If ten million—heck, make it just one million (0.1 percent of the supply) sub-Saharan Africans applied for conversion and Israeli citizenship tomorrow, rabbinical doctrine and Israeli law would both change faster than you can say “olim.”

You mean, faster than you can say Depo Provera

What we are doing when we take in skilled immigrants is, we are strip-mining other countries of their smart fraction.

I’ve never been a fan of this argument. The reason is, if a leftard or an immigration-booster agrees with you that stripping developing countries of their smart fractions is unfair, they don’t conclude that there should be no immigration, they just tell you that, unfortunately for us then, we’ll have no choice but to take their less intelligent fractions. You simply must, must, must agree to accept immigrants, OK? So my position has been that as long as that assumption is as widespread as it is, I’d rather do as Australia does, and at least make some attempt to get better people, rather than settle for whatever riffraff show up.

Congratulations to these kids. These seem somewhat bright, but really, how well would they do in the world Scrabble championships? Chisala says that’s the real test of intellectual horsepower.

“Immigration boosters love to pose as the moral superiors of us heartless restrictionists; but how is it moral to deprive a poor, struggling nation of its small quota of smart people?”

I tried that arguement on liberal relatives. Their reply was, to summarize: “Who cares? Why should those people be stuck in those out-house countries?”

As noted by Zman, the modern left is estranged from their past: These same virtuous liberals were arguing for military intervention around the globe to support international economics.

The change in their thinking has been dramatic over the last ten years. I once could discuss with them immigration’s baleful effects on wages, the environment and social harmony. Now they forcefully assert “America’s economy would collapse without immigration!” Hard lefties supporting foreign wars and global capitalism. Strange days, indeed.

“Hey, maybe we could have a virtual war!”

Most Americans shamefully embrace that delusion already.

Russian, Czech, Slovak, Finnish, Swedish (and a smattering of German) hockey players and their hot wives and girlfriends. That’s my immigration policy.

I wouldn’t call the Jews a “race”. They are an ethnicity, like the English, Germans or Italians. Their race has to be Caucasian because they are usually among the palest people I know. My understanding is that there are three races Caucasoid, Mongoloid and Negroid, unless these definitions have changed, the Jews are distinctly Caucasoid.

When I was a kid, I remember people would refer to the English race or the Italian race, etc., so perhaps that is what Deb is referring to here when he call Jews a “race”. I generally go by what those in the Old Confederacy would consider White, those guys were pretty serious about race, and the Jews were considered White.

There had been no major demographic change since the Anglo-Saxon settlements of the fifth century

The Irish made a significant impact from about the mid-C18th to the mid-20th, which caused much Big Island political instability and also, arguably, Australia. A far graver matter.
Although I bet the archaeogeneticists will say there’s not much of a difference between the substrate populations of the two islands as established in the very earliest bronze age (net of Sassenachs, Romans and the like). Cue Hibernian rage …

I have oft noted that if one only watched American tv, one would naturally conclude that the suburbs are chock full of wealthy, intact black and mixed race families.

It is clear that the progressive plan is to accept as many of the least bright that can get here. If the only the bright ones come, there’s a chance they may start voting for pubs.

We should begin offering asylum to Venezuelans, the young attractive females anyway. They have lots of those.

John

You gave the CUCK-OUT argument against Asian LEGAL IMMIGRATION…..

The only thing that matters is this:What are the consequences of importing Chinese and Hindu Legal Immigrants for THE HISTORIC NATIVE BORN WHITE AMERICAN WORKING CLASS MAJORITY?….ANSWER:WHITE GENOCIDE!!!!….And the Chinese “American” and Hindu “Americans” get to vote for WHITE GENOCIDE!!!!

In a future post I will explain why your small fraction argument is false…

List N countries with majority population sub-Saharan African: 0.9 N of them will be poor, corrupt, crime-addled s***holes.

I’m wracking my brain trying to think of just one; Botswana gets an honourable mention, but even it has serious problems.

Nearly every single advertisement—I exaggerate only slightly and perhaps maybe not at all—features blacks luxuriating in upper-middle class dwellings far beyond the means of most whites.

I’ll take this one step farther: From what I see on telly, at least half the population is black, so how can they possibly be a minority?

What we are doing when we take in skilled immigrants is, we are strip-mining other countries of their smart fraction.

I’ve never been a fan of this argument…. I’d rather do as Australia does, and at least make some attempt to get better people, rather than settle for whatever riffraff shows up.

As Obamacare continues to percolate through the American system, and particularly if any of the Dems win in 2020, you will get more up-close-and-personal experience with strip-mined talent, as imported doctors replace more and more home-grown talent who have thrown in the towel. If you think, “Oh goody, good thing we’ve strip-mined their best,” then read up on the quality of NHS service to disabuse yourself of that notion and go for a zero-immigration policy.

Don’t feel too bad about getting that visa so quickly, Mr. Derbyshire*. I don’t think they check much out, from my experience. If you had done this deal in Chicago, I could have helped you. You don’t piss off the one girl on your left when waiting to get the visa back (this was when they had same-day service). The cutie next to her was OK.

It was kind of random too, about getting a multiple-entry visa vs. a single-entry one. Maybe you just had to ask. This may not matter if you just plan on making this one trip. I hope to read much of your experience in China 18 years after the last time.

.

* You think you’re nothing but chopped liver? Peak Stupidity has not yet even been listed by the $PLC. Please help us reach our goal, by calling them up in the morning and ratting us out. “For the time it takes to get a fancy cup of vente latte expresso, you too, can help us become SOMEBODY.”

You are pushing a stupid argument that allows liberals to win all the time……

First of all, who are you to speak on behalf of all the Hindus on India… Chinese in China?

Neither the Hindus in India and Chinese in China would agree with you or John…

It was the late John Tanton who came up with John’s argument back in 1975 in an essay he wrote……It is a horrible argument

John

It’s a really stupid and foolish argument…abandon it…Now say HUWHITE a hundred times….as your penance….

Interesting breakthroughs these days in the Rieman Hypothesis Realm….Hope you been keeping up…..

I was only road-testing the argument. When I said “immigration moratorium”, they audibly gasped with wide-eyed horror. These people, who I must say are a highly-educated, smart (both with doctorates in chemistry from top schools), charming and interesting upper middle-class white couple, have become beyond all reason. As someone once put it so pithily “We Are Doomed”.

Derbyshire is going to China!!! Don’t forget to take your Chinese offspring with you.

As usual, Derbyshire never fails to show off his stupidity. Derbyshire, give thanks to the Western males (who are not black/Asian/Jewish/Muslim) who invented the plane to let you fly to China. Otherwise, you’d be making the journey on a Chinese junk (pun intended).

Derbyshire, why isn’t China a first world nation like Japan? Your attempt at answering this would be fascinating.

As to the Jews, there you go again. You thought of converting? I think you better get your Chinese offspring to convert. Here’s a youtube on Jews of color:

https://www.centralsynagogue.org/worship/sermons/detail/moses-married-a-cushite-woman-recognizing-the-many-colors-of-the-jewish-com

As a reminder, Jews are not Western and had nothing to do with the development of Western civilization. When your Chinese offspring convert, they can go to Israel. They are not Western and do not belong in the West.

The boosters tell us that Nigerian immigrants to the U.S.A. are among the most successful and prosperous. If that’s true, we’re taking in a lot of smart Nigerians. But how many smart Nigerians are there? What’s the smart fraction?

As ‘people of color’ they just add to the affirmative action and equality cost that back in 1993 Peter Brimelow estimated at 4% of the U.S. gross national product (GNP), based on 1991 figures, in a piece titled When Quotas Replace Merit, Everybody Suffers.

The problem with international migration is always that it is an attempt to use foreigners to solve problems. Unlike international trade, international migration is usually asymmetric.

Migration is just a wealth transfer conduit. Through migrants money is flowing from rich countries to the ones El Trumpo called by a certain uncouth word.

The World Bank estimated officially recorded annual remittance flows to low- and middle-income countries in 2018 at $529 billion. This figure was significantly larger than foreign direct investment (FDI) flows in the same year at $344 billion.

$88 billion was for Latin America and the Caribbean, $62 billion for the Middle East and North Africa, $131 billion for South Asia and $46 billion for Sub-Saharan Africa.

Among countries, the top remittance recipients were India with $79 billion, followed by China ($67 billion), Mexico ($36 billion), the Philippines ($34 billion), and Egypt ($29 billion).

A homogeneous nation without much in the way of Rule of Law can still function because people have shared identity, customs, ways, and mores.

But a diverse nation must have Rule of Law as the bond that holds together different groups because they have different looks, attitudes, customs, and cultures.

This is why citizenship in the US must be defined by Rule of Law that applies to all and is respected by all despite their cultural differences. Polish-Americans, black-Americans, Hindu-Americans, Jewish-Americans, Arab-Americans, and Chinese-Americans have different and even contrasting & hostile cultural perspectives, and they could not become one people on the basis of culture/customs/habits. So, they must be bound by common understanding of and adherence to the law. And since Americanism is defined by citizenship, the rules of citizenship are of paramount importance. If immigrants want to be new citizens, they must obey the law, and the elites of American must enforce those laws. It must be Immigration Due Process, not Immigration Anarchy.

If the rules of being an American Citizen goes out the window, the rule of what an American is also goes out the window. If anyone can just crash into America and become American, then ‘American’ has no meaning. It’s like property rights lose meaning if people are just allowed(and even encouraged) to trespass and squat. If homeless are allowed to enter anywhere, even the home-owners are effectively rendered homeless as their homes must allow Open Doors.

Americanism is said to be about rights of privacy, and privacy requires one’s own space and the respect for that space by others and enforced by law. This is why the state cannot just barge into your house. And it’s illegal for anyone to trespass into your property. If we follow the logic of Open Borders where no nation has its security, the next step is Open Doors where no one should have privacy premised on private property. The next step would be Open Pooters whereby it’d be wrong for women to exclude any man because her ‘exclusionary’ vagina won’t put out to the world. So a rapist can complain, “No human is criminal. I didn’t rape her. I’m just a dreamer-creamer.”

Under rule of law, individuals need privacy and nations need security. Indeed, the ironic thing is EVEN ILLEGALS seek out the West because they want to live under the Rule of Law that is so lacking in their anarchic crazy nations. But by violating West’s rules, they are bringing that very anarchy to the West. Worse, as fish rots from the head, we now have elites of America saying they value the invaders more than the citizens.

US used to have a ruling class. The ruling class may be snobby, but they see themselves as owing something to the lower classes. The ruling class is not a world apart but part of a larger community of the nation. They rule the people of the nation.

But US no longer has a ruling class but a Ruling Tribe, the Jews. Tribalism works differently than Classism. Upper class, despite snobbery, may regard lower classes as ‘my people’. In contrast, the people of the Tribe have a self-enclosed us-versus-them view of the world. Wasp ruling class saw themselves as rulers of all Americans. Jewish ruling tribe sees itself as existing for the good of the Tribe and hell with everyone else who are simply More ‘Palestinians’ to fool, cheat, and crush.
The Ruling Elites should guard the Rule of Law, especially in a diverse nation like the US where, due to cultural and racial differences, all Americans must live under the common principles of the law.
American History moved toward greater application of rule of law to more peoples, finally including blacks fully in the 60s. But since then, a kind of mythological thinking about immigration and Diversity overrode the need for Rule of Law. Suddenly, the act of coming to America was supposedly SO MAGICAL in its DIVERSITY-BOOSTING that it was more important than the law and due process. Anarchy from the bottom is bad enough, but it’s fatal when we have it from the top. Jews fear whites with pitchfolks, so they figure they must be swamped by non-white hordes with H1 Visas or dishwashing skills.

Also, the rise of identity politics favored certain groups for holy status. It was first Jews and blacks. Jews were so holy-holocausty that they couldn’t be called out on anything. We just had to praise them and pledge to Israel. (When Jews simultaneously push on whites to give up racial identity AND to favor Jewish identity uber alles, it makes no sense. But just as God is above human laws, Jews as holy holocaust people became above the rules.) And blacks were always noble victims, and all their problems was explained in terms of ‘racism’. Finally, even homos got holy status. Only those three groups are protected by taboos: ‘antisemitism’, ‘racism’, and ‘homophobia’.

Now, why did this poison the well? Because Diversity or People of Color were led to feel that the most important factor of Americanism is not the Rule of Law(that equally applies to everyone) but the Worship of Identity, especially Jews, blacks, and Homos. As time passed, more groups wanted holiness attached to their own identities in emulation of holy Jews, blacks, and homos.

We see this most strikingly among Hindus, a people as tribal as Jews and shamelessly proud as the fruits. When Hindus bitch about whites, they are really complaining, ‘how come we great holy hindus don’t have the same wokemon points as Jews, blacks, and homos?’ Hindus now think that Bashing-Whitey has magical powers. After all, Jews and blacks always badmouth whites. And homos, though many are white, side with Diversity against whiteness. So, hindus think, “Jews and blacks bash whites, and they go so many holiness points. Let’s do the same and get holy too.” It’s like the Magic Hurt. Hurt whitey, and you get holy!

But as it stands, no one cares about the people of dot. What Hindus fail to understand is that Jewish and Black holiness isn’t due to simply bashing whites. It’s a combination of victor/victim narratives. White folks, esp over millennium of Christian influence, feel most passionately about the Victor who was Victimized. Like Jesus who got whupped real bad but turned out to be the Son of God. The only reason why whites really feel strongly about blacks and Jews is because blacks who were once victims beat up whites in sports. And Jews who were once persecuted won out in culture, intellect, and business… and comedy. White Guilt doesn’t really care about having abused the losers. Who weeps for Palestinians? White Guilt only feels the burden of remorse when the victims turn out to be have been superior to whites in certain visceral areas, like sports or comedy.

Hindus are not athletics, and they are not that funny. Ridiculous, yes, but not funny.

However, there is a great black yawning crevasse between people who know science, math, and statistics and people who don’t. You simply can’t talk across that gap—I know, I’ve spent decades trying.

Well, I know too, because I did hear what you’re saying. And I’ve studied literature and aesthetics and – – – philosophy and psychoanalysis and some such. I don’t believe in the gap at all. You could still call me a bot though. The question then was: Why would something created purely from mathematics and coding have wanted to cross the gap? – Maybe the bot felt lonely, just like wall-e?

Why is Haiti Haiti, Barbados Barbados

IQ estimates provided by Lynn & Vanhanan, 2006:

Haiti: 67.

Barbados: 80.

Other IQ estimates put Barbados at 84.

______________

Also, any or all of the following:

– Different African population stocks forming greater or smaller shares of the Barbadian or Haitian gene pools, with Haiti getting the less-talented;

– A far larger, more reliable caste of non-Blacks in Barbados. The CIA Factbook gives a full-Black population of 92.4% for Barbados, and full-whites at 2.7%. How many full-Whites does Haiti have? It looks very likely that full-White Haitian citizens are at 0.0%, rounding to the nearest tenth;

– Significant levels of gene selection in the many generations of nativity in Barbados vs. Haiti (more eugenic in Barbados? vs. the Haitian dysgenic nightmare): This is where culture comes in and “intervenes” in genetics. British-Protestant legacy vs. French-Catholic-voodoo (and anti-White racial revolution) legacy.

Barbados is a tiny cruise ship port, which relies on retirees, and tourism. It also has the oldest Synagogue in this part of the world, and it had sugar and other plantations long ago

Good. No immigration. Now send your wife and half-Sino kids back.

I’ve never been a fan of this argument. The reason is, if a leftard or an immigration-booster agrees with you that stripping developing countries of their smart fractions is unfair, they don’t conclude that there should be no immigration, they just tell you that, unfortunately for us then, we’ll have no choice but to take their less intelligent fractions. You simply must, must, must agree to accept immigrants, OK? So my position has been that as long as that assumption is as widespread as it is, I’d rather do as Australia does, and at least make some attempt to get better people, rather than settle for whatever riffraff show up.

Actually, there is a more effective response to the complaint that we’re strip-mining Third World countries of their most talented citizens. Specifically, you can ask the people who are making that argument as to why exactly they themselves are not personally moving to the Third World. After all, if they themselves are unwilling to actually move to and live in the Third World, why exactly should they actually expect smart Third Worlders to agree to stay in the Third World?

how is it moral to deprive a poor, struggling nation of its small quota of smart people?

I love your writing, Derb, but I detect more than a hint of concern trolling here. I don’t believe you really care about the effect on a poor country if we import its smart people; your worry–as you have expressed elsewhere–is the effect on the US if we import an overclass.

Mr. Derb, what does the caption say below the photo?

https://vk.com/photo404480909_457239229?rev=1

Hey, maybe we could have a virtual war!

Davy and Peter, RIP.

Mr. Derb, what does the caption say below the photo?

Google can’t translate because it’s an image. But an image search brought up this headline:

Woman Arrested After Filming Herself Stuffing a Full Chicken Inside Her Vaginal Cavity in Public Store

That picture, which really doesn’t resemble the Chinese subway much, I will leave to your imagination.

Tang and Zhu (U.S.A.)

You welcome!

Sorry, that doesn’t sound like a very effective response at all. Leftards concerned about a third world brain drain don’t necessarily “expect smart Third Worlders to agree to stay in the Third World.”
They just insist that developed countries should not attempt to poach them, as a matter of principle.

For immigration restrictionists, it’s largely a waste of time and effort to get caught up debating the details of smart-fraction-stripping. It completely fails to cut to the heart of the issue, which is that immigration – any immigration, smart or stupid – does more harm than good and that people have every right to refuse it.

Restrictionists need to frame immigration as an event, and resist attempts to frame it as a process.

“Yeah, we once had mass immigration, but so what? That doesn’t compel us to have it forever. Mass immigration was a dumb idea back then, and it’s a many times dumber idea today. We should learn from our mistakes, not ‘celebrate’ and repeat them.”

Derb’s position is “no more immigration.” He isn’t issuing calls to send anyone back.

(Derb isn’t, but I would. Starting with Africans and brown third world muslims, like Bengalis. Any sane white country would want to rid itself of such an obvious burden.)

Like Mr. Derbyshire, I’m getting a bit long in the tooth, so when TWMIG meets TWMIM won’t be my problem but they will meet and merge and there isn’t enough to go around so one or the other will have to prevail. Either way most people will have to die. Japan or England can get along with half their present population. Maybe even thrive if they aren’t overrun by the world’s most important graph.

I suspect that the issue of ‘climate change’ has become the euphemism for this problem. Better to blame some extraneous issue beyond man’s control than confront the reality that man can only control who not how. Either we decrease the number of low IQ people or the low IQ people will overwhelm the number of high IQ people the planet can support or we just capsize the lifeboat.

…And also, why should they expect ANY Third Worlders to stay in the Third World? So here we are.

Immigration is not going to go away ( more’s the pity ) We need some new thinking

I’m rather intrigued by a a system, which I read somewhere , where newcomers must be sponsored by existing citizens for permanent residence to be granted .

What about a system where wannabes require old stock citizen referees/sponsors /guarantors?

In detail:
Each person has one point for being native born and one point for every parent and grandparent who is native born . So everyone has a point score between zero and seven .
Four points (out of max seven ) makes you a citizen by descent

If you have less than 4 points you require someone to grant/gift/donate points to you to bring your total number of points to four ( and qualify for permanent residence/citizenship )
But you can give any one wannabe only one point -so if you have zero points you need four people to each give you a point
No questions are asked as to why a grant of a point is made ( so they can be purchased by the rich ) although there still may be some character test for the wannabe ( no mass murders say ).
The sponsor is further required to pay for any ( excess ) public costs incurred by the person s/he sponsored ( I guess there might be insurance for this eventuality)

Of course you can easily envisage some bleeding heart SJW giving away her points to some smart gamer with a sob story and then having to pay a major contribution to his prison costs . I am untroubled by this .

Anyway just a thought . Gives immigration boosters something to do and minimises the power of the usual culprits

Cool. But you’re also a third world brownie Hispanic so your opinion means next to nothing. And I’m not a Muslim either, Paco. Go pick some tomatoes

Google Translate can translate what is on an image. It translated it as:

“Nanjing Line 2. Time: August 1, early peak. A black man squatted in a row of seats and slept, attracting the whole vehicle to despise the passengers. They turned their backs to it. No one dared to stop it, and their black uncles had to be careful.”

I think the threats are more serious than you may believe:

Guzzling up a good portion of a lower-IQ, relatively backward country’s nation’s cognitive elite creates a negative feedback loop, which is bad for the country, bad for for their neighbors, and bad for the world. Negative feedback loops that create failed economies, empower demagogues (filling the cognitive elite vacuum), create instability and thus further refugee pressure, not to mention the literal threat to regional and even world peace from failed states.

Look at how bad Puerto Rico has done.

I agree

Hard lefties supporting foreign wars and global capitalism. Strange days, indeed.

Are you talking about liberals or lefties? They’re two different animals. I still think of lefties as being people with, you know, actual left-wing views. I find it impossible to think of someone who loves capitalism as being a lefty.

It may not work on true doctrinaire leftists, however the strip-mining argument does work on cucks and not-so-political normies.

Think of it this way: IQ strip-mining will adversely affect the s**thole countries, making them even more s**tholey, leading to even more of them attempting to come here.

Here’s an interesting article on Israel:

https://www.timesofisrael.com/nobody-hijacked-israel-its-just-not-what-its-pioneers-thought-theyd-created/

The Jews you are thinking about are the descendants of Jewish men who married women from what is now Italy, Germany and Eastern Europe–the Ashkenazim.

Israel is apparently returning to its Semitic, Middle Eastern roots, both culturally and genetically.

Yoram Hazony is fully bought in, with his Zionism, nine children, and Jewish Orthodoxy. Other, less traditionalist Ashkenazim are going to find themselves increasingly estranged from their Sephardic and Mizrahi cousins.

Derb of the Arctic wrote:

Now list N countries with majority population northwest European—above the Hajnal Line: 0.9 N of them will be stable, prosperous, low-crime, low-corruption social democracies.

But it wasn’t so long ago 1.0 N of northwestern Europeans were bog and forest dwelling savages who couldn’t create a civilization of their own even thousands of years after Grand Civilizations had been created by the natives of Africa (Egypt), Mexico (Olmec), Iraq (Sumer), India (Indus Valley).

Explain that away…

Thanks. Just when I think Derbyshire’s hit peak degeneracy, he manages to come up with something new. He has written that he is afraid of the Jews: http://jewcy.com/post/wrestling_with_derbyshires_law And yet, he had some bizarre idea about converting to Judaism.

He was an illegal alien in the USA: https://www.johnderbyshire.com/Opinions/Straggler/005.html WOW!!!

He doesn’t like Christianity. He has written that he doesn’t understand it. This from a cuck who grew up in an all white and devoutly Christian England. He will, however, help his Chinese woman with her pagan ancestor rituals.

He has written that Asians are smarter than whites. They are not.

The good news is that he, Peter Brimelow and Jared Taylor have now been exposed for the controlled opposition they are. This is why Jared Taylor is always babbling that Northeast Asians and Jews are smarter than whites. They are not. They had nothing to do with the development of Western civilization.

Again, why does he remain in the West? He is free to leave.

He’s just like Ilhan Omar.

Derb the Dumb does math:

The table I’ve been using, David Becker’s table, gives a mean IQ of 68 for Nigeria. That means a smart fraction of 0.4 percent, or one in 250.

Nah, that means it’s you who is hopelessly retarded for actually believing that Nigeria is a country of drooling retards (IQ 68 is well below that threshold). You are not smart enough to understand that data that leads to ridiculous conclusions is most likely fake data.

Drive through some cities in Nigeria and West Africa, and educate yourself:

Yeah, that psychometric bs doesn’t seem to hold up to even basic common sense scrutiny. Derb talks about his statistical and mathematical prowess yet a guy considerably smarter and more accomplished in the field of mathematics and statistics, Nassim Taleb, calls this IQ psychometrics total bullshit.

Why wouldn’t they include foreigners, at least foreigners they find obnoxious?

Apparently they don’t. I got my visa.

I really don’t like being nasty, but sometimes after too many beers it happens.

They are smart.

Apparently they don’t believe you are much of a threat.

Why is this not reported?

https://voiceofeurope.com/2019/08/german-state-sponsored-media-refuses-to-report-on-stuttgart-sword-murder/

So some website is claiming that John D. wrote the following in a Feb. 2007 interview with someone named Joey Kurtzman:

Yes, indeed I was, and am, “afraid of offending Jews.” Of course I am! For a person like myself, a Gentile who is a very minor name in American opinion journalism, desirous of ascending to some slightly less minor status, ticking off Jews is a very, very bad career strategy. I approached the MacDonald review with great trepidation.

It’s difficult to get past all the politics when it comes to Jewish DNA, but the latest information I’ve come across shows Ashkenazi Jews having originated in Southern Italy and branching out from there. There is little, or no connection between the Ashkenazi and the Middle East, depending on the source. I’m sure there must be a lot of intermarriage between the Ashkenazi and Mizrahi and Sephardic, so in a few generations they will probably mostly have at least some connection to the Middle East.

Derbyshire is a degenerate cuck. Even if he didn’t say the above (which he did), his Chinese family and what he has said about the West is proof that he does not belong in the West.

I don’t think the classic For Fear of the Jews political instinct, so well known to all who have dealt with with them since the time of Christ, would be (anywhere near) as influential on Derbyshire’s writing today. As of the late 2010s, I believe he is more open on it. FWIW.

You cucked Western males have got to get over your “Jew fears.” You let the Jews live rent free in your cuckische kopfs. You are the ones who build up the “Jew” to be some invincible foe. You are the ones who refuse to deal with the fact that it is your cowardice that is the root of the West’s problems.

Derb the Dumb has no clue about anything. Negroids do have a talented 10% and big cities in Africa are pulling in these people so that’s why there is some kind of Western style civilization.

However, Africa is still a mess because most people have low IQs. Nigeria has a very high murder rate.

Also, why aren’t black majority cities like Detroit, Baltimore, Philadelphia able to create cities like those in the youtube?

The best thing is for black Americans to get their own state and have them develop their cities.

Intelligence of a nation is a function of it’s culture. The higher the rate of consanguity in marraige the stupider the progeny, on average. Girls being brought into motherhood young leads to robust early maturing overconfident individuals, who are a bit thick. Do both and establish it as the norm and a population of stupid confident robust individuals who will mature ever earlier will evolve. If you want to be intelligent make sure your maternal grandmother doesn’t breed until she’s about 25.

They can’t. They know everything, that’s why.

Many Jews are Ashkenazim who are a Turkic people, so a mix of Mongoloid and Caucasoid.

My understanding is that there are three races Caucasoid, Mongoloid and Negroid

That’s what I recall reading as a kid 50-60 years ago, and it didn’t make sense to me even then. Which box do South Asians (Indians/Pakistanis) fit into? Native Americans (yeah, they supposedly came over from Asia, but . . .)? Australian aborigines?

Is there (or has there ever been–it’s probably been tossed down the memory hole in recent times) a formal, scientific definition of what constitutes a race, as opposed to a sub-racial ethnic group?

BTW, if Jews are among the palest people you know, you must not have met many North Europeans. Jewish skin tone tends to be closer to Italian or Greek than to any other European ethnicity.

“I tried that arguement on liberal relatives. Their reply was, to summarize: “Who cares? Why should those people be stuck in those out-house countries?””

That tells me that the liberals know full well that the intelligent “cream of the crop” immigrants are not the ones being invited. The type of people being invited in are mostly indigents who would be indigent no matter where they lived because they are unproductive types, either too unintelligent to make lives for themselves or guilty of antisocial acts such as theft, violent assault, etc.

It appears to be this way by design.

“My understanding is that there are three races Caucasoid, Mongoloid and Negroid”

I don’t agree. That’s lumping the indigenous people of the Western hemisphere in with the mongoloids. Traditionally, the view was always that there were four races signified by their different colors: Red, Yellow, Black and White. This ‘three races’ idea is of recent vintage. It presumes that only the continents of North and South America had no aboriginal race and it’s based upon the absurd “out of Africa” theory; that all humanity originated in Africa.

Please STFU at your earliest convenience.

” If you want to be intelligent make sure your maternal grandmother doesn’t breed until she’s about 25.”

That is a brilliant idea. I’m going to do that right away.

” Native Americans (yeah, they supposedly came over from Asia, but . . .)?”

Yep, the whole “three races” thing relies on the land bridge theory, but that doesn’t make sense either. Supposedly, when sea levels in what is now the Bering straits were lower (or some such thing) Mongoloids came out of Asia and crossed it into North America, but no “Caucasoids” or “Negroids” did any such thing. Only Mongoloids came over. Hmmmm…

I guess we’re supposed to assume that, even then, Mongoloids were smarter and also more adventurous. What it looks like is that some scientists were persuaded to come up with a tale that would support a scheme for nullifying all those treaties made with Red people.

The scheme went something like: “We’ll just claim that they are Yellow, and that there are no Red people, so there are no indigenous people on either continent of the western hemisphere, only immigrants from Asia. Genius plan, eh?”

Of course that little scheme is secondary to the big scheme, which is claiming that we’re all actually Negroids who just wandered off and changed skin color and other physical characteristics.

You must be another Derbyshire type. Are you involved with Asian females? I most definitely hit a nerve somewhere.

Given your “witty repartee,” you have an IQ below 89 or are involved in some degeneracy which renders you unable to think clearly. Your inability to deal with the truth and facts is seen in your call for some kind of self-censoring on my part.

Fortunately, I conveniently have time to keep “speaking.”

You should name your name from Twodees to Twattledum.

The boosters tell us that Nigerian immigrants to the U.S.A. are among the most successful and prosperous.

That’s because they are children of middle class professionals who get to take full advantage of affirmative action intended for descendents of slaves. Even with an SAT of 1400, they are at the 99th percentile of blacks in the US. Every year there are usually around 8 to 10 kids who get accepted to all 8 Ivies plus Stanford, and majority are first gen. African immigrants, and their SAT scores are usually <1450. A Nigerian kid from my kid's high school got into Stanford this year, and she was totally average in every regard.

How many times have we heard “Judaism is descended from maternal lines”? If it were strictly a religion there wouldn’t be such a provision. Anyone who claims it’s a religion not a race is just plain lying, but then that’s what Jews are good at.

My son wanted to attend the Naval Academy after high school. I told him I didn’t raise him so he could risk his life defending the glory of Israel. Let the Jews go die defending their own homeland. Eff the US military.

South Asians are predominantly Caucasoid