The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewJohn Derbyshire Archive
"Savage Indignation" —the Only Appropriate Reaction to the Arbery Atrocity and Our Emerging Four-Tier Justice System
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

[Excerpted from the latest Radio Derb, now available exclusively through]

The great 18th-century satirist Jonathan Swift, the chap who wrote Gulliver’s Travels, also wrote his own epitaph, as people sometimes do. “Here he lies,” says the epitaph in Latin, “ubi sæva indignatio ulterius cor lacerare nequit“—”where savage indignation can no longer lacerate his heart.”

I am nothing like as much of a misanthrope as Swift, thank goodness. As Radio Derb listeners well know, I cultivate geniality. Still, I am not a total stranger to savage indignation. There are times, blessedly few and far between, when I boil and seethe with righteous anger at the stupidity and cruelty of my fellow human beings.

This is one of those times.

Savage indignation, yes. That was my reaction to the sentencing last Friday of Gregory McMichael, his son Travis, and their neighbor Roddie Bryan in the show trial over the death of Ahmaud Arbery two years ago.

The two McMichaels were both sentenced to life in prison with no possibility of parole. Bryan will be eligible for parole but only after he serves the mandatory minimum of 30 years in prison. He is 52 years old, so good luck there, guy.

These were three honest, hard-working citizens, none of whom had any criminal record. Both the McMichaels had in fact served in law enforcement. Their intentions in confronting Arbery were plain: to defend their neighborhood against a likely thief who, whether or not they knew it, did have a criminal record.

Travis McMichael shot Arbery in plain self-defense when Arbery was trying to wrestle away his gun. Gregory McMichael didn’t shoot anybody—he was trying to call the police. Roddie Bryan wasn’t even armed.

Now their lives have been brutally destroyed, along with the lives of Mrs. McMichael (who has cancer), her daughter, Travis’ five-year-old son, and Roddie Bryan’s fiancée and their two children.

I can’t think of any other way to see this monstrous act of state cruelty other than the way I saw it when the trial was under way back in October: as a ritual sacrifice to the dark gods revered in our weird, sick state religion of white self-hatred. I said back then, following a reference to the Aztecs, that when we offer up our sacrifices, we stage a show trial modeled on the actual trials that used to be conducted before our justice system was taken over by ideological fanatics. The verdict is of course a foregone conclusion.

Then we lock up our sacrificial victim for decades in a place of humiliation and despair, parted forever from his home, his family, and his work.

This is far more cruel than anything the Aztecs would have contemplated.

The McMichaels and Roddie Bryan were sentenced for being white. It couldn’t be more obvious. Does anyone—does anyone —think that sentences like this would have been handed down if they had been black petty criminals and Ahmaud Arbery a white mechanic?

The spectacle is made even uglier by the sight of the usual hyenas hovering around. Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton showed up at the trial, and a posse of rifle-toting black anarchists stood watch outside the courthouse.

Ahmaud Arbery’s mother was dabbing her eyes as she told us what a lovely person her son was, apparently having forgotten that she was so scared of him she’d called the cops at least once. His father Marcus showed up, although whether he had played any part in raising Ahmaud we have not been told.

Who cares? The Ghetto Lottery is the prize now—cash from civil lawsuits. Benjamin Crump is involved somehow, looking forward to his share no doubt. [Ker-ching!] For this, half a dozen white lives have been destroyed.

Not the least depressing thing about this case is that such a monstrous injustice has been protested by nobody at all of any prominence in the media or politics. Tucker Carlson, to the best of my knowledge, has not mentioned it. Fox News’s Greg Gutfeld seems to have approved the verdict[‘The Five’ compare trial of Kyle Rittenhouse and Ahmaud Arbery case in which jury found defendants guilty of murder, Fox News, November 24, 2021]. Someone told me Laura Ingraham has expressed approval too, although I can’t find an online link and would be glad to know it’s not true.

Republican op-ed writers, congresscritters and ex-presidents? [Crickets.]

Out here on the Dissident Right we have been protesting: most eloquently Jared Taylor here on November 26th and January 8th. Also our correspondent “Federale” on November 26th, and of course your genial host myself on October 22nd, November 19th, November 26th, and December 10th.

An email correspondent offers the opinion, which I think correct, that we now have four different legal systems.

  1. White-on-black crime: Mob justice just short of lynching, but with the optics of a fair trial.
  2. White-on-white crime: Standard American jurisprudence.
  3. Black-on-white crime: Standard American jurisprudence, but with reduced severity given that the root cause is “systemic racism,” not any depravity on the part of the defendant.
  4. Black on black crime: Discouraged, but not investigated or prosecuted too vigorously except in the most egregious of cases. Nobody much cares what blacks do to each other; and there’s no money to be made from these crimes by Al Sharpton or Benjamin Crump.

I thought perhaps talking about this might soothe my savage indignation; but no, it’s still lacerating my heart. I shall therefore stop here, except just, in the spirit of a public service announcement, to repeat the advice I offered in November:

The video shot by William Bryan, which shows Travis McMichael and Arbery struggling for Travis’s shotgun, was not known about until the defendants voluntarily gave it to the authorities, on the assumption that it would help prove Travis was acting in self-defense [EXCLUSIVE: Man charged in Ahmaud Arbery murder leaked original video of the shooting,, May 15, 2020].

The lesson to be drawn, listeners, is, once again: If you are white and being investigated by public authorities, and there is a dead black person to be accounted for, do not co-operate with the investigation in any way.

In particular, don’t offer them anything that you think might help your case. They’ll just find a way to use it against you.

As my colleague Nicholas Stix put it in his recent From Jim Snow To The White Genocide Project, “the U.S. is showing unmistakable signs of morphing into an anti-white totalitarian state.

John Derbyshire [email him] writes an incredible amount on all sorts of subjects for all kinds of outlets. (This no longer includes National Review, whose editors had some kind of tantrum and fired him.) He is the author of We Are Doomed: Reclaiming Conservative Pessimism and several other books. He has had two books published by com: FROM THE DISSIDENT RIGHT (also available in Kindle) and FROM THE DISSIDENT RIGHT II: ESSAYS 2013.

(Republished from VDare by permission of author or representative)
Hide 63 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. Wokechoke says:

    The McMichaels have saved lives. High cost to themselves though. Okay

  2. SafeNow says:

    The essay appears to assume that one will be safe from the Tier-1 mob, so long as there is not a “dead black person to be accounted for.” However, very soon, the threshold will be lower than a dead body. Background: As I have explained before, Korematsu was pointedly not legally overruled in Trump vs. Hawaii (Roberts: “Overruled by history”) and thus group internment remains the law of the land. As Justice Jackson wrote in his Korematsu dissent, group internment lies about like a loaded weapon, ready to be fired upon a claim of purported necessity.

    If not a dead black person, then what would it take for the internment mob to descend upon (metaphor incoming) Mr. Derb’s leafy (self-described) street? Mao provided the template: The smallest artifact that can be construed as “proof of crime” or “ironclad evidence.” (“Zuizheng”)
    In our media age, the artifact need not be a tangible object confiscated during a house search. Rather, it can be an easily-retrieved digital record; a published essay, a letter to the editor, an email or a text. And off you go. I can’t prove it, but my guess is that a list already exists,

    • Agree: Achmed E. Newman
  3. … we now have four different legal systems.

    Actually, we have at least 6:

    5. Jew-on-White crime: wide variety; rarely punished. Examples:
    a. War crimes (for Israel)
    b. Great Replacement (White genocide)
    c. Fomenting of Black-on-White crime
    d. Hate-crime hoaxes surprisingly common; rarely punished, never as “hate crimes” themselves.

    6. White-on-Jew crime: Worst possible crime, severely punished with “hate crime” enhancements; 1st Amendment no defense; POC-on-Jew crimes often often spun in (((media))) as White-on-Jew.

    • Replies: @Oh Really
  4. The future is very clear. We can make history or become history. The status quo is unsustainable.

  5. roonaldo says:

    Black criminals are engaged in a veritable feedng-frenzy wherever they’ve been declared immune from prosecution or serious consequences.

    New York City’s new Mayor is determined to out-stupid the legendary Lori Lightfoot of Chicago, where they fine store owners who report thieving hordes–something about “impugning the dignity of a looter.”

    There were a reported nine carjackings in one day in Philadelphia. Park your car in San Francisco, close your eyes, count to three, and, voila!–watch the vultures tear your car apart while nearby cops discuss their sex-change surgeries.

    I’m hankerin’ to get in on the action, so I just ordered a George Floyd quick-change make-up kit complete with angel’s wings and a Ford Exploder with multiple gun ports and grenade launcher. Thus outfitted, I’ll trip the lights fantastic in the Big Apple, play hijack-on-crack in Philly, and tear up Chi-town in a madcap adventure of “Mutual Combat.” What a country!

  6. Savage indignation, yes.

    Derb lays out the problem well — the justice system no longer has anything to do with justice in cases where blacks and whites are involved. It’s a tool for punishing accused whites harshly and warning other whites not to even think of defending themselves against Bantus acting out.

    But I’m sorry, “savage indignation” doesn’t cut it except as a purely emotional response. The progressive Politburo doesn’t give a spit about anyone’s indignation, savage or serene. It’s just their cost of doing vile business, except their enterprise is without costs.

    I like Derb, a fine writer, but he frustrates me. He’s another oh-dear viewer-with-alarm, a sad basset hound. Okay, there’s some value in calling out anti-white injustice, but strategizing about how to overcome it is where the action is.

    • Replies: @Exile
  7. Without getting too much into the details of this case, most people would think that if they were jogging down the street and pursued by three men of a different race armed with a shotgun and pistol, they would believe that they were in mortal danger. So the fact that Arbery tried to disarm the man with the shotgun doesn’t seem like a savage act of aggression but one of the normal (if hardly optimal) reactions available to him. The jury evidently thought this way, too. But Mr. Derbyshire is certainly right that the verdicts and sentences are signs of the anti-white times we live in. If the Etruscan Film Star has “strategized” and come up with a plan, by all means may he let us in on it.

  8. Like Derek Chauvin, The Satilla Three are political prisoners.

    We are at war. Act like it. If you’re White, reduce your Affican-contact footprint to near-zero. Other than cordial business (cashiers and other employees) do not engage in any way. Wherever they’re gathering, leave or STAY AWAY. They are a dangerous liability.

    • Replies: @Goddard
  9. Anonymous[240] • Disclaimer says:

    Every white American who’s still undecided on the White Genocide question should definitely watch that video. You don’t live in a country where you’re a second-class citizen. It’s much, much worse.

    And that’s just a small taste of what (((they))) have in mind.

  10. KenH says:

    The four tiers of justice sound about right. Everyone definitely follows a certain playbook when there’s a white on black crime or incident. Whites are presumed guilty and motivated by racial hatred which taints the public. With the McMichael’s it was an incident because they had absolutely no criminal intent and Arbery’s actions led to his own demise.

    Tucker Carlson really disappointed on this especially when he’s consistently boasted that FOX News management never tells him what he can and can’t say. The only explanation is cowardice. Of course, if he did mention it Candace Owens would have to translate for us. The rest the psychopaths on FOX like Jew Greg Gutfeld are celebrating the verdict and saying the “the jury got it right”.

    The lesson to be drawn, listeners, is, once again: If you are white and being investigated by public authorities, and there is a dead black person to be accounted for, do not co-operate with the investigation in any way.

    It was reasonable to think that the video was exculpatory and it would have been if we were living in a sane nation. Bryan shared this with his attorney and it’s my understanding that the attorney thought it would be a good idea to release to the public, but it obviously backfired.

    I also think the malicious prosecutors twisted the words of all three men to prove “false imprisonment”. Again, even though it’s very hard the lesson is not to say anything at all. These days I’m not even sure you can trust your own defense attorney.

  11. KenH says:

    As my colleague Nicholas Stix put it in his recent From Jim Snow To The White Genocide Project, “the U.S. is showing unmistakable signs of morphing into an anti-white totalitarian state.”

    Thanks to Jewish power, political activism and influence. What’s worse is that the GOP, alleged to be white supremacist by the Jewish left, will not even acknowledge that white people are being made 5th class citizens (behind Jews, blacks, Latinos, Asians) and set up for genocide.

  12. @Tono Bungay

    So the fact that Arbery tried to disarm the man with the shotgun doesn’t seem like a savage act of aggression but one of the normal (if hardly optimal) reactions available to him.

    Help me out here.. Lets say you’re right and the jogger did a normal thing (Nuts) to charge a man holding a shotgun and was as they say murdered in the first degree. (Bullshit) Considering the fact that this wasn’t a liquor store holdup, how in the hell are the charges of first degree murder against the other two even remotely warranted as up and to the point that idiot number 1 shot and killed Aubrey, there was no crime being committed?

    The idea of lumping them all together as many states do when multiple perps are in the commission of say, a home invasion or a car jacking (known felonies) when a murder is involved, the other two men shouldn’t have been charged with anything related to murder. Last I heard making a stupid mistake when you think you’re doing the right thing isn’t necessarily illegal in this country.

    This was nothing more than another anti-white political lynching that’s amplifying the narrative that under no circumstances are white people allowed to confront these things regardless of what they’re doing.

    Something to consider when witnessing munt’s doing something known to be illegal. Like spoiled children, their state appointed mommies and daddies are always going to give them the benefit of the doubt when there is a racial component to any incident.

  13. anarchyst says:

    Having lived through the wretched excesses of the so-called “civil-rights (for some)” movement, here are some of my observations over the decades…
    The jew-run government has cowed law-abiding whites into not only submission, but has driven many whites “underground”, fearful of losing everything at the hands of a tyrannical jew-run government, blacks being the “pets” of the jews.
    Us white people are too busy raising our families, working everyday, and are loathe to lose everything just for legally protesting against blacks and their jewish “masters”.
    Don’t forget that crypto-jew President Eisenhower set the seeds of submission to federal “civil-rights (for some)” power by whites with the used of federal troops to quell honest constitutional dissent by us whites.
    One could say that he was successful in “putting us (gentile) whites “in our place” as third-class citizens, behind jews, blacks and illegal aliens.
    Although it has been decades of white submission to the so-called “civil-rights (for some)” movement that has demoralized whites, the present push to “blackify” everything in advertising and in the social discourse, replacing “equality” with “equity” is already starting to foment “pushback” from many of us aware whites.
    The democRAT-run torching of the cities with little or no police response in 2020 was a wake-up call and proof that government no longer works for society, but is catering to the jewish and black elements in their attempts to establish a jewish bolshevik marxist society here in the “good ol’ USA”…
    Aware white people are very slow to act, but the time is coming…

  14. anarchyst says:

    The jew media has done it’s best to manipulate the case of the “jogger”, Mr. Arbery, who was shot by Travis McMichael in the Satilla Shores subdivision near Brunswick. Well, maybe we think we know all about the case, but let’s delve into the unfairly suppressed evidence, shall we?
    Early in the pre-trial motions, it was decreed by Superior Court Judge Timothy Walmsley that the defense attorneys’ efforts to portray Mr. Arbery as an aggressive young man with a troubled past would not be allowed. In other words, the court suppressed evidence, and the jury wasn’t allowed to hear the whole truth.
    These are the facts that the judge unfairly omitted:
    (1.) Arbery Was a convicted thief (strike 1).
    (2.) Arbery Was a convicted felon, sentenced to 5 Years for unlawful gun possession at a school (strike 2).
    (3.) Arbery was on felony probation on the date he died. Arbery was highly motivated to resist the citizen’s arrest, and try to run away. If convicted of a third felony, it would have been “strike 3”, and Georgia has the “three-strikes law”.
    (4.) Arbery was high when he charged Travis McMichael and fought to take the shotgun. Anyone familiar with weapons knows that pulling on a shotgun barrel can cause the weapon to fire.
    (5.) Arbery was “off his anti-aggression medications” when he charged Travis McMichael.
    (6.) Arbery frequently used “jogging” as a cover to facilitate and excuse theft and “casing” activities.
    (7.) Arbery had repeatedly cased the 220 Satilla Drive property for weeks prior to his death.
    (8.) Post mortem toxicology reports indicate Arbery was stoned at the time of the encounter. And as well as being on something, he was also off something different: The drug Zyprexa, a prescription psychiatric medication that had been prescribed to Arbery to control his violent and aggressive behavior.
    It was judicial malpractice for Judge Walmsley to suppress evidence, and prevent the above 8 facts from being fully explored in open court.
    Grounds for a re-trial? Since the three men have been convicted, an appeal is the only solution.

  15. anarchyst says:

    In addition to a corrupt, compromised “judge”, the “powers that be” had to “shop” for a prosecutor in order to prosecute the three men. This is no different than “judge shopping” to get a friendly judge who will render a favorable verdict.
    Once the original prosecutor made his decision not to prosecute, any further actions in this case should have been rendered “null and void”.
    There should have never been a “second prosecutor” from another jurisdiction pressing the same charges. It could be argued that “double jeopardy” was evident in this case–find a prosecutor who would agree to state charges.
    If the laws need to be changed to keep this from occurring again, let’s get it done.
    If “prosecutor shopping” is legal, we are all in danger…

    • Replies: @SBaker
  16. Dr. X says:

    The McMichaelses and Bryan were railroaded because they were Southern rednecks straight out of central casting. They were basically lynched because of the racial propaganda ginned up by the Jewish-controlled media. Jewish Hollywood producers are probably having wet dreams with multiple orgasms thinking about how they are going to portray these guys in the movie.

    Bryan was guilty of absolutely nothing. If Travis McMichaels was guilty of anything at all, MAYBE you could pin reckless endangerment or negligent homicide on him — in a sane society. Five years max.

    But we don’t live in a sane society….

  17. Phibbs says:

    Black people are genetically inclined to be stupid , criminal and ugly, so I do not blame them for just living out their genes. Jews are Satan’s children — as Jesus made clear. Jews are simply going about the business of serving their father the Devil. White liberals, on the other hand, should be the first to be lined up for execution when the Patriot Revolution arises. White liberals are race traitors and terrorists and need to be sent to Hell where they belong.

    • Agree: Johnny Smoggins
    • Replies: @anon
    , @anarchyst
  18. @Tono Bungay

    Your take is absurd….no sane human being of sound mind would EVER consider running up on a man armed with a shotgun and grabbing the barrel of the shotgun to try to take it away.

    Only a low IQ/ low impulse control dindu is capable of such an insane action.

  19. Perversion is manifested by psychosis. Psychosis is exacerbated by perversion.
    When a system arrives at the point, where those entrusted to a “fair” adjudication, are psychotically perverse, the “system” is dead.

    • Agree: RedpilledAF
  20. Rich says:
    @Tono Bungay

    He wasn’t “jogging” down the street. He was casing a construction site to see what he could steal. You didn’t actually buy the story the he was out for a jog, did you? Nobody could be that gullible, could they? And why would the guy with the camera be guilty? He was just filming the incident.

    • Replies: @Tono Bungay
  21. Oh Really says:
    @Pat Kittle

    Actually, we have NONE. It’s make it up as you go and do as much damage as you think you can get away with.

    • Replies: @Pat Kittle
  22. Exile says:
    @Etruscan Film Star


    Whites need to re-consolidate their families and our numbers in general – reverse the atomization and dilution. Look at moving to areas that are already super-majority White and not part of the ZOG/shitlib core.

    We need physical communities of Whites so they can support and protect each other. Those communities need to pool resources to secure basic necessities – food, water, housing, fuel. Homeschool or co-op/private school the kids with parents, volunteers, etc…

    They need to do their business in-group ala the Amish and do business with outsiders on an extraction-economy basis – capture wealth from the system for their own networks, don’t let it re-circulate.

    This gives you the security you need to do White political activism. Don’t worry so much about national races, focus on getting de facto control of your town and county. Third parties are best – the major parties will do everything they can to subvert your community. Even in better super-White areas, the worst people are usually those who lead either the Democrats or Republicans. At best they’re going to be shabbos-strivers or plain greedheads.

  23. @Oh Really

    We’re talking about the “justice system(s).” You say:

    It’s make it up as you go and do as much damage as you think you can get away with.

    More specifically:

    It’s make it up as you go and do as much damage against White people as you think you can get away with.

  24. Wow just wow this is the Wikipedia entry on this incident which is a downright lie. I’ve seen the video.

    Travis McMichael got out of his truck and assaulted Arbery with a shotgun, then shot him three times as Arbery attempted to defend himself

    Incredible that they can lie like this about an incident which was filmed.

    • Replies: @Cauchemar du Singe
  25. @Exile

    Good on you. This is an example of what I meant by “strategizing” to smack down anti-white oppression. I don’t know if your strategy would bring the desired results, but it’s the kind of thinking that opens up possibilities that indignation doesn’t.

    • Replies: @Exile
  26. KenH says:

    1. White-on-black crime: Mob justice just short of lynching, but with the optics of a fair trial.

    The Jewsmedia follows a similar playbook. Had Arbery been white the media would have described him as a suspected burglar and informed the viewing audience of all of his prior offenses. But since he was black he was just “a black man jogging in a white neighborhood” with no mention of his criminal record, prior incident of assaulting a police officer and the fact that he was currently on probation.

    2. White-on-white crime: Standard American jurisprudence.

    This would have applied had Arbery been white which means the MicMichael’s and Mr. Bryan would either not have been charged or charged with at most involuntary manslaughter. Mr. Bryan would not have been charged at all. There would have been virtually no media coverage and no Twatter outrage.

  27. Technomad says:

    I’d say the mob pressure on the court and the suppression of exculpatory evidence on the part of the judge, would be more than enough reason to overturn the verdict and at least have a re-trial where these are not in play.

  28. waia says:
    @Tono Bungay

    Maybe you should get into the details of the case and learn the facts.

    Fact: from the moment the truck rounded the corner, one can see arbery far behind the stopped mcmichael’s truck, running straight at it. He just keeps running and running toward it, ignoring all widely available means of escape both to the left, right, and behind. Arbery had decided to attack the mcmichaels as he was running TO the truck – and he circled around the truck to attach the gunholder.

    There was no reason for arbery to attack; the mcmichaels could have easily shot him had they intended to do so well before they stopped, and they could have shot him as he ran up to the truck, yet they didn’t. The gunholder didn’t even have his gun in hand until he exited the truck and saw arbery running to the truck.

    You apparently think that anyone who is being beaten on the head by a black should just let the black beat them to death or hand over any weapon in hand so the black can kill them – which is exactly what would have happened had arbery wrested the gun away.

    • Replies: @Tono Bungay
  29. lloyd says: • Website

    The usual “right wing suspects” are staying quiet on this one because they are uneasy. The shooting sounded like lynch America rather than free America. Also they weren’t charged until well over a year after the event. Would that have happened if Arbery had been white? In fact, would any of this have happened? I agree the convictions are too severe and should have been manslaughter or unintended murder. John Derbyshire here reminds me of an old English die hard who is furious he can’t go gun blazing at a ner’ do well jogging past his domain. John is putting himself at risk at having his guns confiscated. I see something of a racial split here. If you are non white, you to some extent see yourself as potentially in Arbery’s situation.

    • Replies: @Cauchemar du Singe
  30. @Grahamsno(G64)

    Wikipedia is part and parcel of The Khazar Jew Problem; lying rats that believe that they’re excused by Kol Nidre. Vampire pirates deserving of no mercy, a toxic infestation on the entire planet.

    Niggers, the stinking shit skidmarks in Uncle Sam’s skivvies; jews, the piss stains.
    Shabbos Goyim hired hand stooges,Uncle Sam’s inflamed hemorrhoids

    The Cure long overdue.

    • LOL: 36 ulster
  31. PJ London says:

    Whilst what is said is true, I have no sympathy with any of them. “Mind your own business” used to be the norm. Not drive around neighbourhoods with guns. Sure what happened is unjust, but it serves them right (as it did Chauvin) for being idiots. They had no legal justification for being there. They had no authority to do anything. They were looking for trouble, not from Aubrey but from the law, and they got it. Big time.
    If you don’t understand what is happening, stay home and protect what is yours, not run around like Charles Bronson planning on being a Hero.

    Frankfurt School (1941-6)
    1. The creation of racism offences.
    2. Continual change to create confusion
    3. The teaching of sex and homosexuality to children
    4. The undermining of schools’ and teachers’ authority
    5. Huge immigration to destroy identity.
    6. The promotion of excessive drinking
    7. Emptying of churches
    8. An unreliable legal system with bias against victims of crime
    9. Dependency on the state or state benefits
    10. Control and dumbing down of media
    11. Encouraging the breakdown of the family

    One of the main ideas of the Frankfurt School was to exploit Freud’s idea of
    ‘pansexualism’ ~ the search for pleasure, the exploitation of the differences between the sexes the overthrowing of traditional relationships between men and women.

    To further their aims they would:
    • attack the authority of the father, deny the specific roles of father and mother, and wrest away from families their rights as primary educators of their children.
    • abolish differences in the education of boys and girls
    • abolish all forms of male dominance ~ hence the presence of women in the armed forces
    • declare women to be an ‘oppressed class’ and men as ‘oppressors’
    ‘We will make the West so corrupt that it stinks.’

    They won. We lost. It stinks.

    • Replies: @Ludwig von Kontzchie
  32. @lloyd

    Non White jabberer sez…WHUT ?

  33. R.C. says:

    Excellent article. I think we all need to realize that if one is white, no matter how righteous their actions, that if they kill a black scumbag robbing raping or murdering someone, they would be wise to hit the road and keep their mouths shut, the latter of which always applies anyway.
    This was death by pure stupidity. If he had just kept on JOGGING and they’d shot him in the back? Sure – maybe manslaughter or worse but grabbing the business end of a shotgun? Darwin award. That evil bastard had three choices two of which were obviously the best. 1) Stop and talk – he probably wouldn’t have even gotten arrested, 2) Run like hell. He chose door number three. The one good part of this is that that scumbag no longer walks this earth.
    Ghetto lottery exactly.
    We need to realize that exactly that is our last hill to die on. Scary but true.
    I do have a slim hope that on a appeal something might change but who am I kidding? It’s a minor miracle that Kyle was acquitted and they’ve not had the feds rearrest him.

  34. the only satisfaction in this case is that the thug got the death penalty…

    It’s time White People start acting with courage and do what is right and implement our own version of Jury Nullification.

    I would have voted not guilty. Trust me, when you stand up to bullies they won’t come after you.

    Sharpton, Jackson, Crump no matter what suit they wear, they always look dirty, a la junk yard dogs…Their bark is worse than their bite.

  35. @PJ London

    I’m familiar with the Frankfurt School, and trust me, Theodor Adorno and the rest were cultural conservatives.

    in the 1960’s before his death, Adorno was attacked during a lecture by some woke hippy dyke who took off her blouse to embarrass him. they practically told him to get out of the way of the woke generation and that Marxism was dead.

  36. I’m familiar with the Frankfurt School, and trust me, Theodor Adorno and the rest were cultural conservatives.

    Adorno was attacked during a lecture by some woke 60′ hippy dyke who took off her blouse to embarrass him. they practically told him to get out of the way of the woke generation and that Marxism was dead.

    • Thanks: Dan Hayes
  37. Goddard says:

    Thank you for not daydreaming about “separate nations” but instead offering practicable solutions.

  38. Goddard says:
    @Sick of Orcs

    If you’re White, reduce your Affican-contact footprint to near-zero.

    And contra Derb and his Talk, do not befriend the well socialized blacks, either. If you do, then you may have to congratulate him on getting the promotion that he didn’t earn—maybe the promotion that he took from you.

  39. Being white or an anti-Talmudic Muslim (as opposed to white feminists and generic sjw/feminist “Muslims” in academia, for example), makes one guilty from the start–original sin, so to speak.

    I am disturbed by how many whites are supportive and defending this show trial. This event was very significant along with the Chauvin trial and the Soros-Rosenberg riots of 2020, as well as the Zio-stooge Trumps buffoonish presidency. It is like the Talmudification of America and the West went into hyper-drive.

    The domestic terrorism push that is becoming big now will target American whites and American Muslims who are not on board the Zio-train and will seek to eradicate them. The Talmudics are creating a socio-politico-cultural mechanism with the whole of the judicial system and law enforcement, at all levels, federal to local, as it’s “muscle.” This mechanism will become an entrenched institution. It will become part of the Western paradigm in a very explicit way unlike what we have ever experienced. I believe this is happening by design and is near inevitable based on how powerful and how much of the Western psyche is dominated (both Shabbos Goys and useful idiots), by the Pharisees.

    I am growing more pessimistic by the day. I don’t see any way that things can change.

  40. Derb, we have a six-, perhaps seven-tier justice system: The additional tiers are

    5) for politicians, bureaucrats, and deep-staters who stray from the official narrative, who are treated in many ways similarly to those White on Black crime perps;

    6) for politicians, bureaucrats, and deep-staters who stick to the narrative in most ways but might miss on a point or two, or might simply wear the wrong uniform, e.g. some Dems, most Repubes; they get chased out of office, often quietly, but the lobbying fees and book deals, and think-tank jobs cushion the fall;

    7) for policians, bureaucrats, deep-staters who drink the narrative Kool-Aid®️. They and their families and friends get to plunder the country and its people with no accountability whatsoever, e.g. Hunter Biden, “Ten Percent” Joe, Stretch Pelosi.

  41. @waia

    I’m pretty sure that if you were to reread my post, slowly and attentively, you’d see that you wasted a lot of breath arguing against positions I never took.

  42. @Rich

    Look back at the photos of Arbery at the construction site that are at the top of Jared Taylor’s piece. They date from October to February. I am not going to argue that Arbery wasn’t a thief, but if he was “casing a construction site” as you say, surely we must both agree that he was a diligent, thorough and rather over-cautious “caser”, no? A thief could starve doing so much “casing”.

    • Replies: @Rich
  43. In New America, if you see someone who looks like the Sacred Jogger, get out of there. Call the police, let it be their problem, not yours. There was a time when men were allowed to protect their own neighborhoods, but that has passed.
    Edit: oops I just remembered if you call the police on a Sacred Jogger, you might be the one to get charged, not the Jogger. So just get out of there, period.

  44. If anything, this ugly interlude really puts into focus the toxic mess of a so-called justice system we inherited from Judaism, which prizes vengeance above all things, and its equally vile offspring, Christianity, which is positively manic about judging others for their human frailties and punishing them with maximum cruelty. This little pack of hunting primates accosted a member of a rival pack who strayed uninvited into their territory. They killed him for being insufficiently deferential, in a human drama of survival of the fittest that has been enacted out millions of times over the millennia. To pay for a few minutes of reverting to the thrall of a primeval instinct, they must now live the rest of their days without hope in concrete and steel cages, de facto torture chambers, at a cost of millions to taxpayers. There is no justice in that sentence, no more than there can be anything praiseworthy about them snuffing out the life of their victim. Compassion, atonement, mercy, forgiveness, healing? These “better angels of our nature” are anathema to this vindictive, hypocritical system.

    One might also be tempted to think that the moral of the tale is when embarking on a vigilante expedition, you should take care not to recruit an imbecilic camera bug as an accomplice.

  45. None of this would be possible without the willing participation of white cops, who have more loyalty to their next paycheck than to their nation, families or ancestors.

    Jews and blacks would be powerless without the aid and protection of these race traitors. In Palestine, they call them collaborators and treat them and their families accordingly.

  46. anon[390] • Disclaimer says:

    Notice how this other-worldly, after death, privileged punishment is only given to the ever so unique and special Jew but not the “White liberals” who should be physically killed in this realm.

    It’s not Jews fault for what they do. No, that’s “Satan”, “the Devil”, the One True God since it created this “Devil” in the first place. Pray for them, Christian. Pray for them, Muslim. These givers of prophets are under such a terrible burden. How ever could you know of the One True God without the ones chosen to teach you about Him? Even to die for you? You should be thanking them for saving your souls.

    For a while I thought it was just the low-information, highly propagandized, Judaized-American Pentecostal Christian Zionist holy-roller kinds [who would eat their own foot to avoid placing real blame onto any Jew] who ultimately thought along these lines but this is unfortunately not the case. It is across the board if you pay attention. During a discussion with a [supposed] Iranian Catholic [who was a big fan of E Michael Jones] they ended with saying Jews are to be pitied because they’re cursed to be tools of “Satan”.

    Oh how utterly convenient for flesh and blood to have their actions blamed on an other-worldly being/force which cannot be physically grabbed by the throat. Not only are actions misdirected onto an untouchable super-natural “Satan” so too is punishment misdirected to an other-worldly realm called “HELL”. This has got to be the most despicable subversion within the Abrahamic ideologies. How otherwise “Jew aware” people cannot recognize the benefits all of it bestows upon them I will never understand since I am not mind-controlled by any of it. Nor have I ever been baptised – which very well might replace the ancestral race-soul of these people with one much easier manipulated/controlled to ultimately protect and benefit “Israel”, “Zion”.

  47. anon215 says:

    Here’s a question nobody seems to be asking:

    Have the burglaries stopped in Satilla Shores since Ahmaud Arbery’s death?

  48. In the original Rights fiasco in the 50s and 60s, this country, and particular the big (and newly black) cities shitholed themselves in a relatively short period of fifteen to twenty years. You could argue as few as ten years in some places. This was undoubtedly with a lot more confrontation and fight, like the folks above.

    The next round of the black plague will bottom out the cities shockingly lightning fast; like a new technology almost. You can now turn city centers into dumps with a quarter of the amount of blacks in half the time. Some places might as well have their property values streamed on a high screen like the Dow to keep up with the dropping numbers in real time by the minute.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  49. Rich says:
    @Tono Bungay

    Come on, what do you think he was doing? The trial is over, you’ve got your pound of flesh. They even gave a guy life for taking pictures, for crying out loud. Only a simpleton would actually believe the guy was “jogging”. Of course it has brought about a great new name for colored folks, so there is that. But, in case you really do go around arguing that he was out for a jog, remember, absolutely no one believes it. No one.

  50. bert33 says:

    so my question is: What was Arbery doing immediately prior to the confrontation, what action did he commit, what crime? Because it is legal to be about your lawful business without interference from vigilantes in this country, regardless of what you look like. We remember George Zimmerman who got an ash-beating at the hands of young Treyvon, who was carrying Skittles candy.

    If you see something you think is suspicious, contact the authorities, people who have been to school and are sworn officers of the law. Being chief of Neighborhood Watch(Zimmerman) means nothing, and it’s neighborhood WATCH, not Neighborhood SHOOT, right? Right. All lives matter. Ask questions first, don’t automatically assume the worst.

    • Replies: @Patrick McNally
  51. SBaker says:

    Yep, and crooked prosecutors and judges are saleable items.

  52. anarchyst says:
    @Carthage Underground

    A number of years ago, the television program “60 Minutes” actually told the truth about property values comparisons between black and white neighborhoods (subdivisions).
    The program started out as the typical “anti-discrimination” piece, comparing two identical suburban Atlanta subdivisions, one primarily black and one primarily white.
    Blacks were interviewed who almost invariably declared that they would not mind if whites moved in next door to them. The piece was somewhat one-sided as the white residents that were interviewed (had to state that) they would have no problem with blacks moving in next door to them.
    The “truth” finally came out at the end, when it was noted that the prices for identical houses were tens of thousands of dollars lower in the black subdivision.
    This is proof that blacks depress property values.

  53. Exile says:
    @Etruscan Film Star

    Most Whites who are somewhat socially/politically aware and honest with themselves realize that there are serious problems with this society, that race is a fundamental insoluble problem for the civic-nationalist vision of America and that our economy and government serves “the 1%.” A smaller number realize the role of the (((3%))) in that 1%.

    But the idea of actively opposing any of it freezes most guys in place. Out of the larger number of “dissidents” who will gripe as online anons or after looking over their shoulders in person, maybe 10% are capable of joining any kind of alternative, pro-social effort to build something better and push back on anti-social elements like Jewish supremacy/privilege, globohomo and corporate sovereignty.

    Everyone is waiting for the first few guys to make a move and seeing how it turns out for them when distributed risk/mass non-compliance/opting-out would best serve them.

    So we want to look at strategies that reduce the risk – have to, really.

    Until the less brave among us screw up their courage, those of us in the vanguard have to commit a disproportionate amount of our effort to defensive strategies, “opsec” and the like.

    Taking practical steps that fit with responsible family stewardship in general – the kinds of things you should be doing to protect and provide for your kids, 14 Words stuff – eases people into a situation where more contentious, overt forms of activism are less risky.

    We’re looking to have prepared, politically active and aware communities ready to anchor a new society when this one inevitably takes a hard downturn. There will be a future convergence point between popular discontent and acceptable risk. At that point, we want to be able to tip the balance toward a family and community oriented White society in our own local areas, then in states, then regionally.

    At this point, “soft secession” seems to be the way the USA will wind down, similar to what has evolved in the post-USSR. The ability and willingness of people to either comply or force compliance with central authority will diminish, correlating loosely with proximity to ZOG priority power centers like coastal cities and cities in general. The “outlying provinces,” hinterlands and border regions will have some ability to exercise de facto if not formal sovereignty.

  54. @bert33

    Zimmerman only shot after he had been assaulted and brought to the ground by Trayvon Martin, who was beating on him. Moreover, Zimmerman had a much better justification for his actions than these 3 fools did. Zimmerman was working as the Neighborhood Watchman in a gated community park, which is an area where non-resident guests are supposed to be willing to identify themselves as such.

    Almost every morning I will walk out of this gated community park where I live and march along the highway towards either one of a couple restaurants. There are some other parks along the way there. They generally have signs at the front about “No Trespassing” and such. I wouldn’t go in there unless I had been invited by someone, and then I would have to be prepared to respond any queries about “who are you? what are you doing here?” with some answer like “I’m looking for so-and-so, they should be expecting me, do you know where they live?”

    There are also a few houses along the highway where people live. If I trespassed on a homeowner’s property then they might raise some fuss. But as long as I simply walk along a public road then they don’t really have any basis for complaint. I can walk through there street, without planting myself on their front lawn, whereas the homeowners who live within the gated community parks could legitimately argue that I shouldn’t be in their park area unless invited by a resident.

    Trayvon Martin had been invited into this gated community park by his father, a resident. So if he hadn’t been drugged up and eager to start a fight it should have been easy for to settle everything with just a short conversation like “hey man, I’m here visiting my dad over at house number xyz, do you know him?” But George Zimmerman was entirely within his rights to want to know who was this stranger that was prowling around the park late at night.

    The Arbery case is a tad more complicated. The way that Arbery had walked across the home-construction site might be regarded as a form of trespassing. But it’s been shown on film that a number of other people had done the same thing. OK, maybe they should have been stopped too and Arbery was just the one unlucky to get caught. That happens in life. But once Arbery had jogged away from the home-construction site it really seems like he was now in public territory. Under those circumstances, these 3 fools should have avoided getting out of a vehicle to confront Arbery. They could have just driven after him while avoiding a confrontation and then let the police handle it. It’s very likely that the police would have allowed Arbery to go after a few questions.

    So they were dumb, yes. But Arbery was the one who made this into an actual fight. Manslaughter could have been a reasonable charge, but this was way overboard pandering to BLM.

  55. anarchyst says:

    Blacks are dysfunctional, cannot “behave” in normal civil society and should be repatriated to the African continent. I don’t care where ((they)) go as long as it is out of civilized American society.
    Black DNA IS different; violent African tribal mores are the norm.
    Disputes are “settled” with violence, not with logic and reason. Instant gratification is the rule, not the exception. The DNA for logic and reason does not exist within the black psyche. Blacks thrive under a “strong man” form of government, where one’s status is determined by proximity to the “chief”.
    Keep in mind that African blacks have never inventing anything. From the wheel, to mining the wealth of minerals beneath their feet, to wondering “what is beyond that ocean or river”, blacks do not possess the DNA for future planning or exploration.
    Fatigue resulting from having to deal with and coddle this dysfunctional race is not only tiring, but getting to be truly intolerable. Whites who “walk on eggshells” to avoid possible by violence by blacks are doing themselves and white society a disservice.
    Let’s not forget the misplaced demand that blacks have for “respect”. Any black who feels that he has been “disrespected” will “act out” and”lash out” against the perpetrator of such “disrespect”. Arbery’s defective black DNA demanded that he attack the man with the shotgun…definitely not a good move. Sad to say, the white men were “railroaded” by the “justice system”. Hopefully appeals of the sentences will be forthcoming.
    I, for one, am tired of pandering to this dysfunction subset of (sub)humanity…simians.
    As far as I am concerned, the white men who took out Arbery did the community a big favor…

  56. This is anti-white lynching but it’s also a class thing, they could not afford a top lawyer. Rittenhouse was saved by people coming together and funding an excellent legal defence for him. Basically, if you’re white and you want to play cop against blacks or Jews, you better be rich.

    • Replies: @Pat Kittle
  57. @Mina Horowitz

    Rittenhouse was saved by people coming together and funding an excellent legal defence for him.

    Rittenhouse was also saved by the good fortune that the evidence was videoed. Without that his excellent legal defence may not have been enough.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  58. MEH 0910 says:

  59. Doctor Jeyi says: • Website

    Encourage you all to look at the complete dashboard and body-camera video coverage of an eye-opening earlier encounter with Mr. Arbery and the Glynn County (Georgia, USA) Police. See…

  60. anarchyst says:
    @Pat Kittle

    Rittenhouse was saved by an honest judge who disallowed the prosecution’s assertion that Rittenhouse’s attackers were “victims”.
    Add to that, the prosecution’s “star witness” Rosenkrantz who admitted that Rittenhouse held off on shooting him until he pointed his firearm at Rittenhouse.
    Rittenhouse was lucky–shooting three jews and dispatching two to the “great hereafter” might have resulted in a conviction if the judge was dishonest.
    In the Arbery case, the judge was as dishonest as he could be. The “Atilla three” have good grounds for successful appeals…

  61. @Exile

    Then you’ll end up on what are effectively “reservations”, like the Boer.
    Hordes of extra savages (in the US case, some sort of Aztec-adjacent heart-rippers or face-peelers, or Haitian probable cannibals) will be brought in and catered to, to fill the lands you have vacated. To bursting point.

    Not the “noble” redman who used to live there. To the globalists, those guys are dead and gone.
    White folks are probably the only people on earth who still give two curly ones about them. The Chinese simply view them as an “in” to the New World by pretending “pan-mongolian brotherhood” or whatever.

    And the bracket bracket bracket pressure unbracket unbracket unbracket will increase.
    Until you are gone.

  62. MEH 0910 says:

  63. MEH 0910 says:

Current Commenter

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone

 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All John Derbyshire Comments via RSS