The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewJohn Derbyshire Archive
NYT Token Conservative Immigration Enthusiast Bret Stephens Rethinks— Sort of
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

[Adapted from the latest Radio Derb, now available exclusively on VDARE.com.]

Last Sunday, September 18th, was the birthday of Samuel Johnson, the great 18th-century man of letters, one of my literary heroes. In a blog post here at VDARE.com I urged readers to commemorate the event by reading Johnson’s fine pessimistic long poem The Vanity of Human Wishes, an annotated version of which can be found on my personal website.

Just ten lines in to the poem, speaking in a general way about human folly, Johnson gives us this couplet:

How rarely Reason guides the stubborn Choice,
Rules the bold Hand, or prompts the suppliant Voice,

Those words came to mind the following morning when, in my New York Post, I read Mark Krikorian‘s excellent opinion piece headlined How the gospel of open borders took over the Democratic Party. Mark argues that Democrats are not driven by a rational albeit treasonous determination to Elect A New People, but by moralistic anti-borders fervor. (VDARE.com Editor Peter Brimelow scathingly disagrees, saying that Democrats are obviously motivated by both and that Mark is just responding prudently to the fact that mention of the Great Replacement fact has been anathematized inside the Beltway, where he operates).

But let me just give you the next couplet, following the one I started with:

How Nations sink, by darling Schemes oppress’d,
When Vengeance listens to the Fool’s Request.

Yes, there is definitely Vengeance in the mix there somewhere. I’ve said repeatedly that our Ruling Elites dislike a great mass of their fellow citizens, especially the white working and middle classes—the Bitter Clingers, the Deplorables. If you want a poster child for that dislike, you couldn’t do better than New York Times Token Conservative columnist

To say that Bret Stephens dislikes a great mass of his fellow citizens is not based on anything subjective or impressionistic; the guy has said so, in cold print.

Here he was in a New York Times op-ed five years ago: “Only Mass Deportation Can Save America.” June 16, 2017.

From that title you might think Mr. Stephens wants mass deportation of illegal aliens, which would put him firmly on our side. No—listen:

The United States has too many people who don’t work hard, don’t believe in God, don’t contribute much to society and don’t appreciate the greatness of the American system.

They need to return whence they came. I speak of Americans whose families have been in this country for a few generations. Complacent, entitled and often shockingly ignorant on basic points of American law and history, they are the stagnant pool in which our national prospects risk drowning.

See, Bret Stephens wanted to deport American citizens—the Deplorable ones. They commit too much crime; their educational attainment is lackluster; they’re not pious, not entrepreneurial, not fertile. Immigrants are better!

There’s no doubt that Bret Stephens’ dislike of his fellow citizens returns an echo from the bosoms of the Leftist elites who dominate our culture, as incarnated in the Biden Administration; although not many of them would be so bold as to air their feelings in a New York Times op-ed.

Stephens allowed towards the end of his column that the mass deportation of U.S. citizens he’d been arguing for wasn’t actually feasible:

O.K., so I’m jesting about deporting “real Americans” en masse. (Who would take them in, anyway?)

That op-ed was published in June of 2017. Has Bret Stephens had any second thoughts this past five years?

Well, sort of.

Tuesday last week here was Stephens again opining in The New York Times: The Border Crisis Could Still Be Biden’s Opportunity September 20, 2022.

The first three-quarters of the piece would not be altogether out of place on VDARE.com. Stephens deplores Ron DeSantis’ ploy of shipping illegals to elite enclaves, but allows that “it succeeded politically” by showing up the Biden Administration’s ineptness.

Then Stephens tosses and gores Kamala Harris and her declarations that the border is secure. He quotes the outrageous numbers of illegals being admitted.

He scoffs at the Administration’s claims that disorder in Latin-American countries explains the surging numbers of border-jumpers. No, says Stephens, those numbers result from the administration’s annulling of Donald Trump’s policies, and openly welcoming an invasion:

This is political malpractice on multiple levels

There was the turn of thought. Stephens isn’t objecting to administration policy on any kind of national, economic, or social cost-benefit analysis. Nor—and for this relief, much thanks—nor is he arguing against it on moral grounds. His objection is purely political:

The crisis is an invitation to nativist demagogy. It was Trump’s ticket to the White House and might be DeSantis’s, too.

That is, the Administration’s blithe, brazen Open-Borders policy plays into the hands of those people—the Deplorables.

Yes, Stephens is telling the Administration, immigration is indeed an unqualified good, but you’re not managing it right:

There’s a solution to this. It requires us to be much more hardheaded at our borders—like by finishing the wall—so we can be more softhearted toward those trying to cross them.

So the guy who, five years ago, was calling for mass deportation of worthless American citizens and replacing them with smarter, more law-abiding, more entrepreneurial and fertile immigrants is now calling on the Administration to, ahem, “Build the Wall!”

Well, Scripture tells us that

joy shall be in heaven over one sinner that repenteth, more than over ninety and nine just persons, which need no repentance.

Still I have a lurking feeling that if I were to try engaging with Bret Stephens on, say, Birthright Citizenship, or Chain Migration, or universal E-Verify, or—worst of all—an Immigration Moratorium, he would stomp out of the room in disgust.

ORDER IT NOW

John Derbyshire [email him] writes an incredible amount on all sorts of subjects for all kinds of outlets. (This no longer includes National Review, whose editors had some kind of tantrum and fired him.) He is the author of We Are Doomed: Reclaiming Conservative Pessimism and several other books. He has had two books published by VDARE.com com: FROM THE DISSIDENT RIGHT (also available in Kindle) and FROM THE DISSIDENT RIGHT II: ESSAYS 2013.

(Republished from VDare by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: Ideology • Tags: American Media, Immigration, Joe Biden 
Hide 38 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. I find backers of the “Immigration Moratorium” concept unbearable.

    What are VDARE cucks trying to accomplish with it? Prove they are not ‘racists’‽ After all, no-one, during the Moratorium, is getting it – including Whites‽ Therefore, it’s ‘race-blind’‽

    Meh!

    There should be immigration. White-only immigration!

    • Replies: @Dumbo
    , @GenFranco
  2. meamjojo says:

    Hell, I’d deport 85% of the posters here on UNZ for those that are American citizens. So what’s the big deal?

  3. But John….Bret does have strong bedbug proclivities…just saying….

    So your fundamental point really is why are the Elites enamoured of the policy of WHITE GENOCIDE?

    It varies from species to species. Take Kathy Hochul. The Courtney Family’s recent family history is pure Native White Working Class. Why would this Irish Catholic family of roaches turn on their own species? Well, here is one thing you can be sure of:Kathy Courtney was the Gonorrhea Girl in high school and at Syracuse University….I mean, just look at Kathy Hochul’s repellant face?

    Bed Bug Bret and Gonorrhea Girl Kathy Hochul…both on board with WHITE GENOCIDE….that’s for gd sure….

  4. Ever since Jack Courtney got a job at the Computer Company…the Courtney Family has been waging Class War against the Native White Working Class of Hamburg NY since the 1960’s……

    .Kathy Hochul…Jack Courtney’s slut daughter…fully intends to stick it to the Native White Working Class of NY State……

    Kathy Hochul is going to implement the WHITE GENOCIDE Policy of the spindly nosed bed bug species that Bret Stephen’s belongs to………This is how things work in post-1965 toilet bowl America…..

  5. Maybe I missed it — but the entire column manages to be about Bret Stephens’ attitudes without once noting that he is a Jew, and his hostility towards the goyim is stereotypically Jewish. Compare to Jennifer Rubin, for example. Or Max Boot.

    It’s a bit like discoursing at length about the flooding in the basement — without once admitting that the fact that the water main is cracked might be the problem.

    Indeed, this is a chronic problem with Derbyshire. Yes, we get incisive, illuminating discussions of the flooding in the basement. No one could come away from reading Derbyshire without agreeing that it is, indeed, a problem, and must be addressed.

    But mention the broken pipe? Point to the root cause? No — never. And so long as that stays unadmitted, I don’t see how we can get anywhere.

  6. Polistra says:

    Mr John Derbyshire is a certified National Treasure and (as he himself immigrated here, once upon a time) a reminder that not all immigration is bad, provided it is carefully vetted.

    IOW, pretty much the opposite of what we now do, with our explicitly dysgenic policy (along with our explicitly dysgenic natalist policies).

    Of course numbers matter too. My own scheme would permit several thousand immigrants each year, carefully vetted. Instead we allow millions each year, and do the precise opposite of vetting.

  7. @Colin Wright

    Bret Steven’s is a hyper-ethnic Jew who wants the Native White Christian Working Class fucking dead dead dead dead dead……

    Yesterday….a Native White Christian Father of 7 Native White Children heard a knock on the door….a dozen FBI Agents came into his home with machine guns pointed at him and his wife…the 7 children were screaming hysterically….

    The previous day, this Native White Father of 7 White Children was at a abortion clinic protest. An Antifa came up this White Father of 7 and his young son he brought along and used filthy language on this White and his young White son……The Antifa got right into the face of this White Father of 7 and used even more profanity….This White Father felt instinctively that this Antifa was too close to him and his young son…so he shoved the Antifa out of the way…..the next day the FBI raided the home this White Father of 7……

    I am sure Tucker will talk about this tonight….Steve Sailer should make a post about this….but he is too busy making posts about NFL Quarterbacks IQ test scores….

    The FBI raid on this White Father of 7 is the kind of Universe that Bed Bug Bret Stephens and Gonorrhea Kathy Hochul want to impose on the Native Born White American Working Class…..

  8. No one ever seems to mention that as America becomes more automated, there are fewer and fewer jobs for the unskilled. How can it possibly benefit America, particularly now, to admit millions of ignorant, illiterate third-world peasants?

    • Agree: Polistra
    • Replies: @Houston 1992
  9. Dumbo says:
    @Vergissmeinnicht

    Yeah, I think the problem is more the “race-blind” aspect of it immigration policies. No one wants to say it out loud, but the main problem with immigration is immigration from Africa and the Middle East (mainly), then dark mestizos from Central America, and from a few other problem countries. Gypsies could be a problem too but they don’t migrate in large numbers. Asians… I think they can also be a problem since they are not white, even if they behave well.

    In the end, I think you can accept migration that is compatible with the main ethnicity of the country, and that’s it. Some European countries accept the migration of descendants of Europeans that were born in other countries, and that’s not a problem. It’s not a geographical question, or a question of language, nor of migration in itself, but of ethnicity. (And maybe religion too).

  10. SMK says: • Website
    @Colin Wright

    like George Soros and other Jews with power and wealth and influence, leftist and “neocon,” Stephens is motivated by hatred of white gentiles and vengeance for the holocaust and Millenia of anti-Jewish discrimination, persecution, and violence.

    Thus, if feasible, he’d deport tens of millions of working- and middle-class whites who vote for the likes of Trump and De Santis rather than legal and illegal aliens from Mexico and Central and South America and blacks from Haiti and sub-Saharan Africa and Muslims from North Africa and the Middle East who hate Jews and want to destroy Israel.

  11. Here is the larger context:

    The Democratic Party is on a murdering rampage. Next week, Eastern Ukraine will be re-incorporated back into Russia…where it has resided for 800-700 years. (((ZELENSKY BED BUG))) will give the order to shell Russia….Slavic Russian Children will be slaughtered. Since Eastern in two weeks will be reincorporated back into Mother Russia….expect a lethal retaliation by the Russian Military….

    The Democratic Party is going to lose very badly in Ukraine. The Democratic Party will retaliate by accusing Trump….Trump Voters…and White Independents of Treason for aiding and abetting Vladimir Putin. The Democratic Party will start murdering Native Born White American Working Class Voters in the streets of America:IN COLD FUCKING BLOOD!!!!……..This is the endgame for sure…

    Now, there may be limited nuclear war between Slavic Russia and homosexual pederast Democratic Party America…..I think this would be a very good thing indeed….for it would end the reign of the terrorist homosexual pederast Democratic Party….otherwise:full-blown nuclear war……NO MORE BED BUGS IN AMERICA!!!….

  12. @Dumbo

    But you would be happy about Asian LEGAL IMMIGRANTS and their US born Asian geneline enthusiastically voting the HISTORIC NATIVE BORN WHITE AMERICAN WORKING CLASS into a white racial minority within the borders of Amdrica……………Of course, there are no economic and demographic reasons for doing this……

    • Replies: @Dumbo
  13. Polistra says:

    Those words came to mind the following morning when, in my New York Post, I read Mark Krikorian‘s excellent opinion piece headlined How the gospel of open borders took over the Democratic Party. Mark argues that Democrats are not driven by a rational albeit treasonous determination to Elect A New People, but by moralistic anti-borders fervor.

    Worth noting, in passing: even the New York Post (one of the few same voices on this topic) sees fit to illustrate Mr. Krikorian’s essay with a photograph showing 100% women and children migrants.

    This is a time-honored MSM trick designed to pull at American heartstrings. Roughly 90% of migrants are actually military-age men, though you’d never know this if you have to depend on the mass media.

    • Agree: Colin Wright
    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  14. martin_2 says:
    @Colin Wright

    If white people are so easily manipulated by Jews who are just serving Jewish interests at our expense then the more fool us.

    • Agree: meamjojo
  15. SMK says: • Website

    A paramount Jewish rationale for supporting the Immigration Act of 1965 and massive nonwhite immigration was to prevent the rise of a Nazi-like regime in the US, a fear that was paranoid, if viscerally and emotionally understandable, in that such an outcome was so remote as to be inconceivable pragmatically.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  16. @Polistra

    ‘…This is a time-honored MSM trick designed to pull at American heartstrings…’

    Yeah. You reminded me of the BBC’s coverage of the Syrian wave of a few years back. To go by the photos, it consisted 100% of worthy young fathers carrying adorable toddlers on their shoulders. It really was kind of a weird vision: millions of ’em, all with a toddler on top…

  17. @SMK

    ‘A paramount Jewish rationale for supporting the Immigration Act of 1965 and massive nonwhite immigration was to prevent the rise of a Nazi-like regime in the US, a fear that was paranoid, if viscerally and emotionally understandable, in that such an outcome was so remote as to be inconceivable pragmatically.’

    The irony is that the net effect of everything the Jews have done to this country is to make a Nazi-like regime more, not less, likely.

    Humpty-Dumpty has fallen off the wall — and they shoved him. What comes next? Word on the street is that you can’t put Humpty-Dumpty back together again.

    This all ends with someone’s authoritarian regime, maintained by intimidation and violence. I can’t see what else is going to happen.

    This sure as hell wasn’t my idea. Thanks, Jews.

  18. The thing about someone like Derbyshire is that he’s carved himself out a niche, and he seems to be fairly secure there. He’s harassed and marginalized to some extent — but he’s tolerated. It’s been years now, and he still hasn’t been silenced.

    Doesn’t a kind of tacit contract come into being? Even if Derbyshire did realize the role Jews play in all this, the little insurance actuary that lives inside all of us might whisper to him that he might not be permitted to speak at all if he brought that up.

    Of course, it’s possible Derbyshire thinks Jews are just fine. However, the other explanation may also have some validity.

  19. Dumbo says:
    @War for Blair Mountain

    What you talking bout Willis? I just said I don’t favour Asian immigration to white countries, even if they are not as bad as other groups.

  20. SafeNow says:

    Of course, it’s possible Derbyshire thinks Jews are just fine. However, the other explanation may also have some validity.

    There’s an old saying (Russian?), “All victories inevitably come at a cost.” The Jewish victory is the evolution of, and now possession of, the talking gene and the interest-rate gene. The cost is that, in parallel, there developed an unrestrained, extreme, dissension/contentiousness/irresolvable-conflict gene. Derb would say nah, these costs did not accompany the positive traits; critics are imagining these negatives, hallucinating; Blinken at Anchorage was such an hallucination; the pluses were cost-free.

  21. @Colin Wright

    Maybe I missed it — but the entire column manages to be about Bret Stephens’ attitudes without once noting that he is a Jew, and his hostility towards the goyim is stereotypically Jewish.

    Derb is, like so many HBDers, a wheak, or a white weakling. He sucks up to Jews as the Master Race.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
    , @Thomm
  22. @Dumbo

    Sorry about that….I have retinitis…sometimes the keyboard and screen gets blurry…..

  23. @Priss Factor

    ‘Derb is, like so many HBDers, a wheak, or a white weakling. He sucks up to Jews as the Master Race.’

    Yeah — but if it were worth your while (which it isn’t) you could go back over my posts and discover I crossed that bridge myself only a year or two ago. Until recently, I wasn’t given to insisting Jews were the problem. It genuinely hadn’t occurred to me that I should allow myself to think that particular bad thought.

    …and I only say what I do because I’m not trying to make converts here. Around and about town, I usually think carefully about introducing it into the usual right-wing bitch session that one can pretty much have at will. Most Americans (including until recently myself) have been very thoroughly inoculated against anti-semitism, and trained to immediately reject it when it rears its head. So to an extent, playing the anti-semitic card is just a way of telling people you’re a thought criminal. They should ignore you, and edge carefully away.

    So if Derbyshire has any hopes of a mass following, well…it’s a judgement call. I’m not going to condemn him for it. I’d call a spade a spade, but that’s me.

    There’s a continuum here. You can rant to your heart’s content — to all the other marginalized. Or you can go the Tucker Carlson route, and content yourself with not actually endorsing Israel, etc. Just be silent. That’ll let you stay on prime time.

    Or you can pick some point in between. There’s something to be said for all the positions.

    • Agree: lavoisier
  24. lloyd says: • Website

    Bret Stephens in early 2000s left the Wall Street Journal to become in Israel the editor of the Jerusalem Post. He after a few years and credited with returning Jerusalem Post to a more right wing position in the Israel context, moved back to New York as a Wall Street Journal Editor. He is also columnist for New York Times. His milieu and himself see no incongruity here. America and Israel are officially two seperate countries. He advocates, apparently non ironically, the expulsion of the several generations native born Americans. He appears to be devoid of humour and intellectual insights. An AI machine could do better. So how did he get these high status jobs. Well

  25. @Macumazahn

    Derbyshire called Kevin MacDonald circa 2005 “the Marx of the Antisemites.”
    He has never retracted or refined that statement.

    Derb has made it clear in his columns that he wont countenance any “antisemitism” which I think means examining whether being Jewish affects your attitudes towards non-White immigration to the West. (I think Derb rates it okay to analyze Israeli Jews residing in Israel attitudes towards immigration into Israel. But to examine, compare and contrast attitudes of Jews in other countries is anti semitic. Similarly, if those Israelis emigrate to White countries, then their approach to immigration should not be examined –compared, contrasted etc on the basis of pursuit of an ethnic interest. )

    Perhaps for being such a decent and jolly good sport he will get an invitation to the Charles III coronation in 2023.

  26. “… I speak of Americans whose families have been in this country for a few generations. Complacent, entitled and often shockingly ignorant on basic points of American law and history, they are the stagnant pool in which our national prospects risk drowning…. ”

    It seems to me that Mr. Stevens is providing a shockingly accurate description of the aggregate mass of Negro citizens in this country, particularly the urban, Negro underclass. I find it hard to disagree with his desire to deport this crowd.

    In fact, repatriation to their ancestral homelands would seem to be an appropriate form of the “reparations” to which so many members of this group seem to feel they are somehow entitled.

  27. Art Deco says:

    Stephens remarks five years ago were replicated by your old buddy Kevin Williamson, whose blood relatives all live around Amarillo and Lubbock. (They’re demonstrably wrong, by the way; the prevalence of self-employment income is the same for white Anglos, Hispanics, and Orientals / East Indians. Self employment income among blacks is about half that of the other three categories).

    While we’re at it, Stephens has spent his entire adult life in opinion journalism. He’s expendable. Williamson’s history is not too different. Williamson was at one time paid over $200,000 by the grift-enablers on NR‘s board.

    • Replies: @MEH 0910
  28. Jim H says:

    ‘There’s no doubt that Bret Stephens’ dislike of his fellow citizens returns an echo from the bosoms of the Leftist elites who dominate our culture.’ — John Derbyshire

    Nice soft-focus take there, John.

    Now let’s hone in on the real reason: Bret Stephens is a hardball neocon Jew, who harbors a deep contempt for an Anglo-Christian culture that he despises.

    If you can’t bring yourself to admit this, then you’re just beating around the bush and distracting from the elephant in the living room which succinctly explains Stephens’ behavior.

    • Agree: Colin Wright
  29. Richard B says:
    @Colin Wright

    Maybe I missed it — but the entire column manages to be about Bret Stephens’ attitudes without once noting that he is a Jew, and his hostility towards the goyim is stereotypically Jewish. Compare to Jennifer Rubin, for example. Or Max Boot.

    Bingo!

    Jewish Supremacy Inc. Narcissistic to the core. I know that word, along with psychopath, gets tossed around a lot. But that doesn’t mean that it isn’t a valid category without range and attributes. It certainly works in the case of JSI.

    Actually, their narcissism is part of The Dark Triad of Lust for Power, Narcissism, and Psychopathy. Or, to put it another way, they’re power-obsessed, self-engrossed and have no conscience.

    But to stick to the narcissistic part, three attributes of it are shamelessness, entitlement and exploitation. That fits Stephens, Rubin, Boot, et al. to a tee. But there’s something else. They can’t function without a Scapegoat.

    No surprise there since their people literally created that social role. And what do Scapegoaters do? Well, they Scapegoat, Gaslight, and Exile their Designated Scapegoat. Which in this case is whites.

    The key takeaway here is that they have no moral authority. None. They just have power. After all, and to put it in question form: Are Jews above criticism because they’re perfect, or because they’re powerful? Because they’re powerful. Of course! So, if you strip them of their moral authority their power becomes illegitimate.

    A better explanation for why they have to abolish freedom of speech would be hard to imagine. Because, if whites were allowed to tell the truth about them the way they are free to lie about whites, their entire explanatory system would be reduced to rubble faster than you can say Whiteness.

  30. jconsley says:

    Bret Stephens is one citizen who should be deported as a useless negative contributor to the United States. I stopped reading the New York Times when it absolutely lied to the American public that attacking Iraq was necessary. Judy Millers’ front page articles were total propaganda but the NYT was eager to publish the lies. Of course the NYT publishers were not aware of Israel’s incessant demands that the United States remove Saddam Hussein and remake the entire Middle East. Moreover, Bret Stephens was a “cheerleader” for the Middle East wars for Israel. Who needs that ilk?

    • Replies: @Kolya Krassotkin
  31. lavoisier says: • Website
    @Colin Wright

    You are right that the elephant in the room is not mentioned. It never is with JD unfortunately.

    How such an intelligent and courageous man such as JD can be so dishonest about the JQ remains a mystery wrapped in an enigma.

  32. Could be the many DC Stephens are in the process
    of crippling/exterminating Germany after sucking
    it dry?

    How many down?

  33. MEH 0910 says:

    https://vdare.com/radio-derb/borders-open-to-latinx-bret-stephens-rethinks-and-how-nations-sink-etc

    https://www.johnderbyshire.com/Opinions/RadioDerb/2022-09-23.html

  34. MEH 0910 says:
    @Art Deco

    Last week:
    https://thedispatch.com/p/kevin-d-williamson-joins-the-dispatch

    As of today, The Dispatch officially has a national correspondent—and you might have heard of him. We’re thrilled to welcome Kevin D. Williamson aboard our ever-growing pirate skiff, where he’ll be the author of the weekly Wanderland newsletter and a regular contributor to our website. We’ll let Kevin fill you in on what to expect in the coming days, but we’re authorized to disclose that his work will include, among other things, accessible coverage of economics and a renewed focus on reporting.

    https://thedispatch.com/p/why-im-at-the-dispatch-ea7

    “They’ve got Goldberg and Hayes and French, and now Allahpundit, just add Williamson and The Dispatch will have the full set.” Funny thing—I’ve been hearing that from people who love The Dispatch and from people who … don’t love The Dispatch. It is the one thing they agree on.

    I love The Dispatch. And, so, here I am

    .

  35. Thomm says:
    @Priss Factor

    Derb is, like so many HBDers, a wheak, or a white weakling. He sucks up to Jews as the Master Race.

    No. It is just part of the terms of his employment. Derb is no more a practitioner of this avoidance than Jared Taylor or Steve Sailer.

    They have all been hired to specifically deflect from this question. Remember what the true purpose of this website is. Why do so many readers here believe Ron Unz is the ONE wealthy Jew who is against the rest of Jewry, the Jewry that made him wealthy?

    Or is it more likely that this website exists for Jewish benefit? Particularly when their White Trashionalist detractors are neither bright nor sympathetic characters?

  36. @jconsley

    Deport Stephens[Ehrlich], along with Victoria Nuland[Nudelman] and Max Boot. They can all make aliyah to Israel, where they can live safely and happily in a Jewish paradise, free from the fear of persecution by the dirty goyim.

  37. GenFranco says:
    @Vergissmeinnicht

    Perhaps because an “Immigration Moratorium” is best we are likely to get in the next 50 years…if we are extremely lucky, and because such a moratorium would essentially be blocking massive non-White immigration, given that non-White immigration is the priority of our elites.

    Do you see any White South Africans being offered a spot in the USA, even after their family members are murdered by black gangs? A flood of Canadians fleeing Trudeau’s people’s republic? Swedes tired of living in a country where rape is the national sport? I don’t.

  38. bert33 says:

    So, the border is blown, and the papers can say what they want but the reality is the govt. has no effective control, it’s unregulated mass entry at this point so you better hope they like us. People that write for leftist rags like the times dont actually interview anyone anymore, they just start typing and when they hit 800 words they press PUBLISH.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All John Derbyshire Comments via RSS