The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewJonathan Cook Archive
Antisemitism Claims Mask a Reign of Political and Cultural Terror Across Europe
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

The Israeli newspaper Haaretz has run a fascinating long report this week offering a disturbing snapshot of the political climate rapidly emerging across Europe on the issue of antisemitism. The article documents a kind of cultural, political and intellectual reign of terror in Germany since the parliament passed a resolution last year equating support for non-violent boycotts of Israel – in solidarity with Palestinians oppressed by Israel – with antisemitism.

The article concerns Germany but anyone reading it will see very strong parallels with what is happening in other European countries, especially the UK and France.

The same European leaders who a few years ago marched in Paris shouting “Je suis Charlie” – upholding the inalienable free speech rights of white Europeans to offend Muslims by insulting and ridiculing their Prophet – are now queuing up to outlaw free speech when it is directed against Israel, a state that refuses to end its belligerent occupation of Palestinian land. European leaders have repeatedly shown they are all too ready to crush the free speech of Palestinians, and those in solidarity with them, to avoid offending sections of the Jewish community.

The situation reduces to this: European Muslims have no right to take offence at insults about a religion they identify with, but European Jews have every right to take offence at criticism of an aggressive Middle Eastern state they identify with. Seen another way, the perverse secular priorities of European mainstream culture now place the sanctity of a militarised state, Israel, above the sanctity of a religion with a billion followers.

Guilt by association

This isn’t even a double standard. I can’t find a word in the dictionary that conveys the scale and degree of hypocrisy and bad faith involved.

ORDER IT NOW

If the American Jewish scholar Norman Finkelstein wrote a follow-up to his impassioned book The Holocaust Industry – on the cynical use of the Holocaust to enrich and empower a Jewish organisational establishment at the expense of the Holocaust’s actual survivors – he might be tempted to title it The Antisemitism Industry.

In the current climate in Europe, one that rejects any critical thinking in relation to broad areas of public life, that observation alone would enough to have one denounced as an antisemite. Which is why the Haaretz article – far braver than anything you will read in a UK or US newspaper – makes no bones about what is happening in Germany. It calls it a “witch-hunt”. That is Haaretz’s way of saying that antisemitism has been politicised and weaponised – a self-evident conclusion that will currently get you expelled from the British Labour party, even if you are Jewish.

The Haaretz story highlights two important developments in the way antisemitism has been, in the words of intellectuals and cultural leaders cited by the newspaper, “instrumentalised” in Germany.

Jewish organisations and their allies in Germany, as Haaretz reports, are openly weaponising antisemitism not only to damage the reputation of Israel’s harsher critics, but also to force out of the public and cultural domain – through a kind of “antisemitism guilt by association” – anyone who dares to entertain criticism of Israel.

Cultural associations, festivals, universities, Jewish research centres, political think-tanks, museums and libraries are being forced to scrutinise the past of those they wish to invite in case some minor transgression against Israel can be exploited by local Jewish organisations. That has created a toxic, politically paranoid atmosphere that inevitably kills trust and creativity.

But the psychosis runs deeper still. Israel, and anything related to it, has become such a combustible subject – one that can ruin careers in an instant – that most political, academic and cultural figures in Germany now choose to avoid it entirely. Israel, as its supporters intended, is rapidly becoming untouchable.

A case study noted by Haaretz is Peter Schäfer, a respected professor of ancient Judaism and Christianity studies who was forced to resign as director of Berlin’s Jewish Museum last year. Schäfer’s crime, in the eyes of Germany’s Jewish establishment, was that he staged an exhibition on Jerusalem that recognised the city’s three religious traditions, including a Muslim one.

He was immediately accused of promoting “historical distortions” and denounced as “anti-Israel”. A reporter for Israel’s rightwing Jerusalem Post, which has been actively colluding with the Israeli government to smear critics of Israel, contacted Schäfer with a series of inciteful emails. The questions included “Did you learn the wrong lesson from the Holocaust?” and “Israeli experts told me you disseminate antisemitism – is that true?”

Schäfer observes:

The accusation of antisemitism is a club that allows one to deal a death blow, and political elements who have an interest in this are using it, without a doubt… The museum staff gradually entered a state of panic. Then of course we also started to do background checks. Increasingly it poisoned the atmosphere and our work.

Another prominent victim of these Jewish organisations tells Haaretz:

Sometimes one thinks, “To go to that conference?”, “To invite this colleague?” Afterward it means that for three weeks, I’ll have to cope with a shitstorm, whereas I need the time for other things that I get paid for as a lecturer. There is a type of “anticipatory obedience” or “prior self-censorship”.

Ringing off the hook

There is nothing unusual about what is happening in Germany. Jewish organisations are stirring up these “shitstorms” – designed to paralyse political and cultural life for anyone who engages in even the mildest criticism of Israel – at the highest levels of government. Don’t believe me? Here is Barack Obama explaining in his recent autobiography his efforts as US president to curb Israel’s expansion of its illegal settlements. Early on, he was warned to back off or face the wrath of the Israel lobby:

Members of both parties worried about crossing the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC). Those who criticized Israeli policy too loudly risked being tagged as “anti-Israel” (and possibly anti-Semitic) and confronted with a well-funded opponent in the next election.

When Obama went ahead anyway in 2009 and proposed a modest freeze on Israel’s illegal settlements:

The White House phones started ringing off the hook, as members of my national security team fielded calls from reporters, leaders of American Jewish organizations, prominent supporters, and members of Congress, all wondering why we were picking on Israel … this sort of pressure continued for much of 2009.

He observes further:

The noise orchestrated by Netanyahu had the intended effect of gobbling up our time, putting us on the defensive, and reminding me that normal policy differences with an Israeli prime minister – even one who presided over a fragile coalition government – exacted a political cost that didn’t exist when I dealt with the United Kingdom, Germany, France, Japan, Canada, or any of our other closest allies.

Doubtless, Obama dare not put down in writing his full thoughts about Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu or the US lobbyists who worked on his behalf. But Obama’s remarks do show that, even a US president, supposedly the single most powerful person on the planet, ended up blanching in the face of this kind of relentless assault. For lesser mortals, the price is likely to be far graver.

No free speech on Israel

It was this same mobilisation of Jewish organisational pressure – orchestrated, as Obama notes, by Israel and its partisans in the US and Europe – that ended up dominating Jeremy Corbyn’s five years as the leader of Britain’s leftwing Labour party, recasting a well-known anti-racism activist almost overnight as an antisemite.

It is the reason why his successor, Sir Keir Starmer, has outsourced part of Labour’s organisational oversight on Jewish and Israel-related matters to the very conservative Board of Deputies of British Jews, as given expression in Starmer’s signing up to the Board’s “10 Pledges”.

It is part of the reason why Starmer recently suspended Corbyn from the party, and then defied the membership’s demands that he be properly reinstated, after Corbyn expressed concerns about the way antisemitism allegations had been “overstated for political reasons” to damage him and Labour. (The rightwing Starmer, it should be noted, was also happy to use antisemitism as a pretext to eradicate the socialist agenda Corbyn had tried to revive in Labour.) It is why Starmer has imposed a blanket ban on constituency parties discussing Corbyn’s suspension. And it is why Labour’s shadow education secretary has joined the ruling Conservative party in threatening to strip universities of their funding if they allow free speech about Israel on campus.

Two types of Jews

But the Haaretz article raises another issue critical to understanding how Israel and the Jewish establishment in Europe are politicising antisemitism to protect Israel from criticism. The potential Achilles’ heel of their campaign are Jewish dissidents, those who break with the supposed “Jewish community” line and create a space for others – whether Palestinians or other non-Jews – to criticise Israel. These Jewish dissenters risk serving as a reminder that trenchant criticism of Israel should not result in one being tarred an antisemite.

Israel and Jewish organisations, however, have made it their task to erode that idea by promoting a distinction – an antisemitic one, at that – between two types of Jews: good Jews (loyal to Israel), and bad Jews (disloyal to Israel).

Haaretz reports that officials in Germany, such as Felix Klein, the country’s antisemitism commissioner, and Josef Schuster, president of the Central Council of Jews in Germany, are being allowed to define not only who is an antisemite, typically using support for Israel as the yardstick, but are also determining who are good Jews – those politically like them – and who are bad Jews – those who disagree with them.

Despite Germany’s horrific recent history of Jew hatred, the German government, local authorities, the media, universities and cultural institutions have been encouraged by figures like Klein and Schuster to hound German Jews, even Israeli Jews living and working in Germany, from the country’s public and cultural space.

When, for example, a group of Israeli Jewish academics in Berlin held a series of online discussions about Zionism last year on the website of their art school, an Israeli reporter soon broke the story of a “scandal” involving boycott supporters receiving funding from the German government. Hours later the art school had pulled down the site, while the German education ministry issued a statement clarifying that it had provided no funding. The Israeli embassy officially declared the discussions held by these Israelis as “antisemitic”, and a German foundation that documents antisemitism added the group to the list of antisemitic incidents it records.

Described as ‘kapos’

So repressive has the cultural and political atmosphere grown in Germany that there has been a small backlash among cultural leaders. Some have dared to publish a letter protesting against the role of Klein, the antisemitism commissioner. Haaretz reports:

The antisemitism czar, the letter charged, is working “in synergy with the Israeli government” in an effort “to discredit and silence opponents of Israel’s policies” and is abetting the “instrumentalization” that undermines the true struggle against antisemitism.

Figures like Klein have been so focused on tackling criticism of Israel from the left, including the Jewish left, that they have barely noted the “acute danger Jews in Germany face due to the surge in far-right antisemitism”, the letter argues.

Again, the same picture can be seen across Europe. In the UK, the opposition Labour party, which should be a safe space for those leading the anti-racism struggle, is purging itself of Jews critical of Israel and using anti-semitism smears against prominent anti-racists, especially from other oppressed minorities.

Extraordinarily, Naomi Wimborne-Idrissi, one of the founders of Jewish Voice for Labour, which supports Corbyn, recently found herself suspended by Starmer’s Labour. She had just appeared in a moving video in which she explained the ways antisemitism was being used by Jewish organisations to smear Jewish left-wingers like herself as “traitors” and “kapos” – an incendiary term of abuse, as Wimborne-Idrissi points out, that refers to “a Jewish inmate of a concentration camp who collaborated with the [Nazi] authorities, people who collaborated in the annihilation of their own people”.

In suspending her, Starmer effectively endorsed this campaign by the UK’s Jewish establishment of incitement against, and vilification of, leftwing Jews.

Earlier, Marc Wadsworth, a distinguished black anti-racism campaigner, found himself similarly suspended by Labour when he exposed the efforts of Ruth Smeeth, then a Labour MP and a former Jewish official in the Israel lobby group BICOM, to recruit the media to her campaign smearing political opponents on the left as antisemites.

In keeping with the rapid erosion of critical thinking in civil society organisations designed to uphold basic freedoms, Smeeth was recently appointed director of the prestigious free speech organisation Index on Censorship. There she can now work on suppressing criticism of Israel – and attack “bad Jews” – under cover of fighting censorship. In the new, inverted reality, censorship refers not to the smearing and silencing of a “bad Jew” like Wimborne-Idrissi, but to criticism of Israel over its human rights abuses, which supposedly “censors” the identification of “good Jews” with Israel – now often seen as the crime of “causing offence”.

Boy who cried wolf

The Haaretz article helps to contextualise Europe’s current antisemitism “witch-hunt”, which targets anyone who criticises Israel or stands in solidarity with oppressed Palestinians, or associates with such people. It is an expansion of the earlier campaign by the Jewish establishment against “the wrong kind of Jew”, as identified by Finkelstein in The Holocaust Industry. But this time Jewish organisations are playing a much higher-stakes, and more dangerous, political game.

Haaretz rightly fears that the Jewish leadership in Europe is not only silencing ordinary Jews but degrading the meaning – the shock value – of antisemitism through the very act of politicising it. Jewish organisations risk alienating the European left, which has historically stood with them against Jew hatred from the right. European anti-racists suddenly find themselves equated with, and smeared as, fledgling neo-Nazis.

If those who support human rights and demand an end to the oppression of Palestinians find themselves labelled antisemitic, it will become ever harder to distinguish between bogus (weaponised) “antisemitism” on the left and real Jew hatred from the right. The antisemitism smearers – and their fellow travellers like Keir Starmer – are likely to end up suffering their very own “boy who cried wolf” syndrome.

Or as Haaretz notes:

The issue that is bothering the critics of the Bundestag [German parliament] resolution is whether the extension of the concept of antisemitism to encompass criticism of Israel is not actually adversely affecting the battle against antisemitism. The argument is that the ease with which the accusation is leveled could have the effect of eroding the concept itself.

The Antisemitism Industry

It is worth noting the shared features of the new Antisemitism Industry and Finkelstein’s earlier discussions of the Holocaust Industry.

In his book, Finkelstein identifies the “wrong Jews” as people like his mother, who survived a Nazi death camp as the rest of her family perished. These surviving Jews, Finkelstein argues, were valued by the Holocaust Industry only in so far as they served as a promotional tool for the Jewish establishment to accumulate more wealth and cultural and political status. Otherwise, the victims were ignored because the actual Holocaust’s message – in contrast to the Jewish leadership’s representation of it – was universal: that we must oppose and fight all forms of racism because they lead to persecution and genocide.

Instead the Holocaust Industry promoted a particularist, self-interested lesson that the Holocaust proves Jews are uniquely oppressed and that they therefore deserve a unique solution: a state, Israel, that must be given unique leeway by western states to commit crimes in violation of international law. The Holocaust Industry – very much to be distinguished from the real events of the Holocaust – is deeply entwined in, and rationalised by, the perpetuation of the racialist, colonial project of Israel.

In the case of the Antisemitism Industry, the “wrong Jew” surfaces again. This time the witch-hunt targets Jewish leftwingers, Jews critical of Israel, Jews opposed to the occupation, and Jews who support a boycott of the illegal settlements or of Israel itself. Again, the problem with these “bad Jews” is that they allude to a universal lesson, one that says Palestinians have at least as much right to self-determination, to dignity and security, in their historic homeland as Jewish immigrants who fled European persecution.

In contrast to the “bad Jews”, the Antisemitism Industry demands that a particularist conclusion be drawn about Israel – just as a particularist conclusion was earlier drawn by the Holocaust Industry. It says that to deny Jews a state is to leave them defenceless against the eternal virus of antisemitism. In this conception, the Holocaust may be uniquely abhorrent but it is far from unique. Non-Jews, given the right circumstances, are only too capable of carrying out another Holocaust. Jews must therefore always be protected, always on guard, always have their weapons (or in Israel’s case, its nuclear bombs) to hand.

‘Get out of jail’ card

This view, of course, seeks to ignore, or marginalise, other victims of the Holocaust – Romanies, communists, gays – and other kinds of racism. It needs to create a hierarchy of racisms, a competition between them, in which hatred of Jews is at the pinnacle. This is how we arrived at an absurdity: that anti-Zionism – misrepresented as the rejection of a refuge for Jews, rather than the reality that it rejects an ethnic, colonial state oppressing Palestinians – is the same as antisemitism.

Extraordinarily, as the Haaretz article clarifies, German officials are oppressing “bad Jews”, at the instigation of Jewish organisations, to prevent, as they see it, the re-emergence of the far-right and neo-Nazis. The criticisms of Israel made by the “bad Jew” are thereby not just dismissed as ideologically unsound or delusions but become proof that these Jews are colluding with, or at least nourishing, the Jew haters.

In this way, Germany, the UK and much of Europe have come to justify the exclusion of the “wrong Jew” – those who uphold universal principles for the benefit of all – from the public space. Which, of course, is exactly what Israel wants, because, rooted as it is in an ideology of ethnic exclusivity as a “Jewish state”, it necessarily rejects universal ethics.

What we see here is an illustration of a principle at the heart of Israel’s state ideology of Zionism: Israel needs antisemitism. Israel would quite literally have to invent antisemitism if it did not exist.

This is not hyperbole. The idea that the “virus of antisemitism” lies semi-dormant in every non-Jew waiting for a chance to overwhelm its host is the essential rationale for Israel. If the Holocaust was an exceptional historical event, if antisemitism was an ancient racism that in its modern incarnation followed the patterns of prejudice and hatred familiar in all racisms, from anti-black bigotry to Islamophobia, Israel would be not only redundant but an abomination – because it has been set up to dispossess and abuse another group, the Palestinians.

Antisemitism is Israel’s “get out of jail” card. Antisemitism serves to absolve Israel of the racism it structurally embodies and that would be impossible to overlook were Israel deprived of the misdirection weaponised antisemitism provides.

An empty space

The Haaretz article provides a genuine service by not only reminding us that “bad Jews” exist but in coming to their defence – something that European media is no longer willing to do. To defend “bad Jews” like Naomi Wimborne-Idrissi is to be contaminated with the same taint of antisemitism that justified the ejection of these Jews from the public space.

Haaretz records the effort of a few brave cultural institutions in Germany to protest, to hold the line, against this new McCarthyism. Their stand may fail. If it does, you may never become aware of it.

Once, the “bad Jews” have been smeared into silence, as Palestinians and those who stand in solidarity with them largely have been already; when social media has de-platformed critics of Israel as Jew haters; when the media and political parties enforce this silence so absolutely they no longer need to smear anyone as an antisemite because these “antisemites” have been disappeared; when the Jewish “community” speaks with one voice because its other voices have been eliminated; when the censorship is complete, you will not know it.

There will be no record of what was lost. There will be simply an empty space, a blank slate, where discussions of Israel’s crimes against Palestinians once existed. What you will hear instead is only what Israel and its partisans want you to hear. Your ignorance will be blissfully complete.

(Republished from Jonathan Cook by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 180 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Wherever you look, gov’t is stepping on peoples natural rights. They are getting away with it for now.

    Wait till the inevitable happens – the economies , all interconnected, start to roll over. That’s when people really start to hurt. That’s when, as Gerald Celente says, ‘when people have nothing left to lose, they lose it’.

    The pendulum of totalitarian impulses is swinging very wide right now, but it will get a jolt once the average person says – enough.

    It should be obvious that when someone is trying to kill you, or seriously injure you or your family, that you have the natural right to fight back. When they get around to mandating vaccines or you lose your job, can’t go grocery shopping, etc, that means the gov’t or industry has decided to kill you – slowly. You have the right to prevent your demise by taking out who or what is trying to do you in.

    The gov’ts of the world are all insane and there needs to be a correction.

    • Replies: @JasonT
  2. Trinity says:

    Almost every single time you see a mocking or degrading display of Jesus or Mohammad, (((the usual suspects))) are involved, and yet (((these same people))) who will stoop low enough to roll in the gutter when it comes to mocking the religions of Islam or Christianity are so FRAGILE that you can’t even identify their racism or criminal activities. Oh, I get it, IF you can’t criticize a group of people, they can do anything they wish whether it is legal or illegal. Had enuff yet, people?

    Personally, I am as pro free speech as it gets, but I think mocking or degrading another religion or religious figure should be OFF LIMITS. And everyone knows WHY THEY PRINTED THAT DEGRADING PICTURE OF MOHAMMAD, IT WAS TO CAUSE DIVISION AMONG THE MUSLIMS AND CHRISTIANS RESIDING IN FRANCE. And then (((these people))) have to nerve or shall we say chutzpah to want to institute hate speech laws. Well who is it that determines what is “hate speech?” Lemme guess who will be in charge, (((the usual suspects))) of course.

    Jews with their control of academia, the media, publishing companies, and now social media which is far larger than the antiquated so-called mainstream media, spew hatred towards White Gentiles, particularly White Christians 24/7/365 and these HYPOCRITE RACIST SOCIOPATHS have the nerve to complain about “anti-Semitism.” Spare me. Jews are the MOST FRAGILE AND PROTECTED CLASS OF PEOPLE IN THE WEST while Whites face not only constant hate speech, and condemnation from Jewish controlled outlets, but also being physically attacked in the streets for supporting the wrong Presidential candidate, or for simply having white skin.

    “Anti-Semitism” in America and/or Europe, especially Europe, where people are thrown in prison for having the wrong opinion about WWII? SPARE ME. Anti-Semitism only exists towards Palestinians when it comes to the West and America. Are the so-called Jews even Semites, well according to some, the Palestinians are more true Semites than those who call themselves Jews, the Palestinians look like they come from that region of the world, the Jews, not so much. And IF there is so much “anti-Semitism” in Europe and America, then the Jew is invited to go home to Israel. Funny, why do all these Jews continue to live in racist and anti-Semitic White nations? haha. Actions speak louder than words, particularly Yiddish. Just like the negro who is always complaining of racism and yet Whites can’t go anywhere without Jews and Blacks following them. IF all Whites moved to Mars, a shitload of Jews, Blacks and others would follow all those racist and anti-Semitic Whites to Mars. Go figure that one out.

  3. JasonT says:
    @RoatanBill

    I would agree with you if this was a normal cycle of totalitarianism. It is not, though.

    In this cycle, once the people have received the microchip, the people will be not only physically controlled by drones, they will be mentally and emotionally controlled as well by AI using signals received through the chips. There will be no human agency left to mount a fight.

    The only hope is if enough people wake up AND become brave enough to take action before the above happens. This will require a leader or leaders to step forward who have the charisma to draw people to them, the intelligence to have an effective plan of action and the compassion to actually look out for other people than use people to advance their own agenda. Will that happen? I do not see any normal human or humans with the requisite skills stepping up to the plate.

    What I see around me makes me want to believe the following: Revelation 19:11-16. But that is both a scary thought and a difficult one to accept for someone wedded to this world.

  4. As discouraging as this news appears, I thank you for bringing it our attention.

    All of it confirms the following:

    1. Jews (even if only Zionist ones) have tremendous influence over western governments.
    2. Jews have tremendous influence over media — both mainstream and otherwise.
    3. Where human rights and liberty are concerned, Zionists are profound hypocrites.

    According to the IHRA standards, Facts #1 and #2 are prima facie anti-Semitic . Fact #3 isn’t as neatly categorized, though I’m sure a slight revision will allow them to excoriate folks for deductive reasoning in the not-too-distant future.

    Now since America’s great distinction among nations is supposed to be the liberty it accords to its citizens and residents, one might infer that the subject of this influence and hypocrisy would be trumpeted far and wide throughout the American media. The fact that it is not confirms Fact #2.

    Thank God for The Unz Review, where no such censorship exists! Viva Ron Unz!

    May there be many “bad Jews” and “bad goyim” alike willing to push back against this tyranny and depose the usual suspects with authority.

    Amen!

  5. @Trinity

    On the topic of blasphemy laws: They were on the books in nations such as England, Denmark, and Norway until recently. They’re still on the books in other European countries.

    I suppose one could perceive them as legislation akin to defamation law. Kevin Barrett drew an insightful analogy between them and “fighting words” legislation that has been gradually eroded in American jurisprudence.

    But, in general, I’m not in favor of them for the simple reason that legislating such matters lends credence to laws against historical revisionism and the like. I always tell my fellow travelers in faith that we need to expend less energy on how the usual suspects portray Jesus and Muhammad — may the eternal peace and blessings of God be upon them both — and more upon their example as it relates to our own conduct. But for Khomenei’s fatwa, Rushdie’s doggerel would have been consigned to the dustbin of history. Same goes for every other molehill made into a mountain of concern by well meaning, yet naive people of faith.

    Once upon a time, hardly anyone cared about Charlie Hebdo. Some, it appears, wanted to give them more publicity than anyone could ever dream of paying for.

  6. Personally, I am as pro free speech as it gets, but I think mocking or degrading another religion or religious figure should be OFF LIMITS.

    LOL. Not much makes me laugh, but this statement is so full of hypocrisy.

    • Agree: Nodwink, Jett Rucker
    • Replies: @AnonStarter
    , @Trinity
  7. The (((boy))) called ‘wolf’ so many times we noticed how many times. That’s all this is. We noticed. And now we’re to be punished for noticing?
    Really! If the Jewish push the wolf-cry any further there will be an insurmountable push-back. It is internationally-recognized that Israel is an apartheid state even against their own people. Sooner or later the wolf call goes South.

    • Replies: @annamaria
  8. Ghali says:

    Zero Tolerance for Anti-Semitism vs 100% Tolerance for Islamophobia and Israel’s Terror in Palestine.

    • Agree: tomo
    • Replies: @Moi
  9. This article implies free men should not be allowed to speak truthfully about the “Prophet [sic]” of Islam, who, according to Islam’s own “holy” texts, was a robber, a rapist, a child molester, a sodomite, a torturer, an enslaver, and a mass murderer. The importance of speaking out against Mohammed goes beyond the principle that truth matters. Faithful Moslems model their behavior after Mohammed, whom they consider to be the “Perfect Man” and “Seal of the Prophets”. That’s why they have conducted themselves like fiends for 1,400 years. Islam is a “religion” that teaches its followers to emulate the behavior and morals of a psychopathic desert raider.

    This article is yet another unfortunate instance of an attempt to invoke sympathy for Moslems on the basis of Jewish misdeeds. Both Jews and Moslems are irreconcilable enemies to White Christians. Neither group should be allowed to live in White Christian countries or to be anywhere near White Christian women and children.

    • Agree: fnn, Katrinka
  10. I find the best way to understand (((them))) is found in psychology texts on the subject of narcissim.

    The constant weedling and pleading or special treatment, the need to be the centre of attention and the endless manipulation of others are classic markers of the illness.

    So to is the hypocrisy and projection, the sociopathy and the expolosive rage when called to account or rejected.

    And, as Voltaire said, to find out who rules over you, ask whom you may not criticise.

    I choose not to their victim and I reject utterly their endless bullshit. I expect those representing me to do likewise.

    • Agree: Kolya Krassotkin
    • Replies: @tomo
  11. Anonymice says:

    Without so contemplating, without so intending, the machinery of thought control targeting me has me resisting and joining ranks with so-called antisemites. When I have been cowed and intimidated by a group of evil minded Zionists at the mere thought of Zionist crimes – as I have been able to so freely do with American, British colonial, French, Spanish, German or Portuguese ones, then I have unwittingly been recruited into the antisemitic fold. It is a badge of honor I will gladly and proudly wear, especially that I find myself in such good company.

  12. My bookshelf contains a number of dictionaries. In one that was published about 40 years ago, the word ‘racism’ has a brief definition: ‘the notion that one’s own ethnic stock is superior’. Today, the word has been weaponized by the Left and the Woke, and is applied by them to anyone who does not agree 100% with their agenda. No proof is required: an accusation is sufficient, and can never be refuted. The person who is accused deserves to be cancelled, or deplatformed, or to incur whatever unpleasant fate the Left may decree. In practice, only white males can be racist (except, of course, for white females named Karen).

    In recent years the Left has invented new thoughtcrimes: homophobia, Islamophobia, and now transphobia.

    I feel that anti-Semitism is used in the same way to intimidate anyone who is not 100% pro-Jewish, and to prevent any proper debate about Israel’s activities.

    • Replies: @Justsaying
  13. GeeBee says:

    Unsurprisingly for an article on this topic by this writer, the word ‘holocaust’ appears twenty-one times. The author writes that because of what he (taking his lead from Norman Finkelstein) distinguishes as ‘the Holocaust Industry’, Jews are able successfully to claim that they are: ‘uniquely oppressed and that they therefore deserve a unique solution: a state, Israel, that must be given unique leeway by western states to commit crimes in violation of international law.’ He later adds that he considers the state of Israel to be a ‘racialist, colonial project’.

    All very well made points. But he then goes on to make a very foolish error, by stating that the ‘Holocaust Industry’ must ‘very much be distinguished’ from what he calls ‘the real events of the Holocaust’.

    He cannot see that in practical terms – in the world of Realpolitik – as long as belief in the holocaust stands, there can only be one outcome. Or in other words, if these ‘real events’ (by which he means the myths and lies that have been shoddily assembled into the now armour-plated official narrative) continue to be believed in, then the ‘Industry’ that this belief has spawned in order to benefit Jews will stand regardless of the empty bleatings that articles such as this represent. Moreover, the article is worse than empty, as it contains within it sentiments that any Jew will relish, to whit, it lends its weight to affirming the official narrative.

    With friends like Mr Cook, the Palestinians are in need of no new enemies.

    • Agree: Carolyn Yeager, L.K
  14. John Hagan says: • Website

    I don’t believe in the superiority of any race of humans although I do believe that the manner of their upbringing and environment has a great effect on outcomes of thought, personality and inclinations. In such a regard I believe that presently the Chinese are devoting huge resources in education and the environment which will eventually pay great dividends. Meanwhile the US is falling well behind.

    I will come to the Jewish question shortly.

    [MORE]


    Meanwhile let us consider why the China may have long ago realized the importance of a structured society. The reign of Emperor Wen of Sui is considered a golden period in Chinese history with vast agricultural surplus and huge population growth.

    Education …The imperial examinations became the major path to office by the mid-Tang dynasty.
    Several construction projects were carried out during the reign of Sui including the famous Grand Canal. The Sui also contributed greatly in governance and administration with their reforms being continued during the reign of the succeeding Tang dynasty.

    Now taking a break from my trans gender equity studies and social justice concerns I am reminded of a quote: .“The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits.”(Albert Einstein). Presently it seems to me that Jewish equity studies are all the rage yet they must stand in the line behind all the other ‘equity’ studies. You all know what they are as they form the basis of most college degrees in the US. Should I be Jewish I should be appalled that Jewish equity studies even exist as an academic pursuit. That being a case where stupidity has no limits.

    This anti-Semitic and holocaust industries must be an embarrassment to anyone with an IQ above the temperature of a warm beer. Hands up those who agree!

  15. I wish the term anti-Semitic would fall by the wayside. It’s a term that should be applied to a language family which includes far many more Arabs than Jews. Just be straightforward and say anti-Jewish if
    that’s what you really mean. Do Jews realize they are digging their own grave in a climate where society is splitting into more opinionated camps by the day? I don’t think so, because they are too full of chutzpah, which will be their undoing. I really don’t want it to come to this, but it may be the case.

    • Replies: @G J T
    , @Anon
  16. @Trinity

    LMAO Unfortunately what you’re saying I believe is true. Calling all white goyim to Mars lol!

    • Replies: @Trinity
  17. noname27 says: • Website

    This isn’t even a double standard. I can’t find a word in the dictionary that conveys the scale and degree of hypocrisy and bad faith involved.

    Standard Pharisaical Jewish behaviour:

    Matthew 15:7 (MCV) Ye hypocrites, well did Isaiah prophesy of you, saying, 8 This people draweth nigh unto me with their mouth, and honoureth me with their lips; but their heart is far from me.

    Matthew 23:13-14 (MCV) But woe (a curse) unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye shut up The Kingdom of God against men: for ye neither go in yourselves, neither suffer ye them that are entering to go in. 14 Woe (a curse) unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye devour widows’ houses, and for a pretence make long prayer: therefore ye shall receive the greater damnation.

    • Replies: @gotmituns
    , @thotmonger
  18. For the world, the “virus of anti-Semitism” is worse than the COVID-19 one. The Zionist Israel lobby puts a stranglehold on the Western world, may it the U. S., Canada, Australia, Great Britain, France, Germany, you name it. The Israel lobby wages a political and cultural war to bring the political class in line with the Zionist Israeli narrative, which is criminal and against international law norms. Even the course of justice is perverted for the sole benefit of the Zionist state. How come that the world’s political elites march in lockstep with a criminal regime? In the future, to utter the name, Palestine or Palestinians will be criminalized.

  19. gotmituns says:
    @noname27

    I’m tired of hearing sayings from that book of myths.

    • Agree: Moi
    • Replies: @noname27
    , @davidgmillsatty
  20. TGD says:

    Photo below is of Israel “Defense Force” Lt. Colonel Shalom Eisner striking a boy from Denmark with the butt of his rifle at a demonstration in the West Bank in 2012. Because this act of brutality was photographed and because the lad was Danish and not Palestinian, the IDF was forced to threaten Eisner with prosecution. Eisner eventually plead guilty to a minor charge and received a sentence of community service. Is reporting of this incident antisemitic?

  21. Jamesburg says:

    The Semites originally from Middle East and not the European Jews are people as ordinary as anywhere else. Good, bad and ugly. The antisemitism word monopoly is brought or sponsored to the world stage by the Merchants of Diamonds and Merchants of human organs (Israelis).

    Like in previous comments on this site the suggestion to have an anti Semite alarm is an idea worth exploring to end the debate and put lot of “journalist” out of business and let them do some productive work. The device could be installed on streets and data could be stored on an antisemite server that could be shared with Israelis. AI will make it possible. A subject while walking walking on the street or passing through any checkpoint say an air port, would be flashed picture of Natanyahooooooo or Allan Dershowitz and the device would record person’s feeling. Bingo. The Antisemite debate would be put to rest for ever, hopefully.

    • Replies: @Wielgus
  22. G J T says:

    As predictable as the sun rising, whenever there is some sort of dissent within the “Jewish community” as it pertains to squashing the free speech of the goyim, it is not because it’s simply the right, moral thing to do. Nope, it’s because it’s actually bad for Jews. This is the extent of the divergence of Jewish opinion, forever and always. They simply disagree about what’s best for Jews, and how to go about getting it done.

  23. G J T says:
    @Brooklyn Dave

    If by “come to this” you mean overplaying their hand yet again and being 110’d the fuck out of my country, then I absolutely DO want it to come to this. The sooner the better.

  24. jimmydan says:
    @TGD

    A brave Talmudist soldier in line of duty protecting the great state of Israel with no borders or constitution.

    Use of word Talmudist should be as normal as using Buddhist, Islamist, Jihadist, Hinduist, or Christianistes.

  25. re: free speech about Islam
    When you read the Quran you cannot avoid noticing that Islam considers itself as totally above all other religions:
    – Islam is the only true religion, all the other religions must submit or be destroyed
    – Religious war for the submission of infidels (jihad) is a sacred duty for all muslims. And if a muslim dies in jihad he goes to the uppermost heaven with many virgins serving him.
    – An unbeliever has no rights against a muslim: the muslim is allowed to lie to him, to use violence, to take his things etc.

    So what are other religions supposed to think about Islam? Is this a religion you can live with? And the rule that muslims can take everything they want from other religions: doesn’t this look like an invitation to get rich at the expense of others ??

  26. Jonathan Cook is a brave and intelligent man.

    The issue, however, is not just Jewish use of a smear to silence their critics.

    It’s the fact that brave men and women do not do what should be painfully obvious…

    BE PROUD ANTI-ISRAEL, ATI-ZIONIST, AND ANTI-JEWISH TRIBAL MAFIA ACTIVISTS.

    • Replies: @frankie p
  27. noname27 says: • Website
    @gotmituns

    Anti-Christs do the Jew’s dirty work for them, whether knowingly or in ignorance.

    • Agree: G J T
    • Replies: @gotmituns
    , @Hillaire
  28. noname27 says: • Website
    @Question Mark

    ISLAM

    Islam was created by Rome circa 600 AC.

    Mohammed was groomed by Augustinian monks in North Africa and was married to an ex-nun 15 years his senior.

    This is why the Koran claims Jesus is a mere prophet, has an entire chapter dedicated to Mary/Mariam (Romish Mary worship) and the Pope is often seen kissing the Koran

    Muslims, like Papists, use and carry prayer beads.

    — Walter Veith video – PS PLEASE NOTE! I am not a Seventh Day Adventist!

    • Replies: @Moi
  29. Wielgus says:
    @Jamesburg

    What would happen if those tested in this manner vomited on the pictures? Would that count as a “maybe”?

  30. Wielgus says:
    @TGD

    I am shocked, shocked by the anti-Semitism implicit in trying to damage a Zionist gun butt with your face.
    And the guy’s name is Shalom. His intentions can only be peaceful.

  31. Marcali says:

    What about Anti-Bulgarianism?

  32. Anti-semitism?

    What about anti-goyism:

    “We Jews, we are the destroyers and will remain the destroyers. Nothing you can do will meet our demands and needs. We will forever destroy because we want a world of our own” (Maurice Samuel, “You Gentiles” p.155)

    Frankly I think the “Destroy the Goy” plan is upon us already. It’s called “The Great Reset”.

    “The Great Reset” = Tikkun Olam = Destroy the Goy?

    Something to ponder………

  33. Moi says:
    @Ghali

    Absolutely. We are all just animals compared to the Chosen.

  34. It ain’t being cheesy; allowed to organize in a host nation, they will always be our misfortune.

    –Chester Cheetah

  35. Moi says:
    @noname27

    I take it you’re not feeling well. Get better.

    • Replies: @noname27
  36. anonymous[299] • Disclaimer says:

    Christ was the biggest anti-semite there ever was. And he was the son of God.

    • Replies: @noname27
  37. gotmituns says:
    @noname27

    Here’s anything anyone has to know about God – Obedience to the laws of nature is obedience to God. Do that and you’ll be fine.

  38. Jews portray themselves as a high-minded and ethical people who function as the conscience of humanity. Why, then, do they keep managing to alienate their non-Jewish host societies?

  39. noname27 says: • Website
    @Moi

    What good fortune for you that there is no premium on ignorance.

    “An error does not become Truth by reason of multiplied propagation, nor does Truth become error because nobody sees it.”

    – Mahatma Gandhi

    “God has no religion.”

    – Mahatma Gandhi

  40. noname27 says: • Website
    @anonymous

    Not so, Jews are not Semites. Jews are Hamitic Shelahite Canaanites – see Genesis 38 or go here:

    Origins of the Royal Judahites and Canaanite Jews explained:
    https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/were-abraham-isaac-and-jacob-jews-genesis-38-royal-judahites-and-the-canaanite-jews-part-1-of-2/

    • Replies: @davidgmillsatty
  41. noname27 says: • Website
    @gotmituns

    I am far better than ‘fine’ whatever that means and what makes you think ‘nature’ is natural?

    • Replies: @Biff
  42. @Ray Caruso

    “…This article implies free men should not be allowed to speak truthfully about the “Prophet [sic]” of Islam, who, according to Islam’s own “holy” texts, was a robber, a rapist, a child molester, a sodomite, a torturer, an enslaver, and a mass murderer…”

    “…Faithful Moslems model their behavior after Mohammed, whom they consider to be the “Perfect Man” and “Seal of the Prophets”…”

    That is what I am saying here all the time, much to the displeasure of our Muslim readers.

    For more information on the crimes of that “perfect man” see:

    http://www.thereligionofpeace.com : Muhammad

    and: https://wikiislam.net : Prophet Muhammad: List of Killings Ordered or Supported by Muhammad.

    I consider both Islam and Judaism as rogue religions, intend on world domination, Islam by low IQ violence and Judaism by high IQ stealth.

    • Agree: 3g4me, Ray Caruso
  43. @TGD

    Why is that bald headed, short, nearly ugly, almost obese with a rag on his head allowed to hit a golden haired, tall, handsome, physically fit with a pretty scarf around the neck in the face?

    Money! Take away the ability to create and control fiat money and that mini-me mighty empire will come crumbling down like the Second Temple!

  44. anarchyst says:
    @JasonT

    You “hit the nail on the head”. Resisting the “chip” will be the only method to push back against our totalitarian state.

    One option may to bribe “chip inserters” and the medical profession to hand you the chip without insertion. You could then put the chip under a bandage, especially in situations in which the chip is needed to conduct commerce.

    Totalitarianism is being driven by big business which is doing the government’s “dirty work”. All one has to do is witness the number of big businesses who will not do business with those of us who refuse to wear the “face diapers” (face masks).

    The “slippery slope” is upon us, with questionable “vaccinations” being forced on us in the near future. Canada is already rolling out a program of vaccination “identity cards” which will allow admittance to certain businesses only for those who possess these vaccination “certificates”.

    The Canadian government is still insisting that they are not “forcing” the vaccination on anyone, but “encouraging” its residents to obtain vaccination certification in order to fully participate in Canadian society.

    If THAT isn’t coercion, I don’t know what is.

  45. @gotmituns

    According to the “laws of nature” the strong shall devour the weak. For confirmation, ask lions and sheep.

    • Replies: @gotmituns
  46. Biff says:
    @Question Mark

    When you read the Quran

    Skid Mark.

    Won’t be reading anything, much less your Talmud nonsense.

  47. geokat62 says:

    This isn’t even a double standard. I can’t find a word in the dictionary that conveys the scale and degree of hypocrisy and bad faith involved.

    CHUTZPAH!

  48. Biff says:
    @noname27

    what makes you think ‘nature’ is natural?

    How’s your basket weaving class going?

    • Replies: @noname27
  49. @gotmituns

    Talk about mythology. Imagine how we feel. Take this IQ test.

    Same or not the same?

    • Agree: Defcon
  50. @Carlton Meyer

    Not much makes me laugh, but this statement is so full of hypocrisy.

    Well, it’s not that ridiculous.

    Freedom of expression has never included defamation of character, and blasphemy law was intended to protect the character of figureheads central to religious nations (in the diasporic sense) bearing significant societal influence. In America, we’ve never had such laws, though there was once a “fighting words” exception to the First Amendment:

    https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/fighting_words#

    Fighting words are, as first defined by the Supreme Court (SCOTUS) in Chaplinsky v New Hampshire, 315 U.S. 568 (1942), words which “by their very utterance, inflict injury or tend to incite an immediate breach of the peace. It has been well observed that such utterances are no essential part of any exposition of ideas, and are of such slight social value as a step to truth that any benefit that may be derived from them is clearly outweighed by the social interest in order and morality.”

    Seven years later, the SCOTUS narrowed the scope of this definition, finding that “words which produce a clear and present danger are unprotected (and are considering fighting words), but words which invite dispute and causes unrest are protected (and are not considered fighting words).” In 1989, fighting words became “a direct personal insult or an invitation to exchange fisticuffs.”

    So there’s precedent for proscribing inciteful expression, which may very well have included speech considered blasphemous while Chaplinsky remained the precedent. Some hearken to a time when mutual respect for others’ religion (or lack thereof) was normative in America, which isn’t a bad thing at all.

    But legislating that respect is simply not possible. It has to arise from the will of people. Otherwise, it’s still coercion at the end of the day.

    • Agree: davidgmillsatty
    • Thanks: Trinity
    • Replies: @Hibernian
  51. anon[138] • Disclaimer says:
    @JasonT

    There is a concern that 5G base stations are easy picking, physically or via EM.

  52. Trinity says:
    @Carlton Meyer

    It is called common decency, JEW BOY. Unlike your Jew ass, I wouldn’t make it criminal I am just saying that I think people should respect others religion, SHLOMO Meyer.

  53. Trinity says:
    @TGD

    Well did the Danish kid stand there and let himself be dehumanized like this or did he at least try and knock the shit out of that POS who butted him a rifle. The kid looks young and reasonably fit and the Jew is an older guy with a gut hanging over his belt line. Knock the hell out of the bastard and see if he tries that shit again with a White man.

  54. gotmituns says:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    I asked and they have no problem with it. They didn’t even seem to know what I was talking about.

    • Replies: @davidgmillsatty
  55. @advancedatheist

    That pesky little thing called Jewish supremacy seems to have a need to cannibalized the host nation. I suspect if Israel ever had to support itself, the upper Jewish caste would eventually destroy the lower ones.

  56. Trinity says:
    @Brooklyn Dave

    Blacks and Jews CAN’T DO ANYTHING WHEN LEFT ALONE, THEY ARE PARASITES. Some freak on here the other day was bragging about the Jew/Israeli military. LMAO. Israeli military might? Hell when was the last time those bastards fought anyone without aid from the West?

    TRUTH IS TRUTH AND PEOPLE’S ACTIONS SPEAK LOUDER THAN WORDS.

    Why doesn’t every Jew in Europe, Australia, Canada, America, take their shit stirring ass to Israel if “anti-Semitism” is so bad? Hell, why should they, when they live like kings in White nations, their collective asses kissed by their own media every single day. The Jew is THE MOST PROTECTED AND PRIVILEGED CLASS IN EUROPE, AMERICA, CANADA, AUSTRALIA AND EVERYONE KNOWS IT, ESPECIALLY THE JEW WHO CRIES OUT IN PAIN AS HE STRIKES YOU. I thought Israel was created in 1948 for Jews to flee persecution and the joke called, “anti-Semitism,” yet, MILLIONS are still in White nations full of “nazis.” I mean, what the fuck?

    The negro is just as bad with his “racism” and “its because I am Black horseshit.” The negro receives jobs that he or she is no way in hell qualified for, someone else lower than the negroes job title has to do the work for the incompetent boob while he or she collects dey check each week. Look at Omar and AOC, I mean AOC is Hispanic but neither one of these 30 somethings are capable of running a McDonald’s restaurant and everyone knows it, hell they know it, but as long as these third world misfits gets dey check and power, they have no pride or conscious, no integrity, so they are willing to accept a job or position they know they are not qualified to do. Just like the white traitor trash coming up named Crooked Joe Biden. Biden is a WINO ( White In Name Only) hell, he walks and talks like a real wino, this freak is going to go up there in front of God and everyone and place his hand on The Bible and swear in as President of The United States and everyone with a double digit IQ know this shitheel was lucky to have received half the 80 million votes that (((they))) claimed Biden won. Third world and Jew behavior anyone? The White man used to be better than this but with WINOs like Biden, many Whites act and behave just like the Jew, the negro and the third world mongrels.

    • Agree: Defcon
    • Replies: @Non Sum Qualis Eram
  57. Oh, yeah, man, our condemnation of the Zionist enterprise can’t possibly have anything to do with its policies of mass theft and genocide, it must be because of an irrational hatred of Jews. You would think people would be able to see through that kind of hasbara.

  58. Jiminy says:

    You can bend the bough until it breaks, but then beware the backlash. People will take only so much, as we have seen in the U.S. where a popular figure such as Trump was elected from out of nowhere. And once a counter movement gains traction, middle ground will be hard to find. It will be a “them against us” scenario. It’s almost as if we are watching history repeat itself. And really it will only be the Jews to blame for what is brought down upon them.

  59. G J T says:
    @Ray Caruso

    I don’t want Arab Muslims in white nations either, for reasons that are self-evident. They are indeed both enemies of white Christians, but they do not represent an equal threat.

    Jews are, and have been for all of recorded history, an existential threat to not just white Christians, but anyone and everyone unfortunate enough to cross paths with them. They are the one eternal constant in the struggle against all that is unnatural and destructive. They are a demonic species who quite frankly can never be allowed to co-exist with other people or enjoy the same rights as other peoples.

    Muslims, at this stage of the game, are a threat only where Jews have made them a threat. Without the insatiable bloodlust Jews have for white Christians, Muslims wouldn’t be in white countries right now. Muslims can be contained far easier than Jews can, and as far as I’m concerned the Jewish problem is so severe that Muslims are an afterthought.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  60. @gotmituns

    Did you take the IQ test? It’s pass/fail.

    • Replies: @gotmituns
  61. This sort of thing predates the “holocaust” and Israel in the United States. Charles Lindbergh went from hero to pariah virtually overnight after his powerful September 11, 1941 speech at Des Moines on behalf of the America First Committee. While he stated he respected the Jewish people and understood their animosity toward Germany, he also said “the leaders of both the British and the Jewish races, for reasons which are as understandable from their viewpoint as they are inadvisable from ours, for reasons which are not American, wish to involve us in the war. We cannot blame them for looking out for what they believe to be their own interests, but we also must look out for ours. We cannot allow the natural passions and prejudices of other peoples to lead our country to destruction.” Lindy committed the unforgivable sin of speaking the truth, that “The three most-important groups who have been pressing this country toward war are the British, the Jewish, and the Roosevelt administration.” Lindbergh was relentlessly attacked in the media and by FDR, who ordered the IRS to audit his tax returns in retaliation. The Lone Eagle’s reputation remained in shreds until JFK courageously invited him to a White House dinner in 1962.

    As the Jewish Prime Minister of England, Benjamin Disraeli, observed long before, “The world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes.” Interestingly, Disraeli was able to get these forbidden words in print only by the subterfuge of putting them in the mouth of a fictitious character in one of his novels. Even Winston Churchill would acknowledge a century later that a “high Cabal” exists which makes the important decisions in world affairs.

  62. Defcon says:

    These Yiddish nomads have beating a dead horse for 75 years, zylcon-b must promote longevity, “survivors” are still coming out of the wood work. Oh wait, these new survivors are so because their parents and grandparents survived. As for these gas chambers, if cyanide was used, which there is not a single shred of evidence to support, everyone in the camp would have died. Here are some headlines about the 6 million: https://youtu.be/6jHe7OnFd5U

    • Agree: anarchyst
  63. @Trinity

    Personally, I am as pro free speech as it gets, but I think mocking or degrading another religion or religious figure should be OFF LIMITS

    So you’re not really for free speech.

    • Replies: @Trinity
  64. The unconscious is the discourse of the Other,” was, probably Jacques Lacan’s most astute psychoanalytical observation. It is the fear that the Other sees you truly, and in this case the Other refers to the gentile world of ethically driven anti racist humanists and truth tellers committed to peace and Justice from all across the spectrum. The so-called rise in antisemitism these days is actually an expression of collective Jewish guilt and the increasing fear among some powerful Jewish elites that they are being seen correctly. The more guilty (some) Jews feel, the more the rest of us are becoming anti-Semitic in their eyes. Jewish Guilt as such is the unbearable fear that the Goyim (non-Jews) know and Antisemitism is everything that raises this fear of being exposed. (Source: Gilad Atzmon)

  65. anarchyst says:
    @G J T

    Actually Islam is “judaism lite” made especially for Arabs and other middle eastern types.

    Both belief systems profess supremacy over others who do not share their beliefs…

    One divergence from judaism that Islam has (a good one) is the treatment and respect that it shows for Jesus Christ and his mother Mary.

    Jews consider Jesus Christ to be an “apostate, boiling in excrement for eternity” while his mother Mary “a harlot who conceived Jesus Christ with a Roman soldier”. It’s in the jewish talmud.

    Muslims consider Jesus Christ to be a “great prophet-not the “Son of God”, but a great prophet nevertheless” while his mother Mary is given a place of high honor, being specifically mentioned in the Qur’an.

    Now which belief system has a greater respect for Christianity? Hint: It isn’t judaism.

    I cringe when I see commercials for the “Fellowship of Christians and jews” begging for money for “jew boxes” for “poor holohoax (oops, I mean holocaust™ “survivors”).

    Despite conning the USA for 38 billion dollars per year (and much more for decades), they beg the stupid American Christian evangelicals for money for their “jew boxes”.

    Even Mike Huckabee is in on the scam, personally begging for “donations”…

    Sickening…

    • Thanks: Trinity, turtle
    • Replies: @anon
  66. @Question Mark

    A transparent effort to divert, distort, denigrate, disrupt, or destroy discussion of the Zionist assault on liberty that is manifestly far more immediate and pernicious than anything Muslims are currently doing in the west. Apparently, some assume that a perfunctory mention of the negative influence of Jews somehow absolves them of the charge that they’re effectively running interference for Zionism in their off-topic attack on Islam.

    They couldn’t be more mistaken.

    That said, I’ll address your falsehoods and let others verify for themselves what I’ve presented. I certainly don’t want anyone believing what I write just because I write it.

    [MORE]

    When you read the Quran you cannot avoid noticing that Islam considers itself as totally above all other religions

    It would seem unlikely for any religion not to stake a claim to superiority over others.

    Islam is the only true religion, all the other religions must submit or be destroyed

    False.

    As for those who don’t fight you for faith nor drive you from your home, God doesn’t forbid you from showing them kindness and dealing justly with them. Surely, God loves the just. [Qur’an 60: 8]

    Indeed, those who keep faith, and those who are Jews, and Christians, and Sabaeans, whoever keeps faith with God and the Last Day and does right, surely their reward is with their Lord, and there no fear shall come upon them, neither shall they grieve. [Qur’an 2: 62]

    They are not all alike. Of the People of The Book, there is a staunch community who recite the Revelations of God in the night season, falling prostrate. They keep faith with God and the Last Day, order their affairs by what is certain and avoid the dubious, and vie with one another in good works. They are of the righteous. And whatever good they do, they will not be denied the meed thereof. God is Aware of the responsible. [Qur’an 3: 113-115]

    Had Islam called for coercion in religion, not a single non-Muslim house of worship would have remained in any region administrated for centuries by Muslims. The existence of ancient churches, synagogues, and other temples in those regions is evidence that decisively puts the lie to your statement.

    Religious war for the submission of infidels (jihad) is a sacred duty for all muslims.

    1. There is no Arabic word that translates as “infidel.” Kafir is properly rendered “denier,” as in “one who recognizes the truth, yet denies it.” It does not refer to a person who lacks faith.

    2. In The Qur’an, God clearly commands the faithful to “Fight in the way of God against those who fight against you, but begin not hostilities. Certainly, God does not love aggressors.” [2: 190] Other verses that command the faithful to fight are conditioned upon the enemies’ aggression and the history of the early Muslims demonstrates that the aggression of Byzantium and Persia warranted a response. Elsewhere, as in Spain, Muslims were called upon by non-Muslim parties who sought their assistance in supplanting oppressive administrators with more equitable ones.

    And if a muslim dies in jihad he goes to the uppermost heaven with many virgins serving him.

    We do not say that martyrs die [Qur’an 3: 169] and the 70 virgins nonsense isn’t recognized in Orthodox Islam. It’s primarily a shi’ah conviction.

    An unbeliever has no rights against a muslim: the muslim is allowed to lie to him, to use violence, to take his things etc.

    In Medina, the Prophet established the world’s first federal constitutional republic, providing a guarantee of religious liberty and protection of personal and property rights to all Jewish tribes living under the aegis of Islam. With the Christians of Najran, a similar covenant was ratified well before Byzantium militated against the Muslim polity.

    Words attributed to the Prophet:

    “Whoever kills a person who has a treaty with the Muslims, shall not smell the scent of Paradise though it can be smelled from a distance of forty years.”

    “Beware, if anyone wrongs a man under the covenant of peace, diminishes his right, forces him to work beyond his capacity, or takes from him anything without his consent, I shall be his adversary on the Day of Judgment.”

    During the life of the Prophet, some companions sought to protect a Muslim thief from punishment and brought forward a Jewish man instead as the culprit. Thereupon God sent down verses 106-112 of Surah al-Nisa (4th chapter of The Qur’an) in defense of the Jew, urging people to be just.

    Though a bit rough around the edges, Wikipedia does fairly well when summarizing the justice meted out by Shuraih al-Qadhi (qadhi translates as “judge”):

    Another well known incidence records Ali’s shield being stolen. Ali recognised his shield when he saw it in the possession of a Jew. He instituted a claim in the court of Qadhi Shuraih who asked that Ali produce his witnesses to prove his claim. Ali presented his son and then his emancipated slave. According to Qadhi Shuraih the testimony of a son in favour of his father or an emancipated slave was not admissible, hence he ordered Ali to present another witness. When Ali was unable to do so, Qadhi Shuraih dismissed his original claim to the shield. Ali, the caliph of the time, emerged from the court cheerfully.

    On seeing this high degree of justice where the leader of the Muslim world could lose a case in the face of a just ruling, the Jew recited the Muslim testimony of faith and embraced Islam. He later presented the shield to Ali saying that he did indeed steal the shield and that it belonged to him. Ali responded: “I have made it a gift for you”. Thereafter the Jew remained perpetually in the company of Ali and was martyred in the battle of Siffeen.

    All of this information is available in our canonical source material, affirmed by Muslims throughout the world.

    Now … Where were we?

    Oh, yeah … “Antisemitism Claims Mask a Reign of Political and Cultural Terror Across Europe.” So what do you have to say on the matter?

    • Thanks: MrVoid
    • Replies: @Question Mark
  67. @Vox Australis

    …and to prevent any proper debate about Israel’s activities.

    Is that a euphemism for Israel’s crimes?

  68. @GeeBee

    Thanks so much for your comment. I never read articles by Jonathan Cook, but the title of this one made me wonder if it could be different. Needless to say I was disappointed, for the very reasons you state so well here. When will lefties understand that if they want to weaken the power of Jews, they have to give up their dependence on bad “Nazis” as an easy way to defend and obscure their own unsuccessful outcomes.

    True facts, freely spoken, science and actual physical evidence has to be believed over unverifiable weepy sob stories told by 90-plus year old jewish activists. Such people have no credibility. According to Jewish culture, in particular Eastern Jews, there is little to no barrier between imagination and reality. I wrote about it here: http://www.eliewieseltattoo.com/elie-admits-his-true-stories-never-happened/ Please take a look because it can profoundly change our understanding.

    I think I (and others) should do much more on this theme. It’s really the key to how Jews have succeeded in our once secure European world. The ‘Holocaust’ is a creation of Eastern European Jewry (such as Elie Wiesel) and their Zionist movement, and it is they who work so hard to keep it going. They should be made to answer for it.

    • Agree: Trinity
  69. Trinity says:
    @Kursk Salient

    I think I already answered this one above to some Jew by the name of (((Meyer.))) Would I throw someone in jail who didn’t have the common decency to know that it is wrong to blaspheme someone’s beliefs? NO, I would not make it a criminal offense but MOST people freed from Jew toilet humor wouldn’t be so fucked up in the head that they would find humor in mocking something someone else holds as sacred. I am not a believer of Islam but I respect that faith and other faiths whether they be Buddhists, Hindu, whatever. Plenty out there to mock without getting that personal. It seems that it is always (((ONE GROUP))) is ALWAYS behind the blaspheming of CERTAIN religious figures like Jesus and/or Mohammad, and NO, it isn’t atheists. I think once the Jew has his grip around China’s neck, Buddha will become mocked as well. Until then, I guess it is Jesus and Mohammad. Btw, sometimes I think I am more an agnostic than a true Christian, I WANT to believe their is a God, but hey, even Mother Teresa had her doubts. COMMON DECENCY and MOST humans don’t need a law to tell them what is right and what is wrong. When you have to have laws controlling every aspect of your life, welcome to Jew Land.

  70. @noname27

    The word is Lese Majeste. Judeo Lese Majeste. It is bad enough if it were only within the land of Palestine whom the modern Jews stole from the indigenous people. But with the Yinom plan and Pax Judaica, this hierarchy of privilege and enforcement of the monarch’s sanctity (as a faux victim!) is now a global problem.

    Overused, the weapon of “anti-semite!” has become dull; soon that harpoon will fail to stick into anything. Stained with so many lies and sins so great, god more than frowns at this modern Ahab…

    And as bacteria have learned to eat penicillin for lunch, so too are people of the world learning to eat the red herring “anti-semite” as they demand redress from Jewish high crimes and international power.

    But now to more important things:

    • Replies: @JM
    , @noname27
  71. @Carolyn Yeager

    Thanks, Carolyn. I couldn’t agree more. I’m always looking for your comments.

    • Thanks: Carolyn Yeager
  72. gotmituns says:
    @davidgmillsatty

    I don’t know why so many people are excited about IQ now. IQ isshit. The only thing that matters now is a good position, controlled breathing, bringing sights on 6 o’clock bull, taking up trigger slack and letting the round go at exactly the right moment, one round, one hit. The man who can do that the best will get the beautiful woman.

    • Replies: @davidgmillsatty
  73. The British State is a giant protection organisation for Jews and Israel, and against the British ethnic people and then other irrelevancies like Muslims. It’s unbelievable, totally shameless about it.

  74. Jimmy1969 says:

    Antisemitism and Racism is big business; whole careers are made out of it, from law firms, to personnel people in corporations, to whole categories of Government departments, to SJW and on and on and on. Good political weapon too. And of course editors love the Jews is news angle. It is always good for a lot of clicks.

  75. I might add that in the city of chicago, and for that matter, the state of illinois, it was tantamount to SUICIDE if one openly and loudly criticized AL CAPONE.

    You goy are still oblivious to the fact that YOU are being ruled over by some of the worst, most ruthless, immoral GANGSTERS that have walked this earth since the SANHEDRIN at the time of Christ.

    By the time you wake up, the razor will have slit YOUR throat.

  76. Anon[332] • Disclaimer says:
    @Brooklyn Dave

    By dropping anti Semitism for anti – Jew or anti -Judaism or anti – Israelism we open the flood gate of similar claimants from other races religions and countries

    . These replacements will become anti -Muslim , anti – Christianity, anti – Russiaism

    How could we allow this ? How could we remove the mysticism ? How could we deprive ourselves of the wealth generated by the smoke of shamanism ? We can’t .
    How could we become again non -Chosen people ?
    Our chosen ness was built with obfuscation, myth building and duplicity in ancient times and then destroyed by other claimants later , hundreds of years after .
    Years later we managed to rebuild this new privileges rights and powers unique to us , in the image of post -modernism
    We are facing same threat again .

    Cant allow this .

  77. niceland says:

    For the average person, eager not to listen to the “horrifying anti-semitic right wing”, this is powerful article and could even open few eyes to the ridiculous situation in Europe and elsewhere.

    Unfortunately the mainstream right is all too happy to participate in this game as most of the victims are from the left. The bigger issue of doing irreparable damage to free speech doesn’t seem to be their problem. Or they are unable to make the connection to their own issues in that regard.

    Thanks Mr Cook!

  78. Germany is a total failure for it’s own people but the majority doesn’t seem to mind. And of course, they have some very powerful people such as Klaus Schwab who appears to be one of the orchestrators of the Covid operation.

    Hitler set Germany up for what we see today; which is exactly what he was fighting which is so ironic, so he was the start of the demise of his own people.

    • Replies: @G J T
  79. annamaria says:
    @Jim Christian

    “It is internationally-recognized that Israel is an apartheid state…”

    — The problem is that Zionists have created apartheid states within the countries they dwell in. These apartheid states within the states — in the UK, France, Germany, the US — discriminate against everyone else but Jews for the benefit of Jews.

    The Holocaust Industry promoted a particularist, self-interested lesson that the Holocaust proves Jews are uniquely oppressed and that they, therefore, deserve a unique solution: a state, Israel, that must be given unique leeway by western states to commit crimes in violation of international law.

    The criminality goes beyond the suppression of Palestinians; the suppression has reached people in the western world. The zionists will not stop their dirty machinations due to a unique set of Jewish values where shamelessness and vindictiveness belong to the highest values.

    Making visible the historical records of Jews’ self-serving behavior against Spaniards, Russians, and Germans can be a remedy, but this remedy has been denied through the rigorous suppression of freedom of information such as the suppression of information about the role of Jewish Bolsheviks (and their American Jewish financiers) in the destruction of imperial Russia. In Russia, the Bolshevik revolution was followed by unimaginably brutal manslaughters in various parts of Russia (see Holodomor in Ukraine and Kazakhstan) and eradication of the intellectual flower of Russia.

    In Germany, the great genetic pool of western civilization was irreparably damaged by the financiers-imposed WWII and by the consequent humiliation of the German nation. Instead, the western world has been experiencing an imposition of the crooked thoughts of inbred activists of the Kristol family, the Kagans family, the Mielikovsly family, from Milton F. idiotic economic theories, and from various Madoffs and Maddows.

    We should never forget, though, that the supposed guardians of western countries have betrayed their people and western values for personal privileges and gains. Exhibit One is Dick Cheney.

    • Thanks: FLgeezer
    • Replies: @Sirius
  80. annamaria says:
    @Carolyn Yeager

    ” The ‘Holocaust’ is a creation of Eastern European Jewry (such as Elie Wiesel) and their Zionist movement, and it is they who work so hard to keep it going.”

    — The most active coauthor of holobiz myths was Ilya Ehrenburg, a bloody opportunist from the Soviet Union. https://zionistnarrative.wordpress.com/2018/01/01/ilya-ehrenburg-zionists-chief-propagandist/

    Son of a Jewish factory manager, Ilya Ehrenburg joined the Russian revolutionary movement in his youth. He remained a Communist Party member even when Stalin was purging Jewish “intellectuals,” having executed many of them. Although a communist, Ehrenburg always considered himself a Jew. Ehrenburg was a prolific writer, celebrated author of novels and other works of fiction. Ehrenburg was also the top Soviet propagandist during World War Two. Ehrenburg was a notorious liar, and a pathological monster. …

    As a leading member of the Soviet-sponsored Jewish Anti-Fascist Committee, Ilya Ehrenburg appeared at fund-raising rallies in the United States, as he raised support for the Communist cause. He displayed fake bars of soap, which he had alleged were manufactured by the Germans from the body fat of the corpses of dead Jews.

    Ehrenburg became most known for his viciously anti-German hate propaganda during World War II. Through his writings, Ehrenburg exhorted Soviet troops to kill all Germans they encountered without pity. In one leaflet entitled “Kill,” Ehrenburg incited the Russian soldiers to treat the Germans as subhuman: “The Germans are not human beings. From now on, the word ‘German’ is the most horrible curse. From now on, the word ‘German’ strikes us to the quick. We have nothing to discuss. We will not get excited. We will kill. If you have not killed at least one German a day, you have wasted that day … If you cannot kill a German with a bullet, then kill him with your bayonet. If your part of the front is quiet and there is no fighting, then kill a German in the meantime … If you have already killed a German, then kill another one – there is nothing more amusing to us than a heap of German corpses. Don’t count the days, don’t count the kilometers. Count only one thing: the number of Germans you have killed. Kill the Germans! … – Kill the Germans! Kill!”

    Just another hysterical proclamation against Amalek. No wonder Ilya Ehrenburg’s lies have been so popular among Zionists.

    • Agree: Kolya Krassotkin
  81. Sirius says:
    @Ray Caruso

    Your views of Prophet Muhammad are so warped and misinformed it is hardly worth responding to, but for one reason: the study of insane hatred and incredible ignorance arising from what appears to be a belief in an ethnoreligious identity.

    Jesus and Muhammad have much more in common than you can possibly ever know or believe, particularly the message of universalism and brotherhood. You can be sure Jesus did not believe in “white” Christianity. I would presume that by your racial definition, Jesus wasn’t even white himself.

    Do you define Christianity as some kind of ethnoreligion, just like the Zionists define their “Judaism”?

    If so, you’ve perverted your own religion as well as your extremely false understanding of Islam.

    • Replies: @Ray Caruso
  82. Petermx says:

    “Despite Germany’s horrific recent history of Jew hatred” You mean like when they made Jews into bars of soap and lampshades? That was admitted to be false by historians many years ago already but they lied again when they said it wasn’t true. They claimed it wasn’t a lie and said it was a mistake. Yes, that is what was said.

    Milquetoast articles like this will not solve the problem that Jews and Jewish power dominate the USA, Europe and all White (ethnically European) countries. The Jews were the founders and leaders of the most murderous ideology and country in the history of the world until that time, having tens of millions of Soviets starved and murdered. The Soviet gov’t was 80 to 85% Jewish and it outlawed Christianity and “anti-Semitism” (criticism of Jews), demonstrating they acted on their own behalf. Other European countries were fearful of this ideology and Jews strongly supported it, going against their own countrymen. That is why Jews were so widely disliked and only lies are holding the resentment in check for now. Every country in Europe, heading eastward from Germany is insulted with memorials to Jews, accusing Germans and all eastern Europeans of being “horrible” war criminals, when the biggest war criminals, the Jews themselves are treated like innocent angels. The Jews were the communist leaders and criminals in charge that tortured others, they also were the leaders in starting WW II and more than anything, they made it into the nastiest and bloodiest war in history with the hatred they pushed with their propaganda. Their power to escalate hatred has been on full display for the last four years in the USA, promoting ridiculous conspiracy theories (President Trump is a Russian spy) that hundreds of millions of people take seriously and they have spread hatred and violence across the USA.

    I think this could all change if the US is surpassed as the top military power in the world and even more so if the US economy crashes, weakening its power. American Jewry leads world Jewry and they would have to find another world power to undermine and take over. The entire narrative and history of the 20th century is a lie to elevate and protect Jews and to keep Europeans down.

    President Nixon on the Jewish media

    Russian President Putin – the first Soviet gov’t was 80 to 85% Jewish

    Historian David Irving on Jewish torturers in Hungary

    David Irving on German and Austrian Jews paying off Winston Churchill to “attack” Germany (starting from minute 35 to minute 45)
    https://archive.org/details/DavidIrvingChurchillsWarcomplete

    • Agree: Hiram of Tyre
    • Thanks: Robjil
    • Replies: @handydan
  83. GeeBee says:
    @Carolyn Yeager

    Many thanks Carolyn. It’s an uphill battle, but in spite of all we face in terms of Jewish control of every narrative, I still believe that we will open up deep cracks in their ‘wailing wall’ that is their holocaust ‘get out of jail free’ card (curiously enough, a term invoked by the unwitting Jew-serving poodle Mr Cook himself). In short, truth will out in course of time. This is especially so when the ‘normies’ begin to grasp the extent not only of Jewish power and influence, but of the multifarious ways in which this same power is directed against them, their families, their culture and their lives.

    Once ordinary people have grasped the extent to which malign Jewish influence has ruined these things, their anger will know no bounds. It can be done, and it must be done. We ‘bearers of the torch’ must never flinch in our determination to expose all that they have done to us in their aim of marginalising and eradicating our culture and our race.

    • Agree: Petermx
  84. G J T says:
    @freedom-cat

    Blaming Hitler for Germany’s (and the world’s) predicament today is beyond ridiculous, and the only way someone could do so is if they have a severe lack of knowledge of the situation before and during WWII, or they are running a deliberate smear campaign against the man.

    Hitler was not perfect, and certainly made some miscalculations, but why is it that he is always held to this impossible standard in all he did while he had the world’s most powerful military alliance and the whole of world Jewry throwing literally everything they had at him?

    Do you grasp the magnitude of what Germany had to overcome in the years after Hitler took power? And even still, if not for treasonous saboteurs within Germany Hitler very well may have prevailed. What Hitler did was and still is the most remarkable feat ever witnessed by a nation and its head of state. Full stop.

    Hitler was the only powerful political figure then, and since, who had the will and the ability to stand up to humanity’s foremost enemy and put them back in their place, if only for a limited time. Everything that is wrong with western civilization today, all the evil that has come to characterize what is left of white Europe and the rest of the Anglo-sphere, Hitler fought with everything he had, until his last breath, to prevent. To lay the blame for the misery and destruction world Jewry has inflicted upon us at the feet of Hitler is nothing short of disgraceful.

    • Disagree: freedom-cat
    • Replies: @Robert Dolan
  85. anon[350] • Disclaimer says:

    The essence of Jew-supremacist “antisemitism” is human rights.

    https://www.ohchr.org/EN/countries/MENARegion/Pages/ILIndex.aspx

    Human rights will end the criminal enterprise of Israel. Israel refuses to interpret its human rights commitments in good faith in furtherance of its plan and program of extermination. This is a crime against humanity – legally, what Nazis do. And we’re going to have to deal with these new Nazis the same way. The Zionazi command structure in Tel Aviv will escalate its crimes until it’s firebombed like Dresden (most likely with a few well-aimed nukes.)

    As the US bleeds legitimacy, it turns on Israel as a scapegoat (read Giraldi.) Jewish antisemitism mass hysteria is an attempt to control other national elites and save the regime’s skin. Zionazis everywhere have adopted the state religion of Israel, a primitive culture of shunning and mobbing to promote group cohesion and genocide.

    The antidote to atavistic Zionazi mass hysteria is Article 19 and General Comment 34,

    https://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/hrc/docs/GC34.pdf

    and Article 20 and General Comment 11, which prohibit Israel’s Jew-supremacist death cult
    [HRI_GEN_1_Rev_9(Vol_I)_(GC11)_en.pdf]

    General comments are important to counter illegal Jew-state human rights distortion:

    https://ccprcentre.org/ccpr-general-comments

    This body of law is the key to freeing brainwashed Jews from their primitive Israeli state religion and bringing them back into the civilized world.

  86. cranc says:

    That is Haaretz’s way of saying that antisemitism has been politicised and weaponised.

    This is my problem with the Left’s position on this matter : that they cannot honestly admit that Jewish identity itself is a locus for political organisation. Not ‘Israel’, but Jewish people in many countries, getting involved in politics – in the wider sense, to promote, defend and further the interests of Jewish people in general. From the perspective which does admit this fact, ‘antisemitism’ has always been politicised, as it is the only way of countering pro-semitic politicking. Any political force must have its counter force unless it is to take over the entire world. This is why so many warned of the Jews getting their own nation state : the religious nature which drives the determination of their particular exceptionalism knows no bounds. It would make more sense to the Jew of conviction to see the entire world destroyed than any kind of compromise.

    The Left have no answer to this conundrum. They are principled enough not to want harm to come to ordinary Jews who are for the most part as oblivious to the true nature of Jewish power as the average gentile, but they are not principled enough to ask what lay behind the fanaticism of Zionism or why Jewish organisations around the world are quite keen to subvert societies without end.
    All the Left really implicitly offer us is to let the Jews sort it out amongst themselves, with the hope that the ‘Good Leftwing Jews’ can overcome the far larger contingent of powerfully embedded ones in the Universities, government, the media and the financial centres of the world. The truth of the situation though is that the US antisemitism tsar was celebrating with Chabad Lubavitch’s crowd the other day. The truth is that the likes of Owen Jones promises us a ‘rational, educational conversation about antisemitism’ featuring (and only featuring) three Leftwing Jews (!).

    It was Corbyn’s trajectory which woke me up to this issue, led me to Atzmon, and all the rest.
    If the Left want a renewed Universalism, they need to reject Jewish identity per se, as it is fundamentally and intrinsically counter to Universalist principles. It has wrecked their whole program since the mid 19th century. There are no ‘chosen’. End of.

    • Replies: @geokat62
  87. @G J T

    Hitler tried to save his country and his people from a Jewish/communist takeover…..the very same evil we are facing today.

    My father and both of my uncles fought in WWII, saw action, engaged in combat, put their lives on the line, not knowing that organized Jewry would forge ahead and wreck the entire western world.

    Hitler was actually the last hope to save Christendom.

    Trump was never really in the game.

    • Replies: @Cohen
  88. Markmat says:
    @Question Mark

    I thought the subject was Antisemitism however, some angry Talmudist or their loyal followers turned it into comparative religion discussion.
    All religious books are written by men. So women are 2nd class citizen.
    All religions claim to be peaceful which is B.S. Religions may be peaceful but leaders are A.H with no exception.
    When Talmudist propagandize about other religions specially about Islam that was not very well know in the west, they took advantage of lack of knowledge of the western population of Islam. Therefore, for Talmudist it had been easier to have cool aid for their victims. But now with changing world through migration people are learning more about each other and all these made up BS is getting exposed. I got a kick of one of Talmudist or his supporter writing phrases like Capitalist Jihadist. Very creative.
    So what about words like: Talmudist, Merchant of Diamonds, Merchants of Human trade, Inventors of trade of Human Organs Protectors of Master Race. and Certified and Permanent Victims.

    • Replies: @anon
  89. geokat62 says:
    @cranc

    If the Left want a renewed Universalism…

    Humans are tribal. Universalism runs counter to this fundamental reality of nature…

    “You may drive out nature with a pitchfork, yet she’ll be constantly running back.” – Horace

    Let’s return to our senses and re-embrace ethnic-majority homelands.

    Diversity Is A Strength was a Big Lie perpetrated by the usual suspects. Just look at the multiculti in London and Paris and see that this is a colossal mistake. Or, better yet, look to the walls surrounding the Zionist Entity.. they clearly do not want to be culturally enriched like JSOs have done to The West.

    • Replies: @cranc
  90. R2b says:

    When you mess with religion in this way, as is the result of a state called ”Israel”, you get what you deserve!
    Religious people are complicit.
    And other, by not acknowledging, that religion, and in this case, Christianity, is the ultimate reality!
    You have what you deserve, once again!
    The lie that is ”Israel” and the poor ones, inhabiting stolen land on heretical base, on an blasphemous act that is unprecedented, is what terrorises the world.
    Its the devils freak-show!
    Now they have you wearing masks.
    Stand in absurdly long ques.
    Not going to Church.
    Unt so weiter, nazi-style.
    The calvinist-puritan movement is in collusion with freemasonry and kabbalistic jews.
    They brought us this!
    Rise up people.
    Go to Church!
    Pray to our Lord Jesus Christ.

    • Replies: @davidgmillsatty
  91. @Trinity

    Muslims should not even be in White nations. If this were the case, there would be no need to discuss the ins and outs of blasphemy against Muhammad, as all but a very small number of people would even want to blaspheme against Muhammad, why would they when Muslims and Islam are out of sight and out of mind. Hell, I doubt most people had even heard of Islam when the Occident was homogeneous.

    Multiculturalism is just not conducive to free speech, as different groups feel threatened by each others’ true intentions. Left-wingers like Jonathan Cook are pretty hostile to the interests of European peoples, you can see this by the way he uses the expression ‘anti-racism’ in a positive tone in this article and others. In fact, there are good and bad reasons to be antagonistic towards Israel, and the likes of Cook are antagonistic for all the bad reasons, namely that they perceive the evil ‘white’ colonists to have gone to Palestine, ethnically cleansed the area and settled there en mass. Israel is basically a newer version of America for these left-wingers, and one which unlike America has not thrown open its borders and does not actively seek to undermine Judaism.

    What opposition to Israel should really be based around is its extreme meddling in the politics of Western nations and its stranglehold on Western foreign policy which has besmirched our name the world over. What opposition should not be based on is Israeli racism against Palestinians, as this is nothing special. If the Israelis can support themselves in their hegemonic designs, then let them, but America and other allied nations should not be drawn in like what happened in Iraq and Syria.

    Jewish power represents the last ‘white’ ethnocentric institution in the eyes of leftists, they could not give a damn about British people being displaced in their homeland and would cry racism and ruthlessly suppress those who oppose this (while hypocritically supporting Palestinian militants, in their armed opposition to invaders)

  92. tomo says:
    @but really

    No – psychopathy is more relevant here
    The only difference between a psychopath and a narcissist is that the former genuinely does not care at all if other people like him.
    Narcissist do care.
    Considering this ‘culture’ as a psychopath is actually based on the premise that ‘everyone hates us – and we hate everyone !’ – psychopathy is a perfect diagnosis here.
    It also involves fake charm, lots of acting (while turning everyone against their victims behind the victims’ back AND while pretending they are victims’ best friend no less)…
    plus most psychopaths love if they could at the same time somehow appear to look as some kind a ‘victim’ as they perform their behind the scenes terror against their victims (they are also masters of dehumanizing the same victims),,,
    It’s a perfect description and diagnosis of most of these people individually and especially collectively – psychopath – as a ‘culture’ is an accurate way to describe them

    Best books on the subject I know of (all can be found for free on pdfdrive.com) are:
    Without Conscience by Robert Hare ( the inventor of psychopath test)
    The Sociopath Next Door by Marta Stout and of course
    Jewish History Jewish Religion, the Weight of Three Thousand Years by Israel Sahak

  93. Hillaire says:

    I think it would be fair to say the jews are not a race a religion or even a historical people, just another criminal cult somewhat like the assassins and thuggees, who have honed their criminal enterprise to such a degree, that the entire world is now their racket . If they can’t buy or bully you they will bury you.

    That such a despicable group is the arbiter of contemporary western democracy should only serve to confirm the notion that the west is in fact not worth saving.

  94. Cohen says:
    @Robert Dolan

    How many Jews are in US armed forces specially in combat?
    How may American Jews have served in Israeli armed forces at different positions?.
    How may Jews are in Banking and Financial services?
    How many in Congress and State Department
    How many Jews are in Academia?
    How many in Law profession?
    How many in Medical profession?
    How many in Hollywood
    How many in Media
    And what is their concentration in each of the above mentioned.
    And what percentile they represent of the population in US and UK.

    In USSR THE JEWS WERE ONLY 5% OR SO BUT HELD MORE THAN 80% OF TOP POSITIONS.
    And we were told that were persecuted by the Soviets

    and Dont give the excuse that everyone of them is an Einstein. I have met many who were dumb as stumps. The tribe takes care of each other.

  95. @annamaria

    The most active coauthor of holobiz myths was Ilya Ehrenburg, a bloody opportunist from the Soviet Union.

    An interesting extract from Joachim Hoffmann’s Stalin’s War of Extermination 1941-1945, regarding Ilya Ehrenburg and the (in)famous six million figure

    [MORE]

    • Thanks: annamaria
  96. Hillaire says:
    @noname27

    The jew is inversion personified, they are the offspring of the temple harlots of antiquity, desert outcasts forever at war with the true creator.

    The original merchant spies, masters of lies and sacrificers of children they wander the earth exploiting the nations.

  97. frankie p says:
    @Truth Hurts the Liars

    Jonathan Cook stands up for SOME moral and ethical righteousness, but at the core he is like his buddy Phil Weiss at Mondoweiss, still most interested in the welfare of his own people, the Jews. He does NOT loudly call out the rampant control of western governments by Jewish capital and agents of usury. He does NOT call for a complete halt of ALL aid, military and otherwise, to the apartheid state of Israel, where if I am not mistaken he resides. I have never heard him call for a one man one vote democracy in the lands of Palestine, which of course would result in a Palestinian majority. He is controlled opposition; he looks brave and intelligent, but he seeks to keep critics from crossing certain red lines like the ones I mentioned above.

    • Replies: @annamaria
    , @L.K
    , @Skeptikal
  98. @AnonStarter

    re:
    It would seem unlikely for any religion not to stake a claim to superiority over others.

    Maybe you should have a look at some Indian religions – f. ex. Budddhism. The way I understand Buddhism is that it grew out of of a technique (meditation) which tried to find truth in the inner world of emotions (=images) and thoughts (=words). And what I noticed in India is that Indian Bouddhists generally like their own religion best but they will never try to convert a non-believer. On the contrary in my North-African travels I have always noticed that when you let yourself be drawn into a discussion with Muslims the only thing that interested them was to convert you. Independently from all soft-spoken arguments these are facts that I have verified myself. BTW the few contacts I had with Indian Sikhs have also left me with a very tolerant impression.

    re:
    As for those who don’t fight you for faith nor drive you from your home, God doesn’t forbid you from showing them kindness and dealing justly with them. Surely, God loves the just. [Qur’an 60: 8]

    Yes, those “who don’t fight you for faith” are accepted – but they will have to pay tribute won’t they?
    And if they don’t want to pay tribute then they will be forced to won’t they?

    re:
    “Whoever kills a person who has a treaty with the Muslims, shall not smell the scent of Paradise though it can be smelled from a distance of forty years.”

    The same thing again: Those “who have a treaty with the Muslims” are again accepted – and could a treaty be a treaty to pay tribute? What if another religion has no special treaty? Will it be attacked? Countries who have a muslim “minority” are apparently always in danger of violence (Kashmir, Thailand, by now most of the northern half of Africa etc)

    I believe that your oh so peaceful arguments mostly refer to situations where other religions have submitted to the Muslims. But religions who do not submit or who are not strong enough to defend themselves are not shown any lenience. This is what history shows in India, North Africa and by now a very large part of Africa.

    re: Now … Where were we?
    Oh, yeah … “Antisemitism Claims Mask a Reign of Political and Cultural Terror Across Europe.” So what do you have to say on the matter?

    In this matter I agree completely with this article. The Zionist lies and parasitism are horrible to contemplate. But I am not sure that they will succeed. Christianism had the strength to resist in Spain (1000 years ago) and I believe the “Deplorables” are beginning to understand who their enemies are. But I also believe that a previous article in the unz.review touched a deep truth when it said (I’m giving my own formulation here because I don’t remember the exact words) “… it will take a long time and drop by drop unhappiness will fall upon the soul and by Gods grace will slowly awaken wisdom and understanding”. It is my feeling that the human mind works like this.

  99. handydan says:
    @Petermx

    Where the beef? I like the title of a site about Elie Wiesel.
    Wiesel was awarded a Nobel Peace Prize at the request of US Congress and became the Director of US Tax payer funded Holocaust Museum in Wash. DC, once put a one page ad in NYT to bomb Iran to promote world peace.
    The site questions about Wiesel tattoo from Auschwitz concentration camp that he failed to show, however, provided documentation of fictitious number like A—-666??? May be tattoo was erased while he took showers with soap made from Jews fat in Germany. Soaps from fat of Super Race

    This guy always wore full sleeve shirts in public.
    Any Talmudist or Evangelist willing to take a stab at this question? as public service.

    The Master Race idea was conceived by Count Richard Von Coudenhove-Kalergi an Austrian and Japanes mixed race in his book Pan Europa in 1923. The project was of funded by bankers like Rothchild and friends. First conference on Master race was held in 1926. Members like Einstein and Sigmund Frued attended.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_von_Coudenhove-Kalergi

    • Agree: Petermx
  100. Sirius says:
    @annamaria

    Ah the redoubtable Dick Cheney. Any self-respecting society should have charged him with Crimes Against Humanity by now. He’s been an exceptional example of a war criminal. It seems he got away with it all.

    There are also plenty of examples of his war profiteering, but that would fill a much larger list of crimes.

    He and his pals also got away with the much smaller crime in the outing of a CIA agent, Valerie Plame. The US system doesn’t even enforce its own rules if you’re a member of the privileged elite, unless you’re a whistleblower like Snowden. The rule of law has failed.

  101. anon[138] • Disclaimer says:
    @anarchyst

    Actually Islam is “judaism lite” made especially for Arabs and other middle eastern types.

    “Actually”, you are a moron.

    Given that fact, is it perhaps too much to ask you to start outlining this analog transposition between the doctrines of Judaism and Islam? Think beer and lite-beer. You can do that, right?

    Islam is a vigorous expression that correctly points out that “there is no religion before God but submission”.

    Is this not, in “fact”, a fact? What sort of a “god” would be submitting to the desires of IT’s creatures? Again, for the moron, think Mom, Dad and infants with diapers. Can you do that?

    So, as a matter of “fact”, ALL religions require “submission” to God. See, ALLAH catches the miserable-at-heart by making statements that the True-At-Heart read correctly. Morons needs not apply. (ALLAH has quite a bit to say about morons, btw. As Jesus said, “no one can save a fool”.)

    As to the “type” of creature that the Lord of All that Exists has directed ITS one and only direct “Lecture” (A meaning of the word Qur’an) to “All Creation”. Think other planets, even an entirely distinct cateogory of creatures, moron. There is, “actually”, even an entire Sura about that topic.

    Can you comprehend that?

    Islam is the Religion for the entirety of Creation. In Toto. It is the Religion of Angels. You will come to ‘know’ this.

    Curtain time is when “Space is Folded” and the Spirit of Lies and Destruction is brought, Submitting, to the Lord of The Universe.

    Got it?

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  102. anon[367] • Disclaimer says:

    “We can never forgive you for making us kill your children.” – Golda

  103. The great Brother Nathanael nails it once again.


    • Replies: @geokat62
  104. anarchyst says:
    @anon

    Your name-calling exposes you as a jew or hasbara troll.

    I have more respect for muslims than jews because muslims DO respect the founders of Christianity to a much greater degree than jews.

    Jews are two-faced and pretend to respect Christians as long as the shekels keep flowing.
    Evangelical Christians are stupid for hitching their cart to judaism.

    This whole concept of “judeo Christianity” that Protestants adhere to should be put on the trash heap of history.

    Sad to say that post-Vatican II Catholicism also adheres to judeo-Christianity–a big dogmatic error.

    Shalom, anon

  105. annamaria says:
    @frankie p

    Mr./Ms. ‘frankie p,’ you are quick to accuse Jonathan Cook (his real name) of cowardice, whereas you post your accusation under a ridiculous pseudonym. What’s your point?

    • Replies: @frankie p
  106. @Trinity

    Why doesn’t every Jew in Europe, Australia, Canada, America, take their shit stirring ass to Israel if “anti-Semitism” is so bad?

    I’ve always been under the impression that when someone runs towards the people they loathe, with the insistence on being closer to them, it’s a malicious act of envy.

    After all, genuinely oppressed people typically want to distance themselves from their oppressors, do they not?

    If there was a nation where Whites could live exclusively among Whites, ruled exclusively by Whites, and exclusively in the best interests of Whites, I rather suspect that there would be few if any Whites anywhere else.

    And that, of course, is why there is not a single piece of land left anywhere on this planet where Whites are allowed to have such a bastion of self-preservation and prosperity. The envious need their cash cows and cannon fodder.

  107. E_Perez says:

    Despite Germany’s horrific recent history of Jew hatred,

    Although I admire the courage of Mr. Cook, phrases like this show that he is from Cuck-Island (no pun intended).

    Like most of his compatriots, he has still not understood that the situation he descibes in this article is exactly what his grandfather was fighting for and what the NS Germans in their ‘horrific recent history‘ wanted to avoid.

    • Agree: L.K
  108. Antisemitism claims are the ultimate pilpul.

  109. geokat62 says:
    @Priss Factor

    The great Brother Nathanael nails it once again.

    Like a fine wine, BN keeps getting better with age…

    Concluding remarks to, The Huge Democrat Party Coup:

    My fellow Americans, China is not the enemy.

    It throws you off the scent from spotting the inner coup.

    The enemy is within my friends.

    That enemy is the Jew.

    My only wish is that Rick Wiles of TruNews would stop throwing Americans off the scent by playing the chicoms card first played by Alex Jones… very disheartening!

    • Replies: @Priss Factor
    , @Tucker
    , @Paul C.
  110. @Question Mark

    Maybe you should have a look at some Indian religions

    Maybe you should reconsider what I wrote again.

    You wrote, “When you read the Quran you cannot avoid noticing that Islam considers itself as totally above all other religions,” attributing strictly to Islam a characteristic that is endemic to all religions. Were it otherwise, no religious adherent would assert or affirm a perspective that he — by virtue of enjoining it — holds as superior to others.

    [MORE]

    Your grievance isn’t about a fact that applies to all religions, but rather, the manner in which you personally observed some Muslims attempt to convert you. Indeed, there are Muslims who make this effort, though in truth, we’re not commanded to missionary work:

    Call to the way of your Lord with wisdom and good counsel, and reason with them in the better way. Indeed, your Lord is best aware of him who strays from His way, and He is Best Aware of those who go aright. [16: 125]

    This is often construed as license to proselytize, an interpretation that arose as a response to Christian missionary inroads throughout the millennial (old) Muslim world. Originally, it was understood as an imperative to invite to God by one’s good conduct, not a command to convert the masses.

    Example: A Muslim may console a Christian who is notably discontent with his poverty by appealing to the wisdom of the Gospel, perhaps alluding to Matthew 6:25-34. Alternatively, the circumstances may warrant enfranchising the Christian with a skill or capital sufficient to alleviate his concern and precipitate gratitude. This all depends upon the people involved.

    Yes, there is a formal element of invitation assigned to a professional class utilized at the discretion of an amir, but this is quite distinct from what you describe.

    Yes, those “who don’t fight you for faith” are accepted – but they will have to pay tribute won’t they?

    Tribute would be levied were the prevailing party non-Muslim as well, and in the early Middle Ages, Europe either kept its non-Christians in ghettos (Jews) or didn’t tolerate them at all. You’re more than welcome to produce an example in which a percentage of personal wealth was not exacted from a government at any time in human history. Happy hunting at that.

    Historically, the jizyah paid by non-Muslims living under the auspices of Islamic government was recirculated into their communities, providing for their commonwealth. Exempting them from military service and guaranteeing protection of their life, property and liberty, it was an infinitesimal sum compared to the sales, property and income tax as currently levied by local, state and federal governments. In fact, even European serfs gave less of their excess production to overlords than we do to our current governments.

    What if another religion has no special treaty? Will it be attacked?

    A treaty is an agreement that arises out of a desire for peace between two otherwise distinct and disparate polities. Inherent to your question is the implication that a polity doesn’t desire such peace with Muslims. This doesn’t suggest it will be attacked, though the fact of rejecting comity is certainly cause for caution.

    Countries who have a muslim “minority” are apparently always in danger of violence

    America has a Muslim minority yet no perceptibly sustained violence motivated by Islam. Same with Australia, South Africa, and Guyana, to name but a few. Your statement, as such, is meaningless.

    But religions who do not submit or who are not strong enough to defend themselves are not shown any lenience.

    There are more than a few who chose to fight Muslims rather than accept their protection. Some of those perished, as would be expected in any war, but those who survived still received that protection, so no, this statement is false on its face.

    This is what history shows in India, North Africa and by now a very large part of Africa.

    No, it isn’t.

    Had Islam mandated that no lenience be shown to non-Muslim communities subject to Muslim rule, not a single Hindu temple, church or synagogue would have remained in any of the countries you list. Yes, there were some houses of worship which fell prey to extremists. By and large, however, this was not the case.

    In this matter I agree completely with this article.

    Thanks.

    • Replies: @Question Mark
  111. @GeeBee

    You raise some good points, though I don’t think it prudent to dismiss Mr. Cook’s article wholesale. Even if the narrative of Jewish suffering during World War II is significantly distorted or exaggerated in many respects, using the events as a shibboleth by which to determine one’s legitimacy in other matters is merely the corollary of Holocaustianity’s priestly class condemning individuals to perdition for the sin of academic inquiry and analysis.

    Given the overwhelming militancy of that de facto religious hierarchy in promulgating its dogma, it should come as no surprise that many are reticent to deviate from it. The issue of criminalizing academic liberty — which relates to the subject of free expression expounded upon in this article — is the angle of attack we should take. The fact that, in the 21st century, people have languished in prison for the “offense” of exercising that liberty is unconscionable.

    This is the battle that must be waged and won first. Until this is accomplished, challenging the official narrative will continue to bear the stigma of moral turpitude.

    • Replies: @GeeBee
  112. @advancedatheist

    Jews need to antagonize their host nations in order to elicit the natural backlash known as “anti-Semitism”. Without it, they would eventually get absorbed into their host nations, as almost happened to the Jews of Germany before Hitler came to power.

    Most nations have natural boundaries to delineate and separate themselves, like the Pyrenees separating Spain and France. Jews use hatred as their mental boundaries to do the same thing in their host nations.

    • Replies: @JM
  113. frankie p says:
    @annamaria

    Ms. Annamaria,

    Huh? I didn’t accuse Jonathan Cook of cowardice! I accused him of gatekeeping. I admitted that he was a strong critic of Israel, but that there were lines that he never crossed, and the reason is that he is ultimately interested in protecting the privileged position of Jews in western society and even in Israel, as long as Israel will be the Israel he wants it to be.

    As to my point, reread my comment. There’s nothing about cowardice. Everything that Jonathan does is planned. I believe that he genuinely wants a “two state solution” or some other impossible dream, but what he doesn’t want is for the Jews of Israel to lose control of that nation, or their huge funding from Uncle Shmuel to keep their military advantage over their neighbors, even distant neighbors like Iran. I do want the Jews of Israel to lose Palestine; I want the Palestinians to gain their nation. He is one of the ones who will call out someone like Alison Weir from If Americans Knew as an antisemite because she appeared on a radio program where an admitted antisemite appeared.

    These guys, he and Phil Weiss, need to come out and admit that antisemitism isn’t a problem, that it’s a tool used to enable Jewish misbehavior, both in Israel and in the west. They need to take strong positions; they need to join Gilad Atzmon.

    • Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert
  114. “It’s a trick. We always use it.” — Shulamit Aloni as spoken to Amy Goodman.

    Jonathan has covered everything, including the fact that Zionism depends on antisemitism for its very existence.

    Figures like Klein have been so focused on tackling criticism of Israel from the left, including the Jewish left, that they have barely noted the “acute danger Jews in Germany face due to the surge in far-right antisemitism”, the letter argues.

    Because Zionist love real antisemites; they encourage aliyah.

  115. JM says:
    @thotmonger

    Welcome to the new Vaudeville…already.

  116. JM says:
    @Hamlet's Ghost

    Which begs the question as to what all this obnoxious effort is ultimately about…establishing and defending a definite social and economic role in Gentile society.

  117. anon[251] • Disclaimer says:

    Thank God for The Unz Review, where no such censorship exists! Viva Ron Unz!

    May there be many “bad Jews” and “bad goyim” alike willing to push back against this tyranny and depose the usual suspects with authority.

    Funny thing is, I never posted to Unz until every conservative website cucked and banned me or censored me.

    The end result on censorship is not going to silence anyone, its going to drive people together elsewhere where the censors and propaganda delivery agents have no control..

    Only Ron Unz held the line.

    • Agree: AnonStarter
    • Thanks: Orville H. Larson
  118. cranc says:
    @geokat62

    Humans are tribal. Universalism runs counter to this fundamental reality of nature…

    I agree that humans are tribal, and that this is a fundamental reality of human nature, and I would agree that it is a key tenet of Leftism to deny this fact. I am not sure that it is the only reality pertaining to this question though, and ask, ‘Is there not some aspect of ‘human nature’ that wants to recognise what is common to us all?’ . Can we say that all of history’s impetus toward universal ideals has been the result of the machinations of Jewish supremacism?

    • Replies: @geokat62
  119. “ZERO TOLERANCE FOR ANTISEMITISM”
    — Subtext:
    100% tolerance for anti-Whitism.

  120. @frankie p

    #1 “…I believe that he genuinely wants a “two state solution” or some other impossible dream…”

    #2 “…I do want the Jews of Israel to lose Palestine; I want the Palestinians to gain their nation…”

    Please explain how #2 is less an “impossible dream” than #1.

    • Troll: L.K
  121. Ram says:

    Labour Party is now Occupied territory just as the Conservative Party is. Some BBC underlings of the “tribe” are involved in an effort to de-fund the Canary.

    • Agree: annamaria
  122. noname27 says: • Website
    @Biff

    How’s your ability to provide an argument going? Non-existent by the looks.

  123. noname27 says: • Website
    @davidgmillsatty

    Nonsense. Khazars were ethnic Turks who converted to Judaism = religious Jews, not ethnic Jews.

  124. noname27 says: • Website
    @thotmonger

    Jews are vehemently anti-monarchy, hence the assassination of Charles I of England and Scotland; followed by the assassination of the Louis XVI of France and all his family plus all the French nobility. Add to that the same regicide in Russia – and all of it at the hands of the Jews.

    On the English Civil War:

    “No English lawyer could be found to draw up the charge (against King Charles I), which was eventually entrusted to an accommodating alien, Isaac Dorislaus (A Dutch Jew).” (All brackets mine) –

    — Hugh Ross Williamson from his book “Charles and Cromwell”

    “It was fated that England should be the first of a series of Revolutions, which is not yet finished.”

    — The Jew, Isaac Disraeli, father of Benjamin Disraeli, British Prime Minister.

  125. @Question Mark

    re:
    Your grievance isn’t about a fact that applies to all religions, but rather, the manner in which you personally observed some Muslims attempt to convert you.

    “Superior” is a slippery word – it can mean “this religion must be master over all the others”. I believe that this is what you mean by it. It can also mean “this religion is what suits me best in practice because I asks me to live in a way that I like” – this is (more or less) my understanding of the Buddhist thought.

    re:
    There are more than a few who chose to fight Muslims rather than accept their protection. Some of those perished, as would be expected in any war, but those who survived still received that protection, so no, this statement is false on its face.

    Look at the “protection” the survivors of the conquest war receive in North Africa: the most valuable regions belong to the conquering muslims, the surviving “berbers” are restricted to a few mountainous and difficult regions and they are not allowed to practice their own ancient religions.

    Look at the way that Islam expands in Nigeria: Boko Haram certainly is a remakable protection for the Christian population.

    In general I think that Islam rules by conquest and violence which you call “protection” and I don’t accept your arguments because the few examples of “peaceful” muslim minorities that you were able to find are not very representative because it is obvious that muslims must necessarily lay low as long as they are a small minority. But when they become more numerous – beware.
    For me this subject is closed – the only point where we agree is about Zionism and the article is about Zionism after all.

  126. Tucker says:
    @geokat62

    As soon as I saw someone post a comment about Rick Wiles boasting about having children in his family who had succumbed to the jewish White Genocide agenda of race mixing, I deleted the bookmark to his website and stopped downloading any of his podcasts.

    The most frustrating aspect to observing the growing number of White news podcasting activists who appear to be Red Pilled on the JQ – is how many of them fail to look at themselves in the mirror and realize how much damage has been inflicted upon them and their families and then honestly acknowledging that it is a consequence of the war the jews are waging on the White race.

    I mean, for crying out loud – how can someone claim to be red pilled on the JQ and then not express a little bit of anger over the fact that his own flesh and blood were brainwashed the jews to submerge their White European genes under the continent of Africa?

    Miscegenation spells death and the extinction of White European mankind. There are only two types of creatures who celebrate that. The jews who are behind promoting it and White imbeciles who are too stupid and gullible to resist the racially suicidal brainwashing and refuse to go along with their own species extincti0n.

    • Replies: @geokat62
  127. geokat62 says:
    @cranc

    Can we say that all of history’s impetus toward universal ideals has been the result of the machinations of Jewish supremacism?

    Of course, not. While Western societies have developed humanistic principles over the centuries, they were still compatible with the notion of distinct relatively homogeneous homelands. It was Jewish supremacism that capitalised on these noble principles that were turned into kryptonite in their hands.

  128. geokat62 says:
    @Tucker

    Miscegenation spells death and the extinction of White European mankind. There are only two types of creatures who celebrate that. The jews who are behind promoting it and White imbeciles who are too stupid and gullible to resist the racially suicidal brainwashing and refuse to go along with their own species extincti0n.

    Very well said!

  129. It seems one needs to sign up with mewe.com to see the pic.

    https://mewe.com

    I’m banned from facebook and twitter, so mewe works.

  130. @AnonStarter

    re:
    Your grievance isn’t about a fact that applies to all religions, but rather, the manner in which you personally observed some Muslims attempt to convert you.

    “Superior” is a slippery word – it can mean “this religion must be master over all the others”. I believe that this is what you mean by it. It can also mean “this religion is what suits me best in practice because I asks me to live in a way that I like” – this is (more or less) my understanding of the Buddhist thought.

    re:
    There are more than a few who chose to fight Muslims rather than accept their protection. Some of those perished, as would be expected in any war, but those who survived still received that protection, so no, this statement is false on its face.

    Look at the “protection” the survivors of the conquest war receive in North Africa: the most valuable regions belong to the conquering muslims, the surviving “berbers” are restricted to a few mountainous and difficult regions and they are not allowed to practice their own ancient religions.

    Look at the way that Islam expands in Nigeria: Boko Haram certainly is a remakable protection for the Christian population and especially so for the young girls.

    In general I think that Islam rules by conquest and violence which you call “protection” and I don’t accept your arguments because the few examples of “peaceful” muslim minorities that you were able to find are not very representative because it is obvious that muslims must necessarily lay low as long as they are a small minority. But when they become more numerous – beware.
    For me this subject is closed – the only point where we agree is about Zionism and the article is about Zionism after all.

    • Replies: @AnonStarter
  131. GeeBee says:
    @AnonStarter

    challenging the official narrative will continue to bear the stigma of moral turpitude.

    I cannot for the life of me see how attempting to spread what, to those of us who have studied the matter carefully, is a self-evident truth can be conflated with ‘moral turpitude’ (or have I missed something regarding the American founding fathers, who employed that very phrase somewhere if I recall.)

    • Replies: @AnonStarter
  132. @JasonT

    I think this microchip insertion meme is just bullshit. I can see a chip with a power source implanted in the brain doing things, but a chip implanted under the skin without a power source can’t do anything. Even if it gets power via the nerve impulses, it’s in a location that can’t be considered a command center.

    The whole AI thing is way overblown. I’m a professional software developer and I understand the limits of what software can do. AI is just the app writing its own decision tables. The code that gives it that ability is written by some developer and it is his design that says how effective the AI can become. AI is not going to take over the world.

    • Agree: annamaria, TheTrumanShow
    • Replies: @JasonT
  133. Paul C. says:
    @geokat62

    I’m afraid Rick Wiles and TRU News is controlled opposition.

    Chuck Middleton, a Christian YouTuber, put together this video to highlight how satanic Jim Bakker and many of these TV Evangelicals are. They’re all (((controlled and funded))) 100%. To my surprise at the 12:30 mark is Rick Wiles sitting on the couch. No respectable Christian would have anything to do with a charlatan like Jim Bakker. But this tells me he’s likely under the same (((management))).

    It was also revealed that Rick made a $15k donation to a synagogue who protested and got fined for ignoring the mask mandate. While I support anyone who is pushing back against the criminal mask mandates, does Rick’s Christian donors know where their money is going?

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  134. anon[228] • Disclaimer says:

    NEW YORK —

    “I think it’s a mistake to believe that Iranian officials… are interchangeable cogs in a machine who have no personal aspects that are irreplaceable,” Elliott Abrams said in an interview with The Times of Israel last week.

    Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, whom Abrams said was “ahead of the curve” when he recognized the dangers of the Iran nuclear agreement and lobbied against its signing in 2015. Now, as President-elect Biden gears up to reenter the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action deserted by Trump in 2018, Abrams issued a last-minute warning, while appearing to take solace in the belief that the “maximum pressure” campaign against Iran that he helped orchestrate to bury the JCPOA will be difficult to undo.

    In defending the practice of targeted assassinations in Iran, Abrams first cited the January killing of Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps commander Qassem Soleimani, for which the US has taken responsibility, claiming that the late general was responsible for both past and future attacks on American forces in the region.

    https://www.timesofisrael.com/trumps-iran-envoy-its-a-mistake-to-believe-iranian-officials-are-replaceable/

  135. anon[228] • Disclaimer says:

    Now blaming America for assassination will be fine with EU but not blaming Israel for assassination .

    Blaming USA for destroying JCOPA will be heartily accepted by EU but blaming Israel or diaspora Jews like Abrams for pressurizing and actually making it a success will not be endorsed by EU .

    Accusing America of ties to evangelical religion as reason is fine but ties of theses people from FDD or Likud to Zionism as reason is not fine .
    Explaining US behavior as product of misguided American exceptionalism is fine but blaming Israel for dream of biblical Eretz Israel is not .

  136. Hibernian says:
    @AnonStarter

    No right is absolute. There are always limits.

  137. @Question Mark

    “Superior” is a slippery word – it can mean “this religion must be master over all the others”. I believe that this is what you mean by it.

    Based on your understanding of what it means to “be master over all the others,” you’re entirely incorrect.

    Like Zionists, you expend a lot of effort on the anti-Islam bandwagon cherry-picking “evidence” in order to confirm your bias. Exceptions to the general rule do not a rule make. Were we to define every religion by its extremists, not a one would come out clean.

    Yours is as pedestrian an argument as it gets, evincing a woeful lack of historical knowledge.

    • Replies: @Question Mark
  138. @GeeBee

    I cannot for the life of me see how attempting to spread what, to those of us who have studied the matter carefully, is a self-evident truth can be conflated with ‘moral turpitude’

    Neither can I.

    The point here is that, by compelling the legal proscription of said academics, Zionists have stigmatized it as something morally objectionable. As such, removing those legal fetters is of paramount importance in eliminating that stigma. It’s a line of attack behind which historical revisionists and free speech advocates should be throwing their entire weight.

    • Replies: @GeeBee
  139. anon[165] • Disclaimer says:
    @Markmat

    Prophet of Islam interacted with Jews and expelled sizable number of them .He judged them with standard and their jurist and killed them because that what the Jews arrived at as justice . His life was attempted many times by these Jews but he did nit kill them for that .He killed them because they fought against his nascent community, conspired to support enemies and they broke the treaties . “kill the Jews” was in response to these sorts of behaviors not because of what they believed. He never forced them to convert He allowed them to even pray in Islamic places .

    Jews hate him because they couldn’t kill or crucify him .

    Today common citizen- muslims hate them .So they go and threaten the kings or bribes them from Morocco to UAE . Then the Zionist also talk of democracy -being only democracy- things like that . I know a thug who also preaches bible on the street corners and makes some extra money. He always reminds me of these Talmudist .

    911 and Iraq war propelled America to attack Iraq and spread democracy Both ruses were provided by Zionist. They benefited and USA got wounded warriors , trillions in debt ,and total breakdown of the society . Smiley Zionist tell Americans that they did not follow each and every cook book rules given to them by the Jews .If it did ,USA would have looked like Aleppo today . I am sure they whisper values of Islamo -Judaism in the ears of Moroccan kings .

  140. GeeBee says:
    @AnonStarter

    Thanks. I seem somehow to have misinterpreted what you were saying. I agree very much with your reply clarifying the matter.

    • Thanks: AnonStarter
  141. Norman Finkelstein said in an interview that the consistently vile behavior of Zionist Jews and the Israeli state – and western media and politicians kowtowing to them and treating them like they are above criticism – results in “antisemitic” statements about the duplicitous nature of Jewish power and influence becoming verifiable statements of fact.

    He used Alan Dershowitz as an example. The man is a deviant sex criminal, defamer and all-around revolting creep who nonetheless gets treated with utmost respect by the media and frequently appears as a guest on news and current affairs broadcasts. If he was not a liberal Jew who shills for Israel would he still get treated with such reverence? Highly unlikely.

    • Replies: @davidgmillsatty
  142. L.K says:
    @GeeBee

    GeeBee,

    Great posts, particularly your #13!

  143. L.K says:
    @frankie p

    Good points, Frankie P.

    The attacks by “annamaria” were uncalled for… then again, she has trouble dealing with criticism of her idols…

    Besides, ain’t “annamaria” an Internet handle as well?

    Regards.

    • Replies: @annamaria
  144. @Trinity

    A pampered golden retriever ought not run in the middle of a pack of attack trained dobermans.
    Collate this with IDF’s shoot to cripple policy, etc. etc.

  145. JasonT says:
    @RoatanBill

    Passive microchips are already used in pets for tracking purposes, and this technology is old. At the very least, it is already possible to implant microchips in people, monitor those chips with ubiquitous cell towers and satellites, and use computer programs to synthesize all of that data. It would be relatively simple, even now, for a program to compare locations of such chipped people to a database of where they are allowed to be and dispatch drones (or police but who needs police when you have drones) to the chipped people if the are not where they are supposed to be.

    Even with yesterday’s technology microchips are an effective control mechanism. In the next decade, both the software and hardware are bound to become even more effective. Eventually, batteries will be small enough and every baby will be chipped in their brain or other location. In 10-20 years you will have a fully functioning borg society.

    You forget that the people in charge of Western society have been at this project for a long time. A few decades is not much longer to wait, and the technology to implement this program is only going to get better.

  146. @JasonT

    The chips in animals require a device near enough to supply power via a coil, much like smartphones can charge by just resting on a device and not plugged in. It’s the transformer principle. Without power, the chip can’t transmit.

    A satellite can’t supply power over a wide area to just light up a few chips. That this could be done is real enough, but that would essentially make the entire environment a microwave oven. I’ll admit that 5G and 6G are heading in that direction now.

    Anyone stupid enough to get chipped deserves what he gets. That the technology can eventually do as you’re suggesting I’ll agree with, but we’re not there now and won’t be there for quite a while yet. In the interim, the US will disappear like a bad smell. Its days are numbered.

    • Replies: @JasonT
  147. @Trinity

    “Well did the Danish kid stand there and let himself be dehumanized like this or did he at least try and knock the shit out of that POS who butted him a rifle. . . .”

    Well, the answer to your question, I think, is that the other IDF POSs would have recognized the threat the unarmed Danish man represented–and shot him dead.

    • Agree: L.K
  148. @JasonT

    Microchip implants in people, not just pets, is already in use:

    https://www.npr.org/2018/10/22/658808705/thousands-of-swedes-are-inserting-microchips-under-their-skin

    These are first steps. Who knows where this will lead to if allowed to continue?

  149. When I read occupation of Palestinian land I cannot but disagree. There are “disputed” areas at most (in UN language). Furthermore, Zahir Muhsein, PLO direction member said in an interview dd march 31, 1977 to the Dutch daily Trouw: “The Palestinian people does not exist”, then can anyone explain how a non-existing people can lay claims to anything?

    • Replies: @AnonStarter
  150. @AnonStarter

    Re:
    cherry-picking evidence & woeful lack of historical knowledge

    We do not have a communication because our ideas of “truth” are different. For muslims it seems that “truth” means following the teachings of Islam – and if these teachings say that you must lie to unbelievers you stick to that against all evidence. This is a feeling I’ve had each time when I let myself be drawn into a discussion like this one. For Christians “truth” has nothing to do with religion but is simply defined by observable and provable facts – the same approch as in mathematics or science and I’ll stick to that.

    • Replies: @AnonStarter
  151. @R2b

    “The calvinist-puritan movement is in collusion with freemasonry and kabbalistic jews.”

    Another possible interpretation (since I am as Calvinistic as it gets since he is considered to be the founder of Presbyterianism and I was raised Presbyterian) is that what the Protestants are beginning to realize is that a couple of their ideals have not worked, freedom of/from religion, being one of them.

    They now realize that the country they founded has been taken over by Jews and Catholics who are far better organized than they are, and that their ideal of freedom of/from religion was a serious mistake, just as their ideal of “no-standing-army” turned out to be a serious mistake and recognized very early on.

    The Protestant right (not to be confused with the Christian right) supports Israel, but not because of the rapture. That is just a cover. They support Israel because Israel is an apartheid country and it works. They clearly see the benefits. Israel builds a wall; Protestant America wants one two. Israel doesn’t want its non-Jewish inhabitants having any rights and it seems to appear that that is the only solution to self preservation. The Protestants see the situation as a threat to their self survival and less than ideal things have to be done survive. They look to South Africa to see what their future will be if some degree of apartheid does not happen here.

    And in actuality, some Presbyterians supported BDS, at least for a while, and have been rebuked for it. I don’t know where Presbyterians stand on the issue today.

  152. @Squarebeard

    Not only that, but Dershowitz has a decidedly Jewish interpretation of all Constitutions both federal and state which were written by Protestants. Catholic jurists like Alito, like to put their Catholic spin on the original intent of the founders as well and on state Constitutions.

    It has been quite some time now since a Protestant was on the SC. And it is quite interesting that Trump who is marginally Protestant, picked three Catholics for the US SC, all of whom just stabbed him in the back.

    Protestants would view standing much differently. They like to have evidence presented for jury consideration. Standing is easy if you are inclined to look at the four things that are necessary for standing: a case, a genuine disagreement among the parties, harm, and the court’s ability to compensate for the harm or prevent it.

    The first two elements of standing are obvious.

    There was plenty of harm in the legal sense: the President can veto legislation, the President can do things by Executive Order, the President can prioritize things that legislation requires him to do, the President can move some funds to things he prefers and not spend it on others, and of course his VP is President of the senate.

    And of course the US SC could issue an easy remedy. Decertify the results based upon illegal ballots.

    US Protestants got fucked again by Jewish and Catholic interpretation of the Constitution. This is a silent religious war.

    • Replies: @Hibernian
  153. @gotmituns

    Apparently you did not understand my IQ test then. Go back and look at it.

  154. @Question Mark

    This is a feeling I’ve had

    Feelings do not constitute a scientific approach.

    Funny how my opponents always trip themselves up like that.

  155. El Dato says:

    There will be no record of what was lost. There will be simply an empty space, a blank slate, where discussions of Israel’s crimes against Palestinians once existed. What you will hear instead is only what Israel and its partisans want you to hear. Your ignorance will be blissfully complete.

    China will have complete files.

    Talking of files, why am I getting requestsdemands to help cancer-striken children in Israel on YouTube?

    I mean, it’s sad for the kids but didn’t Israel receive a holocaust (in the correct, literal sense) of USD 30 billion under Literally Hitler Guy with no strings attached? Apparently they are not spending it on social programs if the need goy to pony up more dollars.

  156. @René Fries

    There are “disputed” areas at most (in UN language).

    The UN has never used such language.

  157. annamaria says:
    @L.K

    I do not do ‘idols.” I simply recognize decency and courage from pretense.

    • Replies: @L.K
  158. JasonT says:
    @RoatanBill

    It looks like we are in agreement on the principles. The time window is to be debated but I think 10 years is likely.

    As for being stupid enough to get chipped, we may eventually have the choice between getting chipped or getting dead.

    • Agree: Liza
  159. MMiller says:

    Jewish American groups have always demanded Americans recognize the Holocaust.

    So then what did they do?

    They turned around and got together with Turkey and Israel to say that the genocide of Armenian Christians by Turkey was not a genocide.

    Israel still does not recognize the Armenian genocide.

    What hypocrites.

    • Agree: Ray Caruso
  160. Anti-Semtism is Hate-Speak used denigrate all who refuse to glorify the shooting of pregnant Palestinian saints in the stomach by the thieves occupying Palestinian land and their associated Tel-Aviv tee-shirt line “one shot two kills”

  161. anon[228] • Disclaimer says:

    Israeli Defense Minister comes under fire for comments about sharing Jerusalem as a capital
    BY NEWS DESK 5 HOURS AGO 0

    BEIRUT, LEBANON (12:00 P.M.) – On Thursday, ministers and members of the Knesset (the Israeli parliament) attacked Defense Minister Benny Gantz, after his statements about sharing the city of Jerusalem as a capital for a Palestinian state. The newspaper Israel Hayom reported on Thursday that Gantz was subjected to a fierce attack by some ministers and members of the Knesset, against the background of his remarks…” AMN News

    Yesterday’s radical ideas become today’s normal . The ultra racist colonial position becomes today’s accepted given fact and is embraced by the liberal establishment . People are called terrorists who challenge and resist the created facts.

  162. Skeptikal says:
    @frankie p

    I don’t know whether Jonathan Cook is Jewish or not.

    I am quite sure Cook lives in Palestine—that is, in a village in the West Bank or somewhere in the Occupied Territories.

    Actually, whether he is Jewish or not is not that relevant unless one takes the racist view that one’s thoughts are determined by a putative racial or ethnic profile.

    As Malcolm stated: “I’m interested in the truth, and I don’t care who says it.”

    • Replies: @frankie p
  163. frankie p says:
    @Skeptikal

    “He does NOT loudly call out the rampant control of western governments by Jewish capital and agents of usury. He does NOT call for a complete halt of ALL aid, military and otherwise, to the apartheid state of Israel, where if I am not mistaken he resides. I have never heard him call for a one man one vote democracy in the lands of Palestine, which of course would result in a Palestinian majority.”

    So deal with the truth in my post. I never criticized Cook as being a Jew; rather, I called him out on
    what I see as his half measures to deal with the problem. He is much like other American Jews who call for a fair resolution of the I/P issue but refuse to address the issues that contribute to the appalling situation that exists there, that is nonstop western military, financial and political support driven by Jewish control of western politicians. Additionally, why not call for a one-state, one-man-one-vote nation?

  164. Hibernian says:
    @davidgmillsatty

    Catholic jurists like Alito, like to put their Catholic spin on the original intent of the founders as well and on state Constitutions.

    All of our institutions are rooted in Catholic Europe. England was Catholic for 1000 years.

  165. @Sirius

    Jesus Christ and Mohammed have nothing in common. Jesus Christ was the Son of God, while Mohammed was the type of false prophet the Son of God warned against. Mohammed was a robber, a rapist, a child molester, a sodomite, a torturer, an enslaver, and a mass murderer, while Jesus Christ lived a sinless life. Mohammed’s crimes are attested by the Moslem “holy” texts, the Koran and Hadith, which must be why you didn’t bother to deny them but just wrote that risible claptrap. Islam is an ideology of brutality, ignorance, and irrationality, and all its adherents are a reflection of that fact.

  166. @TGD

    That liberal brat had it coming. I am a White Christian, and as is true of all rational and historically literate White Christians, I understand BOTH Jews and Moslems are our enemies. If our enemies are fighting one another, no White Christian has any business getting involved unless it’s somehow to escalate their fight, which was surely not the intent there.

    Pretty White boys are the number one sexual fantasy of male Moslem subhumans, nearly all of whom are sodomites. I wouldn’t be surprised if that twerp went to “Palestine” precisely with that in mind. If that was indeed the case, I only regret the Jew was so gentle.

  167. L.K says:
    @annamaria

    I do not do ‘idols.”

    BS.

    The other case where I recall you becoming hysterical was when some folks criticized Colonel Lang, who does deserve a lot of criticism indeed.

    • Replies: @annamaria
  168. annamaria says:
    @L.K

    Well, I certainly do not belong to your camp and am content with that.
    Both Unz and Lang are people of the highest caliber. They are not only highly intelligent and knowledgeable but they stand firm for their principles. Yes, I do respect them and wish there were more men like Ron Unz and Colonel Patrick Lang.

  169. Mike K. says:

    >the real events of the Holocaust

    … Because Jews have allowed the goyim a great deal of space to freely and openly discuss all of history, and especially the 6 Million…

    A figure lacking robust support but alone of all numbers in history – can not ever, ever be doubted.

    Ever wonder if maybe, just maybe, judeophobia has stemmed for more than 2000 years from Jewish behavior toward others?
    https://www.unz.com/article/the-holy-hook/

  170. @Trinity

    jews and blacks taught me to hate them.

  171. Miro23 says:
    @JasonT

    The only hope is if enough people wake up AND become brave enough to take action before the above happens.

    Not going to happen. For example the German public who didn’t support Hitler (plenty) were cowed into silence and didn’t engage in public criticism. The resolution was external through the Soviets smashing their way into Berlin aiming for Hitler’s bunker.

    The corollary in US terms would be the collapse of the Jewish NWO resulting from the military defeat of the USA – not unimaginable. And likely over much faster that WW2.

    • Troll: SolontoCroesus
  172. @Trinity

    Thank you; excellent comment. I agree completely.

  173. The next stop for the terror is America.
    What Trump began, Biden will see through to fruition.

  174. Anonymous[795] • Disclaimer says:
    @Paul C.

    Most conservative websites have been taken over by hardcore Zionists and hasbara. The most extreme example is Free Republic. It’s really amazing how these red-state American gentiles are so willing to go to war for Israel, or even just Israel’s geostrategic interests, yet their own country and civilization is being systematically dismantled before their eyes and at most they bitch about voting out RINOs and AOC.

    But one pattern I see on both Free Republic and in red-state America is how they’ve all formed their identity around their service in the U.S. military (“the professional military”). As E. Michael Jones has said, the military is the greatest tool for deracination. In the last 20 years we’ve seen how the TPTB have used media, sports, politics, entertainment, et al., to raise military service and veterans to the point of veneration. This has really boosted the military’s effectiveness as a tool for deracination.

    When I was growing up our dads were WWII veterans who fought in the Battle of the Bulge or on Omaha Beach or Iwo Jima. They’d never talk about it and you’d only learn of their past at their funerals. It’s rare to meet a veteran today, even ones who spent their military service CONUS doing make-work jobs at Fort Sam Houston or Wright-Patterson AFB, who don’t let you know within the first 10 minutes of conversation that they are a veteran.

    There is a whole military culture that TPTB manipulate and make compliant through phony patriotism and an over-the-top veneration of military service. And for the vast majority of lower-IQed enlisted military they quickly realize it’s to their benefit to identify themselves through their military service. This identity even extends to family members expanding the deracination.

  175. Jett Rucker says: • Website

    The main inspiration for anti-Jewish feeling today is measures undertaken to combat anti-Semitism.

    It’s good business for those designing and implementing such measures.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Jonathan Cook Comments via RSS
PastClassics
Our Reigning Political Puppets, Dancing to Invisible Strings
What Was John McCain's True Wartime Record in Vietnam?
The major media overlooked Communist spies and Madoff’s fraud. What are they missing today?