The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 TeasersiSteve Blog
World Jewish Congress Persuades Mark Zuckerberg to Have His Facebook Social Media Network Ban References to Jews "Controlling Major Institutions Such as Media Networks"
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

From The Forward:

Facebook banned stereotypes of Jewish global domination. Has the move satisfied Jewish groups?

Ari Feldman August 13, 2020

What finally pushed Facebook to announce it would take down posts that make reference to Jewish control of the world, or that include “caricatures of black people in the form of blackface” — two forms of hate that are well over a century old?

Was it the letter, sent August 5, from the attorneys general of 20 states to Mark Zuckerberg, telling the company to do more to prevent hate content and abuse on its platform?

Was it the open letter, published August 7, from more than 120 Jewish organizations urging Facebook to adopt an internationally known definition of anti-Semitism, and to take down posts that meet the definition?

Was it the ad boycott begun this summer, led by the Anti-Defamation League and the NAACP, that saw major multinational companies sign on in support and even led to a brief dip in Facebook’s stock price?

According to Facebook, none of the above.

The idea of banning content that promotes stereotypes of Jewish global control came up a year ago, in a meeting with several Jewish groups convened by Facebook, and was pushed primarily by the World Jewish Congress.

“We applaud Facebook for its leadership and hope this move will be a guiding light for other social media companies to follow,” Ronald Lauder, president of the Congress, said in a statement to Jewish Insider about Facebook’s update.

It took a year to come up with what Facebook calls an “operational policy” on Jewish global control because of the policy deliberations, wordsmithing and data and image analysis involved, said Jordana Cutler, Facebook’s head of policy in Israel and a liaison to Jewish diaspora groups: determining which images and statements will be impacted and identifying offending memes to look out for. The process was also slowed by the pandemic, as people on the team shaping this policy focused time on Covid-19 misinformation.

The site now officially bans content that references “Jewish people running the world or controlling major institutions such as media networks, the economy or the government.” …

In a statement, Daniel Elbaum, the AJC’s Chief Advocacy Officer, called Facebook’s new policy “a step in the right direction and reflective of our ongoing conversations with Facebook officials in the United States, Europe, and Israel.”

 
Hide 80 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. Good, I say. What did years of babbling about this online ever accomplish?

    • LOL: AnonStarter
    • Replies: @BenKenobi
    @JohnPlywood

    You're walking in the desert, and you see a tortoise flipped over on its back. What do you do?

    You're sitting at home and you see a wasp crawling on your arm. What do you do?

    Do they keep you in a box when they aren't using you. Cells. What's it like to touch fingers with a love one? Interlinked.

    Within cells interlinked. Why don't you repeat that for me three times?

    Replies: @The Wild Geese Howard, @Owen C.

    , @Richard B
    @JohnPlywood


    What did years of babbling about this online ever accomplish?
     
    Abe Foxman, is that you?

    There you go again Abe. Asking questions as if they can't be answered.

    The answer, obviously, is that our #1 obligation in life is to live in reality.

    And an important part of that reality today is Jewish Supremacy.

    Proof of that supremacy is found in the power they have to effectuate their insane demands to be placed above criticism, loved unconditionally, and blindly obeyed.

    , @anonymous
    @JohnPlywood

    For some, this babbling exposed somewhat hidden threads and allowed them to get a clearer picture of the entire tapestry. Is having a better understanding of reality so bad?

  2. Mark Zuckerberg stated that the idea of Jewish global domination is “ridiculous,” as he unilaterally silenced all who would discuss the topic.

    • LOL: JimB
    • Replies: @Unladen Swallow
    @Cloudbuster

    Where have we seen something like this before? like Eisner when he was CEO of Disney personally firing Gregg Easterbrook for saying Jews dominated the entertainment industry perhaps, no irony there.

    Replies: @anon, @HarvardSqEddy

    , @Bard of Bumperstickers
    @Cloudbuster

    Oh, it's just RAINING shoes. Straight outa "1984" doublespeak. Bears repeating:

    "Doublethink means the power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one’s mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them. The Party intellectual knows in which direction his memories must be altered; he therefore knows that he is playing tricks with reality; but by the exercise of doublethink he also satisfies himself that reality is not violated. The process has to be conscious, or it would not be carried out with sufficient precision, but it also has to be unconscious, or it would bring with it a feeling of falsity and hence of guilt. Doublethink lies at the very heart of Ingsoc, since the essential act of the Party is to use conscious deception while retaining the firmness of purpose that goes with complete honesty. To tell deliberate lies while genuinely believing in them, to forget any fact that has become inconvenient, and then, when it becomes necessary again, to draw it back from oblivion for just so long as it is needed, to deny the existence of objective reality and all the while to take account of the reality which one denies—all this is indispensably necessary. Even in using the word doublethink it is necessary to exercise doublethink. For by using the word one admits that one is tampering with reality; by a fresh act of doublethink one erases this knowledge; and so on indefinitely, with the lie always one leap ahead of the truth. Ultimately it is by means of doublethink that the Party has been able—and may, for all we know, continue to be able for thousands of years—to arrest the course of history."

  3. Are you still allowed to note that Facebook is run by Zuckerberg, Sandberg, et al?

    • Replies: @Moses
    @Thomas

    At least 3 of the top 8 FB execs are Jewish. The top 2 -- CEO and COO -- are Jewish.

    So yeah -- you might say the world's most powerful media company is run by Jews.

    As Ben Stein might say "You bet Facebook is run by Jews! What of it?"

    PS - No blacks in the top ranks, except the "Chief Diversity Officer with the "Look, I'm Black!" hair. Funny stuff!

    https://about.fb.com/media-gallery/executives/

    Replies: @Richard B

  4. • Replies: @El Dato
    @J.Ross


    Facebook banned stereotypes of Jewish global domination. Has the move satisfied Jewish groups?
     
    https://i.postimg.cc/QMDgYmzS/fat-cat.jpg

    For some time.
  5. If I posted a link to this article from “The Forward” on Facebook, without additional commentary, would Facebook ban it?

    • LOL: Gabe Ruth
  6. I’m so confused. Here we have Jewish organizations exerting total control over attorneys general from 20 states, 120 Jewish organizations signing a letter that results in their successful control of Facebook policy, and we are not allowed to talk about it?

    Gilad is being proven correct again, and I paraphrase: Jewish power is the ability to prevent any discussion of Jewish power.

    I want to do a test. I want to write on my facebook page 120 posts. Each one will say “Jews control…”
    and be followed with the name of one of the 120 Jewish organizations.

    I want to write a post pointing out the unbelievable over-representation of Jews during the last decades as FED Chairman, FED Board Governors, and FED District Bank presidents. Why would “community standards” ever prohibit the sharing of facts?

    We must legislate independent regulation of these internet monsters.

    • Agree: Lurker
    • Replies: @Mr McKenna
    @frankie p


    Here we have Jewish organizations exerting total control over attorneys general from 20 states, 120 Jewish organizations signing a letter that results in their successful control of Facebook policy, and we are not allowed to talk about it?
     
    If you even dare to imply that we wield inordinate power, we shall crush you like the pathetic little insect you are!
  7. Here’s an idea: establish that white is nothing more than a code name for Jews. White nationalism, white supremacism, white fragility, and all the rest. Counter any charge with, “You’re really getting around to Jews, aren’t you?”

    Heck, they’ve spent a century building a well-focused retaliation strategy. We may as well hitchhike on it.

    • Replies: @Anon
    @Reg Cæsar

    That is actually a very intelligent response.

    The other would be for Christian men to organize a parallel info platform. Not white men, those are already demonized. Christians.. not quite yet.

    , @Hans
    @Reg Cæsar

    "One by one, the Jews are capturing the principal newspapers of America” - British politician, Sir Cecil Spring-Rice states, (Letter Nov 1914, to Sir Edward Grey, Letters and Friendships)

    “It is impossible to explain how a press usually so eager to exploit the little incidents of life has been able to remain silent about the horrors perpetrated in Russia...and that it should have so little to say concerning a world organization as vast as Russian Communism. This silence...is favored by various occult forces which for a long time have been working for the overthrow of the Christian Social Order” - Pope Pius XI, Divini Redemptoris, 1937

    "The Bolshevik leaders, most of whom are Jews, care little for Russia or any other country but are internationalists and are trying to start a worldwide revolution." - David R. Francis, US ambassador to Russia, Jan 1918

    From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky, Bela Kun, Rosa Luxembourg, and Emma Goldman, the world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization has been steadily growing...it has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the 19th Century; and now has gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads...In the Soviet institutions the predominance of Jews is even more astonishing. The same evil prominence was obtained by Jews in the terror under Bela Kun in Hungary, Rosa Luxembourg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States), this world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilisation and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing. It played, as a modern writer. Mrs. Webster, has so ably shown a definitely recognisable part in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century ; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the under- world of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and hare become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire.” - Winston Churchill (Illustrated Sunday Herald, Feb 8, 1920, p.5)

    We have seen how completely the Bolsheviks have reduced Russia to absolute starvation...this awful catastrophe has been brought about by a gang of professional revolutionaries, mostly Jews” - Winston Churchill (Western Gazette; Somerset, UK; 30 Sep. 1921, p.12 )

    “I might list a hundred other revolutionary leaders and every one of them would be a Jew. Wherever you read of an assassination or of the explosion of a bomb you will notice in the newspaper dispatches that the man was a Jew...every deed of that kind is done by Jews" - William Eleroy Curtis, The National Geographic, "The Revolution in Russia", Vol. 18, No. 5, (May, 1907) (p. 313)

    , @TomSchmidt
    @Reg Cæsar

    I'll use that. Thanks.

  8. You can switch to saying that “Ivy League cosmopolitan urbanites” control the media, which has more relevance and explanatory power anyway.

    • Replies: @anon
    @IHTG


    You can switch to saying that “Ivy League cosmopolitan urbanites” control the media, which has more relevance and explanatory power anyway.
     
    lol, no.

    https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/001/371/832/1e3.jpg

    https://www.heyalma.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/spreadsheet.png
    , @jsm
    @IHTG

    Talk about the You-Know-Whos. This is effective because the ones who know who you're talking about will nod along. The ones who don't will be curious and go research to find out who you're talking about in order to see themselves as savvy. And the jews will go apeshit that "you know who" is anti-semetic, thus clueing in even the most blockheaded among us.

    , @John Gruskos
    @IHTG

    Yes, the World Ivy-League Congress pressured Facebook to censor all criticism of Ivy League alums.

  9. Irony and hypocrisy are now just a couple of obsolete words. Soon to be disappeared from dictionaries and the like.

    They no longer represent concepts we see in reality.

  10. I don’t think the same person should be in charge of Facebook’s policy in Israel and a “liaison to dispora groups”. The interests of Israel are not the same as all Jewish people throughout the world.

    I do not think that Jewish people run the world but it is true that there are many Jewish people involved in the US media, academia, politics and entertainment. I am not sure that this is a distinction that Facebook is going to continue to make. If pointing out that there are a lot of Jewish people in certain fields is going to become a bannable offence, then I disagree with that. And I do not consider myself an anti-Semite at all.
    I wonder if this will end up being counterproductive?

    • Replies: @Dissident
    @notsaying


    I wonder if this will end up being counterproductive?
     
    It is difficult for me to imagine how it could not eventually be, Hashem yishmoreinu v'yatzileinu [May G-d protect and save us.] As I just wrote in a different comment,

    Does anyone incite more resentment and animosity toward Jews than racketeers such as the ADL and the $PLC? (I almost wonder whether that might be their intent...)
     
    I recall reading a comment somewhere here at Unz from a few years ago in which the author (Randal, if I recall correctly) claimed that Weimar Germany had enacted laws against "hate speech" directed at Jews.

    The interests of Israel are not the same as all Jewish people throughout the world.
     
    Absolutely.

    Zionists have always conflated their state with Jewry as well as Judaism (mis-applying verses and statements about the Land of Israel; conveniently ignoring those that undermine, weaken or cast doubt upon their narrative).

    Zionism was actually condemned by an overwhelming consensus of the foremost rabbis. It was in defiance of them of them and of many devout Jews that the State (that usurped the holy name) of Israel was established. For traditional Orthodox Jews, its reality continues to presents difficult, complicated challenges, many of which divide us.

  11. @frankie p
    I'm so confused. Here we have Jewish organizations exerting total control over attorneys general from 20 states, 120 Jewish organizations signing a letter that results in their successful control of Facebook policy, and we are not allowed to talk about it?

    Gilad is being proven correct again, and I paraphrase: Jewish power is the ability to prevent any discussion of Jewish power.

    I want to do a test. I want to write on my facebook page 120 posts. Each one will say "Jews control..."
    and be followed with the name of one of the 120 Jewish organizations.

    I want to write a post pointing out the unbelievable over-representation of Jews during the last decades as FED Chairman, FED Board Governors, and FED District Bank presidents. Why would "community standards" ever prohibit the sharing of facts?

    We must legislate independent regulation of these internet monsters.

    Replies: @Mr McKenna

    Here we have Jewish organizations exerting total control over attorneys general from 20 states, 120 Jewish organizations signing a letter that results in their successful control of Facebook policy, and we are not allowed to talk about it?

    If you even dare to imply that we wield inordinate power, we shall crush you like the pathetic little insect you are!

  12. The Zuckerbot is one creepy-looking dude. Stare into those dead, soulless eyes and the abyss stares back at you.

    $100 billion can’t buy happiness, that’s for sure.

    And what’s up with the Orwellian composition in the photograph? It looks like a scene from Nineteen Eighty-Four:

  13. A half-jew comments on a half-jew’s blog hosted on jew’s website to a post about jewish groups demanding jewish centibillionaire censor video of deceased jew singing.

    • Replies: @Elmer T. Jones
    @Lot

    I love those Al Jolson videos. Tried to find the complete movie which was "Christy's Minstrels" I think but to no avail. It's like stepping back in time. "The Jolson Story" is still up on youtube and well worth watching.

    I could always get a laff out of Jews when I would tell them "my dad told me that Jews have often been accused of controlling global wealth but their aggregate ownership does not really allow that". To which they would invariably ask "what does you father do?" and I would reply that he was an economics professor and certified financial analyst. Ta-doom-tish.

  14. How unironically ironic.

  15. Plus any comments implying Fakebook is becoming a virtual panopticon will be detected and deleted by these people.

  16. @JohnPlywood
    Good, I say. What did years of babbling about this online ever accomplish?

    Replies: @BenKenobi, @Richard B, @anonymous

    You’re walking in the desert, and you see a tortoise flipped over on its back. What do you do?

    You’re sitting at home and you see a wasp crawling on your arm. What do you do?

    Do they keep you in a box when they aren’t using you. Cells. What’s it like to touch fingers with a love one? Interlinked.

    Within cells interlinked. Why don’t you repeat that for me three times?

    • Replies: @The Wild Geese Howard
    @BenKenobi


    You’re walking in the desert, and you see a tortoise flipped over on its back. What do you do?

     

    "Tell me about your mother."

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Umc9ezAyJv0
    , @Owen C.
    @BenKenobi

    Saw 2049 a couple of nights ago. I had the Blu-ray for a few years, but didn't have anything to play it on until now. They're both great films, the Blade Runner series.

  17. The truth is anti-Semitic. Good lawd, it would take a moron to keep believing this bullshit. Oops, I forgot, the (((medical experts))) are now telling you and your partner to wear masks during sex and people are probably complying. Even telling people who live alone to wear a mask inside their home. My God, someone is laughing their ass off.

  18. So the Jews have so much control over the media that they can silence anyone who suggests that Jews control the media?

    • Replies: @JerseyJeffersonian
    @Ozymandias

    That's about the size of it.

    , @Gordo
    @Ozymandias

    Certainly looks that way.

  19. WHY does any self respecting White person still use Facebook?

    • Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
    @Trinity

    I agreed too fast. Actually,


    WHY does any self respecting White person still use Facebook?
     

    Replies: @Bumpkin

  20. So…for example…you couldn’t say that ‘a Jew controls Facebook.’

    • LOL: mark green
  21. I wonder if we’ll ever understand where the irrational hatred for these people comes from.

  22. Anonymous[697] • Disclaimer says:

    Some good news: Kamala’s Jewish husband seems like a decent guy. Was worried he was another sicko globalist billionaire but it looks like he is just a legit entertainment attorney.

    Some bad news: Thought her dad was Jamaican heritage but born in the usa but no. Both of her parents are immigrants. Neither were citizens when they had Kamala in Oakland.

    So this is a giant step beyond Obama or Ted Cruz etc meaning candidates who had at least American parent.

    Now we’re into two alien parents territory and no one is talking about it. Natural Born Citizen status is being stripped of any logical meaning.

    GOP IS WORTHLESS. WE ARE ON ANOTHER SLIPPERY SLOPE.

    IN TEN YEARS GOP WILL BE AFRAID TO CONTEST THE LEGITIMACY OF A DEM PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE WHO IS AN IMMIGRANT FRESH OFF THE BOAT.

    • Replies: @Steve Sailer
    @Anonymous

    Here's a video of some animal rights jerk storming the stage and taking the microphone from Kamala Harris:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3VaJFKd62RQ

    Her husband Doug Emhoff is the stocky, angry middle aged man who arrives at the end and is ready to punch the protester if the jerk hassles his wife anymore. I'd say Emhoff did good there.

    Replies: @Lurker

    , @epebble
    @Anonymous

    Trump is raising doubts about her eligibility. It may not amount to much; but if she wins, many people may question her legitimacy.


    Trump said, "I heard today that she doesn't meet the requirements." He referred to a lawyer who raised the issue in a Newsweek article, Chapman University professor John Eastman, as "very highly qualified."

    Trump then said he has "no idea" whether it's true Harris doesn't meet the requirements. He then asked the reporter if she was saying Harris doesn't qualify because Harris "wasn't born in this country."
     

    https://www.cnn.com/2020/08/13/politics/trump-news-conference-birtherism-kamala-harris-biden-attacks-fact-check/index.html

    Replies: @AnotherDad

  23. This would ban a standard biography of David Sarnoff, a high level hired hand who ran RCA which included NBC for many years.

  24. Maybe this isn’t on point, but who with sense bothers with Facebook any more?

  25. @Anonymous
    Some good news: Kamala's Jewish husband seems like a decent guy. Was worried he was another sicko globalist billionaire but it looks like he is just a legit entertainment attorney.

    Some bad news: Thought her dad was Jamaican heritage but born in the usa but no. Both of her parents are immigrants. Neither were citizens when they had Kamala in Oakland.

    So this is a giant step beyond Obama or Ted Cruz etc meaning candidates who had at least American parent.

    Now we're into two alien parents territory and no one is talking about it. Natural Born Citizen status is being stripped of any logical meaning.

    GOP IS WORTHLESS. WE ARE ON ANOTHER SLIPPERY SLOPE.

    IN TEN YEARS GOP WILL BE AFRAID TO CONTEST THE LEGITIMACY OF A DEM PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE WHO IS AN IMMIGRANT FRESH OFF THE BOAT.

    Replies: @Steve Sailer, @epebble

    Here’s a video of some animal rights jerk storming the stage and taking the microphone from Kamala Harris:

    Her husband Doug Emhoff is the stocky, angry middle aged man who arrives at the end and is ready to punch the protester if the jerk hassles his wife anymore. I’d say Emhoff did good there.

    • Replies: @Lurker
    @Steve Sailer

    Leaving aside hubby the rest is a TV trope - righteous female PoC threatened by white male.

  26. @IHTG
    You can switch to saying that "Ivy League cosmopolitan urbanites" control the media, which has more relevance and explanatory power anyway.

    Replies: @anon, @jsm, @John Gruskos

    You can switch to saying that “Ivy League cosmopolitan urbanites” control the media, which has more relevance and explanatory power anyway.

    lol, no.

  27. @Cloudbuster
    Mark Zuckerberg stated that the idea of Jewish global domination is "ridiculous," as he unilaterally silenced all who would discuss the topic.

    Replies: @Unladen Swallow, @Bard of Bumperstickers

    Where have we seen something like this before? like Eisner when he was CEO of Disney personally firing Gregg Easterbrook for saying Jews dominated the entertainment industry perhaps, no irony there.

    • Replies: @anon
    @Unladen Swallow

    "Just for saying the Jews dominate entertainment and own Hollywood, you'll never work in this town again, goy boy!"

    , @HarvardSqEddy
    @Unladen Swallow

    Governor Ron DuhhSantis upon returning from his obligatory junket to Israel introduced a bill in Tallahassee making it "...highly illegal..." to associate Jews with Hollywood. I wish I were kidding.
    His Excellency will kiss their asses in order to become a senator with direct access to the 'money-trough' in DC.

  28. @Ozymandias
    So the Jews have so much control over the media that they can silence anyone who suggests that Jews control the media?

    Replies: @JerseyJeffersonian, @Gordo

    That’s about the size of it.

  29. This is like, so Meta and stuff…
    At least until WeChat and Alibaba dethrone Facebook and Amazon.

  30. @Unladen Swallow
    @Cloudbuster

    Where have we seen something like this before? like Eisner when he was CEO of Disney personally firing Gregg Easterbrook for saying Jews dominated the entertainment industry perhaps, no irony there.

    Replies: @anon, @HarvardSqEddy

    “Just for saying the Jews dominate entertainment and own Hollywood, you’ll never work in this town again, goy boy!”

  31. @notsaying
    I don't think the same person should be in charge of Facebook's policy in Israel and a "liaison to dispora groups". The interests of Israel are not the same as all Jewish people throughout the world.

    I do not think that Jewish people run the world but it is true that there are many Jewish people involved in the US media, academia, politics and entertainment. I am not sure that this is a distinction that Facebook is going to continue to make. If pointing out that there are a lot of Jewish people in certain fields is going to become a bannable offence, then I disagree with that. And I do not consider myself an anti-Semite at all.
    I wonder if this will end up being counterproductive?

    Replies: @Dissident

    I wonder if this will end up being counterproductive?

    It is difficult for me to imagine how it could not eventually be, Hashem yishmoreinu v’yatzileinu [May G-d protect and save us.] As I just wrote in a different comment,

    Does anyone incite more resentment and animosity toward Jews than racketeers such as the ADL and the $PLC? (I almost wonder whether that might be their intent…)

    I recall reading a comment somewhere here at Unz from a few years ago in which the author (Randal, if I recall correctly) claimed that Weimar Germany had enacted laws against “hate speech” directed at Jews.

    The interests of Israel are not the same as all Jewish people throughout the world.

    Absolutely.

    Zionists have always conflated their state with Jewry as well as Judaism (mis-applying verses and statements about the Land of Israel; conveniently ignoring those that undermine, weaken or cast doubt upon their narrative).

    Zionism was actually condemned by an overwhelming consensus of the foremost rabbis. It was in defiance of them of them and of many devout Jews that the State (that usurped the holy name) of Israel was established. For traditional Orthodox Jews, its reality continues to presents difficult, complicated challenges, many of which divide us.

  32. @BenKenobi
    @JohnPlywood

    You're walking in the desert, and you see a tortoise flipped over on its back. What do you do?

    You're sitting at home and you see a wasp crawling on your arm. What do you do?

    Do they keep you in a box when they aren't using you. Cells. What's it like to touch fingers with a love one? Interlinked.

    Within cells interlinked. Why don't you repeat that for me three times?

    Replies: @The Wild Geese Howard, @Owen C.

    You’re walking in the desert, and you see a tortoise flipped over on its back. What do you do?

    “Tell me about your mother.”

  33. @Thomas
    Are you still allowed to note that Facebook is run by Zuckerberg, Sandberg, et al?

    Replies: @Moses

    At least 3 of the top 8 FB execs are Jewish. The top 2 — CEO and COO — are Jewish.

    So yeah — you might say the world’s most powerful media company is run by Jews.

    As Ben Stein might say “You bet Facebook is run by Jews! What of it?”

    PS – No blacks in the top ranks, except the “Chief Diversity Officer with the “Look, I’m Black!” hair. Funny stuff!

    https://about.fb.com/media-gallery/executives/

    • Replies: @Richard B
    @Moses


    ".....What of it?”
     
    The "question" proves, once again, that gaslighting and chutzpah go together.

    Just like chutzpah and self-awareness don't.

    It also shows, yet again, that chutzpah is synonymous with psychotic arrogance.
  34. @Steve Sailer
    @Anonymous

    Here's a video of some animal rights jerk storming the stage and taking the microphone from Kamala Harris:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3VaJFKd62RQ

    Her husband Doug Emhoff is the stocky, angry middle aged man who arrives at the end and is ready to punch the protester if the jerk hassles his wife anymore. I'd say Emhoff did good there.

    Replies: @Lurker

    Leaving aside hubby the rest is a TV trope – righteous female PoC threatened by white male.

  35. @Trinity
    WHY does any self respecting White person still use Facebook?

    Replies: @Achmed E. Newman

    I agreed too fast. Actually,

    WHY does any self respecting White person still use Facebook?

    • Replies: @Bumpkin
    @Achmed E. Newman

    My aging mother, who's slowly slipping into senility, loves the popular pet and baby videos and occasional photo updates of past acquintances. I think that's their core demographic these days, not a good omen for their future, just like this censorship.

  36. If some leftist claims you’re a “white supremacist,” the proper response would be, “Damn right, whites are superior.” If some woman claims you’re “patriarchal,” the proper response would be, “Oh, you mean as in building and maintaining civilization?”

    Likewise, “Jews control X industry” should properly be met with, “Damn right we do, you want a piece of the action come try and get it. You want the table, you gotta take on the winner.”

    You don’t hear the Yankees getting all defensive about “controlling” the American League, do you? Neither should my fellow tribesmen get all defensive about earning and wielding great power and prominence in certain fields. What’s tragic is when some of them use this power to warp American culture and institutions that they should cherish instead.

    What does concern me is the long recent parade of bad Jewish role models. And these social media types are especially creepy and dangerous. But I can safely assure you that most of us do not control jack shit

    • Replies: @anon
    @Known Fact

    You don’t hear the Yankees getting all defensive about “controlling” the American League, do you? Neither should my fellow tribesmen get all defensive about earning and wielding great power and prominence in certain fields.

    Perhaps that's because the American League does a good job at what it sets out to do. It just puts on baseball games. It doesn't try to manipulate you. But the media sucks and everyone hates it, and it lies to people all the time, and a lot of people know it. I imagine your tribesmen would prefer it if people thought that it was just a motley collection of random tribeless individuals doing that sort of thing. But it's not.

    So that's sort of the thing. If Jews "earned" prominence in the media through some fair means, then why do they do such a lousy job? As I'm sure you know, there are hundreds of bloggers and YouTube stars who could do a better job telling people the news, but they don't. In fact, when they try, your tribesman try to shut them up. That's a weird way to say that the Jews "earned" their prominence in the media.

    Replies: @Known Fact

    , @J.Ross
    @Known Fact

    The least threatening and most annoying part of Winston's finger count is paid JIDF flunkies wheeling out long-debunked non-arguments and irrelevant nonsense. Blown Khat assures us that he is not Sumner Redstone. I believe him. He can't be, Sumner Redstone just died. But, while he was alive, Sumner Redstone generally was Sumner Redstone, even though there were literally millions of Jews at all levels of ethnic and religious involvement who were not Sumner Redstone.

    , @ATBOTL
    @Known Fact


    Likewise, “Jews control X industry” should properly be met with, “Damn right we do, you want a piece of the action come try and get it. You want the table, you gotta take on the winner.”
     

    What’s tragic is when some of them use this power to warp American culture and institutions that they should cherish instead.
     
    It's never acceptable for White people to have Jews or any other nonwhites controlling or influencing any institutions in OUR society. We alone need 100% control and 100% of the power. The only way White Americans can protect our interests is to take the power back from Jews. That means we have to fight Jews and win. Fight them by any and all means. After we win, we can never let this alien, congenitally hostile, middle eastern tribe have the slightest power or even presence in White societies ever again.
  37. @Anonymous
    Some good news: Kamala's Jewish husband seems like a decent guy. Was worried he was another sicko globalist billionaire but it looks like he is just a legit entertainment attorney.

    Some bad news: Thought her dad was Jamaican heritage but born in the usa but no. Both of her parents are immigrants. Neither were citizens when they had Kamala in Oakland.

    So this is a giant step beyond Obama or Ted Cruz etc meaning candidates who had at least American parent.

    Now we're into two alien parents territory and no one is talking about it. Natural Born Citizen status is being stripped of any logical meaning.

    GOP IS WORTHLESS. WE ARE ON ANOTHER SLIPPERY SLOPE.

    IN TEN YEARS GOP WILL BE AFRAID TO CONTEST THE LEGITIMACY OF A DEM PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE WHO IS AN IMMIGRANT FRESH OFF THE BOAT.

    Replies: @Steve Sailer, @epebble

    Trump is raising doubts about her eligibility. It may not amount to much; but if she wins, many people may question her legitimacy.

    Trump said, “I heard today that she doesn’t meet the requirements.” He referred to a lawyer who raised the issue in a Newsweek article, Chapman University professor John Eastman, as “very highly qualified.”

    Trump then said he has “no idea” whether it’s true Harris doesn’t meet the requirements. He then asked the reporter if she was saying Harris doesn’t qualify because Harris “wasn’t born in this country.”

    https://www.cnn.com/2020/08/13/politics/trump-news-conference-birtherism-kamala-harris-biden-attacks-fact-check/index.html

    • Replies: @AnotherDad
    @epebble



    Trump is raising doubts about her eligibility. It may not amount to much; but if she wins, many people may question her legitimacy...
     
    Actually this is the random stupid shit we get with Trump. (Whose mother by the way was born in Scotland and only naturalized a few years before he was born.) Harris does have a weird--not very "American"--upbringing in that her mom hadn't been in the US very long before Kamala was born, and then zipped off to Canada.

    But that is not the point ...

    The point is she is politically unAmerican--anti-American.

    She represents a party that stands
    -- against republican government and majority rule
    -- against our heritage rooted in Western Civilization, specifically Anglo-American traditions
    -- against the historic liberties of Americans
    -- against the interests of white people--whose ancestors built this nation--in favor of the interests of favored minorities under some sort of phony narrative of relative "oppression"
    -- against the interests of productive law-abiding middle class people (who actually make the country function) and for the Democrats collection of various parasitic grifters
    -- against the idea of borders
    -- against the interests of citizens in favor of the interests of foreigners
    and now quite clearly
    -- against "the rule of law"!
    in sum Harris is against the American nation.

    That's what any patriot would run against--against her and Biden being against the nation! Everything that defines it, maintains it and makes it special and decent and prosperous.

    Yapping about tiddlywink nonsense, is a distraction from what matters, what is critical. And unfortunately a Trump specialty.

    Replies: @ATBOTL, @Rob McX, @LEH50

  38. It took a year to come up with what Facebook calls an “operational policy” on Jewish global control…

    Ha ha! Freudian slip!

  39. that make reference to Jewish control of the world

    Shouldn’t that be “alleged Jewish control”??

    or that include “caricatures of black people in the form of blackface” — two forms of hate that are well over a century old

    What a fascinating point! And who exactly was doing these racist caricatures in blackface a century ago? Would I be able to ask that on Facebook? Or more controversially, answer it?

    • Replies: @Cloudbuster
    @Richard S

    Shouldn’t that be “alleged Jewish control”??

    I am reliably informed they are very smart people. They know exactly what they said.

  40. In related news, the Italian American Civil Rights League told Facebook they should ban references to Italians being involved in organized crime. If they know what’s good for them.

    • LOL: Owen C.
  41. I would be fair and good for open debate if facebook and other big platforms would continue to name specific stetaments you are not supposed to make instead of more general rules against e.g, “hate”.

  42. @J.Ross
    https://postimg.cc/CZScd9Fv
    https://postimg.cc/Q9MSJ5K1

    Replies: @El Dato

    Facebook banned stereotypes of Jewish global domination. Has the move satisfied Jewish groups?

    For some time.

  43. The most frustrating thing about Jewish power is that you are not allowed to observe that there is any form of Jewish power. You have to pretend/believe that Jews are just oppressed “people of colour” that are constantly menaced by pogroms. “How many fingers, Winston?”

    Tyrants at least, of course you cannot criticize them in public, but everyone knows they are in charge. But with Jews, they may control half the world, but any notice of that is verboten. And I’m not even sure that most people (i.e. normies) even see what’s going on. They may not even notice or know that a lot of surnames in Media and Wall Street and Big Pharma are Jewish. It’s like that 80s movie, “They Live”, maybe you need special glasses.

    • Agree: Colin Wright
    • Replies: @bigdicknick
    @Dumbo

    most normies are not aware how powerful jews are. If you try to talk about it you will come off as a loon.

  44. Hmmm … you’d think giving attribution of Global Media Domination to the Jewish people would be paying them the highest honour. Best of the best.

    We’ll reserve Tip of the Spear for another ethnic group with proven athletic prowess.

  45. @BenKenobi
    @JohnPlywood

    You're walking in the desert, and you see a tortoise flipped over on its back. What do you do?

    You're sitting at home and you see a wasp crawling on your arm. What do you do?

    Do they keep you in a box when they aren't using you. Cells. What's it like to touch fingers with a love one? Interlinked.

    Within cells interlinked. Why don't you repeat that for me three times?

    Replies: @The Wild Geese Howard, @Owen C.

    Saw 2049 a couple of nights ago. I had the Blu-ray for a few years, but didn’t have anything to play it on until now. They’re both great films, the Blade Runner series.

  46. anon[174] • Disclaimer says:
    @Known Fact
    If some leftist claims you're a "white supremacist," the proper response would be, "Damn right, whites are superior." If some woman claims you're "patriarchal," the proper response would be, "Oh, you mean as in building and maintaining civilization?"

    Likewise, "Jews control X industry" should properly be met with, "Damn right we do, you want a piece of the action come try and get it. You want the table, you gotta take on the winner."

    You don't hear the Yankees getting all defensive about "controlling" the American League, do you? Neither should my fellow tribesmen get all defensive about earning and wielding great power and prominence in certain fields. What's tragic is when some of them use this power to warp American culture and institutions that they should cherish instead.

    What does concern me is the long recent parade of bad Jewish role models. And these social media types are especially creepy and dangerous. But I can safely assure you that most of us do not control jack shit

    Replies: @anon, @J.Ross, @ATBOTL

    You don’t hear the Yankees getting all defensive about “controlling” the American League, do you? Neither should my fellow tribesmen get all defensive about earning and wielding great power and prominence in certain fields.

    Perhaps that’s because the American League does a good job at what it sets out to do. It just puts on baseball games. It doesn’t try to manipulate you. But the media sucks and everyone hates it, and it lies to people all the time, and a lot of people know it. I imagine your tribesmen would prefer it if people thought that it was just a motley collection of random tribeless individuals doing that sort of thing. But it’s not.

    So that’s sort of the thing. If Jews “earned” prominence in the media through some fair means, then why do they do such a lousy job? As I’m sure you know, there are hundreds of bloggers and YouTube stars who could do a better job telling people the news, but they don’t. In fact, when they try, your tribesman try to shut them up. That’s a weird way to say that the Jews “earned” their prominence in the media.

    • Replies: @Known Fact
    @anon

    I agree that the media has become Public Enemy No. 1 (and the Jews in politics are a horror trip too). But saying the media lies, does a disgraceful job and seeks to warp American culture in large part due to lying liberal Jews is a much more relevant critique than simply saying Jews "control" it, which just comes across like jealousy -- unless you mean actual antitrust violations, unfair practices and so on, which it might well be coming to in social media.

    So what I was saying is that Jews should not defensively try to censor the charges of "control." But as far as the media I'm right there in charging they've abused this position of influence.

    Also don't confuse the current crop of decadent media Jews -- who are helping destroy the entire industry -- with an earlier generation that made the news and entertainment media so Jewish through actual talent and work.

    Replies: @anon

  47. @Cloudbuster
    Mark Zuckerberg stated that the idea of Jewish global domination is "ridiculous," as he unilaterally silenced all who would discuss the topic.

    Replies: @Unladen Swallow, @Bard of Bumperstickers

    Oh, it’s just RAINING shoes. Straight outa “1984” doublespeak. Bears repeating:

    “Doublethink means the power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one’s mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them. The Party intellectual knows in which direction his memories must be altered; he therefore knows that he is playing tricks with reality; but by the exercise of doublethink he also satisfies himself that reality is not violated. The process has to be conscious, or it would not be carried out with sufficient precision, but it also has to be unconscious, or it would bring with it a feeling of falsity and hence of guilt. Doublethink lies at the very heart of Ingsoc, since the essential act of the Party is to use conscious deception while retaining the firmness of purpose that goes with complete honesty. To tell deliberate lies while genuinely believing in them, to forget any fact that has become inconvenient, and then, when it becomes necessary again, to draw it back from oblivion for just so long as it is needed, to deny the existence of objective reality and all the while to take account of the reality which one denies—all this is indispensably necessary. Even in using the word doublethink it is necessary to exercise doublethink. For by using the word one admits that one is tampering with reality; by a fresh act of doublethink one erases this knowledge; and so on indefinitely, with the lie always one leap ahead of the truth. Ultimately it is by means of doublethink that the Party has been able—and may, for all we know, continue to be able for thousands of years—to arrest the course of history.”

  48. @Reg Cæsar
    Here's an idea: establish that white is nothing more than a code name for Jews. White nationalism, white supremacism, white fragility, and all the rest. Counter any charge with, "You're really getting around to Jews, aren't you?"

    Heck, they've spent a century building a well-focused retaliation strategy. We may as well hitchhike on it.

    Replies: @Anon, @Hans, @TomSchmidt

    That is actually a very intelligent response.

    The other would be for Christian men to organize a parallel info platform. Not white men, those are already demonized. Christians.. not quite yet.

  49. @JohnPlywood
    Good, I say. What did years of babbling about this online ever accomplish?

    Replies: @BenKenobi, @Richard B, @anonymous

    What did years of babbling about this online ever accomplish?

    Abe Foxman, is that you?

    There you go again Abe. Asking questions as if they can’t be answered.

    The answer, obviously, is that our #1 obligation in life is to live in reality.

    And an important part of that reality today is Jewish Supremacy.

    Proof of that supremacy is found in the power they have to effectuate their insane demands to be placed above criticism, loved unconditionally, and blindly obeyed.

  50. @Moses
    @Thomas

    At least 3 of the top 8 FB execs are Jewish. The top 2 -- CEO and COO -- are Jewish.

    So yeah -- you might say the world's most powerful media company is run by Jews.

    As Ben Stein might say "You bet Facebook is run by Jews! What of it?"

    PS - No blacks in the top ranks, except the "Chief Diversity Officer with the "Look, I'm Black!" hair. Funny stuff!

    https://about.fb.com/media-gallery/executives/

    Replies: @Richard B

    “…..What of it?”

    The “question” proves, once again, that gaslighting and chutzpah go together.

    Just like chutzpah and self-awareness don’t.

    It also shows, yet again, that chutzpah is synonymous with psychotic arrogance.

  51. @Lot
    A half-jew comments on a half-jew’s blog hosted on jew’s website to a post about jewish groups demanding jewish centibillionaire censor video of deceased jew singing.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_tuu5YtkPIo

    https://i.imgur.com/3OM9s.jpg

    Replies: @Elmer T. Jones

    I love those Al Jolson videos. Tried to find the complete movie which was “Christy’s Minstrels” I think but to no avail. It’s like stepping back in time. “The Jolson Story” is still up on youtube and well worth watching.

    I could always get a laff out of Jews when I would tell them “my dad told me that Jews have often been accused of controlling global wealth but their aggregate ownership does not really allow that”. To which they would invariably ask “what does you father do?” and I would reply that he was an economics professor and certified financial analyst. Ta-doom-tish.

  52. @Achmed E. Newman
    @Trinity

    I agreed too fast. Actually,


    WHY does any self respecting White person still use Facebook?
     

    Replies: @Bumpkin

    My aging mother, who’s slowly slipping into senility, loves the popular pet and baby videos and occasional photo updates of past acquintances. I think that’s their core demographic these days, not a good omen for their future, just like this censorship.

  53. So the Jews just proved the Jews control the media.

  54. @IHTG
    You can switch to saying that "Ivy League cosmopolitan urbanites" control the media, which has more relevance and explanatory power anyway.

    Replies: @anon, @jsm, @John Gruskos

    Talk about the You-Know-Whos. This is effective because the ones who know who you’re talking about will nod along. The ones who don’t will be curious and go research to find out who you’re talking about in order to see themselves as savvy. And the jews will go apeshit that “you know who” is anti-semetic, thus clueing in even the most blockheaded among us.

  55. @Ozymandias
    So the Jews have so much control over the media that they can silence anyone who suggests that Jews control the media?

    Replies: @JerseyJeffersonian, @Gordo

    Certainly looks that way.

  56. @JohnPlywood
    Good, I say. What did years of babbling about this online ever accomplish?

    Replies: @BenKenobi, @Richard B, @anonymous

    For some, this babbling exposed somewhat hidden threads and allowed them to get a clearer picture of the entire tapestry. Is having a better understanding of reality so bad?

  57. @Known Fact
    If some leftist claims you're a "white supremacist," the proper response would be, "Damn right, whites are superior." If some woman claims you're "patriarchal," the proper response would be, "Oh, you mean as in building and maintaining civilization?"

    Likewise, "Jews control X industry" should properly be met with, "Damn right we do, you want a piece of the action come try and get it. You want the table, you gotta take on the winner."

    You don't hear the Yankees getting all defensive about "controlling" the American League, do you? Neither should my fellow tribesmen get all defensive about earning and wielding great power and prominence in certain fields. What's tragic is when some of them use this power to warp American culture and institutions that they should cherish instead.

    What does concern me is the long recent parade of bad Jewish role models. And these social media types are especially creepy and dangerous. But I can safely assure you that most of us do not control jack shit

    Replies: @anon, @J.Ross, @ATBOTL

    The least threatening and most annoying part of Winston’s finger count is paid JIDF flunkies wheeling out long-debunked non-arguments and irrelevant nonsense. Blown Khat assures us that he is not Sumner Redstone. I believe him. He can’t be, Sumner Redstone just died. But, while he was alive, Sumner Redstone generally was Sumner Redstone, even though there were literally millions of Jews at all levels of ethnic and religious involvement who were not Sumner Redstone.

  58. @Richard S

    that make reference to Jewish control of the world
     
    Shouldn’t that be “alleged Jewish control”??

    or that include “caricatures of black people in the form of blackface” — two forms of hate that are well over a century old
     
    What a fascinating point! And who exactly was doing these racist caricatures in blackface a century ago? Would I be able to ask that on Facebook? Or more controversially, answer it?

    Replies: @Cloudbuster

    Shouldn’t that be “alleged Jewish control”??

    I am reliably informed they are very smart people. They know exactly what they said.

  59. anonymous[251] • Disclaimer says:

    Does an ethnic Jewish mafia dominate the American mass media, Conservative Inc media and now social media?

    Might as well try to make a post asking if there are any, many Chinese people in Communist China?

    The answers to both are:

    1) Yeah, like duhhhhhhh

    2) You’re banned, your Paypal, Facebook, Google, YouTube, Mastercard and Visa accounts all closed.

    You must always, always say and yes THINK that Jews are a small, persecuted people with no inordinate wealth or political/social power – and anyone who says or even thinks differently the powerless Jews will destroy that person.

    It’s pretty much the same with radical Islam – a religion of peace… anybody that says or thinks Islam might not be a religion of peace, the Muslims will torture and kill that person and it will be that bad persons fault.

    Jews and Muslims agree that they can never be criticized for anything.

    Any questions?

    JR

  60. @epebble
    @Anonymous

    Trump is raising doubts about her eligibility. It may not amount to much; but if she wins, many people may question her legitimacy.


    Trump said, "I heard today that she doesn't meet the requirements." He referred to a lawyer who raised the issue in a Newsweek article, Chapman University professor John Eastman, as "very highly qualified."

    Trump then said he has "no idea" whether it's true Harris doesn't meet the requirements. He then asked the reporter if she was saying Harris doesn't qualify because Harris "wasn't born in this country."
     

    https://www.cnn.com/2020/08/13/politics/trump-news-conference-birtherism-kamala-harris-biden-attacks-fact-check/index.html

    Replies: @AnotherDad

    Trump is raising doubts about her eligibility. It may not amount to much; but if she wins, many people may question her legitimacy…

    Actually this is the random stupid shit we get with Trump. (Whose mother by the way was born in Scotland and only naturalized a few years before he was born.) Harris does have a weird–not very “American”–upbringing in that her mom hadn’t been in the US very long before Kamala was born, and then zipped off to Canada.

    But that is not the point …

    The point is she is politically unAmerican–anti-American.

    She represents a party that stands
    — against republican government and majority rule
    — against our heritage rooted in Western Civilization, specifically Anglo-American traditions
    — against the historic liberties of Americans
    — against the interests of white people–whose ancestors built this nation–in favor of the interests of favored minorities under some sort of phony narrative of relative “oppression”
    — against the interests of productive law-abiding middle class people (who actually make the country function) and for the Democrats collection of various parasitic grifters
    — against the idea of borders
    — against the interests of citizens in favor of the interests of foreigners
    and now quite clearly
    — against “the rule of law”!
    in sum Harris is against the American nation.

    That’s what any patriot would run against–against her and Biden being against the nation! Everything that defines it, maintains it and makes it special and decent and prosperous.

    Yapping about tiddlywink nonsense, is a distraction from what matters, what is critical. And unfortunately a Trump specialty.

    • Agree: HammerJack
    • Replies: @ATBOTL
    @AnotherDad

    Trump's approach is the same dog whistling that Republicans have been doing to con white voters since Nixon. He makes these vague statements that indirectly allude to race, without saying anything clearly. The point is to trick whites into voting for you and then not do anything that your comments were implying in their minds that you would do. If white people keep falling for Nixon/Reagan/Trump style dog whistling, nothing will change. Trump is just another fraud conning white voters and serving anti-white Jewish elites.

    We need to build an explicitly pro-white party from the ground up and work to take power in the long term. Stop worrying about beating Democrats in the next election. That support for the lesser of two evils will stop whites from doing anything effective until it's too late. We need to break the cycle now by flushing Israel First Trump down the toilet and preparing to run a pro-white candidate in 2024. We can't worry about what share of the vote our candidate gets. It will probably be a small share the first election, but we could catch fire and get Perot level support in 2024.

    Study how the Bolsheviks and the NSDAP took power. Both contested elections. They didn't worry that they were taking away votes from other left/right parties that were bigger than them and helping the other side. Lesser of two evils thinking is the biggest error that pro-white Americans have made. Until we stop falling for that idea, nothing will change.

    , @Rob McX
    @AnotherDad

    Totally agree. Quibbling about her place of birth or citizenship status gives tacit support to the magic dirt theory of human nature. It doesn't matter if she's first or fifth generation American, she's still an enemy of the American nation.

    There was similarly futile and ridiculous speculation on the part of some Republicans about whether Obama was secretly a Muslim. What these deluded cucks don't understand is that most prominent Democrats (and many Republicans) are as dangerous to the American nation as any Muslim.

    , @LEH50
    @AnotherDad

    Wait...Kamala truly is not qualified. She has "birthright citizenship" which is not natural. Neither did either of her "student" parents bother to try to get naturalization. If we continue to ignore these lack of qualifications - pretty soon, any bully can take the Presidency. So, YES, it matters.

    As far as Jews go - they know among themselves who is a Zionist and who is not. And they know the law about not dividing Israel (which Jared is trying so hard to do). Every President tries to do it, and we end up with catastrophic events as if God is paying attention!

    And, I don't like what Jewish people call me, a white woman - it's derogatory. God doesn't approve of his chosen people (BTW, that went to their heads because they don't understand why they were chosen). It's not that God thinks they are the most holy, most obedient, most faithful to Him. He chose them because Abraham decided to follow God in a pagan world. They do not get that they have been disobedient for thousands of years! God's love is Jerusalem. Jews are a race, and a religion. Some people are both. Some are just the race with no love for God or religion. That is the Zionists who are using "God" for power, and draining us in the US to fight their battles for them...because they induce guilt in us because God said, "Whoever blesses Israel, I will bless; whoever curses Israel, I will curse. But, He's talking about the faithful Jews - not the criminals trying to run His world and who bow to money and Satan.

    I can love the misunderstood Jews - but these monsters that are destroying our world - they are not His Chosen People (and Christians are not less than Jews - we Believed in Jesus - and were "grafted in to the vine" in God's words). But......God knows what's going on; their supremacy pride; their treatment of anyone who is not a Jew.....God holds their future in His hands. I wouldn't want to be them!

  61. @Known Fact
    If some leftist claims you're a "white supremacist," the proper response would be, "Damn right, whites are superior." If some woman claims you're "patriarchal," the proper response would be, "Oh, you mean as in building and maintaining civilization?"

    Likewise, "Jews control X industry" should properly be met with, "Damn right we do, you want a piece of the action come try and get it. You want the table, you gotta take on the winner."

    You don't hear the Yankees getting all defensive about "controlling" the American League, do you? Neither should my fellow tribesmen get all defensive about earning and wielding great power and prominence in certain fields. What's tragic is when some of them use this power to warp American culture and institutions that they should cherish instead.

    What does concern me is the long recent parade of bad Jewish role models. And these social media types are especially creepy and dangerous. But I can safely assure you that most of us do not control jack shit

    Replies: @anon, @J.Ross, @ATBOTL

    Likewise, “Jews control X industry” should properly be met with, “Damn right we do, you want a piece of the action come try and get it. You want the table, you gotta take on the winner.”

    What’s tragic is when some of them use this power to warp American culture and institutions that they should cherish instead.

    It’s never acceptable for White people to have Jews or any other nonwhites controlling or influencing any institutions in OUR society. We alone need 100% control and 100% of the power. The only way White Americans can protect our interests is to take the power back from Jews. That means we have to fight Jews and win. Fight them by any and all means. After we win, we can never let this alien, congenitally hostile, middle eastern tribe have the slightest power or even presence in White societies ever again.

    • Agree: smaragdus
  62. @AnotherDad
    @epebble



    Trump is raising doubts about her eligibility. It may not amount to much; but if she wins, many people may question her legitimacy...
     
    Actually this is the random stupid shit we get with Trump. (Whose mother by the way was born in Scotland and only naturalized a few years before he was born.) Harris does have a weird--not very "American"--upbringing in that her mom hadn't been in the US very long before Kamala was born, and then zipped off to Canada.

    But that is not the point ...

    The point is she is politically unAmerican--anti-American.

    She represents a party that stands
    -- against republican government and majority rule
    -- against our heritage rooted in Western Civilization, specifically Anglo-American traditions
    -- against the historic liberties of Americans
    -- against the interests of white people--whose ancestors built this nation--in favor of the interests of favored minorities under some sort of phony narrative of relative "oppression"
    -- against the interests of productive law-abiding middle class people (who actually make the country function) and for the Democrats collection of various parasitic grifters
    -- against the idea of borders
    -- against the interests of citizens in favor of the interests of foreigners
    and now quite clearly
    -- against "the rule of law"!
    in sum Harris is against the American nation.

    That's what any patriot would run against--against her and Biden being against the nation! Everything that defines it, maintains it and makes it special and decent and prosperous.

    Yapping about tiddlywink nonsense, is a distraction from what matters, what is critical. And unfortunately a Trump specialty.

    Replies: @ATBOTL, @Rob McX, @LEH50

    Trump’s approach is the same dog whistling that Republicans have been doing to con white voters since Nixon. He makes these vague statements that indirectly allude to race, without saying anything clearly. The point is to trick whites into voting for you and then not do anything that your comments were implying in their minds that you would do. If white people keep falling for Nixon/Reagan/Trump style dog whistling, nothing will change. Trump is just another fraud conning white voters and serving anti-white Jewish elites.

    We need to build an explicitly pro-white party from the ground up and work to take power in the long term. Stop worrying about beating Democrats in the next election. That support for the lesser of two evils will stop whites from doing anything effective until it’s too late. We need to break the cycle now by flushing Israel First Trump down the toilet and preparing to run a pro-white candidate in 2024. We can’t worry about what share of the vote our candidate gets. It will probably be a small share the first election, but we could catch fire and get Perot level support in 2024.

    Study how the Bolsheviks and the NSDAP took power. Both contested elections. They didn’t worry that they were taking away votes from other left/right parties that were bigger than them and helping the other side. Lesser of two evils thinking is the biggest error that pro-white Americans have made. Until we stop falling for that idea, nothing will change.

    • Agree: smaragdus
  63. @Reg Cæsar
    Here's an idea: establish that white is nothing more than a code name for Jews. White nationalism, white supremacism, white fragility, and all the rest. Counter any charge with, "You're really getting around to Jews, aren't you?"

    Heck, they've spent a century building a well-focused retaliation strategy. We may as well hitchhike on it.

    Replies: @Anon, @Hans, @TomSchmidt

    “One by one, the Jews are capturing the principal newspapers of America” – British politician, Sir Cecil Spring-Rice states, (Letter Nov 1914, to Sir Edward Grey, Letters and Friendships)

    “It is impossible to explain how a press usually so eager to exploit the little incidents of life has been able to remain silent about the horrors perpetrated in Russia…and that it should have so little to say concerning a world organization as vast as Russian Communism. This silence…is favored by various occult forces which for a long time have been working for the overthrow of the Christian Social Order” – Pope Pius XI, Divini Redemptoris, 1937

    “The Bolshevik leaders, most of whom are Jews, care little for Russia or any other country but are internationalists and are trying to start a worldwide revolution.” – David R. Francis, US ambassador to Russia, Jan 1918

    From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky, Bela Kun, Rosa Luxembourg, and Emma Goldman, the world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization has been steadily growing…it has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the 19th Century; and now has gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads…In the Soviet institutions the predominance of Jews is even more astonishing. The same evil prominence was obtained by Jews in the terror under Bela Kun in Hungary, Rosa Luxembourg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States), this world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilisation and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing. It played, as a modern writer. Mrs. Webster, has so ably shown a definitely recognisable part in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century ; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the under- world of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and hare become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire.” – Winston Churchill (Illustrated Sunday Herald, Feb 8, 1920, p.5)

    We have seen how completely the Bolsheviks have reduced Russia to absolute starvation…this awful catastrophe has been brought about by a gang of professional revolutionaries, mostly Jews” – Winston Churchill (Western Gazette; Somerset, UK; 30 Sep. 1921, p.12 )

    “I might list a hundred other revolutionary leaders and every one of them would be a Jew. Wherever you read of an assassination or of the explosion of a bomb you will notice in the newspaper dispatches that the man was a Jew…every deed of that kind is done by Jews” – William Eleroy Curtis, The National Geographic, “The Revolution in Russia”, Vol. 18, No. 5, (May, 1907) (p. 313)

    • Thanks: smaragdus
  64. @AnotherDad
    @epebble



    Trump is raising doubts about her eligibility. It may not amount to much; but if she wins, many people may question her legitimacy...
     
    Actually this is the random stupid shit we get with Trump. (Whose mother by the way was born in Scotland and only naturalized a few years before he was born.) Harris does have a weird--not very "American"--upbringing in that her mom hadn't been in the US very long before Kamala was born, and then zipped off to Canada.

    But that is not the point ...

    The point is she is politically unAmerican--anti-American.

    She represents a party that stands
    -- against republican government and majority rule
    -- against our heritage rooted in Western Civilization, specifically Anglo-American traditions
    -- against the historic liberties of Americans
    -- against the interests of white people--whose ancestors built this nation--in favor of the interests of favored minorities under some sort of phony narrative of relative "oppression"
    -- against the interests of productive law-abiding middle class people (who actually make the country function) and for the Democrats collection of various parasitic grifters
    -- against the idea of borders
    -- against the interests of citizens in favor of the interests of foreigners
    and now quite clearly
    -- against "the rule of law"!
    in sum Harris is against the American nation.

    That's what any patriot would run against--against her and Biden being against the nation! Everything that defines it, maintains it and makes it special and decent and prosperous.

    Yapping about tiddlywink nonsense, is a distraction from what matters, what is critical. And unfortunately a Trump specialty.

    Replies: @ATBOTL, @Rob McX, @LEH50

    Totally agree. Quibbling about her place of birth or citizenship status gives tacit support to the magic dirt theory of human nature. It doesn’t matter if she’s first or fifth generation American, she’s still an enemy of the American nation.

    There was similarly futile and ridiculous speculation on the part of some Republicans about whether Obama was secretly a Muslim. What these deluded cucks don’t understand is that most prominent Democrats (and many Republicans) are as dangerous to the American nation as any Muslim.

  65. @anon
    @Known Fact

    You don’t hear the Yankees getting all defensive about “controlling” the American League, do you? Neither should my fellow tribesmen get all defensive about earning and wielding great power and prominence in certain fields.

    Perhaps that's because the American League does a good job at what it sets out to do. It just puts on baseball games. It doesn't try to manipulate you. But the media sucks and everyone hates it, and it lies to people all the time, and a lot of people know it. I imagine your tribesmen would prefer it if people thought that it was just a motley collection of random tribeless individuals doing that sort of thing. But it's not.

    So that's sort of the thing. If Jews "earned" prominence in the media through some fair means, then why do they do such a lousy job? As I'm sure you know, there are hundreds of bloggers and YouTube stars who could do a better job telling people the news, but they don't. In fact, when they try, your tribesman try to shut them up. That's a weird way to say that the Jews "earned" their prominence in the media.

    Replies: @Known Fact

    I agree that the media has become Public Enemy No. 1 (and the Jews in politics are a horror trip too). But saying the media lies, does a disgraceful job and seeks to warp American culture in large part due to lying liberal Jews is a much more relevant critique than simply saying Jews “control” it, which just comes across like jealousy — unless you mean actual antitrust violations, unfair practices and so on, which it might well be coming to in social media.

    So what I was saying is that Jews should not defensively try to censor the charges of “control.” But as far as the media I’m right there in charging they’ve abused this position of influence.

    Also don’t confuse the current crop of decadent media Jews — who are helping destroy the entire industry — with an earlier generation that made the news and entertainment media so Jewish through actual talent and work.

    • Replies: @anon
    @Known Fact

    But saying the media lies, does a disgraceful job and seeks to warp American culture in large part due to lying liberal Jews is a much more relevant critique than simply saying Jews “control” it, which just comes across like jealousy

    Well, sure. But it amounts to the same thing, doesn't it? I mean. Someone is doing the hiring at all these media outlets, right? Someone hired all those lying liberal Jews. They could be hiring people who are more inclined to honesty, couldn't they? As I understand it, the way careers in the news media typically work is that, for example, a young, idealistic person gets a job at a small, local news outlet. And then they get noticed by a larger regional outlet. And then, after that, if they do a good enough job, they get noticed by one of the national outlets, etc. So, theoretically, the cream should rise to the top, right? Like it's supposed to.

    But that's exactly the opposite of how it works. You know that, if you want to know what really happened, you're better off reading the local paper in Sioux City, Iowa are than reading the New York Times. And that's largely because of the tribe that controls the national news media, because you know that the reporters who are doing an objective, fair job in Sioux City are never going to be hired by the New York Times. Instead, the big outlets will hire more Jennifer Rubins and Rachel Maddows and Ezra Kleins.

    You can call that envy if you want. But the thing is, you asked why Jews don't go around bragging about the fact that they control the media. And my point is simply that the reason they don't do that is because they know that the media is nothing to be proud of. Obviously, nobody is going to go around bragging that they created this awful thing that everybody hates. They'd much rather deflect from the fact that they're responsible for it.

    I guess Jews can brag about all the intelligence and chutzpah it took to gain control of the media if they want, but that's like bragging that you had the intelligence and chutzpah to pull off a really heinous crime. Like, I'll grant that the 9/11 attacks took a lot of planning and ingenuity and courage to accomplish too. But there's a reason that the Arab community doesn't go around bragging about that, obviously. And I think it's basically the same reason Jews don't go around bragging that they had the chutzpah to take control of the news media and turn it into total garbage, and why they're so eager to shut you up if you point out that they did.

    Also don’t confuse the current crop of decadent media Jews — who are helping destroy the entire industry — with an earlier generation that made the news and entertainment media so Jewish through actual talent and work.

    The entertainment media, maybe. Although that's pretty complicated too. I think people tend to remember all the good things from the past and forget about the bad things. For every Steven Spielberg, putting out Jaws and Close Encounters of the Third Kind, there are a couple dozen Lloyd Kaufmanns, cranking out Class Of Nuke 'Em High and Tales From The Crapper. For every Jerry Seinfeld, there are a couple dozen Paulie Shores. I guess you could call what Lloyd Kaufmann and Paulie Shore have "talent", but I wouldn't.

    But I don't believe that there ever was a time that the national news media in this country ever was all that great. Who are these great Jewish journalists people talk about? Carl Bernstein, maybe? Who are the others? Everyone just seems to sort of assume that they existed in the past, but who? Walter Cronkite and Mike Wallace don't seem to have been any better or more honest than the media Jews we have now. It just seemed that way at the time because people didn't have the internet back then, so there weren't goys like Steve Sailer fact-checking them.

    Anyway, I could probably go on for hours like this, but I think you get the point, and this comment is already too long as it is.

    Replies: @sarz

  66. anon[409] • Disclaimer says:
    @Known Fact
    @anon

    I agree that the media has become Public Enemy No. 1 (and the Jews in politics are a horror trip too). But saying the media lies, does a disgraceful job and seeks to warp American culture in large part due to lying liberal Jews is a much more relevant critique than simply saying Jews "control" it, which just comes across like jealousy -- unless you mean actual antitrust violations, unfair practices and so on, which it might well be coming to in social media.

    So what I was saying is that Jews should not defensively try to censor the charges of "control." But as far as the media I'm right there in charging they've abused this position of influence.

    Also don't confuse the current crop of decadent media Jews -- who are helping destroy the entire industry -- with an earlier generation that made the news and entertainment media so Jewish through actual talent and work.

    Replies: @anon

    But saying the media lies, does a disgraceful job and seeks to warp American culture in large part due to lying liberal Jews is a much more relevant critique than simply saying Jews “control” it, which just comes across like jealousy

    Well, sure. But it amounts to the same thing, doesn’t it? I mean. Someone is doing the hiring at all these media outlets, right? Someone hired all those lying liberal Jews. They could be hiring people who are more inclined to honesty, couldn’t they? As I understand it, the way careers in the news media typically work is that, for example, a young, idealistic person gets a job at a small, local news outlet. And then they get noticed by a larger regional outlet. And then, after that, if they do a good enough job, they get noticed by one of the national outlets, etc. So, theoretically, the cream should rise to the top, right? Like it’s supposed to.

    But that’s exactly the opposite of how it works. You know that, if you want to know what really happened, you’re better off reading the local paper in Sioux City, Iowa are than reading the New York Times. And that’s largely because of the tribe that controls the national news media, because you know that the reporters who are doing an objective, fair job in Sioux City are never going to be hired by the New York Times. Instead, the big outlets will hire more Jennifer Rubins and Rachel Maddows and Ezra Kleins.

    You can call that envy if you want. But the thing is, you asked why Jews don’t go around bragging about the fact that they control the media. And my point is simply that the reason they don’t do that is because they know that the media is nothing to be proud of. Obviously, nobody is going to go around bragging that they created this awful thing that everybody hates. They’d much rather deflect from the fact that they’re responsible for it.

    I guess Jews can brag about all the intelligence and chutzpah it took to gain control of the media if they want, but that’s like bragging that you had the intelligence and chutzpah to pull off a really heinous crime. Like, I’ll grant that the 9/11 attacks took a lot of planning and ingenuity and courage to accomplish too. But there’s a reason that the Arab community doesn’t go around bragging about that, obviously. And I think it’s basically the same reason Jews don’t go around bragging that they had the chutzpah to take control of the news media and turn it into total garbage, and why they’re so eager to shut you up if you point out that they did.

    Also don’t confuse the current crop of decadent media Jews — who are helping destroy the entire industry — with an earlier generation that made the news and entertainment media so Jewish through actual talent and work.

    The entertainment media, maybe. Although that’s pretty complicated too. I think people tend to remember all the good things from the past and forget about the bad things. For every Steven Spielberg, putting out Jaws and Close Encounters of the Third Kind, there are a couple dozen Lloyd Kaufmanns, cranking out Class Of Nuke ‘Em High and Tales From The Crapper. For every Jerry Seinfeld, there are a couple dozen Paulie Shores. I guess you could call what Lloyd Kaufmann and Paulie Shore have “talent”, but I wouldn’t.

    But I don’t believe that there ever was a time that the national news media in this country ever was all that great. Who are these great Jewish journalists people talk about? Carl Bernstein, maybe? Who are the others? Everyone just seems to sort of assume that they existed in the past, but who? Walter Cronkite and Mike Wallace don’t seem to have been any better or more honest than the media Jews we have now. It just seemed that way at the time because people didn’t have the internet back then, so there weren’t goys like Steve Sailer fact-checking them.

    Anyway, I could probably go on for hours like this, but I think you get the point, and this comment is already too long as it is.

    • Replies: @sarz
    @anon

    You were making a bit of sense, and then this...


    Like, I’ll grant that the 9/11 attacks took a lot of planning and ingenuity and courage to accomplish too. But there’s a reason that the Arab community doesn’t go around bragging about that, obviously.
     
    Could you in all innocence still be so innocent of the fact, after people like Chris Bollyn have spelled it out in detail, that 9/11 was a Jew op, from conception and story-boarding, to planning, to execution, to media manipulation and cover-up, to the control of the courts dealing with the claims of survivors, to stalling in SDNY and refusing to present the findings of the Lawyers' Committee for 9/11 Inquiry to a grand jury, to seeding websites like this with trolls? And that international Jewry was the major beneficiary? It's hard to believe in a mind quite so virgin as yours.

    https://archive.org/details/MastersOfDeception
    https://bollyn.com/
  67. @Reg Cæsar
    Here's an idea: establish that white is nothing more than a code name for Jews. White nationalism, white supremacism, white fragility, and all the rest. Counter any charge with, "You're really getting around to Jews, aren't you?"

    Heck, they've spent a century building a well-focused retaliation strategy. We may as well hitchhike on it.

    Replies: @Anon, @Hans, @TomSchmidt

    I’ll use that. Thanks.

  68. @Dumbo
    The most frustrating thing about Jewish power is that you are not allowed to observe that there is any form of Jewish power. You have to pretend/believe that Jews are just oppressed "people of colour" that are constantly menaced by pogroms. "How many fingers, Winston?"

    Tyrants at least, of course you cannot criticize them in public, but everyone knows they are in charge. But with Jews, they may control half the world, but any notice of that is verboten. And I'm not even sure that most people (i.e. normies) even see what's going on. They may not even notice or know that a lot of surnames in Media and Wall Street and Big Pharma are Jewish. It's like that 80s movie, "They Live", maybe you need special glasses.

    Replies: @bigdicknick

    most normies are not aware how powerful jews are. If you try to talk about it you will come off as a loon.

  69. @IHTG
    You can switch to saying that "Ivy League cosmopolitan urbanites" control the media, which has more relevance and explanatory power anyway.

    Replies: @anon, @jsm, @John Gruskos

    Yes, the World Ivy-League Congress pressured Facebook to censor all criticism of Ivy League alums.

  70. @anon
    @Known Fact

    But saying the media lies, does a disgraceful job and seeks to warp American culture in large part due to lying liberal Jews is a much more relevant critique than simply saying Jews “control” it, which just comes across like jealousy

    Well, sure. But it amounts to the same thing, doesn't it? I mean. Someone is doing the hiring at all these media outlets, right? Someone hired all those lying liberal Jews. They could be hiring people who are more inclined to honesty, couldn't they? As I understand it, the way careers in the news media typically work is that, for example, a young, idealistic person gets a job at a small, local news outlet. And then they get noticed by a larger regional outlet. And then, after that, if they do a good enough job, they get noticed by one of the national outlets, etc. So, theoretically, the cream should rise to the top, right? Like it's supposed to.

    But that's exactly the opposite of how it works. You know that, if you want to know what really happened, you're better off reading the local paper in Sioux City, Iowa are than reading the New York Times. And that's largely because of the tribe that controls the national news media, because you know that the reporters who are doing an objective, fair job in Sioux City are never going to be hired by the New York Times. Instead, the big outlets will hire more Jennifer Rubins and Rachel Maddows and Ezra Kleins.

    You can call that envy if you want. But the thing is, you asked why Jews don't go around bragging about the fact that they control the media. And my point is simply that the reason they don't do that is because they know that the media is nothing to be proud of. Obviously, nobody is going to go around bragging that they created this awful thing that everybody hates. They'd much rather deflect from the fact that they're responsible for it.

    I guess Jews can brag about all the intelligence and chutzpah it took to gain control of the media if they want, but that's like bragging that you had the intelligence and chutzpah to pull off a really heinous crime. Like, I'll grant that the 9/11 attacks took a lot of planning and ingenuity and courage to accomplish too. But there's a reason that the Arab community doesn't go around bragging about that, obviously. And I think it's basically the same reason Jews don't go around bragging that they had the chutzpah to take control of the news media and turn it into total garbage, and why they're so eager to shut you up if you point out that they did.

    Also don’t confuse the current crop of decadent media Jews — who are helping destroy the entire industry — with an earlier generation that made the news and entertainment media so Jewish through actual talent and work.

    The entertainment media, maybe. Although that's pretty complicated too. I think people tend to remember all the good things from the past and forget about the bad things. For every Steven Spielberg, putting out Jaws and Close Encounters of the Third Kind, there are a couple dozen Lloyd Kaufmanns, cranking out Class Of Nuke 'Em High and Tales From The Crapper. For every Jerry Seinfeld, there are a couple dozen Paulie Shores. I guess you could call what Lloyd Kaufmann and Paulie Shore have "talent", but I wouldn't.

    But I don't believe that there ever was a time that the national news media in this country ever was all that great. Who are these great Jewish journalists people talk about? Carl Bernstein, maybe? Who are the others? Everyone just seems to sort of assume that they existed in the past, but who? Walter Cronkite and Mike Wallace don't seem to have been any better or more honest than the media Jews we have now. It just seemed that way at the time because people didn't have the internet back then, so there weren't goys like Steve Sailer fact-checking them.

    Anyway, I could probably go on for hours like this, but I think you get the point, and this comment is already too long as it is.

    Replies: @sarz

    You were making a bit of sense, and then this…

    Like, I’ll grant that the 9/11 attacks took a lot of planning and ingenuity and courage to accomplish too. But there’s a reason that the Arab community doesn’t go around bragging about that, obviously.

    Could you in all innocence still be so innocent of the fact, after people like Chris Bollyn have spelled it out in detail, that 9/11 was a Jew op, from conception and story-boarding, to planning, to execution, to media manipulation and cover-up, to the control of the courts dealing with the claims of survivors, to stalling in SDNY and refusing to present the findings of the Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry to a grand jury, to seeding websites like this with trolls? And that international Jewry was the major beneficiary? It’s hard to believe in a mind quite so virgin as yours.

    https://archive.org/details/MastersOfDeception
    https://bollyn.com/

    • Disagree: Mr McKenna
  71. @Unladen Swallow
    @Cloudbuster

    Where have we seen something like this before? like Eisner when he was CEO of Disney personally firing Gregg Easterbrook for saying Jews dominated the entertainment industry perhaps, no irony there.

    Replies: @anon, @HarvardSqEddy

    Governor Ron DuhhSantis upon returning from his obligatory junket to Israel introduced a bill in Tallahassee making it “…highly illegal…” to associate Jews with Hollywood. I wish I were kidding.
    His Excellency will kiss their asses in order to become a senator with direct access to the ‘money-trough’ in DC.

  72. @AnotherDad
    @epebble



    Trump is raising doubts about her eligibility. It may not amount to much; but if she wins, many people may question her legitimacy...
     
    Actually this is the random stupid shit we get with Trump. (Whose mother by the way was born in Scotland and only naturalized a few years before he was born.) Harris does have a weird--not very "American"--upbringing in that her mom hadn't been in the US very long before Kamala was born, and then zipped off to Canada.

    But that is not the point ...

    The point is she is politically unAmerican--anti-American.

    She represents a party that stands
    -- against republican government and majority rule
    -- against our heritage rooted in Western Civilization, specifically Anglo-American traditions
    -- against the historic liberties of Americans
    -- against the interests of white people--whose ancestors built this nation--in favor of the interests of favored minorities under some sort of phony narrative of relative "oppression"
    -- against the interests of productive law-abiding middle class people (who actually make the country function) and for the Democrats collection of various parasitic grifters
    -- against the idea of borders
    -- against the interests of citizens in favor of the interests of foreigners
    and now quite clearly
    -- against "the rule of law"!
    in sum Harris is against the American nation.

    That's what any patriot would run against--against her and Biden being against the nation! Everything that defines it, maintains it and makes it special and decent and prosperous.

    Yapping about tiddlywink nonsense, is a distraction from what matters, what is critical. And unfortunately a Trump specialty.

    Replies: @ATBOTL, @Rob McX, @LEH50

    Wait…Kamala truly is not qualified. She has “birthright citizenship” which is not natural. Neither did either of her “student” parents bother to try to get naturalization. If we continue to ignore these lack of qualifications – pretty soon, any bully can take the Presidency. So, YES, it matters.

    As far as Jews go – they know among themselves who is a Zionist and who is not. And they know the law about not dividing Israel (which Jared is trying so hard to do). Every President tries to do it, and we end up with catastrophic events as if God is paying attention!

    And, I don’t like what Jewish people call me, a white woman – it’s derogatory. God doesn’t approve of his chosen people (BTW, that went to their heads because they don’t understand why they were chosen). It’s not that God thinks they are the most holy, most obedient, most faithful to Him. He chose them because Abraham decided to follow God in a pagan world. They do not get that they have been disobedient for thousands of years! God’s love is Jerusalem. Jews are a race, and a religion. Some people are both. Some are just the race with no love for God or religion. That is the Zionists who are using “God” for power, and draining us in the US to fight their battles for them…because they induce guilt in us because God said, “Whoever blesses Israel, I will bless; whoever curses Israel, I will curse. But, He’s talking about the faithful Jews – not the criminals trying to run His world and who bow to money and Satan.

    I can love the misunderstood Jews – but these monsters that are destroying our world – they are not His Chosen People (and Christians are not less than Jews – we Believed in Jesus – and were “grafted in to the vine” in God’s words). But……God knows what’s going on; their supremacy pride; their treatment of anyone who is not a Jew…..God holds their future in His hands. I wouldn’t want to be them!

Comments are closed.

Subscribe to All Steve Sailer Comments via RSS