The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewJonathan Cook Archive
Whoopi Goldberg’s Loudest Critics Are the Real Racists
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Whoopi Goldberg is not someone I would normally rush to defend. Our politics are too far apart on too many issues. And many will doubtless take delight in the fact that the queen of cancel culture has just found herself canceled.

But the pile-on against Goldberg for expressing a non-conventional view about the Holocaust needs examination – less for the content of the furore it has provoked than for what that furore tells us about power relations in our society. And for what the furore says about the things we hold dear and the things we don’t.

What seems to have done for Goldberg – leading to her suspension from a popular daytime TV talk show, The View, even after she apologized – was her comment that the Holocaust “isn’t about race.” Rather, she said, “it’s about man’s inhumanity to man, that’s what it’s about. These are two groups of white people…”

We don’t know exactly where Goldberg was heading with this particular line of thought because nervous fellow panelists shut it down. But she had a chance to clarify later on the Colbert Show, where she appeared to suggest that distinctions of “race” relate chiefly to the color of one’s skin.

“Race,” of course, is a socially constructed idea. Goldberg’s critics are right that calling Jews “white” in the context of the Holocaust is not only historically inaccurate but unhelpful to a clearer understanding of what the Holocaust was about. In Nazi Germany, it was the Nazis, not Whoopi Goldberg, who got to decide which groups constituted a “race.”

Nonetheless, her later apology seemed a good corrective: “On today’s show, I said the Holocaust ‘is not about race, but about man’s inhumanity to man’. I should have said it is about both … I stand corrected.”

‘Dangerous’ comment

But that, of course, was not enough. Much of the coverage has subtly implied that Goldberg skated a little too close to Holocaust denial or antisemitism. Kim Godwin, president of ABC News, reinforced that impression with a statement that presumed all Jews were offended by Goldberg’s remark: “The entire ABC News organization stands in solidarity with our Jewish colleagues, friends, family and communities.”

Jonathan Greenblatt, of the Anti-Defamation League, went even further, labeling Goldberg’s comment “dangerous.” But in what meaningful sense was her remark dangerous rather than naïve, ignorant or misguided?

Goldberg wasn’t excusing or even minimizing the Holocaust. Nothing in her remarks makes a repetition of the Holocaust more likely, or encourages hatred or prejudice towards Jews. She simply reframed the Holocaust in ways that made sense to her given her own experiences of racism. Like many people, she struggled to see clearly enough another person’s viewpoint. We all do that, most of the time.

The question is: So what? Isn’t that what we have TV talk shows for? So people get to talk and exchange ideas, often worthless ones on subjects they know little about.

Moments after she had made her initial comment, Goldberg sought to expand on it in more interesting and helpful ways: “You’re missing the point … let’s talk about it for what it really is. It’s about how people treat each other. It’s a problem. It doesn’t matter if you’re Black or white, Jews … everybody eats each other.”

Within the limits of TV talk shows’ soundbite culture, she appeared to be making a universal point about how each of us is susceptible to being manipulated into hatred and violence against other groups, especially if those groups have been demonized.

‘Reflect and learn’

That was a reminder – one we hear too rarely – that the Holocaust was not a crime only against Jews. It was equally a crime against the Roma people. Half of each “race” was exterminated. The Nazis also sent other groups to the concentration camps, including socialists, gays and the disabled, none of whom could be described in racial terms.

With Western politicians and the media dehumanizing the Russian, Chinese and Iranian peoples by vilifying their leaders – and thereby driving us towards potentially catastrophic wars – it is no bad thing to be reminded that Hitler had larger ambitions even than a genocide of the Jewish people.

It is worth being reminded too that propaganda, and groupthink, occur in every period of history. It is not just one state at one time that has duped its people into committing crimes against humanity. And similarly, many groups and “races” have been victims of others’ greed and fear. To pretend otherwise is to make the repetition of such crimes more likely.

It is quite possible for Goldberg’s comment to be unhelpful or simplistic – this is daytime TV, after all – without it being especially harmful.

Nonetheless, not only was she required to apologize but she was barred from the show for two weeks “to reflect and learn.” It seems a Black woman is in greater need of reflecting on her racism than the ABC News organization and her white colleagues.

That makes sense only in the modern world of souped-up liberal identity politics, where each “race” gets to have exclusive rights over their own concerns. Black Americans can talk about slavery, though not so much about poverty and the justice system. Jews, or rather Jewish organizations, get exclusive rights to define and contextualize the Holocaust. Hispanics get … well, it’s too early to decide what they get.

And whites – the rich ones, at least – get to act as referee while all the other “races” argue about who’s been victimized most.

Schooled on racism

But here we get to the trickiest part of the Whoopi Goldberg episode. The Anti-Defamation League’s Greenblatt appears to have adopted the role of mentor as Goldberg “reflects” on her black privilege. He accompanied her as she made a second apology live on The View, the seeming first step on her path to re-education.

Does Goldberg really need to be schooled on racism by those like Greenblatt who shout their offense loudest?

In fact, Greenblatt joined the pile-on against Goldberg fresh from dealing with another pressing problem that needed his attention. He and the Anti-Defamation League had just emerged from dealing with the renowned human rights group Amnesty International, which offended their sensibilities even more grossly.

ORDER IT NOW

The misnamed Anti-Defamation League (ADL) is only very secondarily concerned with defamation. Its real purpose is much narrower. It works day and night to shield Israel from scrutiny so that the self-declared Jewish state can continue being a racist state oppressing and dispossessing the Palestinians it rules over. (A documentary, “Defamation,” by the Israeli film-maker Yuval Shamir, on the ADL’s role in manipulating public discourse about both the Holocaust and antisemitism is a must watch.)

That is why the ADL has just invested so much of its energies in vilifying Amnesty. This week the human rights group joined Human Rights Watch and B’Tselem, an Israeli group that monitors the Israeli army’s abuses of Palestinians in the occupied territories, in declaring Israel an apartheid state. Israel is increasingly being understood as the successor to apartheid South Africa.

Victims, not perpetrators

Let us back up a minute. Remember Greenblatt said Goldberg’s comments – including her highlighting the universal message of the Holocaust as “man’s inhumanity to man” – were “dangerous.” That seems a strange assessment until we consider what the Holocaust represents to Greenblatt and other fanatical defenders of Israel.

Whoopi Goldberg had observed that all of us are capable of behaving inhumanely towards others: “It doesn’t matter if you’re black or white, Jews … everybody eats each other.”

That is precisely a message Israel’s supporters like Greenblatt have tried to make taboo – and they have used the Holocaust as their most effective tool of enforcement. Greenblatt and the ADL need to sustain a narrow orthodoxy about the Holocaust: that it is by far the worst crime in history; that the Jews were the central, if not only, victims of it; and that for those reasons Jews should always be considered victims and never perpetrators.

The Holocaust has long served as Israel’s get-out-of-jail card, wielded by figures like Greenblatt.

Goldberg inadvertently threw a spanner in the works. She disrupted the entire narrative of Greenblatt and the rest of the Israel lobby by observing both that there were other historic victims of the Holocaust and that all of us, in the right circumstances, can end up being perpetrators of crimes against humanity, even Jews.

That should not need stating. As Amnesty and the human rights community have been warning us, Israel – the self-declared Jewish state – is an apartheid regime. Apartheid is a crime against humanity. Israel’s leaders should be prosecuted at the International Criminal Court, and would be if that court ever found the backbone to take on the United States and other Western states that protect Israel.

But there is no hope of the racist leaders of Israel ever being held to account for their crimes against humanity so long as racist apologists like Greenblatt are able to shield them. So long as he can weaponize the Holocaust and antisemitism against Israel’s critics, creating endless tripwires to terrorize everyone else into silence or submission, we will struggle to stop the Palestinians being brutally oppressed and dispossessed.

So long as we collude in allowing Israel’s apologists to make a Whoopi mountain out of a Whoopi molehill, we play our own small part in perpetuating this modern crime against humanity. Goldberg made a misguided point clumsily. She apologized and clarified. That should be the end of it. Everything else is manipulation. Everything else is bad faith. Everything else is racism.

(Republished from Mintpress News by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 26 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. BuelahMan says:

    Cook, like PC Roberts, has this brainwashing against “Nazis”. But their brainwashing comes from decades of demonization by jewish outlets. I can understand PCR’s hoodwinking since he is a product of that age of disinformation. I suspect Cook is, as well.

    Why can they not understand that their worldview is a summation of this tainted jewish lie?

    Or, do they know better but continue the lie for ulterior reasons?

    As for Goldberg, she is as clueless as the authors I mentioned. But she made her bed in that nasty environment and I welcome her demise.

    • Agree: Exile
    • Replies: @Mike Tre
  2. ‘Whoopi Goldberg’s Loudest Critics Are the Real Racists’

    What’s wrong with being a racist?

  3. And many will doubtless take delight in the fact that the queen of cancel culture has just found herself canceled.

    Yup. I love it.

    • Replies: @throtler
  4. Religion obfuscates clarity, rationality, discernment, logic, and truth. Whoopi Goldberg’s statement concerning what the Holocaust was about is accurate as one can state it. It was an example of “man’s inhumanity to man,” with the common denominator being mankind, regardless of the color, creed, or race. When I lived in Brooklyn, NY, I had a Jew as my shrink, and he said Jews were a people. He didn’t use any other descriptors such as race, or religion. Jews range in shades of color from white to darker shades of white. I don’t know what race any Jews would say they belonged to. According to the Torah, Jews are not white. I don’t know why the “big-wigs” at ABC made a big deal out of it. Perhaps they were annoyed that Whoopi did not classify them as white.

  5. Johnathan Cook: ““Race,” of course, is a socially constructed idea.”

    Not entirely. Is “species” a socially constructed idea? One might argue that there’s a sense in which ALL ideas are socially constructed, but both race and species are taxonomical terms that refer to real, objective differences between organisms.

    Johnathan Cook: “Everything else is racism.”

    Oh noes!! Not waycism! LOL.

    Trivializing racial differences is a stock-in-trade of Christian thinking. It’s muddy thinking like this that has led to such innovations as negroes being held equal to whites, and Jews being allowed to accumulate disproportionate power in white societies. I don’t know whether Cook’s a Christian or not, but this article, with the author’s quotes around the word race as if to suggest that racial differences are only imaginary, and his sneering use of the word racist as a term of opprobrium, reeks of Christian delusion.

    The only thing the right might have profitably jumped on in the Goldberg episode is the fact that, at last, the ADL has admitted that Jews are not white. That’s something this article doesn’t do, and I’ve yet to see any prominent right-wing commentator even bring up this point, let alone emphasize it. Then again, I guess it’s not surprising, given the Christian presuppositions of modern life. This admission by Jewish organizations that Jews aren’t white will be allowed to quickly disappear down the memory hole, and they’ll be back to their usual “fellow white people” ploys in no time. You just have to laugh. It might be tragic if it weren’t so hilarious!

    • Replies: @Roger R.
  6. Whoopi Goldberg is not someone I would normally rush to defend.

    Check. I was impressed with her role in a couple of episodes of Star Trek, and that’s about it.

    But the pile-on against Goldberg for expressing a non-conventional view about the Holocaust needs examination – less for the content of the furore it has provoked than for what that furore tells us about power relations in our society.

    Pile-on indeed! Caryn Elaine Johnson went to the extreme of using a “Jewish” stage name. But did it do her any good? I suspect she was given a good stomping to serve as an example to others precisely because of her long record of subservience.

    I was born and partly raised in the South. “Red and yellow, black or white. They’re all precious in His sight. Jesus loves the little children of the world. Race is about skin color!!! Or so I’d always believed.

    All of a sudden I learn that “Jews” are a Race. Are Baptists a Race? Mormons? Athiests?

    The Pissant State is flexing its muscles, and seeking to extend its control of the US of A.

    If making 14,000 ft Mt. Whoopi out of a 3 inch Whoopi molehill works, so be it. But what will they try next?

  7. Roger R. says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    Another way of looking at race is that it is seen in animals as well. The Wolf can mate with the Coyote and have fertile offspring – per leftist logic/claiming that race is a man made concept or social construct, that means that the Wolf and Coyote are 100% the same in every way – obviously that is not correct for many reasons. Yet a Coyote and Wolf are very different in behavior but can still fully interbreed. The Golden Jackal is another Canine that can also fully breed with the Dog, the Wolf, the Dingo, and the Coyote, but it’s very different than all of them. Human populations are no different. We can interbreed but there are differences, the most important being IQ differences, the average IQ of black Africans is between 65 to 70 while Europeans are at 100 on average. Mixing the two together only lowers the potential of the latter.

    A typical biologist will go on and on about how important it is that say, the Yellowstone Wolves don’t mix with Coyotes, but will turn around and put his virtue signaling finger in the air and say the often quoted [and false] propaganda line of “There is no race only the Human race!”.

  8. Roger R.: “Another way of looking at race is that it is seen in animals as well. ”

    Certainly it is. A great essay to read on this is Rushton’s “Statement on Race as a Biological Concept”.

    https://www.amren.com/news/2010/05/statement_on_ra/

    Unfortunately though, a facet of the Christian delusion is that man is above Nature, a special creature that, unlike animals, is endowed with a “soul” that has “free will”; in other words, a creature to which ordinary rules don’t apply. The result is that in the culture of the West, deformed as it is by Christianity, biological reasoning from examples in the animal world isn’t something that many people find persuasive.

    Roger R.: “A typical biologist will … put his virtue signaling finger in the air and say the often quoted [and false] propaganda line of “There is no race only the Human race!”. ”

    Right again, and again we can discern the contaminating influence of Christianity. Christian creation myths teach that all are descended from the same parents, Adam and Eve, and this is backed up by rabbi Jesus, who claimed that all men are brothers. These false presuppositions have so corrupted the culture of the West that even scientists have bought into them.

    • Replies: @G. Poulin
    , @Adûnâi
  9. Stogumber says:

    Cook is of course right that in Germany at that time the Nazis decided about “race”. But the Nazis didn’t generally maintain that Jews were a particular race. Most experts maintained that Jews and Arabs were of the same race, being “Semites”. And the Arabs were not persecuted, but taken as possible allies.
    So the persecution was not really about race. Its basic motive was a generalized distrust against Jews, and only Jews, as egotist and dishonest.
    And of course Nazis didn’t think in terms of “white race”. From their experience with WWI, there was an obvious struggle between different white peoples, and the idea of a white racial community was at best an utopian hope for the future. From that point of view they simply had no reason to contrapose “Whites” and “Jews”.

  10. raga10 says:

    It is quite possible for Goldberg’s comment to be unhelpful or simplistic – this is daytime TV, after all – without it being especially harmful.

    That is probably the best, most realistic and even-handed description of her comment. In short, it was not a big deal. But I have to note that the reaction is not completely over the top either – it’s this glee shown here at her being “cancelled” that is out of proportion!

    In reality she was NOT cancelled, or punished in any real sense. Apart from the usual chatter on Twitter which means nothing and is part and parcel of being on a talk show, all that happened to her is that she gets to take two weeks holiday – hardly a ‘cancellation’ and given she’s a millionaire many times over not a meaningful financial hit for her I’m sure, even if it affects her pay check all.

  11. Whoopi went off the plantation by explaining The Holocaust to the Jews.They own the narrative
    and fanatically defend it as the centerpiece of their victimhood.Poor Whoopi,with one tit in the ringer
    and the other snagged on razor wire, was forced to eat shit and grin for two weeks before returning
    to her slave quarters in Beverly Hills.

  12. G. Poulin says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    If Jesus ever said that all men are brothers, then I missed it. Christian brotherhood is like being a member of the Moose Lodge. You have to be a member of the lodge to be considered a brother. A lot of Christians have forgotten this essential point these days, but it is the original conception and the only kind of brotherhood taught in the New Testament.

    • Thanks: Right_On
  13. Adûnâi says: • Website
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    > “…the Christian delusion is that man is above Nature, a special creature that, unlike animals, is endowed with a “soul” that has “free will”; in other words, a creature to which ordinary rules don’t apply.”

    Does anthropocentrism necessarily presuppose the exclusion of man from the laws of Nature? A cultural value ascribed to the primacy of human interest above all does not necessarily lead to the denial of biological evolution or gravity. A schizophrenic matter-spiritual dualism does, however.

    Modern wokeism is as theocentric as the traditional Christianity of the past. In both cases, the interests of [Euro] man must be sacrificed for the sake of foreigners, be it the heavenly rabbi of Christianity or the Black supremacy of hyper-Christianity. All in the name of ideals higher than [Euro] man himself.

    I would even posit that those green types who value Nature for its own sake are a mirror reflection of Christians. It seems in the blood of the Western man to humiliate himself and denigrate his own interests as inconsequential, while seeing wisdom in the arcane nonsense such as “truth” or “justice”. The only truth is [population] survival, the only justice – that of the grave.

  14. G. Poulin: “If Jesus ever said that all men are brothers, then I missed it. Christian brotherhood is like being a member of the Moose Lodge.”

    The Jesus of the Bible proclaims his doctrines to all, and he urges his disciples to do likewise (Matthew 28:16–20). If everyone isn’t equally worthy of the message, why bother? He also uses universalist language. For example, blessed are the meek, he says (Matthew 5:5). Not the Christian meek mind you, just the meek. He also says to turn the other cheek, love your enemies, and do good to those that hate you. (Matthew 5:38-44). This appears to include everyone, Christian or not. But if your attackers aren’t your brothers, why not just kill them?

    Jesus’ message only makes sense in the context of Jewish creation myths, in which all mankind stems from the same parentage.

  15. Adûnâi: “It seems in the blood of the Western man to humiliate himself and denigrate his own interests as inconsequential, while seeing wisdom in the arcane nonsense such as “truth” or “justice”. The only truth is [population] survival, the only justice – that of the grave. ”

    The trick here is in how you define population, and how you define survival. The anti-racist will define population quite differently than the racist. The former concerns himself with the survival of mankind as a whole, while the racist only cares about one segment of it. Then too, race can be variously defined. Oxford biologist John Baker, for example, defined the white race as including Jews. Others don’t.

    Also, is racial survival to be a genetic stasis, or as near to it as can be attained? Or is it to be a transhumanist project, open-ended, with no stopping point? A worldwide collapse of the technological system could bring about the former condition. The latter course doesn’t result in anything being conserved. In essence, it’s indistinguishable from anti-racism, in that it regards existing races as only a starting point for endless modifications. If, in the future, nothing of its original genetics survives, in what sense can the white race be said to have survived?

    It’s also not clear to me how such a principle as you suggest can be derived from observation, or even if so, why it should be binding. I see racial survival as an incidental outcome of the individual struggle for survival, which is a stronger instinct. Why should we care about race? In practice, the only reason to care about the survival of other members of one’s race is personal benefit. Were that not true, it would be foolish.

    • Replies: @Adûnâi
  16. Adûnâi says: • Website
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    > “The anti-racist will define population quite differently than the racist.”

    Fortunately, all White Christians have managed to do is to help other, superior races proliferate. The irony of such “left-wing” anti-ethnic ideologies is that by destroying their own, they aid foreigners, and are duly replaced. Russian Marxists might have killed the emperor, but then erected their own czar.

    > “If, in the future, nothing of its original genetics survives, in what sense can the white race be said to have survived?”

    The ultimate conclusion of the Aryan race seems to be in the role it played in uplifting Asia and then going the way of the dodo.

    > “Why should we care about race?”

    Because it is clear that those who will use genocidal force will inherit the planet. Just as Rome and the Arabs, a tight-knit and brutal community will always triumph over diverse and meek ideologies. Hitler’s Germany was the first, but not the last in Eurasia.

  17. throtler says:
    @WorkingClass

    The problem is that she was not cancelled. Because she is a leftist, she will come back in 2 weeks. People on the right get permanently cancelled.

  18. throtler says:

    Whoopi has always been a know-it-all who knows nothing.

  19. Adûnâi: “Because it is clear that those who will use genocidal force will inherit the planet. Just as Rome and the Arabs, a tight-knit and brutal community will always triumph over diverse and meek ideologies.”

    All that is far from clear, at least to me. Romans mixed with other tribes from the very beginning, and so did the Arabs in their conquests. This isn’t at all surprising, since neither group had a clear understanding of the biological concept of race, which didn’t emerge until Linnaeus in the 18th century. Any “genocides” they committed were therefore not based on any idea of racial purity, and hence were incomplete. Plenty of slaves were taken and interbred with. All large empires follow this same model. They incorporate conquered and allied territories, and then genetically mix with them. They don’t first exterminate the original inhabitants so they can fill the vacated land up with their own people. That’s not history. It’s science fiction.

  20. cestall says:

    That’s a very long article to explain how completely wrong you are. Your diseased antisemitism aside, it’s a mere fact of history that the Nazis were the extreme result of racism; that is, the extermination of a mass of people based on their race. To say it wasn’t about race is preposterous and not to be entertained by anyone with a brain cell. Holocaust denial notwithstanding, the very IDEA of the persecution of Jews (whether you only semi-covertly desire it also) is, yes, about race. It is. You can hate the idea of a spherical Earth, but to then advocate a flat earth in response if pure silliness. Don’t adopt nonsense just because you don’t like a fact.

  21. …“Race,” of course, is a socially constructed idea…”

    LOL.

    Defending Whoopi and denying the objective reality of race. That is a stupidity twofer.

    https://www.unz.com/jthompson/x-raying-race/

  22. Wokechoke says:

    WW1 and WW2 are commonly referred to as “the white man’s war” in Africa. The Jews that the German got their hands on were white enough to call themselves European, Caucasian, White at the time. Indeed their pleading with the Anglo Americans to save them was based on their Fellow Whiteness. As far as blacks are concerned Jews are a type of white.

  23. Mike Tre says:
    @BuelahMan

    As I said in another comment regarding Whoopi: Caryn Johnson of NYC took a Jewish stage name because she believed it would help her career by endearing herself to the people running show business. Boomer aged negroes from NYC were familiar with Jewish music producers exploiting negro singers and music groups on a regular basis in the 60’s. She pays lip service to the negro cause, but she knows where her bread is really buttered. The fact that she spoke out of turn reveals that she was never very bright to begin with, even after all these years being submissive to the Jewish narrative.

    • Replies: @Truth
  24. Here with Whoopi we have an example of a member of the idiot social left wandering off the leftist plantation for the black section.

    The Jewish elite may or may not be parasitic depending on your viewpoint, the black elite in America and elsewhere in the world is almost entirely parasitic. In fact, they are parasites of parasites. There are a vanishingly small group of black elites comparable to the self-made elite of other groups. These are people who work hard to create value for consumers in the free market, they deserve their wealth. Next are those who have some talent in an intellectually undemanding area yet by developing their talents to bring the value of joy to others, by way of sports entertainment or some other entertainment usually, earn their fortunes. Good for them. Lastly, and this is unfortunately most of the black elite, are morons such as Whoopi who lack brains, a strong work ethic, talent, or even integrity yet are elevated by a corrupt ruling class to distract the masses with the circus part of the bread and circuses scam. This is the vast majority of black entertainers, journalists, government workers, diversity hires in private industry, and most especially black politicians. The black political class are parasites of parasites as they use their offices to weasel money from the taxpayers to be maneuvered into the pockets of their sponsors who kick back a tiny bit of it to them. Free money for the elite, the politicians, their hangers on ( media people, political consultants, etc), it only cost working suckers.

    Whoopi will be fine after this “teachable moment” and even more devoted to her paymasters, don’t be fooled by her or any of their other minions.

  25. Truth says:
    @Mike Tre

    Caryn Johnson of NYC took a Jewish stage name because she believed it would help her career by endearing herself to the people running show business.

    The fact that she spoke out of turn reveals that she was never very bright to begin with,

    Is that right? What is your net worth?

    Whoopi Goldberg Net Worth:
    \$60 Million
    Whoopi Goldberg’s Salary
    \$8 Million Per Year
    What is Whoopi Goldberg’s net worth and salary?

    Whoopi Goldberg is an American comedian, actress, author, talk show host, singer-songwriter, and political activist who has a net worth of \$60 million. Whoopi enjoyed a highly-successful film career in the mid-1980s through the 1990s. In recent years she has primarily worked as a television talk show host.

    https://www.celebritynetworth.com/richest-celebrities/actors/whoopi-goldberg-net-worth/

  26. Hatuxka says:

    Our esteemed commenter leaves out examining just what she may have meant, regardless of failing to note that the Nazis considered Jews to be a race by adding, “These are two groups of white people…” That notion being under any examination is what they wanted shut down. Jews are not chiefly semitic. The Jews targeted by the Nazis were comprised of white people of the Jewish faith, in reality. Judaism is a religion, Jews are predominantly to nearly all white. Criticizing any particular element or faction of any religion should not be off limits.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Jonathan Cook Comments via RSS
PastClassics
The Shaping Event of Our Modern World
Becker update V1.3.2