the absolute, holy of holies, never to be questioned imperative of the entire Jewish power structure. White countries can not be allowed to stay white. And that my friend, is nothing less than an agenda of genocide. And there doesn’t seem to be one iota of reluctance that I can find in the Jewish community Sam. All of their organizations and media and publications. All of them Sam. All of them are demanding in one form or another the genocide of my people. It’s so ubiquitous that people don’t even notice. If it’s a Jew talking about immigration into white countries of non-whites, you don’t even have to pay attention to know what they’re saying.. because even if they’re someone like Nicolas Sarkozy and they’re saying they don’t like it, as soon as they get in power, all in the sudden they like it.
    If the American people held a popular referendum, and we voted to end the insane and genocidal immigration policies of our fecal government, what do you suppose the Supreme Court would do Sam? All it would take would be for one non-white immigrant to demand the protections of the 14th amendment (protections that the Supreme Court denies to white, American men), and we don’t even have to wonder how Ginsburg or Kagan or Breyer would vote would we Sam? We all know. And we know why too. Genocide Sam. That’s why. ; )

    So yes Sam, a little reluctance would suit me just fine when it comes to some people’s insistence for and obsession with genociding other people off the planet.

    And that is why Coulter and Derbyshire and many others are starting to mention ‘the Jews’. They, (we) just are not quite on board with The Agenda of slow, white race annihilation.. we just don’t quite agree that we need to be genocided for all eternity. We like us.

  291. @Ace

    Farrakhan is much less than you make him out to be. Black Muslims perpetrated the Zebra killings which involved targeting the most ordinary white people you can think of. Stranded white motorists, for example.

    Hmm…. several things come to mind here. First of all, I was not aware of the incidents you were referring to, the “Zebra killings”. It turns out that these were a set of murders in San Francisco that occurred in 1973/1974, i.e. a bit over forty years ago. So I looked it up and read some of the information available online about that. To me, it looks like a rather murky affair…

    Now, I note that, in this message (to which I am replying) you referred to this case and did not mention when it was. Okay, you will never hear me say that things that happened over 40 years ago have no relevance, but still, most people are more oriented towards what is happening now than what was happening back then. To bring up something from over 40 years ago without even mentioning when it was… this raises warning bells with me, that the person doing this has some kind of agenda here.

    I mean to say, by all means, bring up things that happened over 4 decades ago, if you consider it relevant, but to bring up such incidents and talk as if they happened yesterday… maybe I’m mistaken, but I infer dishonesty on your part.

    Farrakhan rushed to fund the legal defense of those killers who were caught and denied funds to the only one who turned state’s evidence.

    Well, from this, I infer that Farrakhan believed that the people in question were being framed, so he funded a legal defence, and presumably a separate investigation into what really happened. I think one can assume that if he simply let the accused be defended by public defenders that there would be no serious investigation or defence of the accused. Now, even if Farrakhan was mistaken about this — I mean the innocence of those accused — he was certainly not alone. And still is not alone. For example, in my googling on the case, I came across this page, written by a prison chaplain, who knew one of the defendants, Larry Green, and expresses his absolute conviction that Green was innocent.

    http://wurldwydelegacy.com/the-peoples-cry-3/

    I don’t know for sure, but the author of the above page, unlike me (AND YOU) knew this man, Larry Green, personally, so I can’t dismiss what he is saying out of hand. And of course, if Green was framed, then it’s an odds-on bet that the other defendants were framed as well.

    What I also do know is that this period of time, the early seventies, is at the very height of the FBI operation known as CointelPro, and my understanding is that all of these radical groups, whether NOI, or Black Panthers, or any of them, were completely infiltrated by the FBI as part of CointelPro.

    So, is it not a little odd to believe that this group of black muslims were able to operate like this, killing random white people, over a period of like a year, without the FBI knowing about it?

    Farrakhan rushed to fund the legal defense of those killers who were caught and denied funds to the only one who turned state’s evidence.

    Well, my understanding based on my recent reading, since you brought this up, is that there was a police informant named Anthony Harris, who was the source of all the testimony that led to the convictions. You are saying that Farrakhan denied legal funds to the police informant? Well… hmm….

    Look, just stepping back from all of this a bit, I personally have reached a point in my understanding of these deep State operations — JFK, MLK, and on and on — where certain things raise warning flags. One of the warning flags is when you have some heinous crime committed and the alleged perpetrator (or perpetrators) have no discernible motive. Here, in this case, a bunch of black muslims decide to just kill random white people for no obvious reason. Like… Sandy Hook… Adam Lanza gets up one morning and decides to get a high powered rifle, go kill his Momma, and then go to an elementary school and kill a bunch of little kids. For absolutely reason whatsoever… Or Lee Harvey Oswald decides to shoot the president for absolutely no reason… Maybe these sorts of things happen, people doing things for no reason, but really, not so often… and the frequency of this, these motive-free crimes, in these “deep events” strikes me as way beyond what you would expect to see.

    So, okay… these people who, it is claimed (though they protest their innocence to this very day) killed all these people, just did it because they hated white folks. They didn’t even known the victims personally… they just walked up to random white people and shot them dead because they hate white folks…

    Now, I want to be clear here. I, UNLIKE YOU, am not expressing any absolute certainty as to what really happened in this case which is over 40 years ago. I don’t know for sure. However, there are various aspects of the case that should set off anybody’s built-in bullshit detector.

    To me, the biggest problems here are (a) again, the absolute lack of motive in the crimes (you say they just hate all white people, but I say… c’mon…) and (b) the understanding that all these kinds of “radical” groups were completely infiltrated by the FBI as part of CointelPro. Basically, none of these black panthers or whoever could take a leak without J. Edgar Hoover knowing about it. (This, by the way, is one of the biggest problems with the 9/11 narrative, the idea that there are really these independent Jihadi groups who can independently mount some massive terrorist attack over a period of years without the CIA or Mossad, or MI6 or Pakistani ISI knowing about it. All of these kinds of radical groups are totally infiltrated by various secret service assets.)

    So, I don’t know about what you’re saying, but there are warning bells going off, both in terms of the official story AND I have real reservations about the honesty of the person (Ace) bringing this up, since he talks about something from over 40 years ago, without even saying when it happened, something that really gives me the feeling that this is not an honest person and this individual has some sort of agenda.

    I understand that if you take sound bites out of context, they can be twisted into a false narrative, but people ought to be able to use their brains.

    A while back, I saw some headlines in the lame stream media. It was all about how Iran was threatening the U.S. Apparently, some Iranians had said that if the U.S. attacks Iran, they have ample means to defend themselves. This was the “threat”! IOW, “If you attack us, we’ll defend ourselves.” So this was the theme of the article: what do about all these threats being hurled by the Iranians?

    Same with Putin. Putin says: “We’re a nuclear power, it would be a very bad idea to attack us.” And that is Putin making threats…

    If you make threatening noises at me, and I say: “If you attack me, I will defend myself. If you strike me, I’ll strike you back.” is that me threatening you?

    And by the same token, Farrakhan, unlike MLK, openly says that he does not believe in non-violence. So he says: “if we are attacked we must defend ourselves”. “We don’t turn the other cheek. That’s not how we roll.” But he is NOT advocating that they should draw the first blood! I am quite certain of that!

    Farrakhan was Rev. Wright’s man of the year, let it be said. And we are talking now of just one degree of separation between Farrakhan and another well known person.

    Well, if you saw it on Fox News, then it must be true!

    Well, look, you can believe what ever they say about Farrakhan on Fox or wherever, or you can get on youtube, and actually just listen to the man. It’s up to you….

    I’m not saying that you even have to like Farrkahan or agree with very much of what he says. That’s not the issue here. I am just saying that if you actually listen to this man, and try to get some grasp on what he is about, you will draw the same conclusion that I do: the whole idea that Minister Farrakhan has an intense hatred of ordinary white people such that wants his followers to just go out and randomly kill white people — that this is really a fundamentally PREPOSTEROUS concept! It really is.

  292. @ Revusky

    I’m sure you can cherry-pick some nice quotes from Farrakhan, but his obvious hatred for whites and tendency towards violence can’t be denied. And you don’t have to listen too long to know that some of his theories are crazy. I wish I could find the video clip from the 1992 Miss Black America pageant where he is clowning around with Mike Tyson and Jesse Jackson and talking about the women in the pageant. He sure comes off as a fake in that video.

    How much time has to pass before an issue is irrelevant? 9-11 happened 14 years ago.

    • Replies: @Jonathan Revusky
  293. @OilcanFloyd

    That’s an odd response to someone who largely agrees with you.

    Well, whatever. You’ll have to excuse me. It appears that a large part of other people’s socialisation amounts to learning to “suffer fools gladly”. I guess I never really learned that lesson. In any case, I am at the point here, on this site, where I have had run-ins with so many arseholes that I am rather disinclined to play any silly games with people.

    I think the official stories behind 9-11 and Boston Marathon bombings are highly suspicious,

    Hmm… Well, no, not really. The official stories in question are not “highly suspicious”. They’re just obvious outright lies. There are independent researchers who have established this. Especially as regards 9/11, it has been established every which way to Sunday that the official story cannot possibly be true.

    But the false flag acts often require Muslim patsies, which seem to be easy to find.

    Well, this is a very strange comment. I have to tell you quite bluntly that clearly, you are not all that advanced in your understanding of these events.

    Look, various sorts of deep events typically require patsies. The main requirement for a patsy is to be some person who is not all that bright and is easy to manipulate. You need for the patsy to be at a certain time and place so that he can be framed for some crime he did not commit.

    The classic patsy, at this point in time, is Lee Harvey Oswald — who they say shot the president of the U.S. because…. well… for absolutely no discernible reason… But regardless, his name (at least among people who minimally “get it”) is synonymous with “patsy” the same way the name of Benedict Arnold is synonymous with “traitor”. Oswald was not a Muslim. He was an all-American white boy. But they manipulated him to be in the appropriate place where he could be framed. Somebody got him a job at the Texas schoolbook repository in Dallas maybe about a month before the JFK hit. You know the story… if not, you can go read about it…

    But the point is this: if your narrative requires a Muslim patsy, you’ll have a Muslim patsy. If your false flag narrative is some kind of race war narrative and you need a black patsy, you’ll have your black patsy. And if you need a white patsy or an Asian patsy, well, guess what… that’s what you’ll have. To make the comment that these patsies are Muslims is utterly nonsensical really. Of course they are! That’s the narrative!

    Just think…. imagine that, contrary to fact, they were hyping some “Hindu terrorism” threat. Then, guess what…. the patsies would be Hindus, right? Would you then express surprise that there are all these Hindu patsies? Well, of course the patsies then are Hindus, you numbnut, because that’s necessitated by the narrative!

    So, it’s like:

    “How surprising that they can find a handful of Muslims that they can manipulate into being patsies. After all, there are only so many hundreds of millions of Muslims out there…”

    Uh, no, it’s not surprising. Get a clue, dude.

    Look, if you ever saw the classic Bogart film, Casablanca, there is a famous line uttered by the French police commissioner “Round up the usual suspects”. It’s very much a related concept. The famous line alludes to the way a lot of sleazy police work operates. There is something of a patsy milieu and when Reynaud says: “Round up the usual suspects”, it’s like, yeah, they have these people that are there and can be framed for a crime if necessary, sure.

    Regardless, one aspect of the thing is that the patsies typically lack the skills to have carried out the crime in question. For example, Lee Harvey Oswald was apparently such a poor shot that he couldn’t hit the side of a barn. Yet he supposedly carried out a feat of marksmanship that few professionals could do. These pilots who had never flown the planes for real before 9/11 supposedly manage these incredible feats of flying….

    Blowback happens.

    Blowback is basically BS. These terrorist attacks are false flags. I outlined earlier my thoughts on this a couple of months ago on this site:

    https://www.unz.com/article/turning-swords-into-plowshares/#comment-1020073

    • Replies: @Mr. Anon
    , @OilcanFloyd
  294. @OilcanFloyd

    I’m sure you can cherry-pick some nice quotes from Farrakhan, but his obvious hatred for whites and tendency towards violence can’t be denied.

    WTF you mean it “can’t be denied”? Sure it can. I deny it. So there.

    (An assertion made with no backing evidence whatsoever cannot be denied???)

    And you don’t have to listen too long to know that some of his theories are crazy.

    Hold on. You were asserting that the man hates white people and has a tendency towards violence. Believing in some crazy theory or other is not the same as that at all. But anyway, what crazy theory? That 9/11 was an inside job? Is that the kind of “crazy theory” you mean?

    I wish I could find the video clip from the 1992 Miss Black America pageant where he is clowning around with Mike Tyson and Jesse Jackson and talking about the women in the pageant. He sure comes off as a fake in that video.

    Oh, really? Oh, well, then I have to concede your point. If there really is some video of Farrakhan making remarks about some women (obviously some pretty fine looking ones…) at a beauty pageant…. yes, that definitely proves that he hates white people and promotes violence! Definitely! The logical connection is obvious! And if it’s true as Mr. Ace claims, that he was born out of wedlock, that really definitely proves it. He must be violent hater of all white people!

    (Actually, that video, assuming you could find it, just mostly prove that the man is not gay….)

    How much time has to pass before an issue is irrelevant? 9-11 happened 14 years ago.

    Okay, that’s it. You’re a f***ing shill. Get out of here, you troll.

    • Replies: @OilcanFloyd
  295. Mr. Anon says:
    @Jonathan Revusky

    “These terrorist attacks are false flags. I outlined earlier my thoughts on this a couple of months ago on this site:”

    Why should I care what you think. You are a stupid crank.

    And you throw around the term “troll” as if you own this site. You don’t. You just showed up here – about now, as far as I can tell. You are the troll here, nitwit.

    Piss off, idiot.

  296. @Mr. Anon

    Why should I care what you think. You are a stupid crank.

    And you throw around the term “troll” as if you own this site. You don’t. You just showed up here – about now, as far as I can tell. You are the troll here, nitwit.

    Piss off, idiot.

    The biggest mystery to me about this site is that, whenever I write a comment, it says: “Your comment is awaiting moderation.” And then the comment always goes through, okay… no comment of mine has ever been censored… But I look at this comment I’m replying to here, and if there is any moderation at all of any sort, I just don’t understand how such a comment gets through.

    It doesn’t engage with anything that I said either logically or factually. It’s just a series of hostile insults from start to finish. No content or legitimate comment of any sort…

    What is this bizarre pretense that there is some sort of moderation going on in this forum? I just don’t get it…

    • Replies: @Mr. Anon
  297. geokat62 says:
    @Mr. Anon

    My compliments to you, Sir.

    Nothing like giving someone a taste of their own medicine. Here’s a sample of the venom this person spews on a regular basis:

    Oh really, the poor little lying troll scum bastard is reduced to whining…. He is soooo very tired of people called a lying troll scum bastard….

    … and he now whines that your posts should be banned for calling him an “idiot” and “troll”… rich, very rich!

    • Replies: @Jonathan Revusky
  298. Mr. Anon says:
    @Jonathan Revusky

    “It doesn’t engage with anything that I said either logically or factually. It’s just a series of hostile insults from start to finish. No content or legitimate comment of any sort…”

    You said nothing with which to engage. You just said: I have studied these things and they are all false flag attacks. You did nothing but make unfounded assertions.

    And my comments were not hostile. They were truthful. You are an idiot.

    • Replies: @Jonathan Revusky
  299. @geokat62

    Look, Troll, I meticulously documented that you were lying:

    https://www.unz.com/tengelhardt/mantra-for-911/#comment-1135150

    Yes, I called you a liar and continue to do so AFTER meticulously demonstrating that you are, in fact, a liar. You obviously don’t like that, but it seems fair enough. I detailed your dishonest behavior, you had every chance to reply to defend yourself yet declined to do so. The above linked comment went unanswered.

    … and he now whines that your posts should be banned for calling him an “idiot” and “troll”… rich, very rich!

    More misrepresentation. I never advocated that your fellow troll or anybody else should be banned. I simply expressed bewilderment that supposedly the forum was being “moderated” yet such content-free ad hominem is allowed. It’s just very strange, that’s all.

  300. @Mr. Anon

    You said nothing with which to engage. You just said: I have studied these things and they are all false flag attacks. You did nothing but make unfounded assertions.

    It is really disquieting to interact with people who are just such absolutely shameless liars, like you, or this Geokat character, or Sam Shama, or the Wizard…. What can one do but simply point out that they are lying?

    You claim I said nothing with which one could engage. Here is the comment of mine you were replying to:

    https://www.unz.com/jderbyshire/storm-in-a-teacup/#comment-1156135

    That comment contains a further link to a comment I posted earlier outlining why “Blowback” was a pretty dubious theory.

    https://www.unz.com/article/turning-swords-into-plowshares/#comment-1020073

    There is definitely plenty of material there with which “to engage”. But instead of attempting to rebut anything I say factually or logically, you just emit a stream of insults. Anybody can see that this is a correct characterisation of the situation.

    Your characterisation of the situation, that there was no substance from me with which to engage, is clearly false, i.e. you are lying.

    • Replies: @Sam Shama
    , @Mr. Anon
  301. Sam Shama says:
    @Jonathan Revusky

    Revusky,
    Are you off your meds? Perhaps the dosage needs to be revisited…….

    • Replies: @geokat62
  302. @Jonathan Revusky

    “WTF you mean it “can’t be denied”? Sure it can. I deny it. So there.

    (An assertion made with no backing evidence whatsoever cannot be denied???)”

    Apparently you hear something very different than I do when you listen to Farrakhan or NOI representatives. Farrakhan’s/the NOI’s beliefs are easy to find. Now, show me the proof that there is no Muslim animosity towards the West or Americans, and that every single terrorist attack is a false flag.

    “Oh, really? Oh, well, then I have to concede your point. If there really is some video of Farrakhan making remarks about some women (obviously some pretty fine looking ones…) at a beauty pageant…. yes, that definitely proves that he hates white people and promotes violence! Definitely! The logical connection is obvious! And if it’s true as Mr. Ace claims, that he was born out of wedlock, that really definitely proves it. He must be violent hater of all white people!

    (Actually, that video, assuming you could find it, just mostly prove that the man is not gay….)”

    The video was often played during the Mike Tyson rape trial, which was over 20 years ago. The point wasn’t that the video proves that Farrakhan hates whites or advocates violence. My point was that the video showed Farrakhan out of character. His speech, demeanor and everything else was different. IOW, he was nothing like a Muslim holy man.

    If anyone if stalking or trolling you, it isn’t me. I’m not even sure if I’ve addressed you before. If you don’t want me to reply to your posts, just say so.

  303. @Jonathan Revusky

    “Hmm… Well, no, not really. The official stories in question are not “highly suspicious”. They’re just obvious outright lies. There are independent researchers who have established this. Especially as regards 9/11, it has been established every which way to Sunday that the official story cannot possibly be true.”

    Lots of outright lies were told about 9-11, which makes the official story highly suspicious. I also don’t believe that Mohammad Attah and his pals had the skills to guide the planes that hit the WTC. No issue there. I also don’t believe that the buildings would have been brought down by airplanes, especially buildings that weren’t even hit.

    “Look, various sorts of deep events typically require patsies. The main requirement for a patsy is to be some person who is not all that bright and is easy to manipulate. You need for the patsy to be at a certain time and place so that he can be framed for some crime he did not commit….”

    Didn’t you see the video of Mohammad Attah and his friends at the airport on the morning of 9-11? I think Attah was the perfect patsy. Like Oswald and the Tsarnaevs, Attah had views that were easy to exploit. In the cases of the Tsarnaev brothers and the Attah crew, it was Islamic extremism and anti-Western attitudes. Nothing strange there.

    If you know exactly who pulled off the WTC attacks and who used the Tsarnaev brothers, I’d like to know.

    • Replies: @Jonathan Revusky
  304. geokat62 says:
    @Sam Shama

    This joker just doesn’t get it. He doesn’t realize that he’s coming off as a total jerk by calling people “liars”, “trolls”, “bastards”, “scum”, constantly throwing around “WTF”. He doesn’t realize this is the behaviour of an unruly teenager, not that of an adult. Just because people disagree with his views, rather than attacking the substance of the opposing comments, he resorts to ad hominem.. a sure sign he hasn’t the maturity or confidence to defend his views without insulting others.

    Here’s a prime example. He says he finds it disconcerting to interact with people who are shameless liars. Well in his recent post he accuses me of suggesting that Mr. Anon should be banned for his most recent post:

    More misrepresentation. I never advocated that your fellow troll or anybody else should be banned.

    But here is what I wrote:

    … and he now whines that your posts should be banned for calling him an “idiot” and “troll”… rich, very rich!

    So rather than suggesting he was calling for him to be banned, I was merely suggesting that he was urging that his post be banned for using such offensive terms as “liar” and “troll”, which pale in comparison to the venom he regularly spews.

    And he has the gall to call others shameless liars.

    • Replies: @Sam Shama
  305. Sam Shama says:
    @geokat62

    geokat,

    You may recall I had actually obtained the opinion of a psychiatrist friend, who upon examining Revusky’s internet history, concluded it was a case of paranoia compounded with obsessive compulsive disorder (and perhaps a neglected childhood Tourette’s as well). Untreated, this mental affliction can progress to schizophrenia even violent psychosis.

    So Revusky, if you are reading this, the camaraderie and goodwill that we have struck up on the internet, compels me to insist that you not spend another day without consulting a psychiatrist. You will feel better with medication, and your prose and language will turn incomparably cleaner than its past renditions.

  306. Mr. Anon says:
    @Jonathan Revusky

    “It is really disquieting to interact with people who are just such absolutely shameless liars, like you, or this Geokat character, or Sam Shama, or the Wizard…. What can one do but simply point out that they are lying?”

    I haven’t lied about a damned thing, you witless idiot. Myself, I find it disquieting to interact with people – like you – who are entirely disconnected from reality.

    “You claim I said nothing with which one could engage. Here is the comment of mine you were replying to:

    https://www.unz.com/jderbyshire/storm-in-a-teacup/#comment-1156135&#8221;

    You said that people have researched it. So? What people? Credulous fools like you? I’ve looked at a lot of the (so-called) 911-truth “research” on the web. And I have found just about all of it to be crap. Idiotic crap that only nitwits could credit.

    “That comment contains a further link to a comment I posted earlier outlining why “Blowback” was a pretty dubious theory.”

    So, it was as stupid as anything else you’ve posted.

    “Your characterisation of the situation, that there was no substance from me with which to engage, is clearly false, i.e. you are lying.”

    No, your contention that you have said anything worth replying to is false. In any event, whatever you claim to have, it is nothing new. I’ve looking at that 911-truth BS for ten years. It is all crap.

    Let me ask you this, conspiracy-rage-boy, do you think that the US landed astronauts on the Moon? Or was that also faked? That will tell the rest of us a lot about you.

    • Replies: @Jonathan Revusky
  307. @OilcanFloyd

    Didn’t you see the video of Mohammad Attah and his friends at the airport on the morning of 9-11?

    Uh, no, I never saw any such video. I seriously doubt that you have either. Have you seen any video of the airplane crashing (allegedly) into the Pentagon? Have you seen any video of Bin Laden’s corpse before they tossed him (allegedly) into the sea?

    I think Attah was the perfect patsy. Like Oswald and the Tsarnaevs, Attah had views that were easy to exploit.

    Excuse me. How do you know what “views” any of these people held? It was claimed that Oswald, for example, was a Marxist-Leninist. However, it seems more likely that he was a minor intelligence asset who was pretending to be a communist in order to infiltrate pro-Castro groups.

    But what does it matter? Oswald did not kill JFK or anybody else, so what does it matter? It is claimed that James Earl Ray, the man they framed for the killing of Martin Luther King, was a virulent racist. Maybe he was or maybe he wasn’t, but since he didn’t shoot MLK anyway, what does it matter whether he was racist or not?

    By the same token, it is claimed that Mohammed Atta was a religious fanatic. It is also claimed by people who lived in Venice, Florida, that he loved cocaine, vodka, and lap dances. Hmm… odd… I have no idea which version is true. But again, it doesn’t matter, since Atta did not fly any plane into any building anyway. I am unsure as to whether he was in any airplane on 9/11 or any of it. The proof for this looks pretty thin. In my view, most likely he was not on any plane, and was simply separately “disappeared”. Or maybe he was tricked into boarding the plane and died along with the rest of the passengers and they then said he hijacked the plane and flew it into the building.

    Stepping back from all this speculative garbage, the point is that you can say anything about anybody if they’re dead. You can claim that that person was a religious fanatic, an atheist communist, that they partook in sex with barnyard animals… the person is dead, you can say anything about them.

    You see, you have this irritating modus operandi, it seems, of taking the conversation into some sort of sterile distraction. Now, okay, maybe this is a result of being a bit stupid, for example, using as your source for Atta’s or other patsies’ “beliefs” the very same people who framed them for the various crimes. I mean to say you could just be a dim bulb. That’s the most generous interpretation of what you’re doing here. But, actually I suspect not. I think you’re some sort of operator and this is deliberate. Just very deliberately putting out all this nonsense as a distraction. (Laced with bits of disinfo, like,… sure… we all saw the video of Mohammed Atta at the airport… (NOT))

    The Farrakhan thing is similar. It is claimed that Farrakhan hates ordinary white people and incites violence and so you claim that you have seen a video (without providing a link) in which Farrakhan behaves in some undignified manner — as if this proves what is at issue!!!??? Practically anybody could be caught on film behaving in an undignified manner and it doesn’t prove that the person is hateful or violent!

  308. @Mr. Anon

    You said that people have researched it. So? What people? Credulous fools like you? I’ve looked at a lot of the (so-called) 911-truth “research” on the web. And I have found just about all of it to be crap. Idiotic crap that only nitwits could credit.

    Among said “nitwits” are a few thousand qualified architects and engineers who signed a petition for a new investigation. Presumably, we should all disregard their views (that they are actually willing to back up by signing their names to) because an anonymous troll on a webpage claims that he has looked into this and “it is all crap”. (A very powerful, cogent argument, that one…)

  309. Technomad says:

    Would someone please explain to me when Jews, alone of all the peoples of the earth, obtained an absolute right to be loved and admired? And why this is a Good Thing?

    Not being willing to listen to people who say “No!” or “You’re barking up the wrong tree!” racks up lots of people. The Kray Twins, according to people who knew them, surrounded themselves with “yes-men,” and ended up overreaching themselves and slapped in quod for the rest of their natural lives. And Elvis Presley, toward the 1970s or so, needed, more than anything, someone with the stature and courage to tell him “E, we all love you and you still can sing, but on-stage performances, particularly in those costumes, are not a good idea.” Without those, he’d be remembered more as the young heart throb than as the fat man in the white spangly clothes, wheezing his way through performances.

  310. My heart always skips a beat at that smile.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All John Derbyshire Comments via RSS