The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewJohn Derbyshire Archive
Racketeering Refugees: What the Million Marching Pussyhatters Really Want?
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Some immigration patriots were disappointed with President Trump’s first day. (Mind if I just pause here and say “President Trump” a couple of times? I just like saying it. President Trump, President Trump! Thank you.) But as his first week closes, he’s made a flurry of announcements and it looks as though we shall get “extreme vetting” and a big reduction in settlement of so-called refugees. [Trump signs order to temporarily shut nation’s door to most refugees and start ‘extreme vetting’ by Brian Bennett and Noah Bierman, LA Times, January 27, 2017]

Most of these refugees are of course bogus, as has been amply documented by the two Anns: Anne Corcoran over at Refugee Resettlement Watch, and the indispensable Ann Coulter. But, ever apprehensive that someone out there in listener-land might think I am being unnecessarily hard-hearted when I insert that qualifier “so-called,” I feel the need to offer some justification.

Here’s this week’s poster guy for “so-called”—Mohamed Bajjar.

Who he? Well, he’s a Syrian refugee, 27 years old, who worked as a translator for British volunteers in the illegal alien camp at Calais, near the English Channel. The so-called “Jungle,” where thousands of so-called “refugees” were camped out waiting to be smuggled into Britain, was bulldozed by the French authorities last October, but there are still many illegals in the area, and some new makeshifts camps have sprung up.

So Syrian refugee Mohamed Bajjar was helping the British volunteers, including those who work for an outfit named Care4Calais, which gives food, clothing, and medical care to the illegals.

Care4Calais was launched in November 2015 by an upper-middle-class British lady, Clare Moseley, 46 years old.

Can you see where this is going?

Yep: before very long, Mohamed Bajjar was having the leg over with Mrs. Moseley. That’s right, she’s a Mrs. Her husband is a wealthy corporate tax accountant living in northwest England.

Now, in the do-gooding line of work, sex affairs between the do-gooders and the do-goodees is frowned on.

I’d assume Mrs. Moseley’s husband was frowning more than most—although looking at her pictures, I might be mistaken on that.

Anyway, there was a big fuss.

As a result of the fuss, people started looking into Mohamed Bajjar’s background. Guess what: he was not Syrian, and also not a refugee. He comes from Tunisia, where his family owns a souk—that’s a sort of Third World mini-mall—in a prosperous resort city.

And guess what else: Mohamed is already married to a different British lady, 54-year-old Carol Hutchings.

You keeping up with the ages here? Mrs. Hutchings—or I guess I should say “Mrs. Bajjar”—54; Mrs. Mosely, 46; Mr. Bajjar, 27.

Mohamed met Mrs. Hutchings-Bajjar while she was on vacation in Tunisia. They married in that country. Mrs. Hutchings-Bajjar returned to Britain. Mohamed began applying for a passport. He didn’t seem to be in a hurry, though; and he was all the time pestering Mrs. Hutchings-Bajjar to send him money. She began to have doubts. Ah:

When lovely woman stoops to folly

And finds too late that men betray..

Apparently giving up on Mrs. Hutchings-Bajjar, Mohamed left Tunisia and got himself into Germany, claiming to be a Syrian refugee. Quote from Mrs. Hutchings-Bajjar:

He claimed asylum there by saying he was Syrian … but he had a job at a Coca-Cola factory in Poland and he flitted back to Germany each month so he could get his asylum-seeker’s allowance.

Exposed: The lies of the ‘refugee’ who had an affair with a married charity chief. He wasn’t Syrian, he came for a wealthy family, and, most staggering of all, he already had a BRITISH wife

By Barbara Davies, The Daily Mail, January 20, 2017

The latest I have is that Mrs. Moseley, too has gotten wise to Mohamed—he’d been pestering her for money, too. They broke up earlier this month.

French police actually arrested Mohamed earlier this month for January 6 on suspicion of stealing Mrs. Moseley’s cellphone but he was released without charge, and is now living above a clothes shop in Calais.

There’s a story for our times. Oh, I forgot to mention: Before the Jungle camp was dismantled in October, it came out that Mrs. Moseley was not alone in developing intimate bonds with one of the illegals—I beg your pardon, “refugees.” The Daily Mail says that

Several women volunteers had embarked on relationships within the camp and a row broke out over whether those involved were “sexually exploiting” the refugees.

I venture to suggest there is a link here, admittedly a tenuous and speculative one, between this story and the prominence of women like obscenity-spouting billionaires Madonna and last Saturday’s million pussyhatted marchers, wearing \$150 running shoes and holding \$500 cell phones, with more life options than they know what to do with, in the anti-Trump movement. See if you can figure it out.

One possible option for American women who are as dissatisfied with their lot as last weekend’s pussyhatted marchers would be to convert to Islam. Life for women under Sharia law is so much more enriching and fulfilling than is the case in the patriarchal oppression of Judeo-Christian society.

Two postulants have taken up that option this week, or at least said they are willing to.

On Wednesday, Madeleine Albright, former Clinton Secretary of State. Wednesday this week Ms. Albright tweeted that she would register herself a Muslim as an act of defiance against President Donald Trump’s immigration plans:

In a later tweet Ms. Albright posted a picture of the Statue of Liberty with the words of Emma Lazarus’ poem “The New Colossus” and the caption “There is no fine print on the Statue of Liberty.”

Whether or not there is any fine print on the Statue of Liberty I cannot discover; but there is no Emma Lazarus poem on the statue. The poem is in the museum located inside the pedestal under the statue—which was a gift from the people of France to commemorate the centenary of our Declaration of Independence —nothing to do with immigration.

I don’t think you should be allowed to serve as Secretary of State if you don’t know elementary facts like that about our national symbols.

And then there’s Lindsay Lohan, who at this point I think everyone just feels sorry for. Ms. Lohan deleted all her photos on Instagram recently, leaving only her profile picture and the greeting “Alaikum salam,” which is Arabic for “And unto you peace.”


Possibly Ms. Lohan has been influenced by her recent residence in Turkey, where she has been working as a volunteer in refugee camps.

Er, wait a minute … as a volunteer in refugee camps?

Mr Bajjar, Mr Mohamed Bajjar to the white courtesy phone, please.


John Derbyshire [email him] writes an incredible amount on all sorts of subjects for all kinds of outlets. (This no longer includes National Review, whose editors had some kind of tantrum and fired him. ) He is the author of We Are Doomed: Reclaiming Conservative Pessimism and several other books. He’s had two books published by FROM THE DISSIDENT RIGHT (also available in Kindle) and From the Dissident Right II: Essays 2013. His writings are archived at

(Republished from VDare by permission of author or representative)
• Category: Ideology • Tags: Donald Trump, Immigration 
Hide 61 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    I think you are on to something here. I suspect that there are no real lesbians helping at refugee camps. They just don’t have the inspiration. I wonder if there are any data on this.

  2. CK says:

    It ain’t the meat, it’s the (e)motion.
    Attributed to Ms Bessie Smith

  3. Whiskeys Place has been making comments along these lines for years. I thought at first he was outrageous but as I watched events, his explanations made increasing sense to me. I wonder if Derb has had the same experience? Middle aged women crave the sexual “tingles” offered by young Arab/Turkish/African men–imagine the demographic group that might be interested in helping the refugees if they were Chinese women between 19 and 27.

    • LOL: Marcus
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    , @Anonymous
  4. El Dato says:

    A middle-aged woman looking for action and a way to make herself useful outside of the Titanic’s passenger suite of modern life and falls prey to some young-ish, colored, upwardly mobile artiste?

    Pretty sure many books have been written about such situations since the 1700s but my literature studies have been sadly neglected.

  5. TigerJ says:

    Hell has no fury like a man scorned. Particularly so when by his own women compatriots, and having to turn to a mail-order bride from China.

    • Replies: @Judah Benjamin Hur
  6. The slutty feminists demand that The Historic Native Born White America Majority hand the Nation over to Aziz Andari’s people….and to Ajit Pai’s People. And the “Noble” American Injun-GENOCIDE!!! taunts will be flushed down the toilet bowl forever. Aziz Andari’s People and Ajit Pai’s People are to enjoy the full benefits of the European conquest of North America.

    Donald Trump is obviously going to risk military conflict with Christian Russia on behalf of Our Friend Israel!!!..Paul Kersey and Richard Spencer:do you both still worship the God Emperor-Land Owner Trump? F off to both of you….

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @anon
  7. densa says:

    So, Germany is going to prosecute him for fraud, right?

  8. anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    These over-the-hill women are able to punch above their weight in terms of the kind of guys they’re able to get by going where people are poor or desperate such as camps or places in the third world where they ‘vacation’. Were those guys westerners under the age of 75 those women would be invisible. Those women are the ones zooming in then have the nerve to make it seem like they were being played by the bad boys. Those cheapskates should pay those nice looking young men and pay them well for their services just like all the rest of the third-world sex tourists. It wasn’t their looks or charm that attracted those men and they must know that yet want it for free or nearly so. Pay up, cheapos. Mr Moseley must be feeling tremendous humiliation right now and it’s fortunate for his wife that he himself is not a Muslim or else he would be contemplating committing an honor killing right about now.

    • Replies: @Old fogey
  9. Old fogey says:

    Wow! Terrific post, Mr. Derbyshire. I always knew most of my fellow women were stupid but I think I underestimated the number. . .

  10. Anon • Disclaimer says:
    @War for Blair Mountain

    If not Paul Kersey or Richard Spencer, then who?

  11. WGG says:

    Abandoning chastity and Christianity to become a secular harlot: seeking approval from Jewish media. Abandoning secular harlotry and all European traditions for Islam: seeking approval from Jewish media.

    Almost like a pattern. Turn the cursed television off.

    Although, I lol’ed at that Family Guy graphic.

  12. anon • Disclaimer says:
    @War for Blair Mountain

    Good post. Isn’t it something how all these Asians talk about the white “conquest” of North America, while so eagerly helping themselves to all the plunder that came from it. It is somehow “wrong” for whites to enjoy the benefits of the society their ancestors spent centuries building but just “fine” to give it all away to Asian foreigners. Now THAT IS CHUTZPAH!

    And how does any of this help the “Injuns”, who the Asians couldn’t care less about?

  13. anon • Disclaimer says:

    Shame on those white women! They betray their countries, husbands and own families in equal measure.

  14. @Anon

    Spencer and Kersey now need to consider the possibility that Trump only has a pragmatic disagreement with the neocons…same goals..”gentle”…implementation of the neocons worldview….evidence:Jared Kushner=bomb Iran….I believe Saker’s commentary most recent has the “I’M AN IMMIGRANT”=innocent muzzie “americans”=enter 9/11 conspiracy theory nuttery….

  15. Just because we’ve been killing their aunts, uncles and kiddies for two decades is no reason for Muslims to complain about the new restrictions. If we don’t demonize them we will have to stop projecting our animus towards Islam. Then what? They have a nerve expecting us to deal with our guilt; we’re exceptional. Don’t they get it? Jeez.

    • Replies: @biz
  16. Someone seems to have made a big mistake in featuring a speaker at the march who was pro-torture and anti-life in a most gruesome way. Billed as an activist, Jamaican immigrant Donna Hylton spent 27 years in prison, but the attendees who applauded her probably didn’t know that it was because she kidnapped, tortured for days, sexually abused, raped and ultimately murdered a Long Island real estate broker, in an ultimately unsuccessful extortion for almost half a million dollars…

  17. Mrs. Moseley

    not those Moseleys then, I trust?

    • Replies: @Expletive Deleted
  18. @Expletive Deleted

    She really doesn’t like white workingmen all that much, does she?

    The founder of a British charity has outraged trucking chiefs by claiming lorry drivers who complain about attacks by migrants in Calais should just change jobs.
    Clare Moseley, the founder of Care4Calais, said it was ‘not the end of the world’ if the drivers were forced from their work and claimed they still had a ‘safe future’.

    [Daily Heil]

    • Replies: @El Dato
  19. Forbes says:

    Mohamed Bajjar certainly learned quickly to take advantage of soft-touch Westerners and their liberal pieties. Is it any wonder Western social welfare spending policies are such a mess with those like-minded to Claire Mosely running the show?

  20. Jason Liu says:

    The most extreme SJWs are not minorities of any type, but usually white cat ladies

    Been saying this for ages and the alt-right doesnt seem to quite get it. Big blind spot there.

    • Replies: @dc.sunsets
  21. Bobzilla says:

    Life for women under Sharia law is so much more enriching and fulfilling than is the case in the patriarchal oppression of Judeo-Christian society.

    There is no such thing as Judeo-Christian. Just Christian, thank you very much.

  22. Anon • Disclaimer says:

    Feminism and Consumerism were bound to mess up the world.

    They are against nature and mess up the organic balance of things.

    To understand this, imagine 4 people: 2 men and 2 women.

    Suppose there are 2 well-paying jobs.

    We need to take human nature into consideration: Men will marry women without jobs, but women don’t wanna marry men without jobs.

    These are the possible outcomes.

    1. Two men get the jobs. Each can afford to raise a family, and each is willing to marry a woman without a job. So, each marry a woman. So, two men have jobs and they have wives. Everyone gets something. Men have jobs and wives, women have husbands, wives have family. Two incomes support two families.

    2. One man and one woman get the jobs. Each can afford a family. The man with the job marries the woman with the job. In contrast, the man without the job cannot a mind a mate since women don’t want men without jobs. So, the woman without the job doesn’t marry the man without the job.
    Since the man with the job and woman with the job married, both their incomes serve just one family. Meanwhile, the man without the job has no money and no family. And the woman without the job doesn’t want to marry the man with no job, so she has nothing too.
    So, we have all the good stuff in one family and nothing for the other two. Also, since both man and woman work, there is a chance that they will have no kids or just one kid. All that combined income goes to serve very narrow interests. Two get it all, the other two get nothing.

    3. One man and one woman get the jobs. Each can afford a family. The man with the job marries the woman without a job. In contrast, the woman with the job remains unmarried because she doesn’t want to marry the man without a job. Under this formulation, three get something while the male without a job get nothing. The man with a job has a wife, the woman without a job, and they can have a family. The woman with a job has money even if no husband. She has no family but she has money to have fun with.
    But the man without a job has no money and no wife. Such a man is destined for White Death.

    4. Two women get the jobs, and that means the two men have no jobs. Since women don’t want to marry men without jobs, the women spend all their income on themselves in wild consumerism. They don’t want a family with loser men with no jobs. Since the two men got no jobs, they lose status and hope.

    Of the four options, only #1 offers something for everyone.

    #3 isn’t so terrible since 3 out of 4 get something.

    #2 is awful because 2 get everything while 2 get nothing. Still, its saving grace is there is formation of at least one family.

    #4 is horrible because 2 get everything but there is no family. All that money is spent on fleeting vanity and hedonism.

    Now, one might hope for a world where 4 people can have 4 good jobs, but the world isn’t like that. There is only a limited number of jobs that can support families.

    When women entered the work force in big numbers, they took away lots of good jobs from men. Every woman who got a good job robbed a man not only of a job but of a family. When a man takes a job from a woman, he doesn’t take away her chance of having a family since men with jobs will marry women without jobs.
    When women take jobs from men, it leads to men losing their market value as marriage prospects. Women not only take the jobs form men but also the hope of family, the most important thing in life(because people, as life-forms, are created from families and pass down their genes and memory by forming their own families).
    When women have high-paying jobs, their standards go up in the mating game. But since fewer men have good jobs, the ‘ideal man’ is harder to find. So, women with jobs face a drought in marriageable men. Since they only want to marry a successful man and will not settle for anything less, many women would rather blow all their money on vanity and self-pleasure. So, the income that, in the hands of man, could have supported a family ends up serving the vain piggery of a woman hooked to SEX AND CITY lifestyle.

    How did we end up like this? It’s because we forgot the lesson that we are, first and foremost, organisms or life-forms. The role of life-form is to sustain itself. Everyone will die one day and so will his/her loved one, the partner in life. So, how do they ‘survive’ after death? Through their children who are continuation of their DNA and cultural/personal torchbearers of their forebears memory. That’s what Judaism is about, indeed how it got started. It was about remembrance of ancestors by descendants, and it all went back to the Covenant.


    Now, we are more than mere life-forms like animals. We have advanced brains, and we need ideas, values, and culture. Still, all those things only exist in and matter to the living. All the books in the world mean nothing without people to read them, and every person is the product of man and woman(unless we create a Brave New World scenario of clones by the state). We are more than biology, but it begins with and is made possible by biology. Without biology, there is no being.
    And the main source of meaning is in the family since every person was created by father and mother and since every person can only ‘live on’ after death via the DNA passed down to his/her kids who are also the cultural/personal torchbearers of their parents’ lives.

    But for some reason, the cult of individualism made us forget that every individual is a ‘continual’, merely one link in the long chain of life. He didn’t pop out of a book or materialize out of the thin air or come into existence by a musing of someone’s mind. Every person is born biologically and become human emotionally.
    Because we are surrounded by books, movies, and fantasy, we seem to think reality can be created via the imagination and ‘creativity’. We’ve replaced creation with creativity. It’s no wonder that we’ve come to accept something like ‘gay marriage’. We confuse reality with fantasy, as if the world is created and sustained by wish-fulfilment. We confuse reproductive fact with creative wish. So, if two lesbians want to believe that they ‘had a kid’ together, we better go along with this charade. If a man says he is a ‘woman’, we are pressured to comply. If a bunch of freaks wanna hair-split sex into 50 genders, we are supposed to take it seriously as intellectualism and science.

    Also, consumerism divorced pleasure from purpose. Life-forms feel pleasure of food and sex because they must eat to survive and they must have sex to produce new life. But consumerism created technologies that allowed wanton eating and wanton sex for pleasure alone. So, piggery became the New Normal, as with fatso Lena Dunham who gorges on cakes while sitting on the toilet. It’s like she has to eat and shi* at the same time. And like an animal, she humps everyone, and she can sustain such behavior because there are contraceptives, pills, and abortion. This kind of porno-propaganda or pornoganda has, in some ways, become America’s main cultural message to the world. America is an exceptional country? Or an excessive cunt-ry?

    Also, the idea of freedom has become nihilistic. It’s good to be free, but for what purpose? In the end, we must make use of our freedoms. And in making any decision, we are choosing one freedom and losing all the others. If we choose to study medicine, we don’t have free time to study other things. We must commit to medicine. If we study chemistry, there are other stuff we can’t study. If we decide to read a book, then we can’t read another book. We have only so much time and energy for so much. So, even though we want freedom, every choice ‘imprisons’ us with one endeavor and locks out all the rest. It’s like the scene in SUPERMAN. If Superman is to save one bunch of people, he can’t save another bunch of people. He can’t do everything. He fails to save Lois Lane and brings her back to life only by cheating.

    So, we must raise a question about the thing that is more important than freedom. We mus ask, what is the main purpose and meaning of life.
    After all, suppose there’s a society where everyone is forced to be a husband or a wife.
    And suppose there is another society where everyone is free and uses his/her freedom to only indulge himself/herself and not have families.
    In the end, isn’t the former society better off since it has families and new life? It lives on and sustains itself.
    In contrast, what good is the other society in the long run? Sure, freedom is nice, but if people used their freedom to just indulge themselves, they’ve left no legacy for the future… like so many hedonistic white folks are doing today.

    Now, we want freedom, but we need to use that freedom wisely. But everything in our ideology and culture fills our hearts, minds, eyes, and ears with the wrong lessons and vile temptations. If Lena Dunham, madonna, Emma Sulk, and Ashley Judd are the ‘role models’ for womenkind, no wonder there are so many problems. Stalinist, Nazi, or even Sharia culture is better for women. After all, the Muslim Order, repressive as it is, lasted for 0ver 1000 yrs. How long can the current West last? In the end, the worth of civilization isn’t measured by trending ideas or fashionable values. It is measured by its ability to survive and continue. The current West pontificates about its pride of ‘western values’, but if those lead to the fall of the West, they were the wrong values.

    Now, I’m not saying that the only choices are between western decadence/excess and Sharia Law. There is something in between. It’s like Aldous Huxley in BRAVE NEW WORLD REVISITED called out his mistake in BRAVE NEW WORLD of offering only two options: the world of neo-primitive brutality and orgy-porgy techo-hedonism.

    We can be both free and find meaning.
    As we are life forms, we are made of families, and we continue through families we create who carry the DNA code, remember their parents/forbears, and preserve the culture/heritage. Family is bio-socialist. Socialism sacrifices the ideal of absolute individual liberty with a system of relations calibrated for the maximum good of society. So, even though taxing the rich at higher rates than others is ‘unfair’ by libertarian principles, it is deemed necessary since the rich can afford to pay more for the GOOD of society. So, socialism takes into consideration the difference between being rich, being middle income, and being poor. In a similar vein, bio-socialism takes into account that men and women are not mere individuals to be understood by abstract theories. It’s not just about individuals and choice. Men and women are biological creatures brought into being by a certain biological process, grow ideally in a sound family environment, and whose legacy is assured by forming families of their and having children. So, family becomes the foremost bio-socialist unit in the formulation of what is best for society. In the aforementioned scenario of 2 men and 2 women in a society with jobs, bio-socialism will favor 2 men getting the jobs since everyone will get something. 2 jobs held by 2 men can support 2 families.

    But the family has come under attack by feminism and other nutjob ideologies. Also, the role of mother has been mocked as ‘having babies’ as if that is all a woman does: lays babies like a chicken lays eggs. In fact, babies soon grow into children, and creating a child is the process of creating a human with mind, heart, ideas, values, and etc. Every day, millions of new neurons are added to children, and the process of their growth is fascinating. Besides, what is a more rewarding ‘thing’ for a person to create than another thinking & feeling human being with heart and soul? Besides, all the products and services offered by professions and jobs exist only to serve human beings. So, creating and developing a new human being is the richest experience in life. It’s why Michael Corleone says at the beginning of GODFATHER III(though bad movie) that the most precious things in this world are children. No matter how rich Michael is, he will die, and then the ONLY people who will remember and care about him are his survivors, the kids and grandkids. His money and his mansions and cars have no mind, no heart, no nothing. Only life remembers life.
    But in our world, the Ideal is for a guy with good job to marry a woman with a good job(which means one less man with a good job who can afford a family), and since are too busy with work, the raising of the kids is left to PC ideologues(teacher hacks) and the Mammon of Pop Culture that corrupts children from a young age.

    The modern world is great for giving us freedoms that our ancestors didn’t have and didn’t know how to have. And initially, modern people had both freedom and meaning, a sense of purpose. They were freed from traditional bonds but still morally and culturally informed by those bonds and values. It’s like Michael Corleone has freedoms that his forbears didn’t in Old Sicily, but having grown up in a culture of family and values, his individuality is shaped by those values. He has freedom but also cultural compass.

    But as the cult of freedom took on a life of its own via ideological arrogance and hedonistic excess, the connection to a sense of purpose was lost.
    Ideology gave people a sense of permanence through ideas when, in fact, ideas only exist in the minds of people, life forms. No people, no ideas. Ideas are nothing without minds to appreciate them, and minds are bio-mass of life-forms.

    If ideology gave people a false sense of permanence via books & arts, entertainment made people feel that the Moment is Forever. Thus, people lose sight of the larger sense of time and history as they’ve become hooked to pop music or movies that glorify the orgiastic hysterics of the moment. Humans went from organismic to the orgasmic. So, even middle aged men and women still feel like teenagers as they listen to pop music and watch hollywood movies about caped heroes. Or when they play dumb video games.

    We need to find a way to reconnect freedom with meaning and purpose.
    All these pussyhat feminists bitch and whine about ‘freedom’, as if Trump is going to turn them all into chattel slaves. But in fact, the real problem women face today is lack of meaning and purpose with all their misguided freedoms. They have freedom, but the choices they’ve made are terrible, not least because our reigning ideology and culture encourages women to act like SEX AND CITY, Lena Dunham, Miley Cyrus, Emma Sulk, or one of those trashy shallow pseudo-intellectuals who write for NYT or yammer on NPR.

    In a way, the odd alliance of feminists and Muslims suggest at something buried in the feminist psyche. There is something within them that is crying out for meaning, order, purpose, and continuance. Is it any surprise that Lindsey Lohan is leaning toward Islam?

    Only a neo-fascism can restore the order and balance in Western Man and Woman.

    The history of mankind has offered people four basic choices:

    1. Forcing people to do what is the right thing.

    2. Forcing people to do what is the wrong thing.

    3. Giving people freedom, and people freely doing the wrong thing.

    4. Giving people freedom, and people freely doing the right thing.

    The best of all possible worlds will have most people in #4 mode.
    The worst of all possible worlds will have most people in #3 mode.

    Why is #3 worse than #2? Why is a world where people are forced to do the wrong thing better than one where people freely do the wrong thing?
    Because in the #3 scenario, there is still a political/social power that can make people do the right thing under a new policy. It may be currently forcing people to do the wrong thing, but with a change of course, the system can force the people to do the right thing.
    In contrast in the #3 scenario, the people have the freedom/power to do the wrong thing, and there is no higher power to stop them or correct them. This is why black problem today is worse than black problem during slavery. During slavery, whites forced blacks to be slaves, the wrong thing. And slavery had to end. But since whites still had the power, they could make blacks do the right things with the end of slavery. In contrast, the corrupt and free blacks of today won’t listen to anything since they got the Agency and Power. But to do what with their freedom? Turn cities into Detroit and Baltimore. Blacks used their freedom to turn their communities into neo-jungles and bitch,whine, and holler like mad baboons. And since they have all the freedoms and rights under the law, they can just go on acting loutish.
    In contrast, blacks in Cuba are in scenario #2. Cuban Socialism doesn’t really work. It is the wrong thing. It keeps blacks doing what is economically backward and inefficient. BUT, the state still has control over the blacks, so if state policy were to change one day for the better, blacks can be pressured to do the right thing under state power. But a lot of American blacks are hopeless. They got the power and freedom and they used it for total lunacy and jungle behavior. And there is no power above them to say NO.

    One might say #1 and #4 have same results and so are equally valid. Whether people are forced to do the right thing OR use their freedom to do the right thing, the end result is people doing the right thing. Still, we want freedom. We don’t want to be forced to do stuff by some tyranny.

    Under system #1, even those who want to do the wrong thing have no choice but to do the right thing.
    Under system #4, those with the freedom to do the wrong thing still choose to do the right thing. That is true morality, but increasingly harder to come by these days because of family breakdown, cultural decadence, moral degeneration, and etc. After all, in order for people to freely do the right thing, they must be inculcated with good, sound, and healthy values and outlook and understanding. But just look at the state of PC and Pop Culture. We are raising kids to be self-absorbed tards and snowflakes and loons. Why so many kids get tattoos? They have no sense of time, of tomorrow. They don’t think, “yrs will pass and I might look back and find this tattoo really stupid.” No, all they care about is the NOW. If they think it’s cool NOW, they must get it and just fuc* tomorrow.

    In order for #4 to work, we need a society that promotes culture and values of maturity, sobriety, dignity, and integrity, like what Vito Corleone had(except for the organized crime thing, but then he was pressured into by that no-good Fanucci who was fleecing the neighborhood).
    But if #4 is rendered impossible because our culture creates tons of idiots with PC and junk culture, then the only option is to go back to #1.

    #1 is unpleasant even if it forces people to do the right thing because we want to be free and also, we want people to do the right thing out of moral sense than out of social coercion. Still, #1 is the only option when #4 fails and we slip into a state of #3. The black American community, at this point, can only fix its problems through #1 option. Too many blacks have freely acted to be a total tards and chillun.

    It’s funny. Life is a form of energy.
    The modern world has tons of energy made possible by electricity. Look at Earth at night from space, and you can see entire areas lit up by tons of electricity. We see the most lights in Western nations and East Asian nations. So much industrial and recreational energy… and yet, so little life energy, so little energy of reproduction. Modern folks are like moths before an artificial light. They are addicted to the false life of industrial energy that fills them with light, convenience, and entertainment, but they have lost the sense of real energy, that of life itself. Because industrial energy is so powerful, those who huddle around it feel so alive, but it’s all an illusion. Watching TV filled with flashing images or playing some roller-coaster video-game may make one feel alive, but it’s all illusion. Being around all that industrial energy has sapped modern man of life energy, that of family and creation of new life for legacy.

    In contrast, the dark continent of Africa is having lots of kids and producing lots of life. They lack in industrial energy but they have something far more valuable: life energy.
    And they will eventually move to the modern world with its aging and dying populations who prefer the artificial ‘life’ of industrial energy over the real energy of life around family and culture.

    Some people say we need to return to Christian values, but I don’t know. Christianity is a mixed blessing.
    Christianity is like coal. It offers lots of spiritual heat and moral warmth. But it has to be handled with care with good ventilation. Why? What does coal produce? Carbon Monoxide or CO which is odorless and lethal.
    So, the Church needs good ventilation system. Yes, the Church teaches us to love mankind and be forgiving, and etc. That is a good message to warm the soul. But too much of anything is never any good. And excessive utopian save-the-world sermonizing of Christians can have the effect of CO.
    So, we need to ventilate the Church. Give us the sermon about love and forgiveness but air out too much sanctimoniousness that turns people into holier-than-thou pied-pipers of their race to extinction.
    Also, Christians need to be reminded that Jesus never said the world of man could be saved. He only said that man should try to be good and seek the Lord’s grace in the afterlife.

    • Replies: @anon
  23. El Dato says:
    @Expletive Deleted

    “Having a safe future” (as a lorry driver) now is code for “Check your privilege!”

    What the hell happened.

  24. Agent76 says:

    June 17, 2011 The Destabilization of Syria and the Broader Middle East War

    What is unfolding in Syria is an armed insurrection supported covertly by foreign powers including the US, Turkey and Israel. Armed insurgents belonging to Islamist organizations have crossed the border from Turkey, Lebanon and Jordan. The US State Department has confirmed that it is supporting the insurgency. The United States is to expand contacts with Syrians who are counting on a regime change in the country.

  25. If the worst thing pseudo-refugees were doing was scamming SJW harridans, I’d say let ’em in by the truckload, they’re performing a public service. Would that it were so.

  26. Bart says:

    Sorry, Scott, it will take many more of this kind of foolishness to make me stop reading Dilbert.

  27. ” the patriarchal oppression of Judeo-Christian society.”

    What’s this Judeo-Christian shit?
    It’s a phrase that would be utterly meaningless to any Christian Minister 100 years ago and is largely a 1960’s device designed to pretend that the Talmudic gibberings of the Jews have some connection to the Greco-Roman based achievements of the West.

    It rears its ugly head whenever some new Zionist atrocity is planned or under way.

    • Replies: @Judah Benjamin Hur
  28. Anon • Disclaimer says:

    Patriots need to go on the offensive and mention the J-factor and American neo-imperialism.

    Progs and so many Jews feign compassion and humanitarianism for the ‘refugees’, but they never address the issue of why ‘refugees’ exist in the first place.

    It is because of Wars for Israel and American neo-imperialist strategy in the Middle East and North Africa. US foreign policy is Babelian. Smash other nations, shatter and scatter the native peoples, and then take them in as ‘refugees’ as a form of pubic relations and bribery. It’s like bribery because the ‘refugees’ who are allowed into the US are so impressed by material rewards that they soon become mum about what the US did to their nations.
    American message is, “We destroy your country, but just forget about it. We let you in and give you free stuff.” Since humans are organisms and since organisms prefer comfort and convenience above all else, a lot of ‘refugees’ who should be angry at the US just keep mum and look forward to all the goodies promised to them by the US government.

    Of course, the US also feeds on much internecine tensions in places like the Middle East. As there’s plenty of corruption, oppression, and nastiness among all the various tribes, clans, sects, and ethnic groups, it’s never difficult for the US to win over allies and collaborators who figure even the neo-imperialist US is better than native enemies or oppressors. Narcissism of small differences.
    But Americans are like that too. Prog whites hate patriotic whites(deplorables) so much that they are willing to side with foreigners to destroy ‘racist’ White America. And even feminists are willing to side with Muslims(semi-officially recognized as the new victim group) against the ‘patriarchy’ of Trump.

    The best way is, of course, for the US to stop meddling in the Middle East. But as long as Jewish Globalists are powerful in both parties — even in Trump’s administration — , the danger remains. Because both parties are so beholden to Jewish Power, no one is willing to say Jewish-controlled foreign policy is largely, though not entirely, responsible for the Mess in MENA that led to this ‘refugee’ crisis — of course, many economic migrants are merely using the crisis as pretext to move to the West for better material life.

    Patriots need to go on the moral offensive. If they just say, “We don’t want Muslim refugees because they are terrorists”, they come across as mean, paranoid, and cold-hearted.
    So, it’s much better to frame the argument in favor of Muslims. First and foremost, patriots must say the Muslims are on the move and they’re angry as hell because of neo-imperialist US foreign policy.
    Patriotism isn’t “my country right or wrong”. True patriotism is a universal defense of the sovereignty of every nation. So, an American patriot should defend the right of other nations to mind their own business and not be destroyed by US invasions, bombs, and proxy wars. A true patriot denounces the policies of his own nation IF it is immoral and imperialist.

    Offense is the best defense. The main issue for the patriots should be the question, “Why are there so many refugees in the first place?” That question will expose the GLOB for what it is. WHO CREATED THE REFUGEE CRISIS? The Globalists!!
    Hell Cometh to the Middle East, Welcometh to the West.

    So, why are the ‘refugees’ on the move?

    Gee, maybe because of policies like this and this and this?

    If Seymour Hersh is right, some decent US military guys prevented the total collapse of Syria and its takeover by Jihadis. Those were true patriots.
    Trump should say he is working with Russia to defeat the Jihadis so that order can prevail in Syria so that the refugees can return home.
    In contrast, the GLOB is for the further destruction of Syria by working with Saudis to fund the Jihadis and then masking its warmongering with bogus humanitarian gesture of ‘caring’ about ‘refugees’. It’s amazing that so many suckers fell for this.

  29. Anon • Disclaimer says:

    Because the US sets the template for all the world through media and academia, its brand of Globalism will be deeply ruinous to all nations around the world.

    If, as globalists claim, the US is so great because it intervenes in all parts of the world and takes in innumerable ‘refugees’, illegal migrants, and immigrants, then that policy becomes the template for the rest of the world whose intellectuals and cultural elites take cues from the US.

    Just look at the state of Europe. There was a time when leaders like Thatcher said, “US is philosophy, Europe is history.” But new elites of Europe want to ‘Americanize’ the Old World with the rules of the New World.
    Of course, since Jews gained supremacist power in the US and since Jews have gained sacred iconic status in the EU due to Holocaustianity, whatever Jews must be taken as the word of god. What is called ‘American Ideas’ and ‘Western Values’ are now concoctions of Jewish Globalists, and they are designed to undermine the native majority gentile power of every nation.

    Because whatever the US does has a great impact on the world, the US must stop with its invade-invite lunacy. It not only harms the US and the nations that are invaded(mostly in the Middle East and North Africa) but all those sucker-nations that slavishly imitate everything the US does.

    If US decides to go over the cliff, much of the world will follow.

    Because the US billed itself as ‘nation of immigrants’, the EU followed, and look at the dire problems this ‘Americanization’ caused.

    Mass Immigration is demographic imperialism.

  30. anon • Disclaimer says:

    “They [Africans] will eventually move to the modern world.”

    Europe could close its borders tomorrow if it was serious about stopping itself from being overrun. After Europe is overwhelmed and becomes Africa 2.0, then what? There is only one Europe for Africans to move to and despoil. So Europe gets dragged down to Africa’s level. How does this help anybody in the long run?

    • Replies: @Anon
  31. Answering (((Dr. Freud))), what do women want? They want more. They’re much more like children and black people.

  32. Anon • Disclaimer says:

    I think part of the problem is blacks have come to represent both the Id and the Superego(or supernegro) among white folks.

    1. Blacks as Id.

    Because blacks are wild, expressive, colorful, and vibrant, many white folks(and other non-black folks, be they Asian, Muslim, Mexican, or Hindu) rely on blacks to express what is repressed or relatively lackluster within themselves. So, a bland proggy white girl will listen to Tina Turner and feel her own sexuality & angst expressed through Tina’s wild & powerful performance. It’s like Jungle Therapy. Since the bland white girl hasn’t the voice, personality, and temperament to be express her own natural drives so fully, robustly, and audaciously, she identifies with the Negress shaman as medium for her emotions and drives. Since the Negress can act wilder, she serves as a kind of Negro-electro-amplifier for the emotions of the white woman that simply cannot be charged up to that level.

    And among the white males, there is a kind of thrill in watching black athletes because black male-athletic powers goes way beyond that of whites. Blacks can run faster, jump higher, punch harder, and etc. So, a white boy, brown boy, and yellow boy may look to the Negro as the most potent purveyor of the universal male Id. Though all males have the male Id or male animal drive, it is manifested most loudly and aggressively when, for example, Muhammad Ali KO’ed Sonny Liston and howled he the greatest and shi*.

    So, there may be a kind of Id Addiction in relation to the Negro. Since our world is sports-music-sex-obsessed, many non-black women look to black women as the most bodacious purveyor of the Id. Consider the success of Beyonce, Rihanna, and Nikki Minaj of the twerking-big-butt-kind.
    And among non-black males, their less-loud-and-less-wild manhood is channeled through the more rambunctious Id of the Negro who can howl the loudest as the rapper dude and who can sack the quarterback the hardest.
    And there may be an element of this in the ‘cuckolding’ culture where white men invite black men to hump their wives. Thus, white boys can partake of the bigger Id of the Negro who be humping the white ho with more gusto. Negro guy becomes the fantasy-extension of the white guy’s Id.
    Given the Id addiction to blackness among whites(and it is spreading to Japan too), the West may be helpless to come to its senses and realize that Negromania is dangerous to civilization.

    2. Blacks as Superego.

    Because America dominates the world, it’s particular Cult of Guilt defines global morality. And since Jews dominate media and academia, they’ve promoted White Guilt vis-a-vis blacks as one of the great sins(next to Holocaust) in order to paralyze white power and make it subservient to moral blackmail.
    So, the deification of MLK and Mandela became central to global morality. Actually, black Americans in the 1950s were well-off and safe compared to many other peoples in the world. Sure, the US was unfair to blacks, but what blacks experienced in the 20th century could hardly be compared with the true horrors all over the world in the 2oth century. Consider the death tolls of Armenians, Poles, Russians, Ukrainians, Chinese, Algerians, East Timorese, Cambodians, Kurds, and etc.
    But since US narrative dominates the world, MLK became a world figure and the ‘plight’ of black Americans(though piddly compared to true horrors suffered by others in the century) became one of the great ‘global’ tragedies.
    And even though blacks in South Africa actually had it better than most blacks in black-run Africa, Apartheid was made out to be one of the most evil things in history. (In contrast, most Americans still don’t know what Nakba is or the true nature of the Occupation in West Bank. Well, Jews control the global narrative.) Anyway, because of the cult of Negro Nobility and neo-religious sanctimony around MLK and Mandela — when Negroes try to be ‘noble’, they come across more eloquent & inspirational than others with their soaring voices or Morgan-Freeman-like smoothness — , white people have come to look to Negro as the gatekeeper to higher morality, even to heaven. For some, the Magic Negro be god hisself.

    So, we have a paradoxical situation where whites look to Negroes as both the celebrators of ultimate Id and torchbearers of the ultimate sanctimony.

    White Delusions are at the center of globalist morality and culture.
    Of course, white elites don’t suffer physically(not yet anyway) from the consequences this delusion since they have money, privilege, and safe spaces. They can afford to deal with only fancy Negroes like Obama who know how to push the buttons and milk White Psychology. They reside in the Elysium world of their own. (It’s like the elites can invite in tons of hostile Muslims and live good for themselves while the hoi polloi must deal with the demographic mess at the ground level.)
    But the spread of blacks and black influence in the culture at large will be the fatal undoing of the West.

    White Race will be destroyed by the black fist, black dong, black booty, and black holler while it gazes at heaven for MLK and Mandela to save its wicked soul.
    Imagine the white race as Milo with a Negro dong up his butt as he preaches that Democrats are the ‘real racists’ because MLK was for the ‘content of one’s character.’

    • Agree: Jim Christian
  33. Haven’t desperate old British cougars been going down to the Southern Mediterranean for decades to flirt with and bed swarthy Arab waiters? It’s actually a national stereotype. Hey, why not bring the Arabs back to the UK? Saves the old bags the airfare and the hassle. This is what you get when you involve women in national policy-making decisions.

    • Agree: Clyde
    • Replies: @Expletive Deleted
  34. Anon • Disclaimer says:

    America is a Nation of Immigrants. So, we are told over and over.

    Okay, I can live with that(depending on how we define immigrants; maybe pilgrims and early settlers could be called ‘immigrants’ too).

    But it’s sort of meaningless as a general abstraction. Why? It’s like saying a Nation is a ‘nation of people’.

    Okay.. but which people? Surely, the character of a nation is defined by WHAT people it has.

    So, while Japan is a nation of people and Germany is a nation of people, they are different because Japan is filled with Japanese people and Germany is filled with German people. Change the composition and the character of the nation changes. Just ask the Serbs in relation to Kosovo.

    Yes, every nation is a ‘nation of people’ but the crucial question is Which People?

    After all, Holy Land would be a ‘nation of people’ whether Jews are there or Arabs are there. But with lots of Jews, it is called Israel and with lots of Arabs, it’s called Palestine.

    So, going back to US as ‘nation of immigrants’. Okay, let’s accept that formulation. But WHICH KIND OF IMMIGRANTS made America?

    If all immigrants are the same, would the America that we know and admire have come into existence if the founding stock had been Pakistanis, Arabs, Hindus, Chinese, Turks, or Nigerians? It would have been some kind of nation, but it wouldn’t have been America. After all, Spanish and Portuguese were ‘immigrants’ who settled Latin America, and the results were VERY DIFFERENT. Why? Different kinds of immigrants to establish the foundation and different kinds of later arrivals in varying numbers. Argentina took in a lot of Italians and ended up sort of like second-rate Italy, itself a second-rate nation in the EU.

    In contrast, the most successful New World nations were US, Canada, New Zealand, and Australia. What do they have in common? Anglo founding stock.
    And it was the formula set down by Anglos that the LATER-ARRIVING whites adapted to. And they could easily meld into the Anglo-American model because they were also white, racially alike or similar. So, once they adopted the new culture and language, they were like fellow Anglos or Angloists.

    So crucial to the formation of America was the arrival of Anglo ‘immigrants’ as founding stock and then arrival of Europeans who could easily meld in with Anglo-norms.

    If indeed, all immigrants are of same worth and usefulness, let’s do to mental experiment.
    Suppose the Anglo founders of America had decided that all future immigrants must come ONLY from India, Africa, and Middle East but NOT from Europe.
    How would US have turned out with such immigration policy? I’m sure it would have been interesting(to say the least), but the result would have been something closer to Ottoman Empire or Venezuela than the most powerful and richest nation on Earth.

    Indeed, we can see the importance of THE ISSUE OF WHICH PEOPLE even from internal migration. If a bunch of white Iowans move to Minnesota, it will have different impact than if a bunch of blacks in Mississippi or a bunch of Mexicans in Arizona move to Minnesota.
    Not all peoples are the same. They are different racially, culturally, and narratively(politics of memory).

    Not just any bunch of generically formulated ‘immigrants’ could have made America possible. America, in its founding and development, has been essentially a Nation of European Immigrants. And ONLY THAT FORMULATION AND NONE OTHER could have made America possible.

    Suppose we do another mind-experiment.
    Suppose not a single East Asian came to the US. Now, the US would suffer from lack of chop suey joints and middle management in high-tech firms, but the US would essentially be what it is even if not a single East Asian had arrived.
    Suppose not a single Hindu came to the US. The US would out on curry joints and funny characters on TV, but the US would essentially be the US.
    Suppose not a single black had been brought to the US. Now, the US would miss out on certain things that came to be associated with Americanism, esp in music.
    However, the essential block of the US would still be what they are. After all, US was not built on boogie woogie and rap-crap. (And US would have far less crime, and its culture would be less rotten without the jungle boogie crap.)
    And so and on if we do this mental experiment with Muslims, Nepalese, Arabs, and etc.

    BUT imagine the US without European ‘immigrants’ as founders and builders, esp Anglos. There simply is NO America as we know it.

    So, WHICH IMMIGRANTS needs to be answered when people yammer about “America is a nation of immigrants.”

    Israel is a nation of immigrants too, but which ones? Chinese? Hindus? Africans? I think that maybe they were Jewish? Would that be a good guess as to why Israel ended up the way it is?

  35. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    Lindsay’s too young for him.

  36. Anon • Disclaimer says:

    Symbols can be powerful, but I’m not sure about all this Pussy stuff. Pussy hats?
    Vagina this, vagina that? One wonders that IF the statue of liberty were built today, it’d feature a fat tattooed woman with her ass jutting out and her hand buried in her vagina.

    But then, even the stolid and stern seeming Statue of Liberty underwent changes in meaning and purpose… depending on WHO has the power.

    Usually, symbols such as that represent DEFENSE OF MOTHERLAND.

    There are statues of Joan of Arc in France, and they don’t stand for “Give us your trash and dregs.”

    And Mother Russia statue in Russia is about defense of motherland from invaders.
    Its message isn’t “Give us your hordes of invaders”.

    And the Hermann statue in Germany is about defense of Germania from the Roman imperialists.

    And the statue in Sparta is also about defense of motherland or fatherland as the case may be with Spartans.

    America is the only nation with a statue welcoming mass invasion.
    “Give us your trash, dregs, morons, tards, and derelicts”.


    To be sure, it wasn’t created to represent such. It was a gift by a Frenchman to celebrate America as the land of the free, not the land of the flea.

    But then, the Lazarus poem goes to show the power of words. Jews favored the Power of Words over power of Idol(atry). Indeed, Jewish tradition called for the destruction of all idols(and there were lots of destruction in Russia under communism). But in the case of Statue of Liberty, the power of words was employed to change the meaning of the icon. So, Statue of Liberty went from a symbol of defense of American Liberty to issuance of American Liberty(built by white folks) to all the world.

    Sometimes, when a new order takes over, there is iconoclasm and smashing of all earlier idols. But sometimes, the takeover is gradual or the earlier achievements were too grand for total destruction. When Roman Empire became Christian, there were lots of idol-smashing. Tons of temples and statues were knocked down. But the Christians couldn’t destroy all that glory. So, they turned once-pagan temples and objects into Christian objects. And later, certain Germanic pagan cultural icons and practices came to represent Christian meanings and values. Pagan was made Christian.
    Pagan artistic styles were used to represent Mary. And later in the Renaissance, Hellenic style was used to depict Moses and, mostly famously, David who was made to look ‘aryan’. Paganics was used to glorify the Biblical.

    And something like that happened with the Statue of Liberty. More recently, Hamilton was altered. A key Founding Father, a Great White Man, is now some pop hero of ‘multi-culturalism’. If in the past, the ‘Aryan’ paganism was made to serve the Semitic-Biblical. Today, with rap as dominant musical form and blacks as icons of Western manhood via sports domination, the thing is to Africanize everything. So, European and American TV and movies often idealize white women going with Negro men. And black women are given beauty pageant awards not only in America and Europe but also in Japan. With globalism having idolized the Negro as the top world stud and Negress as big booty queen — and since the two most sacral global figures are MLK and Mandela — , it’s like every nation has to have its own sacred Negro icon via athlete, beauty queen, or some social justice hustler.

    Anyway, the statue that initially stood for liberty for Americans came to mean America’s sharing of liberty with all the world. This sounded nice and noble, but it eventually entailed invasion and white loss of land.
    Already by the end of 19th century, the Anglo-Americans, the founders of the nation, were feeling the pressure of all those European immigrants from backward east and south. But as fellow Europeans under Anglo-American domination, the European immigrants even from south and east earned their credentials as acculturated Americans.
    But one group, the Jews, would prove be the odd man out. As non-gentiles, Jews felt as part of neither Anglo-America nor immigrant-America. Their position was ambiguous. They were emigrating to Anglo-run America cuz it was more tolerant, free, and equal than a Europe ruled by Poles, Italians, Austrians, Russians, Greeks, and etc. For the Jews, Anglo-America was their savior, especially from the pogromic Russians who drank too much and got violent once their cossack blood caught fire. So, this side of Jewishness admired and appreciated the Anglo-created world. Jews preferred the Anglo-American Order over the social-political orders maintained by other the ethnic domination of immigrant groups. Jews were departing from Europe for a good reason. There was a lot of overt antisemitism there, even violent outbreaks, especially in Russia where Cossacks might drink too much vodka bought from Jewish merchants and go wild. So, even though Jews arrived alongside Poles, Russians, Hungarians, and the rest, Jews couldn’t stand them and vice versa.

    BUT, Jews also came to resent the power of Wasps who, after all, were still goyim. Also, even though Anglo-American world was more tolerant and free for Jews, it had its subtle biases, and in some ways, this drove Jews even nuttier. If you live in an overtly restrictive order, you know what is what. You are on THIS side, the goyim are on THAT side. Stick to the ghetto, and you know it’s your domain. In contrast, Jews could do much more in the US. They were free.. but there were certain barriers just the same. So, Anglo-Americans were freer but also more hypocritical, and nothing pisses people off like hypocrisy.

    So, even though Jews preferred the Anglo-American world over the Old World ruled by Russians, Italians, Poles, Greeks, Hungarians, and etc., they had to make common cause with other immigrant groups since Anglo-Americans held the power and most of the goodies.
    Jews were in a kind of paradoxical situation. They left the Old World dominated by fellow immigrant groups. Jews were glad to get away from ‘dumb polac*s’, ‘oily Italians’, ‘Eek it’s a Greek’, and Ruffian Russians, BUT Jews made common cause with those immigrant groups(who were also fleeing from bad conditions at home but also harbored distrust of the Jew as outsider) against the Wasps. Jews identified as Immigrant but wanted to gain the supreme power of the Founder-Folks.
    Jews used Immigrant-Politics to become the ‘New Wasps’. This way, they could present themselves as forever champion of the newcomer, the little guy, all the while hogging the champion power as the Ruling Elites of America. Jews became the ISP, immigrant semitic power. WASPS were the ‘was’ power, ISPS became the ‘is’ power of the new order.

    When Emma wrote that poem, she wasn’t thinking of poor goyim of the world. Her heart was mainly with Jews living under Russian Empire. And in her day, it’s understandable why she thought of them as living in a prison yearning to be free and why she thought they would find freedom and reach full potential in America. Of course, it wouldn’t have sounded very noble for Emma to have written, “I’m a Jewess and I want Eastern European Jews to come here and have better life, so let hem in, and hell with dumb Polac*s and drunken Russians.” So, she couched her rhetoric in universal terms even though the appeal of America was that Jews could GET AWAY FROM THE HUDDLED GOY MASSES OF EASTERN EUROPE WHO, WHEN NOT HUDDLING, GOT ON HORSES AND TRAMPLED JEWS IN POGROMS. (The great irony of Lazarus poem is that it takes on dark meaning in relation to blacks and Indians. Blacks were ‘huddled’ masses on slave ships when they were brought to the Land of the Free. Black African slave-sellers sold huddled black masses to White America. So, their journey to America wasn’t about finding freedom. Also, in the time of Lazarus, more immigrants meant more ‘genocide’ for Indians. In the film NEW LAND by Jan Troell, we see how the arrival of Swedish immigrants in Minnesota leads to the final destruction of the Indians who are killed after butchering white settlers. Many of those huddled masses that arrived in America went West, took more land from Indians, and their liberty was built upon lost Indian lands. But given who has the power, Ellis Island trumps Wounded Knee. Today, the new tide of non-white mass migration threatens to do to the white race what happened to the Indians. Mexicans have pretty much re-colonized much of Southern California and SW states. And even Midwest States are being filled with non-whites. Somalis have taken over entire neighborhoods in Minneapolis/St. Paul., which used to be such a nice place on the Mary Tyler Moore show. Now, much of it looks like Mogadishu Tire Show. In the 60s, when non-white immigrants were a tiny segment of US population, the Indian narrative was compelling for Jews to guilt-bait whites with, esp as it could be associated with the Vietnam War as new cowboys and indians. But with the huge rise of non-white immigrant population and its great boon to globalism and Democratic Party, the Indian narrative has pretty much fallen by the wayside. Don’t worry, they are happy now with Casino money. Chiefs got the chips.)

    Most nations have statues to commemorate defense and survival. But US has a statue that now invites invasion. Invasivism is the rule of globalism that seeks to break down all national barriers and identities(except in Israel). When globalists cannot do this with military might, they use soft power of Political Correctness(that infects the elites all over the world) and Pop Culture(that addicts masses all over to Rap culture and Hollywood).

    When the Lazarus poem was added to the Statue, it didn’t necessarily stand for invasion. Wasps were still firmly in power. Also, there was a need for immigration because so much of America needed to be settled. America gained much more land that it knew what to do with. As Anglo-Americans couldn’t breed fast enough(and their birthrates were falling) to fill up the land, they had to rely on immigrants. They favored Northern Europeans, but once birth rates dropped and living standards improved in Northern Europe, the new supply was from poorer Southern and Eastern Europe. These people were more problematic, but there was a clear understanding: They come to America to be Good Americans and loyal citizens. They come with respect and gratitude in exchange for freedom and opportunity.

    But today, the US is all filled up. Yes, there are lots of uninhabited land, but the great thing about America is the open spaces, and we need spaces for nature and animals too. Besides, 330 million people are already A LOT OF people. Also, with the world teeming with billions of poor, all-out-open-borders will mean total flooding of America by tons of grubberoons. Also, the quality of people gets worse and worse as so many newcomers are from the Third-Rate World.

    So, what had once been a meaningful invitation to fill up America to build farms and factories has turned into an invasion. Also, due to PC and anti-white hysteria, they no longer come with gratitude and respect but with attitude and revilement.

    It is time to change the meaning of the statue once again. We don’t need all out iconoclasm. We don’t have to tear anything down. We only need to change the meaning. A kind of icono-plasm that changes the symbolism on the symbol.

    For inspiration, there is GUNBUSTER, the mecha-robot designed to protect Earth from foreign invasion.

    Statue of Liberty needs to go GUNBUSTER.

    And replace the Emma poem with this:

    Big Sister, hang on there! We will be defeated!
    What is these 6 months for Coach?
    He also wishes to be with you.
    It’s the last 6 months for him.
    He wanted to say “Don’t go ” and hold you.
    But he gave up those things. And he gave us those 6 months.
    Gave them to GunBuster!
    It’s that 6 months.
    Big Sister!!
    Not only coach, but Kimiko,,and Jung,,
    They entrust us with their future.
    If we were to loose, what would that be for them?
    We must We must We must WIN!
    Hope! Kazumi! Fight!

  37. Anon • Disclaimer says:

    Radioderb continues to be amazing! Look forward to it every week.

    Can’t believe how prolific the other ‘Anon’ is.

    • Replies: @Jeff Albertson
  38. Marcus says:

    White activist wimmin view gays and non-whites as proxies for the children they either didn’t have or don’t care about.

  39. @Anon

    Amazing that to avoid verbosity, he does it all on his phone with his left thumb. While driving!

  40. @Bobzilla

    I have a film recommendation for you: Godfather III. Don’t worry about the early ones, you wouldn’t like them. Just Godfather III.

  41. @Bill Jones

    What’s this Judeo-Christian shit?
    … some connection to the Greco-Roman based achievements of the West.

    Some people like Coke. Others like New Coke. Some even like both Coke and New Coke (as you probably know).

  42. Anon • Disclaimer says:

    Funny how men getting mail order / tkurist brides from East Asia or East Europe are stigmatized by the MScuM, yet White women who invite Africans & MENA to rheir homes are lauded.

  43. TWS says:

    But Joker and Not-so-Great the Tsarnaev brothers are hot items with the moron lefty girls. Joker even made the cover of Rolling Stone.

    It’s enough to make a guy think Whiskey isn’t always wrong.

  44. @TigerJ

    Hell has no fury like a man scorned. Particularly so when by his own women compatriots, and having to turn to a mail-order bride from China.

    The times they are a changin’ When my Chinese wife introduced me to her friends, they were sure I was a Western mail-order groom.

    Seriously, it’s a shame that a brilliant guy like John Derbyshire is writing for so many people that have contempt for his wife and children. I wish he would have stayed in respectable company. He should have created a pen name, say James Lancashire, to write the more hardcore stuff. Of course, people would assume that James Lancashire, author of The Talk, was really John Derbyshire, but you could never truly be 100% certain.

    Steve Sailer (aka Sam Seaman) should have tried something similar.

    • Replies: @iffen
    , @Bill Jones
  45. @Jason Liu

    Cat ladies with Toxoplama gondii eating holes in their brains.

    So many of today’s problems (with women) can be traced to cat shit that the term “catshit crazy” should clearly supplant “batshit crazy.”

    • Replies: @Anon
  46. biz says:
    @Robert Magill

    They’ve killed orders of magnitude more of their own aunts, uncles, and kiddies than we have for the past two decades.

    Occasional feigned concern for women and children rings hollow because they treat women and children like dirt – clitorectomies and forced child marriage and what not.

  47. Anonymous [AKA "Apocalyptus"] says: • Website

    See also the year-old post “Women and Immigrants” at

  48. Anon • Disclaimer says:

    dc, I find your posts very witty, interesting. I rarely go into the archives of commenters but you are the exception.

    • LOL: dc.sunsets
    • Replies: @Jim Christian
  49. TheJester says:

    What women want depends on where they are in their menstrual cycles. The Internet is ripe with references on how the different hormonal levels within the cycle affect women’s moods and their perception of what is desirable in life.

    As one example, at ovulation (with elevated levels of estrogen) women tend to prefer square faced, highly masculine, and aggressive males. The rest the cycle they tend to prefer males with rounder faces who are attentive to their needs — males that more resemble ß-Males than α-Males.

    Follicular Phase –> Ovulation –> Luteal Phase … and then throw a pregnancy or two and later menopause into the mix. It’s like living with a woman with multiple personalities.

    I’m not surprised that the impacts of their menstrual cycles confuse women as much living with the consequences of the cycles confuse men.

  50. Corvinus says:
    @Diversity Heretic

    “Middle aged women crave the sexual “tingles” offered by young Arab/Turkish/African men–imagine the demographic group that might be interested in helping the refugees if they were Chinese women between 19 and 27.”

    Some middle aged women have these emotions, assuredly. To make the generalization that most or all get these “feelings” is to hang on the every word of the bottom feeders of the world known as Roosh and Roissy, the killers of Western Civilization.

    • Replies: @Richard Steele
  51. @Bobzilla

    There is no such thing as Judeo-Christian. Just Christian, thank you very much.

    Judeo Christian literally means Jewish Messiah.

    Since Jesus of Nazareth was not Jewish, in fact detested by Jewish leaders as a heretic, the Judeo-Christian label is not a reference to Jesus.

    More likely it’s a reference to Jews collectively as a messiah.

    People who claim the west is a champion of Judeo Christianity are declaring all Jews to be a messiah for the west.

  52. @Corvinus

    Roosh and Roissy, despite their flaws, are still better men than you could ever hope to be. Furthermore, the real “killers of Western Civilization are leftist douchebags like yourself. Find a nice pier and take a long walk, twat.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  53. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @Diversity Heretic

    Whiskeys Place has been making comments along these lines for years. I thought at first he was outrageous but as I watched events, his explanations made increasing sense to me. I wonder if Derb has had the same experience? Middle aged women crave the sexual “tingles” offered by young Arab/Turkish/African men–imagine the demographic group that might be interested in helping the refugees if they were Chinese women between 19 and 27.

    Or Korean. But why stop at 27?? Northeast Asian women have the oldest expiration date, by far.

  54. Corvinus says:
    @Richard Steele

    “Roosh and Roissy, despite their flaws, are still better men than you could ever hope to be.”

    By telling Christian men such as yourself that it is perfectly acceptable to have affairs outside of marriage? to “pump and dump” women for their own personal pleasure?

    Praytell, how many white children have they sired?

    “Furthermore, the real “killers of Western Civilization are leftist douchebags like yourself. Find a nice pier and take a long walk, twat.”

    I’m neither leftist nor liberal. I’m an American white male who makes his own political decisions.

  55. KenH says:

    A Muslim scam artist posing as a refugee. Imagine that. I’m sure he’s just the tip of the iceberg.

    And a middle aged white woman who gets a tingly vagina over swarthy young males. Another shocker.

    • Replies: @Jim Christian
  56. iffen says:
    @Judah Benjamin Hur

    Seriously, it’s a shame that a brilliant guy like John Derbyshire is writing for so many people that have contempt for his wife and children.

    You want us to have sympathy for someone who dies by the sword that he has lived by?

    Try out big boy land someday.

  57. Hibernian says:

    There’s this subdivision of the Christian Bible called the Old Testament.

  58. @Anon

    Former Washington insider, Sunsets knows his stuff. No one scans MY humble archive, I’m sure. However, I was a Washington insider of another stripe, I installed and fixed their phone systems for thirty years. The lobby-crowd, NOW, Planned Parenthood, Brookings, CATO, DLC, all the foundations of Cafritz and Kennedy Center, Washington Ballet, the universities, their watering holes, on and on. Spooks, mooks, the military and embassies, too. An enterprising phone guy made good, if quiet money back then with recorders, bugs and the ability to plant them for aggrieved spouses, bosses and employees with bad intentions, or maybe just a paranoid streak.

    I have notes and diaries of my own, but no organizational skills. If I could write, I’d have some juicy tales to tell and none of the characters, not one, would be deserving of the protection of the changing of names and places. Nothing is as it seems. Mostly in DC, it’s about the money in the bank, sheltering it, protecting it, growing it and doling it out to the people that matter most. That, and getting out of your marriage, business, think-tank or legal difficulties with the Feds unscathed..

  59. @KenH

    I remember well the pictures of Merkle and her Selfies with Muslim men at airports and camps in Germany and France. Never-married, ugly, feminist and childless Merkle, loose in the camps, getting cozy with swarthy Arabs. Surely she has sampled the goods.

  60. @Judah Benjamin Hur

    Those of us from Lancashire would object to your scheme

Current Commenter

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone

 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All John Derbyshire Comments via RSS