WaPo Reporter Is Tired of Being Reminded He Fell for Sabrina Rubin Erdely's Hate Hoax So Badly He Called for Burning Down UVA Frat Houses
Search Text Case Sensitive Exact Words Include Comments
List of Bookmarks
To put in perspective the objectivity of today's Respectable Media, it's fun to retweet what they wrote in November 2014 in credulous response to Sabrina Rubin Erdely's absurd "A Rape on Campus" Rolling Stone hoax. E.g., here was WaPo reporter Dan Zak calling for anti-frat arson: https://t.co/9UxPi1jAk5
— Steve Sailer (@Steve_Sailer) September 26, 2018
Because it doesn’t fit The Narrative, it’s not widely known that the Rolling Stone article about gang rape on broken glass set off a mini-Kristallnacht as a leftist mob smashed the windows of a UVA fraternity house. Fortunately, Mr. Zak of the Washington Post didn’t get his wish and the riot didn’t progress to arson.

It just got worse for Kavanaugh. There’s now a tragic account of a another girl, Polly Perkins, who went to Garrison Forest prep and came to a bad end after being used by Kavanaugh and Mark Judge:
(((Cristine Blasey Ford)))
(((Michael Avenati)))
What the heck is this , an Elders of Zion convention ??
Havent seen a Jewish conspiracy this big since Pol Pot !!!!!
Just like Nick was obsessed with Rick Von Sloneker's wickedness, so is the left with regard to Kavanaugh.Replies: @David In TN, @Anon
There's some white privilege for ya. Still, I can't prove that the Lion of the Se
nateabed actually groped the young lady without her consent. The only thing we know is that Ted Kennedy drunkenly drove off of the bridge and left the girl to die in the car. But, there's no proof that anyone groped anybody, not anything admissible in a court of law or at an autopsy.The U-boat Commander came out of that unfortunate incident squeaky clean to live a life of service to his country in the US Senate, if by "service" one means destruction via population replacement.
Her name was Mary Jo Kopechne.Replies: @Buffalo Joe
But it is a well known fact among all bros that horse girls have mental issues and are huge sluts
A) drunk girl::regatta
B) gangbang::oarsmen
C) stables::suicide
And the fact that Chris Eigeman’s character intentionally lied to out the bad girl from the group is ironic as well. The current drip, drip of more absurd claims is intended to make Trump and Kavanaugh fold.
Fortunately what transpires daily on Twitter is not representative of real life . I live and work in a big diverse metro area and have never seen SJW shit or any of the Twitter nonsense happen or even get talked about in real life. Its a trap . its not reality. Get off all social media and completely ignore it. You will be glad you did.
MSM pushes story. Twitter bedwetters magnify and retweet. Then the MSM go to Twitter to report what the internet 'thinks'. And unfortunately the media still influences real life. Which means we should all do our part to confront the Twitter bottom feeders.
http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-ramon-escobar-homeless-murders-20180925-story.html
“Trope”? These people are sociopath con artists from a family sit-com.
The “gang rape” accuser had a restraining order taken against her by an ex boyfriend who claimed she stalked him.
https://www.politico.com/story/2018/09/26/ex-boyfriend-filed-restraining-order-against-kavanaugh-accuser-845348
The stalking after a four-year relationship seems reasonable because she surely thought "this was the one," and she would not have to return to the teen rape train party circuit.Replies: @The Wild Geese Howard
It's fascinating, though. Why do they do it (apart from being immoral nutcases)?
(1) sheer hatred for the adversary?
(2) a pathological need for attention?
(3) a guilty conscience over their misdeeds (it's amazing how often these loud Leftists turn out to be shitty people)?
(4) a way to divert attention from their own misdeeds?
(5) the voices in their heads tell them to do it?Replies: @Alec Leamas
Lol drag him Steve. He’s throwing out non sequiturs to appear like some sort of big brain when he’s got no idea how to respond.
“Mark Judge’s ex: I’ll speak to FBI or Senate about Kavanaugh accusations”
https://nypost.com/2018/09/26/mark-judges-ex-ill-speak-to-fbi-or-senate-about-kavanaugh-accusations/
(((Polly Perkins )))
(((Cristine Blasey Ford)))
(((Michael Avenati)))
What the heck is this , an Elders of Zion convention ??
Havent seen a Jewish conspiracy this big since Pol Pot !!!!!
https://www.politico.com/story/2018/09/26/ex-boyfriend-filed-restraining-order-against-kavanaugh-accuser-845348Replies: @J.Ross, @ThirdWorldSteveReader
Very nice, at the end we get this detail:
But we know from recent deep state ructions that the lobbyist revolving door was retaining clearances to be able to charge more money in “civilian” life, and, with the same carelessness, probably being too generous in handing them out.
The stalking after a four-year relationship seems reasonable because she surely thought “this was the one,” and she would not have to return to the teen rape train party circuit.
I know, I've sat through the training presentations for years.
http://leiterreports.typepad.com/blog/2018/09/fords-testimony-about-the-kavanaugh-assault.html
https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/4945864/Ford-Testimony-2018-09-26.pdf
You can block it as you will but that is the theme song of your fans . Test it Negro .
Actually, I believe there was one UVA fraternity that behaved so, uh, extravagantly, that the government seized possession of the fraternity house under its powers of seizing property being used to commit crimes. Back during Doug Wilder’s governorship, one of UVA’s Jewish fraternities got repo’d, I believe by the state government, because there was so much drug selling going on in it. In New York City at roughly the same time, Ed Koch was using the seizure powers to take possession of daddy’s Mercedes when a rich Jersey kid went out to buy drugs in Manhattan around the George Washington bridge.
The anger at being called out is predictable and understandable, IMO.
What’s fascinating is they never answering how could they be fooled so easily by that shameless liar, and why should we keep trusting their opinions after that.
What’s with all these Jews wanting to burn down fraternities?
It sounds like all the smashing of Christian churches in Bolshevik Russia.
Burning down the House!
Well, I say let them do it and show their real face.
PS. After the truth came out, maybe people should have burned down Rolling Stone.
The way she talks when she’s spoken to .
https://nypost.com/2018/09/26/mark-judges-ex-ill-speak-to-fbi-or-senate-about-kavanaugh-accusations/ Replies: @Steve Sailer, @Alden
But perhap Mark Judge’s ex’s ex could be found to dish some dirt on her!
This could go on all year.
Trope alert!
Probably a virulent trope.
http://www.peakstupidity.com/images/tropopause.jpg
Jeez, Steve. Reminding people who still have jobs in the media about the time they called for vigilante arson is so tired.
Who among us hasn’t used our national audience to call for threatening the lives of thousands of innocent people because of ridiculous propaganda pieces in old-timey music magazines?
It’s all so tired.
“To cling to conspiracy, partisanship”
Someone get soy boy a fainting couch.
Right, it’s all very absurd.
Seems to have a fire fetish.
https://twitter.com/MrDanZak/status/1041540566935379968
http://dailyhaymaker.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Duke-Lacrosse-Protest-Castrate-FIRE-Video-e1413496418417-620x434.png
https://thegrio.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/duke-rape-case-five-years-later.jpg
Not coincidentally, Google is making these images harder and harder to locate.
Follow-up: Swetnick clearances. She had some time at a community college but has these clearances at these agencies?

One of us should write a bunch of major media outlets a letter about how Brett kavanaugh assaulted their wife, daughter, sister etc or if you are a woman write it yourself.
See if the media publishes. Let it run for a few hours. Then admit you made the whole thing up.
This is what you need to do if you want kavanaugh confirmed.
Nice reference!
Just like Nick was obsessed with Rick Von Sloneker’s wickedness, so is the left with regard to Kavanaugh.
How nice of (((Dan Zak))) to take up for women. I’m sure his motives are pure as the driven snow.
What's fascinating is they never answering how could they be fooled so easily by that shameless liar, and why should we keep trusting their opinions after that.Replies: @J.Ross
That’s exactly what he does in the fourteen other somethings he petulantly links like anybody is going to read through all of them. This is a regular behavior and they say the same thing every time. The seriousness and reality of the Big Issue (rape, graffitti, haShoah, Iraqi nukes, magic pollution that matters in the first world but not in the developing world, tobacco, etc) not only overtakes but completely excuses any exuberances a crusader might have allowed along the way. The important thing is, we’ve gotta get these Nazis, am I right, unthinking crowd? Yeaaah!
Brian Leiter was accused of sending poop by mail to a woman he had some spat with. It was anonymous poop but lots of circumstantial evidence pointed at him.
https://www.vcstar.com/story/news/courts/2017/01/26/trial-begins-1997-killing-ventura-teen/97097364/
The accused had been interrupted during a home burglary over 20 years ago. Before the interruption, he had taken a crap in the closet laundry hamper (yes I know that is weird).
The homeowner then came home with her teenage son and, during the burglar's escape, he stabbed the son in the neck, and said son subsequently died.
At the time, DNA forensics was insufficiently developed to extract DNA from poop. Now the technology is there. The accused was identified 20 years after the crime due to him being incarcerated for another burglary. Part of the evidence against him, besides the DNA from the poop, was a google search he made inquiring whether or not DNA can be extracted from poop.
He was found guilty (I was dismissed during voire dire).Replies: @CJ
Apparently Collins now wants to subpoena Judge. Judge is a recovering alcoholic who took 7 years to graduate college. Not sure how he’s going to handle the pressure.
Broken glass tables, men taking advantage; like I said…about the UVA case, back in the day: all I could think of was Sean Young. What happened to her, btw? – not that I am encouraging tangents 🙂 – Jack Hanson will kill me before anyone else!, hahaa
It must be fun to totally enjoy schadenfreude, Steve; you go boy! Sometimes, shaming people is fun!
The stalking after a four-year relationship seems reasonable because she surely thought "this was the one," and she would not have to return to the teen rape train party circuit.Replies: @The Wild Geese Howard
Yeah…in non-Clown World having actual restraining orders filed against you for stalking are exactly the kind of adverse behavior that leads to revocation of your security clearance(s).
I know, I’ve sat through the training presentations for years.
I think it’s rich, really rich how the sudden acceleration of the accuser-clown-bus is making DJT today seem to have actual gravitas by comparison. It’s tropetastic
You know it’s true even if your most faithful commenters would deny it .
See if the media publishes. Let it run for a few hours. Then admit you made the whole thing up.
This is what you need to do if you want kavanaugh confirmed.Replies: @Little spoon, @Alden
I’m kidding. Don’t do that. Don’t be a liar.
This cretin Leiter doesn’t seem to understand the concept of cross-examination.
True. But the MSM uses Twitter above all other aspects of the interwebs to support it’s narrative.
MSM pushes story. Twitter bedwetters magnify and retweet. Then the MSM go to Twitter to report what the internet ‘thinks’. And unfortunately the media still influences real life. Which means we should all do our part to confront the Twitter bottom feeders.
I hear with modern forensics they can tell to within a quarter mile where the corn was grown.
For the most part I am avoiding most of the “news” reports about this cockamamie story. While I believe there is a possibility that one or more of the accusers is telling the truth, it is more likely a torpedo launched by a desperate Democratic Party to sabotage what looked like the inevitable appointment of Judge Kavanaugh to the SCOTUS.
What’s really bums me out is that this obvious politically motivated, Stalinesque hit job may succeed not just in derailing the nomination (which I really don’t care about) but also obliterating the legal and biblical prohibitions about bearing false witness. The #MeToo harpies may just have killed due process and innocent until proved guilty.
Exactly. Even if these females fail this time, others on the left will be emboldened by how nearly they succeeded to try the same stunt again.
"The #MeToo harpies may just have killed due process and innocent until proved guilty."
Yes and replaced them with "Guilty because I said so". The personal is not only political, it's well on the way to becoming judicial, too.
For what little it is worth, I've written McConnell demanding that any Republican Senators who vote against Kavanaugh's confirmation be punished in whatever way he has to hand, including revocation of committee memberships, loss of seniority, etc.
Of course that won't matter to such gems as Bob "Barney Fife" Corker and Jeff "Eponymy" Flake.
https://www.politico.com/story/2018/09/26/ex-boyfriend-filed-restraining-order-against-kavanaugh-accuser-845348Replies: @J.Ross, @ThirdWorldSteveReader
Lol, she’s another nutcase, as if this case didn’t already have enough of them.
It’s fascinating, though. Why do they do it (apart from being immoral nutcases)?
(1) sheer hatred for the adversary?
(2) a pathological need for attention?
(3) a guilty conscience over their misdeeds (it’s amazing how often these loud Leftists turn out to be shitty people)?
(4) a way to divert attention from their own misdeeds?
(5) the voices in their heads tell them to do it?
Then think about the sort of politics that would attract them.
Finally, present them with an avenue to the attention they crave.Replies: @Lagertha
It's fascinating, though. Why do they do it (apart from being immoral nutcases)?
(1) sheer hatred for the adversary?
(2) a pathological need for attention?
(3) a guilty conscience over their misdeeds (it's amazing how often these loud Leftists turn out to be shitty people)?
(4) a way to divert attention from their own misdeeds?
(5) the voices in their heads tell them to do it?Replies: @Alec Leamas
The proportion of American women with either Bipolar Disorder or Borderline Personality Disorder would shock you.
Then think about the sort of politics that would attract them.
Finally, present them with an avenue to the attention they crave.
Edgartown! Now, that word sure brings back some repressed memories on my part. Isn’t that where a young man, very much the Kavanaugh frat-boy type, but 100 X richer, swam to shore as a young lady suffocated in his car when it filled up with water? Or, was that a different Edgartown?
There’s some white privilege for ya. Still, I can’t prove that the Lion of the Se
nateabed actually groped the young lady without her consent. The only thing we know is that Ted Kennedy drunkenly drove off of the bridge and left the girl to die in the car. But, there’s no proof that anyone groped anybody, not anything admissible in a court of law or at an autopsy.The U-boat Commander came out of that unfortunate incident squeaky clean to live a life of service to his country in the US Senate, if by “service” one means destruction via population replacement.
Her name was Mary Jo Kopechne.
If the Senate dithers longer, the President needs to withdraw the nomination, replacing Kavanaugh immediately with a Calhoun or Jackson conservative, patriarch, and look-alike. In explanation, the President should say:
“My previous nominee is apparently a Momma’s boy who doesn’t have the character to perform successfully as a Justice in the current Court. This nominee does. See you in January.”
Then think about the sort of politics that would attract them.
Finally, present them with an avenue to the attention they crave.Replies: @Lagertha
I have lived through 3 relationships with female friends (over 30 year course) who all had: Histrionic Personality Disorder. It is very hard to not be drawn-in to their charisma (one of their traits), and, it is very hard to “quit them.” These type of women are very empathetic in the beginning. Then they change, and start making small digs until they cut you to pieces…or sue you over something… yeah, really.
These 3 women were “bunny boilers,” who envied my life and didn’t think I deserved it. That is the hardest to digest: they hate everybody.
The last “bunny burner,” was a bridge too far for my husband, and, our mutual, closest friend said to me: “I forbid you to let her back in to your life.”
I have warned my sons to watch out for the 20-30 signs of women who have personality disorders.
This can’t be said too many times
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/11/16/women-and-prescription-drug-use_n_1098023.html
The funny thing (or do I mean the scary thing?) is that with each new ‘Jackie Coakley’ story we are supposed to forget all the ones which came before, and probably pre-forget the next one too, to be on the safe side.
Oh no. Not the “tired old useless trope” trope.
There's some white privilege for ya. Still, I can't prove that the Lion of the Se
nateabed actually groped the young lady without her consent. The only thing we know is that Ted Kennedy drunkenly drove off of the bridge and left the girl to die in the car. But, there's no proof that anyone groped anybody, not anything admissible in a court of law or at an autopsy.The U-boat Commander came out of that unfortunate incident squeaky clean to live a life of service to his country in the US Senate, if by "service" one means destruction via population replacement.
Her name was Mary Jo Kopechne.Replies: @Buffalo Joe
Achmed, I said this before, but with sincere condolences to Mary Jo’s family, the car sunk too slowly.
I am interested in this list.
Lib writers, when wrong, never say mea culpa. Do you know why? Because in their minds they are never wrong.
No SJWs in real life? What about a court system that is so deeply deranged that it orders a 6-time convicted felon and 6-time deportee RELEASED from ICE custody, only to see him beat random strangers over the head to death with a baseball bat?
http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-ramon-escobar-homeless-murders-20180925-story.html
Hey Steve when I hear this song I can’t help but imagining you singing it to Serena :
Try this :
Today is September 26. The next Supreme Court session begins in less than a week, the 2018 elections are just over one month away, and the next session of Congress (which could have a Democratic senate majority) is just two months away.
Brett Kavanaugh has been a judge on the DC Court of Appeals for 12 years. He was nominated for SCOTUS on July 9, over 11 weeks ago, and his confirmation hearings began over three weeks ago.
This is a bullshit attempt by leftwing fanatics to stall the nomination of a good man and fill the spot on the court with a leftwing liberal, by running out the clock on this congressional term, or just delaying until after the elections, when several red state Democratic senators up for re-election this year will no longer face the pressure to vote for Kavanaugh. It is also an attempt to drive a wedge through America and turn out the womyns vote by making this election about “evil men,” and the party that re-elected Dead Kennedy seven times frankly doesn’t give a shit if it destroys the reputation of an honest man in order to accomplish it’s objectives.
If they succeed (and probably even if they don’t) the Left has driven the American political process to a new low. It’s hard to see where we go from here, but I don’t think it will be good.
If the Left, or the women who claim he assaulted them, wanted to stop Kavanaugh the time to do so was 12 years ago, or July 9, or September 4. It is not just days before a confirmation vote, in a manner bearing all the marks of a hit job and a last minute October surprise.
https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/26/politics/susan-collins-brett-kavanaugh/index.html
They must have their own political/personal reasons for doing this but it sure isn't helping the party that they are supposedly members of.Replies: @F0337, @Wilkey
I grew up in Chevy Chase/Bethesda/Potomac and if that girl from Gaithersburg High School thinks we would ever let her into our gangbang parties, she is dreaming.
Probably a virulent trope.Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
Is it time for a tropopause?
After decades of smugly smearing us honkies with fairy tales of blond-beast rapists, it must be searing torment that so many of the MeToo mack daddies are fellow shofar-blowers. And liberals, too!
https://twitter.com/MrDanZak/status/1041540566935379968Replies: @F0337, @Nigerian Nationalist
Fire? Is that all? How soon we forget.
Not coincidentally, Google is making these images harder and harder to locate.
I think you’re missing the point. It’s all about how it makes women feel.
Saying that you hate white fratboy rapists so much that you’d burn down their frat to make them pay for their horrible crimes makes women feel better. That makes it the right thing to say, even though it’s factually incorrect.
Saying that
“Brett Kavanaugh is a vicious rapist who preys on innocent school girls”
is the right thing to say because it contains the premises
“There are men who use their strength and social position to become sexual predators” + “women who feel that they have been sexually abused need to be listened to and believed”.
Don’t tell women that nothing has been proven in the Kavanaugh case, because women have all the proof they need to know that men are sexual predators and that women must be heard and believed. See how it works?
Nobody really knows why
But it is a well known fact among all bros that horse girls have mental issues and are huge sluts
I bet she got high scores on her SAT analogies.
A) drunk girl::regatta
B) gangbang::oarsmen
C) stables::suicide
Remember all of them. If you have never read Anna Karenina, make this your book to read this autumn. It will expose everything to know about women – spoiler: Anna is the hero, tragic or not.
Start with Hare’s Checklist. Dr. Hare interviewed serial killers for over 20+ years in Canada to come up with the 20 Checklist. As far as Histrionic Personality disorder, they are not as disposed to killing and destroying as they are to wrecking for the thrill of it all. These people are more prevalent in society because they do not cross the line into police/ “arrested.” These people are much more manipulative (women are even more prevalent than men, at least in EU), and try to find the weaknesses of their host. The scary part is: this is 2% of society, all over the world. I have come across 4 psychos in my life, and, I thank god that I had learned to recognize psychos since I was 16.
The politicians don't even need to be on a list of psychopaths as they'll just ruin the ratings for the rest, and can be easily spotted on TV.
Brett Kavanaugh has been a judge on the DC Court of Appeals for 12 years. He was nominated for SCOTUS on July 9, over 11 weeks ago, and his confirmation hearings began over three weeks ago.
This is a bullshit attempt by leftwing fanatics to stall the nomination of a good man and fill the spot on the court with a leftwing liberal, by running out the clock on this congressional term, or just delaying until after the elections, when several red state Democratic senators up for re-election this year will no longer face the pressure to vote for Kavanaugh. It is also an attempt to drive a wedge through America and turn out the womyns vote by making this election about "evil men," and the party that re-elected Dead Kennedy seven times frankly doesn't give a shit if it destroys the reputation of an honest man in order to accomplish it's objectives.
If they succeed (and probably even if they don't) the Left has driven the American political process to a new low. It's hard to see where we go from here, but I don't think it will be good.
If the Left, or the women who claim he assaulted them, wanted to stop Kavanaugh the time to do so was 12 years ago, or July 9, or September 4. It is not just days before a confirmation vote, in a manner bearing all the marks of a hit job and a last minute October surprise.Replies: @Jack D
What you are saying makes perfect sense to me, but apparently it doesn’t to Senators Flake and Collins and Murkowski – they are the ones keeping this Kabuki theater alive.
https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/26/politics/susan-collins-brett-kavanaugh/index.html
They must have their own political/personal reasons for doing this but it sure isn’t helping the party that they are supposedly members of.
I don't know about Collins or Murkowski, but Flake is on his way out of office at the tender age of 56. Given that his ultimate plan is probably to cash out by becoming a lobbyist I find it pretty unlikely that he'll be stupid enough to vote against Kavanaugh. If he did so he would lose any influence he might have with Republicans in Congress.
Collins and Murkowski, whatever their concerns, have to know that if they can't even be counted on to vote for a Republican Supreme Court nominee that their days are pretty much finished, too.Replies: @Desiderius
me too
Because in their mind, their intentions are good – they are fighting for justice and against inequality and against rape, etc. As long as you act with a pure heart and with good intentions in order to bring about a better world where evil no longer reigns, nothing you do can be wrong, even if it causes the death of millions. All of those who were inciting arson and cheering for Erdely MEANT WELL, so you must forgive them, just as we must forgive all those American Communists who backed Stalin.
Steve, OTOH, while he unfortunately happened to be right in just this one instance, does not mean well so he deserves and will get no credit for it from any “liberal”.
Every day we don’t is another day closer to extinction
It sounds like all the smashing of Christian churches in Bolshevik Russia.
Burning down the House!
Well, I say let them do it and show their real face.
PS. After the truth came out, maybe people should have burned down Rolling Stone.Replies: @F0337
They can’t figure out how to burn down golf courses.
Right? I mean, there are limits.
https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/26/politics/susan-collins-brett-kavanaugh/index.html
They must have their own political/personal reasons for doing this but it sure isn't helping the party that they are supposedly members of.Replies: @F0337, @Wilkey
People who don’t want to be the center of attention don’t run for senator in the first place.
https://twitter.com/MrDanZak/status/1041540566935379968Replies: @F0337, @Nigerian Nationalist
If I ever got a time machine, I wouldn’t waste it on Hitler–Foucault is the real threat.
What's really bums me out is that this obvious politically motivated, Stalinesque hit job may succeed not just in derailing the nomination (which I really don't care about) but also obliterating the legal and biblical prohibitions about bearing false witness. The #MeToo harpies may just have killed due process and innocent until proved guilty.Replies: @Kylie, @Steve in Greensboro
“What’s really bums me out is that this obvious politically motivated, Stalinesque hit job may succeed not just in derailing the nomination (which I really don’t care about) but also obliterating the legal and biblical prohibitions about bearing false witness.”
Exactly. Even if these females fail this time, others on the left will be emboldened by how nearly they succeeded to try the same stunt again.
“The #MeToo harpies may just have killed due process and innocent until proved guilty.”
Yes and replaced them with “Guilty because I said so”. The personal is not only political, it’s well on the way to becoming judicial, too.
Just like Nick was obsessed with Rick Von Sloneker's wickedness, so is the left with regard to Kavanaugh.Replies: @David In TN, @Anon
I remember the Von Sloneker character and the Polly Perkins story from the film, “Metropolitan.”
They can be bulldozed like West Bank.
Just like Nick was obsessed with Rick Von Sloneker's wickedness, so is the left with regard to Kavanaugh.Replies: @David In TN, @Anon
One difference. Nick was essentially right about Von Sloneker’s lack of character, and Nick was honest enough to admit to his own failings. He was that odd cynic with real scruples deep down inside.
These feminist types are totally insane.
https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/26/politics/susan-collins-brett-kavanaugh/index.html
They must have their own political/personal reasons for doing this but it sure isn't helping the party that they are supposedly members of.Replies: @F0337, @Wilkey
What you are saying makes perfect sense to me, but apparently it doesn’t to Senators Flake and Collins and Murkowski – they are the ones keeping this Kabuki theater alive.
I don’t know about Collins or Murkowski, but Flake is on his way out of office at the tender age of 56. Given that his ultimate plan is probably to cash out by becoming a lobbyist I find it pretty unlikely that he’ll be stupid enough to vote against Kavanaugh. If he did so he would lose any influence he might have with Republicans in Congress.
Collins and Murkowski, whatever their concerns, have to know that if they can’t even be counted on to vote for a Republican Supreme Court nominee that their days are pretty much finished, too.
https://nypost.com/2018/09/26/mark-judges-ex-ill-speak-to-fbi-or-senate-about-kavanaugh-accusations/ Replies: @Steve Sailer, @Alden
That’s hearsay, formerly inadmissible as evidence. But conclusive evidence from this day forth
I don’t see how that meandering chain is supposed to refute that he causally incited arson.
“Woe is me! Institutions and conspiracy theories! I’m the real victim here!”
Oh, that's right, Mr Monahan and frat boys worldwide.
See if the media publishes. Let it run for a few hours. Then admit you made the whole thing up.
This is what you need to do if you want kavanaugh confirmed.Replies: @Little spoon, @Alden
He flew 3,000 miles across the country and raped me. I think. At least it was a White guy with brown hair.
He’s missing the point, which is:
— By making the post he made, he is implying that he read the Rolling Stone piece, and …
— He is averring that, having read the piece, he believed it, hook-line-sinker level believed it.
So, the glass table, the four friends who decide to abandon the bloody, traumatized victim lest they lose frat party invites, the paucity of quotes and sources: as a professtional journalist no bells were rung for him?
That’s the point.
He’s out of his depth. He should not be a journalist.
That is, unless he is saying that, “Who cares whether it’s true, that is irrelevant, any time anything like this surfaces it is a moment to support women, and that overrides any consideration of the truth of the claims.”
Which is what he might be saying.
Anglo-American media: "UN members laugh at Trump"
Had Foucault still be around, he’d probably have been #MeTooed right away… he would have made Kevin Spacey look like a shy and puritanical saint. In the end, he was hoisted with his own constructivist petard: when Edmund White warned him about Aids, he replied: “you American puritans, you’re always inventing diseases.” https://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/books/authorinterviews/10663337/Edmund-White-recalls-a-night-at-the-opera-with-Michel-Foucault-in-1981.html
the media could be calling these people out all day long, but somehow it's all accepted as normal behavior.
-- By making the post he made, he is implying that he read the Rolling Stone piece, and ...
-- He is averring that, having read the piece, he believed it, hook-line-sinker level believed it.
So, the glass table, the four friends who decide to abandon the bloody, traumatized victim lest they lose frat party invites, the paucity of quotes and sources: as a professtional journalist no bells were rung for him?
That's the point.
He's out of his depth. He should not be a journalist.
That is, unless he is saying that, "Who cares whether it's true, that is irrelevant, any time anything like this surfaces it is a moment to support women, and that overrides any consideration of the truth of the claims."
Which is what he might be saying.Replies: @F0337
It’s what he’s saying, which is a major reason these ‘moments’ will keep coming.
The BBC was corrected many times and finally admitted that Trump at the UN had said “more will follow” not “war will follow” but left the tweet up because, well, you know. It’s a teachable moment and the BBC was just trying to raise awareness.

https://www.rt.com/uk/439454-bbc-trump-un-mixup/
It’s how you earn those blue checkmarks. Nothing in the western media about this, had to find it in the RT.
Anglo-American media: “UN members laugh at Trump”
Totally different cover from the Sixties by Chad and Jeremy—I remember a sibling bringing home the album from college. These guys were sort of the Simon and Garfunkel of the British Invasion.
Lagertha-
I hear you.
I watched my ex pursue a false rape claim all the way through trial.
When I finally found the guts to leave the relationship she tried to trap me with a false theft charge, ultimately proving my reasons for leaving.
Thank God she didn’t try a false DV claim…my career would have been over.
This was about 12 years ago, I was way ahead of curve on this stuff.
As others have said, facts and logic are totally irrelevant to these people. How they feel in the moment is all that matters.
"Woe is me! Institutions and conspiracy theories! I'm the real victim here!"Replies: @Trevor H., @Sean
As Jann Wenner said: “Rolling Stone is just as much a victim as Dean Eramo and Jackie herself,” leaving the rest of us to wonder who the perpetrators might be.
Oh, that’s right, Mr Monahan and frat boys worldwide.
Zak references going to a Catholic high school in Buffalo.
The REAL one in four story…
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/11/16/women-and-prescription-drug-use_n_1098023.html
The sooner our side adopts this mentality the sooner we win.
Every day we don’t is another day closer to extinction
Great film. And I just thought if that scene last night. Similarity to Swetnick’s fantasy is uncanny.
And the fact that Chris Eigeman’s character intentionally lied to out the bad girl from the group is ironic as well. The current drip, drip of more absurd claims is intended to make Trump and Kavanaugh fold.
What kind of name is Dan Zak anyway?
(Just see 2:12 – 2:35, but I STILL can’t set start/end times on videos here. The whole thing is funny though.)
I don’t know all the numbers, Lagertha, so we are all still patiently waiting for your 20 or 30 bullet-point list. All I’ve got to go by is this: 2 of the most mentally-screwed-up (but otherwise intelligent) people I’ve been associated with were both lawyers. After that, you come to the girls majoring in psychology and taking it seriously, not just as an easy major for the MRS degree, leaving time for sorority activities. Further down the list are the people in the actual crazy-house.
The politicians don’t even need to be on a list of psychopaths as they’ll just ruin the ratings for the rest, and can be easily spotted on TV.
"Woe is me! Institutions and conspiracy theories! I'm the real victim here!"Replies: @Trevor H., @Sean
Well reverse it, and imagine Steve wrote something endorsing a false accusation that resulted in a baying mob and a window being broken, eh? The side you are on rather than the offence is causal.
It's easy to bluepencil metaphorical calls to "burn down" to "tear down."
I'm sure I've failed to do that a few times in the millions of words I've published over the years, but I'm trying to Raise Awareness about calls for arson being dangerous and needless.Replies: @Rob McX
Testimony form the grave…yeah, I can see how that works for some… Paul McCartney is in real trouble.
Most single women (over 30 y/o) I know, if you get to know them reasonably well, you discover they take anti-depressants or anti-anxiety drugs. Without a man in their life, they have nowhere to transfer their chaos–no one to bring stability to their life.
If you want to find pure evil take a look at psychiatry.
I don't know about Collins or Murkowski, but Flake is on his way out of office at the tender age of 56. Given that his ultimate plan is probably to cash out by becoming a lobbyist I find it pretty unlikely that he'll be stupid enough to vote against Kavanaugh. If he did so he would lose any influence he might have with Republicans in Congress.
Collins and Murkowski, whatever their concerns, have to know that if they can't even be counted on to vote for a Republican Supreme Court nominee that their days are pretty much finished, too.Replies: @Desiderius
Maine and Alaska are as remote as states get. People who live in remote states are there for a reason, and it isn’t because they get along well with others.
Probably 80% of homosexual men could be #MeTooed, but from that little post, Foucault sounds like quite the perv.
the media could be calling these people out all day long, but somehow it’s all accepted as normal behavior.
Polly Perkins is a composite…like New York Magazine does.
What's really bums me out is that this obvious politically motivated, Stalinesque hit job may succeed not just in derailing the nomination (which I really don't care about) but also obliterating the legal and biblical prohibitions about bearing false witness. The #MeToo harpies may just have killed due process and innocent until proved guilty.Replies: @Kylie, @Steve in Greensboro
I’m waiting for the vote. I’ve already written my RINO Senators imploring them to confirm Kavanaugh, but they seem to be already committed.
For what little it is worth, I’ve written McConnell demanding that any Republican Senators who vote against Kavanaugh’s confirmation be punished in whatever way he has to hand, including revocation of committee memberships, loss of seniority, etc.
Of course that won’t matter to such gems as Bob “Barney Fife” Corker and Jeff “Eponymy” Flake.
No withdrawals either by Trump or Kavanaugh. Make the Senate vote on this.
Then let’s have a full investigation and clear Kavanaugh and prove the no-votes to be either co-conspirators in the fraud as is the entire Dem Senatorial contingent or foolish dupes of the fraud as the RINOs who vote against him, if any.
I agree with you that Trump’s next nominee should certainly be as repellent to the left as possible consistent with Constitutional faithfulness.
My only concern about a patriarch is his age. We need somebody young to be around to rustle the left’s jimmies for a generation or two.
How about Ann Coulter? Or Stephen Miller?
I’m sure there is somebody more repellent to the left, but nobody occurs to me right now.
And the hearing process needs to be revamped substantially. The Kavanaugh process was an abortion. My suggestion is to do away with the hearings entirely and just have a vote.
I was called for jury duty in Ventura County for a murder case which involved poop.
https://www.vcstar.com/story/news/courts/2017/01/26/trial-begins-1997-killing-ventura-teen/97097364/
The accused had been interrupted during a home burglary over 20 years ago. Before the interruption, he had taken a crap in the closet laundry hamper (yes I know that is weird).
The homeowner then came home with her teenage son and, during the burglar’s escape, he stabbed the son in the neck, and said son subsequently died.
At the time, DNA forensics was insufficiently developed to extract DNA from poop. Now the technology is there. The accused was identified 20 years after the crime due to him being incarcerated for another burglary. Part of the evidence against him, besides the DNA from the poop, was a google search he made inquiring whether or not DNA can be extracted from poop.
He was found guilty (I was dismissed during voire dire).
Am I the only one who notices that Dan Zak defended his complete lack of skeptical about the story of the UVA rape case, by telling a story of a woman raped at UVA with a COMPLETE LACK OF SKEPTICISM.
Then he tries to turn the issue around by talking about “men” who “blame women,” or “blame the media.” Blaming them for what? The point is NOTHING HAPPENED.
No one is “exonerating rapists,” there were none. The event did not take place.
The issue is not rape or men. The issue is the media’s obsessive desire to find the great white defendant. And when people like Dan Zak as always uncritically believe these crazy charges, it lets us see behind their mask.
They hate us. They really hate us.
Totally agree. Nick may be seen by most as an abhorrent rich WASP, but I kinda liked him. (I wish I had taken his advice and married a very rich woman.)
Jack, Thank you for the reply. I know you “Meant Well.”
My wife remarks frequently how valuable that is for her day to day happiness.
I have the independence of mind to call it out if I saw it. Unfortunately for you, your hypothetical isn’t real. Steve isn’t that kind of journalist; he is unimpeachably ethical. Go back to 1990s and you won’t find anything of the kind.
Normal people would not incite a crime on the basis of something they themselves could not independently verify.
The mob mentality comes from people who are fully absorbed in the infallibility of their worldview: people who react faster than they can think.
Bluto spent seven years in college. Everyone loves Bluto.
Arson is just about the worst thing for a pundit to call for since there are a tiny but still dangerous number of people out there who are pathological firebugs and they can kill people pretty easily, more easily than just about anybody else. I read a Wambaugh true crime book, The Fire Lover (?), about a Southern California cop who set dozens of fires in stores, including ones where my mother frequently shopped. I think he killed about 4 people over the years, and he mostly seemed to be trying to get the glory of discovering the fire and saving lives himself.
It’s easy to bluepencil metaphorical calls to “burn down” to “tear down.”
I’m sure I’ve failed to do that a few times in the millions of words I’ve published over the years, but I’m trying to Raise Awareness about calls for arson being dangerous and needless.
I’m sure I’ve screwed up over the years. But I try to avoid writing things that might incite criminal violence.
I’m particularly worried about arson since that’s a pretty easy thing for one sicko to do a lot of harm with.
Good one Steve.
This guy would be proud to lead a lynch mob–if the accused was a white man.
The guy doth protest too much.
He was exposed for the lying scumbag he is–hence his rage.
It's easy to bluepencil metaphorical calls to "burn down" to "tear down."
I'm sure I've failed to do that a few times in the millions of words I've published over the years, but I'm trying to Raise Awareness about calls for arson being dangerous and needless.Replies: @Rob McX
That was John Leonard Orr. He was actually a firefighter and arson investigator. He had tried unsuccessfully to become a police officer. I think he failed the physical test.
And those anti-depressants do some fairly alarming things to the human personality. When you look at the state of society today it’s pretty much what you’d expect to see of a society deranged by SSRIs.
If you want to find pure evil take a look at psychiatry.
https://www.vcstar.com/story/news/courts/2017/01/26/trial-begins-1997-killing-ventura-teen/97097364/
The accused had been interrupted during a home burglary over 20 years ago. Before the interruption, he had taken a crap in the closet laundry hamper (yes I know that is weird).
The homeowner then came home with her teenage son and, during the burglar's escape, he stabbed the son in the neck, and said son subsequently died.
At the time, DNA forensics was insufficiently developed to extract DNA from poop. Now the technology is there. The accused was identified 20 years after the crime due to him being incarcerated for another burglary. Part of the evidence against him, besides the DNA from the poop, was a google search he made inquiring whether or not DNA can be extracted from poop.
He was found guilty (I was dismissed during voire dire).Replies: @CJ
Burglars pooping on the premises is a known thing, not at all uncommon. Try a search on “burglars defecate”.
He was obviously a wrong one, he publicly revealed an accelerator technique of arson to the newspapers who printed the information. Other investigators were aghast.
I remember them but I can only recall 2-3 songs of theirs .