What's a Better Term Than "Social Justice Warrior?"
Search Text Case Sensitive Exact Words Include Comments
List of Bookmarks
I sometimes use Social Justice Jihadi.
Or how about this?
People of Pozness
Follow @steve_sailer
The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
Commenters to ignore (one per line)
Commenters to follow (one per line)
Trim Comments?
Comments are closed.
Subscribe to All Steve Sailer Comments via RSSPastClassics
The Surprising Elements of Talmudic Judaism
The evidence is clear — but often ignored
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement
The Shaping Event of Our Modern World
English
Arabic
Chinese (Simplified)
Dutch
French
German
Hebrew
Hindi
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Russian
Spanish
Swedish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Jacobin.
Personally I prefer "Social-Grievance Warrior" or "Social-Justice Whiner"..Replies: @CCZ
Communist
Globalist useful idiots
The Woke.
Racist of Color
People Who Want To Be Black
Quisling
Member of the Faculty Senate?
FHN -Fucking Hypocritical Nanny
(Unless it’s a she and she is young and hot, then …. HFN)
Neo-gnostics.
Unlike most fervent religionists, who can at least rely on their beliefs being within the realm of mystery, sjws’ beliefs are affirmatively false but widely accepted.
Perhaps an emperor’s clothes allusion would be appropriate?
Emperor’s ovationists - not catchy enoughReplies: @Jake, @Anon
Somebody’s Just Whining.
Solipsist Jerkoff Whites.
Social Justice Lakers.
Social Justice Clippers.
Social Justice Trail Blazers.
Social Justice Jazz.
Social Justice Bulls.
Social Justice Cavaliers.
Social Justice Bucks.
Social Justice Pistons.
Social Justice Mavericks.
Social Justice Raptors.
Social Justice Hawks.
Social Justice Wizards.
Social Justice Magic.
Social Justice Heat.
Social Justice Thunder.
Social Justice Timberwolves.
Social Justice Steamrollers!
SleepWoke
Was reading up on the Directoire and the Terreur last night. Fun stuff, and a tad premonitory I daresay.
Personally I prefer “Social-Grievance Warrior” or “Social-Justice Whiner”..
People Who Want *Us* To Be Black.
Morons
That’s what I use.
Something with the feeling of “fag hags,” but adapted for the particulars of social justice.
Or “IQ denialists.”
“What’s a Better Term Than “Social Justice Warrior?””
drama clowns?
As a supporter of the Bonnie Prince, I resent that.
This is actually hard. Possibilities I’ve come up with then rejected:
Slytherins
Lunatics
Pawns
Stooges
Obviously, none of these have anything to do with each other. IOW, I have no idea what’s wrong with these people.
It’s an interesting question. A sjw is a person with religious fervor based on faith in certain accepted premises.
Unlike most fervent religionists, who can at least rely on their beliefs being within the realm of mystery, sjws’ beliefs are affirmatively false but widely accepted.
Perhaps an emperor’s clothes allusion would be appropriate?
Emperor’s ovationists – not catchy enough
Then how about Puritan Orcs?Replies: @uilleam yr alban, @syonredux, @Dieter Kief
Neo-communists or neo-leftists
Zealots
Lollards
Roundheads
Bolsheviks
Red Guards
But let's not forget Baizuo.Replies: @AndrewR
OT – We just had a special election for the Missouri senate in my little district north of Kansas City. The white democrat beat the white republican 59 to 40 percent. It is fuc*ing unbelievable how many whites are still voting democrat. Democrats openly rebuke whites and these chumps continue to vote for them.
To put this in context the GOP governor just resigned. But this prick was not even a republican until this election cycle. He was a pro-Obama guy who suddenly became a republican because he wanted to become governor. He supposedly was a navy SEAL and used that to win the patriotic vote. But he really rode on Trump’s coattails.
Ironically my district has had a GOP state senator for 10 years. But the current guy was appointed to a state commission by the scumbag governor before he resigned, thus triggering this special election which allowed this SJW democrat to win.
Now there is concern that democrat US Senator Claire McCaskill will survive in November because the GOP candidate facing her is our current attorney general who has taken a beating because of the scumbag governor and his scandal and resignation. Keep in mind Trump won in MO in Nov 2016 by 500,000 votes which is a huge margin for Missouri. And Trump’s coattails gave the GOP every statewide race on that election night. That has never happened. We all thought Claire’s days were numbered. But now she is likely to survive just like she did 6 years ago when crazy Todd Akin made that stupid rape remark thus assuring her of reelection.
They’re social reformers. Social reform activism was listed in the Soviet version of the DSM under “sluggish schizophrenia” ( вялотеку́щая шизофрени́я).
You could call them dissidents. I’ve used the term Bolshevik. But the most neutral term is social reform activist. “Becky is a social reform activist, she’s organizing a protest on campus”.
Unlike most fervent religionists, who can at least rely on their beliefs being within the realm of mystery, sjws’ beliefs are affirmatively false but widely accepted.
Perhaps an emperor’s clothes allusion would be appropriate?
Emperor’s ovationists - not catchy enoughReplies: @Jake, @Anon
“It’s an interesting question. A sjw is a person with religious fervor based on faith in certain accepted premises.”
Then how about Puritan Orcs?
mini messiah
Suicide Cult Leaders
Now, who makes their party with all *warriors*?
https://www.themarysue.com/social-justice-pins/
The Resentment Industry.
Let’s not confuse our Jacobins and our Jacobites.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syriac_Orthodox_Church
Semi-serious: I saw an article in the Federalist (yes, I know) describing the appeal of social justice to white people (with or without parentheses) as a sort of ‘recreational scolding’. Given Derbyshire’s thoughts on ‘ethnomasochism’, I’m wondering…
How much of this SJW stuff is displaced BDSM? (Or perhaps not so displaced, given the popularity of both in the same liberal circles?) I am convinced an article on ‘Social Justice as Sadomasochism’ would get many retweets. (I am *really* curious to hear what Albertosaurus thinks, if he sees this in time.)
In addition, I’ve suggested to progressive contacts that submission may be a way for feminists to enjoy the same old roles now that they are coded as ‘transgressive’. Some self-identified feminists have, ah, confirmed this.
Someone smarter than me can, er, tie this all together?
http://thefederalist.com/2018/06/05/melinda-gates-bashes-white-guys-says-shell-discriminate/
Melinda Gates, who's entire life is based on the fact that she managed to marry the (formerly) richest (white) guy in the world, bashes white guys.
Hillary++Replies: @Whiskey
So the sexual desire is somehow opposite to their social position. The white SJW is entitled, so he would want to be debased sexually. The black SJW is not so entitled (in a social hierarchy sense), so wants to dominate sexually. MLK spent much of his spare time indulging in orgies.
Not sure where this ‘sexual socialism’, wanting to reverse differences in the bedroom, comes from. Perhaps it’s from the same source as political socialism. Since we’ve lived for millennia in small groups surrounded by people who are pretty much like ourselves, it’s perfectly natural to instinctively believe in equality. But when that belief collides with the modern world, where people are clearly not equal, you have to jump through internal psychological hoops, as well as try to change the external world, in order to resolve that. Sexual relations are a perfect way to change the inner and outer worlds.Replies: @Rosie, @Anonym
Manjaws and Soyboys
Antifa
The Unemployables
The Rainbow Coalition
Hate Hoaxers
Coalition of the Fringes
High Priests of Identity Politics
Identity Politicos
I once heard an actual Social Justice Warrior refer to himself as a Rainbow Warrior. Perhaps, we can call them The Rainbow Guard?
Social Jackoff Wimp!
Compassion Fascist or Compassion Radicals; or maybe Social Justice Fundamentalists; or Evangelists for Social Justice; or Social Justice Evangelists.
From P.J. O’rourke originally.
I find that the good old “commie” is suitably offensive and descriptive enough. Try it – works wonders.
Jihadi is good. It captures the religious zeal and bigotry towards heretics who do not accept their One True Faith.
Mafia might be good too, given their extortion tactics.
Check out the racketeering in this in depth account of how a couple of “woke gay vegan bakers!?!?!?” are getting shaken down after their clerks tried to turn away somebody who was ostensibly a customer after closing time who turned out to be a black professional social justice activist.
https://quillette.com/2018/06/05/portland-bakery-white-guilt-poisons-batter/
The guy who wrote it actually does real reporting and has the guts to name & shame the grifters. A long but worthwhile read.
Speaking of mau-mauing…
http://www.latimes.com/local/california/la-me-lopez-stockton-money-05272018-story.html
Anybody else see this report about how Stockton, CA is plans “to award stipends of up to $1,000 a month to residents deemed most likely to shoot somebody” no-strings-attached. It’ll be in part financed by the philanthropic foundation run by the incompetent twerp who lucked into his dumb money doing PR for his college roommate, Mark Zuckerberg, even though he had zero tech skills himself. At least he’s been putting his money where his mouth is on behalf of “wealth redistribution” by blowing his ridiculous easy fortune on running the New Republic aground and financing his husband’s hopeless carpet-bagging congressional run.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-rise-and-fall-of-chris-hughes-and-sean-eldridge-americas-worst-gay-power-couple
Pretty much a chronicle of the country's decline.
Relics (of the 20th Century)? Make it clear they’re regressive, not progressive in any sense of the word.
Maybe, then, simply “Regressives”? Sounds familiar though–guessing it’s already been circulated and flopped.
I dunno. Anyone of this mold is beyond the reach of reason and no amount of shaming will likely sway them from their religious fervor.
There are websites that have banned the term SJW from comments. Quite funny when you consider it.
has decent alternatives (more useful for ban circumventing than in the sense iSteve meant in his headline):
SJK - Social Justice Knight
SJP - Social Justice Pawn
What’s wrong with Social Justice Warrior? I like it…
Related, I think we need a new term for “virtue signaling.” Many of the people it applies to aren’t self-aware enough to understand that it is not meant to be a complement.
SJWs = secular puritans (I can claim no originality for this - I remember hearing the late Mel Bradford so describing such people more than 30 years ago).
One of my uncles, a physician, used to refer to them as "proctoliberals."
http://i.magaimg.net/img/17yd.jpgReplies: @Mr. Anon
Also, "Pozzers" seems like a good one, both due to HIV "poz" and well as "poseurs".
Borg Collectivist
Ethnic Forager
Pre-limbic Single Helix Mutoid
Pre-civilizational Throwback
Hunter-gatherer Moralist
Humanimal
To put this in context the GOP governor just resigned. But this prick was not even a republican until this election cycle. He was a pro-Obama guy who suddenly became a republican because he wanted to become governor. He supposedly was a navy SEAL and used that to win the patriotic vote. But he really rode on Trump's coattails.
Ironically my district has had a GOP state senator for 10 years. But the current guy was appointed to a state commission by the scumbag governor before he resigned, thus triggering this special election which allowed this SJW democrat to win.
Now there is concern that democrat US Senator Claire McCaskill will survive in November because the GOP candidate facing her is our current attorney general who has taken a beating because of the scumbag governor and his scandal and resignation. Keep in mind Trump won in MO in Nov 2016 by 500,000 votes which is a huge margin for Missouri. And Trump's coattails gave the GOP every statewide race on that election night. That has never happened. We all thought Claire's days were numbered. But now she is likely to survive just like she did 6 years ago when crazy Todd Akin made that stupid rape remark thus assuring her of reelection.Replies: @The preferred nomenclature is...
I like you can not fathom a straight white male voting for a Democrat these days. But they do.
Some folks are simply broken. Their minds do not function properly.
Rootless cosmopolitans?
Equalibrarians.
Easier to say.Replies: @Neil Templeton
How much of this SJW stuff is displaced BDSM? (Or perhaps not so displaced, given the popularity of both in the same liberal circles?) I am convinced an article on 'Social Justice as Sadomasochism' would get many retweets. (I am *really* curious to hear what Albertosaurus thinks, if he sees this in time.)
In addition, I've suggested to progressive contacts that submission may be a way for feminists to enjoy the same old roles now that they are coded as 'transgressive'. Some self-identified feminists have, ah, confirmed this.
Someone smarter than me can, er, tie this all together?Replies: @Anonymous, @TelfoedJohn, @Anonymous
Here’s an interesting article from The Federalist:
http://thefederalist.com/2018/06/05/melinda-gates-bashes-white-guys-says-shell-discriminate/
Melinda Gates, who’s entire life is based on the fact that she managed to marry the (formerly) richest (white) guy in the world, bashes white guys.
Hillary++
This stuff will only end when White women fear White men. Only fear created respect, submission, and backing will White women stop bashing White men.
OK, I give up.
What the hell is “Pozness”?
Not gettin’ it.
The idea is that SJW beliefs have a similar debilitating effect on the brain to that which HIV has on the body, hence an SJW is said to be 'pozzed' .
Poz
In non-homo sense: the coolness that is; the best ever; the rah digga
"Damn those strippers at the Hustler Club are so poz I wish I could touch them", stated Simon.
I find “vegan Maoist” does the trick.
Small-souled bugmen:https://mpcdot.com/forums/topic/9496-small-souled-bugman-morphology-and-evolution/
Then how about Puritan Orcs?Replies: @uilleam yr alban, @syonredux, @Dieter Kief
1st Wave Inquisitors Intersectional
Inquisitors Intersectional
Inquisitors
Social Justice Inquisitors
Social Inquisitors
Community Inquisitors
Any of the above sub. Inquisixirs, i.e. 1st Wave Inquisixirs Intersectional
I’ve just used the word liberal instead of SJW. I also use the word liberal for criminal. As in, the convenience store in my neighborhood was robbed by a liberal last week.
You can also substitute the word Democrat. The convenience store was robbed by a Democrat.
Lollards
Roundheads
Bolsheviks
Red GuardsReplies: @Thin-Skinned Masta-Beta
Good ones.
But let’s not forget Baizuo.
I like commie too.
Smug buggers.
Useless idiot. Quisling. Traitor. Fool.
I like it, but how about just ‘equalibrians’?
Easier to say.
The term “social justice warrior” has the merit that it is not an offensive slur, like “commie” and some of the other suggestions. The SJWs are proud to be battling for social justice.
The term pozness needs some explanation. I think it has something to do with people who are proud to be HIV positive, or people who wish to show solidarity with those who are HIV positive, or those who like the way HIV positivity unifies the gay community. I am not sure exactly, so I hope someone explains it.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bugchasing
Easier to say.Replies: @Neil Templeton
Good with me. How ’bout Moralacanteurs or Puritarians?
Probably don’t realize that the J stands for Justice.
How much of this SJW stuff is displaced BDSM? (Or perhaps not so displaced, given the popularity of both in the same liberal circles?) I am convinced an article on 'Social Justice as Sadomasochism' would get many retweets. (I am *really* curious to hear what Albertosaurus thinks, if he sees this in time.)
In addition, I've suggested to progressive contacts that submission may be a way for feminists to enjoy the same old roles now that they are coded as 'transgressive'. Some self-identified feminists have, ah, confirmed this.
Someone smarter than me can, er, tie this all together?Replies: @Anonymous, @TelfoedJohn, @Anonymous
There’s often a class element, a reversal of power, in sexual depravity. For instance, the rich banker will want to be pissed on by a prostitute, and the ghetto dweller will want to rape.
So the sexual desire is somehow opposite to their social position. The white SJW is entitled, so he would want to be debased sexually. The black SJW is not so entitled (in a social hierarchy sense), so wants to dominate sexually. MLK spent much of his spare time indulging in orgies.
Not sure where this ‘sexual socialism’, wanting to reverse differences in the bedroom, comes from. Perhaps it’s from the same source as political socialism. Since we’ve lived for millennia in small groups surrounded by people who are pretty much like ourselves, it’s perfectly natural to instinctively believe in equality. But when that belief collides with the modern world, where people are clearly not equal, you have to jump through internal psychological hoops, as well as try to change the external world, in order to resolve that. Sexual relations are a perfect way to change the inner and outer worlds.
It would be interesting to see how various traits (ethnicity, IQ, personality type, etc.) align with sexual proclivity, and perhaps speculate as to reasons why there have evolved to be such.
The Whiny Children of the Elite.
Didn’t the term Poz originate on the My Posting Career forum seven or eight years ago?
Virtue signaling = moral vanity.
SJWs = secular puritans (I can claim no originality for this – I remember hearing the late Mel Bradford so describing such people more than 30 years ago).
One of my uncles, a physician, used to refer to them as “proctoliberals.”
Extreme Social Justice Warriors. ESJW
Hmm … Squares?
They are Abolitionists. My great great Grandfather used to shoot them.
This article about a ‘woke’ bakery in Portland being mercilessly mau-maued is great stuff:
https://quillette.com/2018/06/05/portland-bakery-white-guilt-poisons-batter/
It has excellent detail on how SJWs (or whatever we’d like to call them) really operate.
It also features an appearance by the infamous White Nonsense Roundup, i.e. the white SJW ladies who volunteer to step in when PoC are too exhausted to continue to do the ‘work’ of edumacating the Deplorables about their lack of wokeness.
Last throw: Tikkunistas, Thersitarians, Shadowfarians.
Maybe, then, simply "Regressives"? Sounds familiar though--guessing it's already been circulated and flopped.
I dunno. Anyone of this mold is beyond the reach of reason and no amount of shaming will likely sway them from their religious fervor.Replies: @Anon
I still enjoy using the Regressive Left and the Illiberal Left. Or just the Illiberals. I think you have the right idea to take away the vanity of calling themselves progressive. I also, always liked Steve’s Ctrl-Left.
Then how about Puritan Orcs?Replies: @uilleam yr alban, @syonredux, @Dieter Kief
Given their enthusiasm for buggery, Bogomil Orcs seems more appropriate.
Those of the Progressive Faith.
And that’s why goons like you lose.
http://thefederalist.com/2018/06/05/melinda-gates-bashes-white-guys-says-shell-discriminate/
Melinda Gates, who's entire life is based on the fact that she managed to marry the (formerly) richest (white) guy in the world, bashes white guys.
Hillary++Replies: @Whiskey
Like I said, there is no end of ways in which White women are the natural and eternal enemy of the White beta male. Particularly when nice White ladies are married to a beta male.
This stuff will only end when White women fear White men. Only fear created respect, submission, and backing will White women stop bashing White men.
The Virtue Signal
I like all the comparisons to Puritanism and Maoism. This one probably won’t ever catch on but there was a strand of Puritanism called Puritan Millenialism which is fun for the college aged kids.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puritans#Millennialism
Several commenters came up with Maoism, Red Guard etc. An earlier comment from a different thread had used MAOism as Make America Offended which as an abbreviation might work, otherwise maoist is probably a bit plain??
I don’t know. I’m not a words guy like Trump.
Bourgeois Gentrification-Imperialist Pigs
Traitors.
Outer Party members.
I like “social justice jihadi” more than warrior actually. Islamic immigration is so relevant today and so illiberal, yet the sjws are fully in favor of it in the most over the top way imaginable, so they deserve to have it pinned on them. And it gets to piggy back off of the already famous “social justice warrior” linguistic structure.
A woman I know is a big fan of the blank slate, it drives her crazy if I use the term “Fascist Left”
Baristanistas.
How about “F*cking Idiot”.
Neocoms.
Newcoms.
Brownshirts? Obviously it comes from fascism but the left today both simultaneously emotionally sees fascism as it’s greatest enemy but also behaves similarly to them. See for exhibit A : Antifa. So maybe it will cut them extra deep. Jonah Goldberg also has a book called Liberal Fascism which really pissed the left off.
>Barbara Lerner-Specter Admiration Society
>Caucasian Ethnomasochists
>Multicult Maypole Minions
“SJW” already has a negative connotation, and it’s apt enough that even left-leaning people find themselves using it. It’s their job to come up with a suitable euphemism.
“Social Justice Warrior” is great mocking phrase that cannot be improved on.
SJW is a great term.
Social Justice Jihadi sounds like a more extreme SJW, the kind who’ll attack a Marxist professor for talking to Charles Murray.
I prefer the “Evangelical Left”. Accurate and a solid troll.
Then how about Puritan Orcs?Replies: @uilleam yr alban, @syonredux, @Dieter Kief
The New Puritans
The Purified
The Purifiers
The Pure Stuff
I'm on a roll here, Deiter - thanks for getting me going this morning!Replies: @dieter kief
Unlike most fervent religionists, who can at least rely on their beliefs being within the realm of mystery, sjws’ beliefs are affirmatively false but widely accepted.
Perhaps an emperor’s clothes allusion would be appropriate?
Emperor’s ovationists - not catchy enoughReplies: @Jake, @Anon
I’ve been hoping that someone would write a children’s book about PC madness entitled Emperor Obama’s New Gender Identity.
Moral exhibitionism.
That’s awesome!!
Screaming Judeo Whoopiecushion.
There is no question that there is some connection between SJW and Puritans and Maoists. All three groups have a totalitarian mindset related to specific doctrines or orthodoxies and are (were) heavily into virtue signaling and thought control.
SJWs are like Church Ladies on Steroids, because they combine virtue preening with ignorant Knowitallism. Their ignorance is profound as they never fact check or questions their assumptions.
They use the accusation of racism and sexism to stop debate and make a candid conversation with them socially dangerous.
They always make the worst assumptions about people . Like if you want to reduce immigration because of concerns about housing or wages for working people who are already citizens ….you must be racist!
Leftist Fear Mongerers
The Totalitarianism boys and girls
Haters of American Traditionalism
Anti White Males
Purveyors of Anti White Hatred (PAWH)
The Blue Pilled (Because they inhabit the blue area)
The Western Khmer Rouge
Ignorant Leftist Though Control Police
Church Ladies on Steroids
Fascist Leftists (or Leftist Fascists) (Beware they hate being called this!)
Anti White Racists (AWR)
Progressive Totalitarians
Leftist Thought Control Police (TCP)
Leftist Mind Control Police (MCP)
Leftist Know It Alls (LKIA)
Western Maoists
The Morality Police
Cultural Marxists
Millennial Troskyites
Western Cultural Leninists
I like Social Justice Warriors because everyone knows what it means.
Secular Puritans is also good I think.
I especially think that Anti White Racism (AWR) needs to get more use and traction, because that is basically what many SJWs engage in. And no one wants to be a racist even if it is against White people (who deserve it according to many of the SJWs!).
Social Construct Warriors???
Smuglies
The term pozness needs some explanation. I think it has something to do with people who are proud to be HIV positive, or people who wish to show solidarity with those who are HIV positive, or those who like the way HIV positivity unifies the gay community. I am not sure exactly, so I hope someone explains it.Replies: @Rosie
I think it has something to do with bug-chasing.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bugchasing
baizuo
So the sexual desire is somehow opposite to their social position. The white SJW is entitled, so he would want to be debased sexually. The black SJW is not so entitled (in a social hierarchy sense), so wants to dominate sexually. MLK spent much of his spare time indulging in orgies.
Not sure where this ‘sexual socialism’, wanting to reverse differences in the bedroom, comes from. Perhaps it’s from the same source as political socialism. Since we’ve lived for millennia in small groups surrounded by people who are pretty much like ourselves, it’s perfectly natural to instinctively believe in equality. But when that belief collides with the modern world, where people are clearly not equal, you have to jump through internal psychological hoops, as well as try to change the external world, in order to resolve that. Sexual relations are a perfect way to change the inner and outer worlds.Replies: @Rosie, @Anonym
Perhaps your theory explains Whiskey’s sadistic streak?
And women who don't have the megaphone then imitate them.
In the UK several thousand girls have been raped and abused by gangs of overwhelmingly Muslim men (and it's still going on, there's a current Leeds trial). Had these gangs been white it would have been a feminist cause celebre, yet the sisters have been amazingly quiet. The only UK feminists who've strongly and consistently condemned it are a Muslim woman and a man-hating white lesbian.
Personally I prefer "Social-Grievance Warrior" or "Social-Justice Whiner"..Replies: @CCZ
“Social Grievance Jihadis Making the Ultimate Sacrifice” was a Steve Sailer blog topic here on March 19, 2017 and I think the word grievance more accurately describes the focus of the warriors under discussion.
Legal justice is defined and implemented by laws established through collective social and political action, even though we may personally disagree with a particular law or even the process. Social “justice” is defined subjectively by differing individuals, groups, and cultures in response to their individual, group, or cultural grievance(s). As some legal pundits have noted, either social justice has the same meaning as legal justice or, if not, social justice is a replacement for justice as defined by society’s laws and legal system. So the word social in social justice is either unnecessary or social justice is the expression of personal, group, or cultural grievances and the creation of a new injustice.
I would offer Social Grievance Zealots as a possibly appropriate label.
The winning, devastating term is ‘fake progressives’
The best phrase to shame the evil ones & the idiots, & to get the truth out.
This is the phrase to throw back with quite the same sticky power as ‘racist’ or ‘bigot’ thrown against nationalists etc… ‘Fake progressive’ is what demolishes Hillary Clinton, George Soros & all their myriad followers in 2 words … Who wants to be affiliated with something ‘fake’?
‘Fake progressive’ covers wide ground, & can be expanded usefully, e.g., ‘devious fake-progressive petty dictators’ … ‘Fake progressive’ gives an exit for duped individuals, ‘we were fooled’, when it is seen that the fake progressives are not ‘for the people’, unlike some earlier leftists who fought for sensible health care, workers’ wages etc
The term is instantly comprehensible, as people can be led to see that the Hillarys & Soroses are in fact destructive wrecking-balls, not ‘progressive’ at all …The ‘fake progressive’ label as a tool of shaming, can help those on the fence to quickly grasp the game going on.
Commie is my preferred descriptor too. When they whine, I either 1) suggest that they embrace the suck or 2) ask them to explain the difference between themselves and commies.
Scolds • Nags
Master beraters
Cavileers
Bolgia niners (too esoteric in these illiterate days, but I like it)
Badgers
Hector, Harry, and Goad LLC (not a term tho’)
Lamentation priests
Catechizers
My favorite is:
The pathologically thankless. I’m past wanting to call them clever names. Avoid the politics, just name the behaviors. Get conversation going on this larger issue of thanklessness.
Ingrates is more deft, but not quite so ringing. Besides, the left loves to therapize and disease-ulate everything under the stars. I.e., your boundaries are phobias or manias theirs are philias and hagias. “Pathologically thankless” has worked well in random conversations, I’ve found. It opens up a whole new terrain of discussion:
For in SJWs we see not only an addiction to griping and criticizing and demanding and reproaching…but an utter failure to receive the world, and those around them, with gratitude.
Nothing is ever good enough, nobody is ever right but them and their chosen friends or potential employwers. It is an astonishingly abusive and manipulative communication/interaction culture, like you see in alcoholic or drug addict families. Innocence is abused (see: hate cake bakers) and everything is turned into political advantage for Mother, to which Father (if any) kowtows.
SJWs are also mystagogues, but that’s not catchy given how few people know what it means.
Pascal Boyer has long observed that one of the signature elements of religious thinking was that it must be counterintuitive in some features.
These must incorporate expectations or assertions that violate known material/daily reality.
This comprises a test of faith, as well as a dimension along which to flog initiates into closer adherence to the rites and doctrines. Which as we’ve seen on the left are always changing.
http://ontology.buffalo.edu/smith/courses01/rrtw/Boyer.htm
Why the need for an alternative? SJW is wildly successful as a term — probably because it is a subtle dig, rather than an all out insult. Most alternatives offered here are just blunt and humourless.
Diversity pimp or social parasite
Interesting links.
Pretty much a chronicle of the country’s decline.
They’re not commies, though. Even social democratic issues like expanding the welfare state get short shrift–you can disagree on healthcare or tariffs but it’s the race-and-gender stuff like wedding cakes for gay people or appropriating nonwhite culture or #MeToo that brings the knives out. They seem to have so little interest in class issues corporations are actually embracing all this ‘woke’ stuff, probably at least in part to distract the left from doing anything that would affect their bottom line. “See? Our management team includes gays, women, and black people! We don’t need unions!”
Calling a virus a bacterium and trying to treat it with antibiotics because you just whipped a bacterial epidemic that way isn’t going to help things.
Heck, even antifa usually aren’t commies, but anarchists. It’s like calling Richard Spencer a neocon or Ben Shapiro alt-right. (Well, OK, a few progressives have done that last one.)
It refers to being HIV positive.
The idea is that SJW beliefs have a similar debilitating effect on the brain to that which HIV has on the body, hence an SJW is said to be ‘pozzed’ .
Suicidally Altruistic People i.e. saps
Ticks is a good one too, describes them well.
The great Sir Les Patterson called them wowsers.
I like to use Whine Privelege
Why not True Believers, in honor of Eric Hoffer? His little treatise on the psychology of mass movements contains more truth and real wisdom than all the reams of academic studies published in the decades since he published his book.
Post-Rationals
How much of this SJW stuff is displaced BDSM? (Or perhaps not so displaced, given the popularity of both in the same liberal circles?) I am convinced an article on 'Social Justice as Sadomasochism' would get many retweets. (I am *really* curious to hear what Albertosaurus thinks, if he sees this in time.)
In addition, I've suggested to progressive contacts that submission may be a way for feminists to enjoy the same old roles now that they are coded as 'transgressive'. Some self-identified feminists have, ah, confirmed this.
Someone smarter than me can, er, tie this all together?Replies: @Anonymous, @TelfoedJohn, @Anonymous
The female thing – definitely.
I’m not sure if it is similar or a corollary, but there is clearly an “enjoy old-fashioned gender roles by posing as transgressive” aspect when Lefty females take up anti-Israelism and other predominantly Muslim-led campus causes. They get to surround themselves with hardcore Muslim men who act like hard dominant males who will not hesitate to put them in their place, and yet it all has the cover of being progressive and something Joe Republican wouldn’t like.
Justice and Warrior can have positive connotations.
The Pozed Puritans
TPPs for short
Cuck
Stooge
Toadie
Bugman
Courtesan
Bottom
Something which emphasizes that they are acting on behalf of, or being used by, a greater power.
So the sexual desire is somehow opposite to their social position. The white SJW is entitled, so he would want to be debased sexually. The black SJW is not so entitled (in a social hierarchy sense), so wants to dominate sexually. MLK spent much of his spare time indulging in orgies.
Not sure where this ‘sexual socialism’, wanting to reverse differences in the bedroom, comes from. Perhaps it’s from the same source as political socialism. Since we’ve lived for millennia in small groups surrounded by people who are pretty much like ourselves, it’s perfectly natural to instinctively believe in equality. But when that belief collides with the modern world, where people are clearly not equal, you have to jump through internal psychological hoops, as well as try to change the external world, in order to resolve that. Sexual relations are a perfect way to change the inner and outer worlds.Replies: @Rosie, @Anonym
It may be genetics and assortive mating. Maybe rich, controlling a**holes seek the same in their women?
It would be interesting to see how various traits (ethnicity, IQ, personality type, etc.) align with sexual proclivity, and perhaps speculate as to reasons why there have evolved to be such.
They are what communists became. They are actually-existing communists.
Loser
Nerd
Fag
http://i.magaimg.net/img/17yd.jpgReplies: @Mr. Anon
Catlady!
“SJW” is the best term I’ve come across. None of the alternatives mentioned here come close. Most are obscure, ill-defined, offensive, overly complicated, or come with prior emotional/historical baggage. SJW perfectly, and very specifically, refers to a group of people everyone wishes to ridicule and no one else. That’s what makes it so good; it really gets under their skin.*
“I also, always liked Steve’s Ctrl-Left.”
Both SJW and Alt-Left are better terms. Steve is a better writer than he is a public speaker. “Ctrl-Left” may look better on paper but “Alt-Left” sounds better and is more easily understood by a mass audience; same with “SJW.” You win an audience by the spoken word, not by anything written – not anymore; hence, why YouTube is so influential. And that’s why Trump is president. The guy understands subtle things like that, even if he’s no Einstein.
———————————————————————————————————-
*After being made fun of for so long, the regressives of YouTube have really been losing their minds of late. David Packman seems to have this weird obsession with Elon Musk, using the word “cuck” in his videos (definitely a YouTube TOS violation, but when you’re on the right side of history I guess it doesn’t matter) – another term these unfunny, desperate losers had to crib from us.
Same with Cenk Ugyur’s TYT outfit. Rosanne Bar was a “racist” but Samantha Bee merely has something she’d like to talk about (her lame apology). They’ve been driven completely nuts – every video is an insane conspiracy theory about Trump, stealing Alt-Right words like “cuck”, or calling somebody a racist with an accompanying picture of the person in a tumbnail. How in the hell did Cenk Ugyur get a YouTube television show? Is that what YouTube wants to endorse?
Whatever it is, it needs to capture the fact that they’re unwittingly doing the work of the oligarchs in various ways by redirecting political energy away from criticism of the Masters of the Universe and towards the middle class by waging cultural war against it.
"You are not Truth speaking to Power. You are Power speaking."
Post 31 refers to the sadomasochistic aspect and Derbyshire's term ethnomasochism. But it is sadism more than masochism, as SJWs abuse others more than themselves. Retaining the linguistic form of social justice warrior, I would combine the 'social' to include this sadistic aspect by combining sadism and social to sadocial. If that's too obscure, I'd just go with Sadistic.
The second term, justice, clearly isn't accurate as its fruit is anything but just; it's more like a low-grade terror. But trying to keep the form, I'm reaching for something like jus soli, a similar root but with a more appropriate meaning. 'Jural' might work, but a reference to real justice, natural rights we have as citizens to not be hounded by zealots.
The last term makes the second work. First, warrior, aside from being a cultural appropriation from the most sacred oppressed group ever, has an unwarranted positive connotation. Because they are vigilantes who drive wedges into society, I suggest that substitution.
Thus we have Sadocial Jural Wedge (or Wedgie or Wedger), or Sadistic Jus soli Wedgie.
But brevity and simplicity always win. Someone came up with the term Crybullies awhile back. Don't worry; I won't quit my day job.
Maybe Tooltolitarians?
“Commie” won’t work because we recently learned how actual communists in China treat Muslims: they send them to very harsh re-education camps. The SJWs would never do that.
Richard Spencer summed up SJWs and antifa pretty well:
“You are not Truth speaking to Power. You are Power speaking.”
Diapers, because like diapers, most SJW’s are white on the outside.
“Libtard” works for me, as does “leftoid.”
But let's not forget Baizuo.Replies: @AndrewR
How many levels of ethno-masochism do you have to be on to use that anti-white phrase? Not all “white leftists” are SJWs, good god.
It is the secular equivalent of wearing the biggest cross or shouting “Amen!” the loudest in Church, so something along those lines, as they hate Christianity.
Also, “Pozzers” seems like a good one, both due to HIV “poz” and well as “poseurs”.
“Poz”, in alt-right speak, refers to leftist degeneracy like encouraging children to be drag queens. The term conventionally refers to being HIV-positive. The alt-right usage likely stems from a satire of the insanity among a small subset of the homosexual community in which men actively seek out HIV-positive, unmedicated men to transmit the virus to them. The left can often be said to be engaging in similarly insane and suicidal (or at least clearly harmful) behavior.
After all these years, would a supporter of the Bonnie Prince specifically be a Carolin?
Yes, Fascist Left is good. Brown shirts and red guards were exactly the same kind of thugs.
The only definition of “poz” I can find online is “HIV positive” but obviously it means something else to the alt-right. Can someone explain?
I always refer to them as Social(ist) Just-Us Whores.
How about bitch? — since most are women.
A white guy made you one of the richest wives in the world lol @melindagates
https://twitter.com/getongab/status/1004315080794824704
How about: “Power to Truthers”?
Guilty as charged. Until moldbug shamed me into reading original source old history, I parsed the two as synonymous. Thought English history basically began at George III. (With a bit of Tudors in there somewhere out of prurient interest.)
? — ‘apparently’
Apparently, this was snapped at a school in California. The absolute state of that state.
James II should have done like Henry IV and decided that London was worth not having a mass.
Going another direction: “Establishment Bait & Tackle”
Just an idea; obviously not polished enough. Idea is to tie them in with Antifa, where they’re the hired goons of the Establishment’s agenda. Sometimes that’s to serve as bait, such as in C-Ville, where they baited the WNs into a fight so that the cops could shut the whole thing down; and “tackle” could be for when they serve as the block & tackle of the real talent on the field, or when they just show up and start sucker punching and clocking people with bike locks and such (or, less violently, doxx wrong-thinkers).
My husband and I refer to them as “indoor cats”.
We’re not the originators but I can’t recall where we got it from. Makes us laugh every time.
Shrews needing batteries for their vibrators?
Well, that one is a little long.
The Demonic Ugliness?
Accurate, but still to long.
Incels with Attitude – IWA, including all 37.2 Genders.
That might work.
Satan’s Puritans?
I kinda like that one.
You have the “neocons”, “neochicanery” is too long, maybe “neochicanos” (in contrast to the real thing)?
Whiskey may be a one-trick pony, but he has a teensy pointette here. Women who ‘have the megaphone’ feel free to write and talk about white men in ways they would never do about black or Muslim men (on the other hand, Whiskey might not be so keen on noticing who hands the megaphone to them).
And women who don’t have the megaphone then imitate them.
In the UK several thousand girls have been raped and abused by gangs of overwhelmingly Muslim men (and it’s still going on, there’s a current Leeds trial). Had these gangs been white it would have been a feminist cause celebre, yet the sisters have been amazingly quiet. The only UK feminists who’ve strongly and consistently condemned it are a Muslim woman and a man-hating white lesbian.
This thread discussing banning “SJW”: http://www.ign.com/boards/threads/lol-sjw-is-a-banned-word-in-ign-comments.455141809/
has decent alternatives (more useful for ban circumventing than in the sense iSteve meant in his headline):
SJK – Social Justice Knight
SJP – Social Justice Pawn
“Puppets of Global Capitalism”
why?
Because these people latch onto whatever “cause” the elites hand down to them…and the SJW ethos exists primarily to increase the supply of worker-consumers in the developed nations, thus increasing consumer demand/depressing wages and increasing corporate profits…
Hence the tie-in to global capitalism…but your cultists are all about responding Pavlovian-style to word-association triggers, as opposed to actual original thought, so, never mind…
urbandictionary.com is your friend:
Poz
In non-homo sense: the coolness that is; the best ever; the rah digga
“Damn those strippers at the Hustler Club are so poz I wish I could touch them”, stated Simon.
I haven’t read through the comments yet, but did an unsuccessful cntrl-F for:
The People of the Stupid, the POS’s has other connotations that fit well too.
Too long? FINE!
Stupidophiles?
That is important and the best antidote.
Post 31 refers to the sadomasochistic aspect and Derbyshire’s term ethnomasochism. But it is sadism more than masochism, as SJWs abuse others more than themselves. Retaining the linguistic form of social justice warrior, I would combine the ‘social’ to include this sadistic aspect by combining sadism and social to sadocial. If that’s too obscure, I’d just go with Sadistic.
The second term, justice, clearly isn’t accurate as its fruit is anything but just; it’s more like a low-grade terror. But trying to keep the form, I’m reaching for something like jus soli, a similar root but with a more appropriate meaning. ‘Jural’ might work, but a reference to real justice, natural rights we have as citizens to not be hounded by zealots.
The last term makes the second work. First, warrior, aside from being a cultural appropriation from the most sacred oppressed group ever, has an unwarranted positive connotation. Because they are vigilantes who drive wedges into society, I suggest that substitution.
Thus we have Sadocial Jural Wedge (or Wedgie or Wedger), or Sadistic Jus soli Wedgie.
But brevity and simplicity always win. Someone came up with the term Crybullies awhile back. Don’t worry; I won’t quit my day job.
My vote is for “social justice whore.” Since the current incarnation of social justice is the antithesis of actual justice (group based “justice” infers group based guilt, very contrary to the notion of individual agency and responsibility), a suitable alternative would be “The Social Anti-Justice League.”
black supremacists
I don’t know, but I most assuredly wouldn’t call some Ivy League nerd or twit a “warrior.”
A musical interlude:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nEHFGMwfqNA
Me-huggers
Virtue Vapers
Proglodytes
Trannissaries
Braticals
Teacher’s Pets
Probots
Homoglobins
Nasties
Red Tards
Trigglies
Mommissars
Justice Junkies
Cucktards
I assumed SJW stood for Social Justice Wanker.
Poz is a term referring to the act of seeking out HIV and then attempting to spread it to as many other people as possible. It is based on a magazine about living with AIDs.
They’d have to get out their mother’s basement more often.
Smuggots
Teacher’s PESTS
Pink Diaper Babies
SWC – SHEEP(or SHEEPLE) in WOLF CLOTHING
SJW seems to have caught on really nicely, and it’s hard to improve upon. I’d like to find a better final word though, as “Warrior” is more positive than I would like. (They chose the first two words for themselves, and I think keeping them is useful).
You don’t want the new term to be grossly insulting, so that would rule out things like “Social Justice Fascist” or “Social Justice Nazi.” You do want the last word to carry an uncomplimentary sense of “zealot” or “fanatic”. “Jihadi” is great, except that it isn’t a clear punchy English word, and a lot of people might not even know what it means. Some possibilities might be:
Social Justice Puritan
Social Justice Freak
Social Justice Droid
Social Justice Golem
Social Justice Gnat
Social Justoid
I think a one syllable word scans best, but you’ve got to make do with what you’ve got. A quick look at Dictionary.com suggests other possible replacements for “warrior,” but none seem perfect.
As far as other terms go, I’ve always liked “The New Puritans.” I also think that, if it because widespread enough, “The New Religion” would be an extremely apt and useful umbrella term! If Trump were someone who could actually command respect from those who weren’t already 100% in our camp, and if he had been consistently using “The New Religion” when talking about the Left, that could be enough to make it click. The term is kind of vague though, and without a controversy to publicize its intended meaning a lot of people might find it puzzling. I’ve tried to come up with a specific name for the new religion — Diversitarians? The Multicult? — but nothing really promising so far.
Bullshitters (the “organizers”)
Demented Fucks
Acerebrated
Parasites (they usually live at somebody else’s expense
Hired thugs (they are usually financed by oligarchs or from college tuition funds)
Coalition of the useless
Members of hate groups
MSM consumers
OK, I could be at this for hours but I have real work to do.
Reminds me of Bill Ayers, son of the CEO of Chicago’s Comm Ed power company.
Real warriors are, of necessity, brave.
Call ’em Social Justice …
Thugs.
Totalitarians in Humanitarian Garb.
Neo-Stasi
Harangutans
Screechies
Tantrummies
Progtitutes
Sorosites
And totally full of s**t.
“Libtard” works for me, as does “leftoid.”
And another one: Crybully.
Leftoid crybullies are the scourge of our time.
Black folks are much smarter than Whitey;
And Mexicans, more neat and tidy.
You grovel, white fella,
To black, brown, and yella—
The colors in babe’s dirty didy.
If you can’t imagine why someone would do X, but tens of millions of people are doing X, then the problem is probably with your model of the world.
Because it’s two thirds inappropriate; justice isn’t their objective, it is payback–revenge against anything that smacks of the middle-or working-classes. And WARRIORS?? Please. Chanting stale slogans in large groups does not evoke memories of the Greek Phalanx, the British Square, or even the PANZERKEIL of the German Wehrmacht (!!). “Sneaky Little Shites” (not to be confused with Shi’ites) would be as appropriate as some of the above alternatives.
Secular puritans is painfully descriptive.
They’re like Puritans, but on the other side.
So how about Impuritans?
This works well as an adjective as well. For example, an impuritanical attack on traditional marriage.
I know a number of straight white men who are ardent leftists. Insufferable pricks, the lot. Nearly all of them have weird personality defects.
Some folks are simply broken. Their minds do not function properly.
Probably stated elsewhere, tl;dra:
The Anointed Ones, or AOs;
The Anointed, TAs;
IATGIAs = I Am The Great I Ams
What? Me Worrys – WMWs
Vegeminds
sled-dogs
slackeys
Celibate Workout
and from an earlier comment thread:
People of Dolor.
the Officially Sad / Our Lady Of Perpetual Misery.(credit: Uncle Al in the 1990s).
Theresas (as in Natashas). or, Daughter Theresas.
Subs. Turkish Prisoners. Anvils.
Bottoms, Bot-toms, Bottom Feeders.
Sissy Fits.
Lassies (mocks SJW men and the women, in different ways)
Why not just cut to the chase? White-hating Nazis.
United Harm Workers
Aggroculture
Shillbillies
social jihadi
Pack herd of Pod People or Podkins.
Hypnosterics – hypnotized into hysterics.
All the Social Justice Warriors appear to have matriculated into Professional Equity Activists, so no need to worry about a name change.
Conformies
Prigressives
Buttsniffers
Manic Repressives
Swallows vs Spits.
Those who swallow PC and those who spit it out.
In this thread, we see people failing to understand rhetoric. Go read SJWs Always Lie or similar before you try and replace this term.
A grifter; a member of the Coalition of the Left Fringe.
What's an apt term for the Alt Right?
A mountebank; a member of the Coalition of the Right Fringe.
"Go read SJWs Always Lie..."
Picked up a copy. Nothing new here. Replace "SJW" with "Alt Right" and it's the same book.
Meow Men.
“What’s a Better Term Than “Social Justice Warrior?””
A grifter; a member of the Coalition of the Left Fringe.
What’s an apt term for the Alt Right?
A mountebank; a member of the Coalition of the Right Fringe.
“Go read SJWs Always Lie…”
Picked up a copy. Nothing new here. Replace “SJW” with “Alt Right” and it’s the same book.
“In this thread, we see people failing to understand rhetoric.”
True. A lot of the people here strike me as aging boomers who don’t get “wut the kidz” are up to these days. SJW is basically the perfect term: it doesn’t have the emotional baggage of “commie”, is easily understood, sounds great when spoken (as opposed to the far inferior Ctrl-Left which merely looks good on paper), and it specifically refers to a type of liberal (not any liberal) who acts so stupid that most ordinary folks cringe – which allows people who might be socially liberal to get in on the fun, too, as a means of hitting back at political correctness. For example, there are a few popular YouTubers who are both into videogames and are openly gay but mock feminists and SJWs. If you want to build a broad coalition to advance your agenda, you should start with those types. SJW is a good way to reach them.
We’re not the originators but I can’t recall where we got it from. Makes us laugh every time.Replies: @Antlitz Grollheim
Owen Benjamin uses that phrase
vermin
Uh….Cultural Bug-chasers?
I think of them as “Screaming Shitheads”, and think any local govt.which is too cowardly/ complicit to stop destructive protests should resign in shame/ be arrested for aiding them
Inquisitors
True. A lot of the people here strike me as aging boomers who don't get "wut the kidz" are up to these days. SJW is basically the perfect term: it doesn't have the emotional baggage of "commie", is easily understood, sounds great when spoken (as opposed to the far inferior Ctrl-Left which merely looks good on paper), and it specifically refers to a type of liberal (not any liberal) who acts so stupid that most ordinary folks cringe - which allows people who might be socially liberal to get in on the fun, too, as a means of hitting back at political correctness. For example, there are a few popular YouTubers who are both into videogames and are openly gay but mock feminists and SJWs. If you want to build a broad coalition to advance your agenda, you should start with those types. SJW is a good way to reach them.Replies: @The Last Real Calvinist
Good points.
SJW really has caught on, and it seems that the ironic sneer is now fully embedded in the term, i.e. there’s no one left who can take being called a social justice warrior at face value.
Or am I mistaken about this?
Yeah that makes sense, that’s probably where I heard it. Thanks!
It is a useful gamesmanship term to use in real life- clearly not a compliment but not overtly rude enough to cause justifiable offense. And nothing gives them a rash like being dismissed.
Nominees:
– Magic Phonies
– Useful Idiots
– Brownstains (a play on Leon Trotsky’s real name: Lev Bronstein)
– Emotionauts
– Social Justice Stooges
– The Dorkularity
– Totenkopfverbande
– Cattle Car Cassandras (for just one of them: Cassandra Cattle Car)
– BubbleBots
– Puritopians
– Mister Rogers’s Derangers
– Hindsatzgruppen
– Proglodytes
– Sandbox Queens
– Social Justice Lemmings
– The Mao-Mao
– Commiepozzies
– Social Justice Stasi
– Doxxic Emissions
– Social Justice Commissars
– Rantifa
– Snotzis
– The Gloominati (or, The Doominati)
I especially like Magic Phonies, Puritopians, and The Mao-Mao.
- Magic Phonies
- Useful Idiots
- Brownstains (a play on Leon Trotsky's real name: Lev Bronstein)
- Emotionauts
- Social Justice Stooges
- The Dorkularity
- Totenkopfverbande
- Cattle Car Cassandras (for just one of them: Cassandra Cattle Car)
- BubbleBots
- Puritopians
- Mister Rogers's Derangers
- Hindsatzgruppen
- Proglodytes
- Sandbox Queens
- Social Justice Lemmings
- The Mao-Mao
- Commiepozzies
- Social Justice Stasi
- Doxxic Emissions
- Social Justice Commissars
- Rantifa
- Snotzis
- The Gloominati (or, The Doominati)Replies: @The Last Real Calvinist
Superb stuff, Auntie.
I especially like Magic Phonies, Puritopians, and The Mao-Mao.
Daughters of the Russian Revolution
Sheep in Sheep’s Clothing
Radical Left of the Bell Curve
TyrannoSoros Wrecks
So how about Impuritans?
This works well as an adjective as well. For example, an impuritanical attack on traditional marriage.Replies: @academic gossip
“Pruritans” = prurient Puritans
But that’s the joke, like Little John is always a big guy.
A musical interlude:
These people are contemptible in so many different ways that there is no point in trying to highlight any one of them.
Thank you, my dear The Last Real Calvinist.
Did you notice that “Commiepozzies” is a play on “kamikazes”? For a while I toyed with “Commiekazes” but then realized it could be read incorrectly, with a long “a” in the last syllable; and then Mr. Sailers “Pozzed” sparked the lightbulb moment that produced the “pozzies” suffix to “Commies.”
For at least the last ten or twenty years I’ve been using “Puritopians.”
“Mao-Mao” might be lost on the last two generations whose members may be ignorant of the Mau-Mau; but I like that it plays on Mao’s Cultural Revolution Red Guards and on blacks’ monotonous gibsmedat demands as described in Tom Wolfe’s “Mau-Mauing The Flak Catchers.”
“The Gloominati” captures, I feel, the sense that the SJW’s have what my Dad liked to call “rectaloptilitis” – a sh_tty outlook on life, and it combines that sense with SJW’s unmistakable propensity to posture as being members of, or on their being worthy aspirants to, the illuminati.
Thank you for your kind compliment, and I’m delighted to know you enjoyed reading the list.
Thanks for pointing this out; I missed it. It’s a good illustration of how helpful it is for this kind of derisive nickname to sound catchy.
I also like the plays on ‘illuminati’, in that they allude to the ‘enlightened insider’ feel of what is an essentially gnostic SJW faith.
It could get rude if you got into a Malcolm X style rant about the difference between the house cat and the field cat:
Jacobite may also refer to the Syrian Orthodox Church, the branch of the church of Antioch that rejected the Council of Chalcedon in 451.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syriac_Orthodox_Church
Pozzed Pod People
Kill Whiteys
Communists.
Did you mean to write “The Putrified”? How about “The Putrefaction” or better yet, “The Putrid Faction”“?
I’m on a roll here, Deiter – thanks for getting me going this morning!
Putrified – all right!
And : The Pure Staff (are excellent!) = The Putrid Faction – Always One Step Ahead of Reason!
I'm on a roll here, Deiter - thanks for getting me going this morning!Replies: @dieter kief
209 is the answer. Hit the wrong knob – I’m almost asleep…
I just call them assholes.
Self-righteous Mongers
Globlins
Anal-kisst
Fadicals
Social Justice Witch Hunter
Neo-Stalinists.